Classifications

• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
  • B22D—CASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
  • B22D11/00—Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
  • B22D11/10—Supplying or treating molten metal
  • B22D11/11—Treating the molten metal
  • B22D11/114—Treating the molten metal by using agitating or vibrating means
  • B22D11/115—Treating the molten metal by using agitating or vibrating means by using magnetic fields

Definitions

• the present invention relates to a method and a, device for continuous or semi-continuous casting of metals and alloys, e.g. steel, in a casting mold which is open in both ends in the casting direction.
• Another known method in prior art with the objective to control stirring motion in the meniscus region is a dual-coil EMS system operating with A.C. current and described in the U.S. Patent No. 5,699,850.
• an induction coil arranged in the upper part of the mold in the meniscus region is energized from a current source independent from the current source of the main stirrer arranged in a lower portion of the mold.
• a rotating A.C. magnetic field produced by the upper induction coil is independently controlled with respect to the magnetic field of the main stirrer.
• stirring velocity in the meniscus region increases. This velocity increase can be controlled by the current input to the upper coil.
• the upper stirrer becomes a magnetic brake with respect to the stirring flow in the meniscus region.
• stirring velocity in the meniscus region can be controlled within a range from its original value when there is no braking action applied, to virtual zero, when magnetic torque of the brake is in balance with the angular momentum of stirring flow in the meniscus re- gion.
• the braking action has an effect only on the azimuthal component of the fluid flows induced by stirring or by the impact of pouring stream discharging into the mold.
• the longitudinal component of these flows remains unaf- fected by the A.C. magnetic field produced by the upper induction coil.
• the object of the present invention is to provide a more flexible control of stirring velocity and melt flow, i.e. liquid metal flow, in the meniscus region of the melt in a mold of continuous casters used for the production of e.g. billets and blooms.
• the object of the invention is achieved by a device having the characteristics of claim 1 , a method having the characteristics of claim 7 and a method having the characteristics of claim 1 1 .
• the upper induction coil, here denominated “the second induction coil” of a dual-coil stirring system is energized either by D.C. or A.C. current depending on the desired effect on the stirring motion of the melt in the region adjacent to the upper free surface of the melt, whereas the main induction coil, here denominated “the first induction coil”, is always operating as a stirrer energized A.C. current, i.e. producing an A.C. magnetic field.
• the second induction coil is preferably energized by A.C. current from an independent source with respect to the main stirrer, i.e. with respect to the first induction coil.
• A.C. current is also used to energize the upper induction coil when a full or nearly full reduction of stirring velocity at the meniscus is required with the submerged pour casting practice.
• a partial reduction of stirring velocity at the meniscus can be achieved by applying horizontal DC magnetic field.
• Such a partial braking action is required with the casting utilizing either metering nozzle or submerged entry nozzle and stirring velocity at the meniscus is needed to be controlled within a range of up to 60 or 50 percent of its original value.
• D.C. current is used in order to energize the upper induction coil.
• Such braking intensity is sufficient in many in- stances of the submerged pour casting practice and for the casting through metering nozzle.
• the further reduction of stirring velocity is achieved by applying an A.C. magnetic field. Switching current from A.C. to D.C.
• Fluid flows in the meniscus region arising from stirring produced by the main stirrer, discharging stream of liquid metal, and/or movement of the mold will interact with the horizontal D.C. magnetic field produced by the upper induction coil.
• the horizontal D.C. magnetic field and the fluid flows crossing the magnetic field at any angle different from 0 degrees magnetic forces will arise and impede motion of these flows.
• the maximum interaction is reached at a 90 degree angle between the magnetic field and fluid flow.
• velocity of stirring motion and longitudinal flows, including discharging straight down pouring stream will be reduced. Turbulence in the meniscus will thus be reduced, resulting in improved meniscus stability, process operating conditions and cast product quality.
• this invention brings significant improvements in flexibility of controlling stirring velocity and tur- bulence at the meniscus and results in an increased effectiveness of metallurgical performance and efficiency of the stirring system.
• the invention is a further improvement of the method and the apparatus of dual-coil stirring system.
• This invention is broadly applicable to all electroconductive materials, i.e. metals and alloys, which can be stirred electromagnetically and where control of stirring motion is required within some region or regions with minimal if any at interference with stirring motion of other re- gions of the liquid metal columns.
• the invention is applicable to a wide variety of special orientations of casting mold.
• the mold can be arranged vertically, horizontally or inclined.
• Fig 1 discloses schematically a dual-coil stirring system with respect to a casting mold in accordance with one embodiment of the invention
• Fig. 2 is a single-line diagram of possible electrical connec- tions for the induction coils of a device according to an embodiment of the invention
• Fig. 3 is a graphical representation of the relationship between current of a DC magnetic brake and stirring velocity at the meniscus and in the mid-plane of an electromagnetic stirrer in a column of mercury
• Fig. 4 is a graphic representation of the axial profiles of measured stirring velocity in a mercury pool of square cross section for a dual-coil EMS system operating with and without an A.C. and D.C. magnetic field brake.
• Fig 1 discloses a device for continuous or semi-continuous casting of metals according to an embodiment of the invention.
• the device comprises a casting moJd 1 , which is open in both ends in the casting direction, and means 2 for supplying hot melt 7 to the mold.
• the device is provided with a dual-coil electromagnetic stirring (EMS) system, comprising a first induction coil 4 and a second induction coil 3.
• the second induction coil 3 is arranged at the top end of the mold, upstream of the first induction coil 4. Consequently, the first induction coil 4 is arranged downstream of the second induction coil 3.
• the first induction coil 4 is operating as a stirrer and is energized by A.C. current producing an A.C. magnetic field.
• the first induction coil 4 constitutes an A.C.
• the melt is supplied to the mold by means of a casting tube 2 which opens out below the upper surface of the melt, the meniscus 5. It is of course also possible to utilize other types of means for supplying melt to the mold 1.
• the second induction coil 3 is interchangeably energized by either D.C. or A.C. current depending on the desired effect on the stirring motion of the melt in the region adjacent to the upper free surface 5 of the melt.
• the device is preferrably provided with means 12, schematically indicated in Fig 2, for switching the current to the second induction coil 3 from A.C. to D.C. and vice versa. Switching current from A.C. to D.C. and vice versa is preferably accomplished by electronic and programming means 12, which constitute a part of the system power supply.
• the second induction coil 3 is preferably energized by A.C. current from an independent source with respect to the first induction coil 4.
• a first power source 10 is provided for supplying A.C. current to the first induction coil 4
• a second power source 1 1 is provided for interchangeably supplying A.C. and D.C. current to the second induction coil 3.
• Said first and second power sources are schematically indicated in Fig 2.
• the means for switching current from A.C. to D.C. and vice versa are schematically indicated at 12 in Fig 2. Consequently, either A.C. or D.C. current can be selected to energize the second coil 3.
• This arrangement allows for independent control of stirring actions of either of the first or the second induction coils, regardless of directional pattern of stirring produced by the first induction coil 4.
• the first induction coil 4 comprises a series of coils 8 arranged around the periphery of the casting mold 1. These coils 8 are preferably of multi-phase and multi-pole arrangement. It is also preferred that the second induction coil 3 comprises a series of coils 9 arranged around the periphery of the casting mold 1. These coils 9 are preferably also of multi-phase and multi-pole arrangement.
• the second induction coil 3 is capable of providing at least three different modes of operation, namely
• the second induction coil 3 is energized by D.C. current so as to produce a horizontally directed D.C. magnetic field, which induces electromagnetic forces in the melt 7 opposing the direction of fluid flows, in transversal as well as longitudinal spatial planes of the mold 1 , in the region of the melt adjacent to the upper free surface 5 of the melt, the magnetic field produced by the second induction coil 3 thereby reducing the velocity of the stirring motion induced in the region of the melt adjacent to the upper free surface 5 of the melt by the first induction coil 4, the velocity of longitudinal flows produced in the melt 7 by the stirring action of the first induction coil 4 as well as longitudinal flows produced by continuously discharging melt into the mold 1 .
• the desired mode of operation is selected among the above- mentioned modes depending upon the casting process em- ployed.
• the desired effect of the second induction coil 3 on the stirring motion of the melt in the region adjacent to the meniscus 5 varies with the type of casting process employed.
• the second induction coil 3 is energized either by D.C. or A.C. current in order to produce a braking action in the mold meniscus region for improvement of stirring motion control.
• a metallurgical effectiveness of the EMS system is achieved.
• Braking action performed with A.C. magnetic field may control stirring velocity at the meniscus within a wide range including virtual zero velocity.
• the negative impact produced by the braking on stirring motion in the mold bulk is such that stirring velocity in this region can be reduced by as much as 20 percent.
• Providing the braking action by a horizontal D.C. magnetic field can control stirring velocity in the meniscus region within the range of up to 50 percent of the velocity original value without affecting stirring motion in the mold bulk. This is sufficient for most of the requirements of the continuous casting steel practice with submerged pouring.
• the braking action originated from the interaction between a horizontal D.C. magnetic field produced by the second induction coil 3 and rotating stirring flow in the meniscus region is mostly confined within the boundaries between the meniscus and the bottom end of the magnetic brake.
• the stirring motion within the mold bulk produced by the main stirrer, i.e. the first induction coil 4 remains practically unaffected by the braking action in the meniscus region produced by a horizontal D.C. magnetic field.
• the intensity of the rotational flow in the melt 7 is characterized by its rotational (angular) velocity U which, in turn, depends on the parameters of the magnetic torque and its spatial distribution within the melt, and the size and geometry of the mold cross- section.
• U rotational (angular) velocity
• T is the magnetic torque produced by a 2-phase or 3-phase A.C. magnetic field
• f is the current frequency
• ⁇ is the liquid metal electrical conductivity
• B is the magnetic flux density
• R is the stirring pool radius
• L is the length of stirrer iron yoke.
• the independent control of stirring motion at the meniscus 5 provided by the interchangeable use of A.C. or D.C. current for energizing the second induction coil 3 enables a greater flexibility and accuracy of the stirring process control as well as control of turbulence in the meniscus region caused by longitudinal fluid flows introduced by the first induction coil 4, pouring stream, indicated at 18 in Fig 1 , and oscillating motion of the mold 1 .
• the present invention provides an improved method of controlling liquid metal motion in both horizontal and longitudinal directions within the mold meniscus region.
• the longitudinal component of liquid metal motion induced by the main EMS and by other means, such as the pouring stream of liquid metal discharging into the mold will be minimized by employing induction coils in the form of the stirrer modifier, i.e. the second induction coil, arranged around the melt meniscus region and energized by D.C. electric current, whereas more complete control of stir- ring velocity, i.e. its azimuthal component, is achieved by using A.C. magnetic field produced by the stirrer modifier.
• induction coil as used in this description and the appended claims, also embraces an induction coil comprising several individual coils, as illustrated in Fig 2.
• the invention is of course not in any way restricted to the preferred embodiments described above, but many possibilities to modifications thereof will be apparent to a man with ordinary skill in the art without departing from the basic idea of the invention such as defined in the appended claims.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
• Continuous Casting (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=20280309

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (9)

Families Citing this family (23)

Family Cites Families (11)

• 2000
  • 2000-06-27 SE SE0002459A patent/SE519840C2/sv not_active IP Right Cessation
• 2001
  • 2001-06-27 RU RU2003101963/02A patent/RU2266798C2/ru active
  • 2001-06-27 CN CNB018147992A patent/CN1293965C/zh not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 2001-06-27 WO PCT/SE2001/001498 patent/WO2002000374A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2001-06-27 US US10/311,696 patent/US20030106667A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2001-06-27 JP JP2002505144A patent/JP4831917B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 2001-06-27 KR KR1020027017714A patent/KR20030036247A/ko not_active Ceased
  • 2001-06-27 AU AU2001267977A patent/AU2001267977A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2001-06-27 EP EP01945868A patent/EP1303370A1/de not_active Withdrawn

Non-Patent Citations (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events