EP1255908B1 - Sonnenschutzvorrichtung nach der art einer lamellenjalousie - Google Patents
Sonnenschutzvorrichtung nach der art einer lamellenjalousie Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1255908B1 EP1255908B1 EP00944137A EP00944137A EP1255908B1 EP 1255908 B1 EP1255908 B1 EP 1255908B1 EP 00944137 A EP00944137 A EP 00944137A EP 00944137 A EP00944137 A EP 00944137A EP 1255908 B1 EP1255908 B1 EP 1255908B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sun protection
- slats
- protection device
- top surface
- light
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Revoked
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
- E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
- E06B9/00—Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
- E06B9/24—Screens or other constructions affording protection against light, especially against sunshine; Similar screens for privacy or appearance; Slat blinds
- E06B9/26—Lamellar or like blinds, e.g. venetian blinds
- E06B9/38—Other details
- E06B9/386—Details of lamellae
Definitions
- This invention relates to a sun protection device of the Venetian blind type, comprising a number of spaced apart slats, of which slats the respective longitudinal axes are located substantially in one plane and extend substantially parallel to each other, and which slats are provided with a top surface and a bottom surface and are of reflective design at least at their top surface.
- Such a sun protection device is known from EP-A-0 303 107.
- the slats are concavely curved in upward direction.
- the top surface of each of the slats is designed as a mirror. What is achieved with such a construction is that a considerable part of incident solar radiation is reflected, so that undesired heat concentration at the sun protection device is prevented.
- a disadvantage of the known construction is that it may entail nuisance to those living in the neighborhood due to the uncontrollable reflection from the mirror surfaces of the slats.
- the system may also entail a drawback for the users of the sun protection device, in that its use in a window may involve the slat-reflected light being in turn reflected from the pane in the window, which light, thus reflected twice, may have a disturbing effect in the space screened by the sun protection device.
- light reflected directly from the top surface may also be highly objectionable in the inner space. Due to these phenomena, it is not properly possible to adjust the slats to any random angle.
- FR-A-2 574 469 describes a sun protection device similar to EP-A-0 303 107, in which the top surface of the slats is designed as a flat or convex mirror surface.
- This sun protection device has the same disadvantages as the sun protection device according to EP-A-0 303 107.
- US-A-5 204 777 discloses a sun protection device according to the preamble of claim 1, in which the slats, at the top surface thereof, consist of mirror facets extending in longitudinal direction, with adjacent mirror faces of adjacent mirror facets including an angle of approximately 90° and having a stepped configuration viewed in cross section of the slat.
- a disadvantage of this construction is that though the incident light is reflected back in one longitudinal plane defined by the longitudinal axis and the direction of incidence, the direction in which this light exits in this plane, leaving aside the direction of the normal, deviates from the direction in which the light enters. Only when the direction of incidence in the longitudinal plane formed by the direction of incidence and the longitudinal axis corresponds with the normal to the local slat surface is the direction of incidence equal to the direction of exit. As a consequence, in the construction according to US-A-5 204 777 too, the light reflected back can also entail a nuisance to those living in the neighborhood.
- DE-A-197 00 111 describes a similar sun protection device to US-A-5 204 777, in which the mirror elements extending in the longitudinal direction, in cross section of the slat, have a sawtooth configuration.
- this sun protection device too light incident at an angle with respect to a normal plane extending in transverse direction of the slat exits mirrorwise with respect to the transverse normal plane.
- the direction in which the light exits in the longitudinal plane defined by the longitudinal axis and the direction of incidence, leaving aside the direction of the normal deviates from the direction in which the light enters. The light reflected back can therefore entail a nuisance to those living in the neighborhood in a similar manner as in US-A-5 204 777.
- the invention contemplates a sun protection device of the type mentioned in the preamble, in which, while maintaining the advantages, the disadvantages mentioned are avoided.
- each of the slats is of retroreflective design, such that, for every angle of incidence, light incident on the top surface is reflected back in the direction of incidence, is that incident light, regardless of the direction of incidence, is reflected back to the source, so that any nuisance to the environment is avoided.
- the direction in which the light enters the longitudinal plane defined by the longitudinal axis and the direction of incidence is equal to the direction in which the light exits in the plane, also when it deviates from the perpendicular direction.
- the slats can have an upright, horizontal or oblique orientation, but preferably have their longitudinal axes extend virtually horizontally.
- the plane in which the longitudinal axes of the slats are located can be at least partly curved, such as, for instance, a tunnel-shaped plane having a U-shaped cross section.
- the plane in which the longitudinal axes are located can also be substantially flat, for instance vertical, horizontal or oblique.
- the slats have their longitudinal axes located in a substantially vertical plane.
- the sun protection device enables a relatively strong daylight entrance in a non-disturbing manner.
- the light is transmitted in a selective and metered manner. This proceeds inter alia as follows.
- a part of the light reflected by the slats in the direction of incidence will reflect from the window glass and pass between the slats in the direction of the ceiling.
- Diffuse light coming from the blue sky or from a cloudy sky is reflected in a similar manner to the sunlight. Such light ends up at approximately the same place as the transmitted ground light.
- the top surface of the slats is of retroreflective design through a layer or coating applied thereto, which contains transparent glass or plastic beads.
- retroreflective material is, for instance, the material Scotchlite High Intensity Grade carried by the firm 3M.
- the top surface ofthe slats is of retroreflective design by a layer or coating applied thereto which contains total-reflection prisms.
- retroreflective material is, for instance, the material Scotchlite Diamond Grade VIP carried by the firm 3M.
- the layer or coating is in the form of a self-adhesive film or self-adhesive tape.
- retroreflective material on slats of a sun protection device is known per se from the above-mentioned European patent-A-0 303 107.
- the underside of the slats is retroreflective. The purpose of that is to screen the workplace from possibly blinding radiation coming from the ground outside the building, without having to take recourse to blackening the underside of the slats.
- a relatively strong daylight entrance, as described hereinabove for the sun protection device according to the invention, is not possible with slats having retroreflective undersides.
- the sun protection device there are provided means for modifying the setting angle of each of the slats. Modifying the setting angle can contribute to an optimum screening.
- the setting means are adapted for progressively modifying the setting angle of each of the slates in upward direction. This makes it possible to further optimize screening and light entrance.
- the adjusting means can be computer-controlled means which are adapted for automatically controlling the setting angle of each of the slats based on a function of time and/or of the measured luminance.
- the sun protection device according to the invention with the retroreflective top surfaces of the slats can suitably form part of a sun protection system for an (accommodation) space in a building, in which one or more sun protection devices according to the invention are arranged in a window or windows of the space in question and wherein there is provided an array of directed or directable reflectors mounted on or near the ceiling of the space on the side of the sun protection device(s) to direct light transmitted by the sun protection device(s) to the location of the array of reflectors, to a place in the space which it is desired to light additionally.
- a metered quantity of the "directed sunlight” can be sent to a site of choice, for instance a workplace or to a wall which it is desired to illuminate additionally.
- the preferred site for such a directed reflective optical system is close to the window in front of which the sun protection device according to the invention is located, since at that point virtually throughout the year, a reasonable amount of light becomes available.
- the optical system can be integrated with the artificial lighting in the space in question, including a control system for metering the necessary amount of supplemental artificial light.
- the invention is elucidated with reference to the drawing, in which the single figure is a schematic representation of a sun protection device according to the invention included in a sun protection system.
- a sun protection device 1 of the Venetian blind type is represented in cross section.
- the sun protection device 1 comprises a number of elongate slats 2.
- the longitudinal axes of the spaced apart slats 2 extend in horizontal direction, are parallel to each other and are located in a vertical plane.
- the sun protection device 1 comprises the conventional means (not shown) for varying the setting angle of the slats 2.
- the sun protection device 1 is arranged along a pane 3 of a window in a space to be screened.
- those slats 2, at least on the top surface or window side, are retroreflective in that those slats 2 on that side consist of retroreflective material. That material can be provided on the slats 2 as a layer.
- a layer is in the form of a self-adhesive film or a self-adhesive band or tape.
- Retroreflective material is material that reflects incident light, regardless of the angle of incidence, for the most part back to the light source.
- Such material can be a material based on transparent glass or plastic beads, for instance as marketed by 3M under the name of Scotchlite High Intensity Grade.
- Such material can also be a material based on total-reflection prisms, for instance as marketed by 3M under the name of Scotchlite Diamond Grade VIP.
- Such genuine retroreflective material when applied to the top surface of the slats 2, has the advantage that the surroundings are not hindered by reflected light from, for instance, the sun, since the sunlight is exclusively reflected back in the direction of the sun.
- the sun protection device affords the possibility of a relatively strong daylight admission in a non-disturbing manner.
- the light is transmitted in a selective and metered manner. This proceeds in different ways, as follows.
- a large part of the low-luminance lower hemispheric light coming from the ground 4 of the space outside the space to be screened is transmitted directly by the sun protection device 1, in that it can pass between the slats 2, as indicated by arrows 5 and 6 enclosing an angle ⁇ .
- the luminance of ground or lawn can actually be more than 5,000 cd/m 2 .
- the transmitted light is diffuse light ending up substantially on the ceiling 7 in the vicinity of the window 3.
- Direct solar radiation is reflected by the slats 2 in the direction of the sun, as indicated by the double-headed arrow 8. A part of the reflected light will in turn be reflected from the window 3 in the direction of the ceiling 7. This is indicated by the arrow 9.
- This directed component of the direct solar radiation reflected from the pane glass towards the ceiling can account for 5 to 8% of the total solar radiation. The higher the sun is in the sky, the steeper the angle at which this directed component enters the space to be screened and the closer to the window 3 the ceiling 7 is illuminated thereby.
- the light travels as a homogeneous parallel beam and thus causes a homogenéous luminance of the ceiling 7 over the entire irradiated surface.
- an additional optical system consisting of a series of reflectors 10 mounted on the ceiling 7 adjacent the window 3.
- This additional system on the ceiling 7, a metered amount of the "directed sunlight” can be sent either to a workplace or deeper into the space to be screened, or to a wall which it is desired to illuminate additionally.
- the additional optical system can, if desired, be integrated with the artificial lighting of the space to be screened and be coupled with a control system to meter the needed amount of supplemental artificial light.
- Diffuse light coming from the blue or cloudy sky (having a luminance of sometimes more than 10,000 cd/m 2 ) is reflected, for each small area of the sky, in the same way as the sunlight, albeit that, obviously, a smaller amount of light is involved.
- this diffuse light after retro-reflection from the slats 2, is likewise reflected by the window 3 and, after passing between the slats 2, reaches approximately the same position on the ceiling as the "transmitted ground light".
- Investigation has revealed that if the sky is cloudy, this "reflected sky light” still amounts to about 50% of the "transmitted ground light". It may therefore be acceptable in some cases to use the sun protection according to the invention on the northern or western side of a building as well, for instance there where the luminance of the sky is too high for proper use of displays.
- the retroreflective surface on the slats can be alternated with a non-retroreflective or less strongly retroreflective surface, so that a pattern, such as a logo, can be formed.
- a pattern can be visible at night when, for instance, lights of oncoming traffic shine upon the sun protection.
- a pattern may also be formed by setting the slats of some sun protection devices of a building in a non-reflecting position, by means of a control, while other sun protection devices are set in a reflecting position, for instance by angular displacement and/or raising or lowering the slats.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Blinds (AREA)
- Non-Portable Lighting Devices Or Systems Thereof (AREA)
- Specific Sealing Or Ventilating Devices For Doors And Windows (AREA)
- Time-Division Multiplex Systems (AREA)
- Door And Window Frames Mounted To Openings (AREA)
- Circuit Arrangement For Electric Light Sources In General (AREA)
Claims (9)
- Sonnenschutzvorrichtung (1) nach Art einer Zugjalousie, enthaltend mehrere mit Abstand voneinander angeordnete Lamellen (2) , deren jeweilige Längsachsen im Wesentlichen in einer Ebene liegen und sich im Wesentlichen parallel zueinander erstrecken und die mit einer Oberseite und einer Unterseite versehen sind und wenigstens an ihrer Oberseite reflektierend ausgebildet sind, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Oberseite einer jeden Lamelle (2) eine rückstrahlende Gestaltung aufweist, so dass auf diese Seite auffallendes Licht ohne Rücksicht auf die Einfallsrichtung großteils in die Einfallsrichtung zurück reflektiert wird.
- Sonnenschutzvorrichtung (1) nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Längsachsen der Lamellen (2) jeweils im Wesentlichen in einer vertikalen Ebene angeordnet sind und sich praktisch horizontal und im Wesentlichen parallel zueinander erstrecken.
- Sonnenschutzvorrichtung (1) nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Oberseite der Lamellen (2) durch eine darauf angebrachte Schicht oder Beschichtung, die transparente Glas- oder Kunststoffperlen enthält, eine rückstrahlende Gestaltung aufweist.
- Sonnenschutzvorrichtung (1) nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Oberseite der Lamellen (2) durch eine darauf aufgebrachte Schicht oder Beschichtung, die total-reflektierende Prismen enthält, eine rückstrahlende Gestaltung aufweist.
- Sonnenschutzvorrichtung (1) nach Anspruch 3 oder 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Schicht oder Beschichtung die Form eines selbstklebenden Films oder eines Selbatklebebandes hat.
- Sonnenschutzvorrichtung (1) nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 5, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Sonnenschutzvorrichtung (1) Einrichtungen zum Verändern des Einstellwinkels einer jeder der Lamellen (2) aufweist.
- Sonnenschutzvorrichtung (1) nach Anspruch 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Einstelleinrichtungen dazu eingerichtet sind, den Einstellwinkel einer jeden der Lamellen (2) progressiv in vertikaler Richtung zu verändern.
- Sonnenschutzvorrichtung (1) nach einem der Ansprüche 6 und 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Einstelleinrichtungen rechnergesteuerte Einrichtungen sind, die zum automatischen Steuern des Einstellwinkels einer jeden der Lamellen (2) in Abhängigkeit von der Zeit und/oder der gemessenen Helligkeit eingerichtet sind.
- Sonnenschutzsystem für einen Raum in einem Gebäude, gekennzeichnet durch eine oder mehrere Sonnenschutzvorrichtungen (1) nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 8, die längs eines Fensters in einem oder mehreren Fensterrahmen des fraglichen Raums angeordnet ist bzw. sind, und durch eine Gruppe gerichteter oder einrichtbarer Reflektoren, die an oder nahe der Decke des Raumes auf der Seite der Sonnenschutzvorrichtung(en) befestigt sind, um das von der bzw. den Sonnenschutzvorrichtung(en) über das Fenster reflektierte Licht zum Ort der Reflektorgruppe, zu einer Stelle in dem Raum, die zusätzlich beleuchtet werden soll, zu richten.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NL1012238 | 1999-06-04 | ||
NL1012238A NL1012238C2 (nl) | 1999-06-04 | 1999-06-04 | Zonwering van het jaloezie-type. |
PCT/IB2000/000939 WO2001002687A2 (en) | 1999-06-04 | 2000-06-05 | Venetian blind-type sun protection device |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1255908A2 EP1255908A2 (de) | 2002-11-13 |
EP1255908B1 true EP1255908B1 (de) | 2004-01-14 |
Family
ID=19769312
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP00944137A Revoked EP1255908B1 (de) | 1999-06-04 | 2000-06-05 | Sonnenschutzvorrichtung nach der art einer lamellenjalousie |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1255908B1 (de) |
AT (1) | ATE257900T1 (de) |
AU (2) | AU5837000A (de) |
DE (1) | DE60007780T2 (de) |
NL (1) | NL1012238C2 (de) |
WO (2) | WO2001002687A2 (de) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL1016790C2 (nl) * | 2000-12-04 | 2002-06-05 | Etap Nv | Systeem voor het regelen van de lichttoetreding in een binnenruimte van een gebouw. |
DE20209365U1 (de) * | 2002-06-15 | 2003-10-23 | Hüppe Form Sonnenschutzsysteme GmbH, 26133 Oldenburg | Lamellenjalousie und Lamelle für Lamellenjalousien |
DE202005000415U1 (de) | 2005-01-07 | 2005-05-04 | Deutsche Post Ag | Schattenspender |
FR2922938B1 (fr) * | 2007-10-31 | 2009-12-11 | Somfy Sas | Procede de commande automatisee d'une installation d'ecran de protection solaire comportant des lames de type retro-reflechissant. |
EP2221442A1 (de) * | 2009-02-20 | 2010-08-25 | Kvadrat A/S | Sonnenblende |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2574469A1 (fr) * | 1984-12-11 | 1986-06-13 | Promovence Sarl | Dispositif de protection solaire des volumes vitres |
CH675015A5 (de) * | 1986-09-15 | 1990-08-15 | Peter A Balla | |
AT394882B (de) | 1987-08-10 | 1992-07-10 | Bartenbach Christian | Blendschutzeinrichtung |
US5204777A (en) * | 1992-01-23 | 1993-04-20 | Sea Corporation | Energy efficient skylight and blind |
DE4215968A1 (de) * | 1992-05-18 | 1993-12-02 | Zumtobel Licht | Lichtlenkende Struktur zum Beleuchten eines Raumes mit Tageslicht |
DE19632684A1 (de) * | 1996-08-14 | 1998-02-19 | Idl Ind Und Licht Design Gmbh | Lamellen-Jalousie |
DE19700111C2 (de) * | 1997-01-03 | 2003-02-06 | Fraunhofer Ges Forschung | Sonnenschutzvorrichtung nach Art einer Jalousie |
-
1999
- 1999-06-04 NL NL1012238A patent/NL1012238C2/nl not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2000
- 2000-06-05 EP EP00944137A patent/EP1255908B1/de not_active Revoked
- 2000-06-05 AU AU58370/00A patent/AU5837000A/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-06-05 WO PCT/IB2000/000939 patent/WO2001002687A2/en active IP Right Grant
- 2000-06-05 AT AT00944137T patent/ATE257900T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2000-06-05 DE DE60007780T patent/DE60007780T2/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-06-05 AU AU58371/00A patent/AU5837100A/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-06-05 WO PCT/IB2000/000938 patent/WO2000077337A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1255908A2 (de) | 2002-11-13 |
DE60007780T2 (de) | 2004-11-11 |
AU5837000A (en) | 2001-01-02 |
ATE257900T1 (de) | 2004-01-15 |
NL1012238C2 (nl) | 2000-12-06 |
WO2000077337A2 (en) | 2000-12-21 |
DE60007780D1 (de) | 2004-02-19 |
WO2000077337A3 (en) | 2002-10-17 |
WO2001002687A3 (en) | 2002-09-06 |
WO2001002687A2 (en) | 2001-01-11 |
AU5837100A (en) | 2001-01-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
RU2666131C2 (ru) | Световое устройство | |
AU643429B2 (en) | Light deflecting system for lighting an indoor area | |
US6714352B2 (en) | Mini-optical light shelf daylighting system | |
US10538959B2 (en) | Window louver control system | |
US8624529B2 (en) | Method for the automated control of a solar protection installation | |
US5802784A (en) | Window apparatus for providing and directing glare-free sunlight to a room | |
JPS5873682A (ja) | 太陽光照明用パネルおよびそれを用いた太陽光照明方法 | |
US4634222A (en) | Natural-light illumination enhancement assembly | |
WO2010086720A1 (en) | Fenestration system with solar cells | |
AU704884B2 (en) | Stepped lamella for guiding light radiation | |
KR101400993B1 (ko) | 광선반 장치 | |
EP1255908B1 (de) | Sonnenschutzvorrichtung nach der art einer lamellenjalousie | |
JPS5973801A (ja) | 外光を利用した照明方法及び装置 | |
JPH10317850A (ja) | ブラインド | |
KR101257291B1 (ko) | 스마트 블라인드 시스템 | |
JP2001060407A (ja) | 昼光利用システム | |
JP4447303B2 (ja) | 太陽光採光装置及び採光条件の設定プログラム | |
NL1016790C2 (nl) | Systeem voor het regelen van de lichttoetreding in een binnenruimte van een gebouw. | |
WO2006033090A1 (en) | Multi-aperture light pipe | |
CN1460163A (zh) | 照明装置 | |
JPH11315673A (ja) | ブラインド | |
GB2324598A (en) | LED display with shades to shield LEDs from external light | |
JP5478968B2 (ja) | 住宅用フェンスの採光パネル及びこれを用いた住宅用採光フェンス | |
KR20130117539A (ko) | 수동형 베네시안 타입 광선반 | |
CN209179687U (zh) | 一种窗口固定式采光遮阳装置 |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20020103 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
R17D | Deferred search report published (corrected) |
Effective date: 20020906 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20040114 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040114 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040114 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 60007780 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20040219 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040414 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040414 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040414 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040425 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE SCHAAD, BALASS, MENZL & PARTNER AG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040605 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040608 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20040114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040630 |
|
PLAZ | Examination of admissibility of opposition: despatch of communication + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE2 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLBA | Examination of admissibility of opposition: reply received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE4 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG Effective date: 20040707 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG Effective date: 20040707 Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FOERDERUNGDER ANGEWAND Effective date: 20041004 |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG Effective date: 20040707 Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN Effective date: 20041004 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FOERDERUNG DER ANGEWAN Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20040605 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
PLAZ | Examination of admissibility of opposition: despatch of communication + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE2 |
|
PLBA | Examination of admissibility of opposition: reply received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE4 |
|
PLBQ | Unpublished change to opponent data |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN Effective date: 20041004 |
|
PLAZ | Examination of admissibility of opposition: despatch of communication + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE2 |
|
PLBA | Examination of admissibility of opposition: reply received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE4 |
|
PLBQ | Unpublished change to opponent data |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040614 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20080618 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: LU Payment date: 20080506 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20080624 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20080416 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20080627 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20080618 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN Effective date: 20041004 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN |
|
RDAF | Communication despatched that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20100101 |
|
RDAG | Patent revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090630 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090630 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20080425 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
27W | Patent revoked |
Effective date: 20100117 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090605 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090605 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20120309 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090630 |