EP1117587B1 - Anti-torpedo defence method - Google Patents
Anti-torpedo defence method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1117587B1 EP1117587B1 EP00940415A EP00940415A EP1117587B1 EP 1117587 B1 EP1117587 B1 EP 1117587B1 EP 00940415 A EP00940415 A EP 00940415A EP 00940415 A EP00940415 A EP 00940415A EP 1117587 B1 EP1117587 B1 EP 1117587B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- torpedo
- sonar
- ship
- towed
- distance
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63G—OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
- B63G9/00—Other offensive or defensive arrangements on vessels against submarines, torpedoes, or mines
- B63G9/02—Means for protecting vessels against torpedo attack
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for repelling a Ship attacking torpedoes from the attacked ship in which the torpedo using a ship-based sonar device, which is all around with a aft gap, on-board active sonar and a towed sonar towed away from the ship located, and by means of at least one of the ship deductible Abwehr binors is fought.
- Torpedoes are typically capable of a surface ship attack all directions. So run modern, very strong Torpedoes the ship usually from a previous, older or kielwasserhomende loud torpedoes the ship from one aft sector. For early detection of the incoming Torpedoes is therefore an all-round view of the sonar device required to capture the silent torpedoes, active must be located.
- Known on-board active sonars the Usually installed in the bow of the ship or at the bow as Hull Mounted Sonars (HMS) Due to the position and due to the screw noise of the Ship an imperfect all-round view with one more or less major aft gap. This aft sector of the ship is blind to incoming Torpedoes.
- HMS Hull Mounted Sonars
- a known aft detonator defense system (US-A-5 373 773) uses a pair of passive sonar detectors that are used in the Distance one behind the other in tandem from the ship towed become.
- the sonar detectors detect the presence of Torpedoes and provide data for the calculation of the bearing and Removal of the torpedo. Becomes an attacking torpedo detected, a torpedo alarm is triggered. Out Distance and bearing of the torpedo will be the most likely career of the torpedo predicts, so that an order to intercept the attacking torpedo and to destroy at a scheduled position can.
- an object (DE 35 19 269 C2) is using a large-area sensor array, by a Underwater vehicle towed or at its sides is attached, purely passive the distance of the object from Eigehschiff and the speed component of the object determined perpendicular to the object distance. This is the Object is targeted and at least one emitted by the object measure significant frequency over time. From the Peil change rate and the Frequency change rate will be the distance to the Object calculated.
- the invention has for its object to provide a method for Torpedo defense of the type mentioned so to improve that with little technical effort for the towed sonar a reliable protection against from aft direction attacking torpedoes that may still be noisy to the is reached.
- the inventive method has the advantage that by the passive bearing and passive extraction of a Distance information to the torpedo everyone, even a very loud, aft approaching torpedo reliably measured and the Use of the rejection vectors, which are fast but one have limited range, can be optimized.
- the towed sonar needs only as a short passive Towed antenna to be executed, since they are only a relative low, by the gap angle and the following error of the Towed antenna of ship have specified range got to.
- this inexpensive towed antenna is the blind Sector of the on-board active sonar completely covered, so that a gapless all-round view of the sonar device and so that a complete protection against torpedoes is given.
- a Such a short towed antenna can also be effortlessly and without great effort to bring in and deploy.
- the invention is based on one in the drawing illustrated embodiment in the following described.
- the drawing shows in more schematic Representation of a plan view of a sonar device torpedo defense equipped overwater ship.
- a protection against torpedoes with deflectors equipped overwater vessel 10 has a sonar device on, in addition to locating targets for detection and location serves by the ship attacking torpedoes.
- the Sonar device includes an installed on board (on-board) Active Sonar 11 and one in the water retracted towed sonar 12.
- Towing antenna 13 consists of the ship 10 in one Following error s is trailed.
- the towed antenna 13 is attached to a tow 14.
- At the free end of the Towing antenna 13 can still attached a tow brake 15 be that for an improved straightforward alignment of the Towing antenna 13 provides.
- the equipped with the sonar device described above waterway 10 thus has an all-round protection against attacking torpedoes that reliably detected regardless of their configuration and attack direction and located and actively combated by discontinuation of Abvid syntheticen.
- a torpedo which starts in the surveillance sector of the active sonar 11 is measured with high precision by the active sonar 11, so that its position is known at any point in time of the torpedo run.
- the incoming, often very loud torpedoes are also detected and located.
- the approaching torpedo 16 is acoustically passive in a known manner.
- the bearing angle is indicated by ⁇ T.
- the frequency f T of at least one significant spectral line radiated by the torpedo 16 is measured over time (f T (t)).
- the distance a T to the torpedo 16 is calculated from the Peilwinkelauswandungs Anlagen d ⁇ T / dt, the frequency f T and the rate of change df T / dt the frequency f T in a known manner.
- the torpedo distance a T is given by the following equation: whose derivation is explained in detail in DE 35 19 269 C2.
- the detection range R of the towed antenna 13 can be relative be kept small, so that for the towed antenna 13 a only relatively little technical effort is required.
- the minimum range of the towed antenna 13 corresponds to that with the sine of half the angle ⁇ of the aft gap of the active sonar 11 multiplied lag distance s of Schleppsonars 12 from the ship 10, so s • sin ⁇ / 2.
- the range R of the towing ton 12 chosen slightly larger than this minimum range.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Measurement Of Velocity Or Position Using Acoustic Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Compositions Of Macromolecular Compounds (AREA)
- Colloid Chemistry (AREA)
- Developing Agents For Electrophotography (AREA)
- Magnetic Heads (AREA)
- Superconductors And Manufacturing Methods Therefor (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
- Measurement Of Optical Distance (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren zur Abwehr eines ein Schiff angreifenden Torpedos von dem angegriffenen Schiff aus, bei dem der Torpedo unter Verwendung einer schiffsgestützten Sonareinrichtung, die ein rundum mit einer achterlichen Lücke ortendes, bordgestütztes Aktivsonar und ein im Abstand vom Schiff nachgeschlepptes Schleppsonar aufweist, geortet und mittels mindestens eines vom Schiff absetzbaren Abwehreffektors bekämpft wird.The invention relates to a method for repelling a Ship attacking torpedoes from the attacked ship in which the torpedo using a ship-based sonar device, which is all around with a aft gap, on-board active sonar and a towed sonar towed away from the ship located, and by means of at least one of the ship deductible Abwehreffektors is fought.
Torpedos sind typbedingt in der Lage ein Überwasserschiff aus allen Richtungen anzugreifen. So laufen moderne, sehr leiste Torpedos das Schiff in der Regel aus einem vorlichen, ältere oder kielwasserhomende laute Torpedos das Schiff aus einem achterlich Sektor an. Zur frühzeitigen Ortung des anlaufenden Torpedos ist daher eine Rundumsicht der Sonareinrichtung erforderlich, die zur Erfassung der leisen Torpedos, aktiv orten muss. Bekannte bordgestützte Aktivsonare, die üblicherweise im Bug des Schiffes installiert oder am Bug als sog. Hull Mounted Sonare (HMS) integriert werden, weisen lagebedingt sowie bedingt durch das Schraubengeräusch des Schiffes eine nur unvollkommene Rundumsicht mit einer mehr oder weniger großen achterlichen Lücke auf. Dieser achterliche Sektor des Schiffes ist blind gegen anlaufende Torpedos.Torpedoes are typically capable of a surface ship attack all directions. So run modern, very strong Torpedoes the ship usually from a previous, older or kielwasserhomende loud torpedoes the ship from one aft sector. For early detection of the incoming Torpedoes is therefore an all-round view of the sonar device required to capture the silent torpedoes, active must be located. Known on-board active sonars, the Usually installed in the bow of the ship or at the bow as Hull Mounted Sonars (HMS) Due to the position and due to the screw noise of the Ship an imperfect all-round view with one more or less major aft gap. This aft sector of the ship is blind to incoming Torpedoes.
Zur Abdeckung dieses Verwundbarkeitssektors des Schiffes wird bei einem bekannten Verfahren zur Torpedoabwehr der eingangs genannten Art (DE-Z, "wt" 10/94, Seite 25 - 27) ein im Wasser nachgeschlepptes, aktiv und passiv ortendes Schleppsonar verwendet, das aus einem Sender und einem Empfänger, die an Schleppseilen nachgezogen werden, besteht. Mit diesem Schleppsonar ist die aktive Detektion und Ortung von aus dem ächterlichen Sektor anlaufenden Torpedos aus großer Entfernung möglich. Solche aktiv und passiv ortenden Schleppsonare sind technisch sehr aufwendig und schwer zu händeln. Abwehreffektoren zur aktiven Bekämpfung von Torpedos haben nur eine begrenzte Reichweite, so dass sie erst eingesetzt werden, wenn der Torpedo relativ nahe an das Schiff gelangt. Die älteren und kielwasserhomenden Torpedos sind sehr laut und maskieren die Aktivortung, so dass ihre Position für eine Bekämpfung in diesem Bereich nicht rechtzeitig mittels des Schleppsonars aktiv erfasst werden kann.To cover this vulnerability sector of the ship in a known method for torpedo defense of the beginning mentioned type (DE-Z, "wt" 10/94, page 25 - 27) in the water towed, actively and passively located towed sonar used, which consists of a transmitter and a receiver attached to Tow ropes are tightened. With this Schleppsonar is the active detection and location of out of the notable sector torpedoes approaching large Distance possible. Such active and passive locals Towed are technically very complicated and difficult to affairs. Defensive vectors for the active combat of torpedoes have only a limited range, so they only be used when the torpedo is relatively close to the Ship arrives. The older and kielwasserhomenden torpedoes are very loud and mask the activity tracking, so theirs Position for a fight in this area not be recorded in good time by means of the towed sound can.
Ein bekanntes, achterliches Torpedoabwehrsystem (US-A-5 373 773) benutzt ein Paar von passiven Sonardetektoren, die im Abstand hintereinander als Tandem von dem Schiff geschleppt werden. Die Sonardetektoren detektieren die Anwesenheit von Torpedos und liefern Daten zur Berechnung zur Peilung und Entfernung des Torpedos. Wird ein angreifender Torpedo detektiert, so wird ein Torpedoalarm ausgelöst. Aus Entfernung und Peilung des Torpedos wird die wahrscheinlichste Laufbahn des Torpedos prognostiziert, so dass ein Befehl, den angreifenden Torpedo abzufangen und zu zerstören bei einer geplanten Position ausgegeben werden kann.A known aft detonator defense system (US-A-5 373 773) uses a pair of passive sonar detectors that are used in the Distance one behind the other in tandem from the ship towed become. The sonar detectors detect the presence of Torpedoes and provide data for the calculation of the bearing and Removal of the torpedo. Becomes an attacking torpedo detected, a torpedo alarm is triggered. Out Distance and bearing of the torpedo will be the most likely career of the torpedo predicts, so that an order to intercept the attacking torpedo and to destroy at a scheduled position can.
Bei einem bekannten Verfahren zur Ermittlung des Fahrzustands eines Objektes (DE 35 19 269 C2) wird mit Hilfe einer großflächigen Sensoranordnung, die von einem Unterwasserfahrzeug geschleppt oder an dessen Seiten angebracht ist, rein passiv die Entfernung des Objekts vom Eigehschiff und die Geschwindigkeitskomponente des Objekts senkrecht zur Objektentfernung ermittelt. Hierzu wird das Objekt gepeilt und mindestens eine vom Objekt ausgestrahlte signifikante Frequenz über der Zeit vermessen. Aus der Peiländerungsgeschwindigkeit und der Frequenzänderungsgeschwindigkeit wird die Entfernung zum Objekt berechnet.In a known method for determining the driving condition an object (DE 35 19 269 C2) is using a large-area sensor array, by a Underwater vehicle towed or at its sides is attached, purely passive the distance of the object from Eigehschiff and the speed component of the object determined perpendicular to the object distance. This is the Object is targeted and at least one emitted by the object measure significant frequency over time. From the Peil change rate and the Frequency change rate will be the distance to the Object calculated.
Der Erfindung liegt die Aufgabe zugrunde, ein Verfahren zur Torpedoabwehr der eingangs genannten Art so zu verbessern, dass mit geringem technischen Aufwand für das Schleppsonar ein zuverlässiger Schutz gegen aus achterlicher Richtung angreifende Torpedos, die zu dem noch lautstark sein können, erreicht wird.The invention has for its object to provide a method for Torpedo defense of the type mentioned so to improve that with little technical effort for the towed sonar a reliable protection against from aft direction attacking torpedoes that may still be noisy to the is reached.
Die Aufgabe ist durch die Merkmale des Anspruchs 1 gelöst.The object is solved by the features of claim 1.
Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren hat den Vorteil, dass durch die passive Peilung und passive Gewinnung einer Abstandsinformation zum Torpedo jeder, auch ein sehr lauter, achterlich anlaufende Torpedo zuverlässig vermessen und der Einsatz der Abwehreffektoren, die zwar schnell sind aber eine nur begrenzte Reichweite aufweisen, optimiert werden kann. Das Schleppsonar braucht nur noch als kurze passive Schleppantenne ausgeführt zu werden, da sie nur eine relativ geringe, durch den Lückenwinkel und den Schleppabstand der Schleppantenne von Schiff festgelegte Reichweite aufweisen muss. Mit dieser preiswerten Schleppantenne ist der blinde Sektor des bordgestützten Aktivsonars vollständig abgedeckt, so dass eine lückenlose Rundumsicht der Sonareinrichtung und damit ein lückenloser Schutz gegen Torpedos gegeben ist. Eine solch kurze Schleppantenne lässt sich auch mühelos und ohne großen Aufwand ein- und ausbringen.The inventive method has the advantage that by the passive bearing and passive extraction of a Distance information to the torpedo everyone, even a very loud, aft approaching torpedo reliably measured and the Use of the rejection vectors, which are fast but one have limited range, can be optimized. The towed sonar needs only as a short passive Towed antenna to be executed, since they are only a relative low, by the gap angle and the following error of the Towed antenna of ship have specified range got to. With this inexpensive towed antenna is the blind Sector of the on-board active sonar completely covered, so that a gapless all-round view of the sonar device and so that a complete protection against torpedoes is given. A Such a short towed antenna can also be effortlessly and without great effort to bring in and deploy.
Zweckmäßige Ausführungsformen des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren mit vorteilhaften Weiterbildungen und Ausgestaltungen der Erfindung ergeben sich aus den weiteren Ansprüchen.Expedient embodiments of the method according to the invention with advantageous developments and refinements of Invention will become apparent from the other claims.
Die Erfindung ist an Hand eines in der Zeichnung dargestellten Ausführungsbeispiels im folgenden näher beschrieben. Dabei zeigt die Zeichnung in schematischer Darstellung eine Draufsicht eines mit einer Sonareinrichtung zur Torpedoabwehr ausgerüsteten Überwasserschiffes.The invention is based on one in the drawing illustrated embodiment in the following described. The drawing shows in more schematic Representation of a plan view of a sonar device torpedo defense equipped overwater ship.
Ein zum Schutz gegen Torpedos mit Abwehreffektoren
ausgerüstetes Überwasserschiff 10 weist eine Sonareinrichtung
auf, die neben der Ortung von Zielen zur Detektion und Ortung
von das Schiff angreifenden Torpedos dient. Die
Sonareinrichtung umfasst ein an Bord installiertes
(bordgestütztes) Aktivsonar 11 und ein im Wasser
nachgezogenes Schleppsonar 12. Das Aktivsonar 11 ist in
bekannter Weise entweder als Zylinderbasis oder als
sogenanntes HMS (Hull Mounted Sonar) mit einer
Ortungsreichweite r ausgeführt. Bedingt durch die Anordnung
im Bug des Schiffes oder die Integration in der Bordwand des
Schiffes überstreicht das Aktivsonar 11 nur einen Sektor von
jeweils 150° von Schiffvoraus über Steuerbord und Backbord
und ist in einem achterlichen Sektor α = 60° "blind". Aus
diesem achterlichen Sektor α anlaufende Torpedos werden von
dem Aktivsonar 11 nicht detektiert.A protection against torpedoes with deflectors
equipped
Zur Schließung dieser Lücke von ca. 60° im achterlichen
Bereich des Überwasserschiffes 10 dient das Schleppsonar 12,
das ausschließlich aus einem Empfänger, einer sog.
Schleppantenne 13 besteht, die von Schiff 10 in einem
Schleppabstand s nachgeschleppt wird. Die Schleppantenne 13
ist an einem Schleppseil 14 befestigt. Am freien Ende der
Schleppantenne 13 kann noch eine Schleppbremse 15 befestigt
sein, die für eine verbesserte geradlinige Ausrichtung der
Schleppantenne 13 sorgt.To close this gap of about 60 ° in the aft
Area of the
Das mit der beschriebenen Sonareinrichtung ausgerüstete
Überwasserschiff 10 besitzt damit einen Rundumschutz gegen
angreifende Torpedos, die unabhängig von ihrer Konfiguration
und Angriffsrichtung zuverlässig detektiert und geortet und
durch Absetzen von Abwehreffektoren aktiv bekämpft werden.
Ein in dem Überwachungssektor des Aktivsonars 11 anlaufender
Torpedo wird von dem Aktivsonar 11 hochgenau vermessen, so
dass zu jedem Zeitpunkt des Torpedolaufs dessen Position
bekannt ist. In dem vor dem Schleppsonar 12 überwachten
achterlichen Sektor des Überwasserschiffes 10, in dem das
Aktivsonar 11 "blind" ist, werden die anlaufenden, häufig
sehr lauten Torpedos ebenfalls detektiert und geortet. Dabei
wird zunächst in bekannter Weise der anlaufende Torpedo 16
akustisch passiv gepeilt. In der Zeichnung ist der Peilwinkel
mit ϕT angegeben. Zusätzlich wird die Frequenz fT mindestens
einer vom Torpedo 16 abgestrahlten signifikanten
Spektrallinie über die Zeit vermessen (fT(t)). Nunmehr wird
aus der Peilwinkelauswanderungsgeschwindigkeit dϕT/dt, der
Frequenz fT und der Änderungsgeschwindigkeit dfT/dt der
Frequenz fT in bekannter Weise die Entfernung aT zum Torpedo
16 berechnet. Die Torpedoentfernung aT ergibt sich gemäß
nachstehender Gleichung:
deren Herleitung im Einzelnen in der DE 35 19 269 C2
erläutert ist.The equipped with the sonar device described above
Mit dieser Berechnung der Torpedoentfernung aT ist zu jedem
Zeitpunkt nach Auffassung des angreifenden Torpedos 16 durch
das Schleppsonar 12 dessen Position nach Peilung und
Entfernung bekannt, so dass sich bei Einstellen der
Torpedoentfernung aT, die vom Einsatzbereich eines
Abwehreffektors abgedeckt wird, letzterer zur Bekämpfung des
Torpedos 16 vom Schiff 10 ausgesetzt oder abgeschossen wird.With this calculation of the torpedo distance a T is at any time in the view of the attacking
Die Ortungsreichweite R der Schleppantenne 13 kann relativ
klein gehalten werden, so dass für die Schleppantenne 13 ein
nur relativ geringer technischer Aufwand erforderlich ist.
Die minimale Reichweite der Schleppantenne 13 entspricht dem
mit dem Sinus des halben Winkels α der achterlichen Lücke
des Aktivsonars 11 multiplizierten Schleppabstand s des
Schleppsonars 12 vom Schiff 10, also s • sin α/2.
Üblicherweise wird die Reichweite R des Schleppsonars 12
etwas größer als diese minimale Reichweite gewählt.The detection range R of the
Claims (2)
- Method for a vessel (10) which is being attacked to defend itself against a torpedo (16) which is attacking that vessel (10), in which the torpedo (16) is located using a ship-based sonar device which has an on-board active sonar (11), with an omnidirectional location capability with a gap at the stern, and a towed sonar (12) which is towed at a distance behind the vessel (10), and which torpedo is attacked by means of at least one defensive effector which can be launched from the vessel (10),
characterized in that the towed sonar (12) passively finds the direction of a torpedo (16) which is attacking in the area astern of the vessel (10), and the frequency (fT) of at least one significant spectral line which is emitted from the torpedo (16) is measured over time, in that the range (aT) of the torpedo (16) is calculated continuously from the rate at which the direction angle changes (dϕT/dt), the frequency (fT) of the measured spectral line and its rate of change (dfT/dt) in a known manner, and the launching of the defensive effector is initiated on appearance of a torpedo range aT which is covered by the range of operation of the defensive effector. - Method according to Claim 1, characterized in that the location range of the towed sonar (12) is chosen such that it is somewhat greater than the distance (s) at which the towed sonar (12) is towed behind the vessel (10) multiplied by the sine of half the angle (α) of the stern gap of the active sonar (11).
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DK00940415T DK1117587T3 (en) | 1999-07-28 | 2000-06-30 | Method for determining the measuring distance |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19935436 | 1999-07-28 | ||
DE19935436A DE19935436B4 (en) | 1999-07-28 | 1999-07-28 | Torpedo defense method |
PCT/EP2000/006101 WO2001008970A1 (en) | 1999-07-28 | 2000-06-30 | Anti-torpedo defence method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1117587A1 EP1117587A1 (en) | 2001-07-25 |
EP1117587B1 true EP1117587B1 (en) | 2004-10-27 |
Family
ID=7916350
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP00940415A Expired - Lifetime EP1117587B1 (en) | 1999-07-28 | 2000-06-30 | Anti-torpedo defence method |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1117587B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE280708T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU5535600A (en) |
DE (2) | DE19935436B4 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1117587T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001008970A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102005058559B3 (en) * | 2005-12-08 | 2006-12-14 | Atlas Elektronik Gmbh | Danger warning producing method for use during attacking of wake-controlled torpedo, involves comparing slew rate of cotangent with default value and releasing operating signal for warning alarm if cotangent exceeds default value |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10228681C1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2003-07-03 | Stn Atlas Elektronik Gmbh | Underwater body detection method uses evaluation of electroacoustic signals for detection of splash noise when body drops into water |
DE102016109105A1 (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2017-11-23 | Atlas Elektronik Gmbh | Watercraft for locating an underwater object |
RU2654435C1 (en) * | 2017-01-23 | 2018-05-17 | Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Крыловский государственный научный центр" | Underwater vehicle-hunter |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5373773A (en) * | 1981-08-06 | 1994-12-20 | The United States Of American As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Anti-torpedo stern defense system |
DE3519269C2 (en) * | 1985-05-30 | 1993-12-02 | Nord Systemtechnik | Method for determining travel status data of an object |
-
1999
- 1999-07-28 DE DE19935436A patent/DE19935436B4/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2000
- 2000-06-30 EP EP00940415A patent/EP1117587B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-06-30 WO PCT/EP2000/006101 patent/WO2001008970A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2000-06-30 DE DE50008407T patent/DE50008407D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-06-30 AU AU55356/00A patent/AU5535600A/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-06-30 DK DK00940415T patent/DK1117587T3/en active
- 2000-06-30 AT AT00940415T patent/ATE280708T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102005058559B3 (en) * | 2005-12-08 | 2006-12-14 | Atlas Elektronik Gmbh | Danger warning producing method for use during attacking of wake-controlled torpedo, involves comparing slew rate of cotangent with default value and releasing operating signal for warning alarm if cotangent exceeds default value |
WO2007065535A1 (en) * | 2005-12-08 | 2007-06-14 | Atlas Elektronik Gmbh | Method for production of a danger warning against an attacking torpedo |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1117587A1 (en) | 2001-07-25 |
AU5535600A (en) | 2001-02-19 |
DE19935436A1 (en) | 2001-02-08 |
ATE280708T1 (en) | 2004-11-15 |
WO2001008970A1 (en) | 2001-02-08 |
DE50008407D1 (en) | 2004-12-02 |
DE19935436B4 (en) | 2005-11-10 |
DK1117587T3 (en) | 2005-01-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1518087B1 (en) | Self-protecting device for an object | |
DE977574C (en) | Interception antenna | |
EP1117587B1 (en) | Anti-torpedo defence method | |
DE10151597C1 (en) | System and method for detection and defense against laser threats and underwater objects for underwater vehicles | |
DE10128973C1 (en) | Submarine with active torpedo location device using omnidirectional hydrophones for detection of sound pulses emitted by torpedo | |
EP1426726B1 (en) | Radar-camouflaged launcher | |
EP3227711A1 (en) | System and a method for locating and combatting threats, in particular in asymmetric threat situations | |
DE102005058559B3 (en) | Danger warning producing method for use during attacking of wake-controlled torpedo, involves comparing slew rate of cotangent with default value and releasing operating signal for warning alarm if cotangent exceeds default value | |
DE102005062109A1 (en) | Person e.g. diver, protecting method for use in underwater prohibited area, involves operating unmanned underwater craft equipped with defense unit to expectation area when detecting person entering into prohibited area | |
DE10016781C2 (en) | guard | |
DE2143116C1 (en) | ||
EP0213418B1 (en) | Method of and apparatus for the direction finding of targets | |
US5373773A (en) | Anti-torpedo stern defense system | |
DE4229509C2 (en) | Method and device for protecting radar stations against anti-radar missiles | |
DE19857760C1 (en) | Passive acoustic position finding of a target radiating sound into water uses a torpedo fitted with an electro-acoustic receiving device to pick up a position on a path with a continuously changing course or torpedo maneuver | |
DE3248727C1 (en) | Target search control device for torpedoes | |
DE4010475B3 (en) | Method for protecting ship against torpedo, involves discharging the charge carriers of towed portion if distance between ship and torpedo is less than specific range | |
EP1376079B1 (en) | Method for detecting air-delivered underwater bodies | |
DE3415107B3 (en) | Torpedo defensive apparatus | |
DE102006062581B3 (en) | Underwater defence system i.e. surface ship torpedo defence system, for fighting against torpedo, has effectors arranged in shooting device such that head sensor is pointed outward in star shaped manner | |
DE4040149C1 (en) | Method of defending against torpedoes | |
DE3346299C1 (en) | Submarine defense and evasion on attack by a torpedo with acoustic homing | |
DE3248744A1 (en) | PROCEDURE FOR COMBATING THE COMBAT SITUATION | |
DE202023000414U1 (en) | Protective device for watercraft | |
Nair | Piracy off the coast of Somalia and maritime security |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20010120 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ATLAS ELEKTRONIK GMBH |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20031007 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041027 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50008407 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20041202 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20040403954 Country of ref document: GR |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20050107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050207 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050630 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050630 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050630 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050630 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050630 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050630 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050630 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20050728 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *ATLAS ELEKTRONIK G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20050630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050327 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Payment date: 20110624 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20110610 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: ML Ref document number: 20040403954 Country of ref document: GR Effective date: 20130104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120702 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 50008407 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20190620 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20190619 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20190624 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20190619 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20190619 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20190619 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20190619 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 50008407 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MK Effective date: 20200629 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FI Ref legal event code: MAE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20200629 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20200629 |