EP1099473B1 - Probenentnahmesystem für Wirbelschicht-Gasphasenpolymerisationsverfahren - Google Patents

Probenentnahmesystem für Wirbelschicht-Gasphasenpolymerisationsverfahren Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1099473B1
EP1099473B1 EP00309884A EP00309884A EP1099473B1 EP 1099473 B1 EP1099473 B1 EP 1099473B1 EP 00309884 A EP00309884 A EP 00309884A EP 00309884 A EP00309884 A EP 00309884A EP 1099473 B1 EP1099473 B1 EP 1099473B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sample
sampling
vessel
reactor
polymer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP00309884A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1099473A1 (de
Inventor
Daniel Paul Zilker, Jr.
Christopher Scott Hunnisett
Donald Robert Fields
Kiu Hee Lee
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Univation Technologies LLC
Original Assignee
Univation Technologies LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Univation Technologies LLC filed Critical Univation Technologies LLC
Publication of EP1099473A1 publication Critical patent/EP1099473A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1099473B1 publication Critical patent/EP1099473B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
    • G01N1/02—Devices for withdrawing samples
    • G01N1/10—Devices for withdrawing samples in the liquid or fluent state
    • G01N1/20—Devices for withdrawing samples in the liquid or fluent state for flowing or falling materials
    • G01N1/2035—Devices for withdrawing samples in the liquid or fluent state for flowing or falling materials by deviating part of a fluid stream, e.g. by drawing-off or tapping
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
    • G01N1/02—Devices for withdrawing samples
    • G01N1/22—Devices for withdrawing samples in the gaseous state
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J8/00—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes
    • B01J8/0015—Feeding of the particles in the reactor; Evacuation of the particles out of the reactor
    • B01J8/0035—Periodical feeding or evacuation
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J8/00—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes
    • B01J8/18—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles
    • B01J8/1809—Controlling processes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J8/00—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes
    • B01J8/18—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles
    • B01J8/1872—Details of the fluidised bed reactor
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F10/00—Homopolymers and copolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2208/00—Processes carried out in the presence of solid particles; Reactors therefor
    • B01J2208/00008—Controlling the process
    • B01J2208/00017—Controlling the temperature
    • B01J2208/00026—Controlling or regulating the heat exchange system
    • B01J2208/00035—Controlling or regulating the heat exchange system involving measured parameters
    • B01J2208/00044—Temperature measurement
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2208/00—Processes carried out in the presence of solid particles; Reactors therefor
    • B01J2208/00008—Controlling the process
    • B01J2208/00017—Controlling the temperature
    • B01J2208/00026—Controlling or regulating the heat exchange system
    • B01J2208/00035—Controlling or regulating the heat exchange system involving measured parameters
    • B01J2208/0007—Pressure measurement
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2208/00—Processes carried out in the presence of solid particles; Reactors therefor
    • B01J2208/00008—Controlling the process
    • B01J2208/00017—Controlling the temperature
    • B01J2208/00026—Controlling or regulating the heat exchange system
    • B01J2208/00035—Controlling or regulating the heat exchange system involving measured parameters
    • B01J2208/00088—Flow rate measurement
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2208/00—Processes carried out in the presence of solid particles; Reactors therefor
    • B01J2208/00008—Controlling the process
    • B01J2208/00548—Flow
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F2400/00—Characteristics for processes of polymerization
    • C08F2400/02—Control or adjustment of polymerization parameters

Definitions

  • the invention relates the production of a polymer in a gas phase, fluidized bed polymerization. More particularly, the invention relates to a sampling system for such a gas phase polymerization of a polymer (such as PE, PP, and/or a sticky polymer such as an EPR).
  • a polymer such as PE, PP, and/or a sticky polymer such as an EPR.
  • Cyclones have been used to separate the conveying gas from the solids. These systems work reasonably well for polymers (e.g., crystalline alpha olefin polymers) where the monomers are not too hazardous and can be easily purged. (Cyclones would probably not work well for sticky polymers)
  • EPR ethylene-propylene rubbers
  • BR butadiene rubbers
  • EPR products contain (ethyldiene norbornene (ENB) and BR products contain 1,3-butadiene which have stringent controls to limit air emissions and human exposure.
  • ENB has a strong odor which can be detected in ambient air at 13 ppbv.
  • the current exposure limit for 1,3-butadiene is only 1 ppmv.
  • the present invention provides a process and apparatus for sampling during the polymerization of a sticky polymer.
  • an apparatus comprising:
  • Figure 1 is a schematic drawing of an automated sampling system of the invention.
  • Figure 2 is a depiction of a commercial EPR reactor sampling system of this invention.
  • Figures 1 and 2 :
  • EPR and BR polymers may cross-link or make very high molecular weight polymers if the polymerization reaction is not terminated.
  • the ideal sample system for EPR and BR polymers would be one that can not only take a sample directly from the reactor but it could also perform purging and reaction termination operations rendering the sample innocuous to operating personnel. No sample system capable of performing these functions was known to the authors prior to the development of this process and apparatus.
  • An apparatus of the invention has been developed for taking polymer samples from a fluidized bed gas phase reaction system which is capable of handling volatile hazardous monomers such as 1,3-butadiene.
  • the apparatus consists of a small conical bottom vessel _which is connected directly to a fluidized bed gas phase reactor.
  • the vessel contains internal filters that prevent product fines from exiting the system and protect instrumentation and vent lines from being plugged with product.
  • Special metal-seated valves are used to isolate the sampling vessel from the process.
  • a programmable logic controller (PLC) sequences the operation of the valves attached to the vessel to obtain a sample of the polymer.
  • the PLC logic also ensures the sampling vessel is leak-free, purges the sampling vessel with inert gas, controls the sample size, removes the sample, purges the sample free of monomer with inert gas, chemically passivates the sample, and then permits the discharge of the sample into a container for removal.
  • the PLC logic controls the duration of the purging sequence while ensuring the purge gas flowrate and temperature are maintained during the purging process.
  • the automation of the sampling process using the aforementioned vessel and PLC logic ensures that every sample experiences the same conditioning prior to analysis. This decreases sample-to-sample variability which improves reactor control and operability.
  • the sampling system minimizes the potential for exposing operating personnel to hazardous monomers and reaction by-products.
  • the purged and passivated sample is analyzed off line to determine product properties and physical/chemical characteristics. Results from the analyses of the sample are used to guide adjustment to reaction conditions.
  • the invention is an apparatus comprising means for automatically taking a sample from a gas phase fluidized bed reactor that also purges the sample to remove hydrocarbons and contacts the sample with reaction gel inhibitors or other compounds.
  • the apparatus is comprised of a conical bottom pressure-rated sample chamber, remotely actuated valves, pressure transmitters, pressure indicators, flow indicators, flow restriction orifices, valves, check valves, filter elements, and a programmable logic controller (PLC).
  • PLC programmable logic controller sequences the operation of the valves and performs logic tests to ensure the safe operation of the sampling system and to provide operating personnel with trouble shooting information which is transmitted by to a digital control system for annunciation on operating display units.
  • the remotely operated tasks the PLC could be performs could be done manually but sample reproducibility and safety would be sacrificed.
  • the sampling apparatus is well suited for taking samples from highly reactive and toxic reaction environments and discharging a sample which can be readily handled by operating personnel.
  • the sampling system minimizes exposure of operating personnel to materials with low permissible exposure levels and minimizes the emission of toxic materials to the environment.
  • Each sample taken by the automated sampling system receives the same treatment eliminating the bias that may be created by manually attempting to perform the same tasks involved in taking a sample repeatedly.
  • the sample system may be cycled through its processing steps repeatedly as necessary to obtain samples as analytical testing requirements dictate.
  • FIG. 1 A simplified drawing of the pilot plant automated sampling system is shown in Figure 1. Its primary components consist of a conical bottom pressure-rated cylindrical conical bottom sampling vessel (1), filter elements (2), a programmable logic controller (PLC) (3), full-bore remotely actuated valves with metal seats (4), remotely actuated valves (5), and a manually actuated-full-bore discharge valve (6).
  • the PLC sequences the operation of the actuated valves and performs logic tests necessary for the safe operation of the sampling system.
  • the design of the sample vessel (1) includes a conical bottom with conical angle of at least 45 degrees to enable the flow of solid polymer samples into the sample collection container and is designed for unlimited cycles in cyclical pressure service.
  • Steeper angle cones are routinely used to aid the flow of solids from the vessel.
  • the sampling vessel (1) routinely experiences abrupt changes in internal pressure from near atmospheric pressure to pressures as high as 4 ⁇ 2 MPa gauge (600 psig) and back to near atmospheric pressure during its routine operation.
  • the reactor port which conveys product from the reactor (7) into the sampling vessel (1) through the full-bore remotely actuated valves (4) is normally within a few inches vertically of the gas distributor plate in the pilot plant fluidized bed reactors and at the same height as the normal product discharge nozzle.
  • the use of full-port ball type valves with metal seats is recommended for product transfer valves (4).
  • the second valve provides better isolation of the sample vessel (1) from the reactor (7) should one of the valves develop a leak.
  • the product transfer valves are close coupled to the reactor, preferably using a reactor boss instead of a normal flange outlet to minimize the dead volume between the reactor and the product transfer valve closest to the reactor.
  • a similar sampling system is also being used which removes solid product samples from the product discharge vessel connected to the reactor instead of taking the product sample directly from the reactor.
  • a sampling sequence begins by operating personnel requesting a sample electronically via the programmable logic controller (PLC)(3). All remotely actuated valves begin in the closed position and the PLC checks to ensure the initial valve positions are correct. If any step in the sampling procedure is in error, the PLC activates a fail-safe response. This response is for the logic to alert operating personnel, bypass the remaining sampling steps, and return all remotely actuated valves to their fail safe positions.
  • PLC programmable logic controller
  • the PLC then checks the pressure in the sampling vessel. If the pressure exceeds 0 ⁇ 105 MPa gauge (15 psig), gas inside the sampling vessel (1) is vented via removed actuated valves (5) to the flare (8). The vented gas could also be sent to a catalytic oxidizer or similar device to prevent emissions of hydrocarbons to the environment.
  • the pilot plant sampling system uses a remotely actuated 3-way valve (5) to direct the vented gas from the sampling vessel to the atmosphere (9) or to the flare (8). This additional valve is not necessary if the vented gas is sent to an emission reduction device which operates at low pressure such as a catalytic oxidizer.
  • the next step the apparatus performs is to check for leaks from the sampling vessel (1) to the environment or leaks from the process into the sampling vessel.
  • the sampling vessel is pressurized with nitrogen (10) to approximately 1 ⁇ 05 MPa gauge (150 psig) through a remotely actuated valve (5) and then isolated from the pressurization source.
  • a restriction orifice is used in the pilot plant to control the sampling vessel pressurization rate.
  • the reactor pressure is greater than 1 ⁇ 05 MPa gauge (150 psig) and the pressure inside the sampling vessel continues to rise, it may be indicative of a leak from the reactor (7) to the sampling vessel (1) through faulty valves (4).
  • the sampling systems fail-safe response is activated. If the pressure inside the sample system decreases below a prescribed limit which indicates a leak to the environment, the fail-safe response is activated by the PLC.
  • the sampling vessel After successfully passing the sampling vessel pressure check, the sampling vessel is cyclically pressure purged with nitrogen and vented to remove possible contaminants. The nitrogen is vented to flare at the end of each pressurization cycle.
  • the number of pressurization-vent cycles is variable but six are typically performed in the pilot plant. This step is not absolutely necessary but it may minimize the amount of residual oxygen and moisture in the sampling vessel that migrates into the reactor when a sample is taken.
  • the PLC pressurizes the sampling vessel (1) to control the size of the sample taken from the reactor.
  • the control of sample size is not precise, the pressure in the sample vessel can usually be adjusted to keep the sample size within a few hundred grams. This step is not necessary if the user is not concerned with sample size or chooses to have the size of the sampling vessel control the sample size.
  • the sample transfer valves (4) open which allow solids to flow from the reactor into the sampling vessel.
  • An electro-pneumatic interlock in addition to PLC logic is also used to ensure that the product transfer valves (4) can not be open at the same time as the remotely actuated discharge valve (5) on the bottom of the sampling vessel.
  • the PLC monitors the sampling vessel pressure during this transfer. If no increase in sampling vessel pressure occurs, the transfer line from the reactor to the sampling vessel is assumed to be plugged and the PLC alerts operating personnel and the fail-safe response is activated. The solids are allowed to settle for a few seconds before the pressure is vented from the sampling vessel.
  • Filters (2) inside the sampling vessel contain the solids within the vessel and protect the instrumentation leads to the pressure transmitters from being plugged with the solids. Sintered metal filters are typically because of their mechanical strength.
  • the gaseous contents of the sampling vessel are vented to the flare through a filter (2).
  • a restriction orifice is installed on the vent line in the pilot plant to prevent too rapid a depressurization from lifting the solids into the upper portion of the sampling vessel.
  • the upper filter on the sampling vessel vent is located above the solids entry port to prevent solids from directly impacting on the filter when the sample is transferred from the reactor to the sampling vessel.
  • the PLC monitors the depressurization step and activates the fail-safe response if the sampling vessel pressure does not decrease to less than 0 ⁇ 105 MPa gauge (15 psig) within 30 seconds. While the sampling vessel is being vented, the remotely actuated valve connected to the flare is closed briefly and the filter is blown back with nitrogen to clean it before the next sample is taken.
  • Heated nitrogen (11) at a temperature of 40-80°C at a flowrate of approximately 9 kg /hr (20 lb/hr) is then passed through the bottom internal filter into the sampling vessel. This gas purges volatile hydrocarbons from the solid sample and is vented to the flare.
  • the PLC monitors the flow rate and temperature of the hot nitrogen purge stream..
  • a timer inside the PLC controls the duration of the purge flow. If the purge flow or its temperature is not within prescribed limits, the timer stops and alarms operating personnel. The timer stops until the flow and temperature are within their prescribed limits.
  • alcohol (12) is slowly metered into the hot nitrogen gas stream.
  • Methanol, ethanol, and isopropanol have been used in the pilot plant. Other substances with similar vapor pressures could also be used.
  • Alcohol reacts with the cocatalyst which terminates any subsequent reaction in the sampling vessel. Alcohol also prevents the formation of gels and of other high molecular weight species.
  • the flowrate of alcohol is regulated by a fine capillary on one sampling system in the pilot plant.
  • the hot nitrogen steam is passed through a small vessel containing alcohol where the alcohol-enriched stream leaving the vessel is sent to the sampling vessel. Both methods have been shown to be effective at quenching the cocatalyst residue in the sample and in eliminating gel formation.
  • the PLC controls the duration of the alcohol injection.
  • the molar ratio of alcohol used in the sampling system is at least at a 1:1 mole ratio to the cocatalyst. Typically, a 5:1 alcohol/cocatalyst mole/mole ratio is used in the pilot plant to ensure an adequate quench and to account for a less than ideal distribution of gas flow within the sampling vessel. Alcohol to cocatalyst mole ratios as high as 30:1 have been used. Alcohol quenching may not be necessary for some catalyst systems.
  • the residual pressure inside the sampling vessel is vented to the flare.
  • the pressure drops below 0.014 MPa gauge (2 psig) the contents are ready to be discharged and a logic permissive allows the remotely actuated discharge valve (5) on the bottom of the sampling vessel to be opened.
  • the measurements from two redundant pressure transmitters are used to ensure the pressure in the sampling vessel is low enough to allow the remotely actuated discharge valve to open.
  • the PLC vents the pressure inside the sampling vessel to the atmosphere when the sampling vessel pressure falls below 0 ⁇ 035 MPa gauge (5 psig) Pressure in the pilot plant flare system would sometimes prevent the sampling vessel pressure from dropping to 0 ⁇ 014 MPa gauge (2 psig) thereby inhibiting the product discharge logic.
  • a manual full-bore discharge valve (6) is installed in the pilot plant sampling system to further minimize emissions and to give operating personnel some control of the discharge rate of the solids into the sampling container (13). Once the sample is removed, the sampling system is ready to take another sample by repeating the same tasks.
  • the sampling procedure in the commercial system ( Figure 2) is very similar and only the differences will be noted.
  • the commercial sampling apparatus performs the same vessel integrity and pressure purging as the pilot plant automatic sampling system.
  • the 3-way remotely actuated valve (5) which selects between the flare (8) and an atmospheric vent (9) in Figure 1 is replaced by a manual valve (14) on the atmospheric vent header in the commercial system in Figure 2.
  • a differential pressure transmitter is used to adjust the pressure difference between the reactor (7) and the sample vessel (1) immediately prior to taking a sample to control the size of the sample.
  • the operating technicians adjust the pre-sampling pressure inside the sampling vessel to control the sample size rather than directly adjusting a differential pressure. The end result is the same being that the sample size is controlled by the differential pressure between the reactor and the sampling vessel.
  • the remotely actuated product transfer valve (4) attached to the reactor closes and the cycle gas purge pressure via remotely actuated valve (17) is used to push into the sampling vessel.
  • the other remotely actuated full-port valve (4) connected to the sampling vessel (4) closes along with the purge gas valve(17).
  • the purge gas flow is turned back on to the reactor sample port by opening the sample gas purge valve (16).
  • the cycle gas purge flow is maintained until the next system is ready to take the next sample from the reactor.
  • Sample purging is nearly identical to the pilot plant apparatus where heated nitrogen is passed through a small vessel containing alcohol (18).
  • the alcohol-rich stream may be fed either through a filter located on the bottom side of the conical section or it may be fed via another remotely-actuated valve (19) into the discharge piping beneath the sampling vessel between the two-port remotely actuated discharge valves on the bottom of the sampling vessel.
  • the upper remotely actuated full port discharge valve (20) is not used in the pilot plant sampling system and was added in the commercial system because the lower filter (2) in the plant sampling vessel continued to plug. Higher reactor operating pressures at the EPR-1 vs the pilot plant may have caused this filter problem.
  • the purge gas is completely isolated from the sampling vessel by valve (20). In the pilot plant, the only protection for the purge gas is the filter itself.
  • the discharge sequence for the apparatus at the EPP-1 and the pilot plant are similar with identical logic permissives that must be met before the remotely actuated discharge valves (20) and (5) on the bottom of the sampling vessel will open.
  • PLC logic and an independent external triple redundant PLC ensures that product transfer valves (4) as well as cycle gas purge valve (17) are not open at the same time as the remotely actuated discharge valves.
  • a manual discharge valve (6) on the bottom of the sampling apparatus is used by operating technicians to control the flow of solids into the sample container (13). Once the purged and quenched sample is removed from the apparatus, the automated sample system is ready to take another sample.
  • the location of the nozzle chosen for the sampling system in the commercial unit is more important compared to the pilot plant. It has been recommended that the sampling port be above the gas distributor plate away from the fluid mechanical influences of the gas jets immediately above the plate.
  • the current port for the commercial sampling system is only a few inches above the plate which makes it more sensitive to larger agglomerates and less sensitive to fines. It may also be necessary to add an insert to the sampling nozzle to allow the sampling system to take a sample a short distance away from the wall of the reactor.
  • the EPR-1 commercial unit has not implemented these changes to ensure the sample is truly representative of the fluidized bed contents.
  • the present invention is not limited to any specific type of stirred or fluidized gas phase polymerization reaction and can be carried out in a single reactor or multiple reactors (two or more reactors preferably connected in series).
  • "condensed mode” including the so-called “induced condensed mode”
  • "liquid monomer” operation of a gas phase polymerization reactor can be employed.
  • a conventional fluidized bed process for producing resins is practiced by passing a gaseous stream containing one or more monomers, usually one monomer, continuously through a fluidized bed reactor under reactive conditions in the presence of a nickel catalyst. Product is withdrawn from the reactor. A gaseous stream of unreacted monomer is withdrawn from the reactor continuously and recycled into the reactor along with make-up monomer added to the recycle stream.
  • Conventional gas phase polymerizations are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,922,322; 4,035,560; and 4,994,534.
  • a conventional polymerization of the present invention is conducted in the presence of one or more inert particulate materials as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,994,534.
  • Condensed mode polymerizations are disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,543,399; 4,588,790; 4,994,534; 5,352,749; and 5,462,999. Condensing mode processes are employed to achieve higher cooling capacities and, hence, higher reactor productivity.
  • a recycle stream, or a portion thereof can be cooled to a temperature below the dew point in a fluidized bed polymerization process, resulting in condensing all or a portion of the recycle stream.
  • the recycle stream is returned to the reactor.
  • the dew point of the recycle stream can be increased by increasing the operating pressure of the reaction/recycle system and/or increasing the percentage of condensable fluids and decreasing the percentage of non-condensable gases in the recycle stream.
  • the condensable fluid may be inert to the catalyst, reactants and the polymer product produced; it may also include monomers and comonomers.
  • the condensing fluid can be introduced into the reaction/recycle system at any point in the system. Condensable fluids include saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbons. In addition to condensable fluids of the polymerization process itself, other condensable fluids, inert to the polymerization can be introduced to "induce" condensing mode operation.
  • suitable condensable fluids may be selected from liquid saturated hydrocarbons containing 2 to 8 carbon atoms (e.g., ethane, propane, n-butane, isobutane, n-pentane, isopentane, neopentane, n-hexane, isohexane, and other saturated C 6 hydrocarbons, n-heptane, n-octane and other saturated C 7 and C 8 hydrocarbons, and mixtures thereof).
  • liquid saturated hydrocarbons containing 2 to 8 carbon atoms e.g., ethane, propane, n-butane, isobutane, n-pentane, isopentane, neopentane, n-hexane, isohexane, and other saturated C 6 hydrocarbons, n-heptane, n-octane and other saturated C 7 and C 8 hydrocarbons, and mixtures thereof).
  • Condensable fluids may also include polymerizable condensable comonomers such as olefins, alpha-olefins, diolefins, diolefins containing at least one alpha olefin, and mixtures thereof. In condensing mode, it is desirable that the liquid entering the fluidized bed is dispersed and vaporized quickly.
  • Liquid monomer polymerization mode is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,453,471; U.S. Serial No. 510,375; PCT 95/09826 (US) and PCT 95/09827 (US).
  • liquid monomer present in the bed is adsorbed on or absorbed in solid particulate matter present in the bed, such as in/on polymer being produced or fluidization aids, also known as inert particulate materials (e.g., carbon black, silica, clay, talc, and mixtures thereof) present in the bed, so long as there is no substantial amount of free liquid monomer present.
  • Liquid mode makes it possible to produce polymers in a gas phase reactor using monomers having condensation temperatures much higher than the temperatures at which conventional polyolefins are produced.
  • a liquid monomer process is conducted in a stirred bed or gas fluidized bed reaction vessel having a polymerization zone containing a bed of growing polymer particles.
  • the process comprises continuously introducing a stream of monomer (1,3-butadiene) and optionally one or more inert gases into the polymerization zone optionally in the presence of one or more inert particulate materials; continuously or intermittently introducing a catalyst as described herein into the polymerization zone; continuously or intermittently withdrawing polymer product from the polymerization zone; and continuously withdrawing unreacted gases from the zone; compressing and cooling the gases while maintaining the temperature within the zone below the dew point of at least one monomer present in the zone.
  • the inert gas can include nitrogen, argon, a C 1 -C 20 alkane, and mixtures thereof, with nitrogen, butane, or a mixture of these two being preferred.
  • the temperature within the zone and the velocity of gases passing through the zone are such that essentially no liquid is present in the polymerization zone that is not adsorbed on or absorbed in solid particulate matter.
  • the use of fluidization aids is preferred in the liquid monomer process and in the process of the present invention.
  • liquid monomer mode is the preferred polymerization mode.
  • sticky polymers such as EPRs, polybutadiene (e.g., high cis 1,4-polybutadiene), and polyisoprene are produced in a gas-phase fluidized reactor at or above the softening or sticking temperature of the polymer product optionally and preferably in the presence of an inert particulate material selected from the group consisting of carbon black (including modified and treated carbon black), silica, clay, talc, activated carbon, and mixtures thereof. Of the inert particulate materials, carbon black, silica, and a mixture thereof are preferred, with carbon black being most preferred.
  • the inert particulate material is employed in the gas-phase polymerization in an amount ranging from 0.3 to 80 weight percent, preferably 5 to 75 weight percent, most preferably 5 to 50 weight percent based on the weight of the final elastomeric polymer product.
  • Other inert particulate materials especially carbon blacks
  • a gas phase fluidized bed made up of or containing a "seed bed" of polymer which is the same or different from the polymer product being produced.
  • the bed is preferably made up of the same granular resin that is to be produced in the reactor.
  • the bed comprises formed polymer particles, growing polymer particles, and catalyst particles fluidized by polymerizing and modifying gaseous components introduced at a flow rate or velocity sufficient to cause the particles to separate and act as a fluid.
  • the fluidizing gas is made up of the initial feed, make-up feed, and cycle (recycle) gas, i.e., monomers, and, if desired, modifiers and/or an inert carrier gas (e.g., nitrogen, argon, or inert hydrocarbon (e.g., a C 1 -C 20 alkane such as ethane or butane), with nitrogen and/or butane being preferred).
  • cycle gas e.g., nitrogen, argon, or inert hydrocarbon (e.g., a C 1 -C 20 alkane such as ethane or butane), with nitrogen and/or butane being preferred).
  • a typical cycle gas is comprised of one or more monomers, inert carrier gas(es), and optionally hydrogen, either alone or in combination.
  • the process can be carried out in a batch or continuous manner, the latter being preferred.
  • the essential parts of the reactor are the vessel, the bed, the gas distribution plate, inlet and outlet piping, at least one compressor, at least one cycle gas cooler or heat exchanger, and a product discharge system.
  • the vessel above the bed, there is a velocity reduction zone, and in the bed, a reaction zone. Both are above the gas distribution plate.
  • Variations in the reactor can be introduced if desired.
  • Polymerization can also be conducted by charging one monomer initially, allowing it to polymerize, and then adding a second monomer, and allowing it to polymerize in a single polymerization vessel.
  • two or more polymerization vessels preferably connected in series, can be used to polymerize with two or more monomers.
  • one monomer can be polymerized in the first reactor, and additional monomers can be polymerized in second or subsequent reactors.
  • the polymerization conditions in the gas phase reactor are such that the temperature ranges from 0° to 120°C, preferably 40° to 100°C, and most preferably 50° to 80°C. Partial pressure will vary depending upon the particular monomer employed and the temperature of the polymerization, and it can range from 0 ⁇ 007 to 0 ⁇ 875 MPa (1 to 125 psi). Condensation temperatures of the monomers are well known. In general, it is preferred to operate at a partial pressure slightly above to slightly below (that is, ⁇ 0 ⁇ 07 MPa (10 psi)) the dew point of the monomer.
  • the partial pressure ranges from 0 ⁇ 07 to 0 ⁇ 7 MPa (10 to 100 psi); and isoprene partial pressure ranges from 0 ⁇ 07 to 0 ⁇ 35 MPa (10 to 50 psi).
  • the liquid monomer (isoprene) is maintained at a concentration of 1 to 30 wt % of isoprene monomer to polymer in the reactor.
  • Total reactor pressure ranges from 0 ⁇ 7 to 3 ⁇ 5 MPa (100 to 500 psi).
  • styrene is polymerized analogous to other diene polymerizations such as those of butadiene or ethylidene norbornene.
  • the process of this invention is operated to have a space-time-yield ratio (STY) of about 1:10. That is, they generally require a longer residence time than alpha olefin polymerizations. The higher the space-time-yield ratio the faster the polymer product is produced in the reactor.
  • Polymers which can be benefited by the present invention are preferably granular. They can include polyolefins or alpha olefins such as, for example, homopolymers of ethylene or propylene, copolymers and terpolymers of a major mole percent of ethylene and/or propylene as the main monomer(s) and a minor mole percent of at least one C3 to C8 alpha olefin; a sticky polymer; as well as polyvinyl chlorides; and elastomers such as polybutadiene, EPMs, EPDMs, polyisoprene, styrene, and vinylpolybutadiene.
  • polyolefins or alpha olefins such as, for example, homopolymers of ethylene or propylene, copolymers and terpolymers of a major mole percent of ethylene and/or propylene as the main monomer(s) and a minor mole percent of at least one C
  • the preferred C3 to C8 alpha olefins are propylene, butene-1, pentene-1, hexene-1, 4-methylpentene-1, heptene-1, and octene-1. This description is not intended to exclude the use of this invention with alpha olefin homopolymer and copolymer resins in which ethylene is not a monomer.
  • Examples of sticky polymers which can be benefited by the present invention include ethylene-propylene rubbers and ethylene-propylene-diene rubbers, polybutadiene, polyisoprene, high ethylene content propylene/ethylene block copolymers, poly(1-butene) (when produced under certain conditions), very low density (low modulus) polyethylenes, i.e., ethylen butene rubbers or hexene containing terpolymers, ethylene/propylene/ethylidene norbornene, ethylene/propylen/octadiene, and ethylene/propylene/hexadiene terpolymers.
  • ethylene-propylene rubbers and ethylene-propylene-diene rubbers polybutadiene, polyisoprene, high ethylene content propylene/ethylene block copolymers, poly(1-butene) (when produced under certain conditions), very low density (low modulus) polyethylenes, i.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
  • Polymerisation Methods In General (AREA)
  • Devices And Processes Conducted In The Presence Of Fluids And Solid Particles (AREA)
  • Examining Or Testing Airtightness (AREA)

Claims (4)

  1. Verfahren zur Probenahme eines Polymers während seiner Herstellung in einem Gasphasen-Wirbelschichtreaktor, bei welchem
    (1) ein Probeaufnahmebehälter auf Leckstellen aus dem Probeaufnahmebehälter zur Umgebung und auf Leckstellen von dem Reaktor zu dem Probeaufnahmebehälter untersucht wird,
    (2) eine Polymerprobe aus der Wirbelschicht zu dem Probeaufnahmebehälter entfernt wird,
    (3) die Polymerprobe mit einem Aluminiumalkyl-Abschreckmittel in Kontakt gebracht wird,
    (4) die Polymerprobe in dem Probeaufnahmebehälter mit einem Inertgas gereinigt wird, und
    (5) die Polymerprobe aus dem Probeaufnahmebehälter abgegeben wird.
  2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei welchem das Polymer eine Polyolefin, eine klebriges Polymer, Polyvinylchlorid oder ein Elastomer ist.
  3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, bei welchem das Polymer ein Homopolymer von Ethylen oder Propylen, ein Copolymer oder Terpolymer mit einem größeren Moleprozentanteil an Ethylen und/oder Propylen als das/die Hauptmonomer/e und mit einem kleineren Moleprozentanteil von wenigsten einem C3- bis C8-α-Olefin, Polybutadien, EPM, einem Ethylen-Propylen-Dien-Elastomer, Polyisopren, Polystryrol oder Vinylpolybutadien ist.
  4. Vorrichtung zur Probenahme eines Polymers während seiner Herstellung in einem Gasphasen-Wirbelschichtreaktor, wobei die Vorrichtung
    (1) einen auf Druck ausgelegten Probenahmebehälter mit einem konischen Abgabeboden, wobei der Konus ausreichend steil ist, um zu verhindern, dass klebrige Feststoffe den Boden des Behälters leicht überbrücken,
    (2) einen oder mehrere Filter, um ein Feststoffprodukt innerhalb des Probenahmebehälters zu halten und um es daran zu hindern, zur Instrumentierung oder zu anderen Prozessströmen zu wandern,
    (3) eine speicherprogrammierbare Steuereinrichtung (SPS), die die Funktion der Ventile einordnet und logische Überprüfungen in Verbindung mit einer anderen Prozessinstrumentierung einschließlich Druck-, Temperatur- und Strömungssensoren ausführt, die gewährleisten, dass das Probenahmesystem sicher arbeitet und die gewünschten Funktionen ausführt,
    (4) ein oder mehrere SPS-gesteuerte, fernbetätigte Ventile mit Volldurchgang, die mit dem Reaktor mit Metallsitzen verbunden sind, die Leckstellen aus dem Reaktor in den Probenahmebehälter minimieren,
    (5) ein oder mehrere SPS-gesteuerte, fernbetätigte Ventile, die den Probenahmebehälter mit anderen Prozessströmen, wie Reinigungsgas, Abschreckmittel, Entlüftung, Abfackelung, Reaktorzyklusgas oder zur Abführung des Produkts verbinden, und
    (6) ein manuelles Abgabetrennventil aufweist, das die Steuerung der abschließenden Abgabe des Produkts aus dem Probenahmebehälter für eine unabhängige Analyse ermöglicht.
EP00309884A 1999-11-11 2000-11-07 Probenentnahmesystem für Wirbelschicht-Gasphasenpolymerisationsverfahren Expired - Lifetime EP1099473B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16497799P 1999-11-11 1999-11-11
US164977P 1999-11-11

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1099473A1 EP1099473A1 (de) 2001-05-16
EP1099473B1 true EP1099473B1 (de) 2004-07-07

Family

ID=22596895

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00309884A Expired - Lifetime EP1099473B1 (de) 1999-11-11 2000-11-07 Probenentnahmesystem für Wirbelschicht-Gasphasenpolymerisationsverfahren

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1099473B1 (de)
JP (1) JP2001181307A (de)
KR (1) KR20010051493A (de)
CN (1) CN1296018A (de)
AT (1) ATE270582T1 (de)
BR (1) BR0005265A (de)
DE (1) DE60011982T2 (de)
ES (1) ES2223409T3 (de)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6592827B1 (en) * 2000-10-24 2003-07-15 Univation Technologies Llc Sampling system for fluidized bed gas phase polymerization reaction systems
JP2007017261A (ja) * 2005-07-07 2007-01-25 National Institute Of Advanced Industrial & Technology 流通式振動管を用いた高圧下でのスラリーの密度測定法及び測定装置
DE602005006268T2 (de) * 2005-07-22 2009-07-16 Kemya Al-Jubail Petrochemical Co. System zur Druckregelung
CN106554441B (zh) * 2015-09-30 2019-12-27 中国石油化工股份有限公司 丙烯本体聚合动力学研究的装置及方法
CN106125691B (zh) * 2016-08-04 2018-10-23 石河子天域新实化工有限公司 聚合生产ess与dcs集成紧急安全生产控制方法
CN109126641B (zh) * 2017-06-15 2022-03-01 国家能源投资集团有限责任公司 费托合成催化剂流化床还原装置和在线取样方法
EP3740747A1 (de) * 2018-01-19 2020-11-25 Basell Poliolefine Italia S.r.l. Vorrichtung und verfahren zur entnahme von proben aus einer einheit einer polymerisierungsanlage
JP6951283B2 (ja) * 2018-03-30 2021-10-20 株式会社日立製作所 微粒子分析装置、微粒子分析システム及び洗浄方法
WO2021104837A1 (en) * 2019-11-25 2021-06-03 Basell Poliolefine Italia S.R.L. Process and system for collecting catalyst or polymer samples from an operation unit of a polymerization plant
CN111458186A (zh) * 2020-04-09 2020-07-28 中国神华煤制油化工有限公司 活性粉料取样装置、取样方法及其应用

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3653265A (en) * 1970-09-11 1972-04-04 Atlantic Richfield Co Catalyst sampling apparatus
US4361538A (en) * 1981-03-17 1982-11-30 Davy International Ag Continuous moving bed reactor for manufacture of high molecular weight polyethylene terephthalate
CA1196482A (en) * 1981-07-28 1985-11-12 Robert G. Aronson Fluidized bed discharge process
DE3338782C2 (de) * 1983-10-26 1985-09-12 Sartorius GmbH, 3400 Göttingen Vorrichtung zur aseptischen Probeentnahme von Flüssigkeiten aus einer Leitung, insbesondere in der Getränke-, Pharma- und Kosmetikindustrie
US4594270A (en) * 1984-08-31 1986-06-10 Carbomedics, Inc. Bed sampler for a high-temperature fluidized bed
US6055870A (en) * 1999-06-22 2000-05-02 Jaeger; Ben E. Sampler for fluidized product

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR0005265A (pt) 2001-07-03
DE60011982D1 (de) 2004-08-12
ATE270582T1 (de) 2004-07-15
KR20010051493A (ko) 2001-06-25
JP2001181307A (ja) 2001-07-03
DE60011982T2 (de) 2005-08-18
CN1296018A (zh) 2001-05-23
EP1099473A1 (de) 2001-05-16
ES2223409T3 (es) 2005-03-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6592827B1 (en) Sampling system for fluidized bed gas phase polymerization reaction systems
EP1099473B1 (de) Probenentnahmesystem für Wirbelschicht-Gasphasenpolymerisationsverfahren
CA2155236C (en) Gas phase polymerization process
JPH0647606B2 (ja) 粘着性重合体の製造方法
CN101720334A (zh) 在线监测和控制聚合方法和反应器以防止中断事故的方法
US5387659A (en) Flash gas sampling for polymerization reactions
KR102461683B1 (ko) 효율적인 중합체 입자 퍼징을 위한 공정
US4832915A (en) Vapor recovery from particles containing same
US10471405B2 (en) Continuous gas fluidized bed polymerization process
US10941222B2 (en) Process for operating a polymer powder degasser vessel
US4499263A (en) Vapor recovery from particles containing same
EP0728772B1 (de) Verfahren zur Olefinpolymerisation in der Gasphase
US7625987B2 (en) Gas phase polymerization and method of controlling same
EP2591014B1 (de) Sperre und verfahren
US20220064343A1 (en) Optimized inert gas partial pressure in a gas phase polymerization process
EP1931714B1 (de) Gasphasenpolymerisationsverfahren zur erzielung von hoher partikeldichte
US4996026A (en) Separation system and reducing the emission of solids in pressure relief processes in high pressure polymerization reactors
US6077920A (en) Process for feeding particulate material to a fluidized bed reactor
EP2591013B1 (de) Sperre und verfahren

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: LEE, KIU HEE

Inventor name: FIELDS, DONALD ROBERT

Inventor name: HUNNISETT, CHRISTOPHER SCOTT

Inventor name: ZILKER, DANIEL PAUL, JR.

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010914

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: UNIVATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040707

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040707

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040707

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040707

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040707

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60011982

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040812

Kind code of ref document: P

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20041004

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20041006

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041007

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20041105

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20041105

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20041105

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041108

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20041118

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041130

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20041130

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20041130

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2223409

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20050408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051107

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051108

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060601

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060601

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20051107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060731

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20060601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20060731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20051108

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *UNIVATION TECHNOLOGIES LLC

Effective date: 20051130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041207