EP0919050A1 - Element antivol electronique - Google Patents

Element antivol electronique

Info

Publication number
EP0919050A1
EP0919050A1 EP97940042A EP97940042A EP0919050A1 EP 0919050 A1 EP0919050 A1 EP 0919050A1 EP 97940042 A EP97940042 A EP 97940042A EP 97940042 A EP97940042 A EP 97940042A EP 0919050 A1 EP0919050 A1 EP 0919050A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
conductor tracks
dielectric layer
element according
fuse element
capacitor plates
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP97940042A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0919050B1 (fr
Inventor
Richard Altwasser
Peter Lendering
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Meto International GmbH
Original Assignee
Meto International GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE19705723A external-priority patent/DE19705723A1/de
Application filed by Meto International GmbH filed Critical Meto International GmbH
Publication of EP0919050A1 publication Critical patent/EP0919050A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0919050B1 publication Critical patent/EP0919050B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/22Electrical actuation
    • G08B13/24Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
    • G08B13/2402Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
    • G08B13/2405Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting characterised by the tag technology used
    • G08B13/2414Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting characterised by the tag technology used using inductive tags
    • G08B13/242Tag deactivation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/22Electrical actuation
    • G08B13/24Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
    • G08B13/2402Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
    • G08B13/2428Tag details
    • G08B13/2437Tag layered structure, processes for making layered tags

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a fuse element for the electronic type kels sherung, consisting of at least one spiral conductor track and a capacitor with an intermediate dielectric layer or consisting of two spiral conductor tracks, which are arranged at least partially overlapping on both sides of a dielectric layer ⁇ -> Resonant circuit).
  • Resonant circuits which are excited to resonate at a predetermined resonance frequency, which is usually 8.2 MHz, are generally used to secure goods against theft in department stores. They are often an integral part of adhesive labels or hanging labels made of cardboard that are attached to the items to be secured.
  • the department store is equipped with an electronic monitoring system in the exit area, which detects the resonant resonant circuits and triggers an alarm if a secured article passes through a secured monitoring zone in an unauthorized manner. Once a If the customer has paid for the goods, the resonant circuit is deactivated. The measure prevents an alarm from being triggered as soon as an item has been legally purchased and subsequently passes through the surveillance zone.
  • the deactivation systems which are often placed in the checkout areas, generate a resonance signal with a greater amplitude than is generated in the monitoring systems.
  • a resonance label is usually deactivated in a field strength greater than 1.5 A / m.
  • Different deactivation mechanisms for resonant resonant circuits have become known. Either the insulation between mutually opposite conductor tracks is destroyed, which leads to a short circuit, or a piece of conductor track is overloaded and melts, causing an interruption.
  • the resonant properties of the resonant circuit i.e. the resonance frequency and / or the "Q" factor are modified so strongly that the resonance label is no longer detected by the monitoring system.
  • the deactivated resonant circuit can be unintentionally reactivated by mechanical manipulation, for example by kinking, packing and transporting the goods or by bending the label and thus the resonant circuit. Unintentional reactivation of a resonant circuit attached to a legally purchased item can then trigger an alarm, which is quite a nuisance for both the buyer and the department store.
  • US Pat. No. 5,187,466 also describes a method for generating a deactivatable resonant circuit by means of a short circuit, which cannot be destroyed under normal circumstances.
  • the resonant circuit disclosed therein has capacitor plates which are arranged on both sides of the dielectric.
  • the dielectric layer lying between the two capacitor plates has a through hole.
  • the object of the invention is to propose a resonant circuit with a reduced probability of reactivation.
  • the object is achieved in that at least one selected area (a desired breakdown point) is provided in the dielectric layer, in which a short circuit between the opposite capacitor plates or the spiral conductor tracks is created with a correspondingly high energy supply by an alternating magnetic field, and wherein the selected area is locally reinforced so that destruction of the short circuit Path) is prevented by mechanical stress and thus reactivation of the securing element.
  • a selected area a desired breakdown point
  • the dielectric layer has essentially a uniform thickness and no additional manufacturing defects (e.g. air closures).
  • An advantageous embodiment of the fuse element according to the invention proposes that the dielectric layer in train the selected area thinner than in the remaining areas.
  • the selected area is distinguished by the fact that the dielectric layer here has a different chemical or physical nature than in the remaining areas.
  • the dielectric layer consists of at least two components.
  • the melting point of one component of the dielectric layer is above the manufacturing temperature for fuse elements.
  • the components of the dielectric layer are designed in such a way that they are produced either by coating or by lamination.
  • the selected area in which the deactivation takes place is reinforced by the application of additional pressure.
  • Printing together improves the adhesion between the capacitor plates or the at least partially overlapping conductor tracks. It has proven to be advantageous if the reinforcement is achieved in a three-dimensional form by pressure molding the capacitor plates or the at least partially overlapping conductor tracks. It is particularly advantageous here if the improved adhesion and the shaping of the capacitor plates or the conductor tracks are achieved in one operation.
  • weakened zones are provided on both sides of the reinforced zone. If a bending moment attacks from the outside, the probability that the resonant circuit in the area of the weakened zones will bend or even break is much greater than a bending or breaking within the reinforced zone.
  • the weakened zone can therefore also be referred to as the preferred bending or breaking zone.
  • the weakened zones can be formed by narrowing the width of the conductor track. Another possibility is that the adhesive layer in these weakened zones is treated in such a way that the bond between the spiral conductor tracks is considerably reduced. It is also possible to perforate the conductor tracks in the weakened zones.
  • the resonant circuit is designed such that the capacitance between the upper and lower conductor tracks is concentrated at the inner ends of the coils.
  • a large overlap area of the conductor tracks is provided at the inner ends of the coils, which results in a correspondingly large capacitance, while the overlap at the outer coil ends is very small.
  • An advantageous development of the device according to the invention proposes that the overlap regions between the two conductor tracks and thus the capacitance between the conductor tracks concentrate at the inner ends of the conductor tracks.
  • the outer ends of the two conductor tracks overlap in a small area and that the outer ends of the conductor tracks are followed by a relatively long area without overlap.
  • An advantage of this topology is that the deactivation takes place in the overlap area between the outer ends of the upper and lower conductor tracks, since this is the point with the highest voltage potential between the conductor tracks.
  • the deactivation point is therefore located with a high degree of certainty in the selected area.
  • FIG. 8b a top view of the tool shown in FIG. 8a
  • 9 a plan view of a conductor track with a weakened zone
  • FIG. 12 an equivalent circuit diagram for the voltage conditions of the embodiment of the resonant circuit according to the invention shown in FIG. 11c.
  • Fig. 1 shows an embodiment of the resonant circuit 6 according to the invention in plan view.
  • the resonant circuit 6 shown in FIG. 1 can be seen in cross section.
  • the resonant circuit 6 is deactivated by creating a short circuit between the two spiral conductor tracks 2, 3, which are preferably made of aluminum, through the dielectric layer 4.
  • An applied alternating magnetic field such as that emitted by the monitoring system, induces alternating voltages in the two spiral conductor tracks 2, 3 of the resonant circuit 6.
  • the spiral conductor tracks 2, 3 overlap at least partially and are wound in n opposite directions.
  • the outer end of the lower coil 2 has a positive potential relative to the inner end of the lower coil 2 when the inner end of the upper coil 3 has a positive potential with respect to the outer end of the upper coil 3. It must therefore be noted that the points / areas in which the induced alternating voltages between the two coils 2, 3 are maximum are in the end areas of the coils 2, 3.
  • the upper coil 3 has fewer turns than the lower coil 2 in the example shown in FIG. 1, the highest voltages are generated between the ends of the upper coil 3 and the locations of the lower coil 2 directly below.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the voltage relationships in different areas of the two at least partially overlapping coils 2, 3 of a resonant circuit 6, which can be used according to an advantageous development of the resonant circuit 6 according to the invention.
  • the deactivation takes place in the end regions of the upper coil 2 and lower coil 2, since the induced potential is maximum here. Since the electric field strength occurs concentrated on a surface with a small radius, deactivation occurs precisely at the ends of the conductor tracks 2, 3 - as shown in FIG. 4.
  • the dielectric layer 4 breaks down at these local weak points, although the voltage potential here is lower than at the ends of the upper coil 2 and lower coil 3. Since the voltage potential at the local weak points is lower than at the ends of the conductor tracks 2, 3, the electrical energy available for generating the deactivation short circuit is smaller than the electrical energy that would be necessary for generating a deactivation short circuit at the ends of the upper coil 3.
  • FIG. 5 shows a cross section through a dielectric layer with manufacturing defects, here air bubbles 7 and irregularities in the area of the surface.
  • the dielectric layer 4 is designed according to a further development so that it has a substantially uniform thickness and is largely free of local weak points 7.
  • Such a uniform dielectric layer 4 represents a deactivation in the end regions of the spiral Conductors 2, 3 are safe, since the induced voltage and energy are maximum here.
  • a short circuit caused by such a deactivation is very robust and less susceptible to inadvertent reactivation.
  • the dielectric layer 4 consists of at least two components 4a, 4b, an upper component 4a and a lower component 4b.
  • the lower component 4b is applied to the lower coil 3 before punching and hot stamping.
  • the upper component 4a is applied to the upper coil 2.
  • the upper component 4a has a relatively low melting point, which enables it to serve as a hot melt adhesive and to glue the two coils 2, 3 to the lower coil 3 during the hot stamping of the upper coil 2.
  • the upper component 4a of the dielectric Layer 4 melts during hot stamping of the upper coil 2.
  • the lower component 4b of the dielectric layer 4 has a higher melting point and does not melt during hot stamping onto the upper coil 2.
  • the uniformity of the lower component 4b of the dielectric layer 4 which does not melt, improves the uniformity in the thickness of the dielectric layer 4 as a whole.
  • the coil material (AI) is usually in the form of a wide roll material, so that the uniformity of the surface of the dielectric layer 4 can be maintained and other defects, which are caused, for example, by air pockets 7, are minimized.
  • the reinforced zone 10 is less susceptible to shear and slide movements or a Delaminate. Local reinforcement can reduce the stress on the resonant circuit 6 by kinking or bending, since the two spiral conductor tracks 2, 3 only shear, slide, kink or delaminate in the vicinity, but not within the locally reinforced zone 10.
  • the regions around the ends of one of the two conductor tracks 2, 3, here the upper conductor track 2 are reinforced by the fact that an additional pressure is applied to a local zone 10, the metal, preferably aluminum, is shaped so that it takes on a non-planar shape.
  • the local application of pressure results in better adhesion between the two conductor tracks 2, 3 and between the lower conductor track 3 and the dielectric layer 4.
  • this pressure is applied to a pressure with a predetermined profile (stamp 12) by means of a shaping tool 11 the conductor tracks 2, 3 are shaped such that the resistance of the resonant circuit 6 against reactivation is considerably improved.
  • the tool 11 can also be designed flat and have predetermined dimensions.
  • a metal sheet with grooves, bulges or other incorporated structures is not as easy to bend as a flat sheet.
  • the same principle is used here to create a locally reinforced zone 10. Any large-scale folding or bending of the resonant circuit 6 leads to the resonant circuit 6 being bent, folded, sheared or delaminated in the vicinity but not within the reinforced zone 10. This reduces the risk of unintentional reactivation.
  • the actual shape of the reinforced zone 10 is not critical, the actual profile of the molded one Conductor 2, 3 in the reinforced zone 10 is also not critical.
  • FIG. 7 shows a top view of an embodiment of a reinforced zone 10 at one end of the upper conductor track 2.
  • FIG. 8 a shows a cross section and FIG. 8 b shows a top view of a tool 11 that can be used to produce the reinforced zone 10.
  • the weakened zone 13 can be formed either by narrowing the width of the conductor track 2, 3, as shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, or by appropriate treatment of the adhesive layer in this weakened zone 13, specifically in the way that the bond between the conductor tracks 2, 3 is considerably weaker here. Another way to obtain weakened zones 13 is to perforate the conductor tracks 2, 3.
  • the conductor tracks 2, 3 and the resonant circuit 6 are like this formed that the capacitance between the upper and lower conductor tracks 2, 3 is concentrated at the inner ends of the spiral conductor tracks 2, 3.
  • FIGS. 11a, 11b and 11c show a corresponding resonant circuit 6. From the figures it can be seen that there is a large overlap area of the conductor tracks 2, 3 at the inner ends of the coils 2, 3, which results in a results in proportionally large capacitance, while the overlap at the outer ends of the coils 2, 3 is very small.
  • FIG. 11c and 12 The equivalent circuit diagram of this arrangement is shown in FIG.
  • the voltage difference generated between the two coils 2, 3 is considerably greater at the outer coil ends than at any other point between the coils 2, 3.
  • FIGS. 11c and 12 When looking at FIGS. 11c and 12 together, it can also be seen that the outer The lower conductor track 3 is largely not covered by the upper conductor track 2 at all. Thus, no deactivation can take place along this overlap-free section 9. If you follow the outer turn of the lower conductor track 3 back from the end point, where there is a small overlap area with the upper conductor track 2, it is found that the next point at which there is an overlap of the conductor tracks 2, 3 and thus the possibility of Deactivation exists, a piece back on the outer turn of the lower conductor track 3. This point has a considerably lower voltage potential between the upper and lower conductor tracks 2, 3.
  • Carrier material upper coil lower coil dielectric layer a upper component b lower component adhesive layer resonant circuit or fuse element air inclusion (prepared) selected area overlap-free area 0 reinforced zone 1 tool 2 punch 3 weakened zone

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Coils Or Transformers For Communication (AREA)
  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)
EP97940042A 1996-08-06 1997-07-29 Element antivol electronique Expired - Lifetime EP0919050B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19631775 1996-08-06
DE19631775 1996-08-06
DE19705723 1997-02-14
DE19705723A DE19705723A1 (de) 1996-08-06 1997-02-14 Sicherungselement für die elektronische Artikelsicherung
PCT/EP1997/004116 WO1998006075A1 (fr) 1996-08-06 1997-07-29 Element antivol electronique

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0919050A1 true EP0919050A1 (fr) 1999-06-02
EP0919050B1 EP0919050B1 (fr) 2000-03-22

Family

ID=26028183

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP97940042A Expired - Lifetime EP0919050B1 (fr) 1996-08-06 1997-07-29 Element antivol electronique

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US6262663B1 (fr)
EP (1) EP0919050B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP3634382B2 (fr)
AT (1) ATE191095T1 (fr)
AU (1) AU4203397A (fr)
CA (1) CA2262573C (fr)
ES (1) ES2147456T3 (fr)
NO (1) NO313066B1 (fr)
PT (1) PT919050E (fr)
WO (1) WO1998006075A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1107205A2 (fr) * 1999-12-08 2001-06-13 Checkpoint Manufacturing Japan Co., Ltd. Marqueur resonant

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6775839B1 (en) 2002-03-15 2004-08-10 O'brien Patrick J. Optical storage device with print layer surface feature
JP2003317052A (ja) * 2002-04-24 2003-11-07 Smart Card:Kk Icタグシステム
US7221275B2 (en) * 2002-09-03 2007-05-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Tuneable wireless tags using spatially inhomogeneous structures
US7355516B2 (en) * 2004-12-23 2008-04-08 Checkpoint Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for protecting culinary products
US20070164865A1 (en) * 2005-11-04 2007-07-19 Gerald Giasson Security sensor system
US8125341B2 (en) * 2007-12-10 2012-02-28 Checkpoint Systems, Inc. Resonant tag with reinforced deactivation dimple
WO2010066955A1 (fr) 2008-12-11 2010-06-17 Yves Eray Circuit d'antenne rfid
CN108806155B (zh) * 2018-06-29 2020-02-11 仁怀市云侠网络科技有限公司 基于物联网的安防监控方法

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3967161A (en) 1972-06-14 1976-06-29 Lichtblau G J A multi-frequency resonant tag circuit for use with an electronic security system having improved noise discrimination
US4498076A (en) * 1982-05-10 1985-02-05 Lichtblau G J Resonant tag and deactivator for use in an electronic security system
US4876555B1 (en) * 1987-03-17 1995-07-25 Actron Entwicklungs Ag Resonance label and method for its fabrication
DE59008370D1 (de) 1989-12-20 1995-03-09 Actron Entwicklungs Ag Deaktivierbare resonanzetikette.
CH682957A5 (de) * 1991-04-16 1993-12-15 Kobe Properties Ltd Verfahren zur Deaktivierung einer Resonanz-Etikette.
NL9202067A (nl) 1992-11-27 1994-06-16 Dutch A & A Trading Bv Detectielabel.
US5510770A (en) 1994-03-30 1996-04-23 Checkpoint Systems, Inc. Surface deactivateable tag
EP0755036A1 (fr) 1995-07-20 1997-01-22 Esselte Meto International GmbH Etiquette à résonance déactivable et procédé de sa fabrication

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9806075A1 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1107205A2 (fr) * 1999-12-08 2001-06-13 Checkpoint Manufacturing Japan Co., Ltd. Marqueur resonant
EP1107205A3 (fr) * 1999-12-08 2002-07-24 Checkpoint Manufacturing Japan Co., Ltd. Marqueur resonant

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO990517D0 (no) 1999-02-04
JP2001504604A (ja) 2001-04-03
JP3634382B2 (ja) 2005-03-30
AU4203397A (en) 1998-02-25
EP0919050B1 (fr) 2000-03-22
CA2262573C (fr) 2002-04-16
NO990517L (no) 1999-02-04
WO1998006075A1 (fr) 1998-02-12
ES2147456T3 (es) 2000-09-01
CA2262573A1 (fr) 1998-02-12
PT919050E (pt) 2000-08-31
ATE191095T1 (de) 2000-04-15
NO313066B1 (no) 2002-08-05
US6262663B1 (en) 2001-07-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE60124900T2 (de) Aktivierbares/deaktivierbares sicherheitsetikett mit einem verbesserten elektrostatischen schutz zur verwendung mit einem elektronischen sicherheitssystem
DE69616709T2 (de) Deaktivierbares Sicherheitsetikett
DE69707528T2 (de) Sicherheitsetikett
DE69228483T2 (de) Sicherheitsetikett mit elektrostatischem schutz
DE69427641T2 (de) Mehrfrequenz-etikett
DE69932089T2 (de) Resonanzetikett mit einem leitenden mischmaterial zum schliessen eines elektrischen stromkreisses
DE69011512T2 (de) Aktivierbares/deaktivierbares Sicherheitsetikett zur Anwendung mit einem elektronischen Sicherheitssystem.
DE69108398T2 (de) Sicherheitsetikett für kompaktplattenlagerbehälter.
DE3143208C2 (de) Identifizierungsanordnung in Form eines an einem Gegenstand anbringbaren etikettartigen Streifens und Verfahren zu deren Herstellung
EP0472073B1 (fr) Procédé pour la production de circuits électriques résonnantes, en particulier d'étiquettes à résonance
DE60028986T2 (de) Magnetischer Marker, der in einem elektronischen Warensicherungssystems zum Einsatz kommt
EP0919050A1 (fr) Element antivol electronique
DE3942722A1 (de) Ferromagnetische fasern zur verwendung in der elektronischen artikelueberwachung und verfahren zur herstellung derselben
EP1236169A1 (fr) Etiquette pour marchandise
EP0919049B1 (fr) Circuit a resonance pour element antivol electronique
DE19705723A1 (de) Sicherungselement für die elektronische Artikelsicherung
DE60304735T2 (de) Sicherheitsetikett gegen ladendiebstahl
CH672854A5 (en) Security tag for controlled access to building - has LC circuit with capacitor set to valve by burn in at specific location
EP0810567B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour protéger un article contre le vol
DE3508369A1 (de) Etikettartiges gebilde und verfahren zu seiner herstellung
EP1017033B1 (fr) Elément pour la protection électronique d'articles et procédé de fabrication
DE69416097T2 (de) Markierungsvorrichtung
DE102017001424A1 (de) Herstellung eines Sicherungsetiketts
EP0935767B1 (fr) Elements de securite pour la surveillance electronique d'articles
DE69328819T2 (de) Doppelstatus-Dünnfilmmarkierung für elektronische Artikelüberwachung

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19981127

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB IT LI NL PT SE

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19990812

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB IT LI NL PT SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 191095

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 20000415

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59701333

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20000427

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20000517

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: OK PAT AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20000530

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2147456

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

NLR4 Nl: receipt of corrected translation in the netherlands language at the initiative of the proprietor of the patent
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20040702

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20040705

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20040722

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20040722

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050710

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050729

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050801

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20070730

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20070727

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080731

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080730

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 59701333

Country of ref document: DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20130712

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20130717

Year of fee payment: 17

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140729

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20160613

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20160613

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20160711

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20160726

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20160727

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 59701333

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MK

Effective date: 20170728

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20170728

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20170728

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20180508

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20170730