EP0702204B1 - Verfahren zur Auswertung von Siliziumscheiben - Google Patents
Verfahren zur Auswertung von Siliziumscheiben Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0702204B1 EP0702204B1 EP95114565A EP95114565A EP0702204B1 EP 0702204 B1 EP0702204 B1 EP 0702204B1 EP 95114565 A EP95114565 A EP 95114565A EP 95114565 A EP95114565 A EP 95114565A EP 0702204 B1 EP0702204 B1 EP 0702204B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- microroughness
- silicon wafers
- wafers
- silicon wafer
- afm
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01Q—SCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES OR APPARATUS; APPLICATIONS OF SCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES, e.g. SCANNING PROBE MICROSCOPY [SPM]
- G01Q30/00—Auxiliary means serving to assist or improve the scanning probe techniques or apparatus, e.g. display or data processing devices
- G01Q30/04—Display or data processing devices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B7/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques
- G01B7/34—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring roughness or irregularity of surfaces
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S977/00—Nanotechnology
- Y10S977/84—Manufacture, treatment, or detection of nanostructure
- Y10S977/849—Manufacture, treatment, or detection of nanostructure with scanning probe
- Y10S977/852—Manufacture, treatment, or detection of nanostructure with scanning probe for detection of specific nanostructure sample or nanostructure-related property
- Y10S977/854—Semiconductor sample
Definitions
- This invention relates in general to a method of evaluating silicon wafers and more particularly to a method of evaluating the crystal quality near surface of silicon wafers by means of a microroughness analysis.
- a silicon wafer used for manufacturing semiconductor integrated circuits has a device(s) formed on and near surface thereof.
- the flatness of the surface, an active area of the device(s) is formed thereon, of the silicon wafer is crucial in both macroscopic and microscopic levels. As unevenness at the atomic level, called microroughness, is believed to be reflected by the crystal quality, this microroughness has been evaluated using various techniques.
- microroughness of a silicon wafer surface gets worse after the treatment with a cleaning solution composed of aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide (NH 4 OH) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ).
- a cleaning solution composed of aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide (NH 4 OH) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ).
- NH 4 OH ammonium hydroxide
- H 2 O 2 hydrogen peroxide
- An atomic force microscope hereafter referred to as "AFM”
- STM scanning tunnelling microscope
- An AFM detects the microscopic forces between atoms and a probe, typically van der Waals forces, and detects changes in such forces due to minute differences in the distances between atoms and the probe to determine the surface unevenness.
- AFM Since an AFM is capable of very accurately measuring unevenness without destruction of the surface of the specimen, it is ideal for measuring the microroughness.
- the microroughness obtained by AFM is usually represented by RMS (root mean square), P-V (peak to valley) and so on.
- RMS root mean square
- P-V peak to valley
- Ra is a microroughness evaluation similar to RMS, as shown in the following equation: Where x denotes:
- the evaluation method described above takes measurements in a scanning area of a prescribed size at several points.
- RMS value is shown to change differently depending on the types of silicon crystals when the microroughness measurements are carried out on a silicon wafer using different sizes of scanning area.
- Figure 3 shows the relationship between the size of the scanning area (horizontal axis) and RMS (vertical axis) in the evaluation method described above.
- the samples represented by circles have a haze level of 7 (BIT) without a heat treatment
- the samples represented by squares have a haze level of 16 (BIT) with 20 minutes of a heat treatment at 1000°C
- the samples represented by triangles have a haze level of 107 (BIT) with several hours of a heat treatment at 1100°C.
- "Haze level” is an indicator of the microroughness obtained by an optical method, and a larger haze level values indicates more rough surface.
- the RMS value changes depending on the size of the scanning area and a good correlation with the haze level cannot be obtained.
- the evaluation method described above has to be a microroughness evaluation based on RMS or Ra using a certain fixed size of the scanning area.
- a RMS microroughness evaluation with a fixed size of the scanning area is not an appropriate evaluation of the crystal quality because it is not comprehensive. That is, because the scanning area of the AFM measurement is very small, it is difficult to grasp the silicon surface configuration with a calculation method such as RMS.
- the microroughness of a silicon wafer surface affects the dielectric breakdown properties of an oxide layer.
- the evaluation of dielectric breakdown properties with a fabricating MOS structure on a silicon wafer surface requires complicated and time consuming process such as oxidation or formation of electrodes.
- the object of the present invention is to solve the problems described above and its objective is to detect with high sensitivity changes in the surface configuration of a silicon wafer and thus to provide a method of evaluating the crystal quality of silicon wafers.
- An arbitrary number mentioned above is not limited in particular, but a number which is 2 or more and allows processing with a computer would be practical.
- Said silicon wafers should preferably be treated with a cleaning solution composed of ammonium hydroxide (NH 4 OH), hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and water before said measurement with the AFM is conducted.
- a cleaning solution composed of ammonium hydroxide (NH 4 OH), hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and water before said measurement with the AFM is conducted.
- the ratio of NH 4 OH : H 2 O 2 : H 2 O in said cleaning solution should preferably be 1 : 1 : 5.
- the present invention is focused on the periodicity of the microroughness on a silicon wafer surface revealed by the AFM measurement, uses the autocorrelation function to observe the surface configuration between each silicon crystal and thus evaluates the crystal quality.
- microroughness has not been studied at all. However, the inventors discovered that the microroughness has a periodic nature. Consequently, although the microroughness has been believed to be random unevenness, it has become possible, by analyzing the correlation between each unevenness using the autocorrelation function, to evaluate the microroughness in the atomic level measured by an AFM as a periodic function.
- Figure 1 is a graph showing the periods of the microroughness and relative power for wafers with the low pulling speed.
- Figure 2 is a graph showing the periods of the microroughness and relative power for wafers with the high pulling speed.
- Figure 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the size of the scanning area and RMS in the evaluation of the microroughness of silicon wafers using RMS of the AFM measurements.
- the horizontal axis of Figure 1 and Figure 2 represents the correlation distance, i.e. the period of the microroughness
- the vertical axis represents the value of the autocorrelation function R j , i.e. the strength of correlation for that period.
- R j the autocorrelation function
- a stronger correlation indicates that the microroughness at specific period gets worse more greatly.
- the microroughness of its correlation distance being 400 nm or less gets worse much more rapidly in the case of the wafers grown by high pulling speed.
- the microroughness of any typical period show no aggravation in the case of the wafers grown by low pulling speed. This is believed to indicate that the wafers grown by the low pulling speed are harder to be etched upon by said cleaning solution and have a a relatively good crystal quality.
- the present invention by taking the periodicity of the microroughness on a silicon wafer into account, can detect with high sensitivity changes in the surface configuration of the silicon wafer which could not be detected with conventional methods and makes it possible to evaluate the crystal quality near the surface of the silicon wafer.
- the present invention also allows acquisition of information about periods of the microroughness developed due to a treatment using a cleaning solution comprising a mixed aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide. The evaluation can be done in a relatively short period of time without complicated procedures such as are required in the evaluation of the dielectric breakdown voltage of an oxide layer.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)
- Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
- Cleaning Or Drying Semiconductors (AREA)
- Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
Claims (3)
- Verfahren zum Bewerten von Siliciumwafern, bei dem die Kristallqualität von Siliciumwafern bewertet wird durch Messen der Höhe xi (i = 1, 2, ..., N) einer Vielzahl von Meßpunkten auf der Hauptebene eines Siliciumwafers von einer Referenzebene aus mittels eines Atomkraftmikroskops (nachfolgend als "AFM" bezeichnet), Bestimmen der Autokorrelationsfunktion Rj, wie angegeben durch worin
x bedeutet: Auswählen einer beliebigen Zahl der Autokorrelationsfunktion Rj mit großem Wert aus der Autokorrelationsfunktion Rj, und Analysieren der Mikrorauhigkeit auf dem Siliciumwafer basierend auf den Abständen zwischen dem Punkt Rj=0 und den gewählten Punkten Rj's mit großem Wert, mit Ausnahme von Rj=0. - Verfahren zum Bewerten von Siliciumwafern nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Siliciumwafer mit einer Reinigungslösung, zusammengesetzt aus Ammonionhydroxid (NH4OH), Wasserstoffperoxid (H2O2) und Wasser, behandelt werden, bevor die Messung mit dem AFM durchgeführt wird.
- Verfahren zum Bewerten von Siliciumwafern nach Anspruch 2, wobei das Verhältnis von NH4OH:H2O2:H2O in der Reinigungslösung 1:1:5 beträgt.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP24845894 | 1994-09-16 | ||
JP6248458A JP3055598B2 (ja) | 1994-09-16 | 1994-09-16 | シリコンウエーハの評価方法 |
JP248458/94 | 1994-09-16 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0702204A2 EP0702204A2 (de) | 1996-03-20 |
EP0702204A3 EP0702204A3 (de) | 1996-07-31 |
EP0702204B1 true EP0702204B1 (de) | 1999-11-24 |
Family
ID=17178442
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP95114565A Expired - Lifetime EP0702204B1 (de) | 1994-09-16 | 1995-09-15 | Verfahren zur Auswertung von Siliziumscheiben |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5533387A (de) |
EP (1) | EP0702204B1 (de) |
JP (1) | JP3055598B2 (de) |
DE (1) | DE69513474D1 (de) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6798526B2 (en) | 2002-09-12 | 2004-09-28 | Seh America, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for predicting oxygen-induced stacking fault density in wafers |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6023338A (en) * | 1996-07-12 | 2000-02-08 | Bareket; Noah | Overlay alignment measurement of wafers |
JP4368454B2 (ja) | 1999-05-31 | 2009-11-18 | 協和発酵ケミカル株式会社 | アルコールの製造法 |
US6552337B1 (en) * | 1999-11-02 | 2003-04-22 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Methods and systems for measuring microroughness of a substrate combining particle counter and atomic force microscope measurements |
US6275293B1 (en) | 2000-05-10 | 2001-08-14 | Seh America, Inc. | Method for measurement of OSF density |
US20050275850A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2005-12-15 | Timbre Technologies, Inc. | Shape roughness measurement in optical metrology |
US8284394B2 (en) | 2006-02-09 | 2012-10-09 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. | Methods and systems for determining a characteristic of a wafer |
US8494802B2 (en) * | 2008-06-19 | 2013-07-23 | Kla-Tencor Corp. | Computer-implemented methods, computer-readable media, and systems for determining one or more characteristics of a wafer |
JP5357509B2 (ja) | 2008-10-31 | 2013-12-04 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | 検査装置、検査方法および検査装置の校正システム |
CN103630708A (zh) * | 2013-11-26 | 2014-03-12 | 河北同光晶体有限公司 | 一种辨别碳化硅晶片硅碳面的方法 |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5476006A (en) * | 1992-07-07 | 1995-12-19 | Matsushita Electronics Corporation | Crystal evaluation apparatus and crystal evaluation method |
JPH0642953A (ja) * | 1992-07-24 | 1994-02-18 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | 原子間力顕微鏡 |
US5308974B1 (en) * | 1992-11-30 | 1998-01-06 | Digital Instr Inc | Scanning probe microscope using stored data for vertical probe positioning |
JPH06248458A (ja) | 1993-02-23 | 1994-09-06 | Hitachi Ltd | プラズマ処理装置およびその装置を用いた磁気ディスク製造方法 |
-
1994
- 1994-09-16 JP JP6248458A patent/JP3055598B2/ja not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1995
- 1995-09-14 US US08/528,007 patent/US5533387A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1995-09-15 DE DE69513474T patent/DE69513474D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-09-15 EP EP95114565A patent/EP0702204B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6798526B2 (en) | 2002-09-12 | 2004-09-28 | Seh America, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for predicting oxygen-induced stacking fault density in wafers |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0702204A2 (de) | 1996-03-20 |
JP3055598B2 (ja) | 2000-06-26 |
DE69513474D1 (de) | 1999-12-30 |
JPH0888257A (ja) | 1996-04-02 |
US5533387A (en) | 1996-07-09 |
EP0702204A3 (de) | 1996-07-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
De Wolf | Micro-Raman spectroscopy to study local mechanical stress in silicon integrated circuits | |
EP0702204B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Auswertung von Siliziumscheiben | |
Fang et al. | Comparison of Si surface roughness measured by atomic force microscopy and ellipsometry | |
Miyazaki et al. | Influence of crystal-originated “particle” microstructure on silicon wafers on gate oxide integrity | |
Hartmann et al. | Determination of nanometer structures and surface roughness of polished Si wafers by scanning tunneling microscopy | |
EP0680662A1 (de) | Verfahren zur chemischen oberflaechenpassivierung fuer die in-situ-volume-lebensdauermessung von silizium-halbleiter-material | |
JPH06295945A (ja) | 半導体製造プロセスの評価方法および装置 | |
US5476006A (en) | Crystal evaluation apparatus and crystal evaluation method | |
Bussmann et al. | Sub-10 nm lateral spatial resolution in scanning capacitance microscopy achieved with solid platinum probes | |
JPH05196559A (ja) | 測定される変位の量を較正する標準試料の製法及び標準試料並びに測定装置及び較正方法 | |
Micard et al. | Non-destructive spatially resolved characterization of porous silicon layer stacks | |
Vanhellemont et al. | Spectroscopic ellipsometry studies of SIMOX structures and correlation with cross-section TEM | |
JPH0862122A (ja) | シリコンウェーハの酸素析出欠陥密度評価方法 | |
Dunaevskii et al. | Atomic-force-microscopy visualization of Si nanocrystals in SiO 2 thermal oxide using selective etching | |
JP3767116B2 (ja) | シリコンウエーハ表層の重金属汚染評価方法 | |
EP1968102B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Bewertung eines gebondeten Wafers | |
JP3104640B2 (ja) | 半導体基板の欠陥の検出方法と試料の作製方法及び欠陥の観察方法 | |
JPH02143543A (ja) | エピタキシャルウエーハの遷移領域の評価方法 | |
Pleschinger et al. | A structural and topographical study of low-pressure chemical-vapor-deposited polysilicon by scanning probe microscopy | |
Crossley et al. | A study comparing measurements of roughness of silicon and SiO2 surfaces and interfaces using scanning probe microscopy and neutron reflectivity | |
Chernov et al. | The effect of electrochemical oxidation time on the surface morphology of oxidized indium phosphide | |
JP4003943B2 (ja) | シリコンウエハの八面体ボイドの評価方法 | |
Tran et al. | Quantitative two-dimensional carrier profiling of a 400 nm complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor device by Schottky scanning capacitance microscopy | |
JPH1174493A (ja) | Soiウエーハの欠陥検査方法 | |
KR100862312B1 (ko) | 반도체소자의 웨이퍼 결함 측정방법 |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19960821 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19981103 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69513474 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19991230 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20000225 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000915 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20000915 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20011130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000930 |