EP0654093A4 - Detection et amplification d'acides nucleiques cibles par activite exonucleolytique. - Google Patents

Detection et amplification d'acides nucleiques cibles par activite exonucleolytique.

Info

Publication number
EP0654093A4
EP0654093A4 EP93917324A EP93917324A EP0654093A4 EP 0654093 A4 EP0654093 A4 EP 0654093A4 EP 93917324 A EP93917324 A EP 93917324A EP 93917324 A EP93917324 A EP 93917324A EP 0654093 A4 EP0654093 A4 EP 0654093A4
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
probe
probes
terminus
downstream
ligation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP93917324A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0654093B1 (fr
EP0654093A1 (fr
Inventor
John J Carrinno
Uwe Spies
Laurie A Rinehardt
Edward K Pabich
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Abbott Laboratories
Original Assignee
Abbott Laboratories
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Abbott Laboratories filed Critical Abbott Laboratories
Publication of EP0654093A1 publication Critical patent/EP0654093A1/fr
Publication of EP0654093A4 publication Critical patent/EP0654093A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0654093B1 publication Critical patent/EP0654093B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6844—Nucleic acid amplification reactions
    • C12Q1/6862—Ligase chain reaction [LCR]

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to nucleic acid amplification techniques and, more specifically, to the reduction and preferably elimination of target independent background amplification in assays utilizing the ligase chain reaction (LCR).
  • LCR ligase chain reaction
  • the invention also relates to the identification of differences in target nucleic acid sequences.
  • LCR ligase chain reaction
  • target nucleic acid sequence
  • LCR can be used to detect single or double stranded DNA targets.
  • two ligatable pairs of probes are employed in excess over the target, one pair of the probes are hybridizable to the other.
  • the target DNA is first denatured (if double stranded) to allow for the hybridization of the ligatable probe pairs to their respective complementary strands.
  • the hybridized probes are then ligated by DNA ligase.
  • the ligated probes are dissociated from the target and function as target sequences themselves. By repeated cycles of hybridization and ligation, amplification of the target sequence is achieved.
  • the process of LCR is described in the literature, including EP-A-320,308, EP-A-439,182, EP-A-336,731, WO 89/09835, WO 89/12696, and WO 90/01069 among others.
  • LCR low-density lipoprotein
  • target independent a common problem for LCR is non-specific (i.e. target independent) amplification which can lead to false positive results. This can occur, for example, when a pair of adjacent LCR probes are ligated to each other in the absence of the target. Since LCR probes are typically used in high concentration relative to the target the possibility of target independent ligation is great, and there is a comensurate need to overcome this concern.
  • EP-A-439,182 describes a variation of LCR wherein one of the probes of the ligatable pair is modified so that it cannot be ligated until a correction event takes place. Correction events take place only when the probe is hybridized to target.
  • this application describes modifications to the 3' ends of the upstream probe, where upstream refers to the probes whose 3' ends participate in the ligation reaction.
  • Disclosed modifications are a 3' blocking group, such as phosphate; a 3' overhang of ribonucleotides (on a deoxyribonucleotide probe); 3' overhangs including an abasic site; and 3' gaps which must be filled in to render the probes adjacent and ligatable. None of the disclosed embodiments involve modifications of the 5' end of the downstream probe.
  • the invention provides methods for reducing, and preferably eliminating, target independent amplification by employing modified downstream probes with 5' ends that are incapable of being ligated absent a target-dependent correction step; i.e. these ends can be ligated only after they have been enzymatically degraded following the hybridization of the probe to a target nucleic acid sequence.
  • the method of the invention comprises the steps of: (a) under hybridizing conditions exposing a sample suspected of containing the target nucleic acid sequence in single stranded form to an excess of a first set of oligonucleotides comprising a first upstream probe and a first downstream probe, both probes having sequences substantially complementary to portions of a target nucleic acid sequence, the 3' terminus of the first upstream probe hybridizing proximate to the 5' terminus of the first downstream probe, wherein the 5' end of the first downstream probe is modified to be ligation incompetent absent correction, thereby hybridizing the first set of oligonucleotides to the target nucleic acid sequence, if present; (b) correcting the 5' end of the downstream probe substantially only when the downstream probe is hybridized to target, said correction including exonucleolytic degradation of said 5' end, whereby the correction renders this 5' end ligation competent;
  • the means for rendering the 5' end of the downstream probe ligation incompetent fall into two general groups.
  • a ligation incompetent end is obtained by a non-phosphorylated 5' terminus, which is corrected by cleaving the terminal nucleosides to create a new 5' phosphorylated terminus on said downsteam probe.
  • a ligation incompetent end is obtained selecting a probe sequence which includes at least one nucleotide base in said 5' end which is mismatched with respect to the target sequence to which it hybridizes. This modification is corrected by cleaving the mismatched nucleotide to create a new 5' phosphorylated terminus on said downsteam probe.
  • Such a mismatched nucleotide base may be directly at the 5' terminus or it may be internal, i.e. from 1 to about 5 residues from the 5 ' terminus. In correcting mismatched bases, it has been found that the matched base adjacent the mismatch on its 3' side is also cleaved.
  • degradation of the 5' end is stopped at the point where the 3' end of the upstream probe is abutting, i.e. adjacent. In other embodiments degradation continues beyond this point and the upstream probe is also extended to abut the newly created 5' phosphorylated terminus of the corrected downstream probe.
  • This cleaving and extending activity is nicely performed by certain polymerases having 5' to 3' exonuclease activity, but the two processes may be performed by distinct reagents as well.
  • the ligation events which are dependent on the presence and/or amount of target in the sample, may be determined by assaying for the ligation product, e.g.
  • the amount of target sequence in the sample is increased prior to detection, by including an excess of a second set of oligonucleotides comprising a second upstream probe and a second downstream probe, both probes having sequences substantially complementary to the first downstream probe and first upstream probes, respectively (and therefore also complementary to the complement of the target sequence), the 3' terminus of the second upstream probe being hybridized proximate to the 5' terminus of the second downstream probe.
  • amplification is effected by repeating the hybridization, correction and ligation steps (a-c) several times. Repetition is generally from 10 to about 50 cycles.
  • the second downstream probe may but need not also carry a 5' modification making it ligation incompetent. If it does, the modification may be the same or different than that of the first downstream probe. Correction, ligation and detection are the same as before.
  • compositions comprising modified probes as above.
  • Such compositions comprise:
  • a first set of oligonucleotides comprising a first upstream probe and a first downstream probe, both probes having sequences substantially complementary to portions of a target nucleic acid sequence, the 3' terminus of the first upstream probe hybridizing proximate to the 5' terminus of the first downstream probe;
  • a second set of oligonucleotides comprising a second upstream probe and a second downstream probe, both probes having sequences substantially complementary to the first downstream probe and first upstream probes, respectively, the 3' terminus of the second upstream probe being hybridized proximate to the 5' terminus of the second downstream probe; wherein the 5' end of at least one of the first or second downstream probes is modified to be ligation incompetent absent correction.
  • kits containing the above modified probes which can be used for target nucleic acid detection and/or amplification with reduced or no target independent amplification.
  • Such kits comprise in one or more suitable containers:
  • a set of oligonucleotides comprising an upstream probe and a downstream probe, both probes having sequences substantially complementary to portions of a target nucleic acid sequence, the 3' terminus of the first upstream probe hybridizing proximate to the 5' terminus of the first downstream probe, wherein the 5 ' end of said downstream probe is modified to be ligation incompetent absent correction;
  • the correcting reagents may include one agent for cleaving in the case of overlapping probes; or it may include reagents for cleaving and extending. If two functions are needed for correction, two distinct reagents may be used, but it is preferable to employ a polymerase having both polymerization and 5' to 3' exonucleolytic activities. Preferably the polymerase is thermostable if it will be used for amplification methods.
  • frame a shows the two sets of probes, including a preferred modification on the 5' end of the downstream probes; frame b shows the first set of probes hybridized to a strand of target DNA; and frame c shows the first two probes after correction of the modified probe but before ligation of probe 1 to probe 2.
  • frame a depicts modifications in both downstream probes, the invention requires only that one downstream probe be modified.
  • the shaded rectangle represents one label or repo ⁇ er group, typically a first hapten; while the shaded oval represents a second label or reporter group which may or may not be a second hapten.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic example of a nucleic acid amplification technique using two sets of blunt ended probes wherein the downstream probes have 5' hydroxyl termini in place of the 5' phosphate required for ligation competency.
  • Figure 2 is a schematic example of a nucleic acid amplification technique using two sets of blunt ended probes wherein each downstream probe has a 5' hydroxyl terminus and a one base terminal mismatch with respect to complementary probe and target. Ligation incompetency is provided not only by the 5' hydroxyl termini, but also by weakened hydrogen bonding to template because of the mismatched terminal base.
  • Figure 3 is a schematic example of a nucleic acid amplification technique using two sets of blunt ended probes wherein each downstream probe has a 5' hydroxyl terminus and a one base internal mismatch with respect to its complementary probe and target
  • target independent ligation is reduced by both the 5' hydroxyl and the weakened hydrogen bonding due to the internal mismatch.
  • Figure 4 is a schematic example of a nucleic acid amplification technique using two sets of non-blunt ended probes which have downstream probes with 5' extensions. These 5' extensions are not hybridizable to each other or to their respective targets. These downstream probes also have 5' hydroxyl termini as shown. Ligation incompetency is provided by steric constraints imposed by the extensions and by the 5' hydroxyl.
  • Figure 5 is a schematic example of a nucleic acid amplification technique using two sets of non-blunt ended probes wherein each downstream probe has a one base 5' extension, and the extensions are complementary to each other but not to the target.
  • the downstream probes also have 5' hydroxyl termini as shown. Ligation incompetency on target is provided by weakened hydrogen bonding due to the terminal mismatch and by the 5' hydroxyl.
  • Figure 6 is a schematic example of a nucleic acid amplification technique using two sets of blunt ended probes wherein the downstream probes each have a 5' hydroxyl terminus, and the 5' terminal base mismatches the complementary probe and the target. Ligation incompetency is provided by weakened hydrogen bonding due to the terminal mismatches and by the 5' hydroxyl.
  • Figure 7 is a schematic example of a nucleic acid amplification technique using two sets of non-blunt ended probes with 3' extensions (in the upstream probes) which match each other and the target:
  • the downstream probes have 5' hydroxyl termini. Ligation incompetency is provided by the 5' hydroxyl.
  • Target or “target sequence” refers to the nucleic acid whose presence or absence is sought to be detected or differentiated from other nucleic acid, whose sequence may be very closely related.
  • the target nucleic acid comprises deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or, less typically, ribonucleic acid (RNA).
  • DNA deoxyribonucleic acid
  • RNA ribonucleic acid
  • the target is described to be single stranded. However, this should be understood to include the case where the target is actually double stranded but is simply separated from its complementary strand (also referred to as "target complement”) prior to hybridization with the probes.
  • the second set of probes can also be used in the initial step to hybridize to the target complement.
  • the second set of probes would not participate in the initial hybridization step, but would participate in subsequent hybridization steps, for example, by hybridizing to the ligated product.
  • Probes refer to the oligonucleotide segments utilized in the invention. They are from 10 to about 100 nucleotides long, preferably from about 15-35, and have a defined base sequence suitable for the desired target. Probes are usually DNA, but may be RNA or of mixed DNA RNA composition. Certain probes are modified at their 5' end, as described herein. Probes may be from natural or synthetic sources.
  • Bases shall refer to the pyrimidine and purine compounds Guanine (G), Cytosine (C), Adenine (A) and Thymine (T) in the case of DNA; and, in the case of RNA, the Uracil (U) replaces Thymine.
  • Bases also includes analogs, derivatives and modified base, such as those recognized in 37 CFR ⁇ 1.822(p)(l), which are capable of hybridizing to the target under assay conditions. Unless context dictates otherwise, “base” is sometimes also used to refer to the complete nucelotide residue, including the sugar and phosphate moieties, such as when speaking of filling in the gap with the appropriate bases.
  • Bases are known to pair together in cannonical fashion: A with T and C with G in DNA, and, in the case of RNA, A with U and C with G.
  • “complementary” denotes the pairing or “matching” in accordance with the above description.
  • a paired with G or C represents “mismatched” or “non- complementary” bases.
  • a probe that is “complementary” to another probe or to target means the oligonucleotide can hybridize with the complementary probe or target under hybridization conditions.
  • complementary probes may include sequences that may have mismatched base pairs in the hybridizable region, provided the sequences can be made to hybridize under hybridization conditions.
  • the probes are sufficiently complementary to hybridize selectively to their targets or complementary probes.
  • stopbase refers to the nucleotide at which a nucleolytic or polymerization process terminates.
  • a stopbase may exist as a template base for which the complementary base is absent from the dNTP pool.
  • a stopbase may exist as a nuclease resistant linkage in a downstream probe.
  • Alternative stopbases can be used in combination as well.
  • Test Conditions refers to the conditions of LCR with regard to temperature, ionic strength, probe concentration and the like. These are generally known in the art. LCR involves essentially two states or conditions: annealing or hybridization conditions, and denaturation conditions.
  • Hybridization conditions is defined generally as conditions which promote nucleation and annealing. It is well known in the art, however, that such annealing and hybridization is dependent in a rather predictable manner on several parameters, including temperature, ionic strength, probe length and G:C content of the probes. For example, lowering the temperature of the reaction promotes annealing. For any given set of probes, melt temperature, or Tm, can be estimated by any of several known methods. Typically hybridization conditions include temperatures which are slightly below the melt temperature. Ionic strength or "salt" concentration also impacts the melt temperature, since small cations tend to stabilize the formation of duplexes by shielding the negative charge on the phosphodiester backbone.
  • Typical salt concentrations depend on the nature and valency of the cation but are readily understood by those skilled in the art.
  • high G:C content and increased probe length are also known to stabilize duplex formation because G:C pairings involve 3 hydrogen bonds where A:T pairs have just two, and because longer probes have more hydrogen bonds holding the strands together.
  • a high G:C content and longer probe lengths impact the "hybridization conditions" by elevating the melt temperature. Once probes are selected, the G:C content and length will be known and can be accounted for in determining precisely what "hybridization conditions" will encompass. Since ionic strength is typically optimized for enzymatic activity, the only parameter left to vary is the temperature and obtaining suitable "hybridization conditions" for a particular probe set and system is well within ordinary skill.
  • “Denaturation conditions” is defined generally as conditions which promote dissociation of double stranded nucleic acid to the single stranded form. These conditions include high temperature and/or low ionic strength; essentially the opposite of the parameters described above as is well understood in the art.
  • Ligation is a general term which includes any method of covalently attaching two probes.
  • the preferred method is enzymatic ligation.
  • ligation competent refers to probe ends that are capable of being ligated by enzymatic ligase.
  • ligation competency requires nucleic acid segments such that a 3' hydroxyl terminus is disposed adjacent to a 5' phosphorylated terminus.
  • ligation incompetent probes do not present ends suitable for ligation, typically because of lack of 3' hydroxyl, lack of 5' phosphate or lack of adjacency. Many examples of ligation incompetency are discussed later. Ligation incompetency is a temporary state in this invention, exisiting only until “correction”. Thus it is sometimes referred to as "ligation incompetent absent correction.”
  • Correction refers to repair of the modification that rendered the probe ligation incompetent in the first place. Specific correction mechanisms are discussed later in connection with specific modifications, but relate generally to one or more of: 1) creating or restoring a 3' hydroxyl; 2) creating or restoring a 5' phosphate: or creating adjacency, either by cleaving an overhanging extension or by filling in a gap. It is an important feature of the present invention that correction be "target-dependent”, i.e. that it take place substantially only in the presence of target or target equivalent, and not in the presence of the other probes. "Template dependent" is the same as “target dependent” in that the template is ligated probe product only, and not unligated probes.
  • a hybridized probe is corrected enzymatically by an agent having a suitable exonucleolytic activity which is dependent upon the sequence information contained within the target.
  • Nucleolytic activity refers to the activity, preferably of an enzyme, which excises or degrades a DNA or RNA substrate. Nucleolytic activity may be exonucleolytic (from an end inward) or endonucleolytic (from within). For purposes of this invention the type of nucleolytic activity is not important, provided it is able to correct the modified 5' end in a target dependent fashion. For simplicity, nucleolytic activity described herein is generally referred to as “exonucleolytic” activity, but this is not intended to limit the nucleolytic activity to any particular mechanism. Thus, as used herein the terms “exonucleolytic” or”exonuclease” include nucleic acid degradation whether from the end or from within, whether monomer or larger fragments are the degradation product, and whether by enzymatic or chemical means.
  • Suitable exonucleolytic activity may be found in an exonuclease enzyme, or in the 5 '-3' exonuclease activity traditionally associated with some DNA polymerases.
  • a DNA polymerase with DNA synthesis dependent, strand replacement 5' to 3' exonuclease activity as well as a 5' to 3' polymerization activity has been described in Gelfand, D., Taq DNA Polymerase in PCR Technology: Principles and Applications for DNA Amplification, Erlich, H.A., Ed., Stockton Press, N.Y. (1989) Chapter 2).
  • a similar activity has been demonstrated in the thermostable DNA polymerase ofThermus origin, commercially available from Molecular Biology Resourses (MBR) Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • these DNA polymerases will initiate synthesis from the 3' hydroxyl terminus of a probe hybridized to a target DNA, proceed along the DNA target template, degrading downstream hybridized DNA sequences and replacing them in the process.
  • probes are referred to as “upstream” or “downstream”.
  • upstream When two probes hybridize to distinct regions of the same linear nucleic acid, and the 3' terminus of one probe points towards the 5' terminus of the other, the former is called the “upstream” probe and the latter is called the “downstream” downstream probe, regardless whether the strand(s) posesses a "sense" direction for coding purposes.
  • These two oligonucleotide probes are collectively referred to as a set of probes or oligonucleotides or a "ligatable pair" (as distinct from a complementary pair). In frame a of each figure, two such sets of probes are shown.
  • the first set consists of Probes 1 (also referred to as “first upstream probe”) and 2 ("first downstream probe”).
  • the second set consists of Probes 4 ("second upstream probe") and 3 ("second downstream probe”).
  • a set of probes can also refer to all four probes, or to two probes which hybridize to opposite strands. A distinction is drawn herein between the "end" of a probe and its "terminus”.
  • 3 ' or 5' “terminus” refers to the nucleoside carbon designated 3' or 5' respectively, and thus refers to the terminal point of an oligonucleotide.
  • a 3' or 5' “end” refers more generally to the region near the 3 ' or 5' terminus, respectively.
  • the "end” will include the “terminus” but will also include several adjacent bases, up to one-quarter or one-third of the entire oligonucleotide.
  • the term “blunt-ended” refers, however, to coterminal probes as defined later. When a set of upstream and downstream probes hybridize to their target, they lie “proximate” each other.
  • proximate means the termini are within about 20 nucleotides apart and includes the situations in which: (1) the 3' terminus of one probe abuts the 5' terminus of the other probe, i.e. the probes are directly adjacent; (2) there is a "gap” formed by missing base(s) between the 3' terminus of one hybridized upstream probe and the 5' terminus of the hybridized downstream probe; and (3) the 5' end of the downstream probe is not complementary or only partially complementary to a limited region of the target, whereas the 3' end of the upstream probe is complementary to the same region. When two such probes hybridize to the target, an "overlap" is formed at the 5' end of the downstream probe at this limited region, as is shown in Figure 4b.
  • WRTP is an abbreviation for "with respect to probes" which is used in describing a mismatch (terminal or internal mismatch) between two hybridizable probes.
  • the mismatch may occur between Probes 1 and 3; and/or between Probes 2 and 4.
  • non-blunt ended probes have other regions for potential mismatches.
  • the mismatch may occur between the 5' extensions of Probes 2 and 3.
  • the mismatch may occur between the 3' extensions of Probes 1 and 4.
  • WRTT is an abbreviation for "with respect to target” which is used in describing a mismatch (terminal or internal mismatch) between a probe and its target.
  • Probes may be designed to include one or more mismatches WRTT and WRTP, or they may include mismatches WRTT but not WRTP.
  • label refers to any moiety capable of signalling or reporting the presence of a probe to which it is attached.
  • the label may be direct, such as with chemiluminescent compounds, fluorescent compounds or radioactive isotopes, or it may be indirect, such as with biotin or another ligand or hapten.
  • a further reaction is utilized to realize measurable signal.
  • the further reaction may include reaction with a conjugate label containing a specific binding partner for the hapten and a suitable direct label.
  • radioisotopes include 32p an d tritium; fluorescein, FITC, rhodamine and Texas Red are fluorescent labels: acridine and quinoline are examples of chemiluminescent labels.
  • Some illustrative haptens include many drugs (eg. digoxin, theophylline, phencyclidine (PCP), salicylate, etc.), T3, biotin, fluorescein (FITC), dansyl, 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP); and modified nucleotides such as bromouracil and bases modified by incorporation of a N-acetyl-7-iodo-2- fluorenylamino (ALF) group; as well as many others. Many other examples of each type of label are known to those skilled in the art.
  • Carbazole and Adamantane derived haptens are discussed in the examples. These are described in co-pending U.S. patent application serial number 808,508, filed December 17, 1991, entitled “Haptens, Tracers, Immunogens and Antibodies for 3- phenyl-1-adamantaneacetic Acids”; and in co-pending U.S. patent application serial number 808,839, filed December 17, 1991, entitled “Haptens, Tracers, Immunogens and Antibodies for Carbazole and Dibenzofuran Derivatives.”
  • Methods for adding a hapten label to an oligonucleotide through the use of a phosphoramidite reagent are described in Thuong, N. T. et al., Tet. Letters. 29(46) : 5905-5908 (1988), or Cohen, J. S. et al., U.S. patent application serial number 07 246,688 (NTIS order no. Pat- Appl-7-246,688 (19
  • Non-phosphorylated 5' termini A first form of ligation incompetent ends is a non-phosphorylated 5' terminus, which cannot be ligated to a 3' hydroxyl terminus of the upstream probe but which can be corrected in a target dependent manner to render it ligatable (hereinafter referred to as "non-phosphorylated 5' terminus", “non-phosphorylated 5' terminus”, or described as “non-phosphorylated” in relation to the 5' terminus of the downstream probe). While the ligation incompetent probe is hybridized to target, the 5 ' terminus is "corrected” by removal of the non-phosphate groups and replacement with or exposure of a phosphate group.
  • the 5' non-phosyphorylated end means simply that no phosphate is attached to the 5' terminus of a nucleic acid chain via the exocyclic (5') carbon. Instead, the 5' carbon may connect to H, OH or any other chemical group which is incapable of serving as a substrate for ligation, but does not observably hinder the correcting activity of polymerase or exonuclease in removing the nucleotide containing the "non-phosphate" group from the hybridized downstream probe and/or in extending the hybridized upstream probe.
  • the non-phosphate group should have a molecular weight of at least one but less than a molecular weight that would give rise to a tertiary structure that would prevent correction of the hybridized probes. It may include phosphate derivatives with the mentioned characteristics.
  • the non-phosphate group may be attached directly or via a linker to the 5' terminus of the downstream probe, or it can be the linker alone. It may also include part of a labeling or reporting system as is described later.
  • the non- phosphate group includes but is not limited to the following groups: chromophores, haptens, radiolabeled compounds, peptides, magnetic particles, carbohydrates, and amino-bearing groups such as Aminomodifier.
  • non-phosphate group examples include: -hydryl; -hydroxyl; -sulfhydryl (thiols); hydrocarbons including -methyl; - acyl; -halides, -primary amines; -nitro; and -cyclic compounds.
  • Linkers that can be used include: alkenes, alkynes, amides, amines, esters, ethers, ketones, sulfides, sulfones, sulfoxides, and imines.
  • the 5' non-phosphorylated end is preferably a hydroxyl, a methyl, or an Aminomodified terminus, or an end containing a fluorescent label or a component of a fluorescent labeling system.
  • B Mismatched Bases
  • a second type of ligation incompetent 5' end is a terminal or internal mismatch
  • a "terminal" mismatch occurs in the very last residue of the probe, while an “internal” mismatch need only occur near the end, typically within 1 to about 5 - 8 bases form the 5' terminus.
  • Either type of mismatch may consist of from 1 to about 5, more preferably 1 or 2 bases long, typically all adjacent one another. It has-been found that probes having such a mismatch are not ligated as efficiently as ligation competent probes, especially in a preferred embodiment where the 5' end also includes a non-phosphorylated terminus. Presumably, terminal or internal mismatches create a "loose" 5' end due to reduced hydrogen bonding which is a suitable substrate for the exonuclease activity.
  • FIG. 2 An example of a terminal mismatch is shown in Figure 2, wherein two sets of blunt ended probes are shown, the downstream probes each having a 5' hydroxyl terminus and a one base terminal mismatch with respect to its complementary probe and its target
  • a polymerase a ligase, and a dNTP pool containing 2'- deoxythymidine 5'-triphosphate (dTTP)
  • correction occurs by removing from the downstream probe the mismatched G having the ligation incompetent 5' hydroxyl terminus and by extending the upstream probe with dI F until the probes abut each other and can be ligated.
  • the polymerase will continue to extend the upstream probe and degrade the downstream probe until it reaches a downstream stopbase, in this case, the G in the target. Having degraded and removed the 5' hydroxyl terminus of the downstream probe, the polymerase exposes the C in the downstream probe which has a 5' phosphate terminus, indicated by "p", which is ligation competent.
  • the "TT" shows the thymidylate residues from the dTTP that are used to extend the upstream probe. With the two probes abutting each other and the downstream probe having been corrected to contain a 5' phosphate terminus, the two probes can then be ligated.
  • the second A of probe 3 fails to complement the G in probe 1 and target.
  • dATP 2'-deoxyadenosine 5'- triphosphate
  • dCTP 2'-deoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate
  • the polymerase removes the 5' hydroxyl terminus from the downstream probe, the internal mismatch, and a hybridized base immediately downstream from the mismatched base to expose a 5' phosphorylated terminus, while extending the upstream probe to abut the corrected downstream probe such as to allow ligation of the upstream probe to the downstream probe.
  • probe 1 is extended by the addition of CAC.
  • Probe 4 is also extended by the addition of ACA. In probe 4 the A serves as a stopbase for extension of probe 1. While not shown, either A or C could serve as stopbase in probe 1.
  • the 3' end of an upstream probe must not include a mismatch WRTT or correction does not occur efficiently.
  • the 3' end of the upstream probe can mismatch WRTP.
  • the probe with which the 3' upstream probe mismatched is in reality the 5' end of a downstream probe of the other probe set. Therefore, this mismatch is viewed as the same as a 5' mismatch of the downstream probe.
  • a subset of mismatched ligation incompetent ends is when the probes of a ligatable pair are overlapping.
  • the 5' end of the downstream probe needs to occupy the same position on the target as the 3' end of the upstream probe. But since the 5' end is mismatched, it is displaced by the upstream probe and the 5' end dissociates or becomes "loose" from the target, leaving a suitable substrate for exonucleolytic acitivity.
  • Overlaps being defined with regard to the ligatable partner of each probe set, should not be confused with extensions (see below), which are defined with regard to the complementary probe.
  • the probes are preferably designed so that the termini that are not intended for ligation ("outside termini") cannot be ligated, and this ligation incompetency cannot be corrected.
  • An example of these undesirable ligations is the ligation of the 5' terminus of the upstream probe to the 3' terminus of the downstream probe.
  • the outside terminus of at least one of the probes can be blocked with a "hook" or marker which includes hapten, biotin, and fluorescein.
  • the hooks or markers are adamantane derived hapten, carbazole derived hapten, biotin derived hapten, and fluorescein derived hapten.
  • the carbazole derived hapten and adamantane derived hapten are shown as darkened round circles and shadowed squares, respectively, at the outside termini of the probes in Figures 1 to 4; and 6 to 7.
  • these blocking groups are fluorescein and biotin. These blocking groups can serve a dual purpose by also acting as a label for subsequent detection or capture of the probes. Further description is found in the Examples below.
  • ends which are ligation incompetent may be found in several probe configurations, including blunt ended and non-blunt ended probes, as discussed below.
  • Blunt ended probes describes probes which are co-terminal at their ends that are intended for ligation. That is, the 3' end of Probe 1 is co- terminal with the 5' end of Probe 3; and/or the 5' end of Probe 2 is co- terminal with the 3' end of Probe 4.
  • Figures 1 to 3, and 6 show examples of blunt ended probes. While it should be realized that probes on one side (e.g. probes 1 and 3) may be blunt while probes on the other side are not, Figure 1 and the following description assume blunt ended probes on both sides.
  • Figure 1 shows two sets of blunt ended probes wherein the downstream probes (2 and 3) have 5' non-phosphate modified termini in the form of hydroxyl groups.
  • Frame la shows the two sets of probes such that the first set of probes are complementary to the second set, and the complementary probes are lined up accordingly in Figure la.
  • frame lb only shows the first set of probes hybridized to its target DNA sequence. The bases of these probes are complementary to their respective targets.
  • the correction is carried out in the presence of a polymerase, a ligase, and a deoxyribonucleoside 5'- triphosphate (dNTP) pool containing 2'-deoxythymidine 5'-triphosphate (dTTP).
  • dNTP deoxyribonucleoside 5'- triphosphate
  • the polymerase removes the ligation incompetent hydroxyl end in the downstream probe (2) and extends the upstream probe (1) so the upstream and downstream probes abut each other and can be ligated.
  • the polymerase will potentially continue to extend the upstream probe and degrade the downstream probe until it reaches a downstream stopbase. In this case, this corresponds to the G in the target.
  • the polymerase Having degraded and removed the 5' hydroxyl end of the downstream probe, the polymerase exposes the C in the downstream probe which has a 5' phosphate terminus, indicated by "p", which is ligation competent.
  • the "TT" shows the thymidylate residues from the dTTP that are used to extend the upstream probe.
  • the 5' terminus of the downstream probes must be non-phosphorylated. Otherwise, a 5' non-phosphorylated terminus is not required, though it is preferred as discussed above in connection with the preferred embodiments of Figures 2 and 3.
  • a mismatch WRTT in the downstream probes by necessity dictates a mismatch WRTP, but this is the only situation where this is necessarily true.
  • the number of mismatched bases at the 5' end can be between 1 to 5, and most preferably 1 or 2.
  • blunt ended probes is a downstream probe with a 5' non-phosphorylated terminus and terminal or internal mismatch WRTP and WRTT as shown in Figures 2 and 3.
  • the present invention also encompasses non-blunt ended probes.
  • at least one upstream probes is not co-terminal with its complementary downstream probe.
  • “extensions” are defined with reference to a probe's complement rather than its ligation partner and that they need not be the same type or length on opposite sides. Where two sets of probes are used, and both sets possess the same type (i.e. either 5' or 3') of extensions, then the extensions may be hybridizable (thus forming sticky-ends) or non-hybridizable (non-sticky ends) to each other.
  • the extensions are preferably between one to about ten bases, more preferably between 1 to about 5 bases, and most preferably one or two bases in length. If the extensions are hybridizable to each other, the extensions are preferably shorter, e.g. from one to about four bases, preferably only one or two bases in length. Where the probes have 3' or 5' extensions, if they are hybridizable it is preferred that the downstream probes have non- phosphorylated 5' termini in addition to any other mode of ligation incompetency. (1) 3' Extensions With 3' extensions, the first and second downstream probes may also have 5' terminal or internal mismatch bases with regard to their respective complementary probes.
  • bases in the 3' extensions should be complementary to the target; whereas all or some of the bases in the 5' extensions may be either complementary or non-complementary to the target.
  • An example of probes with hybridizable 3' extensions is shown in Figure 7. As shown in Figure 7a, the extensions are: a "T""on probe 1 and an "A” on probe 4. Since "A" is complementary to "T”, the extensions are hybridizable to each other, and probes could be ligated independently of target unless the 5' end is non-phosphorylated.
  • Correction is carried out in the presence of a polymerase, a ligase, and a dNTP pool containing 2'-deoxythymidine 5'-triphosphate (dTT?) and 2'-deoxyguanosine 5'- triphosphate (dGTP).
  • the polymerase removes the 5' hydroxyl end of the downstream probe to reveal an available 5' phosphate, "p", while extending the upstream probe to abut the corrected downstream probe such as to allow the ligation of the two probes.
  • the 3' extensions are not hybridizable to each other.
  • the extensions can be rendered non- hybridizable to each other by having a sufficient number of bases that are not complementary between them. Since 3' ends should be hybridizable with target to accomodate the preferred polymerase agent, making these extensions non-hybridizable to each other means that there will necessarily be a gap between the proximate hybridized probes. If gaps are involved they can be between 1 to 20 bases long; practically, however, much shorter gaps are preferred, for example from 1 to 3 or 5 bases.
  • the targets, probes and dNTP reagents should be selected such that this gap can be filled along with the replacement of any "corrected" bases from the 5' end of the modified downstream probe.
  • the extensions are "A” on probe 2 and "T” on probe 3.
  • the extensions are hybridizable to each other, since "A” is complementary to "T", but neither is complementary to the G:C pair in the target.
  • the downstream probes 2 and 3 also have 5' hydroxyl termini. Correction involves a polymerase, a ligase, and a dNTP pool containing 2'-deoxycytidine 5 '-triphosphate (dCTP) and 2'-deoxyguanosine 5 '-triphosphate (dGTP).
  • the polymerase removes each 5' hydroxyl terminus along with the base which mismatches the target and the matching base immediately downstream from the mismatched terminal base.
  • the polymerase also extends the upstream probes 1 and 4 with dCTP and dGTP, respectively, to create the ligation competent ends.
  • the extensions are not hybridizable to each other.
  • the 5' extension not be complementary to the target If it is, the dNTP pool needed for correction will include the bases which are complementary to the extensions and the DNA polymerase can "end polish" the upstream probe independently of target. "End polishing" can occur with 5' extensions, using the extension as a template for polymerase to extend the complementary upstream probe.
  • the 5' end of this probe should have one or more of the following features: (1) a non-phosphorylated terminus; (2) if another set of probes also contains a downstream probe with a 5' extension, both these extensions are not hybridizable to each other under a specific assay condition; and (3) non complementary bases WRTT.
  • the 5' extensions shown are hybridizable with neither each other nor target.
  • Frame 4b shows what will happen when probes 1 and 2 hybridize with the target. Because the 5' extension mismatches the target, it dissociates and becomes "loose", establishing a good substrate for exonucleolytic activity.
  • Correction utilizes polymerase, dTTP and ligase.
  • the exonucleolytic activity cleaves the three G residues and at least one T residue to reveal a 5' phosphate group.
  • the polymerase adds at least one T residue to the 3' terminus of probe 1 (two are shown added), but stops at the template G since dCTP is not provided. Ligation occurs at the arrow of frame 4b.
  • the complementary probe pairs exhibit the same formats of modified probes; the two probe pairs may differ.
  • Probes 1 and 3 can be of one format of blunt ended probes
  • Probes 3 and 4 can be of a different format of blunt ended probes or a format of non-blunt ended probes, and vice versa.
  • the variations are limited, for example, by the need to accommodate a dNTP pool which omits one or more types of bases in order to provide for a "stopbase" and/or to avoid end polishing, as discussed above.
  • One aspect of the present invention uses a DNA polymerase with DNA synthesis dependent, strand replacement 5' to 3' exonuclease activity as well as a 5' to 3' polymerization activity (Gelfand, D., Taq DNA Polymerase in PCR Technology: Principles and Applications for DNA Amplification, Erlich, H. A., Ed., Stockton Press, N.Y. (1989) Chapter 2).
  • Taq DNA polymerase has been shown to exhibit this activity, and a similar activity has been demonstrated in the thermostable DNA polymerase of The ⁇ nus origin, commercially available from Molecular Biology Resourses (MBR) Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • these DNA polymerases will initiate synthesis from the 3' hydroxyl terminus of a probe hybridized to a target DNA, proceed along the DNA target template, degrading downstream hybridized DNA sequences and replacing them in the process.
  • the downstream DNA is the downstream probe.
  • a . Detection Methods The methods of the invention can be used as simple detection of target nucleic acid or as an amplification technique. For detection only two probes (one set), the downstream one being modified at its 5' end, need to be employed. In the presence of target the modification is corrected as described above and the probes are ligated. The ligation event can be monitored as a measure of the presence of target by any of the methods disclosed.
  • the detection technique is analogous to those disclosed, for example, in EP 185 494 and EP 246 864 but have the improvement of reduced target independent ligation.
  • the hybridization, correction and ligation steps are identical to those discussed below in connection with Amplification Methods, but need be performed on only one set of probes. No cycling is necessary.
  • the invention is best adapted for use in a method that includes amplification of the target sequence, such as the ligase chain reaction (LCR).
  • LCR ligase chain reaction
  • Amplification provides improved sensitivity and permits detection of much lower levels of target DNA. Linear amplification is achievable by cycling with just one probe set, whereas exponential amplification utilizes two probe sets, one complementary to the other.
  • LCR a downstream probe containing a 5' end which is ligation incompetent absent correction is used. This modification prevents the target independent ligation of the probes.
  • proximate LCR probes hybridize but are not ligatable.
  • Sequence information contained within the target DNA is used as a template for correction of the ligation incompetent end.
  • a DNA polymerase with synthesis dependent, strand replacement 5' to'3' exonuclease activity may be used to extend the upstream probe and hydrolyze the downstream probe using the target nucleic acid as a template.
  • the extension of an upstream probe (and therefore the hydrolysis of a downstream probe) could be controlled such that when a template base in the target is encountered to which no complementary dNTP is present, synthesis (and hydrolysis) terminate.
  • the resultant downstream probe possesses a 5' phosphate which is adjacent to the 3' hydroxyl terminus of the extended upstream probe. Adjacent probes thus present a suitable substrate for ligation by DNA ligase.
  • the ligated probes are separated and become a "target" for a second set of probes complementary to the first set.
  • the second set preferably also takes advantage of the modified probes according to the invention.
  • the process of hybridization, (optional correction) and ligation are repeated for the second probe set.
  • the preferred amplification method comprises repeated steps of (a) hybridizing the ligation incompetent modified probes to the target; (b) correcting the modification in a target dependent manner to render the probes ligatable; (c) ligating the corrected probe to its partner to form a fused or ligated product; and (d) dissociating the fused product from the target and repeating the hybridization, correction and ligation steps a number of times for each probe set to amplify the desired target sequence.
  • the above steps will also apply to the target complement, using Probes 3 and 4 of the second set.
  • Probes 3 and 4 are preferably used to amplify and/or detect the ligated Probes 1 and 2. Similarly, the ligated Probes 3 and 4 serve as the target for Probes 1 and 2 for further detection. Thus, amplification of the target sequence can be achieved by using an excess of Probes 1, 2, 3, and 4, and assay conditions that include cycling.
  • Hybridization of Probes to the Targets The hybridization of probes to their targets (and optionally to the target complements) is adequately explained in the prior art; e.g. EP- 320,308 and EP-
  • Probe length, probe concentration and stringency of conditions all affect the degree and rate at which hybridization will occur.
  • the probes are sufficiently long to provide the desired specificity; i.e, to avoid being hybridizable to random sequences in the sample.
  • probes on the order of 10 to 100 bases serve this purpose.
  • the probes are preferably added in approximately equimolar concentration since they are expected to react stoichiometrically. More preferably, each probe is present in a concentration ranging from about 5 nanomolar (nM) to about 90 nM; preferably from about 10 nM to about 50 nM.
  • nM nanomolar
  • the optimum quantity of a probe used for each reaction also varies depending on the number of cycles which must be performed. Optimum concentrations can be determined by one of ordinary skill in this art.
  • the stringency of conditions is generally known to those in the art to be dependent on temperature, solvent and other parameters. Perhaps the most easily controlled of these parameters is temperature and thus it is generally the reaction parameter varied in the performance of LCR. Temperatures for hybridization are usually selected to be just slightly (i.e. 1 to about 10 °C) below the melt temperature of the probes used. The hybridization conditions required for practicing this invention are similar to those of ordinary LCR and can be determined by those skilled in the art. 2 . Correction of Probes
  • the preferred correction reagents are template-dependent DNA polymerases (also referred to as “target dependent DNA polymerases") that possess both 5' to 3' exonuclease and polymerizing activities. They include Thermus aquaticus (Tag and other Thermus sp. DNA polymerases. It is preferable to use polymerases which can withstand the high temperature cycling required for LCR. If the polymerase is not thermally stable, it typically must be re-added at each LCR cycle. The polymerase can be naturally occurring or non-naturally occurring, e.g. recombinantly produced.
  • Polymerases which can be used to practice this invention also include fragments of polymerases and polymerases having polymerization activity, with or without target dependent exonuclease activity.
  • the polymerases need not have target dependent exonuclease activity if a separate exonucleolytic agent is also used. Correction in this manner requires the presence in the reaction mixture of dNTP's complementary to the bases of the target.
  • the dNTP's are commercially available from a number of sources, including Pharmacia (Piscataway, NJ) and Bethesda Research Laboratories (Gaithersburg, MD). As mentioned above, a subset of dNTPs may be used so that a stopbase will limit the synthesis and degradation reactions to predetermined end points.
  • linkages which are resistant to hydrolysis by nucleases could be employed in the downstream probe.
  • nuclease resistant linkages are phosphothioate and methylphosphonate linkages. These types of linkages could be incorporated into LCR probes, during the synthesis of these probes, at positions where degradation and synthesis need to be terminated, and correction could be thus limited without limiting the dNTP pool, or in addition to limiting the dNTP pool.
  • Ligation of Corrected Probes Enzymatic ligation is the preferred method of covalently attaching the corrected probes. However, ligation can be achieved using any method of covalently attaching two probes such as photo-ligation as described in EP-A-324,616.
  • ligating reagents include prokaryotic ligases such as E. coli ligase, T4 ligase, Thermus thermophilus ligase (e.g., ATCC 27634) as taught in EP-320,308, and Thermus aquaticus ligase (e.g. as disclosed in WO 91/17239).
  • prokaryotic ligases such as E. coli ligase, T4 ligase, Thermus thermophilus ligase (e.g., ATCC 27634) as taught in EP-320,308, and Thermus aquaticus ligase (e.g. as disclosed in WO 91/17239).
  • the latter two ligases are preferred because they maintain their ligase activities during the thermal cycling of LCR. Absent a thermally stable ligase, the ligase must be added again each time the cycle is repeated.
  • eukaryotic ligases including DNA ligase of Drosophilia. reported by Rabin
  • the fused probe is dissociated from the target and, as with conventional LCR, the process is repeated for several cycles.
  • the number of repeat cycles may vary from 1 to about 100, preferably from about 15 to 70.
  • the ligation events are determined using any of the known or disclosed methods.
  • Another aspect of the invention presents methods, using the above modified probes, for detecting differences in the nucleic acid sequences of the targets.
  • This method can be used to screen for mutations, such as point mutations, insertions, deletions, and frameshifts; identify DNA polymorphisms which are useful for example for genetic mapping; and even differentiate between drug-resistant and drug-sensitive strains of microorganisms such as bacteria without the need to culture them first.
  • the detection is carried out, for example, by using probes with mismatched bases (WRTT) and dNTP pool which lacks the complementary bases of the mismatched bases.
  • WRTT mismatched bases
  • dNTP pool which lacks the complementary bases of the mismatched bases.
  • Probe 354.2B first downstream probe
  • the efficiency of extension of Probe 354.4 would be compromised as its 5' end would be mismatched with respect to target.
  • amplification of the target sequence containing the point mutation should be eliminated or greatly reduced.
  • the position of the point mutation can be varied. For example, using the terminal mismatched format, a difference in the base at position 378 or 379 could be detected since the current procedure for this format appears to require the replacement of at least one paired base beyond the mismatch as described above.
  • This method uses probes with 5' extensions not hybridizable with target (analagous to Figure 4 so as to create a "loose", overlapping end). These probes may or may not include 5' non-phosphorylated termini. According to the method, the probes are designed such that target dependent exonuclease (or polymerase with target dependent exonuclease) removes the overlap, so that the hybridized probes become adjacent and ligation can occur.
  • target dependent exonuclease or polymerase with target dependent exonuclease
  • Amplification can be achieved by adding a second set of probes which can form overlaps when hybridized to the target complement.
  • the above steps of hybridization, correction, and ligation are carried out in the presence of excess of all four probes, but no dNTP pool is used and a simple exonuclease may be used.
  • amplification involves the additional step of separating the hybridized and ligated probes from their targets or target complements, the ligated probes thus respectively serve as target complements or targets themselves for further cycles of hybridization, correction, and ligation.
  • V. Modes of Detection the following steps of Detection.
  • the LCR reaction products can be detected using methods known in the art.
  • the ligation event can be monitored by determining the presence or amount of ligated product. Since it is longer than the individual probes, this determination can be made on the basis of molecular weight. Even without labeling the probes a stained band at the correct length or molecular weight can signify the ligation event and the presence of target.
  • one or both probes of a set can be labeled using most any known technology.
  • the LCR probes can be labelled either as part of the synthetic process (using, for example, the linker arm technology disclosed in US 4,948,882); manually using reactive groups (such as Aminomodifier IF M , Clontech, Palo Alto, California) added during synthesis of the probes; or enzymatically following synthesis of the probes.
  • complementary Probes 1 and 3 are synthesized with one type of label, (e.g. the 5' end of Probe 1 and the 3' end of Probe 3) and complementary Probes 2 and 4 are as depected in the Figures synthesized with a second different label (e.g.
  • the amplified LCR reaction products can then be detected by capturing the first label with a solid phase, separating the solid phase from the solution and detecting the second label associated with the solid phase.
  • An alternative labeling method incorporates a label into the dNTPs which are used for correction.
  • labelling is generally a matter of conventional organic chemistry.
  • Linkers or spacers may be used but are not essential. It is only important that the modified dNTP be incorporated opposite its complement on the target strand.
  • the ligation event is monitored by examining the nucleolytic degradation of downstream DNA sequences. As alluded to, this nucleolytic activity results in the release of mono, di, and larger nucleotide fragments.
  • the present invention can also be used to detect the presence of a target by detecting such released fragments. Several strategies may be employed. This could be achieved, for example, by labelling the 5' end of the downstream probe with a chemical group which could be detected. The released fragment would be of a much smaller molecular weight than the probe and should be easily distinguishable using any of a number of detection methodologies, such as gel electrophoresis, or chromatographic techniques. It is generally preferred to employ a homogeneous detection system where possible.
  • the ligation event can be detected homogenously if a fluorescent label is attached to the cleaved fragment.
  • the spin properties of such a label will vary sufficiently between the cleaved and uncleaved state to permit detection by fluorescence polarization. Not only is this a homogeneous detection method, but it can also be used to monitor the course of an amplification reaction at intermediate stages. A specific example demonstrating detection of released fragments by fluorescence polarization is described below in Example 6.
  • a second homogeneous method involves the attachment of a fluorescent "donor" to the downstream probe at a position 3' of the stopbase and the attachment of a suitable quencher or blocker compound in the cleaved region at the 5' end.
  • a fluorescent "donor" to the downstream probe at a position 3' of the stopbase and the attachment of a suitable quencher or blocker compound in the cleaved region at the 5' end.
  • a suitable quencher or blocker compound in the cleaved region at the 5' end.
  • fluorescence is quenched or blocked in unreacted probes until correction.
  • the quencher and fiuorescer are separated and the fluorescence can be observed.
  • Fluorescenced quenching as an immunoassay technique is well known in the art and is described, for example in US 4,174,384. Examples of fiuorescer / quencher pairs include the following compounds.
  • fluorscein isothiocyanate or other derivative
  • quenchers sulforhodamine 101, sulfonyl chloride (Texas Red); succinimdyl 1-pyrenebutyrate; tetramethylrhodamine (TMR); tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC); eosin-5-isothiocyanate (EITC); erythrosine-5-isothiocyanate; b) Texas Red with malachite green isothiocyanate; and.
  • compositions of matter comprising the modified probes discussed herein that are useful for carrying out the methods disclosed herein.
  • the composition of matter may comprise one or two sets of probes, wherein at least one downstream probe is modified at its 5' end.
  • Reagents employed in the methods of this invention can be packaged into diagnostic kits.
  • the kits would include the modified probes, preferably labelled. If the probes are unlabelled, the labelling reagents can also be included in the kits.
  • the kit may also contain other suitably packaged reagents and materials needed for amplification, e.g., buffers; ligase; dNTPs; DNA polymerase with both polymerase and exonuclease activity, or a combination of polymerase and exonuclease reagents.
  • the kit may also contain for example, enzymes and solid phase extractants.
  • the kit preferably contains instructions for conducting the assay.
  • quantities of polymerase are expressed in units, as defined by the manufacturer (Molecular Biology Resources).
  • Units of ligase enzyme are defined herein as: 1 mg of 95% purified Thermus thermophilus DNA ligase has a specific activity of about 1 x 10 8 units. While this is not precisely standardized and may vary by as much as 20%, optimization is easily within the skill of the routine practitioner.
  • each set of probes has a downstream probe with a 5' extension consisting of three bases, and a 5' hydroxyl terminus.
  • the 5' extensions of the first and second downstream probes are not hybridizable to each other, nor to their respective targets.
  • LCR was performed for 75 cycles consisting of a 30 second incubation at 85°C and a 40 second incubation at 55°C in a Coy thermocycler.
  • SEQ ID NO . 12 Target: Chlamydia MOMP 270-315
  • the assay protocol is similar to that used in the commercially available alpha-fetoprotein assay, with the following adaptions: (1) the anti-alpha- fetoprotein antibody coated microparticles are replaced with anti-carbazole antibody coated microparticles; and (2) the conjugates of anti-alpha fetoprotein antibodies:alkaline phosphatase are replaced with the conjugates of anti-3-phenyl-l-adamantaneacetic acid antibodies: alkaline phosphatase.
  • the protocol for the IMx® MEIA assays is further described in EP-A-439,182, supra.
  • the protocol is as follows. A 100 ⁇ L of the sample which has been amplified by LCR is pipetted into the sample well. 30 ⁇ L of this sample is then pipetted into the incubation well, the anticarbazole coated microparticles are added to the well. An appropriate period of incubation follows which allows the formation of a complex consisting of anticarbazole and nucleic acid sequences with the carbazole ends. After the incubation, the mixture is pipetted onto the glass fiber capture matrix of the IMx® reaction cell, and antiadamantanes conjugated to alkaline phosphatases are added.
  • the following target amplification exemplifies the use of two sets of blunt ended probes wherein the downstream probes have 5' hydroxyl termini.
  • LCR was performed for 100 cycles consisting of a 30 second incubation at 85°C and a 40 second incubation at 55°C in a Coy thermocycler. Reactions were set up with either 1 microgram of human placental DNA (negative control) or 1 microgram of human placental DNA containing various dilutions of a Chlamydia trachomatis positive McCoy cell lysate (positive control).
  • the LCR oligonucleotides used were as listed in Table 1 of Example 1 above. These oligonucleotides are specific for map position 354- 401 within the MOMP1 gene of Chlamydia trachomatis.
  • Reactions were run in a buffer containing 50 mM EPPS pH 7.8, 30 mM MgCl 2 , 20 mM KC1, 1 ⁇ M dTTP, 1x1012 molecules each of the oligonucleotides designated in Table 1 as 354.1, 354.2 B, 354.3 B, and 354.4, 1 unit of Thermus DNA polymerase, and 5000 units of Thermus thermophilus DNA ligase in a final reaction volume of 50 microliters.
  • each downstream probe has 5' hydroxyl terminus, and a one base terminal mismatch WRTT and WRTP.
  • LCR was performed for 70 cycles consisting of a 30 second incubation at 85°C and a 40 second incubation at 55°C in a Coy thermocycler. Reactions were set up with either 1 microgram of human placental DNA (negative control) or 1 microgram of human placental DNA containing a 10 *4 dilution of a Chlamydia trachomatis positive McCoy cell lysate (positive control).
  • the LCR oligonucleotides used are as listed in Table 1 of Example 1 above. These oligonucleotides are specific for map position 354- 401 within the MOMP1 gene of Chlamvdia trachomatis.
  • Reactions were run in a buffer containing 50 mM EPPS pH 7.8, 30 mM MgCl 2 , 20 mM KC1, 1 ⁇ M dTTP, 1 x 1012 molecules each of the oligonucleotides designated in Table 1 as 354.1 , 354.2C, 354.3C, and 354.4, 1 unit of Thermus DNA polymerase, and 5000 units of Thermus thermophilus DNA ligase in a final reaction volume of 50 microliters.
  • reaction was diluted 1:1 with IMx® diluent buffer, and the LCR amplification products were detected via a sandwich immunoassay using the Abbott IMx® automated immunoassay system, as described in Example 1.
  • LCR was performed for 40, 50, or 60 cycles consisting of a 30 second incubation at 85°C and a 25 second incubation at 55°C in a Perkin-Elmer 480 thermocycler (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT). Reactions were set up with either 1 microgram of human placental DNA (negative control) or 1 microgram of human placental DNA containing 1Q2 Chlamvdia trachomatis elementary bodies (positive control).
  • the LCR oligonucleotides used are as listed in Table 1 of Example 1 above.
  • oligonucleotides are specific for map position 270-315 within the MOMP1 gene of Chlamvdia trachomatis. Reactions were run in a buffer containing 50 mM EPPS pH 7.8, 30 mM MgCl 2 , 20 mM KC1, 1 ⁇ M dCTP, 1 x 1012 molecules each of the oligonucleotides designated in Table 1 as 270.1, 270.2, 270.3, and 270.4, 2 unit of Thermus DNA polymerase, and 5000 units of Thermus thermophilus DNA ligase in a final reaction volume of 50 microliters.
  • reaction was diluted 1:1 with IMx® diluent buffer, and the LCR amplification products were detected via a sandwich immunoassay performed using the Abbott IMx® automated immunoassay system, as described in Example 1.
  • each downstream probe has a 5' hydroxyl terminus and a 5' extension consisting of one base. These extensions are hybridizable to each other but not to their respective targets. These probes were used to detect hepatitis B virus (HBV) specific sequences in serum samples.
  • HBV hepatitis B virus
  • HBV specific nucleic acid sequences used for the probes within this example were mapped according to Ono Y. et al., Nucleic Acid Res.. 11, 1747-1757 (1983). Except otherwise noted, the sequences are listed in 5' to 3' direction (left to right) where "F' indicates the label Fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate (FITC isomer, Molecular Probes Inc.) and "B” represents a Biotin molecule (Biotin-xx-NHS ester, Clontech Laboratories Inc). The probe sequence is base 666 to base 709 of HBV subtype ADW.
  • SEQ ID NO. 21 TARGET:
  • Reaction were set up with either HBV negative serum (negative control) or serum containing either 1.4 x 10 5 or 1.0 x 103 HBV genomes.
  • the serum samples were treated with Proteinase K (50°C, 3 hrs) and heated at 100°C for 15 minutes.
  • the modified LCR was performed for 55 cycles consisting of a 30 seconds incubation at 85°C and 40 seconds incubation at 50°C in a Perkin-Elmer 480 thermocycler. Reaction were run in a buffer containing 50mM EPPS pH 7.8, 30mM MgCl 2 , 20mM KCl, 1 ⁇ M each of dCTP and dGTP, 1x10 12 molecules each of the oligonucleotides designated 666:1, 666:2, 666:3 and 666:4, 2 units of Thermus DNA
  • Example 6 The following target amplification exemplifies the detection of released fragments of hybridized probes. It used downstream probes with a one base 5' extensions which contained a detectable fluorescein group at their 5' termini. These extensions are not hybridizable to each other and their respective targets.
  • LCR was performed for 85 cycles consisting of a 30 second incubation at 85°C and a 40 second incubation at 55°C in a Coy thermocycler. Reactions were set up with either 1 microgram of human placental DNA (negative control) or 1 microgram of human placental DNA containing a 10-2 dilutions of a Chlamydia trachomatis positive McCoy cell lysate (positive control).
  • the LCR oligonucleotides used were as listed in Table 1 of Example 1 above. These oligonucleotides are specific for map position 354- 401 within the MOMPl gene of Chlamvdia trachomatis.
  • Reactions were run in a buffer containing 50 mM EPPS pH 7.8, 30 mM MgCl , 20 mM KCl, 1 ⁇ M dTTP, 1x1012 molecules each of the oligonucleotides designated in Table 1 as 354.1 , 354.2 D, 354.3 D, and 354.4, 1 unit of Thermus DNA polymerase, and 5000 units of Thermus thermophilus DNA ligase in a final reaction volume of 50 microliters.
  • reactions were diluted 1 : 1 with IMx® diluent buffer, and the LCR amplification products were detected via a sandwich immunoassay performed using the Abbott IMx® automated immunoassay system, as described in
  • the released fragments were detected using fluorescence polarization technique using an Abbott TDx® fluorescence polarization immunoassay analyzer (Abbott).
  • Amplification products remaining from the IMx® detection assay were diluted to 200 ⁇ L with IMx® diluent buffer and the fluorescence polarization values for each sample were determined.
  • the polarization of a fluorescent compound is inversely proportional to the size of the molecule to which it is attached. Therefore, the polarization of a fluorescent molecule attached to an intact oligonucleotide would be expected to be greater than the polarization of the fluorophore attached to a smaller molecular weight degradation product derived from the oligonucleotide, in this case, the released fragments. It follows that a decrease in the polarization value would be indicative of the correction of the downstream probes.
  • ORGANISM Chlamydia trachomatis
  • POSITION IN GENOME
  • MOLECULE TYPE other (synthetic DNA)
  • SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION SEQ ID NO:2 :
  • MOLECULE TYPE other (synthetic DNA)
  • SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION SEQ ID NO:3 :
  • MOLECULE TYPE other (synthetic DNA)
  • SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION SEQ ID NO: :
  • MOLECULE TYPE other (synthetic DNA)
  • SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION SEQ ID NO: 5 :
  • MOLECULE TYPE other (synthetic DNA)
  • SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION SEQ ID NO: 9 :
  • MOLECULE TYPE genomic DNA
  • ORGANISM Hepatitus B virus
  • POSITION IN GENOME GENOME

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Saccharide Compounds (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention se rapporte à des procédés d'amplification en chaîne par ligase (LCR), consistant à utiliser au moins une sonde en aval modifiée au niveau de son extrémité 5' afin de réduire ou de supprimer l'amplification indépendante de la cible. Les différentes sondes modifiées, des kits les contenant, sont également décrites, ainsi que des procédés permettant de détecter des différences dans des séquences d'acide nucléique, ces procédés présentant une amplification indépendante de la cible réduite, et consistant à utiliser les sondes modifiées.
EP93917324A 1992-08-03 1993-07-21 Detection et amplification d'acides nucleiques cibles par activite exonucleolytique Expired - Lifetime EP0654093B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US92540292A 1992-08-03 1992-08-03
US925402 1992-08-03
PCT/US1993/006931 WO1994003636A1 (fr) 1992-08-03 1993-07-21 Detection et amplification d'acides nucleiques cibles par activite exonucleolytique

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0654093A1 EP0654093A1 (fr) 1995-05-24
EP0654093A4 true EP0654093A4 (fr) 1998-01-07
EP0654093B1 EP0654093B1 (fr) 2001-01-03

Family

ID=25451687

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP93917324A Expired - Lifetime EP0654093B1 (fr) 1992-08-03 1993-07-21 Detection et amplification d'acides nucleiques cibles par activite exonucleolytique

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0654093B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP3516953B2 (fr)
AU (1) AU4687393A (fr)
CA (1) CA2140331C (fr)
DE (1) DE69329824T2 (fr)
ES (1) ES2154648T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO1994003636A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5593840A (en) * 1993-01-27 1997-01-14 Oncor, Inc. Amplification of nucleic acid sequences
US5888731A (en) * 1995-08-30 1999-03-30 Visible Genetics Inc. Method for identification of mutations using ligation of multiple oligonucleotide probes
US6852487B1 (en) 1996-02-09 2005-02-08 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Detection of nucleic acid sequence differences using the ligase detection reaction with addressable arrays
CA2255774C (fr) 1996-05-29 2008-03-18 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Detection de differences dans des sequences d'acides nucleiques utilisant une combinaison de la detection par ligase et de reactions d'amplification en chaine par polymerase
GB9902000D0 (en) 1999-01-30 1999-03-17 Delta Biotechnology Ltd Process
DE60125243T2 (de) * 2000-07-03 2007-05-31 Applera Corp., Foster City Polynukleotid-sequenzassay
ATE431407T1 (de) * 2002-01-11 2009-05-15 Biospring Ges Fuer Biotechnolo Verfahren zur herstellung von dna

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1989012696A1 (fr) * 1988-06-24 1989-12-28 Amgen Inc. Procede et reactifs de detection de sequences d'acides nucleiques
WO1991017239A1 (fr) * 1990-05-03 1991-11-14 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Systeme d'amplification d'adn induit par ligase thermostable, servant a detecter des maladies genetiques.
WO1992002638A1 (fr) * 1990-08-06 1992-02-20 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag Systeme de dosage homogene
WO1993000447A1 (fr) * 1991-06-28 1993-01-07 Abbott Laboratories Amplification d'acides nucleiques cibles par la reaction de la ligase comblant des espaces vides
WO1993024656A1 (fr) * 1992-05-29 1993-12-09 Abbott Laboratories Reaction en chaine de ligase commençant avec des sequences d'arn

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2035010C (fr) * 1990-01-26 1996-12-10 Keith C. Backman Methode d'amplification des acides nucleiques cibles applicable aux reactions en chaine a la polymerase et a la ligase

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1989012696A1 (fr) * 1988-06-24 1989-12-28 Amgen Inc. Procede et reactifs de detection de sequences d'acides nucleiques
WO1991017239A1 (fr) * 1990-05-03 1991-11-14 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Systeme d'amplification d'adn induit par ligase thermostable, servant a detecter des maladies genetiques.
WO1992002638A1 (fr) * 1990-08-06 1992-02-20 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag Systeme de dosage homogene
WO1993000447A1 (fr) * 1991-06-28 1993-01-07 Abbott Laboratories Amplification d'acides nucleiques cibles par la reaction de la ligase comblant des espaces vides
WO1993024656A1 (fr) * 1992-05-29 1993-12-09 Abbott Laboratories Reaction en chaine de ligase commençant avec des sequences d'arn

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BARANY F: "GENETIC DISEASE DETECTION AND DNA AMPLIFICATION USING CLONED THERMOSTABLE LIGASE", PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF USA, vol. 88, no. 1, 1 January 1991 (1991-01-01), pages 189 - 193, XP000368693 *
See also references of WO9403636A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69329824D1 (de) 2001-02-08
DE69329824T2 (de) 2001-08-09
ES2154648T3 (es) 2001-04-16
EP0654093B1 (fr) 2001-01-03
EP0654093A1 (fr) 1995-05-24
CA2140331C (fr) 2000-01-18
CA2140331A1 (fr) 1994-02-17
WO1994003636A1 (fr) 1994-02-17
JP3516953B2 (ja) 2004-04-05
JPH08501212A (ja) 1996-02-13
AU4687393A (en) 1994-03-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5573907A (en) Detecting and amplifying target nucleic acids using exonucleolytic activity
CA2250706C (fr) Procede et reactif de detection de sequences nucleotidiques multiples dans un echantillon d'essai
EP0543942B1 (fr) Systeme de dosage homogene
CA2333253C (fr) Torches moleculaires
EP0847449B1 (fr) Procede permettant de reconnaitre des mutations au moyen d'une ligature de sondes oligonucleotidiques multiples
CA2160784C (fr) Lcr avec correction par l'endonuclease iv et reduction du risque de contamination
US6130038A (en) Method for amplifying target nucleic acids using modified primers
AU687535B2 (en) Isothermal strand displacement nucleic acid amplification
US5830664A (en) Method for the detection of target nucleic acid
EP0832281B1 (fr) Procede de detection de sequences d'acide nucleique ayant recours a une amplification competitive
CA2308368C (fr) Procede specifique et sensible pour la detection d'acides nucleiques
JPH09503910A (ja) トラコーマ・クラミジア検出のためのオリゴヌクレオチド及び方法
WO1997007235A2 (fr) Methode integrale d'amplification d'acide nucleique
EP0654093B1 (fr) Detection et amplification d'acides nucleiques cibles par activite exonucleolytique
US6207368B1 (en) Methods and reagents for controlling chain extension and ligation chain reactions
WO1996012824A2 (fr) Emploi de spermidine pour attenuer les effets inhibiteurs de reactions en chaine de ligase dans un echantillon d'essai clinique
WO1995021270A2 (fr) Procede, reactif et kit pour la detection et l'amplification de sequences d'acides nucleiques
WO1995021270A9 (fr) Procede, reactif et kit pour la detection et l'amplification de sequences d'acides nucleiques
JP2002501361A (ja) 臨床検査試料におけるリガーゼ連鎖反応の阻害を軽減するためのスペルミジンの使用

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19950220

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19971124

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19990621

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69329824

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20010208

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2154648

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: A. BRAUN, BRAUN, HERITIER, ESCHMANN AG PATENTANWAE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20040615

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20040702

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20040715

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20040728

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20040730

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20040914

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050721

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050721

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050722

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050731

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050731

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20050721

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20060331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20050722

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *ABBOTT LABORATORIES

Effective date: 20050731