EP0552234B1 - Zusammensetzung zur verbesserten abgabe von tabakmodifikationsmittel - Google Patents

Zusammensetzung zur verbesserten abgabe von tabakmodifikationsmittel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0552234B1
EP0552234B1 EP91918236A EP91918236A EP0552234B1 EP 0552234 B1 EP0552234 B1 EP 0552234B1 EP 91918236 A EP91918236 A EP 91918236A EP 91918236 A EP91918236 A EP 91918236A EP 0552234 B1 EP0552234 B1 EP 0552234B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fiber
combination
tobacco
component
filter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP91918236A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0552234A1 (de
Inventor
Dale Edwin Mathis
James Edward Harris
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Eastman Chemical Co
Original Assignee
Eastman Chemical Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Eastman Chemical Co filed Critical Eastman Chemical Co
Publication of EP0552234A1 publication Critical patent/EP0552234A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0552234B1 publication Critical patent/EP0552234B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
    • D01D5/253—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like with a non-circular cross section; Spinnerette packs therefor
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A24—TOBACCO; CIGARS; CIGARETTES; SIMULATED SMOKING DEVICES; SMOKERS' REQUISITES
    • A24D—CIGARS; CIGARETTES; TOBACCO SMOKE FILTERS; MOUTHPIECES FOR CIGARS OR CIGARETTES; MANUFACTURE OF TOBACCO SMOKE FILTERS OR MOUTHPIECES
    • A24D3/00—Tobacco smoke filters, e.g. filter-tips, filtering inserts; Filters specially adapted for simulated smoking devices; Mouthpieces for cigars or cigarettes
    • A24D3/06—Use of materials for tobacco smoke filters
    • A24D3/08—Use of materials for tobacco smoke filters of organic materials as carrier or major constituent
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A24—TOBACCO; CIGARS; CIGARETTES; SIMULATED SMOKING DEVICES; SMOKERS' REQUISITES
    • A24D—CIGARS; CIGARETTES; TOBACCO SMOKE FILTERS; MOUTHPIECES FOR CIGARS OR CIGARETTES; MANUFACTURE OF TOBACCO SMOKE FILTERS OR MOUTHPIECES
    • A24D3/00—Tobacco smoke filters, e.g. filter-tips, filtering inserts; Filters specially adapted for simulated smoking devices; Mouthpieces for cigars or cigarettes
    • A24D3/06—Use of materials for tobacco smoke filters
    • A24D3/14—Use of materials for tobacco smoke filters of organic materials as additive

Definitions

  • This invention concerns certain fibers in combination with tobacco modifying and/or selective removal agents.
  • tobacco modifying agents are known in the art to be added to smoking products to modify the tobacco smoke.
  • flavorants are added to smoking products to enhance their taste and to compensate for variations in tobacco quality and blend.
  • flavorants are traditionally applied to the tobacco portion of the smoking product, this practice results in only a small fraction of the flavorant ever reaching the smoker.
  • Most of a flavorant added to the tobacco is lost in the sidestream smoke produced during the static burn period of the smoking article or is removed by the smoke filter.
  • the low flavorant delivery efficiencies associated with application on tobacco necessitates the use of relatively large quantities of flavorant to achieve the desired effect. Because many of these flavorants, such as menthol, for example, are expensive, inefficient utilization can add significantly to the cost of the smoking product.
  • flavorants applied to the tobacco are subjected to the high heat of combustion which can undesirably alter their organoleptic characteristics.
  • Adsorbed flavorants which are incorporated into the filter and released by the heat or moisture content of the smoke are not efficiently delivered until enough of the smoking article has been consumed to allow adequate moisture and heat to reach the filter.
  • the flavorant is not available to augment smoke taste during the first few puffs, when it is generally acknowledged as being most needed.
  • absorbants must be customized to achieve the desired release characteristics for each flavorant and, therefore, are not useful for delivering naturally occurring flavoring materials which consist of large numbers of independent chemical entities.
  • Absorbed flavorants which are dissolved in polymer matrices and released by the plasticizing action of moisture or heat in the smoke are subject to the same limitations as adsorbed flavorants.
  • absorbed flavorants are subject to time dependent losses in delivery efficiency because of diffusion of the flavorant into the bulk of the fiber polymer. This limitation is especially evident when a conventional cellulose acetate filter is used as the flavorant absorber.
  • Derivatized flavorants are almost always inappropriate for use in filter flavorant delivery systems because relatively high temperatures are required for their release. Derivatized flavorants are, therefore, typically applied to the tobacco portion of the smoking product, where the liberated flavorant produced during combustion is subject to chemical alteration and loss during the static burn period of the smoking article. The development of derivatized flavorants is highly specific for each flavorant and, therefore, excludes naturally occurring flavoring materials which are composed of a large number of independent chemical entities.
  • selective removal additives can also serve as tobacco modifying agents.
  • selective removal additives modify tobacco smoke by removing, rather than adding, certain compounds or classes of compounds.
  • Selective removal additives are applied to the filter and, therefore, like flavorants, can be absorbed by the filter fibers and lose their effectiveness.
  • significant improvements in the performance of selective removal additives could be achieved by overcoming the limitations imposed by the substrate to which the additives are applied.
  • Such fibers capable of transporting hydrophilic or hydrophobic fluids will be referred to herein as "spontaneously transportable fibers" or, alternatively, “spontaneously wettable fibers”.
  • spontaneously transportable fibers in combination with tobacco modifying agents, such as flavorants, results in improved delivery of such agents.
  • tobacco modifying agents such as flavorants
  • use of these fibers in combination with selective removal additives results in improved selective removal of unwanted materials such as phenol.
  • the present invention is directed to a combination comprising at least one fiber of sufficient geometry and at least one tobacco modifying agent.
  • X is greater than 1.2, more preferably greater than about 2.5, most preferably greater than about 4. Also, it is preferred that 2 r D is greater than 1, more preferred is where 2 r D is between 1.5 and 5.
  • the fiber of the invention satisfies the formula: ⁇ LA ⁇ 12 ⁇ 10 -4 ⁇ ⁇ dpf ⁇ (1-X cos ⁇ a ) ⁇ -0.3, wherein ⁇ LA is the surface tension of water in air in dynes/cm, ⁇ is the fiber density in grams/cc, and dpf is the denier (kg/m) of the single fiber.
  • the combination of the invention preferably comprises a plurality of the fibers of the invention and at least one tobacco modifying agent wherein the combination is in the form of a tobacco smoke filter in substantially cylindrical form.
  • Figure 1 graph of percent delivery efficiency versus milligrams (mg) of triacetin per filter for a cigarette filter of the invention and for a conventional cigarette filter.
  • the o symbols represent filters of the invention and the ⁇ symbols represent filters made from fibers of round cross-section.
  • the arrows labelled "LFA" indicate the location of the liquid-fiber-air interface.
  • the arrows labelled "LFA" indicate the location of the liquid-fiber-air interface.
  • the arrows labelled "LFA" indicate the location of the liquid-fiber-air interface.
  • Figure 3 schematic representation of an orifice of a spinneret useful for producing a spontaneously transportable fiber.
  • Figure 4 - schematic representation of an orifice of a spinneret useful for producing a spontaneously transportable fiber.
  • Figure 5 schematic representation of an orifice of a spinneret useful for producing a spontaneously transportable fiber.
  • Figure 6 schematic representation of an orifice of a spinneret useful for producing a spontaneously transportable fiber.
  • Figure 6B schematic representation of an orifice of a spinneret useful for producing a spontaneously transportable fiber.
  • Figure 7 schematic representation of an orifice of a spinneret having 2 repeating units, joined end to end, of the orifice as shown in Figure 3.
  • Figure 8 - schematic representation of an orifice of a spinneret having 4 repeating units, joined end to end, of the orifice as shown in Figure 3.
  • Figure 9 photomicrograph of a poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber cross-section made using a spinneret having an orifice as illustrated in Figure 3 (specific dimensions of spinneret orifice described in Example 1).
  • Figure 10 photomicrograph of a polypropylene fiber cross-section made using a spinneret having an orifice as illustrated in Figure 3 (specific dimensions of spinneret orifice described in Example 2).
  • FIG 11 photomicrograph of a nylon 66 fiber cross-section made using a spinneret having an orifice as illustrated in Figure 3 (specific dimensions of spinneret orifice described in Example 2).
  • Figure 12 - schematic representation of a poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber cross-section made using a spinneret having an orifice as illustrated in Figure 4 (specific dimensions of spinneret orifice described in Example 8).
  • FIG 13 photomicrograph of a poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber cross-section made using a spinneret having an orifice as illustrated in Figure 5 (specific dimensions of spinneret orifice described in Example 9).
  • Figure 14 photomicrograph of a poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber cross-section made using a spinneret having an orifice as illustrated in Figure 7 (specific dimensions of spinneret orifice described in Example 10).
  • Figure 15 photomicrograph of a poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber cross-section made using a spinneret having an orifice as illustrated in Figure 8 (specific dimensions of spinneret orifice described in Example 11).
  • Figure 16 - schematic representation of a fiber cross-section made using a spinneret having an orifice as illustrated in Figure 3 (Example 1). Exemplified is a typical means of determining the shape factor X.
  • FIG 17 photomicrograph of a poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber cross-section made using a spinneret having an orifice as illustrated in Figure 6 (specific dimensions of spinneret orifice described in Example 12).
  • Figure 17B schematic representation of a poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber cross-section made using a spinneret having an orifice as illustrated in Figure 6B (specific dimensions of spinneret orifice described in Example 13).
  • the fibers useful in the present invention have a complex cross-section geometry that results in a surface area that allows for more efficient delivery of tobacco modifying agent to the user. These fibers also allow for more efficient selective removal when selective removal additives are applied to the fibers of the present invention.
  • the fibers are preferably spontaneously transportable.
  • the fibers are preferably the preferred fibers that are capable of spontaneously transporting water on the surfaces thereof.
  • the fibers are preferably the preferred fibers that are capable of spontaneously transporting n-decane on the surfaces thereof.
  • a spontaneously wettable fiber when contacted with an appropriate fluid tobacco modifying agent, transports said agent on the fiber surface thereby substantially or completely coating the fiber with the agent. Also, it is believed that if a spontaneously wettable fiber is dipped or immersed in an appropriate fluid tobacco modifying agent and then removed from the fluid, said fiber retains a sufficient amount of said fluid which also results in a fiber substantially or completely coated with said agent.
  • an appropriate fluid tobacco modifying agent is one which is capable of being spontaneously transported by the fiber in question.
  • the coated fibers are optionally allowed to dry or substantially dry prior to use.
  • the wettability of a solid surface by a liquid can be characterized by the contact angle that the liquid surface (gas-liquid interface) makes with the solid surface (gas-solid surface).
  • a drop of liquid placed on a solid surface makes a contact angle, ⁇ , with the solid surface. If this contact angle is less than 90°, then the solid is considered to be wet by the liquid. However, If the contact angle is greater than 90°, such as with water on Teflon (trademark) surface, the solid is not wet by the liquid.
  • the contact angle also depends on surface inhomogeneities (chemical and physical, such as roughness), contamination, chemical/physical treatment of the solid surface, as well as the nature of the liquid surface and its contamination.
  • Surface free energy of the solid also influences the wetting behavior. The lower the surface energy of the solid, the more difficult it is to wet the solid by liquids having high surface tension. Thus, for example, Teflon, which has low surface energy does not wet with water. (Contact angle for Teflon-water system is 112°.) However, it is possible to treat the surface of Teflon with a monomolecular film of protein, which significantly enhances the wetting behavior.
  • the contact angle of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), nylon 66, and polypropylene with water is 80°, 71°, and 108°, respectively.
  • PET polyethylene terephthalate
  • nylon 66 is more wettable with water than PET.
  • polypropylene the contact angle is >90°, and thus is nonwettable with water.
  • the third property of fundamental importance to the phenomena of liquid transport is the geometry of the solid surface.
  • grooves enhance fluid transport in general, it has been discovered that particular geometries and arrangements of deep and narrow grooves on fibers and treatments thereof can allow for the spontaneous surface transport of fluids in single fibers.
  • preferred fibers for use herein are those with a combination of properties wherein an individual fiber is capable of spontaneously transporting water or n-decane on its surface.
  • the particular geometry of the deep and narrow grooves can be important.
  • the fluid used to wet the fiber to determine the wetted perimeter is, accordingly, water in the case of fibers which spontaneously transport water, and n-decane in the case of fibers which spontaneously transport n-decane.
  • Pw is substantially equal to the geometric perimeter.
  • the number of continuous grooves present in the fiber useful in the present invention is not critical as long as the required geometry is present. Typically there are at least 2 grooves present, and preferably less than 10.
  • “Spontaneously transportable” and derivative terms thereof refer to the behavior of a fluid in general and in particular a drop of fluid, such as water or n-decane, when it is brought into contact with a single fiber such that the drop spreads along the fiber. Such behavior is contrasted with the normal behavior of the drop which forms a static ellipsoidal shape with a unique contact angle at the intersection of the liquid and the solid fiber. It is obvious that the formation of the ellipsoidal drop takes a very short time but remains stationary thereafter.
  • Figures 2A, 2B and 2C illustrate spontaneous fluid transport on a fiber surface. The key factor is the movement of the location of the air, liquid, solid interface with time.
  • the fiber is spontaneously transportable; if such interface is stationary, the fiber is not spontaneously transportable.
  • the spontaneously transportable phenomenon is easily visible to the naked eye for large filaments (>20 denier (kg/m) per filament (dpf)) but a microscope may be necessary to view the fibers if they are less than 20 dpf. Colored fluids are more easily seen but the spontaneously transportable phenomenon is not dependent on the color. It is possible to have sections of the circumference of the fiber on which the fluid moves faster than other sections. In such case the air, liquid, solid interface actually extends over a length of the fiber. Thus, such fibers are also spontaneously transportable in that the air, liquid, solid interface is moving as opposed to stationary.
  • Spontaneous transportability is basically a surface phenomenon; that is the movement of the fluid occurs on the surface of the fiber. However, it is possible and may in some cases be desirable to have the spontaneously transportable phenomenon occur in conjunction with absorption of the fluid into the fiber.
  • the behavior visible to the naked eye will depend on the relative rate of absorption vs. spontaneous transportability. For example, if the relative rate of absorption is large such that most of the fluid is absorbed into the fiber, the liquid drop will disappear with very little movement of the air, liquid, solid interface along the fiber surface whereas if the rate of absorption is small compared to the rate of spontaneous transportability the observed behavior will be that of wicking or transport, as exemplified in Figures 2A through 2C.
  • a preferred fiber useful in the present invention is capable of spontaneously transporting water on the surface thereof.
  • Distilled water can be employed to test the spontaneous transportability phenomenon; however, it is often desirable to incorporate a minor amount of a colorant into the water to better visualize the spontaneous transport of the water, so long as the water with colorant behaves substantially the same as pure water under test conditions.
  • aqueous Syltint Poly Red (trademark) from Milliken Chemicals to be a useful solution to test the spontaneous transportability phenomenon.
  • the Syltint Poly Red solution can be used undiluted or diluted significantly, e.g., up to about 50x with water.
  • such a fiber useful in the present invention is also capable of spontaneously transporting a multitude of other hydrophilic fluids such as aqueous fluids.
  • Aqueous fluids are those fluids comprising about 50% or more water by weight, preferred is about 75% or more water by weight, most preferred is about 90% or more water by weight.
  • such a fiber useful in the present invention is also capable of transporting an alcoholic fluid on its surface.
  • Alcoholic fluids are those fluids comprising greater than about 50% by weight of an alcoholic compound of the formula R-OH wherein R is an aliphatic or aromatic group containing up to 12 carbon atoms.
  • R is an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, more preferred is 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
  • alcohols include methanol, ethanol, n-propanol and iso-propanol.
  • Preferred alcoholic fluids comprise about 70% or more by weight of a suitable alcohol.
  • such a fiber is capable of spontaneously transporting hydrophilic tobacco modifying agents.
  • Another class of preferred fibers useful in the present invention is capable of spontaneously transporting n-decane on the surface thereof.
  • the n-decane can be colorized for better visualization.
  • such a fiber is also typically capable of spontaneously transporting other hydrophobic fluids such as cyclohexane, xylene or ⁇ -pinene.
  • hydrophobic fluids such as cyclohexane, xylene or ⁇ -pinene.
  • it is also preferred that such a fiber is capable of spontaneously transporting hydrophobic tobacco modifying agents.
  • the fibers useful in the invention can be comprised of any material known in the art capable of having a cross-section of the desired geometry.
  • Preferred materials for use in the present invention are polyesters.
  • polyesters or copolyesters that are well known in the art and can be prepared using standard techniques, such as, by polymerizing dicarboxylic acids or esters thereof and glycols.
  • the dicarboxylic acid compounds used in the production of polyesters and copolyesters are well known to those skilled in the art and illustratively include terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, p,p'-diphenyldicarboxylic acid, p,p'-dicarboxydiphenyl ethane, p,p'-dicarboxydiphenyl hexane, p,p'-dicarboxydiphenyl ether, p,p'-dicarboxyphenoxy ethane, and the like, and the dialkylesters thereof that contain from 1 to about 5 carbon atoms in the alkyl groups thereof.
  • Suitable aliphatic glycols for the production of polyesters and copolyesters are the acyclic and alicyclic aliphatic glycols having from 2 to 10 carbon atoms, especially those represented by the general formula HO(CH 2 ) p OH, wherein p is an integer having a value of from 2 to about 10, such as ethylene glycol, trimethylene glycol, tetramethylene glycol, and pentamethylene glycol, decamethylene glycol, and the like.
  • Suitable aliphatic glycols include 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, 3-ethyl-1,5-pentanediol, 1,4-xylylene, glycol, 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-1,3-cyclobutanediol, and the like.
  • One can also have present a hydroxylcarboxyl compound such as 4,-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyethoxybenzoic acid, or any of the other hydroxylcarboxyl compounds known as useful to those skilled in the art.
  • mixtures of the above dicarboxylic acid compounds or mixtures of the aliphatic glycols can be used and that a minor amount of the dicarboxylic acid component, generally up to about 10 mole percent, can be replaced by other acids or modifiers such as adipic acid, sebacic acid, or the esters thereof, or with modifiers that impart improved dyeability to the polymers.
  • polyester poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET).
  • base fibers include polyamides such as a nylon, e.g., nylon 66 or nylon 6; polypropylene; polyethylene; and cellulose esters such as cellulose triacetate or cellulose diacetate.
  • polyamides such as a nylon, e.g., nylon 66 or nylon 6
  • polypropylene such as polyethylene
  • polyethylene such as polyethylene
  • cellulose esters such as cellulose triacetate or cellulose diacetate.
  • a single fiber useful in the present invention preferably has a denier (kg/m) of between about 1 and about 1,000, more preferred is between about 5 and about 70.
  • the fibers useful in the invention preferably have a surface treatment applied thereto.
  • Such surface treatment may or may not be critical to obtain the desired spontaneous transportability property.
  • the nature and criticality of such surface treatment for any given fiber can be determined by a skilled artisan through routine experimentation using techniques known in the art and/or disclosed herein.
  • a preferred surface treatment, when a hydrophilic tobacco modifying agent is contemplated, is a coating of a hydrophilic lubricant on the surface of the fiber.
  • a preferred surface treatment, when a hydrophobic tobacco modifying agent is contemplated, is a coating of a hydrophobic lubricant on the surface of the fiber.
  • Such coatings are typically uniformly applied at about a level of at least 0.05 weight percent, with about 0.1 to about 2 weight percent being preferred, based on the weight of the fiber.
  • Preferred hydrophilic lubricants include a potassium lauryl phosphate based lubricant comprising about 70 weight percent poly(ethylene glycol) 600 monolaurate.
  • a preferred hydrophobic lubricant is mineral oil.
  • Another surface treatment is to subject the fibers to oxygen plasma treatment, as taught in, for example, Plastics Finishing and Decoration , Chapter 4, Ed. Don Satas, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company (1986).
  • Figures 3 through 8 illustrate spinneret orifices which will prepare fibers of a geometry suitable for use in the present invention.
  • W is between 0.064 millimeters (mm) and 0.12 mm.
  • X 2 is 4W +4W -1W ;
  • X 4 is 2W ⁇ 0.5W;
  • X 6 is 6W +4W -2W ;
  • X 8 is 6W +5W -2W ;
  • X 10 is 7W +5W -2W ;
  • X 12 is 9W +5W -1W ;
  • X 14 is 10W +5W -2W ;
  • X 16 is 11W +5W -2W ;
  • X 18 is 6W +5W -2W ;
  • ⁇ 2 is 30° ⁇ 30°;
  • ⁇ 4 is 45° ⁇ 45°;
  • ⁇ 6 is 30° ⁇ 30°; and
  • ⁇ 8 is 45° ⁇ 45°.
  • W is between 0.064 mm and 0.12 mm; X 20 is 17W +5W -2W ; X 22 is 3W ⁇ W; X 24 is 4W ⁇ 2W; X 26 is 60W +8W -4W ; X 28 is 17W +5W -2W ; X 30 is 2W ⁇ 0.5W; X 32 is 72W +10W -5W ; and ⁇ 10 is 45° ⁇ 15°.
  • each Leg B can vary in length from 0 to and each Leg A can vary in length from 0 to tan (90- ⁇ 10 ) X 26 2 -X 24 .
  • W is between 0.064 mm and 0.12 mm;
  • X 34 is 2W ⁇ 0.5W;
  • X 36 is 58W +20W -10W ;
  • X 38 is 24W +20W -6W ;
  • ⁇ 1 2 is 20° +1 -1 ;
  • ⁇ 1 4 is 180°-2 ⁇ 12 n-1 ; and
  • W is between 0.064 mm and 0.12 mm;
  • X 42 is 6W +4W -2W ;
  • X 44 is 11W ⁇ 5W;
  • X 46 is 11W ⁇ 5W;
  • X 48 is 24W ⁇ 10W;
  • X 50 is 38W ⁇ 13W;
  • X 52 is 3W +3W -1W
  • X 54 is 6W +6W -2W ;
  • X 56 is 11W ⁇ 5W;
  • X 58 is 7W ⁇ 5W;
  • X 60 is 17W ⁇ 7W;
  • X 62 is 28W ⁇ 11W;
  • X 64 is 24W ⁇ 10W;
  • X 66 is 17W ⁇ 7W;
  • X 68 is 2W ⁇ 0.5W;
  • ⁇ 16 is 45° +30° -15° ;
  • ⁇ 18 is 45° ⁇ 15°; and
  • ⁇ 20 is 45° ⁇ 15°.
  • W is between 0.064 mm and 0.12 mm
  • X 72 is 8W +4W -2W
  • X 74 is 8W +4W -2W
  • X 76 is 12W ⁇ 4W
  • X 78 is 8W ⁇ 4W
  • X 80 is 24W ⁇ 12W
  • X 82 is 18W ⁇ 6W
  • X 84 is 8W +4W -2W
  • X 86 is 16W ⁇ 6W
  • X 88 is 24W ⁇ 12W
  • X 90 is 18W ⁇ 6W
  • X 92 is 2W ⁇ 0.5W
  • ⁇ 22 is 135° ⁇ 30°
  • ⁇ 24 is 90° ⁇ 45° 30°
  • ⁇ 26 is 45° ⁇ 15°
  • ⁇ 28 is 45° ⁇ 15°
  • ⁇ 30 is 45° ⁇ 15°
  • ⁇ 32 is 45° ⁇ 15°
  • ⁇ 34 is 45° ⁇ 15°
  • ⁇ 36 is 45
  • Figure 16 illustrates the method for determining the shape factor, X, of the fiber cross-section.
  • r 37.5 mm
  • P w 355.1 mm
  • D 49.6 mm
  • the tobacco modifying agent useful in the present invention can be any such agent used in tobacco products and/or tobacco substitute products where delivery of such agent to the user is desirable. Such agents typically modify the taste and/or aroma of smoking products.
  • the tobacco modifying agent can be a flavorant or other aromatic material including both naturally occurring and synthetic materials regardless of their hydrophobic or hydrophilic nature. Examples of such tobacco modifying agents include flavorants, synergistic flavor enhancers, physiological coolants and other mouth or throat stimulants, with flavorants being preferred.
  • flavorants include tobacco note flavorants comprising naturally occurring materials such as aqueous (hydrophilic) tobacco extracts (as disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,316,919 incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) and aromatics (as disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,424,171 incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), and synthetic materials which augment the minty, camphoraceous, spicy, peppery, fruity, flowery, woody, green, or other tobacco flavor and aroma notes.
  • Other flavorants contemplated for use in the invention include naturally occurring or synthetic flavorants which introduce flavor notes that are not normally indigenous to tobacco such as the following which have been demonstrated to be useful on filters by U.S.
  • Patent 3,144,024 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), wine, rum, coumarin, honey, vanilla, juniper, molasses, maple syrup, chocolate, menthol, and sugars.
  • synergistic flavor enhancers include smoothers such as glutamates and nucleotides as disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,397,700 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) and 2 cyclohexylcyclohexanone as disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,342,186 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).
  • Naturally occurring physiological coolants include mint oils, menthol, camphor and camphoraceous compounds.
  • Examples of synthetic physiological coolants include synthetic menthol and menthol derivatives (the latter exemplified by menthol monoester disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,111,127 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), menthol acetals disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,126,012 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), menthol ethers disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,128,772 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), menthol esters disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,136,319 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), synthetic camphor and camphoraceous compounds such as cyclohexenones and cyclohexanones disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,380,456 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), and synthetic coolants as disclosed in U.K. Patents 1,351,761 and 1,351,762 and U.S. Patents 4,296,255 and 4,230,688.
  • mouth or throat stimulating compounds include either natural or synthetic compounds such as nicotine, and its derivatives, including, for example, nicotine complexes and salts disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,109,436 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).
  • a feature of the invention is the spontaneously wettable character of the preferred fibers used for the tobacco modifying agent delivery substrate and/or the selective removal additive substrate.
  • spontaneously wettable fibers to transport and spread fluids on fibers having high surface areas which are not necessarily penetrated by the modifying agent is responsible for the high delivery efficiencies and high percentage of selective removal of unwanted substrates achieved by the combination of the invention.
  • the invention is, therefore, not limited to a specific polymer or fiber treatment, such as fiber finish, or to a particular form of final fiber assemblage.
  • Tobacco modifying agent delivery articles and/or selective removal additive delivery articles might, therefore, be made from fibers in any suitable form, including but not limited to, webs, continuous tows, and cut staple.
  • webs can be powder, calendar or binder fiber bonded, and staple can be loose or as a sliver.
  • the preferred implementation of the invention is a filter-like article employed either alone or in a multi-component configuration such as in a combination with a conventional cellulose acetate filter plug in a dual filter arrangement, the physical form of the tobacco delivery article and/or selective removal delivery article is not thus limited.
  • the invention is not limited in its uses to cigarettes and is likewise applicable to all smoking products including pipes, and even novel and as yet unconceived of aerosol sources.
  • the combination of the present invention is preferably in the form of a tobacco smoke filter or material useful for the preparation thereof. Cigarette filters are especially preferred. Accordingly, the present invention is also directed to a tobacco smoke filter comprising the combination of the invention wherein said filter is in substantially cylindrical form having a length of about 5 to about 40 millimeters (mm), preferably about 10 to about 30 mm, and a diameter of about 15 to about 30 mm, preferably about 22 to about 25 mm. In a preferred, dual filter arrangement, the portion of the dual filter comprising the combination of the invention is preferably about 6 to about 15 mm.
  • the combination of the invention is useful for the efficient and uniform delivery of tobacco modifying agents.
  • the combination of the invention is also useful for efficient and uniform selective removal of unwanted substances such as phenol or nicotine.
  • the direct economic value of the invention results from cost savings achieved through reductions in the quantity of expensive agents, especially flavorants and selective removal additives, that are needed to achieve a desired organoleptic effect.
  • Other benefits of the invention include increased shelf life, improved consistency of product taste which results from more constant delivery of the tobacco modifying agent over time, and improved efficiency of selective removal of unwanted substances.
  • the tobacco modifying agent(s) and/or selective removal additive of choice is applied, typically as a fluid, to an assemblage of fibers contemplated herein, especially spontaneously wettable fibers.
  • Such assemblage can be, for example, a nonwoven web or continuous tow, which is then preferably made into a rod-like or cylindrical article using filter making technology that is well known to one skilled in the art.
  • the combination is optionally dried by conventional procedures, for example, air drying or oven drying, especially to remove excess solvent, if present.
  • the rod-like article can be subdivided into segments of an appropriate length which are attached to an aerosol source such as the tobacco column of a conventional cigarette either alone or in conjunction with a conventional filter element, e.g., cellulose acetate filter, on the mouth and so as to give the appearance of a conventional cigarette filter.
  • an aerosol source such as the tobacco column of a conventional cigarette either alone or in conjunction with a conventional filter element, e.g., cellulose acetate filter, on the mouth and so as to give the appearance of a conventional cigarette filter.
  • a conventional filter element e.g., cellulose acetate filter
  • Figure 1 contrasts the delivery of the commonly used smoking article flavorant triacetin (glycerol triacetate) from identical fiber assemblages consisting of spontaneously wettable and non-spontaneously wettable (round) fibers of comparable filament denier.
  • the figure clearly demonstrates the substantial flavorant delivery advantage achieved by the spontaneously wettable fiber assemblage.
  • Figure 18 contrasts the delivery of the commonly used smoking article flavorant triacetin (glycerol triacetate) from equal pressure drop fiber assemblages consisting of spontaneously wettable and conventional cellulose acetate fibers. This figure shows that the flavorant delivery advantage achieved by the spontaneously wettable fiber assemblage is even greater when compared to the performance of conventional cellulose acetate fibers. Furthermore, Figure 19 shows that the delivery efficiency of the spontaneously wettable polyester fiber web filter segments for glycerol triacetate is relatively constant over extended periods of storage, whereas the delivery efficiency of the conventional cellulose acetate filter decreases significantly.
  • glycerol triacetate the delivery efficiency of the spontaneously wettable polyester fiber web filter segments for glycerol triacetate is relatively constant over extended periods of storage, whereas the delivery efficiency of the conventional cellulose acetate filter decreases significantly.
  • tobacco modifying agents such as volatile flavorants
  • a solution of menthol in a sufficiently nonvolatile solvent such as triacetin, polyethylene glycol, or mineral oil.
  • the flavorant, applied as a solution to the fiber assemblage will remain on the assemblage dissolved in the solvent but will still be spread uniformly over the fibers in a way that results in its high delivery efficiency.
  • the amount of tobacco modifying agent in the combination of the invention will vary depending on, among other things, the nature of the particular fibers, the chemical nature and potency of the particular tobacco modifying agent, and the desired type of delivery of the agent. However, a typical amount of tobacco modifying agent is about 0.001 to about 100 percent, based on the weight of the fibers. If the tobacco modifying agent is present as a solid free of solvent, a preferred amount of agent is about 0.1 to about 50%, based on the weight of the fibers. If the tobacco modifying agent is present as a liquid, a preferred amount of agent is about 0.1 to about 10%, based on the weight of the fiber.
  • the combination of the invention in a single component cigarette filter form preferably results in at least a 10% improvement, more preferably at least a 30% improvement, in delivery of such agent to the user as compared to a control filter using fibers of round cross-section.
  • the selective removal additives useful in the present invention are specific chemical compounds or mixtures of compounds that are applied to filter fibers to enhance the removal of certain compounds or classes of compounds from cigarette smoke.
  • Selective removal additives may be fluids or solids. If solids are used, they are frequently applied to the filter medium as a solution in an appropriate solvent or as a suspension in an appropriate fluid medium.
  • fluid selective removal additives which are useful for removal of phenols include polyols and their esters such as diethyl citrate, glycerol triacetate, triethylene glycol diacetate, poly(ethylene glycol) 400 or 600, and triethylene glycol.
  • fluid selective removal additives which are useful for removal of nicotine are glycerin and distilled monoglycerides derived from edible fats and glycerine, such as Myverol (trademark) and Myvatem (trademark) sold by Eastman Chemical Company, a division of Eastman Kodak Company, Kingsport, TN.
  • Other generally useful additives include activated carbon, ion exchange resins, zeolites, waxes or starches.
  • Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) polymer of 0.6 I.V. was used in this example.
  • I.V. is the inherent viscosity as measured at 25°C at a polymer concentration of 0.50 g/100 milliliters (mL) in a suitable solvent such as a mixture of 60% phenol and 40% tetra-chloroethane by weight.
  • the polymer was dried to a moisture level of ⁇ 0.003 weight percent in a Patterson Conaform dryer at 120°C for a period of 8 hours.
  • the polymer was extruded at 283°C through an Egan extruder, 1.5-inch (38.1 mm) diameter, with a length to diameter ratio of 28:1.
  • the fiber was extruded through an eight orifice spinneret wherein each orifice is as shown in Figure 3 wherein W is 0.084 mm, X 2 is 4W, X 4 is 2W, X 6 is 6W, X 8 is 6W, X 10 is 7W, X 12 is 9W, X 14 is 10W, X 16 is 11W, X 18 is 6W, ⁇ 2 is 0°, ⁇ 4 is 45°, ⁇ 6 is 30°, and ⁇ 8 is 45°.
  • the polymer throughput was about 7 pounds (lb)/hour (3.18 kg/hour).
  • the air quench system has a cross-flow configuration.
  • the quench air velocity at the top of the screen was an average of 294 feet (ft)/minute (89.61 m/minute). At a distance of about 7 inches (177.8 mm) from the top of the screen the average velocity of the quench air was about 285 ft/minute (86.87 m/minute), and at a distance of about 14 inches (355.60 mm) from the top of the screen the average quench air velocity was about 279 ft/minute (85.04 m/minute). At about 21 inches (533.40 mm) from the top of the air screen the average air velocity was about 340 ft/minute (103.63 m/minute). The rest of the screen was blocked. Spinning lubricant was applied via ceramic kiss rolls.
  • the lubricant has a general composition as follows: it is a potassium lauryl phosphate (PLP) based lubricant having poly(ethylene glycol) 600 monolaurate (70% by weight) and polyoxyethylene (5) potassium lauryl phosphate (30% by weight). An emulsion of the above lubricant with water (90%) was used as the spinning lubricant. The lubricant level on the fiber samples was about 1.5%. Fibers of 20 dpf (denier per filament in kg/m) were wound at 3,000 meters per minute (MPM) on a Barmag SW4SL winder. A photomicrograph of a cross-section of this fiber is shown in Figure 9 (150x magnification).
  • PPM potassium lauryl phosphate
  • the single fiber was tested for spontaneous surface transportation of an aqueous solution which was aqueous Syltint Poly Red (obtained from Milliken Chemicals) which is 80 weight % water and 20 weight % red colorant.
  • aqueous Syltint Poly Red obtained from Milliken Chemicals
  • the following denier (kg/m) per filament PET fibers were also made at different speeds as shown in Table 1 below: Table 1 Denier (kg/m) per Filament Spin Speed (MPM) Winder 20 3,000 Barmag 40 1,500 Leesona 60 1,000 Leesona 120 500 Leesona 240 225 Leesona 400 150 Leesona All the single fibers of above PET fiber with the denier (kg/m) per filament of 20, 40, 60, 120, 240, and 400 spontaneously surface transported the aqueous solution of Syltint Poly Red liquid. The value of the "X" parameter (as defined hereinbefore) for these fibers was about 1.7. PET film of 0.02 inch (0.51 mm) thickness was compression molded from the same polymer as that used for making the above fiber.
  • Polyhexamethylene adipamide (nylon 66) was obtained from Du Pont [Zytel (trademark) 42]. The polymer was extruded at 279°C. A spinneret as shown in Figure 3 was used to form 46 denier (kg/m) per filament fiber at 255 meters/minute speed. The specific dimensions of the spinneret orifices were the same as described in Example 1 except that ⁇ 2 was 30° instead of 0°. The quenching conditions were the same as those for obtaining PET fiber as in Example 1. A photomicrograph of the fiber cross-section is shown in Figure 11 (150x magnification). The lubricant level on the fiber was about 1.8% by weight. The same lubricant as used in the PET fiber was used (Example 1).
  • This nylon 66 fiber spontaneously transported the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution on the fiber surface.
  • the value of the "X" parameter for this fiber was about 1.9.
  • Nylon 66 film of 0.02 inch (0.51 mm) thickness was compression molded from the same polymer as that used for making the fiber of Example 2.
  • Contact angle of distilled water on the above film was measured in air with a contact angle goniometer. The contact angle was 64°.
  • Another sample of the same film as above was sprayed with the same lubricant as used for making the fiber in this example at about the 1.8% level.
  • the contact angle of distilled water on the nylon 66 film sprayed with the lubricant was about 2°.
  • Polypropylene polymer was obtained from Shell Company (Grade 5C14). It was extruded at 279°C. A spinneret as shown in Figure 3 was used to form 51 denier (kg/m) per filament fiber at 2,000 MPM speed. The specific dimensions of the spinneret orifices were the same as in Example 2. The quenching conditions were the same as those for obtaining PET fiber. A photomicrograph of the fiber cross-section is shown in Figure 10 (375x magnification). The lubricant level on the fiber was 2.6%. The same lubricant as used in PET fiber was used (Example 1). The polypropylene fiber spontaneously transported the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution on the fiber surface.
  • Cellulose acetate (Eastman Grade CA 398-30, Class I) was blended with PEG 400 polymer and small quantities of antioxidant and thermal stabilizer. The blend was melt extruded at 270°C.
  • a spinneret as shown in Figure 3 was used to form 115 denier (kg/m) per filament fiber at 540 meters/minute speed. The specific dimensions of the spinneret orifices were the same as in Example 2. No forced quench air was used.
  • the lubricant level on the fiber was 1.6%.
  • the same lubricant as used in the PET fibers (Example 1) was used.
  • the cellulose acetate fiber spontaneously transported the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution on the fiber surface.
  • the value of the "X" parameter for this fiber was about 1.8.
  • PET fiber of Example 1 was made without any spinning lubricant at 20 denier (kg/m) per filament. A single fiber did not spontaneously transport the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution along the fiber surface.
  • PET fiber of circular cross-section was made.
  • the denier (kg/m) per filament of the fiber was 20. It had about 1.5% of the lubricant used in Example 1.
  • a single fiber did not spontaneously transport the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution along the fiber surface.
  • PET fiber of Example 5 was treated with oxygen plasma for 30 seconds.
  • Model "Plasmod" oxygen plasma equipment was used. Exciter power is provided by the RF generator operating at 13.56 MHz frequency.
  • the plasma treatment was conducted at a constant level of 50 watts power.
  • the oxygen plasma treated fiber spontaneously transported the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution along the fiber. This fiber was tested again after washing five times and after 3 days and the spontaneously transportable behavior with the above aqueous solution was still observed.
  • a PET film of the same material as that of the fiber was subjected to the oxygen plasma treatment under the same conditions as those used for the fiber sample.
  • the average contact angle of the oxygen plasma treated film with distilled water in air was observed to be 26° as measured by a contact angle goniometer.
  • the corresponding contact angle for the control PET film (not exposed to the oxygen plasma) was 70°.
  • the significant reduction in contact angle upon subjecting the untreated PET fiber to the oxygen plasma treatment renders it to be spontaneously surface transportable for aqueous solutions.
  • PET Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) polymer of 0.6 IV was used in this example. It was extruded through a spinneret having eight orifices as shown in Figure 4 wherein W is 0.084 mm, X 20 is 17W, X 22 is 3W, X 24 is 4W, X 26 is 60W, X 28 is 17W, X 30 is 2W, X 32 is 72W, ⁇ 10 is 45°, Leg B is 30W, and Leg A is 26W.
  • the rest of the processing conditions were the same as those described in Example 1.
  • a 100 denier (kg/m) per filament fiber was spun at 600 MPM.
  • a sketch of the cross-section of the fiber is shown in Figure 12. The lubricant level on the fiber was about 1%. The same lubricant as used in Example 1 was used. The above fiber spontaneously transported the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution along the fiber surface. The value of the "X" parameter for this fiber was 1.5.
  • Poly(ethylene terephthalate) polymer of 0.6 IV was used in this example. It was extruded through a spinneret having eight orifices as shown in Figure 5 wherein W is 0.10 mm, X 34 is 2W, X 36 is 58W, X 38 is 24W, ⁇ 12 is 20°, ⁇ 14 is 28°, and n is 6. The rest of the extruding and spinning conditions were the same as those described in Example 1.
  • a photomicrograph of the fiber cross-section is shown in Figure 13 (585x magnification). A 20 denier (kg/m) per filament fiber was spun at 3000 MPM. The lubricant level on the fiber was about 1.7%. The same lubricant as used in Example 1 was used. The above fiber spontaneously transported the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution along the fiber surface. The value of the "X" parameter for this fiber was about 2.4.
  • PET Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) polymer of about 0.6 IV was used in this example.
  • the polymer was extruded through a spinneret having four orifices as shown in Figure 7 wherein the dimensions of the orifices are repeats of the dimensions described in Example 2.
  • the rest of the processing conditions were the same as those described in Example 1 unless otherwise stated.
  • a 200 denier (kg/m) per filament fiber was spun at 600 MPM.
  • the polymer throughput was about 7 lbs/hr (3.18 kg/hr).
  • An optical photomicrograph of the fiber is shown in Figure 14 (150x magnification).
  • the lubricant level on the fiber was 2.0%.
  • the same lubricant as used in Example 1 was used.
  • the above fiber spontaneously transported the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution along the fiber surface.
  • the value of the "X" parameter for this fiber was about 2.2.
  • PET Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) polymer of 0.6 IV was used in this example.
  • the polymer was extruded through a spinneret having two orifices as shown in Figure 8 wherein the dimensions of the orifices are repeats of the dimensions described in Example 2.
  • the rest of the processing conditions were the same as those described in Example 1.
  • a 364 denier (kg/m) per filament fiber was spun at 600 MPM.
  • the cross-section of the fiber is shown in Figure 15 (150x magnification).
  • the lubricant level on the fiber was about 2.7%.
  • the same lubricant as used in Example 1 was used.
  • the above fiber spontaneously transported the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution along the fiber surface.
  • the value of the "X" parameter for this fiber was 2.1.
  • PET Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) polymer of 0.6 IV was used in this example. It was extruded through a spinneret having eight orifices as shown in Figure 6 wherein W is 0.10 mm, X 42 is 6W, X 44 is 11W, X 46 is 11W, X 48 is 24W, X 50 is 38W, X 52 is 3W, X 54 is 6W, X 56 is 11W, X 58 is 7W, X 60 is 17W, X 62 is 28W, X 64 is 24W, X 66 is 17W, X 68 is 2W, ⁇ 16 is 45°, ⁇ 18 is 45°, and ⁇ 20 is 45°.
  • W 0.10 mm
  • X 42 is 6W
  • X 44 is 11W
  • X 46 is 11W
  • X 48 24W
  • X 50 is 38W
  • X 52 is 3W
  • X 54 is 6W
  • X 56 is 11W
  • Example 1 The rest of the processing conditions were the same as those described in Example 1.
  • a 100 denier (kg/m) per filament fiber was spun at 600 MPM.
  • the cross-section of the fiber is shown in Figure 17.
  • the lubricant level on the fiber was about 1%.
  • the same lubricant as used in Example 1 was used.
  • the above fiber spontaneously transported the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution along the fiber surface.
  • the value of the "X" parameter for this fiber was 1.3.
  • PET polymer of 0.6 I.V. is used in this example. It is extruded through a spinneret having 8 orifices as shown in Figure 6B wherein W is 0.10 mm, X 72 is 8W, X 74 is 8W, X 76 is 12W, X 78 is 8W, X 80 is 24W, X 82 is 18W, X 84 is 8W, X 86 is 16W, X 88 is 24W, X 90 is 18W, X 92 is 2W, ⁇ 22 is 135°, ⁇ 24 is 90°, ⁇ 26 is 45°, ⁇ 28 is 45°, ⁇ 30 is 45°, ⁇ 32 is 45°, ⁇ 34 is 45°, ⁇ 36 is 45° and ⁇ 38 is 45°.
  • a 20 denier (kg/m) per filament fiber is spun at 3,000 m/min.
  • the rest of the processing conditions are the same as those used in Example 1.
  • the lubricant level on the fiber is about 1%.
  • the cross-section of the fiber is shown in Figure 17B. This fiber spontaneously transports the aqueous Syltint Poly Red solution along the fiber surface.
  • the "X" value for this fiber is about 2.1.
  • Spontaneously wettable polyester fibers were melt spun from polyethylene terephthalate polymer according to the methods described in Example 1.
  • the value of the X parameter (as defined hereinbefore) for these fibers was about 1.8.
  • a yard of these fibers was then drafted to 5.5 denier (kg/m) per filament, heat set at about 180°C, crimped to about 7 or 8 crimps per inch (25.4 mm), and cut into 2-inch (50.8 mm) long staple fibers.
  • the resulting staple fibers were carded and bonded with about 15 weight % Eastobond (trademark) FA-252 polyester adhesive in powder form into a nonwoven web with a density of about 19 grams per square yard (22.71 grams/square meter).
  • Round cross section fiber webs to be used as controls were made by an identical process except that the fibers were melt spun through spinnerets with round holes.
  • the resulting round and spontaneously wettable polyester fiber webs were slit lengthwise into pieces approximately 12 inches (304.80 mm) wide which were then cut into 24-inch (609.60 mm) long sections.
  • the resulting 12-inch (304.80 mm) wide by 24-inch (609.60 mm) long web sections weighed approximately 4 grams each.
  • Glycerol triacetate also referred to as triacetin flavorant, either in its pure form or as a 10, 20, or 50 weight % solution in ethanol, was applied in roughly equal quantities to both round and spontaneously wettable fiber web sections using an aerosol sprayer. The web sections were air dried overnight to remove the residual ethanol.
  • the dried web sections were pulled lengthwise into drinking straws which were about 23 mm in circumference and each straw was cut into 21-mm long segments.
  • the 21-mm long round fiber web filled straw segments contained about 150 mg of web and had an average pressure drop of about 28 mm of water when measured at a flow rate of 17.5 cc/sec. of air.
  • the 21-mm long spontaneously wettable fiber web filled straw segments also contained about 150 mg of web but had an average pressure drop of about 55 mm of water when measured at a flow rate of 17.5 cc/sec. of air.
  • Each 21-mm segment contained between 2 and 18 mgs of glycerol triacetate depending upon the application rate.
  • the 21-mm long web filled straw segments were then attached to 63-mm long blended tobacco columns that had been cut off a popular king-sized domestic cigarette brand, and the resulting cigarettes were smoked according to CORESTA Standard Method No. 10 entitled "Machine Smoking of Cigarettes and Determination of Crude and Dry Smoke Condensate".
  • Experimental cigarettes were smoked in groups such that one glass fiber filter pad was used to collect the smoke condensate from five cigarettes.
  • Each glass fiber filter pad was then extracted with 15 ml of isopropanol containing 0.4 mg/ml hexadecane as an internal standard.
  • the glycerol triacetate present in the isopropanol extract of the condensate from each glass fiber pad was then quantitatively determined by capillary gas chromatography.
  • the performance of the invention for delivering glycerol triacetate is reported in Figure 1.
  • the reported delivery efficiency is defined as the percentage of the flavorant present on the fiber web filled straw segment before smoking that was delivered to the glass fiber filter pad by smoking the experimental cigarettes.
  • the term "4SW" represents fibers capable of spontaneously transporting water on the surfaces thereof.
  • Spontaneously wettable polyester fibers were melt spun from polyethylene terephthalate polymer according to the methods described in Example 1.
  • the value of the X parameter (as defined hereinbefore) for these fibers was about 1.7.
  • a yarn of these fibers was then drafted to 10.3 denier (kg/m) per filament, heat set at about 180 degrees centigrade, crimped to about 7 or 8 crimps per inch (25.4 mm), lubricated with poly(ethylene) 600 monolaurate lubricant, and cut into 2 inch (50.8 mm) long staple fibers.
  • the spontaneously wettable staple fibers were blended with about 20 weight % Kodel (trademark) 410 amorphous polyester binder fiber, carded and thermally bonded into a nonwoven web with a density of about 35 grams per square yard (41.53 grams/square meter). The resulting web was then slit into sections 9.4 inches (238.76 mm) wide and wound onto rolls about 1000 linear yards (914.40 meters) long.
  • Kodel (trademark) 410 amorphous polyester binder fiber carded and thermally bonded into a nonwoven web with a density of about 35 grams per square yard (41.53 grams/square meter).
  • the resulting web was then slit into sections 9.4 inches (238.76 mm) wide and wound onto rolls about 1000 linear yards (914.40 meters) long.
  • Rolls of spontaneously wettable polyester fiber web were processed into filter rods in the following manner.
  • An Eastman Miniature filter tow processing unit was used to unwind the web from the roll, to quantitatively apply glycerol triacetate to the web at each of the two target application rates, and to control the rate of delivery of the web to the next step of the process.
  • a Molins PM-2 filter rod making machine was then used to fold the web into rod shaped cylinders which were wrapped with Ecusta 646 plugwrap.
  • the resulting filter rods were cut into 21 mm long segments which were 24.5 mm in circumference, contained about 178 mg of nonwoven web, and had an average pressure drop of about 27 mm of water when measured at a flow rate of 17.5 cc/sec of air.
  • each filter segment contained either 2.4 mg or 5.6 mg of glycerol triacetate which, when expressed as a percentage of the total filter weight, corresponded to levels of 1.3 and 2.8 weight percent respectively.
  • flavored control filters were made in the conventional manner from 3.3 denier (kg/m) per filament, 39,000 total denier (kg/m), Y cross section, Estron (trademark) solution spun cellulose acetate filter tow.
  • the 21 mm long filter segments were 24.5 mm in circumference, contained 120 mg of filter tow, and had an average pressure drop of about 65 mm of water when measured at a flow rate of 17.5 cc/sec of air.
  • Each filter segment contained 10.3 mg of glycerol triacetate which, when expressed as percentage of the total filter weight, corresponded to a level of 7.0 weight percent.
  • the spontaneously wettable polyester fiber web filter segments were then placed in sealed glass jars and stored for intervals consisting of 10, 18, 28, 39, 52, 66, and 82 days. At the end of each storage interval, the filters were attached to 63 mm long blended tobacco columns that had been cut off of a popular King sized domestic cigarette brand and the resulting cigarettes were smoked acccording to CORESTA Standard Method No. 10 entitled "Machine Smoking of Cigarettes and Determination of Crude and Dry Smoke Condensate". The cellulose acetate control filters were stored for intervals of 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 56, and 84 days prior to smoking.
  • Both experimental and control cigarettes were smoked in groups such that one glass fiber filter pad was used to collect the smoke condensate from 4 cigarettes. Each glass fiber filter pad was then extracted with 15 ml of isopropanol containing 0.4 mg/ml hexadecane as an internal standard. The glycerol triacetate present in the extract of the condensate from each glass fiber pad was then quantitatively determined by capillary gas chromatography.
  • Figure 18 reports the performance of the invention for achieving consistantly higher delivery efficiencies of glycerol triacetate than the control cellulose acetate filters.
  • the delivery efficiency reported in Figure 18 is defined as the percentage of the glycerol triacetate present on the filter segment before smoking that was delivered to the glass fiber pad by smoking the experimental and control cigarettes.
  • Figure 2 shows that the delivery efficiency of the spontaneously wettable polyester fiber web filter segments for glycerol triacetate was 2 to 3 times greater than the delivery efficiency of the conventional cellulose acetate filter segments initially and 3 to 4 times greater by the end of the experiment.
  • Figure 19 reports the performance of the invention far maintaining a constant delivery efficiency of glycerol triacetate over extended periods of storage.
  • the delivery efficiency change reported in Figure 3 is defined as the percentage change in delivery efficiency relative to the delivery efficiency anticipated from a freshly made filter.
  • Figure 19 shows that the delivery efficiencies of the two spontaneously wettable polyester fiber web filter segments for glycerol triacetate are virtually independent of storage time and, therefore, show little change, whereas the conventional cellulose acetate filter segments loose almost half of their already lower delivery efficiency during the time spanned by this experiment.
  • Spontaneously wettable polyester fibers were melt spun from polyethylene terephthalate polymer according to the methods described in Example 1.
  • the value of the X parameter (as defined hereinbefore) for these fibers was about 1.8.
  • a yarn of these fibers was then drafted to 5.5 denier (kg/m) per filament, heat set at about 180 degrees centigrade, crimped to about 7 or 8 crimps per inch (25.4 mm), and cut into 2 inch (50.8 mm) long staple fibers.
  • the resulting staple fibers were carded and bonded with about 15 weight % Eastobond FA-252 polyester adhesive powder into a nonwoven web with a density of about 19 grams per square yard (22.71 grams/square meter).
  • Round cross section fiber webs to be used as controls were made by an identical process except that the fibers were melt spun through spinnerets with round holes.
  • the resulting round and spontaneously wettable polyester fiber webs were slit lengthwise to widths of 15 and 12 inches (381.00 and 304.80 mm), respectively.
  • the round webs were slit to a wider width in order to better match the pressure drops of the resulting filters.
  • Selective removal additives consisting of either glycerol triacetate or poly(ethylene glycol) 600 were applied to each web at a level of 7 weight percent using an aerosol sprayer.
  • Glycerol triacetate was applied to the webs in pure form but, because of its higher viscosity, poly(ethylene glycol) 600 was applied as a 10% aqueous solution.
  • the poly(ethylene glycol) 600 treated webs were dried in an oven at 60 degrees centigrade for 1 hour after spraying to remove excess water. All of the treated webs were allowed to air dry overnight to remove residual volatiles.
  • the dried web sections were pulled lengthwise into drinking straws which were about 23 mm in circumference and each straw was cut into several 21 mm long segments. Filters were made in this manner to achieve a target pressure drop of about 70 mm of water when measured at a flow rate of 17.5 cc/sec of air. Because of differences in the relative abilities of the round and 4SW fiber webs to generate pressure drop, filters made from these two types of web contained different quantities of coated substrate. To achieve the target pressure drop, 21 mm long filters required about 210 mg of coated round fiber PET web and about 160 mg of coated 4SW fiber web.
  • straw filters were also made from a 3.3 denier (kg/m) per filament, 39,000 total denier, Y cross section, Estron solution spun cellulose acetate filter tow that had been treated with either glycerol triacetate or poly(ethylene glycol) 600.
  • the resulting 21 mm long filter tips were 23 mm in circumference, contained about 130 mg of treated cellulose acetate filter tow, and had an average pressure drop of about 75 mm of water when measured at a flow rate of 17.5 cc/sec of air.
  • Each filter segment contained between 8 and 9 mg of either glycerol triacetate or poly (ethylene glycol) 600 which, expressed as percentage, corresponds to an application level of 7.0 weight percent.
  • the 21 mm long treated straw filters were attached to 63 mm long blended tobacco columns that had been cut off of a popular King sized domestic cigarette brand and the resulting cigarettes were smoked acccording to CORESTA Standard Method No. 10 entitled "Machine Smoking of Cigarettes and Determination of Crude and Dry Smoke Condensate".
  • Experimental cigarettes of a given type were smoked in groups such that one glass fiber filter pad was used to collect the smoke condensate from 5 cigarettes. The selective removal efficiency of the filters was then determined by measuring the amount of phenol present in the glass fiber filter pads and the freshly smoked cigarette filters.
  • the glass fiber filter pads and cigarette filters were both separately extracted with diethyl ether and the resulting extracts were concentrated, purified, and quantitately measured using gas chromatography.
  • the percentage of selective phenol removal reported herein is defined as 100 times the amount of phenol on the cigarette filters divided by the sum of the amount of phenol on the cigarette filters and the amount of phenol on the glass fiber filter pad.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Cigarettes, Filters, And Manufacturing Of Filters (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Tobacco Products (AREA)
  • Compositions Of Macromolecular Compounds (AREA)
  • Artificial Filaments (AREA)
  • Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)
  • Nonwoven Fabrics (AREA)

Claims (32)

  1. Kombination, welche folgendes umfaßt:
    (A) mindestens eine Faser mit mindestens einer kontinuierlichen Furche, welche fähig ist, Wasser oder n-Decan spontan auf ihrer Oberfläche zu transportieren, wobei die Faser der Gleichung (1-X cos θa) < 0
    Figure imgb0044
     genügt, worin
    θa der fortschreitende Kontaktwinkel des Wassers oder des n-Decans ist, gemessen auf einem flachen Film, welcher aus dem gleichen Material wie die Faser hergestellt ist und, falls gegeben, die gleiche Oberflächenbehandlung aufweist,
    X ein Formfaktor des Faser-Querschnitts ist, der der folgenden Gleichung genügt: X = P w 4r + (π-2)D
    Figure imgb0045
     worin
    Pw der Benetzungsumfang des Querschnitts der Faser ist und r der Radius des Umschreibungskreises ist, welcher den Faserquerschnitt kreisförmig umschreibt, und D die Abmessung der Kleineren Symmetrieachse quer durch den Faserquerschnitt ist, und
    (B) mindestens ein Tabakmodifikationsmittel.
  2. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin für die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) 2 r D
    Figure imgb0046
     größer als 1 gilt.
  3. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin für die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) 2 r D
    Figure imgb0047
     zwischen 1,5 und 5 liegt.
  4. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) fähig ist, Wasser zu transportieren und der Gleichung γ LA · 12π · 10 -4 (ρ) -1/2 (dpf) 1/2 (1 - X cos θa) <-0,3
    Figure imgb0048
     genügt, worin γLA die Oberflächenspannung von Wasser in Luft in Dyn/cm ist, ρ die Faserdichte in Gramm/cm3 ist und dpf der Denier in kg/m der Einzelfaser ist.
  5. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin für die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) X größer als 1,2 ist.
  6. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin für die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) X größer als 2,5 ist.
  7. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin für die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) X größer als 4 ist.
  8. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) einen Einzelfaser-Denier (kg/m) zwischen 1 und 1 000 aufweist.
  9. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) einen Einzelfaser-Denier (kg/m) zwischen 5 und 70 aufweist.
  10. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) aus einem Material besteht, welches aus der aus einem Polyester, Polypropylen, Polyethylen, einem Celluloseester und einem Nylon bestehenden Gruppe gewählt ist.
  11. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) aus einem Polyester besteht, auf dem eine Schicht eines hydrophilen Gleitmittels aufbeschichtet ist.
  12. Kombination nach Anspruch 11, worin der Polyester Poly(ethylenterephthalat) ist und das hydrophile Gleitmittel ein Gleitmittel auf Kaliumlaurylphosphat-Basis ist, das 70 Gew.-% Poly(ethylenglycol)-600-monolaurat umfaßt, welches in einem Gehalt von mindestens 0,05 Gew.-% der Gesamtfaser gleichförmig aufgetragen ist.
  13. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin für die Faser aus Bestandteil (A) die Breite jeder Furche in dem Faserquerschnitt bei jeder Tiefe in der Furche gleich oder geringer ist als die Breite der Furche an ihrer Mündung.
  14. Kombination nach Anspruch 1 mit einer Vielzahl von Fasern des Bestandteils (A) in Form von Netzen, kontinuierlichen Strängen und Schnitt-Stapeln.
  15. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin das Tabakmodifikationsmittel ein hydrophiles Material ist.
  16. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin das Tabakmodifikationsmittel ein hydrophobes oder hydrophiles Material ist.
  17. Kombination nach Anspruch 15 oder 16, worin das Tabakmodifikationsmittel ein Geschmackstoff ist.
  18. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin der Gehalt des Bestandteils (B) 0,001 bis 100 Prozent, bezogen auf das Gewicht des Bestandteils (A), beträgt.
  19. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, worin das Tabakmodifikationsmittel ein wäßriger Tabakextrakt, aromatischer Tabakextrakt, Rum, Cumarin, Honig, Vanille, Wein, Wacholder, Melasse, Ahornsirup, Schokolade, Menthol, Zucker, Vanillin, Süßholzsaft, Anethol, Anis, Kakao, Kakao- und Schokolade-Nebenprodukten, Zucker, Netzmittel, Eugenol, Nelkenöl, Triacetin, Glutamate, Nucleotide, 2-Cyclohexylcyclohexanon, Minzöl, Menthol, Kampher, kampherartige Verbindungen, Mentholderivate oder Nikotin oder seinen Derivaten ist/sind.
  20. Kombination nach Anspruch 1, ferner umfassend (C) einen selektiven Entfernungs-Zusatzstoff.
  21. Kombination nach Anspruch 20, worin der selektive Entfernungs-Zusatzstoff eine Flüssigkeit ist.
  22. Kombination nach Anspruch 21, worin die Flüssigkeit aus Polyolen, Estern von Polyolen oder Kombinationen davon besteht.
  23. Kombination nach Anspruch 22, worin Polyole und Ester von Polyolen Diethylcitrat, Glycerintriacetat, Triethylenglycoldiacetat, Poly(ethylenglycol)-400 oder -600, Triethylenglycol, Glycerin, destillierte Monglyceride, welche von eßbaren Fetten und Glycerin abgeleitet sind, umfassen.
  24. Kombination nach Anspruch 20, worin der selektive Entfernungs-Zusatzstoff ein Feststoff ist.
  25. Kombination nach Anspruch 24, worin der Feststoff Salcomin, Zinkoxid, Polyethylenimin, Aktivkohle, Ionenaustauschharze, Zeolithe, Wachse oder Stärken umfaßt.
  26. Tabakrauchfilter, umfassend eine Kombination, welche folgendes umfaßt:
    (A) eine Vielzahl von Fasern, worin jede Faser aus dieser Vielzahl mindestens eine kontinuierliche Furche aufweist, welche fähig ist, Wasser spontan auf ihrer Oberfläche zu transportieren, wobei die Faser der Gleichung (1-X cos θa) < 0
    Figure imgb0049
     genügt, worin
    θa der fortschreitende Kontaktwinkel des Wassers ist, gemessen auf einem flachen Film, welcher aus dem gleichen Material wie die Faser hergestellt ist und, falls gegeben, die gleiche Oberflächenbehandlung aufweist,
    X ein Formfaktor des Faser-Querschnitts ist, welcher der folgenden Gleichung genügt: X = P w 4r + (π-2)D
    Figure imgb0050
     worin
    Pw der Benetzungsumfang des Querschnitts der Faser ist, und r der Radius des Umschreibungskreises ist, der den Faserquerschnitt kreisförmig umschreibt, und D die Abmessung der Kleineren Symmetrieachse quer durch den Faserquerschnitt ist, und
    (B) mindestens ein Tabakmodifikationsmittel.
  27. Tabakrauchfilter nach Anspruch 26 in im wesentlichen zylindrischer Form mit einer Länge von 5 bis 40 mm und einem Durchmesser von 15 bis 30 mm.
  28. Tabakrauchfilter nach Anspruch 26 in im wesentlichen zylindrischer Form mit einer Lange von 10 bis 30 mm und einem Durchmesser von 22 bis 25 mm.
  29. Tabakrauchfilter nach Anspruch 26, welcher ein Zigarettenfilter ist.
  30. Tabakrauchfilter nach Anspruch 26, der eine Multikomponenten-Konfiguration ist.
  31. Tabakrauchfilter nach Anspruch 26, der in einer dualen Konfiguration mit einer herkömmlichen Celluloseacetat-Filterkomponente vorliegt.
  32. Zigarette, umfassend den Tabakrauchfilter der Ansprüche 26 bis 31.
EP91918236A 1990-10-04 1991-09-30 Zusammensetzung zur verbesserten abgabe von tabakmodifikationsmittel Expired - Lifetime EP0552234B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US59272390A 1990-10-04 1990-10-04
US592723 1990-10-04
US74129791A 1991-08-06 1991-08-06
US741297 1991-08-06
PCT/US1991/007109 WO1992005713A1 (en) 1990-10-04 1991-09-30 A combination for improved delivery of tobacco modifying agents

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0552234A1 EP0552234A1 (de) 1993-07-28
EP0552234B1 true EP0552234B1 (de) 1996-08-21

Family

ID=27081524

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP91918236A Expired - Lifetime EP0552234B1 (de) 1990-10-04 1991-09-30 Zusammensetzung zur verbesserten abgabe von tabakmodifikationsmittel

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0552234B1 (de)
JP (1) JPH06502068A (de)
AT (1) ATE141468T1 (de)
CA (1) CA2092176C (de)
DE (1) DE69121577T2 (de)
DK (1) DK0552234T3 (de)
ES (1) ES2093109T3 (de)
GR (1) GR3021634T3 (de)
WO (1) WO1992005713A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102005009608A1 (de) * 2005-02-28 2006-08-31 Hauni Maschinenbau Ag Filter für Artikel der Tabak verarbeitenden Industrie

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5800897A (en) * 1996-01-25 1998-09-01 Eastman Chemical Company Air freshener composition containing a fiber pad
US6548474B1 (en) 1998-06-26 2003-04-15 Takasago International Corporation Disubstituted cycloalkanones as fragrance materials
DE10000519C5 (de) * 2000-01-08 2004-12-02 Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken Gmbh Verfahren zur Herstellung eines sauer gestellten Filters für Tabakprodukte, sowie deren Verwendung
MY138902A (en) * 2000-04-20 2009-08-28 Philip Morris Prod "cigarette filters of shaped micro cavity fibers impregnated with flavorant materials"
US8602036B2 (en) * 2006-08-03 2013-12-10 Philip Morris Usa Inc. Smoking articles enhanced to deliver additives incorporated within electrospun microfibers and nonofibers, and related methods
US8113215B2 (en) 2007-06-21 2012-02-14 Philip Morris Usa Inc. Smoking article filter having liquid additive containing tubes therein
GB0922253D0 (en) * 2009-12-21 2010-02-03 British American Tobacco Co Sheet filter materials with additives
GB201112539D0 (en) 2011-07-21 2011-08-31 British American Tobacco Co Porous carbon and methods of production thereof
JP6159470B2 (ja) 2013-03-13 2017-07-05 セラニーズ アセテート，エルエルシー 煙流中の成分を低減するための煙フィルター
RU2552414C2 (ru) * 2013-09-09 2015-06-10 Козлов Борис Владимирович Способ получения глинозема
CN103892462A (zh) * 2014-04-09 2014-07-02 广西中烟工业有限责任公司 红酒提取物在卷烟滤棒中的应用及方法
MX2018004793A (es) * 2015-10-29 2018-06-08 Philip Morris Products Sa Tratamiento con plasma de medios de filtracion para articulos para fumar.
CN106954891A (zh) * 2017-04-10 2017-07-18 滁州卷烟材料厂 一种用于吸附卷烟烟气中重金属的滤嘴
CN108179062A (zh) * 2017-12-27 2018-06-19 广东中烟工业有限责任公司 一种含有天然产物提取物的组合物及其在制备功能化滤棒增塑剂中的应用
CN109797443B (zh) * 2019-01-30 2020-06-09 湖北中烟工业有限责任公司 用于加热不燃烧烟草中的薄荷香型纤维毡的制备方法和应用

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3144024A (en) * 1960-04-11 1964-08-11 Darby Food Corp Impregnated filter means for tobacco articles
US4662384A (en) * 1982-06-29 1987-05-05 British-American Tobacco Company Limited Smoking articles
US4707409A (en) * 1986-07-29 1987-11-17 Eastman Kodak Company Spinneret orifices and four-wing filament cross-sections therefrom
NZ233094A (en) * 1989-04-04 1992-07-28 Eastman Kodak Co Synthetic fibre with grooves spontaneously transports water on its surface
US5105834A (en) * 1989-12-18 1992-04-21 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Cigarette and cigarette filter element therefor

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102005009608A1 (de) * 2005-02-28 2006-08-31 Hauni Maschinenbau Ag Filter für Artikel der Tabak verarbeitenden Industrie

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GR3021634T3 (en) 1997-02-28
DK0552234T3 (da) 1996-09-09
JPH06502068A (ja) 1994-03-10
CA2092176C (en) 1997-04-08
ATE141468T1 (de) 1996-09-15
CA2092176A1 (en) 1992-04-05
DE69121577T2 (de) 1997-01-09
ES2093109T3 (es) 1996-12-16
EP0552234A1 (de) 1993-07-28
WO1992005713A1 (en) 1992-04-16
DE69121577D1 (de) 1996-09-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5275859A (en) Tobacco smoke filter
EP0552234B1 (de) Zusammensetzung zur verbesserten abgabe von tabakmodifikationsmittel
US11700877B2 (en) Menthol cigarette
US4811745A (en) Method and device for control of by-products from cigarette smoke
US4971078A (en) Filter for a smoking article containing a flavored hollow fiber
US4763674A (en) Method and device for controlling hydrogen cyanide and nitric oxide concentrations in cigarette smoke
US4793366A (en) Nicotine dispensing device and methods of making the same
FI80987B (fi) Aromfrigoerande komposition, roekartikel som innehaoller kompositionen samt foerfarande foer framstaellning av en aromfrigoerande roekartikel.
US4744932A (en) Process for forming a skinless hollow fiber of a cellulose ester
KR960014866B1 (ko) 담배 연기로부터 니코틴 부산물을 선택적으로 운반 및 잔류시키는 방법
EA013933B1 (ru) Ароматизированная сигарета
CN111150111A (zh) 一种香味缓释降温单元及包括其的加热式气溶胶发生制品
US20230049506A1 (en) Aerosol-generating article including upstream element
AU2021225347A1 (en) Aerosol-generating article including substrate with gel composition
NZ215629A (en) Coating porous cylindrical product with treating liquid
US5038803A (en) Method and device for control of by-products from cigarette smoke
US4821750A (en) Cigarette filters
CN210275872U (zh) 一种纸基凝胶线和包含该纸基凝胶线的卷烟
JP3150528B2 (ja) 香料保留性複合繊維を用いた喫煙用フィルタおよび喫煙用パイプ
JPH04135476A (ja) シガレット及びシガレットのためのフィルタ素子
KR102639728B1 (ko) 담배 물질, 상기 담배 물질의 제조방법, 상기 담배 물질을 포함하는 필터 및 상기 필터를 포함하는 에어로졸 생성 물품
US3332427A (en) Product and process for filtering tobacco smoke
US3310060A (en) Cellulosic filter for tobacco smoke
EP0250806A2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Entfernung des Stickstoffoxides vom Zigarettenrauch
US3429318A (en) Selective filter medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19930424

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19950510

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19960816

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19960819

Year of fee payment: 6

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 141468

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19960915

Kind code of ref document: T

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19960827

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19960827

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19960828

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19960830

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: KIRKER & CIE SA

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19960910

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19960913

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 19960917

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 19960924

Year of fee payment: 6

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69121577

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19960926

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 19960927

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 19961101

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2093109

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed

Free format text: CORRECTIONS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: FG4A

Free format text: 3021634

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970930

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970930

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970930

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970930

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19970930

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970930

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970930

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971001

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES

Effective date: 19971001

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: EASTMAN CHEMICAL CY

Effective date: 19970930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19970930

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19980401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980603

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 91918236.0

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20001009

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050930