Classifications

• • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
  • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
  • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
  • F42B10/00—Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
  • F42B10/02—Stabilising arrangements
  • F42B10/04—Stabilising arrangements using fixed fins
  • F42B10/06—Tail fins

Definitions

• This invention relates to a non-metallic tail fin for a sub- calibre kinetic energy projectile, herein called a long rod projectile, conventionally fired with an associated surrounding discard sabot from a larger calibre gun so as to impart a supersonic velocity and thereby high kinetic energy to the projectile.
• a projectile of this type is usually fin stabilised, and comprises a dense, cylindrical .penetrator having a tail fin unit attached to its rear end.
• the tail fin unit consists of a fin unit body member " coaxially attached j r to the projectile, with a plurality of radially protrusive fins extending therefrom.
• the body member is typified by an average density
• a tail fin unit on a long rod projectile The main purposes of a tail fin unit on a long rod projectile are to dampen out yaw imparted to the projectile at launch and thereafter stabilise the flight of the projectile to the target.
• the fin unit also provides the projectile with 5 an aerodynamically-induced rate of spin during its flight which is sufficient to even out any asymmetrical in-flight forces caused by manufacturing asymmetries in the shape or balance of the projectile which would otherwise give rise to unacceptable inaccuracies at the target.
• This spin rate is typically 20-200 revolutions per second Q and usually represents only a small fraction of the rate of spin imparted to non-finned, spin-stabilised projectiles fired from guns (spin-rates, in the later type of projectile, of several hundred revolutions per second are typical). However, this spin rate must be greater than the spin rate at which the long rod projectile exhibits spin yaw resonance, which is a spin rate at which the yaw of the projectile builds up during its flight to the targe .
• tail fin units having lightweight metal fins of, for example, aluminium alloy.
• the cost of producing lightweight metal tail fin units may be kept to a minimum by extruding each unit in one piece.
• the process of extrusion produces fins which are parallel to the extruding axis (which axis also defines the axis of the unit) and are of constant cross-sectional shape and area in keeping with the
• Fin units of this type are subject to extremely high in-bore propellant flash temperatures and subsequent aerodynamic heating temperatures which can well exceed the melting point of a lightweight metal. Consequently such fin units must be protected from damage by the provision of a heat resistant or a heat absorbent coating to prevent distortion of the fin profile.
• a heat absorbent coating known for this purpose is described in
• GB1604865 and comprises a thin heat-cured, homogeneous layer of an epoxy resin which will ablate uniformly and consistently at the temperatures encountered, thereby ensuring continuously balanced maintenance of the fin profiles and constancy of spin rate.
• the present invention seeks to provide a light-weight, mouldable, reinforced plastics material fin unit having a profile which is less sensitive to uneven in-flight ablation so as to ensure a predetermined velocity-related spin rate throughout flight.
• the invention further seeks to employ controlled in-flight ablation to achieve a drag reduction during flight.
• a tail fin unit for a long rod projectile comprises a fin unit body member 'consisting of an axisymmetric plastics material moulding, coaxially attachable to the projectile and having a plurality of radially protrusive fins each disposed as a helix of constant pitch around the longitudinal axis of the moulding.
• the principal advantages of the present tail fin unit is that by the use of plastic helical fins of constant pitch to impart the necessary in-flight rate of spin to the projectile, any unequal in-flight ablation of the leading edges of these fins caused by aerodynamic heating will occur without detriment to the spin rate of the long rod projectile. Furthermore, the process of ablation can Itself be turned to advantage because by an appropriate selection of plastics material, It can be used to bring about a significant reduction in the size (and hence surface area) of the fins as they burn away from their leading edges. The surface area hence size of the fins are normally selected to ensure they are large enough to perform their primary function of damping out yaw imparted to the projectile at launch.
• the plastics material is preferably a polymer material comprising a thermoplastic or a thermoset resin composition.
• Suitable thermoset compositions include thermoset polyesters and cured epoxy resins
• suitable thermoplastics include thermoplastic polyesters, polyamides, thermoplastic liquid crystal polymers, polycarbonates, polysulphones, polyethersulphones, polyetherimides, and polyetherketones (PEEK).
• the material may be filled with reinforcing materials comprised by randomly disposed, chopped strands of glass, aramid or carbon fibres.
• the fibres preferably constitute from 2 to 45% by volume of a-the plastics material and preferably have an average length of up to 25mm, more preferably of from 0.25mm to 25mm.
• a long rod projectile comprising a cylindrical penetrator member coaxially attached at its rear end to a tail fin unit according to the first aspect.
• Tne rear end is preferably encased within an axial recess within the fin unit body member to provide the necessary attachment, and preferably includes one or more radial protrusions or indentations to prevent relative axial and rotational movement of the penetrator with respect to the tail fin unit.
• the body member preferably has an average density of at
• the present tail fin unit is, in accordance with a third aspect of this invention, conveniently manufactured by the steps of (a) centrally locating one end of a cylindrical fin unit holding member in a removable tail fin unit mould to close said mould, (b) moulding the tail fin unit onto the said one end in the mould, and (c) withdrawing the moulded tail fin unit from the mould.
• Step (b) preferably comprises the process of injection moulding. It is one further advantage of the present tail fin unit that step (c) may be accomplished by axially twisting and separating the mould and holding member relative to one another in such a manner that the moulded fin unit follows a helical path through the mould which is i n the same direction and of the same pitch as the fins.
• the moulded fin unit may be extracted from the mould without first dismantling those portions of the mould adjacent the fins, which thereby provides a simple and easily automated fin unit- withdrawal step.
• the fin unit moulding is preferably directly attached to the rear end of the long rod projectile during the moulding process.
• the said one end of the holding member is screw- threaded to allow subsequent rotational detachment of the holding member from the moulded tail fin unit.
• Figure 1 is a partial side elevation of a first embodiment, showing a long rod projectile having a helical fin unit attached to its rear end,
• Figure 2 is a cross-section view of the projectile of Figure 1 taken along line I-I
• Figure 3 is a longitudinal section of the projectile of
• Figure 4 is a longitudinal section, similar to that shown in Figure 3, of a second embodiment which is taken through the rear portion of a long rod projectile having a helical fin unit screwed
• the fin unit 10 depicted in Figures 1, 2 and 3 comprises a central cylinder 12 having an axial recess 14 in its forward end and having six radially protrusive fins 16 each extending along the length of the cylinder 12 as a right-handed helix of 20 metre pitch.
• Each fin 16 widens at the root 18 where it adjoins the cylinder 12 and tapers down towards the cylinder 12 at its leading edge 20.
• the taper on each leading edge 20 is symmetrically rounded to ensure that the impact of each leading edge 20 with axial air flow past the fin unit 10 imparts no axial torque thereto.
• the fin tips 22 are
• the fin unit 10 is shown attached to the rear end 24 of a cylindrical penetrator 26 made of tungsten alloy.
• the penetrator 26 has a nose portion 28 at its forward end and has a length-to-diameter ratio of 12:1.
• the unit 10 is manufactured by injecting a molten thermosetting composition or thermoplastic material incorporating
• Kevlar (Registered Trade Mark) aramid into a removable fin unit mould (not shown) within which the knurled rear end 24 of the projectile body 26 has been centrally located to close the mould.
• a process of transfer moulding may alternatively be employed.
• ara id-containing thermosetting- compositions employed were the moulding compounds E20328, which is an epoxy resin moulding compound incorporating chopped Kevlar fibres which is manufactured by the Fiberlite Corporation of inona, Minnesota, USA and Freemix 43-2067, which is a thermosetting polyester moulding compound incorporating about 5% by weight of 6mm chopped Kevlar fibres and supplied by Freeman Polymers Division of PO Box 8, Ellesmere Port, South Wirral, England.
• the fin unit moulding is set in situ either by cooling (in the case of a thermoplastic) or heat curing (in the case of a thermosetting composition), and the fin unit mould removed.
• the removal operation is preferably accomplished by axially twisting and separating the mould and projectile body 26 relative to one another in such a manner that the moulded tail fin unit 10 follows a helical path through the mould in the same direction and of the same pitch as the fins 16.
• the moulded unit 10 may be extracted from the mould without dismantling those portions of the mould surrounding the fins 16, so that high production rates of fin units are made possible using only one or a small number of moulds.
• FIG. 4 The fin unit 110 depicted in Figure 4 is identical to that illustrated in Figures 1, 2 and 3 except that the recess 114 has an axially threaded portion 134 which engages with a cooperating threaded portion 136 on the rear end 124 of a second cylindrical projectile body 126.
• the thread on the fin unit 110 may be right- handed or left-handed according to the type of gun from which the projectile is to be fired.
• Manufacture of the fin unit 110 is, again, identical to the manufacture of the fin unit 10 except that in the case of the fin unit 110, a cylindrical fin unit holder (not shown) with a threaded portion on its rear end may be used in place of the projectile body member 126 itself.
• the threaded portion on the holder is Identical in shape and size to the threaded portion 136 on the projectile body 126. This allows for separate storage of the moulded fin unit 110 once it has been rotationally detached from the holder, so that the fin unit 110 may then be attached at a later time to the threaded portion 136 on projectile body 126.
• each of the fin units 10, 110 is subject to erosion by burning propellant gases during launch, and thereafter to in- flight ablation at the leading edges 20, 120 of the fins 16, 116 due to aerodynamic heating. Ablation may not occur evenly but because the fins 16, 116 are of constant pitch, any loss of material from their leading edges 20, 120 will occur without detriment to the spin rate of the projectile. Since erosion through ablation will reduce the size hence surface area of the fins, any significant ablation will also have the effect of reducing the net drag of the projectile during its flight once the fins have performed their primary function of damping out yaw imparted at launch...

Landscapes

• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Injection Moulding Of Plastics Or The Like (AREA)
• Extrusion Moulding Of Plastics Or The Like (AREA)
• Toys (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=10614054

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (8)

Families Citing this family (8)

Family Cites Families (9)

• 1987
  • 1987-03-17 GB GB878706250A patent/GB8706250D0/en active Pending
• 1988
  • 1988-03-09 DE DE3886209T patent/DE3886209T2/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 1988-03-09 WO PCT/GB1988/000179 patent/WO1988007169A1/en active IP Right Grant
  • 1988-03-09 EP EP88902175A patent/EP0354210B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1988-03-09 GB GB8920302A patent/GB2228987B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1988-03-09 AU AU13914/88A patent/AU600810B2/en not_active Ceased
  • 1988-03-09 BR BR888807422A patent/BR8807422A/pt not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 1988-03-11 IL IL85710A patent/IL85710A0/xx unknown
  • 1988-03-16 CA CA000561567A patent/CA1323246C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related

Non-Patent Citations (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events