EP0354210A1 - Tail fin unit for a projectile. - Google Patents
Tail fin unit for a projectile.Info
- Publication number
- EP0354210A1 EP0354210A1 EP88902175A EP88902175A EP0354210A1 EP 0354210 A1 EP0354210 A1 EP 0354210A1 EP 88902175 A EP88902175 A EP 88902175A EP 88902175 A EP88902175 A EP 88902175A EP 0354210 A1 EP0354210 A1 EP 0354210A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- fin unit
- tail fin
- projectile
- long rod
- mould
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B10/00—Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
- F42B10/02—Stabilising arrangements
- F42B10/04—Stabilising arrangements using fixed fins
- F42B10/06—Tail fins
Definitions
- This invention relates to a non-metallic tail fin for a sub- calibre kinetic energy projectile, herein called a long rod projectile, conventionally fired with an associated surrounding discard sabot from a larger calibre gun so as to impart a supersonic velocity and thereby high kinetic energy to the projectile.
- a projectile of this type is usually fin stabilised, and comprises a dense, cylindrical .penetrator having a tail fin unit attached to its rear end.
- the tail fin unit consists of a fin unit body member " coaxially attached j r to the projectile, with a plurality of radially protrusive fins extending therefrom.
- the body member is typified by an average density
- a tail fin unit on a long rod projectile The main purposes of a tail fin unit on a long rod projectile are to dampen out yaw imparted to the projectile at launch and thereafter stabilise the flight of the projectile to the target.
- the fin unit also provides the projectile with 5 an aerodynamically-induced rate of spin during its flight which is sufficient to even out any asymmetrical in-flight forces caused by manufacturing asymmetries in the shape or balance of the projectile which would otherwise give rise to unacceptable inaccuracies at the target.
- This spin rate is typically 20-200 revolutions per second Q and usually represents only a small fraction of the rate of spin imparted to non-finned, spin-stabilised projectiles fired from guns (spin-rates, in the later type of projectile, of several hundred revolutions per second are typical). However, this spin rate must be greater than the spin rate at which the long rod projectile exhibits spin yaw resonance, which is a spin rate at which the yaw of the projectile builds up during its flight to the targe .
- tail fin units having lightweight metal fins of, for example, aluminium alloy.
- the cost of producing lightweight metal tail fin units may be kept to a minimum by extruding each unit in one piece.
- the process of extrusion produces fins which are parallel to the extruding axis (which axis also defines the axis of the unit) and are of constant cross-sectional shape and area in keeping with the
- Fin units of this type are subject to extremely high in-bore propellant flash temperatures and subsequent aerodynamic heating temperatures which can well exceed the melting point of a lightweight metal. Consequently such fin units must be protected from damage by the provision of a heat resistant or a heat absorbent coating to prevent distortion of the fin profile.
- a heat absorbent coating known for this purpose is described in
- GB1604865 and comprises a thin heat-cured, homogeneous layer of an epoxy resin which will ablate uniformly and consistently at the temperatures encountered, thereby ensuring continuously balanced maintenance of the fin profiles and constancy of spin rate.
- the present invention seeks to provide a light-weight, mouldable, reinforced plastics material fin unit having a profile which is less sensitive to uneven in-flight ablation so as to ensure a predetermined velocity-related spin rate throughout flight.
- the invention further seeks to employ controlled in-flight ablation to achieve a drag reduction during flight.
- a tail fin unit for a long rod projectile comprises a fin unit body member 'consisting of an axisymmetric plastics material moulding, coaxially attachable to the projectile and having a plurality of radially protrusive fins each disposed as a helix of constant pitch around the longitudinal axis of the moulding.
- the principal advantages of the present tail fin unit is that by the use of plastic helical fins of constant pitch to impart the necessary in-flight rate of spin to the projectile, any unequal in-flight ablation of the leading edges of these fins caused by aerodynamic heating will occur without detriment to the spin rate of the long rod projectile. Furthermore, the process of ablation can Itself be turned to advantage because by an appropriate selection of plastics material, It can be used to bring about a significant reduction in the size (and hence surface area) of the fins as they burn away from their leading edges. The surface area hence size of the fins are normally selected to ensure they are large enough to perform their primary function of damping out yaw imparted to the projectile at launch.
- the plastics material is preferably a polymer material comprising a thermoplastic or a thermoset resin composition.
- Suitable thermoset compositions include thermoset polyesters and cured epoxy resins
- suitable thermoplastics include thermoplastic polyesters, polyamides, thermoplastic liquid crystal polymers, polycarbonates, polysulphones, polyethersulphones, polyetherimides, and polyetherketones (PEEK).
- the material may be filled with reinforcing materials comprised by randomly disposed, chopped strands of glass, aramid or carbon fibres.
- the fibres preferably constitute from 2 to 45% by volume of a-the plastics material and preferably have an average length of up to 25mm, more preferably of from 0.25mm to 25mm.
- a long rod projectile comprising a cylindrical penetrator member coaxially attached at its rear end to a tail fin unit according to the first aspect.
- Tne rear end is preferably encased within an axial recess within the fin unit body member to provide the necessary attachment, and preferably includes one or more radial protrusions or indentations to prevent relative axial and rotational movement of the penetrator with respect to the tail fin unit.
- the body member preferably has an average density of at
- the present tail fin unit is, in accordance with a third aspect of this invention, conveniently manufactured by the steps of (a) centrally locating one end of a cylindrical fin unit holding member in a removable tail fin unit mould to close said mould, (b) moulding the tail fin unit onto the said one end in the mould, and (c) withdrawing the moulded tail fin unit from the mould.
- Step (b) preferably comprises the process of injection moulding. It is one further advantage of the present tail fin unit that step (c) may be accomplished by axially twisting and separating the mould and holding member relative to one another in such a manner that the moulded fin unit follows a helical path through the mould which is i n the same direction and of the same pitch as the fins.
- the moulded fin unit may be extracted from the mould without first dismantling those portions of the mould adjacent the fins, which thereby provides a simple and easily automated fin unit- withdrawal step.
- the fin unit moulding is preferably directly attached to the rear end of the long rod projectile during the moulding process.
- the said one end of the holding member is screw- threaded to allow subsequent rotational detachment of the holding member from the moulded tail fin unit.
- Figure 1 is a partial side elevation of a first embodiment, showing a long rod projectile having a helical fin unit attached to its rear end,
- Figure 2 is a cross-section view of the projectile of Figure 1 taken along line I-I
- Figure 3 is a longitudinal section of the projectile of
- Figure 4 is a longitudinal section, similar to that shown in Figure 3, of a second embodiment which is taken through the rear portion of a long rod projectile having a helical fin unit screwed
- the fin unit 10 depicted in Figures 1, 2 and 3 comprises a central cylinder 12 having an axial recess 14 in its forward end and having six radially protrusive fins 16 each extending along the length of the cylinder 12 as a right-handed helix of 20 metre pitch.
- Each fin 16 widens at the root 18 where it adjoins the cylinder 12 and tapers down towards the cylinder 12 at its leading edge 20.
- the taper on each leading edge 20 is symmetrically rounded to ensure that the impact of each leading edge 20 with axial air flow past the fin unit 10 imparts no axial torque thereto.
- the fin tips 22 are
- the fin unit 10 is shown attached to the rear end 24 of a cylindrical penetrator 26 made of tungsten alloy.
- the penetrator 26 has a nose portion 28 at its forward end and has a length-to-diameter ratio of 12:1.
- the unit 10 is manufactured by injecting a molten thermosetting composition or thermoplastic material incorporating
- Kevlar (Registered Trade Mark) aramid into a removable fin unit mould (not shown) within which the knurled rear end 24 of the projectile body 26 has been centrally located to close the mould.
- a process of transfer moulding may alternatively be employed.
- ara id-containing thermosetting- compositions employed were the moulding compounds E20328, which is an epoxy resin moulding compound incorporating chopped Kevlar fibres which is manufactured by the Fiberlite Corporation of inona, Minnesota, USA and Freemix 43-2067, which is a thermosetting polyester moulding compound incorporating about 5% by weight of 6mm chopped Kevlar fibres and supplied by Freeman Polymers Division of PO Box 8, Ellesmere Port, South Wirral, England.
- the fin unit moulding is set in situ either by cooling (in the case of a thermoplastic) or heat curing (in the case of a thermosetting composition), and the fin unit mould removed.
- the removal operation is preferably accomplished by axially twisting and separating the mould and projectile body 26 relative to one another in such a manner that the moulded tail fin unit 10 follows a helical path through the mould in the same direction and of the same pitch as the fins 16.
- the moulded unit 10 may be extracted from the mould without dismantling those portions of the mould surrounding the fins 16, so that high production rates of fin units are made possible using only one or a small number of moulds.
- FIG. 4 The fin unit 110 depicted in Figure 4 is identical to that illustrated in Figures 1, 2 and 3 except that the recess 114 has an axially threaded portion 134 which engages with a cooperating threaded portion 136 on the rear end 124 of a second cylindrical projectile body 126.
- the thread on the fin unit 110 may be right- handed or left-handed according to the type of gun from which the projectile is to be fired.
- Manufacture of the fin unit 110 is, again, identical to the manufacture of the fin unit 10 except that in the case of the fin unit 110, a cylindrical fin unit holder (not shown) with a threaded portion on its rear end may be used in place of the projectile body member 126 itself.
- the threaded portion on the holder is Identical in shape and size to the threaded portion 136 on the projectile body 126. This allows for separate storage of the moulded fin unit 110 once it has been rotationally detached from the holder, so that the fin unit 110 may then be attached at a later time to the threaded portion 136 on projectile body 126.
- each of the fin units 10, 110 is subject to erosion by burning propellant gases during launch, and thereafter to in- flight ablation at the leading edges 20, 120 of the fins 16, 116 due to aerodynamic heating. Ablation may not occur evenly but because the fins 16, 116 are of constant pitch, any loss of material from their leading edges 20, 120 will occur without detriment to the spin rate of the projectile. Since erosion through ablation will reduce the size hence surface area of the fins, any significant ablation will also have the effect of reducing the net drag of the projectile during its flight once the fins have performed their primary function of damping out yaw imparted at launch...
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Extrusion Moulding Of Plastics Or The Like (AREA)
- Injection Moulding Of Plastics Or The Like (AREA)
- Toys (AREA)
Abstract
Un élément de plan fixe de queue (10), moulé à partir d'un matériau plastique, qui est ablatif lorsqu'il est soumis à la fois aux températures d'inflammabilité de l'agent propulseur et au chauffage aérodynamique en vol, se compose d'un corps à plan fixe (12) monté coaxialement à l'extrémité arrière du projectile, et présente une pluralité d'ailettes (16) saillantes radialement, disposées chacune comme une hélice à pas constant autour de l'axe de moulage de l'élément. L'ablation des ailettes (16) peut ne pas se produire uniformément, mais puisqu'elles ont un pas constant, toute érosion de leurs bords conducteurs (20) se produira sans préjudice à la vitesse de rotation du projectile en vol. Un élément préféré, moulé à partir de polyester ou de résine époxy remplie d e fibres aramides Kevlar, est capable de résister à des charges de chambre de canon de 4000kg cm-2.A tail stabilizer member (10), molded from a plastics material, which is ablative when subjected to both propellant flammability temperatures and aerodynamic in-flight heating, consists of a body with a fixed plane (12) mounted coaxially at the rear end of the projectile, and has a plurality of radially projecting fins (16), each arranged like a helix with constant pitch around the casting axis of the 'element. Ablation of the fins (16) may not occur uniformly, but since they have a constant pitch, any erosion of their conductive edges (20) will occur without detriment to the rate of rotation of the projectile in flight. A preferred element, molded from polyester or epoxy resin filled with Kevlar aramid fibers, is capable of withstanding gun chamber loads of 4000kg cm-2.
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB878706250A GB8706250D0 (en) | 1987-03-17 | 1987-03-17 | Tail fin unit for projectile |
GB8706250 | 1987-03-17 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0354210A1 true EP0354210A1 (en) | 1990-02-14 |
EP0354210B1 EP0354210B1 (en) | 1993-12-08 |
Family
ID=10614054
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP88902175A Expired - Lifetime EP0354210B1 (en) | 1987-03-17 | 1988-03-09 | Tail fin unit for a projectile |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0354210B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU600810B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR8807422A (en) |
CA (1) | CA1323246C (en) |
DE (1) | DE3886209T2 (en) |
GB (2) | GB8706250D0 (en) |
IL (1) | IL85710A0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1988007169A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3927917A1 (en) * | 1989-08-24 | 1991-02-28 | Rheinmetall Gmbh | WING STABILIZED SHELL |
DE4007197C2 (en) * | 1990-03-07 | 1997-07-03 | Deutsch Franz Forsch Inst | Tail unit for a high-speed bullet |
KR920010249A (en) * | 1990-11-09 | 1992-06-26 | 앨리언트 테크시스템스 인코오포레이티드 | Ammunition fins with melt and warp resistance |
US5158509A (en) * | 1990-12-14 | 1992-10-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Composite stabilizer unit |
GB2268575A (en) * | 1992-07-09 | 1994-01-12 | Secr Defence | Tail fin unit |
GB0004347D0 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2000-04-12 | Victrex Mfg Ltd | Lightweight ablative materials |
US9644929B1 (en) | 2013-12-03 | 2017-05-09 | Michael S. Bradbury | Pilum bullet and cartridge |
CN111707145B (en) * | 2020-06-10 | 2022-09-09 | 宁波曙翔新材料股份有限公司 | Loading, ablation and heat-proof integrated composite material missile wing and rudder for hypersonic missile and preparation method thereof |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
BE425483A (en) * | 1937-01-04 | |||
FR1061958A (en) * | 1952-05-19 | 1954-04-16 | Le Moulage De Prec | Tailoring improvements |
FR1077083A (en) * | 1953-03-20 | 1954-11-04 | Soc Tech De Rech Ind | Tail for projectiles |
FR1288365A (en) * | 1961-04-07 | 1962-03-24 | Oregon Etablissements Fuer Pat | New fletched projectile |
FR1307270A (en) * | 1961-06-08 | 1962-10-26 | Le Ministre Des Armees Terre D | Tailplane for projectile and method of assembly |
FR2020467A5 (en) * | 1969-01-29 | 1970-07-10 | Losfeld Andre | Projectile adaptable as hand grenade or - self-propelled mortar bomb |
EP0174082A1 (en) * | 1984-07-23 | 1986-03-12 | Judd Engineering Limited | Projectile stabilising fin unit |
DE3517125A1 (en) * | 1985-05-11 | 1986-11-13 | Rheinmetall GmbH, 4000 Düsseldorf | SUB-CALIBRARY FLOOR |
FR2599829B1 (en) * | 1986-06-05 | 1990-04-13 | France Etat Armement | FIXTURE FOR ARROW-TYPE KINETIC ENERGY PROJECTILE |
-
1987
- 1987-03-17 GB GB878706250A patent/GB8706250D0/en active Pending
-
1988
- 1988-03-09 BR BR888807422A patent/BR8807422A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1988-03-09 DE DE3886209T patent/DE3886209T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1988-03-09 GB GB8920302A patent/GB2228987B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-03-09 EP EP88902175A patent/EP0354210B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-03-09 AU AU13914/88A patent/AU600810B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1988-03-09 WO PCT/GB1988/000179 patent/WO1988007169A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1988-03-11 IL IL85710A patent/IL85710A0/en unknown
- 1988-03-16 CA CA000561567A patent/CA1323246C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO8807169A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO1988007169A1 (en) | 1988-09-22 |
IL85710A0 (en) | 1988-08-31 |
EP0354210B1 (en) | 1993-12-08 |
DE3886209D1 (en) | 1994-01-20 |
CA1323246C (en) | 1993-10-19 |
GB2228987B (en) | 1991-01-23 |
AU600810B2 (en) | 1990-08-23 |
GB2228987A (en) | 1990-09-12 |
GB8920302D0 (en) | 1990-02-21 |
BR8807422A (en) | 1990-05-22 |
AU1391488A (en) | 1988-10-10 |
GB8706250D0 (en) | 1987-04-23 |
DE3886209T2 (en) | 1994-06-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10001337B2 (en) | Composite multi-lobe projectile barrel | |
DK3080543T3 (en) | FIBER DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM FOR COMPOSITE PROJECTION CIRCUIT STRUCTURE | |
US9863732B2 (en) | Lightweight composite mortar tube | |
US5932836A (en) | Range limited projectile using augmented roll damping | |
US5789699A (en) | Composite ply architecture for sabots | |
CA1323246C (en) | Tail fin unit for a projectile | |
US4612860A (en) | Projectile | |
DK163892B (en) | BLASTING HEAD | |
EP3039374B1 (en) | High temperature composite projectile barrel | |
CA2130840C (en) | Releasable sabot for a subcaliber projectile | |
CA1284061C (en) | Hunting ammunition comprising a bullet of increased effectiveness | |
EP0015678B1 (en) | Practice warheads for use with rockets | |
US5622335A (en) | Tail piece for a projectile having fins each including a recess | |
EP3537094B1 (en) | Improved fragmentation projectile and method for its manufacturing | |
US11353303B2 (en) | Sabot, bore rider, and methods of making and using same | |
US20160076862A1 (en) | Small Diameter High Straightness Arrow and Method of Manufacture for the Same | |
US9933239B2 (en) | Archery field tip bullet | |
JP3575831B2 (en) | Reduction of speed reduction of stable armor-piercing ammunition | |
BR112020011948A2 (en) | projectile for ammunition, method of making and using it, and coating | |
US10684106B2 (en) | Aerodynamically contoured spinnable projectile | |
EP0249525B1 (en) | Stabilization fins for an arrow-type penetrator | |
KR200495023Y1 (en) | Arrow that can be easily drawn from a target | |
AU589667B2 (en) | High velocity ammunition sabot | |
NZ720293B2 (en) | Fiber winding system for composite projectile barrel structure |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19890919 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL SE |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19901102 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: BARZANO' E ZANARDO ROMA S.P.A. |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL SE |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3886209 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19940120 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
EAL | Se: european patent in force in sweden |
Ref document number: 88902175.4 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP |
|
NLS | Nl: assignments of ep-patents |
Owner name: QINETIQ LIMITED |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20030211 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20030213 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20030214 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20030217 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20030225 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040309 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041001 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041001 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee | ||
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041130 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20041001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20050309 |