EP0270240B1 - Reinigungsmittel in Pulverform und deren Herstellungsverfahren - Google Patents

Reinigungsmittel in Pulverform und deren Herstellungsverfahren Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0270240B1
EP0270240B1 EP87309570A EP87309570A EP0270240B1 EP 0270240 B1 EP0270240 B1 EP 0270240B1 EP 87309570 A EP87309570 A EP 87309570A EP 87309570 A EP87309570 A EP 87309570A EP 0270240 B1 EP0270240 B1 EP 0270240B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weight
powder
spray
detergent
postdosed
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP87309570A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0270240A2 (de
EP0270240A3 (en
Inventor
Peter Willam Appel
Michael Raymond Frederick Bazley
Huug Euser
Seeng Djiang Liem
Michele Emilio Paoli
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10606625&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0270240(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP0270240A2 publication Critical patent/EP0270240A2/de
Publication of EP0270240A3 publication Critical patent/EP0270240A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0270240B1 publication Critical patent/EP0270240B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00—Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02—Anionic compounds
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16—Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37—Polymers
    • C11D3/3746—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C11D3/3757—(Co)polymerised carboxylic acids, -anhydrides, -esters in solid and liquid compositions
    • C11D3/3761—(Co)polymerised carboxylic acids, -anhydrides, -esters in solid and liquid compositions in solid compositions
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D11/00—Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents
    • C11D11/02—Preparation in the form of powder by spray drying
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/06—Powder; Flakes; Free-flowing mixtures; Sheets
    • C11D17/065—High-density particulate detergent compositions
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/02—Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
    • C11D3/12—Water-insoluble compounds
    • C11D3/124—Silicon containing, e.g. silica, silex, quartz or glass beads
    • C11D3/1246—Silicates, e.g. diatomaceous earth
    • C11D3/128—Aluminium silicates, e.g. zeolites
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16—Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37—Polymers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to spray-dried zero-phosphate powders suitable for use as detergent compositions or components thereof.
  • the powders of the invention are built with crystalline or amorphous sodium aluminosilicate.
  • sodium aluminosilicates both crystalline (zeolite) and amorphous (NAS) have become well known as detergency builders. These materials do not, however, possess an ability comparable to that of sodium tripolyphosphate to contribute to the structure of a spray-dried powder.
  • Alkali metal silicates are frequently included in detergent powders as structurants, to reduce washing machine corrosion and to increase alkalinity.
  • spray-dried zeolite-built powders of very high bulk density may be prepared by spray-drying slurries of defined moisture content, and low or zero levels of electrolyte.
  • the presence of a polymeric polycarboxylate is also essential to provide building and structuring.
  • the powders are characterised by exceptionally low particle porosity and excellent powder properties. If desired, the bulk density can be increased further, and powder properties enhanced, by postdosing high-bulk-density salts, notably sodium sulphate, to the spray-dried powder.
  • Spray-dried powders containing anionic surfactants built with zeolite and polymeric polycarboxylate and containing inorganic salts such as sodium carbonate and sodium sulphate, are disclosed in EP-A-137,669 (Procter & Gamble), EP-A-209,840 (Henkel), EP-B-63,399 (Procter & Gamble) and GB-2,095,274 (Colgate-Palmolive), but these powders do not have the low electrolyte levels characteristic of the present invention.
  • EP-A-193,360 (Procter & Gamble) discloses low-phosphate spray-dried detergent powders containing anionic surfactants, zeolite, polymeric polycarboxylate and sodium sulphate. However, these spray-dried powders do not contain any sodium carbonate and a low electrolyte level thereof is nowhere disclosed in EP-A-193,360.
  • the present invention provides a process for the preparation of a zero-phosphate detergent powder which comprises spray-drying an aqueous slurry to form a powder, the slurry comprising
  • the present invention is concerned with a spray-dried detergent powder containing anionic surfactant which is suitable for use as a base for a detergent composition, or indeed as a whole detergent composition in its own right.
  • the base powder of the invention is characterised by an exceptionally low particle porosity of less than 40%, preferably less than 35%.
  • the particle porosity may be determined by the recognised technique of mercury porosimetry.
  • the total level of electrolyte (salts) in the base powder of the invention does not exceed 25% by weight.
  • the electrolyte level does not exceed 15% and more preferably 13%.
  • the electrolyte present is constituted substantially wholly by sodium carbonate. The lowest particle porosities - around 25% - are obtained when no electrolyte whatsoever is present. Surprisingly, however, it has been found that when a fluorescer is present, the presence of a low level of sodium carbonate is beneficial in reducing or eliminating discolouration (yellowing), while giving particle porosities that are not substantially greater than those obtained at zero electrolyte.
  • the preferred amount of sodium carbonate present for this benefit is from 5 to 15% by weight, of the spray-dried powder.
  • the spray-dried particles obtained are strong enough to give excellent powder properties.
  • Any silicate required in order to prevent washing machine corrosion can therefore be postdosed, for example as described in EP 240 356A (Unilever), to be published on 7 October 1987, and EP 242141A (Unilever), to be published on 21 October 1987, thus avoiding the problem of unfavourable interaction with aluminosilicate in the slurry.
  • the slurry may contain sodium silicate, but preferably in an amount not exceeding 10% by weight, and more preferably not exceeding 5% by weight, based on the spray-dried powder.
  • Salts other than sodium carbonate may if desired be present. It is preferred, however, that the slurry should be virtually free of sodium sulphate, other than the small quantities inevitably associated as impurities with other components such as anionic surfactants. Sodium sulphate levels as low as 25% (based on the powder) give particles of considerably greater porosity. Similar considerations apply to other inorganic salts: it is therefore preferred that no significant amounts of salts other than sodium carbonate and possibly sodium silicate be present.
  • the powder of the invention contains crystalline or amorphous aluminosilicate, preferably zeolite, in an amount of from 15 to 86% by weight.
  • the preferred level is from 20 to 70% by weight, more preferably from 30 to 70% by weight. This component is the principal builder in the powder of the invention.
  • auxiliary builder there is also present a polymeric polycarboxylate in an amount from 2 to 40% by weight, preferably from 3 to 25% by weight, and more preferably from 4 to 15% by weight.
  • the polymer appears to be essential not only for building but also for creating adequately structured spray-dried particles.
  • Suitable polymer include the following, the list not being exhaustive: salts of polyacrylic acid, for example, Versicol (Trade Mark) E5, E7 and E9 ex Allied Colloids, average molecular weights 3500, 27 000 and 70 000 respectively; Narlex (Trade Mark) LD 30 and 34 ex National Adhesives and Resins Ltd, average molecular weights 5000 and 25 000 respectively; Acrysol (Trade Mark) LMW-10, LMW-20, LMW-45 and A-IN ex Rohm & Haas, average molecular weights 1000, 2000, 4500 and 60 000; and Sokalan (Trade Mark) PA 110S ex BASF, average molecular weight 250 000; ethylene/maleic acid copolymers, for example, the EMA (Trade Mark) series ex Monsanto; methyl vinyl ether/maleic acid copolymers, for example Gantrez (Trade Mark) AN119 ex GAF Corporation; acrylic acid/maleic acid copolymers, for example, Sokalan (Trade
  • Mixtures of two or more of these polymers may of course be used if desired.
  • the spray-dried base powders of the invention also contain as essential ingredients one or more anionic detergent-active compounds (surfactants), in an amount of from 5 to 60% by weight, preferably from 10 to 60% by weight, more preferably from 10 to 30% by weight, and especially from 12 to 30% by weight.
  • anionic detergent-active compounds surfactants
  • the weight ratio of sodium carbonate to anionic surfactant should not exceed 1.1:1 in order for particle porosities of 40% and below to be obtained.
  • higher ratios can be tolerated: only the limitation on the total electrolyte level (maximum 25% by weight) need be considered.
  • Anionic surfactants are well known to those skilled in the detergents art. Examples include alkylbenzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonates having an average chain length of about C12; primary and secondary alcohol sulphates, particularly sodium C12-C15 primary alcohol sulphates; olefin sulphonates; alkane sulphonates; and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
  • nonionic detergent-active agents may also be present in the spray-dried base powders of the invention, in an amount not exceeding 30% by weight, and preferably not exceeding 15% by weight.
  • a preferred range for nonionic surfactant content is from 1 to 10% by weight.
  • the weight ratio of anionic surfactant to nonionic surfactant is preferably at least 0.67:1, more preferably at least 1:1.
  • Nonionic surfactants that may be used include the primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates, especially the C12-C15 primary and secondary alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 3 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
  • the spray-dried powder of the invention may if desired contain one or more soaps of fatty acids, but the level of soap present is preferably not high enough to cause a significant reduction in particle porosity.
  • the total amount of detergent-active material, including soap, in the spray-dried base powders of the invention is preferably within the range of from 10 to 75% by weight, more preferably from 12 to 65% by weight.
  • the especially preferred range is from 12 to 50% by weight, with a weight ratio of anionic surfactant to nonionic surfactant within the range of from 1:1 to 10:1.
  • the spray-dried base powder may of course contain any of the usual minor ingredients suitable for undergoing slurry-making and spray-drying processes, for example, antiredeposition agents and fluorescers.
  • the spray-dried base powder will also contain a certain amount of moisture: both moisture bound to the zeolite (about 1 part of bound water to 4 parts of zeolite) and free moisture.
  • the free moisture content influences powder porosity and can be determined by suitable choice of spray-drying conditions. The higher the free moisture content, the lower the porosity will be, but powder properties (flow, resistance to caking, compressibility, agglomerate strength) deteriorate as the moisture content rises.
  • a convenient expression of powder moisture content is the relative humidity. This is the partial water vapour pressure of a powder sample in a relatively small closed container at 20°C, expressed as a percentage of the partial water vapour pressure of the atmosphere at that temperature.
  • Spray-dried base powders of the present invention preferably have relative humidities not exceeding 70%, more preferably within the range of from 45 to 65%.
  • the base powder of the invention is prepared, as indicated above, by spray-drying an aqueous slurry of the ingredients.
  • spray-drying here is not restricted to high-temperature operation but also includes processes, more commonly referred to as spray-cooling, in which a tower inlet temperature lower than about 100-150°C is used.
  • the drying process may be carried out in two stages.
  • the slurry may be spray-dried to a relatively high powder moisture content, and the resulting wet powder dried further to its final desired moisture content using other apparatus, for example, a fluidised bed as described in GB 1 237 084 (Unilever).
  • the base powders of the invention are characterised by excellent agglomerate strength. This is defined as the pressure that has to be exerted on a sample of powder to compress it to a bed porosity of 0.4.
  • the latter value has been selected since it is known to be the bed porosity of densely packed granular solids, including detergent powders: to achieve bed porosities below 0.4 any agglomerates in a powder sample have to be broken down into the primary particles of which they are composed, these primary particles corresponding in size to the droplets formed when the detergent slurry was atomised in the spray-drying tower.
  • the agglomerate strength is a measure of the resistance of the agglomerates in a powder, on compression, to breakdown into the smaller primary particles.
  • the agglomerate strength is measured as follows. A 0.3 g sample of the 250-500 ⁇ m sieve fraction of the spray-dried base powder is subjected to compression in a compression cell of circular cross-section, having a diameter of 1.3 cm and (hence) a cross-sectional area of 1.33 cm2. The work of compression is measured and plotted against the height of the powder bed in the cell.
  • Bed porosity as a function of bed height can be calculated from the bulk density of the powder bed (calculated from the weight of the powder sample, its height and the cross-sectional area of the compression cell), the true density of the material (solid density) and the powder porosity, by means of the following equation:
  • the particle porosity may be determined by mercury porosimetry.
  • Agglomerate strength values depend on bulk density as well as on the formulation of the slurry, and for powders having bulk densities of 400 g litre or above values above 7 N/cm2 are considered good.
  • the spray-dried base powder of the invention is useful as a detergent composition in its own right. Generally, however, various additional ingredients may be sprayed on or postdosed to give a more efficient product, and the base powder may form a major or minor part of a more complex composition.
  • granular detergent compositions in accordance with the present invention may contain, for example, from 10 to 100% of the spray-dried base powder of the invention.
  • such detergent compositions may contain from 10 to 90% by weight, preferably from 30 to 90% by weight, of base powder and from 10 to 90% by weight, preferably from 10 to 70% by weight, of postdosed solid and/or liquid material.
  • postdosing here encompasses any non-spray-drying method by which solid or liquid ingredients may be added to the base powder, for example, dry mixing, granulation, agglomeration, overspraying or any combination of these techniques.
  • Some materials may be postdosed because they are sensitive to heat and thus unsuitable for undergoing spray-drying.
  • examples of such materials include surfactants, enzymes, bleaches, bleach precursors, bleach stabilisers, lather suppressors, perfumes and dyes.
  • Liquid or pasty ingredients may conveniently be adsorbed on to a solid, porous, particulate, generally inorganic, carrier which is then postdosed to the base powder of the invention.
  • examples of such ingredients are anionic and nonionic surfactants, and liquid lather suppressors such as silicone oil.
  • solid sodium silicate Another material that may be postdosed, as previously mentioned, is solid sodium silicate: thus unfavourable interaction with the sodium aluminosilicate in the slurry is avoided.
  • an aqueous solution or dispersion of sodium silicate may be blown into the tower simultaneously with the introduction of the base powder slurry, as described and claimed in our European Patent Application No. 87 308239.0 filed on 17 September 1987.
  • the base powder of the invention is characterised by an especially low particle porosity of less than 40%, preferably less than 35%. Its bulk density is therefore very high and it is exceptionally suitable for use as a base for granular detergent compositions of high bulk density, for example, of 650 g/litre and above, especially from 700 to 900 g/litre. In such compositions, it is important that any postdosed material does not lower the bulk density significantly.
  • One especially preferred embodiment of the invention is a very high bulk density detergent composition obtained by filling the voids between the relatively large particles of base powder with postdosed solid material, preferably including a substantial proportion of sodium sulphate, in the form of a finely divided dense powder of low porosity. In this manner an increase in bulk density of 150 g/litre or more, preferably at least 200 g/litre, may be achieved.
  • the final product comprises from 40 to 85% by weight of the base powder of the invention and from 15 to 60% by weight of postdosed ingredients of high bulk density and small particle size, for example from 15 to 35% by weight of sodium sulphate and from 0 to 45% of other postdosed ingredients.
  • the granulometry of the postdosed material is matched to that of the base powder, the relationship being expressed in terms of the Rosin-Rammler particle size distribution described by Rosin and Rammler, J Inst Fuel 7 29-36 (1933).
  • the postdosed solid material should have an overall Rosin-Rammler average particle size not exceeding 75%, and preferably not exceeding 70%, of that of the base powder.
  • the Rosin-Rammler average particle size of the base powder may be from 350 to 800 ⁇ m, and that of the postdosed material from 200 to 400 ⁇ m.
  • the postdosed solid material should also itself be of high bulk density: at least 850 g/litre, preferably at least 900 g/litre.
  • the postdosed solid material contains a substantial proportion of sodium sulphate.
  • This material may be obtained with a bulk density of 1200 g/litre or more, preferably at least 1300 g/litre, and a suitable particle size distribution.
  • the use of very high bulk density sodium sulphate allows greater flexibility in the choice of any other solid postdosed ingredients.
  • a detergent composition produced by the process of the invention will have a particle size distribution such that the larger particles are predominantly derived from the spray-dried base powder while the smaller particles are predominantly derived from the postdosed solid materials, including sodium sulphate.
  • This embodiment of the invention offers another important benefit in addition to increased bulk density. Powders composed of a relatively coarse base powder and relatively fine postdosed material have surprisingly been found to exhibit significantly better dispensing properties in the washing machine, as compared with powders having a similar particle size distribution but composed of a relatively fine base powder and relatively coarse postdosed material.
  • the postdosed material should not contain too high a level of very small particles or "fines": the content of particles smaller than 125 ⁇ m is preferably less than 15% by weight, and more preferably less than 10% by weight.
  • the "fines" content of the base powder is also preferably less than 15% by weight.
  • compositions in which the spray-dried powder of the invention is only a minor component, constituting for example from 10 to 30% by weight of the total product or possibly even less, and perhaps better regarded as an "adjunct" rather than as a base powder.
  • Spray-dried base powders were prepared to the compositions set out in the following Tables IA, IIA, IIIA and IVA, and the properties of these powders are given in the corresponding Tables IB, IIB, IIIB and IVB. Examples identified by number are within the invention, while examples identified by letter are comparative.
  • the polymer used in all the compositions was Sokalan (Trade Mark) CP5 ex BASF, an acrylic/maleic copolymer in sodium salt form.
  • the minor ingredients referred to in the Tables included antiredeposition agent, fluorescer and EDTA.
  • Compositions 1 to 6 in Tables IA and IB all contained relatively high levels, above 14.5% by weight, of anionic surfactant, and in every case the weight ratio of sodium carbonate to anionic surfactant was less than 1.1:1. It will be seen that at total electrolyte levels ranging from zero (insignificant) to 12.6% by weight, powders having particle porosites below 0.40 were obtained. The bulk density in every case exceeded 530 g/l. Although in some cases high moisture content led to rather high compressibility values, the other powder properties were excellent.
  • compositions 7 to 11 in Tables IIA and IIB form a similar series but with lower levels, below 14.5% by weight, of anionic surfactant.
  • the powders all had particle porosities below 0.4 even though in some cases the ratio of sodium carbonate to anionic surfactant exceeded 1.1:1.
  • compositions 1 to 4 and 6 to 11 contained no significant amounts of any electrolyte other than sodium carbonate, while Composition 5 contained sodium carbonate and sodium silicate.
  • Composition 1 containing no sodium carbonate displayed a slight yellow discolouration, while the powders of Examples 2-11 were white.
  • Comparative composition A contained just above 14.5% by weight of anionic surfactant, and the ratio of sodium carbonate to anionic surfactant was just above the limit of 1.1:1, and it will be seen that its particle porosity was 0.41: it should be compared with Example 10 which had the same ratio of sodium carbonate to anionic surfactant but a lower level (just below 14.5% by weight) of anionic surfactant, and a particle porosity of 0.36. Comparative Examples B, C and E show that higher levels of sodium carbonate, and higher ratios, gave even higher particle porosities. Comparative Example D shows the detrimental effect of including sodium sulphate.
  • compositions 12 to 16 in Table IVA and IVB illustrate the invention in a series of compositions containing relatively higher proportions of anionic surfactant. The very high bulk densities of these powders will be noted. As with the earlier Examples, Composition 12 containing no sodium carbonate displayed a slight yellow discolouration, while the other powders were all white.
  • Fully formulated detergent compositions were prepared by postdosing various ingredients, as specified below, to the base powders 4, B and 13 described above.
  • Composition 17 was a powder in accordance with an especially preferred embodiment of the invention since the postdosed material had an overall Rosin-Rammler average particle size (315 ⁇ m) only 75% of that of the base powder, and was also of high bulk density (930 g/litre). An increase of bulk density of 180 g/litre to the very high figure of 740 g/litre was thereby achieved.
  • Composition 18 is an example of a powder in which the base powder was of exceptionally high bulk density (595 g/litre).
  • the postdosed material was also of very high bulk density (930 g/litre) but of larger particle size (320 ⁇ m, 84%) in relation to the base powder (380 ⁇ m) so the increase achieved by postdosing (145 g/litre) was smaller than in Composition 17.
  • the bulk density of the final powder was just as high (740 g/litre) as that of Composition 17.
  • Comparative Composition F was composed of a base powder of low bulk density (440 g/litre) and postdosed material of relatively low bulk density (720 g/litre) and a particle size not significantly smaller than that of the base powder. Postdosing achieved a bulk density increase of 140 g/litre, but the final figure (580 g/litre) was considerably lower than the preferred target figure of 650 g/litre.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)

Claims (21)

  1. Ein Verfahren zur Herstellung eines phosphatfreien Reinigungsmittelpulvers, das das Sprühtrocknen eines wässrigen Breies zur Bildung eines Pulvers umfaßt, wobei der Brei umfaßt:
    a) von 5 bis 60 Gew.-%, bezogen auf das Pulver, einer oder mehrerer anorganischer reinigungsaktiver Verbindungen;
    b) von 0 bis 30 Gew.-%, bezogen auf das Pulver, einer oder mehrerer nichtionischer, waschaktiver Verbindungen;
    c) von 15 bis 86 Gew.-%, bezogen auf das Pulver, kristallinen oder amorphen Natriumaluminiumsilikatbuilders;
    d) von 2 bis 40 Gew.-%, bezogen auf das Pulver, eines polymeren Polycarboxylats;
    e) gegebenenfalls weitere Salze;
    f) gegebenenfalls herkömmliche kleinere Inhaltsstoffe;
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der Brei 2 bis 20 Gew.-%, bezogen auf das Pulver, Natriumcarbonat umfaßt, das Pulver einen Gesamtelektrolytgehalt von nicht mehr als 20 Gew.-% und eine Teilchenporosität von nicht mehr als 0,40 besitzt, und daß, wenn die Menge an anionischer, waschaktiver Verbindung (a) 14,5 Gew.-% übersteigt, das Gewichtsverhältnis von Natriumcarbonat zu der anionischen waschaktiven Verbindung (a) 1.1:1 nicht übersteigt.
  2. Ein Verfahren wie in Anspruch 1 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der Gesamtelektrolytgehalt des gebildeten Pulvers 15 Gew.-% nicht übersteigt.
  3. Ein Verfahren wie in Anspruch 2 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der Gesamtelektrolytgehalt 13 Gew.-% nicht übersteigt.
  4. Ein Verfahren wie in einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der Brei 5 bis 15 Gew.-%, bezogen auf das Pulver, Natriumcarbonat umfaßt.
  5. Ein Verfahren wie in einem vorhergehenden Anspruch beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der Brei Natriumcarbonat in einem Gewichtsverhältnis zu dem anionischen oberflächenaktiven Mittel (a) im Bereich von 0.1:1 bis 0.8:1 umfaßt.
  6. Ein Verfahren wie in einem vorhergehenden Anspruch beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das gebildete Pulver eine Teilchenporosität von weniger als 0,35 besitzt.
  7. Ein Verfahren wie in einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das Pulver im wesentlichen frei von anderen Elektrolyten als Natriumcarbonat ist.
  8. Ein Verfahren wie in einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das Pulver als ein Salz Natriumsilikat einer Menge von nicht mehr als 10 Gew.-% umfaßt.
  9. Ein Verfahren wie in Anspruch 8 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Menge an Natriumsilikat 5 Gew.-% nicht übersteigt.
  10. Ein Verfahren wie in Anspruch 8 oder 9 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das Pulver im wesentlichen frei von anderen Elektrolyten als Natriumcarbonat und Natriumsilikat (e) ist.
  11. Ein Verfahren wie in einem vorhergehenden Anspruch beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das Pulver 10 bis 60 Gew.-% insgesamt an anionischen reinigungsaktiven Verbindungen (a) enthält.
  12. Ein Verfahren wie in einem vorhergehenden Anspruch beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß eine nichtionische waschaktive Verbindung (b) vorhanden ist, wobei das Gewichtsverhältnis einer anionischen reinigungsaktiven Verbindung (a) zu der nichtionische reinigungsaktiven Verbindung (b) wenigstens 0.67:1 beträgt.
  13. Ein Verfahren wie in Anspruch 12 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das Gewichtsverhältnis an anionischer reinigungsaktiver Verbindung zu nichtionischer reinigungsaktiver Verbindung im Bereich von 1:1 bis 10:1 liegt.
  14. Ein Verfahren wie in einem vorhergehenden Anspruch beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die relative Feuchtigkeit des gebildeten Pulvers 70 % nicht übersteigt.
  15. Ein Verfahren wie in Anspruch 14 beansprucht, gekennzeichnet durch eine relative Feuchtigkeit im Bereich von 45 bis 65 Gew.-%.
  16. Eine granuläre, phosphatfreie Reinigungsmittelzusammensetzung, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß sie umfaßt:
    i) von 10 bis 100 Gew.-% eines sprühgetrockneten Pulvers, hergestellt durch ein Verfahren wie in einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 15 beansprucht.
    ii) von 0 bis 90 Gew.-% eines oder mehrerer nachdosierter fester und/oder flüssiger Inhaltsstoffe.
  17. Ein Verfahren wie in Anspruch 16 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß es umfaßt:
    i) von 30 bis 90 Gew.-% eines sprühgetrockneten Pulvers, und
    ii) von 10 bis 70 Gew.-% an nachdosierten Inhaltsstoffen.
  18. Eine Zusammensetzung wie in Anspruch 17 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß sie umfaßt:
    i) von 40 bis 85 Gew.-% eines sprühgetrockneten Pulvers, und
    ii) von 15 bis 60 Gew.-% an nachdosierten Inhaltsstoffen.
  19. Eine Zusammensetzung wie in Anspruch 18 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß sie umfaßt:
    i) von 40 bis 85 Gew.-% des sprühgetrockneten Pulvers,
    ii) von 15 bis 35 Gew.-% an nachdosiertem Natriumsulfat, und
    iii) gegebenenfalls von 0 bis 45 Gew.-% an anderem nachdosiertem Material
  20. Eine Zusammensetzung wie in Anspruch 18 oder Anspruch 19 beansprucht, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß jedes feste nachdosierte Material eine Gesamt-Rosin-Rammler-Durchschnittsteilchengröße von nicht mehr als 75 % der Rosin-Rammler-Durchschnittsteilchengröße des sprühgetrockeneten Pulvers (i) besitzt.
  21. Eine Zusammensetzung wie in einem der Ansprüche 18 bis 20 beansprucht, gekennzeichnet durch eine Schüttdichte von wenigstens 650 g/l.
EP87309570A 1986-10-31 1987-10-29 Reinigungsmittel in Pulverform und deren Herstellungsverfahren Revoked EP0270240B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8626082 1986-10-31
GB868626082A GB8626082D0 (en) 1986-10-31 1986-10-31 Detergent powders

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0270240A2 EP0270240A2 (de) 1988-06-08
EP0270240A3 EP0270240A3 (en) 1990-01-03
EP0270240B1 true EP0270240B1 (de) 1993-09-22

Family

ID=10606625

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP87309570A Revoked EP0270240B1 (de) 1986-10-31 1987-10-29 Reinigungsmittel in Pulverform und deren Herstellungsverfahren

Country Status (11)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0270240B1 (de)
JP (1) JP2544636B2 (de)
KR (1) KR920001993B1 (de)
AU (1) AU602932B2 (de)
BR (1) BR8705812A (de)
CA (1) CA1303938C (de)
DE (1) DE3787511T2 (de)
ES (1) ES2059393T3 (de)
GB (1) GB8626082D0 (de)
TR (1) TR24414A (de)
ZA (1) ZA878120B (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0942958B1 (de) * 1996-12-02 2001-12-19 Unilever Plc Verfahren zur herstellung einer waschmittelzusammensetzung

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA1286563C (en) * 1986-04-04 1991-07-23 Jan Hendrik Eertink Detergent powders and processes for preparing them
GB8810193D0 (en) * 1988-04-29 1988-06-02 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions & process for preparing them
US5024782A (en) * 1989-06-16 1991-06-18 The Clorox Company Zeolite agglomeration process and product
GB8918984D0 (en) * 1989-08-21 1989-10-04 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
GB8924294D0 (en) * 1989-10-27 1989-12-13 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
GB9012612D0 (en) * 1990-06-06 1990-07-25 Unilever Plc Detergents compositions
DE4100306A1 (de) * 1991-01-08 1992-07-09 Henkel Kgaa Kornfoermige, leicht loesliche trockenkonzentrate von inhaltsstoffen aus wasch- und/oder reinigungsmitteln und verfahren zu ihrer herstellung
DE4104085A1 (de) * 1991-02-11 1992-08-13 Henkel Kgaa Granulares additiv fuer wasch- und reinigungsmittel
GB9104547D0 (en) * 1991-03-05 1991-04-17 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
DE4211699A1 (de) * 1992-04-08 1993-10-14 Henkel Kgaa Verfahren zur Erhöhung des Schüttgewichts sprühgetrockneter Waschmittel
ES2116311T3 (es) * 1992-07-15 1998-07-16 Procter & Gamble Procedimiento y composiciones para detergentes compactos.
JPH08501118A (ja) * 1992-09-08 1996-02-06 ユニリーバー・ナームローゼ・ベンノートシヤープ 洗剤組成物及びその製造方法
GB9313878D0 (en) * 1993-07-05 1993-08-18 Unilever Plc Detergent composition or component containing anionic surfactant and process for its preparation
GB9317180D0 (en) * 1993-08-18 1993-10-06 Unilever Plc Granular detergent compositions containing zeolite and process for their preparation
EP0653481A1 (de) * 1993-11-11 1995-05-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Granulare Waschmittelzusammensetzung
EP0745119B1 (de) * 1994-02-18 1999-12-08 Henkel-Ecolab GmbH & Co. OHG Verfahren zur herstellung von sprühgetrockneten granulaten
WO1996018714A1 (fr) * 1994-12-15 1996-06-20 Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd. Adjuvant pour detergent, son procede de fabrication et composition detergente le contenant
DE19500644B4 (de) * 1995-01-12 2010-09-09 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Sprühgetrocknetes Waschmittel oder Komponente hierfür
GB9510695D0 (en) * 1995-05-26 1995-07-19 Unilever Plc Detergent composition and process for its production
GB0125212D0 (en) 2001-10-19 2001-12-12 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
EP1529834A1 (de) * 2003-11-10 2005-05-11 The Procter & Gamble Company Waschmittelteilchen
EP1529833A1 (de) * 2003-11-10 2005-05-11 The Procter & Gamble Company Waschmittelteilchen
JP5705525B2 (ja) * 2010-12-16 2015-04-22 花王株式会社 ゼオライト複合粒子群

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IN161821B (de) * 1981-02-26 1988-02-06 Colgate Palmolive Co
US4379080A (en) * 1981-04-22 1983-04-05 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent compositions containing film-forming polymers
JPS6042279B2 (ja) * 1982-05-25 1985-09-20 花王株式会社 洗浄剤組成物
GR81618B (de) * 1983-06-15 1984-12-11 Procter & Gamble
US4609473A (en) * 1984-11-26 1986-09-02 Colgate Palmolive Company Bentonite-sulfate fabric softening particulate agglomerate, processes for manufacture and use thereof, and detergent compositions containing it
ZA858950B (en) * 1984-12-03 1987-07-29 Colgate Palmolive Co Antistatic built synthetic organic detergent composition
DE3444960A1 (de) * 1984-12-10 1986-06-12 Henkel KGaA, 4000 Düsseldorf Koerniges adsorptionsmittel
GB8504733D0 (en) * 1985-02-23 1985-03-27 Procter & Gamble Ltd Detergent compositions
JPH0665720B2 (ja) * 1985-04-03 1994-08-24 花王株式会社 濃縮粉末洗剤組成物
DE3514364A1 (de) * 1985-04-20 1986-10-23 Henkel KGaA, 4000 Düsseldorf Koerniges waschmittel mit verbessertem reinigungsvermoegen
GB8526999D0 (en) * 1985-11-01 1985-12-04 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
JPS62167399A (ja) * 1986-01-17 1987-07-23 花王株式会社 高密度粒状洗剤の製法
GB8609044D0 (en) * 1986-04-14 1986-05-21 Unilever Plc Detergent powders

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0942958B1 (de) * 1996-12-02 2001-12-19 Unilever Plc Verfahren zur herstellung einer waschmittelzusammensetzung

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR880005245A (ko) 1988-06-28
ZA878120B (en) 1989-07-26
DE3787511D1 (de) 1993-10-28
TR24414A (tr) 1991-10-08
BR8705812A (pt) 1988-05-31
EP0270240A2 (de) 1988-06-08
AU602932B2 (en) 1990-11-01
CA1303938C (en) 1992-06-23
JP2544636B2 (ja) 1996-10-16
DE3787511T2 (de) 1994-01-20
JPS63122797A (ja) 1988-05-26
EP0270240A3 (en) 1990-01-03
GB8626082D0 (en) 1986-12-03
ES2059393T3 (es) 1994-11-16
AU8041687A (en) 1988-05-05
KR920001993B1 (ko) 1992-03-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0270240B1 (de) Reinigungsmittel in Pulverform und deren Herstellungsverfahren
US4923628A (en) High bulk density detergent composition and process for its production
EP0221776B1 (de) Reinigungsmittel, deren Bestandteile und Verfahren zu deren Herstellung
US5238594A (en) Detergent compositions
US5518649A (en) Particulate detergent composition or component comprising zeolite MAP ASA carrier
EP0110588A1 (de) Frei fliessende Detergenspulver
EP0221777A2 (de) Reinigungsmittel
EP0260971B1 (de) Detergenszusammensetzung und Verfahren zu ihrer Herstellung
US4988454A (en) Low phosphorus containing detergent powders and process for preparing them: surfactant, aluminosilicate, sodium silicate and polyacrylate
CA2291631C (en) Detergent compositions
JPH04227693A (ja) 粒状漂白洗剤組成物
EP0985016A1 (de) Waschmittelzusammensetzungen enthaltend nichtionisches tensidgranulat
EP0745117B1 (de) Pfropfcopolymerisat enthaltende waschmittelzusammensetzung
EP0242141A2 (de) Reinigungsmittelpulver und Verfahren zu deren Herstellung
US5854198A (en) Particulate aluminosilicate-built detergent compositions comprising cogranules of zeolite map and alkali metal silicate
WO1994013773A1 (en) Detergent compositions
CA2030990C (en) Process for preparing a high bulk density detergent composition having improved dispensing properties
AU614287B2 (en) Automatic dishwashing detergent powder
EP0892843B1 (de) Modifiziertes aluminosilikat
KR900004554B1 (ko) 세제분말 및 그 제조방법
GB2283756A (en) Particulate detergent composition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19891213

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19910726

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: UNILEVER N.V.

Owner name: UNILEVER PLC

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3787511

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19931028

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: JACOBACCI CASETTA & PERANI S.P.A.

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN

Effective date: 19940617

Opponent name: PROCTER & GAMBLE EUROPEAN TECHNICAL CENTER N.V.

Effective date: 19940616

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN

Opponent name: PROCTER & GAMBLE EUROPEAN TECHNICAL CENTER N.V.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2059393

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 87309570.7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19960919

Year of fee payment: 10

RDAH Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REVO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAE Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFNO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971031

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

APAE Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFNO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20000920

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20001020

Year of fee payment: 14

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20011030

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020501

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 87309570.7

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20020501

PLBC Reply to examination report in opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE3

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20061025

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20061026

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20061031

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20061130

Year of fee payment: 20

RIN2 Information on inventor provided after grant (corrected)

Inventor name: EUSER, HUUG

Inventor name: PAOLI, MICHELE EMILIO

Inventor name: BAZLEY, MICHAEL RAYMOND FREDERICK

Inventor name: APPEL, PETER WILLAM

Inventor name: LIEM, SEENG DJIANG

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20070817

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20061031

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20061017

Year of fee payment: 20