EP0077528B1 - Raffiniertes geniessbares Öl und Verfahren zur Herstellung desselben - Google Patents

Raffiniertes geniessbares Öl und Verfahren zur Herstellung desselben Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0077528B1
EP0077528B1 EP82109482A EP82109482A EP0077528B1 EP 0077528 B1 EP0077528 B1 EP 0077528B1 EP 82109482 A EP82109482 A EP 82109482A EP 82109482 A EP82109482 A EP 82109482A EP 0077528 B1 EP0077528 B1 EP 0077528B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
oil
mixture
percent
phosphoric acid
temperature
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP82109482A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0077528A1 (de
Inventor
Leopold R. Strecker
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever Bestfoods North America
Original Assignee
Unilever Bestfoods North America
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=23207490&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0077528(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Unilever Bestfoods North America filed Critical Unilever Bestfoods North America
Publication of EP0077528A1 publication Critical patent/EP0077528A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0077528B1 publication Critical patent/EP0077528B1/de
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11B—PRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B3/00—Refining fats or fatty oils
    • C11B3/001—Refining fats or fatty oils by a combination of two or more of the means hereafter
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11B—PRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B3/00—Refining fats or fatty oils

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the refining of crude vegetable oils.
  • the present invention relates to the refining of such crude oils containing impurities to produce an essentially additive free product having good oxidative, flavor and cold-test stabilities.
  • alkali refining removes free fatty acids and other acidic materials, some phosphatides, proteinaceous matter, pigments and trace metals.
  • alkali refining is suitable for preparation of oils for further processing steps, such as bleaching and deodorization, it has some serious disadvantages also.
  • Alkali refining typically results in a high loss of the neutral oil components of the crude oil, reducing the amount of yield of the refined oil product.
  • the removal of free fatty acids by alkali refining results in the production of soapstock which has to be further processed in order to recover the fatty acids as a by-product.
  • alkali refining typically results in a large amount of waste water, often causing a serious water pollution problem.
  • Alkali refined oils are additionally disadvantageous in that the finished oils require stabilizers, typically antioxidants or citric acid, or the like, to maintain acceptable flavor characteristics and prevent harmful oxidation on storage.
  • Alkali refining also involves a dewaxing step which increases the cost of the refined oil.
  • This additional step removes such low temperature insoluble compounds, which are generally referred to as waxes although these compounds are not limited to compounds which are classed as waxes in a strict chemical sense. Without this processing step of chilling the oil and removing the solids formed, the finished oil would not have acceptable cold-test stability, i.e. it would not retain good clarity during storage at 0°C for 24 hours.
  • U.S. Patent No. 1,744,843 to Taylor, et al relates to the process of bleaching animal and vegetable oils and fats and comprises adding bleaching earth and sulfuric acid.
  • the bleaching earth is added at least as early in the process as the acid so that the fat or oil is exposed to the acid only in the presence of the bleaching earth.
  • the mixture is agitated and the supernatant oil is drawn off and filtered through a layer of diatomaceous earth.
  • U.S. Patent No. 1,964,875 to Freiberg relates to an alkali-refining process, and discloses a method of removing impurities from oils and fats in which the oils or fats are mixed with a small quantity of concentrated phosphoric acid. The mixture is then heated slowly to about 70°C and stirred, and a small quantity of cellulose is added. When the action of the phosphoric acid and the cellulose is complete, the oil is separated by filtration.
  • U.S. Patent No. 1,973,790 to Appleton relates to the method of purifying non-edible vegetable oils to increase their heat stability for use in paints.
  • the oil is purified by thoroughly mixing it with an amount of phosphoric acid which is sufficient to react with the impurities in the oil. This will cause such impurities to be precipitated and settle out of the oil in the form of a sludge.
  • the purified oil is then segregated from the sludge.
  • U.S. Patent No. 2,510,379 to Christenson relates to a method of removing lecithin, other phosphatides and coloring matter. After the treatment of the oil with an alkali, the oil is further treated with an equivalent amount of a strong acid, and resultant salt produced by the alkali and the acid is removed. Phosphoric acid and other strong acids are used to neutralize the oil (column 2 lines 35-42). The reference also shows the use of acid activated bleaching clay (column 4 lines 10-15).
  • U.S. Patent No. 2,587,254 to Babayan relates to a method for reclaiming contaminated refuse palm oil used in steel fabrication.
  • the refuse palm oil is treated with from 1% to 5% (by weight) of either phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid or hydrochloric acid in at least 50% water (by weight of oil) at some temperature from 0°C to 100°C.
  • the mixture is allowed to stratify and the oil layer is separated from the aqueous layer and bleached.
  • U.S. Patent No. 2,903,434 to Gloss et al relates not to the refining of oils, but to the preparation of activated bleaching clay. Montmorillonite clay is treated with an aqueous solution of a fluorine compound and either hydrochloric, phosphoric or sulfuric acid.
  • U.S. Patent No. 2,981,697 to Mickelson et al shows a process for the preparation of an acid-activated decolorizing clay.
  • An acid-activatable subbentonite clay is treated with hydrogen chloride in aqueous solution and then washed with water until substantially free of chlorides. Then the washed clay is treated with either sulfuric acid or phosphoric acid at a temperature below about 50°C to remove the residual chlorides. Excess acid is removed from the clay, and the clay is flash-dryed at temperatures below 100°C.
  • U.S. Patent No. 3,284,213 to VanAkkeren discloses a process for treating triglyceride cooking oils to inhibit breakdown during heating and to prevent foaming.
  • About 0.05 to 3.5% of concentrated phosphoric acid is added to the oil, and the oil is heated slowly to a temperature of about 100°C and stirred slowly to prevent the formation of free acid in the oil.
  • Bleaching clay is added to the oil when the temperature has reached about 100°C and the mixture is then heated to about 120°C for about 15-30 minutes.
  • the oil is first cooled and filtered to remove the clay and phosphoric acid material, and then heated to about 220-225°C under reduced pressure.
  • the reference teaches that it is important to remove all of the phosphoric acid with the bleaching clay prior to the final heat treatment.
  • a ratio of phosphoric acid to clay up to 1:10 can be calculated from the examples.
  • U.S. Patent No. 3,354,188 to Rock et al shows a method of refining oil in which a refining agent substantially insoluble in the oil is first combined with an emulsifying agent, and then mixed with the oil to form an emulsion.
  • a particulate solid such as Fuller's earth, activated clay or charcoal is then added to adsorb the refining agent and the oil is separated from the solid.
  • Phosphoric acid is listed among the refining agents.
  • U.S. Patent No. 3,590,059 to Velan discloses a process for the purification of vegetable and animal oils containing fatty acids and other impurities.
  • the crude or degummed oil is first washed with about 1 to 5% by weight of water and the aqueous phase is separated from the resultant mixture.
  • the washed oil is then treated with less than 0.3% by weight of organic acid, sueh as formic, acetic, oxalic, lactic, citric, tartaric or succinic acids or the anhydrides of any of these acids or mixtures of these acids.
  • the moisture level of the oil is adjusted and the oil is bleached with a bleaching earth. Following this, the bleached oil is steam distilled under vacuum to remove fatty acids.
  • mineral acids, rather than organic acids is also suggested.
  • U.S. Patent No. 3,895,042 to Taylor relates to a process for refining crude vegetable oils as well as other fatty substances.
  • the crude fatty substances are heated to a temperature of from about 325°F to 500°F under vacuum or inert atmosphere in the presence of phosphoric acid and acid activated clay.
  • the resulting product is then filtered.
  • GB Patent No. 1 580 664 relates to improvements in refining crude fatty oils, which contain substantially no phospholipids. Therefore the degumming step is not an object of the citation. Although the steps of the process according to said'reference are similar to the process according to the invention, the ratio of the bleaching agent to phosphoric acid does not correspond with the claimed ratio, for oils other than palm oil.
  • a process for the refining of crude vegetable oils with the exception of palm oil to provide a product having good oxidative, flavor and cold-test stabilities, by treatment with phosphoric acid and a bleaching agent and subsequent deodorization characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
  • an edible oil having good flavor, oxidative and cold-test stability characteristics can be obtained from a physical-type refining process.
  • the present invention provides an oil as a final product with a level of up to three parts per million (3 ppm) residual phosphoric derived from phosphoric acid used in the process.
  • the phosphoric acid added as a processing aid reacts with minor components of the oil, such as chlorophyll, phospholipids and prooxidant metals during processing and may prevent some deleterious effect the bleaching earth would otherwise have on the oil if the phosphoric acid were not present. It is believed that the phosphorus has no further beneficial effect after the bleaching step and its removal after action of the bleaching earth would not alter the beneficial characteristics of the oil of the present invention.
  • Phosphorus present at the time of bleaching in the form of phospholipids does not produce an oil having the superior properties of the present invention. It is believed that such phosphorus compounds have no ability to bind heavy metals, such as iron and copper which promote oxidation.
  • Vegetable oils are known to contain many different types of impurities which must be removed prior to steam refining. Crude oils may contain any or all of the following: free fatty acids, hydratable phospholipids, non-hydratable phospholipids, low-temperature insolubles (generally referred to as "waxes"), trace metals, pigments, proteinaceous matter, mucilagenous matter, mycotoxins, pesticides and oxidation products.
  • cottonseed oil which contains a dark red pigment generally referred to as "gossipol" which is considered to be removable only by treatment with alkali
  • the process of the present invention can be applied to any of the commercially available oils: corn, soybean, peanut, safflower, sunflower, rapeseed, rice bran, coconut and babassu oils.
  • oils contain at least some of the impurities listed above.
  • Some, such as soybean oil and rapeseed oil typically contain relatively high concentrations of hydratable and non-hydratable phospholipids whereas the concentration of other impurities, such as low temperature insolubles (waxes) may not present a removal problem.
  • Other oils, such as corn oil and sunflower oil may contain relatively high concentrations of waxes, or trace metals, whereas phospholipids may not normally present a removal problem.
  • oils such as palm oil may not have concentrations of impurities which require removal prior to bleaching and steam refining. Physical refining methods have previously been applied to such oils with some success, as described for example in the GB-PS 1 580 664.
  • Free fatty acids and phospholipids can be useful, however, and it is not unusual to attempt to recover these.
  • the free fatty acids removed are only recoverable from the soapstock produced and are of generally low quality.
  • phospholipids as removed are of better quality and can be utilized for animal feed or the like, or further processed to recover commercial quality lecithin.
  • Free fatty acids, of a high quality than the acid oil obtained from soapstock can be obtained directly from the steam distillate in a much purer form.
  • This step may be carried out at any convenient temperature and room temperature is often suitable. However, lower temperatures are useful in order to provide the most efficient removal of compounds which are not soluble in the oil at low temperatures, referred to generally as "waxes". It is advantageous therefore where such waxes are present to complete this step at a slightly lower temperature, and temperatures in the range of about 5°C to about 20°C are most suitable.
  • a suitable degumming reagent typically less than one percent (1%) by weight, and water are added to the oil and agitated.
  • the reagent may be chosen from many which are known to the art, such as organic or inorganic acids or their anhydrides. Emulsifiers and surfactants are also known to be useful for this purpose.
  • the preferred reagents are maleic, fumaric, citric and phosphoric acid.
  • the degummed/ demetalized oil is then separated from the heavy phase containing any residual phospholipids and trace metals.
  • Oil prepared for bleaching, through the steps set out above, or by any other method known to the art, is combined with a small amount of phosphoric acid in aqueous solution. It is preferred to use a concentrated solution to reduce the need for later water removal.
  • the amount of phosphoric acid should be enough to form a mixture with at least two one-hundredths of a percent (0.02%) phosphoric acid by weight in the oil. Although larger amounts could be used, any concentration higher than about two-tenths of a percent (0.2%) phosphoric acid would cause a removal problem and this level therefore represents an upper limit as a practical matter.
  • the preferred range is from about five one-hundredths of a percent (0.05%) to about one tenth of a percent (0.1%) phosphoric acid by weight.
  • This mixture of oil and phosphoric acid is then agitated and it is advantageous to raise the temperature slightly. Temperatures between about 35°C and 40°C are typically employed advantageously, although at higher temperatures, usually above 40°C, it is considered necessary to introduce vacuum to prevent the harmful effects of oxidation on the oil quality.
  • a bleaching agent such as activated bleaching earth, Fuller's earth or the like is added in a suitable amount in order to remove most, but not all, of the phosphoric acid previously added.
  • the amount of bleaching agent should be calculated to provide an oil as a final product with a level of up to three parts per million (3 ppm) residual phosphorus derived from the phosphoric acid.
  • the preferred bleaching agent is an activated bleaching clay commercially available under the Tradename Filtrol 105(8) from Filtrol Corporation, which has been used advantageously in the Examples which follow. If vacuum has not previously been introduced, the system should be evacuated prior to heating the mixture to a temperature suitable for the action of the chosen bleaching agent and agitating.
  • the bleached oil should be filtered.
  • the vacuum should not be broken until the oil has been cooled sufficiently.
  • the oil could be blanketed with an inert gas such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide.
  • the oil bleached in this manner is then steam refined/deodorized in a manner known to the art to complete the processing.
  • a high quality corn oil was extracted from corn germ by the process disclosed in Application No. 8012909 filed in Great Britain on April 18,1980, published on October 28,1981 as UK Patent Application No. 2,074,183.
  • the same disclosure recently issued as United States Patent 4,341,713 claiming priority of the British Application.
  • the corn oil, which has already been degummed, obtained in this manner was uncharacteristically free of phospholipids and waxes, and was refined by the process of this invention and by the alkali refining process of the conventional art for comparison. Certain physical and chemical properties of this crude oil are listed in Table 1.
  • a six kilogram (6.0 kg) quantity of the crude corn oil maintained under a vacuum of two millimeters mercury (2 mm Hg) absolute pressure at 40°C was treated with four one-hundredths of a percent (0.04%) by weight phosphoric acid in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration in aqueous solution and agitated intensely for 15 minutes. Then, one percent (1.0%) bleaching earth by weight of the oil, commercially available from Filtrol Corporation under the Trademark Filtrol 105@ and two-tenths of a percent (0.2%) filter aid by weight of the oil, available from the Johns-Manville Corporation under the trademark Filtercel@ were added to this evacuated system.
  • the system was heated to 120°C and intense agitation continued for an additional 20 minutes, after which the mixture was cooled to 80°C and the vacuum was broken with nitrogen.
  • the bleached oil was filtered off in a Buechner funnel and two portions of two and three-tenths kilogram (2.3 kg) each were measured out.
  • the first such portion was designated Sample A and was steam refined-deodorized for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using two percent (2.0%) sparging steam.
  • a small amount of citric acid known to be a useful additive in alkali refined oils, was added to the second portion, designated Sample B, in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution in order to yield a feedstock for deodorization having one hundred parts per million (100 ppm) citric acid.
  • the sample was then steam refined/deodorized under the same conditions as Sample A. Physical and chemical properties of Sample A and B are also shown in Table 1.
  • Comparative samples were prepared by conventional alkali refining methods in the following manner.
  • a six and one-tenth kilogram (6.1 kg) quantity of the same crude corn oil maintained at 40°C was treated with a two and eight-tenths of a percent (2.8%) of 16° Baume sodium hydroxide solution and agitated intensely for 15 minutes.
  • the oil was then heated to 65°C and stirred for an additional 15 minutes. Following this the oil was centrifuged at fourteen hundred and thirty-three (1433) times the gravitational constant (9.81 m/sec 2 ) at a rate of nine kilograms per hour (9 kg/hr) to separate the precipitated soaps. All centrifugations in this and the following examples were carried out under these conditions unless specifically noted.
  • the oil was then washed by twice adding and mixing hot distilled water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and centrifuging each time. Subsequently, the oil was dried at a temperature of 100°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure for 30 minutes.
  • the oil was bleached by adding one percent (1.0%) bleaching earth by weight of the oil, commercially available from Filtrol Corporation under the Trademark Filtrol@ 105, together with two-tenths of a percent (0.2%) filter aid by weight of the oil, commercially available from the Johns-Manville Corporation under the Trademark Filtercel@, heating the mixture to 120°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure and agitating for 20 minutes. After cooling to 80°C, the oil was filtered off in a Buechner funnel and two portions of two and three-tenths kilogram (2.3 kg) each were measured out.
  • Sample C was deodorized for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using one and one-half percent (1.5%) sparging steam.
  • a small amount of citric acid was added to Sample D in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution in order to yield a feedstock for deodorization having one hundred parts per million (100 ppm) citric acid.
  • the sample was. then deodorized under the same conditions as Sample C. Physical and chemical properties of Samples C and D are also given in Table 1.
  • oils were subjected to color reversion and flavor stability tests.
  • the color reversion test consisted of storage in the dark at ambient temperature with unlimited air space for eight weeks. Color measurements were performed according to AOCS Official Method Cd 13b-45. The color reversion data for each sample are given in Table 2. Since the reversion of color is believed to be a result of oxidative changes in the oil, peroxide values were also measured according to the AOCS Official Method Cd 8-53 at the time of each color determination. This data is also given in Table 2.
  • Flavor stability tests were conducted as follows: Samples were stored in the dark at 35°C with ten percent (10%) air head space and flavor determinations were made by a trained panel after two (2), five (5) and twelve (12) months. Each sample was scored for flavor strength on a scale from 1 to 9 with 1 being completely flavorless and 9 extremely strong. The results of these tests are given in Table 3.
  • Crude, expelled corn oil having appreciable amounts of impurities such as free fatty acids, phospholipids, waxes, trace metals and proteinaceous matter was prepared by the common commercial expelling process.
  • crude oil is recovered by subjecting dry corn germ, typically containing from forty-three percent (43%) to forty-five percent (45%) oil and moisture in the amount of one and one-half percent (1.5%) to two percent (2.0%) by weight, to mechanical pressure in a screw press. Physical and chemical properties for this crude oil are given in Table 4.
  • a thirteen and one-tenth kilogram (13.1 kg) quantity of the crude corn oil was mixed with three percent (3.0%) by weight of distilled water and heated to 60°C. The oil was held at this temperature and intensely agitated for 15 minutes. Precipitating gums were separated by centrifugation.
  • the degummed oil thus obtained was treated with two-tenths of one-percent (0.2%) by weight phosphoric acid in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration in aqueous solution.
  • the oil was intensely agitated at a temperature of 40°Cfor a period of 15 minutes.
  • three percent (3.0%) by weight distilled water was added and the temperature was raised to 60°C and agitated for 15 minutes.
  • the oil was then centrifuged to remove the residual gums and metal complexes.
  • the first portion of five and two-tenths kilogram (5.2 kg) of the degummed, demetalized oil was treated with one-tenth of one percent (0.1%) phosphoric acid in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration in aqueous solution.
  • the oil was then stirred for 15 minutes at 40°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure.
  • the same bleaching earth and filter aid described in Example 1 were then added in the amount of three percent (3.0%) bleaching earth by weight of the oil and six-tenths of one percent (0.6%) filter aid by weight of the oil.
  • This mixture was heated to 120°C and agitated for 20 minutes.
  • the oil was cooled to 90°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was filtered off in a Buechner funnel.
  • Sample E and Sample F each containing two and three-tenths kilogram (2.3 kg) were measured out from the bleached oil obtained in this manner.
  • citric acid in twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution was added to Sample F to provide one hundred parts per million (100 ppm) citric acid in the feedstock for deodorization.
  • Both samples were then steam refined-deodorized for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using two percent (2.0%) spargin steam.
  • Physical and chemical properties for these samples are given in Table 4.
  • the second portion of six and two-tenths kilogram (6.2 kg) of the degummed, demetalized oil was reacted with a five and four-tenths of one percent (5.4%) of 16° Baume sodium hydroxide solution and agitated intensely at 40°C for 15 minutes.
  • the oil was then heated to 65°C and stirred for 15 minutes. Soapstock produced was separated from the oil by centrifugation.
  • the oil was then washed by twice adding and mixing hot distilled water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and centrifuging each time. Subsequently, the oil was dried at a temperature of 100°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure for 30 minutes.
  • the oil was bleached by adding two percent (2.0%) bleaching earth by weight of the oil, and four-tenths of one percent (0.4%) of the filter aid, by weight of the oil, used in Example 1.
  • the mixture was heated to 120°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure and agitated for 20 minutes.
  • the mixture was then cooled to 90°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was filtered off with a Buechner funnel.
  • Sample G and Sample H each containing two and three-tenths kilogram (2.3 kg), were measured out from the oil obtained in this manner.
  • Example 2 citric acid in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution was added to Sample H to provide one hundred parts per million (100 ppm) citric acid in the feedstock for deodorization. Both samples were then deodorized for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using two percent (2.0%) sparging steam. Physical and chemical properties for these samples are given in Table 4.
  • Example 2 Following the methods used in Example 1, the samples produced were subjected to color reversion and flavor stability tests. The resulting data are shown in Table 5 and Table 6.
  • a two thousand two hundred and sixty kilogram (2260 kg) quantity of regular production crude expelled corn oil was placed into a stainless steel kettle equipped with a two-propeller stirrer.
  • the precipitating gums were separated in a Westphalia@ centrifuge operating at seventy-eight hundred revolutions per minute (7800 rpm), with an oil flow rate of four and one-half kilograms per minute (4.5 kg/minute).
  • the degummed oil obtained was deaerated and dried under a vacuum of 10640 Pa (eighty millimeters of mercury, 80 mm Hg) absolute pressure at a temperature of 40°C with intense agitation for 70 minutes.
  • a two hundred and fifty liter (250 I) portion of the oil was pumped into a slurry kettle where it was mixed with sixty two kilograms (62 kg), representing three percent (3.0%) by weight of the total oil, bleaching earth (Filtrol@ 105 as described in Example 1) and twelve and one-half kilogram (12.5 kg), representing six-tenths of a percent (0.6%) by weight of the total oil, filter aid commercially available from the Johns-Manville Corporation under the Trademark Hyflo Super-Cel@.
  • the mixture in the slurry kettle was agitated intensely for 5 minutes, and was then reintroduced into the original kettle, still under vacuum.
  • the mixture was heated to 120°C and agitated at one hundred revolutions per minute (100 rpm) for 30 minutes.
  • the mixture was then cooled to 60°C and held under reduced pressure of 13300 Pa (one hundred millimeters of mercury, 100 mm Hg) absolute pressure until filtration was completed.
  • the filter press was then blown with nitrogen to recover
  • citric acid in the form of a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution was introduced into a quantity of the oil, designated as Sample J.
  • Citric acid was added into the final deodorization stage at the rate of one milliliter per minute (1 ml/min) representing a proportion of citric acid to the oil of fifty parts per million (50 ppm). The remaining oil was not treated with citric acid and was designated as Sample K.
  • Both samples were steam refined-deodorized in a continuous pilot plant deodorizer unit at an oil flow rate of two hundred and seventy-four kilograms per hour (274 kg/hr) at a temperature of 227°C under a vacuum of 133-266 Pa (one to two millimeters of mercury, 1-2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using three percent (3.0%) sparging steam.
  • a fourteen kilogram (14 kg) quantity of crude soybean oil was heated to 40°C in a glass container, then three percent (3.0%) by weight of distilled water was added and the oil was agitated intensely for 20 minutes. The temperature was raised to 60°C and a slower agitation continued for another 20 minutes. The oil was then centrifuged to separate the hydrated phosphatides.
  • the oil thus obtained was treated with two-tenths of a percent (0.2%) phosphoric acid in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration in aqueous solution and agitated intensely for 15 minutes at a temperature 40°C under a nitrogen atmosphere. Distilled water, in the amount of three percent (3.0%) by weight, was then added to the oil. The temperature was increased to 60°C and a slower agitation continued for another 20 minutes. The oil was then centrifuged under the same conditions as above to separate the oil from residual phosphatides and gums.
  • a five and three-tenths kilogram (5.3 kg) portion of the twice degummed oil was treated with three one-hundredths of a percent (0.03%) phosphoric acid in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration in aqueous solution and stirred at 40°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure for 15 minutes.
  • one percent (1.0%) bleaching earth, by weight of the oil, commercially available from Filtrol Corporation under the Trademark Filtrol 105@, and two-tenths of a percent (0.2%) filter aid, by weight of the oil, commercially available from the Johns-Manville Corporation under the Trademark Filtercel@ were added and the mixture, while still under vacuum, was heated to 120°C and intensely agitated. After twenty minutes of such continued treatment, the mixture was cooled to 80°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was filtered off in a Buechner funnel.
  • a comparative sample was prepared by conventional alkali refining methods in the following manner.
  • a six and four-tenths kilogram (6.4 kg) quantity of the same twice degummed oil maintained at 40°C was treated with four and fifty-six one-hundredths of a percent (4.56%) of 16° Baume sodium hydroxide solution and was agitated intensely under a nitrogen atmosphere for 15 minutes.
  • the temperature was increased to 65°C and a slower stirring continued for another 15 minutes.
  • the oil was then centrifuged to separate the precipitated soaps.
  • the oil was washed by twice adding and mixing hot distilled water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and centrifuging each time. Subsequently, the oil was dried at a temperature of 105°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure for 30 minutes.
  • the oil was bleached by adding one percent (1.0%) by weight of the same bleaching earth and two-tenths of a percent (0.2%) by weight of the same filter aid employed above, heating the mixture to 120°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure and agitating for 20 minutes. After cooling to 80°C, the oil was filtered off in a Buechner funnel. A small amount of citric acid in a fifteen percent (15%) aqueous solution was added to yield one hundred parts per million (100 ppm) citric acid in the bleached oil.
  • the oil was then deodorized for 90 minutes at 250°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using one and one-half percent (1.5%) sparging steam.
  • the oil obtained in this manner was designated Sample M.
  • the samples obtained in the above manner were then tested for flavor stability.
  • the samples were sealed in clear 236,6 cm 3 (eight ounce, 8 oz) glass bottles with ten percent (10%) air headspace, and aged under irradiation and dark storage conditions.
  • the samples subjected to irradiation were stored for three (3) weeks in a light cabinet having a continuous light exposure equivalent to 700 lux (sixty-five (65) foot candles) at a constant temperature of 35°C.
  • the samples subjected to dark storage were kept in a light-proof cabinet for six (6) months at a constant temperature of 35°C.
  • flavor evaluations on a scale of 1 to 9 were made by a trained panel. The results are reported in Table 11.
  • rapeseed oil is produced from rapeseed varieties which are typically low in erucic acid and glucosinolate. This oil is commercially available as a water-degummed crude which contains a maximum of two hundred parts per million (200 ppm) residual phosphorus and no more than five percent (5.0%) erucic acid. As described below, a sample of this oil was refined in the laboratory according to the process of the present invention. An additional sample was prepared by the alkali refining process of the conventional art for comparison. Certain physical and chemical properties of this commercially available oil are listed in Table 12.
  • a ten kilogram (10 kg) sample of this Canadian commercial grade crude rapeseed oil was placed in a metal container. With the temperature held constant at 25°C, maleic acid in aqueous solution in the amount of two-hundredths of a percent (0.02%) by weight of the oil was added and the mixture was stirred for ten minutes. Distilled water, in the amount of three percent (3.0%) by weight of the oil, was added and the mixture was agitated for an additional twenty (20) minutes. The mixture was then centrifuged to separate the oil from the hydrated phospholipids.
  • a three and three-tenths kilogram (3.3 kg) portion of the rapeseed oil degummed in this manner was bleached according to the further teachings of the present invention.
  • the oil was maintained under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure at 40°C and was treated with one-tenth of one percent (0.1%) phoshoric acid by weight of the oil in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration in aqueous solution and agitated intensely for 10 minutes.
  • a two and four-tenths kilogram (2.4 kg) portion of the bleached oil thus obtained was then steam refined-deodorized.
  • the bleached oil was first treated with fifty parts per million (50 ppm) citric acid, added in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution. Subsequently, the oil was steam refined-deodorized in a five liter (5 flask for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure, using two percent (2.0%) sparging steam.
  • the rapeseed oil physically refined in this manner was designated Sample N. Certain physical and chemical properties of this oil, at various process stages, are shown in Table 12.
  • a comparative sample was processed by the conventional alkali refining method in the following manner.
  • a five and seven-tenths kilogram quantity (5.7 kg) of the rapeseed oil degummed with maleic acid as described above was treated with one and three-tenths percent (1.3%) of 14° Baume sodium hydroxide solution and agitated intensely at 25°C for 15 minutes.
  • the temperature was raised to 65°C and the oil was stirred slowly for an additional 15 minutes.
  • the precipitating soaps were separated from the oil by centrifugation.
  • the oil was then washed twice by adding and mixing hot water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and separating the water each time by centrifugation. Following this, the oil was dried at a temperature of 60°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury (2 mm Hg)) absolute pressure for 15 minutes.
  • a three and six-tenths kilogram (3.6 kg) quantity of the oil refined with alkali in this manner was bleached by adding two percent (2.0%) bleaching earth, by weight of the oil, commercially available from the Filtrol Corporation under the Trademark Filtrol®105, together with four-tenths of a percent (0.4%) filter aid, by weight of the oil, commercially available from Johns-Manville Corporation under-the Trademark Filtercel@.
  • the mixture was then heated to 120°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure and agitated for 20 minutes.
  • the mixture was then cooled to 80°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was filtered in a Buechner funnel.
  • a ten kilogram (10 kg) sample of crude peanut oil was mixed with two percent (2.0%) distilled water, by weight of the oil, and agitated intensely for 30 minutes at a temperature of 25°C. The oil was then centrifuged to separate the hydrated phospholipids.
  • a two and four-tenths kilogram (2.4 kg) sample of the bleached oil was treated with thirty parts per million (30 ppm) citric acid in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution and the oil was then steam refined-deodorized for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using two percent (2.0%) sparging steam.
  • the oil obtained in this manner was designated Sample P.
  • a comparative sample was prepared by the conventional alkali refining method in the following manner.
  • a two and eight-tenths kilogram (2.8 kg) quantity of oil which had previously been degummed with water was treated with one and two-tenths of a percent (1.2%) 14° Baume sodium hydroxide solution, by weight of the oil, and agitated intensely at 25°C for 15 minutes.
  • the temperature was then raised to 65°C and the oil was stirred slowly for an additional 15 minutes.
  • the oil was centrifuged to separate the precipitated soaps. This was followed by twice washing the oil with hot distilled water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and centrifuging each time.
  • the oil was dried at a temperature of 60°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure for 15 minutes.
  • Bleaching of the oil was performed by adding five-tenths of a percent (0.5%) of Filtrol 105@ bleaching earth together with one-tenth of a percent (0.1 %) of Filtercel@ type filter aid, heating the mixture to 110°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure and agitating for 20 minutes. After cooling the mixture to 90°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was filtered in a Buechner funnel.
  • a two and four-tenths kilogram (2.4 kg) sample of the bleached oil was treated with thirty parts per million (30 ppm) citric acid in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution, and deodorized for 60 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using one and one-half percent (1.5%) sparging steam.
  • the oil obtained in this manner was designated Sample R.
  • a three kilogram (3 kg) sample of crude safflower oil was treated with eight one-hundredths of a percent (0.08%) phosphoric acid in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration in aqueous solution and stirred at 25°C under air for 10 minutes. Then, two percent (2.0%) Filtrol 105" bleaching earth, by weight of the oil, and four-tenths of a percent (0.4%) Filtercel@ filter aid, by weight of the oil, both described previously, were added and the mixture was heated to 110°C with intense agitation under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure. After 20 minutes of such treatment, the mixture was cooled to 80°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was filtered in a Buechner funnel.
  • 266 Pa two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg
  • a comparative sample was prepared by the conventional alkali refining method in the following manner.
  • a four and seven-tenths kilogram (4.7 kg) quantity of crude safflower oil was treated with four percent (4.0%) of 14° Baume sodium hydroxide solution and was agitated intensely at 25°C for 15 minutes. Then, the temperature was increased to 65°C and a slower stirring was continued for another 15 minutes. The oil was then centrifuged to remove soaps. This was followed by twice washing the oil with hot distilled water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and centrifuging each time.
  • the oil was dried for 15 minutes at a temperature of 60°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure.
  • Bleaching of the oil was performed by adding one and one-half percent (1.5%) Filtrol 105@ bleaching earth, by weight of the oil, and three-tenths of a percent (0.3%) Filtercel® filter aid, by weight of the oil, and heating the mixture to 110°C under a vacuum of 20 minutes. After cooling the mixture to 80°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was filtered in a Buechner funnel.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Fats And Perfumes (AREA)
  • Edible Oils And Fats (AREA)

Claims (6)

1. Verfahren zum Raffinieren von Pflanzenrohölen mit Ausnahme von Palmöl zur Herstellung eines Produktes mit guter Oxydations-, Geschmacks- und Kältetestbeständigkeit durch die Behandlung mit Phosphorsäure und einem Bleichmittel und anschließender Desodorisierung, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß es die folgenden Schritte umfaßt:
(a) Degummierung des Rohöls durch
i) Verbinden des Rohöls mit einer geringen Menge Wasser zur Bildung eines Gemisches mit dem Wasser,
ii) Rühren des Gemisches,
iii) Abtrennen des Öls vom Wasser und Ausfällen von Verunreinigungen;
(b) Bleichen des in Schritt (a)(iii) erhaltenen Öls durch
i) Verbinden des Öls mit einer Menge Phosphorsäure in wässriger Lösung, so daß ein Gemisch mit mindestens zwei Hunderstel Gewichtsprozent (0.02%) Phosphorsäure erhalten wird,
ii) Halten des Gemisches auf geeigneter Temperature unter gleichzeitigem intensiven Rühren, um eine Umsetzung zu ermöglichen,
iii) Verbinden des in Schritt (b)(ii) erhaltenen Gemisches mit einem Bleichmittel in einem Verhältnis von 29:1 bis 39:1 zur Phosphorsäure, so daß in dem Endprodukt bis zu drei Parts per million (3 ppm) Restphosphor aus der in Schritt (b)(i) zugebenen Phosphorsäure enthalten sind,
iv) Anheben der Temperatur des Gemisches von Schritt (b)(iii) im Vakuum auf eine Temperatur bei der das Bleichmittel zur Wirkung kommt und Halten der Temperatur unter gleichzeitigem Rühren des Gemisches,
v) Abkühlen des Gemisches von Schritt (b)(iv) auf eine Temperatur, bei der das Vakuum aufgehoben werden kann und
vi) Filtern des gebleichten Öls, anschließend
(c) Dampf-Raffinieren-Desodorisierung des in Schritt (b)(vi) gewonnenen gebleichten Öls.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, worin vor dem Bleichvorgang des Anspruchs 1 der folgende Schritt β durchgeführt wird:
(ß) Degummierung/Demetallisierung des in Schritt (a)(iii) gewonnenen degummierten Öls durch
i) Verbinden des Öls mit einer geringen Menge eines geigneten, bereits bekannten Degummierungsreagens zur Bildung eines Gemisches,
ii) Rühren des Gemisches,
iii) Verbinden des Gemisches mit einer geringen Menge Wasser,
iv) Rühren des Gemisches und
v) Entfernen der Restverunreinigungen aus dem Öl.
3. Verfahren nach Asnpruch 1, worin Schritt (a) bei einer Temperatur zwischen 5°C und 20°C durchgeführt wird.
4. Verfahren nach den Ansprüchen 1, oder 3, worin der Bleichvorgang bei einer Temperatur zwischen 90°C und 120°C durchgeführt wird.
5. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, worin die Menge der im dem Bleichvorgang zugegebenen Phosphorsäure ausreicht, um ein Gemisch mit 0.02 bis 0.2 Gewichtsprozent Phosphorsäure zu bilden.
6. Verfahren nach den Ansprüchen 1, 2, 3 oder 4, worin die Menge der in dem Bleichvorgang zugegebenen Phosphorsäure ausreicht, um ein Gemisch mit 0.03 bis 0.1 Gewichtsprozent Phosphorsäure zu bilden.
EP82109482A 1981-10-15 1982-10-13 Raffiniertes geniessbares Öl und Verfahren zur Herstellung desselben Expired EP0077528B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US31157181A 1981-10-15 1981-10-15
US311571 1981-10-15

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0077528A1 EP0077528A1 (de) 1983-04-27
EP0077528B1 true EP0077528B1 (de) 1987-09-09

Family

ID=23207490

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP82109482A Expired EP0077528B1 (de) 1981-10-15 1982-10-13 Raffiniertes geniessbares Öl und Verfahren zur Herstellung desselben

Country Status (18)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0077528B1 (de)
JP (1) JPS5876500A (de)
KR (1) KR890001463B1 (de)
AU (1) AU8853382A (de)
BR (1) BR8206007A (de)
CA (1) CA1187511A (de)
DE (1) DE3277211D1 (de)
DK (1) DK454982A (de)
ES (1) ES516498A0 (de)
GB (1) GB2107343B (de)
HK (1) HK78886A (de)
IN (1) IN162682B (de)
MX (1) MX7580E (de)
MY (1) MY8600659A (de)
NZ (1) NZ201845A (de)
PH (1) PH21781A (de)
YU (1) YU233182A (de)
ZA (1) ZA826591B (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9410108B2 (en) 2004-11-04 2016-08-09 Monsanto Technology Llc Seed oil compositions

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4981620A (en) * 1984-07-30 1991-01-01 Cpc International Inc. In-line dewaxing of edible vegetable oils
US5286886A (en) * 1988-06-21 1994-02-15 Van Den Bergh Foods Co., Division Of Conopco, Inc. Method of refining glyceride oils
GB8814732D0 (en) * 1988-06-21 1988-07-27 Unilever Plc Method of refining clyceride oils
DE69200004T2 (de) * 1991-04-02 1993-09-09 Vandemoortele Int Nv Verfahren zur kontinuierlichen entschleimung eines glyceridoeles.
ATE430802T1 (de) 2003-08-21 2009-05-15 Monsanto Technology Llc Fettsäuredesaturasen aus primula
WO2005102310A1 (en) 2004-04-16 2005-11-03 Monsanto Technology Llc Expression of fatty acid desaturases in corn
EP2562260B1 (de) 2006-03-10 2018-08-15 Monsanto Technology LLC Sojabohnensamen und ölzusammensetzungen und verfahren zu deren herstellung
JP4249250B1 (ja) * 2008-07-31 2009-04-02 水澤化学工業株式会社 エステル交換油の精製方法
US9480271B2 (en) 2009-09-15 2016-11-01 Monsanto Technology Llc Soybean seed and oil compositions and methods of making same
EP2970818A1 (de) * 2013-03-14 2016-01-20 REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC Verfahren zum entfernen eines schadstoffes aus einer schadstoffhalten biologischen zusammensetzung verwendbar als ausgangsstoff für biokraftstoffe
CN112694946A (zh) * 2021-01-19 2021-04-23 南昌大学 一种去除油脂中黄曲霉素的方法
CN116376631A (zh) * 2023-03-29 2023-07-04 浙江山茶润生物科技有限公司 一种化妆品用山茶油的制备工艺

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3590059A (en) * 1969-09-11 1971-06-29 Salador Huileries Antonin Roux Process for the purification of edible oils
JPS5233903A (en) * 1975-09-11 1977-03-15 Sho Yonezawa Preparation of refined natural food oil
JPS589662B2 (ja) * 1975-11-04 1983-02-22 旭電化工業株式会社 キホウセイスイチユウユガタニユウカシ ノ セイゾウホウ
JPS53114805A (en) * 1977-02-24 1978-10-06 Nisshin Oil Mills Ltd:The Production of palm oil
GB1580664A (en) * 1977-08-02 1980-12-03 Sullivan Systems Inc Refining fatty oils
JPS557816A (en) * 1978-06-30 1980-01-21 Nippon Oils & Fats Co Ltd Vegitable oil purification

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9410108B2 (en) 2004-11-04 2016-08-09 Monsanto Technology Llc Seed oil compositions
US10314317B2 (en) 2004-11-04 2019-06-11 Monsanto Technology Llc Seed oil compositions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE3277211D1 (en) 1987-10-15
HK78886A (en) 1986-10-24
ES8401123A1 (es) 1983-11-16
KR890001463B1 (ko) 1989-05-04
CA1187511A (en) 1985-05-21
MX7580E (es) 1989-11-23
EP0077528A1 (de) 1983-04-27
MY8600659A (en) 1986-12-31
PH21781A (en) 1988-02-24
BR8206007A (pt) 1983-09-13
GB2107343B (en) 1986-05-08
JPS5876500A (ja) 1983-05-09
ES516498A0 (es) 1983-11-16
KR840001832A (ko) 1984-06-07
ZA826591B (en) 1983-10-26
DK454982A (da) 1983-04-16
YU233182A (en) 1985-03-20
GB2107343A (en) 1983-04-27
AU8853382A (en) 1983-04-21
JPH0328479B2 (de) 1991-04-19
NZ201845A (en) 1985-08-16
IN162682B (de) 1988-07-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0348004B1 (de) Verfahren zur Raffination von Glyceridölen
EP2218334B1 (de) Verfahren zur herstellung von ölzusammensetzungen
EP2594625B2 (de) Verfahren zur steuerung des pegels von 3-chloro-1,2-propandiol oder estern davon in ölen und fetten
EP0077528B1 (de) Raffiniertes geniessbares Öl und Verfahren zur Herstellung desselben
US4154750A (en) Activated carbon improved vegetable oil refining process
EP0269277B1 (de) Verfahren zum Entschleimen von Triglyceridölen
US6590113B1 (en) Process for treating oils containing antioxidant compounds
EP0478090B1 (de) Verfahren zum Raffinieren von Glyceridöl
US4609500A (en) Refining of oil and product thereof
EP0389057B1 (de) Verfahren zum Raffinieren von Glyceridölen mittels Silica-Hydrogel
EP0116408A2 (de) Raffinieren von Triglycerid-Ölen in Anwesenheit von Alkalimetall-Borhydriden
EP0507363A1 (de) Verfahren zur kontinuierlichen Entschleimung eines Glyceridöles
EP0170242B1 (de) Stufenweise Entfernung von Wachsen aus essbaren pflanzlichen Ölen
EP0406945B1 (de) Verfahren zum Spalten von Seifenstock mittels einer Hochtemperatur-Behandlung
US5449797A (en) Process for the removal of soap from glyceride oils and/or wax esters using an amorphous adsorbent
EP0456300B1 (de) Verfahren zur Raffination eines Glyceridols
JP2000119682A (ja) 米ぬか油の製造方法
JPH07197076A (ja) 食用植物原油の精製法
GB2162530A (en) Bleaching and dewaxing vegetable oils
US2573358A (en) Process of oxidizing fatty materials
JPH07197075A (ja) 食用植物原油の精製法
EP0583648A2 (de) Kontinuierliches Raffinierungsverfahren mit erniedrigten Abfallströmen
WO1994025551A1 (en) Process for refining glyceride oil
US2754309A (en) Vegetable oil refining
CN117136228A (zh) 精制油脂的制造方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR IT NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19831021

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR IT NL

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR IT NL

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: BARZANO' E ZANARDO MILANO S.P.A.

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3277211

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19871015

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: UNILEVER N.V.

Effective date: 19880603

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: UNILEVER N.V.

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 19890807

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19910923

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19910925

Year of fee payment: 10

ITTA It: last paid annual fee
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19911031

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19930501

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19930630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19930701

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO