CN117871614A - Method for improving longitudinal impurity distribution accuracy of extended resistance test - Google Patents

Method for improving longitudinal impurity distribution accuracy of extended resistance test Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN117871614A
CN117871614A CN202311694078.3A CN202311694078A CN117871614A CN 117871614 A CN117871614 A CN 117871614A CN 202311694078 A CN202311694078 A CN 202311694078A CN 117871614 A CN117871614 A CN 117871614A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
resistance test
test
sample
extended
extended resistance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202311694078.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
刘从吉
王鸥
姜滔
曾璞
刘小会
郑皓予
何勇攀
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
South West Institute of Technical Physics
Original Assignee
South West Institute of Technical Physics
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by South West Institute of Technical Physics filed Critical South West Institute of Technical Physics
Priority to CN202311694078.3A priority Critical patent/CN117871614A/en
Publication of CN117871614A publication Critical patent/CN117871614A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)

Abstract

The invention belongs to the field of silicon-based semiconductor chip extension resistance test, and discloses a method for improving the longitudinal impurity distribution accuracy of extension resistance test, which comprises the following specific steps: step one, performing angle calibration on a sample subjected to an extended resistance test by adopting a step instrument; step two, performing needle mark calibration on the sample subjected to the extended resistance test under a 50-time microscope, and measuring and calculating the number a of points separated between the needle mark starting point and the dividing line; step three, carrying out extension resistance test on the sample again, and placing a+b test points on the left side of the boundary according to the result of the step two; and fourthly, performing needle trace tracking on the retested sample under a 50-time microscope, finding out the point number c on the left side of the boundary, removing the redundant c point numbers in subsequent result analysis, and endowing the real angle value obtained in the first test with a second extended resistance test result. The invention can calibrate the angle of the actually prepared sample and calibrate the actual test point.

Description

Method for improving longitudinal impurity distribution accuracy of extended resistance test
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of silicon-based semiconductor chip extension resistance test, and particularly relates to a method for improving the longitudinal impurity distribution accuracy of extension resistance test.
Background
The extended resistance technology has the characteristics of high longitudinal resolution and wide measurement range, and is widely applied to incoming material detection of silicon-based semiconductor chips and doping process detection in the preparation process. The extended resistance technology can measure the longitudinal resistance change of the silicon chip and also can measure the thickness of the silicon epitaxial wafer, the width of the transition region and the like. Although the extended resistance tester can obtain accurate longitudinal impurity distribution theoretically, in fact, the extended resistance tester is not so, and in the actual testing process, the phenomenon that the extended resistance test result of the silicon epitaxial wafer is inconsistent with the thickness result of the silicon epitaxial wafer tested by the infrared interferometry is often found, and the error is more than 2um at maximum.
1. Sample preparation and testing principle
Sample preparation firstly, a silicon wafer is attached to an angle gauge with a fixed angle, and a sample of a test wafer is produced through bevel technology processing. After the junction is exposed with the bevel treatment, a series of two-point probe tests can be performed on the bevel. At each point, the vertical distance of the probe is recorded and a resistance measurement is made. The resistance value of each point measured changes with the dopant concentration. The relation between depth and resistance value and doping content of each layer is calculated by a computer. And the computer utilizes the obtained data to construct a profile of the doping concentration of the measured sample.
2. Sample testing longitudinal distribution error analysis
The longitudinal distribution error of the impurities, which is tested by the extension resistance, is mainly in the following aspects:
2.1 Angle error caused by sample preparation Process
During sample preparation, the actual grinding angle β occurs greater or less than the angle gauge angle α due to grinding imbalance, as shown in fig. 5.
When β is greater than α in the case of fig. 2A, then the actual depth is greater than the depth tested;
when β is smaller than α in the case of fig. 2B, the actual depth is now smaller than the depth tested;
2.2 errors caused by the probe to the starting Point position
Before the test starts, a series of preset points to be tested are usually placed on the surface of the tested sample, as shown in fig. 3A, which is an ideal starting point, the center of the probe is just pressed on the boundary line between the surface and the inclined plane, but usually, the actual test point of the test equipment has a certain deviation from the preset points, as shown in fig. 3B and 3C, the starting point is either on the left side of the boundary or on the right side of the boundary, and at this time, the test depth is smaller than the actual depth or the test depth is larger than the actual depth.
Therefore, it is highly desirable to find a suitable method to improve the extended resistance test longitudinal impurity profile accuracy.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the technical problems that: in the actual test process, the silicon epitaxial wafer expansion resistance test result is inconsistent with the silicon epitaxial wafer thickness result tested by the infrared interferometry, and the error is larger.
In order to solve the technical problems, the specific technical scheme of the invention is as follows:
a method for improving the accuracy of longitudinal impurity distribution of an extended resistance test comprises the following specific steps:
step one, performing angle calibration on a sample subjected to an extended resistance test by adopting a step instrument;
step two, performing needle mark calibration on the sample subjected to the extended resistance test under a 50-time microscope, and measuring and calculating the number a of points separated between the needle mark starting point and the dividing line;
step three, carrying out extension resistance test on the sample again, and placing a+b test points on the left side of the boundary according to the result of the step two, wherein b is a constant;
and fourthly, performing needle trace tracking on the retested sample under a 50-time microscope, finding out the point number c on the left side of the boundary, removing the redundant c point numbers in subsequent result analysis, and endowing the real angle value obtained in the first test with a second extended resistance test result.
Wherein a+b > c.
The invention has the following advantages: the angle of the actually prepared sample is calibrated, and the actual test point position is calibrated, so that larger test errors caused by two errors can be avoided to a great extent, and useful test data can be provided for chip design better.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an extended resistance test;
FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of the actual angle of the sample and the angle of the angle gauge;
FIG. 2B is a schematic view of the actual angle of the sample and the angle of the angle gauge;
FIG. 3A is a schematic view of the actual probe start point position;
FIG. 3B is a schematic view of the actual probe start point position;
FIG. 3C is a schematic view of the actual probe start point position;
FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of needle marks under a 50-fold microscope;
FIG. 5 is a preset point location for performing an extended resistance test after trace tracking;
FIG. 6 is a practical point location of the 2 nd extension resistance test;
fig. 7 shows test results before and after calibration using the present method.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings for a better understanding of the objects, structures and functions of the present invention.
As shown in fig. 4, white circles in the drawing represent actual needle marks, and black circles represent points at which the distance between the actual starting point and the boundary line can be placed.
The invention relates to a method for improving the accuracy of longitudinal impurity distribution in an extended resistance test, which comprises the following specific steps:
step one, performing angle calibration on a sample subjected to an extended resistance test, wherein a step instrument is adopted in the method;
step two, performing needle mark calibration on the sample subjected to the extended resistance test under a 50-time microscope, and estimating the number of points a between the needle mark starting point and the boundary line as shown in fig. 4;
step three, carrying out expansion resistance test on the sample again, and placing b test points on the left side of the boundary according to the result of the step two, as shown in fig. 5;
and fourthly, performing needle trace tracking on the sample tested in the second time under a 50-time microscope, finding out the point number c on the left side of the boundary, removing redundant c point numbers in subsequent result analysis as shown in fig. 6, and giving the real angle value obtained in the first test to the test result of the second time of the extended resistance, wherein the pair of test results before and after calibration such as shown in fig. 7 is obtained according to the method. In fig. 7, the solid line represents the test result before calibration, and the broken line represents the test result after calibration.
According to the invention, the angle of the actually prepared sample is calibrated by adopting the step instrument, and the actual test point positions are calibrated before and after the test, so that larger test errors caused by two errors can be avoided to a great extent, and useful test data is better provided for chip design.
Although embodiments of the present invention have been described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that several variations and modifications may be made without departing from the principles of the invention, which are also considered to be within the scope of the invention.

Claims (2)

1. A method for improving the accuracy of longitudinal impurity distribution of an extended resistance test is characterized by comprising the following specific steps:
step one, performing angle calibration on a sample subjected to an extended resistance test by adopting a step instrument;
step two, performing needle mark calibration on the sample subjected to the extended resistance test under a 50-time microscope, and measuring and calculating the number a of points separated between the needle mark starting point and the dividing line;
step three, carrying out extension resistance test on the sample again, and placing a+b test points on the left side of the boundary according to the result of the step two;
and fourthly, performing needle trace tracking on the retested sample under a 50-time microscope, finding out the point number c on the left side of the boundary, removing the redundant c point numbers in subsequent result analysis, and endowing the real angle value obtained in the first test with a second extended resistance test result.
2. The method for improving the accuracy of the longitudinal impurity profile of an extended resistance test according to claim 1, wherein a+b > c.
CN202311694078.3A 2023-12-11 2023-12-11 Method for improving longitudinal impurity distribution accuracy of extended resistance test Pending CN117871614A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202311694078.3A CN117871614A (en) 2023-12-11 2023-12-11 Method for improving longitudinal impurity distribution accuracy of extended resistance test

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202311694078.3A CN117871614A (en) 2023-12-11 2023-12-11 Method for improving longitudinal impurity distribution accuracy of extended resistance test

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN117871614A true CN117871614A (en) 2024-04-12

Family

ID=90592441

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202311694078.3A Pending CN117871614A (en) 2023-12-11 2023-12-11 Method for improving longitudinal impurity distribution accuracy of extended resistance test

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN117871614A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110940265A (en) Large strain correction measurement method applied to rapid loading acquisition system of static strength test
CN117871614A (en) Method for improving longitudinal impurity distribution accuracy of extended resistance test
CN113985244A (en) De-embedding method and system based on transmission line part and open circuit part
CN112344864A (en) Precision calibration method and device for laser thickness and length synchronous measuring instrument
CN114325105A (en) Method and device for measuring resistivity of silicon single crystal rod
CN113433301A (en) Concrete shrinkage deformation testing device and method
CN113030000B (en) Method and device for measuring interstitial oxygen content of silicon single crystal rod
CN112927948A (en) Method for correcting probe position of resistance instrument and method for measuring square resistance
CN117450883B (en) Quick measuring method for vertical probe
CN215893461U (en) Core appearance height deviation detection device
CN106841146A (en) The non-destructive measuring method of semi-conducting material impurity ionization energy is obtained using alternating temperature PL spectrums
CN103887204A (en) Silicon wafer quality factor eliminating method related to problems of laser annealing process
CN215418104U (en) Wafer warpage testing arrangement
CN217637156U (en) Horizontal correction jig
CN111750808B (en) Surface roughness obtaining method based on laser radar scanner
CN108120409A (en) Film thickness measurement device and film thickness measuring method
CN111537127B (en) Full-range calibration method of X-ray stress gauge
Wiśniewska et al. Determination of form measuring machine displacement sensor characteristics with a use of flick standard
CN210221001U (en) Calibration sample piece for evaluating and calibrating deep groove measuring capability of contour testing instrument
CN115727774B (en) Calibration method and calibration sheet for measuring thickness of epitaxial layer by infrared spectrometer
CN211651480U (en) IGBT module copper substrate curvature measurement tool
KR100262655B1 (en) Alignment method and device of the wafer prober
CN110112079B (en) Method for evaluating etching process parameters of step sample block
CN115077446A (en) Method for adjusting step instrument
CN111780650B (en) Band saw blade transverse straightness detector and detection method thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination