Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the technical problems that: in order to solve the above-described problems, a method for reducing the influence of the boundary reflection effect on stress wave propagation test data is provided.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows: a method of reducing the effect of boundary reflection on stress wave propagation test data, comprising:
setting boundary materials between the sample and the loading end of the stress wave propagation test, and setting cushion blocks between the boundary materials and the loading end;
the wave impedance value of the boundary material is the optimal wave impedance Z b ;
The optimal wave impedance Z b The following equation is used for calculation:
-Z b 5 +Z b 4 (7Z a -2Z c )+Z b 3 (Z a 2 -10Z a Z c -Z c 2 )+Z a Z b 2 (Z a 2 +10Z a Z c -Z c 2 )+Z a 2 Z b Z c (2Z a -7Z c )+Z a 3 Z c 2 =0
wherein Z is a Z is the wave impedance value of the sample c And the wave impedance value of the cushion block.
The thickness of the boundary material is 1/12-1/8 of the length of the sample.
The thickness of the border material is 1/10 of the length of the sample.
The thickness of the cushion block is 1/4-1/2 of the thickness of the boundary material.
The cushion block adopts a steel cushion block.
The cross-sectional areas of the pad, border material and sample are the same.
The beneficial effects of the invention are as follows: the optimal wave impedance of the boundary material (wave absorbing material) in the stress wave propagation indoor test is obtained through calculation according to the calculation formula of the optimal wave impedance, so that a proper boundary material is selected to be used in the stress wave propagation indoor test to absorb reflected waves, the boundary reflection effect in the stress wave propagation indoor test is practically improved, the boundary reflection effect of the stress wave at the boundary is reduced to the greatest extent, the influence of the boundary reflection effect on stress wave propagation test data is avoided, and the authenticity and the effectiveness of the test data are ensured.
Detailed Description
The present embodiment is a method of reducing the effect of boundary reflection on stress wave propagation test data by providing a boundary material between a sample and a loading end of a stress wave propagation test and providing a spacer between the boundary material and the loading end.
In this example, the boundary material adopts the wave impedance value closest to the optimal wave impedance Z b Is the optimum wave impedance Z b The following equation is used for calculation:
-Z b 5 +Z b 4 (7Z a -2Z c )+Z b 3 (Z a 2 -10Z a Z c -Z c 2 )+Z a Z b 2 (Z a 2 +10Z a Z c -Z c 2 )+Z a 2 Z b Z c (2Z a -7Z c )+Z a 3 Z c 2 =0(1)
wherein Z is a Z is the wave impedance value of the sample c Is the wave impedance value of the cushion block.
The thickness of the boundary material in this case is 1/12 to 1/8, preferably 1/10, of the sample length. The thickness of the pad in this embodiment is 1/4 to 1/2, preferably 1/4, of the thickness of the border material.
The data impact of whether the boundary reflection effect can be reduced in this embodiment is verified by a stress wave propagation test, taking an indoor propagation test of stress waves in a sandstone medium as an example:
step 1, as shown in fig. 1, a stress wave propagation test device mainly comprises a pendulum system, an acceleration sensor, a rigid frame, a loading end (a loading oil cylinder and a jack), a data acquisition instrument, a data transmission line and the like, wherein the length, width and height dimensions of a sandstone sample are respectively 1500mm multiplied by 120mm, and the sandstone sample is horizontally placed in the rigid frame; the loading oil cylinder and the hydraulic jack are positioned at the right end of the sandstone sample, and the axial load is applied to the sandstone sample through the counterforce provided by the rigid frame; placing a boundary material between the sandstone sample and the loading cylinder for improving the reflection effect of the stress wave at the boundary; because the cross section area of the loading cylinder is smaller than that of the boundary material, in order to avoid deformation damage caused by uneven stress of the boundary material due to axial loading, a cushion block (steel cushion block) is arranged between the loading cylinder and the boundary material, and the cushion block, the boundary material and the sandstone sample have the same cross section area.
And 2, knocking the sandstone sample by using a pendulum system at the left end to excite the stress wave, collecting stress wave signal amplitude values at different propagation distances by each acceleration sensor when the stress wave propagates in the sandstone sample, and evaluating the inhibition effect of different boundary materials on the boundary reflection effect by analyzing attenuation rules of the stress wave signal amplitude values at different propagation distances.
And step 3, simplifying a calculation model of the optimal wave impedance of the boundary material on the basis of the stress wave propagation indoor test, and only considering the transreflective effect of the stress wave among the sandstone sample, the boundary material and the cushion block. As shown in FIG. 2, a calculation model of the transreflection of stress wave in the three media is established, and the wave impedance value of the sandstone sample is Z a =6.96×10 6 kg/m 2 S, wave impedance value of boundary material Z b The wave impedance value of the steel cushion block is Z c =41.08×10 6 kg/m 2 ·s。
Step 4, when the excited stress wave propagates from the sandstone sample to the boundary material, a first transreflective phenomenon occurs at the interface between the sample and the boundary material, and reflected waves V are generated respectively R1 And transmitted wave V T1 The expression is shown in the following formula 2, wherein the reflected wave V R1 Returns along the original path into the sandstone sample, and transmits wave V T1 Into the boundary material.
Wherein: v (V) I Is the initial incident wave.
Step 5, when transmitting wave V T1 When the boundary material is continuously transmitted to the cushion block, the second transreflective phenomenon occurs at the interface of the boundary material and the cushion block, and reflected waves V are respectively generated R2 And transmitted wave V T2 The expression is shown in the following formula 3, wherein the reflected wave V R2 Returns along the original path into the boundary material, transmitting wave V T2 Into the spacer.
Step 6, since only the transreflective effect of the stress wave between the sandstone sample, the boundary material and the pad is considered, only the return into the boundary materialReflected wave V in (a) R2 Analysis was performed. When reflected wave V R2 When the boundary material is continuously transmitted to the sandstone sample, the third transreflective phenomenon occurs at the interface of the sample and the boundary material, and reflected waves V are respectively generated R3 And transmitted wave V T3 The expression is shown in formula 4, wherein the reflected wave V R3 Returns along the original path into the boundary material, transmitting wave V T3 Into the sandstone sample.
Step 7, and so on, reflected wave V R3 Continuously generating multiple times of transreflective between the interface of the sample and the boundary material and the interface of the boundary material and the cushion block, and repeatedly adopting the methods of the step 5 and the step 6 to obtain V T5 、V T7 Etc.
The sum of all left-going stress waves reflected back into the sandstone sample is denoted as V L Which comprises V R1 、V T3 、V T5 …. As the number of transflectors increases, the amplitude of the left-hand stress wave reflected back into the rock sample will gradually decrease. Therefore, to simplify the calculation, only V is taken L The first three terms in the expression are calculated, the subsequent left traveling wave is negligible in size, and then V L The expression of (2) is shown in the formula 5;
V L =V R1 +V T3 +V T5 (5)
step 8, V is R1 、V T3 、V T5 The calculation formula of (2) is introduced into formula 4, V L The expression of (2) is shown in formula 6.
Wherein the wave impedance value Z of the sandstone sample a =6.96×10 6 kg/m 2 S, the wave impedance value of the pad is Z c =41.08×10 6 kg/m 2 S, can give V L /V I Ratio and boundary materialWave impedance (Z) b ) The change curve of (2) is shown in FIG. 3.
As can be seen from FIG. 3, the wave impedance value Z increases from point O to point A b Increasing from 0 to 1.12X10 6 kg/m 2 ·s,V L /V I The ratio curve of (2) shows a steep decline trend; when the wave impedance value Z b =1.12×10 6 kg/m 2 When s, the amplitude of the left traveling wave is zero, and theoretically, the point A in the figure 3 represents the optimal wave impedance value of the boundary material under the working condition; increasing from point A to point B, the wave impedance value Z b From 1.12X10 6 kg/m 2 S is increased to 6.82×10 6 kg/m 2 ·s,V L /V I The ratio of (2) increases from zero to-0.71, i.e. the left travelling wave amplitude increases gradually; after point B, along with the wave impedance value Z b Continue to increase, V L /V I The ratio of (2) gradually tends to stabilize.
In conclusion, when V L /V I When the ratio of the wave impedance value is zero, the amplitude of the left stress wave in all reflected sand rock samples is minimum, and the corresponding wave impedance value is the optimal wave impedance value Z of the boundary material b =1.12×10 6 kg/m 2 S. When V is L /V I When the ratio of (2) is zero, equation 6 may be modified to equation 1.
Step 9, calculating by adopting the method 1 based on the calculation model of the optimal wave impedance of the boundary material to obtain the optimal wave impedance value of the boundary material under the test working condition of 1.12 multiplied by 10 6 kg/m 2 ·s。
And respectively carrying out a plurality of stress wave propagation indoor tests by replacing boundary materials with different wave impedance values, so as to verify the optimal wave impedance calculation method according to the embodiment. Three mediums with different wave impedance values are mainly selected as boundary materials, the medium a is rubber, and the wave impedance value is 0.35 multiplied by 10 6 kg/m 2 S; the medium b is a steel block, and the wave impedance value is 41.08 multiplied by 10 6 kg/m 2 S; the medium c is pine wood with a wave impedance value of 1.89 multiplied by 10 6 kg/m 2 S (closest).
And 10, respectively taking the three media as boundary materials, and exciting stress wave signals by using pendulum bob strike under each working condition. In order to obtain stable waveform signals, five repeated strokes are performed under each working condition. Stress wave signal amplitude data at different propagation distances are collected through acceleration sensors uniformly distributed on the sandstone sample, and the inhibition effect of boundary reflection effect is analyzed when three mediums are used as boundary materials. Fig. 4, 5 and 6 are graphs showing the amplitude of stress wave signal as a function of propagation distance, respectively, for rubber, steel blocks and pine as boundary materials.
Step 11, according to V in FIG. 3 L /V I The ratio is along with the change curve of the boundary material wave impedance value, when rubber and steel blocks are used as boundary materials, the left reflected wave generated is 0.75 times and 0.7 times of the incident wave respectively, and as the propagation distance increases, the amplitude of signals received by two sensors which are closer to the boundary of a rock sample is increased, which is shown in fig. 4 and 5, because the reflected wave generated by stress waves at the end part of the rock sample and the original waveform generate superposition amplification effect, the inhibition effect of the rubber and the steel blocks on the boundary reflection effect is poor.
When pine is used as the boundary material, the left reflected wave is 0.21 times of the incident wave, and as shown in fig. 6, the stress wave signal amplitude is gradually reduced along with the increase of the propagation distance, and no abnormal increase phenomenon occurs, which means that when pine is used as the boundary wave absorbing material, the intensity of the reflected wave at the boundary can be obviously reduced, and the effect of inhibiting the boundary reflection effect is better.