CN111738575A - Member assessment and information management method based on co-treatment grid - Google Patents
Member assessment and information management method based on co-treatment grid Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111738575A CN111738575A CN202010527638.6A CN202010527638A CN111738575A CN 111738575 A CN111738575 A CN 111738575A CN 202010527638 A CN202010527638 A CN 202010527638A CN 111738575 A CN111738575 A CN 111738575A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- information
- visiting
- generating
- scoring
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 238000011278 co-treatment Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 10
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 112
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a member assessment and information management method based on a co-treatment grid, which comprises the following steps: step 10, inputting and storing administrator information; step 20, setting evaluation items and corresponding evaluation standards, and generating a grading module based on the evaluation items and the evaluation standards; step 30, recording and storing member information; step 40, associating the scoring module generated in the step 20 with the member information input in the step 30 to generate an evaluation interface; step 50, inputting people information, generating a people account, selecting an evaluated member and an evaluation item needing evaluation, grading, generating a grading record, and storing the grading record; and step 60, selecting a time period, calling a scoring record in the time period, generating a scoring report, and storing the scoring report. The invention combines members, member assessment, information management and the masses together well to realize more scientific and reasonable member assessment management.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of information management, and particularly relates to a member assessment and information management method based on a co-treatment grid.
Background
Members are members and participants of a particular community. For some special groups, the members take the task of interfacing with external structures and personnel, so that certain evaluation is performed on the members to determine whether the members meet the requirements. At present, the conventional member assessment means is performed by a manual visiting way. This requires a high degree of mass adaptation to accomplish and is labor and time intensive. Meanwhile, in the process of manual visit, the situation that the masses dare not to express and do not want to express opinions exists, so that accurate information cannot be acquired. With the development of the internet and the rise of the concept of 'co-treatment grid', member assessment information is managed through a network platform, and the method is a good direction. However, the existing platform has a single function and cannot meet the actual requirements.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the technical problem of providing a member assessment and information management method based on a co-treatment grid aiming at the defects of the prior art, and the member assessment and information management method can well combine members, member assessment, information management and the masses together so as to realize more scientific and reasonable member assessment management.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows: a membership assessment and information management method based on a co-treatment grid comprises the following steps:
step 10, inputting administrator information, setting administrator authority, storing and generating an administrator account;
step 20, setting evaluation items and corresponding evaluation standards, and generating a grading module based on the evaluation items and the evaluation standards;
step 30, inputting and storing member information to generate a member account;
step 40, associating the scoring module generated in the step 20 with the member information input in the step 30, generating an evaluation interface and displaying the evaluation interface on a public interface;
step 50, inputting people information, generating a people account, selecting an evaluated member and an evaluation item needing evaluation, grading, generating a grading record and storing;
and step 60, selecting a time period, calling a scoring record in the time period, generating a scoring report, and storing and displaying the scoring report.
In one embodiment, in step 20, the evaluation items include a visit evaluation, which is as follows:
setting a visit evaluation standard;
entering a visiting evaluation module, inputting visiting time, visiting place and visiting person information, generating visiting information and storing the visiting information;
a positioning function is started, a visiting route is recorded in real time, a visiting route map is generated, and the visiting route map is transmitted to a scoring module;
inputting visiting information and transmitting the visiting information to a scoring module;
and generating and displaying a visiting evaluation result according to the set visiting evaluation standard, the visiting route map and the visiting information.
In one embodiment, the step 60 specifically includes the following steps:
step 601, selecting member information and a complete evaluation time period;
step 602, acquiring all rating records of the member in the selected evaluation time period;
step 603, screening reasonable scores in the score records;
step 604, generating an evaluation average score according to the reasonable scores obtained in the step 603 and the selected evaluation time period;
step 605, inputting appraisal opinions;
and step 606, generating a grading report based on the evaluation average score and the evaluation opinions, and storing and displaying the grading report.
In one embodiment, in step 60, the comment may be evaluated as follows:
selecting stored member information, selecting a time period, calling a visiting appraisal result generated by the member in the time period, inputting appraisal opinion comments or uploading appraisal opinion comment related certification materials, storing and uploading the materials to the appraisal module;
and auditing the appraisal opinions and the related certification materials, and feeding back the auditing opinions based on the appraisal opinions and the related certification materials.
In one embodiment, in step 601, the evaluation period is week, month, season or year.
In one embodiment, in step 603, the reasonable scores are scores excluding abnormal conditions such as unscored and extremely low scores.
In one embodiment, the method further comprises a special item evaluation step, which is as follows:
the administrator account sets a special item evaluation item and a corresponding special item evaluation standard to generate a special item scoring module;
calling member information, selecting a member to be evaluated, sending a special item evaluation notice to a member account, and displaying special evaluation information on a public interface;
selecting members to be evaluated, grading, generating evaluation grading records of special items, and storing;
selecting a special item evaluation time period, calling a special item evaluation scoring record in the time period, generating a scoring report, and storing and displaying the scoring report.
In one embodiment, the member account receiving the special event evaluation may reject the evaluation, upload the rejection reason, and transmit the rejection reason to the administrator account.
In one embodiment, the method further comprises a step of viewing the score report history record, which is specifically as follows:
the member account selects the member information to be checked, uploads a checking reason and sends a rating report history record checking request to the administrator account;
the administrator account checks the checking reason, if the checking reason is agreed, the stored member scoring report history record is sent to the member account, if the checking reason is not agreed, the stored member scoring report history record is uploaded, and the disagreement reason is transmitted to the member account.
In one embodiment, the opinion may be uploaded to the administrator account after being consulted if the member rating report history is received.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
1. setting evaluation items and evaluation standards through an administrator account, and evaluating members corresponding to member accounts through a people account to ensure the authenticity of evaluation;
2. the public account and the member account can both feed back opinions for evaluation, so that the fairness of the evaluation is ensured;
3. special item assessment can be set, so that the management method has a larger extension range and meets the assessment requirements under special conditions.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to specific examples.
A membership assessment and information management method based on a co-treatment grid comprises the following steps:
step 10, inputting administrator information, setting administrator authority, storing and generating an administrator account;
step 20, setting evaluation items and corresponding evaluation standards, and generating a grading module based on the evaluation items and the evaluation standards;
step 30, inputting and storing member information to generate a member account;
step 40, associating the scoring module generated in the step 20 with the member information input in the step 30, generating an evaluation interface and displaying the evaluation interface on a public interface;
step 50, inputting people information, generating a people account, selecting an evaluated member and an evaluation item needing evaluation, grading, generating a grading record and storing;
and step 60, selecting a time period, calling a scoring record in the time period, generating a scoring report, and storing and displaying the scoring report.
In this embodiment, in step 20, the evaluation items include a visit evaluation, which is specifically as follows:
setting a visit evaluation standard;
entering a visiting evaluation module, inputting visiting time, visiting place and visiting person information, generating visiting information and storing the visiting information;
a positioning function is started, a visiting route is recorded in real time, a visiting route map is generated, and the visiting route map is transmitted to a scoring module;
inputting visiting information and transmitting the visiting information to a scoring module;
and generating and displaying a visiting evaluation result according to the set visiting evaluation standard, the visiting route map and the visiting information.
In this embodiment, in the step 60, the following is specifically performed:
step 601, selecting member information and a complete evaluation time period;
step 602, acquiring all rating records of the member in the selected evaluation time period;
step 603, screening reasonable scores in the score records;
step 604, generating an evaluation average score according to the reasonable scores obtained in the step 603 and the selected evaluation time period;
step 605, inputting appraisal opinions;
and step 606, generating a grading report based on the evaluation average score and the evaluation opinions, and storing and displaying the grading report.
In this embodiment, in step 60, the comment evaluation comment may be made as follows:
selecting stored member information, selecting a time period, calling a visiting appraisal result generated by the member in the time period, inputting appraisal opinion comments or uploading appraisal opinion comment related certification materials, storing and uploading the materials to the appraisal module;
and auditing the appraisal opinions and the related certification materials, and feeding back the auditing opinions based on the appraisal opinions and the related certification materials.
In this embodiment, in step 601, the evaluation time period is week, month, season, or year.
In this embodiment, in step 603, the reasonable score is a score excluding abnormal conditions such as no score, extremely low score, and the like.
In this embodiment, the method further includes a special item evaluation step, which is specifically as follows:
the administrator account sets a special item evaluation item and a corresponding special item evaluation standard to generate a special item scoring module;
calling member information, selecting a member to be evaluated, sending a special item evaluation notice to a member account, and displaying special evaluation information on a public interface;
selecting members to be evaluated, grading, generating evaluation grading records of special items, and storing;
selecting a special item evaluation time period, calling a special item evaluation scoring record in the time period, generating a scoring report, and storing and displaying the scoring report.
In this embodiment, the member account that receives the evaluation of the special event may reject the evaluation, upload the rejection reason, and transmit the rejection reason to the administrator account.
In this embodiment, the method further includes a step of viewing the score report history record, which is specifically as follows:
the member account selects the member information to be checked, uploads a checking reason and sends a rating report history record checking request to the administrator account;
the administrator account checks the checking reason, if the checking reason is agreed, the stored member scoring report history record is sent to the member account, if the checking reason is not agreed, the stored member scoring report history record is uploaded, and the disagreement reason is transmitted to the member account.
In this embodiment, if the member scoring report history is received, the opinion may be uploaded to the administrator account after being consulted.
According to the invention, the evaluation items and the evaluation standards are set through the administrator account, and the members corresponding to the member accounts are evaluated through the people account, so that the authenticity of the evaluation is ensured; the public account and the member account can both feed back opinions for evaluation, so that the fairness of the evaluation is ensured; special item assessment can be set, so that the management method has a larger extension range and meets the assessment requirements under special conditions.
The above-mentioned embodiments only express the specific embodiments of the present invention, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but not construed as limiting the scope of the present invention. It should be noted that, for a person skilled in the art, several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the inventive concept, which falls within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A membership assessment and information management method based on a co-treatment grid is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 10, inputting administrator information, setting administrator authority, storing and generating an administrator account;
step 20, setting evaluation items and corresponding evaluation standards, and generating a grading module based on the evaluation items and the evaluation standards;
step 30, inputting and storing member information to generate a member account;
step 40, associating the scoring module generated in the step 20 with the member information input in the step 30, generating an evaluation interface and displaying the evaluation interface on a public interface;
step 50, inputting people information, generating a people account, selecting an evaluated member and an evaluation item needing evaluation, grading, generating a grading record and storing;
and step 60, selecting a time period, calling a scoring record in the time period, generating a scoring report, and storing and displaying the scoring report.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in the step 20, the evaluation items comprise visit evaluations, which are as follows:
setting a visit evaluation standard;
entering a visiting evaluation module, inputting visiting time, visiting place and visiting person information, generating visiting information and storing the visiting information;
a positioning function is started, a visiting route is recorded in real time, a visiting route map is generated, and the visiting route map is transmitted to a scoring module;
inputting visiting information and transmitting the visiting information to a scoring module;
and generating and displaying a visiting evaluation result according to the set visiting evaluation standard, the visiting route map and the visiting information.
3. The membership assessment and information management method based on cooperative grids as claimed in claim 1, wherein in the step 60, the detailed steps are as follows:
step 601, selecting member information and a complete evaluation time period;
step 602, acquiring all rating records of the member in the selected evaluation time period;
step 603, screening reasonable scores in the score records;
step 604, generating an evaluation average score according to the reasonable scores obtained in the step 603 and the selected evaluation time period;
step 605, inputting appraisal opinions;
and step 606, generating a grading report based on the evaluation average score and the evaluation opinions, and storing and displaying the grading report.
4. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein in step 60, the evaluation opinion review can be performed, specifically as follows:
selecting stored member information, selecting a time period, calling a visiting appraisal result generated by the member in the time period, inputting appraisal opinion comments or uploading appraisal opinion comment related certification materials, storing and uploading the materials to the appraisal module;
and auditing the appraisal opinions and the related certification materials, and feeding back the auditing opinions based on the appraisal opinions and the related certification materials.
5. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the evaluation period is week, month, season or year in the step 601.
6. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the reasonable score is a score excluding abnormal conditions such as no score and extremely low score in step 603.
7. The membership assessment and information management method based on cooperative grids as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a special item assessment step, specifically as follows:
the administrator account sets a special item evaluation item and a corresponding special item evaluation standard to generate a special item scoring module;
calling member information, selecting a member to be evaluated, sending a special item evaluation notice to a member account, and displaying special evaluation information on a public interface;
selecting members to be evaluated, grading, generating evaluation grading records of special items, and storing;
selecting a special item evaluation time period, calling a special item evaluation scoring record in the time period, generating a scoring report, and storing and displaying the scoring report.
8. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the member account receiving the evaluation of the special matters can reject the evaluation, upload the reject reason, and transmit the reject reason to the administrator account.
9. The membership assessment and information management method based on cooperative grids as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a step of viewing the score report history record, specifically as follows:
the member account selects the member information to be checked, uploads a checking reason and sends a rating report history record checking request to the administrator account;
the administrator account checks the checking reason, if the checking reason is agreed, the stored member scoring report history record is sent to the member account, if the checking reason is not agreed, the stored member scoring report history record is uploaded, and the disagreement reason is transmitted to the member account.
10. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the member assessment and information management method based on the co-treatment grid is characterized in that if a member scoring report history is received, the member scoring report history can be consulted to upload opinions to an administrator account.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010527638.6A CN111738575A (en) | 2020-06-04 | 2020-06-04 | Member assessment and information management method based on co-treatment grid |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010527638.6A CN111738575A (en) | 2020-06-04 | 2020-06-04 | Member assessment and information management method based on co-treatment grid |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111738575A true CN111738575A (en) | 2020-10-02 |
Family
ID=72648779
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010527638.6A Pending CN111738575A (en) | 2020-06-04 | 2020-06-04 | Member assessment and information management method based on co-treatment grid |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111738575A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113313457A (en) * | 2020-11-19 | 2021-08-27 | 湖南红网新媒体集团有限公司 | Knowledge cloud member management method and system and readable storage medium |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20090131834A (en) * | 2008-06-19 | 2009-12-30 | 주식회사마우스닷컴 | System for providing talent management on internet and method thereof |
| CN102663548A (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2012-09-12 | 深圳市高正软件有限公司 | Method and system for social management information scoring realization |
| CN103093315A (en) * | 2013-01-18 | 2013-05-08 | 余飞 | Medical ethics file quantitative evaluation system based on multiple evaluation subject |
-
2020
- 2020-06-04 CN CN202010527638.6A patent/CN111738575A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20090131834A (en) * | 2008-06-19 | 2009-12-30 | 주식회사마우스닷컴 | System for providing talent management on internet and method thereof |
| CN102663548A (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2012-09-12 | 深圳市高正软件有限公司 | Method and system for social management information scoring realization |
| CN103093315A (en) * | 2013-01-18 | 2013-05-08 | 余飞 | Medical ethics file quantitative evaluation system based on multiple evaluation subject |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113313457A (en) * | 2020-11-19 | 2021-08-27 | 湖南红网新媒体集团有限公司 | Knowledge cloud member management method and system and readable storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107341619A (en) | A kind of bid information acquisition system and method | |
| CN111476548A (en) | Title review method and system based on block chain | |
| US20120179509A1 (en) | Method and Apparatus for Implementing a Personal "Get Out The Vote Drive" Software Application | |
| Cascio et al. | From Brown to busing | |
| KR20160121042A (en) | System for submitting and evaluating a proposal | |
| CN103761598A (en) | Enterprise information centralized collection processing method and system | |
| Farganis et al. | “No hints, no forecasts, no previews”: An empirical analysis of Supreme Court nominee candor from Harlan to Kagan | |
| Bernstein | Gendered characteristics of political engagement in college students | |
| CN110717731A (en) | Safety inspection problem tracking closed loop system | |
| CN113190617B (en) | Concealed engineering quality acceptance method and system based on block chain | |
| US20080320090A1 (en) | System and method for review of discussion content | |
| CN105427042A (en) | PEM project evaluation management system and control method thereof | |
| CN111738575A (en) | Member assessment and information management method based on co-treatment grid | |
| CN110991859A (en) | Expert management system and method based on intelligent text travel | |
| US7974931B2 (en) | Methods for producing, transmitting and preventing transmission of content based on determination of compliance or non-compliance | |
| US7813936B2 (en) | Record-keeping system for transmission and production of content | |
| Baumgartner | The veepstakes: Forecasting vice presidential selection in 2008 | |
| US20060059052A1 (en) | Record-keeping system for transmission and production of content | |
| Yandra et al. | Understanding the Voter Data Information System (SIDALIH): The Need for Sustainable Voter Data Accuracy (DPB) Ahead of the 2024 General Election | |
| CN111986055A (en) | Method and system for filling volunteers in multiple batches | |
| CN112766879A (en) | Full life cycle management method, system, storage medium and server for mapping activities | |
| Coates | The effects of campaign spending on electoral outcomes: A data envelopment analysis | |
| US20060064358A1 (en) | Record-keeping system for transmission and production of content | |
| CN112115373A (en) | Block chain-based file delivery management method, device, equipment and medium | |
| CA3035049A1 (en) | System and method for multi-institutional optimization for a candidate application system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20201002 |