TWM633489U - Enterprise vision scoring system - Google Patents
Enterprise vision scoring system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- TWM633489U TWM633489U TW111207249U TW111207249U TWM633489U TW M633489 U TWM633489 U TW M633489U TW 111207249 U TW111207249 U TW 111207249U TW 111207249 U TW111207249 U TW 111207249U TW M633489 U TWM633489 U TW M633489U
- Authority
- TW
- Taiwan
- Prior art keywords
- scoring
- enterprise
- score
- vision
- module
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Eye Examination Apparatus (AREA)
- Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)
Abstract
一種企業願景評分系統,用於提供多個外部主機填寫評分問卷後,再根據外部資料庫提供之外部資料進行企業評分作業,包括:通訊模組,用於接收評分問卷;檢核評分模組,用於在接收評分問卷後,以評分權重進行企業評分作業,並產生企業評分;機器學習模組,用於對外部主機之企業評分進行機器學習作業,以調整評分權重後獲得修正評分權重;以及內部資料庫,用於儲存企業評分、評分權重以及修正後權重。An enterprise vision scoring system, which is used to provide multiple external hosts to fill out the scoring questionnaire, and then perform the enterprise scoring operation according to the external data provided by the external database, including: a communication module for receiving the scoring questionnaire; a checking and scoring module, It is used to carry out the enterprise scoring operation with the scoring weight after receiving the scoring questionnaire, and generate the enterprise scoring; the machine learning module is used to perform the machine learning operation on the enterprise scoring of the external host, and obtain the corrected scoring weight after adjusting the scoring weight; and An internal database for storing enterprise ratings, rating weights and corrected weights.
Description
本新型揭露一種企業願景評分系統,尤其是一種可根據不同狀況因應挑整評分權重之企業願景評分系統。This model discloses a corporate vision scoring system, especially a corporate vision scoring system that can adjust the scoring weight according to different situations.
舉凡任何公司在經營時,皆會有其不同的企業願景。然而,許多企業所陳述的企業願景,常常淪為表述,並沒有實際可以數據化做為參考的依據,故目前有許多企業已開始引進企業願景評分的系統。When any company is operating, it will have different corporate visions. However, the corporate vision stated by many companies is often reduced to an expression, and there is no actual data that can be used as a reference. Therefore, many companies have begun to introduce a corporate vision scoring system.
其中,ESG評分便是常見的企業願景評分之指標。ESG指的環境、社會、公共治理等英文單字的縮寫,詳細內容分別為環境(Environmental):包含能源使用管理、廢棄物管理、氣候風險、天然資源稀缺、污染及廢棄物等,與環境相關的內容;社會(Social):包括勞工問題、資訊安全、產品責任、風險利益,或是員工健康與安全管理、行銷管理、資安隱私權維護等等;公共治理(Governance):公司治理與行為的各種議題,像是董事會素質與成效、風險管理、商業道德、供應鏈管理等等。Among them, ESG score is a common indicator of corporate vision score. ESG refers to the abbreviation of English words such as environment, society, and public governance. The details are Environmental: including energy use management, waste management, climate risk, scarcity of natural resources, pollution and waste, etc. Content; Social: including labor issues, information security, product liability, risk benefits, or employee health and safety management, marketing management, information security privacy protection, etc.; public governance (Governance): corporate governance and behavior Various topics, such as board quality and effectiveness, risk management, business ethics, supply chain management, etc.
而ESG評分係為一種企業責任、永續投資的概念,且近年來全球越來越多投資人用ESG分數,來衡量一間企業的社會責任表現,認為這個分數能衡量企業的外部風險,看出一間公司未來績效。且ESG評分也類似於一個風險評估的方式,用來評估一間公司外部風險高不高,而雖然目前已有許多機構建立了評分系統來統計一間公司的ESG評分,但可能僅為企業一次性委託,無法與時俱進,且各家機構評分方式不同,權重部分也會因產業及國家所在地而不同。The ESG score is a concept of corporate responsibility and sustainable investment. In recent years, more and more investors around the world use ESG scores to measure the social responsibility performance of a company. They believe that this score can measure the external risks of the company. See predict the future performance of a company. Moreover, ESG scoring is also similar to a risk assessment method, which is used to assess whether a company’s external risks are high or not. Although many institutions have established scoring systems to count a company’s ESG score, it may only be done once for a company. It is impossible to keep pace with the times, and the scoring methods of each institution are different, and the weight part will also vary depending on the industry and the location of the country.
因此,如何發展出一種可以因應時勢、地點及各種因素來調整評分權重的企業願景評分系統,成為了一個十分重要的議題。Therefore, how to develop a corporate vision scoring system that can adjust the scoring weight according to the current situation, location and various factors has become a very important issue.
本新型的目的在於提供一種企業願景評分系統,用於提供多個外部主機填寫評分問卷後,再根據外部資料庫提供之外部資料進行企業評分作業,包括:通訊模組、檢核評分模組、機器學習模組以及內部資料庫。The purpose of this model is to provide an enterprise vision scoring system, which is used to provide multiple external hosts to fill out the scoring questionnaire, and then perform enterprise scoring operations according to the external data provided by the external database, including: communication module, checking and scoring module, Machine learning modules and internal databases.
承上所述,通訊模組,訊號連接外部主機,用於接收評分問卷;檢核評分模組,訊號連接通訊模組,用於在接收評分問卷後,以評分權重進行企業評分作業,並產生企業評分;機器學習模組,訊號連接檢核評分模組,用於對外部主機之企業評分進行機器學習作業,以調整評分權重後獲得修正評分權重;以及內部資料庫,訊號連接通訊模組、檢核評分模組與機器學習模組,用於儲存企業評分、評分權重以及修正後權重。As mentioned above, the communication module, the signal is connected to the external host, and is used to receive the scoring questionnaire; the checking and scoring module, the signal is connected to the communication module, and is used to perform the enterprise scoring operation with the scoring weight after receiving the scoring questionnaire, and generate Enterprise scoring; machine learning module, signal connection checking and scoring module, used to perform machine learning operations on the enterprise scoring of external hosts, to adjust the scoring weights to obtain revised scoring weights; and internal database, signal connection communication modules, The check scoring module and the machine learning module are used to store enterprise scores, scoring weights and corrected weights.
可選地,上述企業評分作業係為多元迴歸分析。Optionally, the above enterprise rating operation is multiple regression analysis.
可選地,上述企業評分作業包括多個評分參數,且上述評分參數包括環境評分、社會評分以及公司治理評分。Optionally, the enterprise scoring job includes multiple scoring parameters, and the scoring parameters include environmental scoring, social scoring, and corporate governance scoring.
可選地,上述環境評分包括多個評分因子,上述因子包括每一年度每百萬元營收之用電量、每一年度每百萬元營收之用水量、每一年度每百萬元營收之溫室氣體排放量、合計已取得環保相關第三方認證數目。Optionally, the above-mentioned environmental score includes multiple scoring factors, and the above-mentioned factors include electricity consumption per million yuan of revenue per year, water consumption per million yuan of revenue per year, and water consumption per million yuan of revenue per year. Greenhouse gas emissions from revenue, and the total number of third-party certifications related to environmental protection obtained.
可選地,上述社會評分包括多個評分因子,上述因子包括違反勞動法令數目、每百萬營收之公益費用支出、離職率、違反社會公益重大不良事件數目。Optionally, the above-mentioned social score includes multiple scoring factors, and the above-mentioned factors include the number of violations of labor laws, public welfare expenses per million of revenue, turnover rate, and the number of major adverse events that violate social public welfare.
可選地,上述公司治理評分包括多個評分因子,上述因子包括稅前淨利率、股東報酬率、營業現金對稅後純益比。Optionally, the above-mentioned corporate governance score includes multiple scoring factors, and the above-mentioned factors include pre-tax net profit rate, shareholder return rate, and ratio of operating cash to after-tax profit.
可選地,上述企業評分更包括風險等級,上述風險等級包括高風險等級、中風險等級以及低風險等級。Optionally, the above-mentioned enterprise scoring further includes risk levels, and the above-mentioned risk levels include high-risk levels, medium-risk levels, and low-risk levels.
可選地,上述企業評分更包括違約情形,當上述外部主機中之其中一者具有違約情形,機器學習模組根據違約情形調整評分權重。Optionally, the above-mentioned enterprise scoring further includes a breach of contract, and when one of the above-mentioned external hosts has a breach of contract, the machine learning module adjusts the scoring weight according to the breach of contract.
綜上所述,本新型的企業願景評分系統具有以下功效:(1) 可以根據外部資料中的評分標準以及企業的整體狀況適時調整評分權重;(2) 可以定期更新不同企業的評分結果,使得評分結果保持一定的公信力;以及(3) 透過機器學習的方式,自動去除不需要的資料,使得評分結果愈加貼近企業的實際營運情形。To sum up, the new enterprise vision scoring system has the following functions: (1) It can adjust the scoring weight in a timely manner according to the scoring standards in external materials and the overall situation of the enterprise; (2) It can regularly update the scoring results of different enterprises, so that The scoring results maintain a certain degree of credibility; and (3) automatically remove unnecessary data through machine learning, making the scoring results closer to the actual operating conditions of the enterprise.
下面將結合本實用新型實施例中的圖式,對本新型實施例中的技術方案進行清楚、完整地描述,顯然,所描述的實施例僅僅是本新型的一部分實施例,而不是全部的實施例。基於本新型中的實施例,本領域通常技術人員在沒有做出進步性貢獻前提下所獲得的所有其他實施例,都屬於本新型保護的範圍。The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of them. . Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without making progressive contributions all belong to the scope of protection of the present invention.
有鑑於上述問題,本新型之實施例發展出一種企業願景評分系統,請參照圖1,圖1為根據本新型一實施例之企業願景評分系統的功能方塊圖。上述企業願景評分系統100,用於提供多個外部主機200填寫評分問卷後,再根據外部資料庫300提供之外部資料進行企業評分作業,包括:通訊模組110、檢核評分模組120、機器學習模組130以及內部資料庫140。In view of the above problems, an embodiment of the present invention develops an enterprise vision scoring system, please refer to FIG. 1 , which is a functional block diagram of an enterprise vision scoring system according to an embodiment of the present invention. The enterprise vision scoring system 100 mentioned above is used to provide multiple external hosts 200 to fill out the scoring questionnaire, and then perform the enterprise scoring operation according to the external data provided by the
承上所述,通訊模組110,訊號連接外部主機200,用於接收評分問卷;檢核評分模組120,訊號連接通訊模組110,用於在接收評分問卷後,以評分權重進行企業評分作業,並產生企業評分;機器學習模組130,訊號連接檢核評分模組120,用於對外部主機200之企業評分進行機器學習作業,以調整評分權重後獲得修正評分權重;以及內部資料庫140,訊號連接通訊模組110、檢核評分模組120與機器學習模組130,用於儲存企業評分、評分權重以及修正後權重。As mentioned above, the
其中,上述外部資料係為各評分的標準,在擷取外部資料後再經由機器學習模組130進行分析,以排除無用的參數,而毋需以人工輸入評分的機制及其權重。值得注意的是,機器學習作業可以是以類神經網路或是AI人工智慧來對這些數據進行更新,並適時去除多餘的資訊進行校正,使得結果可以愈加貼近真實的情況。Wherein, the above-mentioned external data is the standard for each scoring, and after the external data is captured, it is analyzed by the
根據本新型之一實施例,上述企業評分作業係為多元迴歸分析。According to one embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned business scoring operation is multiple regression analysis.
根據本新型之一實施例,上述企業評分作業包括多個評分參數,且上述評分參數包括環境評分、社會評分以及公司治理評分。According to an embodiment of the present invention, the enterprise scoring job includes a plurality of scoring parameters, and the scoring parameters include environmental scoring, social scoring, and corporate governance scoring.
舉例來說,環境評分、社會評分以及公司治理評分各會有一個分數(a 1、b 1以及c 1)及其相應的評分權重(E i、S i以及G i),其計算後加總出的數值(假設為y值)就是本次企業評分作業所產出的企業評分。公式可以例如為下: y 1= a 1E i+ b 1S i+ c 1G i For example, the Environmental Score, Social Score, and Corporate Governance Score will each have a score (a 1 , b 1 , and c 1 ) and their corresponding score weights (E i , S i , and G i ), which are calculated to add up to The output value (assumed to be the y value) is the enterprise score produced by this enterprise scoring operation. The formula can for example be as follows: y 1 = a 1 E i + b 1 S i + c 1 G i
接著,上述環境評分包括多個評分因子,上述因子包括每一年度每百萬元營收之用電量、每一年度每百萬元營收之用水量、每一年度每百萬元營收之溫室氣體排放量、合計已取得環保相關第三方認證數目。Next, the above-mentioned environmental score includes a number of scoring factors. The above-mentioned factors include electricity consumption per million yuan of revenue per year, water consumption per million yuan of revenue per year, and The amount of greenhouse gas emissions and the total number of third-party certifications related to environmental protection obtained.
但本新型不以此為限,環境評分因子還可以是氣候變化、自然資本、汙染與廢棄物以及環境機會等。However, the present invention is not limited thereto, and the environmental scoring factors may also include climate change, natural capital, pollution and waste, and environmental opportunities.
然後,上述社會評分也包括多個評分因子,上述因子包括違反勞動法令數目、每百萬營收之公益費用支出、離職率、違反社會公益重大不良事件數目。Then, the above-mentioned social scoring also includes multiple scoring factors, including the number of violations of labor laws, public welfare expenses per million of revenue, turnover rate, and the number of major adverse events that violate social public welfare.
但本新型不以此為限,社會評分因子還可以是人力資本、產品責任、利益關係以及社交機會等。However, the present invention is not limited thereto, and the social scoring factors may also be human capital, product responsibility, interest relationship, and social opportunity.
再者,上述公司治理評分同樣包括多個評分因子,上述因子包括公司治理以及企業行為,例如稅前淨利率、股東報酬率、營業現金對稅後純益比,但本新型不以此為限。Furthermore, the above-mentioned corporate governance score also includes multiple scoring factors. The above-mentioned factors include corporate governance and corporate behavior, such as pre-tax net interest rate, shareholder return rate, operating cash to after-tax net profit ratio, but this model is not limited to this.
此外,根據本新型一實施例,上述企業評分更包括風險等級,上述風險等級包括高風險等級、中風險等級以及低風險等級。In addition, according to an embodiment of the present invention, the enterprise rating further includes risk levels, and the risk levels include high risk levels, medium risk levels and low risk levels.
舉例來說,企業評分可以不只是一個數字,還可以有等第,例如A~F級,如果企業評分分數高,分類為A、B級,代表該企業的外部風險較低(低風險等級);如果企業評分分數為中等,並分類在C、D級,代表該企業的外部風險為中等(中風險等級);以及如果企業評分分數很低,被分類在E、F級,代表該企業的外部風險較高(高風險等級)。上述的企業評分除了可供投資人在對不同公司進行評分前,有一個明確的依據來評斷是否需投資,還可以提供求職者在進入一間公司前,用來評估該企業是否具有苛待員工而造成企業評分低落的情形。For example, the enterprise rating can be not just a number, but also grades, such as grades A to F. If the enterprise has a high score, it will be classified into grades A and B, which means that the enterprise has a low external risk (low risk level) ; If the enterprise score is medium, and classified in C, D level, representing the external risk of the enterprise is medium (medium risk level); and if the enterprise score is very low, classified in E, F level, representing the enterprise's Higher external risks (high risk rating). The above corporate ratings provide investors with a clear basis to judge whether they need to invest before rating different companies, and can also provide job seekers with a tool to evaluate whether the company has harsh treatment of employees before entering a company. The situation that caused the enterprise to score low.
然後,根據本新型一實施例,上述企業評分更包括違約情形,當上述外部主機200中之其中一者具有違約情形,機器學習模組130根據違約情形調整評分權重,但本新型不以此為限,即使企業並沒有違約情形,但在收集過往資料時,發現部分評分標準於現在已經不適用,例如碳排放的標準可能標準相較十年前已經嚴苛許多,因此機器學習模組130對於此部分的評分權重便會進行調整,或者某企業從某一年度開始,已經完全使用綠能發電來達成企業永續經營的目標,但評分因子中還有關於非綠能發電的指標,因此機器學習模組130也會對於此部分的評分權重進行調整。Then, according to an embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned enterprise ratings further include breach of contract, when one of the above-mentioned external hosts 200 has a breach of contract, the
也就是說,本新型的企業願景評分系統100,不同於以往其他評分系統僅做一次性評分,還可以定期自有參與本企業願景評分系統100之企業評分作業的企業(外部主機200)中撈取資料,以不斷進行更新,行程最貼近各企業型態的評分權重,使得企業願景評分不會僅淪於形式或者有不合時宜的情況發生。That is to say, the new enterprise vision scoring system 100 is different from other scoring systems in the past, which only do one-time scoring, and can also be obtained from enterprises (external hosts 200) that participate in the enterprise scoring operation of the enterprise vision scoring system 100 on a regular basis. The information is constantly updated, and the itinerary is closest to the scoring weight of each enterprise type, so that the corporate vision score will not be reduced to a formality or out of date.
接著,舉另一個實施例,並請參照圖2,圖2為根據本新型一實施例之企業願景評分系統的作業流程圖。圖2的步驟S102中,企業(外部主機200)使用本新型的企業願景評分系統100做公司內部的ESG評分,然後,根據企業願景評分系統100的評分問卷進行評答後,將評分問卷透過通訊模組110回傳至企業願景評分系統100。Next, another embodiment is given, and please refer to FIG. 2 . FIG. 2 is a flow chart of an enterprise vision scoring system according to an embodiment of the present invention. In step S102 of FIG. 2, the enterprise (external host 200) uses the new type of enterprise vision scoring system 100 to perform ESG scoring within the company. The
然後,圖2的步驟S104-S106中,檢核評分模組120接收到通訊模組110傳遞之上述評分問卷後,根據評分權重來進行企業評分作業,並產生企業評分。Then, in steps S104-S106 of FIG. 2 , after receiving the above-mentioned scoring questionnaire delivered by the
舉例來說,上述企業評分作業可以是多元迴歸分析(如前面所述),但本新型不以此為限。For example, the above-mentioned enterprise scoring operation may be multiple regression analysis (as mentioned above), but the present invention is not limited thereto.
接著,圖2的步驟S108中,檢核評分模組120再將上述評分問卷及企業評分傳遞至內部資料庫140進行儲存。Next, in step S108 of FIG. 2 , the checking and
值得注意的是,在進行多元迴歸分析時,各數值的權重可依照外部資料庫300所傳送的外部資料來進行調整,例如本年度中各國的ESG評分標準較以往有大幅修改,便會調整評分權重,或者依照參與評分之企業的所在地或企業的業務類別來自動調整評分權重。It is worth noting that when performing multiple regression analysis, the weights of each value can be adjusted according to the external data sent by the
此外,在本實施例中,將本年度的評分問卷假設為第N年,且在第N年之前並沒有該企業的其他評分問卷(即,此評分權重可以當作初始評分權重)。In addition, in this embodiment, it is assumed that the scoring questionnaire of this year is the Nth year, and there is no other scoring questionnaire of the enterprise before the Nth year (that is, the scoring weight can be regarded as the initial scoring weight).
然後,圖2的步驟S110中,到了隔年度,該企業同樣需要填寫評分問卷,並同樣透過通訊模組110回傳至企業願景評分系統100,此時的評分問卷係為第N+1年的問卷。Then, in step S110 of FIG. 2 , in the next year, the enterprise also needs to fill in the scoring questionnaire and send it back to the enterprise vision scoring system 100 through the
接著,圖2的步驟S112中,根據該企業是否有歷史資料或者違約情形(更可以如上所述,根據外部資料中的評分標準是否有重大變更),來決定是否需調整評分權重。如果有該企業的歷史資料或者發生了違約情形,則進行步驟S114及S116A;反之,如果該企業沒有歷史資料或沒有違約情形,則進行步驟S116B。Next, in step S112 of FIG. 2 , it is determined whether the scoring weight needs to be adjusted according to whether the enterprise has historical data or breach of contract (or as mentioned above, according to whether there is a major change in the scoring criteria in the external data). If there is historical data of the enterprise or there is a breach of contract, proceed to steps S114 and S116A; otherwise, if the enterprise has no historical data or there is no breach of contract, proceed to step S116B.
圖2的步驟S114中,當該企業有歷史資料或者發生違約情形時,舉例來說,企業在去年已經有填寫過評分問卷並且產生相應的企業評分,此時便可以用來當作歷史資料並透過機器學習模組130調整權重(即,機器學習作業);或者,在本年度中企業發生了違約情形,例如為發生違反勞基法的情形,便會並透過機器學習模組130相應地調整權重,使得企業評分降低。In step S114 of Figure 2, when the enterprise has historical data or a breach of contract occurs, for example, the enterprise has filled out the rating questionnaire last year and generated a corresponding enterprise rating, which can be used as historical data and Adjust the weights through the machine learning module 130 (ie, machine learning operations); or, if the company has breached the contract during the year, such as a violation of the Labor Standards Act, the weights will be adjusted accordingly through the
然後,圖2的步驟S116A中,當機器學習模組130調整上述評分權重,並獲得修正評分權重後,再回傳至檢核評分模組120,並以修正評分權重進行企業評分作業,然後進行步驟S118,產生企業評分。值得注意的是,在此為第N+1年的企業評分。Then, in step S116A of FIG. 2 , when the
而當企業沒有歷史資料或沒有違約情形,且近幾年度的ESG評分標準並無特別的變動時,則進行圖2的步驟S116B,使用與之前相同的評分權重進行企業評分作業,然後進行步驟S118,產生企業評分。此處所獲得的企業評分也是第N+1年的企業評分。And when the company has no historical data or no breach of contract, and there is no special change in the ESG scoring standards in recent years, proceed to step S116B in Figure 2, use the same scoring weights as before to perform the corporate scoring operation, and then proceed to step S118 , yielding a firm score. The enterprise score obtained here is also the enterprise score of the N+1 year.
最後,進行圖2的步驟S120,將修正後或未修正的評分權重以及第N+1年的企業評分儲存至內部資料庫140,完成第N+1年的企業評分作業。Finally, go to step S120 in FIG. 2 , store the corrected or uncorrected rating weights and the company rating for the N+1 year in the
也就是說,當到了第N+2年、第N+3年……等不同年度時,機器學習模組130都會因應時勢、企業違約狀況等來定期調整評分權重。此外,當有多筆資料時,多元迴歸分析資料也會有很多筆(如下所示),然後,機器學習模組130在參照這些歷史資料時,也會視情況去除不符時宜的離峰值,使得ESG評分可以維持很高的信賴度,以提供他人或公司內部企業方針做為參考。
y
1= a
1E
i+ b
1S
i+ c
1G
iy
2= a
2E
i+1+ b
2S
i+1+ c
2G
i+1y
3= a
3E
i+2+ b
3S
i+2+ c
3G
i+2
值得注意的是,在此只是舉例為每年都需要重新評定企業的ESG評分,但本新型不以此為限,更新企業評分的頻率可以有不同的態樣,例如:每三個月一次、每六個月一次、每兩年一次,或者當評分標準有重大變更時(由外部資料得知),即發送通知給各外部主機200來進行重新評分,以保持各企業的ESG評分可以維持在很高的準確度而不至於失真。It is worth noting that this is just an example of the need to reassess the company’s ESG score every year, but this model is not limited to this. The frequency of updating the company’s score can vary, for example: once every three months, every Once every six months, once every two years, or when there is a major change in the scoring standard (learned from external sources), a notification is sent to each external host 200 for re-scoring, so as to keep the ESG score of each enterprise at a very high level. High accuracy without distortion.
綜上所述,本新型的基金權益數同步系統具有以下功效: (1) 可以根據外部資料中的評分標準以及企業的整體狀況適時調整評分權重; (2) 可以定期更新不同企業的評分結果,使得評分結果保持一定的公信力;以及 (3) 透過機器學習的方式,自動去除不需要的資料,使得評分結果愈加貼近企業的實際營運情形。 To sum up, the new synchronization system for fund rights and interests has the following effects: (1) The scoring weight can be adjusted in a timely manner according to the scoring standards in external materials and the overall situation of the enterprise; (2) The scoring results of different companies can be updated regularly, so that the scoring results maintain a certain degree of credibility; and (3) Automatically remove unnecessary data through machine learning, making the scoring results closer to the actual operating conditions of the enterprise.
儘管已經示出和描述了本新型的實施例,對於本領域的通常技術人員而言,可以理解在不脫離本新型的原理和精神的情況下可以對這些實施例進行多種變化、修改、替換和變型,本新型的範圍由所附申請專利範圍及其等同物限定。Although the embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, those skilled in the art can understand that various changes, modifications, substitutions and variants, the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended patent scope and its equivalents.
100:企業願景評分系統 110:通訊模組 120:檢核評分模組 130:機器學習模組 140:內部資料庫 200:外部主機 300:外部資料庫 100: Corporate Vision Scoring System 110: Communication module 120: Check and score module 130:Machine Learning Module 140: Internal database 200: external host 300: External database
提供的附圖用以使本新型所屬技術領域具有通常知識者可以進一步理解本新型,並且被併入與構成本新型之說明書的一部分。附圖示出了本新型的示範實施例,並且用以與本新型之說明書一起用於解釋本新型的原理。以下為本新型各圖的簡單說明: 圖1為根據本新型一實施例之企業願景評分系統的功能方塊圖。 圖2為根據本新型一實施例之企業願景評分系統的作業流程圖。 The accompanying drawings are provided to enable those having ordinary knowledge in the technical field of the present invention to further understand the present invention, and are incorporated and constitute a part of the description of the present invention. The drawings illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention and, together with the description of the invention, serve to explain the principle of the invention. The following is a brief description of each figure of the present invention: FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of an enterprise vision scoring system according to an embodiment of the present invention. Fig. 2 is a flow chart of the operation of the enterprise vision scoring system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
100:企業願景評分系統 100: Corporate Vision Scoring System
110:通訊模組 110: Communication module
120:檢核評分模組 120: Check and score module
130:機器學習模組 130:Machine Learning Module
140:內部資料庫 140: Internal database
200:外部主機 200: external host
300:外部資料庫 300: External database
Claims (8)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW111207249U TWM633489U (en) | 2022-07-07 | 2022-07-07 | Enterprise vision scoring system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW111207249U TWM633489U (en) | 2022-07-07 | 2022-07-07 | Enterprise vision scoring system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
TWM633489U true TWM633489U (en) | 2022-10-21 |
Family
ID=85461497
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
TW111207249U TWM633489U (en) | 2022-07-07 | 2022-07-07 | Enterprise vision scoring system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
TW (1) | TWM633489U (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI850149B (en) * | 2023-11-09 | 2024-07-21 | 成創永續股份有限公司 | Greenhouse Gas Inventory Methods |
-
2022
- 2022-07-07 TW TW111207249U patent/TWM633489U/en unknown
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI850149B (en) * | 2023-11-09 | 2024-07-21 | 成創永續股份有限公司 | Greenhouse Gas Inventory Methods |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Moloi et al. | Firm value and integrated reporting quality of South African listed firms | |
Tan et al. | The impact of air pollution on the cost of debt financing: Evidence from the bond market | |
Zhang et al. | Accountability audit of natural resource, government environmental regulation and pollution abatement: An empirical study based on difference-in-differences model | |
Chang et al. | Media coverage of environmental pollution and the investment of polluting companies | |
Asare et al. | Exploring the disclosure of intellectual capital in Ghana: evidence from listed companies | |
Liao et al. | Development of social responsibility evaluation framework of construction projects: a multi-stakeholders perspective | |
Bohnett et al. | Corporate responsibility and biodiversity conservation: challenges and opportunities for companies participating in China’s Belt and Road Initiative | |
TWM633489U (en) | Enterprise vision scoring system | |
Chai et al. | Political association, managerial power heterogeneity, and corporate risk-taking in China | |
Zhang et al. | Corporate earnings management strategy under environmental regulation: Evidence from China | |
Hezabr et al. | Audit committee characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from the insurance sector in Oman | |
Jaffar et al. | Environmental performance: Does corporate governance matter | |
Wang | Evaluating organisational performance during crises: A multi-dimensional framework | |
US7447650B1 (en) | Method for accelerating Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliance process for management of a company | |
Siregar et al. | Analysis Of The Effect Of Competence And Integrity On The Quality Of Internal Audit Results In Medan City | |
Yang et al. | How does heavy haze weather impact operational efficiency? An empirical study of Chinese manufacturing firms | |
Yeh et al. | Disclosure of corporate social responsibility and value creation: evidence from China | |
Geng et al. | How green credit affects corporate environmental information disclosure: evidence from new energy listed companies in China | |
Abidin et al. | Does Audit Tenure, Audit Firm Size, Audit Fee, and Competence Matter? | |
Smaili | Can Continuous Disclosure Defaults Be Attributed to Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 Auditor Differences? | |
Zeng et al. | Internal Control Quality, Corporate Social Responsibility Fulfillment and Enterprise Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China’s Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry | |
Bi et al. | THE RESEARCH OF SECURITY MARKET REGULATORY MECHANISM FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRIPARTITE GAME. | |
Fina et al. | The Effect of Green Accounting, Carbon Emission Disclosure and Profitability on Company Value | |
Liu | Government Environmental Audit Can Improve Company Performance | |
Gan | An Empirical Experiment of Factors Influencing the Quality of Carbon Accounting Disclosure in the Context of Big Data |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
GD4K | Issue of patent certificate for granted utility model filed before june 30, 2004 |