CN105787677A - Petrochemical port area accident risk area quantitative assessment method - Google Patents
Petrochemical port area accident risk area quantitative assessment method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105787677A CN105787677A CN201610200873.6A CN201610200873A CN105787677A CN 105787677 A CN105787677 A CN 105787677A CN 201610200873 A CN201610200873 A CN 201610200873A CN 105787677 A CN105787677 A CN 105787677A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- accident
- risk
- probability
- region
- petrochemical industry
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 66
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 36
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000013076 uncertainty analysis Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 28
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- 239000013256 coordination polymer Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 231100000517 death Toxicity 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000000342 Monte Carlo simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 231100000290 environmental risk assessment Toxicity 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000000205 computational method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000003911 water pollution Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000017899 Spathodea campanulata Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000019771 cognition Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005315 distribution function Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 231100000167 toxic agent Toxicity 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003440 toxic substance Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000012502 risk assessment Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000012954 risk control Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001149 cognitive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005728 strengthening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007794 visualization technique Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/083—Shipping
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a petrochemical port area accident risk area quantitative assessment method comprising the following steps: (1) putting forward a petrochemical port area accident integrated risk area quantitative assessment mode; (2) building an improved accident probability calculation model based on an accident domino effect; (3) building an improved consequence intensity calculation model based on uncertainty analysis; and (4) getting the formation mechanism and the overall distribution characteristics of accident risk in a petrochemical port area according to the corrected accident integrated risk area quantitative assessment mode, the improved accident probability calculation model and the improved consequence intensity calculation model, and putting forward petrochemical port area accident risk control measures. By employing the method of the invention, the accuracy of accident probability calculation and consequence simulation is improved, and the guiding significance of risk assessment to risk prevention and control is enhanced.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of appraisal procedure, be specifically related to a kind of petrochemical industry port district accident risk region quantitative evaluating method.
Background technology
Petrochemical industry port district, refers to the handling of petrochemical industry product and the port area of storage Relatively centralized, is one of the risk prevention system emphasis of the Changjiang river petrochemical industry product storing and transporting security.In recent years, along with a large amount of petrochemical industry product Transportation Enterprises are along the Changjiang river centralized layout, the Transportation of Dangerous Chemicals amount of Changjiang River Trunk Line increases sharply with the speedup of average annual 10%, and the accident risk prevention and control in petrochemical industry port district are brought severe challenge.
Developed countries extensively carries out region accident risk qualitative assessment research, and is applied to multiple fields such as risk management, emergency management and rescue, Land_use change safety program.Due to computationally intensive, the calculating process complexity of region accident risk qualitative assessment, professional software generally can be adopted.China's region accident risk qualitative assessment research starting is relatively later.Wu ancestor took the lead in have employed Regional Risk quantitative evaluating method in Urban Dangers safety program is studied equal to 2006, using individual risk and social risk as risk indicator parameter, it is achieved Regional Risk superposition；Then, some scholars have inquired into the application in China chemical industrial park of the Regional Risk quantitative evaluating method and improvement successively.Chinese scholars conducts a research mainly around the evaluation profile that region accident risk is quantitative.Owing to accident risk is mainly determined by accident probability and consequence intensity, some scholars also inquires into the computational methods of the two.
Existing research often carries out risk assessment model study for " chemical industrial park ", does not suggest that the evaluation profile for " petrochemical industry port district " own characteristic.In the prediction process to damage sequence, researcher is often just for one or several specific accident scene, and ignores other possible accident scene, there is very big cognitive uncertainty, causes the imperfection of Risk Results.In damage sequence strength simulation process, cognitive uncertainty often shows as a lot of risk variable cannot with certain single numeric representation, and the probabilistic sign of variable often becomes research key point.Existing research has been done some in this respect and has been attempted, but is more heavily weighted toward air, water body diffusion model aspect that leakage accident is caused, and the risk variable uncertainty characterization research for the consequence forecast model such as fire, blast also lacks relatively.
Summary of the invention
Brief overview about the present invention given below, in order to the basic comprehension about certain aspects of the invention is provided.Should be appreciated that this general introduction is not that the exhaustive about the present invention is summarized.It is not intended to determine the key of the present invention or pith, and nor is it intended to limit the scope of the present invention.It is only intended to and provides some concept in simplified form, in this, as the preamble in greater detail discussed after a while.
The purpose of the embodiment of the present invention is the defect for above-mentioned prior art, it is provided that the petrochemical industry port district accident risk region quantitative evaluating method of a kind of accuracy improving calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable and Consequence Simulation.
To achieve these goals, the present invention adopts the technical scheme that:
A kind of petrochemical industry port district accident risk region quantitative evaluating method, comprises the following steps:
(1) accident integrated risk region, petrochemical industry port district qualitative assessment pattern is proposed；
(2) the calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable model improved is set up based on accident Domino effect；
(3) the consequence strength model improved is set up based on uncertainty analysis；
(4) formation mechenism and the holistic distribution characteristics of petrochemical industry port district accident risk are obtained according to the accident integrated risk region qualitative assessment pattern revised, the calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable model of improvement and the consequence strength model of improvement, it is proposed to the control measure of petrochemical industry port district accident risk.
Described step (1) including:
A) identification main hazard source
For self-contained unit, adopt and select numerical value S to identify main assessment of risks object；Computing formula is as follows:
In formula: L is that device arrives the distance considering location point, minimum for 100m；A weighs the instruction parameter that device is inherent disastrous, and T, F, E represent toxicant, combustible material and explosive substance respectively；
The specific formula for calculation of instruction parameter A is as follows:
In formula, Q is the quantity (kg) of chemicals in device；O1It it is the parameter characterizing storage device or process apparatus；O2It it is the parameter of characterization apparatus position；O3It is characterize the parameter of gaseous substance quantity after chemicals discharges；G is the ultimate value characterizing physical hazard characteristic；
B) qualitative assessment region security risk
Adopt individual risk (IR) and social risk (FN) carry out quantification area security risk as risk indicator；The computing formula of the individual risk that certain mesh point is total is as follows:
In formula, fsIt it is the probability of happening of event S；PMIt it is the probability of Meteorological Grade M；It it is wind directionProbability；PiIt it is the conditional probability of ignition event i；PdIt it is mesh point probability of death.
Social risk FNComputing formula as follows:
In formula, FdIt is at given event S, Meteorological Grade M, wind directionCalculated coefficient of destruction when ignition event i；NcellIt it is the size of population in grid；It is at given event S, Meteorological Grade M, wind directionThe death toll that when ignition event i, all grids are total；FNIt is causeThe cumulative frequency of all events more than or equal to N；
C) introduce environmental risk assessment index, set up integrated risk region qualitative assessment pattern
Hydrodynamic model and water quality model is selected to carry out water pollution simulation；In conjunction with accident leakage Probability estimate accidents happened environmental risk, by the Mathematical treatment of cartesian grid method He " risk principle of stacking ", by itself and security risk estimation process matching, set up the region qualitative assessment pattern of accident integrated risk；
D) improve the quantization method of risk compensation coefficient, revise the region qualitative assessment pattern of only consideration accident inherent risk
The penalty coefficient CP of existing Regional Risk value is made up of fire-fighting and rescue penalty coefficient FCP and medical aid penalty coefficient MCP two parts, and formula is as follows:
CP=FCP × MCP
Consider the active compensation effect to reducing damage sequence of society's emergency capability waterborne of the departments such as the emergency capability of petrochemical industry Transportation Enterprise self and maritime affairs on this basis, improve the definition of risk compensation, formula is converted into:
CP=WCP × LCP × CCP
In formula, WCP is society's water life-saving penalty coefficient；LCP is social land rescue penalty coefficient；CCP is enterprise self rescue penalty coefficient；
With reference to emergency management and rescue relevant regulations, and in conjunction with petrochemical industry port district emergency capability investigational data on the spot, it is determined that the concrete quantization method of above-mentioned penalty coefficient, improve the computational methods of risk compensation；Risk compensation coefficient is introduced the estimation mode proposed, and then revises the region qualitative assessment pattern of only consideration accident inherent risk；Specific formula for calculation is as follows:
RR=NR × CP
In formula, NR is region inherent risk value；CP is penalty coefficient；RR is region practical risk value.
Described step (2) including:
A) identify and analyzed area domino accident topological relation
First the quadratic risk function accident of fire, the initiation of explosion accident Domino effect is filtered out；
Analyze the spread vector of each initial incident, and in conjunction with the Domino effect critical value standard of all kinds of spread vector, get final product the secondary target that initial option is possible；
Calculating the Extending probability of each secondary target, computing formula is as follows:
For heat radiation: Y=12.54-1.847ln (ttf)
For superpressure: Y=a+bln (Ps)
Wherein, Y is the Extending probability of initial incident；Ttf is the equipment failure time, and unit is s, and the equipment failure time depends on the volume of caloradiance and the target device acting on dissimilar target device；PsFor acting on the peak overpressure of target device, unit is kPa；A and b is the fitting coefficient corresponding with target device type, for instance for non-pressure vessel: a=-18.96；B=2.44；
Using quadratic risk function accident as initial incident, quadratic risk function accident identification flow process is adopted to identify tertiary air danger accident further；Same initial incident and its second accident, three accidents can constitute tree, form domino fault chains；If initial incidents multiple in region are considered simultaneously, then and then form region domino accident topological relation；
B) for fire, explosion accident, the probability calculation model improved is set up
The method adopting Monte Carlo stochastic sampling sets up probability calculation model for fire and explosion accident type, namely under abundant accident scene, each accident is repeatedly performed stochastic sampling, simulate the result of probability, secondary probability, three Probabilistic Synthesis effects, it is achieved the overall probability estimation of accident；
C) for leakage accident, the probability calculation model improved is set up
Based on the probability of fire or explosion accident with consider the overall probability after Domino effect, extrapolate the initiation probability of Domino effect；Assuming that the impact of secondary target fire or explosion accident probability is similar to by Domino effect is equal to its impact on secondary target leakage accident probability, in conjunction with leakage accident probability, derive the leakage accident probability of happening computation model of improvement, it is thus achieved that three kinds of accident patterns synchronize the probability calculation model improved.
Described fire incident type includes pond fire, jet bubble reactor, fireball, scintillation etc., and spread vector is mainly heat radiation and flame contact；Explosion accident type includes machinery blast, limited blast, steam cloud blast etc., and spread vector is mainly positive pressure of shock wave and fragment.
Described step (3) including:
A) risk variable is identified
For processes such as fire, blast, Atmospheric Diffusion, water body diffusions, it is considered to the open factor of model source code, it is determined that suitable consequence forecast model；
For each consequence forecast model, model of cognition needs the risk variable of input；
Risk variable is broadly divided into accident variable and meteorological variables；Accident variable mainly includes the key element of the sign accident characteristic such as leakage probability, leakage rate；Meteorological variables mainly includes the key element of the sign accident generation external conditions such as wind direction frequency, wind speed, temperature；
B) uncertainty of quantization signifying risk variable
The uncertainty of risk variable is characterized by corresponding probability density function；The probability density function of accident variable need to combine finding on the spot make mutually it will be assumed that；The probability density function of meteorological variables is obtained by weather data analysis over the years；For the feature of each risk variable, in conjunction with finding on the spot and calendar year statistics data, determine corresponding probability density function one by one, as the sample drawn of Monte Carlo Method；
C) the consequence strength model improved is set up
Adopt Monte Carlo Method, determine number realization N, utilizing random number stochastic sampling from the probability density function characterizing risk variable that computer automatically generates, obtain the N group input parameter set of Consequence Simulation prediction, each group of parameter set all represents certain special scenes；N group parameter set is inputted consequence forecast model, it is thus achieved that the probability density distribution of analog result and cumulative distribution function, as the important foundation of risk characterization.
Compared with prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects as follows:
The petrochemical industry port district accident risk appraisal procedure of the present invention, accident risk region prevention and control for this kind of special function zones, district, petrochemical industry port riverine, coastal provide theoretical foundation, it is also possible to configure for petrochemical industry port region emergency capability, region security planning provides science to support with layout work.
It being mainly manifested in: 1) present invention proposes accident integrated risk region, the petrochemical industry port district qualitative assessment pattern that is of universal significance, it can be considered that the risk compensation of emergent rescue capability, under regional scale, realize unified quantitatively characterizing and the comprehensive and quantitative assessment of fail-safe risk and environmental risk；
2) by accident Domino effect and Uncertainty Analysis Method, the accuracy of calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable and Consequence Simulation is improved emphatically.
Accompanying drawing explanation
In order to be illustrated more clearly that the embodiment of the present invention or technical scheme of the prior art, the accompanying drawing used required in embodiment or description of the prior art will be briefly described below, apparently, accompanying drawing in the following describes is only some embodiments of the present invention, for those of ordinary skill in the art, under the premise not paying creative work, it is also possible to obtain other accompanying drawing according to these accompanying drawings.
The flow chart of the petrochemical industry port district accident risk region quantitative evaluating method that Fig. 1 provides for the embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed description of the invention
For making the purpose of the embodiment of the present invention, technical scheme and advantage clearly, below in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in the embodiment of the present invention, technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention is clearly and completely described, obviously, described embodiment is a part of embodiment of the present invention, rather than whole embodiments.Can combine with the element shown in one or more other accompanying drawing or embodiment and feature at the element described in the accompanying drawing of the present invention or a kind of embodiment and feature.It should be noted that, for purposes of clarity, accompanying drawing and eliminate expression and the description of unrelated to the invention, parts known to persons of ordinary skill in the art and process in illustrating.Based on the embodiment in the present invention, the every other embodiment that those of ordinary skill in the art obtain under not paying creative work premise, broadly fall into the scope of protection of the invention.
Referring to Fig. 1, petrochemical industry port district accident risk region quantitative evaluating method, comprise the following steps:
1) accident integrated risk region, petrochemical industry port district qualitative assessment pattern is proposed
A, main hazard source identification
For self-contained unit, adopt and select numerical value S to identify main assessment of risks object.Computing formula is as follows:
In formula: L is that device arrives the distance considering location point, minimum for 100m；A weighs the instruction parameter that device is inherent disastrous, and T, F, E represent toxicant, combustible material and explosive substance respectively.The specific formula for calculation of instruction parameter A is as follows:
In formula, Q is the quantity (kg) of chemicals in device；O1It it is the parameter characterizing storage device or process apparatus；O2It it is the parameter of characterization apparatus position；O3It is characterize the parameter of gaseous substance quantity after chemicals discharges；G is the ultimate value characterizing physical hazard characteristic.
B, region security quantifying risk are assessed
Single dangerous matter sources is leaked, the probability of happening of fire and explosion accident and cause that the consequence intensity of individual injures and deaths realizes on the basis of qualitative assessment, Mathematical treatment by cartesian grid method He " risk principle of stacking ", and in conjunction with periphery population density and distribution situation, adopt individual risk (IR) and social risk (FN) carry out quantification area security risk as risk indicator.The computing formula of the individual risk that certain mesh point is total is as follows:
In formula, fsIt it is the probability of happening of event S；PMIt it is the probability of Meteorological Grade M；It it is wind directionProbability；PiIt it is the conditional probability of ignition event i；PdIt it is mesh point probability of death.
Social risk FNComputing formula as follows:
In formula, FdIt is at given event S, Meteorological Grade M, wind directionCalculated coefficient of destruction when ignition event i；NcellIt it is the size of population in grid；It is at given event S, Meteorological Grade M, wind directionThe death toll that when ignition event i, all grids are total；FNIt is causeThe cumulative frequency of all events more than or equal to N.
C, introducing environmental risk assessment index, set up integrated risk region qualitative assessment pattern
Hydrodynamic model and water quality model is selected to carry out water pollution simulation；In order to the quantitatively characterizing index of environmental risk is unified with security risk, suitable econometrics method is selected to estimate the pollution loss of water body, and use value of life Evaluation Method that water pollution loss is further converted into individual death equivalent, thus realizing the unified quantitatively characterizing of security risk and environmental risk.Accident environmental risk can be estimated in conjunction with accident leakage probability, by the Mathematical treatment of cartesian grid method He " risk principle of stacking ", by itself and security risk estimation process matching, and then set up the region qualitative assessment pattern of accident integrated risk.
D, improve the quantization method of risk compensation coefficient, revise the region qualitative assessment pattern of only consideration accident inherent risk
The penalty coefficient CP of existing Regional Risk value is made up of fire-fighting and rescue penalty coefficient FCP and medical aid penalty coefficient MCP two parts, and formula is as follows:
CP=FCP × MCP
This research will consider the active compensation effect to reducing damage sequence of society's emergency capability waterborne of the departments such as emergency capability and the maritime affairs of petrochemical industry Transportation Enterprise self on this basis, improves the definition of risk compensation, is converted into by formula:
CP=WCP × LCP × CCP
In formula, WCP is society's water life-saving penalty coefficient；LCP is social land rescue penalty coefficient；CCP is enterprise self rescue penalty coefficient.
With reference to China's emergency management and rescue relevant regulations, and in conjunction with petrochemical industry port district emergency capability investigational data on the spot, it is determined that the concrete quantization method of above-mentioned penalty coefficient, thus improving the computational methods of risk compensation.Risk compensation coefficient is introduced the estimation mode originally researched and proposed, and then revises the region qualitative assessment pattern of only consideration accident inherent risk.Specific formula for calculation is as follows:
RR=NR × CP
In formula, NR is region inherent risk value；CP is penalty coefficient；RR is region practical risk value.
2) the calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable model improved is set up based on accident Domino effect
A, region domino accident topological relation identification and analysis
First filtering out the quadratic risk function accident of fire, the initiation of explosion accident Domino effect, fire incident type includes pond fire, jet bubble reactor, fireball, scintillation etc., and spread vector is mainly heat radiation and flame contact；Explosion accident type includes machinery blast, limited blast, steam cloud blast etc., and spread vector is mainly positive pressure of shock wave and fragment.
Identification process is: selects an initial incident and analyzes its spread vector, possible secondary target is selected by spread vector, calculate the Extending probability of each secondary target, determine whether other initial incidents, if repeating above-mentioned flow process, i.e. one initial incident of reselection analyze its spread vector, continues below scheme, if it is not, then be defined as second accident.
Specifically include: analyze the spread vector of each initial incident, and in conjunction with the Domino effect critical value standard of all kinds of spread vector, get final product the secondary target that initial option is possible.The Extending probability computing formula of secondary target is as follows:
For heat radiation: Y=12.54-1.847ln (ttf)
For superpressure: Y=a+bln (Ps)
Wherein, Y is the Extending probability of initial incident；Ttf is the equipment failure time, and unit is s, and it depends on the volume of caloradiance and the target device acting on dissimilar target device；PsFor acting on the peak overpressure of target device, unit is kPa；A and b is the fitting coefficient corresponding with target device type, for instance for non-pressure vessel: a=-18.96；B=2.44.
Using quadratic risk function accident as initial incident, above-mentioned flow process can be adopted to identify tertiary air danger accident further.Same initial incident and its second accident, three accidents can constitute tree, form domino fault chains；If initial incidents multiple in region are considered simultaneously, then and then form region domino accident topological relation.
B, for fire, explosion accident, set up the probability calculation model improved
This project considers that in regional extent, accident quantity is more, probability equation is complex, in order to comparatively accurate estimation comprises the overall probability of initial incident, second accident and three accidents, the method adopting Monte Carlo stochastic sampling is set up probability calculation model for fire and explosion accident type, namely under abundant accident scene, each accident is repeatedly performed stochastic sampling, simulate the result of probability, secondary probability, three Probabilistic Synthesis effects, it is achieved the overall probability estimation of accident.
C, for leakage accident, set up the probability calculation model improved
Based on the probability of fire or explosion accident with consider the overall probability after Domino effect, it is possible to extrapolate the initiation probability of Domino effect.Assuming that the impact of secondary target fire/explosion accident probability is similar to by Domino effect is equal to its impact on secondary target leakage accident probability, in conjunction with leakage accident probability, the leakage accident probability of happening computation model of improvement can be derived, and then obtain the probability calculation model that three kinds of accident patterns synchronize to improve.
3) the consequence strength model improved is set up based on uncertainty analysis
A, identification risk variable
For processes such as fire, blast, Atmospheric Diffusion, water body diffusions, it is considered to factors such as the openings of model source code, it is determined that suitable fire, blast or water body diffusion consequence strength model.For each consequence strength model, model of cognition needs the risk variable of input.Risk variable substantially can be divided into accident variable and meteorological variables.Accident variable mainly includes the key element of the sign accident characteristic such as leakage probability, leakage rate；Meteorological variables mainly includes the key element of the sign accident generation external conditions such as wind direction frequency, wind speed, temperature.All there is uncertainty in risk variable, can affect risk evaluation result to some extent.
B, quantization signifying risk variable uncertainty
The uncertainty of risk variable is characterized by corresponding probability density function.The probability density function of accident variable often cannot speculate from historical experience, it is necessary to combines finding on the spot and makes corresponding it is assumed that the value of moment leakage rate is obeyed certain and is evenly distributed as supposed；The probability density function of meteorological variables often can be obtained by weather data analysis over the years, as wind speed substantially conforms to normal distribution.For the feature of each risk variable, in conjunction with finding on the spot and calendar year statistics data, corresponding probability density function need to be determined one by one, as the sample drawn of Monte Carlo Method.
The consequence strength model that c, foundation improve
Adopt Monte Carlo Method, determine number realization N, utilizing random number stochastic sampling from the probability density function characterizing risk variable that computer automatically generates, obtain the N group input parameter set of Consequence Simulation prediction, each group of parameter set all represents certain special scenes.N group parameter set is input in the consequence strength model of fire, blast or water body diffusion, it is thus achieved that the probability density distribution of analog result and cumulative distribution function, as the important foundation of risk characterization.
4) formation mechenism and the holistic distribution characteristics of petrochemical industry port district accident risk are obtained according to the accident integrated risk region qualitative assessment pattern revised, the calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable model of improvement and the consequence strength model of improvement, it is proposed to the control measure of petrochemical industry port district accident risk.Specifically include:
A) select typical case petrochemical industry port district, dangerous matter sources and emergency capability Develop Data are investigated
Consider the factors such as geological location, layout of port, petrochemical industry product transportation quantity and accumulating cargo type, select typical petrochemical industry port district as object of study.Visit on the spot according to literature survey, official statistics, enterprise and administration section, the mode such as expert interviewing, investigate this petrochemical industry port district's danger sources information and emergency capability situation.Answer the following information of emphasis investigation petrochemical industry product Transportation Enterprise: the annual throughput of 1. accumulating cargo type, annual throughout, physico-chemical property etc.；2. the operating pressure of equipment such as wharf apron petrochemical industry product handling ship equipment, petrochemical industry product transport line, petrochemical industry product storage tank and pump, temperature, flow velocity, use time, stop valve installation situation etc. every year；3. the security detection equipment of petrochemical pier platform, pipeline and tank field, the emergent emergency set such as pollution prevention device, fire-fighting equipment are equipped with situation, and emergent strength sets up situation；4. the personnel's distribution situation etc. inside and outside enterprise.
B) adopt the risk assessment pattern proposed, typical case petrochemical industry port district accident integrated risk is carried out district
Territory qualitative assessment and analysis
Main hazard source, identification port district；Based on the accident probability improved and consequence strength model, synchronize to calculate the overall probability of happening of the accidents such as fire, blast and leakage and the distribution of consequence intensity function；By the Mathematical treatment of cartesian grid method He " risk principle of stacking ", the risk compensation coefficient after introducing environmental risk assessment index and improving, it is thus achieved that the region quantitative result of typical case petrochemical industry port district accident integrated risk；In conjunction with acceptable standard, Risk Calculation result is estimated and analysis；Based on visualization technique and index staining integrated risk regional distribution chart of giving that accidents happened.
C) formation mechenism of petrochemical industry port district accident integrated risk, distribution characteristics and control measure research
Region qualitative assessment and analysis result based on accident integrated risk, and accident integrated risk regional distribution chart, analyzing and on the basis of contrast security risk and environmental risk formation mechenism and distribution characteristics, disclose comprehensive formation mechenism and the holistic distribution characteristics of fail-safe and environmental risk, propose the control measure of regional complex risk accordingly.This part achievement can provide theoretical foundation for the accident risk region prevention and control of this kind of special function zones, district, petrochemical industry port riverine, coastal, it is also possible to configure for petrochemical industry port region emergency capability, region security planning provides science to support with layout work.
The method of the present invention is the uniqueness for petrochemical industry port district accident risk, accident integrated risk region, the petrochemical industry port district quantitative evaluating method being of universal significance proposed, consider the risk compensation of emergent rescue capability, it is achieved that the comprehensive and quantitative assessment of fail-safe risk and environmental risk；Meanwhile, by accident Domino effect and Uncertainty Analysis Method, improve emphatically the accuracy of calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable and Consequence Simulation.In research category, by environmental risk assessment index being included in security risk quantitative evaluating method, improve the comprehensive and comprehensive of accident risk research；By including in risk compensation coefficient by society's emergency capability waterborne of the departments such as the emergency capability of enterprise self and maritime affairs, enhance specific aim and the practical significance of petrochemical industry port district accident risk research.In computation model, by Domino effect, synchronize to improve the probability calculation model of leakage, fire and blast these three accident pattern, improve the accuracy of probability calculation；Based on uncertainty analysis, it is thus achieved that the probability distribution of the processes such as fire, blast, Atmospheric Diffusion and water body diffusion, strengthen the representativeness of consequence strength Calculation Result.In practical application, by proposed method being applied to typical case petrochemical industry port district, it is possible to disclose comprehensive formation mechenism and the holistic distribution characteristics of fail-safe and environmental risk, propose the control measure of regional complex risk accordingly；Achievement in research can provide theoretical foundation for the accident risk region prevention and control of this kind of special function zones, district, petrochemical industry port riverine, coastal.In the long run, the Continual Improvement of methods of risk assessment and practical application contribute to strengthening the directive significance that risk prevention system is worked by risk assessment, and with layout work, the configuration of petrochemical industry port region emergency capability, region security planning are had good decision support effect.
In the various embodiments described above of the present invention, the sequence number of embodiment is merely convenient of description, does not represent the quality of embodiment.The description of each embodiment is all emphasized particularly on different fields, certain embodiment there is no the part described in detail, it is possible to referring to the associated description of other embodiments.
In the embodiments such as apparatus and method of the present invention, it is clear that each parts or each step reconfigure after can decomposing, combine and/or decomposing.These decompose and/or reconfigure the equivalents that should be regarded as the present invention.Simultaneously, herein above in the description of the specific embodiment of the invention, the feature described for a kind of embodiment and/or illustrate can use in one or more other embodiment in same or similar mode, combined with the feature in other embodiment, or substitute the feature in other embodiment.
It should be emphasized that term " include/comprise " refers to the existence of feature, key element, step or assembly herein when using, but it is not precluded from the existence of one or more further feature, key element, step or assembly or additional.
Although it is last it is noted that described the present invention and advantage thereof in detail above it should be appreciated that various change, replacement and conversion can be carried out when without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention being defined by the claims appended hereto.And, the scope of the present invention is not limited only to the specific embodiment of the process described by description, equipment, means, method and steps.One of ordinary skilled in the art will readily appreciate that from the disclosure, can use process, equipment, means, method or step that perform the function essentially identical to corresponding embodiment described herein or obtain the result essentially identical with it, that existing and future is to be developed according to the present invention.Therefore, appended claim is directed in their scope to include such process, equipment, means, method or step.
Claims (5)
1. accident risk region, district, petrochemical industry port quantitative evaluating method, it is characterised in that comprise the following steps:
(1) accident integrated risk region, petrochemical industry port district qualitative assessment pattern is proposed；
(2) the calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable model improved is set up based on accident Domino effect；
(3) the consequence strength model improved is set up based on uncertainty analysis；
(4) formation mechenism and the holistic distribution characteristics of petrochemical industry port district accident risk are obtained according to the accident integrated risk region qualitative assessment pattern revised, the calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable model of improvement and the consequence strength model of improvement, it is proposed to the control measure of petrochemical industry port district accident risk.
2. accident risk region, district, petrochemical industry port according to claim 1 quantitative evaluating method, it is characterised in that described step (1) including:
A) identification main hazard source
For self-contained unit, adopt and select numerical value S to identify main assessment of risks object；Computing formula is as follows:
In formula: L is that device arrives the distance considering location point, minimum for 100m；A weighs the instruction parameter that device is inherent disastrous, and T, F, E represent toxicant, combustible material and explosive substance respectively；
The specific formula for calculation of instruction parameter A is as follows:
In formula, Q is the quantity (kg) of chemicals in device；O1It it is the parameter characterizing storage device or process apparatus；O2It it is the parameter of characterization apparatus position；O3It is characterize the parameter of gaseous substance quantity after chemicals discharges；G is the ultimate value characterizing physical hazard characteristic；
B) qualitative assessment region security risk
Adopt individual risk (IR) and social risk (FN) carry out quantification area security risk as risk indicator；The computing formula of the individual risk that certain mesh point is total is as follows:
In formula, fsIt it is the probability of happening of event S；PMIt it is the probability of Meteorological Grade M；It it is wind directionProbability；PiIt it is the conditional probability of ignition event i；PdIt it is mesh point probability of death；
Social risk FNComputing formula as follows:
In formula, FdIt is at given event S, Meteorological Grade M, wind directionCalculated coefficient of destruction when ignition event i；NcellIt it is the size of population in grid；It is at given event S, Meteorological Grade M, wind directionThe death toll that when ignition event i, all grids are total；FNIt is causeThe cumulative frequency of all events more than or equal to N；
C) introduce environmental risk assessment index, set up integrated risk region qualitative assessment pattern
Hydrodynamic model and water quality model is selected to carry out water pollution simulation；In conjunction with accident leakage Probability estimate accidents happened environmental risk, by the Mathematical treatment of cartesian grid method He " risk principle of stacking ", by itself and security risk estimation process matching, set up the region qualitative assessment pattern of accident integrated risk；
D) improve the quantization method of risk compensation coefficient, revise the region qualitative assessment pattern of only consideration accident inherent risk
The penalty coefficient CP of existing Regional Risk value is made up of fire-fighting and rescue penalty coefficient FCP and medical aid penalty coefficient MCP two parts, and formula is as follows:
CP=FCP × MCP
Consider the active compensation effect to reducing damage sequence of society's emergency capability waterborne of the departments such as the emergency capability of petrochemical industry Transportation Enterprise self and maritime affairs on this basis, improve the definition of risk compensation, formula is converted into:
CP=WCP × LCP × CCP
In formula, WCP is society's water life-saving penalty coefficient；LCP is social land rescue penalty coefficient；CCP is enterprise self rescue penalty coefficient；
With reference to emergency management and rescue relevant regulations, and in conjunction with petrochemical industry port district emergency capability investigational data on the spot, it is determined that the concrete quantization method of above-mentioned penalty coefficient, improve the computational methods of risk compensation；Risk compensation coefficient is introduced the estimation mode proposed, and then revises the region qualitative assessment pattern of only consideration accident inherent risk；Specific formula for calculation is as follows:
RR=NR × CP
In formula, NR is region inherent risk value；CP is penalty coefficient；RR is region practical risk value.
3. accident risk region, district, petrochemical industry port according to claim 1 quantitative evaluating method, it is characterised in that described step (2) including:
A) identify and analyzed area domino accident topological relation
First the quadratic risk function accident of fire, the initiation of explosion accident Domino effect is filtered out；
Analyze the spread vector of each initial incident, and in conjunction with the Domino effect critical value standard of all kinds of spread vector, get final product the secondary target that initial option is possible；
Calculating the Extending probability of each secondary target, computing formula is as follows:
For heat radiation: Y=12.54-1.847ln (ttf)
For superpressure: Y=a+bln (Ps)
Wherein, Y is the Extending probability of initial incident；Ttf is the equipment failure time, and unit is s, and the equipment failure time depends on the volume of caloradiance and the target device acting on dissimilar target device；PsFor acting on the peak overpressure of target device, unit is kPa；A and b is the fitting coefficient corresponding with target device type, for instance for non-pressure vessel: a=-18.96；B=2.44；
Using quadratic risk function accident as initial incident, quadratic risk function accident identification flow process is adopted to identify tertiary air danger accident further；Same initial incident and its second accident, three accidents can constitute tree, form domino fault chains；If initial incidents multiple in region are considered simultaneously, then and then form region domino accident topological relation；
B) for fire, explosion accident, the probability calculation model improved is set up
The method adopting Monte Carlo stochastic sampling sets up probability calculation model for fire and explosion accident type, namely under abundant accident scene, each accident is repeatedly performed stochastic sampling, simulate the result of probability, secondary probability, three Probabilistic Synthesis effects, it is achieved the overall probability estimation of accident；
C) for leakage accident, the probability calculation model improved is set up
Based on the probability of fire or explosion accident with consider the overall probability after Domino effect, extrapolate the initiation probability of Domino effect；Assuming that the impact of secondary target fire or explosion accident probability is similar to by Domino effect is equal to its impact on secondary target leakage accident probability, in conjunction with leakage accident probability, derive the leakage accident probability of happening computation model of improvement, it is thus achieved that three kinds of accident patterns synchronize the probability calculation model improved.
4. accident risk region, district, petrochemical industry port according to claim 3 quantitative evaluating method, it is characterised in that described fire incident type includes pond fire, jet bubble reactor, fireball, scintillation etc., and spread vector is mainly heat radiation and flame contact；Explosion accident type includes machinery blast, limited blast, steam cloud blast etc., and spread vector is mainly positive pressure of shock wave and fragment.
5. accident risk region, district, petrochemical industry port according to claim 1 quantitative evaluating method, it is characterised in that described step (3) including:
A) risk variable is identified
For processes such as fire, blast, Atmospheric Diffusion, water body diffusions, it is considered to the open factor of model source code, it is determined that suitable consequence forecast model；
For each consequence forecast model, model of cognition needs the risk variable of input；
Risk variable is broadly divided into accident variable and meteorological variables；Accident variable mainly includes the key element of the sign accident characteristic such as leakage probability, leakage rate；Meteorological variables mainly includes the key element of the sign accident generation external conditions such as wind direction frequency, wind speed, temperature；
B) uncertainty of quantization signifying risk variable
The uncertainty of risk variable is characterized by corresponding probability density function；The probability density function of accident variable need to combine finding on the spot make mutually it will be assumed that；The probability density function of meteorological variables is obtained by weather data analysis over the years；For the feature of each risk variable, in conjunction with finding on the spot and calendar year statistics data, determine corresponding probability density function one by one, as the sample drawn of Monte Carlo Method；
C) the consequence strength model improved is set up
Adopt Monte Carlo Method, determine number realization N, utilizing random number stochastic sampling from the probability density function characterizing risk variable that computer automatically generates, obtain the N group input parameter set of Consequence Simulation prediction, each group of parameter set all represents certain special scenes；N group parameter set is inputted consequence forecast model, it is thus achieved that the probability density distribution of analog result and cumulative distribution function, as the important foundation of risk characterization.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610200873.6A CN105787677B (en) | 2016-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | Petrochemical industry port area accident risk region quantitative evaluating method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610200873.6A CN105787677B (en) | 2016-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | Petrochemical industry port area accident risk region quantitative evaluating method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105787677A true CN105787677A (en) | 2016-07-20 |
| CN105787677B CN105787677B (en) | 2017-11-10 |
Family
ID=56394569
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610200873.6A Expired - Fee Related CN105787677B (en) | 2016-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | Petrochemical industry port area accident risk region quantitative evaluating method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105787677B (en) |
Cited By (35)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106228304A (en) * | 2016-07-22 | 2016-12-14 | 上海理工大学 | Factory safety state evaluating method based on safety index cloud atlas |
| CN106934524A (en) * | 2017-02-15 | 2017-07-07 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of marine oil and gas platform explosion accident consequence quantitative estimation method |
| CN107194537A (en) * | 2017-03-27 | 2017-09-22 | 中山大学 | A kind of LNG port securities risk evaluating system |
| CN107194586A (en) * | 2017-05-23 | 2017-09-22 | 广州中国科学院工业技术研究院 | Storage tank dynamic risk analysis method, apparatus and system |
| CN109165876A (en) * | 2018-10-10 | 2019-01-08 | 杭州电子科技大学 | A kind of chemical industrial park quantification area Risk Calculation method |
| CN110023972A (en) * | 2016-10-26 | 2019-07-16 | 美国纽匹格公司 | The spill hazard of liquid storage facility is evaluated |
| CN110069596A (en) * | 2019-04-28 | 2019-07-30 | 中国疾病预防控制中心 | A kind of emergency work data processing method |
| CN110516933A (en) * | 2019-08-13 | 2019-11-29 | 常州大学 | A kind of gas pipeline external disturbance calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable method based on the tree that develops |
| CN110866664A (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2020-03-06 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk quantification control method and system for petrochemical production process |
| CN111105108A (en) * | 2018-10-25 | 2020-05-05 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Social risk calculation method and system for gas transmission pipeline |
| CN111145633A (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2020-05-12 | 武汉理工大学 | Urban road hazardous chemical transport poison gas leakage diffusion risk potential map construction method |
| CN111160676A (en) * | 2018-11-08 | 2020-05-15 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk determination method and device based on risk matrix |
| CN111242504A (en) * | 2020-01-23 | 2020-06-05 | 南京工业大学 | Coal gasification device risk probability calculation method based on domino effect |
| CN111275329A (en) * | 2020-01-20 | 2020-06-12 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Water transport engineering construction safety accident cause analysis method |
| CN111324970A (en) * | 2020-03-06 | 2020-06-23 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Port oil tank area individual risk analysis method based on multiple domino effects |
| CN111401670A (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2020-07-10 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Social risk evaluation method for peripheral area of oil and gas pipeline and electronic equipment |
| CN111523742A (en) * | 2019-02-01 | 2020-08-11 | 中国石油天然气集团公司 | Oil and gas pipeline danger and risk assessment method |
| CN111801633A (en) * | 2018-06-14 | 2020-10-20 | 舍弗勒技术股份两合公司 | Production control method based on failure risk |
| CN112308355A (en) * | 2019-08-01 | 2021-02-02 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method and device for meshing peripheral areas of oil and gas pipelines |
| CN112446638A (en) * | 2020-12-11 | 2021-03-05 | 贵州元畅采阳新能源科技有限公司 | Risk assessment method, device and system for container |
| CN112529412A (en) * | 2020-12-11 | 2021-03-19 | 华南理工大学 | Dynamic risk analysis method for hazardous chemical substance fire domino accident under multi-disaster coupling |
| CN112633553A (en) * | 2020-11-27 | 2021-04-09 | 合肥泽众城市智能科技有限公司 | Method and system for identifying and evaluating coupling hidden danger of gas pipeline-hazardous chemical enterprise |
| CN113393108A (en) * | 2021-06-07 | 2021-09-14 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Risk evaluation method for dangerous chemical transport vehicle gathering area |
| CN113822505A (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2021-12-21 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Early warning method, device and system for non-recovery event |
| CN113821989A (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2021-12-21 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Emergency disposal simulation risk equipment modeling method and device and storage medium |
| CN114462893A (en) * | 2022-04-11 | 2022-05-10 | 天津渤化讯创科技有限公司 | Chemical industrial park chemical acute poisoning risk assessment method and system |
| US11416643B2 (en) | 2019-07-22 | 2022-08-16 | Kidde Technologies, Inc. | Smoke detection system layout design |
| CN114997757A (en) * | 2022-08-04 | 2022-09-02 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Port petrochemical region transportation risk early warning method and system based on cascading failure |
| CN115511253A (en) * | 2022-08-05 | 2022-12-23 | 广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院 | Method, device, equipment and medium for evaluating block development capacity |
| CN115600900A (en) * | 2022-10-28 | 2023-01-13 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所（Cn） | Safety risk assessment method, system and storage medium for petrochemical port area |
| CN115630756A (en) * | 2022-12-22 | 2023-01-20 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Port threat event prediction method based on big data risk assessment |
| CN116485038A (en) * | 2023-06-08 | 2023-07-25 | 南京工业大学 | Dynamic prediction method for secondary domino accident of fire disaster in pressure storage tank area |
| CN116681292A (en) * | 2023-08-04 | 2023-09-01 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Petrochemical harbor security risk analysis and responsibility division method based on deep learning |
| CN117682403A (en) * | 2024-02-01 | 2024-03-12 | 安徽建工生态科技股份有限公司 | Intelligent building site elevator construction safety monitoring system and method |
| CN117786604A (en) * | 2024-02-23 | 2024-03-29 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Fused safety toughness measurement analysis system based on harbor disaster data |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103955786A (en) * | 2014-04-11 | 2014-07-30 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk oriented hazard analysis method for chemical process device |
-
2016
- 2016-03-31 CN CN201610200873.6A patent/CN105787677B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103955786A (en) * | 2014-04-11 | 2014-07-30 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk oriented hazard analysis method for chemical process device |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 马科伟等: "基于多米诺效应的化工园区定量风险评估方法研究", 《浙江工业大学学报》 * |
Cited By (53)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106228304A (en) * | 2016-07-22 | 2016-12-14 | 上海理工大学 | Factory safety state evaluating method based on safety index cloud atlas |
| CN110023972A (en) * | 2016-10-26 | 2019-07-16 | 美国纽匹格公司 | The spill hazard of liquid storage facility is evaluated |
| CN110023972B (en) * | 2016-10-26 | 2023-08-29 | 美国纽匹格公司 | Spillover risk assessment for liquid storage facilities |
| CN106934524A (en) * | 2017-02-15 | 2017-07-07 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of marine oil and gas platform explosion accident consequence quantitative estimation method |
| CN107194537A (en) * | 2017-03-27 | 2017-09-22 | 中山大学 | A kind of LNG port securities risk evaluating system |
| CN107194586B (en) * | 2017-05-23 | 2020-05-19 | 广州中国科学院工业技术研究院 | Storage tank dynamic risk analysis method, device and system |
| CN107194586A (en) * | 2017-05-23 | 2017-09-22 | 广州中国科学院工业技术研究院 | Storage tank dynamic risk analysis method, apparatus and system |
| CN111801633A (en) * | 2018-06-14 | 2020-10-20 | 舍弗勒技术股份两合公司 | Production control method based on failure risk |
| CN111801633B (en) * | 2018-06-14 | 2024-03-05 | 舍弗勒技术股份两合公司 | Production control method based on failure risk |
| CN110866664B (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2024-02-27 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk quantization management and control method and system for petrochemical production process |
| CN110866664A (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2020-03-06 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk quantification control method and system for petrochemical production process |
| CN109165876B (en) * | 2018-10-10 | 2022-05-20 | 杭州电子科技大学 | Chemical industry park quantitative area risk calculation method |
| CN109165876A (en) * | 2018-10-10 | 2019-01-08 | 杭州电子科技大学 | A kind of chemical industrial park quantification area Risk Calculation method |
| CN111105108B (en) * | 2018-10-25 | 2022-06-07 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Social risk calculation method and system for gas transmission pipeline |
| CN111105108A (en) * | 2018-10-25 | 2020-05-05 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Social risk calculation method and system for gas transmission pipeline |
| CN111160676A (en) * | 2018-11-08 | 2020-05-15 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk determination method and device based on risk matrix |
| CN111160676B (en) * | 2018-11-08 | 2023-06-30 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Risk determination method and device based on risk matrix |
| CN111401670B (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2022-06-07 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Social risk evaluation method for peripheral area of oil and gas pipeline and electronic equipment |
| CN111401670A (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2020-07-10 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Social risk evaluation method for peripheral area of oil and gas pipeline and electronic equipment |
| CN111523742A (en) * | 2019-02-01 | 2020-08-11 | 中国石油天然气集团公司 | Oil and gas pipeline danger and risk assessment method |
| CN110069596A (en) * | 2019-04-28 | 2019-07-30 | 中国疾病预防控制中心 | A kind of emergency work data processing method |
| US11416643B2 (en) | 2019-07-22 | 2022-08-16 | Kidde Technologies, Inc. | Smoke detection system layout design |
| CN112308355A (en) * | 2019-08-01 | 2021-02-02 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method and device for meshing peripheral areas of oil and gas pipelines |
| CN110516933A (en) * | 2019-08-13 | 2019-11-29 | 常州大学 | A kind of gas pipeline external disturbance calculation of Accident Probability of Major Flammable method based on the tree that develops |
| CN110516933B (en) * | 2019-08-13 | 2023-03-24 | 常州大学 | Gas pipeline external interference accident probability calculation method based on evolution tree |
| CN111145633B (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2021-07-06 | 武汉理工大学 | Urban road hazardous chemical transport poison gas leakage diffusion risk potential map construction method |
| CN111145633A (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2020-05-12 | 武汉理工大学 | Urban road hazardous chemical transport poison gas leakage diffusion risk potential map construction method |
| CN111275329A (en) * | 2020-01-20 | 2020-06-12 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Water transport engineering construction safety accident cause analysis method |
| CN111242504B (en) * | 2020-01-23 | 2023-08-22 | 南京工业大学 | Method for calculating risk probability of coal gasification device based on domino effect |
| CN111242504A (en) * | 2020-01-23 | 2020-06-05 | 南京工业大学 | Coal gasification device risk probability calculation method based on domino effect |
| CN111324970A (en) * | 2020-03-06 | 2020-06-23 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Port oil tank area individual risk analysis method based on multiple domino effects |
| CN113821989A (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2021-12-21 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Emergency disposal simulation risk equipment modeling method and device and storage medium |
| CN113822505A (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2021-12-21 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Early warning method, device and system for non-recovery event |
| CN112633553A (en) * | 2020-11-27 | 2021-04-09 | 合肥泽众城市智能科技有限公司 | Method and system for identifying and evaluating coupling hidden danger of gas pipeline-hazardous chemical enterprise |
| CN112446638A (en) * | 2020-12-11 | 2021-03-05 | 贵州元畅采阳新能源科技有限公司 | Risk assessment method, device and system for container |
| CN112529412A (en) * | 2020-12-11 | 2021-03-19 | 华南理工大学 | Dynamic risk analysis method for hazardous chemical substance fire domino accident under multi-disaster coupling |
| CN113393108A (en) * | 2021-06-07 | 2021-09-14 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Risk evaluation method for dangerous chemical transport vehicle gathering area |
| CN114462893A (en) * | 2022-04-11 | 2022-05-10 | 天津渤化讯创科技有限公司 | Chemical industrial park chemical acute poisoning risk assessment method and system |
| CN114997757A (en) * | 2022-08-04 | 2022-09-02 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Port petrochemical region transportation risk early warning method and system based on cascading failure |
| CN114997757B (en) * | 2022-08-04 | 2022-10-21 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Port petrochemical region transportation risk early warning method and system based on cascading failure |
| CN115511253A (en) * | 2022-08-05 | 2022-12-23 | 广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院 | Method, device, equipment and medium for evaluating block development capacity |
| CN115511253B (en) * | 2022-08-05 | 2023-12-29 | 广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院 | Method, device, equipment and medium for evaluating land development capacity |
| CN115600900A (en) * | 2022-10-28 | 2023-01-13 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所（Cn） | Safety risk assessment method, system and storage medium for petrochemical port area |
| CN115600900B (en) * | 2022-10-28 | 2023-04-28 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Security risk assessment method, system and storage medium for petrochemical harbor district |
| CN115630756A (en) * | 2022-12-22 | 2023-01-20 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Port threat event prediction method based on big data risk assessment |
| CN116485038A (en) * | 2023-06-08 | 2023-07-25 | 南京工业大学 | Dynamic prediction method for secondary domino accident of fire disaster in pressure storage tank area |
| CN116485038B (en) * | 2023-06-08 | 2023-11-24 | 南京工业大学 | Dynamic prediction method for secondary domino accident of fire disaster in pressure storage tank area |
| CN116681292A (en) * | 2023-08-04 | 2023-09-01 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Petrochemical harbor security risk analysis and responsibility division method based on deep learning |
| CN116681292B (en) * | 2023-08-04 | 2024-04-09 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Petrochemical harbor security risk analysis and responsibility division method based on deep learning |
| CN117682403A (en) * | 2024-02-01 | 2024-03-12 | 安徽建工生态科技股份有限公司 | Intelligent building site elevator construction safety monitoring system and method |
| CN117682403B (en) * | 2024-02-01 | 2024-04-09 | 安徽建工生态科技股份有限公司 | Intelligent building site elevator construction safety monitoring system and method |
| CN117786604A (en) * | 2024-02-23 | 2024-03-29 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Fused safety toughness measurement analysis system based on harbor disaster data |
| CN117786604B (en) * | 2024-02-23 | 2024-04-26 | 交通运输部水运科学研究所 | Fused safety toughness measurement analysis system based on harbor disaster data |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN105787677B (en) | 2017-11-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN105787677A (en) | Petrochemical port area accident risk area quantitative assessment method | |
| Pasman et al. | Past, present and future of Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) and the incentive it obtained from Land-Use Planning (LUP) | |
| Wang et al. | The real-time estimation of hazardous gas dispersion by the integration of gas detectors, neural network and gas dispersion models | |
| Egidi et al. | The ARIPAR project: analysis of the major accident risks connected with industrial and transportation activities in the Ravenna area | |
| CN105894115A (en) | Regional port major hazard source quantitative risk assessment method | |
| Aven | Quantitative risk assessment: the scientific platform | |
| CN103914622A (en) | Quick chemical leakage predicating and warning emergency response decision-making method | |
| Meng et al. | Regional environmental risk assessment for the Nanjing Chemical Industry Park: an analysis based on information-diffusion theory | |
| CN105678446A (en) | Method used for enterprise safety production risk early warning | |
| Robu et al. | Methods and procedures for environmental risk assessment. | |
| CN102903013A (en) | Risk analysis and layout optimization system for chemical industry park | |
| Rad et al. | A risk-based methodology for optimum placement of flammable gas detectors within open process plants | |
| Sengupta et al. | Challenges for introducing risk assessment into land use planning decisions in an Indian context | |
| Qi et al. | Flexible alarming mechanism of a general GDS deployment for explosive accidents caused by gas leakage | |
| Melnichenko et al. | Devising a procedure to forecast the level of chemical damage to the atmosphere during active deposition of dangerous gases | |
| He et al. | A non-linear risk assessment method for chemical clusters based on fuzzy measure and Choquet integral | |
| He et al. | Risk management of port operations: A systematic literature review and future directions | |
| Liu et al. | Risk evaluation for oil tanker berthing and handling operations using the improved DEMATEL-ISM approach | |
| Török et al. | Chemical risk assessment for storage of hazardous materials in the context of Land Use Planning | |
| Azari et al. | Quantitative risk mapping of urban gas pipeline networks using GIS | |
| Ablieieva et al. | Scientific and methodological approaches to assessing the safety of oil production complexes as potentially dangerous objects | |
| Markiewicz | A Researcher’s View on the Proposal of Legal Regulations Regarding Major Accident Hazard Assessment in the Land‑Use Planning Process in Poland | |
| Tavares | Accidental release of hazardous gases: modelling and assessing risk | |
| Wang et al. | Cask principle of multi-attribute risk assessment: Non-weighted maximal approach for production accidents | |
| Mandal et al. | A review on quantitative risk assessments for oil and gas installations and changes in risk evaluation techniques |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee | ||
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20171110 Termination date: 20180331 |