CA1063050A - Cell culture microcarriers - Google Patents
Cell culture microcarriersInfo
- Publication number
- CA1063050A CA1063050A CA290,641A CA290641A CA1063050A CA 1063050 A CA1063050 A CA 1063050A CA 290641 A CA290641 A CA 290641A CA 1063050 A CA1063050 A CA 1063050A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- microcarriers
- cell culture
- meq
- beads
- cells
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/435—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
- C07K14/52—Cytokines; Lymphokines; Interferons
- C07K14/555—Interferons [IFN]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/435—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
- C07K14/52—Cytokines; Lymphokines; Interferons
- C07K14/555—Interferons [IFN]
- C07K14/565—IFN-beta
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/0068—General culture methods using substrates
- C12N5/0075—General culture methods using substrates using microcarriers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K38/00—Medicinal preparations containing peptides
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2531/00—Microcarriers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2533/00—Supports or coatings for cell culture, characterised by material
- C12N2533/70—Polysaccharides
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Immobilizing And Processing Of Enzymes And Microorganisms (AREA)
- Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Improved cell culture microcarriers, and methods for their production and use, are disclosed herein. These improved microcarriers have positive charge capacities adjusted and/or controlled within a range suitable for good cell growth. One method for producing such improved microcarriers is by treating beads formed from polymers containing pendant hydroxy groups, such as dextran beads, with an aqueous solution of an alkaline material and a chloro- or bromo-substituted tertiary amine under precisely controlled conditions to produce the desired exchange capacity.
The resultant positively charged microcarriers have been used in microcarrier cultures to produce outstanding growth of anchorage-dependent cells. Such cells can be harvested, or used for the production of viruses, vaccines, hormones, interferon or other cellular growth by-products.
Improved cell culture microcarriers, and methods for their production and use, are disclosed herein. These improved microcarriers have positive charge capacities adjusted and/or controlled within a range suitable for good cell growth. One method for producing such improved microcarriers is by treating beads formed from polymers containing pendant hydroxy groups, such as dextran beads, with an aqueous solution of an alkaline material and a chloro- or bromo-substituted tertiary amine under precisely controlled conditions to produce the desired exchange capacity.
The resultant positively charged microcarriers have been used in microcarrier cultures to produce outstanding growth of anchorage-dependent cells. Such cells can be harvested, or used for the production of viruses, vaccines, hormones, interferon or other cellular growth by-products.
Description
1~63~50 BACKGROUND OF TH~ INVENTION
1 Field of the Invention This invention is in the field of biology and more particularly in the field of cell biology.
1 Field of the Invention This invention is in the field of biology and more particularly in the field of cell biology.
2. Descripti~n of the Prior Art The ability to grow mammalian cells is important at both the laboratory and industrial levels. At the labora- -tory level, the limiting factor for cellular or viral re-search at the sub-cellular level is often the amount of raw material available to be studied. At the industrial level, there is much effort being devoted to the development of pharmaceuticals based on mammalian cell products. These are primarily vaccines for human or animal viruses, but also include human growth hormone and other body hormones and bio-chemicals for medical applications.
; Some mammalian cell types have been adapted for growth in suspension cultures. Examples of such cell types include HeLa ~human), BHR (baby hamster kidney) and L cells (mouse). Such cells, in general, have non-normal genetic complements, i.e., too many or too few chromosomes or ab-normal chr~mosomes. Often, these cells will produce a tumor upon injection into an animal of the appropriate species.
--2- ~
.. , . . , . : -, -~(~63~50 Other mammalian cell types have not been adapted for growth in suspension culture to date, and will grow only if they can become attached to an appropriate surface. Such cell types are generally termed "anchorage-dependent" and include 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, mouse bone marrow epithelial cells;
Murine leukemia virus-producing strains of mouse fibroblasts, primary and secondary chick fibroblasts; WI-38 human fibroblast cells; and, normal human embryo lung fibroblast cells (HEL299, ATCC #CCL137). Some anchorage-dependent cells have been grown which are tumor causing but others were grown and found to be non-tumor causing. Also, some anchorage-dependent cells, such as WI-38 and HEL299, can be grown which are genetically normal.
Whereas considerable progress has been made in large scale mammalian cell propagation using cell lines capable of growth in suspension culture, progress has been very limited for large scale propagation of anchorage-dependent mammalian cells. Previous operational techniques employed for large scale propagation of anchorage-dependent cells were based on linear expansion of small scale processes. ~Cell~culture plànts utilized a large number of low yield batch reactors, in the forms of dishes, prescription bottles, roller tubes and-~roller bottles.
Each of these was a discrete unit or isolated batch-reactor requi ing individual environmental controls. These controls, however, were of the most primftive type due to economic considerations.
Variation in nutrients was corrected by a medium change, an operation requiring two steps, i.e., medium removal and meaium addition. Since it was not uncommon for a moderately sized facility to operate hundreds of these batch reactors at a time, even a single change of medium required hundreds of operations, all of which had to be performed accurately, and under exact-ing fiterile conditionfi. Any multiple step operation, such as cell transfer or harvest, compounded the problem accordingly.
Thus, co~ts of equipment, space and manpower were great for this type of facility.
63~SO
There are alternative methods to linear scale-up from small batch cultures which have been proposed. Among such alternatives which have been reported in the literature are plastic bags, stacked plates, spiral films, glass bead propagators, artificial capillaries, and microcarriers.
Among these, microcarrier systems offer certain outstanding and unique advantages. For example, great increases in the attainable ratio of growth surface to vessel volume (S/V) can be obtained using microcarriers over both traditional and newly developed alternative techniques. The increase in S~V
attainable allows the construction of a single-unit homogeneous or quasi-homogeneous batch or semi-batch propagator for high volumetric productivity. Thus, a single stirred tank vessel with simple feedback control for pH and PO2 presents a homo-geneous environment for a large number of cells thereby elimina-ting the necessity for expensive and space consuming, controlled environment incubators. Also, the total number of operations required per unit of cells produced is drastically reduced.
In summary, microcarriers seem to offer economies of capital, -space and manpower in the production of anchorage-dependent cells, relative to current production methods.
Microcarriers also offer the advantage of environ-mental continuity since the cells are grown in one controlled environment. Thus, microcarriers provide the potential for growing anchorage-dependent mammalian cells under one set of environmental conditions which can be regulated to provide constant, optimal cell growth.
One of the more promising microcarrier systems to date has been reported by van Wezel and involves the use of diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-substituted dextran beads in a stirred tank. A. L. van Wezel, "Growth of Cell Strains and Primary Cells on Microcarriers in Homogeneous Culture", Nature 216:64 (1967); D. van Hemert, D. G. Kilburn and A. L. van Wezel, "Homogeneous Cultivation of Animal Cells for the Production of Virus and Virus Products", Biotechnol. Bioeng. 11:875 (1969); and A. L. van Wezel, "Microcarrier Cultures of Animal Cells", Tissue Culture, Methods and Applications, P. F. Kruse and M. K. Patterson, eds., Académic Press, New York, p. 372 (1973). These beads are commerically produced by Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Inc., Piscataway, 1~ ~r~o/en7ar/~
1~ New Jersey, under the tradonamo DEAE-Sephadex A50, an ion exchange system. Chemically, these beads are formed from a crosslinked dextran matrix having diethylaminoethyl groups covalently bound to the dextran chains. As commercially available, DEAE-Sephadex A50 beads-are believed-to have a particle size of 40-120u and a positive charge capacity of about 5.4 meq per gram of dry, crosslinked dextran (ignores weight of attached DEAE moieties).-- Other anion exchange resins, such as DEAE-Sephadex A25, QAE-Sephadex A50 and QAE-Sephadex A25 were also stated by van Wezel to support cell growth.
The system proposed by van Wezel combines multiple surfaces with movable surfaces and has the potential for innovative cellular manipulations and offers advantages in scale-up and environmental controls~ Despite this potential, `
these suggested techniques have not been significantly ex-ploited because researchers have encountered difficulties in cell production due to certain deleterious effects caused by the beads. Among these are initial cell death among a high percentage of the cell inoculum and inadequate cell growth even for those cells which attach. The reasons for these deleterious effects are not thoroughly understood, although it has been proposed that they may be due to bead toxicity or nutrient adsorption. See van Wezel, A. L. ~1967), Nature 216:
64-65; van Wezel, A. L. (1973), Tissue Culture, Methods and Applications. Kruse, P. R. and Patterson, M. R. ~eds.), . . .
1063~50 pp. 372-377, Academic Press, New York; van Hemert, P., Rilburn, D. G., and van Wezel, A. L. (1969), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 11:
875-885; Horng, C. and McLimans, W. (1975), Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 17: 713-732.
It could be that the deleterious effects of these commercially available ion exchange resins are due to their method of manufacture. Certain of these production methods are descri~ed for polyhydroxy materials in patents such as:
U. S. 3,277,025; 3,275,576; 3,042,667 and 3,208,994 all to Flodin et al. Whatever the reason, however, the presently commercially available materials are simply not sufficient for good cell growth of a wide variety of cell types.
One solution to overcoming some of the deleterious effects encountered in attempts to use such commercially available microcarriers for cell growth is described in U.S. Patent No. 4,036,693, issued on July 19, 1977 to Levine et al. Therein, a method for treating these com~er-cially available ion exchange resins with macromolecular polyanions, such as carboxymethylcellulose, is proposed.
While this method has proven successful, it would clearly be more advantageous if the beads could be manufactuxed initially to have properties designed for outstanding growth of anchorage-dependent cells.
SUMMARY OF IHE INVENTION
2$ It has now been discovered that the charge capaci~ty of microcarriers has to be adjusted and/or con-trolled within a certain range to result in good growth of a wide variety of anchorage-dependent cell types at reasonable microcarrier concentrations. Based upon this discovery, microcarrier beads have been produced with con-trolled charge capacities and such beads have been used to obtain good growth of a variety of anchorage-dependent cells.
Cells grown using such microcarrier systems can be harvested or used in the production of animal or plant viruses, vaccines hormones, interferon or other cell growth by-products.
The invention relates to a method of growing anchorage-dependent cells in microcarrier culture, the improvement of em-ploying microcarriers having an amount of positively charged chemical moieties thereon adjusted to provide an exchange capac-ity which allows good growth of said cells, said exchange capac-ity being within the range of between about O.l and about 4.5meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers.
The invention also relates to cell culture micro-carriers having a degree of substitution thereon with positively charged chemical moieties sufficient to provide a charge capac-ity at which good cell growth will occur, and which is from about 0.1 to about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers.
One example of the improved microcarriers is those produced using polymers with pendant hydroxy groups, such as crosslinked dextran beads. These beads can be treated with an aqueous solution of a tertiary or quaternary amine, such as diethylaminoethylchloride:chloride, and an alkaline material, such as sodium hydroxide. The specific charge capacity of the beads is controlled by varying the absolute amounts of the dex-tran, tertiary amine salt and alkaline material, the ratio of -these materials, and/ox the time and temperature of treatment.
Microcarriers produced according to this invention can be used in cultures without the high initial cell loss here-tofore experienced with commercially available microcarriers.
Additionally, attached cells spread and grow to confluence on the bead~ reaching extremely high cell concentrations in the ~uspending medium. The concentration of microcarriers in sus-pen~ion is not limited to very low levels as was customary with A ~ 7 _ the prior art materials, and cell growth appears only to be limited by factors which do not appear to be associated with the microcarriers. Because of this, great increases in the volu-metric productivity of cell cultures can be obtained. In short, the potential offered from the use of microcarriers in the growth of cells, and particularly anchorage-dependent cells, can now be realized.
~ .... . .
A - 7a -.
"' ' ' '' . ' . ' '' ~ . ' , , " ' . . ' ' ' : , , ~ ' : , ' . . , , , ~ .
1063~50 - BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a plot graphically illustrating the growth characteristics of normal diploid human embryo lung fibroblast cells (HEL299) at a microcarrier concentration of 2 grams dry, crosslinked dextran/liter for both commer-cially available DEAE-treated dextran microcarriers and DEAE-treated microcarriers produced according to this invention;
FIG. 2 graphically illustrates the growth charac-teristics of both normal diploid human embryo lung fibro-blast cells (HEL299) and secondary chicken embryo fibro-blasts at a microcarrier concentration of 5 grams dry, crosslinked dextran/liter using improved DEAE-treated .:-microcarriers of this invention.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
As used herein, the terms "microcarriers~, "-cell- -culture microcarriers" and "cell-growth microcarriers" .
mean small, discrete particles suitable for cell attachment -- -and g~rowth-. -Often, alt~oug~-~ot always, microcarr-iers are -porous beads which are formed from polymers. Usually, cells attach to and grow on the outer surfaces of such beads.
As previously described, it has now been dis- : -covered that the amount of charge capacity on cell culture microcarriers must be adjusted and/or controlled to be .~ :~ within a certain range for adequate cell growth`iat r ` , .
~reasonable microcarrier concentrations. Suitable oper-ating and preferred ranges will vary with such factors as the spec~f-ic cel~ls to-~e-grown, the nature of the micro-carriers, the concentration of microcarriers, and other culture parameters including medium composition. In all cases-~-however~- the-amount of charge capacity which has - -- - -,, . . ~. :
1~63~50 been found to be suitable is significantly below the amounts believed to be present on commercially available anion exchange resins previously suggested for microcarrier cell cultures. For example, it is believed that the DEAE-Sephadex A50 beads, suggested by van Wezel, have a charge capacity of about 5.4 meq/gram of dry, untreated (without DEAE), crosslinked dextran. In contradistinction to this relatively high charge capacity, microcarriers have been produced and found suitable for good cell growth according to this invention which have between about 0.1 and about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers. Below about 0.1 meq/gram, it is believed that cells would have difficulty attaching to the microcarriers. Above about 4.5 meq/gram, losses of initial cell inoculum ta~e place, and even the surviving cells do not grow well, particularly at relatively high microcarrier concentrations.
For the growth of normal diploid human fibro-blasts on crosslinked dextran microcarriers, it has been found that a preferred range of charge capacity supplied by DEAE groups is from about 1.0 to about 2.8 meq/g~ of dry, untreated crosslinked dextran. While the preferred range may vary with different cell types or culture conditions, ~ -it is believed that the preferred ranges for any given set of conditions will be within the 0.1-4.5 meq/~m range.
The preferred and optimum conditions can be determined by a person skilled in the art for any set of conditions by routine experimentation.
It will be recognized, of course, that there are certain deficiencies in attempting to define the charge capacity of microcarriers strictly on a unit weight basis.
For example, two beads identical in every way except that they are formed from material~ having different densities : .: . .. : : .. .. . : : - . . . , . .: ~ . . . .. .. .
-~ ~063050 with the same charge distribution thereon would yield different values for their charge capacity per unit weight.
Similarly, two beads having identical charge capacities per unit weight might have quite different charge distribu-tions thereon.
An-alternative definition can be made by specify-ing the range of suitable charges in terms of charge capacity per unit weight of microcarriers in their final functional form. This basis would take into account such factors as the weight of attached DEAE or other positively charged groups, as well as hydration of the beads, etc., whereas the prior-definition is-based-on-dry-, crosslinked -dextran and does not take such factors into account. In an aqueous cell culture medium, the density of micro-carriers should be close to 1.0 gram/cc so that the micro-carriers can be readily dispersed throughout the culture.
Based upon this, it has been determined that the range of suitable charge capacities for microcarriers of this invention defined in this way is from about 0.012 to about 0.25 meq/gram.
The ranges of suitable çharge capacities previ- x ously specified on a weight basis are valid assuming the microcarriers have a substantially uniform charge distri-bution throughout their bulk. If the charge distribution is uneven, it might be possible to have suitable micro-carriers having charge capacities outside of those ranges.
~he important criterion is, of course, that the charge capacity be adjusted to and/or controlled at a value suffi-cient to allow good cell growth on the microcarriers.
Since it may be the charge pattern on the outer surface which is important, it i8 also desirable to be able to define the suitable charge capacity range in .
. : .. . ...... .
.. . .. . .
r- 1063050 terms of the likely surface pattern. This can be done by assuming that the active portion of the microcarriers represents only the outer surface of the bead to a depth of about 20 angstroms. If it is also assumed that the charged groups in the previously mentioned cases are evenly distributed throughout the beads, the previous ranges can be converted to a charge capacity in this outex shell. Using this approach, the range of charge capacity found suitable is from about 0.012 meq/cm3 to about 0.25 meq/cm3. This approach ta~es changes in microcarrier volume due to different charge densities into account.
Microcarriers having the re~uired charge capacity can be prepared by treating microcarriers formed from polymers containing pendant hydroxyl groups with an aqueous solution of an alkaline material and a tertiary or quaternary amine. The beads can be initially swollen in an aqueous medium without the other ingredients, or can be simply con-tacted with an aqueous medium containing the required base and amine. This method of using alkaline materials to catalyze the attachment of positively charged amino groups to hydroxyl-containing polymers is described in Hartmann, U. S. Patent 1,777,970.
Examples of suitable hydroxyl-containing polymers include polysaccharides such as dextran, dextrin, starch, cellu-lose, polyglucose and substituted derivatives of~these.
Certain synthetic polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol and hydroxy-substituted acrylates or methacrylates, such as hydroxy-ethyl methacrylate, are also suitable. Dextran, and especially crosslinked dextran in the form of small spheres or beads, is particularly preferred because it is commercially available, relatively inexpensive, and produces microcarriers which support excellent cell growth.
. .. .
,, ~ , Any material which is alkaline can be used for the reaction. The alkali metal hydroxides, such as sodium or potassium hydroxide, are, however, the preferred alkaline sub-stances.
Either tertiary or quaternary amines are suitable sources of positively charged groups which can be appended onto the hydroxy-containing polymers. Particularly preferred materials are chloro- or bromo-substituted tertiary amines or salts thereof, such as diethylaminoethylchloride, diethylamino-ethylbromide, dimethylaminoethylchloride, dimethylaminoethyl-bromide, diethylaminomethylchloride, diethylaminomethylbromide, di-(hydroxyethyl)-aminoethylchloride, di-(hydroxyethyl)~aminoethyl-bromide, di-(hydroxyethyl)-aminomethylchloride, di-(hydroxy-ethyl)-aminomethylbromide, f-morfolinoethylethylchloride~
~-morfolinoethylbromide, ~-morfolinomethylchloride, ~-mor-- folinomethylbromide and salts thereof, for example, the hydrochlorides.
.
A wide range of reaction temperatures and times may be used. It is preferred to carry out the reactions at temperatures of about between 18C and 65C. However, other temperatures can be used. The reaction kine~ics depend to a large extent, of course,- upon the reaction temperature and the concentration of reactants. Both the time and temperature do affect the final exchange capacity achieved.
The reason that-the charge capacity of the micro-carriers is so critical in cell growth is not thoroughly understood. While not wishing to be bound by this theory, it is possible that the charge capacity at the surface causes certain local discontinuities of medium composition which are the major - controlling influence in microcarrier culture cell growth.
Nevertheless, this is not meant to rule out other possibilities.
106305~
There may be certain bead~, of cour~e, that will not be quitable for good cell growth even though they have a charge capacity within one of the range~ specified. mi~ may be due to 3ide chain~ on the moiety Rupplying the charge capacity which are toxic or otherwise deleteriou~ for cell growth, the presence of ad~orbed or ab~orbed deleterious composition~ or compound~, or it may be due to the porosity of the bead or due to other reason~. If ~uch bead3 are not suitable for cell growth except for the amount of charge capacity, the beads are not con~idered to be "cell-growth microcarriers."
m e invention is further illustrated by the following examples.
_ EPARATION OF DMPROVED MICROCARRIERS
Improved microcarrier~ can be produced as follows.
Dry, uncharged, crosslinked dextran bead9 are sieved to obtain those of approximately 75 um in diameter. One gram of this fraction is added to 10 ml of distilled water and the beads are allowed to swell. An adequate commercial source of dry, cros~-linked dextran known under the trade mark Sephadex G-50 from Pharmacia Fine Chemical~, Piscataway, ~ew Jersey.
An aquQous solution containing 0.01 moles of diethylaminoethylchloride:chloride, tw~ce recrystallized from ~ -methylene chloride, and 0.015 moles of sodium hydroxide is formed in a 10 ml volume. This aqueous ~olution is then added to the swollen dextran bead ~uspen~ion, which is then agitated vig~rously in a shaking water bath for one hour at 60C. After one hour, the beads are ~eparated from the reaction mixture by filtration on Whatman ~trade mark) filter paper No. 595 and wa~hed with 500 ml of distilled water.
' " ~
. . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .
Beads made by this procedure contain approximately 2.0 meq of charge capacity per gram of dry, untreated cross-linked dextran. ThiA charge capacity can be characterized by -13a-measuring the anion exchange capability of the beads as follows. The bead preparations are washed thoroughly with 0.1 normal HCl to saturate all exchange sites with Cl ions.
They are then rinsed with 10-4 normal HCl to remove unbound chloride ions. Subsequently, the beads are washed with a 10% Iw/w) sodium sulfate solution to countersaturate the exchange sites with SO4=. The effluent of the sodium sulfate wash is collected and contains liberated chloride ions. This solut~on is titrated with 1 M silver nitrate using dilute potassium chromate as an indicator.
After titration, the beads are washed thoroughly with distilled water, rinsed with the phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS), suspended in PBS and autoclaved.
This procedure yields hydrated beads of approximately 120-200 pm in diameter, which carry about 2.0 meq of charge capacity per gram of dry, untreated, crosslinked dextran.
EXAMPLE 2.
GROWTH OF ANCHORAGE-DEPENDENT CELLS
WITH MICROCARRIERS OF THIS INVENTION
CONTRASTED TO COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ION EXCHANGE RESIN
All cells were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium. For growth of normal diploid fibroblasts, the medium was supplemented to 10% with fetal calf serum.
For growth of primary and secondary chicken fibroblasts, the medium was supplemented with 1% chicken serum, 1% calf serum, and 2% tryptose phosphate broth (~ifco Laboratories, Detroit, M~). Stocks were passaged on 100-mm plastic dishes ~Falcon Plastics, Inc., Oxnard, CA).
Primary chicken embryo fibroblasts were prepared by mincing and ~equentially trypsinizing 10-day embryos.
, ., ;- ':: .
. . ,,~, ,~,. .
-` ~063050 Secondary chicken embryo fibroblasts were prepared on the first day of primary confluence by trypsinization. For cells grown in plastic dishes, doubling time was about 20 hours.
Diploid human fibroblasts derived from embryonic lung (HEL299, ATCC #CCL 137) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD. These cells had a doubling time of 19 hours in plastic dishes.
Microcarrier cultures were initiated simply by combin-ing cells and beads in stirred culture. 100-ml culture volumes in 250-ml glass spinner bottles (6.5 cm in diameter) equipped with a 4.5-cm magnetically driven TeflOn~ coate:d stir bar (Wilbur Scientific, Inc.,-Boston7-MA~ were-used.- Stirring --speed was approximately 90 rpm. Cultures were sampled directly, and samples were examined microscopically and photographed.
Cells were enumerated by counting nucleii using the modifi-cation of the method of Sanford et al. (Sanford, K. K., Earle, W. R., Evans, V. J., Waltz, H. K., and Shannon, J. E. (1951) -J. Natl Cancer Inst. 11: 773.) as described by van Wezel (van Wezel, A. L. (1973). Tissue Culture, Methods and Appli- -cations. Kruse, P. F. and Patterson, M. R. (eds.), pp. 372-377, Academic Press, New York).
- - Beads with-attached cells were separated from the culture medium by permitting the beads to settle at 1 g for a few minutes and then aspirating the supernatant. This proaedure greatly facilitated the replacement of medium as well as facilitating the separation of cells from micro-carriers after trypsinization.
- Commerclal D~AE Sephadex A-50 was used as micro-carrier for the diploid human fibroblasts and compared with carrier~ 8ynthesiZed and titrated as described in Example 1.
- Por-both bead types~ carrier concentration was 2 gram~ of dry, untreated, crosslinked dextran per liter. The charge capacity of the DEAE Sephadex A-50 was 5.4 meq/g of dry, : - . , . , :. - . ............................................. .
. . : ,: ~ . - . , -- 1~63050 crosslinked dextran, while that of the newly synthesized beads was 2.0 meq/g. The results are illustrated in FIG. 1.
For this cell type, loss of original inoculum on A-50 microcarriers was marked, while the fibroblasts attach, proliferate, and reach confluence on the microcarriers of this invention in six days. This behavior agrees well with the reported behavior of this cell type on standard plates.
As FIG. 1 shows, the final cell density achieved with the new microcarriers at 2 grams dry, crosslinked dextran/liter was 1.2 x 106 cells/ml.
Cultures containing the new carriers demonstrated neither initial cell loss nor any inhibition in~reaching confluence. More importantly, the cultures grew normally at higher microcarrier concentrations. In FIG. 2, for ~
example, human fibroblasts and secondary chicken embryo ~ -fibroblasts are shown to reach saturation concentrations near 4 x 106 cells/ml when 5 grams of dry, crosslinked dextran per liter were used with the new carriers having a charge capacity of 2.0 meq/g dextran. As can be seen, even -at this relatively high microcarrier concentration, there was no significant loss of inoculum.
Secondary chick embryo fibroblasts were also grown at a microcarrier concentration of 10 grams/litex.
With the conditions described above, a saturation concen-tration of 6 x 106 cells/ml was achieved; with addition to ~ the medium of an additional 1% fetal calf serum, a~ ;
; saturation concentration of 8 x 106 cells/ml was achieved.
There was no significant loss of cell inoculum.
Primary chick embryo fibroblasts were grown at a microcarrier concentration of 5 and lO grams/liter and the growth characteristics were similar to those of~the ~econdary chick fibroblasts, although slight inoculum losse~ were noted ana somewhat longer lag times were encountered.
Attempts were also made to grow secondary chick embryo fibroblasts under conditions similar to those used above except that DEAE-Sephadex A-50 microcarriers at con-centrations of 1 and 5 grams/liter were used. No cell growth was detected and significant inoculum loss occurred.
EXAMPLE 3.
PREPARATION OF MICROCARRIERS
WITH VARYING AMOUNTS OF REACTANTS
Batches of microcarriers were prepared by dissolv-ing diethylaminoethylchloride:chloride and sodium hydroxide in 20 ml of distilled water. The-solution was then-poured -over dry Sephadex G-50 beads after which the beads were placed on a reciprocating shaker-water table maintained at 60C. One set of bead batches was treated with a solution containing 0.01 moles of the amine and 0.015 moles of sodium hydroxide, whereas another set of batches was treated with a solution containing 0.03 moles of the amine and 0.045 moles of sodium hydroxide. The reaction time was varied to produce different meq/g within each batch.
Diploid human fibroblasts ~HEL299) were grown in suspension cultures at a microcarrier concentration of 5.0 grams dry, untreated crosslinked dextran per liter following the procedures of Example 2 using microcarriers having varying me~/gram selected from each batch. Su~bsequently, productivity -(106 cells grown/liter hour) was calculated and plotted versus meq/gram for each batch of beads produced as above. Curves plotted using data obtained for both sets were similar in shape, having a general bell shape, but the curve from the batches treated with the higher concentration of reactant~ had a some-what 8harper rise and fall. ~arriers yieldin~ excellent cell growth were produced from each batch.
., .
EXAMPLE 4.
PREPARATION OF MICROCARRIERS
AT VARYING A~INE/ALKALI RATIOS
This example illustrates further changes in the charge capacity which can be obtained by varying DEAE chloride:
chloride/NaOH ratios. In this example, the procedures of Example 3 were followed except that a wide range of concentra-tions of sodium hydroxide was used while maintaining the con-centration of the diethylaminoethylchloride:chloride at 0.01 moles per 20 ml. The concentrations used for the sodium hy-droxide were 0.01, 0.011, 0.012, 0.013, 0.014, 0.015, 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.75, 0.10 moles per 20 ml.-A plot was made of meq/gram after 1.25 hours at 60C. versus concentration of sodium hydroxi~e. It was ob-served from the plot that concentrations of sodium hydroxide below about 0.01 produced no detectable charge capacity.
Charge capacity rose quickly, however, with increases in concentration and reached a maximum of around 2.3 meq/gram dry, crosslinked dextran at a concentration of about 0.014 moles sodium hydroxide. Charge capacity then declined in an almost linear relationship to a value of about 1.1 meq/gram at a sodium hydroxide concentration of about 0.10 moles. Thus, a change in reaction kinetics takes place when the ratio of DEAE Chloride: -chloride to sodium hydroxide is varied at a constant concentra-tion of DEAE chloride:chloride and crosslinked dextran.
EXAMPLE 5.
HUMAN INTERFERON PRODUCTION IN CELLS
GROWN ON IMPROUED MICROCARRIERS
~ The ability of microcarrier grown cells to produce ;~ 30 human interferon is described herein. Cells used for the pro-.
duction of human interferon were normal diploid human foreskin fibrobla~ts, FS-4. The~e fibroblasts were grown in micro-carrier culture~ using procedures as in Example 2. Microcarriers s, , ~ ; :
~ --1063~50 prepared and titrated according to Example 1 were used at a concentration of 5 grams of dry, crosslinked dextran/liter.
The medium used for culture growth was DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
In 8 to 10 days, cultures ceased growing. At this point, growth medium was removed. Cultures were washed 1-4 times with 100 ml of serum-free DMEM. The cells were then ready for interferon induction. This was accomplished by adding to the cultures 50 ml of serum-free DMEM medium con-taining 50~ug/ml cyclohexamide, and varying amounts of poly I
poly C inducer. After 4 hours, Actinomycin D was added to the cultures to a final concentration of 1 ~g/ml.
Five hours after the onset of induction, inducing medium was decanted and cultures were washed 3-4 times with 100 ml of warm serum-free DMEM. Cultures were replenished with 50 ml of DMEM containing 0.5% human plasma protein. ~ -Cultures were incubated under standard conditions for an addi-tional 18 hours. At this time, cultures were decanted, and -the decanted medium was assayed for interferon activity. -Interferon activity was assayèd by determining the 50% level of cell protection for samples and standard solutions, for FS-4 fibroblasts challenged with Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV), Indiana strain. The results of interferon production runs are presented in tabular form below.
25 InducerCell Concentration ConcentrationDuring ProductionInterferon ~pg/ml) (cells/ml)(U/106 cells) 4 2.0 x 106 39 2.6 x 106 378 2.6 x 106 886 2.0 x 1o6 ~sooo These data are each from a separate run and are not intended to demonstrate any correlation to inducer concentration.
-19- ~:
` ' ' ' `' ' . ': ' `'` ' ' . . ' ~ ' ' ' ' ' - ' . , ','`, ' ' EXAMPLE 6.
GROWTH OF CELLS
ON IMPROVED MICROCARRIERS
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRODUCING VIRUSES
The ability of microcarrier grown cells to produce a virus is described here. Primary and secondary chicken embryo fibroblasts were grown in microcarrier culture according to the procedure described in Example 2 with the primary cells grown at 10 grams/liter and the secondary at - 10 5 grams/liter microcarrier concentration. To initiate virus production, growth medium was removed, and the cultures were washed twice with 100 ml of serum free DMEM. Infection of cells with Sindbis virus took place in 50 ml of DMEM supple-mented with 1% calf serum, 2% tryptose phosphate broth, and enough Sindbis virus to equal an MOI (multiplicity of infection) of 0.05.
The virus was harvested 24 hours after infection, by collecting culture broth, clarifying at low centrifuga-tion, and freezing the supernatant. Virus production was assayed by plaque formation in a field of secondary chicken fibroblasts. The results of infecting these microcarrier cultures were:
All Concentration For Production Cell Type (cells/ml) (PFU/ml) PFU/cell Secondary 4.0 x 106 8.4 x 109 2,100 Primary 1.4 x 106 2.3 x 101 16,000 Primary 6.0 x 106 2.6 x 101 5,000 Virus production was also established for the following virus/cell on microcarrier combinations: Polio/
WI-38; Moloney MuLV/Cl-l mouse and VSV/chick embryo fibroblasts.
... . . .
.
EXAMPLE 7.
COMPARATIVE GROWTH OF CELLS IN ROLLER BOTTLES
OF PRODUCING MURINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS PROVIRAL DNA
The reverse-transcribed DNA of Moloney leukemia virus (M-MULV) after infection of JLS-V9 cells, a mouse bone marrow line, was studied.
One technique involved growing cells in roller bottles. Cells were grown in roller bottle culture, the medium removed, and virus inoculum introduced into the bottles. Shortly thereafter, the cultures were fed with fresh medium, and 8-16 hours later extracted for eventual purification of viral DNA. The cultures were washed with fresh buffer and the cell lysed with a solution containing the detergent sodium dodecylsulfate. Subsequent cooling of the lysate and addition of salt to one molar caused co-precipitation of the detergent with high molecular weight DNA. The low molecular weight DNA remaining in the super-natant could then be deproteinized and concentrated for further analysis.
A 50-roller bottle culture contained about 10~
cells. These were infected with about one-liter of viral inoculum titering at 3 x 106 plaque-forming units per ml.
This resulted in a nominal multiplicity of infection of 1-3 and the infected cells yielded 5-20 nanograms of virus-specific DNA.
A simpler procedure was developed employing improved microcarriers according to this invention. A
culture containing 10 grams of beads in one liter of growth medium was used. Upon reaching confluence, the 10 cells on the beadQ were infected by allowing the beads to settle out and replacing the medium with 1 liter of virus inoculum.
For extraction, the cells on the beads were washed with : - . . . , . - : . . :: . .
buffer and then placed in the SDS containing buffer.
After co-precipitation of the high molecular weight DNA
with the detergent, the precipitate together with the beads were centrifuged out and a supernatant extracted for further analysis. The yield of viral DNA was compara-ble.to that obtained in roller bottle culture and the labor involved was 5-10% of that required by roller bottle culture.
EXAMPLE 8.
IMPROVED MICROCARRIER PRODUCTION WITH
DIMETHYLAMrNOETHYL CHARGE GROUPS
A suitable microcarrier was produced by binding an alternate exchange moiety to the dextran matrix utilized in Example 1. Dimethylaminoethyl groups (DMAE) were bound to a dextran matrix by the following procedure: 1 gm of dextran beads (Pharmacia G-50), 50-75 pm in diameter, dry, was added to 10 ml of distilled water and the beads were allowed to swell. An aqueous solution containing 0.01 moles of dimethylaminoethyl-ch~oride:chloride (Sigma Chemical Co.) and 0.015 moles of sodium hydroxide was formed in a 10 ml volume. This aqueous solution was added to the swollen dextran beads and this suspension was then agitated vigorously for one hour at 60C. After reaction, the bead mass was titrated as in Example 1. This reaction binds 1.0 meq of dimethylaminoethyl to the dextran mass. To produce microcarriers of greater degrees of sub-stitution, the above reaction was carried out, and the bead mass washed thoroughly with water. With excess water filtered off, the bead mass was weighed so as to determine the amount of water being retained by the bead mass. To this bead mass was added the appropriate amount of fresh reagents ti.e., DMAE-CL:CL, and NaOH) so that the final ., . .
concentration of DMAE, and NaOH in these succeeding reaction mixtures were identical to those initially used.
In this manner, a series of microcarriers were prepared at 1.0, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.5 meq DMA~/gm unreacted dextran. Cells (~EL 299) were grown in microcarrier culture (S gm/l) with these microcarriers according to the proced-ures in Example 2. The results are tabulated in the follow-ing table:
Degree of Substitution (meq/gm) Cell Spreading Net Growth 1. 0 2.0 2.5 + +
; Some mammalian cell types have been adapted for growth in suspension cultures. Examples of such cell types include HeLa ~human), BHR (baby hamster kidney) and L cells (mouse). Such cells, in general, have non-normal genetic complements, i.e., too many or too few chromosomes or ab-normal chr~mosomes. Often, these cells will produce a tumor upon injection into an animal of the appropriate species.
--2- ~
.. , . . , . : -, -~(~63~50 Other mammalian cell types have not been adapted for growth in suspension culture to date, and will grow only if they can become attached to an appropriate surface. Such cell types are generally termed "anchorage-dependent" and include 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, mouse bone marrow epithelial cells;
Murine leukemia virus-producing strains of mouse fibroblasts, primary and secondary chick fibroblasts; WI-38 human fibroblast cells; and, normal human embryo lung fibroblast cells (HEL299, ATCC #CCL137). Some anchorage-dependent cells have been grown which are tumor causing but others were grown and found to be non-tumor causing. Also, some anchorage-dependent cells, such as WI-38 and HEL299, can be grown which are genetically normal.
Whereas considerable progress has been made in large scale mammalian cell propagation using cell lines capable of growth in suspension culture, progress has been very limited for large scale propagation of anchorage-dependent mammalian cells. Previous operational techniques employed for large scale propagation of anchorage-dependent cells were based on linear expansion of small scale processes. ~Cell~culture plànts utilized a large number of low yield batch reactors, in the forms of dishes, prescription bottles, roller tubes and-~roller bottles.
Each of these was a discrete unit or isolated batch-reactor requi ing individual environmental controls. These controls, however, were of the most primftive type due to economic considerations.
Variation in nutrients was corrected by a medium change, an operation requiring two steps, i.e., medium removal and meaium addition. Since it was not uncommon for a moderately sized facility to operate hundreds of these batch reactors at a time, even a single change of medium required hundreds of operations, all of which had to be performed accurately, and under exact-ing fiterile conditionfi. Any multiple step operation, such as cell transfer or harvest, compounded the problem accordingly.
Thus, co~ts of equipment, space and manpower were great for this type of facility.
63~SO
There are alternative methods to linear scale-up from small batch cultures which have been proposed. Among such alternatives which have been reported in the literature are plastic bags, stacked plates, spiral films, glass bead propagators, artificial capillaries, and microcarriers.
Among these, microcarrier systems offer certain outstanding and unique advantages. For example, great increases in the attainable ratio of growth surface to vessel volume (S/V) can be obtained using microcarriers over both traditional and newly developed alternative techniques. The increase in S~V
attainable allows the construction of a single-unit homogeneous or quasi-homogeneous batch or semi-batch propagator for high volumetric productivity. Thus, a single stirred tank vessel with simple feedback control for pH and PO2 presents a homo-geneous environment for a large number of cells thereby elimina-ting the necessity for expensive and space consuming, controlled environment incubators. Also, the total number of operations required per unit of cells produced is drastically reduced.
In summary, microcarriers seem to offer economies of capital, -space and manpower in the production of anchorage-dependent cells, relative to current production methods.
Microcarriers also offer the advantage of environ-mental continuity since the cells are grown in one controlled environment. Thus, microcarriers provide the potential for growing anchorage-dependent mammalian cells under one set of environmental conditions which can be regulated to provide constant, optimal cell growth.
One of the more promising microcarrier systems to date has been reported by van Wezel and involves the use of diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-substituted dextran beads in a stirred tank. A. L. van Wezel, "Growth of Cell Strains and Primary Cells on Microcarriers in Homogeneous Culture", Nature 216:64 (1967); D. van Hemert, D. G. Kilburn and A. L. van Wezel, "Homogeneous Cultivation of Animal Cells for the Production of Virus and Virus Products", Biotechnol. Bioeng. 11:875 (1969); and A. L. van Wezel, "Microcarrier Cultures of Animal Cells", Tissue Culture, Methods and Applications, P. F. Kruse and M. K. Patterson, eds., Académic Press, New York, p. 372 (1973). These beads are commerically produced by Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Inc., Piscataway, 1~ ~r~o/en7ar/~
1~ New Jersey, under the tradonamo DEAE-Sephadex A50, an ion exchange system. Chemically, these beads are formed from a crosslinked dextran matrix having diethylaminoethyl groups covalently bound to the dextran chains. As commercially available, DEAE-Sephadex A50 beads-are believed-to have a particle size of 40-120u and a positive charge capacity of about 5.4 meq per gram of dry, crosslinked dextran (ignores weight of attached DEAE moieties).-- Other anion exchange resins, such as DEAE-Sephadex A25, QAE-Sephadex A50 and QAE-Sephadex A25 were also stated by van Wezel to support cell growth.
The system proposed by van Wezel combines multiple surfaces with movable surfaces and has the potential for innovative cellular manipulations and offers advantages in scale-up and environmental controls~ Despite this potential, `
these suggested techniques have not been significantly ex-ploited because researchers have encountered difficulties in cell production due to certain deleterious effects caused by the beads. Among these are initial cell death among a high percentage of the cell inoculum and inadequate cell growth even for those cells which attach. The reasons for these deleterious effects are not thoroughly understood, although it has been proposed that they may be due to bead toxicity or nutrient adsorption. See van Wezel, A. L. ~1967), Nature 216:
64-65; van Wezel, A. L. (1973), Tissue Culture, Methods and Applications. Kruse, P. R. and Patterson, M. R. ~eds.), . . .
1063~50 pp. 372-377, Academic Press, New York; van Hemert, P., Rilburn, D. G., and van Wezel, A. L. (1969), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 11:
875-885; Horng, C. and McLimans, W. (1975), Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 17: 713-732.
It could be that the deleterious effects of these commercially available ion exchange resins are due to their method of manufacture. Certain of these production methods are descri~ed for polyhydroxy materials in patents such as:
U. S. 3,277,025; 3,275,576; 3,042,667 and 3,208,994 all to Flodin et al. Whatever the reason, however, the presently commercially available materials are simply not sufficient for good cell growth of a wide variety of cell types.
One solution to overcoming some of the deleterious effects encountered in attempts to use such commercially available microcarriers for cell growth is described in U.S. Patent No. 4,036,693, issued on July 19, 1977 to Levine et al. Therein, a method for treating these com~er-cially available ion exchange resins with macromolecular polyanions, such as carboxymethylcellulose, is proposed.
While this method has proven successful, it would clearly be more advantageous if the beads could be manufactuxed initially to have properties designed for outstanding growth of anchorage-dependent cells.
SUMMARY OF IHE INVENTION
2$ It has now been discovered that the charge capaci~ty of microcarriers has to be adjusted and/or con-trolled within a certain range to result in good growth of a wide variety of anchorage-dependent cell types at reasonable microcarrier concentrations. Based upon this discovery, microcarrier beads have been produced with con-trolled charge capacities and such beads have been used to obtain good growth of a variety of anchorage-dependent cells.
Cells grown using such microcarrier systems can be harvested or used in the production of animal or plant viruses, vaccines hormones, interferon or other cell growth by-products.
The invention relates to a method of growing anchorage-dependent cells in microcarrier culture, the improvement of em-ploying microcarriers having an amount of positively charged chemical moieties thereon adjusted to provide an exchange capac-ity which allows good growth of said cells, said exchange capac-ity being within the range of between about O.l and about 4.5meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers.
The invention also relates to cell culture micro-carriers having a degree of substitution thereon with positively charged chemical moieties sufficient to provide a charge capac-ity at which good cell growth will occur, and which is from about 0.1 to about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers.
One example of the improved microcarriers is those produced using polymers with pendant hydroxy groups, such as crosslinked dextran beads. These beads can be treated with an aqueous solution of a tertiary or quaternary amine, such as diethylaminoethylchloride:chloride, and an alkaline material, such as sodium hydroxide. The specific charge capacity of the beads is controlled by varying the absolute amounts of the dex-tran, tertiary amine salt and alkaline material, the ratio of -these materials, and/ox the time and temperature of treatment.
Microcarriers produced according to this invention can be used in cultures without the high initial cell loss here-tofore experienced with commercially available microcarriers.
Additionally, attached cells spread and grow to confluence on the bead~ reaching extremely high cell concentrations in the ~uspending medium. The concentration of microcarriers in sus-pen~ion is not limited to very low levels as was customary with A ~ 7 _ the prior art materials, and cell growth appears only to be limited by factors which do not appear to be associated with the microcarriers. Because of this, great increases in the volu-metric productivity of cell cultures can be obtained. In short, the potential offered from the use of microcarriers in the growth of cells, and particularly anchorage-dependent cells, can now be realized.
~ .... . .
A - 7a -.
"' ' ' '' . ' . ' '' ~ . ' , , " ' . . ' ' ' : , , ~ ' : , ' . . , , , ~ .
1063~50 - BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a plot graphically illustrating the growth characteristics of normal diploid human embryo lung fibroblast cells (HEL299) at a microcarrier concentration of 2 grams dry, crosslinked dextran/liter for both commer-cially available DEAE-treated dextran microcarriers and DEAE-treated microcarriers produced according to this invention;
FIG. 2 graphically illustrates the growth charac-teristics of both normal diploid human embryo lung fibro-blast cells (HEL299) and secondary chicken embryo fibro-blasts at a microcarrier concentration of 5 grams dry, crosslinked dextran/liter using improved DEAE-treated .:-microcarriers of this invention.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
As used herein, the terms "microcarriers~, "-cell- -culture microcarriers" and "cell-growth microcarriers" .
mean small, discrete particles suitable for cell attachment -- -and g~rowth-. -Often, alt~oug~-~ot always, microcarr-iers are -porous beads which are formed from polymers. Usually, cells attach to and grow on the outer surfaces of such beads.
As previously described, it has now been dis- : -covered that the amount of charge capacity on cell culture microcarriers must be adjusted and/or controlled to be .~ :~ within a certain range for adequate cell growth`iat r ` , .
~reasonable microcarrier concentrations. Suitable oper-ating and preferred ranges will vary with such factors as the spec~f-ic cel~ls to-~e-grown, the nature of the micro-carriers, the concentration of microcarriers, and other culture parameters including medium composition. In all cases-~-however~- the-amount of charge capacity which has - -- - -,, . . ~. :
1~63~50 been found to be suitable is significantly below the amounts believed to be present on commercially available anion exchange resins previously suggested for microcarrier cell cultures. For example, it is believed that the DEAE-Sephadex A50 beads, suggested by van Wezel, have a charge capacity of about 5.4 meq/gram of dry, untreated (without DEAE), crosslinked dextran. In contradistinction to this relatively high charge capacity, microcarriers have been produced and found suitable for good cell growth according to this invention which have between about 0.1 and about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers. Below about 0.1 meq/gram, it is believed that cells would have difficulty attaching to the microcarriers. Above about 4.5 meq/gram, losses of initial cell inoculum ta~e place, and even the surviving cells do not grow well, particularly at relatively high microcarrier concentrations.
For the growth of normal diploid human fibro-blasts on crosslinked dextran microcarriers, it has been found that a preferred range of charge capacity supplied by DEAE groups is from about 1.0 to about 2.8 meq/g~ of dry, untreated crosslinked dextran. While the preferred range may vary with different cell types or culture conditions, ~ -it is believed that the preferred ranges for any given set of conditions will be within the 0.1-4.5 meq/~m range.
The preferred and optimum conditions can be determined by a person skilled in the art for any set of conditions by routine experimentation.
It will be recognized, of course, that there are certain deficiencies in attempting to define the charge capacity of microcarriers strictly on a unit weight basis.
For example, two beads identical in every way except that they are formed from material~ having different densities : .: . .. : : .. .. . : : - . . . , . .: ~ . . . .. .. .
-~ ~063050 with the same charge distribution thereon would yield different values for their charge capacity per unit weight.
Similarly, two beads having identical charge capacities per unit weight might have quite different charge distribu-tions thereon.
An-alternative definition can be made by specify-ing the range of suitable charges in terms of charge capacity per unit weight of microcarriers in their final functional form. This basis would take into account such factors as the weight of attached DEAE or other positively charged groups, as well as hydration of the beads, etc., whereas the prior-definition is-based-on-dry-, crosslinked -dextran and does not take such factors into account. In an aqueous cell culture medium, the density of micro-carriers should be close to 1.0 gram/cc so that the micro-carriers can be readily dispersed throughout the culture.
Based upon this, it has been determined that the range of suitable charge capacities for microcarriers of this invention defined in this way is from about 0.012 to about 0.25 meq/gram.
The ranges of suitable çharge capacities previ- x ously specified on a weight basis are valid assuming the microcarriers have a substantially uniform charge distri-bution throughout their bulk. If the charge distribution is uneven, it might be possible to have suitable micro-carriers having charge capacities outside of those ranges.
~he important criterion is, of course, that the charge capacity be adjusted to and/or controlled at a value suffi-cient to allow good cell growth on the microcarriers.
Since it may be the charge pattern on the outer surface which is important, it i8 also desirable to be able to define the suitable charge capacity range in .
. : .. . ...... .
.. . .. . .
r- 1063050 terms of the likely surface pattern. This can be done by assuming that the active portion of the microcarriers represents only the outer surface of the bead to a depth of about 20 angstroms. If it is also assumed that the charged groups in the previously mentioned cases are evenly distributed throughout the beads, the previous ranges can be converted to a charge capacity in this outex shell. Using this approach, the range of charge capacity found suitable is from about 0.012 meq/cm3 to about 0.25 meq/cm3. This approach ta~es changes in microcarrier volume due to different charge densities into account.
Microcarriers having the re~uired charge capacity can be prepared by treating microcarriers formed from polymers containing pendant hydroxyl groups with an aqueous solution of an alkaline material and a tertiary or quaternary amine. The beads can be initially swollen in an aqueous medium without the other ingredients, or can be simply con-tacted with an aqueous medium containing the required base and amine. This method of using alkaline materials to catalyze the attachment of positively charged amino groups to hydroxyl-containing polymers is described in Hartmann, U. S. Patent 1,777,970.
Examples of suitable hydroxyl-containing polymers include polysaccharides such as dextran, dextrin, starch, cellu-lose, polyglucose and substituted derivatives of~these.
Certain synthetic polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol and hydroxy-substituted acrylates or methacrylates, such as hydroxy-ethyl methacrylate, are also suitable. Dextran, and especially crosslinked dextran in the form of small spheres or beads, is particularly preferred because it is commercially available, relatively inexpensive, and produces microcarriers which support excellent cell growth.
. .. .
,, ~ , Any material which is alkaline can be used for the reaction. The alkali metal hydroxides, such as sodium or potassium hydroxide, are, however, the preferred alkaline sub-stances.
Either tertiary or quaternary amines are suitable sources of positively charged groups which can be appended onto the hydroxy-containing polymers. Particularly preferred materials are chloro- or bromo-substituted tertiary amines or salts thereof, such as diethylaminoethylchloride, diethylamino-ethylbromide, dimethylaminoethylchloride, dimethylaminoethyl-bromide, diethylaminomethylchloride, diethylaminomethylbromide, di-(hydroxyethyl)-aminoethylchloride, di-(hydroxyethyl)~aminoethyl-bromide, di-(hydroxyethyl)-aminomethylchloride, di-(hydroxy-ethyl)-aminomethylbromide, f-morfolinoethylethylchloride~
~-morfolinoethylbromide, ~-morfolinomethylchloride, ~-mor-- folinomethylbromide and salts thereof, for example, the hydrochlorides.
.
A wide range of reaction temperatures and times may be used. It is preferred to carry out the reactions at temperatures of about between 18C and 65C. However, other temperatures can be used. The reaction kine~ics depend to a large extent, of course,- upon the reaction temperature and the concentration of reactants. Both the time and temperature do affect the final exchange capacity achieved.
The reason that-the charge capacity of the micro-carriers is so critical in cell growth is not thoroughly understood. While not wishing to be bound by this theory, it is possible that the charge capacity at the surface causes certain local discontinuities of medium composition which are the major - controlling influence in microcarrier culture cell growth.
Nevertheless, this is not meant to rule out other possibilities.
106305~
There may be certain bead~, of cour~e, that will not be quitable for good cell growth even though they have a charge capacity within one of the range~ specified. mi~ may be due to 3ide chain~ on the moiety Rupplying the charge capacity which are toxic or otherwise deleteriou~ for cell growth, the presence of ad~orbed or ab~orbed deleterious composition~ or compound~, or it may be due to the porosity of the bead or due to other reason~. If ~uch bead3 are not suitable for cell growth except for the amount of charge capacity, the beads are not con~idered to be "cell-growth microcarriers."
m e invention is further illustrated by the following examples.
_ EPARATION OF DMPROVED MICROCARRIERS
Improved microcarrier~ can be produced as follows.
Dry, uncharged, crosslinked dextran bead9 are sieved to obtain those of approximately 75 um in diameter. One gram of this fraction is added to 10 ml of distilled water and the beads are allowed to swell. An adequate commercial source of dry, cros~-linked dextran known under the trade mark Sephadex G-50 from Pharmacia Fine Chemical~, Piscataway, ~ew Jersey.
An aquQous solution containing 0.01 moles of diethylaminoethylchloride:chloride, tw~ce recrystallized from ~ -methylene chloride, and 0.015 moles of sodium hydroxide is formed in a 10 ml volume. This aqueous ~olution is then added to the swollen dextran bead ~uspen~ion, which is then agitated vig~rously in a shaking water bath for one hour at 60C. After one hour, the beads are ~eparated from the reaction mixture by filtration on Whatman ~trade mark) filter paper No. 595 and wa~hed with 500 ml of distilled water.
' " ~
. . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .
Beads made by this procedure contain approximately 2.0 meq of charge capacity per gram of dry, untreated cross-linked dextran. ThiA charge capacity can be characterized by -13a-measuring the anion exchange capability of the beads as follows. The bead preparations are washed thoroughly with 0.1 normal HCl to saturate all exchange sites with Cl ions.
They are then rinsed with 10-4 normal HCl to remove unbound chloride ions. Subsequently, the beads are washed with a 10% Iw/w) sodium sulfate solution to countersaturate the exchange sites with SO4=. The effluent of the sodium sulfate wash is collected and contains liberated chloride ions. This solut~on is titrated with 1 M silver nitrate using dilute potassium chromate as an indicator.
After titration, the beads are washed thoroughly with distilled water, rinsed with the phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS), suspended in PBS and autoclaved.
This procedure yields hydrated beads of approximately 120-200 pm in diameter, which carry about 2.0 meq of charge capacity per gram of dry, untreated, crosslinked dextran.
EXAMPLE 2.
GROWTH OF ANCHORAGE-DEPENDENT CELLS
WITH MICROCARRIERS OF THIS INVENTION
CONTRASTED TO COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ION EXCHANGE RESIN
All cells were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium. For growth of normal diploid fibroblasts, the medium was supplemented to 10% with fetal calf serum.
For growth of primary and secondary chicken fibroblasts, the medium was supplemented with 1% chicken serum, 1% calf serum, and 2% tryptose phosphate broth (~ifco Laboratories, Detroit, M~). Stocks were passaged on 100-mm plastic dishes ~Falcon Plastics, Inc., Oxnard, CA).
Primary chicken embryo fibroblasts were prepared by mincing and ~equentially trypsinizing 10-day embryos.
, ., ;- ':: .
. . ,,~, ,~,. .
-` ~063050 Secondary chicken embryo fibroblasts were prepared on the first day of primary confluence by trypsinization. For cells grown in plastic dishes, doubling time was about 20 hours.
Diploid human fibroblasts derived from embryonic lung (HEL299, ATCC #CCL 137) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD. These cells had a doubling time of 19 hours in plastic dishes.
Microcarrier cultures were initiated simply by combin-ing cells and beads in stirred culture. 100-ml culture volumes in 250-ml glass spinner bottles (6.5 cm in diameter) equipped with a 4.5-cm magnetically driven TeflOn~ coate:d stir bar (Wilbur Scientific, Inc.,-Boston7-MA~ were-used.- Stirring --speed was approximately 90 rpm. Cultures were sampled directly, and samples were examined microscopically and photographed.
Cells were enumerated by counting nucleii using the modifi-cation of the method of Sanford et al. (Sanford, K. K., Earle, W. R., Evans, V. J., Waltz, H. K., and Shannon, J. E. (1951) -J. Natl Cancer Inst. 11: 773.) as described by van Wezel (van Wezel, A. L. (1973). Tissue Culture, Methods and Appli- -cations. Kruse, P. F. and Patterson, M. R. (eds.), pp. 372-377, Academic Press, New York).
- - Beads with-attached cells were separated from the culture medium by permitting the beads to settle at 1 g for a few minutes and then aspirating the supernatant. This proaedure greatly facilitated the replacement of medium as well as facilitating the separation of cells from micro-carriers after trypsinization.
- Commerclal D~AE Sephadex A-50 was used as micro-carrier for the diploid human fibroblasts and compared with carrier~ 8ynthesiZed and titrated as described in Example 1.
- Por-both bead types~ carrier concentration was 2 gram~ of dry, untreated, crosslinked dextran per liter. The charge capacity of the DEAE Sephadex A-50 was 5.4 meq/g of dry, : - . , . , :. - . ............................................. .
. . : ,: ~ . - . , -- 1~63050 crosslinked dextran, while that of the newly synthesized beads was 2.0 meq/g. The results are illustrated in FIG. 1.
For this cell type, loss of original inoculum on A-50 microcarriers was marked, while the fibroblasts attach, proliferate, and reach confluence on the microcarriers of this invention in six days. This behavior agrees well with the reported behavior of this cell type on standard plates.
As FIG. 1 shows, the final cell density achieved with the new microcarriers at 2 grams dry, crosslinked dextran/liter was 1.2 x 106 cells/ml.
Cultures containing the new carriers demonstrated neither initial cell loss nor any inhibition in~reaching confluence. More importantly, the cultures grew normally at higher microcarrier concentrations. In FIG. 2, for ~
example, human fibroblasts and secondary chicken embryo ~ -fibroblasts are shown to reach saturation concentrations near 4 x 106 cells/ml when 5 grams of dry, crosslinked dextran per liter were used with the new carriers having a charge capacity of 2.0 meq/g dextran. As can be seen, even -at this relatively high microcarrier concentration, there was no significant loss of inoculum.
Secondary chick embryo fibroblasts were also grown at a microcarrier concentration of 10 grams/litex.
With the conditions described above, a saturation concen-tration of 6 x 106 cells/ml was achieved; with addition to ~ the medium of an additional 1% fetal calf serum, a~ ;
; saturation concentration of 8 x 106 cells/ml was achieved.
There was no significant loss of cell inoculum.
Primary chick embryo fibroblasts were grown at a microcarrier concentration of 5 and lO grams/liter and the growth characteristics were similar to those of~the ~econdary chick fibroblasts, although slight inoculum losse~ were noted ana somewhat longer lag times were encountered.
Attempts were also made to grow secondary chick embryo fibroblasts under conditions similar to those used above except that DEAE-Sephadex A-50 microcarriers at con-centrations of 1 and 5 grams/liter were used. No cell growth was detected and significant inoculum loss occurred.
EXAMPLE 3.
PREPARATION OF MICROCARRIERS
WITH VARYING AMOUNTS OF REACTANTS
Batches of microcarriers were prepared by dissolv-ing diethylaminoethylchloride:chloride and sodium hydroxide in 20 ml of distilled water. The-solution was then-poured -over dry Sephadex G-50 beads after which the beads were placed on a reciprocating shaker-water table maintained at 60C. One set of bead batches was treated with a solution containing 0.01 moles of the amine and 0.015 moles of sodium hydroxide, whereas another set of batches was treated with a solution containing 0.03 moles of the amine and 0.045 moles of sodium hydroxide. The reaction time was varied to produce different meq/g within each batch.
Diploid human fibroblasts ~HEL299) were grown in suspension cultures at a microcarrier concentration of 5.0 grams dry, untreated crosslinked dextran per liter following the procedures of Example 2 using microcarriers having varying me~/gram selected from each batch. Su~bsequently, productivity -(106 cells grown/liter hour) was calculated and plotted versus meq/gram for each batch of beads produced as above. Curves plotted using data obtained for both sets were similar in shape, having a general bell shape, but the curve from the batches treated with the higher concentration of reactant~ had a some-what 8harper rise and fall. ~arriers yieldin~ excellent cell growth were produced from each batch.
., .
EXAMPLE 4.
PREPARATION OF MICROCARRIERS
AT VARYING A~INE/ALKALI RATIOS
This example illustrates further changes in the charge capacity which can be obtained by varying DEAE chloride:
chloride/NaOH ratios. In this example, the procedures of Example 3 were followed except that a wide range of concentra-tions of sodium hydroxide was used while maintaining the con-centration of the diethylaminoethylchloride:chloride at 0.01 moles per 20 ml. The concentrations used for the sodium hy-droxide were 0.01, 0.011, 0.012, 0.013, 0.014, 0.015, 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.75, 0.10 moles per 20 ml.-A plot was made of meq/gram after 1.25 hours at 60C. versus concentration of sodium hydroxi~e. It was ob-served from the plot that concentrations of sodium hydroxide below about 0.01 produced no detectable charge capacity.
Charge capacity rose quickly, however, with increases in concentration and reached a maximum of around 2.3 meq/gram dry, crosslinked dextran at a concentration of about 0.014 moles sodium hydroxide. Charge capacity then declined in an almost linear relationship to a value of about 1.1 meq/gram at a sodium hydroxide concentration of about 0.10 moles. Thus, a change in reaction kinetics takes place when the ratio of DEAE Chloride: -chloride to sodium hydroxide is varied at a constant concentra-tion of DEAE chloride:chloride and crosslinked dextran.
EXAMPLE 5.
HUMAN INTERFERON PRODUCTION IN CELLS
GROWN ON IMPROUED MICROCARRIERS
~ The ability of microcarrier grown cells to produce ;~ 30 human interferon is described herein. Cells used for the pro-.
duction of human interferon were normal diploid human foreskin fibrobla~ts, FS-4. The~e fibroblasts were grown in micro-carrier culture~ using procedures as in Example 2. Microcarriers s, , ~ ; :
~ --1063~50 prepared and titrated according to Example 1 were used at a concentration of 5 grams of dry, crosslinked dextran/liter.
The medium used for culture growth was DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
In 8 to 10 days, cultures ceased growing. At this point, growth medium was removed. Cultures were washed 1-4 times with 100 ml of serum-free DMEM. The cells were then ready for interferon induction. This was accomplished by adding to the cultures 50 ml of serum-free DMEM medium con-taining 50~ug/ml cyclohexamide, and varying amounts of poly I
poly C inducer. After 4 hours, Actinomycin D was added to the cultures to a final concentration of 1 ~g/ml.
Five hours after the onset of induction, inducing medium was decanted and cultures were washed 3-4 times with 100 ml of warm serum-free DMEM. Cultures were replenished with 50 ml of DMEM containing 0.5% human plasma protein. ~ -Cultures were incubated under standard conditions for an addi-tional 18 hours. At this time, cultures were decanted, and -the decanted medium was assayed for interferon activity. -Interferon activity was assayèd by determining the 50% level of cell protection for samples and standard solutions, for FS-4 fibroblasts challenged with Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV), Indiana strain. The results of interferon production runs are presented in tabular form below.
25 InducerCell Concentration ConcentrationDuring ProductionInterferon ~pg/ml) (cells/ml)(U/106 cells) 4 2.0 x 106 39 2.6 x 106 378 2.6 x 106 886 2.0 x 1o6 ~sooo These data are each from a separate run and are not intended to demonstrate any correlation to inducer concentration.
-19- ~:
` ' ' ' `' ' . ': ' `'` ' ' . . ' ~ ' ' ' ' ' - ' . , ','`, ' ' EXAMPLE 6.
GROWTH OF CELLS
ON IMPROVED MICROCARRIERS
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRODUCING VIRUSES
The ability of microcarrier grown cells to produce a virus is described here. Primary and secondary chicken embryo fibroblasts were grown in microcarrier culture according to the procedure described in Example 2 with the primary cells grown at 10 grams/liter and the secondary at - 10 5 grams/liter microcarrier concentration. To initiate virus production, growth medium was removed, and the cultures were washed twice with 100 ml of serum free DMEM. Infection of cells with Sindbis virus took place in 50 ml of DMEM supple-mented with 1% calf serum, 2% tryptose phosphate broth, and enough Sindbis virus to equal an MOI (multiplicity of infection) of 0.05.
The virus was harvested 24 hours after infection, by collecting culture broth, clarifying at low centrifuga-tion, and freezing the supernatant. Virus production was assayed by plaque formation in a field of secondary chicken fibroblasts. The results of infecting these microcarrier cultures were:
All Concentration For Production Cell Type (cells/ml) (PFU/ml) PFU/cell Secondary 4.0 x 106 8.4 x 109 2,100 Primary 1.4 x 106 2.3 x 101 16,000 Primary 6.0 x 106 2.6 x 101 5,000 Virus production was also established for the following virus/cell on microcarrier combinations: Polio/
WI-38; Moloney MuLV/Cl-l mouse and VSV/chick embryo fibroblasts.
... . . .
.
EXAMPLE 7.
COMPARATIVE GROWTH OF CELLS IN ROLLER BOTTLES
OF PRODUCING MURINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS PROVIRAL DNA
The reverse-transcribed DNA of Moloney leukemia virus (M-MULV) after infection of JLS-V9 cells, a mouse bone marrow line, was studied.
One technique involved growing cells in roller bottles. Cells were grown in roller bottle culture, the medium removed, and virus inoculum introduced into the bottles. Shortly thereafter, the cultures were fed with fresh medium, and 8-16 hours later extracted for eventual purification of viral DNA. The cultures were washed with fresh buffer and the cell lysed with a solution containing the detergent sodium dodecylsulfate. Subsequent cooling of the lysate and addition of salt to one molar caused co-precipitation of the detergent with high molecular weight DNA. The low molecular weight DNA remaining in the super-natant could then be deproteinized and concentrated for further analysis.
A 50-roller bottle culture contained about 10~
cells. These were infected with about one-liter of viral inoculum titering at 3 x 106 plaque-forming units per ml.
This resulted in a nominal multiplicity of infection of 1-3 and the infected cells yielded 5-20 nanograms of virus-specific DNA.
A simpler procedure was developed employing improved microcarriers according to this invention. A
culture containing 10 grams of beads in one liter of growth medium was used. Upon reaching confluence, the 10 cells on the beadQ were infected by allowing the beads to settle out and replacing the medium with 1 liter of virus inoculum.
For extraction, the cells on the beads were washed with : - . . . , . - : . . :: . .
buffer and then placed in the SDS containing buffer.
After co-precipitation of the high molecular weight DNA
with the detergent, the precipitate together with the beads were centrifuged out and a supernatant extracted for further analysis. The yield of viral DNA was compara-ble.to that obtained in roller bottle culture and the labor involved was 5-10% of that required by roller bottle culture.
EXAMPLE 8.
IMPROVED MICROCARRIER PRODUCTION WITH
DIMETHYLAMrNOETHYL CHARGE GROUPS
A suitable microcarrier was produced by binding an alternate exchange moiety to the dextran matrix utilized in Example 1. Dimethylaminoethyl groups (DMAE) were bound to a dextran matrix by the following procedure: 1 gm of dextran beads (Pharmacia G-50), 50-75 pm in diameter, dry, was added to 10 ml of distilled water and the beads were allowed to swell. An aqueous solution containing 0.01 moles of dimethylaminoethyl-ch~oride:chloride (Sigma Chemical Co.) and 0.015 moles of sodium hydroxide was formed in a 10 ml volume. This aqueous solution was added to the swollen dextran beads and this suspension was then agitated vigorously for one hour at 60C. After reaction, the bead mass was titrated as in Example 1. This reaction binds 1.0 meq of dimethylaminoethyl to the dextran mass. To produce microcarriers of greater degrees of sub-stitution, the above reaction was carried out, and the bead mass washed thoroughly with water. With excess water filtered off, the bead mass was weighed so as to determine the amount of water being retained by the bead mass. To this bead mass was added the appropriate amount of fresh reagents ti.e., DMAE-CL:CL, and NaOH) so that the final ., . .
concentration of DMAE, and NaOH in these succeeding reaction mixtures were identical to those initially used.
In this manner, a series of microcarriers were prepared at 1.0, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.5 meq DMA~/gm unreacted dextran. Cells (~EL 299) were grown in microcarrier culture (S gm/l) with these microcarriers according to the proced-ures in Example 2. The results are tabulated in the follow-ing table:
Degree of Substitution (meq/gm) Cell Spreading Net Growth 1. 0 2.0 2.5 + +
3.2 +
As expected, cell growth is related to the degree of substitution with charge carrying groups. At too high a degree of substitution, no cell growth occurs, although attachment and spreading takes place. At too low a degree of substitution, cell adhesionito the surface is not suffi-cient to allow proper spreading and growth.
EXAMPLE 9.
IMPROVED MICROCARRIERS HAVING POSITIVELY
CHARGED PHOSPHONIUM GROUPS ,~ -Improved microcarriers were also prepared using non-amine exchange groups as follows. One gram of dry dextran beads were prepared and swollen with water as in Example 1. To the swollen beads were added 5 ml of a saturated aqueous solution of triethyl-(ethyl-bromide)-h i ( ) 4~5~C ~S d 5 1 f 3 tion of sodium hy~roxide. This slurry was reacted at 65C.
11D63~50 A series of microcarriers were prepared at 1.1, 1.7 and 2.9 meq/gm. The microcarriers at 1.1 meq/gm were prepared by reaction at the above conditions for 4 minutes. The 1.7 meq/gm microcarrier was reacted for 1 hour, and the 2.9 meq/gm microcarriers were reacted successively 3 times as described in Example 7. A microcarrier cell culture at 5 gm/liter was established for each of these carriers with a continuous cell type, JLS-V9 and compared to this cell's growth on improved DEAE-microcarriers prepared as in Example 3. The results are tabulated in the following table.
DEAE
Cell Attachment meq/gram and SpreadingNet Growth 0.9 + +
1.7 + +
3.8 . +
TEP
1.1 + +
1.7 + _ +
2.9 +
It will be recognized by those skilled in the art that there are certain equivalents to the specific tech-niques, materials, etc., described herein, and these are considered to be part of this invention and are intended to be covered by the following claims. Additionally, while most of the description herein has been limited to the use of the improved microcarriers for growth of anchorage-dependent cells, they can also be used, of course, for the growth of other cell types.
As expected, cell growth is related to the degree of substitution with charge carrying groups. At too high a degree of substitution, no cell growth occurs, although attachment and spreading takes place. At too low a degree of substitution, cell adhesionito the surface is not suffi-cient to allow proper spreading and growth.
EXAMPLE 9.
IMPROVED MICROCARRIERS HAVING POSITIVELY
CHARGED PHOSPHONIUM GROUPS ,~ -Improved microcarriers were also prepared using non-amine exchange groups as follows. One gram of dry dextran beads were prepared and swollen with water as in Example 1. To the swollen beads were added 5 ml of a saturated aqueous solution of triethyl-(ethyl-bromide)-h i ( ) 4~5~C ~S d 5 1 f 3 tion of sodium hy~roxide. This slurry was reacted at 65C.
11D63~50 A series of microcarriers were prepared at 1.1, 1.7 and 2.9 meq/gm. The microcarriers at 1.1 meq/gm were prepared by reaction at the above conditions for 4 minutes. The 1.7 meq/gm microcarrier was reacted for 1 hour, and the 2.9 meq/gm microcarriers were reacted successively 3 times as described in Example 7. A microcarrier cell culture at 5 gm/liter was established for each of these carriers with a continuous cell type, JLS-V9 and compared to this cell's growth on improved DEAE-microcarriers prepared as in Example 3. The results are tabulated in the following table.
DEAE
Cell Attachment meq/gram and SpreadingNet Growth 0.9 + +
1.7 + +
3.8 . +
TEP
1.1 + +
1.7 + _ +
2.9 +
It will be recognized by those skilled in the art that there are certain equivalents to the specific tech-niques, materials, etc., described herein, and these are considered to be part of this invention and are intended to be covered by the following claims. Additionally, while most of the description herein has been limited to the use of the improved microcarriers for growth of anchorage-dependent cells, they can also be used, of course, for the growth of other cell types.
Claims (28)
1. In the method of growing anchorage-dependent cells in microcarrier culture, the improvement of employing microcarriers having an amount of positively charged chemical moieties thereon adjusted to provide an exchange capacity which allows good growth of said cells, said exchange capacity being within the range of between about 0.1 and about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers.
2. In the method of Claim 1, the improvement wherein said microcarriers comprise crosslinked dextran beads.
3. In the method of Claim 2, the improvement wherein the positively charged chemical moieties on said crosslinked dextran beads comprise tertiary or quaternary amine groups.
4. In the method of Claim 3, the improvement wherein said exchange capacity is within the range of from about 1 to about 2.8 meq/gram of dry, untreated crosslinked dextran.
5. In the method of Claim 4, the improvement wherein the positively charged chemical moieties on said crosslinked dextran beads comprise diethylaminoethyl groups.
6. In the method of Claim 5, the improvement wherein said dry, crosslinked beads have a diameter of approximately 75 µm in their dry state.
7. A method of growing anchorage-dependent cells, com-prising:
a. forming a suspension in cell culture medium of positively charged microcarriers having their charge capacity adjusted to a value which supports good growth of cells, said charge capacity being within the range of from about 0.1 to about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers;
b. inoculating cells into said suspension of micro-carriers to form a cell culture; and, c. maintaining said cell culture under cell growth conditions.
a. forming a suspension in cell culture medium of positively charged microcarriers having their charge capacity adjusted to a value which supports good growth of cells, said charge capacity being within the range of from about 0.1 to about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers;
b. inoculating cells into said suspension of micro-carriers to form a cell culture; and, c. maintaining said cell culture under cell growth conditions.
8. A method of Claim 7, wherein said microcarriers com-prise crosslinked dextran beads having tertiary or quaternary amine groups thereon.
9. A method of Claim 7, wherein said microcarriers com-prise crosslinked dextran beads having diethylaminoethyl groups thereon.
10. A method of Claim 9, wherein said microcarriers have a charge capacity within the range of between about 1 and about 2.8 meq/gram of dry, untreated crosslinked dextran.
11. A method of Claim 10, wherein said microcarriers have an average diameter of about 75 µm.
12. In the method of growing anchorage-dependent cells including forming a suspension in cell culture medium of micro-carriers comprising crosslinked dextran beads, inoculating cells into said suspension to form a cell culture and maintaining said cell culture under cell growth conditions;
The improvement of pre-treating said crosslinked dextran beads by reacting them in an aqueous solution of a tertiary or quaternary amine and a base under conditions sufficient to provide a positive charge capacity on said beads within the range of between about 1 and about 2.8 meq/gram of dry, untreated crosslinked dextran, which is suitable for exponential growth of said anchorage-dependent cells.
The improvement of pre-treating said crosslinked dextran beads by reacting them in an aqueous solution of a tertiary or quaternary amine and a base under conditions sufficient to provide a positive charge capacity on said beads within the range of between about 1 and about 2.8 meq/gram of dry, untreated crosslinked dextran, which is suitable for exponential growth of said anchorage-dependent cells.
13. A method for producing anchorage-dependent cell growth by-products comprising:
a. forming a suspension of positively-charged microcarriers having a charge capacity sufficient for good growth of anchorage dependent cells in a suitable cell culture medium, said charge capacity being between about 0.1 and about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers;
b. inoculating said culture with anchorage-dependent cells to form a cell culture;
c. maintaining said cell culture under conditions conducive to the production of cell growth by-products;
and, d. harvesting said cell growth by-products.
a. forming a suspension of positively-charged microcarriers having a charge capacity sufficient for good growth of anchorage dependent cells in a suitable cell culture medium, said charge capacity being between about 0.1 and about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers;
b. inoculating said culture with anchorage-dependent cells to form a cell culture;
c. maintaining said cell culture under conditions conducive to the production of cell growth by-products;
and, d. harvesting said cell growth by-products.
14. A method of Claim 13, wherein said cell growth by-product is a virus.
15. A method of Claim 13, wherein said cell growth by-product is a hormone.
16. A method of Claim 13, wherein said cell growth by-product is interferon.
17. A method of Claim 13, wherein said microcarriers com-prise a reaction product of crosslinked dextran beads and an aqueous solution of a tertiary or quaternary amine and a base.
18. A method of Claim 13, wherein said microcarriers com-prise crosslinked dextran beads having diethylaminoethyl groups thereon.
19. A method of Claim 18, wherein said charge capacity is in the range of from about 1 to about 28 meq/grams of dry, untreated microcarriers.
20. A method of Claim 19, wherein said reaction product comprises hydrated beads having an average diameter of about 120-200 µm.
21. Cell culture microcarriers having a degree of substi-tution thereon with positively charged chemical moieties suf-ficient to provide a charge capacity at which good cell growth will occur, and which is from about 0.1 to about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, untreated microcarriers.
22. Cell culture microcarriers of Claim 21, having a charge capacity of from about 0.012 to about 0.25 meq/gram of final microcarriers.
23. Cell culture microcarriers of Claim 21, having a charge capacity in their outer shell of from about 0.012 to about 0.25 meq/cc.
24. Cell culture microcarriers comprising crosslinked dextran beads having a sufficient amount of positively charged groups thereon to provide a charge capacity of between about 0.1 and about 4.5 meq/gram of dry, crosslinked dextran beads.
25. Cell culture microcarriers of Claim 24, wherein said positively charged groups comprise diethylaminoethyl groups.
26. Cell culture microcarriers comprising a reaction pro-duct of crosslinked dextran beads and an aqueous solution of a tertiary or quaternary amine and a base, said aqueous solution having an amount and ratio of amine and base sufficient to pro-vide said microcarriers with an exchange capacity of from about 0.1 to about 4.5 meq/gram of dry dextran.
27. Cell culture microcarriers of Claim 26, wherein said tertiary or quaternary amine comprises diethylaminoethyl.
28. Cell culture microcarriers of Claim 27, wherein said base comprises sodium hydroxide.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US74099376A | 1976-11-11 | 1976-11-11 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1063050A true CA1063050A (en) | 1979-09-25 |
Family
ID=24978920
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA290,641A Expired CA1063050A (en) | 1976-11-11 | 1977-11-10 | Cell culture microcarriers |
Country Status (14)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (3) | JPS5362889A (en) |
AU (1) | AU508398B2 (en) |
BE (1) | BE860721A (en) |
BR (1) | BR7707551A (en) |
CA (1) | CA1063050A (en) |
CH (1) | CH615947A5 (en) |
DE (2) | DE2749989C3 (en) |
FI (1) | FI60407C (en) |
FR (1) | FR2370792A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB1535150A (en) |
IN (1) | IN147612B (en) |
NL (1) | NL177926C (en) |
SE (2) | SE417108C (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA776251B (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ZA776251B (en) * | 1976-11-11 | 1978-07-26 | Massachusetts Inst Technology | Improved cell culture microcarriers |
FR2470794A1 (en) * | 1979-12-05 | 1981-06-12 | Pasteur Institut | NOVEL MICROPARTICLES, THEIR PREPARATION AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN BIOLOGY, PARTICULARLY TO THE CULTURE OF HUMAN DIPLOID CELLS |
US4448884A (en) * | 1982-03-03 | 1984-05-15 | Kms Fusion, Inc. | Glass-surface microcarrier for growth of cell cultures |
JPS592735U (en) * | 1982-06-28 | 1984-01-09 | シャープ株式会社 | Remaining paper amount indicator in paper cassette |
JPS60126453U (en) * | 1984-02-02 | 1985-08-26 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Paper remaining amount display device such as facsimile |
IL74259A0 (en) * | 1984-02-06 | 1985-05-31 | Surface Concepts Pty Ltd | Improved method for cell culture |
JPS60145139U (en) * | 1984-03-07 | 1985-09-26 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Remaining amount display device for sheet recording paper |
SE454518B (en) * | 1984-05-21 | 1988-05-09 | Statens Bakteriologiska Lab | PROCEDURE FOR CULTURING DIPLOID CELLS IN THE PRESENTATION OF CELLULOSA FIBERS |
JP2606213B2 (en) * | 1986-04-22 | 1997-04-30 | 味の素株式会社 | Complexes of Modified Microbial Cellulose with Gels and Animal Cell Membrane |
DE3633891A1 (en) * | 1986-10-04 | 1988-04-07 | Akzo Gmbh | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CULTIVATING ANIMAL CELLS |
US20140170748A1 (en) * | 2012-12-14 | 2014-06-19 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Nutrient Enriched Media for hUTC Growth |
CN113249311B (en) * | 2020-05-25 | 2022-06-28 | 北京唐颐惠康生物医学技术有限公司 | Preparation method of degradable microcarrier for mesenchymal stem cell culture, product and application thereof |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1436323A (en) * | 1972-04-26 | 1976-05-19 | Wellcome Found | Cell and virus culture systems |
US3901095A (en) * | 1974-06-17 | 1975-08-26 | Joseph W Wechsler | Bicycle gear shift |
US3935067A (en) * | 1974-11-22 | 1976-01-27 | Wyo-Ben Products, Inc. | Inorganic support for culture media |
ZA776251B (en) * | 1976-11-11 | 1978-07-26 | Massachusetts Inst Technology | Improved cell culture microcarriers |
JPS5614270A (en) * | 1979-07-14 | 1981-02-12 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Wet type development after treating device |
-
1977
- 1977-10-20 ZA ZA00776251A patent/ZA776251B/en unknown
- 1977-10-27 GB GB44659/77A patent/GB1535150A/en not_active Expired
- 1977-10-31 IN IN1561/CAL/77A patent/IN147612B/en unknown
- 1977-11-04 NL NLAANVRAGE7712202,A patent/NL177926C/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1977-11-08 DE DE2749989A patent/DE2749989C3/en not_active Expired
- 1977-11-08 DE DE2759579A patent/DE2759579C2/en not_active Expired
- 1977-11-09 AU AU30491/77A patent/AU508398B2/en not_active Expired
- 1977-11-09 JP JP13365277A patent/JPS5362889A/en active Granted
- 1977-11-10 FR FR7733954A patent/FR2370792A1/en active Granted
- 1977-11-10 FI FI773377A patent/FI60407C/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1977-11-10 BE BE182543A patent/BE860721A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1977-11-10 CA CA290,641A patent/CA1063050A/en not_active Expired
- 1977-11-10 SE SE7712700A patent/SE417108C/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1977-11-10 BR BR7707551A patent/BR7707551A/en unknown
- 1977-11-11 CH CH1382677A patent/CH615947A5/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
1980
- 1980-10-07 SE SE8006993A patent/SE460906B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1980-10-15 JP JP14308980A patent/JPS5699789A/en active Granted
- 1980-10-15 JP JP14309080A patent/JPS5699790A/en active Granted
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
SE417108C (en) | 1989-04-17 |
BR7707551A (en) | 1978-06-20 |
NL177926B (en) | 1985-07-16 |
DE2749989A1 (en) | 1978-05-18 |
AU508398B2 (en) | 1980-03-20 |
CH615947A5 (en) | 1980-02-29 |
DE2749989B2 (en) | 1979-10-25 |
NL7712202A (en) | 1978-05-16 |
IN147612B (en) | 1980-05-03 |
ZA776251B (en) | 1978-07-26 |
JPS5362889A (en) | 1978-06-05 |
FI60407C (en) | 1982-01-11 |
AU3049177A (en) | 1979-06-28 |
FI60407B (en) | 1981-09-30 |
FR2370792B1 (en) | 1983-07-29 |
JPS5699789A (en) | 1981-08-11 |
SE7712700L (en) | 1978-05-12 |
DE2749989C3 (en) | 1980-07-03 |
BE860721A (en) | 1978-03-01 |
GB1535150A (en) | 1978-12-06 |
JPS575514B2 (en) | 1982-01-30 |
DE2759579C2 (en) | 1983-08-25 |
JPS5614270B2 (en) | 1981-04-03 |
NL177926C (en) | 1985-12-16 |
SE8006993L (en) | 1980-10-07 |
FI773377A (en) | 1978-05-12 |
JPS5735953B2 (en) | 1982-07-31 |
JPS5699790A (en) | 1981-08-11 |
SE417108B (en) | 1981-02-23 |
FR2370792A1 (en) | 1978-06-09 |
SE460906B (en) | 1989-12-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4189534A (en) | Cell culture microcarriers | |
US4293654A (en) | Cell culture microcarriers | |
Levine et al. | Optimization of growth surface parameters in microcarrier cell culture | |
CA1063050A (en) | Cell culture microcarriers | |
US4036693A (en) | Treatment of cell culture microcarries | |
Levine et al. | Microcarrier cell culture: new methods for research-scale application | |
Giard et al. | Virus production with a newly developed microcarrier system | |
UA77383C2 (en) | Process for preparation and isolation of protein having factor viii activity and human cells lines expressing protein having factor viii activity | |
Togawa et al. | Establishment and characterization of a human myeloma cell line (KMM‐1) | |
Mered et al. | Cell growth optimization in microcarrier culture | |
Hopkins et al. | High-frequency cotransfer of the transformed phenotype and a tumor-specific transplantation antigen by DNA from the 3-methylcholanthrene-induced Meth A sarcoma of BALB/c mice. | |
JPH06343477A (en) | Recombinant foamy virus vector for pharmaceutical and diagnostic use and preparation of recombinant foamy virus vector | |
US4650909A (en) | Polyethylene glycol (PEG) reagent | |
Jolicoeur et al. | Effect of the Fv-1 locus on the titration of murine leukemia viruses | |
JP2003509022A (en) | Method for producing heterologous secreted protein from Chinese hamster ovary cells grown on microcarriers | |
US3887430A (en) | Culture medium for tissue culture techniques | |
Thilly et al. | [15] Microcarrier culture: A homogeneous environment for studies of cellular biochemistry | |
KR100255228B1 (en) | Mammalian cell lines and method of obtaining glycoproteins | |
EP0248656B1 (en) | Composition for cell cultivation and use thereof | |
WO1986001531A1 (en) | Detachment of anchorage-dependent cells from microcarriers | |
KR20010033558A (en) | Preparation of cells for production of biologicals | |
Takaki et al. | Expression of a nuclear and a cytoplasmic Epstein-Barr virus early antigen after DNA transfer: cooperation of two distant parts of the genome for expression of the cytoplasmic antigen. | |
EP0041344B1 (en) | Process for producing interferon | |
JPS641119B2 (en) | ||
US5587241A (en) | Mineral fibers and whiskers exhibiting reduced mammalian cell toxicity, and method for their preparation |