AU2004225794A1 - Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide - Google Patents

Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2004225794A1
AU2004225794A1 AU2004225794A AU2004225794A AU2004225794A1 AU 2004225794 A1 AU2004225794 A1 AU 2004225794A1 AU 2004225794 A AU2004225794 A AU 2004225794A AU 2004225794 A AU2004225794 A AU 2004225794A AU 2004225794 A1 AU2004225794 A1 AU 2004225794A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
bath
electrolysis
process according
cryolite
cell
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
AU2004225794A
Other versions
AU2004225794A8 (en
AU2004225794B8 (en
AU2004225794B2 (en
Inventor
Steven Christian Lans
Mpia Cyril Roger Mambote
Markus Andreas Reuter
Dietrich Willem Van Der Plas
Anthonie Van Sandwijk
Yanping Xiao
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Novelis Koblenz GmbH
Original Assignee
Corus Technology BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Corus Technology BV filed Critical Corus Technology BV
Publication of AU2004225794A1 publication Critical patent/AU2004225794A1/en
Assigned to ALERIS ALUMINUM KOBLENZ GMBH reassignment ALERIS ALUMINUM KOBLENZ GMBH Alteration of Name(s) of Applicant(s) under S113 Assignors: CORUS ALUMINIUM WALZPRODUKTE GMBH
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2004225794B2 publication Critical patent/AU2004225794B2/en
Publication of AU2004225794A8 publication Critical patent/AU2004225794A8/en
Publication of AU2004225794B8 publication Critical patent/AU2004225794B8/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25CPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC PRODUCTION, RECOVERY OR REFINING OF METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25C3/00Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts
    • C25C3/06Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts of aluminium
    • C25C3/18Electrolytes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25CPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC PRODUCTION, RECOVERY OR REFINING OF METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25C3/00Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts
    • C25C3/06Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts of aluminium

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electrolytic Production Of Metals (AREA)

Description

WO 2004/088000 PCT/EP2004/003625 PROCESS FOR THE ELECTROLYSIS OF ALUMINIUMSULFIDE 5 The invention relates to a process for the electrolysis of A1 2
S
3 , using a bath of molten salt, preferably a bath of molten chloride salt, in which A1 2
S
3 is dissolved. The most commonly used method for the production of aluminium from aluminium ore is the Hall-Hroult process. Primary aluminum production via electrolysis in the Hall-Hdroult process 10 consumes about 13-15 MWh of electrical energy per tonne of aluminum. The anodes are consumed during the process and have to be changed periodically. In addition, the Hall-H16roult process gives rise to green house emissions such as CF 4 and C 2
F
6 , which should be removed from the off-gas in compliance with environmental legislation. In an alternative process, aluminium oxide is converted in a sulfidation step into 15 aluminium sulfide A1 2
S
3 by a reaction with carbonsulfide CS 2 . A more detailed description of the alternative process, also referred to as Compact Aluminium Production Process or CAPP or more general as sulfide process, is given in patent application WO/00/37691 the content of which is deemed to be included in this description by this reference. The aluminum metal can be extracted from Al 2
S
3 by 20 electrolysis, producing sulfur gas at the anode, preferably a graphite anode. The sulfur gas will be collected and recycled to produce CS 2 , which is used in the sulfidation step, which is of particular advantage in combination with the CAPP-process. The simplified reactions (assuming no complexions) of the electrolysis process are: cathode: A13+ + 3e -- Al (1.) anode: 2 S2 " + S 2 (g) + 4 e- (2.) Overall: A12S 3 -+ 2 Al + 1.5 S 2 (g) (3.) By-products of the Hall-H6roult process such as fluoride off-gases as well as 25 spent pot linings will not be produced, since the electrolyte is basically composed of chlorides.
WO 2004/088000 2 PCT/EP2004/003625 Figure 1 shows the decomposition potential of various aluminium compounds to produce aluminium by electrolysis and shows immediately that the electrolysis of A1 2
S
3 is very advantageous with regard to energy consumption, i.e. it has the lowest decomposition potential. The first bar is a theoretical value for comparison. The second 5 bar represents a process wherein A1 2 0 3 is converted into AlC1 3 which is decomposed. The fourth bar represents the alternative sulfide process and the third bar represents the actual Hall-H6roult process. The theoretical value of the decomposition potential is determined by:
AG
O E'= - , whereas nF Eo = the decomposition potential (4.) AGo = the Gibbs free energy n = the valency of the ion (3 for aluminium) F = Faraday's constant A problem with the sulfide process is the low current density that can be 10 achieved in the known molten chloride bath. The eutectic composition of a MgCl 2 -NaCl-KC1 mixture (50-30-20 mole %) has been proposed previously as an appropriate electrolyte for the electrolyses of A12S 3 (see N.Q.Minh, R.O. Loutfy, N.P.Yao, "The Electrolysis of A1 2
S
3 in A1Cl 3 -MgC1 2 -NaCl KCl Melts", J.Appl. Electrochem, Vol 12, 1982, 653-658; R.O. Loutfy, N.Q. Ming, C. 15 Hsu, N.P. Yao, "Potential Energy Savings in the Production of Aluminium: Aluminium Sulfide Route", Chemical Metallurgy - A Tribute To Carl Wagner, Proc. Of Symp. on Metallurgical Thermodynamics and Electrochemistry at the 110th AIME annual meeting, N.A. Gokcen, Ed., Chicago, Febr. 1981, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, New York, 1981; N.Q. Mingh, R.O. Loutfy, N.P. Yao, "The Electrochemical 20 Behaviour of A12S 3 in Molten MgC1 2 -NaCl-KC1 Eutectic", J. Electroanal. Chem. Vol. 131, 198, 229-242). It was thought that the limiting factor in the achievable current density in the bath of molten chloride salt is the solubility of A1 2
S
3 . The solubility was enhanced by the use of MgCl 2 which was thought to increase the solubility according to the reaction.
WO 2004/088000 3 PCT/EP2004/003625 MgC1 2 + A1 2
S
3 -- + 2AISC1 + MgS (s) (5.) A limiting current density of 0,3 A/cm 2 at the saturation solubility of A1 2
S
3 (= 3 wt %) and of 0,2 A/cm 2 in the MgC1 2 -NaCl-KCl eutectic composition containing about 2 wt % A1 2
S
3 was measured. The current efficiency, i.e. the percentage of the current that is actually used for 5 the electrolysis was determined to be about 80 % at a current destiny of 0,2 A/cm 2 , a cell potential of about 1,5 V and an interelectrode gap between anode and cathode of 3 cm. It is reported in literature that electrochemical studies of the electrolysis of Al2S3 in a chloride melt showed that the reduction of Al-ions at a graphite electrode is a 10 diffusion controlled process and proceeds via a reversible, 3-electron charge transfer. The oxidation of S-ions in the chloride electrolyte should be a reversible diffusion controlled process proceeding via a mechanism based on two steps:
S
2- S + 2e (electrochemical 2-electron process) (6.) S + S - S 2 (dimerization of sulfur atoms to S 2 ) (7.) The normal current density at which the Hall-H6roult process is carried out is about 0,8 A/cm 2 . The achievable current density in the electrolysis of A1 2
S
3 in a 15 eutectic MgC1 2 -NaCl-KCI bath is about 0,3 A/cm 2 . This means that the cell area, when applying the sulfide process should be about three times larger then required for the Hall-H6roult process. This makes the sulfide process not an attractive alternative despite the drawbacks associated with the Hall-H6roult process. Because the limiting current densities found are too low to compete with the 20 Hall-H6roult process, where about 0.8 A-cm -2 is employed, the addition of fluxes to the melt was considered to increase the solubility of A12S 3 and to increase the activity of both Al and S in the melt. It is known that increasing the acidity of the bath of molten salt has a beneficial effect on the solubility of A1 2
S
3 . The addition of AlC1 3 results in a more acidic melt and 25 should favour the solubility. However, due to the high vapour pressure of AlC13 (boiling point 447 oC) additions to the molten salt melt are limited because of WO 2004/088000 4 PCT/EP2004/003625 volatilization. The addition of 5 - 10 wt % Al2S3 increases the solubility of AIC1 3 up to a maximum of 5 - 7 wt % according to the following reaction. AICl 3 + A1 2
S
3 - 3AISC1 The addition of A1C1 3 allows current densities of up to 2 A/cm 2 , but the use of AIC1 3 is not a viable alternative. Even though the eutectic temperature of a MgC1 2 5 NaCl-KCl mixture is relatively low, the high vapour pressure of AIC1 3 causes a considerable amount of AlCl 3 to volatise. In prior publications A1C1 3 was used to enhance the electrowinning process. Since AlCl 3 is readily volatilized from the melt and has to be separated from sulfur downstream to recycle it to the electrowinning process, it was discarded as being 10 impractical. It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for the electrolysis of A1 2
S
3 which allows a high current density, preferably comparable with or higher than the current density achieved in the Hall-H16roult process. It is further object to the present invention to provide a process for the 15 electrolysis of A1 2
S
3 which allows a high current density without the use of AIC1 3 . It is another object of the invention to provide a process for the electrolysis of A1 2
S
3 in which virtually all of the sulfur can be recycled to form new A1 2
S
3 from A1 2 0 3 . These and further objects are reached in a process for the electrolysis of A1 2
S
3 using a bath of molten salt, preferably a bath of molten chloride salt, in which A1 2
S
3 is 20 dissolved which is characterised in that measures are taken to improve the electrical conductivity of the bath, so as to enable an increase in the current density in the bath. Different from what is suggested in the prior art, the present inventors have found that the solubility of A1 2
S
3 in a bath of molten salt having an appropriate composition is not the limiting factor in the achievable current density. The cell 25 potential of an electrolysis cell is built up of thermodynamic, kinetic (activation potential and mass transfer limitations) and ohmic contributions. The inventors have taken a different approach and found a nearly linear relationship between current density and cell potential which indicates that the electrolysis process, at least above a WO 2004/088000 5 PCT/EP2004/003625 minimum concentration of dissolved A1 2
S
3 , is not diffusion controlled, but has ohmic limitations. Then, as observed by the present inventors, an increased solubility of A1 2
S
3 does not result in a substantial enhancement of the cell performance. The relationship between cell potential and current density is nearly linear, which means that this 5 relation is determined by an ohmic relation. Consequently the allowable current density can be increased by improving the electrical conductivity of the bath. Preferably the conductivity is improved in an embodiment of the invention in which the measures comprise adding an additive to the bath. The additives are selected so as to increase the overall electrical conductivity in 10 the bath of molten salt. As an additional effect the additives may increase the activity of both aluminium and sulfur and also the solubility of A1 2
S
3 . As described above AIC1 3 is not a preferred addition. A preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the additive comprises, preferably mainly consists of a fluoride 15 compound. This embodiment is based on the insight that the amount of fluoride has a positive effect on the electrolysis process resulting from a higher activity of AIFn m than A1S + species. Also, as complexing of aluminium with fluor is favoured over complexing of aluminium with sulfur, the concentration of sulfur ions is higher when 20 fluoride is added, favouring the anodic reaction. A further preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the fluoride compound is cryolite. It has been found that addition of cryolite shows a larger improvement of the conductivity than the addition of other fluorides such as NaF, although the specific 25 conductivity of NaF is much higher. Another advantages of adding cryolite, is that cryolite has a high melting point (1012 oC and therefore much higher than the boiling point of AlC1 3 ) and volatilization of cryolite at the normal operating temperature of the electrolysis cell is assumed to be negligible.
WO 2004/088000 6 PCT/EP2004/003625 It can be argued that adding fluoride is not desirable, since this results in fluoride emissions. However, the required amount of cryolite is relatively small and operating temperatures are only about 700 oC, compared to about 950 'C for the conventional Hall-H6roult process. Thus the vapor pressure of fluorides will be very 5 low. The anode effect can be avoided, because sulfur reacts at the anode. As non consumable anodes can be used, the electrowinning can be carried out in a closed system, providing improved off-gas capturing. Another embodiment of the process according to the inventors is characterised in that the concentration of the cryolite is in the range of 5 - 30 wt %, preferably 7 - 15 10 wt %, more preferably about 10 wt %. Test have shown that relatively low concentrations of cryolite are sufficient to obtain the desired increase in conductivity with an optimum concentration of about 10 wt %. From the relationship between current density and cell potential in an electrolysis cell containing a bath of molten salt, and from the effect of cryolite and 15 NaF addition, it was concluded that the beneficial effect of the addition of fluoride containing additives cannot solely be ascribed to the increased specific conductivity of the melt. It was concluded that the process according to the invention is also improved in a embodiment which is characterised in that the measures comprise enhancing the 20 effective area of an anode extending into the bath by reducing the amount and/or size of gas bubbles covering the anode. The following observations have been made that justify the conclusion that the beneficial effect of the addition of fluoride containing fluxes cannot solely be ascribed to the increased specific conductivity of the melt: 25 * The slope of the current density vs. cell potential relationship increases by almost a factor 3 on the addition of cryolite to the MgCl 2 -NaC1-KCl eutectic, which is much more than can be expected from the increased conductivity. * The addition of 10 wt.% cryolite shows a larger improvement of the apparent conductivity than the addition of NaF, although the specific conductivity of NaF is 30 much higher.
WO 2004/088000 7 PCT/EP2004/003625 * There seems to be an optimum amount of fluoride, or fluoride to aluminium ratio, in the electrolyte. The explanation proposed is that a significant portion of the ohmic drop is not 5 related to the bath of molten salt itself but due to the gas bubbles at the anode, since they have virtually zero conductivity and reduce the available anode surface. In literature it has been shown that the main contribution to the cell potential is due to the anodic reaction. It has been determined previously for chlorine evolution in a chloride melt that the apparent conductivity was only about 40% of the specific conductivity of 10 the electrolyte, due to gas bubbles. Chlorine bubbles have the tendency to grow and stick to the anode and the overpotential could be interpreted as an ohmic potential drop in a surface layer at the anode. The same reasoning may apply as regards the evolution of sulfur gas in a chloride melt. It is expected that the quantity of sulfur gas formed at the anode is not changed 15 by the addition of cryolite, but that gas bubbles adhere less strongly or are easier removed from the anode, so that a layer of gas bubbles is less dense. Therefore, a hypothesis can be postulated that on the addition of fluoride, a complex ion is formed, changing interfacial tension at the anode, resulting in different characteristics of the sulfuric bubble layer at the anode surface area, significantly 20 reducing the ohmic drop as well as the energy consumption. A preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the bath of molten salt mainly comprises alkali metal chlorides, preferably KCl and NaC1. 25 From the prior art it is known to use a bath of molten chloride salts comprising NaC1, KCl and MgCl 2 . In particular the last compound is added to increase the solubility of A1 2
S
3 since the solubility in a bath of molten NaCl and KC1 is negligible. However the present inventors have realised that addition of suitable additives like cryolite increases the solubility of Al 2
S
3 in the bath of molten alkali metal chlorides to a 30 level at which the solubility is no longer the limiting factor in the electrolysis process but the conductivity. This has opened the way to a simple and more environmentally friendly bath.
WO 2004/088000 8 PCT/EP2004/003625 A particular advantageous embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the bath of molten metal is substantially free of earth alkaline chlorides. 5 It was found that a sufficient solubility in combination with a high conductivity can also be obtained in a bath of molten salt which is substantially free of earth alkaline chlorides, in particular free of MgC1 2 , in particular when the above mentioned fluoride additions are made. This is of particular interest since earth alkalines like Mg react with 10 the sulfur in the bath and form solid MgS hereby consuming sulfur. Basically the sulfide process in the form of CAPP process does not consume sulfur, since all sulfer can be recycled. Through the creation of MgS a considerable amount of sulfur is removed from 15 the sulfur recycle loop, which makes supply of sulfur necessary at extra costs. Moreover, formation of MgS will lead to a substantial waste stream of environmentally unfriendly material, which needs to be recycled. Finally, formation of MgS will impede cell operation, and make regular cleaning of the cell necessary, which conflicts with the closed cell concept and leads to poor working conditions. Similar problems are to be 20 expected in case other earth alkaline chlorides, such as CaC12, are used. Therefore, preferably, the bath of molten salt is substantially free of earth alkaline chlorides. In a further preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention the electrolysis is carried out at a bath temperature of between 600 0 C and 850 oC, preferably between 700 'C and 800 'C. 25 In the known process MgCl 2 is added to the bath of molten salt to increase the solubility of A1 2 0 3 and to lower the melting temperature of the bath so that AlC1 3 can be added to increase solubility. By deleting MgCl 2 and adding cryolite, the melting temperature of the bath is increased, but that is acceptable since the melting point of cryolite is much higher than 30 the proposed bath temperatures. Further it has to be recognised that the melting temperature of the NaCl-KC1 eutect is still substantially lower than proposed bath temperature.
WO 2004/088000 9 PCT/EP2004/003625 A still further preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention, is characterised in that the electrolysis is carried out in a multi-polar electrolysis cell. Because of operation with non-consumable anodes, the interelectrode gap can be reduced and kept constant and a multi-polar cell operation is possible, which will 5 increase productivity, reduce energy consumption and reduce capital costs The invention will now be further explained and elucidated with reference to the drawing in which Fig. 1 shows the decomposition potential of aluminiumn compounds to produce alumimium by electrolysis. 10 Fig. 2 shows a schematic view of an experimental electrolysis cell. Fig. 3 shows a plot of cathodic current density as a function of the cell potential for the electrolysis of aluminium from A1 2
S
3 in a MgC1 2 -NaC1-KCl electrolyte of 50 30-20 mole % at 725 oC using cryolite as an additive (flux). Fig. 4 shows a plot of cathodic current density as a functions of the cell 15 potential for the electrolysis of aluminium from 4 wt % A1 2
S
3 in a MgC1 2 -NaCl-KC1 electrolyte of 50-30-20 mole % at 725 'C using different amounts of cryolite as an additive (flux). Fig. 5 shows a plot of the cathodic current density as a function of the cell potential for the electrolysis of aluminium from 4 wt % A12S 3 in a MgCl 2 -NaC1-KCl 20 electrolyte of 50-30-20 mole % of 725 oC using NaF as an additive (flux). Fig. 1 has been described above. The electrolysis of aluminum from aluminum sulfide is carried out in a two electrode system. A schematic view of the experimental cell is depicted in Figure 2. The cathode is a pool of molten aluminum (1) (effective area 8.1 cm 2 ), which is 25 polarized by a graphite block (2) connected by a rod of stainless steel (3) shielded by a quartz tube (4). The anode is constructed of a graphite block (5) of 1 cm 2 , 5 cm high, which is immersed 2 cm into the electrolyte and is connected by a stainless steel rod (7) . The interelectrode gap is 2 cm. The anode acts as the reference electrode, thus the cell WO 2004/088000 10 PCT/EP2004/003625 potential is measured during the electrolysis. The electrochemical cell is constructed of sintered A1 2 0 3 (Alsint) walls (10). The melt is protected by an inert Ar atmosphere. Argon is introduced through inlet (8) and leaves the cell through outlet (9). The cell is externally heated by a 2100W cylindrical furnace equipped with heating elements (not 5 shown). The maximum operating temperature is 1400 oC. The temperature is measured and controlled by type S thermocouples and a control unit (not shown). The potential is measured with a potentiostat/galvanostat, which was used in combination with a current booster, to enable a high current throughput (20 A range). The electrochemical measurement system is fully computer controlled. 10 Tests as described below were carried out with a MgCl 2 -NaC1-KCl mixture, but the results also apply to a NaCl-KCl mixture. All chemicals were stored and handled in a glove box, having an argon atmosphere (< 1 ppm H20, 02). KC1, NaCl and NaF were of pro analysis quality. Anhydrous MgC1 2 (98 %), A1 2
S
3 (98 %) and Na 3 AlF 6 (98 %) were commercially 15 obtained from a supplier. The chloride electrolyte mixture was composed and put in a container in the glove box. This container was then taken out of the glove box and heated to 450 oC while purging HCI gas through the solids and subsequently through the melt to remove all water and oxides. After cooling the container was put back into the glove box. The A1 2
S
3 and additives were added at room temperature in the glove 20 box. The electrolysis cell was assembled in the glove box, closed, then transported to the furnace where an Ar flow prevented contact with air. An overview of the salt mixtures used for the experimental program discussed in this paper is given in the table below.
WO 2004/088000 1 PCT/EP2004/003625 Overview of Experimental Program of the electrolysis of Al from A1 2
S
3 in a MgCl 2 -NaC1-KCI Electrolyte of 50-30 20 mole% at 725 'C. Al2S 3 Amount offlux (Ixp. ' ( O) (W O) A 4 B 4 C 4 Na 3 AlF 6 10 D 10 Na 3 AlF 6 10 E 4 Na 3 AlF 6 5 F 4 Na 3 AlF 6 15 G 4 Na 3 AlF 6 20 H 4 Na 3 AlF 6 30 K 4 NaF 10 L 4 NaF 30 Figure 3 shows the major improvement of the electrolysis performance, because of the addition of Na 3 AlF 6 . When adding 10 wt.% of Na 3 AlF 6 , the electrolyte 5 composition changes to a quaternary mixture of 48-29-19-4 mole% of MgCl 2 -NaCl KCI-Na 3 AlF 6 . The current density is more than 3 times larger at a given cell potential. By linear extrapolation it has been determined that E = 0.98 V, which equals the theoretical decomposition potential. This is another indication, that the process is olmically limited rather than diffusion controlled. The Nemrnst equation indicates that 10 the activity of A1 2
S
3 in a melt with cryolite addition approaches unity. Further increase of the A1 2
S
3 concentration in the melt did not produce a significant effect (compare experiments C and D). Figure 4 depicts a graph showing the influence of the amount of cryolite added 15 to the melt. There seems to be an optimum at about 10 wt.% cryolite addition. Experimental work has been carried out in order to investigate whether the positive influence of cryolite on the performance of the electrowinning was caused by WO 2004/088000 12 PCT/EP2004/003625 the amount fluoride added, or by increasing the amount of Al-ions in the electrolyte. Therefore, NaF was used as a fluxing agent. The addition of 10 wt.% NaF results in a melt composition of 42-25-17-16 mole% MgCl 2 -NaC1-KC1-NaF composition. On an elemental basis, the amount of F in the electrolyte is comparable to the cryolite melt, 5 i.e. 6.4 and 7.6 mole% F respectively. Figure 5 depicts the results of those experiments. Increasing the amount of NaF to 30 wt.% shows a deteriorating cell performance, which again is in agreement with the results of cryolite additions. The linear current density-cell potential relationships observed from Figure 3 to Figure 5 indicate that the electrolysis process with these high concentrations of 10 dissolved A1 2
S
3 is no longer diffusion controlled, but shows ohmic limitations. Then, an increased solubility of A1 2
S
3 would not result in a substantial enhancement of the cell perfonnance. This is supported by the experimental results. It is assumed that the addition of Na 3 AlF 6 to the melt has a positive effect on the solubility of A1 2
S
3 . Therefore, the amount of A1 2
S
3 added to the quaternary mixture was increased from 4% 15 to 10% (Exp. C and D in Figure 3). However, this did not improve the cell performance significantly, indicating that diffusion is not the rate limiting step with these relatively high concentrations of Al 2
S
3 employed. At first sight, it can be argued that because of the ohmic control of the process, increasing the conductivity of the melt should result in an increased current density. 20 Since cryolite has a higher conductivity than the chloride eutectic, a better performance is at least to some extent the result of the increased conductivity. When adding 10 wt.% of Na 3
AIF
6 , the electrolyte composition changes to a quaternary mixture of 48-29-19-4 mole% of MgC1 2 -NaCl-KC1-Na 3 A1F 6 , which can have significantly different properties. However, the slope of the linear relationship increased by almost a factor 3 when 25 cryolite was added, which cannot be attributed to the increased conductivity of the melt only. Furthermore, although the specific conductivity of NaF is the highest of all components, i.e. 4.2 OX'.cm -1 at 725 oC, the effect of adding NaF is less pronounced. As cryolite and NaF additions produce similar effects, it can be argued that the amount of fluoride contributes to the positive effect on the electrolysis process, 30 resulting from a higher activity of AIFn m than AlS + species. Also, when complexing of Al with F is favoured over complexing with S, the concentration of S-ions is higher when fluoride is added, favoring the anodic reaction.
WO 2004/088000 13 PCT/EP2004/003625 As described earlier, the major benefit of fluoride additions was found to be an increase in conductivity of the melt, which is most favourably explained in terms of a reduced coverage of the anode by a sulfur gas bubbles layer.

Claims (10)

1. Process for the electrolysis of A1 2 S 3 , using a bath of molten salt, preferably a bath of molten chloride salt, in which A1 2 S 3 is dissolved characterised in that 5 measures are taken to improve the electrical conductivity of the bath, so as to enable an increase in the current density in the bath.
2. Process according to claim 1 characterised in that the measures comprise adding an additive to the bath. 10
3. Process according to claim 2 characterised in that the additive comprises, preferably mainly consists of a fluoride compound.
4. Process according to claim 3 characterised in that the fluoride compound is 15 cryolite.
5. Process according to claim 4 characterised in that the concentration of the cryolite is in the range of 5 - 30 wt%, preferably 7 - 15 wt%, more preferably about 10 wt%. 20
6. Process according to any of the preceding claims characterised in that the measures comprise enhancing the effective area of an anode extending into the bath by reducing the amount and/or size of gas bubbles covering the anode. 25
7. Process according to any of the preceding claims characterised in that the bath of molten salt mainly comprises alkali metal chlorides, preferably KC1 and NaCl.
8. Process according to any of the preceding claims characterised in that the bath 30 of molten metal is substantially free of earth alkaline chlorides. WO 2004/088000 15 PCT/EP2004/003625
9. Process according to any of the preceding claims characterised in that the electrolysis is carried out at a bath temperature of between 600 0 C and 850 oC, preferably between 700 oC and 800 'C. 5
10. Process according to any of the preceding claims characterised in that the electrolysis is carried out in a multi-polar electrolysis cell.
AU2004225794A 2003-03-31 2004-03-31 Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide Ceased AU2004225794B8 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP03075948 2003-03-31
EP03075948.4 2003-03-31
PCT/EP2004/003625 WO2004088000A2 (en) 2003-03-31 2004-03-31 Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide

Publications (4)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2004225794A1 true AU2004225794A1 (en) 2004-10-14
AU2004225794B2 AU2004225794B2 (en) 2009-08-20
AU2004225794A8 AU2004225794A8 (en) 2009-10-22
AU2004225794B8 AU2004225794B8 (en) 2009-10-22

Family

ID=33104133

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2004225794A Ceased AU2004225794B8 (en) 2003-03-31 2004-03-31 Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US20080202939A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1625245A2 (en)
JP (1) JP4975431B2 (en)
AU (1) AU2004225794B8 (en)
CA (1) CA2520798C (en)
NO (1) NO20055027L (en)
RU (1) RU2341591C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2004088000A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ATE466974T1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2010-05-15 Aleris Aluminum Koblenz Gmbh METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PRODUCING ALUMINUM
US7867373B2 (en) 2005-04-01 2011-01-11 Aleris Aluminum Koblenz Gmbh Method and apparatus for the production of aluminum
KR101290586B1 (en) * 2012-04-25 2013-07-30 한국수력원자력 주식회사 Decontamination method of cladding hull wastes generated from spent nuclear fuel and apparatus thereof
JP2014237873A (en) * 2013-06-07 2014-12-18 住友電気工業株式会社 Method for producing molten salt, molten salt, and method for producing aluminum
CA2917342C (en) * 2013-07-09 2018-05-29 Obshchestvo S Ogranichennoy Otvetstvennost'yu "Obedinennaya Kompaniya Rusal Inzhenerno-Tekhnologicheskiy Tsentr" Electrolyte for obtaining melts using an aluminum electrolyzer
WO2019094921A1 (en) * 2017-11-13 2019-05-16 Chromalox, Inc. Medium voltage molten salt heater and molten salt thermal energy storage system including same

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB484014A (en) * 1936-12-04 1938-04-29 Daniel Gardner Improvements in or relating to electrolytic processes for the manufacture of aluminium
US2939824A (en) * 1957-07-26 1960-06-07 Kaiser Aluminium Chem Corp Method and apparatus for the production of aluminum
US4133727A (en) * 1977-05-17 1979-01-09 Aluminum Company Of America Method for extracting heat from a chamber containing a molten salt
JPS54114410A (en) * 1978-02-27 1979-09-06 Shirou Yoshizawa Production of metal aluminium
US4265716A (en) * 1979-06-14 1981-05-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method of winning aluminum metal from aluminous ore
US4464234A (en) * 1982-04-01 1984-08-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Production of aluminum metal by electrolysis of aluminum sulfide
DE3412114A1 (en) * 1984-03-31 1985-10-10 Brown, Boveri & Cie Ag, 6800 Mannheim Process for producing aluminium
ATE305985T1 (en) * 1998-12-18 2005-10-15 Corus Technology Bv METHOD FOR PRODUCING ALUMINUM FROM ALUMINUM OXIDE VIA ALUMINUM SULFIDE PROCESS

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2004225794A8 (en) 2009-10-22
NO20055027L (en) 2005-10-28
EP1625245A2 (en) 2006-02-15
RU2341591C2 (en) 2008-12-20
US20080202939A1 (en) 2008-08-28
WO2004088000A3 (en) 2005-01-13
CA2520798C (en) 2009-06-16
AU2004225794B8 (en) 2009-10-22
JP2006522220A (en) 2006-09-28
AU2004225794B2 (en) 2009-08-20
RU2005133440A (en) 2006-06-10
CA2520798A1 (en) 2004-10-14
WO2004088000A2 (en) 2004-10-14
JP4975431B2 (en) 2012-07-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1215935A (en) Method of producing metals by cathodic dissolution of their compounds in electrolytic cells
CA2877591C (en) Electrolytic cell for aluminum electrolysis and electrolysis process using electrolytic cell
EA011110B1 (en) Method for producing metal by molten salt electrolysis and method for producing metal titanium
US5725744A (en) Cell for the electrolysis of alumina at low temperatures
US6375813B1 (en) Dimensionally stable anode for electrolysis, method for maintaining dimensions of anode during electrolysis
AU2004225794B2 (en) Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide
CA2073625C (en) Process and apparatus for melting metals while reducing losses due to oxidation
JP4763169B2 (en) Method for producing metallic lithium
CA2917342A1 (en) Electrolyte for obtaining melts using an aluminum electrolyzer
JP4089944B2 (en) Electrolytic reduction apparatus and method
Kekesi Electrorefining in aqueous chloride media for recovering tin from waste materials
Chen et al. Penetration behavior of electrolyte into graphite cathode in NaF− KF− LiF− AlF3 system with low cryolite ratios
Feldhaus et al. Influence of LiF on the synthesis of the neodymium & praseodymium molten salt electrolysis
KR101801453B1 (en) Electrolyte used for aluminum electrolysis and electrolysis process using the electrolyte
HAARBERG Electrowinning of Aluminum—Challenges and Possibilities for Reducing the Carbon Footprint—
EP1534879B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for reducing sulfur impurities and improving current efficiencies of inert anode aluminium production cells
US6866766B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for reducing sulfur impurities and improving current efficiencies of inert anode aluminum production cells
EP1876248A1 (en) PROCESS FOR PRODUCING Ti OR Ti ALLOY, AND PULL-UP ELECTROLYSIS METHOD APPLICABLE TO SAID PROCESS
Lukasko et al. Electrolytic production of calcium metal
Haarberg et al. Electrochemical behavior of dissolved titanium species in molten salts
WO2010003906A1 (en) Process for the production of copper from sulphide compounds
JP7084696B2 (en) Metal manufacturing method and sponge titanium manufacturing method
RU2299931C2 (en) Method and apparatus for reducing content of sulfurous impurities and for enhancing efficiency by electric current in aluminum cell with inert anode
Kvande Electrolyte Compositions for Aluminium Production-Options and Desirable Properties
OA17184A (en) Electrolysis tank used for aluminum electrolysis and electrolysis process using the electrolyzer.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
DA2 Applications for amendment section 104

Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT IS: AMEND THE NAME OF THE INVENTOR TO ADD CO-INVENTORS LANS, STEVEN CHRISTIAN; REUTER, MARKUS ANDREAS; MAMBOTE, MPIA CYRIL ROGER; VAN SANDWIJK, ANTHONIE AND XIAO, YANPING.

TH Corrigenda

Free format text: IN VOL 23, NO 40, PAGE(S) 10495 UNDER THE HEADING AMENDMENTS - APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENTS UNDER THENAME ALERIS ALUMINUM KOBLENZ GMBH, DELETE ALL REFERENCE TO 2004225794

Free format text: IN VOL 23, NO 32, PAGE(S) 9667 UNDER THE HEADING APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED - NAME INDEX UNDER THE NAME ALERIS ALUMINUM KOBLENZ GMBH, APPLICATION NO. 2004225794, UNDER INID (72) ADD CO-INVENTORS LANS, STEVEN CHRISTIAN; REUTER, MARKUS ANDREAS; MAMBOTE, MPIA CYRIL ROGER; VAN SANDWIJK, ANTHONIE AND XIAO, YANPING

Free format text: IN VOL 19, NO 41, PAGE(S) 3143 UNDER THE HEADING PCT APPLICATIONS THAT HAVE ENTERED THE NATIONAL PHASE - NAME INDEX UNDER THE NAME CORUS TECHNOLOGY BV, APPLICATION 2004225794, UNDER INID (72), ADD CO-INVENTORS LANS, STEVEN CHRISTIAN; REUTER, MARKUS ANDREAS; MAMBOTE, MPIA CYRIL ROGER; VAN SANDWIJK, ANTHONIE AND XIAO, YANPING

FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired