WO2004088000A2 - Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide - Google Patents

Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004088000A2
WO2004088000A2 PCT/EP2004/003625 EP2004003625W WO2004088000A2 WO 2004088000 A2 WO2004088000 A2 WO 2004088000A2 EP 2004003625 W EP2004003625 W EP 2004003625W WO 2004088000 A2 WO2004088000 A2 WO 2004088000A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
bath
electrolysis
process according
cryolite
molten
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2004/003625
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2004088000A3 (en
Inventor
Dietrich Willem Van Der Plas
Steven Christian Lans
Markus Andreas Reuter
Mpia Cyril Roger Mambote
Anthonie Van Sandwijk
Yanping Xiao
Original Assignee
Corus Aluminium Walzprodukte Gmbh
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Corus Aluminium Walzprodukte Gmbh filed Critical Corus Aluminium Walzprodukte Gmbh
Priority to JP2006505009A priority Critical patent/JP4975431B2/en
Priority to MXPA05009114A priority patent/MXPA05009114A/en
Priority to AU2004225794A priority patent/AU2004225794B8/en
Priority to US10/550,678 priority patent/US20080202939A1/en
Priority to EP04724605A priority patent/EP1625245A2/en
Priority to CA002520798A priority patent/CA2520798C/en
Publication of WO2004088000A2 publication Critical patent/WO2004088000A2/en
Publication of WO2004088000A3 publication Critical patent/WO2004088000A3/en
Priority to NO20055027A priority patent/NO20055027L/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25CPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC PRODUCTION, RECOVERY OR REFINING OF METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25C3/00Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts
    • C25C3/06Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts of aluminium
    • C25C3/18Electrolytes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25CPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC PRODUCTION, RECOVERY OR REFINING OF METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25C3/00Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts
    • C25C3/06Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts of aluminium

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a process for the electrolysis of A1 2 S 3 , using a bath of molten salt, preferably a bath of molten chloride salt, in which A1 2 S 3 is dissolved.
  • Hall-Heroult process gives rise to green house emissions such as CF and C 2 F 6 , which should be removed from the off-gas in compliance with environmental legislation.
  • aluminium oxide is converted in a sulfidation step into aluminium sulfide A1 2 S 3 by a reaction with carbonsulfide CS 2 .
  • CAPP Compact Aluminium Production Process
  • the aluminum metal can be extracted from A1 2 S 3 by electrolysis, producing sulfur gas at the anode, preferably a graphite anode. The sulfur gas will be collected and recycled to produce CS , which is used in the sulfidation step, which is of particular advantage in combination with the CAPP -process.
  • the simplified reactions (assuming no complexions) of the electrolysis process are:
  • Figure 1 shows the decomposition potential of various aluminium compounds to produce aluminium by electrolysis and shows immediately that the electrolysis of A1 2 S 3 is very advantageous with regard to energy consumption, i.e. it has the lowest decomposition potential.
  • the first bar is a theoretical value for comparison.
  • the second bar represents a process wherein A1 2 0 3 is converted into A1C1 3 which is decomposed.
  • the fourth bar represents the alternative sulfide process and the third bar represents the actual Hall-Heroult process.
  • the theoretical value of the decomposition potential is determined by:
  • ⁇ G° the Gibbs free energy n - the valency of the ion (3 for aluminium)
  • a problem with the sulfide process is the low current density that can be achieved in the known molten chloride bath.
  • the eutectic composition of a MgCl -NaCl-KCl mixture (50-30-20 mole %) has been proposed previously as an appropriate electrolyte for the electrolyses of A1 2 S 3 (see N.Q.Minh, R.O. Loutfy, N.P.Yao, "The Electrolysis of A1 2 S 3 in AlCl 3 -MgCl 2 -NaCl- KC1 Melts", J.Appl. Electrochem, Vol 12, 1982, 653-658; R.O. Loutfy, N.Q. Ming, C. Hsu, N.P.
  • a limiting current density of 0,3 A/cm 2 at the saturation solubility of A1 2 S 3 ( ⁇ 3 wt %) and of 0,2 A/cm in the MgCl -NaCl-KCl eutectic composition containing about 2 wt % A1 2 S 3 was measured.
  • the current efficiency i.e. the percentage of the current that is actually used for the electrolysis was determined to be about 80 % at a current destiny of 0,2 A/cm 2 , a cell potential of about 1,5 V and an interelectrode gap between anode and cathode of 3 cm.
  • A1 2 S 3 in a chloride melt showed that the reduction of Al-ions at a graphite electrode is a diffusion controlled process and proceeds via a reversible, 3 -electron charge transfer.
  • the oxidation of S-ions in the chloride electrolyte should be a reversible diffusion controlled process proceeding via a mechanism based on two steps:
  • the normal current density at which the Hall-Heroult process is carried out is about 0,8 A/cm .
  • the achievable current density in the electrolysis of A1 2 S 3 in a eutectic MgCl 2 -NaCl-KCl bath is about 0,3 A/cm 2 . This means that the cell area, when applying the sulfide process should be about three times larger then required for the Hall-Heroult process. This makes the sulfide process not an attractive alternative despite the drawbacks associated with the Hall-Heroult process.
  • A1C1 3 allows current densities of up to 2 A/cm 2 , but the use of A1C1 3 is not a viable alternative. Even though the eutectic temperature of a MgCl - NaCl-KCl mixture is relatively low, the high vapour pressure of A1C1 3 causes a considerable amount of A1C1 3 to volatise.
  • A1C1 3 was used to enhance the electro winning process. Since A1C1 3 is readily volatilized from the melt and has to be separated from sulfur downstream to recycle it to the electrowinning process, it was discarded as being impractical.
  • the present inventors have found that the solubility of A1 2 S 3 in a bath of molten salt having an appropriate composition is not the limiting factor in the achievable current density.
  • the cell potential of an electrolysis cell is built up of thermodynamic, kinetic (activation potential and mass transfer limitations) and ohmic contributions.
  • the inventors have taken a different approach and found a nearly linear relationship between current density and cell potential which indicates that the electrolysis process, at least above a minimum concentration of dissolved A1 2 S 3 , is not diffusion controlled, but has ohmic limitations.
  • an increased solubility of A1 2 S 3 does not result in a substantial enhancement of the cell performance.
  • the relationship between cell potential and current density is nearly linear, which means that this relation is determined by an ohmic relation. Consequently the allowable current density can be increased by improving the electrical conductivity of the bath.
  • the conductivity is improved in an embodiment of the invention in which the measures comprise adding an additive to the bath.
  • the additives are selected so as to increase the overall electrical conductivity in the bath of molten salt. As an additional effect the additives may increase the activity of both aluminium and sulfur and also the solubility of A1 2 S 3 . As described above A1C1 3 is not a preferred addition.
  • a preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the additive comprises, preferably mainly consists of a fluoride compound.
  • This embodiment is based on the insight that the amount of fluoride has a positive effect on the electrolysis process resulting from a higher activity of AlF n m" than AIS species. Also, as complexing of aluminium with fluor is favoured over complexing of aluminium with sulfur, the concentration of sulfur ions is higher when fluoride is added, favouring the anodic reaction.
  • a further preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the fluoride compound is cryolite.
  • cryolite shows a larger improvement of the conductivity than the addition of other fluorides such as NaF, although the specific conductivity of NaF is much higher.
  • cryolite has a high melting point (1012 °C and therefore much higher than the boiling point of A1C1 3 ) and volatilization of cryolite at the normal operating temperature of the electrolysis cell is assumed to be negligible. It can be argued that adding fluoride is not desirable, since this results in fluoride emissions. However, the required amount of cryolite is relatively small and operating temperatures are only about 700 °C, compared to about 950 °C for the conventional Hall-Heroult process. Thus the vapor pressure of fluorides will be very low. The anode effect can be avoided, because sulfur reacts at the anode. As non- consumable anodes can be used, the electrowinning can be carried out in a closed system, providing improved off-gas capturing.
  • the concentration of the cryolite is in the range of 5 - 30 wt %, preferably 7 - 15 wt %, more preferably about 10 wt %. Test have shown that relatively low concentrations of cryolite are sufficient to obtain the desired increase in conductivity with an optimum concentration of about 10 wt %.
  • the process according to the invention is also improved in a embodiment which is characterised in that the measures comprise enhancing the effective area of an anode extending into the bath by reducing the amount and/or size of gas bubbles covering the anode.
  • a preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the bath of molten salt mainly comprises alkali metal chlorides, preferably KC1 and NaCl.
  • a particular advantageous embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the bath of molten metal is substantially free of earth alkaline chlorides.
  • the bath of molten salt is substantially free of earth alkaline chlorides.
  • the electrolysis is carried out at a bath temperature of between 600°C and 850 °C, preferably between 700 °C and 800 °C.
  • MgCl 2 is added to the bath of molten salt to increase the solubility of Al O 3 and to lower the melting temperature of the bath so that A1C1 3 can be added to increase solubility.
  • a still further preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the electrolysis is carried out in a multi-polar electrolysis cell.
  • the interelectrode gap can be reduced and kept constant and a multi-polar cell operation is possible, which will increase productivity, reduce energy consumption and reduce capital costs
  • Fig. 1 shows the decomposition potential of aluminium compounds to produce alumimium by electrolysis.
  • Fig. 2 shows a schematic view of an experimental electrolysis cell.
  • Fig. 3 shows a plot of cathodic current density as a function of the cell potential for the electrolysis of aluminium from A1 2 S 3 in a MgCl -NaCl-KCl electrolyte of 50- 30-20 mole % at 725 °C using cryolite as an additive (flux).
  • Fig. 4 shows a plot of cathodic current density as a functions of the cell potential for the electrolysis of aluminium from 4 wt % A1 2 S 3 in a MgCl 2 -NaCl-KCl electrolyte of 50-30-20 mole % at 725 °C using different amounts of cryolite as an additive (flux).
  • Fig. 5 shows a plot of the cathodic current density as a function of the cell potential for the electrolysis of aluminium from 4 wt % A1 2 S 3 in a MgCl 2 -NaCl-KCl electrolyte of 50-30-20 mole % of 725 °C using NaF as an additive (flux).
  • Fig. 1 has been described above.
  • the electrolysis of aluminum from aluminum sulfide is carried out in a two electrode system.
  • a schematic view of the experimental cell is depicted in Figure 2.
  • the cathode is a pool of molten aluminum (1) (effective area 8.1 cm 2 ), which is polarized by a graphite block (2) connected by a rod of stainless steel (3) shielded by a quartz tube (4).
  • the anode is constructed of a graphite block (5) of 1 cm 2 , 5 cm high, which is immersed 2 cm into the electrolyte and is connected by a stainless steel rod (7) .
  • the interelectrode gap is 2 cm.
  • the anode acts as the reference electrode, thus the cell potential is measured during the electrolysis.
  • the electrochemical cell is constructed of sintered A1 2 0 3 (Alsint) walls (10).
  • the melt is protected by an inert Ar atmosphere.
  • Argon is introduced through inlet (8) and leaves the cell through outlet (9).
  • the cell is externally heated by a 2100W cylindrical furnace equipped with heating elements (not shown).
  • the maximum operating temperature is 1400 °C.
  • the temperature is measured and controlled by type S thermocouples and a control unit (not shown).
  • the potential is measured with a potentiostat/galvanostat, which was used in combination with a current booster, to enable a high current throughput (20 A range).
  • the electrochemical measurement system is fully computer controlled.
  • Figure 3 shows the major improvement of the electrolysis performance, because of the addition of Na 3 AlF 6 .
  • the electrolyte composition changes to a quaternary mixture of 48-29-19-4 mole% of MgCl -NaCl- KCl-Na 3 AlF 6 .
  • the current density is more than 3 times larger at a given cell potential.
  • E - 0.98 V which equals the theoretical decomposition potential. This is another indication, that the process is ohmically limited rather than diffusion controlled.
  • the Nernst equation indicates that the activity of A1 2 S 3 in a melt with cryolite addition approaches unity. Further increase of the A1 2 S 3 concentration in the melt did not produce a significant effect (compare experiments C and D).
  • Figure 4 depicts a graph showing the influence of the amount of cryolite added to the melt. There seems to be an optimum at about 10 wt.% cryolite addition.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electrolytic Production Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

Process for the electrolysis of A12S3, using a bath of molten salt, preferably a bath of molten chloride salt, in which A12S3 is dissolved characterised in that measures are taken to improve the electrical conductivity of the bath, so as to enable an increase in the current density in the bath.

Description

PROCESS FOR THE ELECTROLYSIS OF ALUMINIUMSULFIDE
The invention relates to a process for the electrolysis of A12S3, using a bath of molten salt, preferably a bath of molten chloride salt, in which A12S3 is dissolved.
The most commonly used method for the production of aluminium from aluminium ore is the Hall-Heroult process.
Primary aluminum production via electrolysis in the Hall-Heroult process consumes about 13-15 MWh of electrical energy per tonne of aluminum. The anodes are consumed during the process and have to be changed periodically. In addition, the
Hall-Heroult process gives rise to green house emissions such as CF and C2F6, which should be removed from the off-gas in compliance with environmental legislation.
In an alternative process, aluminium oxide is converted in a sulfidation step into aluminium sulfide A12S3 by a reaction with carbonsulfide CS2. A more detailed description of the alternative process, also referred to as Compact Aluminium Production Process or CAPP or more general as sulfide process, is given in patent application WO/00/37691 the content of which is deemed to be included in this description by this reference. The aluminum metal can be extracted from A12S3 by electrolysis, producing sulfur gas at the anode, preferably a graphite anode. The sulfur gas will be collected and recycled to produce CS , which is used in the sulfidation step, which is of particular advantage in combination with the CAPP -process. The simplified reactions (assuming no complexions) of the electrolysis process are:
cathode: Al3+ + 3e" → Al (1.)
anode: 2 S2_ → S2 (g) + 4 e (2.)
Overall: A12S3 → 2 Al + 1.5 S2 (g) (3.)
By-products of the Hall-Heroult process such as fluoride off-gases as well as spent pot linings will not be produced, since the electrolyte is basically composed of chlorides. Figure 1 shows the decomposition potential of various aluminium compounds to produce aluminium by electrolysis and shows immediately that the electrolysis of A12S3 is very advantageous with regard to energy consumption, i.e. it has the lowest decomposition potential. The first bar is a theoretical value for comparison. The second bar represents a process wherein A1203 is converted into A1C13 which is decomposed. The fourth bar represents the alternative sulfide process and the third bar represents the actual Hall-Heroult process. The theoretical value of the decomposition potential is determined by:
E° = , whereas nF
E° = the decomposition potential
ΔG° = the Gibbs free energy n - the valency of the ion (3 for aluminium)
F- Faraday's constant
A problem with the sulfide process is the low current density that can be achieved in the known molten chloride bath.
The eutectic composition of a MgCl -NaCl-KCl mixture (50-30-20 mole %) has been proposed previously as an appropriate electrolyte for the electrolyses of A12S3 (see N.Q.Minh, R.O. Loutfy, N.P.Yao, "The Electrolysis of A12S3 in AlCl3-MgCl2-NaCl- KC1 Melts", J.Appl. Electrochem, Vol 12, 1982, 653-658; R.O. Loutfy, N.Q. Ming, C. Hsu, N.P. Yao, "Potential Energy Savings in the Production of Aluminium: Aluminium Sulfide Route", Chemical Metallurgy - A Tribute To Carl Wagner, Proc. Of Symp. on Metallurgical Thermodynamics and Electrochemistry at the 110th AIME annual meeting, N.A. Gokcen, Ed., Chicago, Febr. 1981, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, New York, 1981; N.Q. Mingh, R.O. Loutfy, N.P. Yao, "The Electrochemical Behaviour of A12S3 in Molten MgCl2-NaCl-KCl Eutectic", J. Electroanal. Chem. Vol. 131, 198, 229-242).
It was thought that the limiting factor in the achievable current density in the bath of molten chloride salt is the solubility of A1 S3. The solubility was enhanced by the use of MgCl2 which was thought to increase the solubility according to the reaction. MgCl2 + A12S3 → 2A1SC1 + MgS (s) (5.)
A limiting current density of 0,3 A/cm2 at the saturation solubility of A12S3 (~ 3 wt %) and of 0,2 A/cm in the MgCl -NaCl-KCl eutectic composition containing about 2 wt % A12S3 was measured.
The current efficiency, i.e. the percentage of the current that is actually used for the electrolysis was determined to be about 80 % at a current destiny of 0,2 A/cm2, a cell potential of about 1,5 V and an interelectrode gap between anode and cathode of 3 cm.
It is reported in literature that electrochemical studies of the electrolysis of
A12S3 in a chloride melt showed that the reduction of Al-ions at a graphite electrode is a diffusion controlled process and proceeds via a reversible, 3 -electron charge transfer.
The oxidation of S-ions in the chloride electrolyte should be a reversible diffusion controlled process proceeding via a mechanism based on two steps:
S " → S + 2e" (electrochemical 2-electron process) (6.)
S + S → S2 (dimerization of sulfur atoms to S2) (7.)
The normal current density at which the Hall-Heroult process is carried out is about 0,8 A/cm . The achievable current density in the electrolysis of A12S3 in a eutectic MgCl2-NaCl-KCl bath is about 0,3 A/cm2. This means that the cell area, when applying the sulfide process should be about three times larger then required for the Hall-Heroult process. This makes the sulfide process not an attractive alternative despite the drawbacks associated with the Hall-Heroult process.
Because the limiting current densities found are too low to compete with the Hall-Heroult process, where about 0.8 A-cm"2 is employed, the addition of fluxes to the melt was considered to increase the solubility of A12S3 and to increase the activity of both Al and S in the melt.
It is known that increasing the acidity of the bath of molten salt has a beneficial effect on the solubility of A1 S3. The addition of A1C13 results in a more acidic melt and should favour the solubility. However, due to the high vapour pressure of A1C13
(boiling point 447 °C) additions to the molten salt melt are limited because of volatilization. The addition of 5 - 10 wt % A12S3 increases the solubility of A1C13 up to a maximum of 5 - 7 wt % according to the following reaction.
Figure imgf000006_0001
The addition of A1C13 allows current densities of up to 2 A/cm2, but the use of A1C13 is not a viable alternative. Even though the eutectic temperature of a MgCl - NaCl-KCl mixture is relatively low, the high vapour pressure of A1C13 causes a considerable amount of A1C13 to volatise.
In prior publications A1C13 was used to enhance the electro winning process. Since A1C13 is readily volatilized from the melt and has to be separated from sulfur downstream to recycle it to the electrowinning process, it was discarded as being impractical.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for the electrolysis of A12S3 which allows a high current density, preferably comparable with or higher than the current density achieved in the Hall-Heroult process.
It is further object to the present invention to provide a process for the electrolysis of A12S3 which allows a high current density without the use of A1C13.
It is another object of the invention to provide a process for the electrolysis of A12S3 in which virtually all of the sulfur can be recycled to form new A12S3 from A1203.
These and further objects are reached in a process for the electrolysis of A12S3 using a bath of molten salt, preferably a bath of molten chloride salt, in which A12S3 is dissolved which is characterised in that measures are taken to improve the electrical conductivity of the bath, so as to enable an increase in the current density in the bath.
Different from what is suggested in the prior art, the present inventors have found that the solubility of A12S3 in a bath of molten salt having an appropriate composition is not the limiting factor in the achievable current density. The cell potential of an electrolysis cell is built up of thermodynamic, kinetic (activation potential and mass transfer limitations) and ohmic contributions. The inventors have taken a different approach and found a nearly linear relationship between current density and cell potential which indicates that the electrolysis process, at least above a minimum concentration of dissolved A12S3, is not diffusion controlled, but has ohmic limitations. Then, as observed by the present inventors, an increased solubility of A12S3 does not result in a substantial enhancement of the cell performance. The relationship between cell potential and current density is nearly linear, which means that this relation is determined by an ohmic relation. Consequently the allowable current density can be increased by improving the electrical conductivity of the bath.
Preferably the conductivity is improved in an embodiment of the invention in which the measures comprise adding an additive to the bath.
The additives are selected so as to increase the overall electrical conductivity in the bath of molten salt. As an additional effect the additives may increase the activity of both aluminium and sulfur and also the solubility of A12S3. As described above A1C13 is not a preferred addition.
A preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the additive comprises, preferably mainly consists of a fluoride compound.
This embodiment is based on the insight that the amount of fluoride has a positive effect on the electrolysis process resulting from a higher activity of AlFn m" than AIS species. Also, as complexing of aluminium with fluor is favoured over complexing of aluminium with sulfur, the concentration of sulfur ions is higher when fluoride is added, favouring the anodic reaction.
A further preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the fluoride compound is cryolite.
It has been found that addition of cryolite shows a larger improvement of the conductivity than the addition of other fluorides such as NaF, although the specific conductivity of NaF is much higher.
Another advantages of adding cryolite, is that cryolite has a high melting point (1012 °C and therefore much higher than the boiling point of A1C13) and volatilization of cryolite at the normal operating temperature of the electrolysis cell is assumed to be negligible. It can be argued that adding fluoride is not desirable, since this results in fluoride emissions. However, the required amount of cryolite is relatively small and operating temperatures are only about 700 °C, compared to about 950 °C for the conventional Hall-Heroult process. Thus the vapor pressure of fluorides will be very low. The anode effect can be avoided, because sulfur reacts at the anode. As non- consumable anodes can be used, the electrowinning can be carried out in a closed system, providing improved off-gas capturing.
Another embodiment of the process according to the inventors is characterised in that the concentration of the cryolite is in the range of 5 - 30 wt %, preferably 7 - 15 wt %, more preferably about 10 wt %. Test have shown that relatively low concentrations of cryolite are sufficient to obtain the desired increase in conductivity with an optimum concentration of about 10 wt %.
From the relationship between current density and cell potential in an electrolysis cell containing a bath of molten salt, and from the effect of cryolite and NaF addition, it was concluded that the beneficial effect of the addition of fluoride containing additives cannot solely be ascribed to the increased specific conductivity of the melt.
It was concluded that the process according to the invention is also improved in a embodiment which is characterised in that the measures comprise enhancing the effective area of an anode extending into the bath by reducing the amount and/or size of gas bubbles covering the anode.
The following observations have been made that justify the conclusion that the beneficial effect of the addition of fluoride containing fluxes cannot solely be ascribed to the increased specific conductivity of the melt:
• The slope of the current density vs. cell potential relationship increases by almost a factor 3 on the addition of cryolite to the MgCl2-NaCl-KCl eutectic, which is much more than can be expected from the increased conductivity.
• The addition of 10 wt.% cryolite shows a larger improvement of the apparent conductivity than the addition of NaF, although the specific conductivity of NaF is much higher. • There seems to be an optimum amount of fluoride, or fluoride to aluminium ratio, in the electrolyte.
The explanation proposed is that a significant portion of the ohmic drop is not related to the bath of molten salt itself but due to the gas bubbles at the anode, since they have virtually zero conductivity and reduce the available anode surface. In literature it has been shown that the main contribution to the cell potential is due to the anodic reaction. It has been determined previously for chlorine evolution in a chloride melt that the apparent conductivity was only about 40% of the specific conductivity of the electrolyte, due to gas bubbles. Chlorine bubbles have the tendency to grow and stick to the anode and the overpotential could be interpreted as an ohmic potential drop in a surface layer at the anode. The same reasoning may apply as regards the evolution of sulfur gas in a chloride melt.
It is expected that the quantity of sulfur gas formed at the anode is not changed by the addition of cryolite, but that gas bubbles adhere less strongly or are easier removed from the anode, so that a layer of gas bubbles is less dense.
Therefore, a hypothesis can be postulated that on the addition of fluoride, a complex ion is formed, changing interfacial tension at the anode, resulting in different characteristics of the sulfuric bubble layer at the anode surface area, significantly reducing the ohmic drop as well as the energy consumption.
A preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the bath of molten salt mainly comprises alkali metal chlorides, preferably KC1 and NaCl.
From the prior art it is known to use a bath of molten chloride salts comprising
NaCl, KC1 and MgCl2. In particular the last compound is added to increase the solubility of A12S3 since the solubility in a bath of molten NaCl and KC1 is negligible. However the present inventors have realised that addition of suitable additives like cryolite increases the solubility of A12S3 in the bath of molten alkali metal chlorides to a level at which the solubility is no longer the limiting factor in the electrolysis process but the conductivity. This has opened the way to a simple and more environmentally friendly bath. A particular advantageous embodiment of the process according to the invention is characterised in that the bath of molten metal is substantially free of earth alkaline chlorides.
It was found that a sufficient solubility in combination with a high conductivity can also be obtained in a bath of molten salt which is substantially free of earth alkaline chlorides, in particular free of MgCl2, in particular when the above mentioned fluoride additions are made. This is of particular interest since earth alkalines like Mg react with the sulfur in the bath and form solid MgS hereby consuming sulfur. Basically the sulfide process in the form of CAPP process does not consume sulfur, since all sulfer can be recycled.
Through the creation of MgS a considerable amount of sulfur is removed from the sulfur recycle loop, which makes supply of sulfur necessary at extra costs. Moreover, formation of MgS will lead to a substantial waste stream of environmentally unfriendly material, which needs to be recycled. Finally, formation of MgS will impede cell operation, and make regular cleaning of the cell necessary, which conflicts with the closed cell concept and leads to poor working conditions. Similar problems are to be expected in case other earth alkaline chlorides, such as CaCl2, are used. Therefore, preferably, the bath of molten salt is substantially free of earth alkaline chlorides.
In a further preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention the electrolysis is carried out at a bath temperature of between 600°C and 850 °C, preferably between 700 °C and 800 °C.
In the known process MgCl2 is added to the bath of molten salt to increase the solubility of Al O3 and to lower the melting temperature of the bath so that A1C13 can be added to increase solubility.
By deleting MgCl2 and adding cryolite, the melting temperature of the bath is increased, but that is acceptable since the melting point of cryolite is much higher than the proposed bath temperatures. Further it has to be recognised that the melting temperature of the NaCl-KCl eutect is still substantially lower than proposed bath temperature. A still further preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention, is characterised in that the electrolysis is carried out in a multi-polar electrolysis cell.
Because of operation with non-consumable anodes, the interelectrode gap can be reduced and kept constant and a multi-polar cell operation is possible, which will increase productivity, reduce energy consumption and reduce capital costs
The invention will now be further explained and elucidated with reference to the drawing in which
Fig. 1 shows the decomposition potential of aluminium compounds to produce alumimium by electrolysis.
Fig. 2 shows a schematic view of an experimental electrolysis cell.
Fig. 3 shows a plot of cathodic current density as a function of the cell potential for the electrolysis of aluminium from A12S3 in a MgCl -NaCl-KCl electrolyte of 50- 30-20 mole % at 725 °C using cryolite as an additive (flux).
Fig. 4 shows a plot of cathodic current density as a functions of the cell potential for the electrolysis of aluminium from 4 wt % A12S3 in a MgCl2-NaCl-KCl electrolyte of 50-30-20 mole % at 725 °C using different amounts of cryolite as an additive (flux).
Fig. 5 shows a plot of the cathodic current density as a function of the cell potential for the electrolysis of aluminium from 4 wt % A12S3 in a MgCl2-NaCl-KCl electrolyte of 50-30-20 mole % of 725 °C using NaF as an additive (flux).
Fig. 1 has been described above.
The electrolysis of aluminum from aluminum sulfide is carried out in a two electrode system. A schematic view of the experimental cell is depicted in Figure 2. The cathode is a pool of molten aluminum (1) (effective area 8.1 cm2), which is polarized by a graphite block (2) connected by a rod of stainless steel (3) shielded by a quartz tube (4). The anode is constructed of a graphite block (5) of 1 cm2, 5 cm high, which is immersed 2 cm into the electrolyte and is connected by a stainless steel rod (7) . The interelectrode gap is 2 cm. The anode acts as the reference electrode, thus the cell potential is measured during the electrolysis. The electrochemical cell is constructed of sintered A1203 (Alsint) walls (10). The melt is protected by an inert Ar atmosphere. Argon is introduced through inlet (8) and leaves the cell through outlet (9). The cell is externally heated by a 2100W cylindrical furnace equipped with heating elements (not shown). The maximum operating temperature is 1400 °C. The temperature is measured and controlled by type S thermocouples and a control unit (not shown).
The potential is measured with a potentiostat/galvanostat, which was used in combination with a current booster, to enable a high current throughput (20 A range). The electrochemical measurement system is fully computer controlled.
Tests as described below were carried out with a MgCl2-NaCl-KCl mixture, but the results also apply to a NaCl-KCl mixture.
All chemicals were stored and handled in a glove box, having an argon atmosphere (< 1 ppm H20, 02). KC1, NaCl and NaF were of pro analysis quality. Anhydrous MgCl2 (98 %), A12S3 (98 %) and Na3AlF6 (98 %) were commercially obtained from a supplier. The chloride electrolyte mixture was composed and put in a container in the glove box. This container was then taken out of the glove box and heated to 450 °C while purging HCI gas through the solids and subsequently through the melt to remove all water and oxides. After cooling the container was put back into the glove box. The A12S3 and additives were added at room temperature in the glove box. The electrolysis cell was assembled in the glove box, closed, then transported to the furnace where an Ar flow prevented contact with air. An overview of the salt mixtures used for the experimental program discussed in this paper is given in the table below.
Overview of Experimental Program of the electrolysis of
Al from A12S3 in a MgCl2-NaCl-KCl Electrolyte of 50-30-
20 mole% at 725 °C.
AI2S3 Amount of flux
Exp. Flux
(wt.%) (wt.%)
A 4 - -
B 4 - -
C 4 Na3AlF6 10
D 10 Na3AlF6 10
E 4 Na3AlF6 5
F 4 Na3AlF6 15
G 4 Na3AlF6 20
H 4 Na3AlF6 30
K 4 NaF 10
L 4 NaF 30
Figure 3 shows the major improvement of the electrolysis performance, because of the addition of Na3AlF6. When adding 10 wt.% of Na3AlF6s the electrolyte composition changes to a quaternary mixture of 48-29-19-4 mole% of MgCl -NaCl- KCl-Na3AlF6. The current density is more than 3 times larger at a given cell potential. By linear extrapolation it has been determined that E - 0.98 V, which equals the theoretical decomposition potential. This is another indication, that the process is ohmically limited rather than diffusion controlled. The Nernst equation indicates that the activity of A12S3 in a melt with cryolite addition approaches unity. Further increase of the A12S3 concentration in the melt did not produce a significant effect (compare experiments C and D).
Figure 4 depicts a graph showing the influence of the amount of cryolite added to the melt. There seems to be an optimum at about 10 wt.% cryolite addition.
Experimental work has been carried out in order to investigate whether the positive influence of cryolite on the performance of the electrowinning was caused by the amount fluoride added, or by increasing the amount of Al-ions in the electrolyte. Therefore, NaF was used as a fluxing agent. The addition of 10 wt.% NaF results in a melt composition of 42-25-17-16 mole% MgCl2-NaCl-KCl-NaF composition. On an elemental basis, the amount of F in the electrolyte is comparable to the cryolite melt, i.e. 6.4 and 7.6 mole% F respectively. Figure 5 depicts the results of those experiments. Increasing the amount of NaF to 30 wt.% shows a deteriorating cell performance, which again is in agreement with the results of cryolite additions.
The linear current density-cell potential relationships observed from Figure 3 to Figure 5 indicate that the electrolysis process with these high concentrations of dissolved A12S3 is no longer diffusion controlled, but shows ohmic limitations. Then, an increased solubility of A12S3 would not result in a substantial enhancement of the cell performance. This is supported by the experimental results. It is assumed that the addition of Na3AlF6 to the melt has a positive effect on the solubility of A12S3. Therefore, the amount of A12S3 added to the quaternary mixture was increased from 4% to 10%) (Exp. C and D in Figure 3). However, this did not improve the cell performance significantly, indicating that diffusion is not the rate limiting step with these relatively high concentrations of A12S3 employed.
At first sight, it can be argued that because of the ohmic control of the process, increasing the conductivity of the melt should result in an increased current density. Since cryolite has a higher conductivity than the chloride eutectic, a better performance is at least to some extent the result of the increased conductivity. When adding 10 wt.% of Na3AlF6, the electrolyte composition changes to a quaternary mixture of 48-29-19-4 mole% of MgCl2-NaCl-KCl-Na3AlF6, which can have significantly different properties. However, the slope of the linear relationship increased by almost a factor 3 when cryolite was added, which cannot be attributed to the increased conductivity of the melt only. Furthermore, although the specific conductivity of NaF is the highest of all components, i.e. 4.2 Ω^-cm"1 at 725 °C, the effect of adding NaF is less pronounced.
As cryolite and NaF additions produce similar effects, it can be argued that the amount of fluoride contributes to the positive effect on the electrolysis process, resulting from a higher activity of AlFn m" than A1S+ species. Also, when complexing of
Al with F is favoured over complexing with S, the concentration of S-ions is higher when fluoride is added, favoring the anodic reaction. As described earlier, the major benefit of fluoride additions was found to be an increase in conductivity of the melt, which is most favourably explained in terms of a reduced coverage of the anode by a sulfur gas bubbles layer.

Claims

1. Process for the electrolysis of A12S3, using a bath of molten salt, preferably a bath of molten chloride salt, in which A1 S3 is dissolved characterised in that measures are taken to improve the electrical conductivity of the bath, so as to enable an increase in the current density in the bath.
2. Process according to claim 1 characterised in that the measures comprise adding an additive to the bath.
3. Process according to claim 2 characterised in that the additive comprises, preferably mainly consists of a fluoride compound.
4. Process according to claim 3 characterised in that the fluoride compound is cryolite.
5. Process according to claim 4 characterised in that the concentration of the cryolite is in the range of 5 - 30 wt%, preferably 7 - 15 wt%, more preferably about 10 wt%.
6. Process according to any of the preceding claims characterised in that the measures comprise enhancing the effective area of an anode extending into the bath by reducing the amount and/or size of gas bubbles covering the anode.
7. Process according to any of the preceding claims characterised in that the bath of molten salt mainly comprises alkali metal chlorides, preferably KC1 and NaCl.
8. Process according to any of the preceding claims characterised in that the bath of molten metal is substantially free of earth alkaline chlorides.
9. Process according to any of the preceding claims characterised in that the electrolysis is carried out at a bath temperature of between 600°C and 850 °C, preferably between 700 °C and 800 °C.
10. Process according to any of the preceding claims characterised in that the electrolysis is carried out in a multi-polar electrolysis cell.
PCT/EP2004/003625 2003-03-31 2004-03-31 Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide WO2004088000A2 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006505009A JP4975431B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2004-03-31 Electrolysis method of aluminum sulfide
MXPA05009114A MXPA05009114A (en) 2004-03-31 2004-03-31 Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide.
AU2004225794A AU2004225794B8 (en) 2003-03-31 2004-03-31 Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide
US10/550,678 US20080202939A1 (en) 2003-03-31 2004-03-31 Process For the Electrolysis of Aluminiumsulfide
EP04724605A EP1625245A2 (en) 2003-03-31 2004-03-31 Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide
CA002520798A CA2520798C (en) 2003-03-31 2004-03-31 Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide
NO20055027A NO20055027L (en) 2003-03-31 2005-10-28 Process for electrolysis of aluminum sulfide

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP03075948.4 2003-03-31
EP03075948 2003-03-31

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004088000A2 true WO2004088000A2 (en) 2004-10-14
WO2004088000A3 WO2004088000A3 (en) 2005-01-13

Family

ID=33104133

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2004/003625 WO2004088000A2 (en) 2003-03-31 2004-03-31 Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US20080202939A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1625245A2 (en)
JP (1) JP4975431B2 (en)
AU (1) AU2004225794B8 (en)
CA (1) CA2520798C (en)
NO (1) NO20055027L (en)
RU (1) RU2341591C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2004088000A2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006103085A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 Aleris Aluminum Koblenz Gmbh Method and apparatus for the production of aluminium
US7867373B2 (en) 2005-04-01 2011-01-11 Aleris Aluminum Koblenz Gmbh Method and apparatus for the production of aluminum

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101290586B1 (en) * 2012-04-25 2013-07-30 한국수력원자력 주식회사 Decontamination method of cladding hull wastes generated from spent nuclear fuel and apparatus thereof
JP2014237873A (en) * 2013-06-07 2014-12-18 住友電気工業株式会社 Method for producing molten salt, molten salt, and method for producing aluminum
AU2013393889A1 (en) 2013-07-09 2016-02-04 Obshestvo S Ogranichennoy Otvetstvennost'yu Otvetstvennostyu "Obedinennaya Kompaniya Rusal Inzhenerno-Tekhnologicheskiy Tsentr" Electrolyte for producing aluminum by molten electrolysis
WO2019094921A1 (en) * 2017-11-13 2019-05-16 Chromalox, Inc. Medium voltage molten salt heater and molten salt thermal energy storage system including same

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB484014A (en) * 1936-12-04 1938-04-29 Daniel Gardner Improvements in or relating to electrolytic processes for the manufacture of aluminium
US4265716A (en) * 1979-06-14 1981-05-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method of winning aluminum metal from aluminous ore
US4464234A (en) * 1982-04-01 1984-08-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Production of aluminum metal by electrolysis of aluminum sulfide
DE3412114A1 (en) * 1984-03-31 1985-10-10 Brown, Boveri & Cie Ag, 6800 Mannheim Process for producing aluminium

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2939824A (en) * 1957-07-26 1960-06-07 Kaiser Aluminium Chem Corp Method and apparatus for the production of aluminum
US4133727A (en) * 1977-05-17 1979-01-09 Aluminum Company Of America Method for extracting heat from a chamber containing a molten salt
JPS54114410A (en) * 1978-02-27 1979-09-06 Shirou Yoshizawa Production of metal aluminium
CA2355662C (en) * 1998-12-18 2006-07-25 Heiko Sportel Method and apparatus for the production of aluminium from alumina ore by aluminium-sulfide process

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB484014A (en) * 1936-12-04 1938-04-29 Daniel Gardner Improvements in or relating to electrolytic processes for the manufacture of aluminium
US4265716A (en) * 1979-06-14 1981-05-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method of winning aluminum metal from aluminous ore
US4464234A (en) * 1982-04-01 1984-08-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Production of aluminum metal by electrolysis of aluminum sulfide
DE3412114A1 (en) * 1984-03-31 1985-10-10 Brown, Boveri & Cie Ag, 6800 Mannheim Process for producing aluminium

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006103085A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 Aleris Aluminum Koblenz Gmbh Method and apparatus for the production of aluminium
US7867373B2 (en) 2005-04-01 2011-01-11 Aleris Aluminum Koblenz Gmbh Method and apparatus for the production of aluminum

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2004225794B8 (en) 2009-10-22
JP4975431B2 (en) 2012-07-11
CA2520798C (en) 2009-06-16
AU2004225794A8 (en) 2009-10-22
AU2004225794A1 (en) 2004-10-14
NO20055027L (en) 2005-10-28
WO2004088000A3 (en) 2005-01-13
RU2005133440A (en) 2006-06-10
CA2520798A1 (en) 2004-10-14
JP2006522220A (en) 2006-09-28
AU2004225794B2 (en) 2009-08-20
EP1625245A2 (en) 2006-02-15
US20080202939A1 (en) 2008-08-28
RU2341591C2 (en) 2008-12-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1215935A (en) Method of producing metals by cathodic dissolution of their compounds in electrolytic cells
AU758931B2 (en) Removal of oxygen from metal oxides and solid solutions by electrolysis in a fused salt
KR101684813B1 (en) Electrolysis tank used for aluminum electrolysis and electrolysis process using the electrolyzer
EA011110B1 (en) Method for producing metal by molten salt electrolysis and method for producing metal titanium
US5725744A (en) Cell for the electrolysis of alumina at low temperatures
JP3718691B2 (en) Titanium production method, pure metal production method, and pure metal production apparatus
CA2917342A1 (en) Electrolyte for obtaining melts using an aluminum electrolyzer
AU2004225794B2 (en) Process for the electrolysis of aluminiumsulfide
JP4763169B2 (en) Method for producing metallic lithium
Kekesi Electrorefining in aqueous chloride media for recovering tin from waste materials
US20040237710A1 (en) Electrolytic reducion of metal oxides
CN101386996B (en) High conductivity low-temperature electrolytes for aluminum electrolysis and use method thereof
KR101801453B1 (en) Electrolyte used for aluminum electrolysis and electrolysis process using the electrolyte
Sleppy et al. Bench scale electrolysis of alumina in sodium fluoride-Aluminum fluoride melts below 900 C
CN115305507A (en) Method for producing metal aluminum by electrolyzing aluminum oxide through molten salt
RU2771049C2 (en) Electrolytic production of chemically active metals from metal-oxide raw materials containing oxide of target chemically active metal by electrolysis in molten oxide electrolyte
Feldhaus et al. Influence of LiF on the synthesis of the neodymium & praseodymium molten salt electrolysis
WO2010003906A1 (en) Process for the production of copper from sulphide compounds
Lukasko et al. Electrolytic production of calcium metal
US6428675B1 (en) Low temperature aluminum production
JP7084696B2 (en) Metal manufacturing method and sponge titanium manufacturing method
JP2004360025A (en) Method for manufacturing metallic titanium with direct electrolysis method
CA1114769A (en) Process for electrolytically producing aluminum
JP2024005000A (en) Bipolar electrode, molten salt electrolysis apparatus, and method for manufacturing magnesium metal
Freidina et al. Synthesis of Pb-Ca alloys by electrolysis of CaO solution in molten salt

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DPEN Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2004724605

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2004225794

Country of ref document: AU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2520798

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006505009

Country of ref document: JP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2004225794

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20040331

Kind code of ref document: A

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2004225794

Country of ref document: AU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2005133440

Country of ref document: RU

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2004724605

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10550678

Country of ref document: US