WO2023171197A1 - Système de gestion de production, procédé de gestion de production, et programme de gestion de production - Google Patents

Système de gestion de production, procédé de gestion de production, et programme de gestion de production Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023171197A1
WO2023171197A1 PCT/JP2023/003843 JP2023003843W WO2023171197A1 WO 2023171197 A1 WO2023171197 A1 WO 2023171197A1 JP 2023003843 W JP2023003843 W JP 2023003843W WO 2023171197 A1 WO2023171197 A1 WO 2023171197A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
change
index
factor
information
production
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2023/003843
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
弘之 森
真由子 田中
Original Assignee
オムロン株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by オムロン株式会社 filed Critical オムロン株式会社
Publication of WO2023171197A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023171197A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05K—PRINTED CIRCUITS; CASINGS OR CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OF ELECTRIC APPARATUS; MANUFACTURE OF ASSEMBLAGES OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS
    • H05K13/00—Apparatus or processes specially adapted for manufacturing or adjusting assemblages of electric components
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a production management system, a production management method, and a production management program that manage production on a product production line.
  • product inspection equipment is placed in intermediate and final processes of the line to detect defects and sort out defective products.
  • a production line for component mounting boards there is generally a device that prints cream solder on printed wiring boards (printing device), a device that mounts components on the board printed with cream solder (mounting device), and a device that mounts components on the board printed with cream solder.
  • an inspection device placed after each production device inspects whether the work in each device is being performed correctly as planned.
  • a production management system is in operation that collects information from each manufacturing device and inspection device and comprehensively manages defect rates, production volume, etc., which improves the productivity of the entire production line. Contributing to improvement.
  • the present invention was made in view of the above circumstances, and its purpose is to provide a technology that makes it possible to more efficiently improve the quality and productivity of a production line.
  • the present invention for solving the above-mentioned problems has a production line that has a single or plural manufacturing equipment and inspection equipment, and in which a product manufacturing process and an inspection process are performed by the manufacturing equipment and the inspection equipment.
  • a production management system relating to, a change detection unit that detects a change in a predetermined factor related to the manufacturing process and/or the inspection process; an index change acquisition unit that acquires a change in an index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process before and after the change in the factor detected by the change detection unit; an information generation unit that generates information indicating a relationship between a change in the factor and the index based on the change in the index acquired by the index change acquisition unit;
  • This is a production management system that is characterized by comprising:
  • the changes in the predetermined factors include planned changes that are carried out in a planned manner and other changes,
  • the information generated by the information generation unit and indicating the relationship between the change in the factor and the index may include information as to whether the change in the factor is the planned change
  • the change in a predetermined factor related to the manufacturing process and/or the inspection process detected by the change detection section may be a change in inspection conditions.
  • the indicators related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process are numerical values such as the false judgment rate and direct delivery rate, which are calculated based on the inspection results of the board or parts in a predetermined period, and are based on changes in the factors described above.
  • the relationship with the index may be an increase or decrease in a numerical value calculated based on the inspection results of the board or component based on the 4M change.
  • the manufacturing process and/or the testing process refers to at least one of the manufacturing process and the testing process. The same applies to “productivity and/or manufacturing quality" and similar expressions below.
  • information on a change in the predetermined factor detected by the change detection unit information on a change in the index acquired by the indicator change acquisition unit, and a relationship between the change in the factor and the index are provided. It is also possible to further include a database unit that stores and accumulates the information in association with the information indicating the information.
  • information on a change in the predetermined factor detected by the change detection unit information on a change in the index acquired by the indicator change acquisition unit, and a relationship between the change in the factor and the index are provided. It is also possible to further include an output unit that outputs the information in association with the information indicating the information. According to this, it is possible to report findings on how planned or accidental changes to manufacturing processes and inspection processes, as well as unplanned changes, affect productivity and manufacturing quality in manufacturing processes. , it is possible to share within the organization more reliably.
  • the change in the predetermined factor is a 4M change in the manufacturing process
  • the index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process is a numerical value calculated based on the number of defects or the number of defects in a predetermined period
  • the relationship between the change in the factor and the index may be an increase or decrease in the number of defects or a numerical value calculated based on the number of defects based on the 4M change.
  • the index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process is a numerical value indicating the production amount or production speed calculated based on the production number or production time in a predetermined period, and is a numerical value indicating the production amount or production speed, and The relationship with the index may be an increase or decrease in numerical values indicating production volume or production speed based on the 4M change. Examples of numerical values indicating the above-mentioned production amount and production speed include the number of products produced per unit time or the average time required for production per product.
  • the index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process is a numerical value indicating productivity and quality calculated based on the number of products produced and the number of defects in a predetermined period, and changes in the factors and the index The relationship may be an increase or decrease in numerical values indicating productivity and quality based on the 4M change.
  • the numerical value indicating the productivity and quality mentioned above for example, OEE (Overall Equipment Efficiency) can be exemplified.
  • the index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process is a numerical value that is calculated based on the measured value of product quality and indicates process capability such as not being defective, but close to defective, or not close to defective.
  • the relationship between the change in the factor and the index may be an increase or decrease in the numerical value indicating the process capability based on the 4M change. Examples of numerical values indicating this process capability include Cpk and Cp (process capability index).
  • the index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process is calculated based on or at least one of the number of defects, process capacity, production volume, and production speed in a predetermined period. is a numerical value
  • the relationship between the change in the factors and the index may be an increase or decrease in at least one of the number of defects, process capacity, production volume, and production speed based on the 4M change, or a numerical value calculated based on them. . According to this, it is possible to more reliably understand the impact of 4M changes in the manufacturing process on quality, such as the number of defects, defective rate, and process capacity, and the impact on productivity, such as production volume and production speed. It is possible.
  • information indicating a relationship between a change in the factor and the index newly generated by the information generation unit an information confirmation unit that acquires a relationship between a change in the factor and information that has been generated in the past by the information generation unit in response to a change in the same factor and indicates a relationship between a change in the same factor and the index; It is also possible to prepare further.
  • the present disclosure also provides a production control method relating to a production line that includes a single or multiple manufacturing device and inspection device, and in which a product manufacturing process and an inspection process are performed by the manufacturing device and inspection device, a change detection step of detecting a change in a predetermined factor related to the manufacturing process and/or the inspection process; an index change acquisition step of acquiring a change in an index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process before and after the change in the factor detected in the change detection step; an information generation step of generating information indicating a relationship between the change in the factor and the index from the change in the index acquired in the index change acquisition step; It may be a production control method characterized by having the following.
  • the change in the predetermined factor includes a planned change that is carried out in a planned manner and a change other than that
  • the information generated in the information generation step and indicating the relationship between the change in the factor and the index is characterized in that it includes information as to whether the change in the factor is the planned change or another change.
  • the above production control method may be used.
  • the present disclosure also provides information on a change in the predetermined factor detected in the change detection step, information on a change in the index acquired in the index change acquisition step, and information on a change in the factor and the index.
  • the production management method described above may further include a database creation step of storing and accumulating the information in association with the information indicating the relationship.
  • the present disclosure also provides information on a change in the predetermined factor detected in the change detection step, information on a change in the index acquired in the index change acquisition step, and information on a change in the factor and the index.
  • the production management method described above may further include an output step of correlating and outputting information indicating a relationship.
  • the change in the predetermined factor is a so-called 4M change in the manufacturing process
  • the index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process is at least one of the number of defects, process capacity, production volume, and production speed in a predetermined period, or a numerical value calculated based on them
  • the relationship between the change in the factors and the index is an increase or decrease in at least one of the number of defects, process capacity, production volume, and production speed, or a numerical value calculated based on them, based on the 4M change.
  • the above production control method may be characterized in that:
  • the present disclosure also provides information indicating a relationship between a change in the factor newly generated in the information generation step and the index; an information confirmation step of acquiring the relationship between the change in the factor and information that has been generated in the past in the information generation step and indicates the relationship between the change in the same factor and the index;
  • the above production control method may further include the following.
  • a production management program relating to a production line that has a single or multiple manufacturing equipment and inspection equipment, and executes a product manufacturing process and an inspection process using the manufacturing equipment and inspection equipment, a change detection step of causing a computer to detect a change in a predetermined factor related to the manufacturing process and/or the inspection process; an index change acquisition step of acquiring a change in an index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process before and after the change in the factor detected in the change detection step; an information generation step of generating information indicating a relationship between the change in the factor and the index from the change in the index acquired in the index change acquisition step; It may be a production management program characterized by causing the execution of the following.
  • the change in the predetermined factor includes a planned change that is carried out in a planned manner and other changes
  • the information generated in the information generation step and indicating the relationship between the change in the factor and the index includes information as to whether the change in the factor is the planned change or another change. , or the above-mentioned production management program.
  • the quality and productivity of the production line can be improved more efficiently.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a production management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a production management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining planned change information and accidental change information when operating a production line according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • 1 is a diagram showing features of a production management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • 1 is a flowchart of processing in the entire production management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • 5 is a flowchart of a data accumulation process and a case accumulation process according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • 2 is a detailed flowchart of a knowledge extraction process and a process for setting narrowing conditions according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a process for continuous evaluation of knowledge according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • 1 is a flowchart of a process for continuing evaluation of knowledge according to an embodiment of the present invention. It is a figure which shows the example of the report of a fluctuation
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a table in which cases are extracted and listed according to an embodiment of the present invention. It is a figure which shows the example of the table which extracts and lists the cases based on the Example of this invention, and is further narrowed down. It is a figure which shows the example of the table which extracts and lists the cases based on the Example of this invention, and is further narrowed down.
  • a production line 10 to which the present invention is applied includes a solder printing device 10a, a solder printing post-inspection device 10b, a mounter 10c, a post-mounting inspection device 10d, a reflow oven 10e, and a post-reflow inspection device 10f.
  • Each device in the production line 10 is connected to a mounting machine server 1c, an inspection machine server 1e, and a line management server 1a via a network such as a LAN.
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic block diagram of the production management system 1 according to this embodiment.
  • the production management system 1 includes a control unit 11b for managing information on the influence of the 4M change on the production line 10 on the quality or productivity of the production line 10.
  • the control unit 11c also includes a database unit 11c that stores information generated by the control unit 11b regarding the influence of 4M changes on the production line 10 on the quality or productivity of the production line 10 in a database.
  • the control unit 11b further includes a change detection unit 110a, an index change acquisition unit 110b, and an information generation unit 110c as functional modules.
  • the change detection unit 110a detects changes in the manufacturing process and inspection process in the production line 10 during a specified period.
  • the index change acquisition unit 110b acquires changes in the number of defects, defective rate, etc. before and after the changes related to the manufacturing process and inspection process.
  • the information generation unit 110c generates changes in the manufacturing process and inspection process based on the change information detected by the change detection unit 110b and changes in the number of defects, defective rate, etc. acquired by the index change acquisition unit. and information indicating the relationship between changes in indicators such as the number of defectives and defective rate.
  • This application example starts with a change in the cause, accumulates examples of its effects, and converts it into knowledge.
  • planned changes such as work (setup changes, parameter changes) based on production plans, work standards, and instructions for improvement, or work that naturally occurs in the progress of production (replacement when parts are out of stock ⁇ parts lot changes) ) or fluctuations that occur within the production equipment (vacuum pressure, temperature, etc.).
  • data is used to confirm improvement/deterioration/no change in quality, improvement/deterioration/no change in productivity, and improvement/deterioration/no change in cost.
  • a production management system 1 includes, for example, a production line 10 as shown in FIG. 1, and performs production management of this production line 10.
  • the production line 10 in FIG. 1 is a surface mounting line for printed circuit boards.
  • the production line 10 according to the present embodiment includes, in order from the upstream side, a solder printing device 10a, a post-solder printing inspection device 10b, a mounter 10c, a post-mount inspection device 10d, a reflow oven 10e, and a solder post-printing inspection device 10d.
  • An inspection device 10f is provided.
  • the solder printing device 10a is a device that prints solder paste for electrode parts on a printed circuit board.
  • the mounter 10c is a device for placing a large number of electronic components to be mounted on a printed circuit board onto solder paste.
  • the reflow oven 10e is a heating device for soldering electronic components placed on a printed circuit board to printed wiring on the board.
  • the post-solder printing inspection device 10b, the post-mount inspection device 10d, and the post-reflow inspection device 10f inspect the condition of the printed circuit board at the exit of each process, and automatically detect defects or potential defects.
  • the solder printing device 10a, mounter 10c, and reflow oven 10e (hereinafter also collectively referred to as manufacturing devices) described above are connected to the mounting machine server 1c via a network such as a LAN.
  • a maintenance device 1g for maintaining the manufacturing device is connected to this mounting machine server 1c.
  • the solder printing post-inspection device 10b, the post-mount inspection device 10d, and the post-reflow inspection device 10f (hereinafter also collectively referred to as inspection devices) are connected to the inspection machine server 1e via a network.
  • the mounting machine server 1c and the inspection machine server 1e are further connected to a line management server 1a, which is a server that collectively manages the production line 10.
  • the line management server 1a, the mounting machine server 1c, and the inspection machine server 1e are composed of general-purpose computer systems equipped with a CPU (processor), a main storage device (memory), an auxiliary storage device (hard disk, etc.), and the like. Ru. Note that a line manager terminal 1b operated by a line manager and a work instruction/work record terminal 1f operated by a worker are connected to the line management server 1a.
  • the line manager terminal 1b is equipped with an application for checking and analyzing the situation.
  • the work instruction/work record terminal 1f is equipped with a work instruction/record application.
  • a terminal 1d for a mounting machine staff operated by a mounting machine staff is connected to the mounting machine server 1c.
  • the mounting machine personnel terminal 1d is equipped with a mounting program creation application.
  • the line manager's terminal 1b, the mounting machine person's terminal 1d, and the work instruction/work record terminal 1f are equipped with input devices (keyboard, mouse, controller, touch panel, etc.), output devices (display, printer, speakers, etc.) as appropriate. , equipped.
  • a production management system 1 includes these entire systems. In the production management system 1 described above, various parameters related to the production of the production line 10 are determined, and variations in these parameters affect the quality and productivity of the production line 10. Therefore, the production management system 1 manages these parameters while constantly changing them appropriately.
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic block diagram of the production management system 1 according to this embodiment.
  • the production management system 1 includes a data acquisition unit 11a that receives data from each manufacturing device and each inspection device on the production line 10.
  • the control unit 11b also includes a control unit 11b for managing information on the influence of the 4M change on the production line 10 on the quality or productivity of the production line 10 based on the data acquired by the data acquisition unit 11a.
  • the database unit 11c also includes a database unit 11c that stores data acquired by the data acquisition unit 11a and information generated by the control unit 11b regarding the influence of the 4M change on the production line 10 on the quality or productivity of the production line 10.
  • the control unit 11b further includes a change detection unit 110a, an index change acquisition unit 110b, and an information generation unit 110c as functional modules.
  • Each functional module is realized, for example, by a CPU (not shown) reading and executing a program stored in a database unit 11c having an information storage function.
  • the 4M changes mentioned above are changes related to people, machines (equipment), methods, materials, and measurements in the manufacturing process or inspection process, and include planned changes and accidental changes. In addition to physical changes, the meaning includes all changes that occur in the manufacturing process or inspection process, such as changes in conditions and parameters.
  • the change detection unit 110a detects changes related to manufacturing processes and inspection processes in the production line 10, mainly 4M changes that occur intentionally or accidentally, during a specified period.
  • the index change acquisition unit 110b obtains indicators related to productivity and manufacturing quality before and after the changes related to the manufacturing process and inspection process, based on the data from each manufacturing device and each inspection device acquired by the data acquisition unit 11a. Changes in the number of defects, defective rate, etc. are obtained.
  • the information generation unit 110c generates changes in the manufacturing process and inspection process based on the change information detected by the change detection unit 110b and changes in the number of defects, defective rate, etc. acquired by the index change acquisition unit. and information indicating the relationship between changes in indicators such as the number of defectives and defective rate.
  • planned change information refers to information for work that is studied in advance and systematically implemented to improve the quality and productivity of the production line 10 when producing a predetermined product.
  • This information is information that is known in advance to the line manager. For example, when executing a component mounting program for a printed circuit board that is a product, work such as changing the type of nozzle or feeder used for a specific component number, or changing the mounting conditions for a specific component number. Then, the mounting program in the mounting machine server 1c is changed. Further, for example, when a nozzle, feeder, head, etc. are removed from the mounter 10c and taken to the maintenance device 1g to perform regular maintenance, the information is sent from the maintenance device 1g to the mounting machine server 1c.
  • accidental change information refers to information related to work that is not planned and is performed depending on the situation. From the line manager's perspective, this information is a task that cannot be grasped because it is neither planned nor reported one by one. Regarding this, for example, when checking a nozzle with many defects, the nozzle is clogged, or when checking a feeder with many mounting errors, the feeder is distorted.
  • the information is sent to the mounting machine server 1c or the line management server 1a.
  • the person in charge of the mounting machine performs tasks such as replacing the reel when a component runs out, replacing the feeder when a number of defects occur, or temporarily changing mounting conditions when a number of mounting errors occur, that information may be transferred to the mounter. 10c to the mounting machine server 1c.
  • mounter 10c that automatically switches to a spare feeder when a component runs out, and in this case, change information is automatically sent to the mounting machine server 1c without any work.
  • Nozzle replacement The scope of influence is that each of the nozzle ID before replacement and the nozzle ID after replacement is a component (1-2) Change in mounting parameters of part part number: Impact The scope is the entire part before and after the changed part number (1-3) Changes in the nozzle or feeder model assigned to the part number: The affected range is the part number (including the combination of the part number and nozzle or feeder model) good) (1-4) Implementation of mask cleaning: The scope of influence is likely to be the entire part before and after the changed part number.
  • the mounter program should be changed to Rev. A to Rev. B (assignment change). Then, when determining the effect of this feeder change, the mounter program Rev. A to Rev. A method of comparing components C1 and C2 before being changed to B (allocation change) and components C1 and C2 after the allocation change, and components C1 and C2 mounted on Feeder A and component C1 mounted on Feeder B. It is conceivable to compare it with C2.
  • nozzle and feeder specifications As information accompanying the change information, nozzle and feeder specifications, component part numbers, component libraries, and component types and sizes may be linked and managed. Further, in order to have an overview of the entire production process, each change may be managed in association with changes in quality, productivity, and cost at the time of occurrence. Further, by extracting and reporting common points between changes that improve the quality and productivity of the production line and incidental information, it may be possible to contribute to the work of changing production rules. In this case, the target of the report is the creator of production rules and work standards. Degrading changes may also be reported as well. This makes it possible to clarify tasks that should not be performed. In addition, the basis for improvement and deterioration should be clarified by showing correlation coefficients, etc. The itemization of this embodiment is that hidden know-how can be clarified and the entire process can be improved. Another point is that the entire process can be improved by improving unseen deteriorating factors.
  • the production rules may be changed based on the knowledge obtained in this example.
  • Specific production rules include selection of nozzles and feeders for parts, image processing methods for parts (determining which nozzles to use for parts of the same shape, etc.), and maintenance intervals (such as determining quality between the previous maintenance and the next maintenance). comparison).
  • there are tasks that should be improved (method of attaching the component reel to the feeder) and tasks that should be done (replacing the feeder and resetting incorrect learning of the suction position).
  • the points of change are found, and the results are confirmed and accumulated.
  • a recommended new production rule may be presented based on a comparison before and after the change. In that case, we will indicate recommended production conditions and data (number of improvements/number of cases, etc.) (for example, it is recommended to use this nozzle for 1608 chip resistors).
  • the starting point was the result, such as a decline in quality, and only intentional (planned) changes were considered as the cause.
  • a change in the result is used as a starting point to identify and correct the cause, or a change in the cause is used as a starting point to check whether there is a change in the result. They then identified the common causes of good or bad results and turned it into know-how.
  • this embodiment is characterized by starting from a change in the cause, accumulating examples of its effects, and turning it into knowledge.
  • planned changes such as work (setup changes, parameter changes) based on production plans, work standards, and instructions for improvement, or work that naturally occurs in the progress of production (replacement when parts are out of stock ⁇ parts lot changes) ) or fluctuations that occur within the production equipment (vacuum pressure, temperature, etc.).
  • data is used to confirm improvement/deterioration/no change in quality, improvement/deterioration/no change in productivity, and improvement/deterioration/no change in cost.
  • step S101 to step S111 is performed by the line management server 1a, and the processing from step S112 to step S119 is performed by the situation confirmation/analysis application on the line manager terminal 1b.
  • step S101 of this flow newly arrived data regarding mounting, inspection, and changes is confirmed.
  • step S102 mounting/inspection/change data is collected, and in step S103, the mounting/inspection/change data is saved.
  • step S104 defects and mounting errors are totaled and stored for each time period or for each predetermined range.
  • step S105 it is determined whether there is a change in the mounting/inspection/change data. If it is determined in step S105 that there is a change, the process advances to step S106. On the other hand, if it is determined in step S105 that there is no change, the process returns to step S101.
  • step S106 the influence range (data collection range) of the change is specified based on the content of the change.
  • step S107 the defect/mounting error tally results before and after the change are obtained for the affected range specified in step S106.
  • step S108 a determination is made as to whether the defects or mounting errors are improving or worsening.
  • step S109 the improvement/deterioration determination results for defects/mounting errors are saved.
  • step S110 it is determined whether the improvement/deterioration determination result of defects/mounting errors obtained in step S108 meets the notification conditions. If it is determined in step S110 that the facility conditions are not met (negative determination), the process returns to step S101. On the other hand, if it is determined that the notification conditions are met, the process proceeds to step S111, and notification of improvement or deterioration of the defect/mounting error is made.
  • step S112 a notification of improvement or deterioration of defects or mounting errors is received in the situation confirmation/analysis application of the line manager terminal 1b.
  • step S113 a regular timing occurs other than the timing at which the defect/mounting error improvement/deterioration notification is received. Or something you want to investigate occurs.
  • step S114 a situation confirmation/analysis application is opened.
  • step S115 improvement/deterioration status of defects/mounting errors is confirmed.
  • step S116 improvement/deterioration results when the same type of change occurs are collected.
  • step S117 a list of improvement and deterioration results in the same type of change is displayed.
  • step S118 common change points are extracted.
  • step S119 conditions for improvement are reported.
  • step S201 new mounting, inspection, and change data is confirmed.
  • step S202 data collection regarding mounting, inspection, and changes is performed.
  • step S203 mounting/inspection/change data is saved. This is repeated continuously. As long as production continues, data will continue to accumulate.
  • case accumulation is first started in step S301. Then, in step S302, change information within the target period is searched. In step S303, it is determined whether the change information is finished (whether all change information has been searched). If it is determined that the change information is not finished, the process advances to step S304.
  • step S304 the range of influence of the change (data collection range) is specified.
  • step S305 the total results of defects and mounting errors before and after the change are obtained.
  • step S306 it is determined whether the defect or mounting error is improved or worsened.
  • step S307 the improvement/deterioration determination results for defects/mounting errors are saved.
  • step S303 it is determined whether the change information is finished (whether all change information has been searched). If it is determined that the change information is finished, the process advances to step S308. In step S308, knowledge is extracted.
  • step S401 cases in the target period are read.
  • step S402 narrowing conditions are set.
  • conditions are set to narrow down the cases to be displayed based on conditions such as the subject of change and the details of the change, and select and display only the cases that the user wants to check.
  • step S403 cases are narrowed down based on the conditions set in step S402.
  • step S404 it is determined whether or not there are two or more cases whose results have improved due to changes among the narrowed down cases.
  • step S404 it is determined whether there are two or more improved cases. If it is determined in step S404 that the number of improved cases among the narrowed down cases is not two or more, the process returns to step S402. If it is determined that there are two or more improved cases among the cases narrowed down in step S404, the process advances to step S405.
  • step S405 it is determined whether the sum of the narrowed down cases is an improvement determination.
  • the narrowed down cases include a mixture of improved cases, worsened cases, or unchanged cases, it is determined whether improvement has been observed as the total value of those cases. If it is determined in step S405 that the total is not an improvement determination, the process returns to step S402. If it is determined in step S405 that the total is an improvement determination, the process advances to step S406. That is, if the total has improved, it is determined that there is an effect. In step S406, it is saved as knowledge of the improvement effect. In step S407, it is determined whether there is a next narrowing pattern. If it is determined that there is a next narrowing pattern, the process returns to step S402.
  • step S407 If it is determined in step S407 that there is no next narrowing pattern, the process advances to step S408.
  • step S408 the findings are written in a report. It may be possible to report only those cases where the improvement effect is greater than or equal to a predetermined value.
  • step S402 for setting narrowing conditions.
  • the loop of steps S501, S502, and steps S510 to S514 is a loop for setting conditions regarding the category to be changed.
  • the loop from step S503 to step S509 is a loop for setting conditions regarding the change content category.
  • step S501 one category to be changed is selected.
  • one category is selected from categories such as "change target,” "target name,” and "target attribute.”
  • step S502 one content is further selected from among the selected categories to be changed.
  • step S503 the cases are narrowed down and the change content category and its content are extracted.
  • change content categories such as “change content”, “before change”, and “after change” and their specific contents are extracted.
  • step S504 one content is selected from the changed content. Specifically, contents such as “nozzle model change” and “maintenance” are selected as the change contents.
  • step S505 the category to be changed is added to the narrowing down condition list.
  • step S506 one is selected from the contents before and after the change included in the selected change contents. For example, when the selected change content is "nozzle type change", content such as “nozzle diameter 0.5 mm" is selected as the "before change” content.
  • step S507 the selected change content, before change content, and after change content are added to the "change content narrowing condition list".
  • step S508 it is determined whether there is the following content before and after the change.
  • step S506 it is determined whether there is the next change content. If it is determined in step S509 that there is the next change content, the process returns to step S504. If it is determined in step S509 that there is no next change, the process advances to step S510. This creates a filtered list for the selected change target category.
  • step S510 a narrowing condition with the category to be changed is created.
  • step S511 the filtering conditions for the selected change target category are added to each condition of the "change content filtering condition list" and added to the "refining condition list”.
  • step S512 it is determined whether there is the next content of the selected change target category. In step S512, if it is determined that there is the next content of the selected change target category, the process returns to step S502.
  • step S512 if it is determined that there is no next content for the selected change target category, the process advances to step S513.
  • step S513 it is determined whether there is a next category to be changed.
  • step S513 if it is determined that there is the next category to be changed, the process returns to step S501. If it is determined in step S513 that there is no next category to be changed, the process advances to step S514.
  • step S514 the creation of the "narrowing down condition list" is completed.
  • step S601 new knowledge is extracted as described in step S308.
  • step S602 knowledge is added to the list.
  • step S603 past findings under the same conditions are extracted.
  • step S604 it is determined whether the new knowledge and the past knowledge under the same conditions match the determination of improvement or deterioration. If it is determined in step S604 that the determinations of improvement and deterioration match, the process advances to step S606. If it is determined in step S604 that the determinations of improvement and deterioration do not match, the process advances to step S605. In step S605, it is notified that a case contrary to past knowledge has occurred.
  • step S607 it is confirmed whether or not past knowledge is to be deleted. If it is determined in step S607 that past knowledge is to be deleted, the process advances to step S608. If it is determined in step S607 that past knowledge is to be maintained, the process advances to step S609. In step S608, past knowledge of the same conditions is deleted. In S609, knowledge of the same past conditions is maintained. Note that in step S606, which is proceeded to when it is determined in step S604 that the determinations of improvement and deterioration are consistent, it is notified that a case supported by past knowledge has occurred. When the processing in steps S606, S608, and S609 is completed, the process advances to step S610. In step S610, a command to proceed to the next knowledge extraction cycle is issued, and the process proceeds to step S601.
  • step S701 knowledge is extracted in step S701.
  • step S702 past findings under the same conditions are extracted.
  • step S703 cases that are the basis of past knowledge are extracted.
  • step S704 knowledge is extracted again including cases that are the basis of past knowledge.
  • step S705 it is determined whether the determinations of improvement and deterioration match. If it is determined in step S705 that the determinations of improvement and deterioration match, the process advances to step S706. If it is determined in step S705 that the determinations of improvement and deterioration do not match, the process advances to step S708.
  • step S706 it is notified that the past knowledge is still valid.
  • step S708 it is notified that the validity of past knowledge is questionable.
  • step S709 it is confirmed whether to change past knowledge. If it is determined in step S709 that past knowledge is to be changed, the process advances to step S710. On the other hand, if it is determined in step S709 that past knowledge is not to be changed, the process advances to step S712.
  • step S710 past knowledge is rewritten.
  • step S712 past knowledge is maintained and new knowledge is added.
  • the method for determining improvement/deterioration may be the same as (2).
  • the method for determining improvement/deterioration may be the same as (2).
  • the number of parts is insufficient, if the number of parts is insufficient before the change, no evaluation will be made. If there is a shortage after the change, the next evaluation will be performed if the number of parts is sufficient. You may decide to do so.
  • FIG. 10A is a table displaying change history. That is, this is an example of a report of change information, in which the upper row displays the number of times work execution has been completed for each device type, and the lower row displays a list of information on changes that have occurred. All device types may be displayed in a chronological list, or they may be displayed sorted by device type or work content.
  • FIG. 10B is a table showing the termization of changes. In this table, Up means worse (increase in error rate), Down means better (decreased error rate), and Stay means no change (no change).
  • StartToWorkDone indicates before the change
  • ToWorkDoneToEnd indicates after the change.
  • the actual defective rate in AOI after mounting due to changes (nozzle maintenance in this example), the actual defective rate in AOI after mounting increase, respectively, the number of parts that are Up, Down, Stay, and parts for which there is no data. The number of is shown. This makes it clear whether an improvement or deterioration was observed in the actual defect rate in the post-mount AOI and in the post-reflow AOI.
  • the actual defective rate in the AOI after mounting, the defective rate in the AOI after reflow, the recognition error rate, and the results of Up, Down, and Stay, respectively, are displayed.
  • FIG. 11 shows an example of a table in which cases are extracted and listed.
  • “change target” in “change target category” indicates to which target the 4M variation has occurred.
  • the "target name” is the component part number name if the "change target” is a part part number, if it is a nozzle ID, it is the name of the nozzle ID, and if it is a feeder ID, it is the name of the feeder ID.
  • the target attribute is a library name when the "change target" is a part number, and is the name of the library used for the change target. This library is defined for multiple product numbers with the same specifications and implementation conditions.
  • specifications such as size and color of the object to be changed may be used.
  • the attribute may be displayed using the nozzle diameter, which is the specification itself to be changed.
  • the attribute of the target may be defined, such as the width of the feeder.
  • the table shown in FIG. 11 describes the contents of changes for each part number
  • the contents of the library will be changed, and the program will be rewritten in accordance with the changes.
  • the change time is also stated.
  • changes in the number of parts, actual number of defectives, and actual defective rate before and after the change are described. You can use this table to get a bird's-eye view of improvement, deterioration, and no change, and then focus on any of the data to check more detailed information.
  • the entire data before and after the change for the corresponding working day is also listed.
  • part number COMP001 which is the change target in the top row in FIG. 11
  • This part indicates a capacitor (0.6 mm x 0.3 mm square chip) with part number COMP001, and its specifications and production conditions are defined by a library with part library name C0603.
  • this nozzle was changed from a diameter of 0.5 mm to a diameter of 0.7 mm, a change in the mounting conditions for the component with part number COMP001 occurred, and when comparing before and after the change, it was found that there was an effect of reducing actual defects.
  • FIG. 12 This is a table when the display contents of the table shown in FIG. 11 are further narrowed down by the "part part number" to be changed.
  • the display content may be narrowed down to "nozzle model change”
  • the nozzle diameter before the change may be narrowed down to "nozzle diameter 0.5 mm.”
  • Conditions can be narrowed down. As a result, 5 cases were extracted, of which 2 cases improved, 2 cases deteriorated, and 1 case remained unchanged. In this example, as a result of the total change in nozzle type, the effect of reducing actual defects remains unchanged before and after the change. Note that a general statistical method is used to determine whether the change in the calculated actual defective rate is significant, so the explanation will be omitted here.
  • the table shown in FIG. 13 is a diagram obtained by further narrowing down the table shown in FIG. 12.
  • changes made simultaneously to parts with part numbers COMP001, 004, and 005 whose target attribute is "C0603" (library name) are extracted.
  • the nozzle diameter was changed from 0.5 mm to 0.7 mm.
  • three cases were extracted. Of these, two cases improved, one case worsened, and multiple cases improved. In this case, the result was that the actual defective rate improved before and after the change for all extracted cases.
  • the change target has the same "target attribute" as the extracted case.
  • the change content category the contents of "change content”, "before change”, and “after change” are the same. After this, the extraction conditions are relaxed and confirmed, and if the results are effective under broader conditions (conditions with a large number of extracted items), the findings can be made effective over a wider range.
  • FIG. 14 cases are extracted in which the "change target" corresponds to the nozzle ID and the "change content" corresponds to maintenance.
  • three cases are extracted, and three cases are improved.
  • the overall actual defect rate has also improved.
  • FIGS. 15A and 15B will be explained.
  • the "change target" is the feeder ID and the "change content” is reel exchange.
  • 3 cases were extracted, 2 cases of deterioration and 1 case of no change.
  • things were getting worse.
  • cases are extracted where the "change target" is the feeder ID and the "change content” is reel set state correction.
  • two cases are extracted. There were two cases where the condition improved. Overall, things are improving. There are also multiple cases of improvement. From this, it can be found that it is effective to correct the reel set state to the feeder that has occurred accidentally (at the operator's own discretion).
  • FIG. 16A is an example in which a filter is applied based on each narrowing-down pattern and its effect, and results with a clear conclusion of improvement, deterioration, or no change are filtered and notified.
  • FIG. 16B is an example of displaying these items in order of priority in descending order of effectiveness in reducing actual defects. From this, it is possible to clarify effective countermeasures for urgently reducing the defective rate.
  • FIG. 17 is an example of a report of improved cases.
  • Examples of filtering cases described in this improvement notification include (1) X or more improvement cases, (2) Y or less deterioration cases, and (3) reduction in actual defective rate by X% or more. (4) A combination of these.
  • the number of improvement cases is 3 or more
  • the number of deterioration cases is 0 or less
  • the number of actual defects has been reduced by 50% or more.
  • examples of prioritization in the table include (1) descending order of reduction rate of actual defects, (2) descending order of most improved cases, (3) descending order of improved cases - most deteriorating cases, (4) Combinations of these etc. are possible.
  • the rules to be used are selected and the order in which the order is determined is determined. For example, the highest priority may be given to the order with the most improvement cases, and then the order with the largest reduction rate of actual defects. In the example of FIG. 16, two cases were extracted.
  • FIG. 18 is an example of a deterioration report.
  • the filtering in this case is (1) the number of worse cases is X or more, (2) the number of improved cases is Y or less, (3) the actual defective rate increases by X% or more, and (4) a combination of these.
  • the number of deterioration cases is two or more, the number of improvement cases is zero or less, and the number of actual defects has increased by 50% or more.
  • (1) descending order of increasing rate of actual defects, (2) descending order of increasing number of worsening cases, (3) descending order of worsening cases - descending order of improving cases, (4) order of these It may be in the order of combination.
  • the rules to be used are selected and the order for determining the order is determined. For example, the order with the highest number of deterioration cases may be given the highest priority, and then the order with the highest increase rate of actual defects may be given. In the example of FIG. 17, one item was extracted.
  • a production line ( 10 ) A production management system (1) according to a change detection unit (110a) that detects a change in a predetermined factor related to the manufacturing process and/or the inspection process; an index change acquisition unit (110b) that acquires a change in an index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process before and after the change in the factor detected by the change detection unit; an information generation unit (110c) that generates information indicating a relationship between the change in the factor and the index from the change in the index acquired by the index change acquisition unit;
  • a production management system comprising: ⁇ Additional note 6> A production line ( 10 ), the production control method according to a change detection step (S101 to S103) of detecting a change in a predetermined factor related to the manufacturing process and/or the inspection process; an index change acquisition
  • a production line (10) that has a single or multiple manufacturing equipment (10a, 10c, 10e) and inspection equipment (10b, 10d, 10f), and executes a product manufacturing process and an inspection process using the manufacturing equipment and inspection equipment.
  • a production management program relating to, a change detection step (S101 to S103) in which the computer detects a change in a predetermined factor related to the manufacturing process and/or the inspection process; an index change acquisition step (S106 to S107) for acquiring a change in an index related to productivity and/or manufacturing quality in the manufacturing process before and after the change in the factor detected in the change detection step; an information generation step (S108 to S116) of generating information indicating a relationship between the change in the factor and the index from the change in the index acquired in the index change acquisition step; A production management program that executes.
  • Production management system 1a Server for line management 1c... Server for mounting machine 1e... Server for inspection machine 10... Production line 10a... Solder printing device 10b... Solder printing Post-inspection device 10c... Mounter 10d... Post-mount inspection device 10e... Reflow oven 10f... Post-reflow inspection device 11a... Data acquisition section 11b... Control section 11c... Database section 11d ... Output section 110a... Change detection section 110b... Index change acquisition section 110c... Information generation section

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Supply And Installment Of Electrical Components (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne une technologie qui permet d'améliorer plus efficacement la qualité et la productivité d'une chaîne de production. Un système de gestion de production (1) pour une chaîne de production (10), qui comporte au moins un dispositif de fabrication (10a, 10c, 10e) et un dispositif d'inspection (10b, 10d, 10f) et dans lequel le dispositif de fabrication et le dispositif d'inspection sont utilisés pour effectuer une étape de fabrication de produit et une étape d'inspection, comprend : une unité de détection de changement (110a) qui détecte un changement d'un facteur prescrit relatif à l'étape de fabrication et/ou à l'étape d'inspection ; une unité d'acquisition de changement dans un indicateur (110b) qui acquiert le changement d'un indicateur temporellement avant et après le changement du facteur qui a été détecté par l'unité de détection de changement, ledit indicateur se rapportant à la productivité et/ou à la qualité de fabrication de l'étape de fabrication ; et une unité de génération d'informations (110c) qui utilise le changement de l'indicateur qui a été acquis par l'unité d'acquisition de changement de l'indicateur pour générer des informations indiquant la relation entre l'indicateur et le changement du facteur.
PCT/JP2023/003843 2022-03-11 2023-02-06 Système de gestion de production, procédé de gestion de production, et programme de gestion de production WO2023171197A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022038596A JP2023132966A (ja) 2022-03-11 2022-03-11 生産管理システム、生産管理方法、及び生産管理プログラム
JP2022-038596 2022-03-11

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023171197A1 true WO2023171197A1 (fr) 2023-09-14

Family

ID=87936731

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2023/003843 WO2023171197A1 (fr) 2022-03-11 2023-02-06 Système de gestion de production, procédé de gestion de production, et programme de gestion de production

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2023132966A (fr)
WO (1) WO2023171197A1 (fr)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017194921A (ja) * 2016-04-22 2017-10-26 オムロン株式会社 生産ラインの管理装置
JP2019046311A (ja) * 2017-09-05 2019-03-22 オムロン株式会社 情報処理装置および情報処理方法

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017194921A (ja) * 2016-04-22 2017-10-26 オムロン株式会社 生産ラインの管理装置
JP2019046311A (ja) * 2017-09-05 2019-03-22 オムロン株式会社 情報処理装置および情報処理方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2023132966A (ja) 2023-09-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106079892B (zh) 一种pcb锡膏印刷过程质量智能监控系统及方法
JP4552749B2 (ja) 検査基準設定装置及び方法、並びに、工程検査装置
US8421803B2 (en) Information display system and information display method for quality control of component-mounted substrate
US10860004B2 (en) Management system and non-transitory computer-readable recording medium
CN110073396B (zh) 数据处理装置及数据处理方法
EP2355646A2 (fr) Appareil de montage de composants doté d'un dispositif de détection d'anomalies
US8150895B2 (en) Quality improvement system
CN107305367A (zh) 生产线的管理装置
CN110414838A (zh) 一种烟草工艺质量管控方法、系统、设备及存储介质
CN103369952A (zh) 基板检查结果的分析作业支援用信息显示系统及支援方法
JP4805475B2 (ja) 品質評価装置、品質評価方法、品質表示装置、品質表示方法および品質評価システム
CN105302123B (zh) 在线测量数据的监控方法
JP2010182015A (ja) 品質管理システムおよび品質管理装置および品質管理プログラム
JP2010087459A (ja) 故障原因特定装置および方法
CN109840856B (zh) 管理系统、管理装置、管理方法及计算机可读记录介质
JP6953381B2 (ja) 製造の管理を支援するシステム及び方法
CN108966631A (zh) 应用于表面贴装技术的产线技术方案
JP2007053264A (ja) 実装品質の不良検出装置及び実装品質の不良検出方法
JP2002251212A (ja) 品質管理方法、同システム、および同プログラムを記録した記録媒体
WO2023171197A1 (fr) Système de gestion de production, procédé de gestion de production, et programme de gestion de production
US20230351336A1 (en) Method for manufacturing system analysis and/or maintenance
JP2018018917A (ja) 基板生産管理装置および基板生産管理方法
JPH10275168A (ja) 設計支援方法および設計支援システム
JP7484733B2 (ja) 管理システム、管理装置、管理方法、及びプログラム
JPH08287154A (ja) 製造不良解析システム、方法およびこれに関連したデータベースの生成方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 23766377

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1