WO2023041305A1 - Verfahren zur auflösung von winkelmehrdeutigkeiten in einem radarnetzwerk - Google Patents
Verfahren zur auflösung von winkelmehrdeutigkeiten in einem radarnetzwerk Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2023041305A1 WO2023041305A1 PCT/EP2022/073701 EP2022073701W WO2023041305A1 WO 2023041305 A1 WO2023041305 A1 WO 2023041305A1 EP 2022073701 W EP2022073701 W EP 2022073701W WO 2023041305 A1 WO2023041305 A1 WO 2023041305A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- tracks
- track
- radar
- ambiguities
- plausibility
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 14
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 16
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/87—Combinations of radar systems, e.g. primary radar and secondary radar
- G01S13/878—Combination of several spaced transmitters or receivers of known location for determining the position of a transponder or a reflector
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/66—Radar-tracking systems; Analogous systems
- G01S13/72—Radar-tracking systems; Analogous systems for two-dimensional tracking, e.g. combination of angle and range tracking, track-while-scan radar
- G01S13/723—Radar-tracking systems; Analogous systems for two-dimensional tracking, e.g. combination of angle and range tracking, track-while-scan radar by using numerical data
- G01S13/726—Multiple target tracking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60W—CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
- B60W2420/00—Indexing codes relating to the type of sensors based on the principle of their operation
- B60W2420/40—Photo, light or radio wave sensitive means, e.g. infrared sensors
- B60W2420/408—Radar; Laser, e.g. lidar
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for resolving angle ambiguities in a spatially incoherent radar network.
- Radar sensors make it possible, for example during automated, in particular highly automated or autonomous ferry operation of a vehicle, to generate an environment model by detecting backscattering from stationary and moving objects.
- angle ambiguities can mean that a direction of incidence of a signal and thus positions of detected objects cannot be determined unambiguously.
- a method and a device for resolving radar angle ambiguities are known from US 2019/0187268 A1.
- an angular position of a target is determined from a spatial response which has a plurality of amplitude peaks.
- one or more frequency subspectra are selected that highlight amplitude or phase differences in the spatial response and analyze an irregular shape of the response over a wide field of view to determine the angular position of the target.
- the angular position of the target has a unique signature that the radar system can determine and use to resolve the radar angle ambiguities.
- antenna elements of the radar arranged in an array have a spacing which is greater than half the center wavelength of a reflected radar signal which is used to detect the target.
- the invention is based on the object of specifying a novel method for resolving angle ambiguities in a spatially incoherent radar network.
- the object is achieved according to the invention by a method which has the features specified in claim 1.
- a number of radar sensors are used according to the invention to detect an environment, with tracks of detected objects being created in a state space for each radar sensor individually and independently of the other radar sensors.
- the state space is designed, for example, in such a way that angle ambiguities do not have to be resolved in it.
- tracks from different radar sensors are assigned to one another under the condition that they plausibly originate from the same object.
- the tracks assigned to one another are merged for different variants to resolve the angular ambiguities, with each variant being assigned a plausibility measure. The variant with the greatest plausibility is then selected to resolve the angle ambiguities.
- Angular ambiguities in object positions can be reliably resolved by means of the present method by means of a plausibility check using a number of radar sensors in a radar network.
- a number of objects incorrectly positioned due to angle ambiguities also referred to as ghost objects, can be reduced.
- This enables a significant improvement in an environment model generated with the radar sensors.
- driving behavior can be significantly improved as a result. For example, braking maneuvers for objects that are not actually present at a position can be avoided.
- the present method is not dependent on a frequency sub-spectrum, so that it can also be used with radar sensors that are not capable of resolving the angle ambiguities themselves.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram of a device for resolving angle ambiguities in a spatially incoherent radar network
- FIG. 2 schematically shows a conversion of a track detected by means of a radar sensor into a number of hypothetically derived Cartesian tracks and a representation of hypothetically derived Cartesian tracks from a number of sensors and a resulting, most plausible combined track
- Fig. 4 shows a schematic segmentation, which in a refinement of the
- FIG. 5 shows a schematic representation of data structures for generating a merged track from tracks detected by means of a large number of radar sensors
- FIG. 6 shows a schematic representation of a merged track with low plausibility
- FIG. 7 shows a schematic representation of a merged track with high plausibility.
- FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a possible exemplary embodiment of a device 1 for resolving angle ambiguities in a spatially incoherent radar network 2 with a plurality of radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n.
- Radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n for vehicle applications can be adversely affected by angular ambiguities.
- such radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n cannot unambiguously determine an angle of incidence of a target signal.
- the radar sensor 2.1 to 2.n can only determine that a signal from any angle p 0 . . . , p -- out where N is a total number of ambiguities. It is by means of a radar sensor 2.1 to 2.n possible, for example based on an illuminated field of view or internal target tracking, to determine which angle ambiguity is most likely. For further processing, the radar sensor 2.1 to 2.n may only output this most probable angle or also other possible angles.
- the most likely angle measurements correspond to the correct target position.
- tracking and fusion algorithms that neglect the ambiguity of the radar measurements can provide good results.
- the radar sensor 2.1 to 2.n incorrectly resolves the angle ambiguity, such algorithms will probably deliver strongly erroneous results.
- they can emit ghost objects, i. H. Show objects in positions where there aren't any. Since the effects that cause the radar sensor 2.1 to 2.n to resolve the angle ambiguities incorrectly can exist over a long period of time, these ghost objects can also be long-lived.
- such ghost objects can have a major impact on driving behavior, for example leading to emergency braking for no real reason.
- angle ambiguities of tracking and fusion algorithms must not be neglected, even if they only occur with a relatively low frequency.
- angle ambiguities must be recognized and taken into account in the so-called spawn phase, i.e. an initialization of tracks of the objects, since once a track is established, further ambiguous measurement updates tend to be resolved in such a way that they correspond to the previous resolution of angular ambiguities agree.
- reliable initialization of the tracks is required in order to be able to deal with emergency situations, for example pedestrians appearing in the roadway who enter the field of view of radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n late, in particular when the vehicle having radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n is already at a short distance from the pedestrian.
- Emergency situations can also arise from obstacles located a short distance from the vehicle, such as lost cargo, in the roadway, which due to their backscatter properties, can only be detected at a short distance by radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n or other sensors.
- a method for resolving angle ambiguities in the spatially incoherent radar network 2 is carried out by means of the device 1 .
- the method is designed for processing and determining angle ambiguities in radar measurements when objects are spawned and is based on the use of multiple radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n, which detect an environment of a vehicle on which they are arranged (hereinafter referred to as ego vehicle ), with overlapping and/or adjacent detection areas or fields of view.
- a structure of the device 1 depends on the objective of avoiding the use of a full “multiple hypothesis tracking algorithm", which is more difficult to implement and very computationally intensive.
- the surroundings are detected by means of the radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n, with sensor tracking modules 2.1.1 to 2.n.1 using data tracks T1.1 to T1.m . . . Tn .1 to Tn. x detected objects determined and an association module 3 are supplied.
- sensor tracking modules 2.1.1 to 2.n.1 create and manage the tracks T1.1 to T1.m . . . Tn.1 to Tn.x independently for each radar sensor 2.1 to 2.n.
- the tracks T1.1 to T1.m . . . Tn.1 to Tn.x use a state space of measured variables, in particular a distance r, shown in more detail in FIG Radial velocity v rad and a direction cosine u.
- the direction cosine u designates the cosine or sine of the angle of incidence depending on the definition of the angle. Due to the use of this special state space, the sensor tracking modules 2.1.1 to 2.n.1 do not have to resolve the angle ambiguities since the direction cosine u, which relates to an angle of incidence, the distance r to the radar sensor 2.1 to 2.n and the radial velocity v ra d of the state in the prediction step is not affected.
- tracks T1.1 to T1.m . . . Tn.1 to Tn.x are combined by an allocation submodule 4 of a multisensor tracking module to form multisensor track groups TG1 to TGz.
- a combined track S1 to Sy is generated from each of these multisensor track groups TG1 to TGz by means of a combining module 5 .
- the angular ambiguity must be taken into account when converting a detected sensor track T1 into a derived hypothetical Cartesian track T1.1 to T1.3.
- a detected sensor track T1 is shown in the left part of FIG is converted into a plurality of hypothetical derived Cartesian tracks T1.1 to T1.3 shown in the middle of FIG. where u tr is the direction cosine u of the track in sensor coordinates for which the ambiguity was not resolved. nAu is the distance between possible resolutions of the ambiguities and u n is the nth possible resolution.
- T racks T1.1 to T1.3, T2.1 to T2.3, T3.1 to T.3.3 and a resulting, most plausible merged track S1 are shown.
- the derived Cartesian tracks T1.1 to T1.3 are located in a Cartesian reference system with the coordinates x, y, for example what is known as an integrated driving state coordinate system, also known as an integrated driving state frame, or IDS for short.
- the derived Cartesian tracks T1.1 to T1.3 only consist of a position state.
- Tracks T1.1 to T1.3 a number of these tracks T1.1 to T1.3 corresponding to a number of ambiguities in the angle measurement.
- each derived Cartesian track T1.1 to T1.3 is only one of several hypotheses as to how a sensor track T1 is converted into a Cartesian track T1.1 to T1.3.
- a variant of the derived Cartesian track T1.1 to T1.3 is a so-called timestamp-adapted derived Cartesian track. "Timestamp-adapted" here refers to the fact that for this type of track the timestamps are specified to match the sensor tracking modules 2.1.1 to 2.n.1.
- sensor tracks T1 , T2 are converted to timestamp-adapted-derived Cartesian tracks T1.1 to Tl.m ... Tn.1 to Tn.x with common timestamps to create a merge of these tracks T1.1 to Tl.m . .. to enable Tn.1 to Tn.x.
- t p update times be one
- Tracks T1.1 to T1.m ... Tn.1 to Tn.x with an index p and ti the timestamps of a common time axis. Then, a state of the track T1, T2 at ti is determined by
- the track T1.1 to Tl.m ... Tn.1 to Tn.x contains an indicator variable ⁇ D P which is equal to 1 if the tracked target was recognized in journal t k . Otherwise it is 0.
- a merged track S1 to Sy is formed, for example, by calculating a merged state as a weighted average of the states of the timestamp-adjusted-derived Cartesian tracks T1.1 to Tl.m...Tn.1 to Tn.x. That is, for timestamp-adjusted-derived Cartesian
- P st is a number of tracks T1 .1 to T1 .m ... Tn.1 to T nx contributing to the merged track S1 to Sy, and is the covariance matrix of the merged track S1 to Sy at time l.
- FIG. 3 shows an example of a provisional association graph AG.
- Nodes of the association graph AG are tracks T1.1 to T1.m ... Tn.1 to Tn.x and (weighted) connections represent preliminary associations.
- FIG. 4 shows an example of segmentations (a) to (d) which are taken into account when the association graph AG is refined.
- the segmentation (a) corresponds to an original provisional association from a provisional association graph AG.
- segmentations (b), (c), and (d) one or both of the tentative associations are removed.
- a multi-sensor tracking module forms multi-sensor track groups TG1 to TGz by assigning tracks T1.1 to Tl.m . . . Tn.1 to Tn.x detected by means of radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n, which are probably the same represent target object.
- Track T1.1 to T1.m...Tn.1 to Tn.x can include tracks T1.1 to T1.m...Tn.1 to Tn.x of only one radar sensor 2.1 to 2.n, but also by several radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n.
- Tracks T1.1 to Tl.m . . . Tn.1 to Tn.x between adjacent radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n with overlapping detection areas are assigned using a cost matrix and a so-called Munkres algorithm.
- the cost matrix relates to the plausibility that two tracks T1.1 to Tl.m ... Tn.1 to Tn.x originate from the same target object.
- This first step results in an association graph AG, in which the nodes represent the tracks T1.1 to Tl.m...Tn.1 to Tn.x and (weighted) connections preliminary associations, as FIG. 3 shows.
- the connections of the association graph AG can be removed.
- track "A” is plausibly from the same target as track “B”
- track “B” is plausibly from the same target as track “C”
- tracks "A”, "B” and “C” all together represent the same target object.
- a multisensor track group TG1 to TGz with tracks T1.1 to Tl.m...Tn.1 to Tn.x of several radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n supplies hypotheses for combined
- the multi-sensor track group module forms derived Cartesian time stamps from a plurality of time stamps, in particular one per sensor track T1, T2
- Track T1.1 to Tl.m ... Tn.1 to Tn.x a merged track S1 to Sy, each merged track S1 to Sy being provided with a scalar plausibility value.
- a most plausible combined track S p is selected from this.
- a heuristic segmentation algorithm takes on the task of forming multisensor track groups TG1 to TGz from the provisional associations: this algorithm first finds all possible segmentations of the provisionally assigned tracks.
- tentatively associated tracks A, B and C can be divided into the multi-sensor track groups ⁇ A,B ⁇ and ⁇ C ⁇ , the multi-sensor track groups ⁇ A ⁇ , ⁇ B,C ⁇ , the multi-sensor track Groups ⁇ A ⁇ , ⁇ B ⁇ , ⁇ 0 ⁇ or the common multisensor track group ⁇ A, B, C ⁇ .
- the segmentation algorithm calculates the plausibility of each segmentation to select the segmentation with the highest plausibility. Given a segmentation and each segment with index m of that segmentation, the segmentation algorithm constructs a merged track S1 through Sy, determined whose plausibility W m tange has a length L m t, m and an average
- M is the total number of segments within the segmentation.
- FIG. 6 schematically shows a combined track S1 with low plausibility.
- the two originally derived Cartesian tracks T1.1, T1.2 show very little agreement.
- the merged track S1 does not match the derived Cartesian tracks T1.1, T1.2, causing the algorithm to calculate a low plausibility value.
- FIG. 7 shows a highly plausible representation of a combined track S1.
- the two originally derived Cartesian tracks T1.1, T1.2 have a high level of agreement, so that the combined track S1 also agrees with the derived Cartesian tracks T1.1, T1.2, as a result of which the algorithm calculates a high plausibility value.
- the plausibility depends on how well each timestamp-adjusted-derived Cartesian track T1.1 to Tl.m...Tn.1 to Tn.x matches the resulting merged track S1 to Sy.
- a probability that a tracked target object should have been detected by the contributing radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n is determined based on the merged track S1 to Sy and a sensor model. If actual recognition or non-recognition events agree well with a recognition probability, this leads to a higher plausibility of the merged track S1 to Sy.
- the combined track Sp with the highest plausibility value is selected from among the plurality of hypothetical tracks S1 to Sy.
- the goal of resolving the angular ambiguities is achieved by calculating the various hypotheses of the combined tracks S1 to Sy and their plausibility ranking.
- the plausibility of a merged track is determined, for example, in a heuristic process:
- a weighting variable is calculated for each derived Cartesian track p and each timestamp l.
- the weight is according to where p(x;y,P) is the Gaussian probability density function with mean y and covariance matrix P.
- K is a configurable parameter.
- p is an index of the missed track T1.1 to T1.m ... Tn.1 to Tn.x
- v p is an index of the radar sensor 2.1 to 2.n that tracks the track T1.1 to T1.m .. .Tn.1 to Tn.x missed.
- Track TI .1 to Tl .m ... Tn.1 to Tn.x are treated consistently when calculating the merged track plausibility.
- the plausibility of the merged track is S1 to Sy where L mt is a number of time steps of the merged track S1 to Sy and Psensors is the number of radar sensors 2.1 to 2.n. This value corresponds to the combined number of tracks T1.1 to T1.m...Tn.1 to Tn.x and missing tracks T1.1 to T1.m...Tn.1 to Tn.x.
- the algorithm described above is suitable for continuous tracking. However, it is intended to track data only in a short time interval to get merged tracks S1 to Sy, which serve as track initialization or spawning candidate for a main tracking algorithm.
- This usage restriction allows for a simplification with regard to the plausibility calculation and track merging. This means that a situation in which sensor tracks T1, T2 represent the same target object for a specific time interval and—due to a track identity change—not for another time interval is not dealt with.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP22769227.4A EP4402510A1 (de) | 2021-09-14 | 2022-08-25 | Verfahren zur auflösung von winkelmehrdeutigkeiten in einem radarnetzwerk |
KR1020247011231A KR20240049643A (ko) | 2021-09-14 | 2022-08-25 | 레이더 네트워크에서 각도 모호성들을 해결하기 위한 방법 |
CN202280061969.2A CN117940800A (zh) | 2021-09-14 | 2022-08-25 | 用于解决雷达网络中的角度多义性的方法 |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102021210143.7 | 2021-09-14 | ||
DE102021210143.7A DE102021210143A1 (de) | 2021-09-14 | 2021-09-14 | Verfahren zur Auflösung von Winkelmehrdeutigkeiten in einem Radarnetzwerk |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2023041305A1 true WO2023041305A1 (de) | 2023-03-23 |
Family
ID=83283108
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2022/073701 WO2023041305A1 (de) | 2021-09-14 | 2022-08-25 | Verfahren zur auflösung von winkelmehrdeutigkeiten in einem radarnetzwerk |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP4402510A1 (de) |
KR (1) | KR20240049643A (de) |
CN (1) | CN117940800A (de) |
DE (1) | DE102021210143A1 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2023041305A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102022205584B4 (de) | 2022-06-01 | 2024-02-29 | Mercedes-Benz Group AG | Verfahren zum Unterdrücken von auf Winkelmehrdeutigkeiten beruhenden Fehlortungen eines winkelauflösenden Radarsystems |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140218228A1 (en) * | 2013-02-07 | 2014-08-07 | Denso Corporation | Target recognition apparatus |
US20190187268A1 (en) | 2017-12-15 | 2019-06-20 | Google Llc | Radar Angular Ambiguity Resolution |
US10338216B2 (en) * | 2016-11-04 | 2019-07-02 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Object detection in multiple radars |
CN112014835A (zh) * | 2020-09-01 | 2020-12-01 | 中国电子科技集团公司信息科学研究院 | 分布式稀疏阵列雷达在栅瓣模糊下的目标跟踪方法和装置 |
-
2021
- 2021-09-14 DE DE102021210143.7A patent/DE102021210143A1/de active Pending
-
2022
- 2022-08-25 WO PCT/EP2022/073701 patent/WO2023041305A1/de active Application Filing
- 2022-08-25 CN CN202280061969.2A patent/CN117940800A/zh active Pending
- 2022-08-25 KR KR1020247011231A patent/KR20240049643A/ko unknown
- 2022-08-25 EP EP22769227.4A patent/EP4402510A1/de active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140218228A1 (en) * | 2013-02-07 | 2014-08-07 | Denso Corporation | Target recognition apparatus |
US10338216B2 (en) * | 2016-11-04 | 2019-07-02 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Object detection in multiple radars |
US20190187268A1 (en) | 2017-12-15 | 2019-06-20 | Google Llc | Radar Angular Ambiguity Resolution |
CN112014835A (zh) * | 2020-09-01 | 2020-12-01 | 中国电子科技集团公司信息科学研究院 | 分布式稀疏阵列雷达在栅瓣模糊下的目标跟踪方法和装置 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR20240049643A (ko) | 2024-04-16 |
EP4402510A1 (de) | 2024-07-24 |
DE102021210143A1 (de) | 2023-03-16 |
CN117940800A (zh) | 2024-04-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2793045B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Überprüfung eines Umfelderfassungssystems eines Fahrzeugs | |
EP2800982B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur radunabhängigen geschwindigkeitsmessung bei einem fahrzeug | |
EP1531343B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Verfolgung von Objekten | |
EP1502165B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur kurspraediktion bei kraftfahrzeugen | |
DE102013104443A1 (de) | Verkehrsüberwachungssystem zur Geschwindigkeitsmessung und Zuordnung von bewegten Fahrzeugen bei einem Mehrziel-Aufnahmemodul | |
DE102014202752B4 (de) | Erkennung dynamischer Objekte mittels Ultraschall | |
WO2019162794A1 (de) | Verfahren und system zur erkennung von für ein fahrzeug geeigneten parklücken | |
WO2009049976A1 (de) | Verfahren zur schätzung der relativbewegung von video-objekten und fahrerassistenzsystem für kraftfahrzeuge | |
DE102020105192B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Detektieren bewegter Objekte in einer Fahrzeugumgebung und Kraftfahrzeug | |
EP3814795A1 (de) | Verfahren zur erkennung statischer radarziele mit einem radarsensor für kraftfahrzeuge | |
WO2023041305A1 (de) | Verfahren zur auflösung von winkelmehrdeutigkeiten in einem radarnetzwerk | |
DE112021004200T5 (de) | Objekterkennungsvorrichtung | |
DE102018217533A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Klassifikation eines Objekts | |
DE102009033853A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Fahrerassistenzsystems und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens | |
EP2149055B1 (de) | Verfahren zum generieren von zielmarkierenden peiltracks | |
DE102005038314A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Schätzen des Verlaufs einer Fahrspur | |
DE102017005671A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Bestimmung von Fehldetektionen eines Sensorsystems eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
EP1522873A1 (de) | Multisensor-Ortungsgerät | |
WO2022033980A1 (de) | Verfahren zum erkennen von verkehrsteilnehmern in einer umgebung eines fahrzeugs anhand von messungen eines radarsensors durch identifizieren von stördetektionen sowie recheneinrichtung | |
DE102019128686A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ermittlung von Bewegungsinformation in Bezug auf ein Objekt | |
DE102019216152A1 (de) | Adaptiver Hochpunkt-Nachbarschaftsbereich | |
DE102019219750B4 (de) | Fahrerassistenzsystem und Verfahren zum Detektieren von Objektbarrieren in 3D-Punktewolken | |
DE102006051091B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Objekterkennung von Fahrzeugen mittels Nahbereichsdetektion | |
DE102022205584B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Unterdrücken von auf Winkelmehrdeutigkeiten beruhenden Fehlortungen eines winkelauflösenden Radarsystems | |
DE102018007323A1 (de) | Kontrolleinrichtung für eine Ein- und Ausfahrt |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 22769227 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2024515868 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 202280061969.2 Country of ref document: CN |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20247011231 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2022769227 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2022769227 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20240415 |