WO2020211277A1 - Method for evaluating regional geological structure complexity - Google Patents
Method for evaluating regional geological structure complexity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2020211277A1 WO2020211277A1 PCT/CN2019/105877 CN2019105877W WO2020211277A1 WO 2020211277 A1 WO2020211277 A1 WO 2020211277A1 CN 2019105877 W CN2019105877 W CN 2019105877W WO 2020211277 A1 WO2020211277 A1 WO 2020211277A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- unit
- area
- region
- complexity
- cubic
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
- G01V1/282—Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
- G01V1/30—Analysis
- G01V1/306—Analysis for determining physical properties of the subsurface, e.g. impedance, porosity or attenuation profiles
Definitions
- the invention relates to the technical field of regional geological evaluation, in particular to a method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures.
- the present invention provides a method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures.
- the technical scheme adopted by the present invention is: a method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structure, including the following steps:
- Step 1 Establish a 3D geological model of the strata in the area to be evaluated
- Step 2 using a box-counting dimension calculated out a region similar to a n-dimensional tomographic d i, and then obtaining the tomographic perspective dimension D ds, and obtains the fault intensity I;
- Step 3 using a box-counting dimension method obtains a region similar to a n-dimensional folds Z i, and then obtains a perspective dimension D zs, and obtains the Gaussian curvature K of the fold surface;
- Step 4 invasion index Q magmatic rocks strike the region of a n
- Step 5 a n is obtained in the region of collapse column index M;
- Step 6 Normalize the data
- Step 7 Structure complexity level division.
- step 1 the geological structures within the study area: faults, folds, magmatic rock masses, and collapsed columns are identified, and the areas on the horizontal plane are divided into a ⁇ a square grids, numbered a 1 ⁇ a n ;
- the three-dimensional geological body is divided into cubic unit bodies of 1m ⁇ 1m ⁇ 1m, the secondary cubic unit bodies are divided in each unit body, and the statistics of the secondary cubic units passing through the fault plane in each unit body
- the cell area of a n-dimensional tomographic perspective D ds On the surface of a cell in a n area, the cell area of a n-dimensional tomographic perspective D ds:
- D ds for an area of the tomographic dimensional perspective; d i to be evaluated for the three-dimensional geological body region similar dimensional unit cube through the body slice; depth, m h i for the cubic unit cell; H is the total thickness of the stratum in the area to be evaluated; n is the number of faults in the area.
- I is the intensity of the fault
- S imax is the maximum projected area of a fault plane in a cubic unit on a vertical plane of the unit, in m 2
- h i is the depth of the unit, in m, in units The depth of the center point of the grid is the value
- H is the stratum thickness of the evaluation area, in m
- i is the number of faults inside the area.
- the three-dimensional geological body is divided into cubic unit bodies of 1m ⁇ 1m ⁇ 1m, the secondary cubic unit bodies are divided in each unit body, and the secondary cubic units passing through the fold surface in each unit body are counted.
- the performance of the wrinkles in the three-dimensional stratum is a set of mutually parallel curved surfaces, and the stratum level passing through the cubic unit body is used to indicate the degree of wrinkle of the unit body.
- K i is the Gaussian curvature of the cubic unit.
- K of the total area of the Gaussian curvature of a n, k i for all Gaussian curvature folds the lower surface of the flat area a n, a depth, a unit for the cube m h i of the unit body; H region was to be evaluated
- the total thickness of the formation, in m; n is the number of folds in the area.
- Q is a n for the cell region magma intrusion index, V i for the volume of the cell magmatic intrusions, unit m 3; h i for the cell depth, unit m; H is the area to be evaluated The total thickness of the formation, in m; n is the number of magmatic intrusions in the unit area;
- M being an area subsided column index
- V i is the volume of the region of collapse column, m 3
- h i is a subsided column depth, m
- H for the region to be evaluated formation thickness, m
- n for the Area The number of collapsed columns.
- B is the fragmentation degree of the collapsed column, which is quantified by the present invention as 1: the formation is relatively complete; 2: the formation is in a fragmented state; 4: the formation and its fragmentation are basically invisible.
- Xi ' is normalized formation parameters, x i is a cell region a n parameter, ⁇ is to be the evaluation area a 1 ⁇ a n data mean, ⁇ is to be evaluated area data a 1 ⁇ a n of standard deviation; and configuration complexity evaluation region to treat a 1 ⁇ a n were scored:
- step 7 above divide the structure complexity level:
- the present invention has the beneficial effects of constructing a three-dimensional model in the research area, using the idea of fractal and fractal dimensions, and using the box-marking dimension method to obtain the similar dimensions of each three-dimensional unit to represent the research area Considering the inclination angle of faults and folds at the same time, it cannot be reflected in the complex dimensions of the structural plane. Fault intensity and fold curvature are introduced to characterize regional structural complexity. Through the above steps, the structural complexity of the area can be obtained, so as to provide a certain basis for the later exploration and development of energy minerals.
- a method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures including the following steps:
- Step 1 Use the existing drilling data and logging interpretation and seismic data analysis of regional geology, and use the 3D geological modeling software Petrel to establish the 3D geological model of the area to be evaluated.
- the geological structure in the study area faults, folds, The magmatic rock mass and collapse column are identified, and the area on the horizontal plane is divided into a ⁇ a square grids, numbered a 1 ⁇ a n ;
- Step 2 The stratum undergoes strong tectonic movement and fracture displacement occurs.
- step 2 find the intensity I of the fault:
- I is the intensity of the fault
- S imax is the maximum projected area of the fault plane in a cubic unit on a vertical plane of the unit, in m 2
- h i is the depth of the unit, with the center of the unit The point depth is the value, in m
- H is the thickness of the formation in the evaluation area, in m
- i is the number of faults in the area.
- Step 3 When the tectonic stress is not enough to crush the formation, folds will be formed. This is one of the important manifestations of the concentration of underground stress; the three-dimensional geological body is divided into cubic unit blocks of 1m ⁇ 1m ⁇ 1m, and the secondary cubic unit bodies are divided in each unit block, and the statistics of the fold surface passing through each unit body are counted.
- the number of secondary cubic units N(c), reduce the number of secondary cubic units, and set c c 0 /2, c 0 /3, c 0 /4, c 0 /8 to obtain the corresponding N(c) value;
- c c 0 /2, c 0 /3, c 0 /4, c 0 /8 to obtain the corresponding N(c) value;
- D zs is the fold three-dimensional dimension of the area
- Z i is the similar dimension of the cubic unit body through which the fold surface passes in the area in the three-dimensional geological body to be evaluated
- h i is the depth of the cubic unit body in m
- n is the number of folds in the area.
- the performance characteristics of the folds in the three-dimensional stratum are a set of parallel curved surfaces, and the stratum level passing through the cubic unit body is used to express the degree of folds of the unit body.
- K i is the Gaussian curvature of the cubic cell.
- K of the total area of the Gaussian curvature of a n, k i for all Gaussian curvature folds the lower surface of the flat area a n, a depth, a unit for the cube m h i of the unit body; H region was to be evaluated the total thickness of the layer, unit m; n is the number of pleats in a n area.
- Step 4 Effect of extent configured by intrusive magmatic index Q magmatite characterized region of a n:
- Q is a n for the cell region magma intrusion index, V i for the volume of the magmatic intrusions of the unit body, the unit m 3; h i for the cell depth, unit m; H is the area to be evaluated The total thickness of the formation, in m; n is the number of magmatic intrusions in the unit area;
- Step 5 Use the collapse column index M to characterize the structural complexity of the area
- M being an area subsided column index
- V i is the volume of the region of collapse column, m 3
- h i is a subsided column depth, m
- H for the region to be evaluated formation thickness, m
- n for the Area The number of collapsed columns.
- B is the fragmentation degree of the collapsed column, which is quantified by the present invention as 1: the formation is relatively complete; 2: the formation is in a fragmented state; 4: the formation and its fragmentation are basically invisible.
- Step 6 The above-mentioned geological parameters of the strata have large differences due to their dimensions and magnitudes. Normalize the above-mentioned data:
- Xi ' is normalized formation parameters, x i is a cell region a n parameter, ⁇ is to be the evaluation area a 1 ⁇ a n data mean, ⁇ is to be evaluated area data a 1 ⁇ a n of standard deviation; and configuration complexity evaluation region to treat a 1 ⁇ a n were scored:
- Step 7 Divide the level of structural complexity:
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本发明涉及区域地质评价技术领域,特别是涉及一种区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法。[Corrected according to Rule 26 10.10.2019]
The invention relates to the technical field of regional geological evaluation, in particular to a method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures.
为了克服上述现有技术的不足,本发明提供了一种区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法。[Corrected according to Rule 26 10.10.2019]
In order to overcome the above shortcomings of the prior art, the present invention provides a method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures.
Claims (10)
- 一种区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法,其特征在于,包括以下步骤:A method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures, which is characterized by including the following steps:步骤1:建立待评价区域的地层三维地质模型;Step 1: Establish a 3D geological model of the strata in the area to be evaluated;步骤2:利用记盒维数法求取某一区域a n的断层相似维d i,再求取断层立体维D ds,并求取该断层的烈度I; Step 2: using a box-counting dimension calculated out a region similar to a n-dimensional tomographic d i, and then obtaining the tomographic perspective dimension D ds, and obtains the fault intensity I;步骤3:利用记盒维数法求取某一区域a n的褶皱相似维Z i,再求取立体维D zs,并且求取褶皱面的高斯曲率K; Step 3: using a box-counting dimension method obtains a region similar to a n-dimensional folds Z i, and then obtains a perspective dimension D zs, and obtains the Gaussian curvature K of the fold surface;步骤4:求取该区域a n的岩浆岩的侵入指数Q; Step 4: invasion index Q magmatic rocks strike the region of a n;步骤5:求取该区域a n的陷落柱指数M; Step 5: a n is obtained in the region of collapse column index M;步骤6:对数据进行归一化处理;Step 6: Normalize the data;步骤7:构造复杂程度级别划分。Step 7: Structure complexity level division.
- 根据权利要求1所述的区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法,其特征在于:在上述步骤1中,将研究区内部的地质构造:断层、褶皱、岩浆岩体、陷落柱标识出来,并将水平面上的区域划分为a×a的正方形网格,编号a 1~a n; The method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the above step 1, the geological structures in the study area: faults, folds, magmatic rocks, and collapse columns are identified, and the horizontal plane The area on is divided into a×a square grids, numbered a 1 ~a n ;
- 根据权利要求1所述的区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法,其特征在于:在上述步骤2中,将三维地质体划分为1m×1m×1m的立方单元体,在每个单元体内划分次级立方单元体,统计每个单元体内有断层面通过的次级立方单元体的数目N(b),缩小次级立方单元体,令b=b 0/2、b 0/3、b 0/4、b 0/8,得到相应的N(b)值;将其投放到lgN(b)-lgb坐标系中,拟合得到一条直线,用最小二乘法求解直线斜率,其绝对值即为该立方单元体的相似维d i;不同深度的断层所受的垂向主应力不同,垂向主应力应力的大小是判别区域的构造复杂程度之一的标准,将在平面上的深度作为系数,对地表区域的某一单元区域a n,该单元区域的断层立体维D ds: The method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the above step 2, the three-dimensional geological body is divided into 1m×1m×1m cubic unit bodies, and each unit body is divided into secondary Cubic unit, count the number N(b) of the secondary cubic unit with a fault in each unit, reduce the secondary cubic unit, let b = b 0 /2, b 0 /3, b 0 /4 , B 0 /8, get the corresponding N(b) value; put it into the lgN(b)-lgb coordinate system, fit a straight line, use the least square method to solve the slope of the straight line, and its absolute value is the cube The similar dimension d i of the unit body; the vertical principal stresses of faults at different depths are different. The magnitude of the vertical principal stress is one of the criteria for judging the structural complexity of the area. The depth on the plane is taken as the coefficient. a surface region of the cell region a n, the cell area tomographic perspective dimension D ds:式中,D ds为该区域a n的断层立体维;d i为待评价三维地质体内该区域内有断层面通过的立方单元体的相似维;h i为该立方单元格的深度,单位m;H为待评价区域的地层总厚度,单位m;n为该区域的断层数量。 Wherein, D ds in the region of a n-dimensional perspective faults; d i to be evaluated for the three-dimensional geological body region similar unit cell dimensions of cubic cross-sectional plane through; h i for the cubic cell depth, in m ; H is the total thickness of the stratum in the area to be evaluated, in m; n is the number of faults in the area.
- 根据权利要求1所述的区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法,其特征在于:The method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures according to claim 1, characterized in that:在上述步骤2中,求取该断层的烈度I:In step 2 above, find the intensity I of the fault:式中,I为断层烈度;S imax为某个立方单元体内断层面在单元体的某一竖直面上最大投影面积,单位m 2;h i为该单元体的深度,以单元体的中心点深度为值,单位m;H为评价区域的地层厚度,单位m;i为该区域a n内部的断层数量。 In the formula, I is the intensity of the fault; S imax is the maximum projected area of a fault plane in a cubic unit on a vertical plane of the unit, in m 2 ; h i is the depth of the unit, with the center of the unit point depth value, in m; H is the thickness of the formation evaluation area, unit m; the number of a fault inside the region n i.
- 根据权利要求1所述的区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法,其特征在于:在上述步骤3中,将三维地质体划分为1m×1m×1m的立方单元体,在每个单元体内划分次级立方单元体,统计每个单元体内有褶皱面通过的次级立方单元块数目N(c),缩小次级立方单元体,令c=c 0/2、c 0/3、c 0/4、c 0/8,得到相应的N(c)值;将其投放到lgN(c)-lgc坐标系中,拟合得到一条直线,用最小二乘法求解直线斜率,其绝对值即为该立方单元体的相似维z i;不同深度的褶皱所受的垂向主应力不同,垂向主应力应力的大小是判别区域的构造复杂程度之一的标准,将在平面上的深度作为系数,对地表区域的某一单元区域a n来说,该单元区域的褶皱立体维D zs: The method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structure according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the above step 3, the three-dimensional geological body is divided into 1m×1m×1m cubic unit bodies, and each unit body is divided into secondary Cubic unit body, count the number of secondary cubic unit blocks N(c) passing through the fold surface in each unit body, reduce the secondary cubic unit body, let c=c 0 /2, c 0 /3, c 0 /4, c 0 /8, get the corresponding N(c) value; put it into the lgN(c)-lgc coordinate system, fit a straight line, use the least square method to solve the slope of the straight line, and its absolute value is the cubic unit The similar dimension z i of the body; the vertical principal stresses of the folds of different depths are different. The magnitude of the vertical principal stress is one of the criteria for judging the structural complexity of the area. The depth on the plane is used as a coefficient to affect the surface a region of a n unit area, the cell area of the fold perspective dimension D zs:式中,D zs为该区域的褶皱立体维;Z i为待评价三维地质体内该区域a n内有褶皱面通过的立方单元体的相似维;h i为该立方单元体的深度,单位m;H为待评价区域的地层总厚度,单位m;n为该区域a n的褶皱数量。 Wherein, in the region of the fold D zs-dimensional perspective; Z i of the body to be evaluated have a similar three-dimensional geological cubic unit cell dimension by folds in the surface region a n; h i depth, the unit cubic unit cell for the m ; total thickness H of the formation in the region to be evaluated, unit m; n is the number of pleats in a n area.
- 根据权利要求1所述的区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法,其特征在于:在上述步骤3中,褶皱在三维地层里的表现特征为一组互相平行的弯曲面,则用穿过立方单元体的地层层面来表示该单元体的褶皱程度;求取褶皱面的高斯曲率:设褶皱面为 The method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the above step 3, the appearance of the folds in the three-dimensional stratum is a set of mutually parallel curved surfaces, which are used to pass through the cubic unit body. To indicate the degree of fold of the unit body; find the Gaussian curvature of the fold surface: set the fold surface as式中,K i为该立方单元体的高斯曲率。 In the formula, K i is the Gaussian curvature of the cubic unit.式中,K为该区域a n的总高斯曲率,k i为该平面区域a n下的所有褶皱面的高斯曲率,h i为该立方单元体的深度,单位m;H为待评价区域的地层总厚度,单位m;n为该区域的褶皱数量。 Where, K of the total area of the Gaussian curvature of a n, k i for all Gaussian curvature folds the lower surface of the flat area a n, a depth, a unit for the cube m h i of the unit body; H region was to be evaluated The total thickness of the formation, in m; n is the number of folds in the area.
- 根据权利要求1所述的区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法,其特征在于:在上述步骤4中,用岩浆岩的侵入指数Q来表征区域a n的岩浆岩构造影响程度: Depending on the complexity of the geological structure of the region of the evaluation method of claim 1, wherein: in step 4 above, with the invasion index Q magmatic rocks configured to characterize the extent of the affected area magma of a n:式中,Q为该单元区域a n的岩浆侵入指数,V i为该单元体的岩浆侵入体的体积,单位m 3;h i为该单元体的深度,单位m;H为待评价区域的地层总厚度,单位m;n为单元区域内的岩浆侵入体个数; Formula, Q is a n for the cell region magma intrusion index, V i for the volume of the magmatic intrusions of the unit body, the unit m 3; depth, m h i for the unit cell body; H region was to be evaluated The total thickness of the formation, in m; n is the number of magmatic intrusions in the unit area;
- 根据权利要求1所述的区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法,其特征在于:在上述步骤5中,The method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures according to claim 1, characterized in that: in step 5,式中,M为区域an陷落柱指数;v i为区域内陷落柱体积,单位m 3;h i为陷落柱深度,单位m;H为该待评价区域的地层厚度,单位m;n为该区域内的陷落柱数量;B为陷落柱碎裂程度,本发明将其量化为1:地层较为完整;2:地层呈碎裂状态;4:地层及其破碎基本不可见原状。 In the formula, M being an area subsided column index; v i collapse column volumes within the region, unit m 3; h i is a subsided column depth, unit m; H evaluation area for the thickness to be ground, unit m; n for The number of collapsed columns in the area; B is the fragmentation degree of the collapsed columns, which is quantified by the present invention as 1: the formation is relatively complete; 2: the formation is in a fragmented state; 4: the formation and its fragmentation are basically invisible.
- 根据权利要求1所述的区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法,其特征在于:在上述步骤6中,对上述数据进行归一化处理:The method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the step 6, the data is normalized:式中,X i’为归一化的地层参数,x i为一个单元区域a n的参数,μ为待评价区域a 1~a n的数据均值,σ为待评价区域数据a 1~a n的标准差;并对待评价区域a 1~a n的构造复杂程度进行评分: Wherein, X i 'is the normalized formation parameters, x i is a cell region a n parameter, μ is to be the evaluation area a 1 ~ a n data mean, σ is to be evaluated area data a 1 ~ a n standard deviation; and configuration complexity evaluation region to treat a 1 ~ a n were scored:Tan=0.23D ds+0.21I+0.25D zs+0.21K+0.05Q+0.05M (9) Tan=0.23D ds +0.21I+0.25D zs +0.21K+0.05Q+0.05M (9)
- 根据权利要求1所述的区域地质构造复杂程度的评价方法,其特征在于:在上述步骤7中,划分构造复杂程度级别:The method for evaluating the complexity of regional geological structures according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the above step 7, the structural complexity levels are divided:区域a n的构造复杂程度分级 The complexity of the configuration of a n graded region
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2019429806A AU2019429806B2 (en) | 2019-04-18 | 2019-09-16 | Method for evaluating degree of complexity of regional geological structure |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910312580.0A CN110007343B (en) | 2019-04-18 | 2019-04-18 | Method for evaluating complexity of regional geological structure |
CN201910312580.0 | 2019-04-18 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2020211277A1 true WO2020211277A1 (en) | 2020-10-22 |
Family
ID=67172769
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2019/105877 WO2020211277A1 (en) | 2019-04-18 | 2019-09-16 | Method for evaluating regional geological structure complexity |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN110007343B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2019429806B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2020211277A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112415582A (en) * | 2020-10-15 | 2021-02-26 | 山东大学 | Three-dimensional speed geological modeling method for random arrangement of structure and wave velocity |
CN114332401A (en) * | 2022-03-11 | 2022-04-12 | 四川省公路规划勘察设计研究院有限公司 | Quantitative evaluation method for structural complexity of three-dimensional geological model |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110007343B (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2021-01-29 | 中国矿业大学 | Method for evaluating complexity of regional geological structure |
CN112987087B (en) * | 2021-02-20 | 2022-01-04 | 中南大学 | Early warning method for micro-seismic monitoring/acoustic emission fracture source time-space distribution state and trend |
CN112687001B (en) * | 2021-03-15 | 2021-06-01 | 四川省公路规划勘察设计研究院有限公司 | Three-dimensional geological structure model random generation and uncertainty analysis method |
CN114966842A (en) * | 2022-05-27 | 2022-08-30 | 山东科技大学 | Construction method of three-dimensional visualization model of coal-bearing stratum fault |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104239738A (en) * | 2014-09-28 | 2014-12-24 | 山东科技大学 | Method for predicting floor original water flowing fractured zone |
CN106934860A (en) * | 2017-01-12 | 2017-07-07 | 天津大学 | A kind of three-dimensional geological modeling method based on T battens |
US20180128940A1 (en) * | 2016-11-04 | 2018-05-10 | Robert J. Ferderer | Global Inversion of Gravity Data Using the Principle of General Local Isostasy for Lithospheric Modeling |
CN109345119A (en) * | 2018-09-30 | 2019-02-15 | 山东科技大学 | A kind of roof Dynamical Division evaluation method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) |
CN109490985A (en) * | 2018-12-24 | 2019-03-19 | 桂林理工大学 | A kind of geophysical reconnaissance system and method |
CN109598015A (en) * | 2018-10-08 | 2019-04-09 | 成都理工大学 | Rock-mass with cataclastic texture fragmentation grading evaluation method |
CN110007343A (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2019-07-12 | 中国矿业大学 | A kind of evaluation method of regional tectonics complexity |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6052333A (en) * | 1992-10-23 | 2000-04-18 | Texaco Inc. | Method for seismic antenna illumination of subterranean feature for display and evaluation |
CN101853522B (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2012-03-21 | 中国矿业大学(北京) | Three-dimensional geology modeling system and modeling method thereof |
US8892388B2 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2014-11-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Box counting enhanced modeling |
CN105243394B (en) * | 2015-11-03 | 2019-03-19 | 中国矿业大学 | Evaluation method of the one type imbalance to disaggregated model performance influence degree |
CN106019405B (en) * | 2016-05-13 | 2018-08-31 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Reservoir Fracture modeling method and system |
CN107015275B (en) * | 2017-04-14 | 2019-04-19 | 中国矿业大学(北京) | Karst collapse col umn detection method and device |
CN107193053B (en) * | 2017-07-12 | 2019-04-09 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | The vertical transporting capability evaluation method of nappe-gliding structure Volcanic Area reversed fault sub-unit in front of the mountains |
CN107942381B (en) * | 2017-11-01 | 2020-01-10 | 中国矿业大学 | Quantitative prediction method for tight oil reservoir bedding joints |
CN108804849B (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2022-04-26 | 西南石油大学 | Rock mechanical parameter evaluation method based on structural complexity |
-
2019
- 2019-04-18 CN CN201910312580.0A patent/CN110007343B/en active Active
- 2019-09-16 AU AU2019429806A patent/AU2019429806B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2019-09-16 WO PCT/CN2019/105877 patent/WO2020211277A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104239738A (en) * | 2014-09-28 | 2014-12-24 | 山东科技大学 | Method for predicting floor original water flowing fractured zone |
US20180128940A1 (en) * | 2016-11-04 | 2018-05-10 | Robert J. Ferderer | Global Inversion of Gravity Data Using the Principle of General Local Isostasy for Lithospheric Modeling |
CN106934860A (en) * | 2017-01-12 | 2017-07-07 | 天津大学 | A kind of three-dimensional geological modeling method based on T battens |
CN109345119A (en) * | 2018-09-30 | 2019-02-15 | 山东科技大学 | A kind of roof Dynamical Division evaluation method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) |
CN109598015A (en) * | 2018-10-08 | 2019-04-09 | 成都理工大学 | Rock-mass with cataclastic texture fragmentation grading evaluation method |
CN109490985A (en) * | 2018-12-24 | 2019-03-19 | 桂林理工大学 | A kind of geophysical reconnaissance system and method |
CN110007343A (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2019-07-12 | 中国矿业大学 | A kind of evaluation method of regional tectonics complexity |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112415582A (en) * | 2020-10-15 | 2021-02-26 | 山东大学 | Three-dimensional speed geological modeling method for random arrangement of structure and wave velocity |
CN114332401A (en) * | 2022-03-11 | 2022-04-12 | 四川省公路规划勘察设计研究院有限公司 | Quantitative evaluation method for structural complexity of three-dimensional geological model |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN110007343B (en) | 2021-01-29 |
CN110007343A (en) | 2019-07-12 |
AU2019429806B2 (en) | 2021-11-04 |
AU2019429806A1 (en) | 2020-11-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2020211277A1 (en) | Method for evaluating regional geological structure complexity | |
CN109447837B (en) | Danger assessment method for rock burst in mining area | |
CN104730596B (en) | A kind of discrete fractures modeling method based on multiple dimensioned factor constraints | |
CN106501856B (en) | Sub- earthquake fault quantitative forecasting technique | |
WO2014166244A1 (en) | Method for evaluating water inrush weakness of coal seam floor | |
CN113919196A (en) | Reservoir three-dimensional stress field simulation method, simulation system, terminal and storage medium | |
CN104267435B (en) | A kind of well logging computational methods of transverse isotropy stratum coefficient of elasticity and device | |
CN104992468A (en) | Fracture-cavern type carbonate hydrocarbon reservoir three-dimensional geological modeling method | |
CN102455438B (en) | Method for predicting volume of carbonate rock fractured cave type reservoir | |
CN114663627A (en) | Mine digital model establishing method based on three-dimensional point cloud database | |
CN113820750A (en) | Method for quantitatively predicting mudstone structural cracks based on elastoplasticity mechanics | |
CN111222254A (en) | Working face rock burst danger grade dividing method and system based on stress superposition method | |
CN115166853A (en) | Shale gas reservoir natural fracture model establishing method and device, electronic equipment and medium | |
CN114169789A (en) | Coal mine rock burst prediction method based on hierarchical analysis and fuzzy comprehensive judgment | |
CN106199712B (en) | A kind of method and device in definite pressure break casing deformation region | |
Long et al. | Automatic identification of irregular rock blocks from 3D point cloud data of rock surface | |
Alade et al. | Modified volumetric joint count to check for suitability of granite outcrops for dimension stone production | |
CN102650617B (en) | Sound wave penetrating through moving unit body detecting method for structural concrete | |
CN107315880A (en) | The localization method of tunnel straight flange wall three-dimensional failure mode under action of horizontal seismic | |
CN112818439B (en) | Soft rock tunnel surrounding rock sub-level grading method | |
Li et al. | Construction and application of prediction methods for coal texture of CBM reservoirs at the block scale | |
Esmaeilzadeh et al. | Shape effect of fractures on intensity and density of discreet fracture networks | |
Chertkov et al. | Networks originating from the multiple cracking of different scales in rocks and swelling soils | |
CN115408907B (en) | Method and system for evaluating surface antiknock striking performance | |
Wang et al. | Numerical simulation of surface movement and deformation caused by underground mining with complex stratigraphic boundary |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2019429806 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20190916 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 19924734 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 19924734 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |