WO2020123842A1 - Système laser de chirurgie ophtalmique et son procédé d'utilisation pour la chirurgie ophtalmique - Google Patents

Système laser de chirurgie ophtalmique et son procédé d'utilisation pour la chirurgie ophtalmique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2020123842A1
WO2020123842A1 PCT/US2019/066039 US2019066039W WO2020123842A1 WO 2020123842 A1 WO2020123842 A1 WO 2020123842A1 US 2019066039 W US2019066039 W US 2019066039W WO 2020123842 A1 WO2020123842 A1 WO 2020123842A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
laser
light
module
objective
ophthalmic
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2019/066039
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Jesse Buck
Michael Hager
Original Assignee
Drake Precision Optics, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Drake Precision Optics, Inc. filed Critical Drake Precision Optics, Inc.
Publication of WO2020123842A1 publication Critical patent/WO2020123842A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F9/00—Methods or devices for treatment of the eyes; Devices for putting-in contact lenses; Devices to correct squinting; Apparatus to guide the blind; Protective devices for the eyes, carried on the body or in the hand
    • A61F9/007—Methods or devices for eye surgery
    • A61F9/008—Methods or devices for eye surgery using laser
    • A61F9/00825—Methods or devices for eye surgery using laser for photodisruption
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F9/00—Methods or devices for treatment of the eyes; Devices for putting-in contact lenses; Devices to correct squinting; Apparatus to guide the blind; Protective devices for the eyes, carried on the body or in the hand
    • A61F9/007—Methods or devices for eye surgery
    • A61F9/008—Methods or devices for eye surgery using laser
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
    • A61B18/18—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves
    • A61B18/20—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves using laser
    • A61B18/203—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves using laser applying laser energy to the outside of the body
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
    • A61B2018/00571—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body for achieving a particular surgical effect
    • A61B2018/00601—Cutting
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
    • A61B2018/00636—Sensing and controlling the application of energy
    • A61B2018/00773—Sensed parameters
    • A61B2018/00779—Power or energy
    • A61B2018/00785—Reflected power
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
    • A61B18/18—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves
    • A61B18/20—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves using laser
    • A61B2018/2035—Beam shaping or redirecting; Optical components therefor
    • A61B2018/20351—Scanning mechanisms
    • A61B2018/20353—Scanning in three dimensions [3D]
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
    • A61B18/18—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves
    • A61B18/20—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves using laser
    • A61B2018/2035—Beam shaping or redirecting; Optical components therefor
    • A61B2018/20351—Scanning mechanisms
    • A61B2018/20355—Special scanning path or conditions, e.g. spiral, raster or providing spot overlap
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
    • A61B18/18—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves
    • A61B18/20—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves using laser
    • A61B2018/2035—Beam shaping or redirecting; Optical components therefor
    • A61B2018/20351—Scanning mechanisms
    • A61B2018/20359—Scanning mechanisms by movable mirrors, e.g. galvanometric
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
    • A61B18/18—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves
    • A61B18/20—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body by applying electromagnetic radiation, e.g. microwaves using laser
    • A61B2018/2035—Beam shaping or redirecting; Optical components therefor
    • A61B2018/20553—Beam shaping or redirecting; Optical components therefor with special lens or reflector arrangement
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F9/00—Methods or devices for treatment of the eyes; Devices for putting-in contact lenses; Devices to correct squinting; Apparatus to guide the blind; Protective devices for the eyes, carried on the body or in the hand
    • A61F9/007—Methods or devices for eye surgery
    • A61F9/008—Methods or devices for eye surgery using laser
    • A61F2009/00861—Methods or devices for eye surgery using laser adapted for treatment at a particular location
    • A61F2009/00872—Cornea
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F9/00—Methods or devices for treatment of the eyes; Devices for putting-in contact lenses; Devices to correct squinting; Apparatus to guide the blind; Protective devices for the eyes, carried on the body or in the hand
    • A61F9/007—Methods or devices for eye surgery
    • A61F9/008—Methods or devices for eye surgery using laser
    • A61F2009/00897—Scanning mechanisms or algorithms

Definitions

  • the present disclosure generally pertains to an ophthalmic laser system and a method for delivering a laser for ophthalmic surgery or other high precision 3D laser processing applications.
  • the eye In the field of laser surgery, the eye is a particularly beneficial area of endeavor.
  • the measurement of cornea and lens topology (CLT) is of primary importance.
  • the cornea and lens are nearly transparent tissues.
  • optical methods of measurement are advantageous to employ, the major categories being confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and structured light measurements.
  • Examples of structured light include the ubiquitous slit lamp which projects a ribbon of light at an angle through the eye, and 3D laser scanning in which a narrow laser beam is rapidly scanned on a lateral path to effectively create a sheet of light that may be scanned across the material under test to find the X, Y, and Z coordinates of the surface(s) or other scattering regions of the material under test.
  • a CCD camera is typically focused on the material under test so that the scanned stripe of light can be observed with a digital image.
  • the only requirement is to create an angle“A” between the axis of the light source and the optical axis of the camera, in which case the axis in the image which is co-planar with the axis of the light source will have a component of the Z axis proportional to the sine of the angle A.
  • This approach is often referred to as laser triangulation.
  • the angle A is often referred to as the disparity angle.
  • Instruments such as the Oculus PentacamTM diagnostic and the LENSAR femtosecond laser have been popular 3D scanning instruments used on the market. These devices employ the standard approach to create an angle between the camera and the scanning beam, in which the light beam is coming straight into the eye, while the camera is located off to the side and the camera can be mechanically scanned in azimuth around the axis of the light beam.
  • the camera’s azimuthal position is controlled so its optical axis will face the wide axis of the light ribbon or scanning light sheet in order to have the best resolution in the image.
  • the continuous rotation of the light ribbon axis allows every position in the field of view to be illuminated by the corresponding choice of the ribbon angle. With the exception of the origin which is illuminated for all choices of ribbon angle, each point can be illuminated for one and only one choice of ribbon angle, thus there is no multiplicity of perspective angles available for any point in the field of view except for the origin with the PentacamTM.
  • Another advantage of moving the camera’s azimuth position in a full circle is that the disparity angle will be distributed over all clock positions, thus providing the most detailed geometric information. Rotating the camera position creates an advantage of multiple perspective measurements contained in an entire measurement run.
  • the transparency of the tissue of the cornea and lens allows for image guided scanning of a laser focal spot over a 3-dimensional volume with many surgical opportunities available.
  • the laser scanning is essentially 2- dimensional over the surface of the tissue being treated, such as in dermatology.
  • Surgery of the eye to treat cataracts is the highest volume surgical procedure in the world in terms of number of procedures per year; however, the high cost of an eye surgery laser system has been an obstacle, which prevents all but the top tier of surgeons from owning an advanced ophthalmic laser surgery system (e.g., such as an anterior segment femtosecond eye surgery laser).
  • OCT Optical Coherence Tomography
  • LSCM laser scanning confocal microscope
  • femtosecond laser surgery systems use their cutting laser at a lower power setting to provide illumination. Femtosecond surgery lasers are pulsed (e.g., ⁇ 1 picosecond), which concentrates the peak power far above the average power.
  • Such femtosecond laser surgery systems are typically larger and more costly to produce and use.
  • Traditional laser surgery systems and laser delivery systems are bulky, and expensive and difficult to produce and use.
  • a laser delivery system with a deep focus range, such as for ophthalmic surgery is typically a complex optical design, which is expensive and difficult to produce.
  • the complex optical designs for a laser delivery system and associated optical measurement subsystems are costly to manufacture, and comprise a major cost driver of these laser surgery systems, second only to the laser engine which provides the source of femtosecond laser pulses.
  • an ophthalmic 3D laser scanning system configured to be integrated into a femtosecond laser surgery system.
  • This system includes: a light source configured to provide a beam of light that is configured to be scanned and a plurality of reflective and refractive devices configured to direct the beam of light from the light source at a variety of angles along a structured path to an objective.
  • the objective is configured to direct the beam of light from the light source at an object in a viewing region of the objective.
  • the system further includes a camera with imaging optics for capturing images of object topography.
  • the camera has a viewing axis along a Z-axis, and the beam of light is positioned at an angle to the Z-axis as it impinges on the object.
  • the object is configured to reflect at least a portion of the beam of light back into the system, and the imaging optics are configured to receive images of the object illuminated by the beam of light such that the received images are subsequently analyzed to calculate geometric dimensions of the object.
  • an ophthalmic 3D laser system including: a laser engine capable of generating a laser beam; a laser delivery system in optical communication with the laser engine further including: a laser beam shaper; and a laser guide having a scanning module and a focus module.
  • the scanning module has a receiving end and a transmitting end, and the receiving end receives the generated laser beam and brings the generated laser beam into focus thereby creating a focused beam that is transmitted from the transmitting end into the focus module.
  • the focus module is configured to receive the focused beam from the scanning module and revert the focused beam into a parallel light stream and further direct the parallel light stream into an objective module.
  • the objective module is configured to direct the parallel light stream into a focal point within a three dimensional target space.
  • an ophthalmic 3D laser system including: a femtosecond laser engine capable of generating a laser beam for surgical procedure; a laser source, with substantially the same wavelength as the femtosecond laser engine, for delivering a low peak power laser beam; a laser beam shaper; and a reconfigurable optical device.
  • the reconfigurable optical device is configured for positioning in a first position and in a second position in order to selectively engage either the generated femtosecond laser beam of the femtosecond laser engine or the low peak power laser beam of the laser source.
  • the first position of the reconfigurable optical device is configured such that the
  • reconfigurable optical device optically engages with the generated femtosecond laser beam such that it may be in line with a path of the generated femtosecond laser beam generated by the femtosecond laser engine and configured to direct the generated laser beam into the laser beam shaper.
  • the reconfigurable optical device is also configured to deny entry of the low peak power laser beam of the laser source into the laser beam shaper in the first position.
  • the second position of the reconfigurable optical device is configured such that the reconfigurable optical device is out of alignment with the generated femtosecond laser beam and thus the generated femtosecond laser beam is denied entry into the laser beam shaper and wherein the low peak power laser beam is directed into the laser beam shaper.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a traditional scanning system according to known art.
  • FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate a front and side view of a traditional ophthalmic scanning system.
  • FIG. 2C is a representation of an optical measurement using the commercially available PentacamTM instrument.
  • FIG. 3 is a known scanning system in the art, showing the size of the
  • PentacamTM instrument relative to a patient.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a commercially available LENSAR system.
  • FIGS. 5A to 5C show various components in accordance with an embodiment of this disclosure to illustrate exemplary paths of the 3D scanning beams.
  • FIGS. 6A to 6E illustrate an embodiment of the objective module of this disclosure showing the size relative to a patient, also showing exemplary paths of 3D scanning beams, prisms, and channels in an objective housing, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIGS. 7A to 7C further illustrate details of various 3D scanner light paths in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate an embodiment of this disclosure with visible imaging optics and an image sensor which view the surgical field at the output of the objective, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIG. 9 schematically illustrates an ophthalmic surgery laser system, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIG. 10A illustrates an aspect of focusing the laser at the system output and at an intermediate space, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIGS. 10B - 10D illustrate various components of the laser shaper and demonstrate the low number of lens elements required to implement a simplified design, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIG. 11 is a graphical illustration of the relation of encircled energy to radius to form a focal spot, in accordance with an embodiment and compared to a traditional optical design for an ophthalmic laser delivery system.
  • FIG. 12 shows the optical design of the laser guide components of an exemplary laser delivery system, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIGS. 13A - 13C illustrate a counterbalance system, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate an economical high precision mechanism for supporting a lens module, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIG. 15 illustrates a Variable Laser Beam Expander (VLBE), in accordance with an embodiment.
  • VLBE Variable Laser Beam Expander
  • FIGS. 16A and 16B illustrate a comparison between standard VLBE designs and embodiments of this disclosure.
  • FIGS. 17A - 17D illustrate various elements of an embodiment of this disclosure.
  • FIGS. 18A and 18B illustrate an embodiment of a motor controlled variable iris, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIG. 19 schematically illustrates an ophthalmic surgery laser system, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIG. 20 schematically illustrates aspects of the laser beam diagnostics, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIG. 21 schematically illustrates another embodiment of the laser beam diagnostics.
  • FIG. 22 schematically illustrates aspects of the ophthalmic surgery laser system which enable LSCM functionality, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • FIG. 23 illustrates an embodiment of this disclosure.
  • FIG. 24 is a graphical illustration of a data plot in accordance with an embodiment of this disclosure.
  • FIG. 25 is a graphical illustration of an embodiment of an LSCM
  • FIG. 26 is an illustration of the results of a spiral LSCM measurement, in accordance with an embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)
  • any reference to or mention of a laser, a laser beam, or a beam throughout this disclosure refers to a beam of light (or light beam) that may be from a light source or a laser source.
  • this disclosure takes advantage of the video monitor system (see, e.g., video image lenses 816 and CCD camera 815 in FIG. 8A) which is already required on a surgical laser system to allow the doctor to observe the docking and treatment processes.
  • the video monitor for example the CCD camera 815 in FIG. 8A, in conjunction with the video imaging lenses 816 which create an image at the CCD plane using the light received through the objective, may also be employed in this case to receive machine vision type 3D scanning data for analysis by the control system.
  • the only additional parts required to add this 3D scanning system to a surgical laser system already equipped with a doctor’s monitor consist of a compact and relatively inexpensive light projection system (e.g., as described with reference to FIGS. 5A, 7A-7C, and 8A), and small prisms (505) which are added to the outside of the objective assembly (further described with reference to FIGS. 6A-6B).
  • a compact and relatively inexpensive light projection system e.g., as described with reference to FIGS. 5A, 7A-7C, and 8A
  • small prisms 505
  • An ophthalmic surgery laser system and method of laser delivery for an ophthalmic surgery laser system is disclosed herein.
  • Embodiments of the system and method are directed to an ophthalmic surgery laser system including a laser engine, a laser guide, and a laser shaper, which as a group provide the controlled laser cutting.
  • Embodiments of the system and method are directed to, a laser delivery system for an ophthalmic surgery laser system, additional functionality such laser scanning confocal microscopy, structured light scanning, built-in laser beam diagnostics, and other functions.
  • Embodiments further include the use of a lower power illumination source (e.g., continuous wave as opposed to pulsed) for in-vivo measurement functions.
  • the present disclosure shows how to use a movable mirror in conjunction with a small number of additional parts to switch from a laser exposure system over to an LSCM diagnostic imaging function.
  • Many embodiments include a laser delivery system with an alternative design that reduces the number of moving parts and simplifying the embodiments for ophthalmic 3- D scanning systems.
  • Many embodiments include a 3D scanner visible laser delivery system that is configured to provide beams of light entering the eye at an offset angle with respect to the Z-axis of the objective.
  • a camera for capturing images of the patient ophthalmic topography as well as the surgical display, may be positioned with its optical axis coaxial to the central Z-axis of the objective.
  • Many embodiments may be configured with one or more beam splitters for directing the infrared and visible beams along the desired optical paths.
  • 3D scanning is a technique traditionally used to capture optical images of the translucent or opaque structures within a patient’s eye for use in diagnostic and treatment planning procedures.
  • the layout of the traditional system typically involves the camera being placed at an angle to the axis of the imaging light source that is directed into the patient’s eye along the optical axis of the eye, which is understood to be the Z axis. This principle can be illustrated in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates what may be seen in the art with traditional 3D scanning systems, where a camera 101 viewing axis is positioned at an angle to the light source 102.
  • the angle between the camera axis and the light source is important for measuring the position of the object within the Z-axis.
  • the laser or light source 102 in FIG. 1 is directed at an object with various Z positions.
  • the image 120 seen from the camera 101 illustrates the lateral position of the laser beam in the image will correspond to the Z position of the object where it is illuminated.
  • FIG. 2A illustrates a front or top view of a traditional system where the light source is directed to the patient’s eye 202.
  • the camera 101 may be rotated circumferentially around the eye 202 to record the image produced by the axially directed light ribbon passing through the translucent structures of the eye.
  • FIG. 2B illustrated a side view of a traditional system.
  • FIG. 2C shows a typical 3-D analysis of a traditional scanning system.
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate some known prior art systems that follow a more traditional layout for 3-D scanning of patients.
  • FIG. 3 shows a photo of the Pentacam ⁇ system in clinical use. Such system has a moving camera and has an overall diameter of more than a foot to allow for the camera movement.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a LensAR ⁇ refractive cataract laser which is an example of a surgical laser system that uses structured light scanning vs. the more common OCT method.
  • the LensAR ⁇ system does not use OCT , it follows a traditional approach to camera and light source placement for performing the necessary diagnostic measurements of the patient’s eye at the objective. In other words, the camera rotates about the objective to obtain the necessary eye structure geometry prior to performing the surgical procedures. It can be readily seen that such systems can be bulky and complex thus creating a need for smaller and less complex systems to perform such measurements.
  • the camera remains in a fixed position within the system aside from slight focus adjustments and in many other embodiments the camera remains on axis to receive the feedback light scattered from the patient’s eye.
  • the scanning light must be projected into the eye at an angle.
  • the angle for projection of the light is greater than 15 degrees (inclusive) from the Z axis, e.g., in order to provide a useful magnitude of the disparity angle.
  • FIGS. 5A through 6B illustrate various components of the compact 3-D scanning system in accordance with an embodiment. Such features of this herein described 3D scanning system may be incorporated or integrated into a femtosecond laser surgery system.
  • FIG. 5A illustrates one embodiment of various components and exemplary paths of 3D scanning beams in a 3-D scanning system (e.g., subsystem 500 in FIG. 19), in accordance with embodiments herein, having a light source 507 that directs a beam of light towards a plurality of reflective and refractive devices.
  • Such reflective and refractive devices may include, for example, mirrors and prisms, which control a path of the beam(s) of light.
  • small scan mirrors 501 such as having approximately a 3 mm diameter, for example, are configured to redirect the source light into the system to be reflected and refracted down the desired path to the objective 504 and ultimately up to and through the eye.
  • the scan mirrors 501 may be galvo mirrors.
  • the small mirrors 501 may be configured to move with respect to the light source, while no other components need to move to accomplish 3D scanning.
  • the movement of the small mirrors 501 may allow for the angle of the light to be adjusted as it enters the rest of the 3D scanner delivery system thereby adjusting the end position of the light as it exits the objective 504 and into the eye (such as shown in greater detail in FIG. 5B, as well as FIG. 7C).
  • This method of moving the small mirrors with respect to the light source will produce a similar effect as a projected light ribbon on the traditional systems when the light beam is swept along a selected path during the exposure period of a CCD camera.
  • the size of the mirrors and movement system can be much smaller than the traditional light ribbon and moving camera system thereby allowing for a reduction in size and complexity of the system.
  • the small mirrors provide beam position control of the beam of light in two dimensions, so in addition to creating a scanned light ribbon in a direction such as the X axis, the lateral position of such a light ribbon can be controlled in a direction such as Y. That is, in an embodiment, the mirrors are configured to provide the beam of light in two dimensions such as the X-axis and the Y-axis, and the object (eye) receives the beam of light at an angle to the Z-axis (such as 20 degrees, as described later).
  • each (added) prism is able to scan most of the system field of view.
  • the other three (3) prisms can cover the region missed by any one prism, and, in fact, most points in the field of view can be illuminated by all four prisms.
  • the 3D Scanner light source 507 may be added to a traditional system by use of the video beamsplitter 506 (shown in FIGS. 5A, 7A, and 8 A) which transmits the scanning light beams into the objective 504 while reflecting the image information into the video monitor system (see, e.g., video image lenses 816 and CCD camera 815 in FIG. 8A).
  • a scanner fold mirror 520 (FIG. 5A) is added to achieve a more compact design envelope.
  • the reflectivity of the video beamsplitter 506 may be quite high, such as 90%, since, in this case, the sensitivity of the video monitor system will hardly be affected by losses from the beamsplitter 506.
  • the scanning beam will correspondingly be strongly attenuated on passage through the beamsplitter 506, with a transmission of only 10%, for example.
  • compact and economical visible diode laser sources are available (e.g., with power level such as 30-50 milliwatts which are much higher than safe levels used to illuminate the eye such as 1 milliwatt), it is not a problem in this case that the scanning source will have high losses on the beamsplitter 506, such that the diagnostic beam reaches the eye at a safe power level.
  • FIG. 5A also illustrates an exemplary implementation for providing an axial illumination source 502 between pyramidal mirror 509 and fold mirror 520.
  • the illumination source 502 may be an on-axis IR illuminator which may be useful for alignment and calibration purposes.
  • the region between pyramid mirror 509 and fold mirror 520 may contain a patient fixation light 512 and/or an axial scan periscope 510+511 which transforms one arm of the 3D scanner from the original role of providing off axis light beams with a disparity angle into being an on axis scanner with essentially zero disparity angle in the imaging system.
  • At least two mirrors may be added (along with prisms) to a system in order to convert one or more of the usual prism paths into an axial scan function.
  • Such implementations may be useful for initial alignment of the delivery system relative to the patient’s position, for example, projecting a cross or concentric circles to assist in the docking process while the objective is initially several inches away from the patient’s eye.
  • the pyramidal mirror 509 may be placed, in accordance with an embodiment, in proximity of the plurality of mirrors which control the path of the scanning / light beam, such that each prism (505) in the objective (504) may be reached by aiming the beam onto a corresponding facet of the pyramidal mirror 509. In an embodiment, there may be substantial overlap of the regions in the object (eye) which may be scanned by each prism 505.
  • prisms 505 and channels 515, 525 may be added to objective housing 530 of the objective 504.
  • Considerations for adding 3D scanner prisms 505 and internal channels 515 and 525 to the objective housing 530 of objective 504 are illustrated in exemplary embodiments of FIGS. 6A though 6E.
  • An objective 504 is illustrated in FIG. 6A with its outer housing 530 depicted as clear or opaque for illustrative purposes only.
  • FIG. 6B illustrates an embodiment of the objective 504 with an outer housing 530 depicted as opaque.
  • the objective 504, in accordance with an embodiment herein, may be configured to redirect a variety of scanning beams, generally represented in FIG.
  • the prisms 505 and internal channels 515, 525 are added to the housing 530 to support the 3D scanning function, in accordance with an embodiment herein. Such features are shown in greater detail in FIGS. 6B, 6D, and 6E.
  • the prisms 505 add only a small amount to the overall diameter of the objective housing 530 (shown in FIG. 6B, for example) of objective 504, relative to the size of the housing already needed (in known systems) to mount only the circular lens elements.
  • the prisms 505 are placed outside of the objective lenses El, E2, E3, and E4 (shown in FIG.
  • the prisms 505 may be placed in a middle region of the objective housing 530, such that the 3D scanning light travels or passes through the first and last objective lenses El and E4 (respectively), but it will miss the interior objective lenses E2 and E3 and instead travel through the prisms 505.
  • Such a configuration produces a skewed path which is instrumental in generating the herein described (larger) angle (e.g., approximately 20 degrees) to the Z-axis for the scanning light beam(s) of light, as it arrives at and illuminates the object.
  • the prisms 505 may be placed adjacent to or near objective lens E3, such as shown in FIG.
  • the prisms 505 may be mounted outside a diameter of some of the interior lenses of the objective, such as E2 and E3. This configuration also maintains a highly compact overall size for the objective and its housing 530.
  • the objective lens diameters will decrease going from top to bottom and also have large air spaces between them relative to the center thickness of the glass elements.
  • FIG. 6A shows one particular embodiment in accordance with this disclosure in which there are four (4) small prisms 505 positioned every 90 degrees generally about the inner circumference along an inner wall of the housing 530 of objective assembly 504.
  • the disparity angle may be set to have an azimuthal orientation of 0, 90, 180, or 270 degrees around the Z axis, depending on which prism in the objective the light is directed into.
  • the objective housing 530 will have an elongated and tapered shape (such as shown in FIG. 6B) which provides good clearance for patient anatomy (e.g., nose and brow) and furthermore provides the doctor with a nearly unobstructed direct view of the patient during the entire procedure.
  • the patient interface lens 601 - or“PI” lens - (shown in FIG. 6A, for example), which is a component of the patient interface 600 and which provides the optical and mechanical interface between the patient’s eye and the laser system.
  • the PI lens 601 may be designed either as a contact interface (Cl), generally with a concave final surface designed to press directly onto the cornea, or the PI lens 601 may be designed as a liquid interface (LI), with a typically convex final surface designed to be immersed in fluid such as sterile saline with the cornea facing the LI lens also immersed in fluid.
  • the PI diameter of the PI lens 601 may be, in accordance with an embodiment, at least
  • FIG. 6A and FIGS. 6D-6E also show that some internal channels 515 and 525 may be provided, in accordance with embodiments, in the objective housing 530 to allow passage of the scanning beam(s) over its range of scan positions.
  • Channels 515 may be open channels, for the prisms and 3D scanning light paths, that have a depth extending from the inner wall of the housing 530 and into its body (towards an outer wall of the housing), such as seen in FIG. 6D.
  • Channels 515 may be provided in the housing 530 near prisms 505 and objective lenses E2 and E3 and/or near or at a patient interface 600 (such as shown, one side, in FIG. 6E).
  • channels 515 may be provided on either side of an objective housing 530, e.g., across from each other. In a particular embodiment, four channels 515 may be provided in objective housing 530. In one embodiment, each channel 515 may be provided adjacent to (e.g., below or near) a position of a prism 505 within the housing 530. In another embodiment, one or more channels 515 may be provided between prisms 505. In yet another embodiment, channels 515 are provided adjacent to, at, or below objective lens E4 and/or near or at patient interface 600. Channels 525 may be closed channels for receiving light pipe fibers for general illumination of the surgical field, i.e., illuminating the object or eye.
  • each of these closed illumination channels 525 allow a thin light pipe (fibers) to extend along the objective housing 530 and reach down to an output end (at patient interface 600) of the objective housing 530, while any LEDs and associated wiring are provided at a top end of the housing. This is helpful in achieving a compact envelope by moving larger components (like LEDS and wiring) away from the smaller bottom output end.
  • Channels 525 may be formed within a wall (or walls) of the body of the objective housing 530, e.g., formed between the inner wall and the outer wall of the housing 530. In an embodiment, channels 525 may be placed around the objective housing 530.
  • one or more channels 525 may be placed relatively between two prisms 505 (e.g., relatively adjacent prisms). In an embodiment, one or more channels 525 may be placed relatively between relatively adjacent channels 515. In a particular embodiment, eight channels 525 may be provided in objective housing 530. Of course, any combination of the above described placement of channels 515, 525 may also be implemented in embodiments herein.
  • Creating suitable internal channels 515 and 525 to pass these rays / beams in the known (metal) objective housing would be complex and expensive with conventional EDM machining, for example.
  • 3D printing the objective housing 530 with a metal is a cost effective way to produce these necessarily complex internal features and channels 515, 525 of the objective housing 530, in order to accommodate 3D scanning capability.
  • a single pass with conventional machining, such as a lathe is applied to the near net shape 3D metal printed part, in order to economically generate high precision lens mounting surfaces, precise external dimensions, smooth finish, and/or other characteristics difficult to achieve with direct 3D metal printing.
  • the complex internal features of the objective housing may be produced by a process of 3D printing in metal, followed by a single pass of conventional machining to achieve high precision (where required).
  • the direction of the light into different quadrants may be conveniently implemented by placing a square pyramidal mirror (shown as pyramid mirror 509 in FIGS. 5A and 5C) after the galvo scanners or galvo scan mirrors 501. Any of the four quadrant prisms 505 in the objective 504 may be accessed by controlling the galvos 501 to direct the light beam onto the corresponding face of the pyramid mirror 509.
  • the disparity angle may be selected from four (4) different directions, all parts of the eye can be measured with nearly optimum geometry, thus matching the advantage in a traditional system of rotating the camera around the azimuth, but only requiring motion of the small galvo mirrors for implementation.
  • the ability to measure the Z position for a given point in the field of view from multiple disparity directions as provided herein may improve the accuracy of the result by averaging the results for that point from each disparity direction.
  • a traditional ophthalmic scanner such as those previously discussed, only the center point typically benefits from being exposed with multiple disparity azimuth angles.
  • the illustrations and above described embodiment is not intended to be limiting. That is, the number of prisms may be altered based on the desired outcome (e.g., more than 4 or less than 4). Further, the positioning of the prisms may be altered such that the spacing between the prisms is adjusted and need not necessarily be equidistant around and along the inner circumference of the objective 504, but does not necessarily need to be at ninety (90) degrees.
  • each of the prisms 505 are symmetrically arranged around the objective 504 and the pyramid mirror 509 may have a base of a triangle or pentagon.
  • the prisms 505 may be arranged around the objective 504 with 90 degree angles therebetween along with a square pyramid mirror 509, in order to provide a range of disparity angles and a relatively straightforward design.
  • the beamsplitters may be positioned such that the scanning light source is directed to the patient’s eye and the scattered light from the patient can be efficiently redirected to a camera system, such as the imaging lenses 816 plus the image sensor (i.e., CCD camera) 815 depicted in FIG. 8A.
  • the lenses and/or beamsplitters 503 and 506 aid in generating a structured light that will enter the objective assembly 504 to be directed to the patient’s eye at a substantial angle a to the camera viewing axis, i.e., to the Z-axis.
  • FIG. 5B shows details of one embodiment where the scanning light exits the objective 504 shown with a liquid interface LI lens 601 (also shown in FIG. 6A) with approximately a 20 degree angle a to the Z axis, i.e., the rays below the concave surface of the LI going into a uniform medium. While in FIG. 5B the eye structures are not shown in order to clarify the angled exit path of the light, in FIG. 7C, the
  • the objective 504 is the component that ultimately directs the 3D scanning beam of light into the patient interface lens 601 and on to the patient’s eye (or object) to measure the geometry with laser triangulation.
  • the objective 504 may be configured with a number of prisms 505 mounted inside the physical structure of the objective 504.
  • the prisms 505, according to many embodiments may allow the structured light to enter the eye at substantial angles, such as 20 degrees as shown in FIG. 5B, thereby eliminating the need for additional bulky equipment to achieve the precise measurements that are desired and necessary for proper diagnosis and ultimate treatment.
  • Some embodiments having prisms may allow the structured light to enter the eye at an angle a, such as approximately 20 degrees.
  • the disparity angle a i.e., the angle to the Z-axis at which the structured light enters the eye, i.e., as a result of the scanning light exiting the objective 504 and being directed to lens 601
  • the disparity angle a at which the structured light enters the eye is between approximately 15 degrees to approximately 25 degrees (both inclusive).
  • one of the scan sectors be converted to a coaxial output from the objective. Since the field of view is covered from multiple sectors, the removal of any one sector will not prevent any particular part of the field of view from being measured.
  • an axial scan beam may be desired for other purposes, such as projecting a concentric circle pattern for setting up the initial alignment of the objective to the patient’s eye.
  • FIG. 5C An example of adding two (2) mirrors and one (1) lens to convert a 3D scan sector into an axial scan is shown in FIG. 5C. For clarity only, two (2) sectors are shown in FIG.
  • the path going down from the pyramid mirror 509 is a standard 3D scan sector shown for reference, while the path going up from pyramid mirror 509 has been converted to axial by the mirrors or periscope 510 and 511, then the negative lens 513 acts to increase the available angular scan range for the axial scan.
  • the mirror 511 may be chosen to be a dichroic mirror in order to support the function of a fixation light, i.e., a visible light in the center position to assist the patient in directing his or her gaze.
  • a fixation light i.e., a visible light in the center position to assist the patient in directing his or her gaze.
  • the 3D scan laser beam may be green while the fixation light may be red, and the dichroic mirror 511 may be selected to transmit red and reflect green.
  • a light source (not shown) is collimated by the lens 512, transmitted through 511 and 513, and will appear in the center position when viewed by the patient for the function of a fixation light. It is also possible to use the fixation light without converting any sectors to the axial mode.
  • FIG. 7B shows a more detailed representation of the scanning beams 610, shown here as beams 610A, 610B, 610C, 610D, 610E, and 610F.
  • each of the beams 610A-610F are redirected at a different angle once directed through one of the prisms 505 (e.g., one of the aforementioned four prisms 505, in accordance with an embodiment).
  • the prisms 505 e.g., one of the aforementioned four prisms 505, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • Many embodiments achieve the direction of the scanning beams 610 with prisms 505 located within the objective housing 530.
  • the number of scanning beams 610A-610F as provided in the illustrated embodiment is not intended to be limiting; the beams shown represent the approximate full scale range of the scan projection into the target region for each choice of prism 505.
  • the light beams scan in continuous patterns, such as a raster scan, and are projected through each prism in a sequence.
  • the control system will trigger the CCD camera 815 in coordination with the action of the 3D scanner light beam, to rapidly (e.g., less than 5 seconds) acquire a sequence of images in which each image has the 3D scanning beam traversing a predetermined region (for example, one line out of a raster pattern).
  • Each such image may be analyzed with standard laser triangulation methods to find the C,U,Z coordinates of features of an object in a viewing region of the objective illuminated by the 3D scanning beam.
  • Such features may include anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea of the eye or lens capsule, as may be needed for planning the surgical laser cutting path, or may include the iris or sclera, as may be needed for monitoring docking stability, i.e., potential unwanted movement of the eye during the course of anatomy measurement and delivery of the surgical cutting beam.
  • the viewing region of the objective is an anterior portion of an eye to be dimensionally measured.
  • a very compact envelope results from placing the prisms 505 at a conjugate plane to the galvo scan mirrors 501 such as shown in the example optical design layout of FIG. 5 A.
  • the conjugate plane is determined by 2 refractive elements in this example, the exterior video lens 816 and the El objective lens.
  • the beam footprint on the prism will be small even though the beam is scanned over the entire available angular range, thus the prisms 505 are able to have a small size such as 6 mm width in some embodiments.
  • the small size of the prisms 505 may only increase to the size of the objective housing 530 slightly, compared to the size already needed to hold the lens elements which focus the surgical laser beam.
  • each of the scanning beams 610 will necessarily be affected by a substantial degree of astigmatism and this means it is not possible for the output beam to be small at any particular location in both radial and tangential directions.
  • the astigmatism (or the degree thereof) imposed on the scanning beam(s) by traversing a marginal portion of some refractive elements in the path is controlled so that a narrow astigmatic beam dimension is perpendicular to a rapid scan direction used to generate a light sheet with the best resolution.
  • the rays or scanning beams are labeled 610A, 610B... to 610F to show the change of direction of each beam / ray as they pass through one of the prisms 505.
  • the radial direction for a given prism 505 is the direction from that prism to the center axis (Z axis) of the objective 504 while the tangential direction is orthogonal to both the radial axis and the Z axis.
  • the astigmatism is not a disadvantage for the many embodiments of the disclosure because the light beam may be scanned rapidly in the tangential direction in order to create a sheet of light for each video frame that is acquired.
  • the input laser beam to the small scan mirrors 501 may be adjusted in focus characteristics so that the radial beam size is minimized.
  • the scanning visible laser beam may have a radial beam size that is less than 100 microns, throughout the region of the eye that will be scanned, such as a range of 0 to 10 mm past the output of the patient interface lens.
  • FIGS. 8 A and 8B an embodiment of the CCD camera and its imaging optics for the 3-D scanner, in which a beamsplitter 506 directs a large percentage of the light returning from the eye into the camera optics 816, is illustrated, which is part of a video camera system.
  • the camera system which receives the 3D scanning images is the same camera system used for the doctor’s surgical display.
  • the imaging lenses 816 of the camera 815 consist of inexpensive commercial stock singlets and doublets.
  • a beamsplitter 506 with a high reflectivity, such as 90% reflective which means that the scanning beam will be greatly reduced in power while passing through the beamsplitter 506.
  • some embodiments may use small diode lasers available at low cost, which have considerably more power than may be necessary to perform accurate measurements of the eye. Such embodiments will allow the detection system to be nearly as sensitive as possible, while most of the scanning laser power is rejected by the beamsplitter.
  • the visible imaging optics or imaging lenses 816 may be chosen during the design phase to be commercial catalog singlet and doublet lenses which are available at much lower cost than the traditional imaging system design approach of using custom designed lenses and/or high precision multilens assemblies.
  • the imaging performance of this representative design is shown in a standard MTF plot in FIG. 8B.
  • the arrow at the 140 cycle/mm position signifies the Nyquist resolution limit of the CCD in this example. Since the imaging lenses 816 provide significant contrast up to and beyond the resolution limit of the sensor, the performance is thus shown to be camera limited despite the use of inexpensive focusing elements.
  • the inset to FIG. 8A shows that this representative imaging system is telecentric (as evidenced by the vertical paths for light at all positions across the viewing field). Telecentricity is frequently a valuable characteristic for machine vision imaging systems because telecentric image data is simpler to analyze than non-telecentric image data.
  • the method of scanning the beam in the X and Y directions is of paramount importance.
  • a preferred method with a minimum weight and complexity of moving parts is to use galvanometer mirror scanners.
  • the optical invariant is an important conserved quantity in an optical system; in the case of galvo scanners (such as 501, described previously for 3D scanning of a cw visible beam, and as later described below with reference to components 405-1, 405-2, and 405-3 in a laser guide module 400), the optical invariant dictates that the product of beam size and scan angle range is a fixed quantity whose value defines a fundamental performance metric of the system.
  • the size of the galvo mirrors 501 must be small in order to enable high speed scanning required for short procedures (such as less than 10 seconds) and, therefore, the optical scan angle generated by the scanning galvo mirrors must be large in order to provide a useful magnitude of the optical invariant.
  • the size of the galvo mirrors 501 may be approximately 14x20 mm, with each mirror having an elliptical shape.
  • the optical angle generated by the galvo mirrors is between approximately 35 degrees to approximately 50 degrees (both inclusive).
  • This telescope is provided by a combination, designated as 480 in FIG. IOC, of the scan module 410 with the focus module 430.
  • a 3 mirror XY galvo block of galvo scan mirrors such as mirrors 405-1, 405-2, and 405-3 as shown in FIG. 10D, may be used to solve pupil wander, since pupil wander may not be acceptable in laser scanning systems which must produce a nearly diffraction limited spot using a high NA, such as 0.3. While it generally is common practice to employ a 3 mirror galvo set in high precision scanning applications, below are disclosed particular design improvements of a 3 mirror galvo set.
  • the first 2 mirrors are arranged on 1 axis, such as XI and X2, and the 3rd mirror is arranged on the other axis, such as Y.
  • the motion of XI and X2 are combined so that the laser beam footprint is centered on the Y mirror while a wide range of X scan angles may be applied.
  • the pupil is fixed on the Y mirror for any choice of X-Y scan angles and therefore there is no pupil wander.
  • FIGS. 10B and IOC An improved configuration of a 3 mirror galvo block (or galvo group) for the laser shaper is illustrated herein in FIGS. 10B and IOC, labeled generally as mirrors 405, and shown in more detail as mirrors 405-1, 405-2, and 405-3 in the perspective view in FIG. 10D.
  • the three-mirror galvo group / block is configured to reduce an angle of incidence on a second mirror and a third mirror of the group.
  • One improvement may be the use of 35 degree angle of incidence for the beam onto the second mirror 405-2 and also the third mirror 405-3. This results in a more complex mechanical layout as compared to the traditional use of 45 degree incidence beams, because of the intermediate skew angles.
  • the beam footprint with a 35 degree incidence is 15% shorter than with a 45 degree incidence, thus a 35 degree incidence, for example, allows a larger beam to fit on a given mirror compared to 45 degrees. It is traditional in 2 mirror galvo sets to employ a reduced incidence angle such as 35 degrees; here, this method is extended to the 3 mirror galvo design.
  • Another improvement provided by the disclosed 3 mirror galvo block /group configuration concerns the spacing of the mirrors. Generally, for the highest scanning speed capability, it is preferred that the first mirror 405-1 and second mirror 405-2 have a large spacing therebetween, while the second mirror 405-2 and third mirror 405-3 have a minimum spacing therebetween.
  • a distance between a first mirror and the second mirror in the three-mirror galvo group is greater than a second distance between the second mirror and the third mirror.
  • the required angular movement of the middle (second) mirror 405-2 will be as low as possible for a given range of angle output.
  • the first mirror 405-1 must generate a position offset so that, with any choice of scan angle of the second mirror 405-2, the beam has the same position at the last (third) mirror 405-3. By placing the first mirror 405-1 at a long distance, the required position offset may be achieved with a smaller angular excursion of the first mirror.
  • the second mirror 405-2 has to move to an angle equal to the sum of the desired output angle plus the angle imposed by the first mirror 405-1.
  • the extra motion needed by the second mirror is minimized.
  • the pupil wander due to the second mirror acting alone is reduced, which again leads to a lower angle motion needed on the first motor to prevent pupil wander, and thereby a reduced angular range on the second mirror.
  • the angular range of the second mirror will always be the largest of the three for a given choice of X-Y scan range, therefore the system performance may be optimized when the angular range of the middle mirror is as small as possible to achieve the required scan range.
  • the optical design may also be required for the optical design to include a relatively large diameter beam splitter between the focus and objective modules; this is due to the requirement for measurement and diagnostic functions needed to accurately guide the laser. These diagnostic functions, such as video monitor, also need to work through the objective in order to have a compact design.
  • the beam splitter combines the optical path between the treatment laser and the visible light based optical measurement functions.
  • the minimal topology for a galvo based laser delivery system with diagnostics will consist of the galvos, a beam splitter, and 3 optical modules each of which transfer the light beam between a state of nearly parallel propagation and a state of nearly passing through a single point in space, i.e., a focal point.
  • all 3 modules could be termed as objectives based on transitioning light between collimation and focus, but as defined here, only the last module which generates the focus in the target is called the objective module.
  • Embodiments of the system and method are directed to, a type of a laser delivery system for an ophthalmic surgery laser system.
  • the laser delivery system may be designed using encircled energy as its merit function rather than the RMS wavefront error which is typically used to design imaging and many other types of optical systems.
  • the laser delivery system may be designed such that the modules are not infinity corrected which in turn simplifies the structure of the system and may ultimately reduce the overall cost of production due to the reduction in complexity of design and components that is possible by removing the constraint of infinity correction.
  • FIG. 9 schematically illustrates an ophthalmic surgery laser system 100.
  • the ophthalmic surgery laser system 100 (“system”) may be configured for a plurality of eye surgeries which may include cutting or laser processing of transparent tissue or implanted material in the course of intraocular surgery.
  • the surgeries may be performed by focusing a laser beam 50 at a point or focus 51 coincident with the patient’s eye 10 and manipulating its position and/or strength, the strength of the laser effect being dependent on factors such as laser wavelength, pulse duration, spot size, and repetition rate.
  • the system 100 may be configured to move the position of the focus 51 in three dimensions in and about the patient’s eye 10.
  • a frame of reference including a customary X-axis 91, Y- axis 92, and Z-axis 93 is used herein, where the Z-axis 93 originates at the surface of the patient’s eye 10, pointing inward and located on the centerline of the field of view.
  • the system 100 may include a laser engine 200, a beam shaper 300 (also referred to as a laser shaper herein), and a laser guide 400.
  • the laser engine 200 may be a regenerative femtosecond laser amplifier configured to provide a repetitively pulsed femtosecond laser beam collimated along a laser axis. It is understood the laser axis may be reoriented relative to an inline mirror. It is further understood that the laser axis may be at least in part coaxial with the Z-axis 93.
  • the laser guide 400 may be configured to move the focus 51 along the X-axis
  • the laser guide 400 may include a plurality of mirrors (e.g., galvo mirrors) configured to steer the laser beam 50 such that the focus 51 generally travels in the X and Y direction.
  • the laser guide 400 may also include a plurality of moveable lenses configured to move the focus 51 generally in the Z direction; more explicitly described in reference to FIGS. 10A-10D.
  • the moveable lenses may travel a relatively long distance, such as 80 mm, in order to move the focus by a shorter distance such as 9 mm in Z.
  • the laser shaper 300 may be configured to impart a variety of characteristics to the laser beam 50.
  • the laser shaper 300 may also include the“fixed optics” of the system, such as beam transport from the laser source. Generally, the laser shaper 300 may expand or contract the diameter of the laser beam 50, and in addition the clip level at which the Gaussian beam profile is truncated may be controlled.
  • the laser guide 400 may be configured to impart an angle on the laser beam
  • the laser guide 400 may include a plurality of lenses, which may be arranged in a plurality of modules associated with a particular characteristic desired from the beam 50.
  • the laser guide 400 may include a scan module 410 (also referred to herein as a scanning module), a focus module 430, and an objective module 450.
  • a telescope also referred to as a beam expander further illustrated in FIGS. 10A and 12
  • the beam expander 480 increases the beam size while reducing the scan angle to practical dimensions so that the objective can focus the beam onto the target.
  • the lens elements of the scan and focus modules taken together may comprise a beam expander, indicated as 480 in FIG.
  • the system 100 may further include an imaging subsystem 500, a patient interface 600 and a diagnostic subsystem 700, each of which are schematically represented in FIG. 9.
  • the imaging subsystem 500 may be configured to provide real-time imagery of the surgery to an operator.
  • the imaging subsystem 500 may include a display such as real-time video camera 514 or other streaming device.
  • the imaging subsystem 500 may further include a beam splitter 535, which may include features similar to or the same as the aforementioned and described beamsplitters 503 and/or 506, such that the operator may view the patient’s eye during procedure setup and laser operation, or transmit other light beams used for diagnostic measurements, such as optical coherence tomography or structured light scanning.
  • the patient interface 600 is configured to interface with the patient’s eye 10, stabilizing the eye 10 while providing access to the laser beam 50.
  • the patient interface 600 may include a liquid interface at the eye 10, which is well suited for procedures on both the cornea and lens tissues.
  • a moderately scattering fluid is placed in contact with the patient interface lens 601 of the patient interface 600 in order to make LSCM measurements on the PI lens surface location outside of the central area where specular reflection can be measured.
  • a disposable, transparent sterile barrier may be placed between the eye and the final glass surface where the laser is output, i.e., the surface traversed by the femtosecond laser beam.
  • the patient interface 600 may comprise a solid or semi- solid material in contact with the eye, which is termed a contact interface.
  • a contact interface may provide better stability for performing comeal surgery compared to a liquid interface, however the resulting applanation (i.e., distortion in shape) of the cornea may be inclined to produce posterior comeal folds which are disruptive for directing the beam focus onto the crystalline lens, and this effect restricts the use of contact interfaces away from cataract (lens) procedures.
  • a flexible sterile barrier may be useful to include between the eye and the applanating surface.
  • a bio-barrier provides a convenient means of assuring sterity for the patient contact, but in addition, the bio-barrier allows the re-use of the costly high precision contact glass even with using the choice of penetrating cuts which open the surface of the cornea. This is because a penetrating cut must go through and also slightly above the cornea (termed the overcut) to assure a reliable cutting effect. This cut penetration into the contacting material will damage a glass lens in direct contact with the eye, however in the case that a barrier film is present with a layer thickness of 100 um for example, then while using a laser overcut of, for example, 30 um above the cornea, the glass will be protected by approximately a 70 um safety margin. This protection of the glass provided by the sterile barrier enables a more cost effective contact interface deployment whereby a single precision lens is re-used many times, as compared to the traditional disposable interface in which case each laser procedure uses a piece of precision glass one time only.
  • the diagnostic subsystem 700 may include one or more sensors and may be configured to communicate sensed data indicating or otherwise correlating to the functional status of the system 100, for example, to remotely diagnose the functional status or operational“health” of the system 100, for example diagnostic information readings from the laser engine, or internal calibration procedures which could be enabled among the laser shaper and laser guide actuators and sensors.
  • a controller 800 may control one or more components.
  • the controller 800 may operate at least one of the laser engine 200, the laser shaper 300, the laser guide 400, and the imaging subsystem 500.
  • the controller 800 may include a processor, memory, user interface, and communications link.
  • the controller 800 may reside within the system 100, or may be located remotely or otherwise off-board the system 100.
  • the controller 800 uses input data from the operator and the diagnostic data from measuring the eye to customize the operation of the various built in procedures such as flap cutting, lens fragmentation, etc.
  • the controller may accept input from the physician operating the system to define the desired type of procedure and combine this information with the diagnostic data from the patient being treated in order to determine a customized scanning pattern for the C,U,Z positions and energy characteristics of the laser which will be produced by automatically controlling the actuators in the system when the physician starts the procedure.
  • FIGS. 10A to 10D illustrate various aspects of focusing the laser within the context of a laser guide 400.
  • the laser shaper may include the telescope subsystem 480 as mentioned above.
  • the telescope 480 may include various modules of lenses such as a scan module 410 and a focus module 430, as shown in FIGS. 10B and IOC.
  • the last optical group in the system which brings a roughly parallel beam to a focus is referred to as the objective module 450 (or an objective lens assembly).
  • the term objective is used to specify the final optical group of the delivery system.
  • the beam expander is required to have an entrance pupil located at or near the galvo mirrors and an exit pupil at or near the entrance to the objective.
  • any telescope having externally located entrance and exit pupils on opposite sides of the telescope must then contain an intermediate focal plane.
  • the optical design of the laser delivery system will therefore contain two focal planes, and a total of three optical groups which each take roughly parallel light to a focal point, or vice versa.
  • the parallel laser light scanned by the galvos 405 (shown for 3 different positions in FIG.
  • IOC is brought to a focus by the first optical group which is termed the scan module 410 (consisting of two (2) lens elements 411 and 412 in this example), then that focus is reverted to roughly parallel light by the second optical group which is termed the focus module 430 (consisting of two (2) lens elements 433 and 434, in this example), and this parallel light is brought to a final focus by the objective (i.e., the third group) 450, indicated in FIG. 10A.
  • the focus and scan modules together constitute a beam expander in the form of telescope 480 because in combination the input and output of telescope 480 are both collimated or nearly collimated.
  • focusing the laser may include, in particular, examples of infinity correction and lack of infinity correction as illustrated in FIG. 10A.
  • a common practice in the optical design of systems with a number of modules is to design each module to be infinity corrected, which means essentially that each module can operate by itself with a point source or collimated light.
  • LDS laser delivery system
  • the target plane being understood as the plane normal to laser beam 50 at focus 51 of FIG. 9
  • the intermediate space #1 may contain a focal plane 220 (shown in FIG. 10B) represented by a dashed line (see also, intermediate focus 52 of FIG. 9). So, in the case that the scan module is infinity corrected, this focus may be of high quality, as schematically illustrated in FIG. 10A. Likewise, in the case that the scan module is not infinity corrected, the intermediate space #1 focus may be aberrated, as schematically illustrated in FIG. 10 A.
  • the intermediate space #2 may be approximately collimated, and does not contain a focus.
  • the light rays in the intermediate space #2 may have paths that can be extended to a virtual focal plane or a virtual focal point. Such point may located at some distance where the beams will meet at a well-defined point, as illustrated in FIG. 10A.
  • the light rays in intermediate space #2 may have a point source in the case of using infinity corrected modules.
  • a beam of light having a point source can be focused to a (diffraction limited) point when it is passed through an ideal paraxial lens.
  • the light rays in intermediate space #2 have an extended source in the case that the focus module is not infinity corrected.
  • the quality of having light with an extended source means that such light will not focus to a diffraction- limited spot when focused by a perfect lens.
  • the objective module 450 is infinity corrected, a tight focus may be produced over the scanning region when light with a point source (i.e., an ordinary laser beam with possible convergence or divergence but no higher order aberrations) is input into the objective.
  • a point source i.e., an ordinary laser beam with possible convergence or divergence but no higher order aberrations
  • the objective module 450 is not infinity corrected.
  • the scan and focus modules are required to process the light with a certain balance of aberrations before it enters the objective in order to obtain a high quality focus at the target.
  • the system as a whole would preferably be infinity corrected so that a standard laser beam will form a high quality focus in the target region.
  • infinity corrected modules have some advantages, chief among them that they are relatively easy to optically test individually without using specialized equipment such as custom made null lenses. However, by requiring the modules to each be infinity corrected, the complexity of the system and the cost to produce is thereby increased. [0098] In accordance with some embodiments, some modules may not be infinity corrected, therefore, complexity of testing and qualifying the individual modules will generally be more difficult than for testing infinity corrected modules. Although the testing is more complex, it need only be implemented a minimal number of times in order to incorporate it on a large-scale production.
  • testing usually is capable of producing a better product for production from minimal tests because the completed tests typically determines any flaws that should be adjusted for in the final product. For example, only one testing and qualifying may be sufficient to qualify a production facility to produce larger quantities.
  • null lens testing such as directly measuring the fabrication errors of the completed module to show that it meets the design specifications. Beneficially, it can be more cost effective to manufacture production quantities of simplified design modules, which are not infinity corrected, despite the greater difficulty of the module testing process.
  • the scanning module 410 and the focus module 430 may be made up of a variety of lenses that are configured to further guide the incoming beam such that then final output is as desired.
  • the scan module 410 may include two lens elements 411 and 412 and the focus module 430 may include two lens elements 433 and 434.
  • FIG. 10B also illustrates multiple positions 431, 432 of focus module 430, showing its Z control function. More specifically, at position 431, the focus module 430 is in a deep Z focus position, whereas at position 432, the focus module 430 in a shallow Z focus position. Furthermore, as illustrated in FIGS.
  • many embodiments may include a plurality of galvo mirrors 405 to redirect the incoming laser into the scanning module 410 and subsequently into the focusing module 430. Respectively, the positioning of the galvo mirrors 405 can affect or ultimately determine the X and Y positions of the intermediate focus 220 illustrated by the dashed line plane in FIGS. 10B and IOC.
  • FIG. IOC illustrates multiple positions of galvo mirrors 405 in order to illustrate this XY control function.
  • the intermediate focus 220 is required by fundamental optics to be located between the scanning module 410 and the focus module 430. Additionally, the propagation angle of the output beam or beam that leaves the focus module may also be determined by the position of the galvo mirrors.
  • FIG. 10D is an illustrative view of how the positioning of the various galvo mirrors 405 can redirect the laser beam.
  • FIG. 11 illustrates another embodiment of focusing the laser by way of a graphical comparison between RMS wavefront & encircled energy optimization.
  • Optical design methods have evolved in general to produce high quality imaging systems which can for example provide appealing images as judged by the human eye, or fabricate the smallest computer chip features in the case of photolithography.
  • aspects of the system and method are directed to a laser delivery system for an ophthalmic surgery laser system.
  • the laser delivery system may be designed using encircled energy as its primary function rather than RMS wavefront error.
  • Encircled energy refers to the measure of concentration of energy with respect to an optical image over a range of radial distance from the center point, i.e., within a circle of radius R, some fraction of the total energy will be contained.
  • the radius containing 80 percent of the energy is called R80
  • the radius containing 60 percent is called R60 and so forth.
  • Encircled energy may be used as a measurement to determine the spreading of a laser projected over a given range.
  • the encircled energy may be used as the primary design criterion due to the limited need for high contrast optical images in the case of laser delivery systems.
  • the laser delivery system may be designed such that the modules do not need to be infinity corrected.
  • Such uncorrected systems may be a type of laser delivery system, which is substantially simplified and more economical to produce compared to the current practice. In many cases, a simplified design will employ a much lower total number of lens elements and the lens elements will have shapes that are easier to fabricate, compared to a traditional design.
  • a laser delivery system (LDS) design is optimized to minimize the RMS wavefront error, referred to here as simply the RMS, by following the traditional approach to optical imaging system design.
  • LDS laser delivery system
  • the traditional approach may result in producing a design with more capabilities than are actually needed for the application.
  • the imaging system when the aberrations cause some of the light to fall outside of the central spot, minimizing the distance by which the residual light misses the central spot is important for the image quality (e.g., the contrast or sharpness of the image).
  • the image quality e.g., the contrast or sharpness of the image.
  • a laser delivery system in accordance with many embodiments, is not used as a traditional imaging system and does not require the precise resolution that would be required in an imaging system, thereby reducing the complexity and cost necessary to produce and use such systems.
  • the RMS is a good way to account for the distance by which the residual light misses the central spot.
  • LDS which is designed to perform material processing with nonlinear laser-induced effects, such as plasma generation for example, in which case the concern is only for how much of the beam is directed into the plasma region formed by the central spot.
  • the residual light misses the lateral range of the plasma region it does not matter if the light misses by a small distance or a large distance.
  • the greater the distance by which the residual light misses the central focal spot then the greater will be the loss of contrast in the resulting image, which is well described by the RMS criterion.
  • an ophthalmic surgery laser system may be configured such that the quality of a laser beam focus is determined based on the percentage of energy contained in the main focal spot, rather than its focal tightness in consideration of the full extent of the beam energy.
  • the system may be configured from the measured graph of the encircled energy as a function of radius as illustrated in FIG. 11. This is the fraction of energy contained within a disk in the focal plane of the laser.
  • the laser energy may be concentrated at the central point of the focus for purposes of generating a laser plasma where the encircled energy radius contains most of the energy but is significantly less than all of the energy, such as a range of 60-80% of the total beam energy.
  • the laser energy may be concentrated where the encircled energy radius contains sufficient beam energy for cutting independent of its focal tightness or the extent of the light falling outside this radius.
  • FIG. 11 illustrates three curves, the diffraction limit (illustrative of perfect optics); a curve reflective of a standard imaging design using the RMS criterion; and a curve illustrating the simplified design using non- infinity corrected modules with the encircled energy criterion.
  • the simplified method as illustrated in FIG. 11 shows the encircled energy may closely approach and/or substantially match the ideal (diffraction limit) between 60% and 80%, which may be sufficient to couple the laser energy efficiently into the plasma generation at the focal point.
  • the simplified method allows the energy outside of the encircled radius to spread out to relatively greater distances from the focus center.
  • the spreading out from the focal center is traditionally undesirable in conventional optics systems because they function as an imaging system, which requires a higher resolution.
  • the remaining 20% is relatively tightly controlled, represented by the curve, which is close to the ideal curve all the way up to 100%.
  • the RMS design is expected to have better performance for producing an image, but essentially the same performance as the simplified design for laser cutting.
  • a simplified configuration can be advantageously implemented, which is more cost effective to produce than the standard design, which seeks to control 100% of the energy.
  • Another way to describe the difference of a simplified design LDS is that it will have a greater content of high order aberrations than would a corresponding imaging system design.
  • the higher order aberrations by definition produce a steeper error than the lower order aberrations at the margins of the pupil, and this aspect becomes more permissible when applying the encircled energy criterion to the design process.
  • FIG. 12 schematically illustrates an exemplary laser delivery system (LDS) of the ophthalmic surgery laser system of FIG. 9, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • the LDS is represented as laser guide 400 in FIG. 9.
  • the laser guide 400 may include a plurality of modules including a scan module 410, a focus module 430 and an objective module 450; as illustrated in FIGS. 10A and 12.
  • some embodiments of the laser guide 400 may be configured such that the intermediate focus 52 falls between the glass elements of scan module 410 and the focus module 430, to prevent damage to the glass from the intermediate laser focus.
  • the laser guide 400 may be configured such that a beam splitter 535 falls optically between the focus module 430 and the objective module 450.
  • the scanning module 410, the focus module 430, and the objective module 450 each include a number of lenses (including each having multiple lenses) configured to guide various infrared and visible respective beams which are deployed (from the guide or light source).
  • the scanning module, the focus module, and the objective module contain a much lower total number of individual glass lens elements than a traditional ophthalmic laser delivery system, such as 10 elements compared to 20 elements.
  • the laser delivery system may be designed with complexity reducing elements such as the encircled energy criterion and non-infinity corrected lens modules, thereby simplifying and reducing the cost of the overall system.
  • Other embodiments such as illustrated in FIG. 12, may further simplify the system by using more simple lens forms, since these will be easier to fabricate. Simplicity in this sense means lens surfaces with relatively low curvature and lens edges with convenient thicknesses for manufacturing, such as a thickness-to-diameter aspect ratio around 1:6.
  • the lenses used may be plano-convex singlet lenses.
  • Plano-convex lenses are positive focal length lenses with a convex portion and a flat portion, they are the easiest of all lens forms to fabricate and are therefore ideal for reducing cost of an overall laser delivery system. This is due to the relaxed design constraints with the use of encircled energy in many embodiments that make it more feasible to simplify the form of the lens elements in the design, as well as reducing the total number of lens elements required to implement the design in comparison to a traditional approach.
  • the scanning module 410, the focus module 430, and the objective module 450 have lenses wherein a majority of which are simple piano convex lens.
  • the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 12 represents a majority of lenses (e.g., in this example, five (5) out of nine (9)) within the laser deliver system as being plano-convex, which is generally the easiest lens form to fabricate.
  • the objective module 450 may contain a single plano concave lens element and the others are piano convex lens elements.
  • meniscus lenses are those that have a convex and a concave surface. From a simplicity standpoint, the meniscus form is generally less desirable for
  • placing a meniscus lens at the input position for the focus module 430 may be helpful to increase the diameter of the usable scan region at the deeper scan positions of the target region.
  • the laser delivery system may have at least one strongly curved meniscus lens with radii of curvature close to the clear aperture diameters, in addition to being placed at an input position for the focus module. Due to these advantages, many such embodiments may include the use of a larger and thicker meniscus lens, despite the increased fabrication difficulty of this lens form.
  • the laser guide 400 may be configured using its encircled energy diameter as its figure of merit.
  • the LDS may be configured to have an 80% encircled energy diameter (D80).
  • D80 80% encircled energy diameter
  • a small D80 such as 2 microns, will assure that the laser beam is able to efficiently pump energy into the plasma region, but it does not try to control the light which misses the central spot.
  • This essentially means the LDS optical design has less work to do and therefore it can be simplified relative to an imaging system design.
  • many embodiments may allow for the number of individual lenses may be reduced by a substantial amount such as half-compared to a standard design, and the shape of the lenses can be simplified with a high proportion of planar surfaces and relatively mild curvatures.
  • the scan module 410 may be limited to two lenses.
  • the focus module 430 may also be limited to two lenses.
  • the objective module 450 may be limited to four lenses. This arrangement may be useful for regenerative femtosecond laser amplifier systems with a bandwidth in the range of 3 nm, however other laser sources such as fiber laser amplifiers may be of interest with even shorter pulses and correspondingly higher bandwidths such as 10 nm.
  • other laser sources such as fiber laser amplifiers may be of interest with even shorter pulses and correspondingly higher bandwidths such as 10 nm.
  • the objective module 450 may be limited to five lenses.
  • a relatively simple change to the objective design consists of changing the plano-concave lens E3 into a doublet, and this is able to significantly increase the range of acceptable femtosecond laser bandwidth, which can be accommodated by the LDS.
  • the doublet is mechanically still a single piece of glass to be mounted, so the increased complexity of using a doublet relative to the singlet is confined to the glass fabrication process rather than the system integration of the LDS.
  • many embodiments of the laser delivery system described herein may provide for a low-mass movable module assembly (focus module 430) by reducing the number of lenses used. This can enable the high-speed operation of the focus module Z control, which can allow greater flexibility to customize parameters within a scan due to a higher maximum scanning speed associated with the lower mass. Additional benefits may include lower cost to produce the optical elements for the LDS and/or lower cost and shorter manufacturing time to assemble the LDS.
  • the moving mass is significant, consisting of the focus module 430 itself and the moving portion of the linear motor stage (e.g., stage 570, discussed below), which drives the motion.
  • stage 570 stage 570
  • the quality of the treatment depends on stability of the eye position relative to the delivery system, and the limiting acceleration for focus control can be due to the need to avoid creating excessive vibrations in the delivery system, even though the linear motor is capable of operating at considerably higher levels of acceleration.
  • a fast treatment time is not only more comfortable for the lightly sedated patient, but also lessens the chances of inadvertent patient movement affecting the pattern accuracy.
  • FIGS. 13A to 13C shown are parts of a counterbalance system that is part of focus module 430, in accordance with embodiments herein.
  • the counterbalance system is configured to maintain stability of the laser delivery system such that the focal point is controlled within the target space.
  • Various embodiments of the moveable lens may include a set of pulleys 560 and steel wire loops 565 (or cables) connected to the focus module stage 570 at connection points 565 A, 565B (shown in FIG. 13C) as part of the counterbalance system, so that a pair of weights 550 are moved in the opposite direction of the moving focus module 575.
  • Each of the weights 550 may be provided on an arm 580 (see FIG.
  • FIGS. 13A-13C illustrate the focus module 575 position changing from a first position to a second position, respectively, i.e., the right hand limit of travel (FIG. 13A) to the left hand limit of travel (FIG.
  • stage 570 and the focus module 575 are also configured for movement and/or placement between the two (first and second, or right and left) positions.
  • Cables or wire loops 565 are looped around the pulleys 560 to impart motion and an equal travel in the opposite direction upon the counterweights for any movement of the focus module 575.
  • the pair of weights 550 may be designed so that their total mass is equal to the moving mass of the focus module 575 plus the linear motor stage platform 570, thus there will be no net linear momentum change when the focus module is accelerated in either direction, i.e., equal weights are moving equal distances in opposite directions.
  • adding a balanced counterweight to the Z focus module 430A and drive may permit high acceleration patterns to be run up to the force limit of the linear motor.
  • Such applications may not be readily recognizable as advantageous, because the motor is driving twice as much mass with the counterweight installed.
  • the mechanical maximum acceleration possible is equal to half of the maximum acceleration in the case of driving only the focus module, which may allow reaction forces to affect the delivery system.
  • the maximum acceleration limit for a non-counterweight system may be much smaller than the mechanical limit of the motor, for example 10%, because of the need to limit vibrations below a significant level at the patient interface.
  • the counterweight permits operation at 50% of the possible acceleration of a non counterweight system, then for example a 5X increase in available acceleration may be obtained by adding the counterweight, with no additional complexity in the control system.
  • the counterweight system may aid in increasing the acceleration of the laser focus control function without compromising the stability of the patient interface.
  • the full 100% acceleration of a non-counterweight system could be obtained by adding an additional linear motor to drive the counterweights but this would also substantially increase the control system complexity, leading to higher production cost and potentially a negative impact upon reliability.
  • the moving weights 550 may be manufactured from a very dense material such as a machinable tungsten alloy. Such dense materials can help to limit the volume increase associated with adding the counter mass assembly.
  • the pulley wheels 560 can be mounted at various angles.
  • mounting the pulley wheels 560 at 45 degrees to the plane of the focus module linear motion stage 570 may allow the upper cable section to be nearly coincident with the motor stage, thus simplifying the attachment mechanism from cable to stage.
  • Other embodiments may allow the lower cable segment to be accessible to the moving weight by a compact arm coming down from the moving weight 550, this arm structure is located at the tip of the arrow indicating 565 A in FIG. 13C.
  • the steel wire loops 565 may have several attachment points 565A and 565B to the support structure and the moving lens respectively as illustrated in FIG. 13C. Such arrangement may allow for the counter weight to easily move thereby incorporating the high speed movement in a manner consistent with precision operation.
  • many embodiments may include a support structure 605 for the moving lens 575.
  • Many embodiments may include a set of straps 615 configured to wrap around an outer periphery of a housing of the moving lens 575 and secure it in place on the stage platform 570, such as shown in FIG. 14B.
  • the straps may have a first end that is secured (e.g., fastened or bolted) to a frame portion of the stage platform 570, in an embodiment.
  • the straps 615 may have second ends that are secured via a closure mechanism 625.
  • the closure mechanism 625 may be similar to a hose clamp closure.
  • the closure mechanism 625 is provided at a midpoint or top of the lens 575.
  • the support structure 605 may have two straps 615 that are connected at ends thereof via closure mechanism 625 that can be tightened such that the straps 615 cinch around the moving lens 575 and secure it in place on the stage platform 570 for movement by a linear motor actuator or linear drive system.
  • closure mechanism 625 may be provided for closure mechanism 625.
  • a single strap 615 and closure mechanism 625 may be used.
  • the location of the closure mechanism 625 is not intended to be limiting.
  • the support structure may have a key 630 (shown in FIG. 14A) that engages with the moving lens 575 to align the moving lens 575 appropriately within the support structure 605.
  • this mounting method is optimized with low mass for mounting the moving lens module, it is also suitable for mounting a fixed position module such as the focus module.
  • a laser delivery system in accordance with many embodiments may be enhanced with the addition of controllable alteration of the laser beam characteristics of beam size and clip level as the first step in processing the beam out of the laser.
  • these functions may be contained in the beam shaping module 300.
  • these functions may be performed by a secondary beam expander known as a variable laser beam expander.
  • the beam diameter D may be controlled with a variable magnification laser beam expander, while the clip level may be controlled with a variable diameter iris.
  • n refractive index
  • f the focal length
  • optical imperfections present in the laser delivery system may sometimes be effectively accommodated by changing the NA, between and/or within procedures, depending on the details of the procedure to be performed and the nature of the case at hand. Accordingly, it will generally be an advantage to control the NA with selectable values between procedures, as well as changing NA value during procedures.
  • many embodiments may incorporate a variable laser beam expander which is compact and simple to control.
  • the standard design for a laser beam expander requires 2 different lens groups to be moved separately, such that one group moves to vary the magnification and the other group moves in order to maintain collimation of the output.
  • the use of 2 separate position actuators to control magnification results in higher cost and complexity than for a single actuator, so that real-time variable NA has been rarely, if ever, implemented in femtosecond ophthalmic lasers.
  • many embodiments may improve upon the standard designs by incorporating a single actuator to control magnification over a wide range without significantly affecting collimation of the output which is not typical for such systems.
  • variable laser beam expander (VLBE) 701 for the beam shaper, having a single moving element is illustrated.
  • VLBE may be self-compensating during operation.
  • the moving element may be a moving lens 730 that is contained within a lens housing 720 and mechanically connected to a linear drive system 710.
  • the lens housing 720 may include a plurality of fixed lenses 740 supported by lens mounts (not shown for clarity).
  • the lens housing 720 may further be configured with an optical input 705 and an optical output 745.
  • the linear drive 710 may be designed to connect to lens 730 that may be moveable within the lens housing 720.
  • the movement of the lens 730 within the housing 720 may also be controllable via suitable control systems that can dictate the movement and relative position of the moving lens 730 within the housing 720 of the variable laser beam expander 701.
  • FIGS. 16A and 16B illustrate the technique for designing a single moving element variable laser beam expander according to many embodiments.
  • FIG. 16B illustrates a comparison curve between a standard design and the disclosed (new) design according to an embodiment with a single moving element.
  • FIG. 16A illustrates the differences between a self-compensated and paraxial design of a VLBE according to embodiments of this disclosure. It is generally accepted in the optics industry that a variable beam expander must incorporate two separate axial lens motions to have variable expansion while maintaining the state of output collimation, i.e., a defocus term of zero.
  • a common way to measure the defocus for developing graph similar to FIG. 16B is to find the value of the Z4 Zemike Defocus term obtained when the output wavefront is fitted to Zemike polynomials in the usual way.
  • the Z4 term is also called the Defocus term and it measures the spherical shape component of the wavefront.
  • the Z4 term is zero for perfect collimation, and it can assume positive or negative values for an output that is converging or diverging. Also, if the Z4 term is not zero but still quite small, then the output may effectively be called collimated.
  • FIG. 16A An example is shown for a typical CVLBE designed using paraxial optics calculations.
  • the standard design shows a Z4 value going from negative to positive with a fairly steep slope as a function of magnification, or equivalently, as a function of output beam size.
  • the standard design is effectively collimated for a beam size range of 5.6 - 5.9 mm, or an adjustment range of 5% which is generally too small to be of practical use.
  • the quadratic shape of the Z4 vs magnification curve seen in FIG. 16B is important in designing a self-compensated VLBE according to many embodiments.
  • the Z4 curve is a parabola nearly tangent to the X axis, thus maintaining a low value over a relatively wide range of magnification.
  • the disclosed design maintains Z4 within a range of 0.1 for an output beam size range of 4.5 to 7.2 mm, an adjustment range of 2.7 mm or about 45% adjustment range. This wide range is adequate for optimizing many laser based applications, such as surgical laser delivery systems, while offering a simple implementation for the control system.
  • FIGS. 17A-17D illustrate block diagrams of various elements of an embodiment of this disclosure that includes the VLBE with a single moving element as well as embodiments incorporating a focus module with the counterweight discussed above.
  • FIG. 17A illustrates a Beam Shaper module 300 that includes the VLBE 701 that may be positioned between several lenses. Such module may be positioned within the system to receive input from the laser, illustrated by 200 in the figure and subsequently may transmit the beam to a laser guide module 400. Additionally, the movement of the VLBE 701 may be controlled by a magnification command 910 that can direct the position of the lens by the linear drive and thereby place the lens at the desired position based on the variety of factors discussed above, including the patient’s optical topography.
  • a magnification command 910 can direct the position of the lens by the linear drive and thereby place the lens at the desired position based on the variety of factors discussed above, including the patient’s optical topography.
  • FIGS. 17B-17D illustrate how the shaped beam from the beam shaper module 300 may be directed through the other elements of the system previously described; such as the scan module 410 with galvanometer actuators (FIG. 17B), the focus module 430 with a moving counterweight (FIG. 17C), and from focus module 430 to an objective module 450 to precisely control the final position of the femtosecond laser beam focus, or target focus (FIG. 17D).
  • the second beam parameter controlled by the beam shaper module 300 is the clip level. This is illustrated in FIG. 17A by the“clip level command” 920.
  • the femtosecond laser beam is typically produced as a high quality single mode beam with a nearly Gaussian spatial intensity profile. Since a mathematical Gaussian curve has an infinite extent, never completely reaching zero, for any real optical system the Gaussian will be truncated by the finite clear aperture of the components.
  • the clip level is the percentage of laser intensity at the margin of the limiting aperture, relative to the central peak of the laser intensity profile taken as 100%.
  • the clip level rises to a high value, for example to 50%, the beam profile shape becomes more“top hat”. As the clip level drops to a low level, for example to 5%, the beam profile is very nearly Gaussian.
  • a common choice of clip level is 13%, since this level usually strikes a good balance between the expense of fabricating optics with large diameters (favoring a small aperture / high clip level) versus the goal of maintaining a Gaussian beam profile as the beam passes through the optical train (favoring a large aperture / low clip level).
  • a high NA such as .35 in conjunction with a low clip level such as 10% may be optimal for creating a high precision cutting action
  • a low NA such as .20 in conjunction with a high clip level such as 40% may be optimal for creating a powerful and robust cutting action.
  • An apparent drawback of raising the clip level is that more of the laser energy is lost due to clipping.
  • the laser engine has a relatively high unclipped output, such as 15 microjoules, then even with the energy loss due to high clipping, the available energy may still be adequate for the desired procedures, such as 5 microjoules. When excess laser energy is available due to the capabilities of the laser engine, then variable clipping can be a useful way of optimizing optical system performance.
  • the clip level may be controlled by a compact, cost-effective motorized variable iris of the beam shaper.
  • FIGS. 18A and 18B illustrate a motorized iris in accordance with an embodiment of this disclosure, that includes a gear sector actuator.
  • Commercial lenses equipped with an electronic continuously variable diameter iris are typically bulky.
  • Commercially available electronically actuated irises which are compact are apparently found only with a binary open/closed mode of operation rather than a variable position iris.
  • FIG. 18A illustrates a general view of an embodiment of the variable motor controlled iris attached to a mounting bracket 1050.
  • FIG. 18B illustrates an elemental view of the iris.
  • the iris may equipped with a sector of plastic gear 1020 attached to the manual iris lever 1040 which controls the opening size.
  • a small motor 1010 may be equipped with a meshing gear 1015 to drive the iris over its available range.
  • the sector gear 1020 is held in place by the iris lever, which prevents out of plane motion, and also by the grip between the motor gear and the round iris housing, which prevents undesired in-plane motion of the sector gear. Because the sector gear 1020 is adequately constrained by the drive mechanism itself, there is little or no need for additional support structures, resulting in a compact design with a minimal number of required parts.
  • FIG. 19 schematically illustrates an ophthalmic surgery laser system according to an embodiment.
  • the ophthalmic surgery laser system 100A (“system”) may incorporate similar elements of the ophthalmic surgery laser system shown in FIG. 9, further including integrated laser beam diagnostics and/or an illumination source independent of its surgery laser 200.
  • the system 100A may include an illumination source 250, a reconfigurable optical device 270, and/or a laser beam diagnostics unit 750.
  • the system with an LSCM capability should have a far field detector that may additionally take on some functions of a diagnostics unit 750 as illustrated in the figures.
  • the diagnostics unit 750 is important to allow the system the functionality of measuring the far field and near field intensity distributions of the laser beam 50.
  • the diagnostics unit 750 may be separated into two units such as a far field detector and a near field detector as is illustrated in FIG. 20 and FIG. 21.
  • the illumination source 250 illustrated in FIG. 19 may utilize features of the system 100A to provide an integrated laser scanning confocal microscope (“LSCM”), where illumination is brought to a focus at the view point. This may advantageously provide improved resolution, for example, where just the area of interest is illuminated.
  • the LSCM function is used to measure alignment of selected lens surfaces in the laser delivery system.
  • the illumination source 250 is a low peak power diagnostic laser source with substantially the same wavelength as the femtosecond laser engine.
  • the reconfigurable optical device 270 may be movable from a first configuration to a second configuration, or otherwise reconfigurable to selectably engage the laser engine 200 or the illumination source 250 as a light source for the system 100A.
  • the reconfigurable optical device 270 may include a beam splitter (e.g., polarizing beam splitter), where optical component may remain fixed, or generally immovable.
  • an ophthalmic laser surgery system such as system 100A or system 100 (see FIG. 9), may include a laser source (laser engine 200) such as a femtosecond regenerative amplifier at 1053 nm.
  • the light from this source may then directed into a delivery system with the capability to process the beam from the laser over XYZ positions suitable for the system’s surgery requirements.
  • a specific configuration is illustrated in FIG. 19, many embodiments may include other configurations with less than all of the features described above.
  • the reconfigurable optical device 270 may include a mirror having a first position 71 and a second position 72, the first position 71 engaging the laser engine 200 or otherwise providing it access to the delivery system including elements 400, 600 and/or 500.
  • element 300 i.e., beam shaper or laser shaper
  • the first position 71 may disengage or deny the illumination source 250 or otherwise prevent access to the delivery system and/or beam shaper 300, as shown.
  • the laser beam 50 from the laser source (the laser engine 200) may be at least partially reflected into the delivery system and/or beam shaper 300.
  • a full strength laser beam 50 (or a lesser amount, such as 99% strength) may be reflected into the delivery system when the mirror is positioned in its first position 71. Additionally, while in the first position 71, the mirror may block or otherwise prevent a light beam 53 from the illumination source 250 from entering the delivery system.
  • the mirror 270 when in the second position 72, the mirror 270 may be out-of- alignment and/or otherwise positioned out of the path of femtosecond laser beam 50, denying access to the delivery system and/or beam shaper 300. Moreover, the mirror may also be out- of-alignment, or otherwise positioned out of the path of light beam 53, thereby allowing access to (or delivery to or engagement with) the delivery system and/or beam shaper 300. In particular, the mirror 270 may be moved to the second position 72, such that illumination source 250 (or another light source) may engage the delivery system.
  • this reconfiguration of the reconfigurable optical device 270 may be performed automatically, upon selection, manually, or any combination thereof.
  • a separate control system may be implemented to control the position of the optical device 270 in accordance with the desired use of the system.
  • the backscattered light resulting from the low power laser or illumination source 250 impinging on the object in the view of the objective may directed onto a far field sensor, as described in greater detail below with respect to FIG. 20, thus enabling the function of LSCM into the ophthalmic laser system in the second position.
  • the illumination source 250 may be a Continuous Wave (CW) laser source.
  • CW laser source is one that emits a continuous beam with a controlled output of beam intensity. This is in contrast to a pulsed laser that operates by emitting pulses rather than a continuous wave.
  • CW lasers may include compact diode lasers and infrared lasers.
  • the laser may be similar to that found in a laser pointing device which will decrease the cost of manufacturing without sacrificing performance.
  • an independent light source here, a lower power CW laser
  • the illumination source 250 may have an identical or substantially similar wavelength as the surgery laser and, when engaged or provided access to the delivery system, act as an LSCM (see above) utilizing the same delivery system elements used by the system’s surgery laser 200.
  • a point imaged by the LSCM with the CW laser may be substantially the same point that a surgical femtosecond laser beam (laser beam 50) would focus to if engaged or the system 100A is otherwise switched to a“surgery operation mode”.
  • this may provide a higher level of precision in directing the surgery laser focal spot position during the procedure. For example, it may be comparable to providing a system calibration procedure using the patient’s actual eye at the beginning of every procedure.
  • the LSCM will still direct the laser accurately onto the tissue. This important advantage is obtained because the potential calibration drift affects the LSCM and the surgical laser in the identical amount and will not compromise the cutting accuracy when the laser is steered according to the LSCM data.
  • FIG. 20 schematically illustrates aspects of the ophthalmic surgery laser system of FIG. 19 in a first configuration, and shows its laser beam diagnostics in greater detail.
  • the system 100A illustrated in FIG. 20 may be configured in a surgery operation mode, and the laser beam diagnostics of system 100A are illustrated having both near-field and far-field beam metrology functions, which enable remote control of at least some field service procedures and/or parts in the system, and, moreover, provide real-time information on an operational status of the femtosecond laser engine 200 and its beam 50, including diagnostics.
  • the laser beam diagnostics of the system 100A may include a near field diagnostics module 751 and a far field diagnostics module 755.
  • this embodiment may provide for measurement of both near field and far field characteristics of the surgery laser beam, for example, by performing diagnostics on the small portion of the beam 50, such as 1%, which is transmitted through the highly reflective mirror which may be included in the reconfigurable device 270.
  • the system 100A may include a
  • system 100A may have a surgery operating mode that corresponds to the first position 71, and a“laser beam diagnostics mode” that is also available in the first position 71. In a surgery operating mode, the system 100A may be configured such that the movable first mirror 271 positioned in its first position 71, engaging surgery laser beam 50 and providing it access to the delivery system, beginning at laser shaper 400 in this embodiment.
  • the first mirror 271 may be configured to provide a portion of the surgery laser beam 50 for laser beam diagnostics.
  • a leakage beam 54 may pass through the first mirror 271 to at least one of the near field diagnostics module 751 and the far field diagnostics module 755.
  • the first mirror 271 may include a partially transmissive mirror coating that allows the leakage beam 54 pass through.
  • a minimal amount of the surgery laser beam 50 is transmitted through the mirror coating of the first mirror 271 as the leakage beam 54.
  • the leakage beam 54 may represent a 1% transmission of surgery laser beam 50, with the remaining 99% being reflected into the delivery system. Even at 1%, the energy of the leakage beam 54 may be more than sufficient for charge coupled device (“CCD”) based beam diagnostics.
  • CCD charge coupled device
  • the first mirror 271 may be further configured to interact with a portion of the leakage beam 54,
  • the first mirror 271 may include a high reflection surface. In this way, portions of the leakage beam 54 may be efficiently reflected as a sample beam 55 for further diagnostics and analysis, as discussed below.
  • a small portion of the femtosecond generated laser beam engages with the laser beam diagnostics unit.
  • FIG. 21 schematically illustrates one embodiment of the laser beam diagnostics of FIG. 20.
  • the near field diagnostics module 751 may include near field optics 752 and at least one near field sensor 753, as shown.
  • the far field diagnostics module 755 may include far field optics 756 and at least one far field sensor 757, as shown.
  • the near field optics 752 may include a plano convex lens
  • the near field sensor 753 may include an image sensor or CCD used to generate higher quality images.
  • the far field sensor includes an array sensor such as a CCD.
  • the far field optics 756 may include a doublet lens, and the far field sensor 757 may include an image array sensor or CCD. It is understood that the near field sensor 753 and the far field sensor 757 may or may not be the same type or similar devices.
  • the near field optics 752 may be arranged such that at least a portion of the leakage beam 54 is passed to or otherwise directed toward the near field sensor 753, for example, along near field optical path 56. As such, the near field optics 752 may form a near field image from the leakage beam 54 on the near field sensor 753.
  • the sensed data may be processed such that the surgery laser beam near field characteristics may be measured and/or analyzed, for example, by an operator or with automated functions programmed into the controller 100 A.
  • the near field optics 752 may be further configured to reflect back, or otherwise deliver away, a portion of the leakage beam 54 for further analysis.
  • a sample of the leakage beam 54 may be provided to the far field diagnostics module 755 as the reflected sample beam 55, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • the near field optics 752 may include a plano-convex lens having a partially reflecting coating (e.g., 1% - 50% reflecting coating) applied to its piano side. Additionally, the plano-convex lens may be oriented such that that at least a portion of the leakage beam 54 is reflected away from the near field optics 752 as the sample beam 55.
  • the near field optics 752 may be further configured such that the backward reflected sample beam 55 will then hit, for example, the back side of the first mirror 271 when in the first position 71 (see FIG. 20), experience a high reflection surface, be directed toward the second mirror 272, and then be directed by the second mirror 272 to the far field diagnostics module 755. There, the reflected sample beam 55 may pass into the far field optics 756 to form a far field image of the surgical laser beam on the far field sensor 757.
  • a surgery laser beam 50 such as a femtosecond laser beam
  • a surgery laser beam 50 may be characterized in real time with respect to its near- and far-field beam characteristics. This characterization may be performed using the near field sensor 753 to receive the near field signal, and the far field sensor 757 to receive the far field signal.
  • a laser beam may be characterized much more definitively when both near- and far- field are known, compared to only measuring only a single one of those quantities, or in regard to traditional laser systems, compared to measuring neither quantity with built-in diagnostic functions
  • a surgery laser equipped with on board laser beam near field and far field diagnostics may enable additional reliability by automatically verifying correct operation of the laser engine 200 prior to each clinical procedure, and may enable some remote maintenance procedures to be performed by service personnel, since the near field and far field measurement tools are already in the laser system and do not need to be transported to the laser in the field as would traditionally be required.
  • the system 100A may be configured as a Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope (“LSCM”), or in an LSCM mode. As discussed above, in LSCM mode, the system 100A may engage the illumination source 250 or otherwise use an independent, lower energy illumination source (such as the CW laser discussed above), rather than the surgery laser for LSCM measurement procedures.
  • LSCM Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope
  • illumination source 250 may be able to pass a weak collimated laser or other lower energy illumination into the delivery system as light beam 53.
  • Light beam 53 may then be directed by the laser guide optics 400 to a selected XYZ position at a target (e.g., patient’s eye). Some of this light will be scattered back into the delivery system as return light 58. It is understood that return light 58 may vary depending on the density and other characteristics of the tissue or material at the target location.
  • the return light 58 may be directed via the delivery system and reconfigurable optical device back to the laser beam diagnostics which include a far field receiver 755.
  • the target region e.g., patient eye
  • the return light 58 may be focused onto a far field sensor (e.g., CCD in some implementations) of the far field diagnostics module 755 by its far field optics.
  • a far field sensor e.g., CCD in some implementations
  • LSCM systems by scanning the XYZ position of a CW laser, for example, and measuring the intensity and distribution of the returned light signal, a 3 dimensional image of the tissue, or other material, can be produced.
  • the locations of the anatomic surfaces can be accurately measured, while for more general clinical diagnostic testing, it may be of more interest to image regions in the middle portions of the cornea or lens.
  • the cost to add the LSCM function described above to a laser surgery system is relatively low because the costly scanning and focus control optics are already present and may be co-opted.
  • CCDs and the like
  • the traditional LSCM single element detector instead of the traditional LSCM single element detector may allow for decreased sensitivity for alignment drift and can also provide more imaging information than a single element detector.
  • using a lower power illumination device (such as a CW laser) for diagnostics may provide added safety for the patient, compared to a higher peak power pulsed laser light source, which may cause unwanted nonlinear optical effects on the tissue being imaged.
  • Some embodiments may be used for the measurement of tissue.
  • the primary measurement concern for a surgical laser is to have a calibrated position for the necessary anatomic surfaces, in order for the laser control system to accurately implement the procedure selected by an operator.
  • the process of defining and locating a mathematically smooth surface to represent an anatomic surface, for example the anterior lens capsule may involve averaging of values because at the 2-20 micron scale there is extensive cellular structure which can be resolved, i.e., the anatomic surfaces are not smooth at the microns scale.
  • the data bandwidth requirements for biometric surface location may be relaxed compared to detailed 3D microscopic imaging of the tissue.
  • a CMOS or CCD sensor has some advantages as the far-field sensor for anatomic surface measurements, described below.
  • the comeal nerve fibers could be located in the region of planned surgery, and then small adjustments could be made on the fly in order to minimize collateral damage to nerves or other sensitive structures in the eye due to conducting the laser procedure.
  • Some embodiments may require high bandwidth in order to obtain volumetric imaging data in a reasonable time, such as in the case of a traditional use of a fast single element detector (SED) following a pinhole to comprise the far field detector.
  • SED fast single element detector
  • Such uses may be preferred over an array detector such as CCD for some applications.
  • the use of an SED may be challenging in accordance with some embodiments because the mechanical pinhole alignment is quite critical in a confocal microscope system. Accordingly, the use of an SED in some embodiments can allow for the pinhole alignment to be automatically optimized in order to maintain optimum performance.
  • This type of pinhole alignment adjustment is commonly done as a manual procedure with dedicated confocal microscope instruments.
  • piezo actuators to adjust the X, Y pinhole position may be compact, stable, and provide very small step size of adjustment.
  • a calibration signal to adjust the pinhole can be conveniently obtained by placing a slightly turbid scattering medium, such as 1% milk diluted in water or a microsphere suspension, in contact with the output lens interface, and focusing the LSCM beam into the bulk medium.
  • the return signal is due to the laser focus itself, and the microsphere suspension method is commonly used to measure and optimize the point spread function of confocal microscopes.
  • an array sensor may be used as the far field detector.
  • Such embodiments can utilize software to create a virtual pinhole, where the above pinhole calibration procedure can be readily performed without any moving parts to adjust when an array sensor is used.
  • using a CCD for the far field sensor may reduce the complexity and increase the reliability of the system compared to an SED.
  • the LSCM method can accurately measure some optical properties of the delivery system itself. For example, some of the curved lens surfaces may be brought to a center of curvature focus for the LSCM beam within the adjustment range of the focus module, in this case the lateral position of the return image will indicate the centration of the LSCM beam with respect to the particular surface in focus. This method is discussed further under“system alignment”.
  • Another useful measurement which can be made with LSCM is the actual X, Y, Z position of nearly any point on the surface of the Contact Interface (Cl) form of the patient interface.
  • the surface of the Cl serves as a mechanical reference which registers against the cornea representing zero cut depth, so it is crucial to accurately measure and control the laser focus with respect to the Cl surface.
  • specular and diffuse There are two modes of LSCM signal return from the concave final glass Cl surface, these are called specular and diffuse.
  • specular mode the Fresnel reflection of the LSCM beam on the final concave glass surface is reflected back into the delivery optics at an angle within the acceptance pupil, thus the reflected beam will be directed back through the delivery system and to the far field detector in order to produce a signal.
  • specular mode dominates when the radial position of the laser spot in the X, Y scan field is at or near the center of the Cl lens; in this case the Fresnel reflection (i.e., specular reflection) of the beam will occur on a surface nearly normal to the LSCM beam propagation axis.
  • the Fresnel reflected beam may be directed back at a large enough angle so that is totally vignetted before it reaches the far field detector, thus no specular signal will be found outside of the specular cutoff radius.
  • a diffuse reflecting material such as applying white paint onto the glass surface.
  • the return light is spread over a wide angular range, so a small fraction of the scattered light will always be directed inside the acceptance pupil and therefore it will reach the far field detector. Since the diffusely reflected light spreads over a wide range of angles, the signal level is far lower than the case of specular reflection.
  • the low signal level is generally not a problem for detecting diffuse signals, but it does mean that when the specular signal is present then the diffuse signal may be impossible to resolve.
  • the partially vignetted specular signal may become comparable in intensity to the diffuse signal, resulting in a more complex signal than the purely specular and diffuse cases for the radius ranges inside and outside, respectively, the specular cutoff radius.
  • a useful method to measure surface topography with LSCM may be to scan the laser focus in a spiral pattern which is circular in X and Y and linear in Z, such that the spiral begins above the surface of interest and ends below the surface.
  • This embodiment advantageously places the fastest scanning requirements on X and Y, which are controlled by the galvanometer mirrors 405, in a particular implementation, while the slower Z axis control can follow a low acceleration linear ramp.
  • FIG. 23 An example LSCM spiral where the surface of interest is the anterior lens surface is shown in FIG. 23.
  • the return signal level will increase, so by analyzing the LSCM spiral data, the surface Z position can be mapped out over the radius of the spiral scan. While this process may appear analogous to the through-focus linear Z scans utilized in conventional LSCM, it improves upon conventional methods by utilizing a spiral scan to measure Z over a cylindrical region rather than measuring Z along a single line as in a through focus Z scan.
  • FIG. 24 illustrates a data plot in the case of a specular LSCM measurement, taken near the center portion of a Contact Interface lens, in accordance with an embodiment.
  • the signal in this case is a maximum when the focus coincides with the partially reflective surface.
  • the shape of the signal is reasonably well represented by a Lorentzian curve, as predicted for the axial intensity profile of a Gaussian beam.
  • the signal as shown in FIG. 24 does include a small secondary peak at the left side, this is characteristic of minor spherical aberration, however this effect is small enough that the assumption of a Gaussian beam is accurate for locating the primary focus.
  • the specular signal is easily analyzed since the peak of the signal is sharp and it is centered on the surface.
  • This thinner material in some embodiments may have a lower density of scattering features than a paste and may be termed a moderately scattering medium.
  • the beam may penetrate significantly into the medium, i.e., the transmission depth into the medium is similar or larger than the axial depth of focus of the LSCM beam.
  • the measured signal is the sum of contributions starting at the surface where the scattering medium is encountered and on down until the beam has been attenuated below a measurable level by the scattering process.
  • the moderate scattering case requires a more complex analysis, but the advantages of using a convenient fluid can outweigh the computational effort in practical applications.
  • FIG. 25 An example of a diffuse LSCM spiral scan signal plotted as a function of depth at a particular radial and azimuthal position is shown in FIG. 25. Due to the range of penetration into the moderately scattering medium, the peak of the signal will be broad with considerable noise, so the location of the peak is not an accurate way to locate the surface position in this case. A good characteristic to use for surface position measurement may be the rising edge of the signal, which is steep and provides a repeatable and precise measure of the surface location, to within about 1 micron for example.
  • the model developed to address diffuse scattering here is based on Gaussian beam optics, in which case the axial intensity profile has the mathematical form of a
  • the peak height of the Lorentzian coincides with the maximum intensity at the laser beam focus, and at Z positions away from the focus, the shoulders of the curve define how the axial intensity decreases.
  • the half width at half maximum of the axial intensity for a Gaussian beam is also known as the Rayleigh range of the beam.
  • a second component of the diffuse scattering model may be that the beam is attenuated exponentially in passing through the medium, i.e., it follows Beer’s law.
  • the model then can simulate the observed signal as the convolution of the Lorentzian and exponential, with the inclusion of vertical scale and offset factors to account for amplification and background level. By de-convolving the data, the start position of the exponential component will correspond to the precise surface location at which the scattering signal begins.
  • the de-convolved Lorentzian width separately provides a measurement of the Rayleigh range of the LSCM beam.
  • a preferred method to analyze the data in accordance with some embodiments may be to employ iterative forward convolution as a replacement for de-convolution.
  • iterative forward convolution method some initial estimates are made for the Lorentzian width, the exponential decay constant, and the starting position of the exponential, as well as the vertical scale and DC offset factors, for a total of 5 adjustable parameters.
  • the convolution of components is numerically computed and the resulting curve is compared point by point with the data to compute the Chi squared as the sum of the squared deviations between data and model.
  • the parameters are adjusted so that the model reaches a least-squares best fit to the data.
  • the downhill simplex method is a robust and simple to implement optimization algorithm if computation time is not a critical factor.
  • FIG. 25 illustrates the results of this fitting method in a particular example, showing the fit and the component functions resulting from the fitting process, especially the edge of the exponential function corresponding to the surface location.
  • the surface location may be accurately measured directly in the coordinate system of the laser delivery system. This inherent calibration advantage is not available when using a different beam source to perform spatial measurements, as in OCT and 3D scanning.
  • FIG. 26 the results of a spiral IRz scan are shown for diffuse reflection calibration of a Contact Interface.
  • Each point is the Z offset at a particular radial position where the measured surface position is compared to the expected surface position.
  • the scatter in the data is quite low, in the range on 1 micron.
  • the radius of curvature of the laser wavefront may go through various ranges at different locations in the optical system.
  • the CoC image position on the far field detector is a function of the alignment of the LSCM beam onto that particular lens surface.
  • the LSCM beam may be exactly centered on the surface, where the CoC image on the detector may then coincide with the location of the confocal imaging signal.
  • the far field detector is a CCD or other array type detector, it may be capable to measure the off-axis position of the CoC image, providing a very precise autocollimator-type measurement of the CoC surface alignment with respect to the LSCM beam. This may be useful in production while optimizing alignment of the optical system, or also as a self-diagnostic function for systems deployed in the field to monitor system alignment shifts over time. Such as diagnostic function could potentially produce an early warning service request in case the system optical alignment starts to drift, enabling preventive maintenance to be scheduled before the alignment drift can degrade system performance.
  • system alignment may be achieved by installing a wire crosshair (or cross hairs) with precise centration on the input or output aperture of selected optical modules.
  • a wire crosshair or cross hairs
  • at least some of the optical modules are equipped with very fine wire crosshairs to facilitate system alignment procedures in the factory and/or system alignment verification in the field.
  • Cross hair targets are commonly used as temporary alignment fixtures, but in some embodiments the cross hairs may be permanently installed on selected modules.
  • a spot size camera is a test instrument frequently used in the factory and in field service to re- image the final laser focus onto a CCD with sufficient magnification to resolve the features of the ⁇ 2 um laser focus.
  • the conjugate image plane moves in from infinity and in some cases the spot camera focus can be adjusted to form an image of the cross hairs with relatively high magnification, using the laser beam itself to provide the illumination.
  • the centration of the laser beam with respect to the cross hairs is easily determined from the spot camera image of the cross hairs illuminated by the beam.
  • the spot camera magnification may be high enough that the minimum available beam aperture size will not fit into the field of view.
  • the Fresnel rings created by the minimum beam aperture setting of the variable iris in the beam shaper 300 in order to locate the center position of the laser beam and making suitable alignment adjustments to center the Fresnel ring pattern on the cross hairs.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Vascular Medicine (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Laser Surgery Devices (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention porte sur un système laser de chirurgie ophtalmique et un procédé d'émission laser pour un système laser de chirurgie ophtalmique. Des modes de réalisation du système et du procédé concernent un système laser de chirurgie ophtalmique comprenant un moteur laser, un guide laser et un dispositif de mise en forme de faisceau laser. Des modes de réalisation du système et du procédé sont dirigés vers un système d'émission laser pour un système laser de chirurgie ophtalmique. Des modes de réalisation du système et du procédé concernent un système laser de chirurgie ophtalmique comprenant une fonctionnalité supplémentaire telle qu'une microscopie confocale à balayage laser, un balayage laser 3D et des diagnostics par faisceau laser. Des modes de réalisation comprennent en outre l'utilisation d'une source d'éclairage de faible puissance.
PCT/US2019/066039 2018-12-12 2019-12-12 Système laser de chirurgie ophtalmique et son procédé d'utilisation pour la chirurgie ophtalmique WO2020123842A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201862778839P 2018-12-12 2018-12-12
US62/778,839 2018-12-12
US201962814682P 2019-03-06 2019-03-06
US62/814,682 2019-03-06
US201962826381P 2019-03-29 2019-03-29
US62/826,381 2019-03-29

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2020123842A1 true WO2020123842A1 (fr) 2020-06-18

Family

ID=71073853

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2019/066039 WO2020123842A1 (fr) 2018-12-12 2019-12-12 Système laser de chirurgie ophtalmique et son procédé d'utilisation pour la chirurgie ophtalmique

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US11872161B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2020123842A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120283557A1 (en) * 2011-05-05 2012-11-08 Berlin Michael S Methods and Apparatuses for the Treatment of Glaucoma using visible and infrared ultrashort laser pulses
EP3886776A4 (fr) * 2018-11-28 2022-08-10 AMO Development LLC Dispositif d'imagerie pour système laser ophtalmique utilisant une caméra miniature hors axe
WO2021026515A1 (fr) * 2019-08-07 2021-02-11 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Procédé et système de test de performances d'imagerie optique
EP4229387A4 (fr) * 2020-10-15 2024-10-16 Applied Materials Inc Systèmes, appareils et procédés de métrologie en ligne pour dispositifs optiques
WO2022164748A1 (fr) * 2021-01-26 2022-08-04 Omron Corporation Appareil de balayage laser et procédé de fonctionnement
JP2024505454A (ja) * 2021-02-08 2024-02-06 アルコン インコーポレイティド マルチビュー角膜トポグラフィ撮影機
US12026583B2 (en) * 2022-06-22 2024-07-02 Hand Held Products, Inc. One sensor near far solution to minimize FOV mismatch and aiming offsets
CN115657279B (zh) * 2022-11-02 2024-09-03 核工业西南物理研究院 一种光路结构及应用于磁约束等离子体的成像设备
CN118224976B (zh) * 2024-03-13 2024-10-08 安徽瑞视达辉数智光科技有限公司 一种激光定位校正装置及校正方法

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040024485A1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2004-02-05 Mccoy Edward D. Multi-axis laser apparatus and process for the fine cutting of tubing
US20070106285A1 (en) * 2005-11-09 2007-05-10 Ferenc Raksi Laser scanner
US20090122819A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2009-05-14 Board Of Trustees Operating Michigan State Univers Laser Pulse Shaping System
US20140058367A1 (en) * 2011-03-25 2014-02-27 Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University Adaptive laser system for ophthalmic use
US20140098345A1 (en) * 2012-04-24 2014-04-10 Shenzhen Certainn Technology Co.,Ltd. Ophthalmic optical coherence tomography system and method for quick switching to realize anterior and posterior eye segments imaging

Family Cites Families (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6162211A (en) * 1996-12-05 2000-12-19 Thermolase Corporation Skin enhancement using laser light
JP3807871B2 (ja) * 1998-05-28 2006-08-09 株式会社ニデック レーザ治療装置
US6817998B2 (en) * 1999-07-23 2004-11-16 Lahaye Leon C. Method and apparatus for monitoring laser surgery
JP4038350B2 (ja) * 2001-05-01 2008-01-23 株式会社ニデック 眼科用レーザ治療装置
DE10333562A1 (de) * 2003-07-23 2005-02-17 Carl Zeiss Meditec Ag Verfahren, Vorrichtung und System zur Bestimmung eines Systemparameters eines Laserstrahl-Behandlungssystems
US7491350B2 (en) * 2004-12-01 2009-02-17 Acufocus, Inc. Method of making an ocular implant
DE102005013949A1 (de) * 2005-03-26 2006-09-28 Carl Zeiss Meditec Ag Scanvorrichtung
JP5265222B2 (ja) * 2008-03-26 2013-08-14 株式会社ニデック レーザ治療装置
DE102009012873B4 (de) * 2009-03-12 2021-08-19 Carl Zeiss Meditec Ag Ophthalmologisches Lasersystem und Steuereinheit
PL2456383T3 (pl) * 2009-07-23 2017-10-31 Koninklijke Philips Nv Ostrze optyczne oraz urządzenie do cięcia włosów
US8679100B2 (en) * 2009-07-29 2014-03-25 Alcon Lensx, Inc. Optical system with multiple scanners for ophthalmic surgical laser
US8337490B2 (en) * 2010-03-03 2012-12-25 Wavelight Ag Apparatus for movable and weight-compensating suspension of a focusing objective of a laser system
DE102011103181A1 (de) * 2010-06-03 2011-12-29 Carl Zeiss Meditec Ag Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Glaskörperchirurgie
US8851679B2 (en) * 2010-06-14 2014-10-07 Frans J. Van de Velde Electronic ophthalmoscope for selective retinal photodisruption of the photoreceptor mosaic
EP2627240B1 (fr) 2010-10-15 2023-01-18 LENSAR, Inc. Système et procédé d'éclairage commandé par balayage de structures dans un il
CA2819859A1 (fr) * 2010-12-06 2012-06-14 Follica, Inc. Procedes destines a traiter la calvitie et a favoriser la croissance des cheveux
EP2775973B1 (fr) * 2011-11-10 2018-05-09 WaveLight GmbH Élimination d'épithélium assistée par laser
EP2854730B1 (fr) * 2012-05-30 2019-11-20 Ellex R&D Pty Ltd Éclairage coaxial réflex
WO2014078774A2 (fr) * 2012-11-19 2014-05-22 Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. Détecteurs optiques et leurs procédés d'utilisation
US10314745B2 (en) 2012-11-30 2019-06-11 Amo Development, Llc Automatic centration of a surgical pattern on the apex of a curved patient interface
AU2014242096B2 (en) * 2013-03-13 2018-06-28 Amo Development, Llc Laser eye surgery system
US10441465B2 (en) * 2014-03-26 2019-10-15 Optimedica Corporation Registration of LOI fiducials with camera
CN107847289A (zh) * 2015-03-01 2018-03-27 阿里斯医疗诊断公司 现实增强的形态学手术
KR20170025684A (ko) * 2015-08-31 2017-03-08 주식회사 루트로닉 안과용 치료 장치 및 안과용 치료 장치의 구동방법
JP6627382B2 (ja) * 2015-09-30 2020-01-08 株式会社ニデック 眼科用レーザ治療装置
US20180078418A1 (en) * 2016-09-16 2018-03-22 Amo Development, Llc Systems and methods for laser pulse energy control
US20180085257A1 (en) * 2016-09-28 2018-03-29 Kelo Tec Inc Systems and Methods for Laser Eye Surgery

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090122819A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2009-05-14 Board Of Trustees Operating Michigan State Univers Laser Pulse Shaping System
US20040024485A1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2004-02-05 Mccoy Edward D. Multi-axis laser apparatus and process for the fine cutting of tubing
US20070106285A1 (en) * 2005-11-09 2007-05-10 Ferenc Raksi Laser scanner
US20140058367A1 (en) * 2011-03-25 2014-02-27 Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University Adaptive laser system for ophthalmic use
US20140098345A1 (en) * 2012-04-24 2014-04-10 Shenzhen Certainn Technology Co.,Ltd. Ophthalmic optical coherence tomography system and method for quick switching to realize anterior and posterior eye segments imaging

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20240122757A1 (en) 2024-04-18
US20200188166A1 (en) 2020-06-18
US11872161B2 (en) 2024-01-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11872161B2 (en) Ophthalmic surgery laser system and method for utilizing same for ophthalmic surgery
JP6696977B2 (ja) ズーム可能なケプラーシステムを備える光学コヒーレンストモグラフィのシステム
US11161200B2 (en) Apparatus and method for material processing using a transparent contact element
US7692865B2 (en) Adapter for coupling a laser processing device to an object
JP4167979B2 (ja) 眼型器官の収差を測定する装置
JP5756253B2 (ja) 光コヒーレンス断層法機構を有する外科用顕微鏡システム
US8459795B2 (en) Measuring system for ophthalmic surgery
US9265658B2 (en) Contact element for laser machining
US20180360309A1 (en) Measurement system and method for establishing the refraction of an eye, the radius of curvature of the cornea or the internal pressure of an eye
JP4287290B2 (ja) 光学的特性の測定
US20050140981A1 (en) Measurement of optical properties
KR20150084915A (ko) 실시간 고디옵터 범위 순차 파면 센서를 작동하는 장치 및 방법
US9554943B2 (en) Ophthalmological device
US4397310A (en) Anastigmatic high magnification, wide-angle binocular indirect attachment for laser photocoagulator
US20170086667A1 (en) Apparatus and method for wavefront guided vision correction
US11490810B2 (en) Reflectometry instrument and method for measuring macular pigment
CN113616152A (zh) 测量眼睛的光学质量的眼科仪器
JP2003052632A (ja) 眼特性測定装置
JP5237869B2 (ja) 模型眼
JPH067297A (ja) 目の屈折度の判定方法と装置及び装置の使用方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 19896669

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 19896669

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1