Classifications

• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
  • H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
  • H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
  • H01Q1/42—Housings not intimately mechanically associated with radiating elements, e.g. radome
  • H01Q1/422—Housings not intimately mechanically associated with radiating elements, e.g. radome comprising two or more layers of dielectric material
  • H01Q1/424—Housings not intimately mechanically associated with radiating elements, e.g. radome comprising two or more layers of dielectric material comprising a layer of expanded material
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
  • H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
  • H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
  • H01Q1/42—Housings not intimately mechanically associated with radiating elements, e.g. radome
  • H01Q1/422—Housings not intimately mechanically associated with radiating elements, e.g. radome comprising two or more layers of dielectric material
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B32—LAYERED PRODUCTS
  • B32B—LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
  • B32B17/00—Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres
  • B32B17/06—Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material
  • B32B17/10—Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B32—LAYERED PRODUCTS
  • B32B—LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
  • B32B27/00—Layered products comprising a layer of synthetic resin
  • B32B27/06—Layered products comprising a layer of synthetic resin as the main or only constituent of a layer, which is next to another layer of the same or of a different material
  • B32B27/08—Layered products comprising a layer of synthetic resin as the main or only constituent of a layer, which is next to another layer of the same or of a different material of synthetic resin
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B32—LAYERED PRODUCTS
  • B32B—LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
  • B32B27/00—Layered products comprising a layer of synthetic resin
  • B32B27/12—Layered products comprising a layer of synthetic resin next to a fibrous or filamentary layer
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B32—LAYERED PRODUCTS
  • B32B—LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
  • B32B5/00—Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts
  • B32B5/02—Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by structural features of a fibrous or filamentary layer
  • B32B5/022—Non-woven fabric
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B32—LAYERED PRODUCTS
  • B32B—LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
  • B32B7/00—Layered products characterised by the relation between layers; Layered products characterised by the relative orientation of features between layers, or by the relative values of a measurable parameter between layers, i.e. products comprising layers having different physical, chemical or physicochemical properties; Layered products characterised by the interconnection of layers
  • B32B7/02—Physical, chemical or physicochemical properties
  • B32B7/025—Electric or magnetic properties
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B32—LAYERED PRODUCTS
  • B32B—LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
  • B32B7/00—Layered products characterised by the relation between layers; Layered products characterised by the relative orientation of features between layers, or by the relative values of a measurable parameter between layers, i.e. products comprising layers having different physical, chemical or physicochemical properties; Layered products characterised by the interconnection of layers
  • B32B7/04—Interconnection of layers
  • B32B7/12—Interconnection of layers using interposed adhesives or interposed materials with bonding properties
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
  • H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
  • H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
  • H01Q1/42—Housings not intimately mechanically associated with radiating elements, e.g. radome
  • H01Q1/421—Means for correcting aberrations introduced by a radome
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
  • H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
  • H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
  • H01Q1/27—Adaptation for use in or on movable bodies
  • H01Q1/32—Adaptation for use in or on road or rail vehicles
  • H01Q1/325—Adaptation for use in or on road or rail vehicles characterised by the location of the antenna on the vehicle
  • H01Q1/3283—Adaptation for use in or on road or rail vehicles characterised by the location of the antenna on the vehicle side-mounted antennas, e.g. bumper-mounted, door-mounted

Definitions

• the present invention relates to gradient permittivity films useful, for example, in systems with radio wave generating and receiving units.
• Radio waves may be reflected at a sharp boundary between air and a material having a higher relative permittivity. Such reflection may not be desirable in certain applications.
• the present invention provides a gradient permittivity film comprising (a) a first permittivity layer comprising a first continuous matrix of a first material having a first relative permittivity (e G i) and a second component having a second relative permittivity (e ⁇ ) dispersed in the first continuous matrix, the first permittivity layer having a first effective layer relative permittivity (bi) and a thickness (Ti); and (b) a second permittivity layer having a second effective layer relative permittivity (8 2 ) and a thickness (T 2 ) disposed on the first permittivity layer; wherein the gradient permittivity film has a haze greater than 50% or a transmission of visible light less than 50%; and wherein:
• 8 1 is greater than 8 2 by at least 10% for at least one frequency if) within a frequency range between 20 GHz and 300 GHz,
• T 2 0.8(t 2 ) to 1.2
• the present invention provides A gradient permittivity film comprising (a) a first permittivity layer comprising a first continuous matrix of a first material having a first relative permittivity (e G i) and a second component having a second relative permittivity (s ⁇ ) dispersed in the first continuous matrix, the first permittivity layer having a first effective layer relative permittivity (ei) and a thickness (Ti); and (b) a second permittivity layer having a second effective layer relative permittivity (8 2 ) and a thickness (T 2 ) disposed on the first permittivity layer; wherein the gradient permittivity film has a haze greater than 50% or a transmission of visible light less than 50%; and wherein:
• si is greater than 8 2 by at least 10% for at least one frequency (/) within a frequency range between 20 GHz and 300 GHz,
• T 2 0.8(t 2 ) to 1.2
• FIG. 1 is a side elevation cross section of a gradient permittivity film.
• FIG. 2 is a side elevation cross section of another gradient permittivity film.
• FIG. 3 is a side elevation cross section of a nonwoven component for a gradient permittivity film.
• FIG. 4 is a side elevation cross section of a gradient permittivity tape.
• FIG. 5 shows modeling results of a two-layer stacked quarter-wavelength film.
• FIG. 6 shows modeling results of a stacked half-wavelength and quarter- wavelength film.
• FIG. 7 shows modeling results of a two-layer stacked quarter-wavelength film.
• FIG. 8 shows modeling results of a stacked half-wavelength and quarter- wavelength film.
• FIG. 9 is a side elevation cross section of a multilayer gradient permittivity tape.
• FIG. 10 is a side elevation cross section of a single layer gradient permittivity film attached to a surface.
• FIG. 11 is a graph of radar signal plots from Comparative Example 1.
• FIG. 12 is a graph of radar signal plots from Example 1.
• FIG. 13 is a graph of radar signal plots from Example 2.
• FIG. 14 is a graph of radar signal plots from Example 3.
• FIG. 15 is a graph of radar signal plots from Comparative Example 2.
• FIG. 16 shows the reflection coefficient of an antenna.
• FIG. 17 shows the ensemble reflection coefficient of an antenna.
• FIG. 18 shows modeling results from Example 5.
• FIG. 19 shows modeling results from Example 9. Detailed Description
• Radio wave generating and receiving units such as radar (radio detection and ranging) units, may be useful in a diverse and growing application space.
• radar radio detection and ranging
• one or more radar units may be incorporated.
• microwave generation and receiving units may be used, and so for purposes of this application“radar” and“radio waves” shall include microwave range frequencies as well.
• these radar units may be relatively low power when compared to those used for, as an example, air traffic monitoring applications. Accordingly, the signal to noise ratios of these lower power units may be more sensitive to interference or attenuation.
• these radar units In order to protect these radar units from dirt buildup or weather elements such as snow and rain, or, in the case of rotating or moving components, to protect people from injury or accidental damage, the unit is typically protected with a cover. In some cases, this protective cover is referred to as a radome. Alternatively, or additionally, these units are sometimes embedded within the body of the vehicle. In some embodiments, these units are placed behind or within the bumper fascia or another vehicle fascia, which serves as the protective cover. Depending on the direction of interest, these radar units can be placed at any location on the vehicle. Typically, they are arranged so that the least amount of material is disposed between the radar unit and its potential— or intended— targets for detection.
• Relative permittivity for a given frequency which, as used herein is the ratio of a material’s permittivity to the permittivity of a vacuum, measures the resistance of a material to forming an electric field within itself. Sharp changes in this value— as would be encountered by a radio wave traveling in air at an interface with a non-air material, such as a plastic vehicle fascia, will cause at least some of the radio wave to be reflected at this boundary.
• Gradient permittivity films analogous to anti-reflection films or coatings for optical interfaces, provide a smooth or stepped change in permittivity (versus a smooth or stepped change in refractive index for anti -reflection films)— from a first medium to a second medium.
• the gradient permittivity film typically, the gradient permittivity film’s permittivity varies from being closest to the permittivity of the first medium to being closest to the permittivity of the second medium.
• the gradient permittivity film could have a varying permittivity that starts close to the permittivity of air on one side and transitions to the permittivity of a plastic vehicle fascia on the other side (which would be attached to the plastic vehicle fascia). This smooth or stepped transition can significantly reduce the dielectric boundary reflection that otherwise occurs at these sharp transitions.
• Previous gradient permittivity films typically use varying bulk three-dimensional shapes, such as cones or pyramids. However, in atypical use environment where these films may be exposed to dirt accumulation and weather conditions, these films may become contaminated and ineffective, because they rely on the presence of air in order to provide the gradient in permittivity. Films described herein may be less susceptible to debris and contaminant ingress because a limited portion of the air or gas fraction is exposed to external elements, or in some embodiments, the gas volume fraction is completely sealed within the film. In other words, both major surfaces of the gradient permittivity film are primarily a continuous matrix component.
• FIG. 1 is a side elevation cross section of a gradient permittivity film.
• Gradient permittivity film 100 includes first half 110A closest to first major surface 112, second half 110B closest to second major surface 114, continuous matrix of first component 110, with second component 120 disposed within the continuous matrix and also disposed within third component 130. The thickness of the film is indicated by t and includes both halves of the gradient permittivity film.
• Gradient permittivity film 100 represents a simple embodiment of a gradient permittivity film.
• the continuous matrix is a bulk volume of the first component.
• this first component could be a resin, plastic, polymeric material or any other suitable material selected for its permittivity, mechanical properties, thermal or environmental stability, ease of processing, or any combination of the preceding.
• the continuous matrix of the first component is selected to match the permittivity and or composition of a material it is intended to be attached to for its designed application.
• the first continuous matrix of the first component has a first relative permittivity e G i.
• the second component has a second relative permittivity e G 2, where e G i is greater than e G2 for at least one frequency within a frequency range.
• the frequency range may be any frequency range within the radio and microwave wavelength range.
• the frequency range may be between 20 GHz and 300 GHz.
• the frequency range may be between 20 GHz and 100 GHz.
• the frequency range may be between 20 GHz and 81 GHz.
• the frequency range may be between 76 GHz and 81 GHz.
• the frequency range may be between 20 GHz and 30 GHz.
• the second component is air or another inert gas. In some embodiments, the second component is a partial vacuum. Given the low relative permittivity of air, gasses, or partial vacuums, the inclusion of the second component within the gradient permittivity film lowers the effective permittivity of that portion of the film. Averaged over the volume for that portion of the thickness, a half or portion of gradient permittivity film 100 that includes more of second component 120 will have a lower effective permittivity than a half or portion of gradient permittivity film 100 that contains less or none of second component 120. In some embodiments, this difference in permittivity is at least 10%.
• First half 110A which is designed to have a lower permittivity than second half 110B, includes second component 120 disposed within continuous matrix of first component 110, while second half 110B does not include second component 120.
• gradient permittivity film 100 is represented as a single layer. Through certain manufacturing methods (described in more detail elsewhere in this description), it is possible to achieve a single layer film that has a gradient in permittivity.
• Second component 120 is disposed within third component 130, in the illustration of FIG. 1.
• second component 120 is freely disposed within the continuous matrix of the first component—such as in the form of air or gas bubbles.
• nanoparticles such as silsesquioxane nanoparticles can be used to add porosity to a polymer layer, such as an epoxy or silicone layer.
• second component 120 is disposed within a different material.
• second component 120 is disposed within glass, making the spheres in FIG. 1 glass bubbles or microbubbles.
• Glass microbubbles are generally formed by simultaneous fusion of glass-forming components and the expansion of the fused mass. See generally U.S. Patent No. 4,767,726 (Marshall).
• polymeric or plastic microbubbles such as polyethylene, polypropylene, poly(methyl methacrylate) and filled with an inert gas or air may be used.
• cenospheres lightweight spheres typically formed from silica or alumina and filled with air or other inert gas and produced as a byproduct of coal combustion— may be used.
• particles such as expandable microspheres can be used to add porosity to a polymer layer. Expandable microspheres can be incorporated in a polymer component and expand upon the application of heat to form a low density volume in a continuous matrix.
• ceramic particles may be used. These ceramic particles may be porous and include air or another inert gas.
• any of the particles described herein may be coated with or may include an absorber composite.
• the absorber composite may include at least one of ceramic filler materials, conductive filler materials, or magnetic filler materials.
• the conductive filler materials may include, for example, carbon black, carbon bubbles, carbon foam, graphene, carbon fibers, graphite, carbon nanotubes, metal particles, metal nanoparticles, metal alloy particles, metal nanowires, polyacrylonitrile fibers, or conductive coated particles.
• the ceramic material fillers may include, for example, cupric oxide or titanium monoxide.
• the magnetic filler materials may include, for example, Sendust, carbonyl iron, permalloy, ferrites, or garnets.
• the third component has a third relative permittivity e G 3, and e G 2 ⁇ e G 3 for the frequency within the frequency range. Any combination or blend of particles and free voids or bubbles can be used within the continuous matrix of the first component.
• the thickness t may be any suitable value, taking into account physical robustness and environmental stability (such as resistant to heat-cool cycle warping). Additionally, the suitable thickness may also be bounded as being greater than a minimum thickness so that a radio wave experiences and interacts with the intermediate change in permittivity. If the thickness is too thin, an incident electromagnetic wave will not interact with the gradient permittivity film. Or, in the case of multilayer gradient permittivity films, an electromagnetic wave will interact with the multilayer gradient permittivity film as if it were a single layer of a blended effective permittivity— instead of, as desired, as a film of stepped permittivity. If a film is too thick, it may not be effectively attached or may not remain attached to a surface and may be less flexible or conformable than desired.
• the layer permittivity may not be homogeneous through the layer volume.
• the distribution of the second component or its volume fraction within the continuous matrix may vary along one or more non-thickness directions of the film. In some embodiments, the variation may be monotonic.
• gradient permittivity films as described herein may have high visible haze or low visible light transmission. In some embodiments, visible haze may be greater than 50%. In some embodiments, visible light transmission may be less than 50%.
• FIG. 2 is a side elevation cross section of another gradient permittivity film.
• Gradient permittivity film 200 includes first half 210A closest to first major surface 212 and second half 210B closest to second major surface 214 and laminated together by adhesive 270, continuous matrix of first component 210. with second component disposed within the continuous matrix and optionally disposed within third component 230.
• Gradient permittivity film 200 in FIG. 2 is similar and corresponds generally to gradient permittivity film 100 of FIG. 1.
• FIG. 2 illustrates two portions of film— first half 210A and 210B— that are laminated to each other by adhesive 270 instead of the unitary construction in FIG 1.
• FIG. 2 illustrates that second component 220 can be freely disposed within continuous matrix of first component 210 and not within a third component.
• the volume fraction of the second component may vary between any of the portions of the thickness of the gradient permittivity film through either changing either the size, shape, or density of the bubbles, voids, or other components, such as glass microbubbles, expandable microspheres, or cenospheres present in the continuous matrix. In some embodiments, this difference in volume fraction of the second component is at least 10% between the two halves.
• any suitable adhesive may be used as adhesive 270.
• pressure sensitive adhesives UV-curable adhesives, silicone-based adhesives, urethane-based adhesives or any other suitable adhesive or combination of adhesives may be used to bond the halves of gradient permittivity film 200 together.
• adhesive of any thickness may be used, using a thin adhesive (thickness ⁇ D/5) may be preferred to have as little influence as possible on the permittivity of the film’s stack design.
• FIG. 3 is a side elevation cross section of a nonwoven component 300 for a gradient permittivity film.
• Nonwoven component 300 has intrinsic porosity and contains at least some inert gas (e.g., air) volume fraction provided within the continuous matrix of the nonwoven component.
• a gradient permittivity film may use a nonwoven component as part of a multilayer stack, wherein the film varies in effective permittivity by controlling or selecting the porosity of the various layers of the nonwoven component.
• the porosity of a single nonwoven layer can be controlled along the thickness direction such that a gradient in permittivity is present.
• Suitable nonwoven components may include spunbond nonwovens, flashspun nonwovens, melt-blown nonwovens, staple fiber nonwovens, and may include glass or plastic fibers.
• the glass or plastic fibers can themselves contain an inert gas or air component, which may help further tune or control the permittivity gradient along the thickness direction or possibly also in one or more non-thickness directions.
• Nonwoven components may be used in combination with any other layer described herein, including with one or more layers of a resin matrix with voids or bubbles (plastic or glass or free) disposed therein.
• FIG. 4 is a side elevation cross section of another gradient permittivity film.
• Gradient permittivity film 400 includes first permittivity layer 410A and second permittivity layer 411B.
• First permittivity layer 410A comprises continuous matrix of material 410 with second component 420 disposed within the continuous matrix and also disposed within optional third component 430.
• the thickness of first permittivity layer 410A is indicated by Ti.
• First permittivity layer 410A can comprise any of the materials described above.
• Second permittivity layer 41 IB comprises material 411.
• the thickness of second permittivity layer 411B is indicated by T2.
• second permittivity layer 411B comprises a continuous matrix of material with a second component disposed within the continuous matrix and also disposed within an optional third component.
• Second permittivity layer 411B can comprise any of the materials described above.
• second permittivity layer 411B is an adhesive.
• Useful adhesives include acrylic foam adhesives such as double-sided acrylic foam 3MTM VHBTM Tapes available from 3M Company.
• First permittivity layer 410A has an effective permittivity si .
• Second permittivity layer 41 IB has an effective permittivity 82 , where bi is greater than 82 for at least one frequency within a frequency range.
• the thickness of the permittivity layers may be controlled to a certain portion of a wavelength within the material of a desired frequency. In this way, interference effects may also be used to reduce undesired reflections as described below.
• the standing wave in a medium is proportional to the reflection coefficient.
• An approach to lower the reflection is to minimize the contrast between two media. For instance, if reflection occurs at air-dielectric interface, a smaller dielectric constant (close to one) generates a smaller reflection.
• Reflection coefficient for a boundary in where incident wave travels through medium 1 (with impedance rp) and hits the medium 2 (with impedance rp) can be expressed as:
• the reflection phase can change sign (180 degree phase difference) if two media are swapped.
• the portion of field that penetrates into the slab and impinges on the dielectric-air boundary and returns back to the air- dielectric interface and combines with original reflection field should travel a distance equal to an integer multiplication of wavelength which corresponds to the particular radar frequency for the application.
• This means the smallest thickness for the dielectric slab is“half- wavelength.” This concept can be used, for example, to minimize the reflection from the surface of vehicle fascia when radar signal propagates in normal direction to the vehicle fascia.
• preferred combinations of layer thicknesses and permittivity offer improved functional robustness by using optimized quarter- and half-wavelength interference structures analogous to optical interference layers.
• the relative phase and amplitude of reflection from each layer boundary may be selected to provide maximum bandwidth for destructive interference for all reflected waves.
• quarter-wavelength interference structures it can be advantageous to have multiple (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4 or more) adjacent layers of quarter-wavelength thickness at different permittivity to create a stack with wider bandwidth coverage.
• One embodiment includes an anti-reflection (AR) film comprised of two quarter- wavelength layers where their respective permittivity is chosen relative to the geometric mean of the air and bumper fascia permittivity, 8 ce nter, as expressed in equation 2. (eqn. 2)
• the permittivity for the first quarter-wavelength layer, exposed to air has permittivity si , chosen to satisfy equation 3.
• s r is the respective layer permittivity
• / is the wave frequency
• c is the speed of light constant.
• Table 1 Optimized values at a target frequency of 77 GHz for the permittivity of a stacked quarter- wavelength structure for various permittivity fascia.
• Table 2 shows such a case where the permittivity of the first quarter-wavelength layer was limited to a value of 1.45. In this scenario, only the second quarter-wavelength layer was allowed to vary to optimize the reflectance.
• Table 2 Optimized values at a target frequency of 77 GHz for the permittivity of a stacked quarter- wavelength structure for various permittivity fascia, with the restriction that the first layer may not have permittivity below 1.45.
• FIG. 5 shows the reflection coefficient of a patch antenna when placed behind the bumper fascia with a two-layer stacked quarter-wavelength film, where the thickness of each layer varies between ⁇ 10%.
• the frequency shift varies within 250 MHz range (about 0.3% of the center frequency 77 GHz). This variation is even less significant for the case of a stacked half-wavelength and quarter-wavelength film shown in FIG. 6 where the frequency shift is less than 160 MHz (about 0.2% of the center frequency 77 GHz) for ⁇ 10% thickness variation.
• FIGS. 5 - 8 were modeled using the radar reflection variability test method described in the Example section below.
• Another embodiment includes an anti-reflection (AR) film comprised of one half- wavelength and a second quarter-wavelength layer where the permittivity of the half-wavelength layer, Bi / 2 wave , is chosen to equal half of the bumper fascia permittivity as expressed in equation 6.
• AR anti-reflection
• the quarter- wavelength layer in this embodiment, has permittivity, e wave , chosen to equal the geometric mean of the half-wavelength layer permittivity and the bumper fascia permittivity, as expressed in equation 7.
• the thicknesses for the quarter-wavelength layer depends on their permittivity by the relationship of equation 8.
• the preferred thickness for the half- wavelength layer is chosen according to equation 9. n. 8)
• Table 3 Optimized values at a target frequency of 77 GHz for the permittivity of a stacked half wavelength and quarter-wavelength structure for various permittivity fascia.
• Table 4 shows calculated optimum values when the lower limit of the permittivity is fixed to a value of 1.45. In this scenario, only the quarter-wavelength layer was allowed to vary to optimize the reflectance.
• Equations 2 thru 9 represent a far-field solution, and for this application, the distances dictate a near-field solution to provide the preferred solution.
• electromagnetic simulation software from Computer Stimulation Technology (CST) was used with starting values derived from these idealized half-wavelength and quarter-wavelength structures.
• CST Computer Stimulation Technology
• Table 5 Near-field optimized results for permittivity /thickness for a stacked half-wavelength and quarter-wavelength structure at various fascia permittivity.
• FIG. 9 is a side elevation cross section of a multilayer gradient permittivity tape.
• Gradient permittivity tape 900 includes first layer 910, second layer 920, third layer 930, fourth layer 940, fifth layer 950, adhesive layer 960, and backing layer 970. Other embodiments may include additional layers.
• Gradient permittivity tape 900 in FIG. 9 illustrates a multilayer stack design where each of first layer 910, second layer 920, third layer 930, and fourth layer 940 have a different effective permittivity and represent a stepped change moving along the thickness direction of the gradient permittivity tape (up and down in the reference frame of FIG. 9).
• FIG. 9 may be formed separately and attached, such as with an adhesive or through another process such as heat lamination, or they may be formed successively with varying process conditions or input material (for example, different resins with different loadings of glass or plastic microbubbles).
• FIG. 9 is a simplified illustration, and the boundaries between each of the layers is not necessarily as flat and defined in real-world manufactured articles.
• the continuous matrix for each of the layers is the same material. In other embodiments, the continuous matrix and/or the secondary components for layers are different materials.
• Gradient permittivity tape also includes adhesive layer 960 and backing layer 970.
• Adhesive layer 960 may include any suitable adhesives, including pressure sensitive adhesives, repositionable adhesives, or stretch releasable adhesives. Adhesive layer 960 may be any suitable thickness to provide secure contact to a surface with which it is attached. Adhesive layer 960 may alternatively include curable components, such as UV-curable components or heat curable components. In some embodiments, adhesive layer 960 may also include one or more of the components including the inert gas or air, such as glass or plastic microbubbles, cenospheres, ceramic particles, or free voids, in order to further control the permittivity gradient.
• Backing layer 970 may include any suitable film or layer to protect the adhesive properties of adhesive layer 960 and also prevent accidental adhesion of gradient permittivity tape 900 to undesired surfaces. Suitable materials for backing layer 970 include plastic films, coated or uncoated paper, or the like. Backing layer 970 may be selected so that it itself does not have strong adhesion to adhesive layer 960, and therefore is easily removable by hand or with limited tools.
• FIG. 10 is a side elevation cross section of a single layer gradient permittivity film attached to a surface.
• the gradient permittivity tape includes single layer gradient permittivity film 1010 disposed on substrate 1020 and attached to surface 1040 via adhesive layer 1030.
• Gradient permittivity 1010 in FIG. 10 is a single layer gradient permittivity film.
• a single layer gradient permittivity film may be formed through disposing differently-sized or shaped microbubbles (in glass or plastic), expandable microspheres, cenospheres, air or other inert gas bubbles or a combination thereof in an uncured flowable material.
• Such a flowable material may be disposed or coated onto substrate 1020, through any suitable method such as dip coating, spin coating, spray or conformal coating, or even printing.
• the difference in the permittivity between the top and bottom halves of gradient permittivity film 1010 may be at least 10%.
• gradient permittivity film of FIG. 10 is attached to surface 1040 via adhesive layer 1030.
• gradient permittivity film 1010 may have been configured as a tape, with the adhesive layer disposed on the gradient permittivity film prior to attachment to surface 1040, as described and shown in FIG. 9.
• gradient permittivity film 1010 is attached to surface 1040 by application of adhesive layer 1030 at or near the time of attachment. Any suitable adhesive may be used.
• Surface 1040 may be, in some embodiments, a vehicle fascia. Surface 1040 may be a radome. In some embodiments, surface 1040 may be a different protective cover or casing, such as an antenna covering or the external surface of an electronic device. In some embodiments, although FIG. 10 illustrates one gradient permittivity film attached to the surface, more than one gradient permittivity tape may be attached to the surface in the same or similar manner. In some embodiments, a second gradient permittivity film is attached to the opposite side of surface 1040, with its half having lower relative permittivity being disposed away from surface 1040.
• Surface 1040 may be curved or nonplanar, and gradient permittivity film or a tape including such a film may be similarly formed, flexible, or compliant in order to adhere closely to the shape of surface 1040.
• a relative permittivity of the surface is within 10% of the relative permittivity of the continuous matrix.
• the continuous matrix nearest to the surface is the one to be within 10% of the relative permittivity of the surface.
• the relative permittivity of the surface may be within 5% of the relative permittivity of the continuous matrix.
• Gradient permittivity films described herein may be postprocessed in order to further tune the properties and performance of these films.
• gradient permittivity films described here in may be heated or thinned in order to selectively change the properties at a certain point or points on the film.
• gradient permittivity films described herein may be perforated to selectively alter the permittivity characteristics at certain points at the film.
• these perforations have regular shapes and/or sizes.
• these perforations are differently sized or shaped.
• these perforations are round.
• the perforations vary in size, shape, or density over one or more non-thickness directions.
• the gradient permittivity film of the present invention can be used to antireflect intervening materials that are between the antenna and air.
• These intervening materials can be fascia (such as bumpers, body panels, grills, emblems, etc.).
• Auto fascia are often comprised of polymers such as polypropylene, polycarbonate or other engineering thermoplastics.
• the radar unit itself has a cover piece referred to as the“radome” which also can create unwanted reflections.
• the gradient permittivity film of the present invention can be incorporated on the interior surface of the radome to minimize these reflections.
• Radar transparent emblems such as those made from multilayer optical film or other technologies such as indium can be further enhanced in their transmission by use of the present invention.
• the film can be post applied to fascia without thinning.
• the film can be formed into a 2- or 3 -dimensional shape to conform to the surface of the mating fascia. There are several ways this can be done. For example, can be applied as an adhesive tape.
• Another way is to form a part of the film by methods such as pressure or thermoforming and then adhering it to the matching fascia part.
• insert injection molding can be done, where the film is inserted into an injection mold and then the fascia part is injection molded onto the film.
• radar unit is behind automotive glass, and in particular in the rear-view mirror module facing forward toward the windshield.
• the permittivity film can be tuned to antireflect the automotive window construction.
• Auto window constructions can include glass/polyvinylbutyral/glass laminates.
• a sample of 4-layer structures were coated to facilitate the radar transmission measurements; for testing configurations this samples was either fastened to either bare or painted 1.7 mm polypropylene plates to simulate automotive bumper material.
• the air volume for each layer of the three examples of 4-layer structure is provided in the form of hollow glass beads (3M Glass Bubbles Kl) embedded in a matrix of 55% silicone acrylate (Sartomer CN990) and 45% tetra hydrofinfuryl acrylate (Sartomer SR285).
• each layer of the construction was 250 pm, for a total thickness of 1 mm.
• comparative example 1 (CE-l) is provided as a bare 1.7 mm polypropylene plate (no film) and comparative example 2 is provided as same 1.7 mm polypropylene plate with metallic gray paint layer of sufficient thickness so as to be visually opaque.
• the metallic gray paint mixture is 25% DBC9700 (black) commercially available from PPG and 25% Nissan silver (KYO Nissan equivalent available from Dupont P2929) and 50% DT885 reducer / solvent also from PPG.
• the percent bead density by volume for each layer is expected to directly influence the permittivity of the layer.
• the expected permittivity as a function of glass bead vol% is shown in Table 7.
• Modeled examples were constructed to test system susceptibility to variation of systems elements such as bumper fascia thickness and air gap between radar unit and bumper fascia / AR film stack.
• the commercial tool used for these calculations is the electromagnetic simulation software from Computer Stimulation Technology (CST). Modeling was conducted in two manners, one using a patch antenna as a source, the second with a plane wave source.
• Example 4 is composed of a half-wave length single layer slab between bumper fascia and antennae where permittivity of the slab is 1.3 and its thickness is l .75mm.
• Example 5 is a half-wavelength, quarter-wavelength bilayer where the permittivity of the quarter-wavelength layer is 1.7 and the thickness is 0.85 mm and the half- wavelength slab matches example 4.
• Example 6, 7, and 8 are tri -layer structures with permittivity and thicknesses presented in Table 8.
• Example 9 is a bilayer structure with each layer being targeted to quarter-wavelength - quarter-wavelength structure described previously.
• Example 10 is modelled to demonstrate slightly“off optimal” conditions when compared to example 9.
• the representative system with a radar source / antennae plane positioned at a prescribed air gap distance behind a bumper fascia layer represents the ideal configuration.
• the permittivity of the bumper fascia was set to 2.6.
• the goal of the modeling examples 5-9 was to compare the overall system robustness to variations on these two parameters for different anti -reflection layer constructions.
• a baseline reflection coefficient spectrum was first designed to radiate at 77 GHz.
• FIG. 16 shows the reflection coefficient of the antennae in free space from 70 to 84 GHz.
• the simulations used for the reflection variability test method varied the bumper fascia thickness from 2.8 to 3.2 mm thickness and the bumper fascia-to-antennae air gap from 0.4 to 1.2 mm stepwise over (12) conditions shown in Table 9.
• FIG. 17 shows the ensemble reflection coefficient spectrum for the antennae bumper fascia without any AR layer for all (12) variation conditions of table 9. From this baseline, we see that these systematic variation results in a 1.51 GHz frequency shift (about 2% of the resonant frequency) in the absence of any anti-reflection layer structures. This frequency shift for given range of variations was used as the metric for the reflection variability test.
• the near field profile of the electric field radiated by the radar antenna will change according to dielectric properties of the bumper fascia.
• the bumper fascia has a loading effect on each element of the antenna array and detunes the frequency of which the antenna array is designed to operate. Therefore, anti-reflection film should be able to mitigate the impact and prevent the loading effect which causes the frequency shift observed.
• test set up included three essential pieces: (A) a radar testing unit, (B) the sample, positioned about 20mm from this radar unit and (C) a detection target.
• the radar testing unit was a commercially available INRAS RadarBook with MIMO 77 GHz front-end.
• the unit provides a measure, Rx signal [dBV], which is a measure of the relative measurement of the detected radar signal reflected by the sample and detection target combined.
• the output from the testing unit provides a signature of measured signal versus distance from the test head. This is reported simply as“radar signal plot” in measurement results section in form of figures showing graph of Rx versus distance from radar testing unit.
• the sample’s proximity to the radar unit and attachment of the multi-layers to the l .7mm thick polypropylene plate was designed to simulate the effect of a bumper/fascia on the radar signal. Although the distance from the radar unit to the plate was nominally 20mm, this was adjusted slightly between measurements to obtain case for both maximum and minimum target signal. Typical slight adjustments were less than about 2mm from 20mm nominal distance. This adjustment was expected to demonstrate the variability for the measurements due to subtle positioning of samples relative to radar source. In an ideal case, the difference in target signal between the minimum and maximum would be minimized. In the examples shown, a reduction in this variation is seen of around 5dB compared to the variation seen in the bare plate alone As the samples become less visible to the radar source, less variability with sample adjustment is observed.
• a copper plate was placed at approximately 3.5 m from the radar unit. This target distance shows up as peak in the radar unit output of Rx versus distance.
• FIG. 11 shows the radar signal plots from Comparative Example 1 (baseline bare polypropylene plate).
• FIG. 12 shows the radar signal plots from Example 1 on bare polypropylene plate.
• FIG. 13 shows the radar signal plots from Example 2 on bare polypropylene plate.
• FIG. 14 shows the radar signal plots from Example 3 on painted polypropylene plate (corresponding to comparative Example 2).
• FIG. 15 shows the radar signal plots from Comparative Example 2 (polypropylene plate painted with grey paint including metallic flakes).
• the radar reflection variability modeling results are shown in Table 10.
• the radar reflection variability modeling results for Examples 5 and 10 are shown in FIGS. 18 and 19.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Remote Sensing (AREA)
• Textile Engineering (AREA)
• Laminated Bodies (AREA)
• Adhesive Tapes (AREA)
• Inorganic Insulating Materials (AREA)
• Details Of Aerials (AREA)
• Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Priority Applications (4)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Related Child Applications (2)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=68101300

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (4)

Cited By (3)

Families Citing this family (3)

Citations (5)

Family Cites Families (22)

• 2019
  • 2019-04-05 US US17/045,559 patent/US11637367B2/en active Active
  • 2019-04-05 JP JP2020554403A patent/JP7466457B2/ja active Active
  • 2019-04-05 WO PCT/US2019/026106 patent/WO2019195758A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2019-04-05 EP EP19781467.6A patent/EP3776722B1/en active Active
• 2023
  • 2023-03-24 US US18/189,780 patent/US11909107B2/en active Active

Patent Citations (5)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events