WO2018037662A1 - Robot, procédé de commande de robot, et programme de commande - Google Patents

Robot, procédé de commande de robot, et programme de commande Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018037662A1
WO2018037662A1 PCT/JP2017/020972 JP2017020972W WO2018037662A1 WO 2018037662 A1 WO2018037662 A1 WO 2018037662A1 JP 2017020972 W JP2017020972 W JP 2017020972W WO 2018037662 A1 WO2018037662 A1 WO 2018037662A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
robot
interference
drive
contact
unit
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2017/020972
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
浩司 藤永
容正 生野
Original Assignee
シャープ株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by シャープ株式会社 filed Critical シャープ株式会社
Priority to JP2018535466A priority Critical patent/JP6633209B2/ja
Publication of WO2018037662A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018037662A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J13/00—Controls for manipulators
    • B25J13/08—Controls for manipulators by means of sensing devices, e.g. viewing or touching devices

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a robot that performs a predetermined operation and a robot control method.
  • Robots that can communicate with gestures by executing motions are known as conventional technologies.
  • a desired motion cannot be executed as a result of a certain part interfering with another part of the robot.
  • Patent Document 1 describes the meaning of a word indicated by each sign language action when a robot that performs a sign language action causes interference between parts in a trajectory connecting the end point position of the previous sign language action and the start position of the next sign language action.
  • Means for adjusting the end point position and the start point position within a maintainable range is disclosed.
  • JP 2013-97399 Japanese Published Patent Publication “JP 2013-97399” (published on May 20, 2013)
  • the conventional technique as described above has a problem that it is effective only against interference between parts predicted in advance. For example, when a predetermined operation is performed as a motion due to reasons such as aging deterioration, interference may occur as a result of the part not being able to move along the originally planned route. In such a case, the prior art cannot adjust the predetermined operation so as to eliminate the interference.
  • the present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a highly convenient robot that can eliminate interference between parts that cannot be predicted in advance.
  • a robot that performs a predetermined operation, and the predetermined operation includes a drive control unit that drives a part and the part that is driven by itself.
  • a detection unit that detects contact with the robot; and a change unit that changes an operation amount of the predetermined operation when the contact is detected.
  • a robot control method is a robot control method for performing a predetermined operation, and a drive control step of driving a part as the predetermined operation; A detection step of detecting that the driven portion has contacted the robot, and a change step of changing the amount of the predetermined motion when the contact is detected.
  • FIG. 1 It is a block diagram which shows an example of the principal part structure of the robot which concerns on Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of operation
  • (A), (b) is a schematic diagram and a table
  • (A)-(c) is a table
  • Embodiment 1 The robot 1 according to this embodiment will be described in detail with reference to FIGS.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a main configuration of a robot 1 according to this embodiment.
  • the robot 1 includes a storage unit 11, a sensor 12, a drive unit 13, and a control unit 14.
  • the control unit 14 includes a configuration acquisition unit 21, a target setting unit 22, a drive control unit 23, an interference detection unit 24, and an offset setting unit 25.
  • the storage unit 11 stores various data handled by the robot 1. For example, the storage unit 11 moves in a predetermined operation executed by the robot 1, data for performing the operation of each unit, for example, a target position that is a movement destination of a part, and a drive unit 13 that is necessary for moving to the target position. This stores data related to the driving amount. Moreover, in this embodiment, the memory
  • the sensor 12 is disposed at each part of the robot 1 and detects interference between the parts that occurs when the robot 1 performs a predetermined operation.
  • the sensor 12 is an impact sensor that detects an impact generated by interference (contact) between parts.
  • the sensor 12 may have any configuration as long as it can detect interference between parts, a touch sensor that detects a change in capacitance due to interference, and an acceleration sensor that detects acceleration generated at the time of interference. And a pressure-sensitive sensor that detects a pressure generated at the time of interference. Moreover, what combined these sensors may be used.
  • the robot 1 includes a plurality of sensors 12, and the sensors 12 are disposed at each part of the robot 1 and detect an impact. The arrangement of the sensor 12 will be described later.
  • the drive unit 13 is disposed in each part of the robot 1 and realizes a predetermined operation of the robot 1 by being driven according to the control of the drive control unit 23 described later.
  • the robot 1 includes a plurality of drive units 13, and the drive units 13 are arranged in each part of the robot 1.
  • the driving unit 13 may be of any configuration as long as the robot 1 can realize a predetermined operation.
  • the drive unit 13 may be a rotary motor that rotates a rotating shaft, or may be a linear motor that is linearly driven (directly moved) by electromagnetic induction or the like.
  • the drive of the actuator is not limited to the configuration that directly realizes the predetermined operation of the robot 1, but, for example, the rotation drive is converted into the linear drive by combining a motor (rotary motor, linear motor) and a link mechanism. May be. Further, the linear drive may be converted into a rotational drive by a crank mechanism or the like.
  • the control unit 14 controls each part of the robot 1 in an integrated manner.
  • the control unit 14 may be configured to control each unit in accordance with a user input operation on an input operation unit (not shown).
  • the configuration acquisition unit 21 acquires the current configuration information of the robot 1 such as the current position of each part of the robot 1 and the setting information of the robot 1.
  • the target setting unit 22 sets a target for each part to move in order for the robot 1 to execute the determined predetermined operation.
  • the target setting unit 22 sets a route along which the part moves as a predetermined operation. For example, when the robot 1 performs a motion that raises the left hand as a predetermined operation, the target setting unit 22 sets a position where the left hand that is the final position of the motion is up. In the present embodiment, if the final position is set, the driving path of the part is uniquely determined.
  • the drive control unit 23 drives the drive unit 13 so that the part moves to the final position set by the target setting unit 22 as a predetermined operation.
  • the drive unit 13 is a motor
  • the drive control unit 23 controls the movement amount of the part of the robot 1 by controlling the rotation amount of the motor.
  • the drive control unit 23 sets the offset set by the offset setting unit 25 described later as the movement amount for moving toward the final position. Apply the value to drive the site.
  • the interference detection unit 24 detects that the part to be driven has come into contact with the robot. More specifically, the sensor 12 is used to operate as a detection unit that detects contact (interference between parts). Further, when the interference detection unit 24 determines that the interference between the parts has been detected, the interference detection unit 24 notifies the offset setting unit 25 described later of the detected part and the detected value. In this embodiment, the interference detection part 24 detects a contact using the sensor 12 provided in at least two places of the site
  • the offset setting unit 25 sets an offset value with respect to the movement amount in order to eliminate the interference between the parts based on the detected part and the detected value notified by the interference detecting part 24, and the drive control part 23 To notify.
  • the offset setting unit 25 operates as a changing unit that changes the operation amount of a predetermined operation when detecting that the part driven by the interference detection unit 24 has contacted the robot.
  • the offset value is a correction value that is applied every time the motion is executed to cancel the contact of the driven part with the robot. A specific example of the offset value will be described later.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of the operation of the robot 1.
  • the robot 1 has sensors 12 disposed at the tips and heads of both hands.
  • the robot 1 executes a motion of turning the entire left arm upward from the side by rotating the left shoulder, and in this motion, other parts including the left elbow and the left wrist are not driven. .
  • Example 201 shows a case where the left hand interferes with the head when the robot 1 performs a motion in which the entire left arm is directed upward.
  • the robot 1 rotates the entire left arm toward the final position set by the target setting unit 22.
  • the left hand interferes with the head due to reasons such as aged deterioration of the robot 1 and a continuous load due to external factors.
  • the impact caused by the interference is detected by a plurality of sensors 12 arranged in each part.
  • the interference detection unit 24 determines that the left hand has interfered with the head when the sensor 12 disposed at the tip and head of the left hand detects an impact exceeding a predetermined threshold.
  • Example 202 shows that after Example 201, the robot 1 has resolved the interference between the parts and executed the motion.
  • the offset setting unit 25 sets an offset value for eliminating the interference between parts, and applies the set offset value.
  • the drive control unit 23 drives the drive unit 13.
  • the robot 1 completes the execution of the motion by moving the part based on the movement amount obtained by applying the offset value to the movement amount for moving toward the final position.
  • the robot 1 detects that the part driven by the interference detection unit 24 has come into contact with its own robot, the movement amount is changed so that the movable distance of the part is shortened with respect to the predetermined movement amount. To do. That is, the robot 1 sets the offset value so that the execution of the motion is completed before the left hand contacts the head.
  • the position of the part when the interference detection unit 24 determines that the interference between the parts has been detected is acquired. For example, it is assumed that when the robot 1 performs a motion of rotating the left shoulder by 180 °, interference between the parts is detected when the robot 1 is rotated by 160 °.
  • the offset setting unit 25 subtracts 160 ° at which interference is detected from the initial target value of 180 ° and sets a value obtained by adding a certain amount as the offset value for the rotation amount of the left shoulder.
  • the robot 1 uses 155 °, which is the calculated offset value subtracted from the initial target value 180 °, as the amount of rotation of the left shoulder after the offset value is applied, thereby causing interference between parts in the motion. You can avoid it.
  • the robot 1 according to the present embodiment changes the operation amount so that the rotation angle of the rotational drive becomes small when the drive of the part includes the rotational drive. Therefore, when the interference between the parts is detected when the motion is executed, the interference can be eliminated by applying the offset value, and the execution of the motion can be completed.
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a flow of processing executed by the robot 1.
  • the target setting unit 22 determines the position of the target corresponding to the motion (S1).
  • the target position may be determined not by determining the position itself but by determining a driving amount for moving to the position.
  • the drive control unit 23 applies the offset value to the drive amount determined in step S1 (S2).
  • the drive control part 23 drives the drive part 13 so that a site
  • the interference detection unit 24 determines whether or not interference between parts has been detected (S4: detection step). When the interference between the parts is not detected (NO in S4), the driving is continued and the execution of the motion is completed. On the other hand, when the interference between parts is detected (YES in S4), the drive control unit 23 stops driving (S5). Next, the offset setting unit 25 determines an offset value based on the information on the part involved in the interference at the time when it is determined that the interference between the parts is detected in Step S4 (S6: change step). Then, the process ends.
  • the robot 1 can drive the parts to execute the motion, and when detecting the interference between the parts, the robot 1 can execute the motion with the interference eliminated by applying the offset value. That is, when the robot 1 detects the interference between the parts including the part while driving the part, the robot 1 can apply the offset value and eliminate the interference between the parts. Therefore, there is an effect that it is possible to provide a highly convenient robot that can eliminate interference between parts that cannot be predicted in advance.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram and a table showing an example of conditions for determining the position of the sensor 12 and interference between parts in the robot 1 according to the present embodiment.
  • a plurality of sensors 12 are distributed in the robot 1.
  • the sensors 12 are arranged at positions A to F, respectively. That is, A is the appropriate position on the back of the left hand, B is the space between the eyebrows, C is the back of the right hand, D is the center of the trunk, E is the back of the left foot, and F is the appropriate position on the back of the right foot.
  • the sensor 12 may be disposed at any position, but is preferably disposed at a position that is closest when the driven parts are close to each other.
  • it is preferable that only the interference at the time of motion can be determined by operating only the sensor 12 arranged at the site to be driven.
  • (B) of FIG. 4 is an example of a table used for determining whether or not the interference detection unit 24 is interference between parts.
  • the values of A and B in the “sensor value” column are based on values detected by the sensors 12 at positions A and B in FIG. That is, “ ⁇ ” is set when the impact value detected by the sensor 12 at the position A exceeds a predetermined threshold, and “X” is set when the value is equal to or less than the predetermined threshold.
  • the predetermined threshold value may be any value, but is preferably a value that can be distinguished from, for example, the value of an impact that occurs while the robot 1 is performing a normal motion such as walking. is there.
  • the robot 1 rotates the left shoulder and performs a motion of turning the entire left arm upward, and the left hand generates interference between parts with the head.
  • the sensors 12 arranged at the positions A and B both detect an impact exceeding a predetermined threshold, the values of the sensors A and B are both “ ⁇ ”.
  • the interference detection unit 24 refers to the table, since the value of the “contact determination” column is “contact”, it can be determined that interference between the parts has occurred.
  • the value of A is “ ⁇ ” but the value of B is “x”.
  • the interference detection unit 24 can determine that interference between the parts has not occurred.
  • the robot 1 is provided with sensors 12 in at least two locations, ie, a portion to be driven and a position different from the portion, and the interference detection unit 24 uses at least two sensors 12 to perform contact (interference between the portions). ) Can be detected. Therefore, compared with the case where only one sensor 12 is used, when the contact is detected with high accuracy and the contact is detected, there is an effect that it is possible to provide the robot 1 that can eliminate the contact.
  • the threshold value and the number of times may be set by the user, or the user may arbitrarily reset the number of times.
  • the offset setting unit 25 may be configured to change the operation amount of the predetermined operation when the interference detection unit 24 detects the contact a predetermined number of times.
  • a change part changes operation amount, when a detection part detects a contact predetermined times.
  • the number of times of contact is less than the predetermined number of times, the amount of movement is not changed, so that it is possible to prevent the amount of movement from being changed even when accidental interference occurs between parts. There is an effect that can be.
  • FIG. 5 is a table showing an example of conditions for determining interference between parts in the robot 1 according to the present embodiment.
  • the robot 1 determines whether or not interference between parts has been detected by combining the table of FIG. 5A and the table of FIG. 5B.
  • (A) of FIG. 5 is a table showing combinations of sensor values and the number of detections.
  • a table is provided for each motion executed by the robot 1.
  • the number of times the combination has been detected so far is stored in the “contact counter value” column.
  • the sensors 12 arranged at the positions A and B both detected an impact exceeding a predetermined threshold, and the values of the sensors A and B were both “ ⁇ ”. Indicates that it has been detected twice so far.
  • (B) of FIG. 5 is a table summarizing the number of times of detecting interference between parts for each motion.
  • the “motion” column indicates the type of motion performed by the robot 1
  • the “counter total” column indicates the sensors A and B in the table of FIG.
  • the value of “contact counter value” when each of the values is “ ⁇ ” is shown.
  • the “contact determination” column indicates a result of determining whether or not the value of the “counter total” column exceeds a predetermined threshold value. For example, it is assumed that the predetermined threshold value in the “counter total” column is “5”. At this time, in the illustrated example, the counter total of the motion “A” is “2”, and therefore the contact determination is “ ⁇ ”. On the other hand, the counter total of the motion “I” is “5”, and therefore the contact determination is “contact”. Therefore, the robot 1 applies an offset value to the motion “I” to eliminate contact (interference between parts).
  • the offset setting unit 25 sets an offset value for the amount of motion in the motion in which contact is detected among the plurality of motions. Therefore, there is an effect that it is possible to prevent an offset value from being set for an operation amount in another motion in which interference between parts does not occur because interference between parts occurs due to a certain motion. .
  • the number of times detected by the A sensor and the number of times detected by the B sensor are counted as the number of detections, respectively, and when both the A and B sensors are detected, the number of times of detection is counted as “2”. It was. For example, the number of detections is counted only when both the A and B sensors detect, and when only the A sensor or only the B sensor is detected, the number of detections is not counted. May be. That is, as shown in FIG. 5C, the contact counter value is set to “1” only when the values of the sensors A and B are both “ ⁇ ”, and “0” is set otherwise. Also good.
  • the configuration of the robot 1 according to the present embodiment is basically the same as the configuration of the robot 1 according to the first embodiment, but some functions of the configuration acquisition unit 21 and the offset setting unit 25 are different.
  • the configuration acquisition unit 21 operates as a determination unit that determines whether or not a member (attachment part 15) described later is attached.
  • the offset setting unit 25 differs from the first embodiment in that the amount of operation to be changed varies depending on whether or not a member is attached.
  • the robot 1 further includes an attachment part 15.
  • the attachment part 15 is a member having a configuration that can be attached to each part of the robot 1.
  • the attachment part 15 may be of any configuration as long as it can detect the interference when the interference between the parts including the part to which the attachment part 15 is attached occurs. For example, when the additional sensor 12 is disposed inside the attachment part 15 and the robot 1 is mounted, the robot 1 determines whether or not the interference between the parts has been detected using the sensor 12 included in the attachment part 15. May be.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of the operation of the robot 1.
  • the robot 1 has sensors 12 disposed at the tips and heads of both hands.
  • the robot 1 executes a motion that turns the entire left arm upward from the side by rotating the left shoulder, and in this motion, other parts including the left elbow and the left wrist are not driven.
  • the robot 1 is assumed to include an attachment part 15 so as to cover the entire area from the left wrist.
  • Example 301 shows a case where the attachment part 15 attached to the left hand interferes with the head when the robot 1 performs a motion in which the entire left arm is directed upward.
  • the robot 1 rotationally drives the entire left arm toward the position set by the target setting unit 22 based on the result of the configuration acquisition unit 21 determining whether or not the attachment part 15 is present.
  • the sensor 12 arrange
  • the interference detection unit 24 detected an impact exceeding a predetermined threshold in the sensor 12 disposed at the tip and head of the left hand, interference between parts occurred between the left hand and the head. Is determined.
  • Example 302 shows that after Example 301, the robot 1 has resolved the interference between the parts and executed the motion. If the interference detection unit 24 determines that interference between the parts has occurred in the example 301, the offset setting unit 25 sets an offset value and drives based on the set offset value in the same manner as in the example 202 of FIG. The control unit 23 drives the drive unit 13. Then, the robot 1 completes the execution of the motion by moving the part based on the movement amount after the offset value is applied.
  • the robot 1 when detecting the interference between the parts when executing the motion, cancels the interference and completes the execution of the motion. be able to. Further, when the robot 1 executes the same motion again, the application of the offset value may be varied depending on the presence or absence of the attachment part 15.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a flow of processing executed by the robot 1.
  • the configuration acquisition unit 21 determines whether or not the attachment part 15 is being mounted (S11). If it is determined that the attachment part 15 is being mounted (YES in S11), the offset setting unit 25 applies the offset value for the attachment part 15 if there is an offset value set with the attachment part 15 mounted (S12). ), Go to step S3. On the other hand, if it is determined that it is not attached (NO in S11), the process proceeds directly to step S2. Then, similarly to the first embodiment, the processes of steps S4 to S6 are executed.
  • the robot 1 determines the presence or absence of the attachment part 15 and executes the motion. And when the attachment part 15 is attached, the offset value for the case where it is attached is applied, and when it is not attached, the offset value for the case where it is not attached is applied. Thereby, the offset value can be appropriately applied regardless of whether the attachment part 15 is attached or not attached.
  • the configuration may be such that the user can arbitrarily set whether or not the attachment part 15 is mounted. Thereby, even when it is not possible to automatically determine whether or not the attachment part 15 is mounted, an offset value corresponding to the attachment part 15 can be set.
  • the offset value may be installed via a network or a medium.
  • the robot 1 according to the present embodiment has the same configuration as that of the robot 1 according to the first embodiment, except that the drive unit 13 moves linearly and expands and contracts the entire region beyond the elbow.
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of the operation of the robot 1.
  • the robot 1 executes a motion of extending the entire part beyond the left elbow from a state where the left arm is directed upward.
  • Example 401 shows a case where the left hand interferes with the head when the robot 1 performs a motion of extending the entire part beyond the left elbow.
  • the robot 1 detects that interference between parts has occurred in the same manner as in the above embodiments.
  • Example 402 shows that after Example 401, the robot 1 has resolved the interference between the parts and executed the motion.
  • the interference detection unit 24 determines that the interference between the parts has occurred in the example 401
  • the offset setting unit 25 sets the offset value and drives based on the set offset value in the same manner as the example 202 of FIG.
  • the control unit 23 drives the drive unit 13.
  • the offset value is applied to the driving amount for the linear movement of the driving unit 13, specifically, the amount for extending the entire part from the left elbow.
  • the robot 1 completes the execution of the motion by driving the part with the driving amount after the offset value is applied. That is, a motion that is changed so as to extend the entire part from the left elbow to the extent that the left hand does not interfere with the head is executed.
  • the robot 1 changes the amount of movement so that the movement distance of the linear drive is shortened when the drive of the part includes the linear drive. Therefore, if an inter-part interference is detected when executing a motion for a motion including expansion / contraction of the part, the interference can be eliminated and the execution of the motion can be completed.
  • Example 501 shows a path when a part of the robot 1 including the two driving units 13 moves from the initial position to the target position.
  • the first driving unit 13a performs rotational driving of the entire part
  • the second driving unit 13b is installed in a part that receives rotational driving, and performs linear driving for a part of the part.
  • the center of the rotational drive system driven by the first drive unit 13 a is the shoulder of the robot 1
  • the outer periphery of the rotational drive system is the elbow of the robot 1.
  • the second drive unit 13b is disposed on the elbow of the robot 1 and forms a linear drive system that linearly drives a portion beyond the elbow of the robot 1, and the end of the linear drive system indicates the tip of the hand of the robot 1.
  • reference numeral 501 schematically shows a motion in which the robot 1 drives the entire arm around the shoulder while rotating the entire arm linearly. In the example shown in the drawing, the tip of the part is driven toward the opponent along a straight path.
  • Example 502 schematically shows that the tip of the part of the robot 1 interferes with the opponent when the same motion as Example 501 is executed.
  • the tip of the part reaches the second position from the top, it interferes with the opponent, so it cannot reach the top position.
  • the robot 1 stores the states of the first drive unit 13a and the second drive unit 13b at that time.
  • Example 503 schematically shows that after Example 502, the offset value is applied to the path of the part of the robot 1. That is, the offset setting unit 25 sets the drive amounts of the first drive unit 13a and the second drive unit 13b so that the execution of the motion is completed within a range in which interference does not occur on the route that is a straight line set in the example 502. Apply each offset value. Thereby, the front-end
  • the robot 1 can complete the execution of the motion after applying the offset value to the driving amount of the part.
  • control blocks (particularly, the interference detection unit 24 and the offset setting unit 25) of the robot 1 may be realized by a logic circuit (hardware) formed in an integrated circuit (IC chip) or the like, or a CPU (Central Processing Unit). It may be realized by software using
  • the robot 1 includes a CPU that executes instructions of a program that is software that realizes each function, a ROM (Read Only Memory) in which the program and various data are recorded so as to be readable by a computer (or CPU), or a memory.
  • a device (these are referred to as “recording media”), a RAM (Random Access Memory) for expanding the program, and the like.
  • the objective of this invention is achieved when a computer (or CPU) reads the said program from the said recording medium and runs it.
  • a “non-temporary tangible medium” such as a tape, a disk, a card, a semiconductor memory, a programmable logic circuit, or the like can be used.
  • the program may be supplied to the computer via an arbitrary transmission medium (such as a communication network or a broadcast wave) that can transmit the program.
  • a transmission medium such as a communication network or a broadcast wave
  • the present invention can also be realized in the form of a data signal embedded in a carrier wave in which the program is embodied by electronic transmission.
  • a robot (1) is a robot (1) that performs a predetermined operation, and the predetermined operation includes a drive control unit (23) that drives a part, and the part that is driven by itself. It is a structure provided with the detection part (interference detection part 24) which detects having contacted the robot, and the change part (offset setting part 25) which changes the operation amount of the said predetermined
  • the robot changes the amount of movement of the predetermined motion when it is detected that the portion to be driven contacts the robot while the portion is driven as the predetermined motion.
  • the robot (1) according to aspect 2 of the present invention includes the sensor (12) that detects contact in at least two places of the driven part and a position different from the part in the aspect 1, and the detection unit
  • the (interference detection unit 24) may be configured to detect the contact using the at least two sensors (12).
  • the robot detects the contact using the sensors that detect the contact provided at at least two places, that is, the part to be driven and a position different from the part to be driven. And by providing a sensor in the part to drive and the position different from this part, it can be detected appropriately whether the parts contacted. Therefore, compared with the case where only one sensor is used, there is an effect that contact can be detected with high accuracy.
  • the change unit (offset setting unit 25) is detected by the detection unit (interference detection unit 24) a predetermined number of times. In this case, the operation amount of the predetermined operation may be changed.
  • the changing unit changes the operation amount when the detection unit detects contact for a predetermined number of times.
  • the number of times of contact is less than the predetermined number of times, the amount of movement is not changed, so that it is possible to prevent the amount of movement from being changed even when accidental interference occurs between parts. There is an effect that can be.
  • any one of the aspects 1 to 3 there are a plurality of the predetermined operations, and the changing unit (offset setting unit 25) Among them, a configuration may be adopted in which the operation amount in a predetermined operation in which contact is detected is changed.
  • the operation amount is changed for each predetermined operation. Therefore, there is an effect that it is possible to prevent the amount of movement in another predetermined operation in which interference between parts does not occur from being changed due to the occurrence of interference between parts due to a certain predetermined operation. .
  • the robot (1) according to the fifth aspect of the present invention can attach a detachable member (attachment part 15) to the site in any one of the first to fourth aspects.
  • the member (attachment part 15) The determination part (configuration
  • the said change part (offset setting part 25) is the structure which changes the operation amount to change with the presence or absence of attachment of the said member (attachment part 15). It is good.
  • the robot can vary the operation amount of the predetermined operation based on whether or not a member is attached. Therefore, it is possible to prevent the movement amount of the predetermined operation from being changed when the member is not attached, even though interference between the parts occurs because the member is attached. Play.
  • the change unit (offset setting unit 25) changes the movement amount so that the movable distance of the part is shortened. It is good also as composition to do.
  • the robot when the robot detects that the part to be driven has come into contact with its own robot, the robot changes the operation amount so that the movable distance of the part in a predetermined operation is shortened. Therefore, there is an effect that it is possible to prevent occurrence of interference between parts when performing a predetermined operation again.
  • the driving includes rotational driving
  • the changing unit offset setting unit 25
  • the changing unit is configured so that the rotational angle of the rotational driving becomes small. It may be configured to change the operation amount.
  • the robot changes the operation amount of the predetermined operation so that the rotation angle of the rotation drive becomes small with respect to the drive of the part including the rotation drive. Therefore, there is an effect that the driving of the part including the rotational drive can be executed without interference between the parts.
  • the driving includes linear driving
  • the changing unit offset setting unit 25
  • the operation amount may be changed.
  • the robot changes the operation amount of the predetermined operation so that the movement distance of the linear drive becomes short for the drive of the part including the linear drive. Therefore, there is an effect that the driving of the part including the linear drive can be performed without interference between the parts.
  • the control method of the robot (1) according to the aspect 9 of the present invention is a control method of the robot (1) that performs a predetermined operation, and as the predetermined operation, a drive control step (S2) for driving a part; A detection step (S3) for detecting that the part to be driven has come into contact with the robot is included, and a change step (S6) for changing the amount of the predetermined movement when the contact is detected.
  • a drive control step S2
  • S3 for detecting that the part to be driven has come into contact with the robot
  • S6 for changing the amount of the predetermined movement when the contact is detected.
  • the robot (1) according to each aspect of the present invention may be realized by a computer.
  • the robot (1) is operated by operating the computer as each unit (software element) included in the robot (1).
  • the control program for the robot (1) for realizing the above in a computer and a computer-readable recording medium on which the control program is recorded also fall within the scope of the present invention.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Robotics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Manipulator (AREA)

Abstract

Cette invention concerne un robot très pratique capable d'éliminer les interférences entre des parties ne pouvant pas être prédites à l'avance. Un robot (1) conçu pour effectuer une action spécifiée comprend : une section de commande d'entraînement (23) pour entraîner une partie pour ladite action spécifiée ; une section de détection d'interférence (24) pour détecter que ladite partie entraînée a contacté le robot lui-même ; et une section de réglage de décalage (25) pour modifier l'amplitude de l'action spécifiée lorsqu'un tel contact est détecté.
PCT/JP2017/020972 2016-08-26 2017-06-06 Robot, procédé de commande de robot, et programme de commande WO2018037662A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018535466A JP6633209B2 (ja) 2016-08-26 2017-06-06 ロボット、ロボットの制御方法、および制御プログラム

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016-166316 2016-08-26
JP2016166316 2016-08-26

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018037662A1 true WO2018037662A1 (fr) 2018-03-01

Family

ID=61245778

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2017/020972 WO2018037662A1 (fr) 2016-08-26 2017-06-06 Robot, procédé de commande de robot, et programme de commande

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6633209B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2018037662A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7479321B2 (ja) 2021-03-26 2024-05-08 日立Ｇｅニュークリア・エナジー株式会社 学習装置、軌道生成器並びにマニピュレータシステム
JP7484376B2 (ja) 2020-04-22 2024-05-16 セイコーエプソン株式会社 ロボットシステム、及び、ロボットの制御方法

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001239479A (ja) * 1999-12-24 2001-09-04 Sony Corp 脚式移動ロボット及びロボットのための外装モジュール
JP2004283954A (ja) * 2003-03-20 2004-10-14 Sony Corp ロボット装置及びその動作制御方法
JP2005007501A (ja) * 2003-06-17 2005-01-13 Sony Corp ロボット装置及びその動作制御方法
JP2005040913A (ja) * 2003-07-24 2005-02-17 Sony Corp ロボット装置及びその動作制御方法
JP2015520041A (ja) * 2012-06-21 2015-07-16 リシンク ロボティクス インコーポレイテッド ロボット訓練のためのユーザインターフェース

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001191276A (ja) * 1999-10-29 2001-07-17 Sony Corp ロボットシステム、ロボット装置及びその外装
JP5261495B2 (ja) * 2007-11-01 2013-08-14 本田技研工業株式会社 重み行列を用いたリアルタイム自己衝突および障害物回避
JP2009113147A (ja) * 2007-11-06 2009-05-28 Toyota Motor Corp ロボット及びロボット制御方法
DE102008016604B4 (de) * 2008-04-01 2014-07-17 Kuka Laboratories Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Eigenkollisionsüberwachung eines Manipulators

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001239479A (ja) * 1999-12-24 2001-09-04 Sony Corp 脚式移動ロボット及びロボットのための外装モジュール
JP2004283954A (ja) * 2003-03-20 2004-10-14 Sony Corp ロボット装置及びその動作制御方法
JP2005007501A (ja) * 2003-06-17 2005-01-13 Sony Corp ロボット装置及びその動作制御方法
JP2005040913A (ja) * 2003-07-24 2005-02-17 Sony Corp ロボット装置及びその動作制御方法
JP2015520041A (ja) * 2012-06-21 2015-07-16 リシンク ロボティクス インコーポレイテッド ロボット訓練のためのユーザインターフェース

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7484376B2 (ja) 2020-04-22 2024-05-16 セイコーエプソン株式会社 ロボットシステム、及び、ロボットの制御方法
JP7479321B2 (ja) 2021-03-26 2024-05-08 日立Ｇｅニュークリア・エナジー株式会社 学習装置、軌道生成器並びにマニピュレータシステム

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6633209B2 (ja) 2020-01-22
JPWO2018037662A1 (ja) 2019-03-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9579798B2 (en) Human collaborative robot system
JP6591818B2 (ja) 産業用ロボットシステムおよびその制御方法
JP6238021B2 (ja) ロボット、ロボットの制御装置及び制御方法、並びに、ロボット用制御プログラム
JP6392825B2 (ja) 学習制御機能を備えたロボット制御装置
CN106272408B (zh) 将机器人的控制器切换至手动引导运行模式的方法
CN109968377B (zh) 机器人控制系统和控制机器人的方法
US8489238B2 (en) Robot control apparatus
WO2018037662A1 (fr) Robot, procédé de commande de robot, et programme de commande
JP6386516B2 (ja) 学習機能を備えたロボット装置
CN110919627B (zh) 机器人的控制方法及控制装置
JP6464205B2 (ja) ロボット制御装置
JP2019209407A (ja) ロボット、制御装置およびロボットの制御方法
JP6041762B2 (ja) モータ制御装置
US20140114478A1 (en) System and method for remotely positioning an end effector
KR102113544B1 (ko) 로봇 및 로봇 운영 방법
US20140114464A1 (en) System and method for remotely positioning an end effector
JP6447141B2 (ja) ロボットの非常停止方法、ロボットの制御装置
JP6137379B2 (ja) ロボット装置
JP3911258B2 (ja) 制御装置による駆動装置の制御方法および制御装置
JP2006341372A (ja) ロボットの制御方法
JP2019105967A5 (fr)
JP7160737B2 (ja) 機械の制御装置
JP6678034B2 (ja) 動作制御システム及び動作制御方法
JP6400538B2 (ja) モータにより駆動されるロボットを制御するロボット制御装置
WO2020250788A1 (fr) Dispositif d'enseignement direct et procédé d'enseignement direct

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018535466

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 17843150

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 17843150

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1