WO2008029822A1

WO2008029822A1 - Deodorant comprising deodorizing substance originating in sugarcane distillate as the active ingredient and method of improving odor originating in sugarcane

Info

Publication number: WO2008029822A1
Application number: PCT/JP2007/067255
Authority: WO
Inventors: Masami Mizu; Hisanori Nakajima; Masahiro Okuno; Jun Kashimura
Original assignee: Mitsui Sugar Co., Ltd.
Priority date: 2006-09-07
Filing date: 2007-09-05
Publication date: 2008-03-13

Abstract

It is intended to provide a deodorant which is a deodorant containing a deodorizing substance originating in sugarcane as the active ingredient, wherein the above-described deodorizing substance originating in sugarcane is a pot residue that has been obtained by distilling sugarcane juice or a solvent extract of sugarcane, treating the resultant distillate with column chromatography using a fixed support, further distilling the fraction obtained by the above treatment or a mixture of the fraction with water or a solvent mixture consisting of water with an alcohol, and completing the distillation when the alcohol concentration (volume/volume) in the pot residue attains 0% or more but not more than 10%. It is also intended to provide a method of improving the odor originating in sugarcane of a distillate obtained by distilling sugarcane juice or a solvent extract of sugarcane, which comprises treating the distillate by column chromatography using a fixed support, further distilling the fraction obtained by the above treatment or a mixture of the fraction with water or a solvent mixture consisting of water with an alcohol, and collecting the pot residue after completing the distillation when the alcohol concentration (volume/volume) in the pot residue attains 0% or more but not more than 10%.

Description

Specification

A deodorant containing a deodorant substance derived from sweet potato as an active ingredient, and a method for improving the odor derived from sweet potato

Technical field

TECHNICAL FIELD [0001] The present invention relates to a deodorant comprising a sweet potato-derived deodorant as an active ingredient, and more specifically, a sweet potato-derived odor derived from a sweet potato juice or a distillate obtained by distillation of a sweet potato solvent extract. The present invention relates to a deodorant containing an improved deodorant substance as an active ingredient. Furthermore, this invention relates to the method of improving the odor derived from sweet potato.

Background art

[0002] In recent years, with the improvement of living standards, consumers have emphasized the quality or diversity of products, not just the price or quantity of products, and have become more interested in products related to improving the quality of life. . In addition, the social environment and living environment have become increasingly westernized and sealed, and interest in deodorization and deodorization has been increasing year by year due to the values and needs of consumers seeking a comfortable living space. Along with this, many products such as fragrances, deodorants, deodorants, and masking agents that meet a wide range of needs are on the market. Examples of products include deodorants, deodorants, preventive products, etc. for body odors of humans or animals (pets, livestock, etc.), environment, foods, etc. There are various forms of products such as agents and kneading agents.

[0003] Conventionally, from bad odors generated from various living organisms including humans, from bad odors generated from indoors, cars, refrigerators, toilets, barns, factories, tobacco, etc., from household waste or industrial waste Deodorant's ability to deodorize or deodorize the odors generated. Many of these products are chemically synthesized products that are mass-produced. However, since high safety is required for deodorants and deodorants that can be ingested or absorbed by humans or animals, it is desirable to use natural deodorants and deodorants. . In addition, many deodorants and deodorizers (environmental use) derived from chemically synthesized products are used in products that are not directly ingested or absorbed by humans or animals. Use natural deodorants and deodorants. It has been desired.

[0004] As a naturally occurring deodorant existing as a deodorant, a method using activated carbon and various plant extracts as a deodorant that has been used for a long time has been developed. For example, environmental deodorant mixed with activated charcoal, ion exchange resin, and plant extract (Patent Document 1), deodorant and deodorant extracted from asteraceae plant (Patent Document 2), deodorization of green tea extract 'deodorization' Deodorant containing one or a mixture of two or more of extracts (Patent Document 3), red beet, cacao, coffee and parsley extract (Patent Document 4), extraction of Camellia or Tasaceae plants Deodorant containing a product as an active ingredient (Patent Document 5), a method for obtaining a deodorant component from an extract of a pine family plant (Patent Document 6), perilla extract (Patent Document 7), persimmon extract (Patent Document 8) ), Tea leaf tannin fraction (Patent Document 9), mugwort extract (Patent Document 10), etc. have been reported!

[0005] Deodorant derived from natural products as described above · Deodorant has been reported. Activated carbon must be installed in the environment as a solid, and its use is limited to environmental applications, as well as odor absorption and adsorption. On the other hand, when saturates, problems of diffusion of the malodorous substance or waste disposal arise. In addition, many conventional plant-derived deodorants contain plant extracts containing coloring, taste, or flavor derived from plants or production methods, and in particular, in the food field, as deodorants and deodorants. The use of is avoided. Even if it can be used for environmental purposes, etc., in order to obtain an effective ingredient for the deodorant and deodorant of the plant extract, the plant, such as leaves, stems, and skins that are cultivated, is dried. After roasting, it is necessary to crush and extract with organic solvent and / or water, and there is a problem that its production cost is higher than that of chemically synthesized products that are mass-produced.

[0006] Next, as derived from sweet potato, brown sugar is said to have a deodorizing effect on odors such as fishy odor when cooking. However, around 90% of brown sugar is a saccharide, and there is a problem that its own odor or taste (sweetness) is strong. In addition, in order to exert the deodorizing effect for environmental deodorization, a large amount of brown sugar is required, or it itself decays due to microorganisms, and on the contrary, it becomes a causative substance of bad odor. · There was a problem in using as a deodorant

[0007] The applicant of the present invention has proposed a deodorant substance obtained by treating a raw material selected from sweet potato juice and molasses derived from sweet potato with column chromatography, and an odor source containing a distillate derived from sweet potato as an active ingredient. Odorants were reported (Patent Documents 11 to 13). The deodorizing substance and the deodorant are colorless or light yellow and do not have a strong odor per se. In addition, since it is derived from a plant and has a high deodorizing effect with a very small amount of solids that remain highly safe, the deodorizing substance and the deodorant have various and excellent effects.

[0008] However, the deodorant and deodorant have almost no odor when diluted to the use concentration, or have no strong odor! /, Odor! / As a result, there is a case where the user who is sensitive to the unique odor derived from sweet potato is uncomfortable. In particular, when using the above deodorant and deodorant in a highly closed space, or when applied directly to the skin as cosmetics, the unique odor becomes a problem. A plan was desired.

[0009] As one of the measures for improving the unique odor, there has been reported a method for improving the odor of the deodorant by adding plant essential oil and / or essence to the deodorant (Patent Document). 14). Specifically, the addition of chamomile oil, citronella oil, bergamot oil, peppermint oil, melissa oil, lavender oil as essential oils, and orange fluff, chamomile, and melissa as essences are considered to be effective in improving the odor of the deodorant. ing.

[0010] However, the above improvement measures mask the odor derived from sweet potato by the plant essential oil and / or essence, and are limited to applications where the plant essential oil and / or essence can be added. Furthermore, recently, with cosmetics as a representative, consumer interest is not limited to deodorization or deodorization, and there is a growing trend toward preference for odorless or fragrance-free products. The use of essential oils or essences or fragrances is also a problem and tends to be avoided by consumers. Therefore, it is desired to develop a method for improving the unique odor derived from sweet potato without reducing the effective components such as the deodorizing effect of the deodorant and deodorant.

[0011] In addition, it is generally considered that the active ingredient of a deodorant / deodorant is an odorous ingredient, and particularly, it is often seen as an active ingredient of a naturally-derived deodorant / deodorant. For this reason, odor cannot be eliminated or treated with ordinary distillation or various adsorbents such as activated carbon, activated clay, strong acid type, or anion type ion exchange resin, or the odor is reduced and deodorized. Deodorant's deodorant with no fragrance or odor It is difficult to manufacture!

Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 62-211068

Patent Document 2: JP-A-60-7848

Patent Document 3: JP-A-60-185558

Patent Document 4: JP-A-60-207664

Patent Document 5: JP-A-61-106163

Patent Document 6: Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 63-21060

Patent Document 7: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 60-214726

Patent Document 8: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 61-87562

Patent Document 9: JP-A-2-284997

Patent Document 10: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 7-33636

Patent Document 11: JP-A-10-151182

Patent Document 12: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-187825

Patent Document 13: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-87365

Patent Document 14: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-224673

Disclosure of the invention

Problems to be solved by the invention

[0013] In view of the above circumstances, the present invention is a deodorant substance with an improved odor derived from sweet potato, particularly derived from a distillate (sweet potato distillate) obtained by distilling a sweet potato juice or a sweet potato solvent extract. The present invention provides a deodorant containing as an active ingredient. Furthermore, the present invention provides a method for improving the odor derived from sweet potato.

Means for solving the problem

[0014] As a result of intensive studies in order to achieve the above object, the present inventor found the following and completed the present invention.

[0015] The present invention is a deodorant comprising a sweet potato-derived deodorant as an active ingredient, and the sweet potato-derived deodorant distilled a sweet potato juice or a sweet potato solvent extract (hereinafter referred to as the distillation). With primary distillation

V, U)) (hereinafter, the distillate is referred to as a primary distillate) by column chromatography using a fixed carrier, and the fraction obtained by the treatment or the fraction Water in minutes Or when the mixture containing alcohol / water mixture is further distilled (hereinafter referred to as secondary distillation) and the alcohol concentration (volume / volume) in the kettle is 0% to 10%. The present invention also provides a deodorant that is the residue of the kettle when the secondary distillation is completed (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the deodorizer of the present invention). Surprisingly, the deodorizer of the present invention has the original excellent deodorizing effect of the primary distillate, and the odor derived from sweet potato is improved.

The present invention also relates to a method for improving the sweet potato-derived odor of a distillate (primary distillate) obtained by distillation (primary distillation) of a sweet potato juice or a sweet potato solvent extract, wherein the primary distillate is fixed. Treatment by column chromatography using a carrier, further distilling (secondary distillation) a fraction obtained by the treatment or a mixture obtained by adding water or an alcohol-water mixed solvent to the fraction; Alcohol concentration (volume / volume) of the remaining pot is 0% or more to 10

Provided is a method including collecting the residue in the secondary distillation when it is less than or equal to% (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the method of the present invention). The method of the present invention surprisingly improves the sweet odor derived from sweet potato without reducing the original excellent deodorizing effect of the primary distillate.

The invention's effect

[0016] The deodorant of the present invention and the deodorant obtained according to the method of the present invention (hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as the "deodorant of the present invention") are inherently excellent deodorants possessed by primary distillates. It has an effect, and the unique odor derived from sweet potato is improved. Therefore, even if the deodorant of the present invention is used for foods or cosmetics, it does not have a sweet odor derived from sweet potato, so it can be used as a fragrance-free or odorless deodorant-deodorant. The feeling can be satisfied. Furthermore, since the deodorant of the present invention can be produced using a sugar production or refined sugar process, the production cost is low.

Brief Description of Drawings

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the deodorizing effect of the deodorant of the present invention on hydrogen sulfide.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

[0018] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail.

[0019] [Improved odor derived from sweet potato]

The odor derived from sweet potato is improved or the odor derived from sweet potato is improved. The odor of the primary distillate in the present invention is reduced compared to the odor of the sweet potato, or the odor of the sweet potato is finally perceivable, or! I can't feel it. The odor derived from sweet potato can be measured, for example, according to the odor intensity evaluation method described in Example 2 below. According to the evaluation method described in Example 2, the odor derived from sweet potato was improved when the intensity (2, 1, 0) was lower than the odor intensity of the primary distillate (determined to be 3). Evaluation 2 is weaker than the primary distillate, but the odor can be easily detected. Evaluation 1 is barely noticeable, and evaluation 0 is odorless.

[0020] [Primary distillate]

The primary distillate in the present invention can be used as a stock solution for secondary distillation. As a primary distillate, if it is a distillate obtained by distilling a sweet potato juice or a sweet potato solvent extract, it is a publicly known product having various forms obtained by various production methods with no particular restrictions on its production method, form, etc. Can be used (see, for example, Patent Document 13).

[0021] Here, the sweet potato soup in the present invention is a squeezed juice obtained by squeezing sweet potato (sugar cane), a leached juice obtained by leaching sweet potato with water, or a lime-treated clean juice obtained from a raw sugar manufacturing plant. And concentrated juice. The sweet potato solvent extract in the present invention means an extract obtained by extracting sweet potato with a general-purpose organic solvent. Examples of the organic solvent include alcohols such as methanol and ethanol, and these may be used alone or in combination. Furthermore, these solvents and water may be used in combination.

[0022] Specifically, the primary distillate in the present invention can be obtained, for example, according to the following method or according to the method described in Patent Document 13 above.

[0023] The sweet potato soup or the sweet potato solvent extract is placed in a tank having a heating device and heated, and the resulting steam is recovered by cooling to obtain a liquid sweet potato-derived distillate. In this distillation, any apparatus that has a heating device and can cool and recover the vapor as a liquid can be used.

[0024] The distillation conditions for obtaining the primary distillate may be 50 ° C to 120 ° C at a pressure at which the primary distillate boils. Preferably, it can be performed at a pressure of 70 ° C. to 120 ° C. at which the primary distillate boils. The pressure is appropriately adjusted according to the solvent used for extraction and the apparatus used in the distillation step. For example, in the case of using water as an extraction solvent and distilling using a centrifugal thin film vacuum evaporator, a flask connected to a condenser, or a distillation machine, 70 to 105; At ° C, it is 240mmHg to normal pressure. It is also possible to carry out distillation at lower temperatures and pressures. However, if it is desired to recover the vapor as a liquid, the lower the temperature, the lower the pressure must be, and the primary distillate must be condensed in the trap below the distillation temperature. Is too expensive. Therefore, it is possible in the laboratory, but not industrially suitable. In the primary distillation in the present invention, high-temperature heating at 130 ° C or higher is not performed. As a distillation apparatus, for example, a flask connected to a cooling pipe or the like is used in a laboratory, and a concentration can, a crystal can, a utility can, or the like is used in a factory. By adjusting these temperature and pressure conditions, the ratio of the sweet potato-derived deodorant substance to water (if water is included) can be changed to obtain a primary distillate with the desired concentration.

[0025] [Secondary distillation stock solution]

As a stock solution for secondary distillation in the present invention, a fraction obtained by treating the above primary distillate by column chromatography using a fixed carrier, or a mixed solvent of water or alcohol-water is added to the fraction. Use the resulting mixture. By the column chromatography treatment, the components of the primary distillate can be concentrated.

In a further embodiment, a commercially available product can be used as the stock solution for secondary distillation in the present invention, and for example, an extract derived from sweet potato manufactured by Mitsui Sugar Co., Ltd. (corresponding to a primary distillate) is suitable. For example, “sugar cane extract MSX_245” (ethanol concentration 45% (volume / volume)) (manufactured by Mitsui Sugar Co., Ltd.), which is a sweet potato distillate. Sugar cane extract MSX_245 is a product obtained by adjusting the alcohol concentration by adding a mixed solvent of alcohol and water to the fraction obtained by treating the primary distillate with column chromatography using a fixed carrier. It is.

[0026] A method of column chromatography treatment of the primary distillate will be described below.

[0027] The primary distillate can be passed through a column packed with a fixed carrier as it is or in order to adjust the alcohol concentration, the primary distillate is adjusted to an arbitrary concentration with water. The water added to the primary distillate may be tap water, but pure water (that is, ion-exchanged water) or distilled water is more preferable for high-level distillation treatment for removing odor.

[0028] The alcohol concentration (volume / volume) of the primary distillate is the desired deodorant in the primary distillate. In order to efficiently adsorb the substance on the fixed carrier, the content is preferably adjusted to 10% or less 0% or more, more preferably 5% or less 0% or more.

[0029] More preferably, the column chromatography treatment uses a column packed with a synthetic adsorbent as a fixed carrier. The target sample is passed through the column, and the components adsorbed on the synthetic adsorbent are mixed with methanol. And eluting with a solvent selected from ethanol, and a mixture of water, methanol, and ethanol.

[0030] As the fixed carrier, a synthetic adsorbent is preferable. As the synthetic adsorbent, an organic resin can be preferably used. For example, an aromatic resin, an acrylic acid-based methacrylic resin, an acrylonitrile fatty resin, or the like can be used. In addition, such synthetic adsorbents are commercially available, for example, HP-10, HP-20, HP-21, HP-30, HP-40, HP-50 (and more, no substitution) Basic type aromatic resins, all trade names, manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation); SP—825, SP—800, SP—850, SP—875, SP—70, SP—70 0 (or more, unsubstituted) SP-900 (Aromatic resin, trade name, manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation); Amberlite (trademark) ), XAD-2, XAD-4, XAD-16, XAD-2000 (above, aromatic resins, all trade names, manufactured by Organo Corporation); Diaion (trademark) system, SP-205, SP — 206, SP— 207 (Aromatic resin having hydrophobic substituents, both trade names, manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation); HP—2MG, EX—0021 (above Aromatic resins with hydrophobic substituents, all trade names, manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation); Amberlite (trademark), XAD-7HP, XAD-8 (above, acrylic ester resins, both products Name: Organo Co., Ltd .; Diaion (trademark) system, HP1MG, HP2MG (Acrylic acid-based methacrylic resin, both trade names, manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation); Sepha Dettas (trademark) system, LH20, LH60 (Derivatives of cross-linked dextran, all of which are trade names, manufactured by Falmasia Biotech Co., Ltd.). Since the types of synthetic adsorbents to be used vary depending on the concentration of the flow-through target, solvent, extraction method, coexisting substances, etc., it is possible to make appropriate selections.

[0031] The amount of the fixed carrier varies depending on the size of the column, the type of the solvent, the type of the fixed carrier, and the like. When primary distillate is used, for example, 100 to 20,000 times distillation of fixed carrier The substance is passed through and the active ingredient is adsorbed on the fixed carrier. Preferably, a primary distillate of 2,000 to 20,000 times that of the fixed carrier is passed through to adsorb the active ingredient onto the fixed carrier. Therefore, it is preferable to use a fixed carrier having a wet volume of 1/100 to 20,000 times that of the primary distillate to be passed. It is preferable to use a fixed carrier having a wet volume of 2,000 to 20,000 times that of the primary distillate to be passed.

[0032] By passing the primary distillate through the column, the deodorizing substance in the primary distillate is adsorbed on the fixed carrier. The flow rate and flow rate vary depending on the distillation method of the primary distillate. If the primary distillate contains alcohol, it is necessary to dilute this liquid with water and then pass it through the column chromatography. It is preferable to wash the column with water in order to remove impurities after removing the liquid-flowing object through the column, and remove components remaining in the column without being adsorbed by the resin.

[0033] The component adsorbed on the fixed carrier is eluted with a solvent. The elution solvent is selected from methanol, ethanol, and a mixture of water, methanol, and ethanol. The elution solvent is preferably a mixed solvent of water and alcohol, particularly an ethanol / water mixed solvent. Furthermore, since a component having a desired effect can be efficiently eluted at room temperature, a 50/50 to 99.5 / 0.5 (volume / volume) ethanol / water mixed solvent is preferable. Thus, the deodorizing component of the primary distillate is present in the fraction eluted with the solvent. The elution rate varies depending on the column size, the type of solvent, the type of fixed carrier, etc., but is not particularly limited, but elution occurs at SV = 0.;! ~ 10 and elutes within 6 times wet volume of the resin. It is preferable to recover the liquid. Note that SV (Space Velocity) is a unit of how many times the volume of the resin is passed per hour.

[0034] The column chromatography treatment of the primary distillate is not limited to this, but it can be preferably performed as follows. That is, after passing an object to be passed through a column packed with an unsubstituted aromatic resin or acrylic ester resin at a column temperature of 60 to 97 ° C, the inside of the column was washed with water, Next, the components adsorbed on the column are eluted with 50/50 to 99.5 / 0.5 (volume / volume) ethanol / water mixed solvent at a column temperature of 20 to 40 ° C. and mixed with ethanol / water mixed solvent. Collect the eluate that elutes within 6 times the wet volume of the resin from the elution start time at (5). [0035] The eluate (including the elution solvent) obtained from the column is adjusted as it is, or adjusted to a suitable alcohol concentration with water or a mixed solvent of alcohol water, and the stock solution for secondary distillation in the present invention. Can serve as. Alcohol may be any commercially available alcohol or food additive, but it has a high degree of distillation to remove odors. A special grade of JIS standard is preferable. The alcohol may be any water-soluble alcohol such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, or a mixture thereof, but ethanol is optimal in view of food use and safety.

[0036] The alcohol concentration of the stock solution when starting the secondary distillation is preferably more than 0% to 60% or less, more preferably more than 0% to 20% or less, and still more preferably 0 % To 10% or less, or 5% to 60%, more preferably 5% to 20%, and still more preferably 5% to 10%.

[0037] From Tables 1 to 3 showing the results of Examples 4, 5, and 6 below, the ethanol concentration in the residue was 10% regardless of the ethanol concentration in the residue when starting the secondary distillation. Sometimes the odor of Yasu Kanashi has been removed. Therefore, for the purpose of efficiently recovering ethanol, it is preferable to adjust the ethanol concentration to 10% or a range close thereto and then perform the following secondary distillation. However, if the ethanol concentration in the residue is low, for example 5% or even 0%, the odor derived from sweet potato is removed from the residue by secondary distillation. It is not necessary to adjust to a close concentration.

[0038] [Secondary distillation]

The secondary distillation in the present invention refers to secondary distillation (or evaporation) of the above-mentioned secondary distillation raw material using a heating device or the like. Heating devices, etc. can be used industrially, and can use a distillation column or distiller, concentrator, evaporator, container with heating device or kettle. It is preferable to use a centrifugal thin film vacuum evaporator in terms of manufacturing, quality and cost. The treatment method of distillation (evaporation) may be either a batch method, a continuous method, or a combination thereof. The distillation temperature (vapor temperature or product temperature) and pressure conditions are 90 ° C to 105 ° C under normal pressure, and 34 to 90 ° C under reduced pressure (vacuum). Any can be used, but preferably under reduced pressure (steam pressure 90mmHg The following should be distilled in the range of 34-40 ° C.

[0039] In the secondary distillation, the alcohol concentration (volume / volume) of the residue in the kettle is 0 to 10%, and the concentration rate of the primary distillate is 20% (volume) or more with respect to the liquid volume before distillation ( See Example 5 below, fraction 3 in Table 2), preferably 30% (volume) or more, more preferably 40% (volume) or more, the odor derived from sweet potato is distilled while the deodorant substance is Since it remains in the pot residue, it can remove the odor derived from sweet potato well. The odor intensity of the residue (that is, the deodorant of the present invention) is 2 (weaker than the stock solution, but can be easily detected by following the method for evaluating the odor intensity derived from sweet potato described in Example 2 below. ) Or less, preferably 1 (finally perceptible) or less, more preferably 0 (odorless).

[0040] More preferably, the alcohol concentration (volume / volume) of the residue in the kettle is 0 to 5%, and the concentration rate of the primary distillate is 40% (volume) or more with respect to the liquid volume before distillation (see below). Example 5, see fraction 5 in Table 2), preferably more than 50% (volume), more preferably more than 60% (volume), the odor derived from sweet potato is almost completely distilled while deodorizing substances Since it remains in the pot residue, the odor derived from sweet potato can be removed even better. The odor intensity of the residue (that is, the deodorant of the present invention) is 0 (odorless) according to the method for evaluating odor intensity derived from sweet potato described in Example 2 below.

[0041] Furthermore, when the solvent of the primary distillate in the present invention has an alcohol concentration (volume / volume) of 10% or more, it is diluted with water, for example, in Example 2, the primary distillate (ethanol 59% by weight) is 20%. It may be used for secondary distillation after being diluted to% by weight or after being subjected to a concentration treatment.

[0042] [Deodorizer of the present invention]

From the results of Examples 2 to 12 below, the deodorant of the present invention has a unique odor component derived from sweet potato removed, and the deodorizing effect of the primary distillate is hardly reduced. Therefore, the deodorant substance of the present invention is considered to have no masking action. Neutralization, decomposition, oxidation and reduction of chemical deodorizing mechanism, adsorption of physical deodorizing mechanism, and offsetting effect of sensory deodorizing mechanism. It is thought that it has a deodorizing action by a complex mechanism.

[0043] The deodorant of the present invention can contain a deodorant other than the deodorant of the present invention (other deodorant) in addition to the deodorant of the present invention. Use the deodorant of the present invention in combination with other deodorants. As a result, the deodorizing power of these components is enhanced, and a deodorant having both rapid efficacy and sustainability is obtained.

The type of the other deodorant is not particularly limited. One or two or more types of deodorant components selected from plant extracts, organic compounds, inorganic compounds, etc. other than the deodorant of the present invention are used. More specifically, for example, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, phosphoric acid, sulfamic acid, oxalic acid, sorbic acid, Humic acid, Ascorbic acid, Malic acid, Methyl malic acid, Malonic acid, Succinic acid, Alkenyl succinic acid, Gnoretanolic acid, Adipic acid, Pimelic acid, Fumanoleic acid, Maleic acid, Methyl fumaric acid, Methyl maleic acid, Itaconic acid, Citracon Acid, mesaconic acid, acetylenic acid, succinic acid, iso-succinic acid, glycolic acid, tartaric acid, wood vinegar, hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide, chlorine Hydrogen peroxide, peroxide, potassium permanganate, formalin, dalyoxal, sodium bisulfite, sodium sulfite, ferrous sulfate, ferric chloride, dihydroxy monoacetone, 3, 5, 5-trimethylhexanol, β —Ethoxypropionaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, methacrylic acid ester, maleic acid ester, maleic acid monoester, maleic acid monoamide, maleic acid imide, dialkyl fumarate, fumaric acid ester, β-acylacrylic acid, β-acylacrylate, Citronellinole senesionate, 1,3-pentadiene 1-carboxylic acid alkyl ester, pinanhydride peroxide, ρ thimember oxide, 1,2-propylene oxide, 1,2-butylene oxide, glycidyl ether, —cyclodext , Hydroxypropyl cyclodextrin, octacetyl saccharose, Fe (III) -octacarboxyphthalocyanine, Fe (III) -tetracarboxyphthalocyanine, 5 methyl 2 isopropyl 1-2-hexena monoole, Eugnonor, p-Butoxyphenol, Power Teconole, Hydroquinone, 4-Methylcatechol, 1,2,4 Trihydroxybenzene, 3-Methylcatechol, 3-Methoxycatechol, Gallic Acid, Carnosanol, Rosmanol, Brazirin, Hematoxylin , Shikonin, myricetin, squid kalein, baicalin, flavonoid, tannin, citralanole, vanillin, coumarin, oxalis extract, wolfberry extract, clove extract, yew extract, black pine extract, larch extract , Akamatsu extract, Li of the extract, the extract of human Iragimokusi, lilac extract, extract of Kinmokusi, extract of butterbur, Extract of tsububuki, extract of forsythia, extract of tari, extract of alder, extract of quercus, extract of pomegranate, extract of fig, spring extract, extract of cypress, power extract of cypress , Leafhopper extract, mugwort extract, chrysanthemum extract, sanoresubi extract, white-bellied extract, asebi extract, fern extract, pomeliad extract, mosquito extract, pine family Plant extracts such as plant extracts, extracts of mossaceae plants, perilla extract, tea extract, strawberry extract, etc., and more specifically, “Piurière” marketed as a plant extract deodorant containing them. "(Matsushita Electric Works Co., Ltd.)," Smeral "(Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.)," Pansil "(Release Science Industrial Co., Ltd.), etc., zinc oxide, zinc sulfate, chlorous acid Zinc compounds such as zinc phosphate, zinc nitrate, zinc carbonate, zinc acetate, zinc oxalate, zinc citrate, zinc fumarate, zinc formate, zinc lactate, zinc gnoleconate and zinc ricinoleate. These can be used singly or in appropriate combination of two or more.

[0045] The deodorant of the present invention can contain any component other than the above essential components as needed, as long as the effects of the present invention are not hindered. As optional components, water and / or organic solvents, for example, alcohols such as ethanol and isopropyl alcohol, hydrophilic organic solvents such as ketones such as acetone, various solvents such as hydrophobic organic solvents such as hexane and petroleum ether, Surfactant, lower alkylbenzene sulfonic acid or its salt formulated to maintain liquidity at low or high temperatures, hydrotropes such as ethylene glycol, bactericides, antiseptics and fungicides, fragrances, pigments , Antioxidants, thickeners, gelling agents, ultraviolet absorbers, and the like, and these can be formulated in ordinary doses in a range that does not interfere with the effects of the present invention. The compounds used for these optional components are not particularly limited as long as they are usually used for deodorants.

The use of the deodorant of the present invention is not particularly limited. For example, liquids, sprays such as aerosols, or impregnation on carriers, molding into powders, tablets, granules, capsules, etc. Various dosage forms such as can be selected depending on the application, and the production method can also be produced using components commonly used depending on each application and dosage form.

[Use of deodorant of the present invention] The deodorant of the present invention is a food, etiquette deodorant, pet deodorant, environmental deodorant, deodorant cleaning agent, cosmetic, and other deodorant and fragrance as a raw material for the deodorant composition. , Alcohols, surfactants, fats and oils, fatty acids, esters, saccharides, zinc compounds, organic acids, inorganic acids, alkalis, and the like.

[0048] The use form of the deodorant of the present invention is not particularly limited, and for example, it can be used in the following form. Can be used for spraying, aerosol spray, mist spray, sprinkler liquid, liquid for application, gel, paste deodorant and sheet with these deodorants soaked in cloth 'paper' non-woven fabric . In addition, deodorant absorbed in powder 'granules', granular · pellet form · block form · deodorant mixed and adsorbed into tablet gel, ceramic 'activated carbon · bentonite' to porous carriers such as diatomaceous earth Place the adsorbed deodorant or liquid deodorant in the container and let the liquid that is infiltrated with sponge 'cloth * ceramics etc. partially contact the deodorant in the container, and the infiltrated deodorant vaporizes Deodorant with a deodorizing effect, put the deodorant into a porous container such as ceramics, and the deodorant with a deodorizing effect by liquidizing the deodorant penetrated to the outside of the container, liquid Deodorant added directly to malodorous source, deodorant soaked in sheet 'film' filter, wallpaper containing deodorant on the surface or inside, building materials, diapers, sanitary products, insole of shoes, deodorant fiber Can be used for (cloth), deodorant leather, etc.

[0049] In addition, foods, etiquette deodorants, pet deodorants, environmental deodorants, deodorants and cosmetics containing the deodorizer of the present invention are commonly used additives and dispersions in each field. Agents, excipients, etc. can be included.

[0050] [Food]

Specifically, the deodorant of the present invention can be added to foods to remove unpleasant odors of the food material, for example, meat, seafood, vegetables such as Yura or garlic.

[0051] [Etiquette deodorant]

Moreover, the deodorizer of this invention can be used as a raw material of an etiquette deodorizer. Here, the etiquette deodorant in the present invention is a deodorant used directly for humans, such as bad breath, body odor such as armpit (for body), foot odor, hair odor and the like. This deodorant application is It is meant to be used directly on humans regardless of source. Specifically, underarm sweat odor spray lotion powder, mouth odor removal mouse spray 'capsule' mouthwash, hair spray to remove roasted meat or tobacco odor on hair 'shampoo' rinse 'hair one lotion Etc.

[0052] [Deodorant for pets]

The deodorant of the present invention can also be used as a material for pet deodorants. The pet deodorant of the present invention is a deodorant for unpleasant odors originating from pet animals, such as halitosis, body odor, and fecal odor of pet animals. Specifically, pet breath removal sprays' capsules, pet sprays that remove body odor from hair, shampoos, rinses, lotions, pet toilets, kennels or pet cages, pets themselves and pet supplies Can be mentioned. Moreover, the deodorizer of this invention can be used also as a raw material of an environmental deodorizer.

[0053] To prepare a mist spray type deodorant for domestic pet odor using the deodorant of the present invention, more specifically, the following method can be used. Add the deodorant of the present invention to water at a concentration of 0.01 to 50% (volume / volume), and if necessary, add a surfactant, ethanol or antibacterial agent, and fill the mist spray bottle. To do.

[0054] [Environmental deodorant]

The environmental deodorant of the present invention is a deodorant for an unpleasant odor attached to an object or space other than a human or a pet animal. Specifically, disposal of household waste or industrial waste storage site, household waste or industrial waste collection site, household waste or industrial waste collection site, waste collection site, household waste or industrial waste disposal site, etc. Offensive odors from sources, sewage treatment plants, human waste treatment plants, crematoriums, slaughterhouses, animal slaughterhouses, hospitals, clinics, inspection centers, toilets, bathrooms, bathrooms, etc. Building materials or wallpaper (bad odors of processing agents used in chemicals such as formalin), curtains, painting, furniture (bad odors of processing agents such as paint or processing), mold odors such as indentations, shoe boxes, air conditioners, clothing, automobiles Inside the truck, automobile 'truck-generating gas, train' aircraft, factory, restaurant, photo shop 'development shop, gas station, propane gas refilling place, laundry shop' laundry factory, ryokan 'hotel, beauty salon' hairdressing Store, car Can be used in repair shops, livestock barns, construction sites, etc.

[0055] Using the environmental deodorant of the present invention, mist for toilets, kitchen garbage, cooking utensils, etc. More specifically, the following method can be used to prepare a play type deodorant. Add the environmental deodorant of the present invention to water at a concentration of 0.01 to 50% (volume / volume). If necessary, add a surfactant, ethanol or antibacterial agent to the mist spray bottle. Fill.

[0056] In order to prepare an aerosol-type deodorant for household garbage or a bathroom odor, which is a strong odor in the home, using the environmental deodorant of the present invention, more specifically, the following method is used. Taking power S. The environmental deodorant of the present invention is diluted with water or an aqueous ethanol solution to a concentration of 0.2 to 70% (volume / volume) and filled into an aerosol container together with a propellant gas (for example, LPG and carbon dioxide).

[0057] By adsorbing or kneading the environmental deodorant of the present invention on a gel or a suitable carrier, the active component of the deodorant is gradually volatilized, and a deodorant for space that maintains the deodorizing effect for a long period of time. More specifically, the following method can be used for the preparation. The deodorant of the present invention at a concentration of 0.5 to 20% by weight, which is a gelling agent such as carrageenan, agar, locust bean gum, polyburu alcohol, gum arabic, dielan gum, gelatin, carboxymethylsenololose, chitin 'chitosan, Add sodium alginate, polyacrylamide, etc. alone or in combination to a solid gel.

[0058] The environmental deodorant of the present invention can be deodorized in a space by making it into a fine mist and scattering it in a space such as a building, a room, a car, or a factory. More specifically, the deodorizer of the present invention is added to a humidifier, a sprayer (for example, a device that sprays from a nozzle using a pressurizing device), etc. in an amount of 0.0;! To 20%, preferably 0.01 to 10%, more preferably 0.01-; 1% (volume / volume) concentration added to water, and if necessary, by adding a surfactant, ethanol, antibacterial agent, etc. The odor inside can be deodorized.

[0059] By spraying the environmental deodorant of the present invention intermittently or continuously into the air and spraying it on the floor surface, it is possible to avoid the occurrence of bad odors in pig farms, poultry farms, dairy farms, fish markets, etc. The ability to remove bad odors. At this time, the deodorant of the present invention is in a concentration of 0.0 ;! to 20%, preferably 0.01 to 10%, more preferably 0.0;! To 1% (volume / volume) with water. It is preferable to dilute and use.

[0060] Further, the environmental deodorant of the present invention is produced from pigs, dairy farms, poultry farms, etc. Odor can be reduced by spraying the mixture on a field or pasture with a vacuum car or the like. Odor can be suppressed by adding the environmental deodorant of the present invention to the urine in the tank at a concentration of 0.005-0. 5% (volume / volume) before spraying.

[0061] In addition, it is possible to produce a pet excrement treating agent having a high deodorizing effect using the environmental deodorant of the present invention. The excreta treating agent for pets is mainly bentonite, zeolite, wood powder, paper powder, etc., and sodium polyacrylate, other sodium compounds, magnesium compounds, etc. are added to this as necessary, and the present invention is added thereto. 10% by weight of the deodorant of the main material is added to the main material, and an appropriate amount of water is added, followed by mixing and “molding” drying. By putting this in a pet toilet such as a dog or cat and the dog or cat excreting it on the treatment agent, a treatment agent with an excellent deodorizing effect can be obtained.

[0062] In this way, in the method of mixing the other material and the deodorant of the present invention, molding and drying, the active ingredient of the deodorant remains without being completely volatilized during drying. The effect also remains. Further, by mixing materials other than the deodorant of the present invention first, molding and drying, and absorbing the deodorant of the present invention in the obtained molded article, an article having a deodorizing effect can also be obtained. Obtainable.

[0063] [Deodorant cleaning agent]

The deodorant cleaning agent of the present invention contains the deodorant of the present invention, has a deodorizing means for malodorous substances, and further contains a surfactant. The surfactant used in the present invention is not particularly limited, but in consideration of safety to human bodies, pets, etc., monoglycerin esters, polyglycerin esterols and sonorebitans listed in the official food additive regulations. Estenole, propyleneglycoloneestre, sucrose esterole, saponin, and lecithin are preferred. The blending amount of these surfactants is preferably 0.1% to 5.0%, more preferably 0.;! To 3.0%, based on the total amount of the deodorant cleaning agent. That's right. If the blending amount is less than 0.1%, the detergency is poor, and if it exceeds 5.0%, the stability of the product may be deteriorated.

[0064] The deodorant cleaning agent of the present invention is selected and added as desired from among additive components commonly used in ordinary cleaning agents as long as the object of the present invention is not impaired. May be. Examples of such an additive component include a cosmetic raw material standard listed component such as a liquid stabilizer such as ethanol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and sorbitol, and polyoxyethylene isostearyl ether having an average addition mole number of 5 to 10. Examples thereof include foaming agents, antibacterial agents, bactericides, fragrances, dyes, antioxidants, thickeners, gelling agents, ultraviolet absorbers, ion-exchanged water, and barley stone water, which have relatively secured properties.

[0065] The usage form of the deodorant cleaning agent of the present invention is not particularly limited, but it is preferable to use a spray type (trigger type, dispenser type, aerosol). In particular, it is preferable that the foam form is provided with foaming means such as an aerosol type by mixing with LPG. The foam form is a foam that is stable for a long time, specifically, a foam having good shape retention. In addition, it is desirable that the foam is shaken once and foamed, and the stable foam is foamed again even if the aerosol can is left as it is for about 1 minute. In addition, it is desirable to use a soft brush with bristle feet.

[0066] [Cosmetics]

The cosmetic of the present invention contains the deodorant of the present invention as a deodorant component and does not impair the effects of the present invention! /, Within the range, if necessary, a perfume and / or an inorganic ultraviolet scattering agent ( For example, fatty acid soap, fatty acid, fatty acid ester, titanium oxide, zinc oxide), deodorants other than the deodorizer of the present invention, and ingredients used in cosmetics (for example, moisturizers, antioxidants, oil components, emulsifiers) , Surfactants, thickeners, alcohols, powder components, coloring materials, aqueous components, water, various skin nutrients, etc.) can be added as necessary.

[0067] Furthermore, edetate disodium, edetate trisodium, sodium citrate, sodium polyphosphate, sodium metaphosphate, darconic acid, malic acid and other metal sequestering agents, caffeine, tannin, verapamil, tranexamic acid, And derivatives thereof, licorice extract, glabrizine, hot water extract of carin fruit, various herbal medicines, tocophenol acetate, glycyrrhizic acid, and derivatives thereof or salts thereof, retinoic acid, retinol, retinol acetate, pyroion Agents such as acid retinol, retinol normitate, and derivatives or salts thereof, whitening agents such as vitamin C, magnesium ascorbate phosphate, darcoside ascorbate, arbutin, kojic acid, funolectus, mannose, erythritole, trehalose, xylitol Sugars, arginine, amino acids such as lysine, and trimethyl derivatives such as glycine Alternatively, amino acids such as salts thereof can be appropriately blended.

[0068] The cosmetic of the present invention can be widely applied to cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and quasi-drugs applied to the outer skin. The dosage form can be any drug formulation, including solution systems, solubilization systems, emulsification systems, powder dispersion systems, oil / oil two-layer systems, oil / oil powder three-layer systems, gels, aerosols, mists, and Can be provided in any form such as a capsule

Yes

[0069] The use form is also arbitrary, and conventional cosmetics such as sunscreens, foundations, emulsions, creams, lotions, sprays, mousses, jewels, hair shampoos, hair rinses, hair treatments, and lipsticks. It can be used in any form as long as it is used.

[0070] Examples

The ability to explain the present invention in more detail with reference to the following examples and comparative examples The present invention is not limited to these examples. In the following examples,% is% by weight unless otherwise specified. Gas concentration ppm is pp m (mol / mol) according to the usual notation of gas concentration. The ethanol concentration was measured with an alcohol concentration meter (trade name: YSA-200, Yazaki Keiki Co., Ltd.).

[0071] [Production example of primary distillate]

Supply 2800L of sweet potato press (Bx. 12.2) obtained in the raw sugar factory manufacturing process to a centrifugal thin film vacuum evaporator (trade name: Evapor PEP-1, Okawara Seisakusho Co., Ltd.) at a speed of 250L / hr. The components distilled at a temperature of 90 to 95 ° C under a reduced pressure of 500 to 630 mmHg are continuously cooled by a condenser under the conditions of a cooling water temperature of 25 ° C, a cooling water amount of 15 m ³ / hour, and a capacitor area of 2 m ^2. And collected. Distillation was terminated when the raw material juice reached about 2400L, Bx. 13.9. The obtained distillate (hereinafter referred to as primary distillate 1) was about 400 L. The color of the primary distillate 1 was almost colorless and transparent. Primary distillate 1 had a unique odor derived from sweet potato.

[0072] [Production Example of Secondary Distillate Stock Solution]

About 400L of the primary distillate 1 is packed into a column (column size: inner diameter 2.6cm, height 20cm) packed with 40ml of the trade name Amberlite XAD7HP (Organo Corporation). The liquid was passed through. After completion of the flow, the sample was washed with water at the same flow rate for about 5 minutes. The adsorbed components were eluted with an 80% aqueous ethanol solution (ethanol / water = 80/20 (volume / volume)). The solution was passed at a flow rate of SV = 2, and the first 25 ml of the eluate was discarded, and collection of the eluate was started. After passing 80 ml of 80% ethanol aqueous solution, distilled water was passed at the same speed to push out the components, and the elution was completed when the amount of the recovered eluate reached 100 ml. The ethanol concentration (volume / volume) of the obtained eluate (hereinafter also referred to as the primary distillate 2 stock solution) was 59%, and its color was transparent with a slight lemon color. Primary distillate 2 had a unique odor derived from sweet potato.

Example 1

[0073] Distillation by Centrifugal Thin Film Vacuum Evaporator (Production Method of Deodorant of the Present Invention 1)

The primary distillate 2 was diluted with water so as to have an ethanol concentration (volume / volume) force of ¾0% (stock solution). 100 kg of the solution was supplied to a centrifugal thin film vacuum evaporator (trade name: Evapol CEP-5, Okawara Seisakusho Co., Ltd.) at a speed of 300 L / hour. The pressure inside the can of the apparatus was controlled to 90 mmHg (reduced pressure) or less, and distillation was carried out at a temperature (product temperature) of 34 to 40 ° C. When the residue in the kettle reached approximately 37 kg, distillation was terminated and the residue was collected (referred to as the fraction obtained in Example 1). The residue was a pale yellow liquid. Further, when the ethanol concentration of the residue in the kettle was measured with an alcohol densitometer, it was 5.1% (volume / volume).

Example 2

[0074] The sweet potato-derived odor of the fraction obtained in Example 1 was evaluated.

The ethanol concentration of the fraction was adjusted to 45% (volume / volume) with a mixed solution of ethanol and water, and the weight was 100 kg before distillation. The solution was put into a tightly-sealed container (300 ml flask with a stopper), shaken gently, and immediately, the odor intensity in the container was sensory-evaluated according to the following evaluation criteria by 4 to 7 skilled panelists. As a comparative control, the primary distillate 2 (stock solution) obtained in Production Example 2 was adjusted to an ethanol concentration of 45% (volume / volume), and the odor intensity of the comparative control was set to 3.

[0075] Odor intensity derived from sweet potato

0: Odorless

1: At last it can be perceived 2: It is weaker than primary distillate 2, but it can be easily detected.

3: Odor equivalent to primary distillate 2

4: Stronger smell than primary distillate 2

[0076] As a result of the sensory evaluation, the average value of the odor intensity of the fraction obtained in Example 1 was 0. Therefore, the odor of the fraction obtained in Example 1 was improved compared to the primary distillate 2. Example 3

[0077] Distillation by centrifugal thin film vacuum evaporator (Production method 2 of deodorant of the present invention)

Centrifugal thin film vacuum of 600 kg (stock solution) of [sugar cane extract MSX_245] (ethanol concentration 45% (volume / volume)), made by Mitsui Sugar Co., Ltd.] Evaporator (trade name: Evapole CEP-5, Okawara Seisakusho Co., Ltd.) was supplied. The pressure in the concentration can of the apparatus was controlled to 90 mmHg (reduced pressure) or less, and the temperature (product temperature) was distilled at 34 to 40 ° C. When the kettle residue reached approximately 113 kg, distillation was terminated and the kettle residue was recovered. The residue was almost colorless to light yellow liquid. Further, when the ethanol concentration of the residue was measured with an alcohol concentration meter, it was 3.5% (volume / volume).

[0078] The odor derived from the sweet potato of the residue was evaluated. The ethanol concentration in the kettle residue was adjusted to an ethanol concentration of 45% (volume / volume) with a mixed solution of ethanol and water, and the weight was 600 kg, the same as before distillation. As a comparative control, sugarcane extract MSX_245 (stock solution) had an ethanol concentration of 45% (volume / volume), and the odor intensity of the comparative control was 3. The method for sensory evaluation is as described in Example 2.

As a result of sensory evaluation, the average value of odor intensity was 1. Therefore, the odor of the residue was improved compared to the stock solution.

Example 4

[0080] Distillation with a rotary evaporator (Method for producing deodorant of the present invention 3)

A solution of [“sugar cane extract MSX_245”, manufactured by Mitsui Sugar Co., Ltd.], a primary distillate derived from sweet potato, was adjusted with water so that the ethanol concentration (volume / volume) force was ¾0% (stock solution, fraction 1 ). 1000 ml of the solution was supplied to a rotary evaporator (Tokyo Rika Kikai Co., Ltd.), and distilled at a temperature of 90 mmHg (decompression) or less and a vapor temperature of 30 to 40 ° C. At the same time, the residue is sampled every time SlOOml distillation is carried out (fractions 2 ~; 10). Distill until solid to obtain fraction 11. The ethanol concentration was measured with an alcohol densitometer for each of the fractions !!-11. Moreover, the odor derived from sweet potato was evaluated for each of fractions 1 to 11; The ethanol concentration of each of the fractions was adjusted to 45% (volume / volume) with a mixed solution of ethanol and water, and the weight was adjusted to be the same as the weight before distillation. As a comparative control, sugarcane extract MSX-245 (raw material) was adjusted to an ethanol concentration of 45% (volume / volume), and the odor intensity of the comparative control was set to 3. The method of sensory evaluation is as described in Example 2. The results are shown in Table 1.

[table 1]

From Table 1, the distillation amount (concentration rate) of the residue in the kettle increased, and as the ethanol concentration in the residue in the kettle decreased, the odor intensity decreased and the odor derived from sweet potato decreased. In particular, the odor was significantly improved in fractions 5 to 11 with an ethanol concentration of 5% or less (odor intensity 1 or 0). Odor was improved in fraction 4 with an ethanol concentration of 10% or less (odor intensity 2). On the other hand, in fractions 1 to 3 with an ethanol concentration of more than 10%, the odor intensity is the same as that of the control, so the odor derived from sweet potato is not improved.

Example 5 [0083] Distillation by rotary evaporator (Method 4 for producing deodorant of the present invention) The same sugarcane extract MSX-245 as in Example 4 was adjusted with water so that the ethanol concentration (volume / volume) was 10%. (Stock solution, fraction 1). 1000 ml of this solution was subjected to a rotary evaporator (Tokyo Rika Kikai Co., Ltd.) and distilled under the same conditions as in Example 4. At the same time, every time 100 ml of the residue was distilled, the residue was sampled (fractions 2 to 10), and the distillation was terminated when the amount of the residue was 100 ml. The ethanol concentration of each of fractions !! to 10 was measured with an alcohol densitometer. Moreover, the odor derived from sweet potato was evaluated for each of fractions 1 to 10; The evaluation method is as described in Example 4. The results are shown in Table 2.

[0084] [Table 2]

According to Table 2, the distillation amount (concentration rate) of the residue in the kettle increased, and as the ethanol concentration in the residue in the kettle decreased, the odor intensity decreased and the odor derived from sweet potato decreased. In particular, the odor was significantly improved in fractions 3 to 10 with an ethanol concentration of 5% or less (odor intensity 1 or 0). Odor was improved in fraction 2 with an ethanol concentration of 5.7% (odor intensity 2). On the other hand, fraction 1 with an ethanol concentration of 10% was before the start of distillation and its odor intensity was the same as that of the comparative control, so the odor derived from sweet potato was not improved. When the ethanol concentration in the residue was 10%, unlike the case of Example 4, the ethanol concentration in the residue was low, so that the odor derived from sweet potato decreased soon after the start of distillation.

Example 6

[0086] Distillation with a rotary evaporator (Production method 5 of deodorant of the present invention)

The same sugarcane extract MSX-245 as in Example 4 was adjusted with water so that the ethanol concentration (volume / volume) was 40% (stock solution, fraction 1). 1000 ml of this solution was subjected to a rotary evaporator (Tokyo Rika Kikai Co., Ltd.) and distilled under the same conditions as in Example 4. At the same time, every time 100 ml of the residue was distilled, the residue was sampled (fractions 2 to 10), and the distillation was terminated when the amount of the residue was 100 ml. The ethanol concentration of each of fractions !! to 10 was measured with an alcohol densitometer. Moreover, the odor derived from sweet potato was evaluated for each of fractions 1 to 10; The evaluation method is as described in Example 4. The results are shown in Table 3.

[0087] [Table 3]

From Table 3, the distillation amount (concentration rate) of the residue in the kettle increased, and as the ethanol concentration in the residue in the kettle decreased, the odor intensity decreased and the odor derived from sweet potato decreased. In particular, the odor was remarkably improved in the fractions 7 to 10 where the ethanol concentration was 10% or less (odor intensity 1 or 0). Odor was improved in fraction 6 with an ethanol concentration of 11.5% (odor intensity 2). On the other hand, ethanol concentration of 12% or less In the above fractions 1-5, the odor intensity is the same as the control, so the odor derived from sweet potato is not improved.

[0089] From the results of Examples 4 to 6, the sweet potato-derived odor was distilled off when the ethanol concentration of the residue in the kettle reached about 10%, regardless of the ethanol concentration before distillation. Therefore, by adjusting the ethanol concentration before distillation to 10%, the odor derived from sweet potato can be distilled off in a short time.

Example 7

[0090] Distillation by rotary evaporator (Production method of deodorant of the present invention 6)

The same sugarcane extract MSX_245 (stock solution, fraction 1) as in Example 4 was adjusted with water so that the ethanol concentration (volume / volume) was 20%. 1000 ml of the solution was subjected to a rotary evaporator (Tokyo Rika Instruments Co., Ltd.), controlled to 375 mmHg (decompression), and distilled at a steam temperature in the range of 70 to 84 ° C. At the same time, every time 100 ml of the residue was distilled, the residue was sampled (fractions 2 to 10), and the distillation was terminated when the amount of residue in the residue reached 100 ml. The ethanol concentration of each of fractions 1 to 10 was measured with an alcohol densitometer. The evaluation of the odor of the fractions is as described in Example 4. The results are shown in Table 4.

[0091] [Table 4]

[0092] From Table 4, the amount of distillation (concentration rate) of the residue in the kettle increases and the ethanol concentration in the residue in the kettle decreases. However, the odor intensity decreased and the odor derived from sweet potato decreased. In particular, the odor was remarkably improved (odor intensity 1 or 0) in fractions 4 to 10 with an ethanol concentration of 5% (volume / volume) or less. Odor was improved in fraction 3 with an ethanol concentration of 10% or less (odor intensity 2). On the other hand, in fractions 1 and 2 with an ethanol concentration of 12% or more, the odor intensity was the same as that of the comparative control, so the odor derived from sweet potato was improved!

Example 8

[0093] Distillation in open container (kettle) (Production method of deodorant of the present invention 7)

The same sugarcane extract MSX_245 (stock solution, fraction 1) as in Example 4 was adjusted with water so that the ethanol concentration (volume / volume) was 20%. 1000 ml of the solution was supplied to a glass beaker (container), heated at a gas conical port installed in a draft chamber, and distilled under normal pressure at a liquid temperature of 85 to 105 ° C. At the same time, every time 100 ml of the residue was distilled, the residue was sampled (fractions 2 to 10), and the distillation was terminated when the remaining amount of the residue was 100 ml. The ethanol concentration of each of fractions !! to 10 was measured with an alcohol concentration meter. Moreover, the odor derived from sweet potato was evaluated for each of fractions 1 to 10; The evaluation method is as described in Example 4. The results are shown in Table 5.

[0094] [Table 5]

[0095] From Table 5, the distillation amount (concentration rate) of the residue in the kettle increases and the ethanol concentration in the residue in the kettle decreases. However, the odor intensity decreased and the odor derived from sweet potato decreased. In particular, the odor was remarkably improved (odor intensity 1 or 0) in fractions 4 to 10 with an ethanol concentration of 8% (volume / volume) or less. Odor was improved in fraction 3 with an ethanol concentration of 10.5% (odor intensity 2). On the other hand, in fractions 1 and 2 with an ethanol concentration of 14% or more, the odor intensity is the same as that of the control, so the odor derived from Gansu!

Example 9

[0096] Preparation of deodorant

Fraction 11 produced in Example 1 was adjusted to a concentration of 45% (volume / volume) of ethanol with a mixed solvent of ethanol and water so that it had the same weight as before distillation, and then 45% (Volume / volume) A 3-fold diluted solution was made with ethanol. Similarly, each of the fractions 10 produced in Examples 3 to 8 is adjusted to a concentration of 45% (volume / volume) ethanol with a mixed solvent of water or ethanol / water, and the same weight as before distillation. Then, the solution was further diluted 3 times with 45% (volume / volume) ethanol. Each 3-fold diluted solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 to pH 8.5 with hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide, and allowed to stand at 4 ° C. Each was filtered with a membrane filter (model number C045A047A, manufactured by Advantech Toyo Co., Ltd.). Each of the filtrates was deodorized in Example 1, Deodorant in Example 3, Deodorant in Example 4, Deodorant in Example 5, Deodorant in Example 6, Example 7 The deodorant of Example 8 was used.

Example 10

[0097] Deodorizing effect on hydrogen sulfide (gas chromatography analysis)

Preparation of hydrogen sulfide gas is as follows. In a 20 ml headspace vial, 0.1 ml of 360 mM sodium sulfide solution was added, and 0.1 ml of 720 mM hydrochloric acid was slowly added and mixed. This was placed in a 30 ° C. incubator for 30 minutes to volatilize the gas. This head space gas was used as a test hydrogen sulfide gas.

[0098] After adjusting each of the deodorants prepared in Example 9 (deodorants of Examples 1 and 3 to 8) to pH 8.0, each lml of the deodorant was put into a new 20 ml headspace vial. Each was put, sealed, and used as a measurement sample. As a positive control sample, the same sugarcane extract MSX_245 (manufactured by Mitsui Sugar Co., Ltd.) as in Example 4 was used instead of the deodorant. Also, control As a sample, a deodorant-free! /, 45% (volume / volume) ethanol aqueous solution was used.

[0099] From the vial containing hydrogen sulfide gas for test, 0.04 ml of headspace gas was taken with an air syringe (0.1 ml) and added to each of the measurement sample, the positive control sample, and the control sample, 30 ° Incubated with C. 30 minutes after the start of incubation, 0 ml of the headspace gas was collected with an air syringe (lml) and analyzed by gas chromatography (gas chromatograph: G-3900, Hitachi, column: CP- Silica Plot, detector F PD, sample inlet temperature 200 ° C, detector temperature 230 ° C, column temperature 220 ° C, carrier single gas pressure 200 kPa, FPD gas pressure O 60 kPa, H 60 kPa

(2 2, N 150kPa)

2

Fi.

[0100] The deodorization rate for hydrogen sulfide was determined by the following equation.

Deodorization rate (%) = [(ji-3) / ji] 100

c: Hydrogen sulfide gas concentration in the control sample container

s: Hydrogen sulfide gas concentration in the sample container for measurement or in the positive control container

[0101] The results are shown in Figure 1. From FIG. 1, each deodorant prepared in Example 9 reduced the concentration of hydrogen sulfide to the same extent as the positive control sample. The deodorizing mechanism for hydrogen sulfide of the deodorant prepared in Example 9 is probably due to chemical deodorization.

Example 11

[0102] Deodorizing effect on isovaleric acid (sensory test)

100 ml of odorless water in which distilled water was passed through an activated carbon column and each of the deodorizers prepared in Example 9 (samples for measurement) were added to 0.1 ml each of a 300 ml conical stoppered flask (dark brown transparent flask). . 100% 1% (mass / volume) aqueous solution of isovaleric acid was injected into this, and after standing for 30 minutes, sensory evaluation was conducted by 7 skilled panelists to obtain an average. As a positive control sample, the same sugarcane extract MSX_245 (manufactured by Mitsui Sugar Co., Ltd.) as in Example 4 was used instead of the deodorant. As a control sample, a 45% (volume / volume) ethanol aqueous solution containing no deodorant was used.

[0103] The deodorizing effect on isovaleric acid was in accordance with the 6-step odor intensity labeling method shown below in the malodor control method. The results are shown in Table 6 below.

[0104] Evaluation criteria for 6-step odor intensity display method 0: Odorless

1: The smell you can finally detect

2: A weak smell that tells you the smell

3: Easily perceived odor

4: Strong smell

5: Strong smell

[0105] From Table 6, each of the deodorizers prepared in Example 9 showed a deodorizing effect on isovaleric acid that was equal to or higher than that of the positive control sample.

[0106] [Table 6]

Example 12

[0107] Deodorizing effect on tobacco odor (sensory test)

To prepare the tobacco odor-attached fabric, invert the 5 L Erlenmeyer flask, put a lit cigarette about 5 cm from the opening of the triangular flask, collect the cigarette smoke for about 30-40 seconds, and add lOcm x 10 cm. Placed in a Erlenmeyer flask that collected smoke on a cloth (cotton towel), quickly sealed, smoked into the cloth while shaking the flask, removed the cloth after 5 minutes, and used as a test cloth. Then, as a measurement sample, about 0.75 g of a 200-fold diluted solution of each deodorant prepared in Example 9 was sprayed, and then it was thoroughly stirred and homogenized. As a positive control, a 200-fold diluted solution of sugar cane extract MSX-245 as in Example 4 was used instead of the deodorant. In addition, as a control, distilled water was sprayed 5 times (0.15 g x 5 times = about 0.75 g) on the test fabric by spraying, and then it was thoroughly squeezed and homogenized. The test fabric was stored in a sealed container (sealed aluminum pack) at room temperature until evaluation.

[0108] After the spraying of each sample, the evaluation was performed by evaluating the function by 8 skilled panelists 4 to 5 hours, 1 day and 7 days later and taking an average. The evaluation criteria are as follows. The results are shown in Table 7. [0109] Sensory evaluation criteria

◎: The smell disappeared completely

〇: The smell disappeared

Δ: Smell disappeared slightly

X: Not deodorized

[0110] [Table 7]

[0111] From Table 7, each deodorant prepared in Example 9 has the same level of tobacco odor as the positive control sample. Deodorizing effect on

Example 13

[0112] Deodorant effect against mold odor (Sensory test)

As a test fungus, Aspergillus nieer NBRC33023 was used. Potato dextrose agar medium (PDA medium) was inoculated with the test fungus and cultured at 28 ° C for 5 days. The grown mold for test was immersed in distilled water, filtered with a filter paper (model No. 2 Advantech Toyo Co., Ltd.), and the cells were further washed with distilled water. The washed mold for test was suspended in distilled water to obtain a mold spore suspension. The mold spore suspension was cultured at 28 ° C. for 10 days and then filtered through a filter paper (No. 2) to obtain a musty odor water. The mold odor water (300 ml) was added to a lidded bottle (500 ml) containing a cloth (cotton towel) and immersed at 25 ° C. for 5 days. The fabric was taken out from the bottle and air-dried in the shade, and then the fabric was cut into 10 cm × 10 cm squares to obtain a mold odor test fabric.

[0113] The concentration of the deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts was

Diluted with water to 1% (both volume / volume) and filled into mist spray bottles. After spraying about 1. Og on the mold odor test fabric, it was thoroughly squeezed and homogenized. As a positive control, instead of the above deodorant, the same sugarcane extract MSX-245 concentration as in Example 4 was diluted with water so that the concentration was 1% (both volume / volume). In addition, as a control, distilled water was sprayed 6 times (about 1. Og) on the test fabric by spraying, and then it was thoroughly stirred and homogenized. The mold odor test fabric was stored in a sealed container (sealed aluminum pack) at room temperature until evaluation.

[0114] After spraying each sample, the sensory evaluation was performed by 8 skilled panelists 4 to 5 hours, 1 day, 7 days, 14 days, and 30 days, and an average was obtained. The evaluation criteria were sensory evaluation according to the 6-step odor intensity display method of the malodor control method described in Example 11. The results are shown in Table 8.

[0115] [Table 8] Deodorant of Example 9

Against musty odor

Control sample Equal volume mixed positive control

Deodorant effect

Deodorants

4-6 hours later 4.0 0.4 0.8

After 1 hour 4.1 0.5 0.5

7 days later 4.3 0.8 0.7

1 4 days later 4.1 0.7 1.0

After 30 days 4.5 1 .0 1.0

[0116] From Table 8, each deodorant prepared in Example 9 showed a deodorizing effect on the mold odor equivalent to or higher than that of the positive control sample.

Example 14

[0117] Deodorizing effect on pet odor (sensory test)

A bath towel used for 6 months as a dog (indoor dog) rug at home was cut into a lcm x lcm test piece. The test piece was mixed well and made uniform, and then about 6 g was spread on a glass petri dish so that the dough would not overlap, and this was used as a pet odor test piece. As a measurement sample, dilute with water so that the concentration of the deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts is 1% (both volume / volume). And filled into mist spray bottles. After spraying about 1.5 g on the pet odor test piece, it was thoroughly stirred and homogenized. As a positive control, instead of the above deodorant, the same sugarcane extract MSX-245 concentration as in Example 4 was diluted with water so that the concentration was 1% (both volume / volume). In addition, as a control, about 1.5 g of distilled water was sprayed on a test piece by spraying, and then it was thoroughly stirred and homogenized. The pet odor test piece was stored in a sealed container (sealed aluminum pack) at room temperature until evaluation.

[0118] After spraying each sample, the sensory evaluation was performed by 8 skilled panelists 4 to 5 hours, 1 day, 7 days, 14 days, and 30 days, and an average was taken. The evaluation criteria were sensory evaluation according to the 6-step odor intensity display method of the malodor control method described in Example 11. The results are shown in Table 9. The

[0119] [Table 9]

[0120] From Table 9, each of the deodorizers prepared in Example 9 showed a deodorizing effect on the same level of pet cake as the positive control sample.

Example 15

[0121] Mist spray type deodorant

Diluted with water so that the concentration of the deodorant sample prepared in Example 9 was equal to 20% and 0.1% (both volume / volume). Filled spray bottle. When these samples were sprayed on a large dog with animal odor and its kennel, the unpleasant odor due to animal odor disappeared in both the dog and kennel, and the effect lasted for 3 days.

Example 16

[0122] Aerosol type deodorant

The concentration of the deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts was 60% and 1% (both volume / volume), respectively, and the final ethanol concentration was 20% ( (Volume / volume) to dilute with ethanol and water. Each of the resulting mixtures was filled into an aerosol container with a propellant gas (LPG and carbon dioxide). When these were sprayed onto malodorous garbage, the malodor derived from the garbage was suppressed, and the effect lasted for more than 24 hours.

Example 17 [0123] Gel deodorant

2. 2 g of carrageenan and 85 g of water were added to a 200 ml beaker and heated to 70 ° C. with good stirring until completely dissolved. Next, when this mixture was cooled to 50 ° C., 15 g of a deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts was added and mixed to obtain the total weight. Was adjusted to 100 g with water, cooled and solidified to obtain a gel-like deodorant. Similarly, three gel-like deodorants were prepared. The gel-like deodorant was placed in a 2.6 liter desiccator, sealed, and stabilized at 20 ° C. for 3 hours. Trimethylamine gas was injected into this desiccator to an initial concentration of about 20 ppm, and after 24 hours, the trimethylamine concentration was measured with a detector tube (model No. 180L, manufactured by Gastec Co., Ltd.) to determine the reduction rate of the trimethylamine concentration. It was. The gel-type deodorant for which measurement was completed was individually placed in a 300 ml beaker and stored in a constant temperature and humidity chamber at 20 ° C and 60% humidity until the next measurement. The deodorizing effect was measured on the day of preparation of the gel-type deodorant, 7 days after preparation, and 14 days after preparation, and the deodorization rate was determined from the residual concentration of trimethylamine. The deodorization rate was obtained as follows, and the data for the three deodorants were averaged. The results are shown in Table 10.

[0124] Deodorization rate (%) = [1 (Trimethylamine concentration at the end of measurement) / (Trimethylamine concentration at the start of measurement)] X 100

[0125] [Table 10]

[0126] From Table 10, the gel-like deodorant in this example showed high deodorizing activity against the deodorization of trimethylamine.

Example 18

[0127] Indoor deodorization by humidifier

A room with a particularly strong odor was selected in a nursing home and used as a test control. About 1.5 liters of water was added so that the concentration of the deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts was 0.05% (volume / volume). The solution was set in a humidifier. humidifier The operation was intermittently operated at a rate of 1 minute per 15 minutes using an intermittent timer. As a result, odors were suppressed throughout the day.

Example 19

[0128] Pet excreta treating agent

An excrement treating agent for pets was prepared using a deodorant prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts. As a blending example of the treating agent, 50 parts of bentonite, 50 parts of wood flour, 1 part of deodorant and 50 parts of water were used. The raw materials were mixed with a ribbon mixer, and a disk-type pelleter with a diameter of 3 mm and a length of 8-20 mm was obtained. This was further dried with a rotary dryer as a sample. As a positive control, 1 part of the same sugarcane extract MSX-245 as in Example 4 was used instead of the deodorant. As a control, 1 part of water was used in place of the deodorant in the above treatment agent.

[0129] 20 g of each sample was placed in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask, 2 ml of 0.5% aqueous ammonia was added and sealed, and incubated at 30 ° C for 20 minutes. After the incubation, the ammonia concentration (ppm) of the gas portion was measured with a detector tube (model No. 3La, manufactured by Gastec Co., Ltd.). As a blank value, the ammonia concentration when only ammonia was added was measured, and each deodorization rate (%) was calculated. The results are shown in Table 11 below.

[0130] [Table 11]

Since bentonite absorbs ammonia to some extent, the control also has a deodorizing effect compared to the blank, but the treatment using the above-mentioned deodorant of the present invention and the positive control deodorant is clearly more deodorant. Showed the effect.

Example 20 [0132] Preparation of spray type deodorant 1

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 0.6% and trade name “TEGO DEO CW90” (manufactured by Goldschmidt) as zinc ricinoleate 2.0% (About 1% as zinc ricinoleate), dipropylene glycol (5.0%), industrial ethanol (35.0%), and water in the balance, prepare a spray-type deodorant by a conventional method. It was.

Example 21

[0133] Preparation of spray type deodorant 2

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 1.0%, and trade name “TEGO SORB CONC. 50” (manufactured by Goldschmidt) as zinc ricinoleate 1 · 0% (approx.0.5% as zinc ricinoleate), dipropylene glycol 5.0%, ethanol for industrial use 20.0%, and water in the balance, mix the spray-type agent by a conventional method. Key

; ^^

Example 22

[0134] Preparation of spray type deodorant 3

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the same amount of the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 and 0.6%

As a plant extract other than the sweet potato extract, the trade name “Pyurière” (Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd.)

) A spray type deodorant was prepared by a conventional method by mixing 0.6%, industrial ethanol 20.0% and the balance water.

Example 23

[0135] Preparation of spray type deodorant 4

The product name “Smeral” (produced by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.)

Example 24

[0136] Preparation of spray type deodorant 5 Deodorant sample prepared in Example 9 with the same amount of 7 kinds of deodorants mixed with 0.6%, and the plant name “Pancil” (Release Kagaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.) as a plant extract other than sweet potato extract A spray type deodorant was prepared by a conventional method by mixing 0.6%, industrial ethanol 20.0%, and the balance water.

[0137] [Comparative Example 1]

Preparation of spray type deodorant A

In the formulation of the spray-type deodorant of Example 20, and sprayed in a conventional manner without using the deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts. Type A deodorant was prepared.

[Comparative Example 2]

Preparation of spray type deodorant B

In addition to the spray type deodorant of Example 20 !, instead of the deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts, / 3-cyclodextrin 2 0% was blended and a spray was prepared by a conventional method to obtain a spray type deodorant.

[0139] [Deodorization test 1]

Spray type deodorant 1 to 5 of Examples 20 to 24 and spray type deodorant A to B of Comparative Examples 1 to 2! The following tests were conducted to evaluate their deodorizing effects. .

[0140] An odor evaluation box was prepared in which the odor intensity of hydrogen odor, methyl mercabtan, and isovaleric acid, which are general malodors, was set to the odor intensity stage 3 shown in the following odor intensity standards. The sensory test was conducted by skilled panelists on the deodorizing effect on the above three kinds of malodors according to the following evaluation method. Detailed test methods are shown below.

[0141] The above-mentioned spray-type deodorant was sprayed into the 2000-liter odor evaluation box containing the above three kinds of bad odors so that the inside of the chamber had an odor intensity of 3 (the amount of spray per spray was 0.3 g) ). Ten skilled panelists sensory-evaluated the deodorizing effect against bad odor after 1 minute and 10 minutes after spraying according to the 6-step odor intensity display method of the malodor control method described in Example 11, and each spray type was turned off. The average score of the evaluation values of each panel was determined for the odorant. The results are shown in Table 12.

Yes

[0142] [Table 12] Sprayer Hydrogen sulfide Methyl mercabtan Isovaleric acid Eve deodorant 1 minute later 1 0 minute later 1 minute later 1 0 minute later 1 minute later 1 0 minute later Example 20 0. 4 0. 6 0. 4 0. 4 0 5 0. 5 Example 21 0. 7 0. 8 0. 2 0. 2 0. 3 0. 5 Example 22 0. 3 0. 5 0. 4 0. 3 0. 5 0. 4 Example 23 0. 8 0. 8 0. 9 0. 7 0. 9 1.1 Example 24 0. 4 0. 5 1. 0 1. 0 0. 5 0. 8 Comparative Example 1 3. 0 3. 2 2. 7 3. 0 3. 1 3. 3 Comparative Example 2 2. 9 3. 1 2. 8 2. 8 2. 9 3. 0

[0143] From Table 12, the spray-type deodorants of Examples 20 to 24 showed excellent deodorizing effect after 1 minute of spraying against hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan and isovaleric acid, and the effect was 10 minutes after spraying. Lasted even after. On the other hand, the spray type deodorizers of Comparative Examples 1 and 2 did not have a sufficient deodorizing effect after 1 minute of spraying and after 10 minutes of spraying.

Example 25

[0144] Preparation of Deodorant Composition 1

A deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 0.3%, and a product name “Super Piurier A-10” (Matsushita Electric Industrial Chemical Co., Ltd.) as a plant extract. 1) 1.0%, triethanolamine 4.0%, quenic acid 2.0%, and water in the remainder, adjusted to pH 7.0 with ammonia and deodorant composition Obtained.

Example 26

[0145] Preparation of Deodorant Composition 2

A deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 1.0%, and a trade name “Smeral LG” (manufactured by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) as a plant extract 0.5% Then, trihetanolamine 0.6%, sodium dihydrogen citrate 2.0%, and the remainder were mixed with water and adjusted to pH 7.0 with ammonia to obtain a deodorant composition.

Example 27

[0146] Preparation of Deodorant Composition 3

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 0.3% As a plant extract, the product name “Smeral LG” (manufactured by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) 1.0%, monoethanolamine 0.8%, citrate 2.0%, and water in the balance are mixed with ammonia. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 to obtain a deodorant composition.

Example 28

[0147] Preparation of Deodorant Composition 4

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 0.3%

As a plant extract, the trade name “Super Piyurire A-10” (manufactured by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.) 3.0

%, Monoethanolamine 2.3%, quenic acid 3.0%, and water in the remainder were adjusted to pH 7.0 with ammonia to obtain a deodorant composition.

[0148] [Comparative Example 3]

Preparation of deodorant composition

A control sample was obtained by adding 1% 2% monoethanolamine, 2.0% citrate and water to the residue and adjusting to pH 7.0 with ammonia.

[0149] [Deodorization test 2]

In order to confirm the deodorizing effect of the deodorant compositions of Examples 25 to 28;! To 4 and Comparative Example 3, a deodorization test for ammonia, methyl mercabtan and isovaleric acid, and A deodorizing test was conducted using rugs (carpets) used by ru dogs kept at home. The results are shown in Table 13.

[0150] Details of the test method are as follows.

<Test method (1): Deodorization test of ammonia> Place 10 mL of sample (deodorant composition or control sample of Examples 25 to 28 above) into a 1 L glass bottle container, and inject 1 mL of 1% aqueous ammonia solution. After leaving for 10 minutes, sensory evaluation by 10 skilled panelists was performed and an average was taken. The evaluation criteria were in accordance with the 6-step odor intensity display method of the malodor control method described in Example 11.

<Test method (2): Deodorization test of methyl mercaptan> Place 10 mL of a sample in a 1 L glass bottle container, inject 1 mL of 0.1% methyl mercaptan ethanol solution, and let stand for 1 hour. Sensory evaluation was performed and the average was taken. The evaluation criteria were in accordance with the 6-step odor intensity display method of the malodor control method described in Example 11. <Test method (3): Deodorization test of isovaleric acid> Place 10mL of sample in a 1L glass bottle container, inject 100% of 1% aqueous solution of isovaleric acid, leave it for 1 hour, and sensory evaluation by 10 skilled panelists And took the average. The evaluation criteria were in accordance with the 6-step odor intensity display method of the malodor control method described in Example 11.

<Test method (4): Deodorization test of rugs used by indoor dogs> The rug after the sample is sprayed three times (about 2.5 g) on the rug used by dogs kept at home and wiped off. The sensory evaluation was performed based on the remaining odor. The evaluation criteria are as follows.

[0151] Sensory evaluation criteria

◎: The smell disappeared completely

〇: The smell disappeared

Δ: Smell disappeared slightly

X: Not deodorized

[Table 13]

[0152] From Table 13, the deodorant compositions of Examples 25 to 28 showed excellent deodorizing effects on indoor dog rugs that are sources of ammonia, methyl mercaptan, isovaleric acid and offensive odor. . On the other hand, the deodorant composition of Comparative Example 3 showed almost no deodorizing effect.

Example 29

[0153] Preparation of Deodorant Cleaning Agent 1

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 1.0% and the trade name “Smeral LG” (manufactured by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) as a plant extract 1.0% And citrate 3 0%, polyglycerin esterol 0.5%, saponin 0.5%, industrial ethanol 10.0%, POE isostearyl ether 0.1% The pH was adjusted to 4.8 with sodium oxide to obtain a deodorant cleaning agent.

Example 30

[0154] Preparation of Deodorant Cleaning Agent 2

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 1.0% and the trade name “Smeral LG” (manufactured by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) as a plant extract 1.0% And the product name “Super Piyurire A-10J (manufactured by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.) 1 · 0%, Chenic acid 2 · 5%, Propylene glycolenoestestole 1 · 0% and Saponin 0 · 5% In addition, 100% industrial ethanol and 100% ethanol and the balance water were adjusted to pH 4.8 with sodium hydroxide to obtain a deodorant cleaning agent.

[0155] Preparation of Deodorant Cleaning Agent 3

A deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 1.0%, and a trade name “Smeral LG” (manufactured by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) as a plant extract 0.5% Chenic acid 2.5%, saponin 0.5%, POE isostearinoleethenore 0.1%, industrial ethanol 10.0%, and water in the remainder and pH with sodium hydroxide The deodorant cleaning agent was obtained after adjusting to 4.8.

Example 32

[0156] Preparation of Deodorant Cleaning Agent 4

A deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 0.5%, and a trade name “Smeral LG” (produced by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) as a plant extract 1.0% And the product name "Super Piyurire A-10" (Matsushita Electric Works), 0.3%, Chenic acid 2.5%, Lecithin 0.1%, Saponin 0.5% Ethanol for commercial use was mixed with 10.0% and water in the residue, and the pH was adjusted to 5.0 with sodium hydroxide to obtain a deodorant cleaning agent.

Example 33

[0157] Preparation of Deodorant Cleaning Agent 5

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 1.0% As a plant extract, the trade name “Smeral LG” (manufactured by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) 0.5%, citrate 2.5%, saponin 0.5%, POE isostearinoreethenore 0.1%, industrial Ethanol for use was mixed with 10.0% and the remaining water, and the pH was adjusted to 5.8 with sodium hydroxide to obtain a deodorant cleaning agent.

Example 34

[0158] Preparation of Deodorant Cleaning Agent 6

A deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 0.5%, and a trade name “Smeral LG” (produced by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) as a plant extract 1.0% And the product name "Super Piyurire A-10" (manufactured by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.) 0.3%, citrate 2.5%, lecithin 0.5%, and industrial ethanol 10.0% The residue was mixed with water and adjusted to pH 5.0 with sodium hydroxide to obtain a deodorant cleaning agent.

Example 35

[0159] Preparation of Deodorant Cleaning Agent 7

A deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 0.5%, and a trade name “Smeral LG” (manufactured by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) as a plant extract 0.5% And the product name "Super Piyurire A-10J (manufactured by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.)" 0.5%, Chenic acid 2.0%, Saponin 0.1%, Industrial ethanol 10.0%, The residue was mixed with water and adjusted to pH 4.5 with sodium hydroxide to obtain a deodorant cleaning agent.

Example 36

[0160] Preparation of Deodorant Cleaning Agent 8

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 1.0% and the trade name “Smeral LG” (manufactured by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) as a plant extract 1.0% And the product name "Super Piyurire A-10J (manufactured by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.) 1 · 0%, quenate 2 · 0%, sodium dihydrogen tate 2 · 5% and saponin 5 · 0% Then, 100% industrial ethanol and water were mixed with the residue and adjusted to pH 4.8 with sodium hydroxide to obtain a deodorant cleaning agent.

[0161] [Comparative Example 4]

Preparation of deodorant cleaning agent A

Chenic acid 1.0%, lecithin 10.0%, industrial ethanol 10.0%, and water in the balance Blended and adjusted to pH 3.5 with sodium hydroxide to obtain a deodorant cleaning agent.

[0162] [Comparative Example 5]

Preparation of deodorant cleaner B

As a plant extract, the product name “Smeral LG” (manufactured by Environmental Science Development Co., Ltd.) 0. 01% and the product name “Super Pyrienore A-10J (manufactured by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.) 0. 01%, and citrate 3 · 0%, industrial ethanol 10.0%, and water in the remainder were adjusted to pH 6.0 with sodium hydroxide to obtain a deodorant cleaning agent.

[0163] [Comparative Example 6]

Preparation of deodorant cleaner C

Chenic acid 2.5%, industrial ethanol 10.0%, and the remainder were mixed with water and adjusted to pH 4.8 with sodium hydroxide to obtain a deodorant cleaning agent.

[0164] [Deodorization test 3]

Deodorant cleaning agents of Examples 29 to 36;! To 8 and deodorant cleaning agents of Comparative Examples 4 to 6 To confirm the deodorizing effect of A to C, deodorization to ammonia, methyl mercabtan, isovaleric acid A deodorization test was conducted on the test, actual urine of model dogs, and model urine. Furthermore, the cleaning effect on the actual urine and model urine of indoor dogs was confirmed. The deodorization test for ammonia, methyl mercabtan, and isovaleric acid was evaluated using the test methods (1) to (3) described in the above deodorization test 2. In addition, deodorization tests and washing tests using actual urine and model urine of dogs kept at home were evaluated by the following test methods.

[0165] <Test method (5): Deodorization test and washing test using actual urine and model urine of indoor dog> Indoor urine and model urine of indoor dog (0.003% bilirubin (urine pigment) · 1 1% NaCl) is applied to the carpet and lightly patted with a tissue, and then the sample is treated (foam the sample on the size of a golf ball, lift the dirt with a brush, and lightly wipe with a tissue). The remaining colors were subjected to sensory evaluation by 10 skilled panelists and averaged. The evaluation standard for the deodorization test is in accordance with the 6-step odor intensity display method of the malodor control method described in Example 11. For the cleaning test, the untreated color is 5 points and the stain is completely removed. Was one point. The results are shown in Table 14.

[0166] [Table 14] Deodorizing cleaning Deodorizing effect Cleaning effect Agent composition Methyl Indoor dog Indoor dog

Ammonia Isovaleric acid Model urine Model urine Mercabtan Actual urine Actual urine

Example 29 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 Example 30 0 0 1 2 2 1 1 Example 31 0 1 0 2 2 2 1 Example 32 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Example 33 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 Example 34 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Example 35 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Example 36 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Comparative Example 4 2 5 5 5 5 3 2 Comparative Example 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 Comparative Example 6 3 5 5 5 5 5 5

[0167] From Table 14, the deodorant cleaners !! ~ 8 have better deodorant performance for ammonia, methylmerbutane and isovaleric acid compared to the deodorant cleaners AC, and In the deodorization test and cleaning test using real urine or model urine of dogs kept in Japan! /, It showed excellent deodorization and cleaning performance.

Example 37

[0168] Hair Essence

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 3.2%, volatile isoparaffin 5.0%, methylpolysiloxane 1.5%, glycerin 1.5%, 1, 3-butylene glycol 2.5%, sorbite solution (70%) 1 0%, polyethylene glycol 60 00 0.5%, polyethylene glycol dioleate 0.05%, polyisodiole diisostearate 0.5%, water Sodium oxalate 0.05%, Noraben 0.2%, Phenoxyethanolate 0.2%, Trisodium edetate 0.1%, Carrageenan 0.5%, Dimethyldistearyl ammonium hectorite 0.5% And 0.8% of dextrin palmitate, 0.4% of carboxybule polymer, and 1.5% of high molecular weight methylpolysiloxane (degree of polymerization = 3000). Furthermore, a hair essence was prepared by adding an appropriate amount of fragrance in the case of a hair essence containing a fragrance, and adding purified water to the remainder without adding a fragrance in the case of an unscented hair essence. [0169] When these hair essences were tested for the deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the hair essence of this example had an excellent deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor (sensory evaluation: ◎ )showed that.

Example 38

[0170] Hair mist (dispenser)

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 6.0%, P

VP / VA S-630 (GAF) 5.0%, Yuka Former AM-75 (Mitsubishi Chemical) 5.0%

A hair mist was prepared by blending industrial ethanol with the residue.

[0171] When the deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor described in Example 12 was tested for this hair mist, the hair mist of the present example had an excellent deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor (sensory evaluation:

◎).

Example 39

[0172] Shampoo

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 10.5%, dipropylene glycol 1.0%, monostearic acid POE (20) sorbitan 0.1%, ΡΟΕ (2 5) POP (30) 0. 7%, ethylene glycol distearate 2 2.0% coconut oil fatty Monoe Tano one Honoré bromide 2 · 5 ^_0/0, ΡΟΕ La clinoptilolite les utility Honoré acid Natorikumu 5 2.0 ^o / _o ΡΟΕ Lacrinoreutere triethanolamine sulfate 10.0%, 2-alkyl Ν carboxymethyl Ν hydroxetyl imidazolinium betaine 2.0%, Marquat 550 (manufactured by Riki Norecon) 5.0. /. , Citrate 0.5%, sodium citrate 1.0%, sodium chloride 0.8%, acetic acid DL—a tocopherol 0.2%, phenoxyethanol 0.3%, sodium benzoate 0.2%, Lecithin 0.3% was added. Further, in the case of a shampoo containing a fragrance, an appropriate amount of fragrance was added, and in the case of an unscented shampoo, no fragrance was added, and purified water was added to the residue to prepare a shampoo.

[0173] When these shampoos were tested for the deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the shampoo of this example had an excellent deodorizing effect (sensory evaluation: ◎) on the tobacco odor. Indicated.

Example 40 [0174] Hypoallergenic shampoo

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 5.0%, glycerin 0.5%, ethylene glycol distearate 2.0%, coconut oil fatty acid monoethanolamide 1 0%, propylene glycol laurate 2.0%, sodium coconut oil fatty acid methyltaurine sodium 7.0%, coconut oil fatty acid amidopropyl betaine 6.0%, polymer JR400 OJC C) 1 · 0%, citrate 0 · 5%, phenoxyethanol 0.3%, sodium benzoate 0.2%, disodium edetate 0.1%, soybean lecithin 0.2%, cationized potato starch (Sensomer CI-50CALGON) 0 · Formulated with 5%. In addition, in the case of a hypoallergenic shampoo containing fragrance, an appropriate amount of fragrance is added. did.

[0175] When these hypoallergenic shampoos were tested for the deodorant effect against tobacco odor described in Example 12, the hypoallergenic shampoo of this example was superior in deodorant effect (sensory Evaluation: A).

Example 41

[0176] Cosmetics

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 2.0%, methylpolysiloxane 2.0%, cetanolol 3.0%, behenyl alcohol 3.0 %, Glycerin 4.0%, diglycerin 2.0%, cetyl 2-ethylhexanoate 1.0%, glycerinole monostearate 1.0%, stearyltrimethylammonium chloride 2.0%, citrate 0.1%, Oil-soluble plant protein 0.05%, Amino-modified polysiloxane (Toray Dou SM8702C) 1.0%, High molecular weight polysiloxane (Polymerization degree = 4000) 0.5%, Parapen 0.2% did. Furthermore, in the case of cosmetics containing a fragrance, an appropriate amount of fragrance was added, and in the case of an unscented cosmetic, no fragrance was added and purified water was added to the remainder to prepare a cosmetic.

[0177] When these cosmetics were tested for the deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the cosmetic of the present example had an excellent deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor (sensory evaluation: ◎) showed that.

Example 42

[0178] Hair finish spray Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 1.0%, methinorefinolole polysiloxane 0.5%, 1, 3 butylene glycolenole 0.5% Liquid lanolin 0.2%, 2-ethyl cetyl cetylate 0.5%, lauric acid diethanolamide 0.5%, pi-glutamic acid isostearic acid POE hydrogenated castor oil 0.2%, paraben 0.2%, paramethycin cinnamon 2% hexyl acid 2-0.5%, Yucaformer 104 (Mitsubishi Chemical Co., Ltd.) 8.0%, oil-soluble vegetable protein 0.02% were blended. In addition, in the case of cosmetics containing fragrances, an appropriate amount of fragrance is added, and in the case of unscented cosmetics, no fragrance is added, and industrial ethanol is added to the remainder to prepare a stock solution for hair finish spray. Obtained. This stock solution and LPG were mixed at a stock solution / LPG = 55/45 to prepare a hair finishing spray by a conventional method.

[0179] When these hair-finishing sprays were tested for the deodorizing effect against tobacco odor described in Example 12, the hair-finishing spray of this example had an excellent deodorizing effect (sensory Evaluation: A).

Example 43

[0180] Hairspray 1

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 0.5%, cetyl hexylate 0.5%, polyoxyethylene glycol ether 0.3%, A stock solution of hair spray 1 was obtained by blending oil-soluble plant protein 0.1%, plus size L 53 (manufactured by Reciprocal Chemical Co., Ltd.) 12% and industrial ethanol. This stock solution was mixed with LPG and DME at a stock solution / LPG / DME = 40/10/50 to prepare hair spray 1 by a conventional method.

[0181] When this hair spray 1 was tested for the deodorizing effect against tobacco odor described in Example 12, the hair spray 1 of this example had an excellent deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor (evaluation of function). : ◎).

Example 44

[0182] Hairspray 2

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 2.0%, liquid paraffin 6.0%, methylpolysiloxane 3.0%, methylphenylpolysiloxane 2. 0%, decyltetradecanol 6.0%, cetyl hexyl hexanoate 3.0%, and the balance Ingredients were mixed with industrial ethanol to obtain a hairspray 2 stock solution. This stock solution and LPG were mixed at stock solution / LPG = 50/50 to prepare hair spray 2 by a conventional method.

[0183] When this hair spray 2 was tested for the deodorizing effect against tobacco odor described in Example 12, the hair spray 2 of this example had an excellent deodorizing effect against cigarette odor (evaluation of the function). : ◎).

Example 45

[0184] Rinse

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 3.0%, liquid paraffin 1.0%, methylpolysiloxane 3.0%, cetanol 1.0%, otatilde Decanol 3.0%, oil-soluble vegetable protein 0.1%, propylene glycol 5.0%, polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil 0.5%, polyoxyethylene stearyl ether 0.5%, alkyltrimethylammonium chloride 1. 5%, 0.1% citrate, 0.5% potassium chloride, 0.3% phenoxyethanol, and 0.01% viricion zinc solution (50%) were mixed. Furthermore, in the case of rinsing containing a fragrance, an appropriate amount of fragrance was added, and in the case of an unscented rinsing, no fragrance was added and purified water was added to the residue to prepare a rinse.

[0185] When these rinses were tested for the deodorant effect against the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the rinse of this example showed an excellent deodorant effect (sensory evaluation:)) against the tobacco odor. It was. Example 46

[0186] Permanent wave agent 1

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 0.5%, glycerin 4.0%, monoethanolamine laurate 1.0%, polyoxyethylene oleyl Ether 0.5%, lauryltrimethylammonium chloride 0.2%, stearyltrimethyl ammonium monoxide 0.5%, ammonium carbonate 5.0%, urea 2.0%, ammonium thioglycolate solution (50%) 15.0% and hydroxyethane diphosphonic acid (60%) 0.2% were added. In addition, in the case of a permanent wave agent containing a fragrance, an appropriate amount of fragrance was added, and in the case of an unscented permanent wave agent, no fragrance was added, and purified water was added to the remainder to prepare a permanent tube 1 .

[0187] With respect to these permanent wave agents 1, the effects on tobacco odor described in Example 12 were eliminated. When the odor effect was tested, the permanent wave agent 1 of this example showed an excellent deodorizing effect (sensory evaluation: ◎) against tobacco odor.

Example 47

[0188] Permanent wave agent 2

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 0.5%, methylsiloxane emulsion 5.0%, lauryl dimethylamino acetate betaine 0.5% , Sodium monohydrogen phosphate 0.1%, Sodium bromate solution (20%) 40.0%, Potassium dihydrogen phosphate 0.5%, Sodium benzoate 0.2%, and purified water Permanent tube agent 2 was prepared.

[0189] When this permanent wave agent 2 was tested for the deodorizing effect against the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the permanent wave agent of this example had an excellent deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor (sensory evaluation). : ◎).

Example 48

[0190] Body lotion (dispenser)

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 1.0%

, Industrial Ethanol Nole 20 · 0%, Glycerin 6 · 0%, 1, 3—F, Tylene Glycolanol 3 · 0%, P

A body lotion was prepared by blending 0.8% OE (60) hydrogenated castor oil and 1.0% mugwort extract, and blending purified water with the remainder.

[0191] When this body lotion was tested for the deodorant effect against tobacco odor described in Example 12, the body lotion of this example had an excellent deodorant effect (sensory Evaluation: A).

Example 49

[0192] cream

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 0.1%, Vaseline 2.0%, Metinorepolysiloxane 3.0%, Cetanore 2.0%, Glycerin 3. 0%, 1, 3-propylene, styrene glycolol 5.0%, hard coconut oil 2.0%, stearic acid 2.0%, bis-2-ethanole glyceryl hexanoate 3.5%, isostearin Polyoxyethylene glyceryl acid 0.7%, glyceryl monostearate 2-3%, potassium hydroxide 0.15%, sodium hexametaphosphate 0.01% sodium hyaluronate, 0.1% sodium, ascorbic acid phosphate magnesium 2.0%, paraben 0.3%, carboxybule polymer 0.05%. Furthermore, in the case of a cream containing a fragrance, an appropriate amount of fragrance was added, and in the case of an unscented cream, a fragrance was not added, and purified water was added to the remainder to prepare a cream.

[0193] When these creams were appropriately diluted with water and tested for the deodorizing effect against tobacco odor described in Example 12, the cream of this example had an excellent deodorizing effect (governmental) against tobacco odor. Performance evaluation: ◎).

Example 50

[0194] Genore

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 1.0%, industrial ethanol 5.0%, glycerin 8.0%, polyoxyethylene methyldarcoside 4. 0%, ΡΟΕ (12) Lauryl ether 1 · 0%, Lauryldimethylamine oxide 0 · 3%, Potassium hydroxide 0 · 5%, L-ascorbic acid-2-darcoside 2 · 0%, Paraben 0 · 3%, Carboxybule polymer 0.6% was blended. Furthermore, in the case of a jewel containing fragrance, an appropriate amount of fragrance was added. In the case of an unscented jewel, no fragrance was added, and purified water was added to the remainder to prepare a jewel.

[0195] When these jewels were appropriately diluted with water and tested for the deodorant effect against tobacco odor described in Example 12, the jewel of this example had an excellent deodorant effect (sensory Evaluation: A).

Example 51

[0196] Cream for whitening

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 6.0%, liquid paraffin 5.0%, petrolatum 1.0%, methylpolysiloxane 2.0%, industrial use Etano one Norre 3.0 percent, Setanonore 0.5 ^_0/0, glycerin 6.0%, 1, 3 off ,, Chile packaging Ricoh Norre 6.0%, polyethylene glycol Norre 1500 1.0%, Kati匕油2.0%, cetylolehexanoic acid 4.0%, polyoxyethylene glyceryl isostearate 1.0%, polyoxyethylene glyceryl monostearate 1.0%, potassium hydroxide 0.1%, metalin Sodium acetate 0.02%, Arginine hydrochloride 0.1%, Acetic acid DL—a Tocopherol 0.1%, Oil-soluble plant protein Inn 0. 5 ⁰ / o, rosemary extract ^_1. 0 ο / ο, sodium Hianoreron acid 0.2%, Anorefu ,, Chin 5.0%, phenoxyethanol 0, 3%, Edeto acid trisodium 0 - 05%, paramethoxycinnamate 2-ethylhexyl 1.0%, xanthan gum 0.1%, carboxybule polymer 0.1% were blended. Further, in the case of a whitening cream containing a fragrance, an appropriate amount of fragrance was added, and in the case of an unscented whitening cream, no fragrance was added, and purified water was added to the residue to prepare a whitening cream 1.

[0197] When these whitening creams were appropriately diluted with water and tested for the deodorizing effect on tobacco odor as described in Example 12, the whitening cream of this example was excellent in eliminating tobacco odor. Odor effect (sensory evaluation: ◎) was shown.

Example 52

[0198] Deodorant Body Cleansing

EXAMPLE 9 7 type of each deodorant deodorant was mixed with an equal volume of sample 6.0% was prepared in propylene glycol: .pi. Honoré 8 · 0 ^_0/0, Sonorebi, Tsu preparative ί night (70 ^o / _o) 8 · 0 ^o / _o, lauric acid 2-5 ^_0/0, coconut derived fatty acid diethanolamide 4 · 0%, ΡΟΕ Anorekinore (12, 13) ether sulfate Torietano Ruamin 2. 0%, New coconut oil fatty Ashiru L Triethanolamine glutamate 3.0%, 、 Palm oil fatty acid asinole L Sodium gnoretamine 3.0%, 2-amino-2-methyl 2-propanol 2.5%, sodium metaphosphate 0.1%, alpha-tocophero Nodole body cleansing was prepared by blending Nore 0.02%, Lily extract 0.5%, Parapen 0.2%, Canolepoxyhi, Ninore polymer 1.0%, and the remaining purified water.

[0199] When this deodorant body cleansing was tested for the deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the deodorant body cleansing of this example was superior to the tobacco odor. Deodorizing effect (sensory evaluation: ◎) was shown.

Example 53

[0200] Hair manicure

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the 7 types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 0.5%, Benzenore 7 "Nore Inore 10.0 ^ο / _ο , Ν Metinorepyrrolidone 15.0% Hair manicure was prepared by blending 3.0% cunic acid, 1.0% xanthan gum, 0.8% acidic dye, and purified water in the remainder. [0201] When this hair manicure was tested for the deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the product of this Example showed an excellent deodorizing effect (sensory evaluation: ◎) on the tobacco odor. . Example 54

[0202] Oxidative hair dye

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 0.3%, cetanol 10.0%, POE (15) cetyl ether 2.0%, sodium lauryl sulfate 2 0%, liquid paraffin 5.0%, oil-soluble vegetable protein 0.3%, polymethylsiloxane 3.0. /. , Monoethanolamine § Min 3.0%, propylene glycol 8.0%, bicarbonate Anmoniu arm 2 · 0% Chio glycolic acid Anmoniumu 0 - 5%, meta-amino Hue no Honoré 0.5% Paraami Nofuenonore 0.5 ⁰ / _0, Rezonoreshin 0.5% Tonoreen 2, 5-Jiamin 0.5 ^_0/0, Bruno Raamino OTA preparative cresol 0 - 5%, manufactured by polymer JR4000JCC Co.) 0.2%, and blended with purified water residue Thus, one preparation of oxidative hair dye was prepared. Cetanol 10.0%, POE (15) cetyl ester 2.0%, sodium lauryl sulfate 2.0%, liquid paraffin 5.0%, polymethylsiloxane 3.0%, hydrogen peroxide (35%) 18 Purified water was blended in 0% and the remainder, and adjusted to pH 8.0 with citrate to prepare two parts of oxidative hair dye. Next, 1 part and 2 parts of oxidative hair dye were mixed in a ratio of 1 part / 2 parts = 1 / 0.5-2 to obtain the oxidative hair dye of this example.

[0203] When this oxidative hair dye was appropriately diluted with water and tested for its deodorizing effect on tobacco odor as described in Example 12, the oxidative hair dye of this example was excellent in deodorizing tobacco odor. The effect (sensory evaluation: ◎) was shown.

Example 55

[0204] Hair restorer

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 0.5%, industrial ethanol 90.0%, glyceryl tri-2-ethylhexylate 2.0%, POE Hydrogenated castor oil 0.5%, diglyceryl diisostearate 1.0%, lauryldimethylamine oxide 0.5%,? 0.1% acid Sodium oxalate 0.03%, assembly extract 0.5%, Hinokichi-no-re 0.1%, pantothruethyl ether 0.1%, / 3--glycyrrhetinic acid 0.1%, nicotinic acid benzil 0. A hair restorer was prepared by blending 1%, 0.1% pyridoxine hydrochloride, 0.1% tocopherol acetate 0.1%, L-menthol 0.1%, and purified water. [0205] When this hair restorer was tested for the deodorant effect against the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the hair restorer of this example had an excellent deodorant effect (sensory evaluation: ◎) against the tobacco odor. Indicated. Example 56

[0206] Antiperspirant lotion

A deodorant samples 1.0% were mixed in equal amounts was seven each deodorant prepared in Example 9, industrial Etanonore 45 - 0 ^_0/0, Isopurono Nonore 0 - 5 ^_0/0, 1, 3-F, Tyleneglycolol 0.5%, Triethyl citrate 0.7%, Polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene decyltetradecyl ether 0.2%, Fine zinc oxide coated nylon powder 0.2%, Aluminum high mud o · the cyclo ride solution (50%) 20 - 0% to Kisametarin sodium 0/1% chloride Ben Zanorekoniumu night (50 ^o / _o) 0 - 2 ^_0/0, methylcarbamoyl Roh receptacle Honoré loin 0.1 ^_0/0 Antibiotic lotion was prepared by adding 0.1% of polyvinylino pyrrolidone and purified water to the residue.

[0207] When this antiperspirant lotion was tested for the deodorant effect against the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the antiperspirant lotion of this example had an excellent deodorant effect against the tobacco odor (evaluation of the function). : ◎).

Example 57

[0208] Deodorant spray for body

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in an equal amount 1.5%, industrial utannole 20.0%, glycerin 5.0%, dipropylene glycol: π-nore 5 A stock solution of a deodorizing spray for body was prepared by blending 0%, ΡΟΕ · POP decenoretetradecenoleether 1 · 0%, and purified water into the residue. This undiluted solution and nitrogen gas were mixed at undiluted solution / nitrogen gas = 99.3 / 3. 7 to prepare a deodorizing spray for body by a conventional method.

[0209] This body deodorant spray was tested for the deodorant effect on the tobacco odor described in Example 12. As a result, the body deodorant spray of the present example was excellent in deodorizing the tobacco odor. The effect (sensory evaluation: ◎) was shown.

Example 58

[0210] Amist to tobacco deodorant

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 2.0%, industrial ethanol 50.0%, volatile isoparaffin 0.5%, methylpolysiloxane 2 · 0 %, High molecular weight amino-modified dimethylpolysiloxane 0.5%, propylene glycol 2.0%, hard-hardened castor oil 0.5%, hydroxypropinole β-cyclodextrin 1.0%, and the remainder Purified water was added to prepare a stock solution of amist to deodorize tobacco. This stock solution and nitrogen gas were mixed at stock solution / nitrogen gas = 99.2 / 0.8, and tobacco odor deodorizing hair mist was prepared by a conventional method.

[0211] The test of the deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor described in Example 12 was conducted on this odor and deodorant of cigarette odor. Deodorizing effect (sensory evaluation: ◎) was shown.

Example 59

[0212] Hair colon

A deodorant sample (5.0%) prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts, industrial ethanol (15.0%), and red alga extract (1.0%) were blended. In addition, in the case of hair colons containing fragrance, add an appropriate amount of fragrance, and in the case of unscented hair colons, add no fragrance.

The residue was mixed with purified water to prepare a hair colon stock solution. This stock solution and dimethyl ether were mixed at a stock solution / dimethyl ether = 60/40 to prepare a hair colon.

[0213] When this hair colon was tested for the deodorizing effect on the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the product of this example showed an excellent deodorizing effect (sensory evaluation: ◎) on the tobacco odor. It was.

Example 60

[0214] Deodorant spray for indoor use

Deodorant sample prepared by mixing the same amount of the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 and 3.5%

, Industrial ethanol 5.0%, green tea extract 2.0%, persimmon (60) hydrogenated castor oil 0.1%, diglyceryl diisostearate 0.2%, and the balance containing purified water for indoor use A stock solution of deodorant spray was prepared. This undiluted solution and nitrogen gas were mixed at undiluted solution / nitrogen gas = 99.4 / 0.6 to prepare a deodorizing spray for indoor use by a conventional method.

[0215] When this indoor deodorant spray was tested for the deodorant effect against the tobacco odor described in Example 12, the indoor deodorant spray of this example was superior in the deodorant effect against the tobacco odor. (Sensory evaluation: A). Example 61

[0216] Foam body deodorant

Deodorant samples prepared by mixing the seven types of deodorants prepared in Example 9 in equal amounts 0.5%, industrial ethanol 30.0%, silicone-based 0.5%, 1, 3 Chile ring Ricoh Honoré 1.0 ^_0/0, Sani匕亜Russia, 2.0%, Serisai Bok 1.0% POP · POP isethionate Honoré ether Honoré 0.8%, Kuen acid 0. 2% L-menthol 0 · Prepared a stock solution of foam body detergent by adding 1% and purified water to the residue. This stock solution and LPG were mixed at a stock solution / LPG = 92/8 to prepare a foam body deodorant by a conventional method.

[0217] When this foam body deodorant was tested for the deodorant effect against tobacco odor described in Example 12, the foam body deodorant of this example had an excellent deodorant effect (sensory Evaluation: A).

Example 62

[0218] Car deodorant

Prepare a car deodorant by diluting it with water so that the concentration of the deodorant sample prepared in Example 9 was equal to 1% (both volume / volume). did. The vehicle deodorant was set on the liquid side of a sprayer of a two-fluid nozzle (gas / liquid type). The sprayer is operated continuously by installing the sprayer in the rear seat of the vehicle under test and adjusting the pressure by the transformer (air side), for example, compressed air from a baby compressor (Hitachi Machine). Operated.

[0219] A car with a strong pet odor in the car (car A), a car with a strong tobacco odor in the car (car B), a car with a human odor in the car (car C), and a fragrance smell in the car The car (car D) with! / Was left as the test target. The car deodorant was sprayed for 15 minutes in each vehicle under test. During the mist, the air conditioner was circulated at maximum airflow, and the deodorant was distributed throughout the car. After spraying, the car window was opened and dried outdoors for several hours (3-5 hours) at an outside temperature (20-30 ° C, fine weather-cloudy).

[0220] The evaluation was carried out by sensory evaluation by 10 skilled panelists before spraying the vehicle deodorant, after spraying (immediately), several hours after spraying (after drying), and 1 day after spraying, and taking the average. The evaluation criteria were sensory evaluation according to the 6-step odor intensity display method of the malodor control method described in Example 11. So Table 15 shows the results.

[0221] [Table 15]

[0222] From Table 15, the car deodorant in this example showed a high deodorizing effect on the car odor (pet odor, cigarette odor, human body odor, and fragrance smell).

Industrial applicability

[0223] The deodorant of the present invention is naturally derived, has high safety, and has a low production cost. further

In the deodorant of the present invention, since the odor derived from sweet potato is improved, it can be used in a wide range of fields such as the food field, the environmental field, the industrial field, etc. Can be used.

Claims

The scope of the claims

A column using a deodorizing agent comprising a deodorant derived from sweet potato as an active ingredient, wherein the deodorant derived from sweet potato is obtained by distilling a sweet potato juice or a sweet potato solvent extract. The fraction obtained by the chromatography and the fraction obtained by the treatment or a mixture obtained by adding a mixed solvent of water or alcohol to water to the fraction are further distilled, and the alcohol concentration (volume / volume) in the kettle remains 0. A deodorant which is a residue of the kettle when the distillation is completed when the content is not less than 10% and not more than 10%.

The column chromatographic treatment power s, the raw material is passed through a column packed with a synthetic adsorbent as a fixed carrier, and the components adsorbed on the synthetic adsorbent are mixed with methanol, ethanol, water, methanol, and ethanol. 2. The deodorant according to claim 1, which is a process of eluting with a solvent selected from two or more mixtures.

The deodorizing substance power derived from sweet potato is the residue when the distillation is terminated when the alcohol concentration (volume / volume) of the residue is 0% to 5%. Deodorants.

Alcohol power S The deodorizer according to any one of claims 1 to 3, which is selected from methanol, ethanol, propanol and mixtures thereof.

A food comprising the deodorant according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

Etiquette deodorant comprising the deodorant according to any one of claims 1 to 4

A pet deodorant comprising the deodorant according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

An environmental deodorant comprising the deodorant according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

A deodorant cleaning agent comprising the deodorant according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

A cosmetic comprising the deodorant according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

A method for improving a sweet potato-derived odor of a distillate obtained by distilling a sweet potato juice or a sweet potato solvent extract, wherein the distillate is treated by column chromatography using a fixed carrier, When the obtained fraction or a mixture obtained by adding water or a mixed solvent of alcohol and water to the fraction is further distilled, and the alcohol concentration (volume / volume) in the kettle is 0% to 10% Collecting the residue of the kettle at the end of the distillation. [12] The column chromatographic treatment power S, and the raw material is passed through a column packed with a synthetic adsorbent as a fixed carrier, and the components adsorbed on the synthetic adsorbent are methanol, ethanol, water, methanol The method according to claim 11, which is a process of eluting with a solvent selected from a mixture of two or more of ethanol.

[13] The method according to claim 11 or 12, comprising collecting the residue when the distillation is completed when the alcohol concentration (volume / volume) of the residue is 0% to 5%. .

[14] Alcohol strength S The method according to any one of claims 11 to 13; selected from S methanol, ethanol, propanol and mixtures thereof.

[15] A method for deodorizing an object using the deodorizer according to any one of claims;! To 4.