Classifications

• • G—PHYSICS
  • G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
  • G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
  • G16H10/00—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data
  • G16H10/40—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data for data related to laboratory analysis, e.g. patient specimen analysis
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
  • C07F—ACYCLIC, CARBOCYCLIC OR HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS CONTAINING ELEMENTS OTHER THAN CARBON, HYDROGEN, HALOGEN, OXYGEN, NITROGEN, SULFUR, SELENIUM OR TELLURIUM
  • C07F9/00—Compounds containing elements of Groups 5 or 15 of the Periodic Table
  • C07F9/02—Phosphorus compounds
  • C07F9/06—Phosphorus compounds without P—C bonds
  • C07F9/08—Esters of oxyacids of phosphorus
  • C07F9/09—Esters of phosphoric acids
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
  • C07F—ACYCLIC, CARBOCYCLIC OR HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS CONTAINING ELEMENTS OTHER THAN CARBON, HYDROGEN, HALOGEN, OXYGEN, NITROGEN, SULFUR, SELENIUM OR TELLURIUM
  • C07F9/00—Compounds containing elements of Groups 5 or 15 of the Periodic Table
  • C07F9/02—Phosphorus compounds
  • C07F9/06—Phosphorus compounds without P—C bonds
  • C07F9/08—Esters of oxyacids of phosphorus
  • C07F9/09—Esters of phosphoric acids
  • C07F9/10—Phosphatides, e.g. lecithin
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
  • C07F—ACYCLIC, CARBOCYCLIC OR HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS CONTAINING ELEMENTS OTHER THAN CARBON, HYDROGEN, HALOGEN, OXYGEN, NITROGEN, SULFUR, SELENIUM OR TELLURIUM
  • C07F9/00—Compounds containing elements of Groups 5 or 15 of the Periodic Table
  • C07F9/02—Phosphorus compounds
  • C07F9/06—Phosphorus compounds without P—C bonds
  • C07F9/08—Esters of oxyacids of phosphorus
  • C07F9/09—Esters of phosphoric acids
  • C07F9/10—Phosphatides, e.g. lecithin
  • C07F9/106—Adducts, complexes, salts of phosphatides
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
  • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
  • G01N33/483—Physical analysis of biological material
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
  • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
  • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
  • G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
  • G01N33/6893—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids related to diseases not provided for elsewhere
  • G01N33/6896—Neurological disorders, e.g. Alzheimer's disease
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N37/00—Details not covered by any other group of this subclass
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
  • G01N2800/28—Neurological disorders
  • G01N2800/2814—Dementia; Cognitive disorders
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
  • G01N2800/28—Neurological disorders
  • G01N2800/2814—Dementia; Cognitive disorders
  • G01N2800/2821—Alzheimer
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
  • G01N2800/50—Determining the risk of developing a disease
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
  • G01N2800/52—Predicting or monitoring the response to treatment, e.g. for selection of therapy based on assay results in personalised medicine; Prognosis
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N30/00—Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
  • G01N30/02—Column chromatography
  • G01N30/62—Detectors specially adapted therefor
  • G01N30/72—Mass spectrometers
  • G01N30/7233—Mass spectrometers interfaced to liquid or supercritical fluid chromatograph
• • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
  • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
  • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
  • Y10T436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
  • Y10T436/16—Phosphorus containing
  • Y10T436/163333—Organic [e.g., chemical warfare agents, insecticides, etc.]

Definitions

• the present invention relates to small molecules or metabolites that are found to have significantly different abundances between clinically diagnosed dementia or other neurological disorders, and normal patients.
• the present invention also relates to methods for diagnosing dementia and other neurological disorders.
• DSM-IV Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition
• the clinical manifestation of dementia can result from neurodegeneration (e.g. Alzheimer's Disease [AD], dementia with Lewy bodies [DLB] and frontotemporal lobe dementia [FTLD]), vascular (e.g. multi-infarct dementia) or anoxic event (e.g. cardiac arrest), trauma to the brain (e.g. dementia pugilistica [boxer's dementia]), or exposure to an infectious (e.g. Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease) or toxic agent (e.g. alcohol-induced dementia) [3].
• AD Alzheimer's Disease
• DLB dementia with Lewy bodies
• FTLD frontotemporal lobe dementia
• vascular e.g. multi-infarct dementia
• anoxic event e.g. cardiac arrest
• trauma to the brain e.g. dementia pugilistica [boxer's dementia]
• an infectious e.g. Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
• toxic agent e.g. alcohol-induced dementia
• AD is the most common cause of dementia, followed by vascular dementia (VaD), DLB and FTLD [4].
• VaD vascular dementia
• DLB vascular dementia
• FTLD vascular dementia
• the differential diagnosis of the types of dementia is not straightforward, and is typically based on exclusion of other disorders [5]. For example, blood chemistry values are measured to determine if Vitamin B12 deficiency, anemia, infection, venereal disease or thyroid disorder maybe possible reasons for the dementia symptoms.
• Various neuroimaging techniques may be employed, such as magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography scans to determine if the symptoms may be due to the presence of a tumor, infection or vascular event [4].
• AD dementia symptoms
• DLB or FTLD a diagnosis of AD, DLB or FTLD is made exclusively based on the clinical symptoms (e.g. frequency of falls, rapid onset, presence of visual or auditory hallucinations, etc). It is not until a histopathological evaluation of the brain during autopsy is performed that a definitive diagnosis can be obtained [5-7].
• AD Alzheimer's disease
• tau intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles
• SPs senile plaques
• Tau is important for the formation of microtubules in the neuronal axon by binding and promoting polymerization of tubules.
• tau becomes hyperphosphorylated thereby disrupting its main function.
• the tau accumulates and forms tangles within the axon. The neuron can no longer function and dies.
• Tau protein is released into the extracellular space where it can be detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [9].
• CSF cerebrospinal fluid
• SPs cerebrospinal fluid
• APP amyloid precursor protein
• the formation and secretion of ⁇ -amyloid is closely regulated by homeostasis, but something occurs in AD that disrupts homeostasis resulting in the accumulation of the protein within the brain and disrupting the neurons within its vicinity [11-12].
• the increased amount of tau and the absence of ⁇ -amyloid in CSF have been proposed as possible diagnostic markers for AD, but results have not been consistent.
• the problem may be due to the presence of NFTs and SPs that increase in number during normal aging [13].
• NFTs and SPs In order for the NFTs and SPs to be diagnostic of AD, they must be localized together in specific areas of the brain (neocortex and limbic region) [12]. SPs without NFTs are present in the same area in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and in 27% of non-demented individuals greater then 75 years old [13].
• MCI mild cognitive impairment
• a diagnosis of DLB is based on the presence of protein deposits called alpha- synuclein, which is referred to as Lewy Bodies, within brainstem and cortical neurons [6].
• the cognitive deficit corresponds to the amount of Lewy Bodies within the brain.
• FTLD is not characterized by a specific neuropathological feature. Typically, areas of the frontal/temporal cortices have neuronal loss, spongiform changes (microvacuolation) and severe astrocytic gliosis. The clinical symptoms in FTLD are dependent upon where the pathology is found rather than the type of pathology [7].
• ADAS Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale
• MMSE Folstein's Mini-Mental State Exam
• MCI is characterized by a prominent impairment in memory with normal cognitive functions [15]. MCI is considered a transitional stage between normal aging and several types of dementia since a large proportion of individuals with MCI are later diagnosed with AD, DLB, or FTLD and all individuals with fully developed dementia first exhibit mild dementia symptoms similar to MCI [16]. [0013] There is a need to objectively differentiate the types of dementia from one another. Preferably, such a method would be specific, accurate, and efficient. Clearly, there is a pressing need for differential diagnosis of dementia prior to autopsy.
• AD-specific biomarkers in human serum would be extremely useful since it would be noninvasive and could be used to detect the presence of AD pathology prior to the manifestation of clinical symptoms and differentiate those patients who may have a different form of dementia but similar clinical symptoms.
• the present invention relates to small molecules or metabolites that are found to have significantly different abundances between clinically diagnosed dementia or other neurological disorders, and normal patients.
• the present invention also relates to methods for diagnosing dementia and other neurological disorders.
• the present invention provides a method of identifying one or more than one metabolite marker for differentially diagnosing AD dementia, non-AD dementia, cognitive impairment, or a combination thereof, comprising the steps of: introducing one or more than one sample from one or more than one patient with clinically diagnosed AD dementia, clinically diagnosed non-AD dementia, significant cognitive impairment, or any combination thereof, said sample containing a plurality of metabolites into a high resolution mass spectrometer obtaining quantifying data for the metabolites; creating a database of said quantifying data; comparing the identifying and quantifying data from the sample with corresponding data from a sample from a reference sample; identifying one or more than one metabolite marker that differs between same sample and said reference sample,
• the metabolites metabolite markers are selected from the metabolites listed in Tables 1-7, 10-13, and 18, or any combination thereof.
• the method may further comprising selecting a minimal number of metabolite markers needed for optimal diagnosis.
• the high resolution mass spectrometer is a Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometer (FTMS).
• the present invention also provides novel compounds selected from the group consisting of the metabolites listed in Tables 7-13.
• the metabolite may be selected from the group consisting of phosphatidylcholine-related compounds, ethanolamine plasmalogens, endogenous fatty acids, essential fatty acids, lipid oxidation byproducts, metabolite derivatives of said metabolite classes, and any metabolite that may contribute in any way to the anabolic/catabolic metabolism of said metabolite classes.
• the compounds maybe selected from the group consisting of metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 541.3432, 569.3687, 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5197, 751.5555, 803.568, 886.5582, 565.3394, 569.369, 801.555, and 857.6186.
• the metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, a) 541.3432, b) 569.3687, c) 699.5198, d) 723.5195, e) 751.5555, and f) 803.568 may also be characterized by a) an extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) as shown in Figure 4A, and an MS/MS spectrum as shown in Figure 6; b) an EIC as shown in Figure 4B, and an MS/MS spectrum as shown in Figure 7; c) an EIC as shown in Figure 4C, and an MS/MS spectrum as shown in Figure 8; d) an EIC as shown in Figure 4D, and an MS/MS spectrum as shown in Figure 9; e) an EIC as shown in Figure 4E, and an MS/MS spectrum as shown in Figure 10; and f) an EIC as shown in Figure 4F, and an MS/MS spectrum as shown in Figure 11 , respectively.
• EIC extracted ion chromatogram
• the compounds as described above may also be further characterized by molecular formula a) C 25 H 5I NO 9 P, b) C 27 H 55 NO 9 P, c) C 39 H 74 NO 7 P, d) C 4 iH 74 NO 7 P, e) C 43 H 78 NO 7 P, and f) C 43 H 8 iNOioP, respectively; and/or by the structures shown in a) figure 12; b) figure 13; c) figure 17; d) figure 18; e) figure 19; and f) figure 14, respectively.
• the compounds may also be selected from the group consisting of metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, a) 567.3547, b) 565.3394, c) 805.5832, d) 827.57, e) 829.5856, f) 831.5997, and g) 853.5854.
• These compounds may be further characterized by molecular formula a) C 27 H 55 NO 9 P, b) C 27 H 55 NO 9 P, c) C 43 H 83 NO 10 P, d) C 45 H 81 NO 10 P, e) C 45 H 83 NO 10 P, f) C 45 H 85 NO 10 P, and g) C 47 H 83 NO 10 P, respectively; and/or by the structure shown in a) Figure 15 A; b) Figure 15B; c) Figure 15C; d) Figure 15D; e) Figure 15E; f) Figure 15F; and g) Figure 15G, respectively.
• the compounds may further be selected from the group consisting of metabolites M05 to M24 with accurate masses of, or substantially equivalent to those listed in Table 18.
• the metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, a) 701.53591, b) 699.52026, c) 723.52026, d) 747.52026, e) 729.56721 , f) 727.55156, g) 779.58286, and h) 775.55156 maybe further characterized by a MS/MS spectrum as shown in a) figure 21 ; b) figure 22; c) figure 23; d) figure 24; e) figure 25; f) figure 26; g) figure 27; and h) figure 28, respectively.
• novel compounds may also be selected from the group consisting of the metabolites listed in Table 30.
• the metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 207.0822, 275.8712, 371.7311, 373.728, 432.1532, 485.5603, 487.6482, 562.46, 622.2539, 640.2637, 730.6493, and 742.2972 are of particular interest.
• the present invention provides a method for differentially diagnosing dementia or the risk of dementia in a patient, the method comprising the steps of: a) obtaining a sample from said patient; b) analyzing said sample to obtain quantifiying data for one or more than one metabolite marker; c) comparing the quantifying data for said one or more than one metabolite marker to corresponding data obtained from one or more than one reference sample; and d) using said comparison to differentially diagnose dementia or the risk of dementia.
• the the step of analyzing may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), or alternatively may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography and linear ion trap mass spectrometry when the method is a highthroughput method.
• LC-MS liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
• the one or more than one reference sample is a first reference sample obtained from a non-demented control individual.
• the one or more than one reference sample may also comprise a second reference sample obtained from a patient with clinically diagnosed AD-dementia; a third reference sample obtained from a patient with clinically diagnosed non-AD dementia; and/or a fourth reference sample obtained from a patient suffering from significant cognitive impairment.
• the sample and the reference sample are serum samples
• the one or more than one metabolite marker is selected from the metabolites listed in Tables 1 to 7, or a combination thereof.
• These metabolite markers may be selected from the group consisting of phosphatidylcholine-related compounds, ethanolamine plasmalogens, endogenous fatty acids, essential fatty acids, lipid oxidation byproducts, metabolite derivatives of said metabolite classes, and any metabolite that may contribute in any way to the anabolic/catabolic metabolism of said metabolite classes.
• the one or more than one metabolite marker needed for optimal diagnosis may comprise metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 541.3432, 569.3687, 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5197, 751.5555, 803.568, 886.5582 , and any combination thereof.
• the metabolite of accurate masses 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5197, and 751.555 are ethanolamine plasmalogens and are specifically decreased in patients with AD dementia; and the metabolite markers of accurate masses 541.3432, 569.3687, 803.568, and 886.5582 are phosphatidylchoine metabolites, are decreased in patients with cognitive impairment on ADAS-cog, and severity of cognitive impairment correlates to the degree of decrease.
• the one or more than one metabolite marker may be the metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, a) 541.3432, b) 569.3687, c) 699.5198, d) 723.5195, e) 751.5555, and f) 803.568.
• the metabolite may also be further characterized by molecular formula a) C 25 H 51 NO 9 P, b) C 27 H 55 NO 9 P, c) C 39 H 74 NO 7 P, d) C 4 iH 74 NO 7 P, e) C 43 H 78 NO 7 P, and f) C 43 H 8! NOioP, respectively; and/or by the structure shown in a) figure 12; b) figure 13; c) figure 17; d) figure 18; e) figure 19; and f) figure 14, respectively.
• the sample and the reference sample may be cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples, and the one or more than one metabolite marker is selected from the metabolites listed in Table 13, or a combination thereof.
• CSF cerebrospinal fluid
• metabolite markers needed for optimal diagnosis may comprise metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 207.0822, 275.8712, 371.7311, 373.728, 432.1532, 485.5603, 487.6482, 562.46, 622.2539, 640.2637, 730.6493, 742.2972, and any combination thereof.
• metabolite markers 207.0822, 432.1532, 562.46, 622.2539, 640.2637, 730.6493, and 742.2972 are increased in patients with AD dementia; and metabolite markers 275.8712, 371.7311, 373.728, 485.5603, and 487.6482 are decreased inpatients with AD dementia.
• the sample and the reference sample are serum samples
• the one or more than one metabolite marker may be selected from metabolites M05 to M24 with accurate masses of, or substantially equivalent to those listed in Table 18.
• the one or more than one metabolite marker of particular interest may comprise metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, a) 701.53591, b) 699.52026, c) 723.52026, d) 747.52026, e) 729.56721, f) 727.55156, g) 779.58286, and h) 775.55156, and wherein a decrease in the level of a) to h) indicates AD dementia with a severe cognitive impairment.
• the metabolites listed above may be further characterized by a MS/MS spectrum as shown in a) figure 21 , b) figure 22, c) figure 23, d) figure 24, e) figure 25, f) figure 26, g) figure 27, and h) figure 28, respectively.
• the metabolites may also be further characterized by molecular formula a) C ⁇ H 76 NO 7 P, b) C ⁇ H 74 NO 7 P, c) C 41 H 74 NO 7 P, d) C 43 H 74 NO 7 P, e) C 41 H 80 NO 7 P, f) C 4 iH 78 NO 7 P, g) C 45 H 82 NO 7 P, and h) C 45 H 78 NO 7 P, respectively; and/or by the structure
• a method for assessing dementia or the risk of dementia in a patient comprising the steps of: a) obtaining a serum sample from said patient; b) analyzing said sample to obtain quantifiying data for one or more than one metabolite marker; c) comparing the quantifying data for said one or more than one metabolite marker to corresponding data obtained from one or more than one reference sample; and d) using said comparison to assess dementia or the risk of dementia.
• the the step of analyzing may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), or alternatively may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography and linear ion trap mass spectrometry when the method is a highthroughput method.
• LC-MS liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
• the one or more than one reference sample may be a first reference sample obtained from a non-demented control individual.
• the one or more than one reference sample may also further comprise a second reference sample obtained from a patient with cognitive impairment as measured by ADAS-cog, and/or a third reference sample obtained from a patient with with cognitive impairment as measured by MMSE.
• the one or more than one metabolite marker in the method described above may be selected from the metabolites listed in Tables 10-12, or a combination thereof.
• the one or more than one metabolite markers is selected from the group consisting of metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to 541.3432, 569.3687, 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5197, 751.5555, 803.568, 886.5582, 565.3394, 569.369, 801.555, 857.6186, and any combination thereof.
• a decrease in the patient sample in metabolite markers 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5197, and 751.555 indicates AD pathology; a decrease in the patient sample in metabolite markers 541.3432, 569.3687, 803.568, and 886.5582 indicates cognitive impairment on ADAS-cog; and a decrease in the patient sample in metabolite markers 565.3394, 569.369, 801.555, and 857.6186 indicates cognitive impairment on MMSE.
• a method for differentially diagnosing dementia or the risk of dementia in a patient comprising the steps of: a) obtaining a sample from said patient; b) analyzing said sample to obtain quantifiying data for one or more than one metabolite marker; c) obtaining a ratio for each of the one or more than one metabolite marker to an internal control metabolite; d) comparing each ratio of said one or more than one metabolite marker to the internal control metabolite to corresponding data obtained from one or more than one reference sample; and e) using said comparison to differentially diagnose dementia or the risk of dementia.
• the the step of analyzing may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), or alternatively may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography and linear ion trap mass spectrometry when the method is a highthroughput method.
• the one or more than one reference sample may be a first reference sample obtained from a non-demented control individual.
• the one or more than one reference sample may further comprise a second reference sample obtained from a patient with clinically diagnosed AD-dementia; a third reference sample obtained from a patient with clinically diagnosed non-AD dementia; and/or a fourth reference sample obtained from a patient suffering from significant cognitive impairment.
• the sample and the reference sample are serum samples
• the one or more than one metabolite marker is selected from metabolites M05 to M24 with accurate masses of, or substantially equivalent to those listed in Table 18.
• the one or more than one metabolite marker comprising metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, a) 701.53591, b) 699.52026, c) 723.52026, d) 747.52026, e) 729.56721, f) 727.55156, g) 779.58286, and h) 775.55156
• the internal control metabolite comprising the metabolite with accurate mass measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 719.54648.
• the metabolites described above may be further characterized by a MS/MS spectrum as shown in a) figure 21 , b) figure 22, c) figure 23, d) figure 24, e) figure 25, f) figure 26, g) figure 27, and h) figure 28, respectively.
• a method for evaluating the efficacy of a therapy for treating dementia in a patient comprising: a) obtaining a sample from said patient; b) analyzing said sample to obtain quantifying data for one or more than one metabolite marker; c) comparing said quantifying data to corresponding data obtained from one or more than one reference sample; and d) using said comparison to determine whether the therapy is improving the demented state of the patient.
• the the step of analyzing may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), or alternatively may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography and linear ion trap mass spectrometry when the method is a highthroughput method.
• LC-MS liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
• the one or more than one reference sample may be a plurality of samples obtained from from a non-demented control individuals; a plurality of samples obtained from from a clinically diagnosed AD patient; one or more than one pre-therapy baseline sample obtained from the patient; or any combination thereof.
• the sample and the reference sample are serum samples
• the one or more than one metabolite marker is selected from the metabolites listed in Tables 1 to 7, or a combination thereof.
• These metabolite marker markers needed for optimal diagnosis may be selected from the group consisting of phosphatidylcholine-related compounds, ethanolamine plasmalogens, endogenous fatty acids, essential fatty acids, lipid oxidation byproducts, metabolite derivatives of said metabolite classes, and any metabolite that may contribute in any way to the anabolic/catabolic metabolism of said metabolite classes.
• the sample and the reference sample are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples
• the one or more than one metabolite marker is selected from the metabolites listed in Table 13, or a combination thereof.
• CSF cerebrospinal fluid
• the sample and the reference sample are serum samples
• the one or more than one metabolite marker may be selected from metabolites M05 to M24 with accurate masses of, or substantially equivalent to those listed in Table 18.
• the metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 701.53591, 699.52026, 723.52026, 747.52026, 729.56721, 727.55156, 779.58286, and 775.55156 may be of particular interest.
• the present invention also provides a method for evaluating the efficacy of a therapy for treating dementia in a patient, comprising: a) obtaining a sample from said patient; b) analyzing said sample to obtain quantifying data for one or more than one metabolite marker; c) obtaining a ratio for each of the one or more than one metabolite marker to an internal control metabolite; d) comparing each ratio of said one or more than one metabolite marker to the internal control metabolite to corresponding data obtained from one or more than one reference sample; and e) using said comparison to determine whether the therapy is improving the demented state of the patient.
• the the step of analyzing may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), or alternatively may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography and linear ion trap mass spectrometry when the method is a highthroughput method.
• LC-MS liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
• the one or more than one reference sample may be a plurality of samples obtained from from a non-demented control individuals; a plurality of samples obtained from from a clinically diagnosed AD patient; one or more than one pre-therapy baseline sample obtained from the patient; or any combination thereof.
• the sample and said reference sample are serum samples
• the one or more than one metabolite marker may be selected from metabolites M05 to M24 with accurate masses of, or substantially equivalent to those listed in Table 18.
• the metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 701.53591, 699.52026, 723.52026, 747.52026, 729.56721, 727.55156, 779.58286, and 775.55156 and the internal control metabolite with accurate mass measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 719.54648.
• HTS assays can be used for the following, wherein the specific "health-state” in this application refers to, but is not limited to dementia:
• FIGURE 1 shows a mean signal-to-noise +/-SEM of the AD serum 8 biomarker panel for each different clinical group (AD with significant cognitive impairment, Non- AD dementia, and AD with no significant cognitive impairment) relative to non- demented controls.
• FIGURE 2 shows a mean signal-to-noise +/-SEM of the AD serum 8 biomarker panel for two clinical groups with a significant cognitive impairment (AD and Non-AD dementia).
• FIGURE 3 shows a mean signal-to-noise +/-SEM of the AD CSF 12 biomarker panel for two clinical groups with a significant cognitive impairment (AD and Non-AD dementia).
• FIGURE 4 shows Q-Star extracted ion chromatograms (EIC) for the metabolites 541.3432 (A), 569.3687 (B), 699.5198 (C), 723.5195 (D), 751.5555 (E), and 803.568 (F). Top panel, 8 samples from non-demented subjects, bottom panel, 8 samples from clinically-diagnosed AD subjects.
• EIC Q-Star extracted ion chromatograms
• FIGURE 5 shows averaged AD biomarker intensities of the 8 AD and 8 non- demented controls samples from FTMS and Q-Star Analysis.
• FIGURE 6 shows MS/MS spectra for metabolite 541.3432 with CE voltage -50V.
• FIGURE 7 shows MS/MS spectra for metabolite 569.3687 with CE voltage -50V.
• FIGURE 8 shows MS/MS spectra for metabolite 699.5198 with CE voltage -50V.
• FIGURE 9 shows MS/MS spectra for metabolite 723.5195 with CE voltage -50V.
• FIGURE 10 shows MS/MS spectra for metabolite 751.5555 with CE voltage - 50V.
• FIGURE 11 shows MS/MS spectra for metabolite 803.568 with CE voltage -50V.
• FIGURE 12 shows structural determination of ADAS-cog serum biomarker 541.3432.
• FIGURE 13 shows structural determination of ADAS-cog serum biomarker 569.3687.
• FIGURE 14 shows structural determination of ADAS-cog serum biomarker 803.568.
• FIGURE 15 shows putative structures of additional serum biomarkers.
• FIGURE 16 shows the fragments obtained for the MS/MS analysis of the 751.5555 metabolite, along with its proposed structure.
• FIGURE 17 shows the fragments obtained for the MS/MS analysis of the 699.5198 metabolite, along with its proposed structure.
• FIGURE 18 shows the fragments obtained for the MS/MS analysis of the 723.5195 metabolite, along with its proposed structure.
• FIGURE 19 shows the LC-MS and MS/MS analysis of the 751.5555 metabolite (18:0/20:4 EtnPls).
• Panel Al is an extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) of parent ion 750 (M-H-) of a pure standard; panel A2 is MS/MS spectra of parent ion M/Z 750 @ retention time 4.8-5.0 minutes.
• Panel Bl is the EIC of parent ion 750 from a cognitively normal subject; panel B2 is the MS/MS spectra of parent ion M/Z 750 @ 4.8-5.0 min.
• Panel Cl is the EIC of parent ion 750 from an AD subject; and panel C2 is the MS/MS spectra of parent ion M/Z 750 @ 4.8-5.0 min.
• FIGURE 20 shows the general structure of ethanolamine phospholipids, as well as the naming convention used herein.
• FIGURE 21 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of EtnPls 16:0/18:1 (M15) in human serum.
• FIGURE 22 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of EtnPls 16:0/18:2 (M16) in human serum.
• FIGURE 23 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of EtnPls 16:0/20:4 (M17) in human serum.
• FIGURE 24 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of EtnPls 16:0/22:6 (M 19) in human serum.
• FIGURE 25 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of EtnPls 18:0/18:1 (M20) in human serum.
• FIGURE 26 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of EtnPls 18:0/18:2 (M21) in human serum.
• FIGURE 27 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of EtnPls 18:0/20:4 (M23) in human serum.
• FIGURE 28 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of EtnPls 18:0/22:6 (M24) in human serum.
• FIGURE 29 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of EtnPls 18:1/18:2 and Plasmanyl 16:0/20:4 (M07) in human serum.
• FIGURE 30 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of EtnPls 20:0/20:4 and EtnPls 18:0/22:4 (M23) in human serum.
• FIGURE 31 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panel) of Plasmanyl 18:0/20:4 (Ml 2) and Plasmanyl 16:0/22:4 (M08) in human serum.
• FIGURE 32 is an extracted ion chromatogram (upper panel) and MS/MS spectrum (lower panels) of EtnPls 18:1/20:4, EtnPls 16:0/22:5, Plasmanyl 16:0/22:6 ( M09) in human serum.
• FIGURE 33 shows a Q-Trap flow injection analysis standard curve of EtnPls 16:0/22:6 (M19) in healthy human serum.
• FIGURE 34 shows ehe effect of dementia severity and SDAT pathology on serum EtnPl levels (male and female subjects combined).
• A Mono and di -unsaturated EtnPls and saturated PtdEt internal control.
• B Polyunsaturated EtnPls and free DHA (22:6).
• EtnPls abbreviations: (fatty acid carbons : double bonds, not including the vinyl ether double bond) and position on glycerol backbone (sn-l/sn-2).
• FIGURE 35 shows serum DHA-EtnPls (Log(2) EtnPls 16:0/22:6 (M19) to
• PtdEt 16:0/18:0 (MOl) ratio distributions in subjects with different levels of dementia severity (male and female subjects combined).
• FIGURE 36 is a comparison of theoretical distributions of AD pathology
• FIGURE 37 is a linear regression analysis of disease severity (ADAS-cog) and serum 22:6-containing EtnPls (EtnPls 16:0/22:6 (M19) to PtdEt 16:0/18:0 (MOl) ratio) levels in 256 AD subjects.
• FIGURE 38 shows serum 22:6-containing EtnPls (EtnPls 16:0/22:6 (M19) to PtdEt 16:0/18:0 (MOl) ratio) levels in AD, Cognitive Normal, and general population subjects.
• EtnPls 16:0/22:6 (M19) to PtdEt 16:0/18:0 (MOl) ratio serum 22:6-containing EtnPls (EtnPls 16:0/22:6 (M19) to PtdEt 16:0/18:0 (MOl) ratio) levels in AD, Cognitive Normal, and general population subjects.
• B Log(2) distributions.
• FIGURE 39 shows the distribution of serum white and gray matter EtnPl scores in males and females.
• the present invention relates to small molecules or metabolites that are found to have significantly different abundances between clinically diagnosed dementia or other neurological disorders, and normal patients.
• the present invention also relates to methods for diagnosing dementia and other neurological disorders.
• the present invention provides novel methods for discovering, validating, and implementing a metabolite markers for one or more diseases or particular health- states.
• a method for identifying specific biomarkers for differentially diagnosing AD dementia, non-AD dementia, cognitive impairment, or a combination thereof comprising the steps of: introducing one or more than one sample from one or more than one patient with clinically diagnosed AD dementia, clinically diagnosed non-AD dementia, or significant cognitive impairment, said sample containing a plurality of metabolites into a high resolution mass spectrometer (for example, and without wishing to be limiting, a Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometer (FTMS)); obtaining, identifying and quantifying data for the metabolites; creating a database of said identifying and quantifying data; comparing the identifying and quantifying data from the sample with corresponding data from a sample from a non-demented normal patient; identifying one or more than one metabolites that differ.
• FTMS Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Reson
• the metabolite markers identified using the method of the present invention may include the metabolites listed in Tables 1 -7, 10-13, and 18.
• the method may further comprise selecting the minimal number of metabolite markers needed for optimal diagnosis.
• a group of patients representative of the health state i.e. a particular disease
• a group of "normal" counterparts are required.
• Biological samples taken from the patients in the particular health-state category can then be compared to the same samples taken from the normal population as well as to patients in similar health-state category in the hopes of identifying biochemical differences between Ihe two groups, by analyzing the biochemicals present in the samples using FTMS and/or LC-MS.
• the method for the discovery of metabolite markers as described above may be done using non-targeted metabolomic strategies or methods. Multiple non- targeted metabolomics strategies have been described in the scientific literature including NMR [18], GC-MS [19-21], LC-MS, and FTMS strategies [18, 22-24].
• the metabolic profiling strategy employed for the discovery of differentially expressed metabolites in the present invention was the non-targeted FTMS strategy by Phenomenome Discoveries [21,24-27; see also US Published Application No. 2004-0029120 Al, Canadian Application No. 2,298,181, and WO 0157518].
• Non-targeted analysis involves the measurement of as many molecules in a sample as possible, without any prior knowledge or selection of components prior to the analysis.
• the present invention uses a non-targeted method to identify metabolite components in serum samples that differ between clinically diagnosed AD individuals and non AD individuals.
• the same technology was used to identify metabolite components that differ between clinically diagnosed AD individuals with dementia from clinically diagnosed non-AD individuals with dementia in CSF samples.
• the present invention also provides a method for differentially diagnosing dementia or the risk of dementia in a patient, the method comprising the steps of: a) obtaining a sample from said patient; b) analyzing said sample to obtain quantifiying data for one or more than one metabolite marker; c) comparing the quantifying data for said one or more than one metabolite marker to corresponding data obtained from one or more than one reference sample; and d) using said comparison to differentially diagnose dementia or the risk of dementia.
• the step of analyzing the sample may comprise analyzing the sample using a mass spectrometer (MS).
• MS mass spectrometer
• mass spectrometer could be of the FTMS, orbitrap, time of flight (TOF) or quadrupole types.
• the mass spectrometer could be equipped with an additional pre-detector mass filter.
• Q-FTMS quadrupole-FTMS
• Q-TOF quadrupole -TOF
• TQ or QQQ triple quadrupole
• MSn refers to the situation where the parent ion is fragmented by collision induced dissociation (CID) or other fragmentation procedures to create fragment ions, and then one or more than one of said fragments are detected by the mass spectrometer. Such framents can then be further fragmented to create further fragments.
• the sample could be introduced into the mass spectrometer using a liquid or gas chromatographic system or by direct injection.
• the present invention allows for differential diagnosis a various states of dementia; for example and without wishing to be limiting, the present invention may provide differential diagnosis of AD dementia, non-AD dementia, cognitive impariment, or a combination thereof.
• the diagnosis of or the exclusion of any types of neurological disorders is contemplated by the present invention, using all or a subset of the metabolites disclosed herein.
• the term “dementia” is used herein as a broad term indicating both cognitive imparment as well as pathologies causing cognitive impairment. Dementia may be caused by a number of neurological disorders.
• AD dementia refers to dementia caused by Alzheimer's disease (AD, which may also be referred to herein as “SDAT”); types of “non-AD dementia” include, but are not limited to, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), frontotemporal lobe dementia (FTD), vascular induced dementia (e.g. multi-infarct dementia), anoxic event induced dementia (e.g. cardiac arrest), trauma to the brain induced dementia (e.g. dementia pugilistica [boxer's dementia]), dementia resulting from exposure to an infectious (e.g. Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease) or toxic agent (e.g.
• DLB dementia with Lewy bodies
• FDD frontotemporal lobe dementia
• vascular induced dementia e.g. multi-infarct dementia
• anoxic event induced dementia e.g. cardiac arrest
• trauma to the brain induced dementia e.g. dementia pugilistica [boxer's dementia]
• AD dementia Alcohol-induced dementia
• FTD and DLB non-AD dementias are particularly important aspects of AD dementia, and FTD and DLB non-AD dementias.
• Cognitive impairment can be assessed by any method known in the art.
• ADAS Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale
• This neuropsychological test is used to test the language ability (speech and comprehension), memory, ability to copy geometric figures and orientation to current time and place. Errors on the test are recorded resulting in a reverse score impairment (i.e., the higher the score on ADAS, the greater the cognitive impairment).
• a score of 0-15 is considered normal, 16-47 is considered mild- rnoderate impairment and a score of 48-70 is considered moderate-severe impairment [28].
• Another neuropsychological test Folstein's Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), which measures cognitive impairment, may be used.
• MMSE Folstein's Mini-Mental State Exam
• the MMSE is widely used and is an extensively validated test of orientation, short and long-term memory, praxis, language and comprehension.
• additional neuropsychological assessment that measure aspects of the same cognitive deficit, such as, but not exclusive to, the Blessed Roth Dementia Rating Scale, the 7-Minute Screen, Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS), Halstead-Reitan Battery, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, California Verbal Learning Test, Buschke Selective Reminding Test, Boston Naming Test, Clinical Evaluation of Language Functioning, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Tests, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, Memory Assessment Scale, Tests of Memory and Learning, Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning, can also be used.
• any imaging technique that has the potential to show a cognitive impairment or structural change such as, but not exclusive to, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), computerized tomography (CT), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG), single positron emission tomography (SPECT), event related potentials, magnetoencephalography, multi-modal imaging, would be measuring the structural/regional brain areas that are responsible for that cognitive deficit and AD pathology, and therefore, would be related to the metabolites disclosed in this invention.
• MRI structural magnetic resonance imaging
• PET positron emission tomography
• CT computerized tomography
• fMRI functional magnetic resonance imaging
• EEG electroencephalography
• SPECT single positron emission tomography
• event related potentials magnetoencephalography
• multi-modal imaging would be measuring the structural/regional brain areas that are responsible for that cognitive deficit and AD pathology, and therefore, would be related to the metabolites disclosed in this invention.
• any type of biological sample that originates from anywhere within the body, for example but not limited to, blood (serum/plasma), CSF, urine, stool, breath, saliva, or biopsy of any solid tissue including tumor, adjacent normal, smooth and skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, liver, skin, hair, brain, kidney, pancreas, lung, colon, stomach, or other may be used.
• samples that are serum or CSF. While the term "serum” is used herein, those skilled in the art will recognize that plasma or whole blood or a sub-fraction of whole blood may also be used.
• CSF may be obtained by a lumbar puncture requiring a local anesthetic.
• a blood sample when drawn from a patient there are several ways in which the sample can be processed.
• the range of processing can be as little as none (i.e. frozen whole blood) or as complex as the isolation of a particular cell type.
• the most common and routine procedures involve the preparation of either serum or plasma from whole blood. All blood sample processing methods, including spotting of blood samples onto solid-phase supports, such as filter paper or other immobile materials, are also contemplated by the present invention.
• CSF samples may be collected using a lumbar puncture procedure; a local anesthetic is applied to the lower back. A needle is then inserted into the numbed skin between the L4 and L5 vertebrae until it pierces the subdural space. The CSF may be collected into sterile tubes.
• the processed blood, serum or CSF sample described above may then be further processed to make it compatible with ihe methodical analysis technique to be employed in the detection and measurement of Ihe metabolites contained within the processed serum or CSF sample.
• the types of processing can range from as little as no further processing to as complex as differential extraction and chemical derivatization.
• Extraction methods could include sonication, soxhlet extraction, microwave assisted extraction (MAE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) and/or surfactant assisted extraction (PHWE) in common solvents such as methanol, ethanol, mixtures of alcohols and water, or organic solvents such as ethyl acetate or hexane.
• a method of particular interest for extracting metabolites for FTMS non-targeted analysis is to perform a liquid/liquid extraction whereby non-polar metabolites dissolve in an organic solvent and polar metabolites dissolve in an aqueous solvent.
• the extracted samples may be analyzed using any suitable method know in the art.
• extracts of biological samples are amenable to analysis on essentially any mass spectrometry platform, either by direct injection or following chromatographic separation.
• Typical mass spectrometers are comprised of a source which ionizes molecules within the sample, and a detector for detecting the ionized molecules or fragments of molecules.
• Non- limiting examples of common sources include electron impact, electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), atmospheric pressure photo ionization (APPI), matrix assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), surface enhanced laser desorption ionization (SELDI), and derivations thereof.
• Common mass separation and detection systems can include quadrupole, quadrupole ion trap, linear ion trap, time- of-flight (TOF), magnetic sector, ion cyclotron (FTMS), Orbitrap, and derivations and combinations thereof.
• TOF time- of-flight
• FTMS time- of-flight
• Orbitrap ion cyclotron
• the advantage of FTMS over other MS-based platforms is its high resolving capability that allows for the separation of metabolites differing by only hundredths of a Dalton, many which would be missed by lower resolution instruments.
• metabolic it is meant specific small molecules, the levels or intensities of which are measured in a sample, and that may be used as markers to diagnose a disease state. These small molecules may also be referred to herein as “metabolite marker”, “metabolite component”, “biomarker”, or “biochemical marker”.
• the metabolites are generally characterized by their accurate mass, as measured by mass spectormetry technique used in the above method.
• the accurate mass may also be referred to as "accurate neutral mass” or “neutral mass”.
• the accurate mass of a metabolite is given herein in Daltons (Da), or a mass substantially equivalent thereto. By “substantially equivalent thereto”, it is meant that a +/- 5 ppm difference in the accurate mass would indicate the same metabolite, as would be recognized by a person of skill in the art.
• the accurate mass is given as the mass of the neutral metabolite.
• the ionization of the metabolites which occurs during analysis of the sample, the metabolite will cause either a loss or gain of one or more hydrogen atoms and a loss or gain of an electron.
• This changes the accurate mass to the "ionized mass” which differs from the accurate mass by the mass of hydrogens and electrons lost or gained during ionization.
• the accurate neutral mass will be refered to herein.
• Data is collected during analysis and quantifying data for one or more than one metabolite is obtained.
• Quantifying data is obtained by measuring the levels or intensities of specific metabolites present in a sample.
• the quantifying data is compared to correponding data from one or more than one reference sample.
• the "reference sample” is any suitable reference sample for the particular disease state.
• the reference sample may be a sample from a non- demented control individual, i.e., a-.person not suffering from AD dementia, non-AD dementia or cognitive impairment (also refered to herein as a " 'normal' counterpart"); the reference sample may also be a sample obtained from a patient with clinically diagnosed with AD, a patient with clinically diagnosed non-AD dementia, or a patient diagnosed with significant cognitive impairment.
• more than one reference sample may be used for comparison to the quantifying data.
• the one or more than one reference sample may be a first reference sample obtained from a non-demented control individual.
• the one or more than one reference sample may further include a second reference sample obtained from a patient with clinically diagnosed AD-dementia, a third reference sample obtained from a patient with clinically diagnosed non-AD dementia, a fourth reference sample obtained from a patient suffering from significant cognitive impairment, or any combination thereof.
• the present invention also provides novel compounds, identified using the methods of the present invention.
• the novel compounds may be used as metabolite markers in the differential diagnosis of dementia, as described above.
• the compounds may be selected from the metabolites listed in Tables 1 to 7, or a combination thereof. These metabolites were identified in serum samples, and may be phosphatidylcholine-related compounds, ethanolamine plasmalogens, endogenous fatty acids, essential fatty acids, lipid oxidation byproducts, metabolite derivatives of said metabolite classes, and any metabolite that may contribute in any way to the anabolic/catabolic metabolism of said metabolite classes.
• an optimal panel of compounds may be indentified from those metabolites listed in Tables 1 to 7.
• the metabolite markers maybe metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 541.3432, 569.3687, 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5197, 751.5555, 803.568, 886.5582.
• the metabolites of accurate masses 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5197, and 751.555 have presently been identified as ethanolamine plasmalogens, and are specifically decreased in patients with AD dementia.
• the metabolite markers of accurate masses 541.3432, 569.3687, 803.568, and 886.5582 have presently been identified as phosphatidylcholine related metabolites, and are decreased in patients with cognitive impairment on ADAS-cog, and severity of cognitive impairment correlates to the degree of decrease.
• Ethanolamine plasmalogens are a type of ethanolamine phospholipid.
• Ethanolamine phospholipids can be further differentiated based on their sn-1 configurations (either acyl, ether, or vinyl ether).
• the sn-2 position is typically acyl and the sn-3 position contains the phosphoethanolamine moiety. Therefore, the three classes are described as either diacyl (also referred to herein as PtdEt), alkyl-acyl (also referred to herein as plasmanyl) or alkenyl-acyl (also referred to herein as EtnPl or plasmenyl).
• Various basic structures of ethanolamine phospholipids are shown in Figure 20, along with the standard naming convention used herein.
• a decrease in the disclosed ethanolamine plasmalogens may represent the initial or early stages AD, and can be detected non-invasively in living subjects by measuring serum levels of specific ethanolamine plasmalogens. Similarly, cognitive impairment can be quantitated non-invasively by measuring the serum levels of specific phosphatidylcholine metabolites.
• the compounds may be selected from the metabolites listed in Table 13, or a combination thereof. These metabolites were identified in CSF samples. Of particular interest are the metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 207.0822, 275.8712, 371.7311, 373.728, 432.1532, 485.5603, 487.6482, 562.46, 622.2539, 640.2637, 730.6493, 742.2972.
• the metabolite markers 207.0822, 432.1532, 562.46, 622.2539, 640.2637, 730.6493, and 742.2972 are increased in patients with AD dementia; and metabolite markers 275.8712, 371.7311, 373.728, 485.5603, and 487.6482 are decreased in patients with AD dementia.
• a method for assessing dementia or the risk of dementia in a patient comprises the steps of: a) obtaining a serum sample from said patient; b) analyzing said sample to obtain quantiflying data for one or more than one metabolite marker; c) comparing the quantifying data for said one or more than one metabolite marker to corresponding data obtained from one or more than one reference sample; and d) using said comparison to assess dementia or the risk of dementia.
• the step of analyzing the sample (steb b)) may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS).
• the step of analyzing the sample (step b)) may comprise analyzing the sample by linear ion trap mass spectrometry followed by liquid chromatograph, when the method is a highthroughput method.
• the one or more than one reference sample may include a first reference sample obtained from a non-demented control individual, a second reference sample obtained from a patient with cognitive impairment as measured by ADAS-cog, a third reference sample obtained from a patient with with cognitive impairment as measured by MMSE, or a combination of one or more of these.
• the one or more than one metabolite marker used to asses dementia or the risk of dementia may be selected from the metabolites listed in Tables 10- 12, or a combination thereof.
• metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to 541.3432, 569.3687, 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5197, 751.5555, 803.568, 886.5582, 565.3394, 569.369, 801.555, 857.6186.
• a decrease in the patient sample in metabolite markers 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5197, and 751.555 indicates AD pathology; a decrease in the patient sample in metabolite markers 541.3432, 569.3687, 803.568, and 886.5582 indicates cognitive impairment on ADAS-cog; and 565.3394, 569.369, 801.555, and 857.6186 indicates cognitive impairment on MMSE.
• a method for differentially diagnosing dementia or the risk of dementia in a patient comprising the steps of: a) obtaining a sample from said patient; b) analyzing said sample to obtain quantifiying data for one or more than one metabolite marker; c) obtaining a ratio for each of the one or more than one metabolite marker to an internal control metabolite; d) comparing each ratio of said one or more than one metabolite marker to the internal control metabolite to corresponding data obtained from one or more than one reference sample; and e) using said comparison to differentially diagnose dementia or the risk of dementia.
• the step of analyzing the sample may comprise analyzing the sample using a mass spectrometer (MS).
• MS mass spectrometer
• mass spectrometer could be of the FTMS, orbitrap, time of flight (TOF) or quadrupole types.
• the mass spectrometer could be equipped with an additional pre-detector mass filter.
• Q-FTMS quadrupole-FTMS
• Q-TOF quadrupole - TOF
• TQ or QQQ triple quadrupole
• MSn refers to the situation where the parent ion is fragmented by collision induced dissociation (CID) or other fragmentation procedures to create fragment ions, and then one or more than one of said fragments are detected by the mass spectrometer. Such framents can then be further fragmented to create further fragments.
• the sample could be introduced into the mass spectrometer using a liquid or gas chromatographic system or by direct injection.
• the one or more than one reference sample may be a first reference sample obtained from a non-demented control individual.
• the one or more than one reference sample may further include a second reference sample obtained from a patient with clinically diagnosed AD-dementia, a third reference sample obtained from a patient with clinically diagnosed non-AD dementia, a fourth reference sample obtained from a patient suffering from significant cognitive impairment, or any combination thereof.
• the sample and reference sample may be serum samples.
• the one or more than one metabolite marker may be selected from the metabolites as listed and characterized (accurate mass, name/composition, molecular formula) in Table 18.
• the "internal control metabolite” refers to an endogenous metabolite naturally present in the patient. Any suitable endogenous metabolite that does not vary over the disease states can be used as the internal control metabolite.
• the internal control metabolite may be phosphatidylethanolamine 16:0/18:0 (PtdEt 16:0/18:0, MOl), as shown in Table 18; this internal control metabolite has a molecular formula of C 39 H 78 NO 8 P, and a structure characterized as
• a method for evaluating the efficacy of a therapy for treating dementia in a patient comprising: a) obtaining a sample from said patient; b) analyzing said sample to obtain quantifying data for one or more than one metabolite marker; c) comparing said quantifying data to corresponding data obtained from one or more than one reference sample; and d) using said comparison to determine whether the therapy is improving the demented state of the patient.
• a ratio for each of the one or more than one metabolite marker to an internal control metabolite may be obtained.
• each ratio of said one or more than one metabolite marker to the internal control metabolite to corresponding data obtained from one or more than one reference sample is compared to evaluate the efficacy of the therapy.
• the step of analyzing may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), or alternatively may comprise analyzing the sample by liquid chromatography and linear ion trap mass spectrometry when the method is a highthroughput method.
• LC-MS liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
• the one or more than one reference sample may be any suitable reference sample.
• the reference sample may be a plurality of samples obtained from from non-demented control individuals; a plurality of samples obtained from clinically diagnosed AD patients; one or more than one pre-therapy baseline sample obtained from the patient; or any combination thereof.
• a pre-therapy baseline sample from the patient is particularly useful, as the variation in metabolites will then be specific to the patient.
• the sample and the reference sample may be serum samples.
• the one or more than one metabolite marker could be selected from the metabolites listed in Tables 1 to 7, or a combination thereof, for example, metabolite markers with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 541.3432, 569.3687, 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5197, 751.5555, 803.568, 886.5582.
• the metabolite markers may be selected from metabolites M05 to M24 with accurate masses of, or substantially equivalent to those listed in Table 18, for example, metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 701.53591, 699.52026, 723.52026, 747.52026, 729.56721, 727.55156, 779.58286, and 775.55156.
• Metabolites M05-M24 could also be used when a ratio is obtained between the metabolites and the internal control metabolite; the internal metabolite could be, for example, metabolite MOl, as described in Table 18.
• sample and the reference sample may also be cerebrospinal fluid
• the one or more than one metabolite marker could be selected from the metabolites listed in Table 13, or a combination thereof; for example, metabolites with accurate masses measured in Daltons of, or substantially equivalent to, 207.0822, 275.8712, 371.7311, 373.728, 432.1532, 485.5603, 487.6482, 562.46, 622.2539, 640.2637, 730.6493, 742.2972.
• the identified metabolites can be readily measured systemically. This point is of fundamental importance, since the majority of research pertaining to AD and other neurological disorders has ignored the peripheral systems.
• the ability to measure neurodegenerative processes within a blood sample is of substantial value in the diagnosis of dementia.
• these are a valid biochemical marker of AD pathology since this molecular species' content does not change in Parkinson's disease, a disease which is often accompanied by dementia [29] .
• the specificity of the plasmalogen metabolites to AD indicates that its levels in serum could be readily measured longitudinally throughout the lifetime of an individual to assess the risk or for early detection of the disease prior to the emergence of clinical symptoms.
• the present invention also provides high throughput methods for differential diagnosis of AD dementia and non-AD dementia states.
• the method may involve fragmentation of the parent molecule; in a non-limiting example, this may be accomplished by a Q-TrapTM system.
• Detection of the metabolites may be performed using one of various assay platforms, including colorimetric chemical assays (UV, or other wavelength), antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays (ELISAs), chip- based and polymerase-chain reaction for nucleic acid detection assays, bead-based nucleic-acid detection methods, dipstick chemical assays or other chemical reaction, image analysis such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) scan, computerized tomography (CT) scan, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and various mass spectrometry-based systems.
• MRI magnetic resonance imaging
• PET positron emission tomography
• CT computerized tomography
• NMR nuclear magnetic resonance
• a high-throughput method for determining the levels of the metabolites in a person's blood and comparing the levels to levels in a normal "reference" population can lead to a prediction of whether the person has AD or not. This can be carried out in several ways. One way is to use a prediction algorithm to classify the test sample, as previously described, which would output a percentage probability for having AD. A predictive approach would work independently of the assay method, as long as the intensities of the metabolites could be measured. Another method could simply be based on setting a threshold intensity level from the mass spectrometer, and determining whether a person's profile is above or below the threshold which would indicate their AD status.
• a preferred method is a truly quantitative assay could be performed to determine the molar concentration of the six metabolites in the non-demented normal and AD population.
• An absolute threshold concentration could then be determined for AD-positivity. In a clinical setting, this would mean that if the measured levels of the metabolites, or combinations of the metabolites, were below a certain concentration, there would be an associated probability that the individual is positive for AD. Therefore, the optimal diagnostic test could comprise a method of measuring the intensities of the metabolites in serum, and an algorithm for taking the intensity values and outputting a predicted probability for having AD as well as for being healthy (i.e., AD-negative).
• biomarkers of the present invention based on small molecules or metabolites in a sample, fulfills the criteria identified in 1999 for an ideal screening test [82], as development of assays capable of detecting specific metabolites is relatively simple and cost effective per assay.
• the test is minimally invasive and is indicative of cognitive impairment and of AD pathology.
• Translation of Ihe method into a clinical assay compatible with current clinical chemistry laboratory hardware is commercially acceptable and effective.
• the method of the present invention does not require highly trained personnel to perform and interpret the test.
• samples were obtained from representative populations of non-demented healthy individuals and of clinically diagnosed AD and non-AD dementia patients.
• the biochemical markers of AD described in the invention were derived from the analysis of 75 serum samples from patients clinically diagnosed with probable AD (43 patients with significant cognitive impairment, 32 with no cognitive impairment), serum samples from 30 patients with clinically diagnosed non-AD dementia, and 31 serum samples from non-demented controls. Samples in the three groups were from a diverse population of individuals, ranging in age, ethnicity, weight, occupation, and displaying varying non-dementia- related health-states. All samples were single time-point collections. Cognitive impairment of the patients was also assessed using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS)-cognitive subset.
• ADAS Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale
• samples were obtained from a group of patients that represented clinically diagnosed AD with dementia and non-AD patients with dementia.
• the biochemical markers of AD described in this invention were derived from the analysis of 6 CSF samples from clinically diagnosed AD patients with dementia and 5 CSF samples from clinically diagnosed non-AD patients with dementia.
• Samples in both groups were from a diverse population of individuals, ranging in age, ethnicity, weight, occupation, and displaying varying non-dementia- related health-states. All samples were single time-point collections. The metabolites contained within the 136 serum samples and 11 CSF samples used in this application were separated into polar and non-polar extracts through soni cation and vigorous mixing (vortex mixing).
• sample extracts were directly injected without diluting. All analyses were performed on a Bruker Daltonics APEX III Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer equipped with a 7.0 T actively shielded superconducting magnet (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA). Samples were directly injected using electrospray ionization (ESI) and/or APCI at a flow rate of 1200 ⁇ L per hour. Ion transfer/detection parameters were optimized using a standard mix of serine, tetra-alanine, reserpine, Hewlett-Packard tuning mix and the adrenocorticotrophic hormone fragment 4-10.
• ESI electrospray ionization
• Mass Spectrometry Data Processing Using a linear least-squares regression line, mass axis values were calibrated such that each internal standard mass peak had a mass error of ⁇ 1 p.p.m. compared with its theoretical mass. Using XMASS software from Bruker Daltonics Inc., data file sizes of 1 megaword were acquired and zero-filled to 2 megawords. A sinm data transformation was performed prior to Fourier transform and magnitude calculations. The mass spectra from each analysis were integrated, creating a peak list that contained the accurate mass and absolute intensity of each peak.
• Tables 1 -7 show biochemical markers whose concentrations or amounts in serum are significantly different (p ⁇ 0.05) between the tested populations and therefore have potential diagnostic utility for identifying each of the aforesaid populations.
• the features are described by their accurate mass and analysis mode, which together are sufficient to provide the putative molecular formulas and chemical characteristics (such as polarity and putative functional groups) for each metabolite.
• Biomarker 541.3432 - no difference b. Biomarker 569.3687 - no difference c. Biomarker 699.5198 - decreased d. Biomarker 723.5195 - decreased e. Biomarker 723.5197 - decreased f. Biomarker 751.5555 - decreased g. Biomarker 803.568 - no difference h. Biomarker 886.5582 - no difference
• the results of this invention show a clear distinction between the serum of individuals with clinically diagnosed AD WITH a significant cognitive impairment, individuals with clinically diagnosed AD WITHOUT a significant cognitive impairment (this could be early stage AD), individuals with non-AD dementia WITH a significant cognitive impairment, and non-demented controls. These findings are capable of identifying and distinguishing the different types of dementia from one another and from the early stages of cognitive impairment as described in this application. From the above results, it can be further concluded that the metabolite markers with masses 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5997, 751.5555 are specific for AD pathology; while markers with masses of 541.3432, 569.3687, 803.568, 886.5582 are specific for cognitive impaired based on ADAS-cog testing.
• MMSE which measures cognitive impairment
• a total of three 4-biomarker panels can be applied to the 136 patients to classify them into one of 8 categories which will simultaneously indicate the presence of AD pathology (biomarkers 699.5198, 723.5195, 723.5997, 751.5555), cognitive impaired on ADAS-cog (541.3432, 569.3687, 803.568, 886.5582) and cognitive impaired on MMSE (565.3394, 569.369, 801.555, 857.6186).
• each patient can be labeled using a 3 digit code from "000” indicating no cognitive impairment and no AD pathology to " 111 " indicating both MMSE and ADAS- cog impairment and AD pathology.
• Table 9 indicates the separation of the patient samples into the 8 categories.
• Table 11 lists the 124 metabolites that met the p-value criteria for high ADAS score vs. low ADAS score, and Table 12 contains the list of 344 metabolites that met the p-value criteria for impaired score on MMSE and normal cognition on MMSE.
• the sample set (136 individuals) used for this discovery was not trivial, and was comprised of individuals of various ethnic and geographical backgrounds, and of varying age and health status. Therefore, there is sound reason to expect that the findings are representative of the general dementia population.
• a student' s T-test was used to select for metabolites which differ between the clinically diagnosed AD patients and clinically diagnosed non-AD patients in CSF samples (p ⁇ 0.05). 42 metabolites met this criterion (shown in Table 13). These metabolites differed statistically between the two populations and therefore have potential diagnostic utility. The metabolites are described by their accurate mass and analysis mode, which together are sufficient to provide the putative molecular formulas and chemical characteristics (such as polarity and putative functional groups) of each metabolite.
• the 12 biomarker panel was tested using 5 CSF samples from undiagnosed patients. The only information available on the samples was the subject's age, gender, and whether an individual had a cognitive deficit. If the 12 biomarker panel was correct, the subject could be diagnosed as having AD dementia, non-AD dementia, or normal. From the 5 CSF samples provided by undiagnosed patients, 1 was diagnosed with non-AD dementia, 2 with AD dementia, and 2 as normal. The two normal subjects did not have a cognitive impairment as indicated by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. Therefore, using a 12 metabolite feature set it was possible to both diagnose AD and non-AD dementia.
• MMSE Mini Mental State Examination
• Aqueous fractions from five clinically-diagnosed AD and five non- demented control sample extracts were evaporated under nitrogen gas and reconstituted in 100 uL of methanokwater.formic acid (5:94.9:0.1).
• Five ⁇ L of the reconstituted sample was subjected to HPLC (Agilent Technologies) (HP 1100 with Metasil AQ 3u, 100 x 2 mm column) for full scan and 10 ⁇ L for MS/MS at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min.
• Eluate from the HPLC was analyzed using an ABI Q-Star XL mass spectrometer fitted with a Turboion spray ion (ESI) source in negative mode.
• the scan type in full scan mode was time-of- flight (TOF) with an accumulation time of 1.0000 seconds, mass range between 50 and 1500 Da, and duration time of 70 min.
• Source parameters were as follows: Ion source gas 1 (GSl) 55; Ion source gas 2 (GS2) 90; Curtain gas (CUR) 40; Nebulizer Current (NC) 0; Temperature 450 0 C; Declustering Potential (DP) -55; Focusing Potential (FP) -265; Declustering Potential 2 (DP2) -15.
• FIG. 4 The extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) for the six biomarkers are shown in Figure 4
• the top panel shows the eight non-demented control EICs, and the bottom panel of each shows the eight clinically-diagnosed AD EICs.
• the sensitivity of the Q- star is superior to the FTMS, resulting in a greater magnitude in intensity difference between the non-demented control subjects and clinically diagnosed AD population for the selected biomarkers.
• Figure 5 shows the average raw intensity of the six biomarkers of the eight non-demented control and eight clinically-diagnosed AD samples as detected on the FTMS and Q-Star.
• Characteristics that can be used for structure elucidation of metabolites include accurate mass and molecular formula determination, polarity, acid/base properties, NMR spectra, and MS/MS or MSn spectra. These data, and in particular theMS/MS spectrum, can be used as fingerprints of a particular metabolite and are unique identifiers of a particular metabolite regardless of whether the complete structure has been determined.
• metabolite markers were extracted into an organic ethyl acetate fraction (plasmalogen metabolites), indicating that these metabolites are non-polar under acidic condition; one was extracted into an organic ethyl acetate fraction dried down and resuspended in butanol, indicating that this metabolite (plasmalogen metabolite) is non-polar under acidic conditions.
• phosphatidyl choline related metabolites did not extract into the organic fraction, but rather remained in the aqueous methanol/ammonium hydroxide fraction, indicating that these metabolites are very polar.
• the metabolite markers specific to the ADAS-cog scores have been assigned structures having a phosphatidylcholine-related backbone. From the CID MS/MS, the molecular formulae of 3 metabolites specific to the ADAS-cog scores (accurate neutral masses of 541.3432, 569.3687, 803.568) were determined to be C 25 H 5 iNO 9 P, C 27 H 55 NO 9 P, and C 43 H 81 NO 10 P, respectively. Their structures are shown in Figures 12-14. The putative structures of additional markers are shown in Figure 15.
• the HRAPCI-MS m/z measured was 698.5125 ([M - H]-, calcd. 698.5130 for C 39 H 73 NO 7 P).
• the relative intensity of the MS/MS m/z were measured as follows: 698 ([M-H] " , 8%), 536 (4%), 279 (100%), 255 (15%), 119 (10%).
• the MS/MS fragments are shown in Figure 17.
• the structure of the 699.5198 metabolite was determined to be l-O-r-(Z)-hexadecenyl-2-linoleyl-sn- glycero-3 -phosphoethanolamine.
• the HRAPCI-MS m/z measured was 722.5124 ([M-H]-, calcd. 722.5130 for C 41 H 73 NO 7 P).
• the relative intensity of the MS/MS m/z were measured as follows: 722 ([M - H] " , 12%), 482 (1 %), 436 (15%), 418 (6%), 303 (100%), 279 (6%), 259 (15%), 255 (10%), 205 (4%), 140 (5%).
• the MS/MS fragments are shown in Figure 18.
• NMR spectra The MS/MS fragmentation provides highly specific descriptive information about a metabolite.
• nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) can assist in solving and confirming the structures of the metabolites.
• NMR analysis techniques are typically less sensitive than mass spectrometry techniques, multiple injections are performed on the HPLC and the retention time window corresponding to the metabolites of interest collected and combined. The combined extract is then evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in the appropriate solvent for NMR analysis.
• NMR spectral data are recorded on Bruker Avance 600 MHz spectrometer with cryogenic probe after the chromatographic separation and purification of the metabolites of interest.
• I H NMR, 13C NMR, noe-difference spec, as well as 2-D NMR techniques like heteronuclear multiple quantum correlation (HMQC), and heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) are used for structure elucidation work on the biomarkers.
• MS/MS fragments for the 12 CSF metabolite markers are determined in the same manner as detailed above.
• Agilent 1100 HPLC system was used in combination with an Applied Biosystems QSTAR XL mass spectrometer.
• An Agilent Zorbax RX-SIL (4.6 x 150mm, 5 ⁇ m) column was used for normal phase chromatography.
• the column was heated to 35°C.
• the sample injection volume was 1 O ⁇ L.
• Nebulizer operating in negative mode. Values of major instrument parameters were DP, -60; FP, -265; DP2, -15; GSl, 75; GS2, 15; CUR, 30; NC, -3; TEM, 400 0 C; Scan range, 50-1500amu; Accumulation time, 1 sec.
• alkyl-acyl also referred to herein as plasmanyl
• alkenyl-acyl also referred to herein as EtnPl or plasmenyl
• Table 18 shows a list of plasmanyl and plasmenyl ethanolamine phospholipids (M5-M24) that are presently identified and are of particular interest.
• Figures 21-32 show structural information pertaining to selected metabolites detected in serum. These figures illustrate the retention time, MS/MS fragmentation patterns, and putative structures for selected molecules. Due to the conserved MS/MS fragmentation mechanism between these molecules, the theoretical MS/MS transition can be determined for any ethanolamine phospholipid by using a combination of the parent ion mass and the fragment mass of the moiety at either the sn-1 or sn-2 position.
• High throughput screening was performed with a linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Q-trap 4000, Applied Biosystem) coupled with Agilent 1100 LC system.
• Sample was prepared by adding 15uL of internal standard(5 ⁇ g/mLof(24-13C)- Cholic Acid in methanol) to 12OuL ethyl acetate fraction of each sample.100 ul sample was injected by flow injection analysis (FIA), and monitored under negative APCI mode.
• FIA flow injection analysis
• the method was based on multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) scan mode of one parent/daughter transition for each metabolite and one internal standard. Each transition was scanned for 70 ms for a total cycle time of 2.475 sec.
• MRM multiple reaction monitoring
• the isocratic 10% EtOAc in MeOH elution was performed with a flow rate at 360 ⁇ l/min for lmin.
• the source parameters were set as follows: CUR: 10.0, CAD: 8, NC: -4.0, TEM: 400, GSl : 30, GS2: 50, interface heater on.
• the compound parameters were set as follows: DP: -120.0, EP: - 10, NC: -4.0, CE: -40, CXP: -15.
• Figure 33 illustrates a representative standard curve for this method for EtnPls 16:0/22:6 generated by diluting a normal serum sample while maintaining a constant concentration of internal standard (24-13C)-Cholic Acid).
• MMSE > 28 68 cognitively confirmed non-demented subjects
• MMSE 0-26 256 subjects currently diagnosed with SDAT (ADAS-cog 6-70, MMSE 0-26); 20 postmortem confirmed SDAT and 20 post-mortem confirmed controls.
• Brain white matter contains primarily 18:1- and 18:2-containing EtnPls with low levels of 20:4-containing and 22:6-containing EtnPls, whereas gray matter contains significantly higher levels of 20:4-containing and 22:6-containing EtnPls [34].
• increasing dementia appears to affect both white (18:2) and gray (20:4) matter EtnPls equally, whereas in males predominantly gray (22:6) matter EtnPls appear to be affected to a greater extent.
• AD subjects and 20 subjects containing minimal amyloid deposition were also analyzed. Both gray and white matter EtnPls were significantly decreased in post-mortem confirmed AD relative to age matched controls (see Tables 30 and 31).
• Example 7 The Grey and White Matter Score Distribution
• a white and gray matter specific EtnPl scoring system was developed whereby each EtnPl in each subject was normalized to their respective gender-specific cognitively normal mean, Iog2 transformed and mean centered.
• Each subject's white matter score was taken as the lowest such value of plasmenyl 16:0/18:1 (M15), 16:0/18:2 (Ml 6), 18:0/18:1 (M20), and 18:0/18:2 (M21) EtnPls, and their gray matter score as the lowest of plasmenyl 16:0/20:4 (Ml 7), 16:0/22:6 (Ml 9), 18:0/20:4 (M22), and 18:0/22:6 (M24) EtnPls.
• risk prediction can be performed on both male and female subjects (Tables 49-50) where a cut-off value that results in approximately 20- 30% of cognitively normal subjects being classified as either intermediate or high risk is used. Using this cut-off value, a subject's white and gray matter score is evaluated. If the subject tests normal on both scores, the subject is deemed to be at low risk. If the subject tests positive on one of the scores, the subjects is deemed to be at intermediate risk and if the subject tests positive on both scores, the subject is deemed to be at high risk.
• the effect of dementia severity was determined using 324 subjects (176 female, 148 male) aged 56 to 95, comprised of 68 cognitively confirmed non-demented subjects (MMSE > 28) and 256 subjects currently diagnosed with AD (ADAS-cog 6-70, MMSE 0-26).
• Free DHA (M25) was significantly decreased in both moderately and severely demented subjects (p ⁇ 0.05). All eight EtnPls were also significantly decreased in post-mortem confirmed SDAT relative to age matched controls. D16:0/18:0 (MOl) levels, a non-plasmalogen phoshopholipid remained unchanged across the different dementia cohorts.
• Example 9 Population Distributions as a Function of Dementia Severity
• FIG 38B was also examined.
• the populations were assigned as: Pl - subjects with AD pathology and no remaining reserve capacity; P3 - subjects with little or no AD pathology; P2 - subjects that are transitioning from P3 to Pl . These P2 subjects are hypothesized to have AD pathology and some level of reserve remaining.
• AD subjects have a life expectancy of less than 10 years from diagnosis [38, 39] and low 22:6-containing EtnPls are highly associated with AD severity
• the decreased number of Pl subjects observed in the aged 70-95 cohort is most likely due to differences in life expectancy between Pl and P2 or P3.
• the transitory nature of P2 is best illustrated by examining the different ratios between the percentages of subjects present in P3 compared to P2, as observed in the lower three panels of Figure 7B. These three cohorts differ only in dementia status.
• the P3 to P2 ratio changes from 3:1 (68% versus 22%) in the confirmed cognitive normal group to an intermediate ratio of 1 :1 (43% versus 46%) in the normal healthy elderly group of unknown cognitive status, to 0.6:1 (25% versus 40%) in the confirmed demented AD cohort.
• AD patients with a significant cognitive impairment and non-demented controls (p ⁇ 0.05, Iog2 transformed).
• AD patients with a significant cognitive impairment and clinically diagnosed non-AD patients with a significant cognitive impairment p ⁇ 0.05, Iog2 transformed.
• AD patients with a significant cognitive impairment and clinically diagnosed AD patients without a significant cognitive impairment p ⁇ 0.05, Iog2 transformed.
• Table 5 Accurate mass features differing between clinically diagnosed non-AD patients and non-demented controls (p ⁇ 0.05, Iog2 transformed).
• AD patients with a mild cognitive impairment and non-demented controls (p ⁇ 0.05, Iog2 transformed).
• Table 7 Accurate mass features differing between dementia patients with a significant cognitive impairment (ADAS > 16) and dementia patients with a mild cognitive impairment (ADAS ⁇ 15) (p ⁇ 0.05, Iog2 transformed).
• Table 8 Accurate mass features differing between patients with mild cognitive impairment (MMSE 18-23), severe cognitive impairment (MMSE ⁇ 17) and normal cognitive ability (MMSE > 28) as measured on the MMSE.
• Table 9 Grouping of patients into one of 8 groups based on the presence of AD pathology, ADAS score and MMSE score. A score of 1 was given for the presence of AD pathology, high ADAS score (> 16), or low MMSE score ( ⁇ 23); a score of 0 was given in the absence of AD pathology, low ADAS score ( ⁇ 15), or high MMSE score (> 28).
• Table 10 Accurate mass features differing between patients showing the best discrimination between AD and non-AD pathology (p ⁇ 0.05, Iog2 transformed).
• Table 11 Accurate mass features differing between patients showing the best discrimination between high ADAS score and low ADAS score (p ⁇ 0.05, Iog2 transformed).
• Table 12 Accurate mass features differing between patients showing the best discrimination between high MMSE score and low MMSE score (p ⁇ 0.05, Iog2 transformed).
• frag formula The putative computationally derived molecular formula of the fragment neutral mass.
• theoretical The theoretical mass of the formulas shown in the frag formula column.
• Qstar-detected The detected mass from the ABI Q-Star XL. delta: The difference between the theoretical and neutral mass. diff: The mass difference between the Qstar-detected parent ion mass and the Qstar-detected fragmant ion mass.
• frag formula The putative computationally derived molecular formula of the fragment neutral mass.
• theoretical The theoretical mass of the formulas shown in the frag formula column.
• Qstar-detected The detected mass from the ABI Q-Star XL. delta: The difference between the theoretical and neutral mass. diff: The mass difference between the Qstar-detected parent ion mass and the Qstar-detected fragmant ion mass.
• frag formula The putative computationally derived molecular formula of the fragment neutral mass.
• theoretical The theoretical mass of the formulas shown in the frag formula column.
• Qstar-detected The detected mass from the ABI Q-Star XL. delta: The difference between the theoretical and neutral mass. diff: The mass difference between the Qstar-detected parent ion mass and the Qstar-detected fragmant ion mass.
• Age CtI, 30-39, Male Age Ct!, 40-49, Male Age CtI, 50 59, Male Age CtI, 60-69, Male Age CtI, 70+ Male
• Table 36 Average Serum Ethanolamine Phospholipid Ratios to MOl in Males of Different Levels of Dementia Severity
• AD All to CN, Male ADAS 5-19 to CN, Male ADAS 20-39 to CN, Male ADAS 40-70 to CN, Male

Landscapes

• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Molecular Biology (AREA)
• Biochemistry (AREA)
• Organic Chemistry (AREA)
• Biomedical Technology (AREA)
• Immunology (AREA)
• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Pathology (AREA)
• General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
• Hematology (AREA)
• Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
• Food Science & Technology (AREA)
• Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
• Medical Informatics (AREA)
• Public Health (AREA)
• Neurosurgery (AREA)
• Epidemiology (AREA)
• Microbiology (AREA)
• Primary Health Care (AREA)
• Cell Biology (AREA)
• Neurology (AREA)
• Biotechnology (AREA)
• Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
• Biophysics (AREA)
• Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
• Electrochemistry (AREA)
• Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
• Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
• Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
• Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)

Priority Applications (10)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Related Child Applications (1)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=38458611

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (11)

Cited By (16)

Families Citing this family (23)

Citations (2)

Family Cites Families (12)

• 2007
  • 2007-02-28 CA CA2689848A patent/CA2689848A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2007-02-28 EP EP14187832.2A patent/EP2851369A3/en not_active Withdrawn
  • 2007-02-28 WO PCT/CA2007/000313 patent/WO2007098585A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2007-02-28 US US12/280,920 patent/US8304246B2/en active Active
  • 2007-02-28 JP JP2008556622A patent/JP5496513B2/ja active Active
  • 2007-02-28 EP EP10195818A patent/EP2322531A3/en not_active Ceased
  • 2007-02-28 CA CA2640748A patent/CA2640748C/en active Active
  • 2007-02-28 KR KR1020087023687A patent/KR20080104350A/ko not_active Withdrawn
  • 2007-02-28 EP EP07710657A patent/EP1922325B1/en active Active
  • 2007-02-28 AT AT07710657T patent/ATE535535T1/de active
  • 2007-02-28 AU AU2007219666A patent/AU2007219666A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2007-02-28 NZ NZ570413A patent/NZ570413A/en unknown
• 2008
  • 2008-08-08 HK HK15109254.5A patent/HK1208467A1/en unknown
  • 2008-08-13 IL IL193426A patent/IL193426A0/en unknown
• 2012
  • 2012-07-31 JP JP2012169181A patent/JP2012255793A/ja active Pending
  • 2012-09-25 US US13/626,703 patent/US20130110408A1/en not_active Abandoned
• 2014
  • 2014-06-26 JP JP2014131876A patent/JP2014197018A/ja active Pending

Patent Citations (2)

Non-Patent Citations (26)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events