WO2007023556A1 - Tcp handling apparatus - Google Patents
Tcp handling apparatus Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2007023556A1 WO2007023556A1 PCT/JP2005/015479 JP2005015479W WO2007023556A1 WO 2007023556 A1 WO2007023556 A1 WO 2007023556A1 JP 2005015479 W JP2005015479 W JP 2005015479W WO 2007023556 A1 WO2007023556 A1 WO 2007023556A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- tcp
- test
- contact
- tcps
- carrier tape
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
- G01R31/28—Testing of electronic circuits, e.g. by signal tracer
- G01R31/2851—Testing of integrated circuits [IC]
- G01R31/2893—Handling, conveying or loading, e.g. belts, boats, vacuum fingers
Definitions
- the present invention is manufactured using TCP (Tape Carrier Package) and COF (Chip On Film) (hereinafter, TCP, COF, and other TAB (Tape Automated Bonding) mounting technologies, which are one type of IC device. It relates to a TCP handling device that is used to collectively test devices and test "TCP".
- TCP Transmission Carrier Package
- COF Chip On Film
- TAB Tape Automated Bonding
- a test apparatus for TCP is generally composed of a tester body, a test head, and a TCP handling apparatus (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “TCP handler”).
- TCP handler transports a carrier tape on which multiple TCPs are formed on a tape (including the concept of film; the same shall apply hereinafter) and carries the carrier to the probe card probe that is electrically connected to the test head.
- This TCP handler transports a carrier tape on which multiple TCPs are formed on a tape (including the concept of film; the same shall apply hereinafter) and carries the carrier to the probe card probe that is electrically connected to the test head.
- the carrier tape is provided with positioning mark (alignment mark) force si or a plurality of positions for each TCP, and positioning is performed with reference to the alignment mark.
- the TCP position relative to the probe card can be A force that checks the alignment mark as a reference and corrects misalignment as necessary. In some cases, however, a failure determination may be made due to positioning errors.
- the position of the tip portion that contacts the external terminal of the TCP changes in the initial state force due to hundreds of thousands of tests, resulting in variations. .
- a fail determination may be made.
- a failure determination is made because the contact state becomes unstable due to dust adhering to the tip of the probe pin or an increase in contact resistance at the tip of the probe pin.
- the alignment mark outline may not be clearly detected by the camera.
- TCP When TCP receives a fail determination, the operator temporarily stops the test equipment, confirms the positional relationship between the external terminal of the TCP that has received the fail determination and the probe, and the positional relationship is not appropriate. In case of ⁇ , perform the retest after manual alignment to ensure that both are in contact. Then, the TCP that has passed the retest is judged as a good product. Although the yield of TCP can be improved by such confirmation work by the operator, there is a problem that the throughput of the test is lowered because the stop time of the test apparatus becomes longer.
- test apparatus for TCP equipped with a probe card and a test head that can perform two or more TCP tests at the same time. By testing two or more TCPs at the same time, the test throughput can be improved.
- the present invention has been made in view of such a situation, and it is possible to further improve the test throughput of a TCP handling device capable of attaching two or more TCPs to the test simultaneously in each test.
- the purpose is to provide a secure TCP handling device.
- the present invention applies a probe card corresponding to a plurality of TCPs to be tested at the same time, and contacts a plurality of TCP external terminals on the carrier tape with the probe card.
- a TCP handling device that allows multiple TCPs to be tested at the same time by making electrical contact with the terminals. In the first test, multiple TCPs are tested at the same time.
- a TCP handling device characterized in that the received defect determination TCP is moved to a different contact terminal position from the contact terminal that the defect determination TCP is in contact with and then subjected to the test again (Invention 1). .
- a TCP that has been judged to be defective can be automatically retested without stopping the TCP handling device.
- TCP is actually a non-defective product
- it is possible to determine that it is defective for various reasons.
- it can be determined that the product is non-defective by retesting. Yes, the yield of device manufacturing is improved.
- the throughput of the test is improved.
- the retest here includes not only the second test performed after the first test but also the third and subsequent tests as long as different contact terminal groups can be used. For example, if there are three contact terminals, the retest can be performed twice.
- a plurality of TCPs arranged in series with respect to the transport direction of the carrier tape, a plurality of TCPs arranged in parallel with respect to the transport direction of the carrier tape, or a transport direction of the carrier tape A plurality of TCPs arranged in series and a plurality of TCPs arranged in parallel with respect to the transport direction may be simultaneously subjected to the test! (Invention 2).
- the carrier tape specifies the position of each TCP for each TCP.
- the positioning alignment mark to be determined is provided, and the positioning of the contact terminals corresponding to the plurality of TCP external terminals simultaneously subjected to the test should be performed based on at least one alignment mark.
- ⁇ ⁇ Invention 3.
- the powerful TCP handling apparatus it is possible to position the carrier tape in a short time, and the effects of the present invention are significantly exhibited in the powerful TCP handling apparatus.
- one TCP receives a failure determination when a test is performed, one TCP is subjected to retest in the next test. Therefore, if there are, for example, two positions that can contact the TCP in the contact section, in addition to the TCP subjected to the retest, the TCP that is not subject to the retest will also be contacted to the contact section. At this time, the TCP that has never been attached to the test may come into contact with the contact part. If this TCP is attached to the first test during the retest, the first test will be performed at the same time as the retest is performed. Can also be performed, further improving test throughput.
- At least one retest is performed with respect to the failure determination TCP that has received the failure determination in the simultaneous test, with a contact terminal in contact with the failure determination TCP.
- a good test can be easily obtained by a powerful retest. In this case, it is possible to further improve the throughput of a test that does not require a TCP position change operation.
- the retest may be performed by changing a pressing condition between the external terminal of the failure determination TCP and the contact terminal in contact with the external terminal. 7). In some cases, a good test can be easily obtained by a powerful retest. In this case, the throughput of the test that does not require the TCP position change operation can be further improved.
- the retest may be performed by changing the pressing condition (Invention 8). In some cases, it is possible to easily obtain a non-defective product by re-testing. In this case, it is possible to further improve the throughput of the test that does not require a TCP position change operation.
- the contact check function for detecting the electrical contact state between the external terminal of TCP and the contact terminal in contact with the external terminal is used to make contact of any contact terminal.
- the probe card stage that moves the probe card is finely moved in the X-axis direction and the Z-axis or Y-axis direction to obtain the movable area, and the center position in the movable area is identified, and the identification is performed.
- TCP positioning may be performed based on the center position (invention 9). According to the powerful invention, since the contact terminals can be optimally positioned, the frequency of occurrence of defect determination is reduced, and the yield and test throughput are improved.
- the TCP handling device includes an adsorption / pressing member that simultaneously adsorbs and presses a plurality of TCPs against the contact terminal, and the adsorption / pressing member is tested simultaneously.
- the at least one divided suction / pressing member may be adjustable so as to correspond to the TCP pitch to be tested at the same time.
- the present invention is a TCP handling device capable of simultaneously testing a plurality of TCPs, testing a plurality of TCPs simultaneously in the first test, and receiving a failure determination in the simultaneous test.
- the TCP handling device is characterized in that another defect contact terminal different from the contact terminal of the probe card that is in contact with the defect determination TCP is applied to the defect determination TCP and subjected to the test again (Invention 11). .
- the TCP handling apparatus of the present invention when two or more TCPs are tested at the same time, it is possible to improve the test throughput as well as the device manufacturing yield.
- FIG. 1 is an overall front view of a test apparatus for TCP including a TCP handler according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a plan view of a probe card stage in the TCP test apparatus.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the operation of a TCP handler according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation at the time of retest of the TCP handler according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the operation of another aspect at the time of retesting the TCP handler according to one embodiment of the present invention. Explanation of symbols
- FIG. 1 is an overall front view of a test apparatus for TCP including a TCP handler according to an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a plan view of a probe card stage
- FIG. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation of the TCP handler according to the embodiment.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation at the time of retesting the TCP handler according to the embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing another mode of operation when retesting a TCP handler according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- a test apparatus 1 for TCP includes a tester main body (not shown), a test head 10 electrically connected to the tester main body, and a TCP handler provided on the upper side of the test head 10. Consists of two and others.
- the TCP handler 2 is formed in a line along the longitudinal direction on the carrier tape 5 by conveying the carrier tape 5, and sequentially applies each TCP to the test.
- some carrier tapes 5 have TCPs formed in an array of two or more rows along the longitudinal direction. For example, in the case of TCP forces to be tested at the same time, there are 4 rows in 1 row and 2 rows in 2 rows.
- alignment marks 51 are provided at predetermined positions in the vicinity of the TCP for each TCP on the carrier tape 5.
- the TCP handler 2 of the present embodiment applies two TCPs to the test
- the present invention is not limited to a device that applies two TCPs to the test. It also includes a handler that simultaneously tests three or more TCPs arranged in series and Z or parallel on tape 5.
- the TCP handler 2 includes a feed reel 21 and a take-up reel 22.
- the carrier tape 5 before the test is wound around the reel 21 and the carrier tape 5 is also wound around the reel 21 after being subjected to the test. Be done
- the space between the feed reel 21 and the take-up reel 22 is a protective tape peeled off from the carrier tape 5.
- Three spacers 23a, 23b, and 23c are provided to bridge the loop 52 from the brewed linole 21 force to the toritori linole 22.
- Each spacer narrower 23a, 23b, 23c can be moved up and down so that the tension of the protective tape 52 can be adjusted.
- a tape guide 24a, a feed limit roller 25a, an in-side sub sprocket 25b, and an in-side guide roller 25c are provided and are fed out from the feed reel 21. While being guided by the tape guide 24a, the carrier tape 5 is conveyed to the pusher unit 3 through the squeeze limit roller 25a, the in-side sub sprocket 25b, and the in-side guide roller 25c.
- a tape guide 24b, a take-up limit roller 25f, an out-side sub sprocket 25e and an out-side guide roller 25d are provided under the take-up reel 22.
- the carrier tape 5 is wound around the take-up reel 22 while being guided by the tape guide 24b through the out-side guide roller 25d, the out-side sub-sprocket 25e and the take-up limit roller 25f.
- a pusher unit 3 is provided between the in-side guide roller 25c and the out-side guide roller 25d.
- the first camera 6a is on the front side of the pusher unit 3 (left side in FIG. 1), and the second camera 6b is on the lower side of the pusher unit 3 (inside the probe card stage 7 described later).
- a third camera 6c is provided on the rear side (right side in FIG. 1). Also, a mark punch 26a and a reject punch 26b are provided between the pusher unit 3 and the third camera 6c.
- the mark punch 26a is one in which one or a plurality of holes are opened at a predetermined position in the corresponding TCP, and the reject punch 26b is determined to be a defective product as a result of the test. This is to punch out TCP. Note that the mark punch 26a and the rigid punch 26b can be individually controlled so as not to operate.
- Each camera 6a, 6b, 6c is connected to an image processing device (not shown).
- the first camera 6a and the third camera 6c are for judging the presence or absence of TCP on the carrier tape 5 and the position and number of holes by the mark punch 26a.
- the second camera 6b obtains information on the position of the alignment mark on the carrier tape 5 and information on the positional deviation between the TCP and the probe, and displays the photographed image on the monitor to display the contact status of the operator. So that you can understand To do.
- the second camera 6b in the present embodiment is capable of acquiring positional deviation information for a plurality of objects in the field of view.
- the second camera 6b has a narrow imaging field of view because it is necessary to accurately acquire the positional relationship between the TCP test pad and the probe 81 (also referred to as a probe pin). Therefore, the second camera 6b is mounted on the camera stage 61, and can be moved in the vertical and horizontal directions (X-axis Y-axis direction) and the vertical direction (Z-axis direction) in plan view by an actuator provided in the camera stage 61. ing.
- the entire test area of the carrier tape can be moved, the positional relationship between the desired test pad and the probe 81 in TCP and the position of the alignment mark 51 can be clearly imaged.
- the alignment marks 51 at a plurality of locations can be easily detected, positioning can be performed based on the alignment marks 51 at a plurality of locations. Also, in the past, when the operator scrolled the screen displayed on the monitor to check the contact status, the force that sometimes overlooked the target position. Can be used for easy monitor display.
- a servo motor 31 capable of rotating the ball screw 32 is attached to a frame (pusher frame) 36 of the pusher unit 3 via a bracket 361.
- the pusher body 33 to which the ball screw 32 is screwed is attached via two linear motion guides (hereinafter referred to as “LM guides”) that extend in the Z-axis direction!
- LM guides linear motion guides
- a suction plate that is connected to a negative pressure source (not shown) and sucks and holds the carrier tape 5 by sucking the TCP so as to be fixed. 34 is provided.
- a tension sprocket 35a is provided on the front side (left side in FIG. 1) of the pusher body 33, and the main sprocket 35b is provided on the rear side (right side in FIG. 1) of the pusher body 33. It is
- test pads TCP external terminals
- a probe card stage 7 on which a probe card 8 having a large number of probes (contact terminals) 81 capable of contacting with each other is mounted.
- the probe card stage 7 is connected to a servo motor through a plurality of ball screws (not shown), and the probe card 8 can be moved in the horizontal direction (XY plane direction) by driving the servo motor.
- the probe card 8 can be rotated around the vertical axis (around the Z axis).
- the probe card 8 including the plurality of probes 81 is detachably attached to the card ring of the probe card stage 7 by pins (not shown).
- the probe card 8 in the present embodiment has two probe groups (front position 8a probe group Z rear position so that two TCPs arranged in series in the transport direction of the carrier tape 5 can be tested simultaneously. 8b probe group).
- a probe card having four probe groups is applied correspondingly.
- the distance between the front position 8a and the rear position 8b is set to one TCP pitch with respect to the transport direction of the carrier tape 5.
- the interval of one TCP pitch may vary depending on the device type, shape, carrier tape type, etc. of the device under test, so the interval between the front position 8a and the rear position 8b can be changed manually or automatically. It is desirable to have a pitch change mechanism that can be further improved.
- Each probe 81 of the probe card 8 is electrically connected to the tester body via the test head 10, and is below the probe card 8 and inside the probe card stage 7.
- the second camera 6b is located on the side.
- the pusher unit 3 presses the carrier tape 5 conveyed to the probe card stage 7 against the probe card 8 on the test head 10 while adsorbing and supporting it. Then, the two TCPs on the carrier tape 5 come into contact with the probes 81 arranged at the corresponding positions 8a and 8b on the probe card 8. In this state, first, a small direct current is applied to each IC terminal, and the presence or absence of current flowing in the internal circuit of TCP (for example, a protective diode) and the measuring ability of the voltage value are checked. Check that the probe 81 is in electrical contact with the pin and whether there is a short between adjacent pins.
- TCP for example, a protective diode
- test signal from the tester main body is applied to the TCP, and the response signal read out by the TCP camera is sent to the tester main body through the test head 10. Based on this response signal, the TCP performance and test are tested, and the path judgment (non-defective product judgment) or file judgment (defective judgment) is performed for the TCP.
- the TCP handler When using the TCP handler, it is necessary to perform the initial setting before operating the TCP handler 2. In other words, when the TCP type and the probe card 8 are changed accordingly, the standard of the pusher stage 4 and the probe card stage 7 is set so that the TCP test pad contacts the probe 81 of the corresponding probe card 8. The position needs to be determined and registered (this position is referred to as “registered position”).
- an operator selects a plurality of (for example, three) probes 81 and corresponding test pads to determine rough positions, and then installs the second camera 6b and the image processing apparatus.
- the reference position is determined by moving the pusher stage 4 and Z or the probe card stage 7 manually or automatically so that each probe 81 is located in the center of each test pad as much as possible. sign up.
- the rough position may be determined by automatic control instead of manual operation.
- the position coordinates of a predetermined target in the field of view of the second camera 6b are also registered.
- the position coordinates of the alignment mark 51 on the carrier tape 5 are registered.
- the operation of the TCP handler 2 during actual operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
- two TCPs arranged in a line along the longitudinal direction of the carrier tape 5 are tested at the same time.
- a force with four alignment marks 51 is present.
- one alignment mark 51 at the front position 8a is applied to position the TCP.
- the TCP handler 2 includes the control means.
- the pusher stage 4 and the probe card stage 7 first move to the registration positions (step S01).
- the feed reel 21 and the take-up reel 22 rotate by a predetermined angle to move the carrier tape 5 and transport the first and second TCPs to a predetermined position below the suction plate 34 (step S02). .
- the servo motor 31 of the pusher unit 3 is driven to move the suction plate 34 downward in the Z-axis.
- the moved suction plate 34 sucks the carrier tape 5 and descends to the imaging position (step S03).
- the second camera 6b performs imaging (step S04), and transmits image information to the image processing apparatus.
- the image processing apparatus acquires information on the positional deviation between the position coordinates of a predetermined target registered in advance and the position coordinates of the target actually captured from the received image information. For example, in the present embodiment, information on the positional deviation between the registered coordinate position of the alignment mark corresponding to the position 8a and the position coordinate of the alignment mark 51 corresponding to the actually imaged position 8a is acquired.
- the image processing apparatus is based on the earned positional deviation information! Then, the amount of positional deviation around the X-axis direction, Y-axis direction, and vertical axis is calculated to determine the force that needs to be corrected (step S05). If correction is necessary as a result of the determination, the necessary correction operation is performed (step S06).
- the servo motor 31 of the pusher unit 3 is operated, and the suction plate 34 is further moved in the Z-axis direction via the pusher main body 33.
- the suction plate 34 adsorbing the carrier tape 5 is lowered to the contact position, and the first TCP located on the front side in the carrier tape transport direction A (see Fig. 2) corresponds to the probe card 8
- the second TCP which is pressed against the probe 81 placed at the front position 8a and is located behind the carrier tape transport direction A, is placed at the corresponding rear position 8b on the probe card 8.
- the pressed probe 81 is pressed (step S07).
- step S08 the first test for each TCP (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "main test") is executed (step S08).
- a contact check is first performed to confirm that all test pads are in electrical contact with the probe 81, and contact failure is detected even if the suction plate 34 is moved up and down a plurality of times. In the case of failure, the failure is judged.
- a test signal is applied to each TCP through the test head 10 as well as a tester body force, and a response signal read from each TCP passes through the test head 10 to the tester. Sent to the body. Based on this response signal, the tester main body determines pass / fail judgment and rank classification of each TCP, and performs pass judgment (non-defective product judgment) or fail judgment (defective product judgment) for TCP (step S09).
- the mark punch 26a is driven only for the TCP that has passed the path determination (step S10). Note that the mark punch 26a is not operated! /, And there is a control form.
- Step SI 1 referring to the result of the previous main test (Step SI 1), if V, one or both of the TCPs have received a fail determination, a retest operation (step S21 described later) is performed. Execute ⁇ step S36). If a fail determination is made, if desired, a re-test may be performed once at this stage, for example, and a control operation for changing to a pass determination may be added.
- the servo motor 31 of the pusher unit 3 is driven to move the suction plate 34 in the Z-axis upward direction via the pusher body 33.
- the pusher stage 4 and the probe card stage 7 move to the registration position (step S12).
- the suction plate 34 stops the suction of the carrier tape 5 to release the carrier tape 5, and further moves upward in the Z-axis (step S13).
- step S1 4 it is determined whether or not the TCP subjected to this test is the last device (step S1 4). If it is determined that the TCP is the last device, the main operation is terminated and the last device is terminated. If not, return to step S02 and test the next two TCPs. Next, the retest operation will be described.
- the combination of the two TCP fail judgments is that only the TCP at the front position 8a in the carrier tape transport direction A is judged as fail, and only the TCP at the rear position 8b is used. There are cases where the fail judgment is performed and the TCPs at both positions 8a and 8b are judged as fail judgment, and the operations are different.
- Step S21 the same operation as in Step S12 and Step S13 described above is executed, and the suction of the carrier tape 5 by the suction plate 34 is stopped and the carrier tape 5 is released ( Step S21).
- Step S22 determine whether the TCP (in this case, the first TCP) located at the front position 8a in the carrier tape transport direction A has received the pass / fail judgment in the first test.
- step S28 described later is executed.
- the TCP located in the front position 8a receives a fail judgment! /
- the main sprocket 35b is rotated together with the tension sprocket 35a by one TCP pitch to reverse the carrier tape 5 in the reverse direction.
- Move step S23
- the same operations as those from step SO3 to step S07 described above are performed, and the external terminal of the TCP is brought into contact with the probe 81 of the rear position 8b (step S24).
- a retest is performed on the TCP that has contacted the probe 81 at the rear position 8b (step S25), and a path determination or a fail determination is performed on the TCP (step S26).
- contact failure is detected in the retest contact check, contact failure is detected by first moving the carrier tape 5 side slightly or the probe force stage 7 side finely. It is desirable to perform the second processing form, which has a certain force with the second processing form that performs a trial operation to determine whether there is a position where it disappears.
- Step S27a when the TCP subjected to the retest receives the second fail determination, it is determined as a defective product and the reject punch 26b is driven. On the other hand, when the pass determination is received for the second time, the TCP is determined as a non-defective product and the mark punch 26a is driven (step S27b).
- Step 22 or Step 25 when the TCP located at the front position 8a at the beginning receives a path determination, and the TCP located at the rear position 8b receives a path determination. Executes step S12 (step S28).
- step S31 the same operations as in steps S12 and S13 described above are performed, and the carrier by the suction plate 34 is executed. Stop sucking tape 5 and release carrier tape 5 (step S29). Subsequently, the main sprocket 35b is moved forward by one pitch of the TCP together with the tension sprocket 35a, and the carrier tape 5 is moved forward to move the TCP located at the rear position 8b to the front position 8a (step S30). Then, the same operations as those from step SO3 to step S07 described above are executed, and the external terminal of the TCP is brought into contact with the probe 81 of the front position 8a (step S31).
- a retest is performed on the TCP that has contacted the probe 81 at the front position 8a (step S32), and a path determination or a fail determination is performed on the TCP (step S33).
- Step S34a when the TCP attached to the retest receives the second fail determination, it is determined as a defective product and the reject punch 26b is driven. On the other hand, when the second determination is received, the TCP is determined as non-defective and the mark punch 26a is driven (step S34b). Then, Step S12 is executed.
- the TCP that received the fail judgment in the first test is automatically subjected to the retest without stopping the TCP handler. be able to.
- a cause of fail judgment there is a TCP contact failure or positioning failure caused by the probe 81 in one position.
- it is different from the position on the probe card in the first test. Retesting with a probe 81 in another position may result in good contact.
- TCP which is originally a good product, can be judged as a good product by retesting, so that the yield of TCP can be improved.
- the test force can be automatically re-tested without stopping the test equipment.
- the TCP is positioned using the alignment mark 51 corresponding to one position 8a! /, So the TCP located in the other position 8b is relatively poorly positioned. It is easy to become. Even in this case, after moving the TCP to position 8a, the TCP is positioned using the alignment mark 51 of the TCP. As a result, the TCP is more accurately positioned. Therefore, it is possible to effectively obtain a path determination.
- the cause of the fail determination is not only in the case of TCP positioning failure, but also in the case where needle tip deterioration has occurred in any of the multiple probes 81 provided in each of the positions 8a and 8b, Although the contact resistance value may increase due to insufficient pressing force, according to the TCP handler 2 of this embodiment, a pass judgment can be obtained effectively by retesting at a good position. Can do. This eliminates the problem of treating non-defective TCP as a defective product, and improves yield. Furthermore, it is not necessary for the operator to stop the test apparatus once, and the operating rate of the apparatus can be improved.
- the retest in step S32 is a process for performing a retest on the TCP located at the front position 8a on the probe card 8.
- the rear position 8b on the probe card 8 is used. Is contacted with a TCP that has not yet been tested (here, the third). Therefore, when performing the retest in step S32, TCP located at the rear position 8b on the probe card 8 may be attached to the first test at the same time.
- Step S41 to Step S45; see FIG. 5 Step S41 to Step S45; see FIG. 5.
- the TCP located at the rear position 8b on the probe card 8 is located at the rear side in the carrier tape transport direction A ( Here's the third one)! Perform a test (step S41).
- step S45 If the TCP has received a pass determination, it is determined as a non-defective product, the mark punch 26a is driven (step S45), and then step S12 is executed. On the other hand, if the TCP has received a fail determination, step S29 is executed.
- test throughput can be further improved.
- the retest operation may be performed by alternately switching the TCP at positions 8a and 8b. Note that it is desirable that the pusher unit 3 be moved up and down several times before performing the above replacement at the stage when both positions 8a and 8b have both failed. May be obtained.
- the TCP is positioned using the alignment mark 51 corresponding to one position 8a! /, So that the TCP positioned at the other position 8b is relatively positioned.
- the other alignment mark 51 corresponding to the other position 8b may also be used when necessary. For example, if a fail judgment occurs in the TCP at the rear position 8b, after performing the positioning based on the alignment mark 51 on the rear side, perform a retest without moving the TCP. It's okay Depending on the case, a path determination may be obtained. According to this, it is possible to greatly reduce the movement operation for obtaining the position of the alignment mark 51 at the two power points by moving the camera stage 61 greatly, and minimize the decrease in throughput due to the movement time of the second camera 6b. This is practical.
- the contact resistance value generated between each test pad and each probe 81 in contact with the test pad is tens of thousands of pressing stresses, positional deviation of the tip of the probe 81, shape change, elasticity It fluctuates or increases with fluctuations in characteristics and the state of electrical contact parts. Therefore, change the height condition in the pressing direction of the suction plate 34 of the pusher unit 3 within the allowable range of the probe 81 for the TCP probe 81 that has failed, and perform a retest. You may make it perform. If this retest results in a pass, the TCP can be confirmed as good.
- the suction plate 34 may have a structure divided in correspondence with the TCP arrangement direction (X-axis direction, Y-axis direction).
- a movable fine movement mechanism (not shown) may be provided. With such a divided moving structure, it is possible to adjust the pitch between a plurality of TCPs to match the pitch of the corresponding probe group.
- the adjustment width is about several tens of microns, and can be practically implemented.
- the TCP handling device is effective in improving the yield of device manufacturing and the throughput of testing, and efficiently performing TCP testing.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Testing Of Individual Semiconductor Devices (AREA)
- Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)
Abstract
A TCP handling apparatus (2) wherein when TCPs determined to be faulty in a first test are brought into contact, for use in a retest, with a probe (81) different from a probe (81) which was brought into contact with an external terminal when it was determined to be faulty, acceptable products can be picked up by the retest, the yielding of the TCPs can be increased, and the retest can be automatically performed without stopping the TCP handling apparatus (2). As a result, the throughput of the test can be increased.
Description
明 細 書 Specification
TCPハンドリング装置 TCP handling equipment
技術分野 Technical field
[0001] 本発明は、 ICデバイスの 1種である TCP (Tape Carrier Package)や COF (Chip On Film) (以下、 TCP、 COF、その他 TAB (Tape Automated Bonding)実装技術によつ て製造されたデバイスを纏めて「TCP」 t\、う。)を試験するのに用いられる TCPハン ドリング装置に関するものである。 [0001] The present invention is manufactured using TCP (Tape Carrier Package) and COF (Chip On Film) (hereinafter, TCP, COF, and other TAB (Tape Automated Bonding) mounting technologies, which are one type of IC device. It relates to a TCP handling device that is used to collectively test devices and test "TCP".
背景技術 Background art
[0002] ICデバイス等の電子部品の製造過程においては、最終的に製造された ICデバイ スやその中間段階にあるデバイス等の性能や機能を試験する電子部品試験装置が 必要であり、 TCPの場合には、 TCP用の試験装置が使用される。 [0002] In the manufacturing process of electronic components such as IC devices, an electronic component testing device that tests the performance and functions of the final manufactured IC device and devices in its intermediate stage is required. In some cases, test equipment for TCP is used.
[0003] TCP用の試験装置は、一般的にテスタ本体と、テストヘッドと、 TCPハンドリング装 置(以下「TCPハンドラ」という場合がある。)とから構成される。この TCPハンドラは、 テープ (フィルムの概念も含むものとする。以下同じ。)上に TCPが複数形成されたキ ャリアテープを搬送して、テストヘッドに電気的に接続されているプローブカードのプ ローブにキャリアテープを押圧し、 TCPの外部端子をプローブにコンタクトさせること により、複数の TCPを順次試験に付す機能を備えている。 A test apparatus for TCP is generally composed of a tester body, a test head, and a TCP handling apparatus (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “TCP handler”). This TCP handler transports a carrier tape on which multiple TCPs are formed on a tape (including the concept of film; the same shall apply hereinafter) and carries the carrier to the probe card probe that is electrically connected to the test head. By pressing the tape and bringing the external terminal of TCP into contact with the probe, it has the function of sequentially attaching multiple TCPs to the test.
[0004] そして、試験にぉ 、て TCPに必要な性能や機能が確認されると、パス判定(良品判 定)がなされる一方、確認できない場合はフェイル判定 (不良判定)がなされる。ただ し、フェイル判定は、 TCP自体が不良品である場合の他、プローブカードに対する T CPの位置決めが的確でないことに伴う不良発生もあり、またコンタクト状態における 接触抵抗が大きいことに伴う不良発生もある。位置決め不良等が原因でフェイル判 定を受けた TCPの中には良品が含まれているので、再試験を行って良品を見つけ 出すことができれば、 TCPの歩留まりを向上させることができる。 [0004] Then, during the test, when the performance and functions necessary for TCP are confirmed, a pass determination (non-defective product determination) is made, whereas if it cannot be confirmed, a fail determination (defect determination) is made. However, in the fail judgment, in addition to the case where the TCP itself is a defective product, there may be a failure due to the inaccurate positioning of the TCP with respect to the probe card, or a failure due to a large contact resistance in the contact state. is there. TCPs that have failed due to poor positioning, etc. contain non-defective products, so if you can re-test and find non-defective products, you can improve the TCP yield.
[0005] ここで、キャリアテープには、各 TCP毎に位置決め用のマーク(ァライメントマーク) 力 si箇所又は複数箇所付与されており、このァライメントマークを基準にして位置決め が行われる。すなわち、プローブカードに対する TCPの位置を、カメラなどを用いて
ァライメントマークを基準にして確認すると共に、必要に応じて位置ずれを補正したり している力 それでも位置決め不良が原因でフェイル判定がなされる場合がある。 Here, the carrier tape is provided with positioning mark (alignment mark) force si or a plurality of positions for each TCP, and positioning is performed with reference to the alignment mark. In other words, the TCP position relative to the probe card can be A force that checks the alignment mark as a reference and corrects misalignment as necessary. In some cases, however, a failure determination may be made due to positioning errors.
[0006] また、プローブカードに設けられている多数のプローブピンは、数十万回の試験に よって、 TCPの外部端子にコンタクトする先端部の位置が当初の状態力 変わり、ば らつきが生じる。これに伴い、フェイル判定がなされる場合がある。さらに、プローブピ ンの先端にゴミが付着したり、プローブピンの先端における接触抵抗が増加したりし て、コンタクト状態が不安定な状態になることでフェイル判定がなされる場合がある。 また、キャリアテープの種類やキャリアテープ面の反射条件によっては、カメラにより ァライメントマークの輪郭が明瞭に検出できない場合もある。 [0006] In addition, in many probe pins provided on the probe card, the position of the tip portion that contacts the external terminal of the TCP changes in the initial state force due to hundreds of thousands of tests, resulting in variations. . Along with this, a fail determination may be made. In addition, there is a case where a failure determination is made because the contact state becomes unstable due to dust adhering to the tip of the probe pin or an increase in contact resistance at the tip of the probe pin. Also, depending on the type of carrier tape and the reflection conditions on the carrier tape surface, the alignment mark outline may not be clearly detected by the camera.
[0007] TCPがフェイル判定を受けた場合、作業者が試験装置を一旦停止させて、フェイ ル判定を受けた TCPの外部端子とプローブとの位置関係を確認し、その位置関係が 適正でな!ヽ場合は、両者が確実に接触するように手作業で位置合わせを行った後、 再試験を行う。そして、再試験でパス判定となった TCPを良品とする。このような作業 者による確認作業により TCPの歩留まりが向上できるものの、試験装置の停止時間 が長くなるので試験のスループットが低下する難点がある。 [0007] When TCP receives a fail determination, the operator temporarily stops the test equipment, confirms the positional relationship between the external terminal of the TCP that has received the fail determination and the probe, and the positional relationship is not appropriate. In case of ヽ, perform the retest after manual alignment to ensure that both are in contact. Then, the TCP that has passed the retest is judged as a good product. Although the yield of TCP can be improved by such confirmation work by the operator, there is a problem that the throughput of the test is lowered because the stop time of the test apparatus becomes longer.
[0008] ところで、同時に 2つ以上の TCPの試験を行うことができる、プローブカードとテスト ヘッドを備えた TCP用の試験装置がある。このように同時に 2つ以上の TCPの試験 を行うことで、試験のスループットを向上させることができる。 [0008] By the way, there is a test apparatus for TCP equipped with a probe card and a test head that can perform two or more TCP tests at the same time. By testing two or more TCPs at the same time, the test throughput can be improved.
発明の開示 Disclosure of the invention
発明が解決しょうとする課題 Problems to be solved by the invention
[0009] ところ力 同時に試験を行う TCPの数を複数にすると、一括してコンタクトする領域 が広くなる。特に、一層の多ピン化及び狭ピッチ化が進む TCPの試験においては、 同時に試験に付する全ての TCPの位置決めを正確に行うことは容易でない。複数個 の TCPを同時に試験すると、位置決め不良が原因で良品の TCPがフェイル判定と なる頻度が増える。フェイル判定がなされる頻度が増えると、試験装置を一時停止さ せて作業者が確認したり手作業によって位置合わせを行う頻度が高くなり、その分、 試験のスループットが低下する。つまり、同時に試験に付する TCPの数を増やしてス ループットを向上させようとしても、それに伴い試験装置の一時停止頻度も増えるの
で、試験装置の可動時間が低下して、必ずしも十分なスループット向上効果が得ら れない。 [0009] However, if the number of TCPs to be tested simultaneously is plural, the contact area at a time becomes wider. In particular, in the TCP test where the number of pins and the pitch are further reduced, it is not easy to accurately position all the TCPs attached to the test at the same time. When multiple TCPs are tested at the same time, the frequency with which a good TCP is judged as fail is increased due to poor positioning. As the frequency of fail judgments increases, the frequency at which the test equipment is temporarily stopped and the operator confirms or aligns manually increases, and the test throughput decreases accordingly. In other words, if you try to improve throughput by increasing the number of TCPs that are attached to the test at the same time, the frequency of suspension of the test equipment will increase accordingly. As a result, the operating time of the test apparatus is reduced, and a sufficient throughput improvement effect cannot always be obtained.
[0010] 本発明は、このような実状に鑑みてなされたものであり、各回の試験において同時 に 2つ以上の TCPを試験に付すことができる TCPハンドリング装置について、試験の スループットがより向上可能な TCPハンドリング装置を提供することを目的とする。 課題を解決するための手段 [0010] The present invention has been made in view of such a situation, and it is possible to further improve the test throughput of a TCP handling device capable of attaching two or more TCPs to the test simultaneously in each test. The purpose is to provide a secure TCP handling device. Means for solving the problem
[0011] 上記目的を達成するために、第 1に本発明は、同時に試験する複数の TCPに対応 するプローブカードを適用し、キャリアテープ上の複数の TCPの外部端子と、プロ一 ブカードの接触端子とを電気的に接触させることにより、複数の TCPを同時に試験に 付することができる TCPハンドリング装置であって、最初の試験で複数の TCPを同時 に試験し、前記同時試験で不良判定を受けた不良判定 TCPを、当該不良判定 TCP が接触した接触端子とは異なる別の接触端子の位置へ移動させた後、再度試験に 付すことを特徴とする TCPハンドリング装置を提供する (発明 1)。 [0011] In order to achieve the above object, first, the present invention applies a probe card corresponding to a plurality of TCPs to be tested at the same time, and contacts a plurality of TCP external terminals on the carrier tape with the probe card. A TCP handling device that allows multiple TCPs to be tested at the same time by making electrical contact with the terminals. In the first test, multiple TCPs are tested at the same time. Provided is a TCP handling device characterized in that the received defect determination TCP is moved to a different contact terminal position from the contact terminal that the defect determination TCP is in contact with and then subjected to the test again (Invention 1). .
[0012] 上記発明(発明 1)によれば、不良判定を受けた TCPを、 TCPハンドリング装置を停 止させることなく自動的に再試験に付すことができる。すなわち、 TCPが実際には良 品であるにもかかわらず、種々の原因によって不良判定がなされることがある力 上 記発明(発明 1)によれば、再試験によって良品であると判定できることがあり、デバイ ス製造の歩留まりが向上する。また、上記発明(発明 1)によれば、 TCPハンドリング 装置を停止させることなく自動的に再試験を行うことができるので、試験のスループッ トが向上する。 [0012] According to the above invention (Invention 1), a TCP that has been judged to be defective can be automatically retested without stopping the TCP handling device. In other words, despite the fact that TCP is actually a non-defective product, it is possible to determine that it is defective for various reasons. According to the above invention (Invention 1), it can be determined that the product is non-defective by retesting. Yes, the yield of device manufacturing is improved. In addition, according to the above invention (Invention 1), since the retest can be automatically performed without stopping the TCP handling device, the throughput of the test is improved.
[0013] なお、ここでいう再試験は、最初の試験の次に行われる 2回目の試験だけでなぐ 異なる接触端子群を用いることができる限り、 3回目以降の試験も含まれる。例えば、 接触端子群が 3つである場合、再試験を 2回行うことができることになる。 [0013] It should be noted that the retest here includes not only the second test performed after the first test but also the third and subsequent tests as long as different contact terminal groups can be used. For example, if there are three contact terminals, the retest can be performed twice.
[0014] 上記発明(発明 1)においては、キャリアテープの搬送方向に対して直列に並んだ 複数の TCP、キャリアテープの搬送方向に対して並列に並んだ複数の TCP、又はキ ャリアテープの搬送方向に対して直列に並んだ複数の TCP及び搬送方向に対して 並列に並んだ複数の TCP、を同時に試験に付すようにしてもよ!、 (発明 2)。 [0014] In the above invention (Invention 1), a plurality of TCPs arranged in series with respect to the transport direction of the carrier tape, a plurality of TCPs arranged in parallel with respect to the transport direction of the carrier tape, or a transport direction of the carrier tape A plurality of TCPs arranged in series and a plurality of TCPs arranged in parallel with respect to the transport direction may be simultaneously subjected to the test! (Invention 2).
[0015] 上記発明(発明 1)において、キャリアテープには、各 TCP毎に各 TCPの位置を特
定する位置決め用のァライメントマークが設けられており、同時に試験に付される複 数の TCPの外部端子と対応する接触端子の位置決めは、少なくとも一の前記ァライ メントマークに基づ 、て行うようにしてもょ ヽ (発明 3)。力かる TCPハンドリング装置に よれば、キャリアテープの位置決めを短時間で行うことができ、また、本発明の効果は 、力かる TCPハンドリング装置にぉ 、て顕著に現れる。 [0015] In the above invention (Invention 1), the carrier tape specifies the position of each TCP for each TCP. The positioning alignment mark to be determined is provided, and the positioning of the contact terminals corresponding to the plurality of TCP external terminals simultaneously subjected to the test should be performed based on at least one alignment mark. Anyway 発 明 (Invention 3). According to the powerful TCP handling apparatus, it is possible to position the carrier tape in a short time, and the effects of the present invention are significantly exhibited in the powerful TCP handling apparatus.
[0016] 上記発明(発明 1)においては、前記不良判定 TCPを再度試験に付するときに、前 記不良判定 TCPと共に押圧される未検査の TCPを同時に試験に付してもよい (発明 4)。 In the above invention (Invention 1), when the defect determination TCP is subjected to the test again, an uninspected TCP pressed together with the defect determination TCP may be simultaneously applied to the test (Invention 4). ).
[0017] 例えば、試験を行ったときに 1つの TCPが不良判定を受けた場合、次の試験で再 試験に付される TCPは 1つである。したがって、コンタクト部において TCPにコンタク トできるポジションが例えば 2つであれば、再試験に付される TCPの他に、再試験の 対象でない TCPもコンタクト部にコンタクトされることとなる。このとき、試験に一度も付 されていない TCPがコンタクト部にコンタクトされることがある力 再試験時にこの TC Pを最初の試験に付するようにすると、再試験を行うと同時に最初の試験をも行うこが でき、試験のスループットがさらに向上する。 [0017] For example, when one TCP receives a failure determination when a test is performed, one TCP is subjected to retest in the next test. Therefore, if there are, for example, two positions that can contact the TCP in the contact section, in addition to the TCP subjected to the retest, the TCP that is not subject to the retest will also be contacted to the contact section. At this time, the TCP that has never been attached to the test may come into contact with the contact part.If this TCP is attached to the first test during the retest, the first test will be performed at the same time as the retest is performed. Can also be performed, further improving test throughput.
[0018] 上記発明(発明 1)においては、前記不良判定 TCPを再度試験に付するときに、前 記不良判定 TCPと共に押圧される検査済みの TCPを試験の実行から除外すること が好ましい (発明 5)。 [0018] In the above invention (Invention 1), when the defect determination TCP is subjected to the test again, it is preferable to exclude the inspected TCP that is pressed together with the defect determination TCP from the execution of the test (Invention). Five).
[0019] 上記発明(発明 1)においては、前記同時試験で不良判定を受けた不良判定 TCP に対して、当該不良判定 TCPが接触した接触端子により、少なくとも 1回の再試験を 行うことが好ましい (発明 6)。力かる再試験により、簡単に良品判定が得られることが あり、この場合には TCPのポジション変更動作を行う必要がなぐ試験のスループット をより向上させることができる。 [0019] In the above invention (Invention 1), it is preferable that at least one retest is performed with respect to the failure determination TCP that has received the failure determination in the simultaneous test, with a contact terminal in contact with the failure determination TCP. (Invention 6). In some cases, a good test can be easily obtained by a powerful retest. In this case, it is possible to further improve the throughput of a test that does not require a TCP position change operation.
[0020] 上記発明(発明 1)においては、前記不良判定 TCPの外部端子と当該外部端子に 接触する接触端子との押圧条件を変更して、前記再試験を行うようにしてもよい (発 明 7)。力かる再試験により、簡単に良品判定が得られることがあり、この場合には TC Pのポジション変更動作を行う必要がなぐ試験のスループットをより向上させることが できる。
[0021] 上記発明(発明 7)においては、前記不良判定 TCPの外部端子と当該外部端子に 接触する接触端子との接触抵抗を測定して、許容可能な接触抵抗値を超えるものが 検出された場合に、前記押圧条件を変更して、前記再試験を行ってもよい (発明 8)。 力かる再試験により、簡単に良品判定が得られることがあり、この場合には TCPのポ ジシヨン変更動作を行う必要がなぐ試験のスループットをより向上させることができる [0020] In the above invention (Invention 1), the retest may be performed by changing a pressing condition between the external terminal of the failure determination TCP and the contact terminal in contact with the external terminal. 7). In some cases, a good test can be easily obtained by a powerful retest. In this case, the throughput of the test that does not require the TCP position change operation can be further improved. [0021] In the above invention (Invention 7), the contact resistance between the external terminal of the defect determination TCP and the contact terminal in contact with the external terminal was measured, and an object exceeding an allowable contact resistance value was detected. In this case, the retest may be performed by changing the pressing condition (Invention 8). In some cases, it is possible to easily obtain a non-defective product by re-testing. In this case, it is possible to further improve the throughput of the test that does not require a TCP position change operation.
[0022] 上記発明(発明 1)においては、 TCPの外部端子と当該外部端子に接触する接触 端子との電気的接触状態を検出するコンタクトチェック機能を利用して、何れかの接 触端子の接触不良が検出されるまで、プローブカードを移動させるプローブカードス テージを X軸方向及び Z又は Y軸方向へ微動させて移動可能領域を求め、前記移 動可能領域における中央位置を特定し、前記特定した中央位置に基づいて TCPの 位置決めを行うようにしてもよい (発明 9)。力かる発明によれば、接触端子の最適な 位置決めを行うことができるため、不良判定となる発生頻度が低減し、歩留りと試験の スループットが向上する。 [0022] In the above invention (Invention 1), the contact check function for detecting the electrical contact state between the external terminal of TCP and the contact terminal in contact with the external terminal is used to make contact of any contact terminal. Until a defect is detected, the probe card stage that moves the probe card is finely moved in the X-axis direction and the Z-axis or Y-axis direction to obtain the movable area, and the center position in the movable area is identified, and the identification is performed. TCP positioning may be performed based on the center position (invention 9). According to the powerful invention, since the contact terminals can be optimally positioned, the frequency of occurrence of defect determination is reduced, and the yield and test throughput are improved.
[0023] 上記発明(発明 1)において、前記 TCPハンドリング装置は、複数の TCPを同時に 吸着して前記接触端子に押圧する吸着 ·押圧部材を備えており、前記吸着 ·押圧部 材は、同時に試験する TCPの配列に対応して少なくとも 2分割されており、前記分割 された吸着 ·押圧部材は、同時に試験する TCPのピッチに対応し得るように、相互の 間隔が調整可能となっていてもよい (発明 10)。力かる発明によれば、複数の TCP間 のピッチを対応する接触端子群のピッチに一致させる調整を行うことができる。 [0023] In the above invention (Invention 1), the TCP handling device includes an adsorption / pressing member that simultaneously adsorbs and presses a plurality of TCPs against the contact terminal, and the adsorption / pressing member is tested simultaneously. The at least one divided suction / pressing member may be adjustable so as to correspond to the TCP pitch to be tested at the same time. (Invention 10). According to the powerful invention, it is possible to adjust the pitch between the plurality of TCPs to match the pitch of the corresponding contact terminal group.
[0024] 第 2に本発明は、複数の TCPを同時に試験に付することができる TCPハンドリング 装置であって、最初の試験で複数の TCPを同時に試験し、前記同時試験で不良判 定を受けた不良判定 TCPを、当該不良判定 TCPが接触したプローブカードの接触 端子とは異なる別の接触端子を適用して、再度試験に付すことを特徴とする TCPハ ンドリング装置を提供する (発明 11)。 [0024] Secondly, the present invention is a TCP handling device capable of simultaneously testing a plurality of TCPs, testing a plurality of TCPs simultaneously in the first test, and receiving a failure determination in the simultaneous test. The TCP handling device is characterized in that another defect contact terminal different from the contact terminal of the probe card that is in contact with the defect determination TCP is applied to the defect determination TCP and subjected to the test again (Invention 11). .
[0025] 上記発明(発明 11)によれば、不良判定を受けた TCPを、 TCPハンドリング装置を 停止させることなく自動的に再試験に付すことができる。したがって、デバイス製造の 歩留まりが向上するとともに、 TCPハンドリング装置を停止させる必要がなぐ試験の
スループットが向上する。 [0025] According to the above invention (Invention 11), it is possible to automatically re-test a TCP that has received a failure determination without stopping the TCP handling device. Therefore, the device manufacturing yield is improved and the TCP handling device does not need to be stopped. Throughput is improved.
発明の効果 The invention's effect
[0026] 本発明の TCPハンドリング装置によれば、同時に 2つ以上の TCPを試験するにあ たり、デバイス製造の歩留まりとともに、試験のスループットを向上させることができる [0026] According to the TCP handling apparatus of the present invention, when two or more TCPs are tested at the same time, it is possible to improve the test throughput as well as the device manufacturing yield.
図面の簡単な説明 Brief Description of Drawings
[0027] [図 1]本発明の一実施形態に係る TCPハンドラを含む TCP用の試験装置の全体正 面図である。 FIG. 1 is an overall front view of a test apparatus for TCP including a TCP handler according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[図 2]同 TCP用の試験装置におけるプローブカードステージの平面図である。 FIG. 2 is a plan view of a probe card stage in the TCP test apparatus.
[図 3]本発明の一実施形態に係る TCPハンドラの動作を示すフローチャート図である FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the operation of a TCP handler according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[図 4]本発明の一実施形態に係る TCPハンドラの再試験時の動作を示すフローチヤ ート図である。 FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation at the time of retest of the TCP handler according to one embodiment of the present invention.
[図 5]本発明の一実施形態に係る TCPハンドラの再試験時の別態様の動作を示すフ ローチャート図である。 符号の説明 FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the operation of another aspect at the time of retesting the TCP handler according to one embodiment of the present invention. Explanation of symbols
[0028] 1 TCP用の試験装置 [0028] 1 TCP test equipment
2 TCPハンドラ 2 TCP handler
3 プッシャユニット 3 Pusher unit
5 キャリアテープ 5 Carrier tape
7 プローブカードステージ 7 Probe card stage
8 プローブカード 8 Probe card
10 テストヘッド 10 Test head
21 卷出リール 21 brewing reel
22 卷取リール 22 Toray reel
81 プローブ (接触端子) 81 Probe (Contact terminal)
発明を実施するための最良の形態
[0029] 以下、本発明の実施形態を図面に基づいて詳細に説明する。 BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
図 1は、本発明の一実施形態に係る TCPハンドラを含む TCP用の試験装置の全 体正面図であり、図 2は、プローブカードステージの平面図であり、図 3は、本発明の 一実施形態に係る TCPハンドラの動作を示すフローチャート図であり、図 4は、本発 明の一実施形態に係る TCPハンドラの再試験時の動作を示すフローチャート図であ り、図 5は、本発明の一実施形態に係る TCPハンドラの再試験時の別態様の動作を 示すフローチャート図である。 FIG. 1 is an overall front view of a test apparatus for TCP including a TCP handler according to an embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 2 is a plan view of a probe card stage, and FIG. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation of the TCP handler according to the embodiment. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation at the time of retesting the TCP handler according to the embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing another mode of operation when retesting a TCP handler according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0030] まず、本発明の実施形態に係るハンドラを備えた TCP用の試験装置の全体構成に ついて説明する。 [0030] First, the overall configuration of a test apparatus for TCP including a handler according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described.
[0031] 図 1に示すように、 TCP用の試験装置 1は、図示しないテスタ本体と、テスタ本体に 電気的に接続されたテストヘッド 10と、テストヘッド 10の上側に設けられた TCPハン ドラ 2とカゝら構成される。 As shown in FIG. 1, a test apparatus 1 for TCP includes a tester main body (not shown), a test head 10 electrically connected to the tester main body, and a TCP handler provided on the upper side of the test head 10. Consists of two and others.
[0032] TCPハンドラ 2は、キャリアテープ 5を搬送することにより、キャリアテープ 5上にその 長手方向に沿って一列に並んで形成されて 、る各 TCPを順次試験に付するもので ある。なお、キャリアテープ 5としては、その長手方向に沿って 2列又は複数列の配列 で TCPが形成されているものもある。例えば、同時に試験する TCP力 個の場合、 1 列 4個の配列や、 2列 2個単位の配列がある。 [0032] The TCP handler 2 is formed in a line along the longitudinal direction on the carrier tape 5 by conveying the carrier tape 5, and sequentially applies each TCP to the test. Note that some carrier tapes 5 have TCPs formed in an array of two or more rows along the longitudinal direction. For example, in the case of TCP forces to be tested at the same time, there are 4 rows in 1 row and 2 rows in 2 rows.
[0033] 図 2に示すように、キャリアテープ 5における各 TCP毎に、 TCP近傍の所定位置に 、ァライメントマーク 51が設けられている。 As shown in FIG. 2, alignment marks 51 are provided at predetermined positions in the vicinity of the TCP for each TCP on the carrier tape 5.
[0034] なお、本実施形態の TCPハンドラ 2は、 TCPを 2個ずつ試験に付するものであるが 、本発明は、 TCPを 2個ずつ試験に付する装置に限定されるものではなぐキャリア テープ 5上において直列方向および Zまたは並列方向に並んだ 3個以上の TCPを 同時に試験に付するハンドラをも含むものである。 [0034] Although the TCP handler 2 of the present embodiment applies two TCPs to the test, the present invention is not limited to a device that applies two TCPs to the test. It also includes a handler that simultaneously tests three or more TCPs arranged in series and Z or parallel on tape 5.
[0035] TCPハンドラ 2は、卷出リール 21と卷取リール 22とを備えている。卷出リール 21に は試験前のキャリアテープ 5が巻き取られており、キャリアテープ 5は、卷出リール 21 力も巻き出され、試験に付された後に卷取リール 22に巻き取られるように搬送される The TCP handler 2 includes a feed reel 21 and a take-up reel 22. The carrier tape 5 before the test is wound around the reel 21 and the carrier tape 5 is also wound around the reel 21 after being subjected to the test. Be done
[0036] 卷出リール 21と卷取リール 22との間〖こは、キャリアテープ 5から剥離した保護テー
プ 52を、卷出リーノレ 21力ら卷取リーノレ 22に架け渡す 3個のスぺーサローノレ 23a, 23 b, 23c力設けられている。各スぺーサローノレ 23a, 23b, 23cは、保護テープ 52の張 力を調整することができるように、それぞれ上下動できるようになつている。 [0036] The space between the feed reel 21 and the take-up reel 22 is a protective tape peeled off from the carrier tape 5. Three spacers 23a, 23b, and 23c are provided to bridge the loop 52 from the brewed linole 21 force to the toritori linole 22. Each spacer narrower 23a, 23b, 23c can be moved up and down so that the tension of the protective tape 52 can be adjusted.
[0037] 卷出リール 21の下側には、テープガイド 24a、卷出リミットローラ 25a、イン側サブス プロケット 25bおよびイン側ガイドローラ 25cが設けられており、卷出リール 21から卷 き出されたキャリアテープ 5は、テープガイド 24aによってガイドされつつ、卷出リミット ローラ 25a、イン側サブスプロケット 25bおよびイン側ガイドローラ 25cを経てプッシャ ユニット 3に搬送される。 [0037] Below the feed reel 21, a tape guide 24a, a feed limit roller 25a, an in-side sub sprocket 25b, and an in-side guide roller 25c are provided and are fed out from the feed reel 21. While being guided by the tape guide 24a, the carrier tape 5 is conveyed to the pusher unit 3 through the squeeze limit roller 25a, the in-side sub sprocket 25b, and the in-side guide roller 25c.
[0038] 卷取リール 22の下側には、テープガイド 24b、卷取リミットローラ 25f、アウト側サブ スプロケット 25eおよびアウト側ガイドローラ 25dが設けられており、プッシャユニット 3 において試験に付された後のキャリアテープ 5は、アウト側ガイドローラ 25d、アウト側 サブスプロケット 25eおよび卷取リミットローラ 25fを経て、テープガイド 24bによってガ イドされつつ、卷取リール 22に巻き取られる。 [0038] Under the take-up reel 22, a tape guide 24b, a take-up limit roller 25f, an out-side sub sprocket 25e and an out-side guide roller 25d are provided. After being subjected to the test in the pusher unit 3, The carrier tape 5 is wound around the take-up reel 22 while being guided by the tape guide 24b through the out-side guide roller 25d, the out-side sub-sprocket 25e and the take-up limit roller 25f.
[0039] イン側ガイドローラ 25cと、アウト側ガイドローラ 25dとの間には、プッシャユニット 3が 設けられている。そして、プッシャユニット 3の前段側(図 1中左側)には第 1カメラ 6aが 、プッシャユニット 3の下側(後述するプローブカードステージ 7の内側)には第 2カメラ 6bが、プッシャユニット 3の後段側(図 1中右側)には第 3カメラ 6cが設けられている。 また、プッシャユニット 3と第 3カメラ 6cとの間には、マークパンチ 26aおよびリジェクト パンチ 26bが設けられて!/、る。 A pusher unit 3 is provided between the in-side guide roller 25c and the out-side guide roller 25d. The first camera 6a is on the front side of the pusher unit 3 (left side in FIG. 1), and the second camera 6b is on the lower side of the pusher unit 3 (inside the probe card stage 7 described later). A third camera 6c is provided on the rear side (right side in FIG. 1). Also, a mark punch 26a and a reject punch 26b are provided between the pusher unit 3 and the third camera 6c.
[0040] マークパンチ 26aは、試験の結果に基づいて、該当する TCPにっき所定の位置に 1個または複数個の孔を開けるものであり、リジェクトパンチ 26bは、試験の結果不良 品であると判断された TCPを打ち抜くものである。なお、マークパンチ 26aゃリジエタ トパンチ 26bは、動作させないように個別に制御することもできる。 [0040] Based on the test results, the mark punch 26a is one in which one or a plurality of holes are opened at a predetermined position in the corresponding TCP, and the reject punch 26b is determined to be a defective product as a result of the test. This is to punch out TCP. Note that the mark punch 26a and the rigid punch 26b can be individually controlled so as not to operate.
[0041] 各カメラ 6a, 6b, 6cは、図示しない画像処理装置に接続されている。第 1カメラ 6a および第 3カメラ 6cは、キャリアテープ 5上における TCPの有無やマークパンチ 26a による孔の位置や数を判断するためのものである。また、第 2カメラ 6bは、キャリアテ ープ 5上のァライメントマークの位置情報や TCPとプローブとの位置ずれの情報を取 得したり、撮影した画像をモニタ表示して作業者がコンタクト状況を把握できるように
するものである。本実施形態における第 2カメラ 6bは、視野内の複数の対象について の位置ずれ情報を取得することができるものである。 [0041] Each camera 6a, 6b, 6c is connected to an image processing device (not shown). The first camera 6a and the third camera 6c are for judging the presence or absence of TCP on the carrier tape 5 and the position and number of holes by the mark punch 26a. In addition, the second camera 6b obtains information on the position of the alignment mark on the carrier tape 5 and information on the positional deviation between the TCP and the probe, and displays the photographed image on the monitor to display the contact status of the operator. So that you can understand To do. The second camera 6b in the present embodiment is capable of acquiring positional deviation information for a plurality of objects in the field of view.
[0042] 第 2カメラ 6bは、 TCPのテストパッドとプローブ 81 (プローブピンともいう)との位置関 係を正確に取得する必要性から、狭い撮像視野となっている。このため、第 2カメラ 6 bはカメラステージ 61上に搭載されており、カメラステージ 61が有するァクチユエータ によって平面視縦横方向(X軸 Y軸方向)および上下方向(Z軸方向)に移動可能 となっている。これにより、キャリアテープにおける試験領域の全体に移動できるので 、 TCPにおける所望のテストパッドとプローブ 81との位置関係や、ァライメントマーク 5 1の位置を鮮明に撮像することができる。 [0042] The second camera 6b has a narrow imaging field of view because it is necessary to accurately acquire the positional relationship between the TCP test pad and the probe 81 (also referred to as a probe pin). Therefore, the second camera 6b is mounted on the camera stage 61, and can be moved in the vertical and horizontal directions (X-axis Y-axis direction) and the vertical direction (Z-axis direction) in plan view by an actuator provided in the camera stage 61. ing. Thus, since the entire test area of the carrier tape can be moved, the positional relationship between the desired test pad and the probe 81 in TCP and the position of the alignment mark 51 can be clearly imaged.
[0043] ここで、第 2カメラ 6bに関しては、所望の解像度を維持した状態で、画像処理に使 用する画像処理領域よりも、例えば数倍以上広!ヽ撮像視野まで撮像可能な高解像 度のカメラを適用してもよい。この場合には、カメラステージ 61を移動させる頻度を低 減させることができるので、カメラステージ 61の移動に係る処理時間が短くなる。また 、カメラステージ 61の移動回数が少なくなることに伴って、移動量の誤差要因が低減 でき、したがって、より微細ピッチの TCPについても精度良く位置決めできる。さらに 、所望の解像度を維持した状態でデジタルズームが可能となるため、目的とするテス トパッド、プローブ 81およびァライメントマーク 51の相対的な位置関係を容易に把握 特定することができ、多数個のテストパッドとプローブ 81との位置ずれ補正を処理で きる。また、複数箇所のァライメントマーク 51を容易に検出できるようになるため、複 数箇所のァライメントマーク 51に基づいて位置決めを行うことができる。また、従来で は、作業者がコンタクト状況を確認するためにモニタに表示された画面をスクロール するときに、目的の位置を見逃すことがあった力 デジタルズームで適宜拡大 Z縮小 表示できるので、作業者が利用し易いモニタ表示を行うことができる。 [0043] Here, with respect to the second camera 6b, in a state where a desired resolution is maintained, for example, several times wider than the image processing area used for image processing! Degree camera may be applied. In this case, since the frequency of moving the camera stage 61 can be reduced, the processing time for moving the camera stage 61 is shortened. In addition, as the number of movements of the camera stage 61 decreases, the error factor of the movement amount can be reduced, and therefore a fine pitch TCP can be positioned with high accuracy. In addition, since digital zoom is possible while maintaining the desired resolution, the relative positional relationship between the target test pad, probe 81 and alignment mark 51 can be easily identified and identified, and multiple tests can be performed. The displacement correction between the pad and the probe 81 can be processed. In addition, since the alignment marks 51 at a plurality of locations can be easily detected, positioning can be performed based on the alignment marks 51 at a plurality of locations. Also, in the past, when the operator scrolled the screen displayed on the monitor to check the contact status, the force that sometimes overlooked the target position. Can be used for easy monitor display.
[0044] プッシャユニット 3のフレーム(プッシャフレーム) 36には、ボールねじ 32を回転させ ることのできるサーボモータ 31がブラケット 361を介して取り付けられて 、る。そして、 ボールねじ 32が螺合するプッシャ本体部 33が Z軸方向に延びる 2本のリニアモーシ ヨンガイド(以下「LMガイド」 t\、う。) 37を介して取り付けられて!/、る。このプッシャ本 体部 33は、サーボモータ 31を駆動させると、 LMガイド 37にガイドされながら上下方
向(z軸方向)に移動する。 A servo motor 31 capable of rotating the ball screw 32 is attached to a frame (pusher frame) 36 of the pusher unit 3 via a bracket 361. The pusher body 33 to which the ball screw 32 is screwed is attached via two linear motion guides (hereinafter referred to as “LM guides”) that extend in the Z-axis direction! When the servo motor 31 is driven, the pusher body 33 moves up and down while being guided by the LM guide 37. Move in the direction (z-axis direction).
[0045] このプッシャ本体部 33の下端部には、負圧源(図示省略)に接続されて TCPを吸 引することによりキャリアテープ 5を吸着保持して固定状態とすることのできる吸着プ レート 34が設けられている。 [0045] At the lower end of the pusher main body 33, a suction plate that is connected to a negative pressure source (not shown) and sucks and holds the carrier tape 5 by sucking the TCP so as to be fixed. 34 is provided.
[0046] プッシャ本体部 33の前段側(図 1中左側)には、テンションスプロケット 35aが設けら れており、プッシャ本体部 33の後段側(図 1中右側)には、メインスプロケット 35bが設 けられている。 [0046] A tension sprocket 35a is provided on the front side (left side in FIG. 1) of the pusher body 33, and the main sprocket 35b is provided on the rear side (right side in FIG. 1) of the pusher body 33. It is
[0047] また、プッシャユニット 3の下側であって、テストヘッド 10の上部には、図 2に示され るように、 2つの TCPの外部端子(以下「テストパッド」ということがある。)とコンタクトし 得る多数本のプローブ (接触端子) 81を備えたプローブカード 8が搭載されたプロ一 ブカードステージ 7が設置されている。プローブカードステージ 7は、複数のボールネ ジを介してサーボモータに接続されており(図示省略)、サーボモータの駆動により、 プローブカード 8を水平方向(XY平面方向)に移動させることができるとともに、プロ ーブカード 8を垂直軸回り(Z軸回り)に回転させることができる。 [0047] Further, as shown in FIG. 2, below the pusher unit 3 and above the test head 10, there are two TCP external terminals (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "test pads"). A probe card stage 7 on which a probe card 8 having a large number of probes (contact terminals) 81 capable of contacting with each other is mounted. The probe card stage 7 is connected to a servo motor through a plurality of ball screws (not shown), and the probe card 8 can be moved in the horizontal direction (XY plane direction) by driving the servo motor. The probe card 8 can be rotated around the vertical axis (around the Z axis).
[0048] 複数のプローブ 81を備えたプローブカード 8は、ピンによってプローブカードステー ジ 7のカードリングに着脱自在に取り付けられている(図示省略)。本実施形態におけ るプローブカード 8は、キャリアテープ 5の搬送方向に直列に並んだ 2つの TCPを同 時に試験できるように、 2つのプローブ群(前側のポジション 8aのプローブ群 Z後側 のポジション 8bのプローブ群)を備えている。なお、キャリアテープ 5に 2列の TCPを 配列するキャリアテープ 5の場合には、これに対応して 4つのプローブ群を有するプロ ーブカードを適用する。 [0048] The probe card 8 including the plurality of probes 81 is detachably attached to the card ring of the probe card stage 7 by pins (not shown). The probe card 8 in the present embodiment has two probe groups (front position 8a probe group Z rear position so that two TCPs arranged in series in the transport direction of the carrier tape 5 can be tested simultaneously. 8b probe group). In the case of the carrier tape 5 in which two rows of TCP are arranged on the carrier tape 5, a probe card having four probe groups is applied correspondingly.
[0049] 前側のポジション 8aと後側のポジション 8bとの間隔は、キャリアテープ 5の搬送方向 に対して TCPの 1ピッチ分の間隔に設定されている。この TCPの 1ピッチ分の間隔は 、試験対象のデバイスの品種、形状、キャリアテープの種類等によって異なる場合が あるので、前側のポジション 8aと後側のポジション 8bとの間隔が手動又は自動で変 更できるピッチ変更機構を備えることが望ま 、。 [0049] The distance between the front position 8a and the rear position 8b is set to one TCP pitch with respect to the transport direction of the carrier tape 5. The interval of one TCP pitch may vary depending on the device type, shape, carrier tape type, etc. of the device under test, so the interval between the front position 8a and the rear position 8b can be changed manually or automatically. It is desirable to have a pitch change mechanism that can be further improved.
[0050] プローブカード 8の各プローブ 81は、テストヘッド 10を介してテスタ本体に電気的 に接続されており、プローブカード 8の下側であって、プローブカードステージ 7の内
側には第 2カメラ 6bが位置している。 [0050] Each probe 81 of the probe card 8 is electrically connected to the tester body via the test head 10, and is below the probe card 8 and inside the probe card stage 7. The second camera 6b is located on the side.
[0051] このような装置では、プッシャユニット 3は、プローブカードステージ 7まで搬送されて きたキャリアテープ 5を、吸着'支持しながらテストヘッド 10上のプローブカード 8に押 圧する。すると、キャリアテープ 5上の 2つの TCPが、プローブカード 8上の対応する ポジション 8a, 8bに配置されたプローブ 81にコンタクトする状態になる。この状態で まず、微少な直流電流を各 IC端子へ印加して、 TCPの内部回路 (例えば保護用の ダイオード)に流れる電流の有無や電圧値の測定力 コンタクトチェックを行い、全て のテストパッドが電気的にプローブ 81に接触していることや隣接ピン間のショートの 有無を確認する。その後に、テスタ本体力ゝらのテスト信号を TCPに印加し、 TCPカゝら 読み出した応答信号をテストヘッド 10を通じてテスタ本体に送る。この応答信号に基 づ 、て TCPの性能や試験等を試験し、 TCPにつ 、てパス判定(良品判定)またはフ イル判定 (不良判定)を行う。 [0051] In such an apparatus, the pusher unit 3 presses the carrier tape 5 conveyed to the probe card stage 7 against the probe card 8 on the test head 10 while adsorbing and supporting it. Then, the two TCPs on the carrier tape 5 come into contact with the probes 81 arranged at the corresponding positions 8a and 8b on the probe card 8. In this state, first, a small direct current is applied to each IC terminal, and the presence or absence of current flowing in the internal circuit of TCP (for example, a protective diode) and the measuring ability of the voltage value are checked. Check that the probe 81 is in electrical contact with the pin and whether there is a short between adjacent pins. After that, the test signal from the tester main body is applied to the TCP, and the response signal read out by the TCP camera is sent to the tester main body through the test head 10. Based on this response signal, the TCP performance and test are tested, and the path judgment (non-defective product judgment) or file judgment (defective judgment) is performed for the TCP.
[0052] 次に、 TCPハンドラ 2の使用方法および動作について説明する。 Next, the usage method and operation of TCP handler 2 will be described.
TCPハンドラを使用する場合には、 TCPハンドラ 2を実稼動させる前に、あらかじめ 初期設定を行う必要がある。すなわち、 TCPの品種や、それに伴ってプローブカード 8を変更した場合には、 TCPのテストパッドと対応するプローブカード 8のプローブ 81 とがコンタクトするように、プッシャステージ 4およびプローブカードステージ 7の基準 位置を決定し、登録する必要がある(この位置を「登録位置」という)。 When using the TCP handler, it is necessary to perform the initial setting before operating the TCP handler 2. In other words, when the TCP type and the probe card 8 are changed accordingly, the standard of the pusher stage 4 and the probe card stage 7 is set so that the TCP test pad contacts the probe 81 of the corresponding probe card 8. The position needs to be determined and registered (this position is referred to as “registered position”).
[0053] 例えば、マニュアル操作にて作業者が、複数箇所 (例えば 3箇所)のプローブ 81と それに対応するテストパッドとを選択して粗位置を定め、次いで、第 2カメラ 6bおよび 画像処理装置を利用して、それぞれのプローブ 81ができる限り各テストパッドの中央 に位置するように、プッシャステージ 4および Zまたはプローブカードステージ 7を手 動制御又は自動制御で移動させることにより、基準位置を決定し登録する。なお、所 望により、上記粗位置の決定についても、マニュアル操作ではなく自動制御により行 つてもよい。 [0053] For example, by manual operation, an operator selects a plurality of (for example, three) probes 81 and corresponding test pads to determine rough positions, and then installs the second camera 6b and the image processing apparatus. The reference position is determined by moving the pusher stage 4 and Z or the probe card stage 7 manually or automatically so that each probe 81 is located in the center of each test pad as much as possible. sign up. If desired, the rough position may be determined by automatic control instead of manual operation.
[0054] このとき、第 2カメラ 6bの視野内における所定の対象の位置座標を併せて登録する 。本実施形態では、キャリアテープ 5におけるァライメントマーク 51の位置座標を登録 する。
[0055] 次に、 TCPハンドラ 2の実稼動時の動作を図 3のフローチャートを参照しながら説明 する。ここでは、キャリアテープ 5の長手方向に沿って一列に並んだ 2個の TCPを同 時に試験するものとする。また、キャリアテープ 5の位置決めを行うァライメントマーク 5 1は、図 2に示すように、 1個の TCPに対して上下 (Y軸方向)に 2箇所存在するため、 同時に試験する 2個の TCPでは合計 4箇所のァライメントマーク 51が存在する力 本 実施形態では、前側のポジション 8aに有る 1個のァライメントマーク 51を適用して TC Pの位置決めをするものとする。 At this time, the position coordinates of a predetermined target in the field of view of the second camera 6b are also registered. In this embodiment, the position coordinates of the alignment mark 51 on the carrier tape 5 are registered. Next, the operation of the TCP handler 2 during actual operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. Here, two TCPs arranged in a line along the longitudinal direction of the carrier tape 5 are tested at the same time. Also, as shown in Fig. 2, there are two alignment marks 51 for positioning the carrier tape 5 in the vertical direction (Y-axis direction), so two TCPs to be tested simultaneously. In this embodiment, a force with four alignment marks 51 is present. In this embodiment, one alignment mark 51 at the front position 8a is applied to position the TCP.
[0056] TCPハンドラ 2はその制御手段を備えており、 TCPハンドラ 2を実稼動可能な状態 にすると、まずプッシャステージ 4およびプローブカードステージ 7が登録位置に移動 する (ステップ S01)。そして、卷出リール 21および卷取リール 22が所定角度回転し てキャリアテープ 5を移動させ、 1個目および 2個目の TCPを吸着プレート 34の下側 の所定位置まで搬送する (ステップ S02)。 [0056] The TCP handler 2 includes the control means. When the TCP handler 2 is put into a state where it can be actually operated, the pusher stage 4 and the probe card stage 7 first move to the registration positions (step S01). Then, the feed reel 21 and the take-up reel 22 rotate by a predetermined angle to move the carrier tape 5 and transport the first and second TCPs to a predetermined position below the suction plate 34 (step S02). .
[0057] 吸着プレート 34の下側に TCPが搬送されると、プッシャユニット 3のサーボモータ 3 1を駆動して吸着プレート 34が Z軸下方向に移動する。移動した吸着プレート 34は、 キャリアテープ 5を吸着し、撮像位置まで下降する (ステップ S03)。 [0057] When TCP is transported to the lower side of the suction plate 34, the servo motor 31 of the pusher unit 3 is driven to move the suction plate 34 downward in the Z-axis. The moved suction plate 34 sucks the carrier tape 5 and descends to the imaging position (step S03).
[0058] この状態で第 2カメラ 6bは撮像を行 、 (ステップ S04)、画像情報を画像処理装置 に送信する。画像処理装置は、受信した画像情報から、あらかじめ登録された所定 の対象の位置座標と、実際に撮像した対象の位置座標との位置ずれの情報を取得 する。例えば本実施形態では、ポジション 8aに対応する登録されたァライメントマーク の位置座標と、実際に撮像したポジション 8aに対応するァライメントマーク 51の位置 座標との位置ずれの情報を取得する。 In this state, the second camera 6b performs imaging (step S04), and transmits image information to the image processing apparatus. The image processing apparatus acquires information on the positional deviation between the position coordinates of a predetermined target registered in advance and the position coordinates of the target actually captured from the received image information. For example, in the present embodiment, information on the positional deviation between the registered coordinate position of the alignment mark corresponding to the position 8a and the position coordinate of the alignment mark 51 corresponding to the actually imaged position 8a is acquired.
[0059] 画像処理装置は、所得した位置ずれ情報に基づ!ヽて、 X軸方向、 Y軸方向および 垂直軸回りの位置ずれ量を演算し、補正の必要がある力判断する (ステップ S05)。 判断の結果、補正の必要がある場合は必要な補正動作を行う(ステップ S06)。 [0059] The image processing apparatus is based on the earned positional deviation information! Then, the amount of positional deviation around the X-axis direction, Y-axis direction, and vertical axis is calculated to determine the force that needs to be corrected (step S05). If correction is necessary as a result of the determination, the necessary correction operation is performed (step S06).
[0060] 補正動作が終了すると、プッシャユニット 3のサーボモータ 31が作動し、プッシャ本 体部 33を介して吸着プレート 34がさらに Z軸方向に移動する。キャリアテープ 5を吸 着した吸着プレート 34は、コンタクト位置まで下降することとなり、キャリアテープ搬送 方向 A (図 2参照)の前側に位置する 1個目の TCPは、プローブカード 8上の、対応
する前側のポジション 8aに配置されたプローブ 81に対して押圧され、キャリアテープ 搬送方向 Aの後側に位置する 2個目の TCPは、プローブカード 8上の、対応する後 側のポジション 8bに配置されたプローブ 81に対して押圧される(ステップ S07)。 When the correction operation is completed, the servo motor 31 of the pusher unit 3 is operated, and the suction plate 34 is further moved in the Z-axis direction via the pusher main body 33. The suction plate 34 adsorbing the carrier tape 5 is lowered to the contact position, and the first TCP located on the front side in the carrier tape transport direction A (see Fig. 2) corresponds to the probe card 8 The second TCP, which is pressed against the probe 81 placed at the front position 8a and is located behind the carrier tape transport direction A, is placed at the corresponding rear position 8b on the probe card 8. The pressed probe 81 is pressed (step S07).
[0061] そして、各 TCPのテストパッドがプローブ 81にコンタクトすると、各 TCPにとつての 最初の試験(以下「本試験」と称することがある。)が実行される (ステップ S08)。試験 では、先ずコンタクトチェックを行って、全てのテストパッドがプローブ 81に電気的に 接触して ヽることを確認し、吸着プレート 34の複数回の上下動作を行っても接触不 良が検出される場合にはフェイル判定する。 [0061] When each TCP test pad contacts probe 81, the first test for each TCP (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "main test") is executed (step S08). In the test, a contact check is first performed to confirm that all test pads are in electrical contact with the probe 81, and contact failure is detected even if the suction plate 34 is moved up and down a plurality of times. In the case of failure, the failure is judged.
[0062] コンタクトチェックが正常な場合には、各 TCPにテスタ本体力もテストヘッド 10を通 じてテスト信号が印加され、各 TCPから読み出された応答信号がテストヘッド 10を通 じてテスタ本体に送られる。テスタ本体では、この応答信号に基づいて各 TCPの良 否判定やランク分け等を判断し、 TCPにつ 、てパス判定(良品判定)またはフェイル 判定 (不良品判定)を行う(ステップ S09)。 [0062] When the contact check is normal, a test signal is applied to each TCP through the test head 10 as well as a tester body force, and a response signal read from each TCP passes through the test head 10 to the tester. Sent to the body. Based on this response signal, the tester main body determines pass / fail judgment and rank classification of each TCP, and performs pass judgment (non-defective product judgment) or fail judgment (defective product judgment) for TCP (step S09).
[0063] 本試験の結果、パス判定を受けた TCPがあるときは、パス判定を受けた TCPのみ について、マークパンチ 26aが駆動する(ステップ S 10)。なお、マークパンチ 26aは、 動作させな!/、制御形態もある。 As a result of this test, when there is a TCP that has passed the path determination, the mark punch 26a is driven only for the TCP that has passed the path determination (step S10). Note that the mark punch 26a is not operated! /, And there is a control form.
[0064] ここで、先の本試験の結果を参照し (ステップ SI 1)、 V、ずれか一方または両方の T CPがフェイル判定を受けて 、た場合は、後述する再試験動作 (ステップ S21〜ステ ップ S36)を実行する。なお、フェイル判定となった場合には、所望により、この段階 で例えば 1回再試験を行って、パス判定に変化するかの制御動作を追加してもよい。 [0064] Here, referring to the result of the previous main test (Step SI 1), if V, one or both of the TCPs have received a fail determination, a retest operation (step S21 described later) is performed. Execute ~ step S36). If a fail determination is made, if desired, a re-test may be performed once at this stage, for example, and a control operation for changing to a pass determination may be added.
[0065] 一方、両 TCPがパス判定を受けていた場合は、プッシャユニット 3のサーボモータ 3 1が駆動し、プッシャ本体部 33を介して吸着プレート 34を Z軸上方向に移動させると ともに、プッシャステージ 4およびプローブカードステージ 7が登録位置に移動する( ステップ S 12)。そして、吸着プレート 34は、キャリアテープ 5の吸着を停止してキヤリ ァテープ 5を解放するとともに、さらに Z軸上方向に移動する (ステップ S13)。 [0065] On the other hand, if both TCPs have undergone a path determination, the servo motor 31 of the pusher unit 3 is driven to move the suction plate 34 in the Z-axis upward direction via the pusher body 33. The pusher stage 4 and the probe card stage 7 move to the registration position (step S12). Then, the suction plate 34 stops the suction of the carrier tape 5 to release the carrier tape 5, and further moves upward in the Z-axis (step S13).
[0066] そして、本試験を行った TCPが最後のデバイスであるか否かを判断し (ステップ S1 4)、最後のデバイスであると判断した場合には、主動作を終了し、最後のデバイスで ないと判断した場合には、ステップ S02に戻って次の 2個の TCPを試験する。
[0067] 次に再試験動作を説明する。ここで、上記試験の結果、 2個の TCPのフェイル判定 の組み合わせは、キャリアテープ搬送方向 Aの前側のポジション 8aの TCPのみがフ エイル判定となる場合と、後側のポジション 8bの TCPのみがフェイル判定となる場合 と、両方のポジション 8a, 8bの TCPがフェイル判定となる場合とがあり、動作が各々 異なる。 [0066] Then, it is determined whether or not the TCP subjected to this test is the last device (step S1 4). If it is determined that the TCP is the last device, the main operation is terminated and the last device is terminated. If not, return to step S02 and test the next two TCPs. Next, the retest operation will be described. Here, as a result of the above test, the combination of the two TCP fail judgments is that only the TCP at the front position 8a in the carrier tape transport direction A is judged as fail, and only the TCP at the rear position 8b is used. There are cases where the fail judgment is performed and the TCPs at both positions 8a and 8b are judged as fail judgment, and the operations are different.
[0068] 再試験動作では、まず、先に説明したステップ S12およびステップ S13と同様の動 作を実行して、吸着プレート 34によるキャリアテープ 5の吸着を停止してキャリアテー プ 5を解放する (ステップ S21)。 [0068] In the retest operation, first, the same operation as in Step S12 and Step S13 described above is executed, and the suction of the carrier tape 5 by the suction plate 34 is stopped and the carrier tape 5 is released ( Step S21).
[0069] 次に、キャリアテープ搬送方向 Aの前側のポジション 8aに位置する TCP (ここでは 1 個目の TCP)が最初の試験でパス判定を受けている力、フェイル判定を受けている か判断する(ステップ S22)。ここで、前側のポジション 8aに位置する TCPが最初の試 験でノ ス判定を受けている場合は、後述のステップ S28を実行する。一方、前側のポ ジシヨン 8aに位置する TCPがフェイル判定を受けて!/、る場合は、テンションスプロケ ット 35aと共にメインスプロケット 35bを TCPの 1ピッチ分、逆転させてキャリアテープ 5 を逆方向に移動させ (ステップ S23)、プローブカード 8の前側のポジション 8aに位置 していた TCPを後側のポジション 8bに移動させる。そして、先に説明したステップ SO 3からステップ S07と同様の動作を実行し、当該 TCPの外部端子を、後側のポジショ ン 8bのプローブ 81に接触させる(ステップ S24)。 [0069] Next, determine whether the TCP (in this case, the first TCP) located at the front position 8a in the carrier tape transport direction A has received the pass / fail judgment in the first test. (Step S22). Here, when the TCP located at the front position 8a has received a no determination in the first test, step S28 described later is executed. On the other hand, if the TCP located in the front position 8a receives a fail judgment! /, The main sprocket 35b is rotated together with the tension sprocket 35a by one TCP pitch to reverse the carrier tape 5 in the reverse direction. Move (step S23) and move the TCP that was located at the front position 8a of the probe card 8 to the rear position 8b. Then, the same operations as those from step SO3 to step S07 described above are performed, and the external terminal of the TCP is brought into contact with the probe 81 of the rear position 8b (step S24).
[0070] そして、後側のポジション 8bのプローブ 81にコンタクトした TCPに対して再試験を 実行し (ステップ S25)、当該 TCPについてパス判定またはフェイル判定を行う(ステ ップ S26)。ここで、再試験のコンタクトチェックで接触不良が検出された場合、直ちに フェイル判定する第 1の処理形態と、キャリアテープ 5側を微動させたり、プローブ力 ードステージ 7側を微動させて、接触不良が無くなる位置が存在するかの試行動作を 行う第 2の処理形態とがある力 第 2の処理形態を行うことが望ましい。 [0070] Then, a retest is performed on the TCP that has contacted the probe 81 at the rear position 8b (step S25), and a path determination or a fail determination is performed on the TCP (step S26). Here, if contact failure is detected in the retest contact check, contact failure is detected by first moving the carrier tape 5 side slightly or the probe force stage 7 side finely. It is desirable to perform the second processing form, which has a certain force with the second processing form that performs a trial operation to determine whether there is a position where it disappears.
[0071] 再試験の結果、再試験に付した TCPが 2度目のフェイル判定を受けたときは、不良 品として確定させ、リジェクトパンチ 26bを駆動する (ステップ S27a)。一方、 2度目で パス判定を受けたときは、その TCPについて良品として確定させ、マークパンチ 26a を駆動する (ステップ S27b)。
[0072] 次に、ステップ 22又はステップ 25で、当初における前側のポジション 8aに位置する TCPがパス判定を受け、且つ、後側のポジション 8bに位置していた TCPがパス判定 を受けた場合には、ステップ S12を実行する (ステップ S28)。 [0071] As a result of the retest, when the TCP subjected to the retest receives the second fail determination, it is determined as a defective product and the reject punch 26b is driven (step S27a). On the other hand, when the pass determination is received for the second time, the TCP is determined as a non-defective product and the mark punch 26a is driven (step S27b). [0072] Next, in Step 22 or Step 25, when the TCP located at the front position 8a at the beginning receives a path determination, and the TCP located at the rear position 8b receives a path determination. Executes step S12 (step S28).
[0073] 一方、後側のポジション 8bに位置していた TCPがフェイル判定を受けていた場合 は、先に説明したステップ S12およびステップ S13と同様の動作を実行して、吸着プ レート 34によるキャリアテープ 5の吸着を停止してキャリアテープ 5を解放する (ステツ プ S29)。続いて、テンションスプロケット 35aと共にメインスプロケット 35bを TCPの 1 ピッチ分、キャリアテープ 5を前進させて、後側のポジション 8bに位置していた TCPを 前側のポジション 8aに移動させる (ステップ S30)。そして、先に説明したステップ SO 3からステップ S07と同様の動作を実行して、当該 TCPの外部端子を、前側のポジシ ヨン 8aのプローブ 81に接触させる(ステップ S31)。 [0073] On the other hand, if the TCP located at the rear position 8b has received a fail determination, the same operations as in steps S12 and S13 described above are performed, and the carrier by the suction plate 34 is executed. Stop sucking tape 5 and release carrier tape 5 (step S29). Subsequently, the main sprocket 35b is moved forward by one pitch of the TCP together with the tension sprocket 35a, and the carrier tape 5 is moved forward to move the TCP located at the rear position 8b to the front position 8a (step S30). Then, the same operations as those from step SO3 to step S07 described above are executed, and the external terminal of the TCP is brought into contact with the probe 81 of the front position 8a (step S31).
[0074] そして、前側のポジション 8aのプローブ 81にコンタクトした TCPに対して再試験を 実行し (ステップ S32)、当該 TCPについてパス判定またはフェイル判定を行う(ステ ップ S33)。 [0074] Then, a retest is performed on the TCP that has contacted the probe 81 at the front position 8a (step S32), and a path determination or a fail determination is performed on the TCP (step S33).
[0075] この再試験の結果、再試験に付した TCPが 2度目のフェイル判定を受けたときは、 不良品として確定させ、リジェクトパンチ 26bを駆動する (ステップ S34a)。一方、 2度 目でノ ス判定を受けたときは、その TCPについて良品として確定させ、マークパンチ 26aを駆動する(ステップ S34b)。そして、ステップ S12を実行する。 As a result of this retest, when the TCP attached to the retest receives the second fail determination, it is determined as a defective product and the reject punch 26b is driven (step S34a). On the other hand, when the second determination is received, the TCP is determined as non-defective and the mark punch 26a is driven (step S34b). Then, Step S12 is executed.
[0076] このように、本実施形態の TCPハンドラ 2によれば、最初の試験にお!、てフェイル判 定を受けた TCPを、 TCPハンドラを停止させることなく自動的に再試験に付すること ができる。また、フェイル判定の原因として、一方のポジションのプローブ 81に起因す る TCPのコンタクト不良や位置決め不良がある力 本実施形態の TCPハンドラのよう に、最初の試験におけるプローブカード上のポジションとは異なる他のポジションの プローブ 81で再試験を行うことにより、良好なコンタクト状態となる可能性がある。これ により、本来良品である TCPが再試験によって良品と判定できるようになる結果、 TC Pの歩留まりが向上できる。し力も、先に説明したように、試験装置を停止させることな く自動的に再試験を行うことができるので、試験装置の稼働率が向上する結果、試験 のスループットが向上する。
[0077] 特に本実施形態では、一方のポジション 8aに対応するァライメントマーク 51を利用 して TCPの位置決めを行って!/、るため、他方のポジション 8bに位置する TCPは相対 的に位置決め不良になり易い。し力し、このような場合でも、 TCPをポジション 8aに移 動させた後、当該 TCPのァライメントマーク 51を利用して TCPの位置決めが行われ る結果、当該 TCPは、より正確な位置決め状態が得られ、したがって効果的にパス 判定を得ることができる。 [0076] Thus, according to the TCP handler 2 of the present embodiment, the TCP that received the fail judgment in the first test is automatically subjected to the retest without stopping the TCP handler. be able to. In addition, as a cause of fail judgment, there is a TCP contact failure or positioning failure caused by the probe 81 in one position. Unlike the TCP handler of this embodiment, it is different from the position on the probe card in the first test. Retesting with a probe 81 in another position may result in good contact. As a result, TCP, which is originally a good product, can be judged as a good product by retesting, so that the yield of TCP can be improved. As described above, the test force can be automatically re-tested without stopping the test equipment. As a result, the availability of the test equipment is improved, resulting in an increase in test throughput. [0077] In particular, in the present embodiment, the TCP is positioned using the alignment mark 51 corresponding to one position 8a! /, So the TCP located in the other position 8b is relatively poorly positioned. It is easy to become. Even in this case, after moving the TCP to position 8a, the TCP is positioned using the alignment mark 51 of the TCP. As a result, the TCP is more accurately positioned. Therefore, it is possible to effectively obtain a path determination.
[0078] また、フェイル判定の原因は、 TCPの位置決め不良の場合だけでなぐ各ポジショ ン 8a, 8bに多数本設けられているプローブ 81の何れかで、針先劣化が起こっている 場合や、押圧力不足に伴って接触抵抗値が増大している場合があるが、本実施形 態の TCPハンドラ 2によれば、良好なポジション側で再試験することにより、効果的に パス判定を得ることができる。これにより、良品の TCPを不良品として処理される問題 が解消され、歩留まりの向上効果が得られる。更に、作業者が試験装置を一旦停止 させる必要がなくなり、装置の稼働率を向上させることができる。 [0078] Further, the cause of the fail determination is not only in the case of TCP positioning failure, but also in the case where needle tip deterioration has occurred in any of the multiple probes 81 provided in each of the positions 8a and 8b, Although the contact resistance value may increase due to insufficient pressing force, according to the TCP handler 2 of this embodiment, a pass judgment can be obtained effectively by retesting at a good position. Can do. This eliminates the problem of treating non-defective TCP as a defective product, and improves yield. Furthermore, it is not necessary for the operator to stop the test apparatus once, and the operating rate of the apparatus can be improved.
[0079] ここで、ステップ S32の再試験は、プローブカード 8上の前側のポジション 8aに位置 する TCPに対して再試験を行う工程である力 このとき、プローブカード 8上の後側の ポジション 8bには、まだ試験に付されていない TCP (ここでは 3個目)がコンタクトされ る。したがって、このステップ S32の再試験を行うときに、同時に、プローブカード 8上 の後側のポジション 8bに位置する TCPを最初の試験に付してもよい。 [0079] Here, the retest in step S32 is a process for performing a retest on the TCP located at the front position 8a on the probe card 8. At this time, the rear position 8b on the probe card 8 is used. Is contacted with a TCP that has not yet been tested (here, the third). Therefore, when performing the retest in step S32, TCP located at the rear position 8b on the probe card 8 may be attached to the first test at the same time.
[0080] この場合、ステップ S32〜ステップ S34の工程 E1に替えて、次に説明する工程 E2 [0080] In this case, instead of the process E1 in steps S32 to S34, a process E2 described below is performed.
(ステップ S41〜ステップ S45 ;図 5参照)を実行する。すなわち、再試験に付された T CP (ここでは 2個目)だけでなぐ同時に、キャリアテープ搬送方向 Aの後側に位置し ておりプローブカード 8上の後側のポジション 8bに位置する TCP (ここでは 3個目)に つ!、て試験を行う(ステップ S41)。 (Step S41 to Step S45; see FIG. 5). In other words, at the same time as the TCP (second one here) attached to the retest, at the same time, the TCP (located at the rear position 8b on the probe card 8 is located at the rear side in the carrier tape transport direction A ( Here's the third one)! Perform a test (step S41).
[0081] そして、まずは再試験に付した TCPにつ 、て判定を行う(ステップ S42)。この結果 、再試験に付した TCPがフェイル判定を受けたときは、不良品として確定させ、リジェ タトパンチ 26bを駆動する (ステップ S43a)。一方、再試験に付した TCPがパス判定 を受けたときは、良品として確定させ、マークパンチ 26aを駆動する (ステップ S43b)
[0082] そして、再試験と同時に行った最初の試験に付した TCP (ここでは 3個目の TCP) がパス判定を受けている力判断する(ステップ S44)。当該 TCPがパス判定を受けて いる場合は、良品として確定させ、マークパンチ 26aを駆動させ (ステップ S45)、次 いでステップ S 12を実行する。一方、当該 TCPがフェイル判定を受けている場合は、 ステップ S29を実行する。 [0081] First, a determination is made for the TCP subjected to the retest (step S42). As a result, when the TCP subjected to the retest receives a fail determination, it is determined as a defective product and the reject punch 26b is driven (step S43a). On the other hand, when the TCP attached to the retest receives a pass judgment, it is confirmed as a non-defective product and the mark punch 26a is driven (step S43b). [0082] Then, a determination is made as to whether the TCP (here, the third TCP) attached to the first test performed simultaneously with the retest receives a path determination (step S44). If the TCP has received a pass determination, it is determined as a non-defective product, the mark punch 26a is driven (step S45), and then step S12 is executed. On the other hand, if the TCP has received a fail determination, step S29 is executed.
[0083] このように、再試験と同時に最初の試験を行うようにすると、試験のスループットをよ り向上させることができる。 As described above, when the first test is performed simultaneously with the retest, the test throughput can be further improved.
[0084] 以上説明した実施形態は、本発明の理解を容易にするために記載されたものであ つて、本発明を限定するために記載されたものではない。したがって、上記実施形態 に開示された各要素は、本発明の技術的範囲に属する全ての設計変更や均等物を も含む趣旨である。 The embodiments described above are described for facilitating the understanding of the present invention, and are not described for limiting the present invention. Therefore, each element disclosed in the above embodiment is intended to include all design changes and equivalents belonging to the technical scope of the present invention.
[0085] 例えば、上述の試験動作において、プローブカード 8上の両方のポジション 8a, 8b における TCPの判定を同時に行い、両方のポジション 8a, 8bの TCPが共にフェイル 判定となった場合には、前後のポジション 8a, 8bの TCPを交互に入れ替えて再試験 動作を行ってもよい。なお、両方のポジション 8a, 8bの TCPが共にフェイル判定とな つた段階で、上記入れ替えを行う前に、プッシャユニット 3を複数回上下動作させて 再度試験を行うことが望ましぐこれによりパス判定が得られることがある。 [0085] For example, in the above test operation, if TCP determination is performed at both positions 8a and 8b on the probe card 8 at the same time, and both TCPs at both positions 8a and 8b both fail, The retest operation may be performed by alternately switching the TCP at positions 8a and 8b. Note that it is desirable that the pusher unit 3 be moved up and down several times before performing the above replacement at the stage when both positions 8a and 8b have both failed. May be obtained.
[0086] また、位置ずれ補正時には、後側のポジション 8bに対応する登録されたァライメント マークの位置座標と、実際に撮像した後側のポジション 8bに対応するァライメントマ ーク 51の位置座標との位置ずれの情報を取得するようにしてもよい。また、前側のポ ジシヨン 8aに対応するァライメントマーク 51の位置ずれ量と後側のポジション 8bに対 応するァライメントマーク 51の位置ずれ量の平均値を用いてもよ!、。 [0086] At the time of misalignment correction, the position coordinates of the registered alignment mark corresponding to the rear position 8b and the position coordinates of the alignment mark 51 corresponding to the rear position 8b actually captured. Information on deviation may be acquired. Alternatively, the average value of the displacement amount of the alignment mark 51 corresponding to the front position 8a and the displacement amount of the alignment mark 51 corresponding to the rear position 8b may be used.
[0087] また、上記実施形態では、一方のポジション 8aに対応するァライメントマーク 51を 利用して TCPの位置決めを行って!/、るため、他方のポジション 8bに位置する TCPは 相対的に位置決め不良になり易いが、他方のポジション 8bに対応する他方のァライ メントマーク 51も、必要とする場合に利用してもよい。例えば、後側のポジション 8bの TCPでフェイル判定が発生した場合に、後側のァライメントマーク 51に基づ 、て位 置決めを行った後、 TCPを移動させない状態で再試験を行うようにしてもよぐそれ
によってパス判定が得られる場合がある。これによれば、カメラステージ 61を大きく移 動させて 2力所のァライメントマーク 51の位置を求める移動動作を大幅に減らすこと ができ、第 2カメラ 6bの移動時間に伴うスループットの低下を最小に抑えられるため、 実用的である。 [0087] In the above embodiment, the TCP is positioned using the alignment mark 51 corresponding to one position 8a! /, So that the TCP positioned at the other position 8b is relatively positioned. Although it tends to be defective, the other alignment mark 51 corresponding to the other position 8b may also be used when necessary. For example, if a fail judgment occurs in the TCP at the rear position 8b, after performing the positioning based on the alignment mark 51 on the rear side, perform a retest without moving the TCP. It's okay Depending on the case, a path determination may be obtained. According to this, it is possible to greatly reduce the movement operation for obtaining the position of the alignment mark 51 at the two power points by moving the camera stage 61 greatly, and minimize the decrease in throughput due to the movement time of the second camera 6b. This is practical.
[0088] また、数万回の押圧ストレスに伴って、多数本のプローブ 81は変形してくるため、 T CPのテストパッドと接触する全てのプローブ 81が、対応する各テストパッドの中央か らずれたばらつき状態になってくる。そこで、何れかのプローブ 81で接触不良が検出 されるまで、プローブカードステージ 7を X軸方向及び Y軸方向へ順次微動させて移 動可能領域を求め、現状のプローブ 81における最良の中央位置を特定する。これに 基づ 、て TCPの位置決めを行うことで、現状の現状のプローブ 81における最適な位 置決めを行うことができる。また、所望により、得られた移動可能領域情報と中央位置 情報を保存しておき、試験実施時において、それらの情報を利用して位置補正する ことで、最適な位置決めを行うことができる。これにより、フェイル判定となる発生頻度 が低減し、歩留りと試験のスループットが向上する。 [0088] In addition, since a large number of probes 81 are deformed due to tens of thousands of pressing stresses, all the probes 81 in contact with the test pads of the CCP are moved from the center of the corresponding test pads. The state of deviation is shifted. Therefore, until a contact failure is detected by any of the probes 81, the probe card stage 7 is sequentially finely moved in the X-axis direction and the Y-axis direction to obtain a movable area, and the best center position in the current probe 81 is determined. Identify. Based on this, it is possible to determine the optimum position of the current probe 81 by positioning the TCP. If desired, the movable area information and the center position information obtained can be saved, and the position can be corrected using the information at the time of test execution, so that optimum positioning can be performed. This reduces the frequency of fail judgments and improves yield and test throughput.
[0089] また、各テストパッドと、当該テストパッドに接触する各プローブ 81との間に生ずる接 触抵抗値は、数万回の押圧ストレス、プローブ 81の先端部の位置ずれ、形状変化、 弾性特性の変動、電気的な接触部位の状態等に伴って、ばらついたり、増大したり する。そこで、フェイル判定が発生した TCPのプローブ 81に対して、当該プローブ 8 1で許容可能な範囲内で、プッシャユニット 3の吸着プレート 34の押圧方向の高さ条 件を変更して、再試験を実行するようにしてもよい。この再試験でパス判定が得られ た場合は、その TCPを良品として確定することができる。 [0089] Further, the contact resistance value generated between each test pad and each probe 81 in contact with the test pad is tens of thousands of pressing stresses, positional deviation of the tip of the probe 81, shape change, elasticity It fluctuates or increases with fluctuations in characteristics and the state of electrical contact parts. Therefore, change the height condition in the pressing direction of the suction plate 34 of the pusher unit 3 within the allowable range of the probe 81 for the TCP probe 81 that has failed, and perform a retest. You may make it perform. If this retest results in a pass, the TCP can be confirmed as good.
[0090] また、コンタクトチェックにより接触抵抗値を実用的に測定できる TCPの場合には、 フェイル判定が出された後、現状の押圧状態のままで、コンタクトチェックを実行して 、各々の接触抵抗値を測定するようにしてもよい。そして、 TCPの各 IC端子の種類( 入力ピン,出力ピン,電源ピン)で異なる許容可能な最大抵抗値に基づいて、接触抵 抗値の良否判断を行い、第 1に、異常な接触抵抗値のプローブ 81が検出された場 合には、プッシャユニット 3を上下動作させて、当該プローブ 81の接触抵抗を再度測 定し、正常状態に回復した場合にはこの状態で再試験を実行する。第 2に、接触抵
抗値が正常だった場合には、当該 TCPは不良品の可能性が高いため、別のプロ一 ブ 81へ移動させて再試験をする。 [0090] In addition, in the case of TCP that can practically measure the contact resistance value by contact check, after the fail judgment is issued, the contact check is performed with the current pressed state, and each contact resistance is measured. The value may be measured. Then, based on the maximum allowable resistance value that varies depending on the type of each IC terminal of TCP (input pin, output pin, power supply pin), the contact resistance value is judged as good or bad. First, abnormal contact resistance value When the probe 81 is detected, the pusher unit 3 is moved up and down to measure the contact resistance of the probe 81 again. When the probe 81 returns to the normal state, the retest is performed in this state. Second, contact resistance If the resistance is normal, the TCP is likely to be defective, so move to another probe 81 and retest.
[0091] また、吸着プレート 34は、 TCPの配列方向(X軸方向, Y軸方向)に対応して分割さ れた構造となっていてもよぐ更に、分割された吸着プレートが相対的に移動可能な 微動機構 (図示省略)を備えていてもよい。このような分割移動構造により、複数の T CP間のピッチを対応するプローブ群のピッチに一致させる調整を行うことができる。 なお、キャリアテープ 5の薄いフィルムは、ピッチ調整により湾曲した状態となるが、そ の調整幅は数十ミクロン程度であるので実用的に実施できる。但し、プローブカード 側のプローブ 81の TCP間ピッチは、例えば数十ミクロン程度狭く形成しておくことが 望ましい。 [0091] The suction plate 34 may have a structure divided in correspondence with the TCP arrangement direction (X-axis direction, Y-axis direction). A movable fine movement mechanism (not shown) may be provided. With such a divided moving structure, it is possible to adjust the pitch between a plurality of TCPs to match the pitch of the corresponding probe group. Although the thin film of the carrier tape 5 is bent by the pitch adjustment, the adjustment width is about several tens of microns, and can be practically implemented. However, it is desirable that the pitch between the TCPs of the probes 81 on the probe card side be narrow, for example, about several tens of microns.
[0092] 上記のような分割移動構造によれば、多数個(2, 4, 8, 16個)の TCPを同時に試 験する場合において、熱膨張に伴う TCP間ピッチの変動や、狭ピッチで位置精度が 要求される TCPや、多ピンで大型の TCPの TCP間ピッチが広くなる場合や、キャリア テープ 5のフィルムの伸び変動などに、的確に対応することができる。この結果、位置 ずれに伴う不良判定となる発生頻度を一層低減できるため、より多数個 (4, 8, 16個 )の TCPを同時に試験することができ、したがって試験の信頼性及びスループットを 向上させることができる。 [0092] According to the divided moving structure as described above, when testing a large number (2, 4, 8, 16) of TCP simultaneously, the variation in the pitch between TCPs due to thermal expansion or the narrow pitch It is possible to accurately cope with TCP where position accuracy is required, when the pitch between TCPs of a large TCP with a large pin is widened, or when the carrier tape 5 film changes. As a result, it is possible to further reduce the frequency of occurrence of defect determination due to misalignment, so that a larger number (4, 8, 16) of TCPs can be tested simultaneously, thus improving the reliability and throughput of the test. be able to.
産業上の利用可能性 Industrial applicability
[0093] 本発明に係る TCPハンドリング装置は、デバイス製造の歩留りおよび試験のスルー プットを向上させ、効率良く TCP試験を行うのに有効である。
The TCP handling device according to the present invention is effective in improving the yield of device manufacturing and the throughput of testing, and efficiently performing TCP testing.
Claims
[1] 同時に試験する複数の TCPに対応するプローブカードを適用し、キャリアテープ上 の複数の TCPの外部端子と、プローブカードの接触端子とを電気的に接触させるこ とにより、複数の TCPを同時に試験に付することができる TCPハンドリング装置であ つて、 [1] By applying a probe card that supports multiple TCPs to be tested at the same time, and connecting the external terminals of multiple TCPs on the carrier tape and the contact terminals of the probe card, multiple TCPs can be connected. A TCP handling device that can be tested at the same time.
最初の試験で複数の TCPを同時に試験し、前記同時試験で不良判定を受けた不 良判定 TCPを、当該不良判定 TCPが接触した接触端子とは異なる別の接触端子の 位置へ移動させた後、再度試験に付すことを特徴とする TCPハンドリング装置。 After testing multiple TCPs in the first test at the same time, and moving the bad judgment TCP that received the failure judgment in the simultaneous test to a different contact terminal position from the contact terminal that the failure judgment TCP contacted A TCP handling device characterized by being subjected to the test again.
[2] キャリアテープの搬送方向に対して直列に並んだ複数の TCP、キャリアテープの搬 送方向に対して並列に並んだ複数の TCP、又はキャリアテープの搬送方向に対して 直列に並んだ複数の TCP及び搬送方向に対して並列に並んだ複数の TCP、を同 時に試験に付すことを特徴とする請求項 1に記載の TCPハンドリング装置。 [2] Multiple TCPs arranged in series in the carrier tape transport direction, Multiple TCPs arranged in parallel in the carrier tape transport direction, or Multiple in series in the carrier tape transport direction 2. The TCP handling device according to claim 1, wherein the TCP and a plurality of TCPs arranged in parallel in the transport direction are subjected to the test at the same time.
[3] キャリアテープには、各 TCP毎に各 TCPの位置を特定する位置決め用のァラィメ ントマークが設けられており、 [3] The carrier tape is provided with positioning mark to identify the position of each TCP for each TCP.
同時に試験に付される複数の TCPの外部端子と対応する接触端子の位置決めは 、少なくとも一の前記ァライメントマークに基づいて行うことを特徴とする請求項 1に記 載の TCPハンドリング装置。 2. The TCP handling device according to claim 1, wherein positioning of contact terminals corresponding to a plurality of TCP external terminals simultaneously subjected to the test is performed based on at least one alignment mark.
[4] 前記不良判定 TCPを再度試験に付するときに、前記不良判定 TCPと共に押圧さ れる未検査の TCPを同時に試験に付すことを特徴とする請求項 1に記載の TCPハン ドリング装置。 4. The TCP handling device according to claim 1, wherein when the defect determination TCP is subjected to the test again, an uninspected TCP pressed together with the defect determination TCP is simultaneously subjected to the test.
[5] 前記不良判定 TCPを再度試験に付するときに、前記不良判定 TCPと共に押圧さ れる検査済みの TCPを試験の実行から除外することを特徴とする請求項 1に記載の TCPハンドリング装置。 5. The TCP handling apparatus according to claim 1, wherein when the defect determination TCP is subjected to the test again, the inspected TCP pressed together with the defect determination TCP is excluded from the execution of the test.
[6] 前記同時試験で不良判定を受けた不良判定 TCPに対して、当該不良判定 TCPが 接触した接触端子により、少なくとも 1回の再試験を行うことを特徴とする請求項 1〖こ 記載の TCPハンドリング装置。 [6] The defect determination TCP that has received the defect determination in the simultaneous test is subjected to at least one re-test with a contact terminal in contact with the defect determination TCP. TCP handling device.
[7] 前記不良判定 TCPの外部端子と当該外部端子に接触する接触端子との押圧条件 を変更して、前記再試験を行うことを特徴とする請求項 6に記載の TCPハンドリング
装置。 [7] The TCP handling according to [6], wherein the retest is performed by changing a pressing condition between the external terminal of the TCP and the contact terminal that contacts the external terminal. apparatus.
[8] 前記不良判定 TCPの外部端子と当該外部端子に接触する接触端子との接触抵抗 を測定して、許容可能な接触抵抗値を超えるものが検出された場合に、前記押圧条 件を変更して、前記再試験を行うことを特徴とする請求項 7に記載の TCPハンドリン グ装置。 [8] Defect determination When the contact resistance between the external terminal of TCP and the contact terminal in contact with the external terminal is measured, and an object exceeding the allowable contact resistance value is detected, the pressing condition is changed. The TCP handling apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the retest is performed.
[9] TCPの外部端子と当該外部端子に接触する接触端子との電気的接触状態を検出 するコンタクトチェック機能を利用して、何れかの接触端子の接触不良が検出される まで、プローブカードを移動させるプローブカードステージを X軸方向及び Z又は Y 軸方向へ微動させて移動可能領域を求め、 [9] Using the contact check function that detects the electrical contact state between the TCP external terminal and the contact terminal that contacts the external terminal, remove the probe card until a contact failure is detected on any of the contact terminals. Finely move the probe card stage to be moved in the X axis direction and the Z or Y axis direction to obtain the movable area,
前記移動可能領域における中央位置を特定し、 Identify a central position in the movable region;
前記特定した中央位置に基づいて TCPの位置決めを行うことを特徴とする請求項 1に記載の TCPハンドリング装置。 2. The TCP handling apparatus according to claim 1, wherein TCP positioning is performed based on the specified center position.
[10] 前記 TCPハンドリング装置は、複数の TCPを同時に吸着して前記接触端子に押圧 する吸着 ·押圧部材を備えており、 [10] The TCP handling device includes an adsorption / pressing member that simultaneously adsorbs a plurality of TCPs and presses them against the contact terminals,
前記吸着 ·押圧部材は、同時に試験する TCPの配列に対応して少なくとも 2分割さ れており、 The adsorption / pressing member is divided into at least two parts corresponding to the TCP arrangement to be tested at the same time,
前記分割された吸着 ·押圧部材は、同時に試験する TCPのピッチに対応し得るよう に、相互の間隔が調整可能となっていることを特徴とする請求項 1に記載の TCPハン ドリング装置。 2. The TCP handling apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the distance between the divided suction / pressing members can be adjusted so as to correspond to the pitch of TCP to be tested at the same time.
[11] 複数の TCPを同時に試験に付することができる TCPハンドリング装置であって、 最初の試験で複数の TCPを同時に試験し、前記同時試験で不良判定を受けた不 良判定 TCPを、当該不良判定 TCPが接触したプローブカードの接触端子とは異な る別の接触端子を適用して、再度試験に付すことを特徴とする TCPハンドリング装置
[11] A TCP handling device that can simultaneously test a plurality of TCPs. A plurality of TCPs are tested at the same time in the first test, and a defective TCP that receives a failure test in the simultaneous test is Defect determination A TCP handling device characterized in that another contact terminal different from the contact terminal of the probe card with which the TCP is in contact is applied and subjected to the test again.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2007531998A JP4829889B2 (en) | 2005-08-25 | 2005-08-25 | TCP handling device |
PCT/JP2005/015479 WO2007023556A1 (en) | 2005-08-25 | 2005-08-25 | Tcp handling apparatus |
TW095130793A TW200723415A (en) | 2005-08-25 | 2006-08-22 | TCP handling apparatus |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2005/015479 WO2007023556A1 (en) | 2005-08-25 | 2005-08-25 | Tcp handling apparatus |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2007023556A1 true WO2007023556A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 |
Family
ID=37771314
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2005/015479 WO2007023556A1 (en) | 2005-08-25 | 2005-08-25 | Tcp handling apparatus |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP4829889B2 (en) |
TW (1) | TW200723415A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007023556A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2008115147A1 (en) * | 2007-03-16 | 2008-09-25 | Teradyne (Asia) Pte Ltd | A material handler for devices on a reel |
JP2011058908A (en) * | 2009-09-09 | 2011-03-24 | Hioki Ee Corp | Method and device for probing of contact probe |
JPWO2010067472A1 (en) * | 2008-12-08 | 2012-05-17 | 株式会社アドバンテスト | Test apparatus and test method |
US8666691B2 (en) | 2008-12-08 | 2014-03-04 | Advantest Corporation | Test apparatus and test method |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH01125840A (en) * | 1987-11-10 | 1989-05-18 | Tokyo Electron Ltd | Inspection |
JPH0262971A (en) * | 1988-08-29 | 1990-03-02 | Teru Tohoku Kk | Method for inspecting tape carrier |
JP2001099891A (en) * | 1999-09-28 | 2001-04-13 | Ando Electric Co Ltd | Autohandler for tab and processing method thereof |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3191790B2 (en) * | 1999-01-08 | 2001-07-23 | 日本電気株式会社 | Handler with search function |
JP2004271428A (en) * | 2003-03-11 | 2004-09-30 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Test system for multi chip module, and manufacturing method therefor |
AU2003242036A1 (en) * | 2003-06-04 | 2005-01-04 | Advantest Corporation | Electronic component handling device, and method for temperature application in electronic component handling device |
-
2005
- 2005-08-25 JP JP2007531998A patent/JP4829889B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-08-25 WO PCT/JP2005/015479 patent/WO2007023556A1/en active Application Filing
-
2006
- 2006-08-22 TW TW095130793A patent/TW200723415A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH01125840A (en) * | 1987-11-10 | 1989-05-18 | Tokyo Electron Ltd | Inspection |
JPH0262971A (en) * | 1988-08-29 | 1990-03-02 | Teru Tohoku Kk | Method for inspecting tape carrier |
JP2001099891A (en) * | 1999-09-28 | 2001-04-13 | Ando Electric Co Ltd | Autohandler for tab and processing method thereof |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2008115147A1 (en) * | 2007-03-16 | 2008-09-25 | Teradyne (Asia) Pte Ltd | A material handler for devices on a reel |
JPWO2010067472A1 (en) * | 2008-12-08 | 2012-05-17 | 株式会社アドバンテスト | Test apparatus and test method |
US8666691B2 (en) | 2008-12-08 | 2014-03-04 | Advantest Corporation | Test apparatus and test method |
JP2011058908A (en) * | 2009-09-09 | 2011-03-24 | Hioki Ee Corp | Method and device for probing of contact probe |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TW200723415A (en) | 2007-06-16 |
JPWO2007023556A1 (en) | 2009-02-26 |
JP4829889B2 (en) | 2011-12-07 |
TWI321818B (en) | 2010-03-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP2963603B2 (en) | Probe device alignment method | |
US5631573A (en) | Probe-type test handler | |
KR101042654B1 (en) | Calibration method employed in electronic component test system | |
US5444388A (en) | Apparatus for testing semiconductor devices using a conductive sheet | |
US10670652B2 (en) | Semiconductor test equipment | |
KR101302914B1 (en) | Inspecting method and program for object to be inspected | |
JPH10303260A (en) | Method for inspecting semiconductor component by automatic measurement of probe tip parameter | |
US20080059095A1 (en) | Electronic Device Handling Apparatus and Defective Terminal Determination Method | |
CN111128782A (en) | Wafer testing method | |
US11293814B2 (en) | Temperature measurement member, inspection apparatus, and temperature measurement method | |
CN110799848A (en) | History management pad for semiconductor test socket, method of manufacturing the same, and semiconductor test apparatus including the history management pad | |
JP4829889B2 (en) | TCP handling device | |
JP4098306B2 (en) | TCP handling device and misalignment correction method in the device | |
KR20090122306A (en) | Tcp handling apparatus | |
JP2012042407A (en) | Semiconductor integrated circuit inspection apparatus, inspection method of semiconductor integrated circuit, and control program for inspection apparatus for semiconductor integrated circuit | |
JP4817830B2 (en) | Prober, probe contact method and program therefor | |
JP2007095938A (en) | Tester, prober, wafer test system and electrical contact position detection method | |
KR100982343B1 (en) | Apparatus for measuring and calibrating error of stage in wafer prober | |
KR20080040017A (en) | Tcp handling apparatus | |
KR20180015983A (en) | Apparatus and method for inspection and correction of faults on a printed circuit board | |
JP2021032784A (en) | Probe unit and inspection device | |
KR100977328B1 (en) | Aligning method of needles of prober system | |
JP2011237387A (en) | Tcp handling apparatus | |
JP2006318965A (en) | Method and apparatus for inspecting semiconductor device | |
CN101292170A (en) | TCP processing device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200580051390.4 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2007531998 Country of ref document: JP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 05774664 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |