WO2004078543A2 - Minimisation des risques et optimisation de la maintenance par la determination de pourcentages de deterioration a partir de donnees de fonctionnement - Google Patents

Minimisation des risques et optimisation de la maintenance par la determination de pourcentages de deterioration a partir de donnees de fonctionnement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004078543A2
WO2004078543A2 PCT/EP2004/001575 EP2004001575W WO2004078543A2 WO 2004078543 A2 WO2004078543 A2 WO 2004078543A2 EP 2004001575 W EP2004001575 W EP 2004001575W WO 2004078543 A2 WO2004078543 A2 WO 2004078543A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
maintenance
damage
load
maintenance unit
failure
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2004/001575
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
WO2004078543A3 (fr
Inventor
Herbert Depping
Matthias Maisch
Original Assignee
Voith Turbo Gmbh & Co. Kg
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Voith Turbo Gmbh & Co. Kg filed Critical Voith Turbo Gmbh & Co. Kg
Priority to EP04712485A priority Critical patent/EP1599842A2/fr
Publication of WO2004078543A2 publication Critical patent/WO2004078543A2/fr
Publication of WO2004078543A3 publication Critical patent/WO2004078543A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
    • G05B23/0283—Predictive maintenance, e.g. involving the monitoring of a system and, based on the monitoring results, taking decisions on the maintenance schedule of the monitored system; Estimating remaining useful life [RUL]
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/006—Indicating maintenance

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for setting maintenance intervals of motor vehicle assemblies or their subunits, which are to be replaced during the maintenance of the vehicle with a certain degree of wear or fatigue.
  • These subunits are referred to below as maintenance units, since they are typically replaced as a whole in maintenance tasks.
  • Maintenance intervals represent a considerable additional effort.
  • a decision to replace maintenance units is usually based only on one
  • BESTATIGUNGSKOPIE external appearance in connection with the subjective overall impression of the motor vehicle. It therefore depends on the inspector how accurately the risk of failure of a particular maintenance unit is assessed. Nonetheless, even in the case of extensive experience, precise information about the actual exposure history is missing in most cases
  • the invention has for its object a method for determining
  • the method can be implemented as simply as possible with existing electronic control components of motor vehicles.
  • the inventors have recognized that the intervals after which maintenance units have to be inspected or replaced can be determined in a suitable manner by a multi-stage method.
  • the relevant loads on a maintenance unit are analyzed, and the failure behavior associated with these loads is carried out by tests and calculations, in particular
  • Different criteria for the failure of a maintenance unit can be defined, such as for example inadmissible wear, breakage, deformation or an intolerable change in function.
  • the result of this first stage of the process is a map in which the failure behavior depending on the different load levels and Load frequency is shown. Depending on the selection of the relevant loads, the failure behavior is represented by a map with one or more parameters.
  • Loads on the maintenance unit determined. In the simplest case, this involves recording the frequency of the occurrence of a certain load. In many cases, however, a refined procedure is necessary in order to be able to record the occurring loads with sufficient accuracy, especially if there are several relevant load factors or if dynamic effects have to be taken into account.
  • the load can be divided into classes and the damage-related events counted for each of these classes.
  • This counting can be done in different ways, for example by determining the length of stay in the respective class, the frequency of exceeding the class limit or the reversal of the load in the respective class.
  • a load spectrum is created which is representative of the stress on the maintenance unit.
  • the load spectrum determined during driving operation is appropriately offset against the failure behavior of the maintenance unit known from the first stage.
  • the result is an abstract quantity called the sum of damage.
  • This sum of damage which increases during operation and can be stored in a simple manner, is the parameter in the method according to the invention which leads to an inspection of a maintenance unit, on the condition that the sum of damage exceeds a certain critical threshold.
  • the critical threshold can be determined by knowing the failure behavior from the first
  • a fourth stage of the method according to the invention according to which the failure behavior of the maintenance units can be determined in practice using a series of field data.
  • the damage amounts achieved in the field are determined and compared with the test results from the first stage of the process. Adjustments to the real failure behavior can either be made by changing the determination of the damage sum in the electronic control device or by moving the critical threshold of the damage sum.
  • each maintenance unit will be one with a low one
  • 1 shows a flow diagram of the method according to the invention for optimizing maintenance in a control device of a vehicle.
  • 2 schematically shows the subdivision of a motor vehicle assembly into
  • Fig. 3 shows schematically the relationship between the amount and frequency of loading on a maintenance unit and the
  • Fig. 4 shows an example of the division of a burden on a
  • Fig. 5 shows an example of the linkage of the load spectrum
  • Fig. 6 shows an example of the counting process for creating a
  • FIG. 7 shows an example of the probability of failure of two maintenance units as a function of the damage sum, as well as the
  • FIG. 2 shows the maintenance units (W1-W7) of an automatic transmission, which is used in the following as an example to illustrate the invention.
  • the division of the maintenance units shown in FIG. 2 is also only an example. In practice, it will result from the design of the motor vehicle assemblies, which also defines the procedure for maintenance work. For design reasons, only certain units as a whole can be inspected or replaced, with the installation position and interaction with other maintenance units playing an important role here. Another division into Maintenance units will result from the type of load during operation and the resulting signs of wear and tear or the fatigue of this component.
  • Maintenance intervals can also be used to classify motor vehicle assemblies into maintenance units so that the assignment of loads to damage amounts shown below can be carried out in a suitable manner. This means that the type of load on a maintenance unit should be classifiable as clearly as possible.
  • the operating data of the vehicle are the starting point for determining the load on a maintenance unit. This includes sensory data, for example on engine speeds, torques, temperatures of different vehicle components, but also vehicle dynamics data that characterize driving conditions. Furthermore, the operating data also include encoder signals which correspond to the driver's request, for example after acceleration. In today's vehicles, sensory data and encoder signals are available via communication networks, such as the CAN bus, and are used for vehicle control, such as optimizing the switching behavior in automatic transmissions.
  • the term operating data in the following book is understood to mean all information about the vehicle, its payload and the vehicle components, which is typically stored in control units and is accessible via the communication links mentioned. For example, these are characteristic curves of the motor, the gearbox, the axle and gear ratios, and moments of inertia, etc.
  • the loads on the respective maintenance units can be estimated.
  • the loads associated with the operating data or a part of these data must be stored in the control unit of the maintenance units or the motor vehicle modules.
  • the load effects result from the effect of Torque, speed, pressure, temperature on the maintenance unit and the resulting effects such as friction, tension or deformation.
  • Such an assignment between operating data and load is to be specified for each maintenance unit and is determined by the manufacturer of the maintenance unit as a load model.
  • These assigned load data can also be stored in a central control unit for all maintenance units.
  • the hatched area in FIG. 2 extends from a lower threshold, at which the probability that a given pair of stress level and stress frequency leads to a failure is approximately 1%, to an upper threshold, which is accordingly characterized in that the -The probability of failure is 99%.
  • critical failure threshold 1 In the following for illustration
  • the critical Failure threshold is not assigned to the same failure probability across the entire map. If, for example, it is known from load tests that the actual failure behavior fluctuates significantly in statistical terms, the critical failure threshold can be corrected in areas of great variation by an average failure probability so that the critical failure threshold is shifted to a safe side. Essentially, the result of the first stage of the method according to the invention will therefore be to determine relevant loads that lead to failure in the accumulation and to assign them a critical failure threshold in a characteristic diagram.
  • Non-destructive measurement methods can be used to characterize the signs of fatigue during load tests.
  • An example of this is the X-ray refraction method, which can be used to detect microstructural defects such as microcracks resulting from the stress. Simulations of repeated component loads, damage accumulation calculations and plausibility assumptions are also suitable for establishing a quantitative relationship between load factors and damage.
  • the method is to determine the loads relevant for a maintenance unit within a time interval from the operating data and to classify them into a load pattern graded according to the load level. Based on this classification, the damage-relevant events can now be counted. This is what a counting means in the broadest sense
  • this frequency recording of a load in a class can also be a determination of the The length of time over which a load corresponding to the class occurs.
  • Another way of recording the frequency of the occurrence of a load belonging to a class can be to determine the frequency of crossing the class boundary in a defined or any direction or to reverse the load in the respective class.
  • the load history is shown in the form of a load collective, as is shown in a schematically simplified manner in FIG. 4.
  • Four different classes I - IV are shown with increasing load levels as well as a corresponding count of the load events assigned to the respective classes.
  • the failure behavior determined in method step 1 is shown in FIG. 5 with the aid of two curves which, depending on the load level and the frequency of occurrence of such a load, approximately describe a failure probability of 1% and 99%.
  • the load spectrum of the second process stage is added to FIG. The frequency Z ⁇ with a load from the highest is shown in dashed lines
  • / ZAI determined. Accordingly, an increase in the total damage is calculated as an increase in the frequency of exposure ⁇ Z
  • by ⁇ S ⁇ Z
  • a gear part which is loaded by torque fluctuations and which can be replaced as a maintenance unit is considered. It is further assumed that the torque fluctuations can be determined from the operating data or that these can be estimated at least indirectly via a model of the transmission and the measurement of the drive and driven torques.
  • the load is divided into classes, for example in the present case several threshold values can be set for the torque and an event is added to a load class when the torque threshold is exceeded from the lower to the higher torque.
  • Step sizes in the classification are advantageous in areas in which the failure behavior shows large variations with small parameter changes. This is particularly the case in the vicinity of maximum loads.
  • the procedure for counting load events in this illustrative example is illustrated with reference to FIG. 6.
  • the time curve of the torque and four threshold values for the torque are shown. Vertical arrows indicate that one of these threshold values has been exceeded and the corresponding assignment to a load class.
  • Damage total is calculated for each class, so that the total damage total for this maintenance unit is made up of the subtotals that result for the different classes.
  • the damage sum of a maintenance unit can consist of different contributions and thus of weighted partial damage sums if there are different, non-interacting damage mechanisms that cannot be meaningfully combined in a uniform load pattern. This applies in particular if the load factors have significantly different time constants and thus the increase in the partial damage sums are recorded with different time intervals.
  • a combination of permanent loads and stress events is also possible through the summation of separately determined partial damage sums to a damage sum assigned to the maintenance unit.
  • the method according to the invention has a fourth stage, in which a critical threshold value S for the damage sum is set on the basis of real field data in order to correct inaccuracies in the preceding method steps.
  • a critical threshold value S for the damage sum is set on the basis of real field data in order to correct inaccuracies in the preceding method steps.
  • the abstract size of the damage sum should best represent the actual load on a maintenance unit and thus its failure behavior. Accordingly, when recording the sum of damage during operation, this should be in a typical relationship with the probability of failure, which is shown schematically in FIG. 7. Two interpolated failure probabilities for component A and component B in
  • Figure 1 summarizes the inventive method. It shows the four process stages for determining maintenance intervals in the sequence in which they can be implemented in a control unit of a vehicle.
  • the control unit is connected to the sensor system of the vehicle and the control and regulation data of the maintenance units and also receives encoder signals. Additional vehicle data and load models for the maintenance units to be monitored are stored in the control unit. As shown in the flowchart, external and internal information is added
  • Load history for each assigned load collective are then linked to the failure behavior of the maintenance units known from the first method step, only the corresponding information about the failure behavior being stored in the control device and the corresponding tests and correlation calculations being carried out independently of the control device.
  • the combination of load collective and failure behavior in the control unit becomes the abstract, if possible the Determination of the amount of damage corresponding to the load history. This corresponds to the third stage of the process.
  • the subsequent fourth process stage is used to compare the damage sum with a critical threshold value S k . If this value is exceeded, a maintenance interval is completed and customer service with maintenance and possible replacement of the corresponding one
  • Maintenance unit is the result. If this is not immediately possible, at least one of the reaction options is to operate the maintenance unit carefully.
  • the procedural steps that are carried out in the motor vehicle itself are very simple and can usually be carried out using control devices that are already available. This is achieved by the complex procedural steps of creating a load model to estimate loads from the operating data, the procedure for classifying loads into load patterns as well as creating load collectives and assigning the loads to one
  • Threshold is carried out regardless of the vehicle.
  • the process can be verified by constant comparison with field data from customer service. It is thus possible to adapt the critical threshold values to the experiences that result from the care of a correspondingly large one with each service inspection
  • the driver or the control unit can inform the service center about the expiry of a maintenance interval via a wireless connection when the critical threshold value is reached.
  • operation of the component is only carried out in a gentle mode or a corresponding recommendation is signaled to the driver.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
  • Vehicle Cleaning, Maintenance, Repair, Refitting, And Outriggers (AREA)
  • Control Of Electric Motors In General (AREA)
  • Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé pour déterminer des intervalles de maintenance pour des organes de véhicules à moteur comprenant au moins une unité de maintenance. Chaque unité de maintenance correspond à une somme de dommages dont la valeur augmente avec le fonctionnement du véhicule. Les données de fonctionnement du véhicule ou une partie de ces données permettent de déterminer ou d'évaluer la sollicitation agissant sur une unité de maintenance dans un intervalle temporel sélectionné, et de la répartir en différentes catégories d'un modèle de sollicitations. Une comparaison subséquente du modèle de sollicitations d'un intervalle temporel avec des données mémorisées relatives au comportement de panne de l'unité de maintenance permet de calculer l'augmentation de la somme de dommages pour l'intervalle temporel concerné. L'intervalle temporel d'une unité de maintenance touche à sa fin lorsque la somme des dommages correspondante dépasse un seuil critique défini.
PCT/EP2004/001575 2003-03-06 2004-02-19 Minimisation des risques et optimisation de la maintenance par la determination de pourcentages de deterioration a partir de donnees de fonctionnement WO2004078543A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP04712485A EP1599842A2 (fr) 2003-03-06 2004-02-19 Minimisation des risques et optimisation de la maintenance par la determination de pourcentages de deterioration a partir de donnees de fonctionnement

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10310116.0 2003-03-06
DE2003110116 DE10310116A1 (de) 2003-03-06 2003-03-06 Risikominimierung und Wartungsoptimierung durch Ermittlung von Schädigungsanteilen aus Betriebsdaten

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004078543A2 true WO2004078543A2 (fr) 2004-09-16
WO2004078543A3 WO2004078543A3 (fr) 2005-06-23

Family

ID=32891953

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2004/001575 WO2004078543A2 (fr) 2003-03-06 2004-02-19 Minimisation des risques et optimisation de la maintenance par la determination de pourcentages de deterioration a partir de donnees de fonctionnement

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1599842A2 (fr)
DE (1) DE10310116A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2004078543A2 (fr)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006034852A1 (fr) * 2004-09-29 2006-04-06 Abb Patent Gmbh Procede et dispositif servant au diagnostic d'appareils techniques agences a l'interieur d'une installation industrielle
WO2008086586A1 (fr) * 2007-01-15 2008-07-24 Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. Dispositif pour surveiller la détérioration d'une suspension automobile
EP2300887A2 (fr) * 2008-04-29 2011-03-30 Romax Technology Limited Procédés, dispositif et supports de stockage lisibles par ordinateur pour diagnostic de boîtes d'engrenage à base de modèle
DE102008014065B4 (de) * 2007-03-15 2012-06-14 General Motors Corp. Fahrzeug und Verfahren zur Bestimmung der verbleibenden Nutzungsdauer eines Getriebefilters
EP2767817A1 (fr) * 2013-02-18 2014-08-20 IVECO S.p.A. Système de surveillance de l'usure de l'embrayage d'un manuel ou d'une transmission manuelle automatisée, en particulier pour véhicules lourds
EP2767815A1 (fr) * 2013-02-18 2014-08-20 IVECO S.p.A. Système de surveillance de l'usure des engrenages d'une transmission de véhicule
WO2015052274A1 (fr) * 2013-10-11 2015-04-16 Avl List Gmbh Procédé permettant d'évaluer l'endommagement d'au moins une pièce technique
WO2018130348A1 (fr) * 2017-01-10 2018-07-19 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Procédé de détermination de la durée de vie de pièces
WO2019115127A1 (fr) * 2017-12-13 2019-06-20 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Procédé et dispositif de commande pour l'évaluation des dégâts d'une pièce guidant des charges
WO2019166377A1 (fr) * 2018-03-01 2019-09-06 Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh Procédé servant à faire fonctionner un moteur à combustion interne, dispositif de commande et moteur à combustion interne
EP2273238B1 (fr) * 2009-07-09 2020-09-23 Leine & Linde Ab Procédé d'utilisation d'un système d'encodeur et système d'encodeur
CN111855383A (zh) * 2020-07-29 2020-10-30 石河子大学 一种风力机叶片覆冰载荷下疲劳寿命预测方法
DE102022203250A1 (de) 2022-04-01 2023-10-05 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Verfahren zur Nutzung von Betriebsdaten

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102007002801B4 (de) * 2007-01-18 2011-02-17 Audi Ag Verfahren zum Bestimmen einer Ausfallwahrscheinlichkeit mindestens eines Bauteils einer Antriebsvorrichtung
DE102007017614A1 (de) 2007-04-12 2008-10-16 Wittenstein Ag Verfahren zum optimalen Betreiben von Getrieben
DE102008030870A1 (de) * 2008-06-30 2009-12-31 Continental Automotive Gmbh Diagnose bei Brennkraftmaschinen
DE102009058331A1 (de) 2009-12-15 2011-06-16 Robert Bosch Gmbh Steuergerät mit belastungsabhängiger Betriebslebensdauer und Verfahren zur Aktualisierung einer maximalen Betriebslebensdauer
DE102015120203A1 (de) * 2015-11-23 2017-05-24 Dr. Ing. H.C. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und System zur Bestimmung einer Beanspruchung eines Fahrzeugs
SE541415C2 (en) * 2016-09-26 2019-09-24 Scania Cv Ab Method and system for prediction of a drainage valve malfunction probability
MY197884A (en) 2017-03-30 2023-07-23 Tlv Co Ltd Risk assessment device, risk assessment method, and risk assessment program
DE102017004424B4 (de) * 2017-05-08 2020-07-09 Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh Verfahren zur bedarfsgerechten Wartung eines Injektors
DE102017214821B4 (de) * 2017-08-24 2022-05-19 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Diagnoseverfahren zur Zustandsbestimmung von wenigstens einem Zugmittel, Computerprogrammprodukt, Speichermittel, Motorsteuergerät und Fahrzeug
DE102018102710B4 (de) 2018-02-07 2023-09-21 Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH Verfahren zur Ermittlung eines Instandsetzungsbedarfs einer Bremse
DE102018104665B4 (de) * 2018-03-01 2022-12-01 Rolls-Royce Solutions GmbH Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Brennkraftmaschine, Steuereinrichtung und Brennkraftmaschine
EP4276559A1 (fr) 2022-05-12 2023-11-15 BAUER Maschinen GmbH Procédé et système de détermination d'un état critique de fatigue de matériel dans une machine de travaux de génie civil

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3234727A1 (de) * 1982-09-18 1984-03-22 Dr.Ing.H.C. F. Porsche Ag, 7000 Stuttgart Verfahren zum festlegen des zeitpunktes fuer die wartung eines kraftfahrzeugs
US4472964A (en) * 1981-07-22 1984-09-25 Vdo Adolf Schindling Ag Apparatus for indicating the need for maintenance work on an internal combustion engine
US4847768A (en) * 1988-08-29 1989-07-11 General Motors Corporation Automatic engine oil change indicator system
EP0489261A2 (fr) * 1990-12-06 1992-06-10 MAN Nutzfahrzeuge Aktiengesellschaft Dispositif pour calculer l'intervalle de service d'un véhicule automobile
EP0612643A1 (fr) * 1993-02-19 1994-08-31 AUTENT INGENIEURGESELLSCHAFT FÜR AUTOMOBILTEILE-ENTWICKLUNG mbH Dispositif de surveillance d'un élément de sécurité dans un véhicule automobile
US5642284A (en) * 1994-08-12 1997-06-24 Caterpillar Inc. Maintenance monitor system
EP0863490A2 (fr) * 1997-03-07 1998-09-09 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Dispositif et procédé pour calculer et afficher des intervalles de service
DE10129457C1 (de) * 2001-06-19 2002-12-19 Daimler Chrysler Ag Verfahren zur Festlegung von Zeitpunkt und Umfang von Wartungsvorgängen

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4472964A (en) * 1981-07-22 1984-09-25 Vdo Adolf Schindling Ag Apparatus for indicating the need for maintenance work on an internal combustion engine
DE3234727A1 (de) * 1982-09-18 1984-03-22 Dr.Ing.H.C. F. Porsche Ag, 7000 Stuttgart Verfahren zum festlegen des zeitpunktes fuer die wartung eines kraftfahrzeugs
US4847768A (en) * 1988-08-29 1989-07-11 General Motors Corporation Automatic engine oil change indicator system
EP0489261A2 (fr) * 1990-12-06 1992-06-10 MAN Nutzfahrzeuge Aktiengesellschaft Dispositif pour calculer l'intervalle de service d'un véhicule automobile
EP0612643A1 (fr) * 1993-02-19 1994-08-31 AUTENT INGENIEURGESELLSCHAFT FÜR AUTOMOBILTEILE-ENTWICKLUNG mbH Dispositif de surveillance d'un élément de sécurité dans un véhicule automobile
US5642284A (en) * 1994-08-12 1997-06-24 Caterpillar Inc. Maintenance monitor system
EP0863490A2 (fr) * 1997-03-07 1998-09-09 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Dispositif et procédé pour calculer et afficher des intervalles de service
DE10129457C1 (de) * 2001-06-19 2002-12-19 Daimler Chrysler Ag Verfahren zur Festlegung von Zeitpunkt und Umfang von Wartungsvorgängen

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ANONYMOUS: "Transmission oil life diagnostic" RESEARCH DISCLOSURE, KENNETH MASON PUBLICATIONS, HAMPSHIRE, GB, Bd. 313, Nr. 124, Mai 1990 (1990-05), XP007115167 ISSN: 0374-4353 *

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006034852A1 (fr) * 2004-09-29 2006-04-06 Abb Patent Gmbh Procede et dispositif servant au diagnostic d'appareils techniques agences a l'interieur d'une installation industrielle
US7818146B2 (en) 2004-09-29 2010-10-19 Abb Ag Method and device for the diagnosis of technical devices disposed within an industrial installation
WO2008086586A1 (fr) * 2007-01-15 2008-07-24 Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. Dispositif pour surveiller la détérioration d'une suspension automobile
DE102008014065B4 (de) * 2007-03-15 2012-06-14 General Motors Corp. Fahrzeug und Verfahren zur Bestimmung der verbleibenden Nutzungsdauer eines Getriebefilters
EP2300887A2 (fr) * 2008-04-29 2011-03-30 Romax Technology Limited Procédés, dispositif et supports de stockage lisibles par ordinateur pour diagnostic de boîtes d'engrenage à base de modèle
EP2273238B1 (fr) * 2009-07-09 2020-09-23 Leine & Linde Ab Procédé d'utilisation d'un système d'encodeur et système d'encodeur
EP2767815A1 (fr) * 2013-02-18 2014-08-20 IVECO S.p.A. Système de surveillance de l'usure des engrenages d'une transmission de véhicule
EP2767817A1 (fr) * 2013-02-18 2014-08-20 IVECO S.p.A. Système de surveillance de l'usure de l'embrayage d'un manuel ou d'une transmission manuelle automatisée, en particulier pour véhicules lourds
WO2015052274A1 (fr) * 2013-10-11 2015-04-16 Avl List Gmbh Procédé permettant d'évaluer l'endommagement d'au moins une pièce technique
WO2018130348A1 (fr) * 2017-01-10 2018-07-19 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Procédé de détermination de la durée de vie de pièces
WO2019115127A1 (fr) * 2017-12-13 2019-06-20 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Procédé et dispositif de commande pour l'évaluation des dégâts d'une pièce guidant des charges
WO2019166377A1 (fr) * 2018-03-01 2019-09-06 Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh Procédé servant à faire fonctionner un moteur à combustion interne, dispositif de commande et moteur à combustion interne
CN111855383A (zh) * 2020-07-29 2020-10-30 石河子大学 一种风力机叶片覆冰载荷下疲劳寿命预测方法
CN111855383B (zh) * 2020-07-29 2023-09-05 石河子大学 一种风力机叶片覆冰载荷下疲劳寿命预测方法
DE102022203250A1 (de) 2022-04-01 2023-10-05 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Verfahren zur Nutzung von Betriebsdaten

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1599842A2 (fr) 2005-11-30
WO2004078543A3 (fr) 2005-06-23
DE10310116A1 (de) 2004-09-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2004078543A2 (fr) Minimisation des risques et optimisation de la maintenance par la determination de pourcentages de deterioration a partir de donnees de fonctionnement
EP1607192B1 (fr) Méthode et système pour estimer l'usure des articulations d'un bras de robot
DE102008006370A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Überwachen einer Maschine
WO2023061850A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance de l'état d'une machine-outil
DE10348608A1 (de) Spindelvorrichtung mit Zustandsüberwachung sowie entsprechendes Überwachungsverfahren und -system
EP1405147B1 (fr) Surveillance d'un signal de mesure, en particulier dans la technique d'automatisation
WO2020064712A1 (fr) Procédé pour l'amélioration de la priorisation de messages, composant logiciel, système de commande et d'observation et système d'automatisation
EP2956348B1 (fr) Surveillance d'éléments d'attelage d'un véhicule
DE112018002549T5 (de) Elektronisches Steuergerät
EP1528447B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositf de diagnostic pour la surveillance du fonctionnement d'une boucle de réglage
EP3056957B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de diagnostic destinés à la surveillance du fonctionnement d'un circuit régulateur
EP1262760B1 (fr) Méthode de détermination de la viscosité d'in fluide de travail d'un moteur à combustion
DE19962967B4 (de) Verfahren zur Überwachung von Fertigungsprozessen
DE60117650T2 (de) Verfahren zur Detektion streifiger Fehler in einer laufenden Papierbahn
EP1431927A1 (fr) Méthode pour estimer la durée de vie résiduelle d'un appareil
DE102012211722A1 (de) Verfahren zur Diagnose eines Bauteils, eines Systems oder einer Systemkomponente einer Brennkraftmaschine
DE102021203806A1 (de) Verfahren zur Überwachung des Betriebs eines Ventilators, Vorrichtung und Ventilator
DE102019107242A1 (de) Diagnoseverfahren, Diagnosesystem und Kraftfahrzeug
DE102019114488A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Abfüllanlage und Abfüllanlage
DE10014740B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Ressourcen in einem mehrstufigen Fertigungsprozeß
DE102019120927A1 (de) Funktionsmodell Leitungsdiagnose
EP3807512A1 (fr) Procédé de détection d'usure et de pronostic prédictif d'usure d'actionneurs électromécaniques par rapport au temps de fonctionnement d'une machine à moteur à combustion interne
WO2019115342A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif permettant de prédire l'instant de défaillance de la soupape de limitation de pression d'une pompe à carburant haute pression d'un véhicule automobile
WO2023011831A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détermination de la durée de vie restante de mécanisme d'engrenage
DE10138240A1 (de) Adaptionsverfahren für die Steuerung von Schaltelementen

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2004712485

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2004712485

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 2004712485

Country of ref document: EP

DPEN Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)