WO2003097830A1 - Procede pour evaluer la sensibilite a l'imatinib - Google Patents
Procede pour evaluer la sensibilite a l'imatinib Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2003097830A1 WO2003097830A1 PCT/JP2003/006330 JP0306330W WO03097830A1 WO 2003097830 A1 WO2003097830 A1 WO 2003097830A1 JP 0306330 W JP0306330 W JP 0306330W WO 03097830 A1 WO03097830 A1 WO 03097830A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- genes
- est
- imatinib
- seq
- gene
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/435—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
- C07K14/46—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from vertebrates
- C07K14/47—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from vertebrates from mammals
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
- C12Q1/6883—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
- C12Q1/6886—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material for cancer
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/106—Pharmacogenomics, i.e. genetic variability in individual responses to drugs and drug metabolism
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/158—Expression markers
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for determining sensitivity to imatinib or a derivative thereof or a pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof.
- the method of the present invention is useful, for example, for determining the therapeutic effect of imatinib or a derivative thereof or a pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof on chronic myeloid leukemia (GML).
- GML chronic myeloid leukemia
- CML is a clonal disease resulting from canceration of hematopoietic stem cells, most of which are characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) and the constitutive activation of the BGR-ABL thymic synkinase (S. Fader I et al., N Engl J Med 341, 164-72. (1999)).
- GNIL progresses through three phases: a chronic phase, an accelerated phase, and a blast crisis, which always results in death.
- administration of interferon-1 and allogeneic (a 11 ogen ic) stem cell transplantation (SCT) can be selected. Interferon- ⁇ administration can prolong survival, but has strong side effects.
- SGT is the only radical treatment, complications are quite common and can be treated only in patients who have found a suitable donor. Therefore, the prognosis of CML is still poor.
- Imatinib (4- (4-methylbiperazin-1-ylmethyl) -N- [4-methyl-3- (4-pyridin-3-ylpyrimidine-2-ylamino) phenyl) is an ABL-selective inhibitor of thymic synthase ] Benzamide, codename STI571) was developed, and the treatment of GML has greatly advanced (E. Buchdunger, A. Matter, BJ Druker, Biochim Biophys Acta 1551, Ml 1-8. (2001); BJ Druker et. al., Nat Med 2, 561-6. (1996)).
- Imatinib is an anticancer drug having the chemical structure represented by the following formula [I], and is not only widely used for the treatment of CML but also for other tumors such as gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GS). It has been reported that it is also effective for treatment.
- Imatinib mesylate is also commercially available from Novart is Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of Basel, Switzerland under the trade name Gli vec and is used clinically for the treatment of CML. ing.
- imatinib is not effective in all GML patients, and some patients with CML do not respond to imatinib.
- Imatinib when effective, has a remarkable therapeutic effect, making it difficult to decide in a timely manner whether or not to perform SGT (M. Goldman, BJ Druker, Blood 98, 2039- 42. (2001)) 0
- administering imatinib to patients who do not respond to imatinib is a waste of time and medicine, and the risk that patients lose their chance to receive other treatments. There is also. Therefore, if it is possible to know in advance whether imatinib administration is effective for the treatment, it is very advantageous for the treatment of GML.
- An object of the present invention is to determine whether a patient is susceptible to imatinib when a patient suffering from a disease such as CML is treated by administering imatinib. It is intended to provide a method for predicting whether or not imatinib administration is effective for treating the disease.
- the inventors of the present invention are categorized into patients who are sensitive to imatinib, that is, responders who are effective in imatinib administration, and patients who are not sensitive to imatinib, that is, non-responders who are ineffective in imatinib administration.
- the present inventors completed the present invention by experimentally confirming that a responder or a non-responder could be predicted based on the expression level of the gene.
- the present invention measures the expression levels of a plurality of genes of the following gene groups (1) to (77) in specimen cells isolated from a living body, and evaluates imatinib or its derivative or pharmacologically acceptable
- a method for determining sensitivity to imatinib or an derivative thereof or a pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof which comprises comparing the expression level of each of the above genes in responders and non-responders having sensitivity to the salt thereof. .
- HN1 (A1086871), (2) AKR1C3 (D17793), (3) QARS (X76013), (4) KIAA1105 (AA1361 80), (5) KIAA0668 (AA506972), (6) BLGAP (AF053470), (7) ADFP (X97324), (8) FLJ10422 (AA894857), (9) HMGCL (L07033) (10) EST (A 1051454), (11) KLF4 (AI290876), (12) H3F3A (11354).
- the present invention it can be predicted whether or not administration of imatinib to a patient is effective in treating the disease. Therefore, administration of imatinib to patients who are not effective in imatinib administration wastes time and medicine costs, and reduces the risk that patients lose their chances of receiving other treatments.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the relationship between the number of discriminating genes and the classification score (GS).
- FIG. 2 is a diagram showing prediction scores when the number of identification genes is changed. R indicates responder, N indicates non-responder.
- FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the results of cluster analysis using 15 or 30 predicted gene sets. All samples were reclassified by sensitivity to imatinib.
- FIG. 4 is a diagram showing predicted scores of individual patients. The filled circles and filled triangles show the scores in the validated cases (learned cases) of patients using the expression data for selection of the discriminating gene. Open circles and open triangles indicate scores for four additional cases (test cases). The circles indicate that the GML patient is in the chronic phase, and the triangles indicate that the GML patient is in the blast crisis (learning case) and transitional phase (test case), respectively. The larger the absolute value, the higher the reliability.
- the 77 genes that can be used in the method of the present invention have statistically significant expression levels in monocytes of CML patients between responders and non-responders by the method described in detail in the Examples below. This is selected by determining whether or not there is a difference (P 0.05).
- the rank, P value, symbol name, GenBank Accession No., gene name, and expression level in non-responders of these 77 genes are larger or smaller than those in responders.
- ⁇ ”, and“ ⁇ ”when the number is small are summarized in Tables 1-4 below.
- the order of description in the table is ascending order of ⁇ value, that is, The order is strict. As is clear from the fact that GenBank Accession Nos.
- GenBank is a database of governmental agencies in the United States that collects gene and protein sequences.Everyone can access and use the Internet for free, so the sequence of each gene is easily available. .
- the numbers (1) to (77) described in claim 1 at the time of filing are numbers assigned in ascending order of P value shown in Table 1, and the lower the number, the more statistically significant the gene is. This indicates that the difference is large.
- the expression levels of a plurality of genes in the gene group of (1) to (77) in the specimen cells separated from the living body are measured. This does not mean that the accuracy of the determination increases as the number of genes whose expression level is measured increases, and the number of genes to be measured is preferably about 10 to 35.
- the number of genes to be measured is preferably about 10 to 35.
- the specimen cells separated from the living body cells exhibiting the symptoms of the disease to be treated by imatinib administration are preferable.
- white blood cells such as monocytes are preferable.
- a sample in which more than 65% of cells are positive for Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome is preferable.
- the expression level of each gene in the cell can be measured by measuring the mRNA level of each gene in the cell, and the mRNA level can be measured by a well-known method.
- a DNA microarray was prepared in which cDNAs of the gene to be investigated were immobilized in equal amounts, while each RNA in the sample cells was designated as type III in the presence of a labeled nucleotide.
- a labeled cDNA is synthesized by synthesizing the cDNA with the DNA microarray, and this is incubated with the DNA microarray under hybridization conditions to hybridize with the cDNA on the DNA microarray. It can be measured by measuring the labeling amount of each spot above.
- the method for measuring the expression level of each gene in the sample cells is not limited to this method, and any other method that can measure the expression level of each gene can be used. it can. For example, it is also possible to measure each RNA in cells by real-time detection reverse transcription PCR, Northern blot method, or the like. In a preferred embodiment, the expression level of a relatively large number of genes is determined. Therefore, a simple and preferable method for measuring the amount of labeling by hybridizing labeled cDNA prepared from a sample cell with each gene immobilized on a microarray, as described in Examples below, is preferred.
- the “expression amount” does not need to be an absolute amount, but may be a relative amount.
- the expression is not necessarily required to be expressed numerically. For example, a case where a visible label such as a fluorescent label is used as a label and the determination is made by visual observation corresponds to “measurement of expression level”.
- the measured expression level of each gene is compared with the expression level of each gene in responders who have sensitivity to imatinib and non-responders who do not. To do this, it is, of course, necessary to check the expression levels of each gene in known responders and non-responders in advance. Then, these are compared with the expression level of each gene in the sample cells. The comparison compares the expression level of each gene in the sample cells with the average value of the expression level of each gene in known responders and non-responders. It can also be performed by determining whether or not the prediction score (prediction screen, PS value) is calculated by a statistical method. It is preferable to determine the sensitivity to imatinib based on the following.
- “contrast” means not only comparing the expression level as it is, but also performing a statistical process on the measured expression level and the measured value in known responders and non-responders. It also includes doing.
- the method of calculating the prediction score itself is known (TR Golub et al., Science 286, 531- 7. (1999); TJ MacDonald et al., Nat Genet 29, 143-52. (2001)). That is, each gene ( gi ) will vote for either responder or non-responder based on whether its expression level () is closer to the average of the expression levels of responders or non-responders. You.
- the size of the vote (v reflects the deviation of the expression level in the sample from the average of the two groups.
- ⁇ and ⁇ n indicate the average values of the expression levels in the responder group and the non-responder group, respectively.
- the votes are summed to calculate a total vote for each of the responder (V r ) and the non-responder (V n ), and the PS value is calculated by the following equation.
- PS ((V r -V n ) X (V r + V n )) X 100
- the PS value is between -100 and 100. Positive values are judged as responders, and negative values are judged as non-responders. The larger the value, the higher the certainty of the judgment.
- the expression levels of the genes (1) to (15) and the genes (1) to (30) were measured by this method, and the PS value was determined. As a result, the PS value was found to be low in any of the 18 “learning examples” used for gene selection and the “test j” total of 4 cases used to confirm the validity of the method of the present invention.
- the drug whose sensitivity can be measured by the method of the present invention described above is not limited to imatinib, but is a derivative of imatinib, that is, the above formula
- the number of substituents is not particularly limited, but is preferably 5 or less, and examples of the substituent include a lower alkyl group having 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a halogen, an amino group, a hydroxyl group, a nitro group, and a propyloxyl group.
- lower alkyl groups having 1 to 6 carbon atoms can be exemplified, but not limited thereto.
- imatinib or a derivative thereof may be in the form of a pharmacologically acceptable acid addition salt.
- pharmacologically acceptable acid addition salts include, but are not limited to, mesylate, hydrochloride, sulfate, nitrate and the like.
- Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 22 adult myeloid leukemia patients with informed consent prior to imatinib treatment. Each patient then became part of a Phase II clinical trial to evaluate the anti-leukemic effects of imatinib. Before the treatment, more than 65% of the cells were positive for Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome (determined by FISH analysis to detect the bcr / abl fusion gene). Analysis was performed using the cDNA microarray system (described later). Sixteen patients in the chronic phase received 400 mg / day of imatinib (imatinib mesylate (trade name Gleevec, Novartis Pharmaceuticals), dose values converted to imatinib).
- imatinib imatinib mesylate (trade name Gleevec, Novartis Pharmaceuticals), dose values converted to imatinib).
- the 18 patients used to build the predictive score system were classified as either responders or non-responders, and the remaining four were used to test the validity of the predictive score system described below.
- two “learning” cases the ones used in the construction of the predictive score system described below
- test cases The case used to test the validity of the predictive scoring system described below was in a transitional state.
- imatinib was clinically ineffective and was treated with imatinib within 12 weeks.
- cytogenetic responses were analyzed 12 weeks after the start of treatment.
- a monocyte cell mixture derived from peripheral blood of one healthy volunteer was used.
- cDNA microarray system was prepared as follows. First, in order to obtain cDNA for spotting on a glass slide, RT-PCR was performed for each gene by a known method (H. Okabe et al., Cancer Res 61, 2129-37. (2001)). Was done. More specifically, a cDNA microarray on which 23,040 kinds of GDNAs selected from the UniGene database of the National Cancer for Biotechnology Information were immobilized was prepared as follows.
- RNA polyadenylation obtained from tissues of one of two normal human organs (brain, heart, liver, skeletal muscle, small intestine, spleen, placenta, thyroid, fetal brain, fetal kidney, fetal lung and fetal liver)
- polyA + RNA (Glontech) was used for the preparation of cDNA.
- RNA was reverse transcribed using an oligo (dT) primer and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Ufe Technologies Inc). Thereafter, a region of 200 to 1100 bp that did not contain the repetitive sequence or poly (A) was amplified by the PGR method using primers having the gene-specific sequences selected as described above.
- PCR product was electrophoresed on an agarose gel, checked for a single band of the expected size, and used for spotting.
- PCR products were purified and spotted on a Type-7 glass slide (manufactured by Amersham Biosciences) using a microarray spotter (Microray spotter Generation III (Amersham Biosciences)).
- Five different sets of slides (a set of 4,608 pieces of cDNA and a total of 23,040 pieces of cDNA) were produced. Each slide also spotted the same 52 housekeeping genes and two negative control genes.
- primer sets used for amplification of the above-mentioned 77 types of genes were as shown in Tables 5 to 7 below.
- the gene numbers in Tables 5 to 7 indicate the gene numbers shown in Tables 1 to 4 described above.
- the temperature cycling conditions for the above PCR were as follows: first, heat denaturation at 95 ° C for 5 minutes, then 40 cycles of 95 ° C for 30 seconds, 60 ° C for 30 seconds, and 72 ° C for 1 minute. It is 10 minutes at 72 ° C. Table 5
- SEQ ID NO: 1 5 SEQ ID NO: 1 6 U HMWlPboIL ( ⁇ "U” ⁇ 7 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ,) Rooster column number 1 7 Rooster system 'J number 1 8 SEQ ID NO: 1 9 SEQ ID NO: 20
- STIM1 (AA101834) SEQ ID NO: 105 SEQ ID NO: 106
- a PD2 (M91029) SEQ ID NO: 1 07 SEQ ID NO: 1 08
- IFNB1 (NI25460) SEQ ID NO: 1 1 1 SEQ ID NO: 1 1 2
- RPL26 (AA778161) SEQ ID NO: 1 2 1 SEQ ID NO: 1 2 2
- EPB49 (L19713) SEQ ID NO: 1 3 3 SEQ ID NO: 1 3 4
- EEF1D (Z21507) SEQ ID NO: 1 4 5 SEQ ID NO: 1 4 6
- ARRB1 (AA918725) SEQ ID NO: 1 4 9 SEQ ID NO: "! 5 0
- the samples used for analysis were white blood cells prepared from the peripheral blood of one healthy individual as a common control, and gene expression analysis of leukemia cells prepared from the peripheral blood of each GML patient was performed.
- the preparation of the sample at that time is as follows. Monocyte cells were prepared using Ficol I (Amersham Biosciences), and total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Life Technologies, Inc. NY) according to the method described in the instruction manual for the product. After treatment with DNase I (manufactured by Nippon Gene), an RNA amplification method using T7 RNA polymerase was performed. This RNA amplification method was performed according to the method of Luo, L. (Nat Med., 5; 117-122, 1999). That is, specifically, I went.
- RNA extracted from the sample and 7-oligod (T) 21 primer to which a T7 promoter sequence was added were subjected to a reverse transcription reaction using Superscript II to synthesize single-stranded cDNA.
- T7-oligod (T) 21 primer to which the T7 promoter sequence was added again was reacted using DNA polymerase I to synthesize double-stranded cDNA. did.
- T7 RNA polymerase T7 RNA polymerase
- RNA amplified RNA (aRNA) was obtained by performing 2 cycles of the above-mentioned RNA amplification using 2 ⁇ g of total RNA as a starting material. Similar amplification was performed for the control sample to obtain a sufficient amount of aRNA. The amount of the obtained aRNA was measured with a spectrophotometer, and the quality of RNA was also examined by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis. The RNA amplified by this method was confirmed to be consistent with the results of the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PGR) whether using total RNA or aRNA as type III. (K. Ono et a, Cancer Res 60, 50 07-11. (2000)).
- RT-PGR reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
- the resulting labeled probe was mixed with microarray hybridization solution solution 2 (manufactured by Amersham Biosciences) and formamide (manufactured by Sigma) at a final concentration of 50%. .
- Hybridization and washing were performed using a commercially available automated slide processor (Automated Slide Processor (Amersham B osc ences)) according to the instruction manual.
- Array Scanner Generation
- genes were selected using the following two criteria.
- Each of the insects was evaluated optically using a commercially available software (Array Vision computer program (Amersham Biosciences)) and normalized to the average signal of the housekeeping gene.
- the CY3: GY5 ratio for each sample was calculated by averaging the spots.
- the cut-off value of the expression level is automatically calculated according to the background fluctuation.
- Fluctuations were evaluated by subtracting the variance of the log ratio of Cy3: Cy5 from the variance of the log ratio of Cy3: Cy5 from the variance of the log ratio of Cy3: Cy5 for highly expressed genes (top 30%; negligible if the background fluctuation is small) can do. Genes with an expression level of more than about 10 5 with fluctuations below the critical value (1.0) were used. This is because other genes with low expression levels are buried in background fluctuations.
- the non-uniformity of the spot amount on the slide in the microarray (although it is controlled within a certain range) can be controlled by adding a control (subject) to the sample. Analyze the data in the form of the expression level ratio. The ratio obtained by dividing the expression level in the so-called sample by the expression level of the control is referred to as “relative expression level ratio”.
- the mean (and standard deviation (b)) was calculated from the logarithmic transformed relative expression ratio of each gene in responders (r) and non-responders (n).
- the discrimination score (DS) was calculated as follows. Defined.
- a prediction score (prediction score, PS) was calculated. That is, each gene will vote for either the responder or the non-responder based on whether its expression level (X;) power is closer to the average of the expression levels of the responders or non-responders.
- the size of the vote ( Vi ) reflects the deviation of the expression level in the sample from the average of the two groups.
- the PS value is in the range of -100 to 100, and a larger absolute value reflects a more reliable prediction.
- the seven types of candidate genes are arranged in the order of the permutation P value (Tables 1 to 4), and the top 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50 of this rank order list are listed.
- , 55, 60, 65, 70, 75 and 79 genes were subjected to a leave-one-out test for cross-validation. This was performed as follows. sand That is, one sample was excluded, the permutation P value and the average expression level were calculated for the remaining samples, and then the group of excluded samples was determined by calculating the prediction score. This operation was performed for each of the 18 samples.
- a classification score (GS) was then calculated for each set of genes to determine the number of genes that could best separate the two groups. This was performed as follows. That is, the classification score (GS) was calculated by the following equation using the predicted score of the responder (PS) and the predicted score of the non-responder (PS n ).
- the number of genes used in the calculation affects the ability to separate the two groups.
- the responders and non-responders could be clearly separated.
- Fig. 1 The “prediction score” system using these two sets of genes clearly separated the two patient groups (Fig. 2).
- Figure 3 Hierarchical clustering was performed as follows: The 15 or 30 discriminating genes ranked highest by the permutation test (Table 1). The hierarchical clustering method was applied by using the “cluster” and “treeviewj (http: // genome-) software developed by M. Eisen and available from the Internet web.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Oncology (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP03730542A EP1533373A4 (en) | 2002-05-22 | 2003-05-21 | PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING SENSITIVITY AGAINST IMATINIB |
US10/515,051 US20060246436A1 (en) | 2002-05-22 | 2003-05-21 | Method for judging sensibility to imatinib |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2002-148339 | 2002-05-22 | ||
JP2002148339A JP4035600B2 (ja) | 2002-05-22 | 2002-05-22 | イマチニブに対する感受性の判定方法 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2003097830A1 true WO2003097830A1 (fr) | 2003-11-27 |
Family
ID=29545232
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2003/006330 WO2003097830A1 (fr) | 2002-05-22 | 2003-05-21 | Procede pour evaluer la sensibilite a l'imatinib |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20060246436A1 (ja) |
EP (1) | EP1533373A4 (ja) |
JP (1) | JP4035600B2 (ja) |
WO (1) | WO2003097830A1 (ja) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2005113801A2 (en) * | 2004-05-14 | 2005-12-01 | Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research | Identification and characterization of a subset of glioblastomas sensitive to treatment with imatinib |
US8421478B2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2013-04-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Radio frequency integrated circuit with on-chip noise source for self-test |
US8775573B2 (en) | 2006-06-15 | 2014-07-08 | International Business Machines Corporarion | Method and apparatus for localized adaptation of client devices based on correlation or learning at remote server |
US8931102B2 (en) | 2011-06-01 | 2015-01-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Testing web applications for file upload vulnerabilities |
US9430653B2 (en) | 2012-11-13 | 2016-08-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Protection of user data in hosted application environments |
US10171287B2 (en) | 2012-04-18 | 2019-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multi-user analytical system and corresponding device and method |
US10245968B2 (en) | 2012-02-03 | 2019-04-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method of charging a vehicle using a dynamic power grid, and system and method of managing power consumption in the vehicle |
US11120099B2 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2021-09-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Rendering a web element in a web page |
Families Citing this family (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7291568B2 (en) * | 2003-08-26 | 2007-11-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for fabricating a nitrided silicon-oxide gate dielectric |
US20050096964A1 (en) * | 2003-10-29 | 2005-05-05 | Tsai Roger Y. | Best indicator adaptive forecasting method |
US8156490B2 (en) | 2004-05-08 | 2012-04-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic migration of virtual machine computer programs upon satisfaction of conditions |
US7523098B2 (en) | 2004-09-15 | 2009-04-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for efficient data searching, storage and reduction |
US8725705B2 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2014-05-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for searching of storage data with reduced bandwidth requirements |
US8199893B2 (en) * | 2005-12-06 | 2012-06-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and methods for disclosing call destination characteristic |
US7487340B2 (en) * | 2006-06-08 | 2009-02-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Local and global branch prediction information storage |
US9069870B2 (en) | 2006-07-12 | 2015-06-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Client-side aggregation of context-sensitive request results where results for aggregation are asynchronously produced by multiple servers |
US9432243B2 (en) | 2007-08-22 | 2016-08-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Re-using asynchronous server-side results generated for a request context of one client to satisfy a request context of a different client |
DE102007041657A1 (de) * | 2007-09-03 | 2009-03-05 | Protagen Ag | Markersequenzen für Multiple Sklerose und deren Verwendung |
US20090077248A1 (en) * | 2007-09-14 | 2009-03-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Balancing access to shared resources |
JP2009092508A (ja) * | 2007-10-09 | 2009-04-30 | Norihiro Nishimoto | リウマチ治療剤の効果の予測方法 |
EP2242852A4 (en) * | 2007-12-07 | 2011-02-09 | Univ Oregon Health & Science | PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING WHETHER AN INDIVIDUAL REQUIRES A BCR ABL INHIBITOR |
WO2010066891A2 (en) * | 2008-12-11 | 2010-06-17 | Institut National De La Sante Et De La Recherche Medicale (Inserm) | Method for predicting the response to treatment by tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the bcr-abl fusion protein in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients |
JP5250871B2 (ja) | 2008-12-24 | 2013-07-31 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | ムラ評価装置、ムラ評価方法、ディスプレイ検査装置、およびプログラム |
CN101877679B (zh) * | 2009-04-30 | 2013-01-23 | 国际商业机器公司 | 用于处理电子邮件的方法和系统 |
US20110022662A1 (en) | 2009-07-23 | 2011-01-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Event triggered notifications for collaborative processes |
US8756609B2 (en) | 2011-12-30 | 2014-06-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamically scaling multi-tier applications vertically and horizontally in a cloud environment |
US10103226B2 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2018-10-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of fabricating tunnel transistors with abrupt junctions |
CN103514224B (zh) | 2012-06-29 | 2017-08-25 | 国际商业机器公司 | 数据库中的数据处理方法、数据查询方法和相应装置 |
US8856034B2 (en) | 2012-08-16 | 2014-10-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent point of sale system |
US8916448B2 (en) | 2013-01-09 | 2014-12-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Metal to metal bonding for stacked (3D) integrated circuits |
US9495418B2 (en) | 2013-08-07 | 2016-11-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Scalable acceleration of database query operations |
US9830354B2 (en) | 2013-08-07 | 2017-11-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Accelerating multiple query processing operations |
CN105631239B (zh) | 2014-10-30 | 2018-08-17 | 国际商业机器公司 | 用于管理基因序列的方法和装置 |
US10310813B2 (en) | 2014-12-29 | 2019-06-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Hardware implementation of a tournament tree sort algorithm using an external memory |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5646011A (en) * | 1994-04-08 | 1997-07-08 | Yokoyama; Shiro | Cisplatin resistance gene and uses therefor |
JP2001516009A (ja) * | 1997-07-17 | 2001-09-25 | ルードヴィッヒ インスティテュート フォー キャンサー リサーチ | ガン関連核酸及びポリペプチド |
US6218521B1 (en) * | 1997-07-17 | 2001-04-17 | Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research | Isolated nucleic acid molecules associated with gastric cancer and methods for diagnosing and treating gastric cancer |
CA2753372C (en) * | 2001-06-14 | 2018-08-07 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Mutations in the bcr-abl tyrosine kinase associated with resistance to sti-571 |
WO2003087404A1 (en) * | 2002-04-17 | 2003-10-23 | Novartis Ag | Methods to predict patient responsiveness to tyrosine kinase inhibitors |
-
2002
- 2002-05-22 JP JP2002148339A patent/JP4035600B2/ja not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2003
- 2003-05-21 EP EP03730542A patent/EP1533373A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-05-21 WO PCT/JP2003/006330 patent/WO2003097830A1/ja active Application Filing
- 2003-05-21 US US10/515,051 patent/US20060246436A1/en not_active Abandoned
Non-Patent Citations (6)
Title |
---|
B. J. DRUKER ET AL., NAT MED, vol. 2, 1996, pages 561 - 6 |
E. BUCHDUNGER; A. MATTER; B. J. DRUKER, BIOCHIM BIOPHYS ACTA, vol. 1551, 2001, pages M11 - 8 |
HASHIMOTO Y. ET AL.: "A rescue factor abolishing neuronal cell death by a wide spectrum of familial Alzheimer's disease genes and Abeta", PROC. NATL. ACAD. SCI. USA, vol. 98, no. 11, 2001, pages 6336 - 6341, XP002190962 * |
KANETA Y. ET AL.: "Prediction of sensitivity to STI571 among chronic myeloid leukemia patients by genome-wide cDNA micro-array analysis", JPN. J. CANCER RES., vol. 93, no. 8, August 2002 (2002-08-01), pages 849 - 856, XP002260979 * |
S. FADERL, N ENGL J MED, vol. 341, 1999, pages 164 - 72 |
See also references of EP1533373A4 |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2005113801A2 (en) * | 2004-05-14 | 2005-12-01 | Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research | Identification and characterization of a subset of glioblastomas sensitive to treatment with imatinib |
WO2005113801A3 (en) * | 2004-05-14 | 2006-02-23 | Ludwig Inst Cancer Res | Identification and characterization of a subset of glioblastomas sensitive to treatment with imatinib |
AU2005245572B2 (en) * | 2004-05-14 | 2008-12-04 | Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research | Identification and characterization of a subset of glioblastomas sensitive to treatment with imatinib |
AU2005245572B9 (en) * | 2004-05-14 | 2009-01-29 | Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research | Identification and characterization of a subset of glioblastomas sensitive to treatment with imatinib |
US8775573B2 (en) | 2006-06-15 | 2014-07-08 | International Business Machines Corporarion | Method and apparatus for localized adaptation of client devices based on correlation or learning at remote server |
US8421478B2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2013-04-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Radio frequency integrated circuit with on-chip noise source for self-test |
US8931102B2 (en) | 2011-06-01 | 2015-01-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Testing web applications for file upload vulnerabilities |
US9009841B2 (en) | 2011-06-01 | 2015-04-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Testing web applications for file upload vulnerabilities |
US10245968B2 (en) | 2012-02-03 | 2019-04-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method of charging a vehicle using a dynamic power grid, and system and method of managing power consumption in the vehicle |
US10336205B2 (en) | 2012-02-03 | 2019-07-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method of charging a vehicle using a dynamic power grid, and system and method of managing power consumption in the vehicle |
US10171287B2 (en) | 2012-04-18 | 2019-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multi-user analytical system and corresponding device and method |
US9430653B2 (en) | 2012-11-13 | 2016-08-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Protection of user data in hosted application environments |
US11120099B2 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2021-09-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Rendering a web element in a web page |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4035600B2 (ja) | 2008-01-23 |
EP1533373A1 (en) | 2005-05-25 |
US20060246436A1 (en) | 2006-11-02 |
EP1533373A4 (en) | 2007-04-18 |
JP2004000018A (ja) | 2004-01-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2003097830A1 (fr) | Procede pour evaluer la sensibilite a l'imatinib | |
EP2715348B1 (en) | Molecular diagnostic test for cancer | |
US11591655B2 (en) | Diagnostic transcriptomic biomarkers in inflammatory cardiomyopathies | |
EP2925885B1 (en) | Molecular diagnostic test for cancer | |
EP1824997B1 (en) | Genetic alteration useful for the response prediction of malignant neoplasia to taxane-based medical treatment | |
Bernardini et al. | High-resolution mapping of genomic imbalance and identification of gene expression profiles associated with differential chemotherapy response in serous epithelial ovarian cancer | |
WO2010064702A1 (ja) | 癌の予後を予測するためのバイオマーカー | |
EP2162459B1 (en) | Transcriptomic biomarkers for individual risk assessment in new onset heart failure | |
US20130303826A1 (en) | Prognostic signature for oral squamous cell carcinoma | |
CA2524173A1 (en) | Methods for diagnosing aml and mds differential gene expression | |
US20080182246A1 (en) | Methods of predicting distant metastasis of lymph node-negative primary breast cancer using biological pathway gene expression analysis | |
AU2012261820A1 (en) | Molecular diagnostic test for cancer | |
WO2004053074A2 (en) | Outcome prediction and risk classification in childhood leukemia | |
EP2982985A1 (en) | System for predicting prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer | |
CN105648058A (zh) | 一种评估肝癌预后的试剂盒 | |
WO2021222867A1 (en) | Immunotherapy response signature | |
EP2152916B1 (en) | A transcriptomic biomarker of myocarditis | |
KR20070115891A (ko) | 충실성 종양의 예후전망을 위한 약물유전학 마커 | |
Nagahata et al. | Expression profiling to predict postoperative prognosis for estrogen receptor‐negative breast cancers by analysis of 25,344 genes on a cDNA microarray | |
US20150038351A1 (en) | Gene Signatures That Predispose Or Protect Individuals From Low-Dose Radiation Induced Breast Cancer Or Are Associated with Disease-Free Survival | |
JP4370409B2 (ja) | がんの予後予測方法 | |
US20130274127A1 (en) | Gene expression markers for prediction of response to phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors | |
WO2007137366A1 (en) | Diagnostic and prognostic indicators of cancer | |
WO2003040407A2 (en) | Novel markers for cardiopathies | |
US20150011411A1 (en) | Biomarkers of cancer |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): CA US |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2003730542 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2003730542 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2006246436 Country of ref document: US Ref document number: 10515051 Country of ref document: US |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 10515051 Country of ref document: US |