Classifications

• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
  • D21D—TREATMENT OF THE MATERIALS BEFORE PASSING TO THE PAPER-MAKING MACHINE
  • D21D5/00—Purification of the pulp suspension by mechanical means; Apparatus therefor
  • D21D5/02—Straining or screening the pulp
• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
  • D21F—PAPER-MAKING MACHINES; METHODS OF PRODUCING PAPER THEREON
  • D21F1/00—Wet end of machines for making continuous webs of paper
  • D21F1/66—Pulp catching, de-watering, or recovering; Re-use of pulp-water

Definitions

• the present invention relates to a method in connection with the manufacturing of paper and cardboard.
• the method aims to level out quality variations and to raise the quality level through converting excess waste for manufacturing, so-called broke.
• the converted broke is returned in a more controlled way to the paper of cardboard, as compared to conventional techniques.
• paper and cardboard are manufactured from different stock compositions consisting of different proportions of different fibre and pulp types depending on which properties are desired in the final product. Even if a given paper or cardboard quality has a given nominal fibre composition, there is a natural variation in the fibre raw materials included as different wood species have different fibre characteristics, see Table 1, and there are also natural property variations for the fibres in wood with regard to length, width, fibre wall thickness, etc.
• the fibre length distribution for a Swedish softwood pulp spans from fractions of millimetres up to 6-7 mm. For birch pulp, the corresponding value is from fractions of millimetres up to approx. 3-4 mm. This means that fresh cellulose pulps demonstrate major non- homogeneities in fibre property distributions.
• broke can comprise edge strips, widths on rolls of final product which results in that the whole machine width cannot be used to the full, second-rate quality, etc From the mentioned examples of factors which result in broke, it is understood that the broke quantity varies over time If one manufactures a product which complies with the quality specification and utilises the whole machine width, there will be small quantities of broke When for some reason there are problems with complying to the quality specification, e g at a change of quality on the machine, and the full machine width cannot be used, the quantities of broke will become larger
• Table 2 shows a calculation example of how a varying broke quantity changes the fibre composition in a three-ply product for different broke mixes The example is based on the broke being returned directly to the inner ply
• the present invention a method in connection with the manufacturing of paper of cardboard is presented, whereupon excess material from the manufacturing, so-called broke, is re-used in an optimum way.
• the quality of the product may be controlled, the product's service properties may be improved and quality variations in the paper or cardboard product may be levelled out.
• the fibre composition for the broke is determined by on-line characterisation of one or more of the fibre length, fibre width, fibre coarseness, fibre shape and fibre flexibility parameters, while the fibre composition in the fibre fraction(s) produced is determined in the same way or is calculated, and the fibre composition in the input paper pulp for the said given ply is determined by means of intermittent characterisation of one or more of the said parameters.
• the fractionation is controlled on basis of one or more of the parameters fibre composition in the input paper pulp for the said given ply, fibre composition in the broke and fibre composition in at least one of the fibre fraction(s) produced.
• the fractionation equipment used for the fractionation is characterised intermittently in terms of fractionating effect for different fibre compositions furnished to the fractionation equipment and operating conditions, whereby operating conditions refer to the input flow to the equipment, the ratio between input flow and reject, the concentration of the input flow, or similar operating conditions, which characterisation forms the basis for the said control of the fractionation.
• the fractionation is controlled, preferably continuously, by means of a change of at least one of the operating conditions of the fractionation equipment, which operating conditions include the input flow to the equipment, the ratio between input flow and reject, the concentration of the input flow, or similar operating conditions
• the fractionation is performed in at least two steps, whereupon a first fraction is controlled primarily to contain short fibres, and another fraction is controlled primarily to contain long fibres.
• the fraction with long fibres is controlled through fractionation in a second step to consist of a second fraction primarily containing long flexible fibres and a third fraction primarily containing long stiff fibres, after which the said first and/or second and/or third fraction is distributed in a desired proportion to the said given ply or several given plies at the manufacturing the paper or the cardboard.
• the fractioning is performed on basis of fibre length, preferably by use of a screen, while the fractionation on basis of fibre thickness and thereby fibre flexibility is performed preferably by use of a hydrocyclone
• the broke in existing chemical short fibre pulp preferably in the above-mentioned first fraction
• chemical long fibre pulp preferably in the above-mentioned second fraction which contains long flexible fibres
• mechanical pulp preferably in the above-mentioned third fraction which contains long stiff fibres
• - chemical long fibres may be used optionally, after possible subsequent beating and/or fractionating, in an outer ply and/or as reinforcement in an inner ply If the fraction containing mainly chemical long fibres undergoes further fractionation, the fine fraction can be conveyed to an outer ply and the coarse fraction can be conveyed to an inner ply as reinforcement, after beating
• the advantage of the method according to the invention is that by separating the different fibre components in the broke, a desired proportion of the fibre component can be controlled to be included in a certain ply, in a specific proportion, in the final product
• on-line fibre characterisation, characterisation of fractionators and calculation of the fibre property composition of different fractions makes it possible to utilise fractionation in order to, with the aid of suitable combinations of fractionation equipment, achieve a very good possibility for optimum control of the fractionation at every individual step Several subsequent fractionation steps may together create a fractionation system in order to tailor-make fractions with the desired fibre property composition The desired fibre property composition in a certain fraction may thereafter be
• Fig 1 shows a simplified diagram of a proposed embodiment of the invention
• Fig 2A shows a graph that constitutes an example of fibre accept degree as a function of fibre length for a screen
• Fig 2B shows a graph that constitutes an example of fibre accept degree as a function of fibre length for a cyclone
• Fig 3 shows how the line in Fig 2A changes in connection with an increasing ratio between reject and inject in a screen
• Fig 4 shows a result of a comparison between a bending stiffness index for a cardboard according to the invention and a reference cardboard
• Step 1 Characterisation of pulp
• Each pulp 1, 2, 3 which is intended for a respective ply in the produced cardboard or paper is analysed with on-line fibre characterisation equipment 4
• the pulp is analysed in terms of different fibre properties/fibre compositions, e g fibre length, fibre width, fibre coarseness (fibre length weight), fibre form, fibre flexibility, etc
• a sufficient quantity of fibres is analysed to achieve distributions with regard to the different properties for every pulp
• the fractionator or fractionators 5, 6 which is to be characterised are supplied with inject pulp which has been characterised in terms of fibre properties according to step 1
• the operating conditions and equipment for the fractionator are varied systematically during the characterisation experiment Equipment refers, for example, to the type of screen basket used if the fractionator is a screen, or the type of outlet nozzle used if the fractionator is a cyclone 6, i e the equipment determines design-related limitations for the fractionator
• Operating conditions refer, for example, to inject flow, ratio between inject flow and reject flow, the concentration of the inject pulp, i e parameters which determine how a certain fractionator with a certain design is operated
• the graphs in Figure 2 A and 2B are interpreted such that of all fibres in a given population of a certain fibre length a certain share ends up in the accept and the remaining share in the reject For example, of fibres with length x t , yj% end up in the accept Consequently, 100- y ⁇ % ends up in the reject Of fibres with length x 2 , y 2 % end up in the accept and 100- y 2 % ends up in the reject
• the two graphs in the figure also illustrate the fact that has been described previously, that the screen 5 fractionates according to fibre length, while the cyclone 6 fractionates according to other fibre properties (the same fibre accept degree irrespective of fibre length)
• the curve in the respective graph is moved as is shown in Figure 2A and 2B
• Figure 3 shows in a diagrammatic form what happens if the flow ratio between reject flow and inject flow in a screen is varied An increasing flow ratio thereby leads to a reduced proportion of fibres of a certain length ending up in the
• Steps 1 and 2 described above do not need to be performed continuously in the application of the invention, especially not the characterisation of the fractionator
• the characterisation of the fractionator is relevant as long as the fractionator is intact, but needs to be repeated if the equipment is changed or if the operating parameters are changed so that they deviate from the intervals within which the different parameters were varied during the characterisation
• the characterisation of input pulp may, if it is not performed continuously, be redone when the pulp production process is modified, the wood collection area is changed, major seasonal variations exist, etc
• the part of the manufactured paper of cardboard which is returned as broke 7 is characterised in the same way as the input pulps in Step 1
• the broke is hereupon disintegrated and, where appropriate, processed with beating or refining
• the fibre property distributions of the broke 7 from Step 3 form the basis for controlling the operating conditions of the fractionator 5, 6 so that the fibre property distributions for the fractions of the broke, at a comparison with the fibre property distributions for the input pulps 1, 2, 3 are as similar as possible
• the fibre property distributions for the original input pulps 1, 2, 3 are known from Step 1
• based on the fibre property distribution for the broke 7 one can calculate the fibre composition in the broke
• This calculated fibre composition governs the operating parameters of the fractionator so that the operating condition will give the desired fibre separation
• the fractionation is thereby controlled e g so that there is produced a first fraction 8 chiefly consisting of a first type of fibres, which resemble a first 1 of the input pulps, a second fraction 9 chiefly consisting of a second type of fibres, which resemble a second 2 of the input pulps, and a third fraction 10 consisting of a third type of fibres, which resemble a third 3 of the input
• these fractions 8, 9, 10 are characterised 4 in the same way as the input pulps 1, 2, 3 in Step 1
• the comparison between the fibre property distributions of the input pulps and the fibre property distributions of the fractions shows whether a possible adjustment of the operating conditions is necessary, which is then performed automatically
• the physical control of the fractionators 5, 6 is performed by gathering data concerning fibre characterisation in a process computer where all necessary data processing is performed Depending on the outcome of the data processing, the process computer thereafter gives signals to the process equipment, e g adjustments of valves, pumps, etc , in order to control the operating conditions or issue alarms if the equipment for the fractionators 5, 6 should be modified
• Steps 3 and 4 should be performed continuously during operating in order for the invention to operate in the best way
• the four steps described constitute a system for separating the broke 7 by, using knowledge of the fibre property distributions of the input pulps 1, 2, 3, (step 1) and the work method used by the fractionators 5, 6 (step 2), analysing the broke (step 3) and controlling the fractionator (step 4) so that fibre fractions are obtained from the broke which in their characteristics resemble the input pulps
• the following example is based on results from a pilot-scale trial During the trial, a three-ply cardboard was manufactured with a nominal basis weight of 200 g/m 2 on a pilot paper machine
• the outer plies nominally had basis weights of 40 g/m 2 each, and the central ply nominally had a basis weight of 120 g/m 2
• the outer plies consisted of a 50/50 mix of chemical short fibre/chemical long fibre and the central ply consisted of a 50/50 mix of mechanical fibres/broke
• the reference cardboard was compared with a trial cardboard which had the same nominal ply basis weights and the same original pulps The difference was that the broke had been fractionated in three steps In the first fractionation step, which was performed in a screen, a fraction was separated out which was denoted chemical short f ⁇ bre broke .
• the long fibres were separated out in a fraction of flexible fibres, chemical long fibre broke and a fraction of stiff fibres, mechanical fibre broke-
• the chemical long fibre broke fraction was fractionated in a third step to an accept consisting of shorter, more slender fibres, chemical long fibre broke unbeaten and a reject consisting of longer coarser fibres, chemical long fibre broke be te -
• the reject was beaten hard to serve as a reinforcement pulp
• the composition in the outer plies of the trial cardboard was 50/50 (chemical short long fibre + chemical long fibre brok e, unbeaten) and the composition of the centre ply was 55/45 mechanical brQs/(mechamcalf ⁇ bresbroke + chemical long fibre br ke beaten).

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
• Paper (AREA)
• Replacement Of Web Rolls (AREA)
• Machines For Manufacturing Corrugated Board In Mechanical Paper-Making Processes (AREA)
• Making Paper Articles (AREA)

Priority Applications (10)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=20414566

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (15)

Cited By (5)

Families Citing this family (12)

Citations (3)

Family Cites Families (22)

• 1999
  • 1999-02-22 SE SE9900607A patent/SE513596C2/sv not_active IP Right Cessation
• 2000
  • 2000-01-13 RU RU2001123674/12A patent/RU2219297C2/ru active
  • 2000-01-13 NZ NZ513669A patent/NZ513669A/xx not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 2000-01-13 DE DE60022212T patent/DE60022212T2/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 2000-01-13 CA CA002360223A patent/CA2360223C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 2000-01-13 CN CNB008041652A patent/CN1160501C/zh not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 2000-01-13 EP EP00901373A patent/EP1218590B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 2000-01-13 WO PCT/SE2000/000042 patent/WO2000050695A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2000-01-13 US US09/914,017 patent/US6517680B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 2000-01-13 BR BRPI0008414-0A patent/BR0008414B1/pt not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 2000-01-13 ES ES00901373T patent/ES2248040T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 2000-01-13 AT AT00901373T patent/ATE302877T1/de active
  • 2000-01-13 AU AU21413/00A patent/AU2141300A/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2000-01-13 PL PL350849A patent/PL192736B1/pl unknown
  • 2000-01-13 JP JP2000601249A patent/JP4753472B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related

Patent Citations (3)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events