WO1998049524A1 - Procede permettant d'etablir une distinction entre des erreurs de forme d'une surface courbe a forme libre - Google Patents
Procede permettant d'etablir une distinction entre des erreurs de forme d'une surface courbe a forme libre Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1998049524A1 WO1998049524A1 PCT/JP1998/001842 JP9801842W WO9849524A1 WO 1998049524 A1 WO1998049524 A1 WO 1998049524A1 JP 9801842 W JP9801842 W JP 9801842W WO 9849524 A1 WO9849524 A1 WO 9849524A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- shape
- principal curvatures
- principal
- free
- regions
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T17/00—Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
- G06T17/30—Polynomial surface description
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B21/00—Measuring arrangements or details thereof, where the measuring technique is not covered by the other groups of this subclass, unspecified or not relevant
- G01B21/20—Measuring arrangements or details thereof, where the measuring technique is not covered by the other groups of this subclass, unspecified or not relevant for measuring contours or curvatures, e.g. determining profile
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S715/00—Data processing: presentation processing of document, operator interface processing, and screen saver display processing
- Y10S715/961—Operator interface with visual structure or function dictated by intended use
- Y10S715/964—CAD or CAM, e.g. interactive design tools
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a shape error determination method for a free-form surface. Description of related technology
- FIG. 1 shows a forming sample showing a defect in plate forming
- FIG. 2 shows an example of a conventional method for evaluating a curved surface shape error. This example is described in "Simulation of 3-D sheet bending process" (Takizawa, et al., 1991, VDI BE ICHETE NR.
- the white portion indicates the reference shape (for example, a mold shape)
- the mesh portion indicates the shape obtained by the molding simulation.
- the simulation shape is displayed at the same position, and only the one located on the front side is displayed.Therefore, from the displayed white portion and the mesh portion, the difference between the simulation shape and the reference shape is obtained. The shape error can be roughly determined. And, this man The law had the following problems.
- Fig. 3 shows the CMM data (approximately 400 points) measured using the three-dimensional measuring machine "Mityos-Par-BHN506".
- Fig. 4 shows the top view of Fig. 3. (Approximately 800 points).
- the shape of a molded product actually molded using a mold can be displayed as an image as shown in Figs. 3 and 4 by measuring with a 3D measuring machine. From the image, shape errors such as unevenness and twist can be roughly discriminated visually.
- (4) when the reference shape is not flat but has a complicated curve three-dimensional measurement is possible. There was a problem that the difference from the result could hardly be distinguished visually.
- the main object of the present invention is to accurately grasp a difference between two three-dimensional shapes such as an actual molded shape, a simulation shape by computer simulation, or a reference shape by CAD.
- the reference position can be applied without exact match, part batchwise bend like can cause grasp an error occurs in the It is possible to grasp by objective numerical values how much the shape matches as a whole, and the reference shape is complicated. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of determining a shape error of a free-form surface which can be easily determined even in such a case.
- the inventors of the present invention have devised a new evaluation model “extended Gaussian curvature” which does not depend on a coordinate system. This classifies the local shape error of a free-form surface into three types (peak, valley, and twist) by comparing it with a reference CAD surface, for example. We also devised a method to calculate the ratio of the same label using image processing technology. The present invention is based on such a novel idea.
- the principal curvatures at the corresponding positions of the target surface S ′ and the reference surface S are respectively obtained, and from the difference in the principal curvature, each part is (a) when the two principal curvatures are increased, b) When the two principal curvatures are decreasing, (c) when the one is increasing, and the other is decreasing, the classification is made and displayed.
- the present invention further extends the Gaussian curvature K.
- the principal curvatures at the corresponding positions of the target surface S ′ including the error and the reference surface S are respectively obtained, and the respective portions are expressed as (a) (b) ( c)
- the classification is displayed. It is possible to accurately grasp the difference between the two three-dimensional shapes.
- the shape error can be determined by obtaining the principal curvatures of the corresponding positions, the method can be applied without accurately matching the reference positions of the two three-dimensional shapes, such as partial bending. It is possible to understand the cause of the error occurrence.
- Figure 1 is a halftone image displayed on the display of a processed sample showing a failure in plate forming.
- FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a conventional method for evaluating a curved surface shape error using a simulation.
- FIG. 3 is a measurement diagram by a three-dimensional measuring machine.
- FIG. 4 is a top view of FIG.
- FIG. 5 is a halftone image displayed on a display showing a perspective view of the impeller.
- FIG. 6 is a diagram in which bending deformation is added to the originally twisted shape according to the method of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a diagram in which a twisted deformation is applied to an originally twisted shape according to the method of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is an example in which the method of the present invention is applied based on measured data.
- FIG. 9 is an example in which the method of the present invention is applied based on the result of numerical simulation.
- FIG. 10 shows another example in which the method of the present invention is applied based on measured data.
- FIG. 11 shows another example in which the method of the present invention is applied based on the result of numerical simulation. Description of the preferred embodiment
- Equation 1 is a relational expression in differential geometry. This relationship is disclosed, for example, in "Curves and Surfaces for Computer Aided Geometric Desigm (Far in, G, 1988, A Practial Guide. Academic Press).
- Equation 2 the normal surface / c at an arbitrary point S (u, v) is expressed as in Equation 2 according to the description in Equation 1.
- the principal curvature is / c ,, ⁇ 2, which is obtained by solving the following (Equation 3), and the Gaussian curvature K is defined as / c, ⁇ 2.
- Equation 3 the Gaussian curvature K is defined as / c, ⁇ 2.
- the above is the conventional definition of the Gaussian curvature K.
- FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the impeller
- FIGS. 6 and 7 show the results of applying the method of the present invention.
- 6 and 7 show the case where the force shown by the arrow in the figure is applied
- FIG. 6 shows the case where the blade (blade) is subjected to bending deformation
- FIG. 7 shows the case where torsional deformation is applied.
- the labels “peak” according to the present invention are indicated by “10”, “valleys” are indicated by “ ⁇ ”, and the twist is indicated by a symbol of%.
- the ratio of the same label is calculated from the labels of (a), (b), and (c) above to obtain the matching ratio. That is, the labels of “mountain”, “valley”, and “twist” are mapped onto the pixels of the u, V parameter overnight plane ([0, 1] X [0, 1]), and this parameter plane is By dividing the grid with an appropriate pitch d and applying the collation rate ( ⁇ ) in (Equation 5), it is possible to grasp objectively how much the shape matches as a whole by numerical values. can do.
- This collation rate ( ⁇ ) indicates the precision of the type of label, and since there was no index for molding defects in the past, it can be used as a simple and clear index. It should be noted that this can be further developed, and further subdivided according to the magnitude of the extended Gaussian curvature ( ⁇ ).
- the method can be applied without accurately matching the reference positions of the two three-dimensional shapes, such as partial bending. It is possible to understand the cause of the error occurrence.
- FIGS. 10 and 11 are comparative examples for the “side view” of FIG. 1
- FIG. 10 is an example of applying the method of the present invention based on measurement data
- FIG. 11 is a numerical simulation. This is an example in which the method of the present invention is applied based on the results of the review.
- the present invention proposes a simple and general-purpose method for defining a local shape error of a free-form surface.
- This method calculates the principal curvature between the surface containing the error and the reference surface. Use the difference.
- the reference surface is usually represented by CAD data.
- Surfaces with errors can be obtained by surface approximation of discrete points such as measurement points and node points in numerical simulation.
- the principal curvature is used in the evaluation of curved surfaces and the generation of curved surfaces from the aspect of design, but was not used numerically in the formulation and comparison of shape errors.
- the inventors of the present invention extended the Gaussian curvature, formulated the local shape error, and compared the FEM simulation with the CMM data based on the CAD data.
- the “extended Gaussian curvature” is newly defined, and the local shape error of the free-form surface can be classified into three types (peak, valley, and twist) by comparison with a reference CAD surface. Classify into.
- a matching method using image processing technology was also proposed.
- the method of the present invention is proved to be effective and powerful through comparison of deviation patterns between actual measurement data and numerical simulation data from reference CAD data. Proven.
- the method of the present invention can be widely used in a wide range of industrial fields, such as forming and measuring / evaluating fields, in combination with a three-dimensional measuring device, a CAD device, a CAM device, or a shy-mechanical device. it can.
- the shape error determination method for a free-form surface can accurately grasp a difference between two three-dimensional shapes, and can determine a shape error by determining a main curvature at a corresponding position.
- the cause of error occurrence such as partial bending, etc.
- it has excellent effects such as easy identification.
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2000571733A JP3937212B2 (ja) | 1997-04-25 | 1998-04-22 | 自由曲面の形状誤差判別方法 |
AU70791/98A AU7079198A (en) | 1997-04-25 | 1998-04-22 | Method of discriminating shape errors of free-form curved surface |
DE69838581T DE69838581T2 (de) | 1997-04-25 | 1998-04-22 | Verfahren zur determinierung von fehlern im form einer willkürlichen krummen oberflache |
US09/403,589 US6683985B1 (en) | 1997-04-25 | 1998-04-22 | Method of discriminating shape of free-form curved surface |
EP98917621A EP0977009B1 (en) | 1997-04-25 | 1998-04-22 | Method of discriminating shape errors of free-form curved surface |
CA002288177A CA2288177C (en) | 1997-04-25 | 1998-04-22 | Method of determining shape error of free-form surface |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP10913997 | 1997-04-25 | ||
JP9/109139 | 1997-04-25 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1998049524A1 true WO1998049524A1 (fr) | 1998-11-05 |
Family
ID=14502595
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP1998/001842 WO1998049524A1 (fr) | 1997-04-25 | 1998-04-22 | Procede permettant d'etablir une distinction entre des erreurs de forme d'une surface courbe a forme libre |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6683985B1 (ja) |
EP (1) | EP0977009B1 (ja) |
JP (1) | JP3937212B2 (ja) |
AU (1) | AU7079198A (ja) |
CA (1) | CA2288177C (ja) |
DE (1) | DE69838581T2 (ja) |
WO (1) | WO1998049524A1 (ja) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2000161946A (ja) * | 1998-11-27 | 2000-06-16 | Mitsutoyo Corp | 3次元データ解析方法及び装置 |
JP2006201164A (ja) * | 2005-01-18 | 2006-08-03 | General Electric Co <Ge> | 加工された構成要素の検査方法およびシステム |
JP2010169395A (ja) * | 2008-07-08 | 2010-08-05 | Samsung Heavy Ind Co Ltd | 曲形部材の加工完成度評価システム及びその方法 |
JP2011513727A (ja) * | 2008-02-28 | 2011-04-28 | コーニング インコーポレイテッド | シート材の基準面に対する共形化可能度を予測する方法 |
JP2019090675A (ja) * | 2017-11-14 | 2019-06-13 | 株式会社荏原製作所 | 検査装置、検査システム、プログラムを記憶した記憶媒体 |
Families Citing this family (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3344649B2 (ja) * | 1998-08-19 | 2002-11-11 | 理化学研究所 | 自由曲面の形状誤差評価方法 |
CA2314794A1 (en) * | 2000-08-01 | 2002-02-01 | Dimitre Hristov | Apparatus for lesion or organ localization |
US20020065637A1 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2002-05-30 | Thompson John S. | Method and apparatus for simulating the measurement of a part without using a physical measurement system |
US7139432B2 (en) * | 2002-04-10 | 2006-11-21 | National Instruments Corporation | Image pattern matching utilizing discrete curve matching with a mapping operator |
JP4794160B2 (ja) * | 2004-03-31 | 2011-10-19 | 日東電工株式会社 | 表面形状測定装置および表面形状測定方法 |
US7672705B2 (en) * | 2004-07-19 | 2010-03-02 | Resonant Medical, Inc. | Weighted surface-to-surface mapping |
US7729744B2 (en) * | 2004-07-20 | 2010-06-01 | Resonant Medical, Inc. | Verifying lesion characteristics using beam shapes |
WO2006007716A2 (en) * | 2004-07-20 | 2006-01-26 | Resonant Medical Inc. | Calibrating imaging devices |
CA2581127C (en) * | 2004-09-20 | 2013-12-24 | Resonant Medical Inc. | Radiotherapy treatment monitoring using ultrasound |
TWI267761B (en) * | 2004-12-03 | 2006-12-01 | Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd | A simulative measurement demo system and method |
EP1940515A4 (en) * | 2005-09-06 | 2010-05-26 | Resonant Medical Inc | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURING PATIENT DATA FOR RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT |
US8929621B2 (en) * | 2005-12-20 | 2015-01-06 | Elekta, Ltd. | Methods and systems for segmentation and surface matching |
US8395626B2 (en) * | 2006-04-08 | 2013-03-12 | Alan Millman | Method and system for interactive simulation of materials |
US8786613B2 (en) | 2006-04-08 | 2014-07-22 | Alan Millman | Method and system for interactive simulation of materials and models |
US9451928B2 (en) * | 2006-09-13 | 2016-09-27 | Elekta Ltd. | Incorporating internal anatomy in clinical radiotherapy setups |
US10531858B2 (en) | 2007-07-20 | 2020-01-14 | Elekta, LTD | Methods and systems for guiding the acquisition of ultrasound images |
WO2009012577A1 (en) * | 2007-07-20 | 2009-01-29 | Resonant Medical Inc. | Methods and systems for compensating for changes in anatomy of radiotherapy patients |
US8135198B2 (en) * | 2007-08-08 | 2012-03-13 | Resonant Medical, Inc. | Systems and methods for constructing images |
US8189738B2 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2012-05-29 | Elekta Ltd. | Methods and systems for guiding clinical radiotherapy setups |
US10542962B2 (en) * | 2009-07-10 | 2020-01-28 | Elekta, LTD | Adaptive radiotherapy treatment using ultrasound |
US9248316B2 (en) | 2010-01-12 | 2016-02-02 | Elekta Ltd. | Feature tracking using ultrasound |
US20110172526A1 (en) | 2010-01-12 | 2011-07-14 | Martin Lachaine | Feature Tracking Using Ultrasound |
FR2966956B1 (fr) * | 2010-10-27 | 2012-12-14 | Michelin Soc Tech | Methode de pre-traitement d'une image tri dimensionnelle de la surface d'un pneumatique a l'aide de deformations b-spline successives |
US20130085734A1 (en) * | 2011-10-03 | 2013-04-04 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Model and computer based coolant flow diagnostic system |
JP6528308B2 (ja) * | 2015-02-05 | 2019-06-12 | 国立大学法人神戸大学 | 形状評価方法および形状評価装置 |
CN110769731B (zh) * | 2017-06-15 | 2022-02-25 | 奥林巴斯株式会社 | 内窥镜系统、内窥镜用处理系统、图像处理方法 |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH04276513A (ja) * | 1991-03-04 | 1992-10-01 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | 形状測定処理方法 |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4679331A (en) * | 1985-08-26 | 1987-07-14 | Ppg Industries, Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining contour characteristics of a contoured article |
JPH03176703A (ja) * | 1989-12-05 | 1991-07-31 | Yoshiaki Kakino | 数値制御装置 |
US5715166A (en) * | 1992-03-02 | 1998-02-03 | General Motors Corporation | Apparatus for the registration of three-dimensional shapes |
US5844801A (en) * | 1994-12-08 | 1998-12-01 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Method of inspecting and manufacturing vehicle body |
JP3054108B2 (ja) * | 1997-08-15 | 2000-06-19 | 理化学研究所 | 自由曲面の測定データ合成方法 |
US6285320B1 (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2001-09-04 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Apparatus and method for mapping surfaces of an object |
-
1998
- 1998-04-22 CA CA002288177A patent/CA2288177C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-04-22 WO PCT/JP1998/001842 patent/WO1998049524A1/ja active IP Right Grant
- 1998-04-22 EP EP98917621A patent/EP0977009B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-22 US US09/403,589 patent/US6683985B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-04-22 DE DE69838581T patent/DE69838581T2/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-22 AU AU70791/98A patent/AU7079198A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-04-22 JP JP2000571733A patent/JP3937212B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH04276513A (ja) * | 1991-03-04 | 1992-10-01 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | 形状測定処理方法 |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2000161946A (ja) * | 1998-11-27 | 2000-06-16 | Mitsutoyo Corp | 3次元データ解析方法及び装置 |
JP2006201164A (ja) * | 2005-01-18 | 2006-08-03 | General Electric Co <Ge> | 加工された構成要素の検査方法およびシステム |
JP2011513727A (ja) * | 2008-02-28 | 2011-04-28 | コーニング インコーポレイテッド | シート材の基準面に対する共形化可能度を予測する方法 |
JP2010169395A (ja) * | 2008-07-08 | 2010-08-05 | Samsung Heavy Ind Co Ltd | 曲形部材の加工完成度評価システム及びその方法 |
JP2019090675A (ja) * | 2017-11-14 | 2019-06-13 | 株式会社荏原製作所 | 検査装置、検査システム、プログラムを記憶した記憶媒体 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0977009B1 (en) | 2007-10-17 |
CA2288177C (en) | 2006-07-18 |
DE69838581D1 (de) | 2007-11-29 |
CA2288177A1 (en) | 1998-11-05 |
EP0977009A4 (en) | 2006-10-18 |
DE69838581T2 (de) | 2008-02-07 |
US6683985B1 (en) | 2004-01-27 |
JP3937212B2 (ja) | 2007-06-27 |
EP0977009A1 (en) | 2000-02-02 |
AU7079198A (en) | 1998-11-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO1998049524A1 (fr) | Procede permettant d'etablir une distinction entre des erreurs de forme d'une surface courbe a forme libre | |
US6353768B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for designing a manufacturing process for sheet metal parts | |
Kase et al. | Shape error evaluation method of free-form surfaces | |
JP4633625B2 (ja) | メタルシート成形段階のジオメトリモデルの決定 | |
US6785640B1 (en) | Surface evaluation in a stamping manufacturing process utilizing true reflection line methodology and computer graphics technology | |
CN101253385A (zh) | 应变评价装置及应变评价方法 | |
CN102735204B (zh) | 一种基于弦线的航空薄壁叶片加工扭曲度误差测量方法 | |
US20100114350A1 (en) | Method of determining mesh data and method of correcting model data | |
US6338000B1 (en) | Method of generating shape data method of verifying shape data | |
CN100589126C (zh) | 利用阻光度传递函数的ct图像体素成像方法 | |
Hongzhi et al. | Investigation of sheet metal forming by numerical simulation and experiment | |
JPH08339396A (ja) | 金属板の変形過程の数値シミュレート結果の処理装置 | |
JP4604762B2 (ja) | 特徴図の比較評価方法およびシミュレーションモデル作成方法 | |
US20210407064A1 (en) | Method and device for geometric analysis of a part surface | |
JP2016203216A (ja) | 鍛造型の補正方法 | |
Eder et al. | Validation of material models for sheet metals using new test equipment | |
CN111914350A (zh) | 一种飞机框肋类钣金件弯边成形性判定方法 | |
CN107609255A (zh) | 车身特征线消失位置的检测方法 | |
JP2021508290A (ja) | 曲げるべきシート工作物の曲げ短縮の決定 | |
JP4097164B2 (ja) | 立体形状記述方法 | |
JP2000122996A (ja) | ワーク成形面の形状不良評価方法 | |
JP2007299167A (ja) | 設計検証装置 | |
Carasusán et al. | An automated procedure for non-contact strain analysis of sheet metal parts | |
CN117367516B (zh) | 基于多维测试的铝塑复合板性能检测系统 | |
JP3945311B2 (ja) | プレス成形品寸法精度評価方法およびその装置 |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IS JP KE KG KR KZ LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1998917621 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2288177 Country of ref document: CA Ref country code: CA Ref document number: 2288177 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 09403589 Country of ref document: US |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1998917621 Country of ref document: EP |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP Ref document number: 2000 571733 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 1998917621 Country of ref document: EP |