WO1995006128A2 - Fertile, transgenic maize plants and methods for their production - Google Patents
Fertile, transgenic maize plants and methods for their production Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1995006128A2 WO1995006128A2 PCT/US1994/009699 US9409699W WO9506128A2 WO 1995006128 A2 WO1995006128 A2 WO 1995006128A2 US 9409699 W US9409699 W US 9409699W WO 9506128 A2 WO9506128 A2 WO 9506128A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- gene
- cells
- dna
- plant
- genes
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H4/00—Plant reproduction by tissue culture techniques ; Tissue culture techniques therefor
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/415—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from plants
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8201—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
- C12N15/8206—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation by physical or chemical, i.e. non-biological, means, e.g. electroporation, PEG mediated
- C12N15/8207—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation by physical or chemical, i.e. non-biological, means, e.g. electroporation, PEG mediated by mechanical means, e.g. microinjection, particle bombardment, silicon whiskers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8201—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
- C12N15/8209—Selection, visualisation of transformants, reporter constructs, e.g. antibiotic resistance markers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/87—Introduction of foreign genetic material using processes not otherwise provided for, e.g. co-transformation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/0018—Culture media for cell or tissue culture
- C12N5/0025—Culture media for plant cell or plant tissue culture
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/04—Plant cells or tissues
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N9/00—Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
- C12N9/0004—Oxidoreductases (1.)
- C12N9/0006—Oxidoreductases (1.) acting on CH-OH groups as donors (1.1)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N9/00—Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
- C12N9/88—Lyases (4.)
Definitions
- the present invention relates to reproducible systems for genetically transforming monocotyledonous plants such as maize, to methods of selecting stable genetic transformants from suspensions of transformed cells, and to methods of producing fertile plants from the transformed cells.
- Exemplary transformation methods include the use of microprojectile bombardment to introduce nucleic acids into cells, and selectable and/or screenable marker systems, for example, genes which confer resistance (e.g., antibiotic, herbicide, etc.), or which contain an otherwise phenotypically observable or other detectable trait.
- the invention relates to the production of stably transformed and fertile monocot plants, gametes and offspring from the transgenic plants.
- This transformation may be accomplished even where the recipient organism is from a different phylum, genus or species from that which donated the gene (heterologous transformation).
- Attempts have been made to genetically engineer desired traits into plant genomes by introduction of exogenous genes using genetic engineering techniques. These techniques have been successfully applied in some plant systems, principally in dicotyledonous species.
- the uptake of new DNA by recipient plant cells has been accomplished by various means, including Agrobacterium infection (Nester et al., 1984), polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated DNA uptake (Lorz et al., 1985), electroporation of protoplasts (Fromm et al., 1986) and microprojectile
- a transformation technique that circumvents the need to use protoplasts is microprojectile bombardment. Although transient expression of a reporter gene was detected in bombarded tobacco pollen (Twell et al. , 1989), stable transformation by microprojectile bombardment of pollen has not been reported for any plant species. Bombardment of soybean apical meristems with DNA-coated gold particles resulted in chimeric plants containing transgenic sectors. Progeny containing the introduced gene were obtained at a low frequency (McCabe et al. , 1988).
- a second major problem in achieving successful monocot transformation has resulted from the lack of efficient marker gene systems which have been employed to identify stably transformed cells.
- Marker gene systems are those which allow the selection of, and/or screening for, expression products of DNA.
- the selectable or screenable products should be those from genetic constructs introduced into the recipient cells. Hence, such marker genes can be used to identify stable transformants.
- kanamycin resistance has been used successfully in both rice (Yang et al., 1 988) and corn protoplast systems (Rhodes et al., 1988), it remains a very difficult selective agent to use in monocots due to high endogenous resistance (Hauptmann, et al., 1 988).
- the present invention addresses one or more of the foregoing or other shortcomings in the prior art by providing compositions and methods for the preparation of stably transformed, monocotyledonous cells and the subsequent regeneration of fertile, transgenic plants and progeny, particularly maize.
- the invention particularly provides techniques for the preparation of transgenic, fertile monocots, such as maize, which have been stably transformed through the introduction of discrete DNA sequences into the plant genome.
- transgenic plants are intended to refer to plants that have incorporated DNA sequences, including but not limited to genes which are perhaps not normally present, DNA sequences not normally transcribed into RNA or translated into a protein ("expressed"), or any other genes or DNA sequences which one desires to introduce into the non-transformed plant, such as genes which may normally be present in the non-transformed plant but which one desires to either genetically engineer or to have altered expression. It is
- transgenic plants of the present invention will have been augmented through the stable introduction of the transgene.
- the introduced gene will replace an endogenous sequence.
- genes which may be introduced include, for example, DNA sequences or genes from another species, or even genes or sequences which originate with or are present in the same species, but are incorporated into recipient cells by genetic engineering methods rather than classical reproduction or breeding techniques.
- exogenous is also intended to refer to genes which are not normally present in the cell being transformed, or perhaps simply not present in the form, structure, etc., as found in the transforming DNA segment or gene, or genes which are normally present yet which one desires, e.g., to have overexpressed.
- the term “exogenous” gene or DNA refers to any gene or DNA segment that is introduced into a recipient cell, regardless of whether a similar gene may already be present in such a cell. Introduced, in this context, is known in the art to mean introduced by the hand of man.
- the most preferred monocots for use in the present invention will be cereals such as maize.
- the present invention is exemplified through the use of A188 ⁇ B73 cell lines, cell lines developed from other genotypes and immature embryos. Hence, it will be understood that the invention is in no way limited to a particular genotype or cell line. To date, a variety of different Zea mays lines and
- One exemplary embodiment for generating a stably transformed monocot includes culturing recipient corn cells in suspension cultures using embryogenic cells in Type II callus, selecting for small (10-30 ⁇ ) isodiametric, cytoplasmically dense cells, introducing a desired DNA segment into these cells, growing the transformed cells in or on culture medium containing hormones, subculturing into a progression of media to facilitate development of shoots and roots, and finally, hardening the transgenic plant and readying it metabolically for growth in soil.
- the present invention is suitable for use in transforming any maize variety. While not all cell lines developed out of a particular variety or cross will necessarily show the same degree of stable transformability, it has been the inventors' finding that a reasonable percentage of cell lines developed from essentially every genotype tested to date can be developed into fertile, transgenic plants. Thus, where one desires to prepare transformants in a particular cross or variety, it will generally be desirable to develop several cell lines from the particular cross or variety (e.g., 8 to 1 0), and subject all of the lines so developed to the
- Another exemplary embodiment for generating a stably transformed monocot includes introducing a desired DNA segment into cells of organized tissues such as immature embryos, growing the embryos on a culture medium , subculturing into a progression of media to facilitate development of shoots and roots, and finally, hardening the transgenic plant and readying it metabolically for growth in soil.
- the invention is capable of transforming any variety of maize. Through the use of the present invention it is possible to simultaneously deliver DNA segments to a large number of embryos. It has been the inventor's finding that a percentage of the embryos that are contacted by exogenous DNA will develop into fertile transgenic plants, similar to delivering DNA to a large population of cultured cells.
- the present invention is exemplified through the use of immature embryos from the genotypes H99 and Hi-II, but is in no way limited to these genotypes. To date only experiments with these genotypes have progressed to the point where one would reasonably expect to recover transformants.
- the ability to provide even a single fertile, transgenic corn line would be generally sufficient to allow the introduction of the transgenic component (e.g., recombinant DNA) of that line into a second corn line of choice.
- the practice of the invention allows one to subsequently, through a series of breeding manipulations, move a selected gene from one corn line into an entirely different corn line. For example, studies have been conducted wherein the gene for resistance to the herbicide Basta ® , bar, has been moved from two transformants derived from cell line SC71 6 and one transformant derived from cell line SC82 into 1 8 elite inbred lines by backcrossing. It is possible with these inbreds to produce a large number of hybrids. Eleven such hybrids have been made and are in field tests.
- Practicing the present invention includes the generation and use of recipient cells.
- recipient cells refers to monocot cells that are receptive to transformation and subsequent regeneration into stably transformed, fertile monocot plants.
- Recipient cell targets include, but are not limited to, meristem cells, Type I, Type II, and Type III callus, immature embryos and gametic cells such as microspores pollen, sperm and egg cells.
- Type I, Type II, and Type III callus may be initiated from tissue sources including, but not limited to, immature embryos, seedling apical meristems, microspores and the such.
- Those cells which are capable of proliferating as callus are also recipient cells for genetic transformation.
- the present invention provides techniques for transforming immature embryos followed by initiation of callus and subsequent regeneration of fertile transgenic plants. Direct transformation of immature embryos obviates the need for long term development of recipient cell cultures.
- Pollen as well as its precursor cells, microspores, may be capable of functioning as recipient cells for genetic transformation, or as vectors to carry foreign DNA for incorporation during fertilization. Direct pollen transformation would obviate the need for cell culture.
- Meristematic cells i.e., plant cells capable of continual cell division and
- embryogenic suspension cultures may be an in vitro meristematic cell system, retaining an ability for continued cell division in an undifferentiated state, controlled by the media environment.
- cultured plant cells that can serve as recipient cells for transforming with desired DNA segments include corn cells, and more specifically, cells from Zea mays L. Somatic cells are of various types.
- Embryogenic cells are one example of somatic cells which may be induced to regenerate a plant through embryo formation.
- Non-embryogenic cells are those which will typically not respond in such a fashion.
- An example of non-embryogenic cells are certain Black Mexican Sweet (BMS) corn cells. These cells have been transformed by microprojectile bombardment using the neo gene followed by selection with the aminoglycoside, kanamycin (Klein et al. , 1 989). However, this BMS culture was not found to be regenerable.
- the present invention also provides certain techniques that may enrich recipient cells within a cell population. For example, Type II callus development, followed by manual selection and culture of friable, embryogenic tissue, generally results in an enrichment of recipient cells for use in, e.g. , micro-projectile
- Suspension culturing particularly using the media disclosed herein, may also improve the ratio of recipient to non-recipient cells in any given
- Manual selection techniques which employed to select recipient cells may include, e.g., assessing cell morphology and differentiation, or may use various physical or biological means. Cryopreservation is also contemplated as a possible method of selecting for recipient cells.
- recipient cells e.g., by selecting embryogenic cells from the surface of a Type II callus, is one means employed by the inventors in an attempt to enrich for recipient cells prior to culturing (whether cultured on solid media or in suspension).
- the preferred cells may be those located at the surface of a cell cluster, and may further be identifiable by their lack of differentiation, their size and dense cytoplasm.
- the preferred cells will generally be those cells which are less differentiated, or not yet committed to differentiation. Thus, one may wish to identify and select those cells which are cytoplasmically dense, relatively unvacuolated with a high nucleus to cytoplasm ratio (e.g., determined by
- recipient cells are selected following growth in culture.
- cultured cells will preferably be grown either on solid supports or in the form of liquid suspensions.
- nutrients may be provided to the cells in the form of media, and environmental conditions controlled.
- tissue culture media comprised of amino acids, salts, sugars, growth regulators and vitamins.
- Most of the media employed in the practice of the invention will have some similar components (see, e.g., Table 1 herein below), the media differ in the composition and proportions of their ingredients depending on the particular application envisioned.
- various cell types usually grow in more than one type of media, but will exhibit different growth rates and different morphologies, depending on the growth media. In some media, cells survive but do not divide.
- N6 media examples include, but are not limited to, the N6 medium described by Chu et al. (1 975) and MS media (Murashige & Skoog, 1962).
- MS media Murashige & Skoog, 1962.
- the inventors have discovered that media such as MS which have a high ammonia/nitrate ratio are counterproductive to the generation of recipient cells in that they promote loss of morphogenic capacity.
- N6 media has a somewhat lower ammonia/nitrate ratio, and is contemplated to promote the generation of recipient cells by maintaining cells in a proembryonic state capable of sustained divisions.
- Suitable cultures can be initiated from a number of whole plant tissue explants including, but not limited to, immature embryos, leaf bases, immature tassels, anthers, microspores, and other tissues containing cells capable of in vitro proliferation and regeneration of fertile plants.
- recipient cell cultures are initiated from immature embryos of Zea mays L. by growing excised immature embryos on a solid culture medium containing growth regulators including, but not limited to, dicamba., 2,4-D, NAA, and IAA.
- Embryos will produce callus that varies greatly in morphology including from highly unorganized cultures containing very early embryogenic structures (such as, but not limited to, type II cultures in maize), to highly organized cultures containing large late embryogenic structures (such as, but not limited to, type I cultures in maize). This variation in culture morphology may be related to genotype, culture medium composition, size of the initial embryos and other factors. Each of these types of culture
- suspension cultures capable of plant regeneration may be used in the context of the present invention.
- Suspension cultures may be initiated by transferring callus tissue to liquid culture medium containing growth regulators. Addition of coconut water or other substances to suspension culture medium may enhance growth and culture morphology, but the utility of
- suspension cultures is not limited to those containing these compounds. In some embodiments of this invention, the use of suspension cultures will be preferred as these cultures grow more rapidly and are more easily manipulated than callus cells growing on solid culture medium.
- DNA is introduced by particle bombardment into immature embryos following their excision from the plant .
- Embryos are transferred to a culture medium that will support proliferation of tissues and allow for selection of transformed sectors, 0-14 days following DNA delivery. In this embodiment of the invention it is not necessary to establish stable callus cultures capable of long term maintenance and plant regeneration.
- the method of maintenance of cell cultures may contribute to their utility as sources of recipient cells for transformation.
- composition of culture medium, and environment factors including, but not limited to, light quality and quantity and temperature are all important factors in
- alternating callus between different culture conditions may be beneficial in enriching for recipient cells within a culture.
- cells may be cultured in suspension culture, but transferred to solid medium at regular intervals. After a period of growth on solid medium cells can be manually selected for return to liquid culture medium, it is proposed that by repeating this sequence of transfers to fresh culture medium it is possible to enrich for recipient cells.
- passing cell cultures through a 1.9 mm sieve is useful in maintaining the friability of a callus or suspension culture and may be beneficial is enriching for transformable cells.
- cryopreservation may effect the development of, or perhaps select for, recipient cells.
- Cryopreservation selection may operate due to a selection against highly vacuolated, non-embryogenic cells, which may be selectively killed during cryopreservation.
- the inventors propose that there is a temporal window in which cultured cells retain their regenerative ability, thus, it is believed that they must be preserved at or before that temporal period if they are to be . used for future transformation and regeneration.
- suspension or callus culture cells may be cryopreserved and stored for periods of time, thawed, then used as recipient cells for transformation.
- An illustrative embodiment of cryopreservation methods comprises the steps of slowly adding cryoprotectants to suspension cultures to give a final concentration of 10% dimethyl sulfoxide, 10% polyethylene glycol (6000MW), 0.23 M proline and 0.23 M glucose. The mixture is then cooled to -35°C at 0.5°C per minute. After an isothermal period of 45 minutes, samples are placed in liquid N 2 (modification of methods of Withers and King (1979); and Finkle et al. (1985)).
- cells may be thawed rapidly and pipetted onto feeder plates similar to those described by Rhodes et al. (Vaeck et al. , 1987).
- Virtually any DNA composition may be used for delivery to recipient monocotyledonous cells to ultimately produce fertile transgenic plants in
- DNA segments in the form of vectors and plasmids, or linear DNA fragments, in some instances containing only the DNA element to be expressed in the plant, and the like, may be employed.
- Vectors plasmids, cosmids, YACs (yeast artificial chromosomes) and DNA segments for use in transforming such cells will, of course, generally comprise the cDNA, gene or genes which one desires to introduce into the cells.
- DNA constructs can further include structures such as promoters, enhancers,
- the DNA segment or gene chosen for cellular introduction will often encode a protein which will be expressed in the resultant recombinant cells, such as will result in a screenable or selectable trait and/or which will impart an improved phenotype to the regenerated plant.
- this may not always be the case, and the present invention also encompasses transgenic plants incorporating non-expressed transgenes.
- Preferred constructs will generally include a plant promoter such as the CaMV 35S promoter (Odell et al. , 1985), or others such as CaMV 19S (Lawton et al. , 1987), nos (Ebert et al. , 1987), Adh (Walker et al. , 1987), sucrose synthase (Yang & Russell, 1990), ⁇ -tubulin, actin (Wang et al., 1992), cab (Sullivan et al.
- CaMV 35S promoter Odell et al. , 1985
- CaMV 19S Lawton et al. , 1987
- nos Ebert et al. , 1987
- Adh Adh
- sucrose synthase Yang & Russell, 1990
- ⁇ -tubulin actin
- actin Wang et al., 1992
- cab Sullivan et al.
- Tissue specific promoters such as root cell promoters (Conkiing et al., 1990) and tissue specific enhancers (Fromm et al., 1989) are also contemplated to be particularly useful, as are inducible promoters such as ABA- and turgor-inducible prompters.
- Constructs will also include the gene of interest along with a 3' end DNA sequence that acts as a signal to terminate transcription and allow for the polyadenylation of the resultant mRNA.
- the most preferred 3' elements are
- Regulatory elements such as Adh intron 1 (Callis et al., 1987), sucrose synthase intron (Vasil et al. , 1 989) or TMV omega element (Gallie, et al., 1989), may further be included where desired.
- leader sequences are contemplated to include those which include sequences predicted to direct optimum expression of the attached gene, i.e., to include a preferred consensus leader sequence which may increase or maintain mRNA stability and prevent inappropriate initiation of translation.
- sequences will be known to those of skill in the art in light of the present disclosure. Sequences that are derived from genes that are highly expressed in plants, and in maize in particular, will be most preferred.
- vectors for use in accordance with the present invention may be constructed to include the ocs enhancer element.
- This element was first identified as a 16 bp palindromic enhancer from the octopine synthase ⁇ ocs) gene of agrobacterium (Ellis et al., 1987), and is present in at least 10 other promoters (Bouchez et al. , 1 989). It is proposed that the use of an enhancer element, such as the ocs element and particularly multiple copies of the element, will act to increase the level of transcription from adjacent promoters when applied in the context of monocot transformation.
- the most desirable DNA segments for introduction into a monocot genome may be homologous genes or gene families which encode a desired trait (e.g., increased yield per acre) and which are introduced under the control of novel promoters or enhancers, etc., or perhaps even homologous or tissue specific (e.g., root-, collar/sheath-, whorl-, stalk-, earshank-, kernel- or leaf-specific) promoters or control elements.
- tissue specific e.g., root-, collar/sheath-, whorl-, stalk-, earshank-, kernel- or leaf-specific
- a particular use of the present invention will be the targeting of a gene in a tissue-specific manner.
- insect resistant genes may be expressed specifically in the whorl and collar/sheath tissues which are targets for the first and second broods, respectively, of ECB.
- genes encoding proteins with particular activity against rootworm may be targeted directly to root tissues.
- tissue-specific promoters will typically include tissue-specific promoters and may also include other tissue-specific control elements such as enhancer sequences. Promoters which direct specific or enhanced expression in certain plant tissues will be known to those of skill in the art in light of the present disclosure. These include, for example, the rbcS promoter, specific for green tissue; the ocs, nos and mas promoters which have higher activity in roots or wounded leaf tissue; a truncated (-90 to + 8) 35S promoter which directs enhanced expression in roots, an ⁇ -tubulin gene that directs expression in roots and promoters derived from zein storage protein genes which direct expression in endosperm.
- ocs octopine synthase
- tissue specific expression may be functionally accomplished by introducing a constitutively expressed gene (all tissues) in combination with an antisense gene that is expressed only in those tissues where the gene product is not desired.
- a gene coding for the crystal toxin protein from B. thuringiensis (Bt) may be introduced such that it is expressed in all tissues using the 35S promoter from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus. Expression of an antisense transcript of the Bt gene in a maize kernel, using for example a zein promoter, would prevent accumulation of the Bt protein in seed. Hence the protein encoded by the introduced gene would be present in all tissues except the kernel.
- tissue-specific promoter sequences for use in accordance with the present invention.
- one may first isolate cDNA clones from the tissue concerned and identify those clones which are expressed specifically in that tissue, for example, using Northern blotting.
- tissue concerned a tissue concerned
- identify those clones which are expressed specifically in that tissue for example, using Northern blotting.
- the promoter and control elements of corresponding genomic clones may then be localized using the techniques of molecular biology known to those of skill in the art.
- genes that respond to the environment. For example, expression of some genes such as rbcS, encoding the small subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase, is regulated by light as mediated through phytochrome. Other genes are induced by secondary stimuli. For example, synthesis of abscisic acid (ABA) is induced by certain environmental factors, including but not limited to water stress. A number of genes have been shown to be induced by ABA (Skriver and Mundy, 1990). It is also anticipated that expression of genes conferring resistance to insect predation would be desired only under conditions of actual insect infestation.
- ABA abscisic acid
- transgenic plants will be desired only in a certain time period during the development of the plant. Developmental timing is frequently correlated with tissue specific gene expression. For example, expression of zein storage proteins is initiated in the endosperm about 1 5 days after pollination.
- vectors may be constructed and employed in the intracellular targeting of a specific gene product within the cells of a transgenic plant or in directing a protein to the extracellular environment. This will generally be achieved by joining a DNA sequence encoding a transit or signal peptide sequence to the coding sequence of a particular gene. The resultant transit, or signal, peptide will transport the protein to a particular intracellular, or extracellular destination, respectively, and will then be post-translationally removed. Transit or signal peptides act by facilitating the transport of proteins through intracellular
- membranes e.g., vacuole, vesicle, plastid and mitochondrial membranes
- signal peptides direct proteins through the extracellular membrane.
- a particular example of such a use concerns the direction of a herbicide resistance gene, such as the EPSPS gene, to a particular organelie such as the chloroplast rather than to the cytoplasm.
- a herbicide resistance gene such as the EPSPS gene
- organelie such as the chloroplast rather than to the cytoplasm.
- This is exemplified by the use of the rbcS transit peptide which confers plastid-specific targeting of proteins.
- phytopathogenic organisms to the extracellular spaces, or to target proteins to the vacuole.
- nucleus it may be useful to target introduced DNA to the nucleus as this may increase the frequency of transformation.
- nucleus Within the nucleus itself it would be useful to target a gene in order to achieve site specific integration. For example, it would be useful to have an gene introduced through transformation replace an existing gene in the cell.
- Marker genes are genes that impart a distinct phenotype to cells expressing the marker gene and thus allow such transformed cells to be distinguished from cells that do not have the marker. Such genes may encode either a selectable or screenable marker, depending on whether the marker confers a trait which one can 'select' for by chemical means, i.e., through the use of a selective agent (e.g., a herbicide, antibiotic, or the like), or whether it is simply a trait that one can identify through observation or testing, i.e., by 'screening' (e.g., the R-locus trait).
- a selective agent e.g., a herbicide, antibiotic, or the like
- selectable or screenable marker genes are also genes which encode a "secretable marker” whose secretion can be detected as a means of identifying or selecting for transformed cells. Examples include markers which encode a secretable antigen that can be identified by antibody interaction, or even secretable enzymes which can be detected by their catalytic activity.
- Secretable proteins fall into a number of classes, including small, diffusible proteins detectable, e.g., by ELISA; small active enzymes detectable in extracellular solution (e.g., ⁇ -amyiase, ⁇ -lactamase, phosphinothricin acetyltransf erase); and proteins that are inserted or trapped in the cell wall (e.g., proteins that include a leader sequence such as that found in the expression unit of extensin or tobacco PR-S).
- small, diffusible proteins detectable e.g., by ELISA
- small active enzymes detectable in extracellular solution e.g., ⁇ -amyiase, ⁇ -lactamase, phosphinothricin acetyltransf erase
- proteins that are inserted or trapped in the cell wall e.g., proteins that include a leader sequence such as that found in the expression unit of extensin or tobacco PR-S.
- a gene that encodes a protein that becomes sequestered in the cell wall, and which protein includes a unique epitope is considered to be particularly advantageous.
- a secreted antigen marker would ideally employ an epitope sequence that would provide low background in plant tissue, a promoter-leader sequence that would impart efficient expression and targeting across the plasma membrane, and would produce protein that is bound in the cell wall and yet accessible to antibodies.
- a normally secreted wall protein modified to include a unique epitope would satisfy all such
- a protein suitable for modification in this manner is extensin, or hydroxyproline rich glycoprotein (HPRG).
- HPRG hydroxyproline rich glycoprotein
- the use of the maize HPRG (Steifel et al., 1 990) which is preferred as this molecule is well characterized in terms of molecular biology, expression and protein structure.
- any one of a variety of extensins and/or glycine-rich wall proteins could be modified by the addition of an antigenic site to create a screenable marker.
- a secretable screenable marker concerns the use of the maize genomic clone encoding the wall protein HPRG, modified to include the unique 15 residue epitope M A T V P E L N C E M P P S D (seq id no:1 ) from the pro-region of murine interleukin-1 -ß (IL-1 -ß).
- IL-1 -ß murine interleukin-1 -ß
- any detectable epitope may be employed in such embodiments, as selected from the extremely wide variety of antigen.antibody combinations known to those of skill in the art.
- the unique extracellular epitope whether derived from IL-1-ß or any other protein or epitopic substance, can then be straightforwardly detected using antibody labeling in conjunction with chromogenic or fluorescent adjuncts.
- selectable markers for use in connection with the present invention include, but are not limited to, a neo gene (Potrykus et al. , 1 985) which codes for kanamycin resistance and can be selected for using kanamycin, G41 8, etc.; a batgene which codes for bialaphos resistance; a mutant aroA gene which encodes an altered EPSP synthase protein (Hinchee et al. , 1988) thus conferring glyphosate resistance; a nitrilase gene such as bxn from Klebsiella ozaenae which confers resistance to bromoxynil (Stalker et al.
- ALS acetolactate synthase gene
- CTP chloroplast transit peptide
- a selectable marker gene capable of being used in systems to select transformants is the genes that encode the enzyme phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, such as the bar gene from Streptomyces hygroscopicus or the pat gene from Streptomyces viridochromogenes.
- the enzyme phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) inactivates the active ingredient in the herbicide bialaphos, phosphinothricin (PPT). PPT inhibits glutamine synthetase, (Murakami et al., 1986; Twell et al., 1989) causing rapid accumulation of ammonia and cell death.
- Screenable Markers Screenable markers that may be employed include a ß-glucuronidase or uidA gene (GUS) which encodes an enzyme for which various chromogenic substrates are known; an R-locus gene, which encodes a product that regulates the production of anthocyanin pigments (red color) in plant tissues (Dellaporta et al. , 1988); hari-lactamase gene (Sutcliffe, 1978), which encodes an enzyme for which various chromogenic substrates are known (e.g., PADAC, a chromogenic cephalosporin); a xylE. gene (Zukowsky et al.
- GUS ß-glucuronidase or uidA gene
- the R gene complex in maize encodes a protein that acts to regulate the production of anthocyanin pigments in most seed and plant tissue.
- Maize strains can have one, or as many as four, R alleles which combine to regulate pigmentation in a developmental and tissue specific manner.
- the present inventors have applied a gene from the R gene complex to maize transformation, because the expression of this gene in transformed cells does not harm the cells.
- an R gene introduced into such cells will cause the expression of a red pigment and, if stably incorporated, can be visually scored as a red sector.
- a maize line is carries dominant alleles for genes encoding the enzymatic intermediates in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (C2, A1 , A2, Bz1 and Bz2), but carries a recessive allele at the R locus, transformation of any cell from that line with R will result in red pigment formation.
- Exemplary lines include Wisconsin 22 which contains the rg-Stadler allele and TR1 1 2, a K55 derivative which is r-g, b, PI.
- any genotype of maize can be utilized if the C1 and R alleles are introduced together.
- R gene regulatory regions may be employed in chimeric constructs in order to provide mechanisms for controlling the expression of chimeric genes. More diversity of phenotypic expression is known at the R locus than at any other locus (Coe et al. , 1 988). It is contemplated that regulatory regions obtained from regions 5' to the structural R gene would be valuable in directing the expression of genes for, e.g., insect resistance, herbicide tolerance or other protein coding regions. For the purposes of the present invention, it is believed that any of the various R gene family members may be successfully employed (e.g., P, S, Lc, etc.). However, the most preferred will generally be Sn (particularly Sn:bol3). Sn is a dominant member of the R gene complex and is functionally similar to the R and B loci in that Sn controls the tissue specific deposition of anthocyanin pigments in certain seedling and plant cells, therefore, its phenotype is similar to R.
- a further screenable marker contemplated for use in the present invention is firefly luciferase, encoded by the lux gene.
- the presence of the lux gene in transformed cells may be detected using, for example, X-ray film, scintillation counting, fluorescent spectrophotometry, low-light video cameras, photon counting cameras or multiwell luminometry. It is also envisioned that this system may be developed for populational screening for bioluminescence, such as on tissue culture plates, or even for whole plant screening.
- a particularly important advance of the present invention is that it provides methods and compositions for the transformation of plant cells with genes in addition to, or other than, marker genes.
- transgenes will often be genes that direct the expression of a particular protein or polypeptide product, but they may also be non-expressible DNA segments, e.g., transposons such as Ds that do no direct their own transposition.
- an "expressible gene” is any gene that is. capable of being transcribed into RNA (e.g., mRNA, antisense RNA, etc.) or translated into a protein, expressed as a trait of interest, or the like, etc., and is not limited to selectable, screenable or non-selectable marker genes.
- the invention also contemplates that, where both an expressible gene that is not necessarily a marker gene is employed in combination with a marker gene, one may employ the separate genes on either the same or different DNA segments for transformation. In the latter case, the different vectors are delivered concurrently to recipient cells to maximize cotransformation.
- the choice of the particular DNA segments to be delivered to the recipient cells will often depend on the purpose of the transformation.
- One of the major purposes of transformation of crop plants is to add some commercially desirable, agronomically important traits to the plant.
- Such traits include, but are not limited to, herbicide resistance or tolerance; insect resistance or tolerance; disease resistance or tolerance
- bacterial, bacterial, fungal, nematode stress tolerance and/or resistance, as exemplified by resistance or tolerance to drought, heat, chilling, freezing, excessive moisture, salt stress; oxidative stress; increased yields; food content and makeup; physical appearance; male sterility; drydown; standability; prolificacy; starch properties; oil quantity and quality; and the like.
- the present invention contemplates the transformation of a recipient cell with more than one advantageous transgene.
- Two or more transgenes can be supplied in a single transformation event using either distinct transgene-encoding vectors, or using a single vector incorporating two or more gene coding sequences.
- plasmids bearing the bar and aroA expression units in either convergent, divergent, or colinear orientation are considered to be particularly useful.
- Further preferred combinations are those of an insect resistance gene, such as a Bt gene, along with a protease inhibitor gene such as pinII, or the use of bar in combination with either of the above genes.
- any two or more transgenes of any description such as those conferring herbicide, insect, disease
- Herbicide Resistance (viral, bacterial, fungal, nematode) or drought resistance, male sterility, drydown, standability, prolificacy, starch properties, oil quantity and quality, or those increasing yield or nutritional quality may be employed as desired.
- the bar and pat genes code for an enzyme, phoshinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT), which inactivates the herbicide phosphinothricin and prevents this compound from inhibiting glutamine synthetase enzymes.
- PAT phoshinothricin acetyltransferase
- the enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase (EPSP Synthase) is normally inhibited by the herbicide N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine (glyphosate).
- genes are known that encode glyphosate-resistant EPSP Synthase enzymes. These genes are particularly contemplated for use in monocot transformation.
- the deh gene encodes the enzyme dalapon dehalogenase and confers resistance to the herbicide dalapon.
- the bxn gene codes for a specific nitrilase enzyme that converts bromoxynil to a non-herbicidal degradation product
- An important aspect of the present invention concerns the introduction of insect resistance-conferring genes into monocotyledonous plants such as maize.
- Potential insect resistance genes which can be introduced include Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxin genes or Bt genes (Watrud et al. , 1985). Bt genes may provide resistance to lepidopteran or coleopteran pests such as European Corn Borer (ECB).
- EBC European Corn Borer
- Preferred Bt toxin genes for use in such embodiments include the CrylA(b) and CrylA(c) genes. Endotoxin genes from other species of B. thuringiensis which affect insect growth or development may also be employed in this regard.
- procaryotic Bt toxin genes in plants is a well-documented phenomenon, and the use of different promoters, fusion proteins, and leader sequences has not led to significant increases in Bt protein expression (Vaeck et al., 1989; Barton et al., 1987). It is therefore contemplated that the most advantageous Bt genes for use in the transformation protocols disclosed herein will be those in which the coding sequence has been modified to effect increased expression in plants, and more particularly, those in which maize preferred codons have been used. Examples of such modified Bt toxin genes include the variant Bt CrylA(b) gene termed IAb6 (Perlak et al., 1991 ) and the synthetic CrylA(c) genes termed 1800a and 1800b.
- Protease inhibitors may also provide insect resistance (Johnson et al., 1989), and will thus have utility in maize transformation.
- the use of a protease inhibitor II gene, pinII, from tomato or potato is envisioned to be particularly useful. Even more advantageous is the use of a pinII gene in combination with a Bt toxin gene, the combined effect of which has been discovered by the present inventors to produce synergistic insecticidal activity.
- Other genes which encode inhibitors of the insects digestive system, or those that encode enzymes or co-factors that facilitate the production of inhibitors, may also be useful. This group may be exemplified by oryzacystatin and amylase inhibitors such as those from wheat and barley.
- genes encoding lectins may confer additional or alternative insecticide properties.
- Lectins (originally termed phytohemagglutinins) are multivalent carbohydrate-binding proteins which have the ability to agglutinate red blood cells from a range of species. Lectins have been identified recently as insecticidal agents with activity against weevils, ECB and rootworm (Murdock et al., 1 990; Czapla &
- Lectin genes contemplated to be useful include, for example, barley and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) and rice lectins (Gatehouse et al., 1 984), with WGA being preferred.
- WGA barley and wheat germ agglutinin
- Gatehouse et al., 1 984 rice lectins
- Genes controlling the production of large or small polypeptides active against insects when introduced into the insect pests such as, e.g., lytic peptides, peptide hormones and toxins and venoms, form another aspect of the invention.
- the expression of juvenile hormone esterase directed towards specific insect pests, may also result in insecticidal activity, or perhaps cause cessation of metamorphosis (Hammock et al., 1990).
- Transgenic maize expressing genes which encode enzymes that affect the integrity of the insect cuticle form yet another aspect of the invention.
- genes include those encoding, e.g., chitinase, proteases, lipases and also genes for the production of nikkomycin, a compound that inhibits chitin synthesis, the introduction of any of which is contemplated to produce insect resistant maize plants.
- Genes that code for activities that affect insect molting such those affecting the production of ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyl transferase, also fall within the scope of the useful transgenes of the present invention.
- Genes that code for enzymes that facilitate the production of compounds that reduce the nutritional quality of the host plant to insect pests are also encompassed by the present invention. It may be possible, for instance, to confer insecticidal activity on a plant by altering its sterol composition. Sterols are obtained by insects from their diet and are used for hormone synthesis and membrane stability. Therefore alterations in plant sterol composition by expression of novel genes, e.g., those that directly promote the production of undesirable sterols or those that convert desirable sterols into undesirable forms, could have a negative effect on insect growth and/or development and hence endow the plant with insecticidal activity. Lipoxygenases are naturally occurring plant enzymes that have been shown to exhibit anti-nutritional effects on insects and to reduce the nutritional quality of their diet.
- transgenic plants with enhanced lipoxygenase activity which may be resistant to insect feeding.
- the present invention also provides methods and compositions by which to achieve qualitative or quantitative changes in plant secondary metabolites.
- One example concerns transforming maize to produce DIMBOA which, it is contemplated, will confer resistance to European corn borer, rootworm and several other maize insect pests.
- Candidate genes that are particularly considered for use in this regard include those genes at the bx locus known to be involved in the synthetic DIMBOA pathway
- Tripsacum dactyloides is a species of grass that is resistant to certain insects, including corn root worm. It is anticipated that genes encoding proteins that are toxic to insects or are involved in the biosynthesis of compounds toxic to insects will be isolated from Tripsacum and that these novel genes will be useful in conferring resistance to insects. It is known that the basis of insect resistance in Tripsacum is genetic, because said resistance has been transferred to Zea mays via sexual crosses (Branson and Guss, 1 972).
- genes encoding proteins characterized as having potential insecticidal activity may also be used as transgenes in accordance herewith.
- Such genes include, for example, the cowpea trypsin inhibitor (CpTI; Hilder et al., 1 987) which may be used as a rootworm deterrent; genes encoding avermectin (Avermectin and Abamectin. , Campbell, W.C, Ed., 1 989; Ikeda et al. , 1 987) which may prove particularly useful as a corn rootworm deterrent; ribosome inactivating protein genes; and even genes that regulate plant structures.
- Transgenic maize including anti-insect antibody genes and genes that code for enzymes that can covert a non-toxic insecticide (pro-insecticide) applied to the outside of the plant into an insecticide inside the plant are also contemplated. 3. Environment or Stress Resistance
- Resistance to oxidative stress can be conferred by expression of superoxide dismutase (Gupta et al., 1993), and may be improved by glutathione reductase (Bowler et al., 1992).
- superoxide dismutase Gupta et al., 1993
- glutathione reductase Bowler et al., 1992
- Such strategies may allow for tolerance to freezing in newly emerged fields as well as extending later maturity higher yielding varieties to earlier relative maturity zones.
- drought resistance and “drought tolerance” are used to refer to a plants increased resistance or tolerance to stress induced by a reduction in water availability, as compared to normal circumstances, and the ability of the plant to function and survive in lower-water environments.
- this aspect of the invention it is proposed, for example, that the expression of genes encoding for the
- osmotically-active solutes such as polyol compounds
- biosynthesis of osmotically-active solutes may impart protection against drought.
- genes encoding for mannitol dehydrogenase Lee and Saier, 1 982
- trehalose-6-phosphate synthase Kaasen et al., 1992.
- these introduced genes will result in the accumulation of either mannitol or trehalose, respectively, both of which have been well documented as protective compounds able to mitigate the effects of stress.
- Mannitol accumulation in transgenic tobacco has been verified and preliminary results indicate that plants expressing high levels of this metabolite are able to tolerate an applied osmotic stress (Tarczynski et al.,
- Naturally occurring metabolites that are osmotically active and/or provide some direct protective effect during drought and/or desiccation include fructose, erythritol (Coxson et al., 1992), sorbitol, dulcitol (Karsten et al., 1992), giucosylglycerol (Reed et al., 1 984; ErdMann et al., 1992), sucrose, stachyose (Koster and Leopold, 1988; Blackman et al., 1 992), raffinose (Bernal-Lugo and Leopold, 1 992), proline (Rensburg et al., 1 993) and glycinebetaine (Wyn-Jones and Storey, 1 982), ononitol and pinitol (Vernon and Bohnert, 1 992).
- genes which promote the synthesis of an osmotically active polyol compound are genes which encode the enzymes mannitol-1 -phosphate dehydrogenase, trehalose-6-phosphate synthase and myoinositol O-methyltransferase.
- Late Embryogenic Proteins have been assigned based on structural similarities (see Dure et al., 1989). All three classes of LEAs have been demonstrated in maturing (i.e. desiccating) seeds. Within these 3 types of LEA proteins, the Type-ll (dehydrin-type) have generally been implicated in drought and/or desiccation tolerance in vegetative plant parts (i.e. Mundy and Chua, 1988; Piatkowski et al., 1 990; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki et al., 1992).
- HVA-1 Type-IIl LEA
- Other types of proteins induced during water stress include thiol proteases, aldolases and transmembrane transporters (Guerrero et al., 1990), which may confer various protective and/or repair-type functions during drought stress. It is also possible to confer drought tolerance.
- genes that effect lipid biosynthesis and hence membrane composition might also be useful in conferring drought resistance on the plant.
- genes that are involved with specific morphological traits that allow for increased water extractions from drying soil would be of benefit. For example, introduction and expression of genes that alter root characteristics may enhance water uptake. It is also contemplated that expression of genes that enhance reproductive fitness during times of stress would be of significant value. For example, expression of genes that improve the synchrony of pollen shed and receptiveness of the female flower parts, i.e., silks, would be of benefit. In addition it is proposed that expression of genes that minimize kernel abortion during times of stress would increase the amount of grain to be harvested and hence be of value.
- control of mycotoxin producing organisms may be realized through expression of introduced genes.
- Resistance to viruses may be produced through expression of novel genes.
- expression of a viral coat protein in a transgenic plant can impart resistance to infection of the plant by that virus and perhaps other closely related viruses (Cuozzo et al., 1 988, Hemenway et al., 1 988, Abel et al., 1 986).
- expression of antisense genes targeted at essential viral functions may impart resistance to said virus.
- an antisense gene targeted at the gene responsible for replication of viral nucleic acid may inhibit said replication and lead to resistance to the virus. It is believed that interference with other viral functions through the use of antisense genes may also increase resistance to viruses. Further it is proposed that it may be possible to achieve resistance to viruses through other approaches, including, but not limited to the use of satellite viruses.
- Peptide antibiotics are polypeptide sequences which are inhibitory to growth of bacteria and other microorganisms.
- the classes of peptides referred to as cecropins and magainins inhibit growth of many species of bacteria and fungi.
- expression of PR proteins in monocotyledonous plants such as maize may be useful in conferring resistance to bacterial disease.
- genes are induced following pathogen attack on a host plant and have been divided into at least five classes of proteins (Bol, Linthorst, and Cornelissen, 1 990). Included amongst the PR proteins are ⁇ -1 , 3-glucanases, chitinases, and osmotin and other proteins that are believed to function in plant resistance to disease organisms. Other genes have been identified that have antifungal properties, e.g., UDA (stinging nettle lectin) and hevein (Broakaert et al. , 1 989; Barkai-Goian et al. , 1 978). It is known that certain plant diseases are caused by the production of phytotoxins.
- UDA stinging nettle lectin
- hevein Broakaert et al. , 1 989; Barkai-Goian et al. , 1 978. It is known that certain plant diseases are caused by the production of phytotoxins.
- resistance to these diseases would be achieved through expression of a novel gene that encodes an enzyme capable of degrading or otherwise inactivating the phytotoxin. It is also contemplated that expression novel genes that alter the interactions between the host plant and pathogen may be useful in reducing the ability the disease organism to invade the tissues of the host plant, e.g., an increase in the waxiness of the leaf cuticle or other morphological characteristics.
- Plant parasitic nematodes are a cause of disease in many plants, including maize. It is proposed that it would be possible to make the corn plant resistant to these organisms through the expression of novel genes. It is anticipated that control of nematode infestations would be accomplished by altering the ability of the nematode to recognize or attach to a host plant and/or enabling the plant to produce nematicidal compounds, including but not limited to proteins.
- mycotoxin Reduction/Elimination Production of mycotoxins, including aflatoxin and fumonisin, by fungi associated with monocotyledonous plants such as maize is a significant factor in rendering the grain not useful. These fungal organisms do not cause disease symptoms and/or interfere with the growth of the plant, but they produce chemicals (mycotoxins) that are toxic to animals. It is contemplated that inhibition of the growth of these fungi would be reduce the synthesis of these toxic substances and therefore reduce grain losses due to mycotoxin contamination. It is also proposed that it may be possible to introduce novel genes into
- Genes may be introduced into monocotyledonous plants, particularly commercially important cereals such as maize, to improve the grain for which the cereal is primarily grown.
- a wide range of novel transgenic plants produced in this manner may be envisioned depending on the particular end use of the grain.
- maize grain The largest use of maize grain is for feed or food. Introduction of genes that alter the composition of the grain may greatly enhance the feed or food value.
- the primary components of maize grain are starch, protein, and oil. Each of these primary components of maize grain may be improved by altering its level or composition. Several examples may be mentioned for illustrative purposes but in no way provide an exhaustive list of possibilities.
- the protein of cereal grains including maize is suboptimal for feed and food purposes especially when fed to pigs, poultry, and humans.
- the protein is deficient in several amino acids that are essential in the diet of these species, requiring the addition of supplements to the grain.
- Limiting essential amino acids may include lysine, methionine, tryptophan, threonine, valine, arginine, and histidine.
- Some amino acids become limiting only after corn is supplemented with other inputs for feed formulations. For example, when corn is supplemented with soybean meal to meet lysine requirements methionine becomes limiting.
- the levels of these essential amino acids in seeds and grain may be elevated by mechanisms which include, but are not limited to, the introduction of genes to increase the biosynthesis of the amino acids, decrease the degradation of the amino acids, increase the storage of the amino acids in proteins, , or increase transport of the amino acids to the seeds or grain.
- One mechanism for increasing the biosynthesis of the amino acids is to introduce genes that deregulate the amino acid biosynthetic pathways such that the plant can no longer adequately control the levels that are produced. This may be done by deregulating or bypassing steps in the amino acid biosynthetic pathway which are normally regulated by levels of the amino acid end product of the pathway. Examples include the introduction of genes that encode deregulated versions of the enzymes aspartokinase or dihydrodipicolinic acid (DHDP)-synthase for increasing lysine and threonine production, and anthranilate synthase for increasing tryptophan production.
- DHDP dihydrodipicolinic acid
- Reduction of the catabolism of the amino acids may be accomplished by introduction of DNA sequences that reduce or eliminate the expression of genes encoding enzymes that catalyze steps in the catabolic pathways such as the enzyme lysine-ketoglutarate reductase.
- the protein composition of the grain may be altered to improve the balance of amino acids in a variety of ways including elevating expression of native proteins, decreasing expression of those with poor composition, changing the composition of native proteins, or introducing genes encoding entirely new proteins possessing superior composition.
- Examples may include the introduction of DNA that decreases the expression of members of the zein family of storage proteins. This DNA may encode ribozymes or antisense sequences directed to impairing expression of zein proteins or expression of regulators of zein expression such, as the opaque-2 gene product.
- the protein composition of the grain may be modified through the phenomenon of cosupression, i.e., inhibition of expression of an endogenous gene through the expression of an identical structural gene or gene fragment introduced through transformation (Goring et al., 1 991 ).
- the introduced DNA may encode enzymes which degrade zeins. The decreases in zein expression that are achieved may be accompanied by increases in proteins with more desirable amino acid composition or increases in other major seed constituents such as starch.
- a chimeric gene may be introduced that comprises a coding sequence for a native protein of adequate amino acid composition such as for one of the globulin proteins or 10 kD zein of maize and a promoter or other regulatory sequence designed to elevate expression of said protein.
- the coding sequence of said gene may include additional or replacement codons for essential amino acids.
- composition of the seed may be employed.
- genes that alter the oil content of the grain may be of value. Increases in oil content may result in increases in metaboiizable-energy-content and -density of the seeds for uses in feed and food.
- the introduced genes may encode enzymes that remove or reduce rate-limitations or regulated steps in fatty acid or lipid biosynthesis. Such genes may include, but are not limited to, those that encode acetyl-CoA carboxylase, ACP-acyltransferase, ⁇ -ketoacyl-ACP synthase, plus other well known fatty acid biosynthetic activities.
- genes that encode proteins that do not possess enzymatic activity such as acyl carrier protein.
- Genes may be introduced that alter the balance of fatty acids present in the oil providing a more healthful or nutritive feedstuff.
- the introduced DNA may also encode sequences that block expression of enzymes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis, altering the proportions of fatty acids present in the grain such as described below.
- Genes may be introduced that enhance the nutritive value of the starch component of the grain, for example by increasing the degree of branching, resulting in improved utilization of the starch in cows by delaying its metabolism.
- genes may be introduced that affect a variety of other nutritive, processing, or other quality aspects of the grain as used for feed or food.
- pigmentation of the grain may be increased or decreased. Enhancement and stability of yellow pigmentation is desirable in some animal feeds and may be achieved by
- unpigmented white corn is desirable for production of many food products and may be produced by the introduction of DNA which blocks or eliminates steps in pigment production pathways.
- Feed or food comprising primarily maize or other cereal grains possesses insufficient quantities of vitamins and must be supplemented to provide adequate nutritive value.
- Introduction of genes that enhance vitamin biosynthesis in seeds may be envisioned including, for example, vitamins A, E, B 12 , choline, and the like.
- Maize grain also does not possess sufficient mineral content for optimal nutritive value.
- Genes that affect the accumulation or availability of compounds containing phosphorus, sulfur, calcium, manganese, zinc, and iron among others would be valuable.
- An example may be the introduction of a gene that reduced phytic acid production or encoded the enzyme phytase which enhances phytic acid
- the improvements may not even necessarily involve the grain, but may, for example, improve the value of the corn for silage.
- Introduction of DNA to accomplish this might include sequences that alter lignin production such as those that result in the "brown midrib" phenotype associated with superior feed value for cattle.
- genes may also be introduced which improve the processing of corn and improve the value of the products resulting from the processing.
- the primary method of processing corn is via wetmilling. Maize may be improved though the expression of novel genes that increase the efficiency and reduce the cost of processing such as by decreasing steeping time.
- Improving the value of wetmilling products may include altering the quantity or quality of starch, oil, corn gluten meal, or the components of corn gluten feed. Elevation of starch may be achieved through the identification and elimination of rate limiting steps in starch biosynthesis or by decreasing levels of the other components of the grain resulting in proportional increases in starch.
- An example of the former may be the introduction of genes encoding ADP-glucose
- pyrophosphorylase enzymes with altered regulatory activity or which are expressed at higher level.
- Examples of the latter may include selective inhibitors of, for example, protein or oil biosynthesis expressed during later stages of kernel development.
- the properties of starch may be beneficially altered by changing the ratio of amylose to amylopectin, the size of the starch molecules, or their branching pattern.
- a broad range of properties may be modified which include, but are not limited to, changes in gelatinization temperature, heat of gelatinization, clarity of films and pastes, rheological properties, and the like.
- genes that encode granule-bound or soluble starch synthase activity or branching enzyme activity may be introduced alone or combination. DNA such as antisense constructs may also be used to decrease levels of endogenous activity of these enzymes.
- the introduced genes or constructs may possess regulatory sequences that time their expression to specific intervals in starch biosynthesis and starch granule development.
- any molecule may be envisioned, limited only by the existence of enzymes that catalyze the derivatizations and the accessibility of appropriate substrates in the starch granule.
- important derivations may include the addition of functional groups such as amines, carboxyls, or phosphate groups which provide sites for subsequent in vitro derivatizations or affect starch properties through the introduction of ionic charges.
- other modifications may include direct changes of the glucose units such as loss of hydroxyl groups or their oxidation to aldehyde or carboxyl groups.
- Oil is another product of wetmilling of corn, the value of which may be improved by introduction and expression of genes.
- the quantity of oil that can be extracted by wetmilling may be elevated by approaches as described for feed and food above. Oil properties may also be altered to improve its performance in the production and use of cooking oil, shortenings, lubricants or other oil-derived products or improvement of its health attributes when used in the food-related applications. Novel fatty acids may also be synthesized which upon extraction can serve as starting materials for chemical syntheses. The changes in oil properties may be achieved by altering the type, level, or lipid arrangement of the fatty acids present in the oil. This in turn may be accomplished by the addition of genes that encode enzymes that catalyze the synthesis of novel fatty acids and the lipids possessing them or by increasing levels of native fatty acids while possibly reducing levels of precursors.
- DNA sequences may be introduced which slow or block steps in fatty acid biosynthesis resulting in the increase in precursor fatty acid intermediates.
- Genes that might be added include desaturases, epoxidases, hydratases, dehydratases, and other enzymes that catalyze reactions involving fatty acid intermediates.
- Representative examples of catalytic steps that might be blocked include the desaturations from stearic to oleic acid and oleic to linolenic acid resulting in the respective accumulations of stearic and oleic acids.
- Another example is the blockage of elongation steps resulting in the accumulation of c 8 to c 12 saturated fatty acids.
- Improvements in the other major corn wetmilling products, corn gluten meal and corn gluten feed may also be achieved by the introduction of genes to obtain novel corn plants. Representative possibilities include but are not limited to those described above for improvement of food and feed value.
- the corn plant be used for the production or manufacturing of useful biological compounds that were either not produced at all, or not produced at the same level, in the corn plant previously.
- the novel corn plants producing these compounds are made possible by the introduction and expression of genes by corn transformation methods.
- the vast array of possibilities include but are not limited to any biological compound which is presently produced by any organism such as proteins, nucleic acids, primary and intermediary metabolites, carbohydrate polymers, etc.
- the compounds may be produced by the plant, extracted upon harvest and/or processing, and used for any presently recognized useful purpose such as pharmaceuticals, fragrances, industrial enzymes to name a few.
- corn of varying maturities is developed for different growing locations. Apart from the need to dry down sufficiently to permit harvest is the desirability of having maximal drying take place in the field to minimize the amount of energy required for additional drying post-harvest. Also the more readily the grain can dry down, the more time there is available for growth and kernel fill.
- genes that influence maturity and/or dry down can be identified and introduced into corn lines using transformation techniques to create new corn varieties adapted to different growing locations or the same growing location but having improved yield to moisture ratio at harvest.
- Expression of genes that are involved in regulation of plant development may be especially useful, e.g., the liguleless and rough sheath genes that have been identified in corn.
- genes may be introduced into corn that would improve standability and other plant growth characteristics. Expression of novel genes which confer stronger stalks, improved root systems, or prevent or reduce ear droppage would be of great value to the farmer. It is proposed that
- photoassimilate available by, for example, increasing light distribution and/or interception would be advantageous.
- expression of genes that increase the efficiency of photosynthesis and/or the leaf canopy would further increase gains in productivity. Such approaches would allow for increased plant populations in the field.
- the ability to utilize available nutrients may be a limiting factor in growth of monocotyledonous plants such as maize. It is proposed that it would be possible to alter nutrient uptake, tolerate pH extremes, mobilization through the plant, storage pools, and availability for metabolic activities by the introduction of novel genes. These modifications would allow a plant such as maize to more efficiently utilize available nutrients. It is contemplated that an increase in the activity of, for example, an enzyme that is normally present in the plant and involved in nutrient utilization would increase the availability of a nutrient. An example of such an enzyme would be phytase. It is also contemplated that expression of a novel gene may make a nutrient source available that was previously not accessible, e.g., an enzyme that releases a component of nutrient value from a more complex molecule, perhaps a macromolecule.
- male sterility is useful in the production of hybrid seed. It is proposed that male sterility may be produced through expression of novel genes. For example, it has been shown that expression of genes that encode proteins that interfere with development of the male inflorescence and/or gametophyte result in male sterility. Chimeric ribonuclease genes that express in the anthers of transgenic tobacco and oilseed rape have been demonstrated to lead to male sterility (Mariani et al, 1 990) .
- T cytoplasm A number of mutations were discovered in maize that confer cytopiasmic male sterility.
- One mutation in particular, referred to as T cytoplasm also correlates with sensitivity to Southern corn leaf blight.
- a DNA sequence, designated TURF-1 3 (Levings, 1 990) was identified that correlates with T cytoplasm. It is proposed that it would be possible through the introduction of
- TURF- 13 via transformation to separate male sterility from disease sensitivity. As it is necessary to be able to restore male fertility for breeding purposes and for grain production it is proposed that genes encoding restoration of male fertility may also be introduced.
- genes encoding traits that can be selected against may be useful for eliminating- undesirable linked genes. It is contemplated that when two or more genes are introduced together by cotransformation that the genes will be linked together on the host chromosome. For example, a gene encoding a Bt gene that confers insect resistance on the plant may be introduced into a plant together with a bar gene that is useful as a selectable marker and confers resistance to the herbicide Ignite ® on the plant. However, it may not be desirable to have an insect resistant plant that is also resistant to the herbicide Ignite ® . It is proposed that one could also introduce an antisense bar gene that is expressed in those tissues where one does not want expression of the bar gene, e.g., in whole plant parts. Hence, although the bar gene is expressed and is useful as a selectable marker, it is not useful to confer herbicide resistance on the whole plant.
- the bar antisense gene is a negative selectable marker.
- a negative selection is necessary in order to screen a population of transformants for rare homologous recombinants generated through gene targeting.
- a homologous recombinant may be identified through the inactivation of a gene that was previously expressed in that cell.
- the antisense gene to neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptll) has been investigated as a negative selectable marker in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Xiang, C. and Guerra, D.J. 1 993).
- nptll neomycin phosphotransferase II
- both sense and antisense npt II genes are introduced into a plant through transformation and the resultant plants are sensitive to the antibiotic kanamycin.
- negative selectable markers may also be useful in other ways.
- One application is to construct transgenic lines in which one could select for transposition to unlinked sites. In the process of tagging it is most . common for the transposable element to move to a genetically linked site on the same chromosome.
- a selectable marker for recovery of rare plants in which transposition has occurred to an unlinked locus would be useful.
- the enzyme cytosine deaminase may be useful for this purpose (Stouggard, J., 1 993) . In the presence of this enzyme the compound 5-fluorocytosine is converted to 5- fluorouracil which is toxic to plant and animal cells.
- transposable element is linked to the gene for the enzyme cytosine deaminase
- the parental plants and plants containing transpositions to linked sites will remain sensitive to 5-fluorocytosine.
- T-DNA gene 2 from Agrobacterium tumefaciens encodes a protein that catalyzes the conversion of ⁇ -naphthalene acetamide (NAM) to ⁇ -naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) renders plant cells sensitive to high concentrations of NAM (Depicker et al., 1988).
- negative selectable markers may be useful in the construction of transposon tagging lines.
- an autonomous transposable element such as Ac, Master Mu, or En/Spn
- a negative selectable marker By marking an autonomous transposable element such as Ac, Master Mu, or En/Spn with a negative selectable marker, one could select for transformants in which the autonomous element is not stably integrated into the genome. It is proposed that this would be desirable, for example, when transient expression of the autonomous element is desired to activate in trans the transposition of a defective transposable element, such as Ds, but stable integration of the autonomous element is not desired. The presence of the autonomous element may not be desired in order to stabilize the defective element, i.e., prevent it from further transposing. However, it is proposed that if stable integration of an autonomous transposable element is desired in a plant the presence of a negative selectable marker may make it possible to eliminate the autonomous element during the breeding process.
- DNA may be introduced into corn and other monocots for the purpose of expressing RNA transcripts that function to affect plant phenotype yet are not translated into protein.
- RNA transcripts that function to affect plant phenotype yet are not translated into protein.
- Two examples are antisense RNA and RNA with ribozyme activity. Both may serve possible functions in reducing or eliminating expression of native or introduced plant genes.
- Genes may be constructed or isolated, which when transcribed, produce antisense RNA that is complementary to all or part(s) of a targeted messenger RNA(s).
- the antisense RNA reduces production of the polypeptide product of the messenger RNA.
- the polypeptide product may be any protein encoded by the plant genome.
- the aforementioned genes will be referred to as antisense genes.
- an antisense gene may thus be introduced into a plant by transformation methods to produce a novel transgenic plant with reduced expression of a selected protein of interest.
- the protein may be an enzyme that catalyzes a reaction in the plant. Reduction of the enzyme activity may reduce or eliminate products of the reaction which include any enzymatically synthesized compound in the plant such as fatty acids, amino acids, carbohydrates, nucleic acids and the like.
- the protein may be a storage protein, such as a zein, or a structural protein, the decreased expression of which may lead to changes in seed amino acid composition or plant morphological changes respectively.
- a storage protein such as a zein
- structural protein the decreased expression of which may lead to changes in seed amino acid composition or plant morphological changes respectively.
- Genes may also be constructed or isolated, which when transcribed produce RNA enzymes, or ribozymes, which can act as endoribonucleases and catalyze the cleavage of RNA molecules with selected sequences. The cleavage of selected messenger RNA's can result in the reduced production of their encoded polypeptide products. These genes may be used to prepare novel transgenic plants which possess them. The transgenic plants may possess reduced levels of polypeptides including but not limited to the polypeptides cited above that may be affected by antisense RNA.
- genes may be introduced to produce novel transgenic plants which have reduced expression of a native gene product by a mechanism of cosuppression. It has been demonstrated in tobacco, tomato, and petunia (Goring et al, 1991 ; Smith et al., 1990; Napoli, C. et al., 1990; van der Krol et al., 1 990) that expression of the sense transcript of a native gene will reduce or eliminate expression of the native gene in a manner similar to that observed for antisense genes.
- the introduced gene may encode all or part of the targeted native protein but its translation may not be required for reduction of levels of that native protein.
- DNA elements including those of transposable elements such as Ds, Ac, or Mu, may be inserted into a gene and cause mutations. These DNA elements may be inserted in order to inactivate (or activate) a gene and thereby "tag" a particular trait, in this instance the transposable element does not cause instability of the tagged mutation, because the utility of the element does not depend on its ability to move in the genome.
- the introduced DNA sequence may be used to clone the corresponding gene, e.g., using the introduced DNA sequence as a PCR primer together with PCR gene cloning techniques (Shapiro, 1 983; Dellaporta et al., 1988).
- the entire gene(s) for the particular trait may be isolated, cloned and manipulated as desired.
- the utility of DNA elements introduced into an organism for purposed of gene tagging is independent of the DNA sequence and does not depend on any biological activity of the DNA sequence, i.e., transcription into RNA or translation into protein.
- the sole function of the DNA element is to disrupt the DNA sequence of a gene.
- unexpressed DNA sequences including novel synthetic sequences could be introduced into cells as proprietary "labels" of those cells and plants and seeds thereof. It would not be necessary for a label DNA element to disrupt the function of a gene endogenous to the host organism, as the sole function of this DNA would be to identify the origin of the organism. For example, one could introduce a unique DNA sequence into a plant and this DNA element would identify all cells, plants, and progeny of these cells as having arisen from that labelled source. It is proposed that inclusion.of label DNAs would enable one to distinguish proprietary germplasm or germplasm derived from such, from unlabelled germplasm.
- MAR matrix attachment region element
- Stief chicken lysozyme A element
- the present invention generally next includes steps directed to introducing an exogenous DNA segment, such as a cDNA or gene, into a recipient cell to create a transformed cell.
- an exogenous DNA segment such as a cDNA or gene
- the frequency of occurrence of cells receiving DNA is believed to be low.
- it is most likely that not all recipient cells receiving DNA segments will result in a transformed cell wherein the DNA is stably integrated into the plant genome and/or expressed. Some may show only initial and transient gene expression. However, certain cells from virtually any monocot species may be stably transformed, and these cells developed into transgenic plants, through the application of the techniques disclosed herein.
- Suitable methods are believed to include virtually any method by which DNA can be introduced into a cell, such as by Agrobacterium infection, direct delivery of DNA such as, for example, by PEG-mediated transformation of protoplasts (Omirulleh et al., 1 993), by desiccation/inhibition-mediated DNA uptake, by electroporation, by agitation with silicon carbide fibers, by acceleration of DNA coated particles, etc.
- acceleration methods are preferred and include, for example, microprojectile bombardment and the like.
- Krzyzek et al. U.S. Serial Number 07/635,279 filed December 28, 1990, incorporated herein by reference
- certain cell wall-degrading enzymes such as pectin-degrading enzymes, are employed to render the target recipient cells more susceptible to transformation by electroporation than untreated cells.
- recipient cells are made more susceptible to transformation, by mechanical wounding.
- friable tissues such as a suspension culture of cells, or embryogenic callus, or
- pectolyases pectolyases
- Such cells would then be recipient to DNA transfer by electroporation, which may be carried out at this stage, and transformed cells then identified by a suitable selection or screening protocol dependent on the nature of the newly incorporated DNA.
- a further advantageous method for delivering transforming DNA segments to plant cells is microprojectile bombardment.
- particles may be coated with nucleic acids and delivered into cells by a propelling force.
- Exemplary particles include those comprised of tungsten, gold, platinum, and the like.
- non-embryogenic BMS cells were bombarded with intact cells of the bacteria E. coli or Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing plasmids with either the ⁇ -glucoronidase or bar gene engineered for expression in maize. Bacteria were inactivated by ethanol
- particles may contain DNA rather than be coated with DNA.
- DNA-coated particles may increase the level of DNA delivery via particle bombardment but are not, in and of themselves, necessary.
- An advantage of microprojectile bombardment in addition to it being an effective means of reproducibly stably transforming monocots, is that neither the isolation of protoplasts (Cristou et al. , 1988) nor the susceptibility to Agrobacterium infection is required.
- An illustrative embodiment of a method for delivering DNA into maize cells by acceleration is a Biolistics Particle Delivery System, which can be used to propel particles coated with DNA or cells through a screen, such as a stainless steel or Nytex screen, onto a filter surface covered with corn cells cultured in suspension. The screen disperses the particles so that they are not delivered to the recipient cells in large aggregates. It is believed that a screen intervening between the projectile apparatus and the cells to be bombarded reduces the size of projectiles aggregate and may contribute to a higher frequency of transformation by reducing damage inflicted on the recipient cells by projectiles that are too large.
- cells in suspension are preferably concentrated on filters or solid culture medium.
- immature embryos or other target cells may be arranged on solid culture medium.
- the cells to be bombarded are positioned at an appropriate distance below the macroprojectile stopping plate.
- one or more screens are also positioned between the acceleration device and the cells to be bombarded.
- bombardment transformation one may optimize the prebombardment culturing conditions and the bombardment parameters to yield the maximum numbers of stable transformants.
- Both the physical and biological parameters for bombardment are important in this technology. Physical factors are those that involve manipulating the DNA/microprojectile precipitate or those that affect the flight and velocity of either the macro- or microprojectiies.
- Biological factors include all steps involved in manipulation of cells before and immediately after bombardment, the osmotic adjustment of target cells to help alleviate the trauma associated with bombardment, and also the nature of the transforming DNA, such as linearized DNA or intact supercoiled plasmids. It is believed that prebombardment manipulations are especially important for successful transformation of immature embryos.
- TRFs trauma reduction factors
- the next steps of the invention generally concern identifying the transformed cells for further culturing and plant regeneration.
- identifying the transformed cells for further culturing and plant regeneration.
- one may desire to employ a selectable or screenable marker gene as, or in addition to, the expressible gene of interest.
- An exemplary embodiment of methods for identifying transformed cells involves exposing the bombarded cultures to a selective agent, such as a metabolic inhibitor, an antibiotic, herbicide or the like.
- a selective agent such as a metabolic inhibitor, an antibiotic, herbicide or the like.
- Cells which have been transformed and have stably integrated a marker gene conferring resistance to the selective agent used will grow and divide in culture. Sensitive cells will not be amenable to further culturing.
- a selective agent such as a metabolic inhibitor, an antibiotic, herbicide or the like.
- ranges of 1 -3 mg/l bialaphos or 1 -3 mM glyphosate will typically be preferred, it is proposed that ranges of 0.1 -50 mg/l bialaphos or 0.1 -50 mM glyphosate will find utility in the practice of the invention.
- Tissue can be placed on any porous, inert, solid or semi-solid support for bombardment, including but not limited to filters and solid culture medium.
- Bialaphos and glyphosate are provided as examples of agents suitable for selection of transformants, but the technique of this invention is not limited to them.
- a screenable marker trait is the red pigment produced under the control of the R-locus in maize. This pigment may be detected by culturing cells on a solid support containing nutrient media capable of supporting growth at this stage and selecting cells from colonies (visible aggregates of cells) that are pigmented. These cells may be cultured further, either in suspension or on solid media.
- the R-locus is useful for selection of transformants from bombarded immature embryos. In a similar fashion, the introduction of the C1 and B genes will result in pigmented cells and/or tissues.
- the enzyme luciferase is also useful as a screenable marker in the context of the present invention.
- cells expressing luciferase emit light which can be detected on photographic or x-ray film, in a luminometer (or liquid scintillation counter), by devices that enhance night vision, or by a highly light sensitive video camera, such as a photon counting camera. All of these assays are nondestructive and transformed cells may be cultured further following identification.
- the photon counting camera is especially valuable as it allows one to identify specific cells or groups of cells which are expressing luciferase and manipulate those in real time.
- a selection agent such as bialaphos or glyphosate
- a selection agent may either not provide enough killing activity to clearly recognize transformed cells or may cause substantial nonselective inhibition of transformants and nontransformants alike, thus causing the selection technique to not be effective.
- selection with a growth inhibiting compound, such as bialaphos or glyphosate at concentrations below those that cause 100% inhibition followed by screening of growing tissue for expression of a screenable marker gene such as luciferase would allow one to recover transformants from cell or tissue types that are not amenable to selection alone.
- embryogenic type II callus of Zea mays L. was selected with sub-lethal levels of bialaphos. Slowly growing tissue was subsequently screened for expression of the luciferase gene and transformants were identified. In this example, neither selection nor screening conditions employed were sufficient in and of themselves to identify transformants. Therefore it is proposed that combinations of selection and screening will enable one to identify transformants in a wider variety of cell and tissue types.
- Cells that survive the exposure to the selective agent, or cells that have been scored positive in a screening assay, may be cultured in media that supports regeneration of plants.
- the inventors have modified
- MS and N6 media by including further substances such as growth regulators.
- a preferred growth regulator for such purposes is dicamba or 2,4-D.
- other growth regulators may be employed, including NAA, NAA + 2,4-D or perhaps even picloram.
- Media improvement in these and like ways was found to facilitate the growth of cells at specific developmental stages. Tissue is preferably maintained on a basic media with growth regulators until sufficient tissue is available to begin plant regeneration efforts, or following repeated rounds of manual selection, until the morphology of the tissue is suitable for regeneration, at least two weeks, then transferred to media conducive to maturation of embryoids. Cultures are transferred every two weeks on this medium. Shoot development will signal the time to transfer to medium lacking growth regulators.
- the transformed cells identified by selection or screening and cultured in an appropriate medium that supports regeneration, will then be allowed to mature into plants.
- Developing plantlets are transferred to soilless plant growth mix, and hardened, e.g., in an environmentally controlled chamber at about 85% relative humidity, 600 ppm CO 2 , and 25-250 microeinsteins m -2 ⁇ s -1 of light. Plants are preferably matured either in a growth chamber or greenhouse. Plants are
- tissue culture vessels Illustrative embodiments of such vessels are petri dishes and Plant Con ® s.. Regenerating plants are preferably grown at about 19 to 28°C. After the regenerating plants have reached the stage of shoot and root
- R 0 plants were regenerated from transformants of an A 1 88 ⁇ B73 suspension culture line (SC82), and these plants exhibited a phenotype expected of the genotype of hybrid A1 88 X B73 from which the callus and culture were derived.
- the plants were similar in height to seed-derived A1 88 plants (3-5 ft tall) but had B73 traits such as anthocyanin accumulation in stalks and prop roots, and the presence of upright leaves. It would also be expected that some traits in the transformed plants would differ from their source, and indeed some variation will likely occur.
- the proportion of regenerating plants derived from transformed callus that successfully grew and reached maturity after transfer to the greenhouse was 97% (73 of 76).
- R 0 plants in the greenhouse are tested for fertility by backcrossing the transformed plants with seed-derived plants by pollinating the R 0 ears with pollen from seed derived inbred plants and this resulted in kernel development.
- pollen was collected from R 0 plants and used to pollinate seed derived inbred plants, resulting in kernel development.
- fertility can vary from plant to plant greater than 100 viable progeny can be routinely recovered from each transformed plant through use of both the ear and pollen for doing crosses.
- kernels on transformed plants may require embryo rescue due to cessation of kernel development and premature senescence of plants.
- To rescue developing embryos they are excised from surface-disinfected kernels 10-20 days post-pollination and cultured.
- An embodiment of media used for culture at this stage comprises MS salts, 2% sucrose, and 5.5 g/l agarose.
- embryo rescue large embryos (defined as greater than 3 mm in length) are germinated directly on an appropriate media. Embryos smaller than that were cultured for one week on media containing the above ingredients along with 10 -5 M abscisic acid and then transferred to growth regulator-free medium for germination.
- Progeny may be recovered from the transformed plants and tested for expression of the exogenous expressible gene by localized application of an appropriate substrate to plant parts such as leaves.
- an appropriate substrate to plant parts such as leaves.
- transformed parental plants (R 0 ) and their progeny (R 1 ) exhibited no bialaphos-related necrosis after localized application of the herbicide
- assays include, for example, “molecular biological” assays, such as Southern and Northern blotting and PCR; “biochemical” assays, such as detecting the presence of a protein product, e.g., by immunological means (ELISAs and Western blots) or by enzymatic function; plant part assays, such as leaf or root assays; and also, by analyzing the phenotype of the whole regenerated plant.
- Genomic DNA may be isolated from callus cell lines or any plant parts to determine the presence of the exogenous gene through the use of techniques well known to those skilled in the art. Note, that intact sequences will not always be present, presumably due to rearrangement or deletion of sequences in the cell.
- DNA elements introduced through the methods of this invention may be determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Using this technique discreet fragments of DNA are amplified and detected by gel
- exogenous genes introduced into different sites in the genome, i.e., whether transformants are of independent origin. It is contemplated that using PCR techniques it would be possible to clone fragments of the host genomic DNA adjacent to an introduced gene.
- Positive proof of DNA integration into the host genome and the independent identities of transformants may be determined using the technique of Southern hybridization. Using this technique specific DNA sequences that were introduced into the host genome and flanking host DNA sequences can be identified. Hence the Southern hybridization pattern of a given transformant serves as an identifying characteristic of that transformant. In addition it is possible through Southern hybridization to demonstrate the presence of introduced genes in high molecular weight DNA, i.e., confirm that the introduced gene has been integrated into the host cell genome.
- the technique of Southern hybridization provides information that is obtained using PCR e.g., the presence of a gene, but also demonstrates integration into the genome and characterizes each individual transformant. It is contemplated that using the techniques of dot or slot blot hybridization which are modifications of Southern hybridization techniques one could obtain the same information that is derived from PCR, e.g., the presence of a gene.
- RNA will only be expressed in particular cells or tissue types and hence it will be necessary to prepare RNA for analysis from these tissues.
- PCR techniques may also be used for detection and quantitation of RNA produced from introduced genes. In this application of PCR it is first necessary to reverse transcribe RNA into DNA, using enzymes such as reverse transcriptase, and then through the use of conventional PCR techniques amplify the DNA. In most instances PCR techniques, while useful, will not demonstrate integrity of the RNA product. Further information about the nature of the RNA product may be obtained by Northern blotting. This technique will demonstrate the presence of an
- RNA species and give information about the integrity of that RNA.
- the presence or absence of an RNA species can also be determined using dot or slot blot Northern hybridizations. These techniques are modifications of Northern blotting and will only demonstrate the presence or absence of an RNA species.
- Southern blotting and PCR may be used to detect the gene(s) in question, they do not provide information as to whether the gene is being expressed. Expression may be evaluated by specifically identifying the protein products of the introduced genes or evaluating the phenotypic changes brought about by their expression.
- Assays for the production and identification of specific proteins may make use of physical-chemical, structural, functional, or other properties of the proteins.
- Unique physical-chemical or structural properties allow the proteins to be separated and identified by electrophoretic procedures, such as native or denaturing gel electrophoresis or isoelectric focussing, or by chromatographic techniques such as ion exchange or gel exclusion chromatography.
- the unique structures of individual proteins offer opportunities for use of specific antibodies to detect their presence in formats such as an ELISA assay. Combinations of approaches may be employed with even greater specificity such as western blotting in which antibodies are used to locate individual gene products that have been separated by electrophoretic techniques. Additional techniques may be employed to absolutely confirm the identity of the product of interest such as evaluation by amino acid sequencing following purification. Although these are among the most commonly employed, other procedures may be additionally used.
- Assay procedures may also be used to identify the expression of proteins by their functionality, especially the ability of enzymes to catalyze specific chemical reactions involving specific substrates and products. These reactions may be followed by providing and quantifying the loss of substrates or the generation of products of the reactions by physical or chemical procedures. Examples are as varied as the enzyme to be analyzed and may include assays for PAT enzymatic activity by following production of radiolabeled acetylated phosphinothricin from phosphinothricin and 14 C-acetyl CoA or for anthranilate synthase activity by following loss of fluorescence of anthranilate, to name two.
- bioassays Very frequently the expression of a gene product is determined by evaluating the phenotypic results of its expression. These assays also may take many forms including but not limited to analyzing changes in the chemical composition, morphology, or physiological properties of the plant. Chemical composition may be altered by expression of genes encoding enzymes or storage proteins which change amino acid composition and may be detected by amino acid analysis, or by enzymes which change starch quantity which may be analyzed by near infrared reflectance spectrometry. Morphological changes may include greater stature or thicker stalks. Most often changes in response of plants or plant parts to imposed treatments are evaluated under carefully controlled conditions termed bioassays.
- An example is to evaluate resistance to insect feeding.
- the inventors have been successful in producing fertile transgenic monocot plants (maize) where others have failed.
- Aspects of the methods of the present invention for producing the fertile, transgenic corn plants comprise, but are not limited to, isolation of recipient cells using media conducive to specific growth patterns, choice of selective systems that permit efficient detection of
- transformation modifications of DNA delivery methods to introduce genetic vectors with exogenous DNA into cells; invention of methods to regenerate plants from transformed cells at a high frequency; and the production of fertile transgenic plants capable of surviving and reproducing.
- FIG. 1 Schematic representation of plasmids (vectors) used in bombardment experiments.
- FIG. 1 Map of plasmid pAGUSI , also known as pDPG141 , in which the 5'-noncoding and 5'-coding sequences were modified to incorporate the Kozak consensus sequence and HindIII restriction site.
- the nucleotide sequence is seq id no:2.
- FIG 1 (F) Restriction map of the plasmid pDPG237 containing the Sn:bol3 cDNA.
- FIG. 1 Map of plasmid pDPG317 containing the aroA gene and the 35S-histone fusion promoter in addition to the bar expression cassette.
- FIG. 1 Map of plasmid pDPG290 containing the B. thuringiensis crystal toxin protein gene lab6 with a 35S promoter.
- FIG. 1 (R) Map of plasmid pDPG302 containing the B. thuringiensis crystal toxin protein gene lab6 with a 35S promoter in addition to the bar expression cassette from pDPG 1 65.
- FIG. 1 Map of plasmid pDPG303 containing the B. thuringiensis crystal toxin protein gene lab6 with a 35S promoter in addition to the bar expression cassette from pDPG 165.
- FIG. 1 Map of plasmid pDPG386, a plasmid containing the wheat dwarf virus replicon and containing a neomycin phosphotransferase II gene. This virus replicates in plant cells as well as bacteria.
- FIG. 1 Map of plasmid pDPG389, a plasmid containing the wheat dwarf virus replicon and containing a neomycin phosphotransferase II gene and the bar gene. This virus replicates in plant cells as well as bacteria.
- FIG. 1 Map of plasmid pDPG451 containing the 35S promoter - adh intron- mtlD- Tr7 expression cassette. Expression of this cassette will lead to accumulation of mannitol in the cells.
- FIG. 1 Map of plasmid pDPG354 containing a synthetic Bt gene (see figure 12).
- FIG. 1 Map of plasmid pDPG344 containing the proteinase inhibitor II gene from tomato.
- FIG. 1 Map of plasmid pDPG337 containing a synthetic Bt gene (see figure 12).
- FIG. 2 Appearance of cell colonies which emerge on selection plates with bialaphos. Such colonies appear 6-7 weeks after bombardment.
- FIG. 2 (A) SC82 bialaphos-resistant colony selected on 1 mg/l bialaphos.
- FIG. 2 (B) Embryogenic SC82 bialaphos-resistant callus selected and maintained on 1 mg/I bialaphos.
- FIG. 3 Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) activity in embryogenic
- FIG. 4 Integration of the bar gene in bialaphos-resistant SC82 callus isolates E1 -E1 1 . DNA gel blot of genomic DNA (4 ⁇ g/digest) from E1 -E1 1 and a nonselected control (EO) digested with EcoRI and HindIII. The molecular weights in kb are shown on the left and right.
- the blot was hybridized with 32 P-labeled bar from pDPG 1 65 ( ⁇ 25 ⁇ 10 6 Cerenkov cpm). Lanes designated 1 and 5 copies refer to the diploid genome and contain 1 .9 and 9.5 pg respectively of the 1 .9 kb bar expression unit released from pDPG 1 65 with EcoRI and HindIII .
- FIG. 5 Integration of exogenous genes in bialaphos-resistant SC71 6 isolates R1 -R21 .
- FIG. 5 (A) DNA gel blot of genomic DNA (6 ⁇ g/digest) from transformants isolated from suspension culture of A1 88 ⁇ B73 (SC71 6), designated R1 -R21 , were digested with EcoRI and HindIII and hybridized to 32 P-labeled bar probe ( ⁇ 10 ⁇ 10 6 Cerenkov cpm). Molecular weight markers in kb are shown on the left and right.
- FIG. 5 (B) The blot from A was washed and hybridized with 32 P-labelled GUS probe ( ⁇ 35 ⁇ 10 6 Cerenkov cpm). Two copies of the 2.1 kb GUS-containing
- EcoRI/HindIII fragment from pDPG208 is 6.3 pg.
- FIG. 6 Histochemical determination of GUS activity in bar-transformed
- SC82 callus line Y13 This bialaphos-resistant callus line, Y13, which contained intact GUS coding sequences was tested for GUS activity three months post-bombardment. In this figure, differential staining of the callus was observed.
- FIG. 7 Mature R 0 Plant, Developing Kernels and Progeny.
- FIG. 7 (C) Using pollen from transformed R, plants to pollinate B73 ears, large numbers of seed have been recovered.
- FIG. 7 (D) A transformed ear from an R- plant crossed with pollen from a non-transformed inbred plant.
- FIG. 8 Functional Expression of Introduced Genes in Transformed R 0 and R 1 Plants.
- FIG. 8(A) Basta R resistance in transformed R 0 plants.
- a Basta R solution was applied to a large area (about 4 ⁇ 8 cm) in the center of leaves of
- FIG. 8 (B) Basta R resistance in transformed R 1 plants. Basta R was also applied to leaves of four R 1 plants; two plants without bar (left) and two plants containing bar (right). The herbicide was applied to R 1 plants in 1 cm circles to four locations on each leaf, two on each side of the midrib. Photographs were taken six days after application.
- E Light micrograph as in (D) of control leaf.
- Extracts from one plant derived from each of the four transformed regenerable callus lines from a suspension culture of A1 88 x B73, SC82 (E10, E1 1 , E2/E5, and E3/E4/E6) were tested for PAT activity (The designations E2/E5 and E3/E4/E6 represent
- FIG. 10 DNA Gel Blot Analysis of Genomic DNA from Transformed
- Genomic DNA was digested with EcoRI and HindIII, which released the 1.9 kb bar expression unit (CaMV 35S promoter-bar-Tr7 3'-end) from pDPG165, the plasmid used for microprojectile bombardment transformation of SC82 cells, and hybridized to bar.
- the molecular weights in kb are shown on the left and right. Lanes designated E3/E4/E6, E1 1 ,
- E2/E5, and E10 contained 5 ⁇ g of either callus (C) or R 0 plant DNA.
- the control lane contained DNA from a nontransformed A1 88 X B73 plant.
- the lane designated " 1 copy" contained 2.3 pg of the 1 .9 kb EcoRI/HindIII fragment from pDPG165 representing one copy per diploid genome.
- FIG. 1 1 PAT Activity and DNA Gel Blot Analysis of Segregating Progeny of E2/E5 R 0 Plants.
- FIG. 1 1 (A) Analysis of PAT activity in ten progeny (lanes a-j) and a nontransformed control plant (lane k). Lanes designated a, b-h, i, and j contained protein extracts from progeny of separate parental R 0 plants. The lane designated callus contained protein extract from E2/E5 callus. Approximately 25 micrograms of total protein were used per reaction.
- FIG. 11 (B) DNA gel blot analysis of genomic DNA isolated from the ten progeny analyzed in A. Genomic DNA (5 ⁇ g/lane) was digested with Smal, which releases a 0.6 kb fragment containing jbar from pDPG165, and hybridized with bar probe. The lane designated R 0 contained DNA from the R 0 parent of progeny a. The lane designated 1 copy contained pDPG165 digested with Smal to represent approximately 1 copy of the 0.6 kb fragment per diploid genome (0.8 pg).
- FIG. 12 DNA sequence of a synthetic Bt gene coding for the toxin portion of the endotoxin protein produced by Bacillus thurincriensis subsp.kurstaki strain HD73 (M.J. Adang et al. 1985). This gene was synthesized and assembled using standard techniques to contain codons that are more preferred for translation in maize cells. A translation stop codon was introduced after the 613th codon to terminate the translation and allow synthesis of a Bt endotoxin protein consisting of the first 613 amino acids (including the f-met) of the Bt protein.
- the nucleic acid sequence is represented by seq id no: 10 and the amino acid sequence by seq id no: 11.
- FIG. 13 (A-D) DNA sequence of a synthetic Bt gene coding for the toxin portion of the endotoxin protein produced by Bacillus thurincriensis strain HD1. This gene was synthesized and assembled using standard techniques to contain codons that are more preferred for translation in maize cells.
- the nucleic acid sequence is represented by seq id no: 12 and the amino acid sequence by seq id no: 13. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
- vectors to deliver the DNA to cells delivering DNA to cells; assaying for successful transformations; using selective agents if necessary to isolate stable transformants; regenerating plants from transformants; assaying those plants for gene expression and for identification of the exogenous DNA sequences;
- the invention also relates to transformed maize cells, transgenic plants and pollen produced by said plants.
- Recipient Cells Tissue culture requires media and controlled environments.
- Media refers to the numerous nutrient mixtures that are used to grow cells in vitro, that is, outside of the intact living organism.
- the medium is usually a suspension of various categories of ingredients (salts, amino acids, growth regulators, sugars, buffers) that are required for growth of most cell types.
- each specific cell type requires a specific range of ingredient proportions for growth, and an even more specific range of formulas for optimum growth. Rate of cell growth will also vary among cultures initiated with the array of media that permit growth of that cell type.
- Nutrient media is prepared as a liquid, but this may be solidified by adding the liquid to materials capable of providing a solid support. Agar is most commonly used for this purpose.
- Bactoagar, Hazelton agar, Gelrite, and Gelgro are specific types of solid support that are suitable for growth of plant cells in tissue culture. Some cell types will grow and divide either in liquid suspension or on solid media. As disclosed herein, maize cells will grow in suspension or on solid medium, but regeneration of plants from suspension cultures requires transfer from liquid to solid media at some point in development. The type and extent of differentiation of cells in culture will be affected not only by the type of media used and by the environment, for example, pH, but also by whether media is solid or liquid. Table 1 illustrates the composition of various media useful for creation of recipient cells and for plant regeneration.
- Tissue (suspension) was plated on filters, bombarded and then filters were transferred to culture medium. After 2-7 days, the filters were transferred to selective medium. Approximately 3 weeks after
- transformable cultures have been produced from ten different genotypes of maize, including both hybrid and inbred varieties. These techniques for development of transformable cultures are also important in direct transformation of intact tissues, such as immature embryos as these techniques rely on the ability to select transformants in cultured cell systems.
- Example 1 Initiation of the Suspension Culture G(A188XB73)716 (designated
- This Example describes the development of a maize suspension culture, designated SC716, which was employed in various of the transformation studies described hereinbelow.
- the Type II tissue used to initiate the cell suspension was initiated from immature embryos of A1 88 ⁇ B73 plated onto N6-based medium with 1 mg/ml 2,4-D (201 ; see Table 1 ).
- a Type II callus was initiated by visual selection of fast growing, friable embryogenic cells.
- the suspension was initiated within 6 months after callus initiation.
- Tissue chosen from the callus to initiate the suspension consisted of undifferentiated Type II callus. The characteristics of this undifferentiated tissue include the earliest stages of embryo development and soft, friable, undifferentiated tissue underlying it.
- liquid medium was medium 402 to which different slow-release growth regulator capsule treatments were added (Adams, W.R., Adams, T.R., Wilston, H.M., Krueger, R.W., and Kausch, A.P, Silicone Capsules for Controlled
- a sterile ten ml, wide tip, pipet was used for this transfer (Falcon 7304). Any very large aggregates of ceils which would not pass easily through the pipet tip were excluded. If a growth regulator capsule was present, it was also transferred to the new flask. After approximately 7 weeks, the loose embryogenic cell aggregates began to predominate and fragment in each of the cultures, reaching a state referred to as "dispersed.” The treatment which yielded the highest proportion of embryogenic clusters was the 402 medium plus one NAA capsule.
- a one ml packed cell volume inoculum from each culture was transferred into 20 ml 401 medium using a ten ml narrow tip pipet (Falcon 7551 ) . These transfers were performed about every 3 % days.
- An inoculum from the 402 plus 2,4-D plus NAA capsules culture was also used to initiate a culture in 409 medium (402 without 2,4-D and including 10mg/l dicamba) either with or without 1 ml coconut water (Gibco 670-8130AG) per 25 ml culture medium.
- the most dispersed cultures were cryopreserved after 2 weeks, 2 months or 5 months.
- the culture grown on 409 with coconut water was thawed eight months after cryopreservation, cultured for two weeks on solid 201 culture medium using BMS as a feeder layer (Rhodes et al. , 1988) and transferred to media 409 without coconut water.
- the culture was maintained by subculturing twice weekly in 409 medium by the method described above.
- SC82 another cell line employed in various of the transformation studies set forth below, termed SC82.
- inoculum for suspension culture initiation was visually selected from a Type II callus that was initiated from A188 ⁇ B73 immature embryos plated on a N6-based medium containing 13.2 mg/l dicamba (227, Table
- the suspension culture was initiated within 3 months of initiation of the Type II callus.
- this 5 ml culture was sieved through a 71 0 micron mesh and used to inoculate 20 mis of corresponding fresh and filter-sterilized conditioned medium from the established G(A188 ⁇ B73) 716 cultures in 1 50 ml flasks. After one week or more of growth, two mis of packed cells were subcultured to fresh media by the method described above. The suspension culture maintained on 409 by this method was then cryopreserved within 3 months. The original cell line, which was maintained on 409 (not a reinoculated cryopreserved culture) was used in experiments 1 and 2 months later which resulted in stable transformation and selection (see Table 6 below) . The cryopreserved culture was used for experiment 6 (see Table 6 below).
- Example 3 initiation and Maintenance of Cell Line AT824.
- This example describes the initiation and maintenance of cell line AT824 which has been used routinely for transformation experiments.
- Immature embryos (0.5 - 1 .0mm) were excised from the B73-derived inbred line AT and cultured on N6 medium with 100 uM silver nitrate, 3.3 mg/L dicamba, 3% sucrose and 12 mM proline (2004).
- Six months after initiation type I callus was
- the first suspension cultures of AT824 were initiated 31 months after culture initiation.
- Suspension cultures may be initiated in a variety of culture media including media containing 2,4-D as well as dicamba as the auxin source, e.g., media designated 210, 401 , 409, 279. Cultures are maintained by transfer of approximately 2 ml packed cell volume to 20 ml fresh culture medium at 3 1 ⁇ 2 day intervals.
- AT824 can be routinely transferred between liquid and solid culture media with no effect on growth or morphology.
- Suspension cultures of AT824 were initially cryopreserved 33-37 months after culture initiation. The survival rate of this culture was improved when it was cryopreserved following three months in suspension culture. AT824 suspension cultures have been cryopreserved and reinitiated from cryopreservation at regular intervals since the initial date of freezing. Repeated cycles of freezing have not affected the growth or transformability of this culture.
- Example 4 Initiation and maintenance of cell lines ABT3, ABT4, ABT6, AB80, AB82, AB12, AB44, AB60, AB61 , AB62, AB63, AB69
- Friable, embryogenic maize callus cultures were initiated from hybrid immature embryos produced by pollination of inbred A188 plants (University of Minnesota, Crop Improvement Association) with pollen of inbred line B73 plants (Iowa State University). Ears were harvested when the embryos had reached a length of 1 .5 to 2.0 mm. The whole ear was surface sterilized in 50% v/v commercial bleach (2.63% w/v sodium hypochlorite) for 20 min. at room
- Initiation/maintenance medium (hereinafter referred to as medium 734) consisted of
- N6 basal medium Cho 1975 with 2% (w/v) sucrose, 1.5 mg per liter 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 6 mM proline, and 0.25% Gelrite (Kelco, Inc. San Diego).
- the pH was adjusted to 5.8 prior to autoclaving. Unless otherwise stated, all tissue culture manipulations were carried out under sterile conditions. The immature embryos were incubated at 26°C in the dark. Cell proliferation from the scutellum of the immature embryos were evaluated for friable consistency and the presence of well defined somatic embryos. Tissue with this morphology was transferred to fresh media 10 to 14 days after the initial plating of the immature embryos.
- the tissue was then subcultured on a routine basis every 14 to 21 days. Sixty to eighty milligram quantities of tissue were removed from pieces of tissue that had reached a size of approximately one gram and transferred to fresh medium. Subculturing always involved careful visual monitoring to be sure that only tissue of the correct morphology was maintained. The presence of somatic embryos ensured that the cultures would give rise to plants under the proper conditions.
- the cell cultures named ABT3, ABT4, ABT6, AB80, AB82, AB12, AB44, AB60, AB61 , AB62, AB63, AB69 were initiated in this manner.
- the cell lines ABT3, ABT4, and ABT6 were initiated from immature embryos of a 5-methyltryptophan resistant derivative of A188 ⁇ B73.
- the Hi-ll genotype of corn was developed from an A188 ⁇ B73 cross. This genotype was developed specifically for a high frequency of initiation of type II cultures (100% response rate, Armstrong et al., 1991 ). Immature embryos (8-12 days post-pollination, 1 to 1.2 mm) were excised and cultured embryonic axis down on N6 medium containing 1 mg/L 2,4-D, 25 mM L-proiine (201 ) or N6 medium containing 1.5 mg/L 2,4-D, 6mm L-proline (734). Type II callus can be initiated either with or without the presence of 100 ⁇ M AgNo 3 . Cultures initiated in the presence of AgNo 3 was transferred to medium lacking this compound 14-28 days after culture initiation. Callus cultures were incubated in the dark at 23-28°C and transferred to fresh culture medium at 14 day intervals.
- Hi-ll type II callus is maintained by manual selection of callus at each transfer.
- callus can be resuspended in liquid culture medium, passed through a 1 .9 mm sieve and replated on solid culture medium at the time of transfer. It is believed that this sequence of manipulations is one way to enrich for recipient cell types.
- Regenerable type II callus that is suitable for transformation can be routinely developed from the Hi-ll genotype and hence new cultures are developed every 6-9 months. Routine generation of new cultures reduces the period of time over which each culture is maintained and hence insures
- An ear of the genotype B73 was pollinated by A188. Immature embryos (1 .75- 2.00 mm) were excised and cultured on 212 medium (see Table 1 ) . About 4 months after embryo excision, approximately 5 ml PCV type II callus was inoculated into 50 ml liquid 210 medium (see Table 1 ). The suspension was maintained by transfer of 5 ml suspension to 50 ml fresh 210 medium every 3 1 /2 days. This suspension culture was cryopreserved about 4 months after initiation.
- Cryopreservation is important because it allows one to maintain and preserve a known transformable cell culture for future use, while eliminating the cumulative detrimental effects associated with extended culture periods.
- cryopreservation protocol comprised adding a pre-cooled (0°C) concentrated cryoprotectant mixture stepwise over a period of one to two hours to pre-cooled (0°C) cells. The mixture was maintained at 0°C throughout this period. The volume of added cryoprotectant was equal to the initial volume of the cell suspension (1 :1 addition), and the final concentration of cryoprotectant additives was 10% dimethyl suifoxide, 10% polyethylene glycol (6000 MW), 0.23 M proline and 0.23 M glucose. The mixture was allowed to equilibrate at 0°C for 30 minutes, during which time the cell suspension/ cryoprotectant mixture was divided into 1 .5 ml aliquot (0.5 ml packed cell volume) in 2 ml polyethylene cryo-vials. The tubes were cooled at 0.5°C/minute to -8°C and held at this temperature for ice nucleation.
- the tubes were cooled at 0.5°C/minute from -8°C to -35 °C. They were held at this temperature for 45 minutes (to insure uniform freeze-induced dehydration throughout the cell clusters). At this point, the cells had lost the majority of their osmotic volume (i.e. there is little free water left in the cells), and they could be safely plunged into liquid nitrogen for storage. The paucity of free water remaining in the cells in conjunction with the rapid cooling rates from -35 to -196°C prevented large organized ice crystals from forming in the cells. The cells are stored in liquid nitrogen, which effectively immobilizes the cells and slows metabolic processes to the point where long-term storage should not be detrimental.
- Thawing of the extracellular solution was accomplished by removing the cryo-tube from liquid nitrogen and swirling it in sterile 42 °C water for
- the tube was removed from the heat immediately after the last ice crystals had melted to prevent heating the tissue.
- the cell suspension (still in the cryoprotectant mixture) was pipetted onto a filter, resting on a layer of BMS cells (the feeder layer which provided a nurse effect during recovery).
- cryoprotectant occurred slowly as the solutes diffused away through the filter and nutrients diffused upward to the recovering cells. Once subsequent growth of the thawed cells was noted, the growing tissue was transferred to fresh culture medium. The cell clusters were transferred back into liquid suspension medium as soon as sufficient cell mass had been regained (usually within 1 to 2 weeks). After the culture was reestablished in liquid (within 1 to 2 additional weeks), it was used for transformation experiments. When desired, previously cryopreserved cultures may be frozen again for storage.
- DNA segments carrying DNA into a host cell there are several methods to construct the DNA segments carrying DNA into a host cell that are well known to those skilled in the art.
- the general construct of the vectors used herein are plasmids comprising a promoter, other regulatory regions, structural genes, and a 3' end.
- pDPG237 Fig. 1 (F); pDPG31 3 through pDPG31 9, Fig. 1 (H) through Fig. 1 (N); pDPG290, Fig. 1 (0); pDPG300 through pDPG304, Fig. 1 (P) through Fig. 1 (S); pDPG386 through pDPG389, Fig. 1 (T) through Fig. 1 (W); pDPG140, Fig. 1 (X); pDPG172, Fig. 1 (Y); pDPG425, Fig. 1 (Z); pDPG427, Fig. 1 (AA); pDPG451 , Fig. 1 (BB); pDPG 354, Fig 1 (CC); pDPG344, Fig 1 (DD); pDPG337, Fig 1 (EE).
- PDPG230-231 251, 262- pUC19 1, 2, 100, 1,2 264, 279, 282, 283 101
- PDPG238-239 pUC19 2, 4, 100, 2,4
- the uidA gene from E. Coli encodes ⁇ -glucuronidase (GUS). Cells expressing uidA produce a blue color when given the appropriate substrate. Jefferson, R.A. 1987. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep 5: 387-405.
- PAT acetyltransferase
- the lux gene from firefly encodes luciferase.
- Cells expressing lux emit light under appropriate assay conditions. deWet, J.R., Wood, K.V., DeLuca, M.,
- the aroA gene from Salmonella typhimurium encodes 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3- phosphate synthase (EPSPS). Comai, L., Sen, L.C., Stalker, D.M., Science 221 : 370-371 , 1983.
- EPSPS 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3- phosphate synthase
- DHFR dihydrofolate reductase
- the neo gene from E.Coli encodes aminoglycoside phosphotransferase (APH).
- the amp gene from E. Coli encodes /5-lactamase.
- Cells expressing ⁇ -lactamase produce a chromogenic compound when given the appropriate substrate.
- the R,C1 and B genes from maize encode proteins that regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in maize. Goff, S., Klein, T., Ruth, B., Fromm, M., Cone, K., Radicella, J., Chandler, V. 1 990. EMBO J.: 2517-2522. 10.
- the als gene from Zea mays encodes acetolactate synthase. The enzyme was mutated to confer resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides. Cells expressing als are resistant to the herbicide Gieen. Yang, L.Y., Gross, P.R. , Chen, C.H., Lissis, M. 1 992. Plant Molecular Biology 1 8: 1 185-1 187.
- the proteinase inhibitor II gene was cloned from potato and tomato. Plants expressing the proteinase inhibitor II gene show increased resistance to insects. Potato: Graham, J.S., Hall, G., Pearce, G., Ryan, CA. 1986 Mol. Cell. Biol. 2: 1044-1051 . Tomato: Pearce, G., Strydom, D., Johnson, S., Ryan, C. A. 1991 . Science 253: 895-898.
- the Bt gene from Bacillus thuringensis berliner 171 5 encodes a protein that is toxic to insects. Plants expressing this gene are resistant to insects. This gene is the coding sequence of Bt 884 modified in two regions for improved expression in plants. Vaeck, M., Reynaerts, A., Hofte, H., Jansens, S.,
- the bxn gene from Klebsiella ozaeneae encodes a nitrilase enzyme specific for the herbicide bromoxynil. Cells expressing this gene are resistant to the herbicide bromoxynil. Stalker, D.m., McBride, K.E., and Malyj, L. Science 242: 419-422, 1988.
- the WGA-A gene encodes wheat germ agglutinin. Expression of the WGA-A gene confers resistance to insects.
- the WGA-A gene was cloned from wheat. Smith, J.J., Raikhel, N.V. 1989. Plant Mol. Biology 13: 601 -603.
- the dapA gene was cloned from E. Coli.
- the dapA gene codes for
- dihydrodipicoiinate synthase expression of this gene in plant cells produces increased levels of free lysine. Richaud, F., Richaud, C, Rafet, P. and Patte,
- the Z10 gene codes for a 10kd zein storage protein from maize. Expression of this gene in cells alters the quantities of 10kD Zein in the cells. Kirihara, J.A., Hunsperger, J.P., Mahoney, W.C, and Messing, J. 1988. Mol. Gen.
- the A20 sequence encodes the 19kd zein storage protein of Zea mays.
- the Z4 sequence is for the 22kd zein storage protein of Zea mays.
- the Bt gene cloned from Bacillus thuringensis Kurstaki encodes a protein that is toxic to insects.
- the gene is the coding sequence of the cry IA(c) gene modified for improved expression in plants. Plants expressing this gene are resistant to insects. H ⁇ fte, H. and Whiteiey, H.R., 1 989. Microbiological Reviews. 53: 242-255.
- the als gene from Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a sulfonylurea herbicide
- the deh l gene from Pseudomonas putida encodes a dehalogenase enzyme.
- the hygromycin phosphotransferase II gene was isolated from £ coli.
- the lysC gene from E. coli encodes the enzyme asparty! kinase III.
- the hygromycin phosphotransferase II gene was isolated from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. Expression of this gene in cells produces resistance to the antibiotic hygromycin.
- EPSPS gene (5-enolpyruvy/shikimate - 3-phosphate synthase) gene from
- the mtlD gene was cloned from E. coli. This gene encodes the enzyme
- the HVA-1 gene encodes a Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) protein.
- Terminator sequences from Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (a) Bevan, M., 1984. Nucleic Acid Research 12: 871 1 -8721 ; (b) ingelbrecht, I.L.W., Herman, L.M.F., DeKeyser, R.A., Van Montagu, M.C, Depicker, A.G.
- Optimized transit peptide sequence consisting of sequences from sunflower and maize. Constructed by Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie.
- Terminator sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene An, G., Mitra, A., Choi, H.K., Costa, M.A., An, K., Thornburg, R.W., Ryan, CA. 1989. Plant Cell 1 : 1 1 5-122. 1 1 1 . Promoter from the maize 10kd zein gene.
- the matrix attachment region was isolated from chicken. Use of this DNA sequence reduces variations in gene expression due to integration position effects. Stief, A., Winter, D., Stratling, W.H., Sippel, A.E. 1 989. Nature 341 : 343.
- Terminator sequences from the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus genome are identical to the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus genome.
- DNA segments encoding the bar gene were constructed into a plasmid, termed pDPG1 65, which was used to introduce the bialaphos resistance gene into recipient cells (see Figures 1 A and C).
- the bar gene was cioned from
- Streptomyces hygroscopicus (White et al., 1990) and exists as a 559-bp Sma I fragment in plasmid plJ4101 .
- the sequence of the coding region of this gene is identical to that published (Thompson et al. , 1987).
- the Sma I fragment from plJ4104 was ligated into a pUC19-based vector containing the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV) 35S promoter (derived from pBI221 .1 . provided by R.
- CaMV Cauliflower Mosaic Virus
- sequences for GUS were modified to incorporate the Kozak consensus sequence (Kozak, 1 984) and to introduce a new HindIII restriction site 6 bp into the coding region of the gene (see Figure 1 E).
- the 2.1 kb BamHI/EcoRI fragment from pAGUSI was ligated into a 3.6 kb BamHI/EcoRI fragment of a pUC1 9-based vector pCEV1 (provided by Calgene, Inc., Davis, CA) .
- the 3.6 kb fragment from pCEV1 contains pUC1 9 and a 430 bp 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus adjacent to the first intron from maize Adh 1.
- the most preferred vectors contain the 35S promoter from
- Cauliflower Mosaic Virus the first intron from maize Adh 1 gene, the Kozak consensus sequence, Sn:boI3 cDNA, and the transcript 7 3' end from
- pDPG237 Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
- One such vector prepared by the inventors is termed pDPG237.
- pDPG237 To prepare pDPG237 (see Figure 1 F), the cDNA clone of Sn:bol3 was obtained from S. Dellaporta (Yale University, USA) .
- a genomic clone of Sn was isolated from genomic DNA of Sn:bol3 which had been digested to completion with HindIII, ligated to lambda arms and packaged in vitro. Plaques hybridizing to two regions of cloned R alleles, R-nj and R-sc (Dellaporta et al., 1 988) were analyzed by restriction digest.
- a 2 kb Sst-HincIl fragment from the pSn7.0 was used to screen a cDNA library established in lambda from RNA of light-irradiated scutellar nodes of Sn:bol3. The sequence and a restriction map of the cDNA clone was established. The cDNA clone was inserted into the same plant expression vector described for pDPG165, the bar expression vector (see above), and contains the 35S Cauliflower mosaic virus promoter, a polylinker and the transcript 7 3' end from Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
- This plasmid, pDPG232 was made by inserting the cDNA clone into the polylinker region; a restriction map of pDPG232 is shown in Figure 1 G.
- the preferred vector, pDPG237 was made by removing the cDNA clone and Tr7 3' end from pDPG232, with Aval and EcoRI and ligating it with a BamHI/EcoRI fragment from pDPG208. The ligation was done in the presence of a BamHI linker as follows (upper strand, seq id no:3; lower strand, seq id no:4): GATCCGTCGACCATGGCGCTTCAAGCTTC GCAGCTGGTACCGCGAAGTTCGAAGGGCT
- the final construct of pDPG237 contained a Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter, the first intron of Adh 1 , Kozak consensus sequence, the BamHI linker, cDNA of Sn:Bol3, and the Tr7 3' end and is shown in Figure 1 F.
- pDPG128 a vector, designated pDPG128, has been constructed to include the neo coding sequence (neomycin phosphotransferase (APH(3')-II)).
- Plasmid pDPG128 contains the 35S promoter from CaMV, the neomycin
- Plasmid pDPG154 contains the 35S promoter, the entire coding region of the crystal toxin protein of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki HD 263, and the Tr7 promoter.
- a barfaroA tandem vector (pDPG238) was constructed by Iigating a blunt-ended 3.2 kb DNA fragment containing a mutant EPSP synthase aroA expression unit (Barkai-Golan et al. , 1978) to Ndel-cut pDPG165 that had been blunted and dephosphorylated (Ndel introduces a unique restriction cut approximately 200 bp downstream of the Tr7 3'-end of the bar expression unit). Transformants having aroA in both orientations relative to bar were identified. Additional bar gene vectors employed are pDPG284 and pDPG313-pDPG319
- Figure 1 H-N the latter series being obtained from Rh ⁇ ne-Poulenc Agrochimie (RPA).
- the orientation of the bar gene in DPG165 was inverted with respect to the pUC vector, to obtain pDPG284.
- An additional 32 bp of DNA has been inserted into the Ndel site of pDPG165 and pDPG284, to obtain pDPG295 and pDPG297 and pDPG298, respectively.
- This extra 32 bp of sequence preserves the unique Ndel site in each vector and adds four additional restriction sites with the following orientation, relative to the unique Narl site:
- Tandem bar-aroA vectors with a 35S-histone promoter (constitutive and meristem enhanced expression) in convergent (pDPG314), divergent (pDPG313), and colinear orientations (pDPG317) have also been employed, as have aroA vectors with a histone promoter (meristem-specific promoter, (pDPG315/pDPG31 6) and an ⁇ -tubulin promoter (root-specific, pDPG318/pDPG319) in colinear and divergent orientations to bar respectively.
- Plasmid pDPG290 incorporates the modified Bt CrylA(b) gene, lAb6, obtained from Plant Genetic Systems, PGS. A 1.8kb Ncol-Nhel fragment
- Plasmids pDPG292 and pDPG293 containing the NotI linker were designated pDPG298 and pDPG297, respectively.
- a NotI site was introduced adjacent to the 3' end of the Tr7 3' region by removing a 200 bp EcoRI fragment from pDPG294. This vector was designated pDPG296.
- lAb6 vector with flanking NotI sites was constructed via a 4-way ligation consisting of the Tr7 3' region (as a 500bp HpaI-BglII fragment from pDPG296), the lAb 6 gene (as a 1 .8Kb BamHI-Ncol fragment from pDPG290), the 35S promoter-Adh1 intron 1 cassette (as a 800bp XbaI-Ncol fragment from pDPG208), and the pBluescript Ii SK(-)plasmid (as a 2.95 Kb XbaI-HindII fragment).
- the pBluescript plasmid has a polylinker that positioned a second NotI recognition site next to the 5' end of the lAb6 expression unit.
- the plasmid which contained the Notl-flanked lAb6 expression unit was designated pDPG299.
- the lAb6 expression unit was excised from pDPG299 as a 3.1 kb NotI fragment and ligated to NotI cut PDPG295 and pDPG298 to yield pDPG300/pDPG301 and pDPG302/pDPG303, respectively ( Figure 1 P-S).
- the pairs are the two orientations possible for each ligation.
- a plasmid DNA, pDPG310 was constructed that contains a bar expression unit and a single copy of the matrix attachment region from the chicken lysozyme gene.
- the nuclear matrix attachment region (MAR, or "A-element") from the chicken genomic DNA region 5' to the lysozyme gene is contained on a 2.95 kb Kpnl-Pstl fragment in plasmid pUC19 B1-X1 (received from A.E. Sippel, Freiburg).
- Plasmid DNA pDPG310 was constructed by performing a 3-way litigation among the following DNAs: 1 ) 2.9 kb NotI-KpnI fragment from pBluescript II SK(-),
- Plasmid pDPG310 contains three SacI sites, one in each of the above DNA fragments. A second MAR element was inserted into the SacI site at the end of the pBluescript II SK(-) multiple cloning region. The resulting plasmid has a unique NotI site, into which future traits of interest could be cloned.
- plasmid DNA, pRJ15 containing the genomic DNA sequence for the potato pinII gene, was obtained from Clarence Ryan (Washington State University) and renamed pDPG288.
- pT2-47 containing the cDNA sequence for the tomato pinII gene, was obtained from Clarence Ryan and renamed pDPG289.
- the potato pinII gene in pDPG288 is flanked by a 35S promoter and a Tr7 3' end.
- Tandem vectors were constructed containing a bar expression unit and a potato or tomato pinII expression unit in either convergent or colinear orientation.
- the bar and pinII expression units were contained on a HindIII fragment that also contains a 1 .9 kb fragment of Adh 1 but lacks the Amp R gene and the plasmid origin of replication.
- the 1.9 kb Adh 1 region provides a locus for recombination into the plant genome without disruption of either the bar or pinII expression units.
- the potato pinII terminator was cloned into pBluescript II SK(-) via a three-part ligation.
- pBluescript II a 3.7 kb PstI fragment was first removed from pDPG288 and subsequently digested with RsaI/PstI to yield the 930 bp pinII terminator.
- the pBluescript II vector was digested with Scal/PstI and ScaI/SmaI in two separate reactions; the appropriate two plasmid fragments were gel-purified . These fragments and the pinII terminator were ligated to give plasmid pDPG331 .
- pDPG320 In order to construct pDPG320, a pinII expression vector containing the 35S promoter-AdhI intronl-pinII (with intron and terminator)-Tr7 terminator vector, the following protocol was used. pDPG309 was cut with BglII/EcoRI and the vector fragment was isolated. pDPG1 57 was cut with PstI/EcoRI and the 500 bp Tr7 fragment was isolated. To isolate the Adhl intron 3'-end, pDPG309 was cut with BglII/XbaI. Finally, pDPG288 was restricted with XbaI/PstI and the potato pinII gene (with intron and terminator) was isolated. After purification, the four fragments were ligated together and transformed into competent DH5 ⁇ cells.
- a further plant expression vector that contains the potato pinII terminator is pDPG343.
- This plasmid contains the 420-bp 35S promoter, maize Adhl intron I, a multiple cloning region, and the potato pinII terminator.
- pDPG343 was constructed by way of a three-part ligation of the following DNAs:
- Plasmid pDPG343 contains the following restriction sites between the Adh1 intron I and the potato pinII terminator: BamHI - SalI - XbaI - SpeI - BamHI Of the above sites, SpeI in the only unique one in pDPG343. While BamHI can readily be used for one-step cloning of trait genes, use of SalI or XbaI will require either three-part (or greater) ligations, or multiple cloning steps.
- the DNA fragment encoding the firefly luciferase protein was inserted into a pUC18-based vector containing the 35S promoter from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus, the first intron from the maize Adhl gene, and the transcript 7 3' end from
- pDPG215 contains the same regulatory elements as the bar-expression vector pDPG165.
- luciferase vectors Two additional luciferase vectors were created, both utilizing intron VI from Adh 1 (derived from vector pDPG273) fused to firefly luciferase (obtained from vector pDPG215). These elements were inserted into either the pDPG282 (4 OCS inverted-35S) to create pDPG350, or into the pDPG283 (4 OCS-35S) backbone to create pDPG351 (bar was excised as a BamHI/Nhel fragment and the intron plus luciferase gene inserted). The 4 OCS-35S promoter has been shown with the uidA gene to give very high levels of transient expression.
- Replication-competent viral vectors are also contemplated for use in maize transformation.
- Two wheat dwarf virus (WDV) "shuttle" vectors were obtained from J. Messing (Rutgers). These vectors, pWI-1 1 (pDPG386) and pWI-GUS (pDPG387) ( Figure 1 T,U), are capable of autonomous replication in cells derived from electroporated'maize endosperm protoplasts (Ugaki et al., 1 991 ). Both of these vectors encode a viral replicase and contain viral and E. coli origins of replication. In both of these vectors, the viral coat protein coding sequence has been replaced by the neo gene.
- pDPG387 (pWI-GUS) was created by insertion of a GUS expression cassette (35S-GUS-35S 3') into the BamHI site of pDPG386 (pWI-1 1 ).
- the expression and integration of marker genes introduced into maize cells on a replicating vector was examined using pDPG387 (pWl-GUS) and BMS cells.
- Six filters of BMS ceils were bombarded with ⁇ DPG387/pDPG1 65 (35S-bar-Tr7) and as a control, six filters were bombarded with pDPG128
- kanamycin-resistant colonies from tissue bombarded with pDPG387 was very inefficient (4 colonies) as compared to the control treatment in which cells were bombarded with pDPG128/pDPG165 (364 colonies). It also appears that bialaphos selection was less efficient for cells bombarded with pDPG387/pDPG1 65 (59 colonies) than it was for the control in which cells were bombarded with
- pDPG128/pDPG1 65 (274 colonies).
- pDPG387 The neo gene carried by pDPG387 is driven by the native WDV coat protein promoter; this promoter may not be strong enough to confer kanamycin resistance.
- the relatively low number of pDPG128/pDPG1 65 is driven by the native WDV coat protein promoter; this promoter may not be strong enough to confer kanamycin resistance.
- pDPG387/pDPG165 infers some sort of negative impact of pDPG387 on the ultimate selection for expression of a marker gene on a separate, non-replicating vector.
- WDV-bar vectors were constructed to help address the question of the effect of promoter strength on selection as well as to provide replicating vectors for eventual use with embryogenic cultures.
- the 35S-bar-Tr7 expression cassette was isolated from pDPG165 as an EcoRI/HindIII fragment and protruding ends were filled in with T4 DNA polymerase. This fragment was ligated into pDPG386
- a gene encoding the enzyme EPSPS was cloned from Zea mays. Two mutations were introduced into the amino acid sequence of EPSPS to confer glyphosate resistance, i.e., a substitution of isoleucine for threonine at amino acid position 102 and a substitution of serine for proline at amino acid position 106. Seven plant expression vectors were constructed using the promoterless mutant maize EPSPS expression vector received from Rhone Poulenc (pDPG425). The mutant EPSPS gene in this vector encodes an enzyme with amino acid changes at positions 102 (threonine to isoleucine) and 106 (proline to serine). Seven promoters ( ⁇ introns) were used in vector constructions using the mutant maize EPSPS gene. A description of the construction of these vectors is presented below.
- Arabidopsis histone promoter was isolated as a 1 .4 kb EcoRI/Hindlll fragment from pDPG404.
- the 2X 35S/Arabidopsis histone promoter was isolated as a 1.8 kb EcoRI/Hindlll fragment from pDPG405.
- the above mentioned promoter fragments were T4 DNA polymerase-treated to create blunt ends prior to ligation into Smal linearized pDPG425 ( Figure 1 (Z)).
- the structural gene was isolated as a 1 500 bp fragment after digestion of pCD7.5 with NsiI and PstI, and was ligated into a pUC18-based vector containing the 35S promoter from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus, the first intron from the maize Adh l gene, and the transcript 7 3' end from Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
- the backbone and regulatory elements were prepared for this construction by removing the luciferase structural gene from pDPG21 5 (35s-Adhl 1 -luc-Tr7 3';
- this intermediate vector was designated pDPG431 .
- pDPG431 was then linearized using Nsil and the mtlD gene was inserted.
- the final vector was designated pDPG451 ( Figure 1 (BB)).
- a second expression vector for the mt/D gene was created by removing the bar gene from pDPGI 82 using Smal. After blunting the ends of the mt/D gene, it was ligated into the pUC-based vector; between the maize Adhlpromoter/Adhlintron and the transcript 7 3' end from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (provided in pCEV5 from Calgene, Inc., Davis, CA). This plasmid vector was designated
- HVa-1 A gene isolated from barley that encodes a Late Embryogenic Abundant protein (Dure, L., et al., 1989). (HVa-1 ) was obtained from Dr. H.D. Ho
- Plasmid constructs designed for increasing the level of lysine in the plant were designed to place a dapA polypeptide-coding sequence, modified to contain a sequence corresponding to one of two maize plastid transit peptide sequences, under the control of various plant promoter elements.
- These constructs include the widely-used CaMV 35S promoter, maize endosperm-specific promoters from genes encoding either a 27 kD (Z27) or a 10 kD (Z10) zein storage protein, and an embryo-specific promoter from the maize Globulini gene (Glb1 ), which encodes an abundant embryo storage protein.
- the transit peptide sequences used here correspond to those present in genes encoding either a maize rubisco small subunit polypeptide (MZTP) or the native maize DHDPS polypeptide (DSTP).
- MZTP maize rubisco small subunit polypeptide
- DSTP native maize DHDPS polypeptide
- PDPG371 in this construct, the synthetic pea chloroplast transit peptide encoding sequence described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/204,388 was replaced with a synthetic sequence corresponding to that encoding a maize chloroplast transit peptide (from a rubisco small subunit sequence; GenBank
- GenBank Y00322 except for the introduction of a HindIII-compatible sequence generated by the addition of AGCTT to the 5' end of MZTP46 and an A residue to the 3' end of MZTP25.
- the ATG initiation codon is indicated in bold type, as is the TGC cysteine codon corresponding to the carboxyterminal residue of the native maize ssu transit peptide. This corresponds to a 47 amino acid transit peptide sequence, from the initiating methionine to the carboxyterminal cysteine.
- equimolar amounts of oiigonucleotides MZTP49, 51 , 39, 25,45, and 53 were phosphorylated at their 5' ends in a polynucleotide kinase reaction; these were then combined with equimolar amounts of MZTP46 and MZTP54.
- This mixture was then added to a ligation reaction mixture containing the pGem3 vector (Promega Biotec, Madison, Wl) which had previously been cleaved with the restriction enzymes HindIII and Sphl to yield plasmid 9106.
- MZTP/dap A/nosS' cassette was ligated into the HindIII site of plasmid 35-227 (U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/204,388), which contains the 35S promoter, to yield plasmid 9305.
- the entire cassette was isolated as a 1790 bp ClaI/SmaI fragment from plasmid 9305 and inserted into the commercial cloning vector pSP73 (Promega) which had been cleaved with Clal and Smal. This final construct is designated pDPG371 .
- pDPG335 In this construct the synthetic MZTP ssu transit peptide sequence was replaced with DNA encoding the transit peptide sequence from the native maize DHDPS enzyme.
- the plasmid pMDS-1 containing a cDNA clone corresponding to maize DHDPS (Frisch et al. Mol. Gen. Genet. 228:287-293, 1991 ), was a gift from B. Gengenbach, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. The
- the 35S/DSTP cassette was subsequently fused to the dapA coding sequence. This was performed by cloning the cassette into the plasmid pHDAP73, which was constructed as follows: The 2728 bp hygromycin phosphotransferase cassette from plasmid pHygl 1 (U.S. Patent Application Serial No.
- 35S/MZTP/dapA/nos cassette obtained as an 1800bp BglII/Clal fragment from pDPG371 was inserted to yield pHDAP73. This latter plasmid was then cleaved at the Sphl site, at which point the MZTP sequence joins the dapA sequence.
- Sphl 3' overhang was filled in by using Klenow fragment to produce a blunt end, and the resultant linear plasmid was subsequently cleaved with BglII, removing the 35S/MZTP portion from pHDAP73.
- the 35S/DSTP cassette was isolated from pPoI35SDTP by cleavage with Xbal, followed by digestion with mung bean nuclease to remove the resultant 5' overhang. This treatment was followed by BamHI cleavage, which yielded a 674 bp fragment that was inserted into the cleaved pHDAP73 plasmid in place of the 35S/MZTP sequence.
- This novel plasmid containing the cassette 35S/DSTP/dapA/nos, is designated pHDTP.
- a 1095 bp EcoRl/BamHI fragment containing the DSTPIdapA region, was cloned into the EcoRI and BamHI sites of the commercial vector pUC1 19 (BRL) to yield pDSTP1 19.
- Nucleotide sequence analysis of this latter clone revealed a 2 bp deletion, apparently caused by the cloning process, at the junction of the DSTP and dapA sequences. This mutation was corrected in such a way as to restore the original reading frame and to introduce an additional Maell restriction enzyme site as follows:
- CT deleted in pDSTP119 ile thr phe thr gly modify to: ATC ACG
- the resultant plasmid designated pMae2- 1
- pMae2- 1 was cleaved with EcoRI, treated with Klenow polymerase to generate blunt ends, then cleaved with BamHI to yield an 1 100bp fragment consisting of the DSTP/dapA cassette.
- This fragment was cloned into the Sma and BamHI sites of pZ27Z10 (in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/636,089), replacing the Z10 coding region and placing the DSTPIdapA sequence under control of the Z27 promoter and the 35S 3' regulatory region.
- This final construct is designated pDPG335.
- PDPG372 To place the DSTP/dapA cassette under control of the 35S promoter, a 1221 bp Scal/EcoRI fragment from pHDTP, containing pSP73 vector sequences and the 35S promoter, was inserted into the Seal and EcoRI sites of pMae2-1 to yield p35MDAP. Tto join the nos 3' regulatory region to the
- p35DSD containing the 35S/DSTP/dapA /nos 3' cassette
- nucleotide sequence analysis of 35DSD revealed the presence of a cloning artifact that introduced an ATG translation initiation codon 13 codons upstream of the authentic DSTP initiation codon.
- This problem was corrected by substituting this region of p35DSD with the corresponding region from pDPG335, as follows: a 525 bp fragment from pDPG335, extending from a Kpnl site at the 3' end of the 35S promoter to a BstEII site internal to the dapA sequence, was inserted into KpnI/BstEII-cleaved p35DSD to yield pDPG372, which contains a functional 35S/DSTP/dapA/nos cassette.
- PDPG334 In this construct, the MZTP/dapA/nos cassette was placed under control of the Z10 promoter region as follows: a 1 1 37 bp HindIII/NcoI fragment from pG10B-H3 (Kirihara et al, Gene 71 :359-370, 1 988), consisting of the Z10 promoter, was inserted into HindIII/Ncol cleaved pDAP9284, yielding pDPG334 which consists of the Z10/MZTP/dapA/nos cassette.
- pDPG418 In this construct, the DSTPIdapA cassette was placed under control of the 5' and 3' regulatory regions of the maize Globulini (GlbP gene (Belanger and Kriz Genetics 129:863-872, 1991 ) as follows: a 1050 bp KpnI/PstI fragment from pDPG335, consisting of the DSTP/dapA cassette, was inserted into the Kpnl/Pstl sites of the GIb1 expression vector pGEMSV3 (GenBank Accession No. L22295) to yield pDPG418.
- GlbP gene Belanger and Kriz Genetics 129:863-872, 1991
- Constructs pDPG 165, 231 , 283, and 363 are as described above. Constructs pDPG355 and 367 are described in Walters et al., 1 992 as pBII221 and pHygl1 , respectively. Construct pDPG366 was made by transferring the hygromycin expression cassette (35S/Adhl 1 /hpt/nos) from pDPG367 as an EcoRI/HindIII fragment into EcoRI/HindIII cleaved pSP73.
- the plasmid pDPG375 is a 7 kb pUC1 1 9 plasmid containing a 3.9 kb HindIII fragment of a genomic clone encoding the 10 kD zein (Kirihara et al., 1 988).
- the plasmid pDPG373 is a pUC1 1 9-based plasmid containing a HindIII-RsaI Z4 (22 kD zein) promoter fragment and an NcoI-EcoPI fragment with the 1 0 kD zein coding and 3' sequences
- pDPG338 is a pUC1 1 9-based plasmid containing the 1 .1 kb 27 kD zein promoter, 2.3 kb of the 10 kD zein coding and 3' sequences, and a cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S poly(A) sequence.
- CaMV cauliflower mosaic virus
- HPT hygromycin phosphotransferase
- pHYGM pHYGM also known as pDPG367
- the plasmid pDPG363 was constructed by inserting a 0.5 kb Smal fragment with BamHI linkers containing the bar gene into pHYG73, replacing the HPT gene.
- the plasmid pHYG73 was constructed by insertion of a 2.1 kb EcoRI-HindIII fragment containing the HPT coding sequence from pDPG367 (cited above) into pSP73 (Promega).
- the screenable marker gene of pBII221 which encodes ß-glucuronidase (GUS) was also used
- the plasmid pBH221 was constructed by adding a 0.75 kb fragment containing the Adhl intron between the 35S CaMV promoter and the GUS coding sequence of pBI221 (Clontech; pBI221 is pBI121 in pUC19 rather than pBIN19; Jefferson et al., 1987).
- the plasmid pDPG380 contains the entire BalI-EcoRI 71 1 bp coding sequence of the gene encoding the 19 kD A20 zein and the 0.5 kb 5' sequence encoding the A20 preprotein (reconstructed independently from the coding sequence by PCR) in antisense orientation, with 1 137 bp of the 10 kD zein promoter and 250 bp of nos 3' sequence.
- the plasmid pDPG340 is a pUC1 1 9-based plasmid containing 1 1 37 bp of Z10 promoter sequence, a 980 bp Xbal- SacI fragment with the entire Z4 coding sequence in antisense orientation, and 250 bp of nos 3' sequence.
- antisense constructs These genes are hereafter referred to as antisense constructs.
- pDPG 1 65 35S::bar::Tr7, described elsewhere in this CIP
- pDPG363 35S::Adh 1 ::bar::nos, also described elsewhere in this CIP
- pDPG367 35S::Adh1 ::HPT::nos, described elsewhere
- the vector pDPG354 contains an expression cassette for producing Bt endotoxin in maize (see Figure 1 (CC) for map). It was constructed to contain the following DNA:
- a promoter consisting of two ocs enhancers (J.G. Ellis et al., 1987 ) placed in the reverse orientation and located upstream of the TATA box derived from the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter (Eco RV site to the transcription start site; H.Guilley et al.,1982 ; R.Kay et al.1987 ), located upstream from:
- intron VI intron VI
- maize Adhl gene derived from the maize Adhl gene (Callis, J., Fromm, M., Walbot, V. ,1987), a 423bp AccI-MspI fragment from a genomic clone of the Adhl gene) that was located upstream from:
- This expression cassette was inserted into the E.coli plasmid pBluescript SK-(Stratagene, Inc.) and can be made available from the ATCC
- the vector pDPG344 was designed to mediate the expression of the tomato protease inhibitor II (pin) gene in maize and was constructed to contain the following DNA (see Figure 1 (DD):
- the plasmid vector pDPG337 (also known as pLK487) consists of an E.coli replicon (pBS + ;Stratagene Inc.) containing the following DNA (see Figure 1 (EE)): 1 .
- a segment of DNA (5' ATC TGG CAG CAG AAA AAC AAG TAG TTG AGA
- the Bt gene was followed by a segment of DNA derived from the 3' of
- transcription 7 gene from Agrobacterium tumefasciens (P. Dhaese et al.,1983,).
- Samples of E.coli containing pDPG337 can be made available through the ATCC.
- the bar gene codes for an enzyme, PAT, that inactivates the herbicide phosphinothricin.
- Phosphinothricin is an inhibitor of both cytoplasmic and chloroplast glutamine synthetases.
- Current expression vectors target PAT to the cell cytoplasm.
- a transit:bar chimeric gene was constructed. A sequence encoding the rbcS transit peptide and part of the rbcS mature
- polypeptide present on a 300 bp XbaI-BamHI fragment from pDPG226, was cloned adjacent to the bar sequence in pDPG1 65, to produce pDPG287. This resulted in an in-frame fusion of the two protein coding regions, with the intervening sequence coding for the following amino acids: rbcS-Pro-Arg-Gly-Ser-Thr-bar
- Protoplasts were electroporated with pDPG287 and assayed for PAT activity. Using proteinase treatment and protection studies, it was then determined that the PAT enzyme is sequestered within an organelle, particularly the plastid.
- Preferred Methods of Delivering DNA to Cells Preferred DNA delivery systems do not require protoplast isolation or use of
- Agrobacterium DNA There are several potential cellular targets for DNA delivery to produce fertile transgenic plants: pollen, microspores, meristems, immature embryos and cultured embryogenic cells are but a few examples. Germline transformation in maize has not been previously reported.
- One of the newly emerging techniques for the introduction of exogenous DNA constructs into plant cells involves the use of microprojectile bombardment.
- the details of this technique and its use to introduce exogenous DNA into various plant cells are discussed in Klein, 1989, Wang, et al. , 1 988 and Christou, et al. , 1988.
- One method of determining the efficiency of DNA delivery into the cells via microprojectile bombardment employs detection of transient expression of the enzyme ⁇ -glucuronidase (GUS) in bombarded cells.
- GUS ⁇ -glucuronidase
- plant cells are bombarded with a DNA construct which directs the synthesis of the GUS enzyme.
- Apparati are available which perform microprojectile bombardment.
- a commercially available source is an apparatus made by Biolistics, Inc. (now
- microprojectile or acceleration methods are within the scope of this invention.
- other "gene guns” may be used to introduce DNA into cells.
- stainless steel mesh screens were introduced below the stop plate of the bombardment apparatus, i.e., between the gun and the cells.
- modifications to existing techniques were developed by the inventors for precipitating DNA onto the microprojectiles.
- Example 8 Microprojectile Bombardment--SC82, SC94 and SC716
- friable, embryogenic Type-II callus (Armstrong & Green, 1985) was initiated from immature embryos essentially as set forth above in Examples 1 and 2.
- the callus was initiated and maintained on N6 medium (Chu et al. , 1 975) containing 2 mg/l glycine, 2.9 g/l L-proline, 100 mg/l casein hydrolysate, 13.2 mg/l dicamba or 1 mg/l 2,4-D, 20 g/l sucrose, pH 5.8, solidified with 2 g/l Gelgro (ICN Biochemicals). Suspension cultures initiated from these callus cultures were used for bombardment.
- SC82 suspension culture SC82 was initiated from Type-ll callus maintained in culture for 3 months. SC82 cells (see Example 2) were grown in liquid medium for approximately 4 months prior to bombardment (see Table 5, experiments #1 and #2). SC82 cells were also cryopreserved 5 months after suspension culture initiation, stored frozen for 5 months, thawed and used for bombardment (experiment #6).
- SC716 In the case of suspension culture SC716 (see Example 1 ), it was initiated from Type-ll callus maintained 5 months in culture. SC716 cells were cultured in liquid medium for 5 months, cryopreserved for 8 months, thawed, and used two months later in bombardment experiments #4 and #5. SC94 was initiated from 10 month old Type-ll callus; and cultured in liquid medium for 5 months prior to bombardment (experiment #3). Prior to bombardment, recently subcultured suspension culture cells were sieved through 1000 ⁇ m stainless steel mesh. From the fraction of cell clusters passing through the sieve, approximately 0.5 ml packed cell volume (PCV) was pipetted onto 5 cm filters (Whatman #4) and vacuum-filtered in a Buchner funnel.
- PCV packed cell volume
- the filters were transferred to petri dishes containing three 7 cm filters (Whatman #4) moistened with 2.5 ml suspension culture medium.
- the dish containing the filters with the suspension cells was positioned 6 cm below the lexan plate used to stop the nylon macroprojectile.
- plasmid DNA was precipitated in an equimolar ratio onto tungsten particles (average diameter approximately 1 .2 ⁇ m, GTE Sylvania) using a modification of the protocol described by Klein, et al. ( 1 987) .
- tungsten was incubated in ethanol at 65 °C for 12 hours prior to being used for precipitation.
- the precipitation mixture included 1 .25 mg tungsten particles, 25 ⁇ g plasmid DNA, 1 .1 M CaCI 2 and 8.7 mM spermidine in a total volume of 575 ⁇ l.
- the mixture was vortexed at 4° C for 10 min, centrifuged (500 X G) for 5 min and 550 ⁇ l of supernatant was decanted. From the remaining 25 ⁇ l of suspension, 1 ⁇ l aliquots were pipetted onto the macroprojectile for bombardment.
- X B84, 100 ⁇ m or 1000 ⁇ m stainless steel screens were placed about 2.5 cm below the stop plate in order to increase the number of foci while decreasing their size and also to ameliorate injury to the bombarded tissue.
- the suspension cells and the supporting filter were transferred onto solid medium or the cells were scraped from the filter and resuspended in liquid culture medium.
- the number of cells in individual foci that expressed GUS averaged 2-3 (range 1 -10). Although histochemical staining can be used to detect cells transformed with the gene encoding GUS, those cells will no longer grow and divide after staining. For detecting stable transformants and growing them further, e.g., into plants, selective systems compatible with viability are required.
- Example 9 Microprojectile bombardment: AB12
- Cell line AB1 2 was initiated as described in example 4.
- the microprojectile bombardment instrument, microprojectiles and stopping plates were obtained from Biolistics (Ithaca, NY). Five clumps of 7- to 12-day-old callus, each approximately
- Control bombardments contained TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) with no DNA.
- the sample plate tray was placed 5 cm below the bottom of the stopping plate tray of the microprojectile instrument, with the stopping plate platform in the slot nearest to the barrel.
- a 3 mm ⁇ 3 mm mesh galvanized steel screen was placed over the open dish.
- the instrument was operated as described by the manufacturer (Biolistics, Inc.), using a gunpowder charge as the motive force.
- Example 10 Microprojectile Bombardment--AT824
- Suspension culture AT824 (described in example 3) was subcultured to fresh medium 409 2 days prior to particle bombardment. Cells were plated on solid 409 medium 16-24 hours before bombardment (about 0.5 ml packed cell volume per filter). Tissue was treated with 409 medium containing 200 mOsm sorbitol (medium 431 ) for 1 hour prior to bombardment.
- DNA was introduced into cells using the DuPont Biolistics PDS1000He particle bombardment device.
- DNA was precipitated onto gold particles as follows.
- a stock solution of gold particles was prepared by adding 60 mg of 1 um gold particles to 1000 ul absolute ethanol and incubating for at least 3 hours at room temperature followed by storage at -20C Twenty to thirty five ul sterile gold particles are centrifuged in a microcentrifuge for 1 min. The supernatant is removed and one ml sterile water is added to the tube, followed by centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes.
- Microprojectile particles are resuspended in 30 ul of DNA solution (30 ug total DNA) containing 10 ug each of the following vectors: pDPG165 (bar), pDPG344 (tomato proteinase inhibitor II gene), and pDPG354 (B. thuringiensis crystal toxin protein gene).
- pDPG165 bar
- pDPG344 tomato proteinase inhibitor II gene
- pDPG354 Bactase inhibitor II gene
- Two hundred twenty microliters sterile water, 250 ul 2.5 M CaCI 2 and 50 ul spermidine are added. The mixture is thoroughly mixed and placed on ice, followed by vortexing at 4C for 10 minutes and centrifugation at 500 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant is removed and the pellet resuspended in 600 ul absolute ethanol. Following centrifugation at 500 rpm for 5 minutes the pellet is resuspended in 36 ul of absolute ethanol .
- DNA/microprojectile precipitate or those that affect the flight and velocity of either the macro- or microprojectiles.
- Biological factors include all steps involved in manipulation of cells immediately after bombardment.
- the prebombardment culturing conditions, such as osmotic environment, the bombardment parameters, and the plasmid configuration have been adjusted to yield the maximum numbers of stable transformants.
- the variable nest (macro holder) can be adjusted to vary the distance between the rupture disk and the macroprojectile, i.e., the gap distance. This distance can be varied from 0 to 2 cm.
- the predicted effects of a shorter gap are an increase of velocity of both the macro- and microprojectiles, an increased shock wave (which leads to tissue splattering and increased tissue trauma), and deeper penetration of microprojectiles. Longer gap distances would have the opposite effects buf may increase viability and therefore the total number of recovered stable transformants.
- bombardments be conducted with a gap distance of 6 to 9 mm.
- Flight Distance The fixed nest (contained within the variable nest) can be varied between 2 and 2 cm in predetermined increments by the placement of spacer rings to adjust the flight path traversed by the macroprojectile.
- Short flight paths allow for greater stability of the macroprojectile in flight but reduces the overall velocity of the microprojectiles.
- Increased stability in flight increases the number of centered GUS foci.
- Greater flight distances increase velocity but also increases instability in flight.
- the effect of the macroprojectile flight path length was investigated using E1 suspension cells. The flight distances tested were 0, 1.0, 1 .5, and 2.0 cm.
- bombardments be done with a flight path length of 1.0 cm.
- Tissue distance Placement of tissue within the gun chamber should have significant effects on microprojectile penetration. Increasing the flight path of the microprojectiles will decrease velocity and trauma associated with the shock wave. A decrease in velocity will also result in shallower penetration of the
- Helium pressure By manipulation of the type and number of rupture disks, pressure can be varied between 400 and 2000 psi within the gas acceleration tube. Optimum pressure for stable transformation has been determined to be between 1000 and 1 200 psi. Biological Parameters
- Culturing conditions and other factors can influence the physiological state of the target cells and may have profound effects on transformation and integration efficiencies.
- the act of bombardment could stimulate the production of ethylene which could lead to senescence of the tissue.
- the degree of tissue hydration may also contribute to the amount of trauma associated with
- the number of cells transiently expressing GUS increased following subculture into both fresh medium and osmotically adjusted medium. Pretreatment times of 90 minutes showed higher numbers of GUS expressing foci than shorter times. Cells incubated in 500 mOSM/kg medium for 90 minutes showed an approximately 3.5 fold increase in transient GUS foci than the control.
- Plasmid configuration it will be desirable to deliver DNA to maize cells that does not contain DNA sequences necessary for maintenance of the plasmid vector in the bacterial host, e.g., E. coli, such as antibiotic resistance genes, including but not limited to ampicillin, kanamycin, and tetracycline
- the 4.4 kb HindIII fragment of pDPG325 containing the bar expression cassette and 2 kb of the uidA expression cassette (structural gene and 3' end) were purified by gel electrophoresis on a 1.2% low melting temperature agarose gel.
- the 4.4 kb DNA fragment was recovered from the agarose gel by melting gel slices in a 6-10 fold excess of Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCI pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 70-72C); frozen and thawed (37C); and the agarose pelleted by centrifugation.
- Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCI pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 70-72C
- frozen and thawed 37C
- a Qiagen Q-100 column was used for purification of DNA.
- Isolated DNA fragments can be recovered from agarose gels using a variety of eiectroelution techniques, enzyme digestion of the agarose, or binding of DNA to glass beads (e.g., Gene Clean). In addition HPLC and/or use of magnetic particles may be used to isolate DNA fragments. This DNA was delivered to AT824 cells using microprojectile
- a plasmid vector can be digested with a restriction enzyme and this DNA delivered to maize cells without prior purification of the expression cassette fragment.
- pDPG 1 65 was digested with EcoRI and HindIII . This digestion produces an approximately 1 900 base pair fragment containing the 35S-bar-Tr7 expression cassette and an approximately 2600 base pair DNA fragment containing the ampicillin resistance gene and bacterial origin of DNA replication. This DNA was delivered to AT824 cells using microprojectile bombardment and 2/9 transformants (22%) isolated did not contain the ampicillin resistance gene.
- pDPG 1 65 digested with restriction enzymes as described above was delivered to AT824 cells via electroporation. Eight of twenty four transformants (33%) recovered lacked the ampicillin resistance gene. Plant regeneration is in progress from transformants lacking the ampicillin resistance gene that were produced in these two
- Example 12 Bombardment of immature Embryos immature embryos (1 .2 - 2.0 mm in length) were excised from surface-sterilized, greenhouse-grown ears of Hi-ll 1 1 -12 days post-pollination.
- the Hi-II genotype was developed from an A188 x B73 cross for high frequency
- N6 medium containing 1 mg/l 2,4-D, 100 mg/l casein hydrolysate, 6 mM L-proline, 0.5 g/l 2-(N-morphoiino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), 0.75 g/l MgCI 2 , and 2% sucrose solidified with 2 g/l Gelgro, pH 5.8 (#735 medium) Embryos were cultured in the dark for two days at 24° C.
- MES 2-(N-morphoiino)ethanesulfonic acid
- embryos were transferred to the above culture medium with the sucrose concentration increased from 3% to 12%.
- sucrose concentration increased from 3% to 12%.
- embryos were transferred to the high osmoticum medium they were arranged in concentric circles on the plate, starting 2 cm from the center of the dish, positioned such that their coleorhizal end was orientated toward the center of the dish.
- two concentric circles were formed with 25-35 embryos per plate.
- the plates containing embryos were placed on the third shelf from the bottom, 5 cm below the stopping screen. The 1 100 psi rupture discs were used. Each plate of embryos was bombarded once. A total of 420 embryos were bombarded on 14 plates with the luciferase, bar, and Bt genes. Embryos were allowed to recover overnight on high osmotic strength medium prior to initiation of selection. A set of plates was also bombarded with the C1 B vector pDPG265. Red spots representing transient expression of anthocyanin pigments are observed
- Maize suspension culture cells were enzyme treated and electroporated using conditions described in Krzyzek and Laursen (PCT Publication WO 92/12250). SC716 or AT824 suspension culture cells, three days post subculture, were sieved through 1000 ⁇ m stainless steel mesh and washed, 1.5 ml packed cells per 10 ml, in incubation buffer (0.2 M mannitol, 0.1 % bovine serum albumin, 80 mM calcium chloride, and 20 mM 2-(N-morpholino)-ethane sulfonic acid, pH 5.6).
- incubation buffer 0.2 M mannitol, 0.1 % bovine serum albumin, 80 mM calcium chloride, and 20 mM 2-(N-morpholino)-ethane sulfonic acid, pH 5.6.
- Linearized plasmid DNA 100 ug of EcoRI digested pDPG 1 65 and 100 ug of EcoRI digested pDPG208, was added to 1 ml aliquots of electroporation buffer. The DNA/electroporation buffer was incubated at room temperature for
- cells were diluted with 2.5 ml 409 medium containing 0.3 M mannitol. Cells were then separated from most of the liquid medium by drawing the suspension up in a pipet, and expelling the medium with the tip of the pipet placed against the petri dish to retain the cells. The cells, and a small amount of medium (approximately 0.2 ml) were dispensed onto a filter (Whatman #1 , 4.25 cm) overlaying solid 227 medium (Table 1 ) containing 0.3 M mannitol. After five days, the tissue and the supporting filters were transferred to 227 medium containing 0.2 M mannitol. After seven days, tissue and supporting filters were transferred to 227 medium without mannitol.
- Example 14 Electroporation of Immature embryos immature embryos (0.4 - 1 .8 mm in length) were excised from a surface-sterilized, greenhouse-grown ear of the genotype H99 1 1 days post-pollination. Embryos were plated axis side down on a modified N6 medium containing 3.3 mg/l dicamba, 100 mg/i casein hydrolysate, 1 2 mM L-proline, and 3% sucrose solidified with 2 g/l Gelgro ® , pH 5.8 (#726 medium), with about 30 embryos per dish.
- Embryos were cultured in the dark for two days at 24° C immediately prior to electroporation, embryos were enzymatically treated with 0.5% Pectoiyase Y-23 (Seishin Pharmaceutical Co.) in a buffer containing 0.2 M mannitol, 0.2% bovine serum albumin, 80 mM calcium chloride and 20 mM 2-(N-morphoiino)-ethane sulfonic acid (MES) at pH 5.6. Enzymatic digestion was carried out for 5 minutes at room temperature. Approximately 140 embryos were treated in batch in 2 ml of enzyme and buffer.
- Pectoiyase Y-23 Steishin Pharmaceutical Co.
- bovine serum albumin 80 mM calcium chloride
- MES 2-(N-morphoiino)-ethane sulfonic acid
- the embryos were washed two times with 1 ml of 0.2 M mannitol, 0.2% bovine serum albumin, 80 mM calcium chloride and 20 mM MES at pH 5.6 followed by three rinses with electroporation buffer consisting of 10 mM 4- ⁇ 2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) and 0.4 M mannitol at pH 7.5.
- electroporation buffer consisting of 10 mM 4- ⁇ 2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) and 0.4 M mannitol at pH 7.5.
- electroporation buffer consisting of 10 mM 4- ⁇ 2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) and 0.4 M mannitol at pH 7.5.
- HEPES 4- ⁇ 2-Hydroxyethyl-1-piperazinee
- embryos were diluted 1 :10 with 726 medium containing 0.3 M mannitol. Embryos were then transferred to Gelgro ® solidified 726 medium containing 0.3 M mannitol. Embryos were incubated in the dark at 24° C. After five days embryos were transferred to Gelgro solidified 726 medium containing 0.2 M mannitol. Two days later embryos were transferred to selection medium.
- Example 15 DNA delivery using silicon carbide fibers
- the suspension culture SC82 was tested for transformability using the silicon carbide (silar) transformation method described by Kaepprer et al. The initiation of cell line SC82 is described in example 2.
- a 2% mixture of siiar in absolute ethanol was prepared.
- Microfuge tubes were prepared (one per sample) by pipetting 80 ⁇ l of silar into each tube. The fibers were pelleted and the ethanol removed. Samples were then washed with sterile water, pelleted, and the water removed. Plasmid DNA (25 ⁇ l of 1 mg/ml) was added to each tube. Tissue samples were prepared by adding 0.25 ml PCV of cells to a second set of microfuge tubes. Cells were pelleted and the medium removed. A 100 ⁇ I aliquot of fresh medium was next added to each tissue sample. The silar/ DNA mixture was resuspended and added to the ceils. The
- BMS Black Mexican Sweet
- D'Halluin et al. (1992) demonstrated that using the neo gene and selecting with kanamycin transformants could be isolated following electroporation of immature embryos of the genotype H99 or type I callus of the genotype PA91.
- Bialaphos is a tripeptide antibiotic produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus and is composed of phosphinothricin (PPT), an analogue of L-glutamic acid, and two L-alanine residues. Upon removal of the L-alanine residues by intracellular peptidases, the PPT is released and is a potent inhibitor of glutamine synthetase (GS), a pivotal enzyme involved in ammonia assimilation and nitrogen metabolism (Ogawa et al. , 1 973) .
- GS glutamine synthetase
- Synthetic PPT the active ingredient in the herbicides Basta ® or Ignite ® is also effective as a selection agent, inhibition of GS in plants by PPT causes the rapid accumulation of ammonia and death of the plant cells.
- Streptomyces also synthesizes an enzyme phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) which is encoded by the bar gene in Streptomyces hygroscopicus and the pat gene in Streptomyces viridochromogenes.
- PAT phosphinothricin acetyl transferase
- the use of the herbicide resistance gene encoding phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) is referred to in DE 3642 829 A wherein the gene is isolated from Streptomyces viridochromogenes. In the bacterial source organism this enzyme acetylates the free amino group of PPT preventing auto-toxicity (Thompson et al. , 1 987).
- the bar gene has been cloned (Murakami et al. , 1986; Thompson et al. , 1987) and expressed in transgenic tobacco, tomato and potato plants (De Block, 1987) and Brassica (De Block, 1989). In previous reports, some transgenic plants which expressed the resistance gene were completely resistant to commercial formulations of PPT and bialaphos in greenhouses.
- PCT Application No. WO 87/00141 refers to the use of a process for protecting plant cells and plants against the action of glutamine synthetase inhibitors. This application also refers to the use of such of a process to develop herbicide resistance in determined plants.
- the gene encoding resistance to the herbicide BASTA (Hoechst, phosphinothricin) or Herbiace (Meiji Seika, bialaphos) was said to be introduced by Agrobacterium infection into tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv Petit Havan SR1 ), potato (Solanum tuberosum cv Benolima) and tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) and conferred on plants resistance to
- herbicides Another herbicide which is useful for selection of transformed cell lines in the practice of this invention is the broad spectrum herbicide glyphosate.
- Glyphosate inhibits the action of the enzyme EPSPS which is active in the aromatic amino acid biosynthetic pathway. Inhibition of this enzyme leads to starvation for the amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan and secondary metabolites derived thereof.
- U.S. Patent 4,535,060 describes the isolation of EPSPS mutations which infer glyphosate resistance on the Salmonella typhimurium gene for EPSPS, aroA.
- the EPSPS gene was cloned from Zea mays and mutations similar to those found in a glyphosate resistant aroA gene were introduced in vitro.
- the mutant gene encodes a protein with amino acid changes at residues 102 and 106.
- An exemplary embodiment of vectors capable of delivering DNA to plant host cells is the plasmid, pDPG165 and the vectors pDPG433, pDPG434, pDPG435, and pDPG436.
- the plasmid pDPG165 is illustrated in Fig. 1 A and 1 C.
- a very important component of this plasmid for purposes of genetic transformation is the bar gene which encodes a marker for selection of transformed cells exposed to bialaphos or PPT.
- Plasmids pDPG434 and pDPG436 contain a maize EPSPS gene with mutations at amino acid residues 102 and 106 driven by the actin promoter and 35S promoter-Adh1 intron I respectively.
- a very important component of these plasmids for purposes of genetic transformation is the mutated EPSPS gene which encodes a marker for selection of transformed cells.
- the suspension culture (designated SC82) used in the initial experiments (see Example 8) was derived from embryogenic Type-ll callus of A188 X B73.
- Colonies on solid supports are visible groups of cells formed by growth and division of cells plated on such support. Colonies can be seen in Fig. 2A on a petri dish. In this figure, the cells capable of growth are those that are resistant to the presence of the herbicide bialaphos, said resistance resulting from integration and expression of the bar gene. Exposure of cells was to 1 mg/l bialaphos.
- Figure.2B is a magnification showing the morphology of one bialaphos-resistant culture maintained on selection media indicating that growth is embryogenic.
- bialaphos-resistant callus lines were analyzed for activity of the bar gene product, phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT), by thin-layer chromatography.
- PAT phosphinothricin acetyl transferase
- the lane in Figure 4 designated " 1 " and "5" copies contain 1.9 and 9.5 pg respectively of the 1.9 kb bar expression unit released from the plasmid pDPG165 by application of the EcoRI and HindIII enzymes; these amounts represent about 1 and 5 copies per diploid genome.
- Genomic DNA from all eleven bialaphos-resistant isolates contained bar-hybridizing sequences as shown in Figure 4.
- the hybridization in all isolates to a fragment migrating slightly larger than 2 kb may be due to contaminating pUC19 sequences contained in this bar probe preparation; no such hybridization occurred in subsequent experiments using the same genomic DNA and a different
- Seven hybridization patterns were unique, likely representing seven independent single-cell transformation events. The patterns and intensities of hybridization for the seven transformants were unchanged during four months in culture, providing evidence for the stability of the integrated sequences. The seven independent transformants were derived from two separate bombardment experiments. Four independent transformants representing isolates E2/E5,
- E3/E4/E6, E1 and E7/E8, were recovered from a total of four original filters from bombardment experiment #1 and the three additional independent transformants, E9, E10, and E1 1 , were selected from tissue originating from six bombarded filters in experiment #2. These data are summarized in Table 5.
- TOTALS 40 54 40 30 7 77(30/39) 18(7/39) culture reinitiated from cryopreserved cells
- SC716 Bombardment studies and subsequent analyses were also performed on the A188xB73 suspension culture, termed SC716 (see Example 1 ).
- the resultant transformed plant ceils were analyzed for integration of bar genes.
- genomic DNA was obtained from R1 -R21 isolates; 6 ⁇ g of DNA was digested with the restriction endonucleases EcoRI and HindIII, and DNA gel blot analysis was performed using the bar gene as probe.
- molecular weights in kb are shown to the right and left.
- the untransformed control is designated "RO," and the last column to the right contains the equivalent of two copies of the bar gene expression unit per diploid genome.
- SC716 transformants discussed in Example 17 were further analyzed for integration and expression of the gene encoding GUS. As determined by histochemical assay, four of the SC71 6 transformants (R5, R7, R16, and R21 ) ha detectable GUS activity 3 months post-bombardment. Expression patterns observed in the four coexpressing callus lines varied. The number of cells with GUS activity within any given transformant sampled ranged from - 5% to - 90% and, in addition, the level of GUS activity within those cells varied. The cointegration frequency was determined by washing the genomic blot hybridized with bar (Figure 5A) and probing with 32 P-labeled GUS sequence as shown in Figure 5B. EcoRI and HindIII, which excise the bar expression unit from pDPG16 also release from pDPG208 a 2.1 kb fragment containing the GUS coding sequen and the nos 3' end ( Figure I B).
- the suspension culture (designated AT824) used in this experiment was derived from an elite B73-derived inbred (described in example 3). The culture was maintained in medium 409. Four filters were bombarded as described in example 10.
- Cells in experiment S10 were bombarded as described in example 10 except the gold particle-DNA preparation was made using 25 ul pDPG319 DNA (bar gene and aroA expression cassette containing the ⁇ -tubulin promoter). Following particle bombardment cells remained on solid 279 medium in the absence of selection for one week. At this time cells were removed from solid medium, resuspended in liquid 279 medium, replated on Whatman filters at 0.5 ml PCV per filter, and transferred to 279 medium containing 1 mg/L bialaphos. Following one week, filters were transferred to 279 medium containing 3 mg/L bialaphos. One week later, cells were resuspended in liquid 279 medium and plated at 0.1 ml PCV on 279 medium containing 3 mg/L bialaphos. Nine transformants were identified 7 weeks following bombardment.
- ABT4 Initiation of cell line ABT4 is described in example 4.
- ABT4 was maintained as a callus culture.
- tissue was scraped off the solid culture medium and resuspended in 20 mis of 708 medium containing 0.2M mannitol.
- Tissue was dispersed with a large bore 10 ml pipette by picking up and dispensing several times until one could pickup 0.5 ml packed cell volume (PCV) for subculture to fresh solid 708 medium.
- PCV packed cell volume
- Prior to bombardment three week old 708 maintenance cultures of ABT4 were transferred from solid medium to 20 mis 708 + 0.2M mannitol and 0.5 ml PCV was plated on glass fiber filters over 708 + 0.2M mannitol medium.
- tissue was returned to 708 + 0.2M mannitol and allowed to recover for 2-5 days. Selection began at this point by moving the tissue/filter to 708 + 1 mg/L bialaphos for 12 days. At this time tissue was transferred to 30-40 ml 708 + 0.5 mg/L bialaphos, dispersed, and thin plated at 0.05 to 0.10 PCV on 708 + 0.5 mg/L bialaphos solid medium. Transformants were identified 5-12 weeks following thin plating. Following identification transformants were maintained on 708 + 3 mg/L bialaphos.
- Example 22 Transformation of immature Embryos of the Genotype Hi-II Using Bialaphos as a Selective Agent Following Particle Bombardment immature embryos of the genotype Hi-II were bombarded as described in example 1 2. Embryos were allowed to recover on high osmoticum medium (735, 12% sucrose) overnight (1 6 - 24 hours) and were then transferred to selection medium containing 1 mg/l bialaphos (#739, 735 plus 1 mg/l bialaphos or #750, 735 plus 0.2M mannitol and 1 mg/l bialaphos).
- Embryos were maintained in the dark at 24° C After three to four week on the initial selection plates about 90% of the embryos had formed Type II callus and were transferred to selective medium containing 3 mg/l bialaphos (#758). Responding tissue was subcultured about every two weeks onto fresh selection medium (#758). Nineteen transformants were identified six to eight weeks after bombardment. Fifteen of nineteen transformants contained the B. thuringiensis (Bt) crystal toxin gene. Plants have been regenerated from one transformant containing the Bt gene and transferred to soil in the greenhouse. Regeneration of plants from remaining lines containing the Bt gene is in progress.
- Bt B. thuringiensis
- Cells of AT824 and SC716 were electroporated and allowed to recover from electroporation as described in example 13.
- tissue growing on filters was removed from the filter and transferred as clumps (approximately 0.5 cm in diameter) to the surface of solid selection medium.
- the selection medium consisted of 227 medium supplemented with 1 mg/L bialaphos.
- PAT phosphinothricin acetyltransferase
- PPT phosphinothricin acetyltransferase
- PAT activity is determined by the ability of total protein extracts from potentially transformed cells to acetylate phosphinothricin (PPT), using 14 C-acetyl coenzyme A as the acetyl donor. This transfer is detected, using thin layer chromatography and autoradiography, by a shift in the mobility of 14 C labelled compound from that expected for 14 C-acetyl coenzyme A to that expected for 14 C-N-acetyl PPT.
- the assay used for detection of PAT activity has been described in detail (Adams et al., published PCT application no. WO91 /02071 ; Spencer et al.1 990). All three callus lines tested contained PAT activity.
- suspension culture cells were electroporated with a second plasmid, pDPG208, encoding ß-giucuronidase (GUS).
- GUS activity can be performed histochemically using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl giucuronide (X-gluc) as the substrate for the GUS enzyme, yielding a blue precipitate inside of cells containing GUS activity.
- X-gluc 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl giucuronide
- This assay has been described in detail (Jefferson 1987).
- One of the seven AT824 callus lines selected in this example, EP413-13 contained cells that turned blue in the histochemical assay.
- SC716 in this example did not contain detectable GUS activity.
- Southern blot analysis was performed on three bialaphos resistant callus lines to determine the presence and integration of the bar gene in genomic callus DNA. Southern blot analysis was performed as follows. Genomic DNA was isolated using a procedure modified from Shure et al. (1 983). Approximately one gram of callus tissue from each line was iypholyzed overnight in 1 5 ml
- Genomic DNA was digested with a 3fold excess of restriction enzymes, electrophoresed through 0.8% agarose (FMC), and transferred (Southern, 1 975) to Nytran (Schleicher and Schuell) using 10X SCP (20X SCP: 2 M NaCI, 0.6 M disodium phosphate, 0.02 M disodium EDTA).
- Filters were prehybridized in 6X SCP, 10% dextran sulfate, 2% sarcosine, and 500 ⁇ g/ml heparin (Chomet et al., 1987) for approximately 10 minutes. Filters were hybridized overnight at 65 °C in 6X SCP containing 100 ⁇ g/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA and 32 P-Iabelled probe. Probe was generated by random priming (Feinberg and Vogelstein, 1983); Boehringer-Mannheim). Hybridized filters were washed in 2X SCP, 1 % SDS at 65° for 30 minutes and visualized by autoradiography using Kodak XAR5 film.
- genomic DNA isolated from bialaphos resistant callus lines was digested with HindIII and EcoRI, which release a 1.9 kb bar fragment from pDPG165 ( Figure 1 A).
- Genomic DNA was probed with 32 P labelled 0.6 kb Smal bar fragment from pDPG165 ( Figure 1 A). All three EP413 callus lines analyzed contained DNA that hybridized to the bar probe. Copy number in the transformed callus ranged from one to two copies (EP413-3) to greater than 20 copies of bar (EP413-1 ).
- the restriction digest used yielded bar-hybridizing fragments in callus DNA samples that were larger than the bar fragment released from pDPG165 in the same restriction digest.
- Regenerates were subsequently transferred to a soilless mix in 0.5 liter pots and acclimated to ambient humidity in a growth chamber (200-450 ⁇ E M -2 s -1 ; 14 h photoperiod).
- the soilless mix has been described in detail (Adams et al., published PCT application no. WO91 /02071 ). Plants were then transferred to a soilless mix in 16 liter pots and grown to maturity in a greenhouse.
- Plants regenerated from five different EP413 callus lines were assayed for PAT activity as described for callus earlier in this example. All five plants
- EP413-13 Three plants regenerated from the single EP413 callus line that exhibited GUS activity (EP413-13) were analyzed for GUS activity. All three EP413-13 R 0 plants were positive for GUS activity. Files of blue cells were observed in leaf tissue of EP413-13 plants upon incubation with X-Gluc.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Fertilizers (AREA)
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU77169/94A AU684105C (en) | 1993-08-25 | 1994-08-24 | Fertile, transgenic maize plants and methods for their production |
BR9407355A BR9407355A (en) | 1993-08-25 | 1994-08-24 | Transgenic fertile corn plant progeny seed cells and process for preparing a fertile transgenic corn plant |
EP94927962A EP0721509A1 (en) | 1993-08-25 | 1994-08-24 | Fertile, transgenic maize plants and methods for their production |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/113,561 US7705215B1 (en) | 1990-04-17 | 1993-08-25 | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof |
US08/113,561 | 1993-08-25 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1995006128A2 true WO1995006128A2 (en) | 1995-03-02 |
WO1995006128A9 WO1995006128A9 (en) | 1995-03-30 |
WO1995006128A3 WO1995006128A3 (en) | 1995-09-14 |
Family
ID=22350146
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1994/009699 WO1995006128A2 (en) | 1993-08-25 | 1994-08-24 | Fertile, transgenic maize plants and methods for their production |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7705215B1 (en) |
EP (2) | EP2107118A1 (en) |
BR (1) | BR9407355A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2170260A1 (en) |
HU (1) | HUT74392A (en) |
IL (1) | IL110781A0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1995006128A2 (en) |
ZA (2) | ZA964217B (en) |
Cited By (308)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1996040951A2 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1996-12-19 | Calgene, Inc. | Use of ovary-tissue transcriptional factors |
WO1997004103A2 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 1997-02-06 | Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie | Mutated 5-enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene coding for said protein and transformed plants containing said gene |
WO1997004114A2 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 1997-02-06 | Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie | Isolated dna sequence for use as a regulator region in a chimeric gene useful for transforming plants |
WO1997010328A2 (en) * | 1995-07-13 | 1997-03-20 | Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Compositions and method for modulation of gene expression in plants |
WO1997026365A2 (en) * | 1996-01-19 | 1997-07-24 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Transgenic maize with increased mannitol content |
WO1997028247A2 (en) * | 1996-01-29 | 1997-08-07 | Biocem | AMINO ACID-ENRICHED PLANT PROTEIN RESERVES, PARTICULARLY LYSINE-ENRICHED MAIZE η-ZEIN, AND PLANTS EXPRESSING SUCH PROTEINS |
DE19621572A1 (en) * | 1996-05-29 | 1997-12-04 | Max Planck Gesellschaft | Localized cell death in plants |
WO1998002562A2 (en) * | 1996-07-16 | 1998-01-22 | Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie | Chimera gene with several herbicide resistant genes, plant cell and plant resistant to several herbicides |
FR2751987A1 (en) * | 1996-08-01 | 1998-02-06 | Biocem | PLANT PHYTASES AND BIOTECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS |
WO1998006862A1 (en) * | 1996-08-09 | 1998-02-19 | Calgene Llc | Methods for producing carotenoid compounds and speciality oils in plant seeds |
CN1037913C (en) * | 1995-12-28 | 1998-04-01 | 中国农业科学院生物技术研究中心 | Expressive carrier with coded insect-killing protein fusion gene, and transfer gene plant |
WO1998016650A1 (en) * | 1996-10-17 | 1998-04-23 | E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Enhanced transgene expression in a population of monocot cells employing scaffold attachment regions |
WO1998020144A2 (en) * | 1996-11-07 | 1998-05-14 | Zeneca Limited | Herbicide resistant plants |
WO1998040504A1 (en) * | 1997-03-12 | 1998-09-17 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Methods for altering benzoxazinone levels in plants |
WO1998040505A1 (en) * | 1997-03-13 | 1998-09-17 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Maize dimboa biosynthesis genes |
WO1998044140A1 (en) * | 1997-04-03 | 1998-10-08 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Glyphosate resistant maize lines |
WO1998050562A1 (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 1998-11-12 | E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Corn pullulanase |
WO1998056921A1 (en) * | 1997-06-12 | 1998-12-17 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Regulatory sequences for transgenic plants |
WO1999010514A1 (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 1999-03-04 | North Carolina State University | Fumonosin resistance |
DE19741375A1 (en) * | 1997-09-19 | 1999-04-01 | Max Planck Gesellschaft | Transgenic plants, the above-ground parts of which ripen earlier and die off completely |
WO1999027116A2 (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 1999-06-03 | Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. | Dna molecules conferring dalapon-resistance to plants and plants transformed thereby |
WO1999040209A1 (en) * | 1998-02-09 | 1999-08-12 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Alteration of amino acid compositions in seeds |
WO2000004159A1 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2000-01-27 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol amine oxidase polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
WO2000004160A1 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2000-01-27 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol amine oxidase polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
WO2000004158A2 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2000-01-27 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
WO2000006757A1 (en) * | 1998-07-31 | 2000-02-10 | Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. | Improved plant transformation process by scaffold attachment regions (sar) |
US6069298A (en) * | 1993-02-05 | 2000-05-30 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Methods and an acetyl CoA carboxylase gene for conferring herbicide tolerance and an alteration in oil content of plants |
US6143563A (en) * | 1997-05-20 | 2000-11-07 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Cryopreservation of embryogenic callus |
US6153811A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-11-28 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Method for reduction of transgene copy number |
WO2001005980A1 (en) * | 1999-07-14 | 2001-01-25 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
US6204436B1 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2001-03-20 | Novartis Ag | Transgenic plants |
WO2001019859A2 (en) * | 1999-09-15 | 2001-03-22 | Monsanto Technology Llc | LEPIDOPTERAN-ACTIVE BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS δ-ENDOTOXIN COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE |
US6222099B1 (en) | 1993-02-05 | 2001-04-24 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Transgenic plants expressing maize acetyl COA carboxylase gene and method of altering oil content |
US6350934B1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2002-02-26 | Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Nucleic acid encoding delta-9 desaturase |
WO2002034923A2 (en) | 2000-10-23 | 2002-05-02 | Bayer Cropscience Gmbh | Monocotyledon plant cells and plants which synthesise modified starch |
WO2002036787A2 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2002-05-10 | Bayer Cropscience S.A. | Herbicide-tolerant plants through bypassing metabolic pathway |
US6388171B1 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2002-05-14 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
US6414222B1 (en) | 1993-02-05 | 2002-07-02 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Gene combinations for herbicide tolerance in corn |
US6429356B1 (en) | 1996-08-09 | 2002-08-06 | Calgene Llc | Methods for producing carotenoid compounds, and specialty oils in plant seeds |
WO2002095002A2 (en) | 2001-05-22 | 2002-11-28 | University Of Chicago | N4 virion single-stranded dna dependent rna polymerase |
AU757208B2 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 2003-02-06 | Bayer S.A.S. | Mutated 5-enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene coding for said protein and transformed plants containing said gene |
WO2003038112A2 (en) | 2001-10-26 | 2003-05-08 | Baylor College Of Medicine | A composition and method to alter lean body mass and bone properties in a subject |
WO2003049700A2 (en) | 2001-12-11 | 2003-06-19 | Advisys, Inc. | Growth hormone releasing hormone suplementation for treating chronically ill subjects |
US6635806B1 (en) | 1998-05-14 | 2003-10-21 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Methods and compositions for expression of transgenes in plants |
US6653530B1 (en) | 1998-02-13 | 2003-11-25 | Calgene Llc | Methods for producing carotenoid compounds, tocopherol compounds, and specialty oils in plant seeds |
WO2003099216A2 (en) | 2002-05-22 | 2003-12-04 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Fatty acid desaturases from fungi |
WO2004053134A1 (en) | 2002-12-12 | 2004-06-24 | Bayer Cropscience S.A. | Expression cassette encoding a 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (epsps) and herbicide-tolerant plants containing it |
EP1445321A1 (en) | 2002-12-18 | 2004-08-11 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Maize embryo-specific promoter compositions and methods for use thereof |
US6831208B1 (en) | 1997-11-12 | 2004-12-14 | Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University | 4-coumarate co-enzyme a ligase promoter |
WO2005016504A2 (en) | 2003-06-23 | 2005-02-24 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Disruption of acc synthase genes to delay senescence in plants |
WO2005019409A2 (en) | 2002-07-15 | 2005-03-03 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Combinatorial protein library screening by periplasmic expression |
WO2005054453A1 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2005-06-16 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | 2-methyl-6-solanylbenzoquinone methyltransferase as target for herbicides |
US6943279B1 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2005-09-13 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol amine oxidase polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
WO2006005520A2 (en) | 2004-07-08 | 2006-01-19 | Dlf-Trifolium A/S | Means and methods for controlling flowering in plants |
WO2006023869A2 (en) | 2004-08-24 | 2006-03-02 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Adenylate translocator protein gene non-coding regulatory elements for use in plants |
US7041653B2 (en) | 1990-12-20 | 2006-05-09 | The University Of Chicago | Gene transcription and ionizing radiation: methods and compositions |
US7045684B1 (en) | 2002-08-19 | 2006-05-16 | Mertec, Llc | Glyphosate-resistant plants |
EP1658364A2 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2006-05-24 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Tubulin regulatory elements for use in plants |
AU2002313983B2 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 2006-06-22 | Bayer S.A.S. | Mutated 5-enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene coding for said protein and transformed plants containing said gene |
WO2006073727A2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2006-07-13 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Recombinant dna constructs and methods for controlling gene expression |
WO2006099249A2 (en) | 2005-03-10 | 2006-09-21 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Maize seed with synergistically enhanced lysine content |
WO2006103107A1 (en) | 2005-04-01 | 2006-10-05 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Phosphorylated waxy potato starch |
WO2006124678A2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2006-11-23 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Corn plants and seed enhanced for asparagine and protein |
US7144569B1 (en) | 1999-10-01 | 2006-12-05 | Isis Innovation Limited | Diagnosis of coeliac disease using a gliadin epitope |
WO2007011479A2 (en) | 2005-07-19 | 2007-01-25 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Double-stranded rna stabilized in planta |
WO2007031547A1 (en) | 2005-09-16 | 2007-03-22 | Bayer Cropscience Sa | Transplastomic plants expressing lumen-targeted protein |
EP1772052A1 (en) | 2005-10-05 | 2007-04-11 | Bayer CropScience GmbH | Improved methods and means for production of hyaluronic acid |
WO2007039317A2 (en) | 2005-10-05 | 2007-04-12 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants having an increased content of amino sugars |
EP1806399A2 (en) | 1998-10-09 | 2007-07-11 | Bayer BioScience GmbH | Nucleic acid molecules encoding a branching enzyme comprising bacteria of the genus Neisseria and method for producing alpha-1.6-branched alpha-1, 4-glucanes |
US7247769B2 (en) | 1998-07-31 | 2007-07-24 | Bayer Cropscience Gmbh | Plants synthesizing a modified starch, a process for the generation of the plants, their use, and the modified starch |
WO2007090121A2 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-09 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Phosphopantetheinyl transferases from bacteria |
US7288403B2 (en) | 1993-08-25 | 2007-10-30 | Anderson Paul C | Anthranilate synthase gene and method for increasing tryptophan production |
WO2007134122A2 (en) | 2006-05-09 | 2007-11-22 | The Curators Of The University Of Missouri | Plant artificial chromosome platforms via telomere truncation |
WO2008014484A1 (en) | 2006-07-27 | 2008-01-31 | University Of Maryland, Baltimore | Cellular receptor for antiproliferative factor |
US7335760B2 (en) | 2004-12-22 | 2008-02-26 | Ceres, Inc. | Nucleic acid sequences encoding zinc finger proteins |
WO2008028115A2 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-06 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing transgenic plants |
WO2008027592A2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-06 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Phased small rnas |
US7364901B2 (en) | 2002-07-15 | 2008-04-29 | University Of Kentucky Research Foundation | Recombinant Stokesia epoxygenase gene |
WO2008067547A2 (en) | 2006-11-30 | 2008-06-05 | Research Development Foundation | Improved immunoglobulin libraries |
WO2008113078A1 (en) | 2007-03-15 | 2008-09-18 | Jennerex, Inc. | Oncolytic vaccinia virus cancer therapy |
WO2008133643A2 (en) | 2006-10-12 | 2008-11-06 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Plant micrornas and methods of use thereof |
WO2008137475A2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2008-11-13 | Research Development Foundation | Immunoglobulin fc libraries |
EP2000538A2 (en) | 1997-06-03 | 2008-12-10 | The University of Chicago | Plant artificial chromosome (PLAC) compositions and methods for using them |
EP2017345A1 (en) | 2003-08-18 | 2009-01-21 | Ceres, Inc. | Nucleotide sequences and polypeptides encoded thereby useful for inreasing plant size and increasing the number and size of leaves |
WO2009029831A1 (en) | 2007-08-31 | 2009-03-05 | University Of Chicago | Methods and compositions related to immunizing against staphylococcal lung diseases and conditions |
EP2044948A1 (en) | 2002-08-12 | 2009-04-08 | Jennerex Biotherapeutics ULC | Methods and compositions concerning poxviruses and cancer |
US7563943B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2009-07-21 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
WO2009094647A2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2009-07-30 | Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. | P53 biomarkers |
EP2123764A1 (en) | 1999-05-14 | 2009-11-25 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | The rice actin 2 promoter and intron and methods for use thereof |
US7663020B2 (en) | 2006-01-11 | 2010-02-16 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil content |
WO2010022089A2 (en) | 2008-08-18 | 2010-02-25 | University Of Maryland, Baltimore | Derivatives of apf and methods of use |
WO2010042481A1 (en) | 2008-10-06 | 2010-04-15 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to bacterial eap, emp, and/or adsa proteins |
WO2010045324A1 (en) | 2008-10-14 | 2010-04-22 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Utilization of fatty acid desaturases from hemiselmis spp. |
US7714186B2 (en) | 2002-12-19 | 2010-05-11 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plant cells and plants which synthesize a starch with an increased final viscosity |
EP2184351A1 (en) | 2008-10-30 | 2010-05-12 | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. | Polynucleotides encoding caryophyllene synthase and uses thereof |
WO2010068738A1 (en) | 2008-12-10 | 2010-06-17 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Mek mutations conferring resistance to mek inhibitors |
US7763771B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2010-07-27 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
WO2010084488A1 (en) | 2009-01-20 | 2010-07-29 | Ramot At Tel-Aviv University Ltd. | Mir-21 promoter driven targeted cancer therapy |
WO2010096510A2 (en) | 2009-02-17 | 2010-08-26 | Edenspace Systems Corporation | Tempering of cellulosic biomass |
US7790954B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2010-09-07 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US7820883B2 (en) | 2006-03-15 | 2010-10-26 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Resistance to auxinic herbicides |
WO2010129347A2 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2010-11-11 | Vanderbilt University | Compositions and methods for the treatment of disorders involving epithelial cell apoptosis |
WO2010138971A1 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2010-12-02 | Edenspace Systems Corporation | Plant gene regulatory elements |
WO2010141801A2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-12-09 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Reprogramming t cells and hematophietic cells |
US7851672B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2010-12-14 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US7851674B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2010-12-14 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US7851673B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2010-12-14 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US7855320B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2010-12-21 | Agrigenetics Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
EP2272968A2 (en) | 2005-09-08 | 2011-01-12 | Chromatin, Inc. | Plants modified with mini-chromosomes |
WO2011005341A2 (en) | 2009-04-03 | 2011-01-13 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein a (spa) variants |
EP2281886A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-02-09 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
WO2011025826A1 (en) | 2009-08-26 | 2011-03-03 | Research Development Foundation | Methods for creating antibody libraries |
EP2292649A2 (en) | 2002-06-05 | 2011-03-09 | ISIS Innovation Limited | Therapeutic epitopes and uses thereof |
EP2295586A2 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2011-03-16 | Chromatin, Inc. | Plant centromere compositions |
WO2011032180A1 (en) | 2009-09-14 | 2011-03-17 | Jennerex, Inc. | Oncolytic vaccinia virus combination cancer therapy |
WO2011050271A1 (en) | 2009-10-23 | 2011-04-28 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for expression of transgenes in plants |
WO2011076885A1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2011076889A1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2011076882A1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2011076892A1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2011076877A1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2011089021A1 (en) | 2010-01-25 | 2011-07-28 | Bayer Bioscience N.V. | Methods for manufacturing plant cell walls comprising chitin |
WO2011095460A1 (en) | 2010-02-02 | 2011-08-11 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Soybean transformation using hppd inhibitors as selection agents |
WO2011095528A1 (en) | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-11 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | A method for increasing photosynthetic carbon fixation using glycolate dehydrogenase multi-subunit fusion protein |
EP2357240A1 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2011-08-17 | Chromatin, Inc. | Plant centromere compositions |
US8003799B2 (en) | 2000-01-06 | 2011-08-23 | Bayer Sas | Picolinic acid derivatives and their use as fungicides |
WO2011106298A1 (en) | 2010-02-25 | 2011-09-01 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Braf mutations conferring resistance to braf inhibitors |
WO2011108930A1 (en) | 2010-03-04 | 2011-09-09 | Interna Technologies Bv | A MiRNA MOLECULE DEFINED BY ITS SOURCE AND ITS DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC USES IN DISEASES OR CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH EMT |
US8017830B2 (en) | 2007-06-18 | 2011-09-13 | Agrinomics, Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein or fiber content |
EP2368570A2 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2011-09-28 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to staphylococcal bacterium proteins |
US8030541B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2011-10-04 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8034993B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2011-10-11 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8034791B2 (en) | 2001-04-06 | 2011-10-11 | The University Of Chicago | Activation of Egr-1 promoter by DNA damaging chemotherapeutics |
WO2011127032A1 (en) | 2010-04-05 | 2011-10-13 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein a (spa) antibodies as an enhancer of immune response |
WO2011126976A1 (en) | 2010-04-07 | 2011-10-13 | Vanderbilt University | Reovirus vaccines and methods of use therefor |
WO2011133512A1 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2011-10-27 | Research Development Foundation | Rtef-1 variants and uses thereof |
WO2011146754A1 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2011-11-24 | The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. | Altered leaf morphology and enhanced agronomic properties in plants |
EP2390256A1 (en) | 2001-05-30 | 2011-11-30 | Agrisoma, Inc. | Plant artificial chromosomes, uses thereof and methods of preparing plant artificial chromosomes |
US8071864B2 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2011-12-06 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plants and seeds of corn variety CV897903 |
US8071865B2 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2011-12-06 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plants and seeds of corn variety CV589782 |
WO2011154158A1 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2011-12-15 | Bayer Bioscience N.V. | Methods and means to modify a plant genome at a nucleotide sequence commonly used in plant genome engineering |
WO2011156588A1 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2011-12-15 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | A mek 1 mutation conferring resistance to raf and mek inhibitors |
WO2011154159A1 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2011-12-15 | Bayer Bioscience N.V. | Methods and means to modify a plant genome at a nucleotide sequence commonly used in plant genome engineering |
WO2011159684A2 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2011-12-22 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from small volumes of peripheral blood |
WO2011159797A2 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2011-12-22 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | A compendium of ready-built stem cell models for interrogation of biological response |
WO2011157791A1 (en) | 2010-06-16 | 2011-12-22 | Institut National De La Recherche Agronomique | Overproduction of jasmonic acid in transgenic plants |
WO2012003474A2 (en) | 2010-07-02 | 2012-01-05 | The University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein a (spa) variants |
WO2012005572A1 (en) | 2010-07-06 | 2012-01-12 | Interna Technologies Bv | Mirna and its diagnostic and therapeutic uses in diseases or conditions associated with melanoma, or in diseases or conditions associated with activated braf pathway |
WO2012006440A2 (en) | 2010-07-07 | 2012-01-12 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Endothelial cell production by programming |
WO2012012698A1 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2012-01-26 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | FERULOYL-CoA:MONOLIGNOL TRANSFERASE |
US8106253B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2012-01-31 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
EP2412380A1 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2012-02-01 | BTG International Limited | Epitopes related to coeliac disease |
WO2012018933A2 (en) | 2010-08-04 | 2012-02-09 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Reprogramming immortalized b cells |
WO2012034067A1 (en) | 2010-09-09 | 2012-03-15 | The University Of Chicago | Methods and compositions involving protective staphylococcal antigens |
US8143480B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2012-03-27 | Whitehead Institute For Biomedical Research | Compositions and methods for efficient gene silencing in plants |
US8158850B2 (en) | 2007-12-19 | 2012-04-17 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Method to enhance yield and purity of hybrid crops |
WO2012061615A1 (en) | 2010-11-03 | 2012-05-10 | The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. | Transcription factors for modification of lignin content in plants |
EP2453012A1 (en) | 2010-11-10 | 2012-05-16 | Bayer CropScience AG | HPPD variants and methods of use |
EP2468848A2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2012-06-27 | Arizona Board Regents For And On Behalf Of Arizona State University | Modified cyanobacteria |
EP2474617A1 (en) | 2011-01-11 | 2012-07-11 | InteRNA Technologies BV | Mir for treating neo-angiogenesis |
US8222482B2 (en) | 2006-01-26 | 2012-07-17 | Ceres, Inc. | Modulating plant oil levels |
WO2012109208A2 (en) | 2011-02-08 | 2012-08-16 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Hematopoietic precursor cell production by programming |
WO2012109133A1 (en) | 2011-02-07 | 2012-08-16 | Research Development Foundation | Engineered immunoglobulin fc polypeptides |
WO2012130684A1 (en) | 2011-03-25 | 2012-10-04 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Use of n-(1,2,5-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzamides for controlling unwanted plants in areas of transgenic crop plants being tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2012130685A1 (en) | 2011-03-25 | 2012-10-04 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Use of n-(tetrazol-4-yl)- or n-(triazol-3-yl)arylcarboxamides or their salts for controlling unwanted plants in areas of transgenic crop plants being tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2012136653A1 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2012-10-11 | Novvac Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting staphylococcus aureus |
WO2013009825A1 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2013-01-17 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Methods for cell reprogramming and genome engineering |
US8362332B2 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2013-01-29 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plants and seeds of corn variety CV165560 |
WO2013014241A1 (en) | 2011-07-28 | 2013-01-31 | Genective | Glyphosate tolerant corn event vco-ø1981-5 and kit and method for detecting the same |
WO2013023992A1 (en) | 2011-08-12 | 2013-02-21 | Bayer Cropscience Nv | Guard cell-specific expression of transgenes in cotton |
WO2013025834A2 (en) | 2011-08-15 | 2013-02-21 | The University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to antibodies to staphylococcal protein a |
WO2013026015A1 (en) | 2011-08-18 | 2013-02-21 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Muc1 ligand traps for use in treating cancers |
WO2013050410A1 (en) | 2011-10-04 | 2013-04-11 | Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh | RNAi FOR THE CONTROL OF FUNGI AND OOMYCETES BY INHIBITING SACCHAROPINE DEHYDROGENASE GENE |
WO2013052660A1 (en) | 2011-10-06 | 2013-04-11 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | Hibiscus cannabinus feruloyl-coa:monolignol transferase |
WO2013053730A1 (en) | 2011-10-12 | 2013-04-18 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants with decreased activity of a starch dephosphorylating enzyme |
WO2013053899A1 (en) | 2011-10-12 | 2013-04-18 | Moeller Niels Iversen | Peptides derived from campylobacter jejuni and their use in vaccination |
WO2013053729A1 (en) | 2011-10-12 | 2013-04-18 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants with decreased activity of a starch dephosphorylating enzyme |
WO2013090814A2 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2013-06-20 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | p-Coumaroyl-CoA:Monolignol Transferase |
WO2013087821A1 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2013-06-20 | Institut De Recherche Pour Le Développement (Ird) | Overproduction of jasmonates in transgenic plants |
WO2013095132A1 (en) | 2011-12-22 | 2013-06-27 | Interna Technologies B.V. | Mirna for treating head and neck cancer |
WO2013130456A2 (en) | 2012-02-27 | 2013-09-06 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | Control of cellulose biosynthesis |
WO2013162751A1 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2013-10-31 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to antibodies that neutralize coagulase activity during staphylococcus aureus disease |
WO2013162746A1 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2013-10-31 | University Of Chicago | Staphylococcal coagulase antigens and methods of their use |
WO2013160762A2 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2013-10-31 | Adisseo France S.A.S. | A method of production of 2,4-dihydroxybutyric acid |
WO2014009432A2 (en) | 2012-07-11 | 2014-01-16 | Institut National Des Sciences Appliquées | A microorganism modified for the production of 1,3-propanediol |
WO2014009435A1 (en) | 2012-07-11 | 2014-01-16 | Adisseo France S.A.S. | Method for the preparation of 2,4-dihydroxybutyrate |
WO2014043435A1 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2014-03-20 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Hppd variants and methods of use |
WO2014047653A2 (en) | 2012-09-24 | 2014-03-27 | Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. | Methods and compositions for extending shelf life of plant products |
WO2014065945A1 (en) | 2012-10-23 | 2014-05-01 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System | Antibodies with engineered igg fc domains |
WO2014072357A1 (en) | 2012-11-06 | 2014-05-15 | Interna Technologies B.V. | Combination for use in treating diseases or conditions associated with melanoma, or treating diseases or conditions associated with activated b-raf pathway |
WO2014130770A1 (en) | 2013-02-22 | 2014-08-28 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Hepatocyte production via forward programming by combined genetic and chemical engineering |
WO2014132137A2 (en) | 2013-03-01 | 2014-09-04 | Université De Genève | Transgenic cell selection |
WO2014134144A1 (en) | 2013-02-28 | 2014-09-04 | The General Hospital Corporation | Mirna profiling compositions and methods of use |
WO2014138339A2 (en) | 2013-03-07 | 2014-09-12 | Athenix Corp. | Toxin genes and methods for their use |
EP2839837A1 (en) | 2006-09-15 | 2015-02-25 | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Oncolytic Farmington rhabdovirus |
WO2015035395A1 (en) | 2013-09-09 | 2015-03-12 | Figene, Llc | Gene therapy for the regeneration of chondrocytes or cartilage type cells |
WO2015070050A1 (en) | 2013-11-08 | 2015-05-14 | Baylor Research Institute | Nuclear loclization of glp-1 stimulates myocardial regeneration and reverses heart failure |
WO2015070009A2 (en) | 2013-11-08 | 2015-05-14 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System | Vh4 antibodies against gray matter neuron and astrocyte |
US9045729B2 (en) | 2009-12-10 | 2015-06-02 | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Oncolytic rhabdovirus |
WO2015082536A1 (en) | 2013-12-03 | 2015-06-11 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting staphylococcus aureus |
US9084746B2 (en) | 2010-09-22 | 2015-07-21 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | Therapeutic applications of SMAD7 |
WO2015116753A1 (en) | 2014-01-29 | 2015-08-06 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Antibodies against the muc1-c/extracellular domain (muc1-c/ecd) |
US9121028B2 (en) | 2005-09-09 | 2015-09-01 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Selective gene expression in plants |
WO2015130783A1 (en) | 2014-02-25 | 2015-09-03 | Research Development Foundation | Sty peptides for inhibition of angiogenesis |
WO2015138394A2 (en) | 2014-03-11 | 2015-09-17 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Hppd variants and methods of use |
US9139838B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2015-09-22 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for selective regulation of protein expression |
US9150873B2 (en) | 2007-09-12 | 2015-10-06 | Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh | Plants which synthesize increased amounts of glucosaminoglycans |
WO2015164228A1 (en) | 2014-04-21 | 2015-10-29 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Hepatocyte production via forward programming by combined genetic and chemical engineering |
EP2944649A1 (en) | 2008-01-10 | 2015-11-18 | Research Development Foundation | Vaccines and diagnostics for the ehrlichioses |
US9192112B2 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2015-11-24 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing hybrid seed |
WO2016077624A1 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2016-05-19 | Nmc, Inc. | Transgenic plants with engineered redox sensitive modulation of photosynthetic antenna complex pigments and methods for making the same |
WO2016075305A2 (en) | 2014-11-13 | 2016-05-19 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Peptides derived from acinetobacter baumannii and their use in vaccination |
WO2016120697A1 (en) | 2015-01-28 | 2016-08-04 | Sabic Global Technologies B.V. | Methods and compositions for high-efficiency production of biofuel and/or biomass |
WO2016130516A1 (en) | 2015-02-09 | 2016-08-18 | Research Development Foundation | Engineered immunoglobulin fc polypeptides displaying improved complement activation |
US9422352B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2016-08-23 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | PTD-SMAD7 therapeutics |
WO2016134293A1 (en) | 2015-02-20 | 2016-08-25 | Baylor College Of Medicine | p63 INACTIVATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF HEART FAILURE |
US9528121B2 (en) | 2007-02-20 | 2016-12-27 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Invertebrate microRNAs |
WO2017040380A2 (en) | 2015-08-28 | 2017-03-09 | Research Development Foundation | Engineered antibody fc variants |
CN106520661A (en) * | 2016-10-12 | 2017-03-22 | 北京大北农科技集团股份有限公司 | Corn transforming method |
WO2017070337A1 (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2017-04-27 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Methods for directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells to immune cells |
WO2017075389A1 (en) | 2015-10-30 | 2017-05-04 | The Regents Of The Universtiy Of California | Methods of generating t-cells from stem cells and immunotherapeutic methods using the t-cells |
WO2017079202A1 (en) | 2015-11-02 | 2017-05-11 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Methods of cd40 activation and immune checkpoint blockade |
WO2017079746A2 (en) | 2015-11-07 | 2017-05-11 | Multivir Inc. | Methods and compositions comprising tumor suppressor gene therapy and immune checkpoint blockade for the treatment of cancer |
WO2017083296A1 (en) | 2015-11-09 | 2017-05-18 | The Children's Hospital Of Philadelphia | Glypican 2 as a cancer marker and therapeutic target |
EP3211005A1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2017-08-30 | Geneuro SA | Therapeutic use of specific ligand in msrv associated diseases |
WO2017144523A1 (en) | 2016-02-22 | 2017-08-31 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting staphylococcus aureus |
US9765351B2 (en) | 2006-02-13 | 2017-09-19 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Modified gene silencing |
WO2017168348A1 (en) | 2016-03-31 | 2017-10-05 | Baylor Research Institute | Angiopoietin-like protein 8 (angptl8) |
WO2017184727A1 (en) | 2016-04-21 | 2017-10-26 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Tal-effector mediated herbicide tolerance |
WO2017216384A1 (en) | 2016-06-17 | 2017-12-21 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccination targeting ichthyophthirius multifiliis |
WO2017220787A1 (en) | 2016-06-24 | 2017-12-28 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines against aearomonas salmonicida infection |
WO2018005975A1 (en) | 2016-07-01 | 2018-01-04 | Research Development Foundation | Elimination of proliferating cells from stem cell-derived grafts |
EP3269816A1 (en) | 2016-07-11 | 2018-01-17 | Kws Saat Se | Development of fungal resistant crops by higs (host-induced gene silencing) mediated inhibition of gpi-anchored cell wall protein synthesis |
WO2018015575A1 (en) | 2016-07-22 | 2018-01-25 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Chimeric proteins for inducing immunity towards infection with s. aureus |
EP3279314A1 (en) | 2008-06-04 | 2018-02-07 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Methods for the production of ips cells using non-viral approach |
WO2018035429A1 (en) | 2016-08-18 | 2018-02-22 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Peptides that inhibit syndecan-1 activation of vla-4 and igf-1r |
WO2018039590A1 (en) | 2016-08-26 | 2018-03-01 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | Transcription factors to improve resistance to environmental stress in plants |
WO2018042385A2 (en) | 2016-09-02 | 2018-03-08 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Methods and compositions involving interleukin-6 receptor alpha-binding single chain variable fragments |
US9919047B2 (en) | 2011-01-04 | 2018-03-20 | Sillajen, Inc. | Generation of antibodies to tumor antigens and generation of tumor specific complement dependent cytotoxicity by administration of oncolytic vaccinia virus |
WO2018067826A1 (en) | 2016-10-05 | 2018-04-12 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Generating mature lineages from induced pluripotent stem cells with mecp2 disruption |
WO2018067836A1 (en) | 2016-10-05 | 2018-04-12 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Methods for directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells to hla homozygous immune cells |
US9976152B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2018-05-22 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Temporal regulation of gene expression by microRNAs |
WO2018098214A1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2018-05-31 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Axmi669 and axmi991 toxin genes and methods for their use |
EP3330371A1 (en) | 2008-08-12 | 2018-06-06 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Methods for the production of ips cells |
WO2018111902A1 (en) | 2016-12-12 | 2018-06-21 | Multivir Inc. | Methods and compositions comprising viral gene therapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor for treatment and prevention of cancer and infectious diseases |
WO2018119336A1 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2018-06-28 | Athenix Corp. | Use of cry14 for the control of nematode pests |
WO2018127545A1 (en) | 2017-01-05 | 2018-07-12 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines targeting pseudomonas aeruginosa |
WO2018136611A1 (en) | 2017-01-18 | 2018-07-26 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Use of bp005 for the control of plant pathogens |
WO2018136604A1 (en) | 2017-01-18 | 2018-07-26 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Bp005 toxin gene and methods for its use |
EP3354738A1 (en) | 2017-01-30 | 2018-08-01 | Kws Saat Se | Transgenic maize plant exhibiting increased yield and drought tolerance |
WO2018165091A1 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2018-09-13 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Hppd variants and methods of use |
US10080799B2 (en) | 2010-02-12 | 2018-09-25 | Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of Arizona State University | Methods and compositions related to glycoprotein-immunoglobulin fusions |
US10105437B2 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2018-10-23 | Btg International Limited | Epitopes related to coeliac disease |
WO2018195175A1 (en) | 2017-04-18 | 2018-10-25 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Antigen-specific immune effector cells |
US10125373B2 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2018-11-13 | Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of Arizona State University | Geminiviral vector for expression of rituximab |
US10214741B2 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2019-02-26 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Methods and compositions for inhibiting retinopathy of prematurity |
WO2019083810A1 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2019-05-02 | Basf Se | Improvement of herbicide tolerance to 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (hppd) inhibitors by down-regulation of hppd expression in soybean |
WO2019083808A1 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2019-05-02 | Basf Se | Improvement of herbicide tolerance to hppd inhibitors by down-regulation of putative 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate reductases in soybean |
WO2019086603A1 (en) | 2017-11-03 | 2019-05-09 | Interna Technologies B.V. | Mirna molecule, equivalent, antagomir, or source thereof for treating and/or diagnosing a condition and/or a disease associated with neuronal deficiency or for neuronal (re)generation |
EP3485907A1 (en) | 2015-01-12 | 2019-05-22 | Evaxion Biotech ApS | Treatment and prophylaxis of k. pneumoniae infection |
WO2019099493A1 (en) | 2017-11-14 | 2019-05-23 | Henry Ford Health System | Compositions for use in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disorders resulting from cerebrovascular injury |
US10363293B2 (en) | 2013-02-21 | 2019-07-30 | Turnstone Limited Partnership | Vaccine composition |
WO2019145399A1 (en) | 2018-01-24 | 2019-08-01 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines for prophylaxis of s. aureus infections |
WO2019186274A2 (en) | 2018-03-30 | 2019-10-03 | University Of Geneva | Micro rna expression constructs and uses thereof |
WO2019238832A1 (en) | 2018-06-15 | 2019-12-19 | Nunhems B.V. | Seedless watermelon plants comprising modifications in an abc transporter gene |
WO2020036635A2 (en) | 2018-03-19 | 2020-02-20 | Multivir Inc. | Methods and compositions comprising tumor suppressor gene therapy and cd122/cd132 agonists for the treatment of cancer |
US10584350B2 (en) | 2016-10-27 | 2020-03-10 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | Structurally modified COI1 |
WO2020069313A2 (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2020-04-02 | Henry Ford Health System | Use of extracellular vesicles in combination with tissue plasminogen activator and/or thrombectomy to treat stroke |
WO2020083904A1 (en) | 2018-10-22 | 2020-04-30 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines targeting m. catharrhalis |
WO2020171889A1 (en) | 2019-02-19 | 2020-08-27 | University Of Rochester | Blocking lipid accumulation or inflammation in thyroid eye disease |
WO2020174044A1 (en) | 2019-02-27 | 2020-09-03 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines targeting h. influenzae |
US10772951B2 (en) | 2011-06-08 | 2020-09-15 | Children's Hospital Of Eastern Ontario Research Institute Inc. | Compositions and methods for glioblastoma treatment |
US10883089B2 (en) | 2017-04-04 | 2021-01-05 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Feruloyl-CoA:monolignol transferases |
US10883090B2 (en) | 2017-04-18 | 2021-01-05 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | P-coumaroyl-CoA:monolignol transferases |
WO2021016062A1 (en) | 2019-07-19 | 2021-01-28 | The Children's Hospital Of Philadelphia | Chimeric antigen receptors containing glypican 2 binding domains |
WO2021076930A1 (en) | 2019-10-18 | 2021-04-22 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Plxdc activators and their use in the treatment of blood vessel disorders |
EP3812464A1 (en) | 2019-10-17 | 2021-04-28 | Board of Trustees of Michigan State University | Elevated resistance to insects and plant pathogens without compromising seed production |
WO2021113644A1 (en) | 2019-12-05 | 2021-06-10 | Multivir Inc. | Combinations comprising a cd8+ t cell enhancer, an immune checkpoint inhibitor and radiotherapy for targeted and abscopal effects for the treatment of cancer |
WO2021140123A1 (en) | 2020-01-06 | 2021-07-15 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines targeting neisseria gonorrhoeae |
US11078540B2 (en) | 2010-03-09 | 2021-08-03 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Methods of diagnosing and treating cancer in patients having or developing resistance to a first cancer therapy |
US11174495B2 (en) | 2015-12-04 | 2021-11-16 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Reporter system for detecting and targeting activated cells |
US11174493B2 (en) | 2016-05-26 | 2021-11-16 | Nunhems B.V. | Seedless fruit producing plants |
US11180770B2 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2021-11-23 | BASF Agricultural Solutions Seed US LLC | HPPD variants and methods of use |
WO2021243256A1 (en) | 2020-05-29 | 2021-12-02 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Retinal pigmented epithelium and photoreceptor dual cell aggregates and methods of use thereof |
WO2021240240A1 (en) | 2020-05-27 | 2021-12-02 | Antion Biosciences Sa | Adapter molecules to re-direct car t cells to an antigen of interest |
WO2021243203A1 (en) | 2020-05-29 | 2021-12-02 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Bilayer of retinal pigmented epithelium and photoreceptors and use thereof |
US11371056B2 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2022-06-28 | BASF Agricultural Solutions Seed US LLC | HPPD variants and methods of use |
WO2022173767A1 (en) | 2021-02-09 | 2022-08-18 | University Of Houston System | Oncolytic virus for systemic delivery and enhanced anti-tumor activities |
WO2022175815A1 (en) | 2021-02-19 | 2022-08-25 | Pfizer Inc. | Methods of protecting rna |
WO2022235586A1 (en) | 2021-05-03 | 2022-11-10 | Astellas Institute For Regenerative Medicine | Methods of generating mature corneal endothelial cells |
WO2022235869A1 (en) | 2021-05-07 | 2022-11-10 | Astellas Institute For Regenerative Medicine | Methods of generating mature hepatocytes |
WO2022251443A1 (en) | 2021-05-26 | 2022-12-01 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Methods to prevent rapid silencing of genes in pluripotent stem cells |
US11524062B2 (en) | 2015-06-29 | 2022-12-13 | University Of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc. | Compositions and methods for treating cancer and promoting wound healing |
EP4116316A1 (en) | 2015-07-04 | 2023-01-11 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting pseudomonas aeruginosa |
WO2023280807A1 (en) | 2021-07-05 | 2023-01-12 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Vaccines targeting neisseria gonorrhoeae |
EP4137578A1 (en) | 2018-01-05 | 2023-02-22 | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Modified vaccinia vectors |
WO2023089556A1 (en) | 2021-11-22 | 2023-05-25 | Pfizer Inc. | Reducing risk of antigen mimicry in immunogenic medicaments |
WO2023144779A1 (en) | 2022-01-28 | 2023-08-03 | Pfizer Inc. | Coronavirus antigen variants |
WO2023178191A1 (en) | 2022-03-16 | 2023-09-21 | University Of Houston System | Persistent hsv gene delivery system |
WO2023213983A2 (en) | 2022-05-04 | 2023-11-09 | Antion Biosciences Sa | Expression construct |
WO2023213393A1 (en) | 2022-05-04 | 2023-11-09 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Staphylococcal protein variants and truncates |
WO2023239940A1 (en) | 2022-06-10 | 2023-12-14 | Research Development Foundation | Engineered fcriib selective igg1 fc variants and uses thereof |
WO2024006911A1 (en) | 2022-06-29 | 2024-01-04 | FUJIFILM Holdings America Corporation | Ipsc-derived astrocytes and methods of use thereof |
US11981904B2 (en) | 2018-11-09 | 2024-05-14 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | BAHD acyltransferases |
WO2024130212A1 (en) | 2022-12-16 | 2024-06-20 | Turnstone Biologics Corp. | Recombinant vaccinia virus encoding one or more natural killer cell and t lymphocyte inhibitors |
WO2024137438A2 (en) | 2022-12-19 | 2024-06-27 | BASF Agricultural Solutions Seed US LLC | Insect toxin genes and methods for their use |
WO2024186630A1 (en) | 2023-03-03 | 2024-09-12 | Henry Ford Health System | Use of extracellular vesicles for the treatment of cancer |
EP4431609A1 (en) | 2023-03-14 | 2024-09-18 | Adisseo France S.A.S. | Method for improving 2, 4 dihydroxybutyric acid production and yield |
Families Citing this family (192)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7705215B1 (en) | 1990-04-17 | 2010-04-27 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof |
US6946587B1 (en) * | 1990-01-22 | 2005-09-20 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Method for preparing fertile transgenic corn plants |
US7279619B2 (en) * | 1998-01-22 | 2007-10-09 | National Research Council Of Canada | Methods and compositions for modifying levels of secondary metabolic compounds in plants |
EP2116607B1 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2012-12-19 | Monsanto Technology, LLC | Novel plant promoters for use in early seed development |
EP1921152A1 (en) | 2003-05-05 | 2008-05-14 | Monsanto Technology, LLC | Transgenic plants with glycine-betaine specific promoter |
PL1656449T3 (en) * | 2003-08-21 | 2009-08-31 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Fatty acid desaturases from primula |
EP1699928B9 (en) | 2003-10-02 | 2010-11-03 | Monsanto Technology, LLC | Stacking crop improvement traits in transgenic plants |
ATE516295T1 (en) | 2004-01-20 | 2011-07-15 | Monsanto Technology Llc | CHIMERIC PROMOTORS FOR USE IN PLANTS |
AR047598A1 (en) | 2004-02-10 | 2006-01-25 | Monsanto Technology Llc | TRANSGENIZED CORN SEED WITH GREATER AMINO ACID CONTENT |
ATE517548T1 (en) | 2004-03-10 | 2011-08-15 | Monsanto Technology Llc | HERBICIDAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING N-PHOSPHONOMETHYLGLYCINE AND AN AUXIN HERBICIDE |
US20060041961A1 (en) | 2004-03-25 | 2006-02-23 | Abad Mark S | Genes and uses for pant improvement |
WO2005110068A2 (en) | 2004-04-09 | 2005-11-24 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Compositions and methods for control of insect infestations in plants |
US8378186B2 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2013-02-19 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Expression of fatty acid desaturases in corn |
US20060075522A1 (en) | 2004-07-31 | 2006-04-06 | Jaclyn Cleveland | Genes and uses for plant improvement |
AR050866A1 (en) | 2004-09-09 | 2006-11-29 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | INOSITOL GENES 2-KINASE POLYPHOSPHATE AND USES OF THE SAME |
AU2005285014A1 (en) | 2004-09-14 | 2006-03-23 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Promoter molecules for use in plants |
WO2006069017A2 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2006-06-29 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits |
WO2007044043A2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-04-19 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits |
WO2006076423A2 (en) | 2005-01-12 | 2006-07-20 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Genes and uses for plant improvement |
EP1882392A4 (en) | 2005-05-10 | 2009-07-01 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Genes and uses for plant improvement |
WO2007030668A2 (en) | 2005-09-07 | 2007-03-15 | Jennerex Biotherapeutics Ulc | Systemic treatment of metastatic and/or systemically-disseminated cancers using gm-csf-expressing poxviruses |
US8980246B2 (en) | 2005-09-07 | 2015-03-17 | Sillajen Biotherapeutics, Inc. | Oncolytic vaccinia virus cancer therapy |
ATE542912T1 (en) | 2005-10-03 | 2012-02-15 | Monsanto Technology Llc | TRANSGENIC PLANT SEEDS WITH INCREASED LYSINE |
EP1962577A4 (en) | 2005-12-21 | 2009-12-16 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits |
BRPI0707626A2 (en) | 2006-02-10 | 2011-05-10 | Monsanto Technology Llc | identification and use of target genes for the control of plant parasitic nematodes |
EP1984511A2 (en) | 2006-02-13 | 2008-10-29 | Monsanto Technology LLP | Selecting and stabilizing dsrna constructs |
EP2843053A1 (en) | 2006-02-17 | 2015-03-04 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Chimeric regulatory sequences comprising introns for plant gene expression |
EP2016181B1 (en) | 2006-05-12 | 2013-04-17 | Monsanto Technology, LLC | Methods and compositions for obtaining marker-free transgenic plants |
EP2455491A3 (en) | 2006-05-25 | 2012-07-18 | Monsanto Technology LLC | A method to identify disease resistant quantitative trait loci in soybean and compositions thereof |
US7855326B2 (en) | 2006-06-06 | 2010-12-21 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for weed control using plants having dicamba-degrading enzymatic activity |
BRPI0714390B1 (en) * | 2006-07-19 | 2018-05-15 | Monsanto Technology Llc | POLYNUCLEOTIDE, DNA CONSTRUCTION, FUNGAL OR BACTERIAL HOST CELL, PROCESS FOR FOOD OR FOOD PRODUCTION AND COMPOSITION FOR FOOD OR FOOD PRODUCT |
AU2007286176B2 (en) | 2006-08-11 | 2012-10-11 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Production of high tryptophan maize by chloroplast targeted expression of anthranilate synthase |
AR063688A1 (en) | 2006-08-15 | 2009-02-11 | Monsanto Technology Llc | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR PLANT PRODUCTION USING THE HIGH DENSITY MARKER INFORMATION |
EP2048939A4 (en) | 2006-08-17 | 2010-04-28 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits |
CL2007002532A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-01-11 | Monsanto Technology Llc Soc Organizada Bajo Las Leyes Del Estado De Delaware | Procedure to identify genes that confer improved traits of a plant population. |
US8754011B2 (en) | 2006-10-16 | 2014-06-17 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for improving plant health |
US7939721B2 (en) | 2006-10-25 | 2011-05-10 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Cropping systems for managing weeds |
US7838729B2 (en) | 2007-02-26 | 2010-11-23 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Chloroplast transit peptides for efficient targeting of DMO and uses thereof |
US8609936B2 (en) | 2007-04-27 | 2013-12-17 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Hemipteran-and coleopteran active toxin proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis |
AU2008261094B2 (en) * | 2007-06-05 | 2014-07-17 | Cryxa Llc | Enteric coated, soluble creatine and polyethylene glycol composition for enhanced skeletal uptake of oral creatine |
EP2152891A4 (en) | 2007-06-06 | 2010-09-22 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Genes and uses for plant enhancement |
AR066922A1 (en) | 2007-06-08 | 2009-09-23 | Monsanto Technology Llc | METHODS OF MOLECULAR IMPROVEMENT OF THE GERMOPLASMA OF A PLANT BY DIRECTED SEQUENCING |
US20110265221A1 (en) | 2007-07-10 | 2011-10-27 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits |
EP2735619A3 (en) | 2007-08-29 | 2014-08-13 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Methods and compositions for breeding for preferred traits associated with Goss' Wilt resistance in plants |
US8097712B2 (en) | 2007-11-07 | 2012-01-17 | Beelogics Inc. | Compositions for conferring tolerance to viral disease in social insects, and the use thereof |
WO2009146015A2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2009-12-03 | Ceres, Inc. | Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof |
CA2894042C (en) | 2008-04-07 | 2017-02-21 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plant regulatory elements and uses thereof |
EP2271760A2 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2011-01-12 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Genes and uses for plant enhancement |
EP2304030B1 (en) | 2008-07-01 | 2015-11-25 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Recombinant dna constructs and methods for modulating expression of a target gene |
WO2010009353A1 (en) | 2008-07-16 | 2010-01-21 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and vectors for producing transgenic plants |
US20110258735A1 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2011-10-20 | Marie Coffin | Genes and uses for plant enhancement |
WO2010099431A2 (en) | 2009-02-27 | 2010-09-02 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Hydroponic apparatus and methods of use |
WO2010123904A1 (en) | 2009-04-20 | 2010-10-28 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Multiple virus resistance in plants |
WO2011019652A2 (en) | 2009-08-10 | 2011-02-17 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Low volatility auxin herbicide formulations |
US8962584B2 (en) | 2009-10-14 | 2015-02-24 | Yissum Research Development Company Of The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem, Ltd. | Compositions for controlling Varroa mites in bees |
BR122021001265B1 (en) | 2010-01-14 | 2022-02-22 | Monsanto Technology Llc | DNA molecule comprising plant regulatory elements |
WO2011091311A2 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2011-07-28 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Excision of transgenes in genetically modified organisms |
PE20171378A1 (en) | 2010-03-08 | 2017-09-15 | Monsanto Technology Llc | POLYNUCLEOTIDE MOLECULES FOR GENETIC REGULATION IN PLANTS |
WO2011111041A1 (en) * | 2010-03-09 | 2011-09-15 | Yissum Research Development Company Of The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem Ltd. | Organism with altered carotenoid content and method of producing same |
TWI570239B (en) | 2010-06-24 | 2017-02-11 | 布魯克哈芬科學聯合有限責任公司 | Accumulation of ω-7 fatty acids in plant seeds |
KR20180008885A (en) | 2010-06-24 | 2018-01-24 | 다우 아그로사이언시즈 엘엘씨 | Lowering saturated fatty acid content of plant seeds |
US8816153B2 (en) | 2010-08-27 | 2014-08-26 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Recombinant DNA constructs employing site-specific recombination |
RS57012B1 (en) | 2010-08-30 | 2018-05-31 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Sugarcane bacilliform viral (scbv) enhancer and its use in plant functional genomics |
CN106978439A (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2017-07-25 | 陶氏益农公司 | Assign the nucleic acid molecules to the resistance of coleoptera harmful organism |
WO2012092580A2 (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2012-07-05 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Nucleic acid molecules that target the vacuolar atpase h subunit and confer resistance to coleopteran pests |
WO2012092573A2 (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2012-07-05 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Nucleic acid molecules that target the vacuolar atpase c subunit and confer resistance to coleopteran pests |
US8945588B2 (en) | 2011-05-06 | 2015-02-03 | The University Of Chicago | Methods and compositions involving protective staphylococcal antigens, such as EBH polypeptides |
US20140173770A1 (en) | 2011-06-06 | 2014-06-19 | Bayer Cropscience Nv | Methods and means to modify a plant genome at a preselected site |
CN107287234A (en) | 2011-08-22 | 2017-10-24 | 拜尔作物科学公司 | The ways and means of modified plant genome |
US10806146B2 (en) | 2011-09-13 | 2020-10-20 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for weed control |
US10829828B2 (en) | 2011-09-13 | 2020-11-10 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for weed control |
MX343071B (en) | 2011-09-13 | 2016-10-21 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for weed control. |
US10760086B2 (en) | 2011-09-13 | 2020-09-01 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for weed control |
MX362810B (en) | 2011-09-13 | 2019-02-13 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for weed control. |
ES2645927T3 (en) | 2011-09-13 | 2017-12-11 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Procedures and compositions for weed control |
US9840715B1 (en) | 2011-09-13 | 2017-12-12 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for delaying senescence and improving disease tolerance and yield in plants |
MX350771B (en) | 2011-09-13 | 2017-09-15 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for weed control. |
US9920326B1 (en) | 2011-09-14 | 2018-03-20 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for increasing invertase activity in plants |
AU2012328638B2 (en) | 2011-10-26 | 2016-11-17 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Salts of carboxylic acid herbicides |
AP2014007895A0 (en) | 2012-02-01 | 2014-08-31 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Synthetic brassica-derived chloroplast transit peptides |
CN104202966B (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2017-11-10 | 陶氏益农公司 | Plant trans-activation interaction motif and application thereof |
RU2639517C2 (en) | 2012-02-29 | 2017-12-21 | ДАУ АГРОСАЙЕНСИЗ ЭлЭлСи | Enhancer of sugar cane baculovirus (scbv) and its application in functional genomics of plants |
WO2013138354A1 (en) | 2012-03-13 | 2013-09-19 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Genetic reduction of male fertility in plants |
CA2867385A1 (en) | 2012-03-13 | 2013-09-19 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Genetic reduction of male fertility in plants |
CA2867377A1 (en) | 2012-03-13 | 2013-09-19 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Genetic reduction of male fertility in plants |
CA2868473A1 (en) | 2012-03-26 | 2013-10-03 | Pronutria, Inc. | Nutritive fragments, proteins and methods |
AU2013205557B2 (en) | 2012-04-17 | 2016-04-21 | Corteva Agriscience Llc | Synthetic brassica-derived chloroplast transit peptides |
AU2013259647B2 (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2018-11-08 | Corteva Agriscience Llc | Methods and compositions for nuclease-mediated targeted integration of transgenes |
WO2013175480A1 (en) | 2012-05-24 | 2013-11-28 | A.B. Seeds Ltd. | Compositions and methods for silencing gene expression |
WO2013184622A2 (en) | 2012-06-04 | 2013-12-12 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Aqueous concentrated herbicidal compositions containing glyphosate salts and dicamba salts |
CA2877873C (en) | 2012-06-26 | 2020-11-24 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and composition for enhanced forage quality |
UA118090C2 (en) | 2012-09-07 | 2018-11-26 | ДАУ АГРОСАЙЄНСІЗ ЕлЕлСі | Fad2 performance loci and corresponding target site specific binding proteins capable of inducing targeted breaks |
KR102147007B1 (en) | 2012-09-07 | 2020-08-21 | 다우 아그로사이언시즈 엘엘씨 | Fad3 performance loci and corresponding target site specific binding proteins capable of inducing targeted breaks |
WO2014062989A2 (en) | 2012-10-18 | 2014-04-24 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for plant pest control |
US20150307894A1 (en) | 2012-11-28 | 2015-10-29 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Transgenic Plants With Enhanced Traits |
WO2014106838A2 (en) | 2013-01-01 | 2014-07-10 | A.B. Seeds Ltd. | Methods of introducing dsrna to plant seeds for modulating gene expression |
US10683505B2 (en) | 2013-01-01 | 2020-06-16 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods of introducing dsRNA to plant seeds for modulating gene expression |
EP2946015B1 (en) | 2013-01-16 | 2021-05-26 | Emory University | Cas9-nucleic acid complexes and uses related thereto |
US10000767B2 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2018-06-19 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for plant pest control |
CA2901680C (en) | 2013-02-27 | 2021-09-07 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Glyphosate composition for dicamba tank mixtures with improved volatility |
EP3604535A3 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2020-04-22 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Methods and compositions for weed control |
EP2967082A4 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-11-02 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for weed control |
US20140283211A1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2014-09-18 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and Compositions for Plant Pest Control |
US10568328B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-02-25 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for weed control |
US9777288B2 (en) | 2013-07-19 | 2017-10-03 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Compositions and methods for controlling leptinotarsa |
US9850496B2 (en) | 2013-07-19 | 2017-12-26 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Compositions and methods for controlling Leptinotarsa |
US9777286B2 (en) | 2013-10-04 | 2017-10-03 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Zea mays metallothionein-like regulatory elements and uses thereof |
US20160237447A1 (en) | 2013-10-07 | 2016-08-18 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Transgenic Plants With Enhanced Traits |
CN105611828A (en) | 2013-10-09 | 2016-05-25 | 孟山都技术公司 | Interfering with hd-zip transcription factor repression of gene expression to produce plants with enhanced traits |
MX2016004595A (en) | 2013-10-09 | 2016-08-01 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Transgenic corn event mon87403 and methods for detection thereof. |
US10392626B1 (en) | 2013-10-09 | 2019-08-27 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plant regulatory elements and uses thereof |
BR102014025574A2 (en) | 2013-10-15 | 2015-09-29 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | zea mays regulatory elements and uses thereof |
BR102014025499A2 (en) | 2013-10-15 | 2015-09-29 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | zea mays regulatory elements and their use |
EP3066200A1 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2016-09-14 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Compositions and methods for controlling arthropod parasite and pest infestations |
AU2014341934B2 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2017-12-07 | Corteva Agriscience Llc | Optimal soybean loci |
JP6649261B2 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2020-02-19 | ダウ アグロサイエンシィズ エルエルシー | Optimal corn loci |
CA2928666C (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2023-05-23 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Optimal maize loci for targeted genome modification |
TW201525136A (en) | 2013-11-26 | 2015-07-01 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Production of omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in oilseed crops by a thraustochytrid PUFA synthase |
UA119253C2 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2019-05-27 | Біолоджикс, Інк. | Compositions and methods for virus control in varroa mite and bees |
BR102014031844A2 (en) | 2013-12-20 | 2015-10-06 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | RAS and related nucleic acid molecules that confer resistance to Coleoptera and Hemiptera pests |
US10676745B2 (en) | 2013-12-20 | 2020-06-09 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Nucleic acid molecules that confer resistance to coleopteran pests |
TW201527314A (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2015-07-16 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Novel maize ubiquitin promoters |
TW201527313A (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2015-07-16 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Novel maize ubiquitin promoters |
TW201527312A (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2015-07-16 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Novel maize ubiquitin promoters |
TW201527316A (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2015-07-16 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Novel maize ubiquitin promoters |
WO2015108982A2 (en) | 2014-01-15 | 2015-07-23 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for weed control using epsps polynucleotides |
BR102015000943A2 (en) | 2014-01-17 | 2016-06-07 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | increased protein expression in plant |
CA3194412A1 (en) | 2014-02-27 | 2015-09-03 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Compositions and methods for site directed genomic modification |
TW201538518A (en) | 2014-02-28 | 2015-10-16 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Root specific expression conferred by chimeric gene regulatory elements |
US11091770B2 (en) | 2014-04-01 | 2021-08-17 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Compositions and methods for controlling insect pests |
WO2015168124A1 (en) | 2014-04-28 | 2015-11-05 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Compositions and methods for controlling plant growth and development |
KR20170002504A (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2017-01-06 | 다우 아그로사이언시즈 엘엘씨 | Dre4 nucleic acid molecules that confer resistance to coleopteran pests |
EP3158067B1 (en) | 2014-06-23 | 2020-08-12 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Compositions and methods for regulating gene expression via rna interference |
WO2015200539A1 (en) | 2014-06-25 | 2015-12-30 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for delivering nucleic acids to plant cells and regulating gene expression |
WO2016018887A1 (en) | 2014-07-29 | 2016-02-04 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Compositions and methods for controlling insect pests |
US20160194658A1 (en) | 2014-12-22 | 2016-07-07 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Nucampholin nucleic acid molecules to control coleopteran insect pests |
BR112017015705A2 (en) | 2015-01-22 | 2018-03-20 | Monsanto Technology Llc | compositions and methods for leptinotarsal control |
US20160264991A1 (en) | 2015-03-13 | 2016-09-15 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Rna polymerase i1 nucleic acid molecules to control insect pests |
JP2018511331A (en) | 2015-04-15 | 2018-04-26 | ダウ アグロサイエンシィズ エルエルシー | Plant promoter for transgene expression |
JP2018511333A (en) | 2015-04-15 | 2018-04-26 | ダウ アグロサイエンシィズ エルエルシー | Plant promoter for transgene expression |
BR102016012010A2 (en) | 2015-05-29 | 2020-03-24 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | NUCLEIC ACID, RIBONUCLEIC ACID (RNA) AND DOUBLE-FILAMENT RIBONUCLEIC ACID (DSRNA) MOLECULE, CELL, PLANT AND SEED USES, PRIMARY PRODUCT, AS WELL AS METHODS TO CONTROL A POPULATION OF HOLIDAYS, OR HOSPITALS, OR HOSPITALS, OR HOSPITALS, OR HOSPITALS THE INCOME OF A CULTURE, AND TO PRODUCE A TRANSGENIC VEGETABLE CELL AND A TRANSGENIC PLANT |
AU2016270870A1 (en) | 2015-06-02 | 2018-01-04 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Compositions and methods for delivery of a polynucleotide into a plant |
WO2016196782A1 (en) | 2015-06-03 | 2016-12-08 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for introducing nucleic acids into plants |
EP3313994A1 (en) | 2015-06-23 | 2018-05-02 | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. | Carbon-neutral and carbon-positive photorespiration bypass routes supporting higher photosynthetic rate and yield |
IL241462A0 (en) | 2015-09-10 | 2015-11-30 | Yeda Res & Dev | Heterologous engineering of betalain pigments in plants |
TW201718862A (en) | 2015-09-22 | 2017-06-01 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Plant promoter and 3' UTR for transgene expression |
TW201718861A (en) | 2015-09-22 | 2017-06-01 | 道禮責任有限公司 | Plant promoter and 3'UTR for transgene expression |
MX2018004063A (en) | 2015-10-02 | 2019-04-01 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Recombinant maize b chromosome sequence and uses thereof. |
US10280429B2 (en) | 2015-10-22 | 2019-05-07 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Plant promoter for transgene expression |
US20170121726A1 (en) | 2015-11-04 | 2017-05-04 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Plant promoter for transgene expression |
AU2017271575A1 (en) | 2016-05-25 | 2018-11-15 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Engineered nucleases to generate deletion mutants in plants |
WO2018005491A1 (en) | 2016-06-28 | 2018-01-04 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for use in genome modification in plants |
CN109844107B (en) | 2016-08-17 | 2024-05-28 | 孟山都技术公司 | Methods and compositions for dwarf plants for increasing harvestable yield by manipulating gibberellin metabolism |
IL247752A0 (en) | 2016-09-11 | 2016-11-30 | Yeda Res & Dev | Compositions and methods for regulating gene expression for targeted mutagenesis |
US10519459B2 (en) | 2016-10-03 | 2019-12-31 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Plant promoter from Panicum virgatum |
CA3038508A1 (en) | 2016-10-03 | 2018-04-12 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Plant promoter for transgene expression |
EP3342780A1 (en) | 2016-12-30 | 2018-07-04 | Dow AgroSciences LLC | Pre-mrna processing factor 8 (prp8) nucleic acid molecules to control insect pests |
GB201708665D0 (en) | 2017-05-31 | 2017-07-12 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | Compositions and methods for increasing extractability of solids from coffee beans |
GB201708662D0 (en) | 2017-05-31 | 2017-07-12 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | Compositions and methods for increasing shelf-life of banana |
WO2018220582A1 (en) | 2017-05-31 | 2018-12-06 | Tropic Biosciences UK Limited | Methods of selecting cells comprising genome editing events |
CN111263810A (en) | 2017-08-22 | 2020-06-09 | 纳匹基因公司 | Organelle genome modification using polynucleotide directed endonucleases |
EP3676383B1 (en) | 2017-08-31 | 2024-06-19 | Corteva Agriscience LLC | Compositions and methods for expressing transgenes using regulatory elements from chlorophyll binding ab genes |
ES2915576T3 (en) | 2017-09-19 | 2022-06-23 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | Modification of the specificity of plant non-coding RNA molecules to silence gene expression |
EP3701013A4 (en) | 2017-10-25 | 2021-08-04 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Targeted endonuclease activity of the rna-guided endonuclease casx in eukaryotes |
US20210054389A1 (en) | 2017-12-27 | 2021-02-25 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Transformation of dicot plants |
EP3752621A4 (en) | 2018-02-15 | 2021-12-01 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Compositions and methods for improving crop yields through trait stacking |
MX2020008560A (en) | 2018-02-15 | 2020-10-12 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Compositions and methods for improving crop yields through trait stacking. |
GB201807192D0 (en) | 2018-05-01 | 2018-06-13 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | Compositions and methods for reducing caffeine content in coffee beans |
EP3800998A1 (en) | 2018-06-07 | 2021-04-14 | The State of Israel, Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Development, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO) (Volcani Center) | Methods of regenerating and transforming cannabis |
CA3102978A1 (en) | 2018-06-07 | 2019-12-12 | The State Of Israel, Ministry Of Agriculture & Rural Development, Agricultural Research Organization (Aro) (Volcani Center) | Nucleic acid constructs and methods of using same |
CA3123890A1 (en) | 2019-01-04 | 2020-07-09 | Cargill Incorporated | Engineered nucleases to generate mutations in plants |
WO2020181101A1 (en) | 2019-03-07 | 2020-09-10 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Crispr-cas effector polypeptides and methods of use thereof |
GB201903521D0 (en) | 2019-03-14 | 2019-05-01 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | No title |
GB201903520D0 (en) | 2019-03-14 | 2019-05-01 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | Modifying the specificity of non-coding rna molecules for silencing genes in eukaryotic cells |
GB201903519D0 (en) | 2019-03-14 | 2019-05-01 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | Introducing silencing activity to dysfunctional rna molecules and modifying their specificity against a gene of interest |
US11447790B2 (en) | 2019-05-29 | 2022-09-20 | Altria Client Services Llc | Compositions and methods for producing tobacco plants and products having reduced or eliminated suckers |
CN110904143A (en) * | 2019-09-12 | 2020-03-24 | 黑龙江省农业科学院耕作栽培研究所 | Multifunctional glyphosate-resistant rice transformation vector pCDMAR-epsps and construction method and application thereof |
EP4040947A2 (en) | 2019-10-10 | 2022-08-17 | Altria Client Services LLC | Pale yellow locus and its applications in tobacco |
US11326176B2 (en) | 2019-11-22 | 2022-05-10 | Mozza Foods, Inc. | Recombinant micelle and method of in vivo assembly |
EP4210475A1 (en) | 2020-09-10 | 2023-07-19 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Increasing gene editing and site-directed integration events utilizing meiotic and germline promoters |
JP2024505756A (en) | 2021-02-03 | 2024-02-07 | アルトリア クライアント サーヴィシーズ リミテッド ライアビリティ カンパニー | Methods for increasing trichome density and improving metabolite transport in plant trichomes |
GB202103256D0 (en) | 2021-03-09 | 2021-04-21 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | Method for silencing genes |
EP4362662A1 (en) | 2021-07-02 | 2024-05-08 | Tropic Biosciences UK Limited | Delay or prevention of browning in banana fruit |
GB202109586D0 (en) | 2021-07-02 | 2021-08-18 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | Method for editing banana genes |
GB202112866D0 (en) | 2021-09-09 | 2021-10-27 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | Resistance to fusarium wilt in a banana |
WO2023150637A1 (en) | 2022-02-02 | 2023-08-10 | Inscripta, Inc. | Nucleic acid-guided nickase fusion proteins |
WO2023199198A1 (en) | 2022-04-12 | 2023-10-19 | John Innes Centre | Compositions and methods for increasing genome editing efficiency |
WO2023230433A1 (en) | 2022-05-23 | 2023-11-30 | Altria Client Services Llc | Methods and compositions for regulating alkaloids in tobacco field |
US20240229054A9 (en) | 2022-08-05 | 2024-07-11 | Altria Client Services Llc | Methods and compositions for regulating alkaloids in tobacco |
WO2024155597A1 (en) | 2023-01-17 | 2024-07-25 | Inscripta, Inc. | Methods and compositions of co-expression of t7rna polymerase and inhibitory rna aptamers |
EP4442817A1 (en) | 2023-04-04 | 2024-10-09 | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. | Paclitaxel (taxol) biosynthesis pathway |
GB202305021D0 (en) | 2023-04-04 | 2023-05-17 | Tropic Biosciences Uk Ltd | Methods for generating breaks in a genome |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1991002071A2 (en) * | 1989-08-09 | 1991-02-21 | Dekalb Plant Genetics | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof |
WO1991010725A1 (en) * | 1990-01-22 | 1991-07-25 | Dekalb Plant Genetics | Fertile transgenic corn plants |
DE4013099A1 (en) * | 1990-04-25 | 1991-10-31 | Hoechst Ag | Transforming immature somatic plant, esp. maize, embryos - by treating, in dry state, with nucleic acid soln., esp. for introducing resistance to phosphinothricin |
EP0485970A2 (en) * | 1990-11-13 | 1992-05-20 | Yeda Research And Development Company Limited | Transgenic plants overproducing threonine and lysine |
WO1992012250A1 (en) * | 1990-12-28 | 1992-07-23 | Dekalb Plant Genetics | Stable transformation of maize cells by electroporation |
WO1993007278A1 (en) * | 1991-10-04 | 1993-04-15 | Ciba-Geigy Ag | Synthetic dna sequence having enhanced insecticidal activity in maize |
WO1993019190A1 (en) * | 1992-03-19 | 1993-09-30 | E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Nucleic acid fragments and methods for increasing the lysine and threonine content of the seeds of plants |
EP0589110A1 (en) * | 1992-08-19 | 1994-03-30 | Plant Genetic Systems N.V. | Control of ostrinia |
Family Cites Families (165)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4370160A (en) | 1978-06-27 | 1983-01-25 | Dow Corning Corporation | Process for preparing silicone microparticles |
US4634665A (en) | 1980-02-25 | 1987-01-06 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Processes for inserting DNA into eucaryotic cells and for producing proteinaceous materials |
US4399216A (en) | 1980-02-25 | 1983-08-16 | The Trustees Of Columbia University | Processes for inserting DNA into eucaryotic cells and for producing proteinaceous materials |
US4727028A (en) | 1981-06-22 | 1988-02-23 | Eli Lilly And Company | Recombinant DNA cloning vectors and the eukaryotic and prokaryotic transformants thereof |
US4536475A (en) | 1982-10-05 | 1985-08-20 | Phytogen | Plant vector |
US4583320A (en) | 1982-10-12 | 1986-04-22 | Plant Genetics, Inc. | Delivery system for meristematic tissue |
US4559302A (en) | 1982-11-01 | 1985-12-17 | Eli Lilly And Company | DNA for directing transcription and expression of structural genes |
US4535060A (en) | 1983-01-05 | 1985-08-13 | Calgene, Inc. | Inhibition resistant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthetase, production and use |
US5094945A (en) | 1983-01-05 | 1992-03-10 | Calgene, Inc. | Inhibition resistant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthase, production and use |
US5352605A (en) | 1983-01-17 | 1994-10-04 | Monsanto Company | Chimeric genes for transforming plant cells using viral promoters |
EP0131623B2 (en) | 1983-01-17 | 1999-07-28 | Monsanto Company | Chimeric genes suitable for expression in plant cells |
US5034322A (en) | 1983-01-17 | 1991-07-23 | Monsanto Company | Chimeric genes suitable for expression in plant cells |
NL8300698A (en) | 1983-02-24 | 1984-09-17 | Univ Leiden | METHOD FOR BUILDING FOREIGN DNA INTO THE NAME OF DIABIC LOBAL PLANTS; AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS BACTERIA AND METHOD FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF; PLANTS AND PLANT CELLS WITH CHANGED GENETIC PROPERTIES; PROCESS FOR PREPARING CHEMICAL AND / OR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS. |
US4559301A (en) | 1983-03-03 | 1985-12-17 | Eli Lilly And Company | Process for preparing macrocin derivatives |
US6943282B1 (en) | 1983-09-26 | 2005-09-13 | Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. | Insect resistant plants |
AU567155B2 (en) | 1983-04-15 | 1987-11-12 | Damon Biotech Inc. | Capsules for releasing core material at constant rate |
GB8324800D0 (en) | 1983-09-15 | 1983-10-19 | Pasteur Institut | Antigens |
BR8404834A (en) | 1983-09-26 | 1985-08-13 | Agrigenetics Res Ass | METHOD TO GENETICALLY MODIFY A PLANT CELL |
US5567600A (en) | 1983-09-26 | 1996-10-22 | Mycogen Plant Sciences, Inc. | Synthetic insecticidal crystal protein gene |
US5380831A (en) | 1986-04-04 | 1995-01-10 | Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. | Synthetic insecticidal crystal protein gene |
ATE100141T1 (en) | 1984-03-06 | 1994-01-15 | Mgi Pharma Inc | HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS. |
US4761373A (en) | 1984-03-06 | 1988-08-02 | Molecular Genetics, Inc. | Herbicide resistance in plants |
EP0160390A3 (en) | 1984-04-16 | 1987-04-08 | Sandoz Ltd. | Embryogenic callus and cell suspension of inbred corn |
US4520113A (en) | 1984-04-23 | 1985-05-28 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Department Of Health And Human Services | Serological detection of antibodies to HTLV-III in sera of patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS conditions |
GB2159173B (en) | 1984-05-11 | 1988-10-12 | Ciba Geigy Ag | Transformation of hereditary material of plants |
US4642411A (en) | 1984-09-04 | 1987-02-10 | Molecular Genetics Research And Development Limited Partnership | Tryptophan overproducer mutants of cereal crops |
US4581847A (en) | 1984-09-04 | 1986-04-15 | Molecular Genetics Research And Development | Tryptophan overproducer mutants of cereal crops |
US4665030A (en) | 1984-09-07 | 1987-05-12 | Sungene Technologies Corporation | Process for regenerating corn |
US4666844A (en) | 1984-09-07 | 1987-05-19 | Sungene Technologies Corporation | Process for regenerating cereals |
US4743548A (en) | 1984-09-25 | 1988-05-10 | Calgene, Inc. | Plant cell microinjection technique |
US5145777A (en) | 1984-10-01 | 1992-09-08 | The General Hospital Corporation | Plant cells resistant to herbicidal glutamine synthetase inhibitors |
US5036006A (en) | 1984-11-13 | 1991-07-30 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Method for transporting substances into living cells and tissues and apparatus therefor |
US4945050A (en) | 1984-11-13 | 1990-07-31 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Method for transporting substances into living cells and tissues and apparatus therefor |
DE3587548T2 (en) | 1984-12-28 | 1993-12-23 | Bayer Ag | Recombinant DNA that can be introduced into plant cells. |
US5254799A (en) | 1985-01-18 | 1993-10-19 | Plant Genetic Systems N.V. | Transformation vectors allowing expression of Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins in plants |
BR8600161A (en) | 1985-01-18 | 1986-09-23 | Plant Genetic Systems Nv | CHEMICAL GENE, HYBRID, INTERMEDIATE PLASMIDIO VECTORS, PROCESS TO CONTROL INSECTS IN AGRICULTURE OR HORTICULTURE, INSECTICIDE COMPOSITION, PROCESS TO TRANSFORM PLANT CELLS TO EXPRESS A PLANTINIDE TOXIN, PRODUCED BY CULTURES, UNITED BY BACILLA |
US5240841A (en) | 1985-03-21 | 1993-08-31 | Duke University | E. coli resistance to Qβ virus infection |
US5580716A (en) | 1985-03-21 | 1996-12-03 | Stephen A. Johnston | Parasite-derived resistance |
US4683202A (en) | 1985-03-28 | 1987-07-28 | Cetus Corporation | Process for amplifying nucleic acid sequences |
JPS61265086A (en) | 1985-05-21 | 1986-11-22 | Mitsui Toatsu Chem Inc | Method of cultivating protoplast |
US4935340A (en) | 1985-06-07 | 1990-06-19 | Eli Lilly And Company | Method of isolating antibiotic biosynthetic genes |
US4885357A (en) | 1985-06-12 | 1989-12-05 | Lubrizol Genetics Inc. | Modified zein proteins containing lysine |
US4886878A (en) | 1985-06-12 | 1989-12-12 | Lubrizol Genetics, Inc. | Modified zein genes containing lysine |
US4956282A (en) | 1985-07-29 | 1990-09-11 | Calgene, Inc. | Mammalian peptide expression in plant cells |
US4940835A (en) | 1985-10-29 | 1990-07-10 | Monsanto Company | Glyphosate-resistant plants |
DK175922B1 (en) | 1985-08-07 | 2005-07-04 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Glyphosate-resistant plants |
DE3765449D1 (en) | 1986-03-11 | 1990-11-15 | Plant Genetic Systems Nv | PLANT CELLS RESISTED BY GENE TECHNOLOGY AND RESISTANT TO GLUTAMINE SYNTHETASE INHIBITORS. |
US4944954A (en) | 1986-04-23 | 1990-07-31 | Epe Incorporated | Vegetable oil extraction process |
US5188958A (en) | 1986-05-29 | 1993-02-23 | Calgene, Inc. | Transformation and foreign gene expression in brassica species |
US5565347A (en) | 1986-06-10 | 1996-10-15 | Calgene, Inc. | Transformation and foreign gene expression with plant species |
US5134074A (en) | 1986-06-20 | 1992-07-28 | Dekalb Plant Genetics | Embryogenic callus and cell suspensions of corn inbred B73 |
US5177010A (en) | 1986-06-30 | 1993-01-05 | University Of Toledo | Process for transforming corn and the products thereof |
US5187073A (en) | 1986-06-30 | 1993-02-16 | The University Of Toledo | Process for transforming gramineae and the products thereof |
EP0257472A3 (en) | 1986-08-14 | 1989-10-04 | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. | Transgenic monocotyledonous plants, seeds thereof and process for the preparation of the plants |
US4806483A (en) | 1986-08-18 | 1989-02-21 | Sungene Technologies Corporation | Process for regenerating corn |
US5273894A (en) | 1986-08-23 | 1993-12-28 | Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft | Phosphinothricin-resistance gene, and its use |
US5276268A (en) | 1986-08-23 | 1994-01-04 | Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft | Phosphinothricin-resistance gene, and its use |
US5215912A (en) | 1986-08-29 | 1993-06-01 | Lubrizol Genetics, Inc. | Monocot seed storage proteins in dicots |
US5003045A (en) | 1986-08-29 | 1991-03-26 | Lubrizol Genetics, Inc. | Modified 7S legume seed storage proteins |
IL84064A0 (en) | 1986-10-01 | 1988-03-31 | Plant Cell Res Inst | Method and medium for controlled regeneration of cucumis sp.plants in vitro from explant tissue |
US5268463A (en) | 1986-11-11 | 1993-12-07 | Jefferson Richard A | Plant promoter α-glucuronidase gene construct |
ATE94209T1 (en) | 1986-11-20 | 1993-09-15 | Monsanto Co | INSECT RESISTANT TOMATO PLANTS. |
US5004863B2 (en) | 1986-12-03 | 2000-10-17 | Agracetus | Genetic engineering of cotton plants and lines |
US5015580A (en) | 1987-07-29 | 1991-05-14 | Agracetus | Particle-mediated transformation of soybean plants and lines |
IL84459A (en) | 1986-12-05 | 1993-07-08 | Agracetus | Apparatus and method for the injection of carrier particles carrying genetic material into living cells |
JPS63192383A (en) | 1986-12-08 | 1988-08-09 | サンジェン・テクノロジーズ・コーポレイション | Method for increasing free pool lisine content in corn |
US5049500A (en) | 1987-01-13 | 1991-09-17 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours | Pollen-mediated gene transformation in plants |
EP0275069A3 (en) | 1987-01-13 | 1990-04-25 | DNA PLANT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (under the laws of the state of Delaware) | Pollen-mediated gene transformation in plants |
GB2200367B (en) | 1987-01-29 | 1990-08-08 | Inst Botan Im N G Kholodnogo A | Method of preparing genetically transformed cellular plant matter by micro- injection. |
US4753035A (en) | 1987-02-04 | 1988-06-28 | Dow Corning Corporation | Crosslinked silicone coatings for botanical seeds |
US5001060A (en) | 1987-02-06 | 1991-03-19 | Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. | Plant anaerobic regulatory element |
US5290924A (en) | 1987-02-06 | 1994-03-01 | Last David I | Recombinant promoter for gene expression in monocotyledonous plants |
JPH0822224B2 (en) | 1987-02-09 | 1996-03-06 | 三井石油化学工業株式会社 | Plant tissue culture method |
US5196342A (en) | 1987-04-16 | 1993-03-23 | Prutech R&D Partnership Ii | Bacillus thuringiensis P-2 toxin gene |
TR27832A (en) | 1987-04-29 | 1995-08-31 | Monsanto Co | Plants resistant to harmful volatile damage. |
US5371003A (en) | 1987-05-05 | 1994-12-06 | Sandoz Ltd. | Electrotransformation process |
EP0290395B1 (en) | 1987-05-05 | 1994-01-26 | Sandoz Ag | Plant tissue transformation |
DE3716309A1 (en) | 1987-05-15 | 1988-11-24 | Hoechst Ag | RESISTANCE TO PHOSPHINOTHRICIN |
US5350689A (en) | 1987-05-20 | 1994-09-27 | Ciba-Geigy Corporation | Zea mays plants and transgenic Zea mays plants regenerated from protoplasts or protoplast-derived cells |
EP0846771A1 (en) | 1987-05-20 | 1998-06-10 | Novartis AG | Zea mays plants and transgenic zea mays plants regenerated from protoplasts or protoplast-derived cells |
US4971908A (en) | 1987-05-26 | 1990-11-20 | Monsanto Company | Glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthase |
NL8701450A (en) | 1987-06-22 | 1989-01-16 | Solvay | METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING CELLS. |
DE3855591T2 (en) | 1987-10-20 | 1997-04-03 | Plant Genetic Systems Nv | Process for the production of a biologically active peptide by expression of modified storage protein genes in transgenic plants |
DE3853278T2 (en) | 1988-02-29 | 1995-07-13 | Du Pont | Device for delivering substances in cells and tissues in a non-lethal manner. |
EP0331083A3 (en) | 1988-03-02 | 1990-11-28 | Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (Eth) | Method for the production of transgenic plants |
DE58909753D1 (en) | 1988-03-08 | 1997-01-23 | Ciba Geigy Ag | Regeneration of fertile Gramineae plants from the Pooideae subfamily based on protoplasts |
GB8806643D0 (en) | 1988-03-21 | 1988-04-20 | Ici Plc | Genetic manipulation |
NZ228320A (en) | 1988-03-29 | 1991-06-25 | Du Pont | Nucleic acid promoter fragments of the promoter region homologous to the em gene of wheat, dna constructs therefrom and plants thereof |
US5250515A (en) | 1988-04-11 | 1993-10-05 | Monsanto Company | Method for improving the efficacy of insect toxins |
US5013658A (en) | 1988-05-13 | 1991-05-07 | Dna Plant Technology Corporation | Transposon tagging of genes in transformed plants |
AU3756889A (en) | 1988-06-01 | 1990-01-05 | The Texas A & M University System | Method for transforming plants via the shoot apex |
NL8801444A (en) | 1988-06-06 | 1990-01-02 | Solvay | Genetic transformation of eukaryotic cells - esp. plant cells, by treating dried cells with DNA soln. |
US5258300A (en) | 1988-06-09 | 1993-11-02 | Molecular Genetics Research And Development Limited Partnership | Method of inducing lysine overproduction in plants |
US5990387A (en) | 1988-06-10 | 1999-11-23 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Stable transformation of plant cells |
EP0348348B1 (en) | 1988-06-20 | 2000-08-09 | Novartis AG | Process for controlling plant pests with the help of non-plant-derived proteinase-inhibitors |
CA1341467C (en) | 1988-07-29 | 2004-12-07 | John C. Rogers | Producing commercially valuable polypeptides with genetically transformed endosperm tissue |
GB8818706D0 (en) | 1988-08-05 | 1988-09-07 | Ici Plc | Dna constructs & plants incorporating them |
EP0359617A3 (en) | 1988-09-02 | 1990-04-04 | Plant Genetic Systems, N.V. | Stress-tolerant plants |
NZ230375A (en) | 1988-09-09 | 1991-07-26 | Lubrizol Genetics Inc | Synthetic gene encoding b. thuringiensis insecticidal protein |
US5057419A (en) * | 1988-09-22 | 1991-10-15 | Rutgers University | Genetically engineered plasmid and organisms for the production of specialized oils |
EP0360750A3 (en) | 1988-09-22 | 1991-01-02 | Ciba-Geigy Ag | Novel herbicide tolerant plants |
US5693507A (en) | 1988-09-26 | 1997-12-02 | Auburn University | Genetic engineering of plant chloroplasts |
US5589615A (en) | 1988-10-14 | 1996-12-31 | Plant Genetic Systems N.V. | Process for the production of transgenic plants with increased nutritional value via the expression of modified 2S storage albumins |
DE3843627A1 (en) | 1988-12-21 | 1990-07-05 | Inst Genbiologische Forschung | POTATO TUBE-SPECIFIC TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION |
CA2024811A1 (en) | 1989-02-24 | 1990-08-25 | David A. Fischhoff | Synthetic plant genes and method for preparation |
US5082767A (en) | 1989-02-27 | 1992-01-21 | Hatfield G Wesley | Codon pair utilization |
US5110732A (en) | 1989-03-14 | 1992-05-05 | The Rockefeller University | Selective gene expression in plants |
US5231020A (en) | 1989-03-30 | 1993-07-27 | Dna Plant Technology Corporation | Genetic engineering of novel plant phenotypes |
EP0400246A1 (en) | 1989-05-31 | 1990-12-05 | Plant Genetic Systems, N.V. | Prevention of Bt resistance development |
US5302523A (en) | 1989-06-21 | 1994-04-12 | Zeneca Limited | Transformation of plant cells |
US5310667A (en) | 1989-07-17 | 1994-05-10 | Monsanto Company | Glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthases |
US6803499B1 (en) | 1989-08-09 | 2004-10-12 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof |
US7705215B1 (en) | 1990-04-17 | 2010-04-27 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof |
CA2064761C (en) | 1989-08-09 | 2006-06-13 | Thomas R. Adams | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed fertile monocot plants and cells thereof |
US5550318A (en) | 1990-04-17 | 1996-08-27 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof |
US5097093A (en) | 1989-08-30 | 1992-03-17 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Inbred corn line PHJ33 |
SK280670B6 (en) | 1989-09-27 | 2000-05-16 | Gist-Brocades N.V. | Purified and isolated dna sequence, construct, vector, transformed cell, peptide or protein having phytase activity, process for its preparation, and its use |
US5322783A (en) | 1989-10-17 | 1994-06-21 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Soybean transformation by microparticle bombardment |
DE59009881D1 (en) | 1989-12-19 | 1995-12-21 | Ciba Geigy Ag | Method and device for the genetic transformation of cells. |
AU7182791A (en) * | 1990-01-05 | 1991-07-24 | Cornell Research Foundation Inc. | Rice actin gene and promoter |
US5641876A (en) | 1990-01-05 | 1997-06-24 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Rice actin gene and promoter |
US5484956A (en) | 1990-01-22 | 1996-01-16 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Fertile transgenic Zea mays plant comprising heterologous DNA encoding Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin |
US6025545A (en) | 1990-01-22 | 2000-02-15 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof |
US6777589B1 (en) | 1990-01-22 | 2004-08-17 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof |
US6946587B1 (en) | 1990-01-22 | 2005-09-20 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Method for preparing fertile transgenic corn plants |
EP0442174A1 (en) | 1990-02-13 | 1991-08-21 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Stable transformation of plant cells |
EP0442175A1 (en) | 1990-02-13 | 1991-08-21 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Plants with increased tissue culture and regeneration potential |
US6117677A (en) * | 1990-03-16 | 2000-09-12 | Thompson; Gregory A. | Plant stearoyl-ACP desaturases genes |
US7037692B1 (en) | 1990-03-16 | 2006-05-02 | Calgene, Inc. | Plant desaturases compositions and uses |
ATE241007T1 (en) * | 1990-03-16 | 2003-06-15 | Calgene Llc | DNAS CODING FOR PLANT DESATURASES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS |
US5593963A (en) | 1990-09-21 | 1997-01-14 | Mogen International | Expression of phytase in plants |
DE69133128T2 (en) | 1990-04-12 | 2003-06-18 | Syngenta Participations Ag, Basel | Tissue-specific promoters |
US5451513A (en) | 1990-05-01 | 1995-09-19 | The State University of New Jersey Rutgers | Method for stably transforming plastids of multicellular plants |
DE69132366T2 (en) | 1990-05-18 | 2001-04-05 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation, Campbell | Recombinant promoter for gene expression in monocots |
CA2083259C (en) * | 1990-05-25 | 2007-05-15 | William D. Hitz | Nucleotide sequence of soybean stearoyl-acp desaturase gene |
US5349123A (en) * | 1990-12-21 | 1994-09-20 | Calgene, Inc. | Glycogen biosynthetic enzymes in plants |
US5498830A (en) * | 1990-06-18 | 1996-03-12 | Monsanto Company | Decreased oil content in plant seeds |
US5187267A (en) | 1990-06-19 | 1993-02-16 | Calgene, Inc. | Plant proteins, promoters, coding sequences and use |
DK0469273T3 (en) | 1990-06-23 | 2004-04-13 | Bayer Cropscience Gmbh | Fertile transgenic maize plants with species promoted gene as well as methods for their preparation |
US6395966B1 (en) | 1990-08-09 | 2002-05-28 | Dekalb Genetics Corp. | Fertile transgenic maize plants containing a gene encoding the pat protein |
DK0546090T4 (en) * | 1990-08-31 | 2006-11-20 | Monsanto Co | Glyphosate-tolerant enolpyruvyl shikimate-3-phosphate synthases |
US6022846A (en) | 1990-09-21 | 2000-02-08 | Mogen International And Gist-Brocades N.V. | Expression of phytase in plants |
US5866775A (en) * | 1990-09-28 | 1999-02-02 | Monsanto Company | Glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthases |
AU643563B2 (en) | 1990-11-01 | 1993-11-18 | Sapporo Breweries Limited | Method for preparing transformed plant |
ATE318318T1 (en) | 1990-11-23 | 2006-03-15 | Bayer Bioscience Nv | METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING MONOCOTYL PLANTS |
US5436389A (en) | 1991-02-21 | 1995-07-25 | Dekalb Genetics Corp. | Hybrid genetic complement and corn plant DK570 |
FR2673642B1 (en) | 1991-03-05 | 1994-08-12 | Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie | CHIMERIC GENE COMPRISING A PROMOTER CAPABLE OF GIVING INCREASED TOLERANCE TO GLYPHOSATE. |
ATE271131T1 (en) | 1991-05-09 | 2004-07-15 | Univ Arizona | TRANSGENIC PLANTS WITH MODIFIED POLYOL CONTENT |
US5559223A (en) | 1991-08-09 | 1996-09-24 | E. I. Dupont De Nemours And Company | Synthetic storage proteins with defined structure containing programmable levels of essential amino acids for improvement of the nutritional value of plants |
WO1993004178A1 (en) * | 1991-08-23 | 1993-03-04 | University Of Florida | A novel method for the production of transgenic plants |
DK0616644T3 (en) * | 1991-12-04 | 2003-10-27 | Du Pont | Fatty acid desaturase genes from plants |
CA2084348A1 (en) | 1991-12-31 | 1993-07-01 | David F. Hildebrand | Fatty acid alteration by a d9 desaturase in transgenic plant tissue |
US5422254A (en) | 1992-02-14 | 1995-06-06 | Oy Alko Ab | Method to increase the trehalose content of organisms by transforming them with the structural genes for the short and long chains of yeast trehalose synthase |
US5773691A (en) | 1992-03-19 | 1998-06-30 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Chimeric genes and methods for increasing the lysine and threonine content of the seeds of plants |
EP0591530A4 (en) | 1992-03-24 | 1995-05-03 | Rice Breeding Research Lab | Process for reducing seed storage proteins and process for transforming plants. |
US5591616A (en) * | 1992-07-07 | 1997-01-07 | Japan Tobacco, Inc. | Method for transforming monocotyledons |
US5743477A (en) | 1992-08-27 | 1998-04-28 | Dowelanco | Insecticidal proteins and method for plant protection |
US5545545A (en) | 1993-04-27 | 1996-08-13 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Lysine-insensitive maize dihydrodipicolinic acid synthase |
US6118047A (en) | 1993-08-25 | 2000-09-12 | Dekalb Genetic Corporation | Anthranilate synthase gene and method of use thereof for conferring tryptophan overproduction |
US6281411B1 (en) | 1993-08-25 | 2001-08-28 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Transgenic monocots plants with increased glycine-betaine content |
US5780709A (en) | 1993-08-25 | 1998-07-14 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Transgenic maize with increased mannitol content |
US5668292A (en) | 1994-09-26 | 1997-09-16 | Carnegie Institution Of Washington | Use of plant fatty acyl hydroxylases to produce hydroxylated fatty acids and derivatives in plants |
US5641644A (en) | 1994-12-09 | 1997-06-24 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Method and apparatus for the precise positioning of cells |
US6075183A (en) * | 1997-04-11 | 2000-06-13 | Abbott Laboratories | Methods and compositions for synthesis of long chain poly-unsaturated fatty acids in plants |
US6603061B1 (en) * | 1999-07-29 | 2003-08-05 | Monsanto Company | Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation method |
-
1993
- 1993-08-25 US US08/113,561 patent/US7705215B1/en active Active
-
1994
- 1994-08-24 HU HU9600425A patent/HUT74392A/en active IP Right Revival
- 1994-08-24 CA CA002170260A patent/CA2170260A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1994-08-24 EP EP09164563A patent/EP2107118A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1994-08-24 EP EP94927962A patent/EP0721509A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1994-08-24 WO PCT/US1994/009699 patent/WO1995006128A2/en active Application Filing
- 1994-08-24 BR BR9407355A patent/BR9407355A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1994-08-25 ZA ZA964217A patent/ZA964217B/en unknown
- 1994-08-25 ZA ZA946488A patent/ZA946488B/en unknown
- 1994-08-25 IL IL11078194A patent/IL110781A0/en unknown
-
1995
- 1995-05-23 US US08/447,985 patent/US6399861B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1991002071A2 (en) * | 1989-08-09 | 1991-02-21 | Dekalb Plant Genetics | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof |
WO1991010725A1 (en) * | 1990-01-22 | 1991-07-25 | Dekalb Plant Genetics | Fertile transgenic corn plants |
DE4013099A1 (en) * | 1990-04-25 | 1991-10-31 | Hoechst Ag | Transforming immature somatic plant, esp. maize, embryos - by treating, in dry state, with nucleic acid soln., esp. for introducing resistance to phosphinothricin |
EP0485970A2 (en) * | 1990-11-13 | 1992-05-20 | Yeda Research And Development Company Limited | Transgenic plants overproducing threonine and lysine |
WO1992012250A1 (en) * | 1990-12-28 | 1992-07-23 | Dekalb Plant Genetics | Stable transformation of maize cells by electroporation |
WO1993007278A1 (en) * | 1991-10-04 | 1993-04-15 | Ciba-Geigy Ag | Synthetic dna sequence having enhanced insecticidal activity in maize |
WO1993019190A1 (en) * | 1992-03-19 | 1993-09-30 | E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Nucleic acid fragments and methods for increasing the lysine and threonine content of the seeds of plants |
EP0589110A1 (en) * | 1992-08-19 | 1994-03-30 | Plant Genetic Systems N.V. | Control of ostrinia |
Non-Patent Citations (7)
Cited By (543)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6268546B1 (en) | 1989-07-19 | 2001-07-31 | Calgene Llc | Ovary-tissue transcriptional factors |
US7041653B2 (en) | 1990-12-20 | 2006-05-09 | The University Of Chicago | Gene transcription and ionizing radiation: methods and compositions |
US6268550B1 (en) | 1993-02-05 | 2001-07-31 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Methods and a maize acetyl CoA carboxylase gene for altering the oil content of plants |
US6069298A (en) * | 1993-02-05 | 2000-05-30 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Methods and an acetyl CoA carboxylase gene for conferring herbicide tolerance and an alteration in oil content of plants |
US6222099B1 (en) | 1993-02-05 | 2001-04-24 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Transgenic plants expressing maize acetyl COA carboxylase gene and method of altering oil content |
US6414222B1 (en) | 1993-02-05 | 2002-07-02 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Gene combinations for herbicide tolerance in corn |
US6146867A (en) * | 1993-02-05 | 2000-11-14 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Methods for expressing a maize acetyl CoA carboxylase gene in host cells and encoded protein produced thereby |
US7288403B2 (en) | 1993-08-25 | 2007-10-30 | Anderson Paul C | Anthranilate synthase gene and method for increasing tryptophan production |
US6350934B1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2002-02-26 | Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Nucleic acid encoding delta-9 desaturase |
WO1996040951A3 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-02-13 | Calgene Inc | Use of ovary-tissue transcriptional factors |
WO1996040951A2 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1996-12-19 | Calgene, Inc. | Use of ovary-tissue transcriptional factors |
WO1997010328A3 (en) * | 1995-07-13 | 1997-05-15 | Ribozyme Pharm Inc | Compositions and method for modulation of gene expression in plants |
WO1997010328A2 (en) * | 1995-07-13 | 1997-03-20 | Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Compositions and method for modulation of gene expression in plants |
WO1997004103A3 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 1997-03-20 | Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie | Mutated 5-enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene coding for said protein and transformed plants containing said gene |
US6338961B1 (en) | 1995-07-19 | 2002-01-15 | Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie | Isolated DNA sequence capable of serving as regulatory element in a chimeric gene which can be used for the transformation of plants |
EP1217073A2 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 2002-06-26 | Aventis Cropscience S.A. | Transformed plants with improved tolerance to phosphomethylglycine family herbicides containing a gene encoding a mutated 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phophate synthase |
WO1997004114A3 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 1997-03-20 | Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie | Isolated dna sequence for use as a regulator region in a chimeric gene useful for transforming plants |
EP1217073A3 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 2002-09-04 | Aventis Cropscience S.A. | Transformed plants with improved tolerance to phosphomethylglycine family herbicides containing a gene encoding a mutated 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phophate synthase |
AU757208B2 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 2003-02-06 | Bayer S.A.S. | Mutated 5-enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene coding for said protein and transformed plants containing said gene |
JP2011041567A (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 2011-03-03 | Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie | Mutated 5-enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene encoding the protein and transformed plant containing the gene |
WO1997004114A2 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 1997-02-06 | Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie | Isolated dna sequence for use as a regulator region in a chimeric gene useful for transforming plants |
WO1997004103A2 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 1997-02-06 | Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie | Mutated 5-enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene coding for said protein and transformed plants containing said gene |
US6566587B1 (en) | 1995-07-19 | 2003-05-20 | Bayer Cropscience S.A. | Mutated 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene coding for said protein and transformed plants containing said gene |
AU2002313983B2 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 2006-06-22 | Bayer S.A.S. | Mutated 5-enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene coding for said protein and transformed plants containing said gene |
US7982092B2 (en) | 1995-07-19 | 2011-07-19 | Bayer Cropscience Sa | Chimeric gene comprising intron from histone H3.3 gene |
CN1037913C (en) * | 1995-12-28 | 1998-04-01 | 中国农业科学院生物技术研究中心 | Expressive carrier with coded insect-killing protein fusion gene, and transfer gene plant |
WO1997026365A3 (en) * | 1996-01-19 | 1997-09-12 | Dekalb Genetic Corp | Transgenic maize with increased mannitol content |
WO1997026365A2 (en) * | 1996-01-19 | 1997-07-24 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Transgenic maize with increased mannitol content |
US7297847B1 (en) | 1996-01-29 | 2007-11-20 | Biogemma | Amino acid-enriched plant protein reserves, particularly lysine-enriched maize γ-zein, and plants expressing such proteins |
WO1997028247A2 (en) * | 1996-01-29 | 1997-08-07 | Biocem | AMINO ACID-ENRICHED PLANT PROTEIN RESERVES, PARTICULARLY LYSINE-ENRICHED MAIZE η-ZEIN, AND PLANTS EXPRESSING SUCH PROTEINS |
WO1997028247A3 (en) * | 1996-01-29 | 1997-10-09 | Biocem | AMINO ACID-ENRICHED PLANT PROTEIN RESERVES, PARTICULARLY LYSINE-ENRICHED MAIZE η-ZEIN, AND PLANTS EXPRESSING SUCH PROTEINS |
DE19621572A1 (en) * | 1996-05-29 | 1997-12-04 | Max Planck Gesellschaft | Localized cell death in plants |
WO1998002562A3 (en) * | 1996-07-16 | 1998-04-30 | Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie | Chimera gene with several herbicide resistant genes, plant cell and plant resistant to several herbicides |
FR2751347A1 (en) * | 1996-07-16 | 1998-01-23 | Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie | CHIMERIC GENE WITH MULTIPLE GENES OF TOLERANCE HERBICIDE, PLANT CELL, AND TOLERANT PLANTS WITH SEVERAL HERBICIDES |
WO1998002562A2 (en) * | 1996-07-16 | 1998-01-22 | Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie | Chimera gene with several herbicide resistant genes, plant cell and plant resistant to several herbicides |
US7250561B1 (en) | 1996-07-16 | 2007-07-31 | Bayer Cropscience S.A. | Chimera gene with several herbicide resistant genes, plant cell and plant resistant to several herbicides |
US7935869B2 (en) | 1996-07-16 | 2011-05-03 | Bayer S.A.S. | Chimeric gene with several herbicide tolerance genes, plant cell and plant resistant to several herbicides |
WO1998005785A1 (en) * | 1996-08-01 | 1998-02-12 | Biocem | Plant phytases and biotechnological applications |
FR2751987A1 (en) * | 1996-08-01 | 1998-02-06 | Biocem | PLANT PHYTASES AND BIOTECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS |
WO1998006862A1 (en) * | 1996-08-09 | 1998-02-19 | Calgene Llc | Methods for producing carotenoid compounds and speciality oils in plant seeds |
US6429356B1 (en) | 1996-08-09 | 2002-08-06 | Calgene Llc | Methods for producing carotenoid compounds, and specialty oils in plant seeds |
US6972351B2 (en) | 1996-08-09 | 2005-12-06 | Calgene Llc | Methods for producing carotenoid compounds and specialty oils in plant seeds |
WO1998016650A1 (en) * | 1996-10-17 | 1998-04-23 | E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Enhanced transgene expression in a population of monocot cells employing scaffold attachment regions |
WO1998020144A3 (en) * | 1996-11-07 | 1998-07-16 | Zeneca Ltd | Herbicide resistant plants |
WO1998020144A2 (en) * | 1996-11-07 | 1998-05-14 | Zeneca Limited | Herbicide resistant plants |
WO1998040504A1 (en) * | 1997-03-12 | 1998-09-17 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Methods for altering benzoxazinone levels in plants |
WO1998040505A1 (en) * | 1997-03-13 | 1998-09-17 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Maize dimboa biosynthesis genes |
US6331660B1 (en) | 1997-03-13 | 2001-12-18 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Maize DIMBOA biosynthesis genes |
US6762344B1 (en) | 1997-04-03 | 2004-07-13 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Method of plant breeding |
WO1998044140A1 (en) * | 1997-04-03 | 1998-10-08 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Glyphosate resistant maize lines |
US7314970B2 (en) | 1997-04-03 | 2008-01-01 | Monanto Technology, Llc | Method for plant breeding |
EP1894467A2 (en) * | 1997-04-03 | 2008-03-05 | DeKalb Genetics Corporation | Use of glyphosate resistant maize lines |
EP1894467A3 (en) * | 1997-04-03 | 2008-07-16 | DeKalb Genetics Corporation | Use of glyphosate resistant maize lines |
WO1998050562A1 (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 1998-11-12 | E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Corn pullulanase |
US6429358B1 (en) | 1997-05-06 | 2002-08-06 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Corn pullulanase |
US6143563A (en) * | 1997-05-20 | 2000-11-07 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Cryopreservation of embryogenic callus |
EP2000538A2 (en) | 1997-06-03 | 2008-12-10 | The University of Chicago | Plant artificial chromosome (PLAC) compositions and methods for using them |
US6384207B1 (en) | 1997-06-12 | 2002-05-07 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Regulatory sequences for transgenic plants |
WO1998056921A1 (en) * | 1997-06-12 | 1998-12-17 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Regulatory sequences for transgenic plants |
WO1999010514A1 (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 1999-03-04 | North Carolina State University | Fumonosin resistance |
DE19741375C2 (en) * | 1997-09-19 | 1999-10-21 | Max Planck Gesellschaft | Transgenic plants, the above-ground parts of which ripen earlier and die off completely |
DE19741375A1 (en) * | 1997-09-19 | 1999-04-01 | Max Planck Gesellschaft | Transgenic plants, the above-ground parts of which ripen earlier and die off completely |
US6204436B1 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2001-03-20 | Novartis Ag | Transgenic plants |
US6969784B2 (en) | 1997-11-12 | 2005-11-29 | Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University | Genetic engineering of plants through manipulation of lignin biosynthesis |
US6831208B1 (en) | 1997-11-12 | 2004-12-14 | Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University | 4-coumarate co-enzyme a ligase promoter |
WO1999027116A2 (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 1999-06-03 | Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. | Dna molecules conferring dalapon-resistance to plants and plants transformed thereby |
WO1999027116A3 (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 1999-08-12 | Yeda Res & Dev | Dna molecules conferring dalapon-resistance to plants and plants transformed thereby |
US6153811A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-11-28 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Method for reduction of transgene copy number |
US7053282B1 (en) | 1998-02-09 | 2006-05-30 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Alteration of amino acid compositions in seeds |
WO1999040209A1 (en) * | 1998-02-09 | 1999-08-12 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Alteration of amino acid compositions in seeds |
US6653530B1 (en) | 1998-02-13 | 2003-11-25 | Calgene Llc | Methods for producing carotenoid compounds, tocopherol compounds, and specialty oils in plant seeds |
US7803927B2 (en) | 1998-05-14 | 2010-09-28 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for expression of transgenes in plants |
US7803928B2 (en) | 1998-05-14 | 2010-09-28 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for expression of transgenes in plants |
US6635806B1 (en) | 1998-05-14 | 2003-10-21 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Methods and compositions for expression of transgenes in plants |
US7741538B2 (en) | 1998-05-14 | 2010-06-22 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Methods and compositions for expression of transgenes in plants |
US7256283B2 (en) | 1998-05-14 | 2007-08-14 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | Methods and compositions for expression of transgenes in plants |
US6835569B2 (en) | 1998-07-15 | 2004-12-28 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol oxidase amine polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
WO2000004158A3 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2000-05-18 | Pioneer Hi Bred Int | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
WO2000004158A2 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2000-01-27 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
US6211435B1 (en) | 1998-07-15 | 2001-04-03 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol amine oxidase polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
WO2000004159A1 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2000-01-27 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol amine oxidase polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
US6987212B2 (en) | 1998-07-15 | 2006-01-17 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol amine oxidase polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
US7241934B2 (en) | 1998-07-15 | 2007-07-10 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol amine oxidase polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
US6211434B1 (en) | 1998-07-15 | 2001-04-03 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol amine oxidase polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
US6538177B1 (en) | 1998-07-15 | 2003-03-25 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
WO2000004160A1 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2000-01-27 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol amine oxidase polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
WO2000006757A1 (en) * | 1998-07-31 | 2000-02-10 | Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. | Improved plant transformation process by scaffold attachment regions (sar) |
US7385104B2 (en) | 1998-07-31 | 2008-06-10 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants synthesizing a modified starch, a process for the generation of the plants, their use, and the modified starch |
US7247769B2 (en) | 1998-07-31 | 2007-07-24 | Bayer Cropscience Gmbh | Plants synthesizing a modified starch, a process for the generation of the plants, their use, and the modified starch |
EP1806399A2 (en) | 1998-10-09 | 2007-07-11 | Bayer BioScience GmbH | Nucleic acid molecules encoding a branching enzyme comprising bacteria of the genus Neisseria and method for producing alpha-1.6-branched alpha-1, 4-glucanes |
EP2123764A1 (en) | 1999-05-14 | 2009-11-25 | Dekalb Genetics Corporation | The rice actin 2 promoter and intron and methods for use thereof |
US6534291B1 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2003-03-18 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
US6482621B1 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2002-11-19 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
US6822140B2 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2004-11-23 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
US6388171B1 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2002-05-14 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
US6943279B1 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2005-09-13 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Amino polyol amine oxidase polynucleotides and related polypeptides and methods of use |
WO2001005980A1 (en) * | 1999-07-14 | 2001-01-25 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification |
US7332594B2 (en) | 1999-09-15 | 2008-02-19 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Lepidopteran-active Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin polynucleotides, compositions, and methods of use |
US7534939B2 (en) | 1999-09-15 | 2009-05-19 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plant transformed with polynucleotide encoding lepidopteran-active Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin |
US7078509B2 (en) | 1999-09-15 | 2006-07-18 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Lepidopteran-active Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin polynucleotides, compositions, and methods of use |
WO2001019859A2 (en) * | 1999-09-15 | 2001-03-22 | Monsanto Technology Llc | LEPIDOPTERAN-ACTIVE BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS δ-ENDOTOXIN COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE |
US6593293B1 (en) | 1999-09-15 | 2003-07-15 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Lepidopteran-active Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin compositions and methods of use |
WO2001019859A3 (en) * | 1999-09-15 | 2002-05-10 | Monsanto Technology Llc | LEPIDOPTERAN-ACTIVE BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS δ-ENDOTOXIN COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE |
US7144569B1 (en) | 1999-10-01 | 2006-12-05 | Isis Innovation Limited | Diagnosis of coeliac disease using a gliadin epitope |
US8329144B2 (en) | 1999-10-01 | 2012-12-11 | Isis Innovation Limited | Diagnostic and therapeutic epitope, and transgenic plant |
US7888460B2 (en) | 1999-10-01 | 2011-02-15 | Isis Innovation Limited | Diagnostic and therapeutic epitope, and transgenic plant |
US8003799B2 (en) | 2000-01-06 | 2011-08-23 | Bayer Sas | Picolinic acid derivatives and their use as fungicides |
WO2002034923A2 (en) | 2000-10-23 | 2002-05-02 | Bayer Cropscience Gmbh | Monocotyledon plant cells and plants which synthesise modified starch |
WO2002036787A2 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2002-05-10 | Bayer Cropscience S.A. | Herbicide-tolerant plants through bypassing metabolic pathway |
EP2141240A2 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2010-01-06 | Bayer CropScience SA | Plants that can tolerate herbicides by bypassing the metabolic route |
US8034791B2 (en) | 2001-04-06 | 2011-10-11 | The University Of Chicago | Activation of Egr-1 promoter by DNA damaging chemotherapeutics |
WO2002095002A2 (en) | 2001-05-22 | 2002-11-28 | University Of Chicago | N4 virion single-stranded dna dependent rna polymerase |
EP2390256A1 (en) | 2001-05-30 | 2011-11-30 | Agrisoma, Inc. | Plant artificial chromosomes, uses thereof and methods of preparing plant artificial chromosomes |
WO2003038112A2 (en) | 2001-10-26 | 2003-05-08 | Baylor College Of Medicine | A composition and method to alter lean body mass and bone properties in a subject |
US7338656B2 (en) | 2001-10-26 | 2008-03-04 | Baylor College Of Medicine | Composition and method to alter lean body mass and bone properties in a subject |
US7241744B2 (en) | 2001-12-11 | 2007-07-10 | Baylor College Of Medicine | Treating anemia in subjects by administration of plasmids encoding growth hormone releasing hormone |
WO2003049700A2 (en) | 2001-12-11 | 2003-06-19 | Advisys, Inc. | Growth hormone releasing hormone suplementation for treating chronically ill subjects |
US8178504B2 (en) | 2001-12-11 | 2012-05-15 | Vgx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Gene therapy expression of GHRH for increasing RBC count in subjects |
WO2003099216A2 (en) | 2002-05-22 | 2003-12-04 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Fatty acid desaturases from fungi |
EP2826787A1 (en) | 2002-06-05 | 2015-01-21 | ISIS Innovation Limited | Therapeutic epitopes and uses thereof |
EP2292649A2 (en) | 2002-06-05 | 2011-03-09 | ISIS Innovation Limited | Therapeutic epitopes and uses thereof |
US10053497B2 (en) | 2002-06-05 | 2018-08-21 | Oxford University Innovation Limited | Therapeutic epitopes and uses thereof |
US7364901B2 (en) | 2002-07-15 | 2008-04-29 | University Of Kentucky Research Foundation | Recombinant Stokesia epoxygenase gene |
WO2005019409A2 (en) | 2002-07-15 | 2005-03-03 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Combinatorial protein library screening by periplasmic expression |
EP2269619A1 (en) | 2002-08-12 | 2011-01-05 | Jennerex Biotherapeutics ULC | Methods and compositions concerning poxviruses and cancer |
EP2269618A1 (en) | 2002-08-12 | 2011-01-05 | Jennerex Biotherapeutics ULC | An oncolytic vaccinia virus for use in combination with a chemotherapy for treating cancer. |
EP2044948A1 (en) | 2002-08-12 | 2009-04-08 | Jennerex Biotherapeutics ULC | Methods and compositions concerning poxviruses and cancer |
USRE41943E1 (en) | 2002-08-19 | 2010-11-16 | Mertec, Llc | Glyphosate-resistant plants |
US7626077B2 (en) | 2002-08-19 | 2009-12-01 | Mertec Llc | Glyphosate-resistant plants |
US7045684B1 (en) | 2002-08-19 | 2006-05-16 | Mertec, Llc | Glyphosate-resistant plants |
WO2004053134A1 (en) | 2002-12-12 | 2004-06-24 | Bayer Cropscience S.A. | Expression cassette encoding a 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (epsps) and herbicide-tolerant plants containing it |
EP1445321A1 (en) | 2002-12-18 | 2004-08-11 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Maize embryo-specific promoter compositions and methods for use thereof |
US7714186B2 (en) | 2002-12-19 | 2010-05-11 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plant cells and plants which synthesize a starch with an increased final viscosity |
US8017832B2 (en) | 2002-12-19 | 2011-09-13 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plant cells and plants which synthesize a starch with an increased final viscosity |
WO2005016504A2 (en) | 2003-06-23 | 2005-02-24 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Disruption of acc synthase genes to delay senescence in plants |
EP2357240A1 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2011-08-17 | Chromatin, Inc. | Plant centromere compositions |
EP2295586A2 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2011-03-16 | Chromatin, Inc. | Plant centromere compositions |
EP2017345A1 (en) | 2003-08-18 | 2009-01-21 | Ceres, Inc. | Nucleotide sequences and polypeptides encoded thereby useful for inreasing plant size and increasing the number and size of leaves |
EP2343364A3 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2011-10-26 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Tubulin regulatory elements for use in plants |
US7838654B2 (en) | 2003-08-25 | 2010-11-23 | Heck Gregory R | Tubulin regulatory elements for use in plants |
US7511130B2 (en) | 2003-08-25 | 2009-03-31 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Chimeric rice Os-TubA-3 promoter and methods of use |
EP1658364A4 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2008-04-02 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Tubulin regulatory elements for use in plants |
EP2308961A3 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2011-07-27 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Tubulin regulatory elements for use in plants |
US8088911B2 (en) | 2003-08-25 | 2012-01-03 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Tubulin regulatory elements for use in plants |
EP1658364A2 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2006-05-24 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Tubulin regulatory elements for use in plants |
WO2005054453A1 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2005-06-16 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | 2-methyl-6-solanylbenzoquinone methyltransferase as target for herbicides |
EP2486935A1 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2012-08-15 | BTG International Limited | Epitopes related to Coeliac Disease |
US10105437B2 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2018-10-23 | Btg International Limited | Epitopes related to coeliac disease |
EP2486934A1 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2012-08-15 | BTG International Limited | Epitopes Related To Coeliac Disease |
EP2412380A1 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2012-02-01 | BTG International Limited | Epitopes related to coeliac disease |
US9017690B2 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2015-04-28 | Btg International Limited | Epitopes related to coeliac disease |
WO2006005520A2 (en) | 2004-07-08 | 2006-01-19 | Dlf-Trifolium A/S | Means and methods for controlling flowering in plants |
WO2006023869A2 (en) | 2004-08-24 | 2006-03-02 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Adenylate translocator protein gene non-coding regulatory elements for use in plants |
EP2302052A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-03-30 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2808389A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2014-12-03 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving MIRNA and MIRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2292755A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-03-09 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2302056A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-03-30 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2808390A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2014-12-03 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2292756A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-03-09 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2302054A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-03-30 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2287303A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-02-23 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2284265A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-02-16 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2281886A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-02-09 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2298894A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-03-23 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2281889A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-02-09 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2302055A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-03-30 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2322616A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-05-18 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2302051A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-03-30 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2281888A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-02-09 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2314688A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-04-27 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2302053A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-03-30 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2281887A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-02-09 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
EP2298893A1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-03-23 | Asuragen, Inc. | Methods and compositions involving miRNA and miRNA inhibitor molecules |
WO2006073727A2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2006-07-13 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Recombinant dna constructs and methods for controlling gene expression |
US9708620B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2017-07-18 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Recombinant DNA constructs and methods for controlling gene expression |
US9212370B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2015-12-15 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Recombinant DNA constructs and methods for controlling gene expression |
US10793869B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2020-10-06 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Recombinant DNA constructs and methods for controlling gene expression |
EP3372676A1 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2018-09-12 | Monsanto Technology, LLC | Recombinant dna constructs and methods for controlling gene expression |
EP2765189A1 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2014-08-13 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Recombinant DNA constructs and methods for controlling gene expression |
US9000264B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2015-04-07 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Recombinant DNA constructs and methods for controlling gene expression |
US7335760B2 (en) | 2004-12-22 | 2008-02-26 | Ceres, Inc. | Nucleic acid sequences encoding zinc finger proteins |
WO2006099249A2 (en) | 2005-03-10 | 2006-09-21 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Maize seed with synergistically enhanced lysine content |
US8148517B2 (en) | 2005-04-01 | 2012-04-03 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Phosphorylated waxy potato starch |
WO2006103107A1 (en) | 2005-04-01 | 2006-10-05 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Phosphorylated waxy potato starch |
WO2006124678A2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2006-11-23 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Corn plants and seed enhanced for asparagine and protein |
WO2007011479A2 (en) | 2005-07-19 | 2007-01-25 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Double-stranded rna stabilized in planta |
EP2272968A2 (en) | 2005-09-08 | 2011-01-12 | Chromatin, Inc. | Plants modified with mini-chromosomes |
US9121028B2 (en) | 2005-09-09 | 2015-09-01 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Selective gene expression in plants |
WO2007031547A1 (en) | 2005-09-16 | 2007-03-22 | Bayer Cropscience Sa | Transplastomic plants expressing lumen-targeted protein |
EP1772052A1 (en) | 2005-10-05 | 2007-04-11 | Bayer CropScience GmbH | Improved methods and means for production of hyaluronic acid |
WO2007039317A2 (en) | 2005-10-05 | 2007-04-12 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants having an increased content of amino sugars |
US9192112B2 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2015-11-24 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing hybrid seed |
US10876126B2 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2020-12-29 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing hybrid seed |
EP3339441A1 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2018-06-27 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Methods for producing hybrid seed |
US7663020B2 (en) | 2006-01-11 | 2010-02-16 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil content |
EP2368570A2 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2011-09-28 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to staphylococcal bacterium proteins |
EP2368569A2 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2011-09-28 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to staphylococcal bacterium proteins |
US8222482B2 (en) | 2006-01-26 | 2012-07-17 | Ceres, Inc. | Modulating plant oil levels |
US8143480B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2012-03-27 | Whitehead Institute For Biomedical Research | Compositions and methods for efficient gene silencing in plants |
WO2007090121A2 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-09 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Phosphopantetheinyl transferases from bacteria |
US11708577B2 (en) | 2006-02-13 | 2023-07-25 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Modified gene silencing |
US9765351B2 (en) | 2006-02-13 | 2017-09-19 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Modified gene silencing |
US8088979B2 (en) | 2006-03-15 | 2012-01-03 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Resistance to auxinic herbicides |
US8071847B2 (en) | 2006-03-15 | 2011-12-06 | Agrigenetics Inc. | Resistance to auxinic herbicides |
US8535893B2 (en) | 2006-03-15 | 2013-09-17 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Resistance to auxinic herbicides |
US8603755B2 (en) | 2006-03-15 | 2013-12-10 | Dow Agrosciences, Llc. | Resistance to auxinic herbicides |
US7820883B2 (en) | 2006-03-15 | 2010-10-26 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Resistance to auxinic herbicides |
WO2007134122A2 (en) | 2006-05-09 | 2007-11-22 | The Curators Of The University Of Missouri | Plant artificial chromosome platforms via telomere truncation |
WO2008014484A1 (en) | 2006-07-27 | 2008-01-31 | University Of Maryland, Baltimore | Cellular receptor for antiproliferative factor |
US8853488B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2014-10-07 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for rapidly transforming monocots |
US10006036B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2018-06-26 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing transgenic plants |
WO2008028115A3 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-06-19 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing transgenic plants |
WO2008028115A2 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-06 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing transgenic plants |
US9783813B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2017-10-10 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for rapidly transforming monocots |
US8962326B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2015-02-24 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing transgenic plants |
EP3287524A1 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2018-02-28 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Phased small rnas |
US9617552B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2017-04-11 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plant transformation without selection |
US10301623B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2019-05-28 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Phased small RNAs |
WO2008027592A2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-06 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Phased small rnas |
US8513016B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2013-08-20 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing transgenic plants |
US8395020B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2013-03-12 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for rapidly transforming monocots |
US8124411B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2012-02-28 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing transgenic plants |
US10233455B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2019-03-19 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plant transformation without selection |
US8581035B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2013-11-12 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plant transformation without selection |
US9309512B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2016-04-12 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Phased small RNAs |
US11091766B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2021-08-17 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods for producing transgenic plants |
US11718855B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2023-08-08 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Methods for producing transgenic plants |
US10941407B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2021-03-09 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plant transformation without selection |
US8847009B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2014-09-30 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plant transformation without selection |
EP2839837A1 (en) | 2006-09-15 | 2015-02-25 | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Oncolytic Farmington rhabdovirus |
EP2559767A2 (en) | 2006-10-12 | 2013-02-20 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Plant microRNAs and methods of use thereof |
EP3378953A1 (en) | 2006-10-12 | 2018-09-26 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Plant micrornas and methods of use thereof |
WO2008133643A2 (en) | 2006-10-12 | 2008-11-06 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Plant micrornas and methods of use thereof |
EP2985353A1 (en) | 2006-10-12 | 2016-02-17 | Monsanto Technology LLC | Plant micrornas and methods of use thereof |
US10435686B2 (en) | 2006-10-12 | 2019-10-08 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plant microRNAs and methods of use thereof |
US8946511B2 (en) | 2006-10-12 | 2015-02-03 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plant microRNAs and methods of use thereof |
US8753840B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2014-06-17 | Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of Arizona State University | Modified cyanobacteria |
EP2468848A2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2012-06-27 | Arizona Board Regents For And On Behalf Of Arizona State University | Modified cyanobacteria |
US8030541B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2011-10-04 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US9167758B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2015-10-27 | Agrigenetics Inc | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8912395B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2014-12-16 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8916747B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2014-12-23 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8519224B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2013-08-27 | Agrigenetics Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US7763771B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2010-07-27 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8106253B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2012-01-31 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8217225B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2012-07-10 | Dow Agrosciences, Llc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US9719104B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2017-08-01 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8217224B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2012-07-10 | Dow Agrosciences, Llc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8367892B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2013-02-05 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US7855320B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2010-12-21 | Agrigenetics Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8034993B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2011-10-11 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US9277762B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2016-03-08 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US8163978B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2012-04-24 | Arigenetics Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US9624501B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2017-04-18 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US7943817B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2011-05-17 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
US9587246B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2017-03-07 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered protein, fiber, or oil content |
WO2008067547A2 (en) | 2006-11-30 | 2008-06-05 | Research Development Foundation | Improved immunoglobulin libraries |
US7790954B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2010-09-07 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US7678960B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2010-03-16 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US9765354B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2017-09-19 | Dow Agrosciences Llc. | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US10400247B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2019-09-03 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US8921651B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2014-12-30 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US7851672B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2010-12-14 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US7947870B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2011-05-24 | Agrigenetics, Inc. | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US7851674B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2010-12-14 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US7563943B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2009-07-21 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US7851673B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2010-12-14 | Agrinomics Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein, or fiber content |
US10570414B2 (en) | 2007-02-20 | 2020-02-25 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Invertebrate microRNAs |
US9528121B2 (en) | 2007-02-20 | 2016-12-27 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Invertebrate microRNAs |
WO2008113078A1 (en) | 2007-03-15 | 2008-09-18 | Jennerex, Inc. | Oncolytic vaccinia virus cancer therapy |
WO2008137475A2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2008-11-13 | Research Development Foundation | Immunoglobulin fc libraries |
US8017830B2 (en) | 2007-06-18 | 2011-09-13 | Agrinomics, Llc | Generation of plants with altered oil, protein or fiber content |
US11008580B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2021-05-18 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Regulation of gene expression by temporal or leaf specific promoters |
US9976152B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2018-05-22 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Temporal regulation of gene expression by microRNAs |
WO2009029831A1 (en) | 2007-08-31 | 2009-03-05 | University Of Chicago | Methods and compositions related to immunizing against staphylococcal lung diseases and conditions |
US9150873B2 (en) | 2007-09-12 | 2015-10-06 | Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh | Plants which synthesize increased amounts of glucosaminoglycans |
US8158850B2 (en) | 2007-12-19 | 2012-04-17 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Method to enhance yield and purity of hybrid crops |
EP2944649A1 (en) | 2008-01-10 | 2015-11-18 | Research Development Foundation | Vaccines and diagnostics for the ehrlichioses |
WO2009094647A2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2009-07-30 | Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. | P53 biomarkers |
EP3447128A1 (en) | 2008-06-04 | 2019-02-27 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Methods for the production of ips cells using non-viral approach |
EP3279314A1 (en) | 2008-06-04 | 2018-02-07 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Methods for the production of ips cells using non-viral approach |
EP3211005A1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2017-08-30 | Geneuro SA | Therapeutic use of specific ligand in msrv associated diseases |
EP3330371A1 (en) | 2008-08-12 | 2018-06-06 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Methods for the production of ips cells |
WO2010022089A2 (en) | 2008-08-18 | 2010-02-25 | University Of Maryland, Baltimore | Derivatives of apf and methods of use |
WO2010042481A1 (en) | 2008-10-06 | 2010-04-15 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to bacterial eap, emp, and/or adsa proteins |
WO2010045324A1 (en) | 2008-10-14 | 2010-04-22 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Utilization of fatty acid desaturases from hemiselmis spp. |
EP2184351A1 (en) | 2008-10-30 | 2010-05-12 | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. | Polynucleotides encoding caryophyllene synthase and uses thereof |
US9084781B2 (en) | 2008-12-10 | 2015-07-21 | Novartis Ag | MEK mutations conferring resistance to MEK inhibitors |
WO2010068738A1 (en) | 2008-12-10 | 2010-06-17 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Mek mutations conferring resistance to mek inhibitors |
WO2010084488A1 (en) | 2009-01-20 | 2010-07-29 | Ramot At Tel-Aviv University Ltd. | Mir-21 promoter driven targeted cancer therapy |
WO2010096510A2 (en) | 2009-02-17 | 2010-08-26 | Edenspace Systems Corporation | Tempering of cellulosic biomass |
US9907850B2 (en) | 2009-04-03 | 2018-03-06 | The University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein A (SpA) antibodies as an enhancer of immune response |
EP3281947A1 (en) | 2009-04-03 | 2018-02-14 | The University of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein a (spa) variants |
US9212219B2 (en) | 2009-04-03 | 2015-12-15 | The University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein A (SpA) antibodies as an enhancer of immune response |
WO2011005341A2 (en) | 2009-04-03 | 2011-01-13 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein a (spa) variants |
EP3002293A1 (en) | 2009-04-03 | 2016-04-06 | The University of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein a (spa) variants |
US8071865B2 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2011-12-06 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plants and seeds of corn variety CV589782 |
US8362332B2 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2013-01-29 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plants and seeds of corn variety CV165560 |
US8071864B2 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2011-12-06 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plants and seeds of corn variety CV897903 |
WO2010129347A2 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2010-11-11 | Vanderbilt University | Compositions and methods for the treatment of disorders involving epithelial cell apoptosis |
EP3061766A1 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2016-08-31 | Vanderbilt University | Compositions and methods for the treatment of disorders involving epithelial cell apoptosis |
WO2010138971A1 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2010-12-02 | Edenspace Systems Corporation | Plant gene regulatory elements |
EP2548950A2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2013-01-23 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Reprogramming T cells and hematopoietic cells |
WO2010141801A2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-12-09 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Reprogramming t cells and hematophietic cells |
EP3150701A1 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2017-04-05 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Reprogramming t cells and hematopoietic cells |
WO2011025826A1 (en) | 2009-08-26 | 2011-03-03 | Research Development Foundation | Methods for creating antibody libraries |
EP3409119A1 (en) | 2009-09-14 | 2018-12-05 | SillaJen Biotherapeutics, Inc. | Oncolytic vaccinia virus combination cancer therapy |
WO2011032180A1 (en) | 2009-09-14 | 2011-03-17 | Jennerex, Inc. | Oncolytic vaccinia virus combination cancer therapy |
WO2011050271A1 (en) | 2009-10-23 | 2011-04-28 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for expression of transgenes in plants |
US9045729B2 (en) | 2009-12-10 | 2015-06-02 | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Oncolytic rhabdovirus |
US9896664B2 (en) | 2009-12-10 | 2018-02-20 | Turnstone Limited Partnership | Oncolytic rhabdovirus |
WO2011076889A1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2011076892A1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2011076877A1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2011076885A1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2011076882A1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
US9279130B2 (en) | 2010-01-25 | 2016-03-08 | Bayer Cropscience Nv | Methods for manufacturing plant cell walls comprising chitin |
WO2011089021A1 (en) | 2010-01-25 | 2011-07-28 | Bayer Bioscience N.V. | Methods for manufacturing plant cell walls comprising chitin |
WO2011095460A1 (en) | 2010-02-02 | 2011-08-11 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Soybean transformation using hppd inhibitors as selection agents |
WO2011095528A1 (en) | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-11 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | A method for increasing photosynthetic carbon fixation using glycolate dehydrogenase multi-subunit fusion protein |
US10080799B2 (en) | 2010-02-12 | 2018-09-25 | Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of Arizona State University | Methods and compositions related to glycoprotein-immunoglobulin fusions |
US8637246B2 (en) | 2010-02-25 | 2014-01-28 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | BRAF mutations conferring resistance to BRAF inhibitors |
US9279144B2 (en) | 2010-02-25 | 2016-03-08 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Screening method for BRAF inhibitors |
EP3028699A1 (en) | 2010-02-25 | 2016-06-08 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Braf mutations conferring resistance to braf inhibitors |
WO2011106298A1 (en) | 2010-02-25 | 2011-09-01 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Braf mutations conferring resistance to braf inhibitors |
EP3214174A1 (en) | 2010-03-04 | 2017-09-06 | InteRNA Technologies B.V. | A mirna molecule defined by its source and its diagnostic and therapeutic uses in diseases or conditions associated with emt |
WO2011108930A1 (en) | 2010-03-04 | 2011-09-09 | Interna Technologies Bv | A MiRNA MOLECULE DEFINED BY ITS SOURCE AND ITS DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC USES IN DISEASES OR CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH EMT |
US11078540B2 (en) | 2010-03-09 | 2021-08-03 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Methods of diagnosing and treating cancer in patients having or developing resistance to a first cancer therapy |
WO2011127032A1 (en) | 2010-04-05 | 2011-10-13 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein a (spa) antibodies as an enhancer of immune response |
US8808699B2 (en) | 2010-04-05 | 2014-08-19 | The University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein A (SpA) antibodies as an enhancer of immune response |
WO2011126976A1 (en) | 2010-04-07 | 2011-10-13 | Vanderbilt University | Reovirus vaccines and methods of use therefor |
WO2011133512A1 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2011-10-27 | Research Development Foundation | Rtef-1 variants and uses thereof |
WO2011146754A1 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2011-11-24 | The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. | Altered leaf morphology and enhanced agronomic properties in plants |
US11789022B2 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2023-10-17 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | MEK1 mutation conferring resistance to RAF and MEK inhibitors |
WO2011154159A1 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2011-12-15 | Bayer Bioscience N.V. | Methods and means to modify a plant genome at a nucleotide sequence commonly used in plant genome engineering |
WO2011156588A1 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2011-12-15 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | A mek 1 mutation conferring resistance to raf and mek inhibitors |
EP3333259A1 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2018-06-13 | Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | A mek1 mutation conferring resistance to raf and mek inhibitors |
WO2011154158A1 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2011-12-15 | Bayer Bioscience N.V. | Methods and means to modify a plant genome at a nucleotide sequence commonly used in plant genome engineering |
US9880169B2 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2018-01-30 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | MEK1 mutation conferring resistance to RAF and MEK inhibitors |
US10788496B2 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2020-09-29 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | MEK1 mutation conferring resistance to RAF and MEK inhibitors |
EP3889254A1 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2021-10-06 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | A mek1 mutation conferring resistance to raf and mek inhibitors |
US9574201B2 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2017-02-21 | Bayer Cropscience Nv | Methods and means to modify a plant genome at a nucleotide sequence commonly used in plant genome engineering |
WO2011159797A2 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2011-12-22 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | A compendium of ready-built stem cell models for interrogation of biological response |
EP3382008A1 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2018-10-03 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from small volumes of peripheral blood |
WO2011159684A2 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2011-12-22 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from small volumes of peripheral blood |
WO2011157791A1 (en) | 2010-06-16 | 2011-12-22 | Institut National De La Recherche Agronomique | Overproduction of jasmonic acid in transgenic plants |
WO2012003474A2 (en) | 2010-07-02 | 2012-01-05 | The University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to protein a (spa) variants |
WO2012005572A1 (en) | 2010-07-06 | 2012-01-12 | Interna Technologies Bv | Mirna and its diagnostic and therapeutic uses in diseases or conditions associated with melanoma, or in diseases or conditions associated with activated braf pathway |
EP3369817A1 (en) | 2010-07-06 | 2018-09-05 | InteRNA Technologies B.V. | Mirna and its diagnostic and therapeutic uses in diseases or conditions associated with melanoma , or in diseases or conditions with activated braf pathway |
WO2012006440A2 (en) | 2010-07-07 | 2012-01-12 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Endothelial cell production by programming |
WO2012012741A1 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2012-01-26 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | FERULOYL-CoA:MONOLIGNOL TRANSFERASE |
EP3138919A1 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2017-03-08 | Board of Trustees of Michigan State University | FERULOYL-CoA:MONOLIGNOL-TRANSFERASE |
WO2012012698A1 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2012-01-26 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | FERULOYL-CoA:MONOLIGNOL TRANSFERASE |
WO2012018933A2 (en) | 2010-08-04 | 2012-02-09 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Reprogramming immortalized b cells |
WO2012034067A1 (en) | 2010-09-09 | 2012-03-15 | The University Of Chicago | Methods and compositions involving protective staphylococcal antigens |
US9474784B2 (en) | 2010-09-22 | 2016-10-25 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | Therapeutic applications of SMAD7 |
EP3536337A1 (en) | 2010-09-22 | 2019-09-11 | The Regents of the University of Colorado, a body corporate | Therapeutic applications of smad7 |
US10350265B2 (en) | 2010-09-22 | 2019-07-16 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | Therapeutic applications of Smad7 |
US9084746B2 (en) | 2010-09-22 | 2015-07-21 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | Therapeutic applications of SMAD7 |
WO2012061615A1 (en) | 2010-11-03 | 2012-05-10 | The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. | Transcription factors for modification of lignin content in plants |
EP2669369A1 (en) | 2010-11-10 | 2013-12-04 | Bayer CropScience AG | HPPD variants and methods of use |
EP2669372A1 (en) | 2010-11-10 | 2013-12-04 | Bayer CropScience AG | HPPD variants and methods of use |
EP2669370A1 (en) | 2010-11-10 | 2013-12-04 | Bayer CropScience AG | HPPD variants and methods of use |
EP2669371A1 (en) | 2010-11-10 | 2013-12-04 | Bayer CropScience AG | HPPD variants and methods of use |
EP2669373A1 (en) | 2010-11-10 | 2013-12-04 | Bayer CropScience AG | HPPD variants and methods of use |
EP2453012A1 (en) | 2010-11-10 | 2012-05-16 | Bayer CropScience AG | HPPD variants and methods of use |
US9919047B2 (en) | 2011-01-04 | 2018-03-20 | Sillajen, Inc. | Generation of antibodies to tumor antigens and generation of tumor specific complement dependent cytotoxicity by administration of oncolytic vaccinia virus |
WO2012096573A1 (en) | 2011-01-11 | 2012-07-19 | Interna Technologies B.V. | Mirna for treating diseases and conditions associated with neo-angiogenesis |
EP2474617A1 (en) | 2011-01-11 | 2012-07-11 | InteRNA Technologies BV | Mir for treating neo-angiogenesis |
WO2012109133A1 (en) | 2011-02-07 | 2012-08-16 | Research Development Foundation | Engineered immunoglobulin fc polypeptides |
WO2012109208A2 (en) | 2011-02-08 | 2012-08-16 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Hematopoietic precursor cell production by programming |
WO2012130684A1 (en) | 2011-03-25 | 2012-10-04 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Use of n-(1,2,5-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzamides for controlling unwanted plants in areas of transgenic crop plants being tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2012130685A1 (en) | 2011-03-25 | 2012-10-04 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Use of n-(tetrazol-4-yl)- or n-(triazol-3-yl)arylcarboxamides or their salts for controlling unwanted plants in areas of transgenic crop plants being tolerant to hppd inhibitor herbicides |
WO2012136653A1 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2012-10-11 | Novvac Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting staphylococcus aureus |
EP3406628A1 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2018-11-28 | Evaxion Biotech ApS | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting staphylococcus aureus |
US10675340B2 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2020-06-09 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting staphylococcus aureus |
US9534022B2 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2017-01-03 | Novvac Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting Staphylococcus aureus |
US9085631B2 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2015-07-21 | Nov Vac APS | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting Staphylococcus aureus |
US10034928B2 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2018-07-31 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting Staphylococcus aureus |
US11052145B2 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2021-07-06 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting Staphylococcus aureus |
US11654192B2 (en) | 2011-06-08 | 2023-05-23 | Children's Hospital Of Eastern Ontario Research Institute Inc. | Compositions and methods for glioblastoma treatment |
US10772951B2 (en) | 2011-06-08 | 2020-09-15 | Children's Hospital Of Eastern Ontario Research Institute Inc. | Compositions and methods for glioblastoma treatment |
US10689667B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2020-06-23 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for selective regulation of protein expression |
US9139838B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2015-09-22 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for selective regulation of protein expression |
US11560574B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2023-01-24 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for selective regulation of protein expression |
US9816106B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2017-11-14 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Methods and compositions for selective regulation of protein expression |
WO2013009825A1 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2013-01-17 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Methods for cell reprogramming and genome engineering |
US9994863B2 (en) | 2011-07-28 | 2018-06-12 | Genective | Glyphosate tolerant corn event VCO-O1981-5 and kit and method for detecting the same |
WO2013014241A1 (en) | 2011-07-28 | 2013-01-31 | Genective | Glyphosate tolerant corn event vco-ø1981-5 and kit and method for detecting the same |
WO2013023992A1 (en) | 2011-08-12 | 2013-02-21 | Bayer Cropscience Nv | Guard cell-specific expression of transgenes in cotton |
WO2013025834A2 (en) | 2011-08-15 | 2013-02-21 | The University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to antibodies to staphylococcal protein a |
WO2013026015A1 (en) | 2011-08-18 | 2013-02-21 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Muc1 ligand traps for use in treating cancers |
WO2013050410A1 (en) | 2011-10-04 | 2013-04-11 | Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh | RNAi FOR THE CONTROL OF FUNGI AND OOMYCETES BY INHIBITING SACCHAROPINE DEHYDROGENASE GENE |
WO2013052660A1 (en) | 2011-10-06 | 2013-04-11 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | Hibiscus cannabinus feruloyl-coa:monolignol transferase |
WO2013053729A1 (en) | 2011-10-12 | 2013-04-18 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants with decreased activity of a starch dephosphorylating enzyme |
WO2013053899A1 (en) | 2011-10-12 | 2013-04-18 | Moeller Niels Iversen | Peptides derived from campylobacter jejuni and their use in vaccination |
WO2013053730A1 (en) | 2011-10-12 | 2013-04-18 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Plants with decreased activity of a starch dephosphorylating enzyme |
WO2013087821A1 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2013-06-20 | Institut De Recherche Pour Le Développement (Ird) | Overproduction of jasmonates in transgenic plants |
WO2013090814A2 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2013-06-20 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | p-Coumaroyl-CoA:Monolignol Transferase |
WO2013095132A1 (en) | 2011-12-22 | 2013-06-27 | Interna Technologies B.V. | Mirna for treating head and neck cancer |
WO2013130456A2 (en) | 2012-02-27 | 2013-09-06 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | Control of cellulose biosynthesis |
EP3805395A1 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2021-04-14 | University Of Chicago | Staphylococcal coagulase antigens and methods of their use |
WO2013160762A2 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2013-10-31 | Adisseo France S.A.S. | A method of production of 2,4-dihydroxybutyric acid |
WO2013162746A1 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2013-10-31 | University Of Chicago | Staphylococcal coagulase antigens and methods of their use |
WO2013162751A1 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2013-10-31 | University Of Chicago | Compositions and methods related to antibodies that neutralize coagulase activity during staphylococcus aureus disease |
WO2014009432A2 (en) | 2012-07-11 | 2014-01-16 | Institut National Des Sciences Appliquées | A microorganism modified for the production of 1,3-propanediol |
WO2014009435A1 (en) | 2012-07-11 | 2014-01-16 | Adisseo France S.A.S. | Method for the preparation of 2,4-dihydroxybutyrate |
EP3683307A2 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2020-07-22 | BASF Agricultural Solutions Seed US LLC | Hppd variants and methods of use |
WO2014043435A1 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2014-03-20 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Hppd variants and methods of use |
EP3173477A1 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2017-05-31 | Bayer Cropscience LP | Hppd variants and methods of use |
EP3622810A1 (en) | 2012-09-24 | 2020-03-18 | Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. | Methods and compositions for extending shelf life of plant products |
WO2014047653A2 (en) | 2012-09-24 | 2014-03-27 | Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. | Methods and compositions for extending shelf life of plant products |
WO2014065945A1 (en) | 2012-10-23 | 2014-05-01 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System | Antibodies with engineered igg fc domains |
EP3800256A1 (en) | 2012-11-06 | 2021-04-07 | InteRNA Technologies B.V. | Combination to be used in therapeutic use against diseases or conditions associated with melanoma, or in diseases or conditions associated with activated b-raf pathway |
WO2014072357A1 (en) | 2012-11-06 | 2014-05-15 | Interna Technologies B.V. | Combination for use in treating diseases or conditions associated with melanoma, or treating diseases or conditions associated with activated b-raf pathway |
US10125373B2 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2018-11-13 | Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of Arizona State University | Geminiviral vector for expression of rituximab |
US10660947B2 (en) | 2013-02-21 | 2020-05-26 | Turnstone Limited Partnership | Vaccine composition |
US10363293B2 (en) | 2013-02-21 | 2019-07-30 | Turnstone Limited Partnership | Vaccine composition |
US10646557B2 (en) | 2013-02-21 | 2020-05-12 | Turnstone Limited Partnership | Vaccine composition |
WO2014130770A1 (en) | 2013-02-22 | 2014-08-28 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Hepatocyte production via forward programming by combined genetic and chemical engineering |
WO2014134144A1 (en) | 2013-02-28 | 2014-09-04 | The General Hospital Corporation | Mirna profiling compositions and methods of use |
US10086093B2 (en) | 2013-02-28 | 2018-10-02 | The General Hospital Corporation | miRNA profiling compositions and methods of use |
WO2014132137A2 (en) | 2013-03-01 | 2014-09-04 | Université De Genève | Transgenic cell selection |
WO2014138339A2 (en) | 2013-03-07 | 2014-09-12 | Athenix Corp. | Toxin genes and methods for their use |
EP3626828A2 (en) | 2013-03-07 | 2020-03-25 | BASF Agricultural Solutions Seed US LLC | Toxin genes and methods for their use |
US9422352B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2016-08-23 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | PTD-SMAD7 therapeutics |
US10456448B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2019-10-29 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate | PTD-SMAD7 therapeutics |
WO2015035395A1 (en) | 2013-09-09 | 2015-03-12 | Figene, Llc | Gene therapy for the regeneration of chondrocytes or cartilage type cells |
WO2015070009A2 (en) | 2013-11-08 | 2015-05-14 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System | Vh4 antibodies against gray matter neuron and astrocyte |
WO2015070050A1 (en) | 2013-11-08 | 2015-05-14 | Baylor Research Institute | Nuclear loclization of glp-1 stimulates myocardial regeneration and reverses heart failure |
US11807669B2 (en) | 2013-12-03 | 2023-11-07 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting Staphylococcus aureus |
EP4227685A2 (en) | 2013-12-03 | 2023-08-16 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting staphylococcus aureus |
WO2015082536A1 (en) | 2013-12-03 | 2015-06-11 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting staphylococcus aureus |
WO2015116753A1 (en) | 2014-01-29 | 2015-08-06 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | Antibodies against the muc1-c/extracellular domain (muc1-c/ecd) |
US10214741B2 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2019-02-26 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Methods and compositions for inhibiting retinopathy of prematurity |
WO2015130783A1 (en) | 2014-02-25 | 2015-09-03 | Research Development Foundation | Sty peptides for inhibition of angiogenesis |
WO2015138394A2 (en) | 2014-03-11 | 2015-09-17 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Hppd variants and methods of use |
WO2015164228A1 (en) | 2014-04-21 | 2015-10-29 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Hepatocyte production via forward programming by combined genetic and chemical engineering |
US11111497B2 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2021-09-07 | Nmc, Inc. | Transgenic plants with engineered redox sensitive modulation of photosynthetic antenna complex pigments and methods for making the same |
US10745708B2 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2020-08-18 | Nmc, Inc. | Transgenic plants with engineered redox sensitive modulation of photosynthetic antenna complex pigments and methods for making the same |
WO2016077624A1 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2016-05-19 | Nmc, Inc. | Transgenic plants with engineered redox sensitive modulation of photosynthetic antenna complex pigments and methods for making the same |
US11857615B2 (en) | 2014-11-13 | 2024-01-02 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Peptides derived from Acinetobacter baumannii and their use in vaccination |
WO2016075305A2 (en) | 2014-11-13 | 2016-05-19 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Peptides derived from acinetobacter baumannii and their use in vaccination |
EP3777883A1 (en) | 2014-11-13 | 2021-02-17 | Evaxion Biotech ApS | Peptides derived from acinetobacter baumannii and their use in vaccination |
EP4279080A2 (en) | 2015-01-12 | 2023-11-22 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Treatment and prophylaxis of k. pneumoniae infection |
EP3485907A1 (en) | 2015-01-12 | 2019-05-22 | Evaxion Biotech ApS | Treatment and prophylaxis of k. pneumoniae infection |
US10434162B2 (en) | 2015-01-12 | 2019-10-08 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting Klebsiella pneumoniae |
US10849968B2 (en) | 2015-01-12 | 2020-12-01 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting Klebsiella pneumoniae |
WO2016120697A1 (en) | 2015-01-28 | 2016-08-04 | Sabic Global Technologies B.V. | Methods and compositions for high-efficiency production of biofuel and/or biomass |
WO2016130516A1 (en) | 2015-02-09 | 2016-08-18 | Research Development Foundation | Engineered immunoglobulin fc polypeptides displaying improved complement activation |
WO2016134293A1 (en) | 2015-02-20 | 2016-08-25 | Baylor College Of Medicine | p63 INACTIVATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF HEART FAILURE |
US11524062B2 (en) | 2015-06-29 | 2022-12-13 | University Of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc. | Compositions and methods for treating cancer and promoting wound healing |
US12006342B2 (en) | 2015-07-04 | 2024-06-11 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
EP4116316A1 (en) | 2015-07-04 | 2023-01-11 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting pseudomonas aeruginosa |
WO2017040380A2 (en) | 2015-08-28 | 2017-03-09 | Research Development Foundation | Engineered antibody fc variants |
WO2017070337A1 (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2017-04-27 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Methods for directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells to immune cells |
WO2017075389A1 (en) | 2015-10-30 | 2017-05-04 | The Regents Of The Universtiy Of California | Methods of generating t-cells from stem cells and immunotherapeutic methods using the t-cells |
WO2017079202A1 (en) | 2015-11-02 | 2017-05-11 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Methods of cd40 activation and immune checkpoint blockade |
WO2017079746A2 (en) | 2015-11-07 | 2017-05-11 | Multivir Inc. | Methods and compositions comprising tumor suppressor gene therapy and immune checkpoint blockade for the treatment of cancer |
EP4382127A2 (en) | 2015-11-09 | 2024-06-12 | The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Glypican 2 as a cancer marker and therapeutic target |
WO2017083296A1 (en) | 2015-11-09 | 2017-05-18 | The Children's Hospital Of Philadelphia | Glypican 2 as a cancer marker and therapeutic target |
US11174495B2 (en) | 2015-12-04 | 2021-11-16 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Reporter system for detecting and targeting activated cells |
WO2017144523A1 (en) | 2016-02-22 | 2017-08-31 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Proteins and nucleic acids useful in vaccines targeting staphylococcus aureus |
WO2017168348A1 (en) | 2016-03-31 | 2017-10-05 | Baylor Research Institute | Angiopoietin-like protein 8 (angptl8) |
WO2017184727A1 (en) | 2016-04-21 | 2017-10-26 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Tal-effector mediated herbicide tolerance |
US11761018B2 (en) | 2016-05-26 | 2023-09-19 | Nunhems B.V. | Seedless fruit producing plants |
US11174493B2 (en) | 2016-05-26 | 2021-11-16 | Nunhems B.V. | Seedless fruit producing plants |
WO2017216384A1 (en) | 2016-06-17 | 2017-12-21 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccination targeting ichthyophthirius multifiliis |
WO2017220787A1 (en) | 2016-06-24 | 2017-12-28 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines against aearomonas salmonicida infection |
WO2018005975A1 (en) | 2016-07-01 | 2018-01-04 | Research Development Foundation | Elimination of proliferating cells from stem cell-derived grafts |
EP3269816A1 (en) | 2016-07-11 | 2018-01-17 | Kws Saat Se | Development of fungal resistant crops by higs (host-induced gene silencing) mediated inhibition of gpi-anchored cell wall protein synthesis |
WO2018011082A1 (en) | 2016-07-11 | 2018-01-18 | Kws Saat Se | Development of fungal resistant crops by higs (host-induced gene silencing) mediated inhibition of gpi-anchored cell wall protein synthesis |
WO2018015575A1 (en) | 2016-07-22 | 2018-01-25 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Chimeric proteins for inducing immunity towards infection with s. aureus |
US11414464B2 (en) | 2016-07-22 | 2022-08-16 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Chimeric proteins for inducing immunity towards infection with S. aureus |
EP3889167A1 (en) | 2016-07-22 | 2021-10-06 | Evaxion Biotech ApS | Chimeric proteins for inducing immunity towards infection with s. aureus |
WO2018035429A1 (en) | 2016-08-18 | 2018-02-22 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Peptides that inhibit syndecan-1 activation of vla-4 and igf-1r |
WO2018039590A1 (en) | 2016-08-26 | 2018-03-01 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | Transcription factors to improve resistance to environmental stress in plants |
WO2018042385A2 (en) | 2016-09-02 | 2018-03-08 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Methods and compositions involving interleukin-6 receptor alpha-binding single chain variable fragments |
WO2018067826A1 (en) | 2016-10-05 | 2018-04-12 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Generating mature lineages from induced pluripotent stem cells with mecp2 disruption |
WO2018067836A1 (en) | 2016-10-05 | 2018-04-12 | Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. | Methods for directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells to hla homozygous immune cells |
CN106520661A (en) * | 2016-10-12 | 2017-03-22 | 北京大北农科技集团股份有限公司 | Corn transforming method |
US10584350B2 (en) | 2016-10-27 | 2020-03-10 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | Structurally modified COI1 |
WO2018098214A1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2018-05-31 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Axmi669 and axmi991 toxin genes and methods for their use |
WO2018111902A1 (en) | 2016-12-12 | 2018-06-21 | Multivir Inc. | Methods and compositions comprising viral gene therapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor for treatment and prevention of cancer and infectious diseases |
WO2018119336A1 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2018-06-28 | Athenix Corp. | Use of cry14 for the control of nematode pests |
US11718648B2 (en) | 2017-01-05 | 2023-08-08 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Vaccines targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
WO2018127545A1 (en) | 2017-01-05 | 2018-07-12 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines targeting pseudomonas aeruginosa |
WO2018136611A1 (en) | 2017-01-18 | 2018-07-26 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Use of bp005 for the control of plant pathogens |
WO2018136604A1 (en) | 2017-01-18 | 2018-07-26 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Bp005 toxin gene and methods for its use |
EP3354738A1 (en) | 2017-01-30 | 2018-08-01 | Kws Saat Se | Transgenic maize plant exhibiting increased yield and drought tolerance |
WO2018138386A1 (en) | 2017-01-30 | 2018-08-02 | Kws Saat Se | Transgenic maize plant exhibiting increased yield and drought tolerance |
US12012608B2 (en) | 2017-01-30 | 2024-06-18 | KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA | Transgenic maize plant exhibiting increased yield and drought tolerance |
US11505802B2 (en) | 2017-01-30 | 2022-11-22 | KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA | Transgenic maize plant exhibiting increased yield and drought tolerance |
US11371056B2 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2022-06-28 | BASF Agricultural Solutions Seed US LLC | HPPD variants and methods of use |
WO2018165091A1 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2018-09-13 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Hppd variants and methods of use |
US11180770B2 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2021-11-23 | BASF Agricultural Solutions Seed US LLC | HPPD variants and methods of use |
US11807875B2 (en) | 2017-04-04 | 2023-11-07 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Feruloyl-CoA:monolignol transferases |
US10883089B2 (en) | 2017-04-04 | 2021-01-05 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Feruloyl-CoA:monolignol transferases |
WO2018195175A1 (en) | 2017-04-18 | 2018-10-25 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Antigen-specific immune effector cells |
US11807876B2 (en) | 2017-04-18 | 2023-11-07 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | P-coumaroyl-CoA:monolignol transferases |
US10883090B2 (en) | 2017-04-18 | 2021-01-05 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | P-coumaroyl-CoA:monolignol transferases |
EP4083063A2 (en) | 2017-04-18 | 2022-11-02 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Antigen-specific immune effector cells |
WO2019083810A1 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2019-05-02 | Basf Se | Improvement of herbicide tolerance to 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (hppd) inhibitors by down-regulation of hppd expression in soybean |
WO2019083808A1 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2019-05-02 | Basf Se | Improvement of herbicide tolerance to hppd inhibitors by down-regulation of putative 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate reductases in soybean |
WO2019086603A1 (en) | 2017-11-03 | 2019-05-09 | Interna Technologies B.V. | Mirna molecule, equivalent, antagomir, or source thereof for treating and/or diagnosing a condition and/or a disease associated with neuronal deficiency or for neuronal (re)generation |
WO2019099493A1 (en) | 2017-11-14 | 2019-05-23 | Henry Ford Health System | Compositions for use in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disorders resulting from cerebrovascular injury |
EP4137578A1 (en) | 2018-01-05 | 2023-02-22 | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Modified vaccinia vectors |
WO2019145399A1 (en) | 2018-01-24 | 2019-08-01 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines for prophylaxis of s. aureus infections |
WO2020036635A2 (en) | 2018-03-19 | 2020-02-20 | Multivir Inc. | Methods and compositions comprising tumor suppressor gene therapy and cd122/cd132 agonists for the treatment of cancer |
US11649455B2 (en) | 2018-03-30 | 2023-05-16 | University Of Geneva | Micro RNA expression constructs and uses thereof |
WO2019186274A2 (en) | 2018-03-30 | 2019-10-03 | University Of Geneva | Micro rna expression constructs and uses thereof |
WO2019238832A1 (en) | 2018-06-15 | 2019-12-19 | Nunhems B.V. | Seedless watermelon plants comprising modifications in an abc transporter gene |
WO2020069313A2 (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2020-04-02 | Henry Ford Health System | Use of extracellular vesicles in combination with tissue plasminogen activator and/or thrombectomy to treat stroke |
WO2020083904A1 (en) | 2018-10-22 | 2020-04-30 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines targeting m. catharrhalis |
US11981904B2 (en) | 2018-11-09 | 2024-05-14 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | BAHD acyltransferases |
WO2020171889A1 (en) | 2019-02-19 | 2020-08-27 | University Of Rochester | Blocking lipid accumulation or inflammation in thyroid eye disease |
WO2020174044A1 (en) | 2019-02-27 | 2020-09-03 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines targeting h. influenzae |
WO2021016062A1 (en) | 2019-07-19 | 2021-01-28 | The Children's Hospital Of Philadelphia | Chimeric antigen receptors containing glypican 2 binding domains |
EP3812464A1 (en) | 2019-10-17 | 2021-04-28 | Board of Trustees of Michigan State University | Elevated resistance to insects and plant pathogens without compromising seed production |
WO2021076930A1 (en) | 2019-10-18 | 2021-04-22 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Plxdc activators and their use in the treatment of blood vessel disorders |
WO2021113644A1 (en) | 2019-12-05 | 2021-06-10 | Multivir Inc. | Combinations comprising a cd8+ t cell enhancer, an immune checkpoint inhibitor and radiotherapy for targeted and abscopal effects for the treatment of cancer |
WO2021140123A1 (en) | 2020-01-06 | 2021-07-15 | Evaxion Biotech Aps | Vaccines targeting neisseria gonorrhoeae |
WO2021240240A1 (en) | 2020-05-27 | 2021-12-02 | Antion Biosciences Sa | Adapter molecules to re-direct car t cells to an antigen of interest |
WO2021243203A1 (en) | 2020-05-29 | 2021-12-02 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Bilayer of retinal pigmented epithelium and photoreceptors and use thereof |
WO2021243256A1 (en) | 2020-05-29 | 2021-12-02 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Retinal pigmented epithelium and photoreceptor dual cell aggregates and methods of use thereof |
WO2022173767A1 (en) | 2021-02-09 | 2022-08-18 | University Of Houston System | Oncolytic virus for systemic delivery and enhanced anti-tumor activities |
WO2022175815A1 (en) | 2021-02-19 | 2022-08-25 | Pfizer Inc. | Methods of protecting rna |
WO2022235586A1 (en) | 2021-05-03 | 2022-11-10 | Astellas Institute For Regenerative Medicine | Methods of generating mature corneal endothelial cells |
WO2022235869A1 (en) | 2021-05-07 | 2022-11-10 | Astellas Institute For Regenerative Medicine | Methods of generating mature hepatocytes |
WO2022251443A1 (en) | 2021-05-26 | 2022-12-01 | FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. | Methods to prevent rapid silencing of genes in pluripotent stem cells |
WO2023280807A1 (en) | 2021-07-05 | 2023-01-12 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Vaccines targeting neisseria gonorrhoeae |
WO2023089556A1 (en) | 2021-11-22 | 2023-05-25 | Pfizer Inc. | Reducing risk of antigen mimicry in immunogenic medicaments |
WO2023144779A1 (en) | 2022-01-28 | 2023-08-03 | Pfizer Inc. | Coronavirus antigen variants |
WO2023178191A1 (en) | 2022-03-16 | 2023-09-21 | University Of Houston System | Persistent hsv gene delivery system |
WO2023213393A1 (en) | 2022-05-04 | 2023-11-09 | Evaxion Biotech A/S | Staphylococcal protein variants and truncates |
WO2023213983A2 (en) | 2022-05-04 | 2023-11-09 | Antion Biosciences Sa | Expression construct |
WO2023239940A1 (en) | 2022-06-10 | 2023-12-14 | Research Development Foundation | Engineered fcriib selective igg1 fc variants and uses thereof |
WO2024006911A1 (en) | 2022-06-29 | 2024-01-04 | FUJIFILM Holdings America Corporation | Ipsc-derived astrocytes and methods of use thereof |
WO2024130212A1 (en) | 2022-12-16 | 2024-06-20 | Turnstone Biologics Corp. | Recombinant vaccinia virus encoding one or more natural killer cell and t lymphocyte inhibitors |
WO2024137438A2 (en) | 2022-12-19 | 2024-06-27 | BASF Agricultural Solutions Seed US LLC | Insect toxin genes and methods for their use |
WO2024186630A1 (en) | 2023-03-03 | 2024-09-12 | Henry Ford Health System | Use of extracellular vesicles for the treatment of cancer |
EP4431609A1 (en) | 2023-03-14 | 2024-09-18 | Adisseo France S.A.S. | Method for improving 2, 4 dihydroxybutyric acid production and yield |
WO2024189069A1 (en) | 2023-03-14 | 2024-09-19 | Adisseo France S.A.S. | Method for improving 2, 4 dihydroxybutyric acid production and yield |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ZA964217B (en) | 1996-08-26 |
AU7716994A (en) | 1995-03-21 |
HUT74392A (en) | 1996-12-30 |
ZA946488B (en) | 1995-11-30 |
BR9407355A (en) | 1997-08-19 |
AU684105B2 (en) | 1997-12-04 |
EP2107118A1 (en) | 2009-10-07 |
US7705215B1 (en) | 2010-04-27 |
CA2170260A1 (en) | 1995-03-02 |
WO1995006128A3 (en) | 1995-09-14 |
IL110781A0 (en) | 1994-11-11 |
EP0721509A1 (en) | 1996-07-17 |
HU9600425D0 (en) | 1996-04-29 |
US6399861B1 (en) | 2002-06-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6399861B1 (en) | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof | |
US6777589B1 (en) | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof | |
US7615685B2 (en) | Methods of producing human or animal food from stably transformed, fertile maize plants | |
US6025545A (en) | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof | |
WO1995006128A9 (en) | Fertile, transgenic maize plants and methods for their production | |
US5969213A (en) | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed fertile monocot plants and cells thereof | |
AU644097B2 (en) | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof | |
US6803499B1 (en) | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed, fertile monocot plants and cells thereof | |
CA2074355C (en) | Method of producing fertile transgenic corn plants | |
US5780709A (en) | Transgenic maize with increased mannitol content | |
US5538877A (en) | Method for preparing fertile transgenic corn plants | |
US20070300315A1 (en) | Fertile transgenic corn plants | |
JP2011101653A (en) | Method and composition for expression of transgene in plant | |
WO2004053055A2 (en) | Transgenic maize with enhanced phenotype | |
US6281411B1 (en) | Transgenic monocots plants with increased glycine-betaine content | |
US20200370063A1 (en) | Genetically engineered land plants that express lcid/e protein and optionally a ccp1 mitochondrial transporter protein and/or pyruvate carboxylase | |
AU684105C (en) | Fertile, transgenic maize plants and methods for their production | |
AU712874B2 (en) | Fertile, transgenic maize plants and methods for their production | |
CA2064761C (en) | Methods and compositions for the production of stably transformed fertile monocot plants and cells thereof | |
Hasegawa et al. | New vistas are opened for sorghum improvement by genetic transformation | |
Oneto et al. | Maize Genetic Transformation: The Biolistic Protocol |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AM AT AU BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK ES FI GB GE HU JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LT LU LV MD MG MN MW NL NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SI SK TJ TT UA UZ VN |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): KE MW SD AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
COP | Corrected version of pamphlet |
Free format text: PAGES 1/48-48/48,DRAWINGS,REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/43-43/43;DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) |
Free format text: AM,AT,AU,BB,BG,BR,BY,CA,CN,CZ,DE,DK,FI,GB,GE,HU,JP,KE,KG,KP,KR,KZ,LK,LT,LU,LV,MD,MG,MN,MW,NL,NO,NZ,PL,PT,RO,RU,SD,SE,SI,SK,TJ,TT,UA,UZ,VN, EUROPEAN PATENT(AT,BE,DE,DK,FR,GB,IE,IT,LU,MC,NL,PT,SE), OAPI PATENT(BF,BJ,CF,CG,CI,CM,GA,GN,ML,MR,NE,SN,TD,TG), ARIPO PATENT(KE,MW,SD) |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AM AT AU BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK ES FI GB GE HU JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LT LU LV MD MG MN MW NL NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SI SK TJ TT UA UZ VN |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): KE MW SD AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2170260 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1994927962 Country of ref document: EP |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1994927962 Country of ref document: EP |