USRE44698E1 - Plants with reduced susceptibility to pathogenic oomycetes - Google Patents

Plants with reduced susceptibility to pathogenic oomycetes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE44698E1
USRE44698E1 US13/344,782 US200513344782A USRE44698E US RE44698 E1 USRE44698 E1 US RE44698E1 US 200513344782 A US200513344782 A US 200513344782A US RE44698 E USRE44698 E US RE44698E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
reduced susceptibility
bremia lactucae
plant
susceptibility towards
genetic information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US13/344,782
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Jacobus Petrus Cornelis De Wit
Cornelis Maria Petrus Van Dun
Joannes Wilhelmus Schut
Petrus Lambertus Josephus Egelmeers
Robert Helene Ghislain Dirks
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel BV
Original Assignee
Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel BV filed Critical Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel BV
Priority to US13/344,782 priority Critical patent/USRE44698E1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE44698E1 publication Critical patent/USRE44698E1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H5/12—Leaves
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H5/02—Flowers
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H6/14—Asteraceae or Compositae, e.g. safflower, sunflower, artichoke or lettuce

Definitions

  • the invention relates to plants, in particular lettuce and spinach plants, which are altered with respect to their mode of interaction with pathogens. More in particular, this invention relates to lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) that show a modified interaction with oomycetes, in particular downy mildews such as Bremia lactucae and Peronospora farinosa, that leads to a reduced susceptibility of these crop plant species towards these pathogens.
  • the invention further relates to methods for obtaining lettuce and spinach plants with altered genotypes, which plants show a reduced susceptibility towards pathogens, in particular the oomycetes Bremia lactucae and Peronospora farinosa, respectively.
  • Breeding of leafy vegetables like lettuce and spinach aims at the production of commercial varieties optimally adapted to local growing conditions which allows the grower to maximise the productivity of high quality produce. Many characteristics need to be taken into account during selection which relate to both input as well as output traits.
  • One of the most important input traits in this respect relates to disease resistance, in particular to resistance towards oomycetes and more in particular towards downy mildews.
  • the first layer is of a physical nature and can be manifested in the form of an enforced cell wall or cuticle layer.
  • a plant can exhibit a basal form of resistance which may prevent the pathogen from infecting the plant.
  • Non-host resistance can be considered as an extremely successful form of basal defense which in fact is effective for most plant pathogen interactions.
  • a third layer of intricate defense may be encountered in the form of the induction of factors which actively inhibit the infection process initiated by the pathogen.
  • the plant initiates these events only after specific recognition of the invading pathogen. In many cases this recognition occurs after the pathogen has established the first phases of interaction and transferred a so called pathogenicity (or avirulence) factor into the plant cell.
  • pathogenicity factors interact with host components in order to establish conditions which are favorable for the pathogen to invade the host and thereby cause disease.
  • a resistance response can be initiated.
  • R-gene resistance gene
  • guard model Upon recognition a multi-component cascade of events takes place including the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to a tightly regulated local induction of programmed cell death around the cells which have been infected by the pathogen.
  • ROS reactive oxygen species
  • genes encoding defense factors such as pathogenesis related or PR proteins are induced which contribute to the execution of the defense response. Also increased callose formation can be induced by recognition of pathogen attack.
  • systemic acquired resistance SAR
  • R-genes are exploited at large scale in commercial plant breeding. As a consequence of their mode of action these resistances are not durable as the pathogen population constantly adapts to the newly introduced R-gene. For lettuce, this has resulted in the introduction of over 20 different R-genes in commercial varieties over the last 50 years. As resistance towards downy mildew is a prerequisite for any cultivar to be commercialised, resistance breeding has been given high priority.
  • the invention thus relates to a method for obtaining a plant, in particular lettuce or spinach, showing a reduced susceptibility towards infection with a pathogen, in particular an oomycete, comprising:
  • step b) optionally repeating step b) and c) n times to obtain M1+n seeds and growing plants therefrom;
  • the mutations are suitably induced by means of chemical mutagenesis, which may be performed by contacting the seeds with one or more mutagenic agents, in particular alkylating mutagenic agents, such as ethyl methanesulfonate (ems), diethyl sulfate (des), ethyleneimine (ei), propane sultone, N-methyl-N-nitrosourethane (mnu), N-nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU), N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (enu), sodium azide.
  • mutagenic agents such as ethyl methanesulfonate (ems), diethyl sulfate (des), ethyleneimine (ei), propane sultone, N-methyl-N-nitrosourethane (mnu), N-nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU), N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (enu), sodium azide
  • the mutations are induced by means of irradiation, which is for example selected from x-rays, fast neutrons, UV irradiation.
  • the mutations are induced by means of genetic engineering, such as by means of use of chimeric oligonucleotides, homologous recombination, introduction of modified target genes which compete with the endogenous product, downregulation through RNA interference, etc.
  • the step of selecting plants that show a reduction or absence of sporulation of the pathogen as plants having a reduced susceptibility phenotype is suitably performed by visual inspection.
  • the method of the invention further comprises pyramiding of multiple reduced susceptibility alleles.
  • Production of M1 and M1+n seeds is suitably effected by means of self-pollination.
  • the invention further provides plants showing a reduced susceptibility towards infection with a pathogen, in particular an oomycete, obtainable by a method as claimed.
  • Such plant is suitably a lettuce plant (Lactuca sativa L.) or a spinach plant (Spinacia oleracea L.).
  • the invention relates to plants, which have in their genome genetic information which is responsible for the reduced susceptibility for oomycetes and is as found in the genome of a lettuce plant as listed in Table 6 of which seed was deposited with the NCIMB on 9 Jun. 2005, which seed has the corresponding accession number as listed in Table 6.
  • the invention also relates to plants, which have in their genome the genetic information which is responsible for the reduced susceptibility towards oomycetes and is as found in the genome of spinach plants derived from the M2 population RZ03.67551, of which seed is deposited at the NCIMB on 9 Jun. 2005 under accession number . . . .
  • the invention relates to lettuce plants as listed in Table 6, of which seed was deposited at the NCIMB on 9 Jun. 2005 under the accession numbers given in Table 6.
  • Another embodiment of the invention is a spinach plant which is derived from the M2 population of seed with the RZ accession number RZ03.67551 as deposited at the NCIMB on 9 Jun. 2005 under NCIMB accession number . . . .
  • Progeny of the plants as claimed are also part of this invention. “Progeny” as used herein is intended to encompass all plants having the same or a similar reduced susceptibility towards infection with a pathogen, in particular an oomycete, as the original plants described herein and being derived therefrom in any way, such as by crossing, haploid culture, protoplast fusion or other techniques. Such progeny is not only the first but also all further generations as long as the reduced susceptibility is retained.
  • FIG. 1 shows a microscope image of a leaf tissue 6 days after inoculation, showing many clear hyphae and haustoria in a susceptible control variety Baccares.
  • FIG. 2 shows a microscope image of a leaf tissue showing absence of hyphae and haustoria of resistant control variety Hillary.
  • This form of resistance which is in fact a reduction in or lack of susceptibility, aims at the modification of host factors required to establish infection by the pathogen.
  • This type of approach was found possible for plant-oomycete interactions especially for lettuce-Bremia as well as spinach-Peronospora interactions, but can also be used for other plant-pathogen combinations.
  • Identification of the desired modified plants can occur through the establishment of an interaction with an oomycete species for which the starting plant material shows susceptibility. Those mutants which show loss or reduction of susceptibility may contain modified genes which are involved in susceptibility.
  • identification of a plant containing reduced susceptibility alleles can be done by several means including the inoculation of individual plants of an ems M2 population and visual inspection of the inoculated plants for absence or reduction of sporulation of the pathogen as a consequence of the inability of the pathogen to establish a successful infection. Such screen can be carried out at different levels of plant development including seedlings and adult vegetative or flowering plants.
  • alkylating agents such as ethyl methanesulfonate (ems), diethyl sulfate (des), ethyleneimine (ei), propane sultone, N-methyl-N-nitrosourethane (mnu), N-nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU), N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (enu), sodium azide.
  • alkylating agents such as ethyl methanesulfonate (ems), diethyl sulfate (des), ethyleneimine (ei), propane sultone, N-methyl-N-nitrosourethane (mnu), N-nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU), N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (enu), sodium azide.
  • irradiation by x-rays, fast neutrons or UV irradiation can be used to induce gene modification.
  • genetic engineering technologies for specifically modifying gene targets residing in the genome of a plant can be used. Particularly suitable are chimeric oligonucleotides that are effective mutagens with a specific mode of action.
  • Another approach is to modify gene targets through homologous recombination or gene targeting. Using such approach, a fragment of a gene is exchanged for an introduced DNA fragment containing a desired modification.
  • RNA interference Downregulation of specific genes can be achieved through RNA interference.
  • mutagenic oligonucleotides gene targeting or genetic engineering technologies are used to modify susceptibility factors involved in lettuce-Bremia or spinach-Peronospora interaction, obviously, the primary structure of the gene targets need to be known.
  • F2 populations may be generated using the reduced susceptibility mutant and the susceptible wild-type. Phenotyping the resulting F2 plants and genotypic analysis using molecular markers (marker alleles with known genetic map positions) allows to establish the genetic map locations of independently generated reduced susceptibility alleles. Linked marker alleles can be used to select indirectly for the different susceptibility alleles in the offspring.
  • susceptibility alleles can simply be combined through crossing and selection on the basis of linked molecular markers or distinguishing phenotypic characteristics.
  • This form of so-called gene-pyramiding or gene stacking is also part of this invention.
  • Seeds of the lettuce varieties Troubadour, Apache and Yorvik which are highly susceptible towards Bremia lactucae strains B1:18, B1:20, B1:22, B1:24 and B1:25 were treated with ems by submergence of approximately 2000 seeds per variety into an aerated solution of either 0.05% (w/v) or 0.07% (w/v) ems during 24 hours at room temperature.
  • M2 seeds were harvested and bulked in one pool per variety per treatment.
  • the resulting-6 pools of M2 seeds were used as starting material to identify the individual M2 plants containing reduced susceptibility alleles.
  • the initial identification of M2 plants containing reduced susceptibility alleles as a result of the ems treatment described in Example 1 was carried out by inoculating M2 plants at the seedling level with a suspension of spores of Bremia lactucae strains B1:18 as follows.
  • Table 1 is a summary of the results of the screen for reduced susceptibility towards Bremia lactucae strains B1:18 in different M2 populations of lettuce.
  • leaf samples were taken of the individual M2 plants at the 10-leaf stage.
  • Two leaf discs per strain were incubated on wetted filter paper in a closed container to establish an environment of high relative humidity and inoculated with spore suspensions of Bremia lactucae strains B1:18 or B1:22.
  • the inoculated leaf discs were incubated under controlled conditions being 15° C. at 16 hours light, 8 hours dark regime. This leaf disc test follows more or less the protocol described by Bonnier et al. (1992), supra. After 8, 11 and 14 days of incubation, the disease index was scored by manual inspection.
  • the disease index is a measure for the level of infection and discriminates between the categories R (resistance) which means no obvious infection, RS (reduced susceptible) which means a significant reduction of the infection as compared to a susceptible control and S (susceptible) which means heavily infected and strongly sporulating oomycete biomass.
  • This example describes the identification of M2 plants of lettuce, which have acquired a reduced susceptibility towards Bremia lactucae. These M2 plants were grown in the greenhouse to maturity and allowed to set seed by natural self-fertilisation. For each individual selected M2 plant, M3-line seed was harvested. In several cases this M3-seed was sown in a seedling test, as described in Example 2. Less susceptible M3-seedlings were selected from the test and they were grown to mature plants to produce M4-seed by self-fertilisation. The M3- or M4-seeds were subsequently used to confirm the occurrence of reduced susceptibility alleles by testing for reduced susceptibility to Bremia lactucae both at the seedling as well as mature plant level. The seedling test is carried out as described in Example 2.
  • Seedling and field test results for the original varieties are included in the table headers. Field test data are based on combined results of 2002 and 2003. Seedling test results are based on M3-lines and, where available, M4-lines. Segregation of reduced susceptibility alleles is not included in this table.
  • Example 3 In addition to the test described in Example 3, another seedling test is performed using the fysio B1:24. The seedling test is carried out as described in Example 2.
  • the original varieties Apache, Troubadour and Yorvik are susceptible for this fysio.
  • Another susceptible variety, Bacares was used as susceptible standard, and the variety Hillary was used as a resistant standard, based on R-gene mediated response.
  • Lactophenol Trypan Blue per 100 ml: 25 ml lactic acid, 25 ml glycerol, 25 ml phenol, 25 ml water, 25 mg trypan blue
  • the mixture is subsequently heated at 100° C. for 5 minutes and then allowed to cool down to room temperature. Trypan blue is removed and the same volume of chloral hydrate (per 100 ml: 80 g chloral hydrate, 30 ml water, 10 g glycerol) is added to destain the leaf sample which is done overnight.
  • the sample is treated in a Speedvac for approximately 5 minutes to remove air bubbles from the leaf samples. Subsequently the leaf samples are spread onto a microscope glass slide for microscopy.
  • Seeds of the spinach line F5 (755*265)*BLLT which is highly susceptible towards Peronospora farinosa races Pfs 5,6 and 7 were treated with ems by submergence of approximately 10.000 seeds into an aerated solution of 0.3% (w/v) ems during 24 hours at room temperature. The treated seeds were germinated and grown in a greenhouse to induce bolting and flowering.
  • M2 seeds were harvested and bulked in one pool.
  • the resulting pool of M2 seeds is used as starting material to identify the individual M2 plants containing reduced susceptibility alleles.
  • This pool is deposited under RZ accession number 03.67551 with the NICMB on 9 Jun. 2005 under NCIMB accession number . . . .
  • the efficacy of the genetic modification procedure was assessed by determining the occurrence of bleached plants which is indicative for chlorophyll loss due to modifications in genes directly or indirectly involved in the formation or accumulation of chlorophyl.
  • individual plants which are bleached were observed which demonstrates that the applied treatments result in genetic modifications.
  • the initial identification of M2 plants containing reduced susceptibility alleles as a result of the ems treatment described in Example 6 was carried out by inoculating M2 plants at the seedling level with suspensions of spores of Peronospora farinosa race Pf7.
  • This Example describes the identification of M2 plants of spinach which have acquired a reduced susceptibility towards Peronospora farinose race Pfs:7. These M2 plants were grown in the greenhouse to maturity and allowed to set seed. From the 36 individual selected M2 plants, an M3 seed generation was harvested from 32 of them. The M3 seeds are subsequently used to establish the occurrence of reduced susceptibility alleles by testing for reduced susceptibility to Peronospora farinosa at the seedling level. The seedling test is carried out as described in Example 7.
  • the M2 population of spinach is a batch of seeds that may each contain one or more mutations, thus forming a pool of mutations.
  • Plants having the reduced susceptibility of the invention can be selected therefrom by screening the plant population as described throughout the specification, including by inoculating M1 plants of the present invention, or progeny thereof, with a pathogen, and selecting plants that show a reduction or absence of sporulation of the pathogen as plants having a reduced susceptibility phenotype.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Pretreatment Of Seeds And Plants (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
US13/344,782 2004-06-16 2005-06-10 Plants with reduced susceptibility to pathogenic oomycetes Active 2027-09-30 USRE44698E1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/344,782 USRE44698E1 (en) 2004-06-16 2005-06-10 Plants with reduced susceptibility to pathogenic oomycetes

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP04076729 2004-06-16
EP04076729 2004-06-16
US13/344,782 USRE44698E1 (en) 2004-06-16 2005-06-10 Plants with reduced susceptibility to pathogenic oomycetes
US11/628,885 US8008548B2 (en) 2004-06-16 2005-06-10 Plants with reduced susceptibility to pathogenic oomycetes
PCT/EP2005/006314 WO2005124108A2 (en) 2004-06-16 2005-06-10 Reduced susceptibility towards pathogens, in particular comycetes, such as downy mildew in lettuce and spinach

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE44698E1 true USRE44698E1 (en) 2014-01-07

Family

ID=34980172

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/344,782 Active 2027-09-30 USRE44698E1 (en) 2004-06-16 2005-06-10 Plants with reduced susceptibility to pathogenic oomycetes
US11/628,885 Ceased US8008548B2 (en) 2004-06-16 2005-06-10 Plants with reduced susceptibility to pathogenic oomycetes

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/628,885 Ceased US8008548B2 (en) 2004-06-16 2005-06-10 Plants with reduced susceptibility to pathogenic oomycetes

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (2) USRE44698E1 (es)
EP (2) EP1781793A2 (es)
JP (1) JP4782112B2 (es)
CN (1) CN101098965B (es)
AU (1) AU2005254660B2 (es)
CA (1) CA2571078C (es)
IL (2) IL180094A (es)
MX (1) MXPA06014640A (es)
NZ (1) NZ551981A (es)
WO (1) WO2005124108A2 (es)
ZA (1) ZA200610465B (es)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007051483A1 (en) 2005-11-01 2007-05-10 Universiteit Utrecht Holding B.V. Disease resistant plants
US7935865B2 (en) * 2008-05-30 2011-05-03 Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. Spinach line SMB66-1082F
ES2686143T3 (es) * 2013-03-15 2018-10-16 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel B.V. Semillas de lechuga que germinan a alta temperatura
NZ630628A (en) 2013-10-08 2015-04-24 Seminis Vegetable Seeds Inc Methods and compositions for peronospora resistance in spinach
NZ630710A (en) 2014-02-27 2016-03-31 Seminis Vegetable Seeds Inc Compositions and methods for peronospora resistance in spinach
CN105580523A (zh) * 2015-03-18 2016-05-18 上海市农业科学院 构建生菜突变体库的ems诱变浓度筛选
EP3376853A1 (en) * 2015-11-20 2018-09-26 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V. Peronospora resistance in spinacia oleracea
WO2017194073A1 (en) * 2016-05-13 2017-11-16 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel B.V. Non r-gene mediated resistance in spinach
EP3410845A1 (en) * 2016-09-30 2018-12-12 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V. Method for modifying the resistance profile of spinacia oleracea to downy mildew
CN111655026A (zh) * 2018-01-26 2020-09-11 纽海姆有限公司 对至少粉霜霉8、9、11、13和16号小种具有抗性的菠菜植物
US11952583B2 (en) 2018-10-11 2024-04-09 Nunhems B.V. Downy mildew resistant lettuce mutant
AU2021303718A1 (en) * 2020-07-06 2023-02-02 Syngenta Crop Protection Ag Bremia lactucae resistance SG01

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000063432A1 (en) * 1999-04-16 2000-10-26 Enza Zaden, De Enkhuizer Zaadhandel B.V. Method for obtaining a plant with a lasting resistance to a pathogen
WO2002038727A2 (en) 2000-11-09 2002-05-16 Plant Research International B.V. Dna sequences encoding proteins conferring phytophthora infestans resistance on plants
US6555735B2 (en) * 2001-08-06 2003-04-29 Harris Moran Seed Company Lettuce named HMX 7555

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000063432A1 (en) * 1999-04-16 2000-10-26 Enza Zaden, De Enkhuizer Zaadhandel B.V. Method for obtaining a plant with a lasting resistance to a pathogen
WO2002038727A2 (en) 2000-11-09 2002-05-16 Plant Research International B.V. Dna sequences encoding proteins conferring phytophthora infestans resistance on plants
US6555735B2 (en) * 2001-08-06 2003-04-29 Harris Moran Seed Company Lettuce named HMX 7555

Non-Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Dietrich et al. "Arabidopsis Mutants Simulating Disease Resistance Response" Cell, Cell Press (May 20, 1994) pp. 565-577, No. 77.
Lebeda A. et al. "Host-Parasite Specificity and Defense Variability in the Lactuca SPP.-Bremia lactucae Pathosystem" Journal of Plant Pathology, Edizioni ETS, Pisa, IT. (2001) pp. 25-35, vol. 83, No. 2.
Maisonneuve B. et al. "Rapid Mapping of Two Genes for Resistance to Downy Mildew from Lactuca serriola to Existing Clusters of Resistance Genes" Theorectical and Applied Genetics, Springer, Berlin, DE. (1994) pp. 96-104, vol. 89, No. 1.
Maleck, Klaus et al. "Isolation and Characterization of Broad-Spectrum Disease-Resistant Arabidopsis Mutants" Genetics (Apr. 2002) pp. 1661-1671, vol. 160, No. 4.
Okubara, Patricia et al. "A Transgenic Mutant of Lactuca sativa (lettuce) with a T-DNA Tightly Linked to Loss of Downy Mildew Resistance" Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions (Nov. 1997) pp. 970-977, vol. 10, No. 8.
Wu et al. Plant Molecular Biol (2005), vol. 59, pp. 85-97. *
Yuen J. et al. "A New Gene for Resistance to Bremia lactucae"Phytopathology, St. Paul, MN, US. (1983) pp. 159-162, vol. 73, No. 2.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IL180094A0 (en) 2007-05-15
JP2008502335A (ja) 2008-01-31
JP4782112B2 (ja) 2011-09-28
WO2005124108A2 (en) 2005-12-29
ZA200610465B (en) 2008-02-27
NZ551981A (en) 2010-03-26
US8008548B2 (en) 2011-08-30
EP1781793A2 (en) 2007-05-09
CA2571078C (en) 2020-08-04
WO2005124108A3 (en) 2006-02-23
EP2175027A2 (en) 2010-04-14
EP2175027A3 (en) 2010-07-07
CA2571078A1 (en) 2005-12-29
CN101098965B (zh) 2012-11-21
AU2005254660A1 (en) 2005-12-29
IL212824A (en) 2015-06-30
MXPA06014640A (es) 2007-03-12
AU2005254660B2 (en) 2009-09-03
IL212824A0 (en) 2011-07-31
IL180094A (en) 2015-06-30
CN101098965A (zh) 2008-01-02
US20080256661A1 (en) 2008-10-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USRE44698E1 (en) Plants with reduced susceptibility to pathogenic oomycetes
US9615531B2 (en) Peronospora resistance in Spinacia oleracea
JP6267865B2 (ja) レタスアブラムシナソノビア・リビスニグリ・バイオタイプｉに耐性のレタス
US11690339B2 (en) Bremia lactucae resistant plants
US9615532B2 (en) Peronospora resistance in Sinacia oleracea
AU2011331262B2 (en) Resistance to Nasonovia ribisnigri biotype 1 (Nr:1) from Lactuca serriola
US20140059721A1 (en) Rice resistant/tolerant to hppd inhibiting herbicides
US10273499B2 (en) R-genes in coupling phase
US9351451B2 (en) Resistance against Leveillula taurica in pepper
US20200315116A1 (en) Dark stem cucumber plants
US20190364774A1 (en) Mildew resistant basil plants
IL312212A (en) Ostoma plant with resistance to Fusarium ostoma wilt
AU2015268714A1 (en) Lettuce that is resistant to the lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri biotype 1
Simpson Hordeeae Epichloë endophytes and the formation of synthetic symbioses with cereal grasses: a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Plant Biology at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Forster et al. Mutations in the genetic analysis of root traits in barley and their associations with plant performance in stressed and non-stressed conditions
THOMAS MUTATIONS IN THE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF ROOT TRAITS IN BARLEY AND THEIR ASSOCIATIONS WITH PLANT PERFORMANCE IN STRESSED AND NON-STRESSED CONDITIONS BP FORSTER1, O. CHLOUPEK2, S. CLARK3, H. AL-MENIAE1+ 4
EP2640183A1 (en) Resistance to nasonovia ribisnigri biotype 1 (nr:1) from lactuca serriola

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12