USPP20292P2 - Grapevine ‘IFG 31-077’ - Google Patents

Grapevine ‘IFG 31-077’ Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USPP20292P2
USPP20292P2 US12/215,931 US21593108V USPP20292P2 US PP20292 P2 USPP20292 P2 US PP20292P2 US 21593108 V US21593108 V US 21593108V US PP20292 P2 USPP20292 P2 US PP20292P2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
variety
ifg
density
color
hairs
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US12/215,931
Inventor
David W. Cain
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BLOOM FRESH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Original Assignee
International Fruit Genetics LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by International Fruit Genetics LLC filed Critical International Fruit Genetics LLC
Priority to US12/215,931 priority Critical patent/USPP20292P2/en
Assigned to INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC reassignment INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CAIN, DAVID W.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USPP20292P2 publication Critical patent/USPP20292P2/en
Assigned to CAIN, DAVID W. reassignment CAIN, DAVID W. CONTRACT Assignors: INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC
Assigned to BLOOM FRESH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED reassignment BLOOM FRESH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01HNEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H6/00Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H6/88Vitaceae, e.g. Vitus [grape]
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01HNEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H5/00Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
    • A01H5/08Fruits

Definitions

  • Vitis vinifera Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: Vitis vinifera.
  • the new and distinct grapevine described and claimed herein originated from a hand pollinated cross of the Summer Royal variety (non-patented) and the Regal variety (South African PBR ZA971795)) hybridized in May 2001.
  • the abortive seed traces were subsequently embryo cultured and the resulting population of plants were planted in the field in April 2002.
  • the present variety of grapevine was selected as a single plant from within a population of 106 plants in July 2003 and was first asexually propagated by hardwood cuttings in December 2003.
  • the resulting propagules were planted during April 2004 near Delano, Kern County, Calif. and were found to reproduce true-to-type through at least three generations of asexual reproduction.
  • ‘IFG 31-077’ was selected on the basis of a unique grouping of characteristics, including the ability to produce large, elongated, fully black, naturally large seedless fruits that ripen early and possess high sugar content and superior eating quality.
  • the clusters have strong stems with good berry attachment.
  • ‘IFG 31-077’ can be distinguished from these varieties based on the unique combination of characteristics for which it was selected. ‘IFG 31-077’ can further be distinguished from these known varieties as follows.
  • ‘IFG 31-077’ can be distinguished from its parent the Summer Royal (non-patented) variety by having much more elongated berries as opposed to the nearly round berries of Summer Royal.
  • the new variety ripens 7 days or more before the Summer Royal variety.
  • the vine of the new variety is more vigorous and robust than the vine of the Summer Royal variety.
  • ‘IFG 31-077’ differs from its parent the Regal variety by possessing black rather than white fruits. Berries of the new variety are slightly less elongated than the Regal variety. Berries of the new variety more readily attain high sugar content and are of superior eating quality as compared to the Regal variety.
  • ‘IFG 31-077’ most closely resembles the Sugrathirteen variety in having somewhat similar color, fruit shape and an early ripening period.
  • the new variety differs from the Sugrathirteen variety by having darker more fully black fruits that will attain full color even under low light conditions thus requiring less manipulation of the canopy to obtain commercially acceptable color.
  • the new variety possesses slightly smaller berry size and berries are slightly softer and juicier.
  • the new variety more readily attains high sugar content and has somewhat more acid giving a better sugar acid balance.
  • ‘IFG 31-077’ somewhat resembles the Mariah variety however it differs from the Mariah variety by having a larger average berry size (6.1 g vs. 4.8 g).
  • the new variety can further be distinguished from the Mariah variety by having more elongated and narrower berry as opposed to the shorter more nearly round berries of the Mariah variety.
  • the new variety is responsive to gibberellic acid application to reduce berry number and increase berry size and does not show phytotoxicity to normal levels of gibberellic acid.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates in full color ‘IFG 31-077’.
  • the photograph was taken using conventional techniques. The colors are as nearly true as is reasonably possible in a color representation of this type.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
  • Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)

Abstract

This invention is a new and distinctive grapevine ‘IFG 31-077’. ‘IFG 31-077’ produces large, elongated, fully black, naturally large seedless fruits that ripen early and possess high sugar content and superior eating quality. The clusters have strong stems with good berry attachment.

Description

Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: Vitis vinifera.
Variety denomination: ‘IFG 31-077’.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The new and distinct grapevine described and claimed herein originated from a hand pollinated cross of the Summer Royal variety (non-patented) and the Regal variety (South African PBR ZA971795)) hybridized in May 2001. The abortive seed traces were subsequently embryo cultured and the resulting population of plants were planted in the field in April 2002. The present variety of grapevine was selected as a single plant from within a population of 106 plants in July 2003 and was first asexually propagated by hardwood cuttings in December 2003. The resulting propagules were planted during April 2004 near Delano, Kern County, Calif. and were found to reproduce true-to-type through at least three generations of asexual reproduction.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
‘IFG 31-077’ was selected on the basis of a unique grouping of characteristics, including the ability to produce large, elongated, fully black, naturally large seedless fruits that ripen early and possess high sugar content and superior eating quality. The clusters have strong stems with good berry attachment.
To the inventor's knowledge, the known varieties to which the new grapevine variety is most similar are the parent varieties, the Sugrathirteen variety (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,434), and the Mariah variety (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,040). ‘IFG 31-077’ can be distinguished from these varieties based on the unique combination of characteristics for which it was selected. ‘IFG 31-077’ can further be distinguished from these known varieties as follows.
‘IFG 31-077’ can be distinguished from its parent the Summer Royal (non-patented) variety by having much more elongated berries as opposed to the nearly round berries of Summer Royal. The new variety ripens 7 days or more before the Summer Royal variety. The vine of the new variety is more vigorous and robust than the vine of the Summer Royal variety.
‘IFG 31-077’ differs from its parent the Regal variety by possessing black rather than white fruits. Berries of the new variety are slightly less elongated than the Regal variety. Berries of the new variety more readily attain high sugar content and are of superior eating quality as compared to the Regal variety.
‘IFG 31-077’ most closely resembles the Sugrathirteen variety in having somewhat similar color, fruit shape and an early ripening period. The new variety differs from the Sugrathirteen variety by having darker more fully black fruits that will attain full color even under low light conditions thus requiring less manipulation of the canopy to obtain commercially acceptable color. The new variety possesses slightly smaller berry size and berries are slightly softer and juicier. The new variety more readily attains high sugar content and has somewhat more acid giving a better sugar acid balance.
‘IFG 31-077’ somewhat resembles the Mariah variety however it differs from the Mariah variety by having a larger average berry size (6.1 g vs. 4.8 g). The new variety can further be distinguished from the Mariah variety by having more elongated and narrower berry as opposed to the shorter more nearly round berries of the Mariah variety. The new variety is responsive to gibberellic acid application to reduce berry number and increase berry size and does not show phytotoxicity to normal levels of gibberellic acid.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying photographic illustration in FIG. 1 illustrates in full color ‘IFG 31-077’. The photograph was taken using conventional techniques. The colors are as nearly true as is reasonably possible in a color representation of this type.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Throughout this specification, color names beginning with a small letter signify that the name of that color, as used in common speech, is aptly descriptive. Color names beginning with a capital letter designate values based upon R.H.S. Colour Chart, published by The Royal Horitcultural Society, London, England.
Throughout this specification subjective description values conform to those set forth by the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute publication ‘Descriptors for Grape’ (Vitis spp.) (1983) which was developed in collaboration with the Office International de la Vigne et du Vin (OIV) and the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV).
The following descriptive matter pertains to ‘IFG 31-077’ plants grown in the vicinity of Delano, Kern County, Calif. during 2007–2008, and is believed to apply to plants of the variety grown under similar conditions of soil and climate elsewhere.
VINE
  • General:
      • Size.—Very Large.
      • Vigor.—Vigorous.
      • Density of foliage.—Dense.
      • Productivity.—Medium productive.
      • Root stock.—Own root.
      • Training method.—Typically spur pruned leaving two bud spurs.
  • Trunk:
      • Trunk diameter of 4-year-old vines at 30 cm above the soil line.—7.4 cm.
      • Shape.—Stocky.
      • Straps.—Very long Split.
      • Surface texture.—Medium.
      • Inner bark color.—Greyed-Orange 174A.
SHOOTS
  • Young shoot:
      • Form of tip.—Wide open.
      • Distribution of anthocyanin coloration of tip.—Absent.
      • Intensity of anthocyanin coloration of tip.—Absent.
      • Density of prostrate hairs of tip.—Sparse.
      • Density of erect hairs of tip.—Absent.
      • Color.—Yellow Green 144A.
  • Woody shoot (mature canes):
      • Shape.—Stocky.
      • Internode length.—Long; About 13.7 cm.
      • Width at node.—About 1.9 cm.
      • Cross section.—Circular.
      • Surface.—Striate.
      • Main color.—Greyed-Orange about 166B to 166C.
      • Density of erect hairs of nodes.—None.
      • Density of erect hairs on internodes.—None.
      • Growth of axillary shoots.—Strong, Approximately 23.2 cm.
  • Flowering shoot:
      • Vigor during flowering.—Very strong.
      • Attitude during flowering on shoots not tied.—Drooping.
      • Color.—Dorsal side of internodes — Green with red stripes.
      • Color.—Ventral side of internodes — Yellow Green 144A.
      • Color.—Dorsal side of nodes — Yellow Green 144A.
      • Color.—Ventral side of node — Yellow Green 144A.
      • Density of prostrate hairs of nodes.—None to Very sparse.
      • Density of erect hairs on nodes.—None.
      • Density of prostrate hairs on internode.—None to Very sparse.
      • Density of erect hairs on internode.—None.
      • Anthocyanin coloration of buds.—Absent.
  • Tendrils:
      • Distribution on the shoot (at full flowering)—Discontinuous.
      • Length of tendril.—Long; About 29.2 cm.
      • Thickness.—Medium.
      • Color.—Yellow Green 144A.
      • Form.—Bifurcated.
      • Number of consecutive tendrils.—2.
LEAVES
  • Young leaves:
      • Color of upper surface of first four distal unfolded leaves.—Copper yellow.
      • Average intensity of anthocyanin coloration of six distal leaves prior to flowering.—Weak.
      • Density of prostrate hairs between veins (lower surface).—Absent.
      • Density of prostrate hairs on veins.—Very sparse.
      • Density of erect hairs between veins (lower surface).—Absent.
      • Density of erect hairs on veins.—Very sparse.
  • Mature leaves:
      • Average length.—About 17.2 cm.
      • Average width.—About 24.4 cm.
      • Mature leaf size.—Very large.
      • Shape of blade.—Circular.
      • Number of lobes.—5.
      • Anthocyanin coloration of main veins on upper side of blade.—Weak.
      • Mature leaf profile.—Involute.
      • Blistering surface of blade upper surface.—Strong.
      • Leaf blade tip.—In the plane of the leaf.
      • Undulation of margin.—Pronounced.
      • Thickness.—Medium.
      • Undulation of blade between main and lateral veins.—Overall.
      • Shape of teeth.—Both sides convex.
      • Length of teeth.—Medium.
      • Ratio length/width of teeth.—Small.
      • Shape of upper lateral sinuses.—Slightly overlapping.
      • Depth of upper lateral sinuses.—Shallow.
      • General shape petiole sinus.—Lobes strongly overlapping.
      • Shape of base of upper leaf sinuses.—V-shaped.
      • Density of prostrate hairs between veins on lower surface of blade.—None or very sparse.
      • Density of erect hairs between veins on lower surface of blade.—None.
      • Density of prostrate hairs on main veins on lower surface of blade.—Very sparse.
      • Density of erect hairs on main veins on lower surface of blade.—Sparse.
      • Density of prostrate hairs on main veins on upper surface of blade.—None or very sparse.
      • Density of erect hairs on main veins on upper surface of blade.—None or very sparse.
      • General shape petiole sinus.—Lobes very strongly overlapping.
      • Shape of base of petiole sinus.—V-shaped.
      • Mature leaf tooth at petiole sinus.—Absent.
  • Upper surface:
      • Color.—Green 139A.
      • Anthocyanin coloration of main veins.—Absent.
      • Surface appearance.—Semi-glossy to dull.
      • Blistering surface of blade.—Weak to medium.
  • Lower surface:
      • Color.—Green 138A.
      • Anthocyanin coloration of main veins (lower surface).—Absent.
      • Surface texture.—Rugose.
      • Surface appearance.—Semi-glossy.
  • Petiole:
      • Length.—About 11.4 cm.
      • Length of petiole compared to middle vein.—Slighty shorter.
      • Density of prostrate hairs on petiole.—None.
      • Density of erect hairs on petiole.—None.
  • Buds:
      • Bud fruitfulness.—Basal: Mostly fruitful.
      • Position of first fruitful shoot on previous season cane.—1st–2nd node.
      • Time of bud burst.—Early, Feb. 29, 2008 (measurement from one location).
FLOWERS
  • General:
      • Flower sex.—Hermaphrodite.
      • Length of first inflorescence.—17.2 cm (at full bloom).
      • Position of first flowering and fruiting node.—5th node (current season growth).
      • Number of inflorescence per flowering shoot.—Up to 1.
      • Time of bloom.—Early–Medium as compared with similar varieties in the growing area of Delano, Calif.
FRUIT
  • General:
      • Ripening period.—Early; Approximately Jul. 17, 2007 (measurement from a single location).
      • Use.—Fresh market.
      • Keeping quality.—Good.
      • Resistance to.—Insects: Average typical of Vitis vinifera species. diseases: Average typical of Vitis vinifera species.
      • Refractometer test.—Solid-sugar: About 20.0 Brix.
      • Brix/acid.—About 45.8.
      • Titratable acidity.—About 0.44.
      • Juice pH.—About 3.45.
  • Cluster:
      • Mature cluster length (peduncle excluded).—About 23.5 cm.
      • Mature cluster width.—About 16.6 cm.
      • Mature cluster weight.—About 665 g.
      • Bunch density.—Medium to Dense.
      • Number of berries.—About 140.
      • Form.—Conical.
  • Peduncle:
      • Length of peduncle.—Approximately 5.0 cm.
      • Lignification of peduncle.—Weak.
  • Berry:
      • Uniformity of size.—Uniform.
      • Single berry weight.—About 6.1 g when treated with gibberellic acid.
      • Shape.—Elongated ovate.
      • Seed.—Rudimentary to small seed traces.
      • Berry dimensions.—Longitudinal axis: About 27.2 mm. horizontal axis: About 18.5 mm.
      • Skin color (without bloom).—Black. 202A.
      • Berry firmness.—Medium.
      • Particular flavor.—Neutral.
      • Bloom (cuticular wax).—Weak to Medium.
      • Berry separation from pedicel.—Medium.
  • Skin:
      • Thickness.—Medium.
      • Texture.—Medium.
      • Reticulation.—Absent.
      • Tenacity.—Tenacious to flesh.

Claims (1)

1. A new and distinct variety of grapevine plant having the characteristics substantially as described and illustrated herein.
US12/215,931 2008-06-27 2008-06-27 Grapevine ‘IFG 31-077’ Active USPP20292P2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/215,931 USPP20292P2 (en) 2008-06-27 2008-06-27 Grapevine ‘IFG 31-077’

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/215,931 USPP20292P2 (en) 2008-06-27 2008-06-27 Grapevine ‘IFG 31-077’

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USPP20292P2 true USPP20292P2 (en) 2009-09-15

Family

ID=41058981

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/215,931 Active USPP20292P2 (en) 2008-06-27 2008-06-27 Grapevine ‘IFG 31-077’

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USPP20292P2 (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USPP20377P2 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG 104-253’
USPP24611P3 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Fourteen’
USPP29651P2 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Twenty-nine’
USPP28667P3 (en) Grapevine named ‘IFG Twenty-three’
USPP23315P2 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Eight’
USPP33069P3 (en) Grapevine plant named ‘IFG Forty-four’
USPP21664P3 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG 68-175’
USPP30706P2 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Thirty-five’
USPP31147P3 (en) Grapevine plant named ‘IFG Thirty-two’
USPP20292P2 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG 31-077’
USPP30424P2 (en) Grapevine named ‘IFG Thirty’
USPP28956P2 (en) Grapevine named ‘IFG Twenty-four’
USPP29936P2 (en) Grapevine named ‘IFG Thirty-one’
USPP30089P2 (en) Grapevine named ‘IFG Twenty-eight’
USPP31717P3 (en) Grapevine named ‘IFG Twenty-five’
USPP26541P3 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Twenty-one’
USPP25435P3 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Seventeen’
USPP26121P3 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Nineteen’
USPP27147P2 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Twenty-two’
USPP24551P3 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Eleven’
USPP24466P3 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Thirteen’
USPP24439P3 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Four’
USPP20491P2 (en) Grapevine plant named ‘Sugrathirtyfive’
USPP23399P2 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Seven’
USPP23398P3 (en) Grapevine ‘IFG Five’

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CAIN, DAVID W.;REEL/FRAME:021562/0751

Effective date: 20080911