US7424168B2 - Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images - Google Patents

Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US7424168B2
US7424168B2 US10/746,423 US74642303A US7424168B2 US 7424168 B2 US7424168 B2 US 7424168B2 US 74642303 A US74642303 A US 74642303A US 7424168 B2 US7424168 B2 US 7424168B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
image
bit depth
modifying
manner
modified
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related, expires
Application number
US10/746,423
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20050147317A1 (en
Inventor
Scott J. Daly
Xiao-fan Feng
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sharp Corp
Original Assignee
Sharp Laboratories of America Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sharp Laboratories of America Inc filed Critical Sharp Laboratories of America Inc
Priority to US10/746,423 priority Critical patent/US7424168B2/en
Assigned to SHARP LABORATORIES OF AMERICA, INC. reassignment SHARP LABORATORIES OF AMERICA, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DALY, SCOTT J., FENG, XIAO-FAN
Priority to JP2004337479A priority patent/JP4544974B2/ja
Publication of US20050147317A1 publication Critical patent/US20050147317A1/en
Priority to US12/221,584 priority patent/US7907787B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7424168B2 publication Critical patent/US7424168B2/en
Assigned to SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA reassignment SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SHARP LABORATORIES OF AMERICA INC.
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration
    • G06T5/73—Deblurring; Sharpening
    • G06T5/75—Unsharp masking
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N1/00—Scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, e.g. facsimile transmission; Details thereof
    • H04N1/40—Picture signal circuits
    • H04N1/409—Edge or detail enhancement; Noise or error suppression

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a system for image enhancement and, more particularly, to a system for enhancing the quality of a quantized image.
  • Problems in the area of digital image processing relate generally to achieving a balance between acceptable image distortion and bit-depth representations.
  • the coding system In order to increase the efficiency and therefore the usefulness of digital image decoding schemes, the coding system must provide a coded set of image data that is more efficient to store, transmit, etc., than the original image data and must reproduce a decoded image with some minimum level of quality.
  • the conversion of relatively high bit rate image data to lower bit rate data virtually always entails a loss of image quality.
  • One straightforward method for digitizing an image is to create an artificial grid over the image and to assign a value to each grid space representing the color of the original image at that grid space. If the grids are made small enough and the values represent a large enough range of color, then the image may be encoded and decoded with small image quality degradation.
  • display screen images are made up of an array of pixels, i.e., picture elements. On a black and white screen, each pixel has a value of one or zero representing the on/off state of the pixel. In a one-to-one bit-to-pixel coding scheme, each pixel value is represented as a 1 or as a 0 and the entire screen image is encoded. The result of the encoding is an array of binary values. To decode the image, the array values are translated into a screen image having pixels on or off in the same order in which they were originally encoded.
  • the image is comprised of more than two distinct colors, then more than a 1-bit code must be used to represent the pixel values. For example, if four distinct colors are present in the image, a 2-bit binary code can represent all of the values. If the image includes 256 distinct colors, a 8-bit binary codes is required to uniquely represent each of the color values.
  • the memory requirements for such coding schemes increase as the number of distinct colors in the image increases. However, with high bit-depth representation schemes, the quality of the image that results will be good as long as the digital image transmission or recovery from storage is successful.
  • the bit-depth representation of the image may be reduced in some manner. For example, an image with a bit-depth of 6 bits per pixel requires significantly less storage capacity and bandwidth for transmission than the same sized image with 16 bits per pixel.
  • Decoded images constructed by a low bit-depth representation, generally suffer from the following types of degradations: (a) quasi-constant or slowly varying regions suffer from contouring effects and amplified granular noise, and (b) textured regions lose detail.
  • Contouring effects which are the result of spatial variations, in a decoded image are generally fairly obvious to the naked eye.
  • the contouring effects that appear in the slowly varying regions are also caused by the fact that not all of the variations in the intensity of the original image are available for the decoded image. For example, if a region of the original image included an area having 4 intensity changes therein, the decoded image might represent the area with only 2 intensities.
  • the effect of the granular noise on the viewed image is often mitigated by the very nature of the textured regions. But it can be both amplified or suppressed due to quantization, as well as altered in spectral appearance.
  • Kundu et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,218,649, disclose an image processing technique that enhances images by reducing contouring effects.
  • the enhancement system identifies the edge and non-edge regions in the decoded image. Different filters are applied to each of these regions and then they are combined together. A low pass filter (LPF) is used on the non-edge regions, and a high-pass enhancer is used on the edge regions.
  • LPF low pass filter
  • Kundu et al. teaches that the contour artifacts are most visible in the non-edge areas, and the LPF will remove these edges. Unfortunately, problems arise in properly identifying the edge regions (is a steep slope an edge or a non-edge?).
  • Chan U.S. Pat. No. 5,651,078, discloses a system that reduces the contouring in images reproduced from compressed video signals.
  • Chan teaches that some contours result from discrete cosine transformation (DCT) compression, which are more commonly called blocking artifacts.
  • DCT discrete cosine transformation
  • Chan observes that this problem is most noticeable in the dark regions of image and as a result adds noise to certain DCT coefficients when the block's DC term is low (corresponding to a dark area).
  • the resulting noise masks the contour artifacts, however, the dark areas become noisier as a result.
  • the dark areas thus have a noise similar to film-grain-like noise which may be preferable to the blocking artifacts.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a contrast sensitivity function
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an image processing technique
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a de-contouring functions
  • FIG. 4 illustrates another de-contouring function.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates yet another de-contouring function.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a modified image processing technique
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a modified image processing technique
  • a particular class of image processing techniques may be used, such as for example, dithering techniques.
  • dithering techniques Several different types have been developed, such as for example, amplitude dithering, spatial dithering, and phase dithering.
  • amplitude dithering may preserve the image entropy at low frequencies, while allowing for entropy losses at high frequencies.
  • dithering techniques are traditionally used for pre-processing of images. The reason for this pre-processing limitation is because the entropy loss has already occurred at the low frequencies due to quantization, which acts to reduce the amplitude resolution uniformly across all frequencies.
  • FIG. 1 depicts the overall spatial response of the human visual system with its underlying visual channels with the coarse quantization below the threshold. Further, the masking effects by the higher frequency content of the image, which is limited to the channels as shown in FIG. 1 , further inhibits the visibility of the steps in the waveforms in the high frequency regions of the image.
  • the system preferably (albeit not necessary) reduces the effects of the objectionable contours without having to add noise to the image in order to hide them.
  • the system is suitable for use with images that are otherwise free of image capture noise, such as computer graphics and line art with gradients.
  • the technique is implemented without decision steps or if statements to achieve computational efficiency.
  • the technique should require not more than a single buffer of a size less than or equal to the image, and more preferable a buffer less than 30, 20, or 10 percent of the size of the image.
  • the system preferably does not need to classify spatial regions of the image.
  • an input image 100 is provided with bit-depth P.
  • the bit-depth P is frequently 8-bits for many images.
  • the image with a bit depth of P is normally quantized into 2 P different values but may exhibit contouring effects when displayed on a display with a different bit depth, such as a 10 bit display.
  • the present inventor came to the realization that the aspects of the image that will create contouring effects should be identified in a suitable manner.
  • the image may be represented as N bits, but actually have quantization artifacts due to less than N bits.
  • An example is a DVD image which is represented at 8 bits/color (“N”) but only has 6 bits/color (“P”) of real information because of the quantization of P or B-frames, or in the YCbCr to RGB conversion.
  • N 8 bits/color
  • P 6 bits/color
  • the bit-depth limitation comes from the inaccurate color matrix calculation (e.g., insufficient bit-depth in the registers).
  • the image is preferably low-pass filtered 102 .
  • the low-pass filter applied to the image also acts to increase the bit depth, since the low pass filter is primarily an averaging operation (averaging across a neighborhood of pixels), and the averaging results in a higher precision.
  • Other techniques may likewise be applied to effectively modify the bit depth of the image.
  • the system may also modify the bit depth by switching the number of bits used for processing the image, such as 8 bits to 16 bits.
  • changing the bit depth e.g., padding
  • is performed to facilitate the subsequent operations such as for example setting up the register for 10 bits to allow the low pass filter results to be stored, while the low pass filter itself increases the “real” bit depth.
  • One way of characterizing an increase in the bit depth of an image is to modify in any manner an image to 2 R different levels, where N ⁇ P, or N ⁇ R.
  • the image may have a bit-depth of N, but the image itself may have a limited bit-depth of P (P ⁇ N).
  • the result of the low pass filtering of the image is to modify the image to achieve a bit depth of N.
  • the bit depth N is the desired bit depth in the final image, such as an image having bit depth N to be displayed on a N bit display.
  • the low pass filter should be sufficiently wide (in the spatial domain) to reduce most false steps (contouring) due to the bit-depth limit P. It is noted that the low pass filter likewise reduces other desirable image information within the image, so merely low-pass filtering the image is insufficient. Note that the low pass filter reduces much useful image information, such as by severely blurring the image, so this step is insufficient to properly rectify the undesirable contouring.
  • the low pass filter 102 may be implemented as Cartesian-separable 1-dimensional filters.
  • the use of a pair of 1-dimensional filters is more computationally efficient than a 2-dimensional filter.
  • the filter preferably has a rectangular shape.
  • the size of the low pass filter kernel is determined from the expected spacing of the contour distortions. If contours are 16 pixels apart, a filter of width 16 is preferred. Based on a study of many images, as well as noticing detrimental effects of having too wide of a spatial extent low pass filter the present inventor determined that the kernel size should actually be more than 31 pixels to remove the low frequency modulation component of the false contour. Accordingly, the kernel size should be based upon the low frequency modulation component of the false contour, as opposed to merely the visibility of the contour edge.
  • the resulting image from the low pass filter is primarily the low frequency components of the image. It is likewise to be understood that any suitable filter may be used, such as one that generally attenuates the high frequency components with respect to the low frequency components of the image.
  • the system may subtract 105 the low pass filtered image 102 from the original bit-depth limited image 100 having false contours. This in essence reduces the low-frequency content of the input image, while primarily leaving the high frequency content. However, the subtraction 105 also results in another attribute, namely, the high frequency portion of the remaining image contains the high frequency portion of the contour artifacts. The result of this operation may be referred to as the HP component 107 . It is also noted that the result of the low pass filter 102 is that the low frequency portion of the remaining image from low pass filter 102 contains the low frequency portion of the contour artifacts, however, if the low pass filter is spatially wide enough the low frequency portion is essentially removed. Accordingly, the contouring artifacts are separated in some manner between the low frequency and high frequency components of the image.
  • the subtraction process 105 leads to a bit-depth increase of 1 due to the sign. For example a subtraction of two images with 0 to +255 results in an image with a range from ⁇ 255 to +255.
  • the high pass component 107 has N+1 bit depth (this is based upon a source image being padded to N bits before the subtraction operation).
  • Padding may include inserting 0's and/or 1's to the least significant bits that are missing from the lower bit depth representations relative to the higher.
  • the source image may be padded to R bits before the subtraction, such that the HP component 107 has a bit-depth of R+1 bits.
  • the output of the system may not need N+1 bits, but it should be able to carry a sign, and thus have a zero mean level. If only N bits are used and one bit is dedicated to the sign, then only N ⁇ 1 bits are available for addition to the low pass filter image (in the last addition step). In that case some edge sharpness and detail may be lost.
  • the result of subtracting the low pass filtered image from the original image results in an image that maintains high frequency false contour information.
  • the high frequency false contour information that should be reduced are those having a low amplitude. Accordingly, the low amplitude information should be reduced with respect to the high amplitude information.
  • a coring function 110 may be applied.
  • CVout CVin for
  • CVin is the input code value of the HP image to the coring function
  • CVout is the output code value of the coring function
  • M is the merge point that is where the coring behavior ends (or substantially ends) and the coring function returns to the identify function (or other suitable function).
  • a and ⁇ are parameters selected to ensure two conditions at the merge point, M, namely:
  • the first criterion ensures that the coring function has no discontinuity in actual value, and the second ensures that the 1 st derivative is continuous.
  • the first criterion keeps the tone scale monotonic in the HP band, and the second avoids mach band type artifacts. Thus this coring function could even be applied to the low pass band without such artifacts.
  • the coring function preferably has a slope that equals 1 that intersects with the origin of the plot as well as no second order discontinuities.
  • Curve 50 has a slope equal to 1 .
  • the curve 52 is equation (1) with the parameters to achieve a merge point at 8.
  • the curve 54 are the actual code values if the HP image is quantized to N bits.
  • the curve 56 is the slope of the scaled cosine function in equation (1), before the merge point. It is noted that only the positive half of CVin is illustrated.
  • the next step is to add the cored image 110 (N+1 bit precision) and the filtered low pass components 102 (R bit precision, R>(N+1)) together at 112 . If R ⁇ N, then this cored image 110 may be padded. This operation restores some of the low frequency information that was reduced back to the image.
  • each of the steps shown in FIG. 2 may be applied to the entire image in a sequential manner, which may result in the need for large buffers.
  • a more memory efficient technique involves using as a sliding window, where the computations within the window are used to compute the pixel at the center of the window (or in some other position in the window). This reduces the memory requirements.
  • bit-depth of the input and output images are known in advance. This is typically the case in many applications, such as display an eight bit image on a 10-bit display.
  • the present inventors came to the realization that one may separate the case where the low amplitude information is due to the image texture (which is generally isotropic) versus the case when the low amplitude information is due to a false contour (which is generally non-isotropic, a.k.a., structured error).
  • Generally isotropic information (“iso” meaning one or the same, and “tropic” meaning space or direction) has generally the same texture in all directions. For example, clean sand on the beach may be considered generally isotropic.
  • generally non-isotropic information has different textures in different directions. In many cases, the non-isotopic information has the characteristic of an edge. Accordingly, generally isotropic information has more uniform texture relative to generally non-isotropic information.
  • the accumulation of local special activity may be determined in a suitable manner, such as for example, a single sigma type filter or a single sum of absolute differences (“SAD”) type filter.
  • the system may accumulate local activity 116 , if desired, over a local region around a pixel of the image to be cored (examples include standard deviation, ⁇ , over a local 9 ⁇ 9 window, or SAD, over a similar local window).
  • One may select different coring functions based on a local activity index (or continuously adjust coring function based on a local activity index).
  • Local activity measure could be taken from the mean of the local window, but is more preferably around the zero activity point of the HP image (i.e., 0, unless a pedestal offset is used.).
  • the addition 112 may result in an image having a bit depth of N as used for the image 114 .
  • the output of the addition 112 may have a bit depth “R” greater than the desired output bit-depth “N” for the image 114 (e.g., R>N).
  • the bit depth of the input image may have been the same as, or less than, the desired bit-depth of the output image which during the image processing technique for reducing the contouring effects is increased to a bit-depth greater than the desired bit-depth of the output image.
  • a dithering technique 118 e.g., bit depth extension
  • dithering techniques are typically not considered applicable for overcoming bit-depth limitations for image processing when the image provided has a bit depth less than the bit depth of the output image.
  • the image 112 is modified with a dithering technique 118 , such as for example, amplitude dithering, spatial dithering, and phase dithering.
  • the dithering technique 118 may allow the bit depth to be reduced without noticeable visible loss from R+1 to N.
  • an amplitude based dither pattern is applied that is characterized by the frequency spectrum that is approximately matched to the inverse of the human visual spatial frequency response.
  • Another technique that may be applied is to increase the bit depth of the high pass component 107 to a greater bit depth, such as “R”. In this manner, a more accurate coring function may be applied in the R-bit space. In some implementations, this may be accomplished by modifying the bit depth of the input image to R bits before the subtraction that form the high pass component 107 .
  • the dithering technique 118 may be applied to the low pass filtered image, if desired. This reduces the effects of contouring effects as a result of quantization while similarly increasing the quality of the output image.
  • the dithering technique 118 may be applied to the input image 100 by first expanding the bit depth of the image 130 . While spectrally shaped “noise” may be used, in addition “white” noise may likewise be used, if desired. The low pass filter will effectively modify the “white” noise to a “high pass” noise, which has the general desired spectral characteristics.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)
  • Facsimile Image Signal Circuits (AREA)
  • Controls And Circuits For Display Device (AREA)
US10/746,423 2003-12-24 2003-12-24 Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images Expired - Fee Related US7424168B2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/746,423 US7424168B2 (en) 2003-12-24 2003-12-24 Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images
JP2004337479A JP4544974B2 (ja) 2003-12-24 2004-11-22 量子化され、デコードされた画像の画質をエンハンスする方法
US12/221,584 US7907787B2 (en) 2003-12-24 2008-08-05 Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/746,423 US7424168B2 (en) 2003-12-24 2003-12-24 Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/221,584 Continuation US7907787B2 (en) 2003-12-24 2008-08-05 Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050147317A1 US20050147317A1 (en) 2005-07-07
US7424168B2 true US7424168B2 (en) 2008-09-09

Family

ID=34710692

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/746,423 Expired - Fee Related US7424168B2 (en) 2003-12-24 2003-12-24 Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images
US12/221,584 Expired - Fee Related US7907787B2 (en) 2003-12-24 2008-08-05 Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/221,584 Expired - Fee Related US7907787B2 (en) 2003-12-24 2008-08-05 Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US7424168B2 (ja)
JP (1) JP4544974B2 (ja)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080298711A1 (en) * 2003-12-24 2008-12-04 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images
US20110141368A1 (en) * 2009-12-16 2011-06-16 Vixs Systems, Inc. Adaptive edge enhancement using directional components from non-linear filtering
US9390660B2 (en) 2009-07-24 2016-07-12 Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation Image control for displays

Families Citing this family (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7515160B2 (en) * 2006-07-28 2009-04-07 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for color preservation with image tone scale corrections
US8120570B2 (en) 2004-12-02 2012-02-21 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for tone curve generation, selection and application
US7961199B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2011-06-14 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for image-specific tone scale adjustment and light-source control
US7924261B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2011-04-12 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for determining a display light source adjustment
US8922594B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2014-12-30 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for enhancing display characteristics with high frequency contrast enhancement
US7782405B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2010-08-24 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for selecting a display source light illumination level
US8947465B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2015-02-03 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for display-mode-dependent brightness preservation
US7800577B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2010-09-21 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for enhancing display characteristics
US8004511B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2011-08-23 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for distortion-related source light management
US9083969B2 (en) * 2005-08-12 2015-07-14 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for independent view adjustment in multiple-view displays
US8111265B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2012-02-07 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for brightness preservation using a smoothed gain image
US8913089B2 (en) * 2005-06-15 2014-12-16 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for enhancing display characteristics with frequency-specific gain
US7768496B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2010-08-03 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for image tonescale adjustment to compensate for a reduced source light power level
US7982707B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2011-07-19 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for generating and applying image tone scale adjustments
FR2893806A1 (fr) * 2005-11-21 2007-05-25 Thomson Licensing Sas Systeme de transmission d'images de dynamique elevee, unites et procedes de codage et de decodage pour ce systeme
US8189941B2 (en) * 2005-11-30 2012-05-29 Nec Corporation Image processing device, display device, image processing method, and program
US8270750B2 (en) * 2006-03-02 2012-09-18 Nec Corporation Image processor, display device, image processing method, and program
US7839406B2 (en) * 2006-03-08 2010-11-23 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for enhancing display characteristics with ambient illumination input
US7826681B2 (en) * 2007-02-28 2010-11-02 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for surround-specific display modeling
US8208560B2 (en) * 2007-10-15 2012-06-26 Intel Corporation Bit depth enhancement for scalable video coding
US8204333B2 (en) * 2007-10-15 2012-06-19 Intel Corporation Converting video and image signal bit depths
US8155434B2 (en) * 2007-10-30 2012-04-10 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for image enhancement
US8345038B2 (en) * 2007-10-30 2013-01-01 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for backlight modulation and brightness preservation
US9177509B2 (en) * 2007-11-30 2015-11-03 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for backlight modulation with scene-cut detection
US8378956B2 (en) * 2007-11-30 2013-02-19 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for weighted-error-vector-based source light selection
US8169431B2 (en) 2007-12-26 2012-05-01 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for image tonescale design
US8203579B2 (en) * 2007-12-26 2012-06-19 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for backlight modulation with image characteristic mapping
US8179363B2 (en) * 2007-12-26 2012-05-15 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for display source light management with histogram manipulation
US8223113B2 (en) * 2007-12-26 2012-07-17 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for display source light management with variable delay
US8207932B2 (en) 2007-12-26 2012-06-26 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for display source light illumination level selection
US8531379B2 (en) * 2008-04-28 2013-09-10 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for image compensation for ambient conditions
US8416179B2 (en) * 2008-07-10 2013-04-09 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for color preservation with a color-modulated backlight
US9330630B2 (en) * 2008-08-30 2016-05-03 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for display source light management with rate change control
JP5640253B2 (ja) * 2008-12-01 2014-12-17 マーベル ワールド トレード リミテッド ビット解像度の向上のための装置及び方法
US8165724B2 (en) * 2009-06-17 2012-04-24 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Methods and systems for power-controlling display devices
US20110001737A1 (en) * 2009-07-02 2011-01-06 Kerofsky Louis J Methods and Systems for Ambient-Adaptive Image Display
TW201136298A (en) * 2010-04-12 2011-10-16 Novatek Microelectronics Corp Filter and filtering method for reducing image noise
US9911179B2 (en) 2014-07-18 2018-03-06 Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation Image decontouring in high dynamic range video processing
US10609372B2 (en) * 2017-09-29 2020-03-31 Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation Up-conversion to content adaptive perceptual quantization video signals

Citations (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3789133A (en) * 1971-10-26 1974-01-29 Commercial Electronics Inc Television camera aperture correction system
US4020462A (en) 1975-12-08 1977-04-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for form removal from contour compressed image data
US4196452A (en) 1978-12-01 1980-04-01 Xerox Corporation Tone error control for image contour removal
US4223340A (en) 1979-05-11 1980-09-16 Rca Corporation Image detail improvement in a vertical detail enhancement system
US4268864A (en) 1979-12-05 1981-05-19 Cbs Inc. Image enhancement system for television
US4399461A (en) 1978-09-28 1983-08-16 Eastman Kodak Company Electronic image processing
US4402006A (en) 1981-02-23 1983-08-30 Karlock James A Image enhancer apparatus
US4523230A (en) 1983-11-01 1985-06-11 Rca Corporation System for coring an image-representing signal
US4536796A (en) 1983-08-23 1985-08-20 Rca Corporation Non-linear dynamic coring circuit for video signals
US4549212A (en) 1983-08-11 1985-10-22 Eastman Kodak Company Image processing method using a collapsed Walsh-Hadamard transform
US4553165A (en) 1983-08-11 1985-11-12 Eastman Kodak Company Transform processing method for reducing noise in an image
US4937677A (en) * 1985-06-27 1990-06-26 Oce-Nederland B.V. Method of enlarging/reducing dithered images
US4962426A (en) 1988-04-07 1990-10-09 Hitachi, Ltd. Dynamic noise reduction circuit for image luminance signal
US4977605A (en) 1986-09-30 1990-12-11 Bertin & Cie Binary quantification of an image having multiple levels of greys
JPH03102579A (ja) 1989-09-18 1991-04-26 Fujitsu Ltd イメージデータのノイズ除去方式
US5012333A (en) * 1989-01-05 1991-04-30 Eastman Kodak Company Interactive dynamic range adjustment system for printing digital images
US5025312A (en) 1990-03-30 1991-06-18 Faroudja Y C Motion-adaptive video noise reduction system using recirculation and coring
US5218649A (en) 1990-05-04 1993-06-08 U S West Advanced Technologies, Inc. Image enhancement system
US5227869A (en) 1990-08-20 1993-07-13 Ikegami Tsushinki Co., Ltd. Method for correcting contour of image
US5247588A (en) * 1990-08-14 1993-09-21 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method of image restoration
US5260791A (en) 1992-06-04 1993-11-09 David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc. Method and apparatus for the spatio-temporal coring of images
US5389978A (en) 1992-02-29 1995-02-14 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Noise eliminative circuit employing a coring circuit
JPH089154A (ja) 1994-06-15 1996-01-12 Ricoh Co Ltd 画像処理装置
US5526446A (en) 1991-09-24 1996-06-11 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Noise reduction system
US5598482A (en) * 1992-02-11 1997-01-28 Eastman Kodak Company Image rendering system and associated method for minimizing contours in a quantized digital color image
US5651078A (en) * 1994-07-18 1997-07-22 Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. Method and apparatus for reducing contouring in video compression
JPH09261464A (ja) 1996-03-26 1997-10-03 Sharp Corp 画像２値化装置
US5696852A (en) 1990-04-27 1997-12-09 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image signal processing apparatus
US5920653A (en) 1996-10-22 1999-07-06 Hewlett-Packard Company Multiple spatial channel printing
US6055340A (en) 1997-02-28 2000-04-25 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for processing digital images to suppress their noise and enhancing their sharpness
US6204934B1 (en) * 1997-08-12 2001-03-20 Murata Kikai Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing device and image processing method
US6441867B1 (en) * 1999-10-22 2002-08-27 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Incorporated Bit-depth extension of digital displays using noise
US6504953B1 (en) 1998-09-17 2003-01-07 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft Method for the automatic removal of image errors
US6674904B1 (en) * 1999-12-14 2004-01-06 Intel Corporation Contour tracing and boundary detection for object identification in a digital image
US6751006B2 (en) * 2000-07-03 2004-06-15 Imax Corporation Processing techniques for superimposing images for image projection
US6765695B2 (en) * 2001-09-12 2004-07-20 Seiko Epson Corporation Color processing architecture and algorithms for color laser printers
US7190380B2 (en) * 2003-09-26 2007-03-13 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Generating and displaying spatially offset sub-frames
US7268790B1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2007-09-11 National Semiconductor Corporation Display system with framestore and stochastic dithering

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05300371A (ja) * 1992-04-17 1993-11-12 Omron Corp 画像処理用フィルタ回路
JP2601156B2 (ja) * 1993-10-19 1997-04-16 日本電気株式会社 画像処理装置
JPH08163407A (ja) * 1994-11-30 1996-06-21 Victor Co Of Japan Ltd リンギング低減装置
JP3816151B2 (ja) * 1995-09-29 2006-08-30 富士写真フイルム株式会社 画像処理方法および装置
JP3738788B2 (ja) * 1995-09-29 2006-01-25 富士写真フイルム株式会社 画像のダイナミックレンジ圧縮処理方法および装置
JP3717561B2 (ja) * 1995-10-09 2005-11-16 オリンパス株式会社 カメラ
US6185334B1 (en) * 1998-01-30 2001-02-06 Compaq Computer Corporation Method for reconstructing a dithered image
US6347160B1 (en) * 1998-01-30 2002-02-12 Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. Increasing the bit depth of and filtering dithered images for the purpose of inverse dithering
US6163629A (en) * 1998-01-30 2000-12-19 Compaq Computer Corporation Method for low complexity low memory inverse dithering
US6222945B1 (en) * 1998-01-30 2001-04-24 Compaq Computer Corporation Selective filtering of a dithered image for the purpose of inverse dithering
US6108453A (en) * 1998-09-16 2000-08-22 Intel Corporation General image enhancement framework
US6671068B1 (en) * 1999-09-30 2003-12-30 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Adaptive error diffusion with improved edge and sharpness perception
JP2002183726A (ja) * 2000-12-19 2002-06-28 Konica Corp 画像処理装置
JP2002183727A (ja) * 2000-12-19 2002-06-28 Konica Corp 画像処理装置
GB0105561D0 (en) * 2001-03-07 2001-04-25 Segmentis Ltd Improvements in and relating to image signal processing and printing of picture therefrom
US7308146B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2007-12-11 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Digital video compression
US7424168B2 (en) * 2003-12-24 2008-09-09 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images

Patent Citations (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3789133A (en) * 1971-10-26 1974-01-29 Commercial Electronics Inc Television camera aperture correction system
US4020462A (en) 1975-12-08 1977-04-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for form removal from contour compressed image data
US4399461A (en) 1978-09-28 1983-08-16 Eastman Kodak Company Electronic image processing
US4196452A (en) 1978-12-01 1980-04-01 Xerox Corporation Tone error control for image contour removal
US4223340A (en) 1979-05-11 1980-09-16 Rca Corporation Image detail improvement in a vertical detail enhancement system
US4268864A (en) 1979-12-05 1981-05-19 Cbs Inc. Image enhancement system for television
US4402006A (en) 1981-02-23 1983-08-30 Karlock James A Image enhancer apparatus
US4549212A (en) 1983-08-11 1985-10-22 Eastman Kodak Company Image processing method using a collapsed Walsh-Hadamard transform
US4553165A (en) 1983-08-11 1985-11-12 Eastman Kodak Company Transform processing method for reducing noise in an image
US4536796A (en) 1983-08-23 1985-08-20 Rca Corporation Non-linear dynamic coring circuit for video signals
US4523230A (en) 1983-11-01 1985-06-11 Rca Corporation System for coring an image-representing signal
US4937677A (en) * 1985-06-27 1990-06-26 Oce-Nederland B.V. Method of enlarging/reducing dithered images
US4977605A (en) 1986-09-30 1990-12-11 Bertin & Cie Binary quantification of an image having multiple levels of greys
US4962426A (en) 1988-04-07 1990-10-09 Hitachi, Ltd. Dynamic noise reduction circuit for image luminance signal
US5012333A (en) * 1989-01-05 1991-04-30 Eastman Kodak Company Interactive dynamic range adjustment system for printing digital images
JPH03102579A (ja) 1989-09-18 1991-04-26 Fujitsu Ltd イメージデータのノイズ除去方式
US5025312A (en) 1990-03-30 1991-06-18 Faroudja Y C Motion-adaptive video noise reduction system using recirculation and coring
US5696852A (en) 1990-04-27 1997-12-09 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image signal processing apparatus
US5218649A (en) 1990-05-04 1993-06-08 U S West Advanced Technologies, Inc. Image enhancement system
US5247588A (en) * 1990-08-14 1993-09-21 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method of image restoration
US5227869A (en) 1990-08-20 1993-07-13 Ikegami Tsushinki Co., Ltd. Method for correcting contour of image
US5526446A (en) 1991-09-24 1996-06-11 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Noise reduction system
US5598482A (en) * 1992-02-11 1997-01-28 Eastman Kodak Company Image rendering system and associated method for minimizing contours in a quantized digital color image
US5389978A (en) 1992-02-29 1995-02-14 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Noise eliminative circuit employing a coring circuit
US5260791A (en) 1992-06-04 1993-11-09 David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc. Method and apparatus for the spatio-temporal coring of images
JPH089154A (ja) 1994-06-15 1996-01-12 Ricoh Co Ltd 画像処理装置
US5651078A (en) * 1994-07-18 1997-07-22 Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. Method and apparatus for reducing contouring in video compression
US5912992A (en) 1996-03-26 1999-06-15 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Binary image forming device with shading correction means using interpolation of shade densities determined by using sample points
JPH09261464A (ja) 1996-03-26 1997-10-03 Sharp Corp 画像２値化装置
US5920653A (en) 1996-10-22 1999-07-06 Hewlett-Packard Company Multiple spatial channel printing
US6055340A (en) 1997-02-28 2000-04-25 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for processing digital images to suppress their noise and enhancing their sharpness
US6204934B1 (en) * 1997-08-12 2001-03-20 Murata Kikai Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing device and image processing method
US6504953B1 (en) 1998-09-17 2003-01-07 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft Method for the automatic removal of image errors
US6441867B1 (en) * 1999-10-22 2002-08-27 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Incorporated Bit-depth extension of digital displays using noise
US6674904B1 (en) * 1999-12-14 2004-01-06 Intel Corporation Contour tracing and boundary detection for object identification in a digital image
US6751006B2 (en) * 2000-07-03 2004-06-15 Imax Corporation Processing techniques for superimposing images for image projection
US6765695B2 (en) * 2001-09-12 2004-07-20 Seiko Epson Corporation Color processing architecture and algorithms for color laser printers
US7268790B1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2007-09-11 National Semiconductor Corporation Display system with framestore and stochastic dithering
US7190380B2 (en) * 2003-09-26 2007-03-13 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Generating and displaying spatially offset sub-frames

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Tilne Jarske, Petri Haavisto and Irek Defee, "Post-Filtering Methods for Reducing Blocking Effects from Coded Images," IEEE, Jun. 27, 1994.

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080298711A1 (en) * 2003-12-24 2008-12-04 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images
US7907787B2 (en) 2003-12-24 2011-03-15 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images
US9390660B2 (en) 2009-07-24 2016-07-12 Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation Image control for displays
US20110141368A1 (en) * 2009-12-16 2011-06-16 Vixs Systems, Inc. Adaptive edge enhancement using directional components from non-linear filtering
US8284314B2 (en) * 2009-12-16 2012-10-09 Vixs Systems, Inc. Adaptive edge enhancement using directional components from non-linear filtering

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7907787B2 (en) 2011-03-15
US20080298711A1 (en) 2008-12-04
JP4544974B2 (ja) 2010-09-15
US20050147317A1 (en) 2005-07-07
JP2005190468A (ja) 2005-07-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7424168B2 (en) Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images
US7400779B2 (en) Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images
JP2960386B2 (ja) 信号適応フィルタリング方法及び信号適応フィルター
JP5290171B2 (ja) 符号器によって補助された後処理に関する方法及び装置
EP1242975B1 (en) Digital imaging
US7373013B2 (en) Directional video filters for locally adaptive spatial noise reduction
US5379122A (en) Decompression of standard ADCT-compressed images
US7995849B2 (en) Method and apparatus for improving video quality of low bit-rate video
US7430337B2 (en) System and method for removing ringing artifacts
EP1168824A2 (en) Image processing method for reducing noise and blocking artifact in a digital image
US20080123979A1 (en) Method and system for digital image contour removal (dcr)
JPWO2002093935A1 (ja) 画像処理装置
US10922792B2 (en) Image adjustment method and associated image processing circuit
US7983504B2 (en) Sign coring for contour reduction
JP4066367B2 (ja) 画像ノイズ除去方法
US7440633B2 (en) Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images
US7424166B2 (en) Enhancing the quality of decoded quantized images
JP4380498B2 (ja) ブロック歪み低減装置
JP4053460B2 (ja) 画像処理装置、画像形成装置、画像処理方法、画像処理プログラム、および記録媒体
US5757975A (en) Artifact reduction for large dynamic range input data in JPEG compression
KR100676226B1 (ko) 동영상 코덱의 후처리 방법 및 이를 위한 에지 보상 및 향상 필터링 방법
JP3233999B2 (ja) 画像信号復号化装置
JPH0951532A (ja) 歪み除去装置
JP2859274B2 (ja) 画像雑音除去方法
Fung et al. Restoration of halftoned color-quantized images using projection onto convex sets

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SHARP LABORATORIES OF AMERICA, INC., WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DALY, SCOTT J.;FENG, XIAO-FAN;REEL/FRAME:015240/0335

Effective date: 20040130

AS Assignment

Owner name: SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SHARP LABORATORIES OF AMERICA INC.;REEL/FRAME:021590/0190

Effective date: 20080926

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20160909