US3842772A - Semisubmerged ship with bow impact alleviator - Google Patents
Semisubmerged ship with bow impact alleviator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3842772A US3842772A US00379509A US37950973A US3842772A US 3842772 A US3842772 A US 3842772A US 00379509 A US00379509 A US 00379509A US 37950973 A US37950973 A US 37950973A US 3842772 A US3842772 A US 3842772A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- platform
- impact
- shaped
- cusp
- ship
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B1/00—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils
- B63B1/02—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving lift mainly from water displacement
- B63B1/10—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving lift mainly from water displacement with multiple hulls
- B63B1/107—Semi-submersibles; Small waterline area multiple hull vessels and the like, e.g. SWATH
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B1/00—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils
- B63B1/02—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving lift mainly from water displacement
- B63B1/10—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving lift mainly from water displacement with multiple hulls
- B63B1/12—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving lift mainly from water displacement with multiple hulls the hulls being interconnected rigidly
- B63B2001/128—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving lift mainly from water displacement with multiple hulls the hulls being interconnected rigidly comprising underwater connectors between the hulls
Definitions
- ABSTRACT An improvement is provided for the semisubmerged ship which reduces the impact effect of large waves when they strike the ships platform.
- a semisubmerged ship by having at least one submerged elongate hull supporting a platform above the waters surface by at least one water-surface piercing strut is capable of high-speed operation and a large wave directly striking the platform could damage the ship.
- Including pairs of lifting hydrofoils on the upper reaches of the forwardly disposed water-surface piercing struts raises the platform to reduce the impact forceand the possibility of damage to the platform.
- bow-shaped projections on the underside of the platform generate lifting forces which raise the platform over the waves to reduce the impact force. Designing the bow shaped projections to be cusp-shaped also helps them cleave into the waves to further reduce the impact and the effects of impact on the underside of the platform.
- the concave surfaces of the cusps translate the impacting force to tensile stresses in their sheet-metal surfaces. These sheet metal surfaces are capable of bearing greater tensile forces without yielding whereas conventional flat surfaces are deformed and end up irregularly shaped.
- the improvement is a means carried on the forward portion of the semisubmerged ship above the waters surface being appropri-.
- a further object is to provide for means reducing the impact on the bottom-side of the platform of the semisubmerged ship when unusually high sea states are encountered.
- Another object is to provide ski-like or bow-like projections for reducing the effects of impact.
- Yet another object is to provide an arrangement of dependent cusp-shaped members carried on the forward portion of the platform for reducing the effect of the impacting force of large waves.
- Still another. object is to provide lifting hydrofoils carried above the normal water line for reducing the impacting force of large waves.
- Yet another object is to provide a combination of cusp-shaped members and lifting hydrofoils normally carried above the waters surface to reduce the impact of large waves.
- Yet another object is to provide cusp-shaped members fabricated to ensure the generation of nondestructive tensile forces when the members contact large waves.
- FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 are three typical embodiments of the semisubmerged ship each mounting a variation of the impact reducing means.
- FIG. 4' is a front view of a single dependent cuspshaped member functioning as the impact reducing means.
- FIG. 5 shows several dependent cusp-shaped members arranged in a side-by-side relationship and functioning as the impact reducing means.
- FIG. 5a shows a cross-sectional detail of a dependent cusp-shaped member.
- FIG. 6 is a variation of a dependent member.
- FIG. 6a is a partial side view of FIG. 6.
- FIG. 7 shows a front view of a single lifting hydrofoil functioning as the impact reducing means.
- FIG. 8 is a front view showing a plurality of pairs of lifting hydrofoils functioning as the impact reducing means.
- FIG. 9 shows a combination of dependent cusps and hydrofoils functioning as the impact reducing means.
- FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 three representative types of the semisubmerged ship, 10, 10a and 10b, are shown in FIGS. 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
- the semisubmerged ship of FIG. 1 has two elongate hulls 11 each supporting a platform 12 by an aft water-surface piercing strut l3 and a forward watersurface piercing strut 14 (only one aft and forward strut are shown).
- the third representative semisubmerged ship of FIG. 3 has a single elongate hull 11b supporting a platform 12b by a single forward water-surfacepiercing .are optionally located in the hulls.
- the platform is supported a considerable distance above the surface of the water and, by being so placed, provides a stable plat-' form for hauling supplies, passengers, or for serving as a stable weapons platform.
- the forward and aft struts are shaped for a minimal hydrodynamic reaction to surface spray and wave action and canard fins and horizontally oriented stabilizers or cantilevered vanes are mounted on the submerged hulls to responsively control the vessel s attitude.
- the configuration, design considerations, and details of the semisubmerged ship are thoroughly discussed in the above referred to US. Pat. Nos. 3,623,444 and 3,730,l23.
- a ship fabricated in accordance with the teachings of these patents is capable of sustained high-speed operation in relatively high sea states due, in part, to the placing of the elongate hulls and control surfaces beneath the area of surface wave action. I-Iydrodynamically designed struts reaching this area of surface wave action do not create excessive drag and they support a large platform above and beyond the turbulance associatedwith wind and waves to permit smooth, rapid, up to and in excess of, 40 knot speeds.
- FIG. 4 shows a single cuspshaped member 16 dependent from bow portion 12' and longitudinally rearward along the length of platform 12.
- the apex of member 16 first contacts the wave and splits it gradually.
- the bottom surface of the platform gradually slides into and over the wave and a single full impact of the full force of the wave on the otherwise flat underside of the platform is avoided.
- the second embodiment of this invention shows the twin-hulled semisubmerged ship mounting a plurality of smaller cusp-shaped members 17 from how portion 12 backwardalong the length of platform 12.
- These cusp-shaped members have the cross-sectional configuration of a ceratoid cusp for hydrodynamically interacting with impinging large waves to prevent damage to the platform.
- the full impact of the crest and body of an unusually large wave is prevented from striking the bottom of platform 12 at one time since the wave is broken-up by the contours of the several smaller cusp-shaped members.
- the platform rides up and over the waves crest on the cusp-shaped members and the full impact of the wave is deflected from the otherwise planar surface of the platforms underside.
- each cusp-shaped member 17 has a rounded convex curvature; this further avoids presenting a planar surface to the waves surface.
- FIG. 3 shows cusp-shaped members 17 on the single hull semisubmerged ship. These cusp-shaped members also are included in the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 4 and 5. Details of all the embodiments are set out in FIG. 5a which showsan internal framework 18 in the form of an elongate steel rod. The rod covering being held in tension, see arrows 19a, when an upward pressure represented by arrows 20, is exerted by the crest of a large wave slamming against the platform.
- ski or bow-shaped members 12" continue downward from bow portion 12' in a rounded contour. Upon striking a large wave, member 12" lifts the bottom of platform 12 from the waves path. Member 12" optionally extends the length of the platform.
- a single lifting hydrofoil 21 is mounted on each of the forward struts 14 in an area 14a located well above the surface of the water.- Only when an unusually large wave is encountered does this hydrofoil become wetted, and only then does it hydrodynamically cooperate with the mass of water to lift the platform over the crest of the wave to avoid impact-damage.
- the lifting hydrofoil has a cross-sectional configuration to ensure the creation of such lift, or it is a hydrofoil canted with respect to the direction of forward motion to ensure the generation of the lifting force.
- pairs of oppositely extending lifting hydrofoils 22, 23, and 24, are mounted on a separate forward strut 14 in the area 14a located well above surface wave action. Note that the smallest pair of lifting hydrofoils is located nearest to the waters surface and that the intermediate pair of lifting hydrofoils and the largest upper pair of lifting hydrofoils are disposed at positions further up on the strut. As an unusually high wave strikes the semisubmerged ship while it travels through the water, lowest pair 24 of lifting hydrofoils contacts the large wave and begins to exert a relatively small lifting force. If the lift created by pair 24 is insufficient, and as the semisubmerged ship continues to plow into the wave, pair 23 of lifting hydrofoils begins to slice into the the crest of the large wave to generate a greater lifting force is generated.
- pair 22 becomes wetted and the platform is lifted from the waves path.
- FIGS. 5 and 8 The two types of impact reducing means depicted in FIGS. 5 and 8 are combined in the embodiment of FIG. 9.
- a plurality of smaller cusp-shaped members 17 depending from platform 12 and the aforedescribed pairs of oppositely extending lifting hydrofoils 22, 23, and 24 are mounted on the struts of the twin hulled semisubmerged ship.
- the hydrodynamic reactions of both the cusp-shaped members and the lifting hydrofoils are substantially identical to that described above, and the additive lifting force produced assures high-speed safe passage in high sea states. It naturally follows that there is .little chance of water coming over the bow and men and materials are protected.
- the impact reducing means includes a plurality of dependent cusp-shaped members forming the underside of said platform in a juxtaposed relationship and the impact reducing means further includes a plurality of pairs of oppositely extending members mounted in a vertically spaced relationship on each forwardly disposed strut.
- the plurality of dependent members are cusp-shaped and formingthe underside of the bow of said platform and each of the pairs of oppositely extending members are hydrofoil shaped to produce a lifting force.
- each of the plurality of cusp-shapedmembers includes an elongate rigid element curving upward toward and being secured to the forwardportion of said platform at its front end and on an aft portion of said platform at its second end and a skin-like element extending over and "reaching between adjacent elongate rigid elements and the pairs of oppositely extending hydrofoils are configured with increasing dimensions with respect 5 to one another.
- each cusp-shaped member has a convex curvature at the bow and each of the pairs of oppositely extending hydrofoils are oriented to produce a lifting force.
- said skin-like element of the plurality of cusp-shaped members is an integral plate shaped like a series of ceratoid cusps for translating impact forces to tensile forces in the skin-like plate when large waves strike and there are disposed pairs of oppositely extending hydrofoils arranged to present surface areas of increasing dimensions in proportion to their proximity to the platform.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
- Other Liquid Machine Or Engine Such As Wave Power Use (AREA)
Abstract
An improvement is provided for the semisubmerged ship which reduces the impact effect of large waves when they strike the ship''s platform. A semisubmerged ship by having at least one submerged elongate hull supporting a platform above the water''s surface by at least one water-surface piercing strut is capable of high-speed operation and a large wave directly striking the platform could damage the ship. Including pairs of lifting hydrofoils on the upper reaches of the forwardly disposed watersurface piercing struts raises the platform to reduce the impact force and the possibility of damage to the platform. Similarly configured bow-shaped projections on the underside of the platform generate lifting forces which raise the platform over the waves to reduce the impact force. Designing the bow shaped projections to be cusp-shaped also helps them cleave into the waves to further reduce the impact and the effects of impact on the underside of the platform. The concave surfaces of the cusps translate the impacting force to tensile stresses in their sheetmetal surfaces. These sheet metal surfaces are capable of bearing greater tensile forces without yielding whereas conventional flat surfaces are deformed and end up irregularly shaped.
Description
United States Patent r191 Lang SEMISUBMERGED SHIP WITH BOW IMPACT ALLEVIATOR ['75] Inventor: Thomas G. Lang, San Diego, Calif. [73] Assignee: The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy, Washington, DC. [22] Filed: July 16, 1973 [21] App]. No.: 379,509
Primary Examiner-Robert G. Sheridan Assistant ExaminerDonald W. Underwood Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Richard S. Sciascia; Ervin F. Johnston; Thomas Glenn Keough [111 3,842,772 51 Oct. 22, 1974 [5 7] ABSTRACT An improvement is provided for the semisubmerged ship which reduces the impact effect of large waves when they strike the ships platform. A semisubmerged ship by having at least one submerged elongate hull supporting a platform above the waters surface by at least one water-surface piercing strut is capable of high-speed operation and a large wave directly striking the platform could damage the ship. Including pairs of lifting hydrofoils on the upper reaches of the forwardly disposed water-surface piercing struts raises the platform to reduce the impact forceand the possibility of damage to the platform. Similarly configured bow-shaped projections on the underside of the platform generate lifting forces which raise the platform over the waves to reduce the impact force. Designing the bow shaped projections to be cusp-shaped also helps them cleave into the waves to further reduce the impact and the effects of impact on the underside of the platform. The concave surfaces of the cusps translate the impacting force to tensile stresses in their sheet-metal surfaces. These sheet metal surfaces are capable of bearing greater tensile forces without yielding whereas conventional flat surfaces are deformed and end up irregularly shaped.
5 Claims, 9 Drawing Figures PAIENHDUEYZZW V 3.842.772
SHEET 10$ 3 FIGZ ' FIG'.3
SEMISUBMERGED SHIP WITH BOW IMPACT ALLEVIATOR STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Most conventional surface ships and catamaran-type vessels create excessive spray and wave drag, even though some have had their bows modified to break cleanly through the water; however, when unusually high sea states were encountered, these bows tended to plow through the waves and water would break over the bow and deck. One attempt to reduce the problems associated with excessive plowing and wave drag is shown in US. Pat. No. 3,530,815. This catamaran-type ship employs an anti-pitching hydrofoil section disposed below the waters surface. The hydrofoil is articulated to lift the vessel and to lessen the ships pitching tendencies. Hydrofoils also are used on a full-time basis to control attitude on an air-cushion vehicle of the type shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,661,110. The hydrofoils in this vehicle are disposed below the waters surface to provide hydrodynamic lift in much the same manner as practiced by conventional hydrofoil boats. Thus, it is evident that particularly-shaped bows and hydrofoils routinely have been employed on a full-time basis to hydrodynamically provide lift and high-speed stability. Yet the state of the art fails to recognize theme of such structures carried above the waters surface to guard against the damage caused by unusually large waves. Where high-speed stability is inherent, such as in the case of the semisubmerged ship thoroughly disclosed and claimed in US. Pat. No. 3,623,444, only the possibility of damage by unusually high sea states poses any hazard. A typical embodiment of the semisubmerged ship has 30-foot long supporting struts. As a result, in sea states having waves less than 30 feet from crest to trough, safe-high-speed operation is maintained by appropriately controlling the ships fully-submerged control surfaces. But in higher sea states which could bring waves in-contact with the broad expanse of its platform, permanent damage could occur. In fact, there is every reason in expect that'there will be a deformation to the bottom-side of the platform. Some means should be provided for reducing the effects of impact on the platform other than creating excessively heavy structure which penalizes the payload. A continuing need exists for such a means as the semisubmerged ship travels at high speed.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION connecting the hull and platform. The improvement is a means carried on the forward portion of the semisubmerged ship above the waters surface being appropri-.
ately shaped for reducing the effects of impact when high waves strike the platform.
It is a prime object of this invention to provide an improvement for the semisubmerged ship.
A further object is to provide for means reducing the impact on the bottom-side of the platform of the semisubmerged ship when unusually high sea states are encountered.
Another object is to provide ski-like or bow-like projections for reducing the effects of impact.
Yet another object is to provide an arrangement of dependent cusp-shaped members carried on the forward portion of the platform for reducing the effect of the impacting force of large waves.
Still another. object is to provide lifting hydrofoils carried above the normal water line for reducing the impacting force of large waves.
Yet another object is to provide a combination of cusp-shaped members and lifting hydrofoils normally carried above the waters surface to reduce the impact of large waves.
Yet another object is to provide cusp-shaped members fabricated to ensure the generation of nondestructive tensile forces when the members contact large waves.
These and other objects of the invention will become morereadily apparent from the ensuing specification when taken with the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 are three typical embodiments of the semisubmerged ship each mounting a variation of the impact reducing means.
FIG. 4' is a front view of a single dependent cuspshaped member functioning as the impact reducing means.
FIG. 5 shows several dependent cusp-shaped members arranged in a side-by-side relationship and functioning as the impact reducing means.
FIG. 5a shows a cross-sectional detail of a dependent cusp-shaped member.
FIG. 6 is a variation of a dependent member.
FIG. 6a is a partial side view of FIG. 6.
FIG. 7 shows a front view of a single lifting hydrofoil functioning as the impact reducing means.
FIG. 8 is a front view showing a plurality of pairs of lifting hydrofoils functioning as the impact reducing means.
FIG. 9 shows a combination of dependent cusps and hydrofoils functioning as the impact reducing means.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT This improvement is specifically intended for modification of the semisubmerged ships of US. Pat. Nos. 3,623,444 and 3,730,123 issued Nov. 30,1971 and May 1, 1973 to'ThomasG. Lang. In these drawings, three representative types of the semisubmerged ship, 10, 10a and 10b, are shown in FIGS. 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The semisubmerged ship of FIG. 1 has two elongate hulls 11 each supporting a platform 12 by an aft water-surface piercing strut l3 and a forward watersurface piercing strut 14 (only one aft and forward strut are shown). The type of FIG. 2 has a single elongate hull 11a supporting a platform 12a via a single aft water-surface piercing strut 13a. while a pair of water piercing forward struts 14a depends from opposite lateral extremes of the front portion of the platform. Lastly, the third representative semisubmerged ship of FIG. 3 has a single elongate hull 11b supporting a platform 12b by a single forward water-surfacepiercing .are optionally located in the hulls. The platform is supported a considerable distance above the surface of the water and, by being so placed, provides a stable plat-' form for hauling supplies, passengers, or for serving as a stable weapons platform. The forward and aft struts are shaped for a minimal hydrodynamic reaction to surface spray and wave action and canard fins and horizontally oriented stabilizers or cantilevered vanes are mounted on the submerged hulls to responsively control the vessel s attitude. The configuration, design considerations, and details of the semisubmerged ship are thoroughly discussed in the above referred to US. Pat. Nos. 3,623,444 and 3,730,l23. A ship fabricated in accordance with the teachings of these patents is capable of sustained high-speed operation in relatively high sea states due, in part, to the placing of the elongate hulls and control surfaces beneath the area of surface wave action. I-Iydrodynamically designed struts reaching this area of surface wave action do not create excessive drag and they support a large platform above and beyond the turbulance associatedwith wind and waves to permit smooth, rapid, up to and in excess of, 40 knot speeds.
However, in severe sea states, waves reach heights in excess of the distance the struts hold the platform above the waters surface. When this occurs, there is a strong likelihood of deformation or rupture of the bottom-side of the platform as it plows into the large wave. Furthermore, any cargo not securely locked in place or any crewmen caught on the exposed upper deck of the platform are certain to be swept overboard as water rushes over the top of the platform. Thus, modifica tions of the patented semisubmerged ships were needed which would diminish the high waves damaging impact on the platform and lessen the chance of water being taken over the bow.
The modifications to the semisubmerged ship, i.e., the embodiments of this invention, which reduce the possibility of damage to the platform are either located at the underside of bow portion 12, 12a, and 12b, or on the upper areas 15, a and 15b of the forward struts 14, 14a, and 141;, or, a combination of both locations. However, with respect to setting forth these several embodiments, FIGS. 4 through 9 and the ensuing description will be concerned with the twin-hulled semisubmerged ship of FIG. 1. Similar modifications of the semisubmerged ships shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 will be obvious in view of the following description.
The embodiment of FIG. 4 shows a single cuspshaped member 16 dependent from bow portion 12' and longitudinally rearward along the length of platform 12. As the semisubmerged ship travels through the water and the crest of the large wave slams against the bow portion the apex of member 16 first contacts the wave and splits it gradually. The bottom surface of the platform gradually slides into and over the wave and a single full impact of the full force of the wave on the otherwise flat underside of the platform is avoided. By designing arcuate contours 16a and 16b of member 16, there is a translation of force as it effects the surface of the skin-like plate forming the bottom-side of platform 12.
In FIG. 5 the second embodiment of this invention shows the twin-hulled semisubmerged ship mounting a plurality of smaller cusp-shaped members 17 from how portion 12 backwardalong the length of platform 12. These cusp-shaped members have the cross-sectional configuration of a ceratoid cusp for hydrodynamically interacting with impinging large waves to prevent damage to the platform. Here again, the full impact of the crest and body of an unusually large wave is prevented from striking the bottom of platform 12 at one time since the wave is broken-up by the contours of the several smaller cusp-shaped members. The platform rides up and over the waves crest on the cusp-shaped members and the full impact of the wave is deflected from the otherwise planar surface of the platforms underside. To further reduce the full impact the apex of each cusp-shaped member 17 has a rounded convex curvature; this further avoids presenting a planar surface to the waves surface. For purposes of demonstration, note that FIG. 3 shows cusp-shaped members 17 on the single hull semisubmerged ship. These cusp-shaped members also are included in the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 4 and 5. Details of all the embodiments are set out in FIG. 5a which showsan internal framework 18 in the form of an elongate steel rod. The rod covering being held in tension, see arrows 19a, when an upward pressure represented by arrows 20, is exerted by the crest of a large wave slamming against the platform. Because of the manner of construction of cuspshaped members 17, a translation of force is made. The punishing impact the lower skin-like plate covering 19 is subjected to (which would deform a flat conventionally mounted plate), is translated into internal tensile stresses which the cusp-shaped configuration is particularly adept at hearing.
A variation using dependent structure is shown in FIGS. 6 and 6a. Here, ski or bow-shaped members 12" continue downward from bow portion 12' in a rounded contour. Upon striking a large wave, member 12" lifts the bottom of platform 12 from the waves path. Member 12" optionally extends the length of the platform.
Looking to the embodiment of FIG. 7, a single lifting hydrofoil 21 is mounted on each of the forward struts 14 in an area 14a located well above the surface of the water.- Only when an unusually large wave is encountered does this hydrofoil become wetted, and only then does it hydrodynamically cooperate with the mass of water to lift the platform over the crest of the wave to avoid impact-damage. In the alternative, the lifting hydrofoil has a cross-sectional configuration to ensure the creation of such lift, or it is a hydrofoil canted with respect to the direction of forward motion to ensure the generation of the lifting force.
Improved lifting is provided by the cascaded hydrofoil arrangement shown in FIG. 8. Here, pairs of oppositely extending lifting hydrofoils 22, 23, and 24, are mounted on a separate forward strut 14 in the area 14a located well above surface wave action. Note that the smallest pair of lifting hydrofoils is located nearest to the waters surface and that the intermediate pair of lifting hydrofoils and the largest upper pair of lifting hydrofoils are disposed at positions further up on the strut. As an unusually high wave strikes the semisubmerged ship while it travels through the water, lowest pair 24 of lifting hydrofoils contacts the large wave and begins to exert a relatively small lifting force. If the lift created by pair 24 is insufficient, and as the semisubmerged ship continues to plow into the wave, pair 23 of lifting hydrofoils begins to slice into the the crest of the large wave to generate a greater lifting force is generated.
If the additive lifting force created by pair 24 and pair 23 is insufficient to raise the platform and the semisubmerged ship continues to plow into the wave, pair 22 becomes wetted and the platform is lifted from the waves path.
The two types of impact reducing means depicted in FIGS. 5 and 8 are combined in the embodiment of FIG. 9. A plurality of smaller cusp-shaped members 17 depending from platform 12 and the aforedescribed pairs of oppositely extending lifting hydrofoils 22, 23, and 24 are mounted on the struts of the twin hulled semisubmerged ship. The hydrodynamic reactions of both the cusp-shaped members and the lifting hydrofoils are substantially identical to that described above, and the additive lifting force produced assures high-speed safe passage in high sea states. It naturally follows that there is .little chance of water coming over the bow and men and materials are protected.
This improvement gives the semisubmerged ship concept a high-speed; capability that is not overly influenced by the surrounding sea states. The aforedescribed impact reducing means are not normally wetted and, therefore, function only when high sea states must be dealt with. The semisubmerged ships superior capabilities are not compromised but are improved by inclusion of the present invention.
Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in the light of the above teachings, and it is therefore understood that within the scope of the disclosed inventive concept, the invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described.
What is claimed is: 1. In a semisubmerged ship having at least one elongate hull completely disposed beneath the waters surface, and a platform joined to the elongate hull and carried above waters surface by at least one water-surface piercing strut dependent from the platform, an improvement therefor is provided comprising:
means carried on the semisubmerged ship above the waters surface for reducing the effects of impact when waves higher than the length of at least one water-surface piercing strut approach the platform, the impact reducing means includes a plurality of dependent cusp-shaped members forming the underside of said platform in a juxtaposed relationship and the impact reducing means further includes a plurality of pairs of oppositely extending members mounted in a vertically spaced relationship on each forwardly disposed strut. 2. An improvement according to claim 1 in which the plurality of dependent members are cusp-shaped and formingthe underside of the bow of said platform and each of the pairs of oppositely extending members are hydrofoil shaped to produce a lifting force.
3. An improvement according to claim 2 in which each of the plurality of cusp-shapedmembers includes an elongate rigid element curving upward toward and being secured to the forwardportion of said platform at its front end and on an aft portion of said platform at its second end and a skin-like element extending over and "reaching between adjacent elongate rigid elements and the pairs of oppositely extending hydrofoils are configured with increasing dimensions with respect 5 to one another.
4. An improvement according to claim 3 inwhich the apex of each cusp-shaped member has a convex curvature at the bow and each of the pairs of oppositely extending hydrofoils are oriented to produce a lifting force.
5. An improvement according to claim 4 in which said skin-like element of the plurality of cusp-shaped members is an integral plate shaped like a series of ceratoid cusps for translating impact forces to tensile forces in the skin-like plate when large waves strike and there are disposed pairs of oppositely extending hydrofoils arranged to present surface areas of increasing dimensions in proportion to their proximity to the platform. t
Claims (5)
1. In a semisubmerged ship having at least one elongate hull completely disposed beneath the water''s surface, and a platform joined to the elongate hull and carried above water''s surface by at least one water-surface piercing strut dependent from the platform, an improvement therefor is provided comprising: means carried on the semisubmerged ship above the water''s surface for reducing the effects of impact when waves higher than the length of at least one water-surface piercing strut approach the platform, the impact reducing means includes a plurality of dependent cusp-shaped members forming the underside of said platform in a juxtaposed relationship and the impact reducing means further includes a plurality of pairs of oppositely extending members mounted in a vertically spaced relationship on each forwardly disposed strut.
2. An improvement according to claim 1 in which the plurality of dependent members are cusp-shaped and forming the underside of the bow of said platform and each of the pairs of oppositely extending members are hydrofoil shaped to produce a lifting force.
3. An improvement according to claim 2 in which each of the plurality of cusp-shaped members includes an elongate rigid element curving upward toward and being secured to the forward portion of said platform at its front end and on an aft portion of said platform at its second end and a skin-like element extending over and reaching between adjacent elongate rigid elements and the pairs of oppositely extending hydrofoils are configured with increasing dimensions with respect to one another.
4. An improvement according to claim 3 in which the apex of each cusp-shaped member has a convex curvature at the bow and each of the pairs of oppositely extending hydrofoils are oriented to produce a lifting force.
5. An improvement according to claim 4 in which said skin-like element of the plurality of cusp-shaped members is an integral plate shaped like a series of ceratoid cusps for translating impact forces to tensile forces in the skin-like plate when large waves strike and there are disposed pairs of oppositely extending hydrofoils arranged to present surface areas of increasing dimensions in proportion to their proximity to the platform.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US00379509A US3842772A (en) | 1973-07-16 | 1973-07-16 | Semisubmerged ship with bow impact alleviator |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US00379509A US3842772A (en) | 1973-07-16 | 1973-07-16 | Semisubmerged ship with bow impact alleviator |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3842772A true US3842772A (en) | 1974-10-22 |
Family
ID=23497555
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US00379509A Expired - Lifetime US3842772A (en) | 1973-07-16 | 1973-07-16 | Semisubmerged ship with bow impact alleviator |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3842772A (en) |
Cited By (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3960100A (en) * | 1975-06-02 | 1976-06-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Pressurized ship structure for slamming loads |
US4215862A (en) * | 1977-06-28 | 1980-08-05 | Japan Aircraft Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Water-surface towed target |
JPS5613269A (en) * | 1979-07-06 | 1981-02-09 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Ship equipped with submerged bodies |
JPS5617777A (en) * | 1979-07-18 | 1981-02-19 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Semisubmerged catamaran |
JPS5699871A (en) * | 1980-01-11 | 1981-08-11 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Half-sunken catamaran |
JPS5699872A (en) * | 1980-01-16 | 1981-08-11 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Half-sunken catamaran |
JPS56103683A (en) * | 1980-01-18 | 1981-08-18 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Semisubmerged catamaran |
JPS56160283A (en) * | 1980-05-15 | 1981-12-09 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Catamaran with submerged body |
JPS5954390U (en) * | 1982-10-04 | 1984-04-10 | 三井造船株式会社 | Pressure-resistant structural components |
US4802428A (en) * | 1987-03-17 | 1989-02-07 | Lang Thomas G | Planing catamaran vessel |
US4944238A (en) * | 1988-08-17 | 1990-07-31 | Lang Thomas G | Semi-submerged ship |
USRE33359E (en) * | 1987-03-17 | 1990-10-02 | Planing catamaran vessel | |
US5529009A (en) * | 1991-01-18 | 1996-06-25 | Societe Nouvelle Des Ateliers Et Chantiers Du Harve | Displacement and multihull ship with limited transverse rectifying torque and with reduced resistance to forward motion |
GB2346841A (en) * | 1999-02-18 | 2000-08-23 | Marvin Motsenbocker | Watercraft, particularly electric watercraft |
US6213042B1 (en) | 1999-03-01 | 2001-04-10 | Barry E. Delfosse | Small waterplane area multihull (SWAMH) vessel with submerged turbine drive |
US6273015B1 (en) | 1998-02-26 | 2001-08-14 | Maruta Electric Boatworks Llc | Stabilized electric watercraft for high speed cruising, diving and sailing |
US6470817B2 (en) | 1999-03-01 | 2002-10-29 | Barry E. Delfosse | Small waterplane area multihull (SWAMH) vessel |
US6532884B2 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2003-03-18 | Maruta Electric Boatworks Llc | High speed electric watercraft |
WO2005060552A2 (en) | 2003-12-11 | 2005-07-07 | Lang Thomas G | Low drag ship hull |
WO2007045934A1 (en) * | 2005-10-17 | 2007-04-26 | Apostolos Kourtis | Sailboat with cruciform hull, dolphin nose bow bulb, asymmetrical pontoons and specialized usage deck |
US20100000460A1 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2010-01-07 | Daniel Astrand | Web frame |
WO2011075023A1 (en) * | 2009-12-18 | 2011-06-23 | Gva Consultants Ab | A marine structure comprising a web frame |
US20110174140A1 (en) * | 2009-09-10 | 2011-07-21 | International Maritime Security Corporation | Watercraft, water diverter, entanglement system, and defense system for watercraft |
US10017227B2 (en) | 2016-12-13 | 2018-07-10 | Naviform Consulting & Research Ltd. | Minimum wave bow |
-
1973
- 1973-07-16 US US00379509A patent/US3842772A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3960100A (en) * | 1975-06-02 | 1976-06-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Pressurized ship structure for slamming loads |
US4215862A (en) * | 1977-06-28 | 1980-08-05 | Japan Aircraft Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Water-surface towed target |
JPS5613269A (en) * | 1979-07-06 | 1981-02-09 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Ship equipped with submerged bodies |
JPS6142675B2 (en) * | 1979-07-18 | 1986-09-22 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | |
JPS5617777A (en) * | 1979-07-18 | 1981-02-19 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Semisubmerged catamaran |
JPS5699871A (en) * | 1980-01-11 | 1981-08-11 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Half-sunken catamaran |
JPS5699872A (en) * | 1980-01-16 | 1981-08-11 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Half-sunken catamaran |
JPS56103683A (en) * | 1980-01-18 | 1981-08-18 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Semisubmerged catamaran |
JPS56160283A (en) * | 1980-05-15 | 1981-12-09 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Catamaran with submerged body |
JPS5954390U (en) * | 1982-10-04 | 1984-04-10 | 三井造船株式会社 | Pressure-resistant structural components |
US4802428A (en) * | 1987-03-17 | 1989-02-07 | Lang Thomas G | Planing catamaran vessel |
USRE33359E (en) * | 1987-03-17 | 1990-10-02 | Planing catamaran vessel | |
US4944238A (en) * | 1988-08-17 | 1990-07-31 | Lang Thomas G | Semi-submerged ship |
US5529009A (en) * | 1991-01-18 | 1996-06-25 | Societe Nouvelle Des Ateliers Et Chantiers Du Harve | Displacement and multihull ship with limited transverse rectifying torque and with reduced resistance to forward motion |
US6273015B1 (en) | 1998-02-26 | 2001-08-14 | Maruta Electric Boatworks Llc | Stabilized electric watercraft for high speed cruising, diving and sailing |
GB2346841A (en) * | 1999-02-18 | 2000-08-23 | Marvin Motsenbocker | Watercraft, particularly electric watercraft |
GB2346841B (en) * | 1999-02-18 | 2003-03-26 | Marvin Motsenbocker | Advantageous use of battery mass in electric watercraft |
US6213042B1 (en) | 1999-03-01 | 2001-04-10 | Barry E. Delfosse | Small waterplane area multihull (SWAMH) vessel with submerged turbine drive |
US6470817B2 (en) | 1999-03-01 | 2002-10-29 | Barry E. Delfosse | Small waterplane area multihull (SWAMH) vessel |
US6532884B2 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2003-03-18 | Maruta Electric Boatworks Llc | High speed electric watercraft |
WO2005060552A2 (en) | 2003-12-11 | 2005-07-07 | Lang Thomas G | Low drag ship hull |
WO2007045934A1 (en) * | 2005-10-17 | 2007-04-26 | Apostolos Kourtis | Sailboat with cruciform hull, dolphin nose bow bulb, asymmetrical pontoons and specialized usage deck |
US20100000460A1 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2010-01-07 | Daniel Astrand | Web frame |
US8001917B2 (en) | 2008-07-07 | 2011-08-23 | Kellogg Brown & Root Llc | Web frame |
US20110271893A1 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2011-11-10 | Kellogg Brown & Root Llc | Web frame |
US20110174140A1 (en) * | 2009-09-10 | 2011-07-21 | International Maritime Security Corporation | Watercraft, water diverter, entanglement system, and defense system for watercraft |
US8667917B2 (en) * | 2009-09-10 | 2014-03-11 | International Maritime Security Corporation | Watercraft, water diverter, entanglement system, and defense system for watercraft |
WO2011075023A1 (en) * | 2009-12-18 | 2011-06-23 | Gva Consultants Ab | A marine structure comprising a web frame |
US10017227B2 (en) | 2016-12-13 | 2018-07-10 | Naviform Consulting & Research Ltd. | Minimum wave bow |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3842772A (en) | Semisubmerged ship with bow impact alleviator | |
US6038995A (en) | Combined wedge-flap for improved ship powering | |
KR100479792B1 (en) | High speed hybrid marine vessel | |
JPS6271787A (en) | Hydrocraft | |
US5522333A (en) | Catamaran boat with planing pontoons | |
US10518842B1 (en) | Boat hull | |
US4003325A (en) | Cargo vessel low resistance bow | |
US20080190348A1 (en) | Watercraft with wave deflecting hull | |
AU3861789A (en) | Improved hull construction for a swath vessel | |
US3709179A (en) | High speed boat | |
RU2658728C2 (en) | Vessel with improved hull form | |
US3707936A (en) | Boat hull construction | |
US20090308300A1 (en) | Watercraft with wave deflecting hull | |
US5031556A (en) | Marine hull | |
US5645008A (en) | Mid foil SWAS | |
KR20020040557A (en) | Method For Reducing Wave Making Resistance At Transom Stern And Transom Stern Form | |
US5934215A (en) | Stabilized air cushioned marine vehicle | |
KR101800073B1 (en) | Ship hull structure comprising wave resistance increase minimizing steps | |
US5433161A (en) | SWAS vessel | |
KR20090051010A (en) | Vessel provided with a foil below the waterline | |
EP3050792B1 (en) | Wave piercing ship hull | |
US2984200A (en) | Pitch and yaw eliminator for vessels and the like | |
US5317982A (en) | Ship | |
CA2359532A1 (en) | Monohull wave piercing bow | |
US7188575B2 (en) | Watercraft with wave deflecting hull |