March 11, 1969 H.A. KING 3,431,818
LIGHTWEIGHT PROTECTIVE ARMOR PLATE Filed April 2e. 1955 sheet of s ATTORNEYS March 11, 1969 H. A. KING LIGHTWEIGHT PROTECTIVE ARMOR PLATE Filed April 26. 1955
Sheet 2 of 5 ICI giga INVENTOR.
ATTORNEYS HARRY A. KING BY w E @um 5o l 55 /A AVAUnUvvv ix nv March ll, 1969l H. A, KING 3,431,818
LIGHTWEIGHT PROTECTIVE ARMOR PLATE Filed April 2e, 1955
sheet 3 ef s vnv Fig. 3b
INVENTOR. HARRY A. KING BYQQMAQCDWLL ATTORNEYS 3,431,818 LIGHTWEIGHT PROTECTIVE ARMGR PLATE Harry A. King, Covina, Calif., assigne-r to Aerojet-General Corporation, El Monte, Calif., a corporation of @hic Continuation-impart of application Ser. No. 246,490, Dec. 21, 1962. This application Apr. 26, 1965, Ser. No. 450,657 U.S. Cl. 89-36 11 Claims Int. Cl. F41h 5 04 The present application constitutes a continuation-inpart of my copending U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 246,490, filed Dec. 21, 1962, now abandoned.
This invention relates in general to protective armor coating or plating and more particularly to such an armor coating or plating directed toward preventing a projectile or a particle therefrom from traversing therethrough.
Whether a projectile enters conventional armor plating at an angle or directly perpendicular to the plating surface generally does not operate to change the effectiveness of the plating other than to require the projectile entering at an angle to traverse a greater distance of plate. Thus, thickness alone has been the primary measure of the eiciency of armor plates of a particular material.
Recent improvements in armor plating, however, have taken the direction of providing a tipping plate in addition to the armor plate whereby particles or projectiles entering armor plating at an angle more than from the normal are diverted from their course by a first plate and are caused to strike the heavier inner plating at a greatly increased angle and in fact perhaps broadside, thereby rendering the inner plating much more effective in stopping the projectile. Such increased effectiveness results from energy transfer as well as a greater area contacted by the turned projectile. Another attempt at improvement, the use of sharply angled V-sections joined in the form of a corrugated metallic liner mounted against a plate, has generally not been successful in adding to the effectiveness of protection per amount of metal utilized because of the large percentage of area which is ineffective.
Such attempts to increase the protection afforded by armor plate have serious disadvantages of either extreme weight for dense-mass stopping or repelling a projectile, or use of excessive space around the object to be protected such as required by the tipping plate which is spaced a minimum of l2 inches beyond the heavy inner plating and which therefor results in a bulky protective shield. Both of these types of armor plating usually require the use of metal and are therefore further subject to limited or restricted use at times when lmetal is scarce.
The present invention avoids the disadvantages of the foregoing types of armor plating for protecting against projectiles by providing an improved lightweight armor plate of considerably less bulkiness than conventional metallic armor plate and which may be composed of all non-metallic materials or a composite of metallic and non-metallic materials.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a protective composite armor plate capable of stopping or diverting projectiles of various sizes and composed primarily of non-metallic materials.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a composite armor plate capable of stopping or diverting projectiles which occupies substantially the same volume and has substantially less weight than prior armor platings or plate systems of comparable effectiveness.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved lightweight armor plate comprising a plurality of energy-dissipating elements embedded in a nonnited States Patent O metallic body in spaced apart relationship, wherein a minimum number of the energy-dissipating elements are adapted to be shattered when subjected to the impact of a projectile thereagainst while causing fragmentation of the projectile to effectively dissipate its energy so as to stop or divert the projectile.
Other objects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:
FIGURE 1 is an isometric view in section of one embodiment of the invention;
FIGURE 2 is an isometric view in section of another embodiment of the invention;
FIGURE 3a is an isometric view in section, and partially broken away, of another embodiment of the invention;
FIGURE 3b is an isometric view in section similar to FIGURE 3a, but showing another embodiment of the invention;
FIGURE 4 is an enlarged isometric vie-w of an alternate component for the embodiments illustrated in FIGURES 3a and 3b;
FIGURE 5a is a sectional view showing a conventional type of metallic armor plate and the manner in which a projectile is stopped thereby;
FIGURE 5b is a sectional view showing another conventional type of metallic armor plating and the manner in which a projectile is stopped thereby; and
FIGURE 5c is a sectional view showing a lightweight armor plate constructed in accordance with the present invention and showing the manner in which a projectile is stopped thereby.
Referring more specifically to the drawings, the embodiments of the present invention are directed generally toward a lightweight composite armor plate providing protection against iiying particles or projectiles. The armor plate is adapted to be mounted about an area requiring protection and is so constructed that a projectile, regardless of the angle at which the projectile strikes the armor plate, is diverted from its course in a manner in which the force of the projectile is dissipated through the shattering of a component of the armor plate struck by the projectile causing the projectile itself to be broken into fragments, whereby the integrity of the protected area is maintained. The armor plate comprises a plurality of such components, hereinafter termed energy-dissipating elements, and a solid mass of a suitable high strength reinforced plastic forming the body of the armor plate in which the energy-dissipating elements are embedded in spaced relation to each other. Preferably, the energydissipating elements are made of hard ceramic material, such as aluminum oxide, nickel-plated aluminum oxide, or boron carbide, although the energy-dissipating elements may be made of a suitable metal or other material suitable for dissipating the force of a projectile by shatter` ing upon impact of the projectile thereagainst.
In FIGURE 1, the composite lightweight armor plate 11 therein shown comprises a plurality of energy-dissipating elements in the form of spheres or
balls 12 which are embedded in the
plastic lbody 16 of the armor plate 11 in spaced relation to each other. The
spheres 12 are arranged in plural interrupted layers or courses in the
body 16 of the armor plate 11, two such layers of
spheres 12 being shown, the
spheres 12 being spaced apart and the
spheres 12 in one layer being staggered with respect to
corresponding spheres 12 in the other layer. The
plastic body 16 of the armor plate 11 has a considerably heavier or thicker portion disposed on the side of the
spheres 12 adjacent to the area to be protected by the armor plate 11. The
spheres 12 may be positioned and secured in the
plastic body 16 of the armor plate 11 adjacent to
layers 14 which may be of metal or other hard substance or strong fabric. The
layers 14 form front and rear boundaries for the
spheres 12 so as to generally confine any particles from the
spheres 12 or the
projectile 15 upon impact of the
projectile 15 against the composite armor plate 11 to the area between the
layers 14. In FIGURE l, a
projectile 15 is shown at the moment of entry into the armor plate 11 in a Vheading normal to the armor plate 11 in phantom lines, and after entry in full lines to indicate the curved path traversed by the
projectile 15 within the armor plate 11, thereby showing the effect of the armor plate 11 in causing diversion of the projectile from its original course and fragmentation of the projectile. By such diversion and fragmentation of the projectile, a substantial amount of the energy of the projectile is expended, and the projectile is stopped by the armor plate 11.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, the
projectile 15 upon entering the armor plate 11 and striking a
sphere 12 causes the
sphere 12 to shatter, while being broken into fragments, to substantially dissipate the force of the projectile 11S-the path of the
projectile 15 also being diverted with the fragmentation of the
projectile 15 so that the fragments of the
projectile 15 continue on a diverging course and either will be contained in the armor plate 11 or will have an exceedingly high amount of energy expended therein so that the
projectile 15 is rendered ineffective. It should be under- 9 stood that varying thicknesses of the
plastic body 16 and sizes of
spheres 12 may be employed in the composite armor plate 11 in relation to the size and weight of the projectile against which protection is desired.
As noted, two layers of
spheres 12 are shown in FIG- URE 1 such that a typical projectile having a pointed tip or nose which enters the plastic `
body 16 of the armor plate 11 at a position substantially equidistant from two or
more spheres 12 in one layer of
spheres 12 will nevertheless strike a
sphere 12 in the other layer to shatter the impacted
sphere 12, thereby diverting the projectile and breaking it into fragments for expending its energy to stop the projectile.
In the embodiment of the invention illustrated in FIG- URE 2, the energy-dissipating elements take the form of elongated cylinders having circular transverse crosssections. The
cylinders 20 effect diversion and fragmentation of the
projectile 12 in the same manner as do the
spheres 12 of FIGURE 1. The cylinders 2t) are embedded in the
plastic body 16 so as to be arranged in plural interrupted layers or courses, two such layers of
cylinders 20 being shown, the cylinders 2t) being spaced apart and the
cylinders 20 in one layer being staggered with respect to
corresponding cylinders 20 in the other layer. Undulating layers of
spacing material 17 may also be embedded in the
plastic body 16, each layer of spacing
material 17 being alternately wound over and under the
cylinders 20 in a respective layer thereof. The
spacing material 17 is preferably made of reinforced, plasticimpregnated, woven fabric in sheet form and aids in restricting or limiting the shattering of the
cylinders 20 to the immediate region where the projectile enters the armor plate 11 of FIGURE 2. In this respect, the layers of
spacing material 17 substantially reduce or prevent the transmission of shock waves from the
projectile 15, which would otherwise have a tendency to cause shattering of the
cylinders 20 over a large area from the impact of a single projectile to reduce the effectiveness of the armor plate.
It will be understood that the
cylinders 20 which have circular cross-sections may be replaced by elongated energy-dissipating elements having various cross-sectional shapes, other than circular, whic-h require less material than the
cylinders 20 to further reduce the weight and cost of the armor plate 11 shown in FIGURE 2.
Another embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG- URE 3a wherein the energy-dissipating elements embedded in the
plastic body 16 of the armor plate 11 are substantially square plate members or tiles having planar or Hat front and rear surfaces. The
tiles 30 are arranged in spaced relationship with respect to each other in a single interrupted layer or course as shown, although it will be understood that the armor plate 11 of FIG- URE 3a may include plural interrupted layers or courses of the
tiles 30 to increase the protection afforded thereby-the increased protection being accompanied, however, by a corresponding increase in the ybulk of the armor plate.
In the embodiment illustrated in FIGURE 3a, the composite armor plate 11 includes a
metallic backing plate 31 bonded or otherwise suitably secured to the rear surface of the
plastic body 16. The
metallic backing plate 31 is preferably made of a lightweight metal of high strength, such as aluminum or titanium, and serves as added protection by diverting or stopping fragments of the
projectile 15 after the
projectile 15 has entered the armor plate 11 and has shattered one of the tiles 36 toA become broken into fragments and diverted from its original path. It will be understood that a metallic backing plate similar to the
metallic backing plate 31 of FIG- URE 3a may be included as a component of the embodiments of the composite armor plate illustrated in FIG-
URES 1 and 2.
FIGURE 3b shows another modification of the composite armor plate 11 which is generally similar to the embodiment illustrated in FIGURE 3a. The modified composite armor plate 11 of FIGURE 3b includes
layers 33 and 34 of Woven material respectively disposed over the front and back surfaces of the tiles 3G. The
layers 33 and 34 of woven material are made of a suitable reinforced, plastic-impregnated fabric, such as Dacron or fiber glass. The
layers 33 and 34 of woven material comprise anti-spalling means to prevent particles from the
tiles 30 which are shattered upon being struck by a projectile from being rapidly expelled away from the composite armor plate 11. This is an added safety feature to protect personnel and equipment in the area shielded by the composite armor plate 11 from injury or damage `which could result from `flying fragments of the
tiles 30 when they are shattered. The plastic matrix 'bonding the
tiles 30 together in substantially contacting, but spaced relationship, comprises the
plastic body 16 in which the
tiles 30 are embedded.
In the modied composite armor plate 11 of FIGURE 3b, an elastomeric liner or
sheet 35 is sandwiched `between the matrix comprising the
plastic body 16 and the
metallic backing plate 31 with the
anti-spalling layer 34 of woven material being disposed between the tiles 3Q and the
liner 35. The elastomeric liner in addition to providing structural support for the composite armor plate 11 also serves to further absorb the impact energy of a projectile striking the composite armor plate 11 and/ or to transmit such impact energy to the
metallic backing plate 31 without causing the shattering of
tiles 30 adjacent to the
tile 30 which is directly impacted by the projectile and shattered. The liner 315 may be made of any elastomeric material suitable for the purpose desired, one such suitable elastomeric material being a nitrile rubber indentified as Gen-Gard V- manufactured by the General Tire and r Rubber Company of Akron, Ohio.
It may be generally stated that a single layer of the energy-dissipating elements embedded in the
plastic body 16 in each of the embodiments shown in FIGURES l, 2, 3a and 3b will be less effective in diverting a projectile entering the armor plate perpendicular to the front surface thereof than `would two or more layers of the energydissipating elements. However, it has been determined that Iwhere a `projectile enters the armor plate at a minimum deviation of 15 from a perpendicular relation to the front surface thereof, a single layer of energydissipating elements embedded in the plastic body of the armor plate is substantially as effective in stopping the projectile as two or more layers.
Although the plate members or
tiles 30 in FIGURES 3a and 3b are shown as having a substantially square shape, it is within the spirit of this invention to form tiles having planar or flat front and rear surfaces in a wide variety of shapes including various polygonal shapes, for example, for use as the energy-dissipating elements of the armor plate shown in FIGURES 3a and 3b. One such alternate shape is the
pentagonal tile 32. f FIG- URE 4.
To better understand the action of the composite armor plate in accordance with the present invention in stopping a projectile as compared to conventional armor plate structures, reference is made to FIGURES 5a, 5b, and 5c. FIGURE 5a illustrates the entrance of a projectile into a conventional metallic armor plate Where stopping of the projectile is predicated primarily on the thickness of the metallic armor lplate. FIGURE 5b illustrates another form of conventional metallic armor plating which includes a metallic tipping plate and a metallic armor plate of increased thickness relative to the metallic tipping plate and spaced to the rear thereof, wherein a projectile entering the composite metallic armor plating at an angle deviating by at least from perpendicular relation to the front surface thereof is diverted by the metallic tipping plate so that the projectile will be caused to strike the heavier armor plate at a greatly increased angle of deviation from perpendicular relation thereto to increase the effectiveness of the heavier armor plate in stopping the projectile. FIGURE 5c illustrates the action of the energy-dissipating elements in the composite light- |weight armor plate according to the present invention in diverting a projectile and breaking it into fragments.
In accordance with the invention, the energy-dissipating elements of the composite armor plate are made of a material providing la very hard and rigid surface for the energy-dissipating elements to be resistant to penetration of the entering point of the projectile. The energydissipating elements are embedded in the plastic body of the composite armor plate such that they are substantially rigidly held in place so that they cannot be swept aside by the projectile on its passage through the composite armor plate.
Although it is intended that an energy-dissipating element ywill be shattered upon impact of a projectile thereagainst in absorbing substantial energy from the projectile, the material of the energy-dissipating elements is not readily crushable, Ibecause the energy-dissipating elements must be capable of breaking the projectile into fragments and diverting the fragmented projectile from its original path. It has been determined that a minimum hardness of the order of 400 K500 is required for the material of the energy-dissipating elements to obtain satisfactory protection from the composite armor plate. The unit of measure K500 refers to the Knoop value of hardness for a 500 gram load. iIn the latter respect, the Knoop Value of hardness is obtained from a hardness test which relies upon the indentation of a diamond pyramid whose dimensions are known into a polished specimen of material whose hardness is to be measured, Where the indenting load in grams of the diamond pyramid imposed on the specimen is expressed in the Knoop value as a subscript. Nickel-plated aluminum oxide which is one of the preferred ceramic materials suitable for the energy-dissipating elements has a Knoop hardness value in excess of 1200 K500.
As noted, the body of the composite armor plate in the embodiments thereof illustrated in FIGURES 1, 2, 3a, and 3b may be a suitable high strength reinforced plastic material, such as for example a thermo-setting epoxy resin reinforced by fiber glass of the type disclosed in my copending U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 241,- 569, filed Dec. 3, 1962, now abandoned. Since the plastic body of the composite armor plate as constructed in accordance with the present invention must serve as an effective carrier for the energy-dissipating elements embedded therein, it should exhibit a high resistance to shattering when subjected to the impact of a projectile such that the plastic body of the composite armor plate will remain substantially intact while one or more of the energy-dissipating elements embedded therein are shattered upon being struck by the projectile to absorb a substantial amount of its energy and cause it to break into fragments.
As illustrated, the forwardly and rearwardly disposed layers of energy-dissipating elements in the forms of the composite armor plate of FIGURES 1 and 2, and the forwardly and rearwardly facing surfaces of the layer of energy-dissipating elements in the form of the composite armor plate of FIGURE 3a are preferably covered by respective layers of the same high strength reinforced plastic material which forms the body of the composite armor plate. These layers of plastic material may be an integral part of the plastic body 16 (as in FIGURE 3a) or may be formed as discrete layers (as in FIGURE 2) suitably laminated to the
plastic body 16 to provide a unitary construction. In the armor plate of FIGURE 1, these layers of plastic material may be either an integral part of the
plastic body 16 or discrete layers laminated to the
layers 14, depending upon the nature of the
layers 14 which may be metal or woven fabric, for example. These outer layers of plastic material effectively serve as anti-spalling means to prevent particles from the energy-dissipating elements which are shattered upon being struck by a projectile from flying out- Wardly of the front and rear surfaces of the composite armor plate.
By the present invention, a composite relatively thin armor plate of primarily non-metallic materials is provided for effectively stopping a projectile, wherein the composite armor plate may have a thickness equal to or less than that of conventional armor plating of comparable effectiveness while being of substantially reduced Weight as compared thereto.
I claim:
1. A lightweight armor plate for protecting an area against high energy particles, such as projectiles, by resisting the penetration thereof, said armor plate comprising (a) a body of non-metallic, shatter-resistant material,
(b) a plurality of spherical fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating elements embedded in said non-metallic body so as to be rigidly held in place thereby, said spherical fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating elements being arranged in at least one layer and in spaced relationship with respect to each other in said body,
(c) said plurality of spherical fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating elements being individually shatterable in response to the impact of a high energy particle thereagainst to cause the high energy particle to be broken into fragments for dissipating the force of the high energy particle while tending to divert the path taken by the fragments of the high energy particle,
(d) layers of anti-spalling material in said body and respectively disposed forwardly and rearwardly of said spherical fragmentation-inducing and energydissipating elements to define conning boundaries therefor, and
(e) said spherical fragmentation-inducing and energydissipating elements, said layers of anti-spalling material, and said non-metallic body cooperating to define a composite plate-like structure capable of containing the fragments of the high energy particle and fragments from said spherical fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating elements therewithin, wherein said layers of anti-spalling material in said body prevent the shattered portions of an individual spherical fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating element struck by a high energy particle from fiying outwardly away from the composite platelike structure.
2. A lightweight armor plate for protecting an area against high energy particles, such as projectiles, by resisting the penetration thereof, said armor plate comprising (a) a body of non-metallic, shatter-resistant material,
(b) a plurality of elongated cylindrical fragmentationinducing and energy-dissipating elements embedded in said non-metallic body so as to be rigidly held in place thereby, said cylindrical fragmentation-inducing and energy dissipating elements being arranged in plural layers and in spaced parallel relationship with respect to each other in said body,
(c) the cylindrical fragmentation-inducing and energydissipating elements in one layer being disposed in staggered relation with respect to respective corresponding cylindrical fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating elements in an adjacent layer,
(d) said plurality of cylindrical fragmentationinducing and energy-dissipating elements being individually shatterable in response to the impact of a high energy particle thereagainst to cause the high energy particle to be broken into fragments for dissipating the force -of the high energy particle while tending to divert the path taken by the fragments of the high energy particle,
(e) undulating layers of anti-spalling material in said body and being disposed alternately over and under the cylindrical fragmentation-inducing and energydissipating elements in respective layers thereof, and
(f) said cylindrical fragmentation inducing and energy-dissipating elements, said undulating layers of anti-spalling material, and said non-metallic body cooperating to define a composite plate-like structure capable of containing the fragments of the high energy particle and fragments from said cylindrical fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating elements therewithin, wherein said undulating layers of anti-spalling material restrict shattering of an individual cylindrical fragmentation-inducing and energy-dssipating element struck by a high energy particle to the immediate region where the high energy particle enters the composite plate-like structure.
3. A lightweight armor plate for protecting an area against high energy particles, such as projectiles, by resisting the penetration thereof, said armor plate comprising (a) a plurality of ceramic tiles of a selected predetermined size and shape having substantially planar front and rear faces, said ceramic tiles being arranged in at least one layer and in closely spaced relationship with respect to each other,
(b) a shatter-resistant plastic material bonding said plurality of ceramic tiles together so as to rigidly hold said ceramic tiles in place,
(c) anti-Spalling front and rear fabric webs respectively secured to the front and rear faces of said plurality of ceramic tiles in covering relation thereto,
(d) an elastomeric liner disposed across the rear fabric web covering the rear faces of said plurality of ceramic tiles and secured to said rear fabric web,
(e) a metallic back-up plate secured to said elastomeric liner in covering relation thereto,
(f) said plurality of ceramic tiles being individually shatterable in response to the impact of a high energy particle thereagainst to cause the high energy particle to be broken into fragments for dissipating the force of the high energy particle while tending to divert the path taken by the fragments of the high energy particle, and
(g) said ceramic tiles, said shatter-resistant plastic material, said anti-spalling front and rear webs, said elastomeric liner, and said metallic back-up plate cooperating to define a composite plate-like structure capable of containing the fragments of the high energy particle and fragments from said ceramic tiles therewithin, wherein said anti-spalling front and rear webs serve to prevent the shattered portions of an individual ceramic tile struck by a high energy particle from fiying outwardly away from the composite plate-like structure.
4. A lightweight armor plate as defined in
claim 3, wherein (a) each of said ceramic tiles has a substantially square shape.
5. A lightweight armor plate as defined in
claim 3,
wherein (a) each of said ceramic tiles has a shape in the form of a polygon having more than four sides.
6. A lightweight armor plate as defined in
claim 3,
wherein (a) each of said ceramic tiles has a hardness value of at least 400 K500, and
(b) said shatter-resistant plastic material comprises a thermo-setting resin reinforced by glass fibers.
7. A lightweight armor plate as defined in
claim 3,
wherein (a) each of said ceramic tiles has a hardness value in excess of 1200 K500, and
(b) said shatter-resistant plastic material comprises a lthermo-setting resin reinforced by glass fibers.
8. A lightweight armor plate for protecting an area against high energy particles, such as projectiles, by resisting the penetration thereof, said armor plate comprising (a) a fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating ceramic plate member provided with forward and rear surfaces having a significant area, said forward surface of said ceramic plate member being disposed in a direction opposed to the probable path to be taken by a high energy particle.
(b) `said ceramic plate member being made of a material having a hardness value in excess of 1200 K500:
(c) back-up layer means of shatter-resistant material supporting said ceramic plate member and disposed adjacent the rear surface thereof in covering relation to the entire area of said rear surface,
(d) said ceramic plate member being shatterable in response to the impact of a high energy particle striking the forward surface thereof to cause the high energy particle to be broken into fragments for dissipating the force of the high energy particle while tending to divert the path taken by the fragments of the high energy particle, and
(e) said back-up layer means being of sufiicient toughness and strength so as to contain the fragments of the high energy particle and fragments from said ceramic plate member therewithin, thereby preventing the passage of such fragments through said backup layer means.
9. A lightweight armor plate as defined in claim 8,
wherein (a) said back-up layer means comprises a thermosetting resin material reinforced by glass fibers.
10. A lightweight armor plate for protecting an area against high energy particles, such as projectiles, by resisting the penetration thereof, said armor plate compr1sing (a) a plurality of ceramic plate members of a selected predetermined size and shape having front and rear faces, said ceramic plate members being arranged in at least one layer and in closely `spaced relationship with respect to each other,
(b) each of said ceramic plate members being made of a material having a hardness value of at least 400 Ksoo,
(c) a shatter-resistant plastic material bonding said plurality of ceramic plate members together so as to rigidly hold said ceramic plate members in place,
(d) said shatter-resistant plastic material comprising a thermo-setting resin reinforced by glass bers,
(e) anti-spalling front and rear fabric webs respectively secured to the front and rear faces of said plurality of ceramic plate members in covering relation thereto,
(f) an elastomeric liner disposed across the rear .fabric web covering the rear faces of said plurality of ceramic plate members and secured to said rear fabric web,
(-g) a metallic back-up plate secured to said elastomeric liner in covering relation thereto,
(h) said plurality of ceramic plate members being individually shatterable in response to the impact of a high energy particle thereagainst to cause the high energy particle to be broken into fragments for dissipating the force of the high energy particle while tending to divert the path taken by the fragments of the high energy particle,
(i) said ceramic plate members, said shatter-resistant plastic material, said anti-spalling front and rear webs, said elastomeric liner, and said metallic backup plate cooperating to define a composite plate-like `structure capable of containing the fragments of the hihg energy particle and fragments from said ceramic plate members therewithin, wherein said anti-spalling front and rear webs serve to prevent the Shattered portions of an individual ceramic plate member struck by a high energy particle from flying outwardly away from the composite plate-like structure, and
(j) said front and rear faces of said ceramic plate members extending generally parallel to the surfaces of the composite plate-like structure so as to dispose said one layer of said ceramic plate members in generally parallel relationship to the surfaces of the composite plate-like structure.
11. A lightweight armor plate for protecting an area against high energy particles, such as projectiles, by resisting the penetration thereof, said armor plate comprising (a) a body of non-metallic shatter-resistant material,
(b) a plurality of ceramic tiles of a selected predetermined size and shape having substantially planar front and rear faces embedded in said non-metallic body so as to be rigidly held in place thereby, said plurality of ceramic tiles being arranged in side-byside relationship to each other so as to deline a layer of fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating elements,
(c) said non-metallic body including front and rear anti-spalling portions respectively covering the front and rear faces of said plurality of ceramic tiles cornprising said layer of fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating elements,
(d) a metallic back-up plate secured to the rear portion of said non-metallic body in covering relation thereto,
(e) said plurality of ceramic tiles included in said layer of fragmentation-inducing and energy-dissipating elements being individually shatterable in response to the impact of a high energy particle thereagainst to cause the high energy particle to be broken into fragments for dissipating the force of the high energy particle while tending to divert the path taken by the fragments of the high energy particle,
(f) said non-metallic body, said plurality of ceramic tiles included in said layer of fragmentation-inducing 4and energy-dissipating elements, said front and rear anti-spalling portions, and said metallic back-up plate cooperating to define a composite plate-like structure capable of containing the fragments of the high energy particle and fragments from said ceramic tiles therewithin, wherein said anti-spalling portions prevent the shattered portions of an individual ceramic tile struck by a high energy particle from flying outwardly away from the composite plate-like structure,
(g) said layer of fragmentation-inducing and energydissipe-.ting elements delined by said plurality of ceramic tiles extending generally parallel to the surfaces of the composite plate-like structure, and
(h) adjacent ceramic tiles in said layer being closely spaced apart from each other so that the combined surface area of the front faces of said plurality of ceramic tiles in said layer is substantially equal to the total area of the surface of the composite plate-like structure which is adapted to be exposed to the impact of a high energy particle,
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 663,961 12/1900 Donaldson 114-13 1,463,498 7/ 1923 Burgess 89-36 2,110,322 3/1938 Calzavara 89-36 2,410,022 10/1946 Dumais 89--36 2,738,297 3/ 1956 Pstershammer 89--3 6 2,956,281 10/ 1960 McMillan et al 343-872 952,877 3/ 1910 Cowper-Coles. 2,318,301 5/1943 Eger. 2,723,214 11/1955 Meyer. 2,861,021 11/1958 Dietz et al. 3,324,768 6/ 1967 Eichelberger 89--36 FOREIGN PATENTS 1,178,328 9/ 1964 Germany.
BENJAMIN A. BORCHELT, Primary Examiner'.
STEPHEN C. BENTLEY, Assistant Examiner.
U.S. Cl. X.R