US20100313744A1 - Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor - Google Patents
Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100313744A1 US20100313744A1 US11/338,021 US33802106A US2010313744A1 US 20100313744 A1 US20100313744 A1 US 20100313744A1 US 33802106 A US33802106 A US 33802106A US 2010313744 A1 US2010313744 A1 US 2010313744A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- polymer matrix
- tile
- matrix composite
- ballistic armor
- composite reinforced
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
- F41H5/04—Plate construction composed of more than one layer
- F41H5/0414—Layered armour containing ceramic material
- F41H5/0428—Ceramic layers in combination with additional layers made of fibres, fabrics or plastics
- F41H5/0435—Ceramic layers in combination with additional layers made of fibres, fabrics or plastics the additional layers being only fibre- or fabric-reinforced layers
Definitions
- This invention relates to improvements in application of polymer matrix composite materials useful in a ballistic armor.
- Modern ballistic armor involves a classic balancing of weight versus penetration resistance. Two classes of materials predominate. Metal armor can be fabricated to almost any thickness and alloyed for increased hardness. It is heavy but tends to deform when impacted, allowing it to survive multiple impacts. Ceramic armor is lighter than metal, harder but more fragile. Even when not penetrated it may shatter and be comprised for further use. Personal armor tends toward light ceramics and there is a needed to strengthen the ceramic tiles to withstand multiple impacts.
- FIG. 1 shows a prior art armor tile without the facing layers of this invention.
- FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of the composite armor tile of this invention.
- the invention is a composite ceramic-based armor which provides improved resistance to penetration upon initial impact and residual resistance to impact after the initial impact.
- the composite tile of this invention withstands multiple impacts because the high tensile strength bonded facing strengthens the underlying ceramic tile, moderates shock waves throughout the tile, controls tensile stress changes through the bulk of the ceramic and holds the tile together in the event that the tile is penetrated.
- the tile component is selected primarily on the basis of hardness.
- suitable ceramic materials include aluminum oxide, aluminum nitride, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, boron carbide, titanium diboride and titanium carbide.
- Mixed ceramics and infused ceramics are encompassed within the scope of the useful ceramics.
- the salient characteristic is that the ceramic be harder than the incident projectile and have a high compressive strength. The ceramic tile must be able to erode and break up hardened steel penetrators without being destroyed itself.
- fibers such as glass, aramid, PBO, M5, Rusar and carbon in prepregged form. adhered directly to tile faces provide enhanced impact resistance compared to systems applying adhesives to attach fibers to ceramics. Furthermore, we have discovered that multiple layers of fibers arranged in layers oriented at 90° to each other show superior performance when compared to random orientations (chopped fiber).
- Boron carbide (B 4 C) was selected because of its hardness and availability in armor grade as pressure assisted densification (PAD) material from Cercom Inc., CA, USA. Prepregged carbon fibers, polyacrylonitrilebased (PAN) in oriented tapes were used for laying up the polymer matrix.
- PAN pressure assisted densification
- the tapes were arranged at 0°/90° in the plane of the tile.
- the coated tiles were isotactically compressed in a bag which was evacuated and the sealed bag heated to 250° F. for 2-3 hours. Table I shows the construction of the samples.
- FIG. 1 shows the prior art tile 1 .
- a backing layer 3 such as Spectra Shield Plus® supports a B 4 C tile 5 , to the face of which is applied adhesively a spall cover of woven polyethylene fabric.
- the projectile direction is indicated by arrow 9 .
- FIG. 2 shows the armor of this invention.
- the adhered carbon fiber composite 11 , 11 ′ is adhered to both sides of the B 4 C tile.
- the ballistic impact testing was conducted versus the armor piercing 7.62 mm AP M61 (NATO 0.308) round.
- the powder charge in the cartridge was adjusted to produce varying impact velocities at the target location.
- the ceramic tile thickness that was selected, 6.2 mm, was chosen to assure that complete penetration of the armor tiles could be achieved within the range of velocities available.
- the armor targets were mounted on the back surface of a steel plate (relative to the impact direction) using a bolted-on window frame holder that applied a uniform clamping force around the perimeter of the armor tile.
- the central 76 ⁇ 76 mm (3 ⁇ 3 in.) area of the back face of the armor tile was unsupported during the test.
- the steel plate with the mounted armor tile was held in a rigid frame at a muzzle-to-target distance of 10 m (30 ft.).
- a universal receiver on a fixed pedestal was used to fire the rounds at the target.
- the armor tiles were examined to determine whether the impact resulted in a complete penetration or a partial penetration, in which the armor is partially penetrated, but the projectile is stopped within the armor system. Every effort was made to be consistent in tile preparation, mounting, and testing to assure valid side-by-side comparison of the ballistic impact performance.
- V 50 indicates that the tile was penetrated one-half of the time.
- the armor tiles having a PMC facing showed improved ballistic impact performance compared to the baseline armor tile without the PMC facing.
- the areal density of the tiles was generally increased by the addition of the PMC facing, this was more than offset by the improvement in penetration resistance.
- the areal density of sample number 4 with 8 PMC layers was 9% higher than the baseline armor tile, but the apparent ballistic V 50 was increased by more than 40%.
- the composite layers act to delay the onset of fracture and fragmentation of the ceramic material.
- the composite layers may provide a lateral constraint on the ceramic tile, which could slow the spread of cracks and the separation of tile fragments.
- the PMC layers may provide a form of acoustical damping that affects the propagation of stress waves in the ceramic tile resulting in delayed fracture.
- Armored tiles have utility in any occupation in which a person might be subject to being shot, such as in law enforcement and transportation of money and precious gems. Scatter shields for protection against mechanical equipment failure are also envisioned for the invention.
Abstract
Description
- The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to contract number DE-AC05-00OR22725 between the United States Department of Energy and U.T. Battelle, LLC.
- This invention relates to improvements in application of polymer matrix composite materials useful in a ballistic armor.
- Modern ballistic armor involves a classic balancing of weight versus penetration resistance. Two classes of materials predominate. Metal armor can be fabricated to almost any thickness and alloyed for increased hardness. It is heavy but tends to deform when impacted, allowing it to survive multiple impacts. Ceramic armor is lighter than metal, harder but more fragile. Even when not penetrated it may shatter and be comprised for further use. Personal armor tends toward light ceramics and there is a needed to strengthen the ceramic tiles to withstand multiple impacts.
- Multiple layered armor using epoxy adhesives is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,705,764 to Schade et al. Infiltration of porous ceramics is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,451,385 to Hilden et al. An armor, including multiple layers of fibers in an elastomeric matrix bonded to a hard metal or ceramic plate, in a perimeter wrapped tile mounted on a backing plate, is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,497 to Ghiorse et al.
- It is a first objective of this invention to provide a new form of polymer composite matrix facing for a ceramic tile. It is a second object of this invention to provide a different method for preparing a composite tile armor. It is a third object of this invention to provide an armor tile which can withstand multiple impacts without shattering the underlying tile.
- These and other objects of the invention can be obtained by providing an oriented fiber composite face to a hardened ceramic tile armor by direct heat and pressure bonding of a non-woven high tensile strength fabric to a ceramic tile.
-
FIG. 1 shows a prior art armor tile without the facing layers of this invention. -
FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of the composite armor tile of this invention. - The invention is a composite ceramic-based armor which provides improved resistance to penetration upon initial impact and residual resistance to impact after the initial impact. The composite tile of this invention withstands multiple impacts because the high tensile strength bonded facing strengthens the underlying ceramic tile, moderates shock waves throughout the tile, controls tensile stress changes through the bulk of the ceramic and holds the tile together in the event that the tile is penetrated.
- The tile component is selected primarily on the basis of hardness. Non-limiting examples of suitable ceramic materials include aluminum oxide, aluminum nitride, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, boron carbide, titanium diboride and titanium carbide. Mixed ceramics and infused ceramics are encompassed within the scope of the useful ceramics. The salient characteristic is that the ceramic be harder than the incident projectile and have a high compressive strength. The ceramic tile must be able to erode and break up hardened steel penetrators without being destroyed itself.
- When the shock wave from the projectile reflects off the back face of a tile it becomes a tensile stress. Excessive tensile stress results in cracks and/or disintegration. Methods to moderate or relieve stress have focused upon laminations of various materials over or around the ceramic tile.
- We have discovered that fibers such as glass, aramid, PBO, M5, Rusar and carbon in prepregged form. adhered directly to tile faces provide enhanced impact resistance compared to systems applying adhesives to attach fibers to ceramics. Furthermore, we have discovered that multiple layers of fibers arranged in layers oriented at 90° to each other show superior performance when compared to random orientations (chopped fiber).
- Boron carbide (B4C) was selected because of its hardness and availability in armor grade as pressure assisted densification (PAD) material from Cercom Inc., CA, USA. Prepregged carbon fibers, polyacrylonitrilebased (PAN) in oriented tapes were used for laying up the polymer matrix.
- The tapes were arranged at 0°/90° in the plane of the tile. The coated tiles were isotactically compressed in a bag which was evacuated and the sealed bag heated to 250° F. for 2-3 hours. Table I shows the construction of the samples.
-
FIG. 1 shows the prior art tile 1. Abacking layer 3 such as Spectra Shield Plus® supports a B4C tile 5, to the face of which is applied adhesively a spall cover of woven polyethylene fabric. The projectile direction is indicated byarrow 9.FIG. 2 shows the armor of this invention. The adheredcarbon fiber composite - The ballistic impact testing was conducted versus the armor piercing 7.62 mm AP M61 (NATO 0.308) round. The powder charge in the cartridge was adjusted to produce varying impact velocities at the target location. The ceramic tile thickness that was selected, 6.2 mm, was chosen to assure that complete penetration of the armor tiles could be achieved within the range of velocities available. The armor targets were mounted on the back surface of a steel plate (relative to the impact direction) using a bolted-on window frame holder that applied a uniform clamping force around the perimeter of the armor tile. The central 76×76 mm (3×3 in.) area of the back face of the armor tile was unsupported during the test. The steel plate with the mounted armor tile was held in a rigid frame at a muzzle-to-target distance of 10 m (30 ft.). A universal receiver on a fixed pedestal was used to fire the rounds at the target. After the bullet was fired, the armor tiles were examined to determine whether the impact resulted in a complete penetration or a partial penetration, in which the armor is partially penetrated, but the projectile is stopped within the armor system. Every effort was made to be consistent in tile preparation, mounting, and testing to assure valid side-by-side comparison of the ballistic impact performance.
- The results of the ballistic impact tests are summarized in Table II. V50 indicates that the tile was penetrated one-half of the time. In all cases where a partial penetration was recorded, the armor tiles having a PMC facing showed improved ballistic impact performance compared to the baseline armor tile without the PMC facing. Although the areal density of the tiles was generally increased by the addition of the PMC facing, this was more than offset by the improvement in penetration resistance. For example, the areal density of sample number 4 with 8 PMC layers was 9% higher than the baseline armor tile, but the apparent ballistic V50 was increased by more than 40%.
- It has been found that increasing the number of plies in the PMC facing increased the penetration resistance of the armor tile for the range of values tested. Ballistic performance improved monotonically as the number of plies was increased from 0 to 8. It also is apparent that the orientation of the fibers in the PMC plies had an effect on the test results. Fibers arranged at 90° to each other show best results. Differences, if any, in the prepreg resins were not apparent.
- The reason for the improvement in ballistic impact performance when the PMC facing layers were present is not yet fully understood, while not being bound by any theory. It may be speculated that the composite layers act to delay the onset of fracture and fragmentation of the ceramic material. The composite layers may provide a lateral constraint on the ceramic tile, which could slow the spread of cracks and the separation of tile fragments. Based on the observed effect of the fiber orientation, it is also possible that the PMC layers may provide a form of acoustical damping that affects the propagation of stress waves in the ceramic tile resulting in delayed fracture.
- It is not known whether similar effects would be observed with B4C from other suppliers or with alternative ceramic armor materials such as Al2O3, SiC, and Si3N4.
- The invention has been described on the basis of representative examples which are in no way limitative of the invention. Modifications apparent to a person with skill in the art are included within the scope of the invention.
- Armored tiles, according to this invention have utility in any occupation in which a person might be subject to being shot, such as in law enforcement and transportation of money and precious gems. Scatter shields for protection against mechanical equipment failure are also envisioned for the invention.
-
TABLE I Identification and characteristics of fibers used to form the PMC facing layers. Sample Elastic Tensile Number Fiber Material Modulus Strength 2-6 Toray T700a Carbon Intermediate High 7 Granoc XN-05b Carbon Low Low 8 Toray M46Ja Carbon High High 9 Granoc CN-80b Carbon Ultra-high Low 10 Zylon ® (PBO)c Polymer Intermediate High aToray Carbon Fibers America, Inc.; bNippon Graphite Fiber Corp.; cToyobo Company, Ltd. -
TABLE II Armor tile variations and ballistic impact results. Areal “V50” FOM2 FOM Sample PMC Fiber Density “V50”1 Increase V50/Areal Increase Number PMC Fiber Plies Orientation (lb/ft2) (ft/s) (%) Density (%) 1 No PMC — — 5.26 2050 — 390 — 2 T700 2 0/90 5.20 >2175 >6 >418 >7.1 3 T700 4 0/90/0/90 5.53 2550 24 461 18 4 T700 8 0/90/0/90 5.73 >2880 >40 >503 >29 5 T700 4 +45/−45/+45/− 5.41 >2625 >28 485 >24 45 6 T700 4 0/−45/+45/90 5.44 no — — — partial 7 XN-05 4 0/90/0/90 5.35 2500 22 467 20 8 M46J 4 0/90/0/90 5.42 no — — — partial 9 CN-80 4 0/90/0/90 5.45 >2610 >27 >479 >23 10 Zylon ® 4 0/90/0/90 5.43 >2730 >33 >503 >29 (PBO) 1For most variations, the number of samples tested was insufficient to determine a true ballistic V50 value. V50 is the velocity at which 50% of impacts are complete penetrations and 50% are partial penetrations. 2The Figure of Merit (FOM) is defined as the V50 velocity with units of ft/s divided by the areal density with units of lb/ft2
Claims (16)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/338,021 US7849779B1 (en) | 2006-01-23 | 2006-01-23 | Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor |
US12/940,578 US8087340B2 (en) | 2006-01-23 | 2010-11-05 | Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/338,021 US7849779B1 (en) | 2006-01-23 | 2006-01-23 | Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/940,578 Division US8087340B2 (en) | 2006-01-23 | 2010-11-05 | Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US7849779B1 US7849779B1 (en) | 2010-12-14 |
US20100313744A1 true US20100313744A1 (en) | 2010-12-16 |
Family
ID=43303008
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/338,021 Expired - Fee Related US7849779B1 (en) | 2006-01-23 | 2006-01-23 | Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor |
US12/940,578 Expired - Fee Related US8087340B2 (en) | 2006-01-23 | 2010-11-05 | Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/940,578 Expired - Fee Related US8087340B2 (en) | 2006-01-23 | 2010-11-05 | Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7849779B1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090071322A1 (en) * | 2007-09-17 | 2009-03-19 | Oxford J Craig | Apparatus and method for broad spectrum radiation attenuation |
US20120325076A1 (en) * | 2011-06-23 | 2012-12-27 | Monette Jr Stephen A | Composite Armor |
WO2014200592A3 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2015-03-12 | Phoenix Armor, Llc | Polymer and block copolymer, ceramic composite armor system |
US8978536B2 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2015-03-17 | Future Force Innovation, Inc. | Material for providing blast and projectile impact protection |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9682536B2 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2017-06-20 | The Boeing Company | Sandwiched fiber composites for ballistic applications |
RU2484412C1 (en) * | 2011-12-23 | 2013-06-10 | Закрытое акционерное общество Корпорация "Защита" | Ceramics-based composite armour packet (cbcap) |
US9327458B2 (en) | 2014-09-30 | 2016-05-03 | The Boeing Company | In-situ annealing of polymer fibers |
US10562269B2 (en) * | 2015-09-09 | 2020-02-18 | Composite Horizons, LLC | Polymer matrix-ceramic matrix hybrid composites for high thermal applications |
NO345285B1 (en) * | 2019-09-11 | 2020-11-30 | Missingen Services As | Antiballistic panel arranged for optical inspection and procedure thereof |
Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3431818A (en) * | 1965-04-26 | 1969-03-11 | Aerojet General Co | Lightweight protective armor plate |
US3516898A (en) * | 1963-03-28 | 1970-06-23 | Goodyear Aerospace Corp | Hard faced plastic armor |
US4732803A (en) * | 1986-10-07 | 1988-03-22 | Smith Novis W Jr | Light weight armor |
US4944974A (en) * | 1984-10-24 | 1990-07-31 | Zachariades Anagnostis E | Composite structures of ultra-high-molecular-weight polymers, such as ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene products, and method of producing such structures |
US5705764A (en) * | 1996-05-30 | 1998-01-06 | United Defense, L.P. | Interlayer for ceramic armor |
US5935678A (en) * | 1994-05-17 | 1999-08-10 | Park; Andrew D. | Ballistic laminate structure in sheet form |
US6389594B1 (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2002-05-21 | Israel Military Industries Ltd. | Anti-ballistic ceramic articles |
US6435071B1 (en) * | 2000-10-26 | 2002-08-20 | John Bruce Campbell | Vehicle for traveling through hostile environments |
US6451385B1 (en) * | 1999-05-04 | 2002-09-17 | Purdue Research Foundation | pressure infiltration for production of composites |
US20020178900A1 (en) * | 2001-04-24 | 2002-12-05 | Ghiorse Seth R. | Armor with in-plane confinement of ceramic tiles |
US6500507B1 (en) * | 1998-06-25 | 2002-12-31 | Armortec Incorporated | Flexible, impact-resistant materials |
US6642159B1 (en) * | 2000-08-16 | 2003-11-04 | Honeywell International Inc. | Impact resistant rigid composite and method for manufacture |
US20040083880A1 (en) * | 2002-09-19 | 2004-05-06 | Michael Cohen | Ceramic bodies and ballistic armor incorporating the same |
US6862970B2 (en) * | 2000-11-21 | 2005-03-08 | M Cubed Technologies, Inc. | Boron carbide composite bodies, and methods for making same |
US6969553B1 (en) * | 2004-09-03 | 2005-11-29 | Honeywell International Inc. | Drawn gel-spun polyethylene yarns and process for drawing |
US7077048B1 (en) * | 2001-06-22 | 2006-07-18 | Southwest Research Institude | Multi-layered trap ballistic armor |
US7598185B2 (en) * | 2005-12-15 | 2009-10-06 | Polystrand, Inc. | Composite ballistic panels and method of use |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1666829B1 (en) * | 2001-07-25 | 2011-10-12 | Aceram Materials and Technologies Inc. | An armour plate for use in personal or vehicular armour |
DE50309268D1 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2008-04-10 | Sgl Carbon Ag | Multilayered anti-tank material and process for its production |
-
2006
- 2006-01-23 US US11/338,021 patent/US7849779B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-11-05 US US12/940,578 patent/US8087340B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3516898A (en) * | 1963-03-28 | 1970-06-23 | Goodyear Aerospace Corp | Hard faced plastic armor |
US3431818A (en) * | 1965-04-26 | 1969-03-11 | Aerojet General Co | Lightweight protective armor plate |
US4944974A (en) * | 1984-10-24 | 1990-07-31 | Zachariades Anagnostis E | Composite structures of ultra-high-molecular-weight polymers, such as ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene products, and method of producing such structures |
US4732803A (en) * | 1986-10-07 | 1988-03-22 | Smith Novis W Jr | Light weight armor |
US5935678A (en) * | 1994-05-17 | 1999-08-10 | Park; Andrew D. | Ballistic laminate structure in sheet form |
US5705764A (en) * | 1996-05-30 | 1998-01-06 | United Defense, L.P. | Interlayer for ceramic armor |
US6500507B1 (en) * | 1998-06-25 | 2002-12-31 | Armortec Incorporated | Flexible, impact-resistant materials |
US6451385B1 (en) * | 1999-05-04 | 2002-09-17 | Purdue Research Foundation | pressure infiltration for production of composites |
US6642159B1 (en) * | 2000-08-16 | 2003-11-04 | Honeywell International Inc. | Impact resistant rigid composite and method for manufacture |
US6435071B1 (en) * | 2000-10-26 | 2002-08-20 | John Bruce Campbell | Vehicle for traveling through hostile environments |
US6862970B2 (en) * | 2000-11-21 | 2005-03-08 | M Cubed Technologies, Inc. | Boron carbide composite bodies, and methods for making same |
US20020178900A1 (en) * | 2001-04-24 | 2002-12-05 | Ghiorse Seth R. | Armor with in-plane confinement of ceramic tiles |
US6601497B2 (en) * | 2001-04-24 | 2003-08-05 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Armor with in-plane confinement of ceramic tiles |
US7077048B1 (en) * | 2001-06-22 | 2006-07-18 | Southwest Research Institude | Multi-layered trap ballistic armor |
US6389594B1 (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2002-05-21 | Israel Military Industries Ltd. | Anti-ballistic ceramic articles |
US20040083880A1 (en) * | 2002-09-19 | 2004-05-06 | Michael Cohen | Ceramic bodies and ballistic armor incorporating the same |
US6969553B1 (en) * | 2004-09-03 | 2005-11-29 | Honeywell International Inc. | Drawn gel-spun polyethylene yarns and process for drawing |
US7598185B2 (en) * | 2005-12-15 | 2009-10-06 | Polystrand, Inc. | Composite ballistic panels and method of use |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090071322A1 (en) * | 2007-09-17 | 2009-03-19 | Oxford J Craig | Apparatus and method for broad spectrum radiation attenuation |
US8359965B2 (en) * | 2007-09-17 | 2013-01-29 | Oxford J Craig | Apparatus and method for broad spectrum radiation attenuation |
US20120325076A1 (en) * | 2011-06-23 | 2012-12-27 | Monette Jr Stephen A | Composite Armor |
US8978536B2 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2015-03-17 | Future Force Innovation, Inc. | Material for providing blast and projectile impact protection |
WO2014200592A3 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2015-03-12 | Phoenix Armor, Llc | Polymer and block copolymer, ceramic composite armor system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20110186218A1 (en) | 2011-08-04 |
US7849779B1 (en) | 2010-12-14 |
US8087340B2 (en) | 2012-01-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8087340B2 (en) | Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor | |
US7478579B2 (en) | Encapsulated ballistic structure | |
Medvedovski | Ballistic performance of armour ceramics: Influence of design and structure. Part 2 | |
US9400146B1 (en) | Method for forming cylindrical armor elements | |
US9696122B2 (en) | Antiballistic article and method of producing same | |
US6389594B1 (en) | Anti-ballistic ceramic articles | |
US9046324B2 (en) | Antiballistic article and method of producing same | |
CN112066805B (en) | Lightweight fiber/ceramic matrix composite bulletproof structure | |
US8628857B2 (en) | Ballistic plate and method of fabrication thereof | |
Matchen | Applications of ceramics in armor products | |
US10197363B1 (en) | Porous refractory armor substrate | |
US20090324966A1 (en) | Multilayer armor plating, and process for producing the plating | |
CN112848554A (en) | High-toughness fiber-reinforced foamed aluminum gradient anti-explosion composite structure | |
Reddy et al. | Ceramic composite armour for ballistic protection | |
CN114933479B (en) | Preparation method of anti-multiple-bullet ceramic and bulletproof plugboard | |
US20120318131A1 (en) | Polymer ceramic composite | |
CN103727844A (en) | Resilient bomb-resisting mixed composite material | |
EP1288607A1 (en) | Anti-ballistic ceramic articles | |
Colombo et al. | Ceramic–polymer composites for ballistic protection | |
CN206459566U (en) | A kind of bulletproof composite sheet material | |
RU110831U1 (en) | SECURITY PANEL | |
JP5405844B2 (en) | Impact resistant material | |
Hansen et al. | Composite treatment of ceramic tile armor | |
Nunn et al. | Improved ballistic performance by using a polymer matrix composite facing on boron carbide armor tiles | |
Klement et al. | Ceramic materials for ballistic protection |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: U.T. BATTELLE, LLC, TENNESSEE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FRAME, BARBARA J.;HANSEN, JAMES G.R.;REEL/FRAME:017960/0208 Effective date: 20060509 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:UT-BATTELLE, LLC;REEL/FRAME:025199/0794 Effective date: 20100929 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20141214 |