Classifications

• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
  • B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
  • B22F9/00—Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
  • B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
  • B22F1/00—Metallic powder; Treatment of metallic powder, e.g. to facilitate working or to improve properties
  • B22F1/17—Metallic particles coated with metal
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
  • C22C—ALLOYS
  • C22C33/00—Making ferrous alloys
  • C22C33/02—Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
  • C22C33/0207—Using a mixture of prealloyed powders or a master alloy
• • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
  • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
  • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
  • Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
  • Y10T428/12—All metal or with adjacent metals
  • Y10T428/12181—Composite powder [e.g., coated, etc.]
• • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
  • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
  • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
  • Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
  • Y10T428/12—All metal or with adjacent metals
  • Y10T428/12493—Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.]
  • Y10T428/12708—Sn-base component
• • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
  • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
  • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
  • Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
  • Y10T428/12—All metal or with adjacent metals
  • Y10T428/12493—Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.]
  • Y10T428/12771—Transition metal-base component
  • Y10T428/12861—Group VIII or IB metal-base component
  • Y10T428/12951—Fe-base component
  • Y10T428/12972—Containing 0.01-1.7% carbon [i.e., steel]
  • Y10T428/12979—Containing more than 10% nonferrous elements [e.g., high alloy, stainless]

Definitions

• Stainless steel powder is coated with tin or a tin alloy of copper or nickel.
• the amount of coating is a definite percent of the stainless steel powder. The purpose is to enhance corrosion resistance.
• This invention is concerned with metal powders for molding purposes, and more particularly with methods for improving the corrosion resistance of stainless steel powder moldings and with novel stainless steel powders which confer such advantages.
• the powders which lend themselves to such improvement include the austenitic chromium-nickel-iron 300 Series stainless steels, such as Types 302, 304 and 316, as well as the martensitic 400 Series chrome irons. These powders typically average to 45 microns in particle size, some being 100% finer than 325 mesh while others may contain substantial proportions coarser than 200 mesh.
• the additives which confer corrosion resistance include substantially pure tin as well as tin in combination with up to 90% of copper, nickel or both. Especially preferred are combinations of to 50% by weight of tin with 80 to 50% by weight of copper, nickel or copper-nickel combinations.
• additive required, whether it be tin or tin plus copper or nickel, is quite small. Important advantages are achieved with as little as 0.25% additive based on the weight of the stainless powder, and optimum results are generally achieved with no more than about 1.52% additive. Indeed, additive levels substantially above 2% will sometimes adversely affect the tensile strength of the molded articles and are therefore preferably avoided.
• a more complex procedure involves coating the stainless steel powder with the tin or tin alloy at the levels indicated. This method, which assumes uniformity and avoids the risk of segregation of the constituents in storage, will often be preferred.
• An elegant method of preparing such coated powders entails blending the stainless powder with an aqueous dispersion of a reducible tin salt, optionally including reducible copper or nickel salts as well, then separating the water and reducing the salt(s) to elemental metal in an atmosphere of hydrogen.
• Reducible salts of tin, copper and nickel which lend themselves best to the aforementioned technique include the chlorides, nitrates, formates, acetates and sulfates of such metals.
• Stannous chloride, cupric nitrate and nickel nitrate are readily available and appropriate.
• the quantity of salts should be equivalent to about 0.25 to 1.5% of total elemental tin, copper and/or nickel, based on the weight of stainless powder.
• the volume of aqueous salt solution or suspension for optimum uniformity will, of course, vary with the particle size of the powder, higher volumes being advisable with the finer powders. Generally at least about 0.025 ml. will be desirable per gram of powder, while volumes in excess of 0.25 ml. per gram offer no added advantage.
• the water may be removed, suitably by evaporation at elevated temperature or reduced pressure. It is a desirable precaution to stir or agitate the powder during drying to insure uniform deposition.
• salts employed for coating include soluble sulfates or chlorides
• best results are achieved by precipitating the metal compounds on the stainless powder before separating the water. This permits thorough washing of the coated powder before reduction, to eliminate traces of chloride and sulfur, which may be objectionable in the final product.
• Precipitation may be elfected by addition of alkali, preferably at least about one equivalent, or 1025% in excess if desired, of alkali per cation equivalent. Any alkali may be employed for this purpose, e.g. sodium or potassium carbonate, bicardonate or hydroxide. If a hydroxide is used, substantial excess should be avoided to prevent solubilization of the tin compounds.
• the water may be separated from the treated powder by filtration or decanting, and the powder washed and dried.
• Reduction of the tin, copper and/or nickel compounds to elemental metal is next effected, by heating the treated powder in a hydrogen atmosphere at a temperature below that which causes sintering.
• Optimum reduction temperatures and times will vary with the coating composition, the particle size, and the heating capacity of the furance, and are therefore best determined by experiment. Generally, reduction at a temperature above about 500-600 F. and below about 1600-18 00 F. for about 45 mintues to an hour will prove appropriate.
• the product may be subjected to light hammer milling to break up any aggregates which may have formed during processing.
• One preferred technique includes compacting and sintering in accordance with conventional powder metallurgy procedures.
• lubricant e.g. %l% of stearic acid, zinc stearate or the like.
• the powder is then cornpacted at high pressure to the desired shape, usually at room temperature and about 30 to 50 tons per square inch pressure.
• the compacting occurs substantially instantaneously, but the pressure may be applied forabout a minute to insure complete flow.
• the compacted article is then removed from the mold and heated to sintering temperature, suitably at about 2000-2300" F. for from about 15 minutes to an hour.
• the article shrinks and becomes denser, the shrinkage usually being less than about 1%.
• the conventional compacting and sintering techniques will, of course, be substantially the same.
• the stainless steel powder may be uniformly coated with copper and/or nickel, and then blended with particulate tin prior to compacting and sintering.
• tin-coated stainless steel powder may be blended with particulate copper and/or nickel, or with particulate copper-nickel alloy.
• EXAMPLE 1 Stannous chloride dihydrate, 9.72 grams, is dissolved in 30 ml. water, whereupon some white precipitate forms. The resulting suspension is mixed with 500 grams Type 304 stainless steel powder, and the mixture is dried one hour at 400 F. and screened through 100 mesh.
• the solid thus obtained is divided into two portions. These are heated in a furnace under a hydrogen atmosphere for one hour at 1800 F. and 1200 F., respectively, to obtain two powders each uniformly coated with 1% tin.
• the powders are compacted at 50 tons per square inch, applied for one minute at room temperature, and then sintered at 2100 F. for one hour, to form test bars about A x A x 3 inches.
• each bar is exposed for 24 hours in a 250 ml. beaker containing 80 ml. of a solution of 5 g. sodium chloride in 95 ml. distilled water.
• Control bars prepared from uncoated stainless steel powder and from stainless steel powder coated with 1% copper or 1% nickel show almost immediate staining upon immersion, and exhibit rusting within 24 hours.
• the bars prepared from tin-coated powder show negligible staining after 24 hours, and the immersed metal remains rust-free in 48 hours exposure.
• the copperand nickel-coated powders are prepared in the same manner as the tin-coated powder, with substitution of aqueous cupric nitrate and nickel carbonate for the stannous chloride solution.
• EXAMPLE 2 Stannous chloride dihydrate, 258 grams, is dissolved in 715 ml. water and added to 30 pounds of Type 304 stainless steel powder. These ingredients are mixed for 3 minutes, and then a solution of 133 grams of sodium carbonate in 350 ml. hot water is added to precipitate the tin salt. After two minutes additional stirring 1000 ml. water is added and the slurry is filtered and washed with three 2500 ml. portions of water. The resulting damp solid is dried at 500 F. in a rotating tube furnace and heated at 1200 F. under hydrogen for hour to obtain stainless steel powder uniformly coated with 1% tin. Properties of the coated powder are as follows:
• Example 1 This product is molded as in Example 1 to form test bars resistant to salt-water corrosion in a test of 10 days duration.
• Other properties of the sintered bars are as fol lows:
• EXAMPLE 3 Stainless steel powder, 200 grams, is wetted with a solution of 0.38 g. stannous chloride dihydrate and 6.73 g. cupric nitrate trihydrate in 17 ml. water. Next, a solution of 3.45 g. sodium carbonate in 13 ml. hot water is added, followed by 10 ml. water. After stirring, the mixture is filtered, and the damp solid is Washed with 200 ml. water and dried at 385-400" F. for one hour.
• the solid thus obtained is reduced in hydrogen at 800- 1200 F. for hour to obtain stainless steel powder having a 1% coating of an alloy of 10% tin in copper.
• This product is compacted at 50 tons per square inch and sintered at 2300 F. for one hour.
• the immersed metal remains stainand rust-free for the duration of a 216-hour test, whereas another bar, also sintered at 2300" F., and prepared from stainless steel powder coated with 1% copper, exhibits rusting of the immersed end and ferric hydrate precipitation in the solution within 72 hours.
• EXAMPLE 4 The procedure of the previous example is repeated, with substitution of 1.24 grams of the stannous chloride, 5.05 grams of the cupric nitrate, and 3.12 grams of the sodium carbonate for the previously specified quantities, to obtain a powder uniformly coated with 1% of an alloy of 33% tin in copper.
• Test bars are compacted at 50 tons per square inch and sintered at 2100 F. In the salt-water corrosion test, the immersed metal remains clean and rust-free for the duration of a 216-hour test.
• Example 4 Density grams per cc 6.60 Change in length on sintering "percent" -0.48 Tensile strength p.s.i 40,100 Elongation, percent in 1 inch 13.5 Rockwell hardness H-85 EXAMPLE 5
• the procedure of Example 4 is repeated with the omission of the sodium carbonate addition and the filtration step, to prepare a coated powder like that of the previous example. After reduction at 8001200 F. as before, the product is subjected to a light hammer-milling to break up aggregates. The resulting powder is compacted and sintered as in the previous example, and the moldings exhibit corrosion resistance comparable to the products of that example.
• Example 3 Density grams per cc 6.64 Change in length on sintering percent 0.49 Tensile strength p.s.i 41,200 Elongation, percent in 1 inch 15.0 Rockwell hardness H87 EXAMPLE 6
• the procedure of Example 3 is repeated, with substitution of 1.24 grams of the stannous chloride, 6.76 grams of nickelous nitrate hexahydrate and 3.35 grams of the sodium carbonate for the previously specified ingredients and quantities, to obtain a powder uniformly coated with 1% of an alloy of 33% tin in nickel.
• Test bars are molded as before, with 0.75% stearic acid incorporated as lubricant. The products exhibit substantially enhanced corrosion resistance in comparison with bars molded from nickelcoated stainless steel powder.
• EXAMPLE 7 A solution of 24.8 grams stannous chloride dihydrate and 101 grams cupric nit-rate trihydrate in 200 ml. water is poured into a solution of 71 grams sodium carbonate (25% excess) in 200 ml. water. After stirring, the suspension is filtered and the cake washed with 950 ml. water and dried overnight at about 225 F. The dry solid is reduced at 8001200 F. for 4 hour to obtain an alloy powder containing about 33% tin in copper.
• Portions of the stainless steel powder are also blended with 0.25, 0.5 and 2% by weight of the tin-copper alloy, and these mixtures are compacted and sintered as before to form corrosion-resistant moldings. These experiments are repeated substituting pure copper and tin powders in equivalent proportion for the alloy powder, and excellent salt-water corrosion resistance is again obtained.
• Coating composition percent Wt. percent coating
• EXAMPLE 10 Moldings corresponding in composition to those of Example 9 are prepared by blending the appropriate proportions of tin, nickel and copper powders with stainless steel powder, followed by compacting at 50 tons per square inch and sintering at 2300 F. The moldings obtaincd exhibit outstanding resistance to salt-water corrosion.
• the resulting copper-coated powder (0.5% copper) is blended with 0.5% of 325 mesh tin powder, compacted into test bars at 50 tons per square inch, sintered for one hour at 2100 F. and cooled for 30 minutes. When exposed for 24 hours to salt solution as described in Example 1, the tests bars remain corrosion-free. Similar results are obtained with nickel-coated stainless steel powders blended with tin powder, and with tin-coated stainless steel powder blended with copper powder or with nickel powder.

Landscapes

• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Materials Engineering (AREA)
• Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
• Metallurgy (AREA)
• Organic Chemistry (AREA)
• Powder Metallurgy (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=23542551

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (4)

Cited By (9)

Families Citing this family (2)

Citations (4)

• 0
  • DE DEP37469A patent/DE1234998B/de active Pending
• 1964
  • 1964-08-18 US US390462A patent/US3425813A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
• 1965
  • 1965-08-12 GB GB34647/65A patent/GB1103634A/en not_active Expired
  • 1965-08-16 CH CH1144765A patent/CH473633A/de not_active IP Right Cessation

Patent Citations (4)

Also Published As

Similar Documents