US3288199A - Low exess air operation of multipleburner residual-fuel-fired furnaces - Google Patents

Low exess air operation of multipleburner residual-fuel-fired furnaces Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3288199A
US3288199A US476662A US47666265A US3288199A US 3288199 A US3288199 A US 3288199A US 476662 A US476662 A US 476662A US 47666265 A US47666265 A US 47666265A US 3288199 A US3288199 A US 3288199A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
burner
air
burners
fuel
excess air
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US476662A
Inventor
John E Gerrard
Charles W Siegmund
Philippoff Wladimir
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Co
Original Assignee
Exxon Research and Engineering Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Exxon Research and Engineering Co filed Critical Exxon Research and Engineering Co
Priority to US476662A priority Critical patent/US3288199A/en
Priority to GB32194/66A priority patent/GB1115889A/en
Priority to DE19661526221 priority patent/DE1526221A1/en
Priority to FI662028A priority patent/FI48386C/en
Priority to DK398266AA priority patent/DK115485B/en
Priority to AT736166A priority patent/AT283563B/en
Priority to CH1114166A priority patent/CH474020A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3288199A publication Critical patent/US3288199A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
    • F23N1/00—Regulating fuel supply
    • F23N1/02—Regulating fuel supply conjointly with air supply
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
    • F23N5/00—Systems for controlling combustion
    • F23N5/003—Systems for controlling combustion using detectors sensitive to combustion gas properties
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
    • F23N5/00—Systems for controlling combustion
    • F23N5/003—Systems for controlling combustion using detectors sensitive to combustion gas properties
    • F23N5/006—Systems for controlling combustion using detectors sensitive to combustion gas properties the detector being sensitive to oxygen
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
    • F23N2237/00—Controlling
    • F23N2237/02—Controlling two or more burners

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to multiple-burner residual-fuel-fired furnaces and boilers. In general, it concerns a process and apparatus for establishing and maintaining optimum combustion at a low level of excess air in a multiple-burner furnace or boiler. In particular, it provides a process for achieving this optimum combustion by achieving the proper adjustment of the individual burners of such multipleburner systems.
  • Multiple-burner residual-fuel-fired furnaces or boilers are commonly used in firing power plants. Such furnaces or boilers may have a dozen burners, be as tall as an eight story building and consume up to 400 barrels of fuel oil per hour.
  • the residual fuel oils employed in such burners contain ash (i.e. metallic contaminants that are both non-volatile and non-combustible) and sulfur. Ash is troublesome in nearly all types of combustion equipment. The most common problem is deposit formation or slagging which reduces heat transfer, etc. Sulfur is found in varying amounts and chemical combinations in all grades of residual fuel oil. Some heavy fuels from high sulfur crudes contain as much as 5 wt. percent sulfur, while others from low sulfur crudes may have less than 1 wt. percent. Typical is a No. 6 oil having an average sulfur level of 2.5 wt. percent. When sulfurcontaining fuels are burned, part of the sulfur is converted to sulfur trioxide which in turn causes sulfuric acid corrosion.
  • analysis of components in the common flue gas enables the establishment for each individual burner of a substantially stoichiometric combustion point.
  • the same level of excess air combustion for each individual burner is obtained by backing off from this point.
  • Each burner is treated individually in this manner, i.e. first establishing a substantially stoichiometric combustion point, and second backing off.
  • This process is conveniently referred to as tuning the burners.
  • the tuning is repeated until each individual burner is operating at the same level of excess air.
  • the process of continuously tuning the burners involves an iteration in the mathematical sense that successive trials home in on the solution if the system is inherently convergent which this is. After the burners are tuned, if the level of excess air combustion is other than that which is desired, appropriate adjustment of all burners simultaneously to achieve the desired level is easily effected.
  • Either of two basic flue gas analyses can be used in the first step of the process of the present invention.
  • the analysis is performed on the combustibles in the flue gas.
  • the combustibles are substantially carbon monoxide, which is the most sensitive component in the combustion system as regards rapid concentration change at the stoichiometric point.
  • the analysis is performed on any component of the combustion system which peaks in concentration near the stoichiometric point. Carbon dioxide is one such component which peaks in concentration near the stoichiometric point.
  • each subsequent burner be brought to the same common flue gas carbon monoxide level, i.e. substantially stoichiometric point.
  • the burner is backed off this level in order to achieve the desired level of low excess air combustion, e.g. about 23% excess air.
  • the backing off is accomplished by increasing the air and/ or decreasing the fuel feed to the particular burner in question.
  • the extent to which the bumer should be backed off can in general be determined by either one of two methods.
  • the first, and preferred, method involves a trial-and-error technique. In this technique, the air and/ or fuel supply valve to the individual burner is turned, i.e. backed off a measurable displacement.
  • a flame temperature measuring device is used to determine the extent to which the burner should be backed off.
  • sheathed refractory-metal thermocouples' provide a means of determining flame temperature.
  • Other devices such as closedtube photopyrometers may also be used.
  • flame temperature varies about 6 to 10 Fahrenheit degrees per percent excess air.
  • each burner should be backed off in terms of temperature to the same extent e.g. 20 to 30 F.
  • This second method requires the use of some means for measuring flame temperature. In the past great difiiculty has been encountered in providing suitable devices which would continue to function without failure under the high temperature conditions which exist within the furnaces.
  • the device is subjected to these high temperatures only once, i.e. during initial calibration. For example, a thermocouple or other device is used initially to establish the extent to which the burner should be backed off. The result is then converted into a fixed displacement on the individual air (or fuel) control valve for the burner in question and the device is removed from the furnace. It is apparent from the above that the first method described does not require the use of any temperature measuring device.
  • the level of excess air combustion is determined by flue gas analysis of the stack gas for the percent oxygen. If the results of this analysis indicate that the level is other than that which is desired, appropriate adjustment of all burners simultaneously to achieve the desired level is easily effected.
  • Suitable apparatus would include a carbon monoxide or combustibles analyzer a level-sensing device on the output from the analyzer which activates the air and/or fuel control valves on the respective feeds to the individual burners.
  • a furnace 1 equipped with four burners 2. Air and fuel are supplied to each burner 2 through the respective control valves 3. Fuel is supplied through supply means 5 to each control valve 3 from a fuel manifold 4. Air is supplied through supply means 7 to each control valve 3 from an air manifold 6. Control valve 8 regulates the air/ fuel ratio to the fuel manifold 4 and air manifold 6.
  • a flue gas analyzer 9 is located in the furnace stack 10 and analyzes the mixture of flue gases from the four burners 2. Signals from the level-sensing device 11 on the output from flue gas analyzer 9 are conducted through suitable conduit means 12 to activate air and/ or feed control valves on the respective feeds to the individual burners.
  • Each control valve 3 and control valve 8 are shown as single valves, however, two separate valves, one on the fuel supply line and one on the air supply line, can also be employed at any or all of these points in the system.
  • This apparatus would include a peak component analyzer, e.g. 'a carbon dioxide analyzer and a peaksensing device on the output from the analyzer which actuates air and/ or fuel control valves on the respective feeds to the individual burners.
  • a peak component analyzer e.g. 'a carbon dioxide analyzer
  • a peaksensing device on the output from the analyzer which actuates air and/ or fuel control valves on the respective feeds to the individual burners.
  • a process for the control of low excess air combustion in a multiple-burner furnace during operation of the burners thereof which comprises (a) adjusting the air-fuel feed to a first burner of said furnace, while analyzing the concentration of a flue gas component whose concentration in the flue gas is proportional to the level of excess air operation of said first burner, thereby establishing essentially the stoichiometric point of said first burner; (b) backing off said first burner to the desired level of low excess air combustion and (c) sequentially repeating (a) and (b) on each burner of said multiple-burner furnace, thereby establishing substantially the same desired level of combustion at each burner of said furnace.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Regulation And Control Of Combustion (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Non-Biological Materials By The Use Of Chemical Means (AREA)

Abstract

1,115,889. Controlling burners. ESSO RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO. 18 July, 1966 [2 Aug., 1965], No. 32194/66. Addition to 1,080,069. Heading F4T. A process for the control of low excess air combustion in a multiple-burner furnace comprises (a) adjusting the air-fuel feed to a first burner while analyzing the concentration of a flue gas component whose concentration is proportional to the level of excess air operation of this burner, thereby establishing the stoichiometric point of the burner; (b) adjusting the first burner to the desired low excess air level and (c) sequentially repeating (a) and (b) for each of the other burners. Any further adjustment to the fuel-air feed indicated by analyzing the flue gases is made to all the burners simultaneously. The analysis is carried out on either the carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide component of the flue gases. Step (b) is carried out either by a trial-and-error technique or by determining the burner flame temperature and adjusting the air level until the temperature has altered by 25‹ F. which will provide for the required 3% excess air level.

Description

29, 1966 J. E. GERRARD ETAL 3,288,199
LOW EXCESS AIR OPERATION OF MULTIPLE-BURNER RES IDUAL-FUEL-FIRED FURNACES Filed Aug. 2, 1965 FLUE GAS ANALYZER 5 5 5 W5 FUEL 7. 7. 7. MANIFOLD LEVEL- FUEL SUPPLY 8 AIR MANlFOLD SUPPLY PA TENT ATTORNEY Patented Nov. 29, 1966 3,288,199 LOW EXCESS AIR OPERATHQN F MULTIILE- BURNER RESlDUAL-FUEL-FIRED FURNACES John E. Gerrard, ltiatawan, Charles W. Siegmund, Morris Plains, and Wladimir Philippoif, Cranford, N.J., assignors to 13550 Research and Engineering Company, a corporation of Delaware Filed Aug. 2, 1965, Ser. No. 476,662 4 Glaims. (Cl. 158-1175) The present invention relates to multiple-burner residual-fuel-fired furnaces and boilers. In general, it concerns a process and apparatus for establishing and maintaining optimum combustion at a low level of excess air in a multiple-burner furnace or boiler. In particular, it provides a process for achieving this optimum combustion by achieving the proper adjustment of the individual burners of such multipleburner systems.
Multiple-burner residual-fuel-fired furnaces or boilers are commonly used in firing power plants. Such furnaces or boilers may have a dozen burners, be as tall as an eight story building and consume up to 400 barrels of fuel oil per hour. The residual fuel oils employed in such burners contain ash (i.e. metallic contaminants that are both non-volatile and non-combustible) and sulfur. Ash is troublesome in nearly all types of combustion equipment. The most common problem is deposit formation or slagging which reduces heat transfer, etc. Sulfur is found in varying amounts and chemical combinations in all grades of residual fuel oil. Some heavy fuels from high sulfur crudes contain as much as 5 wt. percent sulfur, while others from low sulfur crudes may have less than 1 wt. percent. Typical is a No. 6 oil having an average sulfur level of 2.5 wt. percent. When sulfurcontaining fuels are burned, part of the sulfur is converted to sulfur trioxide which in turn causes sulfuric acid corrosion.
It is well known that the operation of residual-fuel-fired systems is substantially improved in terms of reducing superheater slagging and corrosion of both superheaters and air preheaters by carrying out the combustion at levels of low excess air only slightly higher than stoichiometric, e.g. 0.01-5% excess. This is an effective method of optimizing combustion, but in the past has been limited in application because smoke formation and poor combustion usually result before the low excess air combustion is achieved. One of the problems associated with achieving this low excess air combustion is assuring that the individual burners of a multiple-burner system are each operating at the same level of excess air. For instance, if half the burners in a multiple-burner system operate at 6% excess air, and the remainder operate at stoichiometric conditions, the flue gas analysis of the stack gases (which gases, of course, are a composite of the gases from all the individual burners) for the percent oxygen will show the overall combustion to be at 3% excess air (i.e. optimum combustion conditions). However, conditions are actually poor in terms of smoke and corrosion, since the burners operating at or slightly below stoichiometric conditions will produce dense smoke, and those operating at 6% excess air will tend to cause superheater and air preheater corrosion.
According to the present invention, there is provided a process and apparatus which assure that the individual burners of a multiple-burner system are each operating at substantially the same level of excess air and thus afford a practical means of realizing the inherent benefits of low excess air combustion.
In the present invention, analysis of components in the common flue gas enables the establishment for each individual burner of a substantially stoichiometric combustion point. The same level of excess air combustion for each individual burner is obtained by backing off from this point. Each burner is treated individually in this manner, i.e. first establishing a substantially stoichiometric combustion point, and second backing off. This process is conveniently referred to as tuning the burners. The tuning is repeated until each individual burner is operating at the same level of excess air. The process of continuously tuning the burners involves an iteration in the mathematical sense that successive trials home in on the solution if the system is inherently convergent which this is. After the burners are tuned, if the level of excess air combustion is other than that which is desired, appropriate adjustment of all burners simultaneously to achieve the desired level is easily effected.
Either of two basic flue gas analyses can be used in the first step of the process of the present invention. In the first, the analysis is performed on the combustibles in the flue gas. The combustibles are substantially carbon monoxide, which is the most sensitive component in the combustion system as regards rapid concentration change at the stoichiometric point. In the second, the analysis is performed on any component of the combustion system which peaks in concentration near the stoichiometric point. Carbon dioxide is one such component which peaks in concentration near the stoichiometric point.
When carbon monoxide analysis is used to tune the burners, the following procedure is followed:
Assuming a multiple-burner furnace to be in a state wherein the individual burners are operating at various levels of excess air, all Well above stoichiometric, the concentration of carbon monoxide in the common flue gas is close to zero.
In practice, most furnaces are generally operated in such a state because of the smoke and air pollution problems which result if any burners are not operating on excess air. systematically reducing the air supply to only the first burner increases the carbon monoxide level Within the common flue gas very sharply as this first burner approaches the stoichiometric point. At some arbitrary level shortly after the beginning of the rapid rise in carbon monoxide concentration in the common flue gas as detected by a combustible analyzer, it is established that the burner in question is operating at the substantially stoichiometric combustion point. It is not important that the carbon monoxide level in the common flue gas correspond to the exact stoichiometric point for the particular burner. However, it is important that each subsequent burner be brought to the same common flue gas carbon monoxide level, i.e. substantially stoichiometric point. After the first burner has been brought to the substantially stoichiometric point the burner is backed off this level in order to achieve the desired level of low excess air combustion, e.g. about 23% excess air.
The backing off is accomplished by increasing the air and/ or decreasing the fuel feed to the particular burner in question. The extent to which the bumer should be backed off can in general be determined by either one of two methods. The first, and preferred, method involves a trial-and-error technique. In this technique, the air and/ or fuel supply valve to the individual burner is turned, i.e. backed off a measurable displacement.
In the second method, a flame temperature measuring device is used to determine the extent to which the burner should be backed off. For example, sheathed refractory-metal thermocouples'provide a means of determining flame temperature. Other devices such as closedtube photopyrometers may also be used. Whatever the device used, it is known that flame temperature varies about 6 to 10 Fahrenheit degrees per percent excess air.
It follows, therefore, that each burner should be backed off in terms of temperature to the same extent e.g. 20 to 30 F. This second method requires the use of some means for measuring flame temperature. In the past great difiiculty has been encountered in providing suitable devices which would continue to function without failure under the high temperature conditions which exist within the furnaces. In this second method, the device is subjected to these high temperatures only once, i.e. during initial calibration. For example, a thermocouple or other device is used initially to establish the extent to which the burner should be backed off. The result is then converted into a fixed displacement on the individual air (or fuel) control valve for the burner in question and the device is removed from the furnace. It is apparent from the above that the first method described does not require the use of any temperature measuring device.
It is,.of course, conceivable, and in fact, very likely, that the excess air level established in the first burner will be upset by the redistribution of fuel and air taking place during the rest of the tuning. This is easily counteracted by reinitiating the whole sequence when the last burner is tuned. It is apparent then, that the burners are iterated into balance.
After the burners are tuned, the level of excess air combustion is determined by flue gas analysis of the stack gas for the percent oxygen. If the results of this analysis indicate that the level is other than that which is desired, appropriate adjustment of all burners simultaneously to achieve the desired level is easily effected.
The individual components of the apparatus employed in carrying out the process of the present invention when carbon monoxide analysis is used are Well known and, per se, form no part of the present invention. Suitable apparatus would include a carbon monoxide or combustibles analyzer a level-sensing device on the output from the analyzer which activates the air and/or fuel control valves on the respective feeds to the individual burners.
The invention is further understood by reference to the accompanying drawing which shows a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the same.
With reference to the drawing there is shown a furnace 1 equipped with four burners 2. Air and fuel are supplied to each burner 2 through the respective control valves 3. Fuel is supplied through supply means 5 to each control valve 3 from a fuel manifold 4. Air is supplied through supply means 7 to each control valve 3 from an air manifold 6. Control valve 8 regulates the air/ fuel ratio to the fuel manifold 4 and air manifold 6. A flue gas analyzer 9 is located in the furnace stack 10 and analyzes the mixture of flue gases from the four burners 2. Signals from the level-sensing device 11 on the output from flue gas analyzer 9 are conducted through suitable conduit means 12 to activate air and/ or feed control valves on the respective feeds to the individual burners. Each control valve 3 and control valve 8 are shown as single valves, however, two separate valves, one on the fuel supply line and one on the air supply line, can also be employed at any or all of these points in the system.
When carbon dioxide or some other component of the combustion system which peaks in concentration around the stoichiometric point is used to tune the burners the following procedure is used:
Assuming a multiple-burner furnace to be in a state wherein each of the individual burners are operating at various levels of excess air all well above stoichiometric, there is some fixed level of carbon dioxide in the furnace stack. Reduction of the air level to the first burner increases the carbon dioxide concentration in the flue gases from the flame of the first burner and therefore in the overall stack analysis. As the air to the first burner is progressively reduced, the carbon dioxide in the stack gases continues to rise until the stoichiometric point of 'the first burner is reached, after which time the level begins decreasing. In this manner, the stoichiometric point for the first burner has been fixed and a backing olf procedure similar to that described above is followed to establish the desired level of low excess air combustion for the first burner. Each individual burner is treated in this manner, as with the carbon monoxide analysis.
The individual components of the apparatus employed in practicing the process of the present invention when a component which peaks in concentration around the stoichiometric point is used are well known to those skilled in the art, and per se, form no part of the present invention. This apparatus would include a peak component analyzer, e.g. 'a carbon dioxide analyzer and a peaksensing device on the output from the analyzer which actuates air and/ or fuel control valves on the respective feeds to the individual burners.
By means of the present invention there is provided a relatively uncomplex, inexpensive process by which low excess air combustion at each individual burner of a multiple-burner furnace can be automatically controlled. It is readily apparent that this process may be employed wherever multiple-burner residual-fuel-fired furnaces are found, for example, in power-generating plants, both on land and at sea. While a general description has been given and a preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described, it is to be understood that various modifications and adaptions thereof to different uses may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention and the scope thereof as described by the following claims.
What is claimed is:
1. A process for the control of low excess air combustion in a multiple-burner furnace during operation of the burners thereof which comprises (a) adjusting the air-fuel feed to a first burner of said furnace, while analyzing the concentration of a flue gas component whose concentration in the flue gas is proportional to the level of excess air operation of said first burner, thereby establishing essentially the stoichiometric point of said first burner; (b) backing off said first burner to the desired level of low excess air combustion and (c) sequentially repeating (a) and (b) on each burner of said multiple-burner furnace, thereby establishing substantially the same desired level of combustion at each burner of said furnace.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein said flue gas component is carbon monoxide.
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein said flue gas component is carbon dioxide.
4. A process according to claim 1 wherein said desired level of low excess air combustion is determined by measuring the flame temperature at each of said burners.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,645,350 10/1927 Reineke 23615 2,666,584 1/1954 Kliever 236l5 3,015,357 1/1962 Bain et al 158117.5
JAMES W. WESTHAVER, Primary Examiner.

Claims (1)

1. A PROCESS FOR THE CONTROL OF LOW EXCESS AIR COMBUSTION IN A MULTIPLE-BURNER FURNACE DURING OPERATION OF THE BURNERS THEREOF WHICH COMPRISES (A) ADJUSTING THE AIR-FUEL FEED TO A FIRST BURNER OF SAID FURNACE, WHILE ANALYZING THE CONCENTRATION OF A FLUE GAS COMPONENT WHOSE CONCENTRATION IN THE FLUE GAS IS PROPORTIONAL TO THE LEVEL OF EXCEES AIR OPERATION OF SAID FIRST BURNER, THEREBY ESTABLISHING ESSENTIALLY THE STOICHIOMETRIC POINT
US476662A 1965-08-02 1965-08-02 Low exess air operation of multipleburner residual-fuel-fired furnaces Expired - Lifetime US3288199A (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US476662A US3288199A (en) 1965-08-02 1965-08-02 Low exess air operation of multipleburner residual-fuel-fired furnaces
GB32194/66A GB1115889A (en) 1965-08-02 1966-07-18 Improved method and apparatus for multi-burner fuel-fired furnaces
DE19661526221 DE1526221A1 (en) 1965-08-02 1966-07-22 Method and device for operating a multiple oil burner
FI662028A FI48386C (en) 1965-08-02 1966-08-01 A method for controlling combustion in a furnace equipped with several bulbs.
DK398266AA DK115485B (en) 1965-08-02 1966-08-01 Method for controlling combustion in a multi-burner furnace.
AT736166A AT283563B (en) 1965-08-02 1966-08-01 Method for controlling combustion with low excess air in a residual oil-fired multi-burner system
CH1114166A CH474020A (en) 1965-08-02 1966-08-02 Method for controlling the combustion in a multi-burner system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US476662A US3288199A (en) 1965-08-02 1965-08-02 Low exess air operation of multipleburner residual-fuel-fired furnaces

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3288199A true US3288199A (en) 1966-11-29

Family

ID=23892751

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US476662A Expired - Lifetime US3288199A (en) 1965-08-02 1965-08-02 Low exess air operation of multipleburner residual-fuel-fired furnaces

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US3288199A (en)
AT (1) AT283563B (en)
CH (1) CH474020A (en)
DE (1) DE1526221A1 (en)
DK (1) DK115485B (en)
FI (1) FI48386C (en)
GB (1) GB1115889A (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4237825A (en) * 1978-11-06 1980-12-09 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Furnace heat absorption control
US4270470A (en) * 1979-04-27 1981-06-02 Barnett William O Combustion system and method for burning fuel with a variable heating value
US4316420A (en) * 1978-11-06 1982-02-23 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Furnace heat absorption control
US4362499A (en) * 1980-12-29 1982-12-07 Fisher Controls Company, Inc. Combustion control system and method
US4492560A (en) * 1983-11-14 1985-01-08 Hardy Sundberg Gas combustion control apparatus
US5902926A (en) * 1997-07-23 1999-05-11 Davis; Thomas G. Method to identify gas combustion integrity in fan assisted equipment
WO2000050816A1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2000-08-31 Eta Exclusive Thermodynamic Application Ltd. Method for controlling the performance of an energy system
US6312250B1 (en) * 1999-04-19 2001-11-06 North American Manufacturing Company Premix burner with firing rate control
US20110226039A1 (en) * 2010-03-17 2011-09-22 Carrier Corporation Flue Gas Sensor With Water Barrier Member
US20140087316A1 (en) * 2012-09-26 2014-03-27 American Air Liquide, Inc. Method and System for Heat Recovery from Products of Combustion and Charge Heating Installation Including the Same
US20200240636A1 (en) * 2019-01-30 2020-07-30 Grasim Industries Ltd Systems and methods for firing an insulator
US20210278087A1 (en) * 2020-03-06 2021-09-09 Wolf Steel Ltd. Control system for a fuel burning appliance and a method of operating such an appliance

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3032978A1 (en) * 1980-09-02 1982-04-15 Grolitsch Erhard Dipl Ing Agr METHOD FOR COMPLETELY LOW POLLUTANT COMBUSTION (OXIDATION) OF CARBONED FUELS
JPS5782623A (en) * 1980-11-13 1982-05-24 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Self-heated vaporizing combustor
DE4315969A1 (en) * 1993-05-10 1995-02-23 Mannesmann Ag Method and equipment for optimising combustion plants

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1645350A (en) * 1925-04-11 1927-10-11 Reineke Josef Heinz Apparatus for regulating air supply
US2666584A (en) * 1950-12-18 1954-01-19 Honeywell Regulator Co Combustion control apparatus
US3015357A (en) * 1958-01-23 1962-01-02 United States Steel Corp Method of controlling the operation of an open hearth furnace

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1645350A (en) * 1925-04-11 1927-10-11 Reineke Josef Heinz Apparatus for regulating air supply
US2666584A (en) * 1950-12-18 1954-01-19 Honeywell Regulator Co Combustion control apparatus
US3015357A (en) * 1958-01-23 1962-01-02 United States Steel Corp Method of controlling the operation of an open hearth furnace

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4237825A (en) * 1978-11-06 1980-12-09 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Furnace heat absorption control
US4316420A (en) * 1978-11-06 1982-02-23 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Furnace heat absorption control
US4270470A (en) * 1979-04-27 1981-06-02 Barnett William O Combustion system and method for burning fuel with a variable heating value
US4362499A (en) * 1980-12-29 1982-12-07 Fisher Controls Company, Inc. Combustion control system and method
US4492560A (en) * 1983-11-14 1985-01-08 Hardy Sundberg Gas combustion control apparatus
US5902926A (en) * 1997-07-23 1999-05-11 Davis; Thomas G. Method to identify gas combustion integrity in fan assisted equipment
WO2000050816A1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2000-08-31 Eta Exclusive Thermodynamic Application Ltd. Method for controlling the performance of an energy system
US6312250B1 (en) * 1999-04-19 2001-11-06 North American Manufacturing Company Premix burner with firing rate control
US20110226039A1 (en) * 2010-03-17 2011-09-22 Carrier Corporation Flue Gas Sensor With Water Barrier Member
US8707759B2 (en) * 2010-03-17 2014-04-29 Carrier Corporation Flue gas sensor with water barrier member
US20140087322A1 (en) * 2012-09-26 2014-03-27 American Air Liquide, Inc. Method and System for Heat Recovery from Products of Combustion and Charge Heating Installation Including the Same
US20140087316A1 (en) * 2012-09-26 2014-03-27 American Air Liquide, Inc. Method and System for Heat Recovery from Products of Combustion and Charge Heating Installation Including the Same
CN104822990A (en) * 2012-09-26 2015-08-05 乔治洛德方法研究和开发液化空气有限公司 Method and system for heat recovery from products of combustion and charge heating installation including same
US9618203B2 (en) * 2012-09-26 2017-04-11 L'Air Liquide Société Anonyme Pour L'Étude Et L'Eploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Method and system for heat recovery from products of combustion and charge heating installation including the same
CN104822990B (en) * 2012-09-26 2017-12-08 乔治洛德方法研究和开发液化空气有限公司 For carrying out the method and system of recuperation of heat from combustion product and including its furnace charge firing equipment
US9851102B2 (en) * 2012-09-26 2017-12-26 L'Air Liquide Société Anonyme Pour L'Étude Et L'Exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Method and system for heat recovery from products of combustion and charge heating installation including the same
EP2904321B1 (en) * 2012-09-26 2019-07-03 L'Air Liquide Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude Method and system for heat recovery from products of combustion and charge heating installation including the same
EP2904320B1 (en) * 2012-09-26 2019-08-14 L'Air Liquide Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude Method and system for heat recovery from products of combustion and charge heating installation including the same
US20200240636A1 (en) * 2019-01-30 2020-07-30 Grasim Industries Ltd Systems and methods for firing an insulator
US20210278087A1 (en) * 2020-03-06 2021-09-09 Wolf Steel Ltd. Control system for a fuel burning appliance and a method of operating such an appliance
US11976821B2 (en) * 2020-03-06 2024-05-07 Wolf Steel Ltd. Control system for a fuel burning appliance and a method of operating such an appliance

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CH474020A (en) 1969-06-15
DE1526221A1 (en) 1970-04-23
FI48386C (en) 1974-09-10
GB1115889A (en) 1968-05-29
AT283563B (en) 1970-08-10
FI48386B (en) 1974-05-31
DK115485B (en) 1969-10-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3288199A (en) Low exess air operation of multipleburner residual-fuel-fired furnaces
US3369749A (en) Low excess air operation of multipleburner residual-fuel-fired furnaces
US4588372A (en) Flame ionization control of a partially premixed gas burner with regulated secondary air
GB980818A (en) Method and apparatus for generating vapor
ATE28696T1 (en) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE AFTERCOMBUSTION OF EXHAUST GASES.
US3463599A (en) Combustion process for coal fired boilers
US4531905A (en) Optimizing combustion air flow
US4241869A (en) Furnace fuel optimizer
TW256874B (en)
FR2407428A1 (en) DEVICE FOR PREHEATING A GASEOUS FUEL INTENDED TO SUPPLY AN OVEN DESIGNED TO BURN VARIOUS GASES
JPS6411689B2 (en)
SU418677A1 (en) METHOD FOR BURNING SULFUR FUELS
SU1462067A1 (en) Method of controlling combustion process
JPS604724A (en) Combustion method by oxygen-enriched air for combustion
JPS5616024A (en) Inspecting method of combustion of combusting apparatus
EP0017407A3 (en) Fuel burner and fuel distribution device therefor
JPS55110725A (en) After burning control for direct flame-heating type non-oxidative furnace
SU1241019A1 (en) Method of boiler unit burner operation
SU1698582A1 (en) Method for adjusting process of combustion
SU140049A1 (en) Retort furnace for the synthesis of carbon disulfide
SU1170224A1 (en) Method of burning fuel
SU706652A1 (en) Apparatus for automatic ignition of boiler unit burner
SU983386A1 (en) Method of automatic control of mazut heating temperature
JPH07139728A (en) Air-fuel control device for boiler
SU411274A1 (en)