US20200405627A1 - Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor - Google Patents

Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20200405627A1
US20200405627A1 US16/897,927 US202016897927A US2020405627A1 US 20200405627 A1 US20200405627 A1 US 20200405627A1 US 202016897927 A US202016897927 A US 202016897927A US 2020405627 A1 US2020405627 A1 US 2020405627A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
week
vitiligo
patient
ruxolitinib
cream
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US16/897,927
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Kathleen BUTLER
Jim Lee
Kang Sun
Fiona KUO
Michael Howell
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Incyte Corp
Original Assignee
Incyte Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=73651112&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20200405627(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Incyte Corp filed Critical Incyte Corp
Priority to US16/897,927 priority Critical patent/US20200405627A1/en
Priority to US17/023,269 priority patent/US20210030672A1/en
Assigned to INCYTE CORPORATION reassignment INCYTE CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SUN, KANG, BUTLER, KATHLEEN, KUO, FIONA, LEE, JIM, HOWELL, MICHAEL
Publication of US20200405627A1 publication Critical patent/US20200405627A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/395Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
    • A61K31/495Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with two or more nitrogen atoms as the only ring heteroatoms, e.g. piperazine or tetrazines
    • A61K31/505Pyrimidines; Hydrogenated pyrimidines, e.g. trimethoprim
    • A61K31/519Pyrimidines; Hydrogenated pyrimidines, e.g. trimethoprim ortho- or peri-condensed with heterocyclic rings
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/0012Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
    • A61K9/0014Skin, i.e. galenical aspects of topical compositions
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/06Ointments; Bases therefor; Other semi-solid forms, e.g. creams, sticks, gels
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/10Dispersions; Emulsions
    • A61K9/107Emulsions ; Emulsion preconcentrates; Micelles
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P17/00Drugs for dermatological disorders
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P37/00Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to topical treatment of vitiligo using ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
  • Vitiligo occurs when the cells that produce melanin die or stop functioning, resulting in patchy loss of skin pigmentation.
  • Nonsegmental vitiligo involves depigmentation in patches of skin all over the body. Depigmentation typically occurs on the face, neck, and scalp, and around body openings. Loss of pigmentation is also frequently seen in areas that tend to experience rubbing, impact, or other trauma, such as the hands, and arms. Segmental vitiligo is associated with smaller patches of depigmented skin that appear on one side of the body in a limited area. Vitiligo is estimated to affect 0.5% to 2% of the population worldwide (Krüger C, Schallreuter K U. A review of the worldwide prevalence of vitiligo in children/adolescents and adults.
  • Vitiligo is associated with autoimmune diseases such as Sutton nevus, thyroid disorders, juvenile diabetes mellitus, pernicious anemia, and Addison's disease.
  • autoimmune diseases such as Sutton nevus, thyroid disorders, juvenile diabetes mellitus, pernicious anemia, and Addison's disease.
  • the natural course of the disease is generally unpredictable, but it is often progressive.
  • Some degree of spontaneous repigmentation may occur in 10% to 20% of patients; however, it is typically not cosmetically acceptable (Castanet J, Ortonne J P. Pathophysiology of vitiligo. Clin Dermatol 1997:15:845-851).
  • Vitiligo is a serious disease owing to its substantial psychological impact on patients' day-to-day functioning, and its progressive course if left untreated. Studies have shown that the effect vitiligo has on quality of life, particularly psychological impairment, is similar to other skin diseases, such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD) (Linthorst Homan M W, Spuls P I, de Korte J, Bos J D, Sprangers M A, van der Veen J P. The burden of vitiligo: patient characteristics associated with quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 61:411-420).
  • AD atopic dermatitis
  • vitiligo begins in childhood can be associated with significant psychological trauma that may have long lasting effects on self-esteem.
  • the extent of vitiligo is associated with quality of life (QOL) impairment in children and adolescents, especially self-consciousness, but also bullying and teasing.
  • QOL quality of life
  • vitiligo patients reporting negative childhood experiences reported significantly more problems in social development than those not reporting negative experiences.
  • vitiligo Currently there is no approved drug treatment for vitiligo. Drugs have been used off-label; however, the clinical evidence that has been generated consists of a few, small, randomized, controlled studies.
  • the off-label topical treatments that have been used for vitiligo include corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and vitamin D analogues.
  • Other therapies include oral drugs, phototherapies, and some surgical methods (e.g., implantation of melanocytes into depigmented lesions). Due to the low level of evidence for any of these treatments, definitive clinical recommendation for treatment of vitiligo could not be proposed, and the management of vitiligo is empirical and based on the most recent consensus guidelines.
  • Vitiligo pathogenesis involves intrinsic defects within melanocytes and autoimmunity that targets these cells. Once melanocytes become stressed, they release inflammatory signals that activate innate immunity, which may represent the initiation event in vitiligo. Janus kinases are intracellular signaling enzymes that act downstream of key proinflammatory cytokines implicated in vitiligo pathogenesis. The oxidative stress, cell damage, and cytokines secreted from innate immune cells then trigger CXCL10 release by skin cells, and that recruits CD8+ T cells to the site. Activated CD8+ T cells produce IFN- ⁇ and other inflammatory mediators to target and destroy melanocytes (Frisoli M L, Harris J E.
  • IFN- ⁇ signaling utilizes the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway. Inhibition of JAK signaling may play a role in the treatment of vitiligo.
  • Case reports of administering JAK inhibitors to patients with vitiligo include a patient with both alopecia areata and vitiligo who was treated with oral ruxolitinib 20 mg BID for 20 weeks and subsequently had hair regrowth as well as repigmentation of areas affected with vitiligo (Harris J E, Rashighi M, Nguyen N, et al. Rapid skin repigmentation on oral ruxolitinib in a patient with coexistent vitiligo and alopecia areata (AA). J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74:370-371).
  • the present invention provides, inter alia, methods of treating patients suffering from vitiligo with ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, or 1.5% BID.
  • the present disclosure further provides a ruxolitinib composition or cream for use in any of the methods described herein.
  • the present disclosure also provides use of a ruxolitinib composition or cream for manufacture of a medicament for use in any of the methods described herein.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph of F-VASI-50 response (%) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, and Week 24 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order).
  • FIG. 2 is a graph of F-VASI-75 response (%) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, and Week 24 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order).
  • FIG. 3 is a graph of F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear (%) at Week 12 (first bar) and Week 24 (second bar) for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph of mean (SEM) percentage change from baseline in F-VASI at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, and Week 24 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving F-VASI50 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving F-VASI50 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period by a Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation method.
  • LOCF Last Observation Carried Forward
  • FIG. 7 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving F-VASI25 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 8 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving F-VASI25 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period by LOCF imputation method.
  • FIG. 9 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving F-VASI75 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 10 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving F-VASI75 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period by a LOCF imputation method.
  • FIG. 11 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving F-VASI90 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 12 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving F-VASI90 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period by a LOCF imputation method.
  • FIG. 13 is a graph depicting mean change from baseline in F-VASI score by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 14 is a graph depicting mean percentage change from baseline in F-VASI score by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 15 is a graph depicting mean change from baseline in T-VASI score by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 16 is a graph depicting mean percentage change from baseline in T-VASI score by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 17 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving T-VASI50 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 18 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving T-VASI50 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period by a LOCF imputation method.
  • FIG. 19 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving T-VASI25 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 20 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving T-VASI25 response by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period by a LOCF imputation method.
  • FIG. 21 is a graph depicting mean change from baseline in T-BSA score by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 22 is a graph depicting mean percentage change from baseline in T-BSA score by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 23 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving T-VASI25 response (head and neck only) by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 24 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving T-VASI50 response (head and neck only) by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 25 is a graph depicting the proportion of subjects achieving T-VASI75 response (head and neck only) by visit and treatment group at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 26 is a graph depicting mean change from baseline in T-VASI score (head and neck only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 27 is a graph depicting mean percentage change from baseline in T-VASI score (head and neck only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 28 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI25 response (hands only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 29 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI50 response (hands only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 30 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI75 response (hands only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 31 is a graph depicting mean change from baseline in T-VASI score (hands only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 32 is a graph depicting mean percentage change from baseline in T-VASI score (hands only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 33 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI25 response (upper extremities only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 34 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI50 response (upper extremities only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 35 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI75 response (upper extremities only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 36 is a graph depicting mean change from baseline in T-VASI score (upper extremities only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 37 is a graph depicting mean percentage change from baseline in T-VASI score (upper extremities only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 38 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI25 response (trunk only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 39 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI50 response (trunk only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 40 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI75 response (trunk only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 41 is a graph depicting mean change from baseline in T-VASI score (trunk only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 42 is a graph depicting mean percentage change from baseline in T-VASI score trunk only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 43 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI50 response (trunk only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 44 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI25 response (trunk only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 45 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI75 response (trunk only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 46 is a graph depicting mean change from baseline in T-VASI score (trunk only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 47 is a graph depicting mean percentage change from baseline in T-VASI score trunk only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 48 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI50 response (feet only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 49 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI25 response (feet only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 50 is a graph depicting proportion of T-VASI75 response (feet only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 51 is a graph depicting mean change from baseline in T-VASI score (feet only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 52 is a graph depicting mean percentage change from baseline in T-VASI score (feet only) by visit and treatment group at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order) for the intent-to-treat subjects population in the double blind period.
  • FIG. 53 is a table showing p-values from Fisher Exact Test for T-VASI25, T-VASI50, and T-VASI75 between combined group and vehicle group at Week 24.
  • FIG. 54 is a graph depicting T-VASI50 response for patients who treated all depigmented skin at Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 34, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order).
  • T-VASI50 response is reported for the subset of patients with baseline T-BSA ⁇ 20% because treatment was limited to lesions constituting ⁇ 20% of T-BSA.
  • FIG. 55 is a graph depicting mean percentage change in F-BSA from baseline at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream (bars for each group shown consecutive order).
  • FIG. 56 depicts graphs of F-PhGVA (A) and T-PhGVA (B) by disease category at baseline, Week 24, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream. Bars are shown from bottom to top: Clear (C), Almost Clear (AC), Mild Disease (MiD), Moderate Disease (MoD), Severe Disease (SD), Missing (M). For A/baseline: veh, 0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, 1.5% BID (MiD, MoD, SD).
  • veh veh (MiD, MoD, SD, M), 0.15% QD (AC, MiD, MoD, M), 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, 1.5% BID (AC, MiD, MoD, SD, M).
  • A/Week 52 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD (C, AC, MiD, MoD, SD), 1.5% BID (AC, MiD, MoD, SD).
  • B/baseline veh, 0.15% QD, 0.5% QD (MiD, MoD, SD), 1.5% QD (MoD, SD), 1.5% BID (MiD, MoD).
  • FIG. 57 depicts graphs of F-PaGVA (A) and T-PaGVA (B) by disease category at baseline, Week 24, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream. Bars are shown from bottom to top: No White Patches (NW), Mild (Mi), Moderate (Mo), Severe (S), Very Severe (VS), Missing (M). For A/baseline: veh, 0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, 1.5% BID (Mi, Mo, S, VS).
  • A/Week 24 veh, 0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, 1.5% BID (Mi, Mo, S, VS, M).
  • A/Week 52 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD (Mi, Mo, S, VS), 1.5% BID (NW, Mi, Mo, S, VS).
  • B/baseline veh, 0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, 1.5% BID (Mi, Mo, S, VS).
  • FIG. 58 depicts representative clinical images of patients at Day 1, Week 24, and Week 52 (left to right) for hands (top) and trunk (bottom).
  • FIG. 59 is a table of TEAEs through 52 weeks of treatment.
  • FIG. 60 is a graph depicting mean hemoglobin (g/L) at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream.
  • top line is 0.5% QD
  • middle line is 1.5% QD
  • bottom line is 1.5% BID.
  • FIG. 61 is a graph depicting mean platelets (10 9 /L) at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 34, Week 40, Week 46, and Week 52 for vehicle, 0.15% QD ruxolitinib cream, 0.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% QD ruxolitinib cream, and 1.5% BID ruxolitinib cream.
  • top line is 1.5% QD
  • middle line is 1.5% BID
  • bottom line is 0.5% QD.
  • FIG. 62 is a chart showing F-VASI50 response to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID at week 24 by patient demographics and skin type.
  • FIG. 63 is a chart showing F-VASI50 response to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID at Week 24 by baseline vitiligo lesion characteristics.
  • FIG. 64 is a chart showing F-VASI50 response to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID at Week 24 by disease characteristics and previous treatment.
  • Ruxolitinib (R)-3-(4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-3-cyclopentylpropanenitrile) (sometimes referred to as INCB018424), having the structure shown below, and its pharmaceutically acceptable salts have been previously been described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,598,257, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • Ruxolitinib phosphate is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,722,693, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • the present disclosure describes, inter alia, methods of treating generalized vitiligo using ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
  • the present invention provides for the treatment of patients suffering from vitiligo with ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, or 1.5% BID. All percentages are on a (w/w) basis of ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (e.g., ruxolitinib phosphate) in the cream, on a free base basis.
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (e.g., ruxolitinib phosphate) in the cream, on a free base basis.
  • the present disclosure provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 0.15% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, once per day.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 0.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, once per day.
  • the present disclosure provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, once per day.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day.
  • the patient is administered ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for up to 24 weeks.
  • the patient is administered ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for up to 52 weeks.
  • the patient is administered ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD for up to 24 weeks.
  • the patient is administered ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD for up to 52 weeks.
  • the patient is administered ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD for up to 24 weeks.
  • the patient is administered ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD for up to 52 weeks.
  • the patient is administered ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD for up to 24 weeks.
  • the patient is administered ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD for up to 52 weeks.
  • the present disclosure provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a cream containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day.
  • the cream contains 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis.
  • patients achieve a 25% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 90% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a Facial Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment response of 0 (no white patches) or 1 (mild) and at least a 1 point reduction from baseline. patients achieve a Facial Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
  • patients achieve a Total Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). In some embodiments, patients achieve a Patient global impression of change for vitiligo of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
  • the present disclosures provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a cream containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, once per day.
  • the cream contains 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis.
  • patients achieve a 25% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 90% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a Facial Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment response of 0 (no white patches) or 1 (mild) and at least a 1 point reduction from baseline. In some embodiments, patients achieve a Facial Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
  • patients achieve a Total Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). In some embodiments, patients achieve a Patient global impression of change for vitiligo of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
  • the present disclosure provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a cream containing about 0.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, once per day.
  • the cream contains 0.5% w/w ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis.
  • patients achieve a 25% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 90% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a Facial Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment response of 0 (no white patches) or 1 (mild) and at least a 1 point reduction from baseline. In some embodiments, wherein patients achieve a Facial Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
  • patients achieve a Total Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). In some embodiments, patients achieve a Patient global impression of change for vitiligo of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
  • the present disclosure provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a cream containing about 0.15% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, once per day.
  • the cream contains 0.15% w/w ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis.
  • patients achieve a 25% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • patients achieve a 90% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. In some embodiments, patients achieve a Facial Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment response of 0 (no white patches) or 1 (mild) and at least a 1 point reduction from baseline. In some embodiments, patients achieve a Facial Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
  • patients achieve a Total Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). In some embodiments, patients achieve a Patient global impression of change for vitiligo of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
  • the present disclosure provides treating vitiligo in a patient comprising topically administering a pharmaceutical composition (e.g., a cream) to an affected skin area of the patient, wherein the composition comprises about 0.15%, about 0.5%, or about 1.5% ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the composition (or cream) (w/w) on a free base basis.
  • a pharmaceutical composition e.g., a cream
  • the ruxolitinib, or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is ruxolitinib phosphate.
  • the composition is a cream.
  • the composition (or cream) comprises 0.15% ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis and is administered to the skin of the patient once-daily (QD).
  • the composition (or cream) comprises 0.5% ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis and is administered to the skin of the patient once-daily (QD).
  • the composition (or cream) comprises 1.5% ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis and is administered to the skin of the patient once-daily (QD).
  • the composition (or cream) comprises 1.5% ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis and is administered to the skin of the patient twice-daily (BID).
  • no more than 60 grams of the composition (or cream) is administered in a 4 day period.
  • the affected skin area of the patient is affected skin on the face of the patient.
  • the affected skin area of patients is affected skin area on the face and body of the patient.
  • the affected skin area of the patient is affected skin on the trunk of the patient.
  • the affected skin area of the patient is affected skin on the upper extremities.
  • the affected skin area of the patient is affected skin on the lower extremities.
  • the affected skin area of the patient is affected skin on the hands.
  • the affected skin area of the patient is affected skin on the feet.
  • the affected skin area of the patient is affected skin on the head and neck.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the head and neck. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the head and neck at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the upper extremities. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the upper extremities at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the hands. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the hands at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the feet. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the feet at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the head and neck. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the head and neck at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the upper extremities. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the upper extremities at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the hands.
  • the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the feet. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the feet at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the head and neck. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the head and neck at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the upper extremities. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the upper extremities at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the hands. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the hands at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the feet. In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the feet at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient suffers from generalized vitiligo.
  • the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo.
  • the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score. In some embodiments, the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score. In some embodiments, the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score. In some embodiments, the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 90% or greater improvement in Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score. In some embodiments, the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 90% or greater improvement in Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score. In some embodiments, the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score. In some embodiments, the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score. In some embodiments, the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 90% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score. In some embodiments, the patient suffers from segmental vitiligo and achieves a 90% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 4; or at Week 8; or at Week 12; or at Week 18; or at Week 24; or at Week 28; or at Week 34; or at Week 40; or at Week 46; or at Week 52.
  • the patient is white.
  • the patient is non-white.
  • the patient is female.
  • the patient is male.
  • the patient has Fitzpatrick scale Type I, II, or III skin type.
  • the patient has 1.5% or less facial BSA at baseline.
  • the patient has an F-VASI score of from 0.75 to less than 1.5 at baseline.
  • the patient has stable vitiligo at baseline.
  • the patient has progressive vitiligo at baseline.
  • a patient with progressive vitiligo experiences new lesions and/or other objective clinical signs of active disease (e.g., confetti-like macules and/or trichrome lesions).
  • the patient has a disease duration at baseline of at least 5 years.
  • the patient has a disease duration at baseline of at least 10 years.
  • the patient has a disease duration at baseline of at least 20 years.
  • the patient was previously treated with topical corticosteroids.
  • the patient has total BSA of 20% or lower.
  • the patient has total BSA of 10% or greater. In some embodiments, the patient has total BSA of greater than 10%.
  • the patient has total BSA of 15% or greater. In some embodiments, the patient has total BSA of greater than 15%.
  • the patient has total BSA of 20% or greater. In some embodiments, the patient has total BSA of greater than 20%.
  • the patient has long standing vitiligo.
  • the patient has a % facial body surface area affected by vitiligo (F-BSA) of greater than 1.5%.
  • the patient has a % facial body surface area affected by vitiligo (F-BSA) of greater than 1.5% and achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 24.
  • F-BSA % facial body surface area affected by vitiligo
  • the patient suffers from generalized vitiligo with depigmented area of: (i) 0.5% or greater body surface area (BSA) on the face, (ii) 3% or greater BSA on non-facial areas, and (iii) total body not exceeding 10% BSA.
  • BSA body surface area
  • the patient suffers from generalized vitiligo with depigmented area of: (i) 0.5% or greater body surface area (BSA) on the face, (ii) 3% or greater BSA on non-facial areas, and (iii) total body not exceeding 20% BSA.
  • BSA body surface area
  • Total % BSA (includes facial and nonfacial areas) afflicted by vitiligo can be approximated to the nearest 0.1% using the Palmar Method as guides, the palm plus 5 digits, with fingers tucked together and thumb tucked to the side (handprint), as 1% BSA and the thumb as 0.1% BSA.
  • the patient is an individual aged 12 years or older.
  • the patient is an individual aged 50 years or younger.
  • the patient is an individual aged 12 years to 50 years.
  • the patient is an adult.
  • the patient is an adolescent.
  • the patient has Fitzpatrick scale Type I or II skin type.
  • the patient has Fitzpatrick scale Type III, IV, V, or VI skin type.
  • the patient is not:
  • a patient with a non-generalized form of vitiligo including, but not limited to, segmental vitiligo
  • vitiligo including, but not limited to, segmental vitiligo
  • other differential diagnosis of vitiligo or other skin depigmentation disorder including, but not limited to piebaldism, pityriasis alba, leprosy, postinflammatory hypopigmentation, progressive macule hypomelanosis, nevus anemicus, chemical leukoderma, and tinea versicolor
  • skin depigmentation disorder including, but not limited to piebaldism, pityriasis alba, leprosy, postinflammatory hypopigmentation, progressive macule hypomelanosis, nevus anemicus, chemical leukoderma, and tinea versicolor
  • a patient who previously used (a) active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection; (b) a history of thrombosis (including deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or arterial thrombosis); (c) clinically significant or uncontrolled cardiac disease, including unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction within 6 months from Day 1 of study drug administration, New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure, and arrhythmia requiring therapy or uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure >150/90 mmHg); (d) current liver disease (including known hepatitis B or C, with hepatic or biliary abnormalities); (e) history of alcoholism or drug addiction within 1 year before screening or current alcohol or drug use that, in the opinion of a physician, will interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the administration schedule and treatment assessment; and (f) mental health institution by virtue of an order issued either by the judicial or the administrative authorities;
  • a patient having any of the laboratory values at screening (a) hemoglobin ( ⁇ 10 g/dL); (b) liver function tests: aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase ⁇ 2 ⁇ upper limit of normal; or alkaline phosphatase and/or bilirubin >1.5 ⁇ upper limit of normal; (c) Severe renal disease on dialysis (serum creatinine >2 mg/dL); (d) Clinically significant abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone or free T4 at screening as determined by a physician; or (e) positive serology test results at screening for HIV antibody;
  • the patient is not:
  • a patient with a non-generalized form of vitiligo including, but not limited to, segmental vitiligo
  • vitiligo including, but not limited to, segmental vitiligo
  • other differential diagnosis of vitiligo or other skin depigmentation disorder including, but not limited to piebaldism, pityriasis alba, leprosy, postinflammatory hypopigmentation, progressive macule hypomelanosis, nevus anemicus, chemical leukoderma, and tinea versicolor
  • skin depigmentation disorder including, but not limited to piebaldism, pityriasis alba, leprosy, postinflammatory hypopigmentation, progressive macule hypomelanosis, nevus anemicus, chemical leukoderma, and tinea versicolor
  • a patient who previously used (a) active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection; (b) a history of thrombosis (including deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or arterial thrombosis); (c) clinically significant or uncontrolled cardiac disease, including unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction within 6 months from Day 1 of study drug administration, New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure, and arrhythmia requiring therapy or uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure >150/90 mmHg); (d) current liver disease (including known hepatitis B or C, with hepatic or biliary abnormalities); (e) history of alcoholism or drug addiction within 1 year before screening or current alcohol or drug use that, in the opinion of a physician, will interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the administration schedule and treatment assessment; and (f) mental health institution by virtue of an order issued either by the judicial or the administrative authorities;
  • a patient having any of the laboratory values at screening (a) hemoglobin ( ⁇ 10 g/dL); (b) liver function tests: aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase ⁇ 2 ⁇ upper limit of normal; or alkaline phosphatase and/or bilirubin >1.5 ⁇ upper limit of normal; (c) Severe renal disease on dialysis (serum creatinine >2 mg/dL); (d) Clinically significant abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone or free T4 at screening as determined by a physician; or (e) positive serology test results at screening for HIV antibody;
  • the patient did not previously receive a JAK inhibitor, systemic or topical.
  • the method does not comprise administering a topical drug on the affected area (including but not limited to, corticosteroids, calcineurin, and phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors or retinoids). In some embodiments, the method does not comprise, within 1 week after initiation of treating with the composition (or cream), administering a topical drug on the affected area (including but not limited to, corticosteroids, calcineurin, and phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors or retinoids).
  • the method does not comprise administering melanocyte-stimulating agents (including but not limited to, afamelanotide), immunomodulating systemic medications (including but not limited to, corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine), any systemic therapies that could increase the skin sensitivity to UV/visible light or impact skin pigmentation (including but not limited to, tetracyclines and metoxypsoralens), and live vaccine.
  • melanocyte-stimulating agents including but not limited to, afamelanotide
  • immunomodulating systemic medications including but not limited to, corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine
  • any systemic therapies that could increase the skin sensitivity to UV/visible light or impact skin pigmentation (including but not limited to, tetracyclines and metoxypsoralens), and live vaccine.
  • the method does not comprise, within 4 weeks after initiation of treating with the composition (or cream), administering melanocyte-stimulating agents (including but not limited to, afamelanotide), immunomodulating systemic medications (including but not limited to, corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine), any systemic therapies that could increase the skin sensitivity to UV/visible light or impact skin pigmentation (including but not limited to, tetracyclines and metoxypsoralens), and live vaccine.
  • melanocyte-stimulating agents including but not limited to, afamelanotide
  • immunomodulating systemic medications including but not limited to, corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine
  • any systemic therapies that could increase the skin sensitivity to UV/visible light or impact skin pigmentation (including but not limited to, tetracyclines and metoxypsoralens), and live vaccine.
  • the method does not comprise administering laser or any kind of phototherapy (including but not limited to, a tanning bed or intentional UV exposure). In some embodiments, the method does not comprise, within 8 weeks after initiation of treating with the composition (or cream), laser or any kind of phototherapy (including but not limited to, a tanning bed or intentional UV exposure).
  • the method does not comprise administering a biologic for treatment of vitiligo. In some embodiments, the method does not comprise, within 12 weeks after initiation of treating with the composition (or cream), administering a biologic for treatment of vitiligo.
  • the patient previously received phototherapy e.g., including narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen ultraviolet A photochemotherapy, or excimer laser.
  • phototherapy e.g., including narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen ultraviolet A photochemotherapy, or excimer laser.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI50). In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI75). In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 90% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VAS 190.
  • the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI75) at week 24.
  • F-VASI75 Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI75) at week 52.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI50) at week 24.
  • F-VASI50 Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI50) at week 52.
  • F-VASI50 Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a 90% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI90) at week 24.
  • F-VASI90 Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a 90% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI90) at week 52.
  • F-VASI90 Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI25). In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI50). In some embodiments, the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI75).
  • the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI25) at week 24.
  • T-VASI25 Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI25) at week 52.
  • T-VASI25 Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI50) at week 24.
  • T-VASI50 Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI50) at week 52.
  • T-VASI50 Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI75) at week 24.
  • T-VASI75 Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI75) at week 52.
  • T-VASI75 Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
  • the patient achieves a score of 4 or 5 in Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS).
  • VNS is a patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success, which has a 5-point scale (Batchelor J M, Tan W, Tour S, Yong A, Montgomery A A, Thomas K S. Validation of the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale: a patient-reported outcome measure of vitiligo treatment success. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174:386-394): (1) More noticeable, (2) As noticeable, (3) Slightly less noticeable, (4) A lot less noticeable, and (5) No longer noticeable.
  • the patient achieves improvement in % facial body surface area affected by vitiligo (F-BSA) from baseline.
  • F-BSA vitiligo
  • the improvement in F-BSA from baseline is about 10 percentage points.
  • the improvement in F-BSA from baseline is about 15 percentage points.
  • the improvement in F-BSA from baseline is about 20 percentage points.
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating nonfacial vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • ruxolitinib e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient previously received phototherapy for vitiligo.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient had high inflammatory burden before the administering step.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the composition (e.g., a cream) is applied to the patient's hands, feet, or both.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient is a female and equal to or younger than 50 years of age.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • ruxolitinib containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient is a female and equal to or younger than 50 years of age.
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein patients who are female and equal to or younger than 50 years of age respond better after 24 weeks of administering the composition (e.g., a cream) than men of the same age.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient is a female.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • ruxolitinib containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient is a female.
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein patients who are female respond better after 24 weeks of administering the composition (e.g., a cream) than men.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient has had vitiligo for greater than 20 years before the administering step.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • ruxolitinib containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient has had vitiligo for greater than 20 years before the administering step.
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein patients who have had vitiligo for greater than 20 years before the administering step respond better after 24 weeks of administering the composition (e.g., a cream) than patients who have not had vitiligo for greater than 20 years before the administering step.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient has a skin type I-III.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • ruxolitinib containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient has a skin type I-III.
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient has a skin type I-II.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • ruxolitinib containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein patients having skin type I-III respond better after 24 weeks of administering the composition (e.g., a cream) than patients who do not have skin type I-III.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein there is no substantial difference in response between white patients and non-white patients.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patients have progressive vitiligo.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • ruxolitinib containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein there is no substantial difference in response between patients having BSA equal to or less than 20 and patients having BSA greater than 20.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • ruxolitinib containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof
  • the present disclosure further provides a method of treating vitiligo in a patient, comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a composition (e.g., a cream) containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient has a BSA greater than 20.
  • a composition e.g., a cream
  • ruxolitinib containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day; wherein the patient has a BSA greater than 20.
  • the severity of vitiligo can be assessed by the physician using the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (PhGVA), which has a 5-point scale as shown in the table below. Response can be reported for face or overall (F-PhGVA or T-PhGVA).
  • PrGVA Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment
  • the patient achieves a Patient global impression of change for vitiligo of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
  • the PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the patient on a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo: (1) Very much improved, (2) Much improved, (3) Minimally improved, (4) No change, (5) Minimally worse, (6) Much worse, and (7) Very much worse.
  • Response can be reported for face or total body (F-PaGVA or T-PaGVA)
  • the mean plasma concentration of ruxolitinib is less than 150 nM after two hours of administering BID.
  • the mean plasma concentration of ruxolitinib is less than 120 nM after two hours of administering BID.
  • the mean plasma concentration of ruxolitinib is less than 80 nM after two hours of administering QD.
  • the mean plasma concentration of ruxolitinib is less than 60 nM after two hours of administering QD.
  • human subject refers to any animal, including mammals, preferably mice, rats, other rodents, rabbits, dogs, cats, swine, cattle, sheep, horses, or primates, and most preferably humans.
  • the patient is a human.
  • the patient is a human aged 12 years or older.
  • patients means one patient. In some embodiments, “patients” means a patient population. In some embodiments, “patients” means one or more patients. In some embodiments, “a patient” means one patient. In some embodiments, “a patient” means a patient population. In some embodiments, “a patient” means one or more patients.
  • the pharmaceutical composition is a cream formulation.
  • the cream formulation is an oil-in-water emulsion.
  • the cream formulation is described in U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2015/0250790, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • the term “emulsifier component” refers, in one aspect, to a substance, or mixtures of substances that maintains an element or particle in suspension within a fluid medium.
  • the emulsifier component allows an oil phase to form an emulsion when combined with water.
  • the emulsifier component refers to one or more non-ionic surfactants.
  • the oil-in-water formulations also displayed a general trend of increased permeability when the strength of the solubilized cream was increased from 0.5% w/w to 1.5% w/w.
  • the formulations described herein are relatively simple to manufacture with a repeatable process of formulation. The resultant product is easily packaged. The formulations appear to have good stability and relatively consistent permeation profiles.
  • the oil component is present in an amount of about 10% to about 40% by weight of the formulation.
  • the oil component is present in an amount of about 17% to about 27% by weight of the formulation.
  • the oil component is present in an amount of about 20% to about 27% by weight of the formulation.
  • the oil component is present in an amount of about 17% to about 24% by weight of the formulation.
  • the oil component comprises one or more substances independently selected from petrolatums, fatty alcohols, mineral oils, triglycerides, and silicone oils.
  • the oil component comprises an occlusive agent component.
  • the occlusive agent component is present in an amount of about 2% to about 15% by weight of the formulation.
  • the occlusive agent component is present in an amount of about 5% to about 10% by weight of the formulation.
  • occlusive agent component refers to a hydrophobic agent or mixtures of hydrophobic agents that form an occlusive film on skin that reduces transepidermal water loss (TEWL) by preventing evaporation of water from the stratum corneum.
  • TEWL transepidermal water loss
  • the occlusive agent component comprises one or more substances selected from fatty acids (e.g., lanolin acid), fatty alcohols (e.g., lanolin alcohol), hydrocarbon oils & waxes (e.g., petrolatum), polyhydric alcohols (e.g., propylene glycol), silicones (e.g., dimethicone), sterols (e.g., cholesterol).
  • fatty acids e.g., lanolin acid
  • fatty alcohols e.g., lanolin alcohol
  • hydrocarbon oils & waxes e.g., petrolatum
  • polyhydric alcohols e.g., propylene glycol
  • silicones e.g., dimethicone
  • sterols e.g., cholesterol
  • vegetable or animal fat e.g., cocoa butter
  • vegetable wax e.g., Carnauba wax
  • wax ester e.g., bees wax
  • the occlusive agent component comprises one or more substances selected from lanolin acid fatty alcohols, lanolin alcohol, petrolatum, propylene glycol, dimethicone, cholesterol, cocoa butter, Carnauba wax, and bees wax.
  • the occlusive agent component comprises petrolatum.
  • the occlusive agent component comprises white petrolatum.
  • the oil component comprises a stiffening agent component.
  • the stiffening agent component is present in an amount of about 2% to about 8% by weight of the formulation.
  • the stiffening agent component is present in an amount of about 3% to about 6% by weight of the formulation.
  • the stiffening agent component is present in an amount of about 4% to about 7% by weight of the formulation.
  • the term “stiffening agent component” refers to a substance or mixture of substances that increases the viscosity and/or consistency of the formulation or improves the rheology of the formulation.
  • the stiffening agent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from fatty alcohols.
  • the stiffening agent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from C 12-20 fatty alcohols.
  • the stiffening agent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from C 16-18 fatty alcohols.
  • the stiffening agent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from cetyl alcohol and stearyl alcohol.
  • the oil component comprises an emollient component.
  • the emollient component is present in an amount of about 5% to about 15% by weight of the formulation.
  • the emollient component is present in an amount of about 7% to about 13% by weight of the formulation.
  • the term “emollient component” refers to an agent that softens or soothes the skin or soothes an irritated internal surface.
  • the emollient component comprises one or more substances independently selected from mineral oils and triglycerides.
  • the emollient component comprises one or more substances independently selected from light mineral oil and medium chain triglycerides.
  • the emollient component comprises one or more substances independently selected from light mineral oil, medium chain triglycerides, and dimethicone.
  • the water is present in an amount of about 35% to about 65% by weight of the formulation.
  • the water is present in an amount of about 40% to about 60% by weight of the formulation.
  • the water is present in an amount of about 45% to about 55% by weight of the formulation.
  • the emulsifier component is present in an amount of about 1% to about 9% by weight of the formulation.
  • the emulsifier component is present in an amount of about 2% to about 6% by weight of the formulation.
  • the emulsifier component is present in an amount of about 3% to about 5% by weight of the formulation.
  • the emulsifier component is present in an amount of about 4% to about 7% by weight of the formulation.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises an emulsifier component and a stiffening agent component, wherein the combined amount of emulsifier component and stiffening agent component is at least about 8% by weight of the formulation.
  • the emulsifier component comprises one or more substances independently selected from glyceryl fatty esters and sorbitan fatty esters.
  • the emulsifier component comprises one or more substances independently selected from glyceryl stearate, and polysorbate 20.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation further comprises a stabilizing agent component.
  • the stabilizing agent component is present in an amount of about 0.05% to about 5% by weight of the formulation.
  • the stabilizing agent component is present in an amount of about 0.1% to about 2% by weight of the formulation.
  • the stabilizing agent component is present in an amount of about 0.3 to about 0.5% by weight of the formulation.
  • the term “stabilizing agent component” refers to a substance or mixture of substances that improves the stability of the pharmaceutical formulation and/or the compatibility of the components in the formulation. In some embodiments, the stabilizing agent component prevents agglomeration of the emulsion and stabilizes the droplets in the oil-in-water emulsion.
  • the stabilizing agent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from polysaccharides.
  • the stabilizing agent component comprises xanthan gum.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation further comprises a solvent component.
  • the solvent component is present in an amount of about 10% to about 35% by weight of the formulation.
  • the solvent component is present in an amount of about 15% to about 30% by weight of the formulation.
  • the solvent component is present in an amount of about 20% to about 25% by weight of the formulation.
  • solvent component is a liquid substance or mixture of liquid substances capable of dissolving ruxolitinib or other substances in the formulation.
  • the solvent component is a liquid substance or mixture of liquid substances in which ruxolitinib, or its pharmaceutically acceptable salt, has reasonable solubility.
  • solubilities of ruxolitinib (free base) or its phosphate salt are reported in Table 21 of U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2015/0250790.
  • a solvent is a substance or mixture thereof, in which ruxolitinib, or its pharmaceutically acceptable salt (whichever is used), has a solubility of at least about 10 mg/mL or greater, at least about 15 mg/mL or greater, or at least about 20 mg/mL or greater, when measured as described in Example 4 of U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2015/0250790.
  • the solvent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from alkylene glycols and polyalkylene glycols.
  • the solvent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from propylene glycol and polyethylene glycol.
  • the therapeutic agent is present in an amount of about 0.5% to about 1.5% by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the therapeutic agent is present in an amount of about 0.5% by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the therapeutic agent is present in an amount of about 1% by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the therapeutic agent is present in an amount of about 1.5% by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the therapeutic agent is (R)-3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propanenitrile phosphate.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the oil component comprises one or more substances independently selected from petrolatums, fatty alcohols, mineral oils, triglycerides, and dimethicones;
  • the emulsifier component comprises one or more substances independently selected from glyceryl fatty esters and sorbitan fatty esters;
  • the solvent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from alkylene glycols and polyalkylene glycols;
  • the stabilizing agent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from polysaccharides.
  • the oil component comprises one or more substances independently selected from white petrolatum, cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, light mineral oil, medium chain triglycerides, and dimethicone;
  • the emulsifier component comprises one or more substances independently selected from glyceryl stearate and polysorbate 20;
  • the solvent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from propylene glycol and polyethylene glycol;
  • the stabilizing agent component comprises xanthan gum.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation comprises:
  • ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, by weight of the formulation on a free base basis.
  • the combined amount of the stiffening agent component and the emulsifier component is at least about 8% by weight of the formulation.
  • the occlusive agent component comprises a petrolatum
  • the stiffening agent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from one or more fatty alcohols
  • the emollient component comprises one or more substances independently selected from mineral oils and triglycerides;
  • the emulsifier component comprises one or more substances independently selected from glyceryl fatty esters and sorbitan fatty esters;
  • the stabilizing agent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from polysaccharides.
  • the solvent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from alkylene glycols and polyalkylene glycols.
  • the occlusive agent component comprises white petrolatum
  • the stiffening agent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from cetyl alcohol and stearyl alcohol;
  • the emollient component comprises one or more substances independently selected from light mineral oil, medium chain triglycerides, and dimethicone;
  • the emulsifier component comprises one or more substances independently selected from glyceryl stearate and polysorbate 20;
  • the stabilizing agent component comprises xanthan gum
  • the solvent component comprises one or more substances independently selected from propylene glycol and polyethylene glycol.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation further comprises an antimicrobial preservative component.
  • the antimicrobial preservative component is present in an amount of about 0.05% to about 3% by weight of the formulation.
  • the antimicrobial preservative component is present in an amount of about 0.1% to about 1% by weight of the formulation.
  • antimicrobial preservative component is a substance or mixtures of substances which inhibits microbial growth in the formulation.
  • the antimicrobial preservative component comprises one or more substances independently selected from alkyl parabens and phenoxyethanol.
  • the antimicrobial preservative component comprises one or more substances independently selected from methyl paraben, propyl paraben, and phenoxyethanol.
  • the pharmaceutical formulation further comprises a chelating agent component.
  • chelating agent component refers to a compound or mixtures of compounds that has the ability to bind strongly with metal ions.
  • the chelating agent component comprises edetate disodium.
  • % by weight of the formulation on a free base basis” of ruxolitinib, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof means that the % w/w is calculated based on the weight of ruxolitinib in the total formulation.
  • 0.5% w/w on a free base basis” of ruxolitinib phosphate means that for 100 grams of total formulation, there are 0.66 grams of ruxolitinib phosphate in the formulation (which equates to 0.5 grams of the free base, ruxolitinib).
  • the components are present in exactly the ranges specified (e.g., the term “about” is not present). In some embodiments, “about” means plus or minus 10% of the value.
  • each component of the formulation comprises a different substance or mixture of substances.
  • component can mean one substance or a mixture of substances.
  • fatty acid refers to an aliphatic acid that is saturated or unsaturated. In some embodiments, the fatty acid is in a mixture of different fatty acids. In some embodiments, the fatty acid has between about eight to about thirty carbons on average. In some embodiments, the fatty acid has about 12 to 20, 14-20, or 16-18 carbons on average.
  • Suitable fatty acids include, but are not limited to, cetyl acid, stearic acid, lauric acid, myristic acid, erucic acid, palmitic acid, palmitoleic acid, capric acid, caprylic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, hydroxystearic acid, 12-hydroxystearic acid, cetostearic acid, isostearic acid, sesquioleic acid, sesqui-9-octadecanoic acid, sesquiisooctadecanoic acid, behenic acid, isobehenic acid, and arachidonic acid, or mixtures thereof.
  • fatty alcohol refers to an aliphatic alcohol that is saturated or unsaturated. In some embodiments, the fatty alcohol is in a mixture of different fatty alcohols. In some embodiments, the fatty alcohol has between about 12 to about 20, about 14 to about 20, or about 16 to about 18 carbons on average. Suitable fatty alcohols include, but are not limited to, stearyl alcohol, lauryl alcohol, palmityl alcohol, cetyl alcohol, capryl alcohol, caprylyl alcohol, oleyl alcohol, linolenyl alcohol, arachidonic alcohol, behenyl alcohol, isobehenyl alcohol, selachyl alcohol, chimyl alcohol, and linoleyl alcohol, or mixtures thereof.
  • polyalkylene glycol employed alone or in combination with other terms, refers to a polymer containing oxyalkylene monomer units, or copolymer of different oxyalkylene monomer units, wherein the alkylene group has 2 to 6, 2 to 4, or 2 to 3 carbon atoms.
  • oxyalkylene employed alone or in combination with other terms, refers to a group of formula —O-alkylene-.
  • the polyalkylene glycol is polyethylene glycol.
  • sorbitan fatty ester includes products derived from sorbitan or sorbitol and fatty acids and, optionally, poly(ethylene glycol) units, including sorbitan esters and polyethoxylated sorbitan esters.
  • the sorbitan fatty ester is a polyethoxylated sorbitan ester.
  • sorbitan ester refers to a compound, or mixture of compounds, derived from the esterification of sorbitol and at least one fatty acid.
  • Fatty acids useful for deriving the sorbitan esters include, but are not limited to, those described herein.
  • Suitable sorbitan esters include, but are not limited to, the SpanTM series (available from Uniqema), which includes Span 20 (sorbitan monolaurate), 40 (sorbitan monopalmitate), 60 (sorbitan monostearate), 65 (sorbitan tristearate), 80 (sorbitan monooleate), and 85 (sorbitan trioleate).
  • Other suitable sorbitan esters include those listed in R. C. Rowe and P. J. Shesky, Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, (2006), 5th ed., which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • polyethoxylated sorbitan ester refers to a compound, or mixture thereof, derived from the ethoxylation of a sorbitan ester.
  • the polyoxethylene portion of the compound can be between the fatty ester and the sorbitan moiety.
  • sorbitan ester refers to a compound, or mixture of compounds, derived from the esterification of sorbitol and at least one fatty acid.
  • Fatty acids useful for deriving the polyethoyxlated sorbitan esters include, but are not limited to, those described herein.
  • the polyoxyethylene portion of the compound or mixture has about 2 to about 200 oxyethylene units.
  • the polyoxyethylene portion of the compound or mixture has about 2 to about 100 oxyethylene units. In some embodiments, the polyoxyethylene portion of the compound or mixture has about 4 to about 80 oxyethylene units. In some embodiments, the polyoxyethylene portion of the compound or mixture has about 4 to about 40 oxyethylene units. In some embodiments, the polyoxyethylene portion of the compound or mixture has about 4 to about 20 oxyethylene units.
  • Suitable polyethoxylated sorbitan esters include, but are not limited to the TweenTM series (available from Uniqema), which includes Tween 20 (POE(20) sorbitan monolaurate), 21 (POE(4) sorbitan monolaurate), 40 (POE(20) sorbitan monopalmitate), 60 (POE(20) sorbitan monostearate), 60K (POE(20) sorbitan monostearate), 61 (POE(4) sorbitan monostearate), 65 (POE(20) sorbitan tristearate), 80 (POE(20) sorbitan monooleate), 80K (POE(20) sorbitan monooleate), 81 (POE(5) sorbitan monooleate), and 85 (POE(20) sorbitan trioleate).
  • TweenTM series available from Uniqema
  • Tween 20 POE(20) sorbitan monolaurate
  • 21 POE(4)
  • POE polyoxyethylene
  • the number following the POE abbreviation refers to the number of oxyethylene repeat units in the compound.
  • Other suitable polyethoxylated sorbitan esters include the polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid esters listed in R. C. Rowe and P. J. Shesky, Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, (2006), 5th ed., which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • the polyethoxylated sorbitan ester is a polysorbate.
  • the polyethoxylated sorbitan ester is polysorbate 20.
  • the term “glyceryl fatty esters” refers to mono-, di- or triglycerides of fatty acids.
  • the glyceryl fatty esters may be optionally substituted with sulfonic acid groups, or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
  • Suitable fatty acids for deriving glycerides of fatty acids include, but are not limited to, those described herein.
  • the glyceryl fatty ester is a mono-glyceride of a fatty acid having 12 to 18 carbon atoms.
  • the glyceryl fatty ester is glyceryl stearate.
  • triglycerides refers to a triglyceride of a fatty acid. In some embodiments, the triglyceride is medium chain triglycerides.
  • alkylene glycol refers to a group of formula —O-alkylene-, wherein the alkylene group has 2 to 6, 2 to 4, or 2 to 3 carbon atoms.
  • the alkylene glycol is propylene glycol (1,2-propanediol).
  • polyethylene glycol refers to a polymer containing ethylene glycol monomer units of formula —O—CH 2 —CH 2 —.
  • Suitable polyethylene glycols may have a free hydroxyl group at each end of the polymer molecule, or may have one or more hydroxyl groups etherified with a lower alkyl, e.g., a methyl group.
  • derivatives of polyethylene glycols having esterifiable carboxy groups are also suitable.
  • Polyethylene glycols useful in the present invention can be polymers of any chain length or molecular weight, and can include branching. In some embodiments, the average molecular weight of the polyethylene glycol is from about 200 to about 9000.
  • the average molecular weight of the polyethylene glycol is from about 200 to about 5000. In some embodiments, the average molecular weight of the polyethylene glycol is from about 200 to about 900. In some embodiments, the average molecular weight of the polyethylene glycol is about 400.
  • Suitable polyethylene glycols include, but are not limited to polyethylene glycol-200, polyethylene glycol-300, polyethylene glycol-400, polyethylene glycol-600, and polyethylene glycol-900. The number following the dash in the name refers to the average molecular weight of the polymer.
  • the biological sample is blood, serum, plasma, urine, spinal fluid, saliva, lacrimal fluid, or sweat. In some embodiments, the biological sample is blood, serum, or plasma.
  • the concentration of the protein is measured by an immunological method (e.g., selected from the group consisting of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, enzyme immunoassay, radioimmunoassay, chemiluminescent immunoassay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, latex turbidimetric immunoassay, latex photometric immunoassay, immuno-chromatographic assay, and western blotting).
  • an immunological method e.g., selected from the group consisting of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, enzyme immunoassay, radioimmunoassay, chemiluminescent immunoassay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, latex turbidimetric immunoassay, latex photometric immunoassay, immuno-chromatographic assay, and western blotting.
  • the concentration of the protein is measured by mass spectrometry.
  • baseline concentration of protein refers to the concentration of a protein in a subject prior to initiation of treatment with ruxolitinib.
  • reduced concentration means a concentration of the protein being analyzed that is lower than the concentration of that protein in a control or in a previous sample.
  • the concentration of the protein being analyzed can be at least 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 25, 50, 75, or 100 times lower, or at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 200%, 300%, 400%, 500%, 600%, 700%, 800%, 900%, 1,000%, 1,500%, 2,000%, 2,500%, 3,000%, 3,500%, 4,000%, 4,500%, or 5,000% lower, than the concentration of that protein in a control.
  • the term “increased concentration” means a concentration of the protein being analyzed that is higher than the concentration of that protein in a control or in a previous sample.
  • the concentration of the protein being analyzed can be at least 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 25, 50, 75, or 100 times higher, or at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 200%, 300%, 400%, 500%, 600%, 700%, 800%, 900%, 1,000%, 1,500%, 2,000%, 2,500%, 3,000%, 3,500%, 4,000%, 4,500%, or 5,000% higher, than the concentration of that protein in a control.
  • the term “respond to a therapy” means that the subject administered with the therapy shows a positive response to ruxolitinib therapy provided.
  • One or more additional pharmaceutical agents such as, for example, anti-inflammatory agents, steroids, immunosuppressants, as well as Bcr-Abl, Flt-3, RAF and FAK kinase inhibitors such as, for example, those described in WO 2006/056399, or other agents can be used in combination with the formulations of the present invention for treatment of vitiligo.
  • the one or more additional pharmaceutical agents can be administered to a patient simultaneously or sequentially.
  • Example steroids include corticosteroids such as dexamethasone or prednisone.
  • Example Bcr-Abl inhibitors include the compounds, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, of the genera and species disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,521,184, WO 04/005281, and U.S. Ser. No. 60/578,491.
  • Example suitable Flt-3 inhibitors include compounds, and their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, as disclosed in WO 03/037347, WO 03/099771, and WO 04/046120.
  • Example suitable RAF inhibitors include compounds, and their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, as disclosed in WO 00/09495 and WO 05/028444.
  • Example suitable FAK inhibitors include compounds, and their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, as disclosed in WO 04/080980, WO 04/056786, WO 03/024967, WO 01/064655, WO 00/053595, and WO 01/014402.
  • the formulations of the invention can be used in combination with one or more other kinase inhibitors including imatinib, particularly for treating patients resistant to imatinib or other kinase inhibitors.
  • a corticosteroid such as dexamethasone is administered to a patient in combination with the compound of the invention where the dexamethasone is administered intermittently as opposed to continuously.
  • a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a cream containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day.
  • the cream contains 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis.
  • the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • any one of embodiments 1-2 wherein the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. 6. The method of any one of embodiments 1-2, wherein the patient achieves a 90% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. 7. The method of any one of embodiments 1-6, wherein the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. 8. The method of any one of embodiments 1-6, wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. 9. The method of any one of embodiments 1-6, wherein the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. 10.
  • any one of embodiments 1-9 wherein the patient achieves a Facial Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment response of 0 (no white patches) or 1 (mild) and at least a 1 point reduction from baseline. 11. The method of any one of embodiments 1-9, wherein the patient achieves a Facial Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). 12. The method of any one of embodiments 1-9, wherein the patient achieves a Total Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). 13. The method of any one of embodiments 1-9, wherein the patient achieves a Patient global impression of change for vitiligo of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
  • 30. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities at Week 24.
  • 31. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities at Week 24.
  • 32. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities at Week 52.
  • 33. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities at Week 52. 34.
  • F-BSA % facial body surface area affected by vitiligo
  • 51. The method of any one of embodiments 1-50, wherein the patient is an individual aged 50 years old or less.
  • 52. The method of any one of embodiments 1-51, wherein the patient is female.
  • a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a cream containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day.
  • the cream contains 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis.
  • 56. The method of embodiment 54 wherein patients achieve a 25% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • 57. The method of embodiment 54 wherein patients achieve a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • 58. The method of embodiment 54 wherein patients achieve a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. 59.
  • 90. The method of embodiment 80 wherein patients achieve a Facial Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
  • 91. The method of embodiment 80 wherein patients achieve a Total Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
  • a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising administering to the patient in need thereof a cream containing about 0.15% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, once per day.
  • a cream containing about 0.15% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, once per day.
  • the cream contains 0.15% w/w ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis.
  • 95 The method of embodiment 93 wherein patients achieve a 25% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.
  • 97
  • a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising topically administering to an affected skin area of the patient in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day. 107.
  • a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising topically administering to an affected skin area of the patient in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day, wherein the affected area is selected from lower extremities, trunk, hands, upper extremities, and feet.
  • a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day, wherein the affected area is selected from lower extremities, trunk, hands, upper extremities, and feet.
  • the method of embodiment 108 wherein the affected skin area is the feet of the patient.
  • 114 The method of any one of embodiments 108-113, wherein the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index on the affected skin area.
  • 115 The method of any one of embodiments 108-114, wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index on the affected skin area.
  • 116 The method of any one of embodiments 108-115, wherein the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index on the affected skin area.
  • any one of embodiments 108-116 wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the hands of the patient at Week 4, Week 8, Week 18, Week 24, Week 32, Week 38, Week 42, Week 48, or Week 52.
  • any one of embodiments 108-118 wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the feet of the patient at Week 4, Week 8, Week 18, Week 24, Week 32, Week 38, Week 42, Week 48, or Week 52.
  • the method of any one of embodiments 108-119 wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities of the patient at Week 4, Week 8, Week 18, Week 24, Week 32, Week 38, Week 42, Week 48, or Week 52.
  • 121 121.
  • the affected area is selected from lower extremities, trunk, hands, upper extremities, and feet;
  • the patient suffers from generalized vitiligo with depigmented area of: (i) 0.5% or greater body surface area (BSA) on the face, (ii) 3% or greater BSA on non-facial areas, and (iii) not exceeding 10% BSA on total body area;
  • BSA body surface area
  • the method does not comprise administering laser or any kind of phototherapy.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the affected skin area.
  • the affected area is selected from lower extremities, trunk, and feet;
  • the patient suffers from generalized vitiligo with depigmented area of: (i) 0.5% or greater body surface area (BSA) on the face, (ii) 3% or greater BSA on non-facial areas, and (iii) not exceeding 10% BSA on total body area;
  • BSA body surface area
  • the method does not comprise administering laser or any kind of phototherapy.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the affected skin area.
  • a method of treating generalized vitiligo in a patient comprising topically administering to an affected skin area of the patient in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day, wherein the patient has a vitiligo disease duration of at least 20 years and wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Scoring Index.
  • the method of embodiment 124, wherein the affected area is face.
  • the affected area is head and neck 127.
  • the method of embodiment 124, wherein the affected area is selected from lower extremities, trunk, hands, upper extremities, and feet. 128.
  • a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising topically administering to an affected skin area of the patient in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day, wherein the patient does not receive phototherapy for vitiligo during the administration of the pharmaceutical composition.
  • a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day, wherein the patient does not receive phototherapy for vitiligo during the administration of the pharmaceutical composition.
  • any one of embodiments 106-138 wherein the patient has at least 1.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo (F-BSA) and achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 24.
  • F-BSA facial body surface area affected by vitiligo
  • 140. The method of any one of embodiments 106-139, wherein the patient has 1.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo (F-BSA) and achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 52.
  • 141 The method of any one of embodiments 106-140, wherein the patient has 1.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo (F-BSA) and achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 24.
  • T-BSA vitiligo
  • 150 The method of any one of embodiments 106-149, wherein the patient has been clinically diagnosed with vitiligo.
  • 151 The method of any one of embodiments 106-150, wherein the patient is aged 12 years old and older.
  • 154 The method of any one of embodiments 106-150, wherein the patient is aged 50 years old or less. 155.
  • the method of any one of embodiments 106-162, wherein a hemoglobin level of the patient at Week 52 is similar to a hemoglobin level of the patient at baseline.
  • any one of embodiments 106-164 wherein there is no substantial difference in response between patients having baseline total body surface area affected by vitiligo equal to or less than 20% and patients having baseline total body surface area affected by vitiligo greater than 20%.
  • 166 The method of any one of embodiments 106-165, wherein the ruxolitinib, or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, is ruxolitinib phosphate.
  • 167 The method of any one of embodiments 106-166, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a cream.
  • the cream is an oil-in-water emulsion. 169.
  • a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising topically administering to an affected skin area of the patient in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day, wherein the affected area is selected from lower extremities, trunk, hands, upper extremities, and feet. 175.
  • the method of embodiment 174, wherein the method does not comprise administering laser or any kind of phototherapy.
  • the method of embodiment 174, wherein the affected skin area is the lower extremities of the patient. 178.
  • the method of embodiment 174, wherein the affected skin area is the trunk of the patient. 179.
  • the method of embodiment 174, wherein the affected skin area is the hands of the patient. 180.
  • the method of embodiment 174, wherein the affected skin area is the upper extremities of the patient. 181.
  • the method of embodiment 174, wherein the affected skin area is the feet of the patient. 182.
  • the method of embodiment 174, wherein the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index on the affected skin area.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index on the affected skin area. 184.
  • the method of embodiment 174 wherein the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index on the affected skin area.
  • the method of embodiment 174 wherein the patient does not administer any other agents for the treatment of vitiligo. 190.
  • the method of embodiment 174, wherein the patient is 18 years old to 75 years old. 191.
  • the method of embodiment 174 wherein the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the feet of the patient at Week 4, Week 8, Week 18, Week 24, Week 32, Week 38, Week 42, Week 48, or Week 52. 194.
  • the method of embodiment 174 wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the hands of the patient at Week 4, Week 8, Week 18, Week 24, Week 32, Week 38, Week 42, Week 48, or Week 52.
  • the method of embodiment 174 wherein the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the lower extremities, upper extremities, feet, hands, or trunk of the patient at Week 4, Week 8, Week 18, Week 24, Week 32, Week 38, Week 42, Week 48, or Week 52.
  • the pharmaceutical composition is a cream.
  • the method of embodiment 202, wherein the cream is an oil-in-water emulsion.
  • the cream contains 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis.
  • the method of embodiment 204, wherein the cream has a pH of about 2.8 to about 3.9. 206.
  • T-BSA total body surface area affected by vitiligo
  • the affected area is selected from lower extremities, trunk, hands, upper extremities, and feet;
  • the patient is aged 18 or older;
  • the patient suffers from generalized vitiligo with depigmented area of: (i) 0.5% or greater body surface area (BSA) on the face, (ii) 3% or greater BSA on non-facial areas, and (iii) not exceeding 10% BSA on total body area;
  • BSA body surface area
  • the method does not comprise administering laser or any kind of phototherapy.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the affected skin area.
  • a method of treating generalized vitiligo in a patient comprising topically administering to an affected skin area of the patient in need thereof a cream comprising 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis, twice per day, wherein:
  • the affected area is selected from lower extremities, trunk, and feet;
  • the patient is aged 18 or older;
  • the patient suffers from generalized vitiligo with depigmented area of: (i) 0.5% or greater body surface area (BSA) on the face, (ii) 3% or greater BSA on non-facial areas, and (iii) not exceeding 10% BSA on total body area;
  • BSA body surface area
  • the method does not comprise administering laser or any kind of phototherapy.
  • the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score on the affected skin area.
  • a method of treating generalized vitiligo in a patient comprising topically administering to an affected skin area of the patient in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day, wherein the patient has a vitiligo disease duration of at least 20 years and wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Scoring Index.
  • the ruxolitinib, or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is ruxolitinib phosphate.
  • the pharmaceutical composition is a cream. 212.
  • the method of embodiment 211, wherein the cream is an oil-in-water emulsion. 213.
  • the method of embodiment 212, wherein the cream contains 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib phosphate on a free base basis. 214.
  • the method of embodiment 213 wherein the cream has a pH of about 2.8 to about 3.9. 215.
  • the method of embodiment 209, wherein the patient has at least 0.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo. 216.
  • the method of embodiment 209, wherein the patient has at least 3% non-facial body surface area affected by vitiligo. 217.
  • the method of embodiment 209 wherein the patient suffers from generalized vitiligo with depigmented area of: (i) at least 0.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo and (ii) at least 3% non-facial body surface area affected by vitiligo. 218.
  • the method of embodiment 209 wherein the patient achieves a 25% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. 222. The method of embodiment 209, wherein the patient achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. 223. The method of embodiment 209, wherein the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. 224. The method of embodiment 209, wherein the patient has at least 1.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo. 225. The method of embodiment 209, wherein the patient has at least 1.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo and achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 24. 226.
  • the method of embodiment 209 wherein the patient has at least 1.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo and achieves a 50% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 52. 227.
  • the method of embodiment 209, wherein the patient has at least 1.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo and achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 52. 229.
  • the method of embodiment 209 wherein the patient achieves a 75% or greater improvement in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index score at Week 52. 235.
  • the method of embodiment 209, wherein the patient is aged 50 years old or less. 239.
  • a hemoglobin level of the patient at Week 52 is similar to a hemoglobin level of the patient observed at baseline. 242.
  • the method of embodiment 209, wherein a platelet level of the patient at Week 52 is similar to a platelet level of the patient observed at baseline. 243.
  • the method of embodiment 209, wherein the affected area is face. 245.
  • the method of embodiment 209, wherein the affected area is head and neck. 246.
  • the method of embodiment 209, wherein the affected area is selected from lower extremities, trunk, hands, upper extremities, and feet. 247.
  • a method of treating generalized vitiligo in a patient comprising topically administering to an affected skin area of the patient in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day. 250.
  • a method of treating vitiligo in a patient comprising topically administering to an affected skin area of the patient in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day, wherein the patient does not receive phototherapy for vitiligo during the administration of the pharmaceutical composition.
  • a pharmaceutical composition containing about 1.5% w/w ruxolitinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, on a free base basis, twice per day, wherein the patient does not receive phototherapy for vitiligo during the administration of the pharmaceutical composition.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the ruxolitinib, or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, is ruxolitinib phosphate.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the administering is for up to 24 weeks. 260.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the administering is for up to 52 weeks. 261.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the patient has at least 1.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo. 262.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is a cream. 274.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250 wherein a platelet level of the patient at Week 52 is similar to a platelet level of the patient at baseline. 282.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250 wherein there is no substantial difference in response between patients having baseline total body surface area score equal to or less than 20% and patients having baseline total body surface area score greater than 20%.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the vitiligo is segmental vitiligo.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the patient has a vitiligo disease duration of at last 20 years. 285.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the affected skin area is the face. 287.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the affected skin area is the head and neck. 288.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the affected skin area is selected from lower extremities, trunk, hands, upper extremities, and feet. 289.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the affected skin area is selected from non-acral lower extremities and non-acral upper extremities.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the patient has at least 0.5% facial body surface area affected by vitiligo. 291.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the patient has at least 3% non-facial body surface area affected by vitiligo. 292.
  • the method of embodiment 249 or 250, wherein the patient is 18 years old to 75 years old.
  • INCB 18424-211 was a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 3-parts study in adults with vitiligo who had depigmented areas including at least 0.5% BSA on the face and at least 3% BSA on nonfacial areas.
  • a total of 157 participants were equally randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% QD, 0.5% QD, 0.15% QD, or vehicle BID for 24 weeks.
  • the ruxolitinib in the cream formulation was present as ruxolitinib phosphate with the percentages as % w/w on a free base basis.
  • the 0.5% and 1.5% cream formulations were oil-in-water cream formulations as described in Tables 3 and 5 of U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2015/0250790, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • the mean (SD) age was 48.3 (12.9) years, 46.5% of patients were men, and 84.1% were white.
  • the distribution of baseline disease characteristics was similar across treatment groups. See Table 1 for patient demographics and baseline disease characteristics. Most patients (93.0%) had nonsegmental vitiligo and skin types (63.7%). Median (range) disease duration was 14.0 (0.3-67.9) years.
  • the mean (SD) percentages of T-BSA and F-BSA involvement at baseline were 22.1% (18.4%) and 1.48% (0.86%), respectively, and baseline mean (SD) T-VASI and F-VASI scores were 18.0 (15.5) and 1.26 (0.82), respectively. Discontinuation rates were low through Week 52. By Week 24, 18 patients (11.5%) had discontinued study treatment. Primary reasons were withdrawal by patient (6.4%), AEs (1.9%), patient lost to follow-up (1.3%), protocol deviation (1.3%), and noncompliance with study drug (0.6%).
  • the secondary endpoints include achieving scores of clear or almost clear (F-PhGVA is 0 or 1) in the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) at Week 24; percentage of participants achieve T-VASI50 at Week 52; and safety and tolerability assessed by monitoring the frequency, duration, and severity of adverse events (AEs) at least 30 days after the last dose, up to 120 weeks.
  • vitiligo also excluded are subjects with other dermatologic disease besides vitiligo whose presence or treatments could complicate the assessment of repigmentation; subjects who have used skin bleaching treatments for past treatment of vitiligo or other pigmented areas; subjects who have received any of the following treatments within the minimum specified timeframes such as the use of any biologic, investigational, or experimental therapy or procedure for vitiligo within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of screening, the use of laser or light-based vitiligo treatments, including tanning beds, within 8 weeks of screening, and the use of immunomodulating oral or systemic medications (eg, corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine) or topical treatments that may affect vitiligo (eg, corticosteroids, tacrolimus/pimecrolimus, retinoids) within 4 weeks of screening; subjects who use any prior and concomitant therapy not listed above that may interfere with the objective of the study as per discretion of the investigator, including drugs that
  • the area of the face analyzed for F-VASI included the area on the forehead to the hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically to the jawline and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus.
  • the area of the face analyzed did not include surface area of the lips, scalp, eyelids, ears, or neck but did include the nose.
  • Phototherapy includes narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen ultraviolet A photochemotherapy, and excimer laser.
  • Results from the Week 24 analysis are presented in FIGS. 1 to 4 .
  • FIG. 62 shows F-VASI50 response to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID at week 24 by patient demographics and skin type.
  • FIG. 63 shows F-VASI50 response to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID at Week 24 by baseline vitiligo lesion characteristics.
  • FIG. 64 shows F-VASI50 response to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID at Week 24 by disease characteristics and previous treatment.
  • ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID
  • subjects randomized to vehicle were randomized to 1 of the 3 higher active treatment groups in a 1:1:1 ratio while maintaining the blind.
  • Subjects in the ruxolitinib (INCB018424) 0.15% QD dose group who did not achieve a ⁇ 25% improvement from baseline on F-VASI (nonresponders of F-VASI25) were re-randomized to 1 of the 3 higher active treatment groups while maintaining the blind.
  • Subjects randomized to ruxolitinib 0.15% QD who achieved a ⁇ 25% improvement from baseline on F-VASI remained on the same dose until Week 52.
  • Subjects randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% BID, 1.5% QD, and 0.5% QD remained on the same dose until Week 52.
  • the primary endpoint, Week 24 F-VASI50 was achieved by significantly more patients treated with any dose of ruxolitinib cream (1.5% BID, 45.5% [P ⁇ 0.001]; 1.5% QD, 50.0% [P ⁇ 0.001]; 0.5% QD, 25.8% [P ⁇ 0.05]; 0.15% QD, 32.3% [P ⁇ 0.01]) than vehicle (3.1%; FIG. 5 ).
  • the additional key secondary endpoint of achieving scores of clear or almost clear in the F-PhGVA at Week 24 was attained only by patients treated with ruxolitinib cream (3.2%-13.3% across doses; FIG. 3 ).
  • Subgroup analysis investigated response by patient demographics and baseline characteristics; results were generally similar across treatment groups at Week 24.
  • F-VASI50 responders a larger proportion of patients in the following subgroups were F-VASI50 responders: patients ⁇ 50 years old (58.8%); female patients (60.0%); patients with skin type I-III (50.0%), ⁇ 1.5% affected baseline facial BSA (52.6%), baseline F-VASI scores of 0.75 to ⁇ 1.5 (75.0%), and disease duration >20 years (60.0%); and previous recipients of topical corticosteroids (50.0%).
  • Ruxolitinib cream was effective for the treatment of vitiligo across demographics and clinical characteristics, including in patients with longstanding and extensive disease.
  • Results from the Week 52 analysis are presented in FIGS. 5 to 22 and in Table 3. Sub-analysis was also conducted on T-VASI scores for head and neck, hands, upper extremities, trunk, lower extremities, and feet. Results from this sub-analysis are presented in FIGS. 23 to 53 .
  • FIGS. 54 to 61 Additional results are shown in FIGS. 54 to 61 .
  • F-VASI75 and F-VASI90 approximate desired patient outcomes of complete or near-complete repigmentation (Eleftheriadou, et al., Br J Dermatol 2019; 180:574-9); these responses paralleled improvements in PhGVA and PaGVA scores at Week 52.
  • Week 52 more patients had clear to mild disease versus baseline per F-PhGVA and T-PhGVA assessments ( FIG. 56 ).
  • Week 52 more patients reported mild disease or no white patches per F-PaGVA and T-PaGVA after 52 weeks of treatment with ruxolitinib cream versus baseline ( FIG. 57 ).
  • Subgroup analysis determined the proportion of patients achieving ⁇ 50% and ⁇ 75% improvement from baseline in total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI50 and T VASI75) at Week 52 by affected body area.
  • Ruxolitinib cream application was limited to ⁇ 20% of total BSA, and analyses were conducted only in these patients.
  • Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID produced the highest response in most body areas.
  • 1.5% BID produced substantial overall T-VASI50 and T-VASI75 responses (45.0% and 15.0%) across all body regions: head/neck (60.0% and 55.0%) ( FIGS. 24 and 25 ), trunk (29.4% and 11.8%) ( FIGS.
  • ruxolitinib cream produced repigmentation of all body areas in patients with vitiligo, including the hands/feet, which has not been reported with previous treatment modalities.
  • TEAEs treatment-emergent AEs
  • Acne was noted as a treatment-related AE in 13 patients (8.3%) who received ruxolitinib cream and in 1 patient (3.1%) who received vehicle. All treatment-related AEs were mild (grade 1) or moderate (grade 2) in severity.
  • a Phase III a randomized, vehicle-controlled study in adolescent and adult ( ⁇ 12 years old) participants who have been diagnosed with non-segmental vitiligo who have depigmented area including at least ⁇ 0.5% BSA on the face, ⁇ 0.5 F-VASI, at least ⁇ 3% BSA on nonfacial areas, and ⁇ 3 T-VASI is being conducted. Total body (facial and nonfacial) vitiligo should not exceed 10% BSA. Participants will be randomized on ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID or vehicle, stratified by age ( ⁇ 40 or >40 years) and skin type (Fitzpatrick scale Type I and II vs Type III, IV, V, and VI) to receive study treatment for 24 weeks.
  • the ruxolitinib in the cream formulation was present as ruxolitinib phosphate with the percentages as % w/w on a free base basis.
  • the cream formulation was an oil-in-water cream formulation as described in Table 5 of U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2015/0250790, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Adolescents will make up at least 10% of the study population, and no more than 50% of participants will be greater than 40 years of age.
  • the area of the face analyzed for F-VASI will include the area on the forehead to the original hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically to the jawline and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus.
  • the area of the face analyzed will not include surface area of the lips, scalp, ears, or neck but will include the nose and eyelids.
  • VASI is based on a composite estimate of the overall area of vitiligo patches at baseline and the degree of macular repigmentation within these patches over time. Facial VASI is measured by percentage of vitiligo involvement (% of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation. The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement is estimated by the investigator using the Palmar Method (see Section 8.2.1). Hand unit is based on participant's hand size. Investigator uses his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each vitiligo involvement site is determined and estimated to the nearest of the following percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100%.
  • the F-VASI is then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites together (possible range 0-3).
  • Total body VASI is calculated using a formula that includes contributions from all body regions (possible range, 0 100).
  • VASI ⁇ [hand units] ⁇ [Residual Depigmentation] all body sites
  • the body is divided into the following 6 separate and mutually exclusive sites: (1) head/neck, (2) hands, (3) upper extremities (excluding hands), (4) trunk, (5) lower extremities (excluding feet), and (6) feet.
  • the percentage of vitiligo involvement is estimated in hand units (% of BSA) by the same investigator during the entire course of the study. Hand unit is based on participant's hand size. The investigator uses his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate % BSA vitiligo involvement.
  • the degree of depigmentation for each body site is determined and estimated to the nearest of the following percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100%.
  • the T-VASI is then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing the values of all body sites together (Hamzavi I, Jain H, McLean D, Shapiro J, Zeng H, Lui H. Parametric modeling of narrowband UV-B phototherapy for vitiligo using a novel quantitative tool: the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140:677-683).
  • participant After completion of the Week 24 assessments, participants will be offered the opportunity to receive an additional 28 weeks of open-label extension treatment with ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID. To be eligible, participants must have completed the baseline and Week 24 visit assessments, be compliant with study medication, and meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria with exceptions that there will be no required lower limit or upper limit to the % BSA and the exclusion criterion of no prior JAK inhibitor treatment is not applicable for participants who receive ruxolitinib cream in the first 24 week double-blinded vehicle control period. The treated area should not exceed 10% BSA or 20% BSA. On areas that are fully repigmented, the participants may stop applying study drug and continue to be observed.
  • Approval to treat additional areas may occur via telephone during the open-label extension period, although the investigator, at his/her discretion, may ask the participant to return for an unscheduled visit.
  • Patients receiving laser or any kind of phototherapy, including tanning bed or intentional UV exposure, are excluded from the study.
  • subjects who have no pigmented hair within any of the vitiligo areas on the face are also excluded; subjects who have other forms of vitiligo (eg, segmental) or other differential diagnosis of vitiligo or other skin depigmentation disorders (eg, piebaldism, pityriasis alba, leprosy, postinflammatory hypopigmentation, progressive macule hypomelanosis, nevus anemicus, chemical leukoderma, and tinea versicolor); subjects who have used depigmentation treatments (eg, monobenzone) for past treatment of vitiligo or other pigmented areas; and subjects who use protocol-defined treatments within the indicated washout period before baseline.
  • depigmentation treatments eg, monobenzone
  • the primary endpoint for the study is the proportion of participants achieving F-VASI75 at Week 24.
  • Secondary endpoints include: the percentage change from baseline in F-BSA (facial body surface area) at Week 24; the proportion of participants achieving F-VASI50 at Week 24; the proportion of participants achieving F-VASI90 at Week 24; the proportion of participants achieving T-VASI50 at Week 24; the proportion of participants achieving F-VASI75 at Week 52; the proportion of participants achieving F-VASI90 at Week 52; the proportion of participants achieving T-VASI50 at Week 52; the proportion of participants achieving T-VASI75 at Week 52; and the proportion of patients achieving a Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) of 4 (“a lot less noticeable”) or 5 (“no longer noticeable) at Week 24; number of treatment-emergent adverse events upto 56 Weeks including any adverse event either reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug; proportion of participants

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Dermatology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
US16/897,927 2019-06-10 2020-06-10 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor Abandoned US20200405627A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/897,927 US20200405627A1 (en) 2019-06-10 2020-06-10 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor
US17/023,269 US20210030672A1 (en) 2019-06-10 2020-09-16 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor

Applications Claiming Priority (13)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201962859601P 2019-06-10 2019-06-10
US201962859495P 2019-06-10 2019-06-10
US201962859506P 2019-06-10 2019-06-10
US201962859584P 2019-06-10 2019-06-10
US201962859532P 2019-06-10 2019-06-10
US201962894496P 2019-08-30 2019-08-30
US201962894514P 2019-08-30 2019-08-30
US201962894541P 2019-08-30 2019-08-30
US201962894564P 2019-08-30 2019-08-30
US201962894581P 2019-08-30 2019-08-30
US201962911845P 2019-10-07 2019-10-07
US202062967879P 2020-01-30 2020-01-30
US16/897,927 US20200405627A1 (en) 2019-06-10 2020-06-10 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/897,923 Continuation-In-Part US11602536B2 (en) 2019-06-10 2020-06-10 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a JAK inhibitor

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/023,269 Continuation-In-Part US20210030672A1 (en) 2019-06-10 2020-09-16 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20200405627A1 true US20200405627A1 (en) 2020-12-31

Family

ID=73651112

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/897,927 Abandoned US20200405627A1 (en) 2019-06-10 2020-06-10 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor
US16/897,923 Active 2041-05-05 US11602536B2 (en) 2019-06-10 2020-06-10 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a JAK inhibitor
US17/860,884 Active US11590138B2 (en) 2019-06-10 2022-07-08 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor
US18/077,315 Active 2040-07-28 US12233067B2 (en) 2019-06-10 2022-12-08 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a JAK inhibitor

Family Applications After (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/897,923 Active 2041-05-05 US11602536B2 (en) 2019-06-10 2020-06-10 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a JAK inhibitor
US17/860,884 Active US11590138B2 (en) 2019-06-10 2022-07-08 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor
US18/077,315 Active 2040-07-28 US12233067B2 (en) 2019-06-10 2022-12-08 Topical treatment of vitiligo by a JAK inhibitor

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (4) US20200405627A1 (https=)
EP (1) EP3982971A4 (https=)
JP (2) JP7532511B2 (https=)
AU (2) AU2020290995B2 (https=)
CA (1) CA3150975A1 (https=)
IL (1) IL290637A (https=)
MA (1) MA56215A (https=)
TW (1) TW202112377A (https=)
WO (1) WO2020252012A1 (https=)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2022178540A1 (en) * 2021-02-18 2022-08-25 Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. Topical formulations of a jak 1/3 inhibitor and methods of use thereof for treatment of atopic dermatitis and other skin conditions
WO2023051833A1 (zh) 2021-09-28 2023-04-06 杭州中美华东制药有限公司 一种芦可替尼组合物及其制备方法
US11739086B2 (en) 2017-11-03 2023-08-29 Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. Substituted pyrrolopyridine JAK inhibitors and methods of making and using the same
US11820775B2 (en) 2018-08-10 2023-11-21 Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. Pyrrolopyrimidine ITK inhibitors
CN117279915A (zh) * 2021-02-18 2023-12-22 阿克拉瑞斯治疗股份有限公司 Jak1/3抑制剂的局部制剂及其用于特异性皮炎和其他皮肤病况的治疗的方法

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7532511B2 (ja) 2019-06-10 2024-08-13 インサイト・コーポレイション Jak阻害剤による尋常性白斑の局所治療
WO2022061351A1 (en) * 2020-09-16 2022-03-24 Incyte Corporation Topical treatment of vitiligo
EP4389114A4 (en) * 2021-08-19 2025-09-03 Zhuhai United Laboratories Co Ltd LOCAL TOPICAL FORMULATION CONTAINING A JAK INHIBITOR OR A SALT THEREOF OR A CRYSTALLINE FORM THEREOF, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF AND CORRESPONDING APPLICATION

Family Cites Families (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5521184A (en) 1992-04-03 1996-05-28 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Pyrimidine derivatives and processes for the preparation thereof
PT1107964E (pt) 1998-08-11 2010-06-11 Novartis Ag Derivados de isoquinolina com actividade inibidora da angiogénese
US6133031A (en) 1999-08-19 2000-10-17 Isis Pharmaceuticals Inc. Antisense inhibition of focal adhesion kinase expression
GB9905075D0 (en) 1999-03-06 1999-04-28 Zeneca Ltd Chemical compounds
GB0004890D0 (en) 2000-03-01 2000-04-19 Astrazeneca Uk Ltd Chemical compounds
BR0212760A (pt) 2001-09-19 2004-12-07 Aventis Pharma Sa Compostos quìmicos
DE60213842T2 (de) 2001-10-30 2007-09-06 Novartis Ag Staurosporin-derivate als hemmer der flt3-rezeptor-tyrosinkinase-wirkung
PE20040522A1 (es) 2002-05-29 2004-09-28 Novartis Ag Derivados de diarilurea dependientes de la cinasa de proteina
GB0215676D0 (en) 2002-07-05 2002-08-14 Novartis Ag Organic compounds
EP1542768A1 (en) 2002-09-20 2005-06-22 Alcon, Inc. Use of cytokine synthesis inhibitors for the treatment of dry eye disorders
TWI335913B (en) 2002-11-15 2011-01-11 Vertex Pharma Diaminotriazoles useful as inhibitors of protein kinases
UA80767C2 (en) 2002-12-20 2007-10-25 Pfizer Prod Inc Pyrimidine derivatives for the treatment of abnormal cell growth
GB0305929D0 (en) 2003-03-14 2003-04-23 Novartis Ag Organic compounds
AR045944A1 (es) 2003-09-24 2005-11-16 Novartis Ag Derivados de isoquinolina 1.4-disustituidas
AU2005309019A1 (en) 2004-11-24 2006-06-01 Novartis Ag Combinations of JAK inhibitors and at least one of Bcr-Abl, Flt-3, FAK or RAF kinase inhibitors
SG10202003901UA (en) 2005-12-13 2020-05-28 Incyte Holdings Corp Heteroaryl substituted pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridines and pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyrimidines as janus kinase inhibitors
KR20150036210A (ko) 2007-06-13 2015-04-07 인사이트 코포레이션 야누스 키나제 억제제(R)―3―(4―(7H―피롤로[2,3-d]피리미딘―4―일)―1H―피라졸―1―일)―3―사이클로펜틸프로판니트릴의 염
PE20130216A1 (es) 2010-05-21 2013-02-27 Incyte Corp Formulacion topica para un inhibidor de jak
AU2017358703A1 (en) 2016-11-10 2019-05-09 Galapagos Nv Compounds and pharmaceutical compositions thereof for the treatment of inflammatory diseases
US11957931B2 (en) 2017-04-26 2024-04-16 Yale University Compositions and methods for treating vitiligo
US20190060311A1 (en) 2017-08-24 2019-02-28 Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. Compositions and methods for treatment of vitiligo
MA52655A (fr) 2018-03-30 2021-02-17 Incyte Corp Biomarqueurs pour maladie cutanée inflammatoire
CN111374639A (zh) 2018-12-28 2020-07-07 陈柏龄 败血症的菌种预测系统与方法
US20210030672A1 (en) 2019-06-10 2021-02-04 Incyte Corporation Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor
JP7532511B2 (ja) * 2019-06-10 2024-08-13 インサイト・コーポレイション Jak阻害剤による尋常性白斑の局所治療

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11739086B2 (en) 2017-11-03 2023-08-29 Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. Substituted pyrrolopyridine JAK inhibitors and methods of making and using the same
US12281111B2 (en) 2017-11-03 2025-04-22 Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. Substituted pyrrolopyridine JAK inhibitors and methods of making and using the same
US11820775B2 (en) 2018-08-10 2023-11-21 Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. Pyrrolopyrimidine ITK inhibitors
US12297203B2 (en) 2018-08-10 2025-05-13 Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. Pyrrolopyrimidine ITK inhibitors
WO2022178540A1 (en) * 2021-02-18 2022-08-25 Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. Topical formulations of a jak 1/3 inhibitor and methods of use thereof for treatment of atopic dermatitis and other skin conditions
CN117279915A (zh) * 2021-02-18 2023-12-22 阿克拉瑞斯治疗股份有限公司 Jak1/3抑制剂的局部制剂及其用于特异性皮炎和其他皮肤病况的治疗的方法
WO2023051833A1 (zh) 2021-09-28 2023-04-06 杭州中美华东制药有限公司 一种芦可替尼组合物及其制备方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2026200410A1 (en) 2026-02-12
MA56215A (fr) 2022-04-20
US20230355628A1 (en) 2023-11-09
US20200383986A1 (en) 2020-12-10
US20220409622A1 (en) 2022-12-29
WO2020252012A1 (en) 2020-12-17
AU2020290995B2 (en) 2025-12-11
AU2020290995A1 (en) 2022-04-07
US11590138B2 (en) 2023-02-28
TW202112377A (zh) 2021-04-01
JP2024105436A (ja) 2024-08-06
US11602536B2 (en) 2023-03-14
US12233067B2 (en) 2025-02-25
EP3982971A1 (en) 2022-04-20
EP3982971A4 (en) 2023-08-16
IL290637A (en) 2022-04-01
JP7532511B2 (ja) 2024-08-13
CA3150975A1 (en) 2020-12-17
JP2022545568A (ja) 2022-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11590138B2 (en) Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor
US20220387447A1 (en) Formulations of testosterone and methods of treatment therewith
US20210030767A1 (en) Formulations of testosterone and methods of treatment therewith
US20210030672A1 (en) Topical treatment of vitiligo by a jak inhibitor
US12589096B2 (en) Ruxolitinib formulation for reduction of itch in atopic dermatitis
US11878008B2 (en) Composition for preventing or treating atopic dermatitis
US20220265572A1 (en) Remittive effects of tapinarof in the treatment of plaque psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, or radiation dermatitis
US20230364095A1 (en) Topical treatment of vitiligo
RS60365B1 (sr) Lečenje alopecije areate
EA052074B1 (ru) Топическое лечение витилиго ингибитором jak
KR20150095772A (ko) 아토피성 피부염 치료를 위한 피도티모드의 사용
GB2616294A (en) Composition for use

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: INCYTE CORPORATION, DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BUTLER, KATHLEEN;LEE, JIM;SUN, KANG;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20201001 TO 20201020;REEL/FRAME:054161/0177

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION