US20190142993A1 - Ultra-thin, high strength, drug-loaded sutures and coatings thereof - Google Patents

Ultra-thin, high strength, drug-loaded sutures and coatings thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20190142993A1
US20190142993A1 US16/083,787 US201716083787A US2019142993A1 US 20190142993 A1 US20190142993 A1 US 20190142993A1 US 201716083787 A US201716083787 A US 201716083787A US 2019142993 A1 US2019142993 A1 US 2019142993A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
suture
sutures
fibers
agent
pcl
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
US16/083,787
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Kunal S. Parikh
Justin Hanes
Laura Ensign
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Johns Hopkins University
Original Assignee
Johns Hopkins University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Johns Hopkins University filed Critical Johns Hopkins University
Priority to US16/083,787 priority Critical patent/US20190142993A1/en
Assigned to THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY reassignment THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HANES, JUSTIN, ENSIGN, LAURA, PARIKH, KUNAL S.
Assigned to NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION reassignment NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CONFIRMATORY LICENSE (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
Publication of US20190142993A1 publication Critical patent/US20190142993A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L17/00—Materials for surgical sutures or for ligaturing blood vessels ; Materials for prostheses or catheters
    • A61L17/005—Materials for surgical sutures or for ligaturing blood vessels ; Materials for prostheses or catheters containing a biologically active substance, e.g. a medicament or a biocide
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/04—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for suturing wounds; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A61B17/06—Needles ; Sutures; Needle-suture combinations; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A61B17/06166—Sutures
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33—Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/395—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
    • A61K31/535—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with at least one nitrogen and one oxygen as the ring hetero atoms, e.g. 1,2-oxazines
    • A61K31/5375—1,4-Oxazines, e.g. morpholine
    • A61K31/5383—1,4-Oxazines, e.g. morpholine ortho- or peri-condensed with heterocyclic ring systems
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L17/00—Materials for surgical sutures or for ligaturing blood vessels ; Materials for prostheses or catheters
    • A61L17/06—At least partially resorbable materials
    • A61L17/10—At least partially resorbable materials containing macromolecular materials
    • A61L17/105—Polyesters not covered by A61L17/12
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L17/00—Materials for surgical sutures or for ligaturing blood vessels ; Materials for prostheses or catheters
    • A61L17/06—At least partially resorbable materials
    • A61L17/10—At least partially resorbable materials containing macromolecular materials
    • A61L17/12—Homopolymers or copolymers of glycolic acid or lactic acid
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L31/00—Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
    • A61L31/04—Macromolecular materials
    • A61L31/06—Macromolecular materials obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L31/00—Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
    • A61L31/14—Materials characterised by their function or physical properties, e.g. injectable or lubricating compositions, shape-memory materials, surface modified materials
    • A61L31/148—Materials at least partially resorbable by the body
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
    • D01D5/0007—Electro-spinning
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
    • D01D5/0007—Electro-spinning
    • D01D5/0015—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
    • D01D5/0007—Electro-spinning
    • D01D5/0015—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material
    • D01D5/0023—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material the material being a polymer melt
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
    • D01D5/0007—Electro-spinning
    • D01D5/0015—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material
    • D01D5/003—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material the material being a polymer solution or dispersion
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
    • D01D5/0007—Electro-spinning
    • D01D5/0015—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material
    • D01D5/003—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material the material being a polymer solution or dispersion
    • D01D5/0038—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material the material being a polymer solution or dispersion the fibre formed by solvent evaporation, i.e. dry electro-spinning
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
    • D01D5/0007—Electro-spinning
    • D01D5/0015—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material
    • D01D5/003—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material the material being a polymer solution or dispersion
    • D01D5/0046—Electro-spinning characterised by the initial state of the material the material being a polymer solution or dispersion the fibre formed by coagulation, i.e. wet electro-spinning
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
    • D01D5/0007—Electro-spinning
    • D01D5/0061—Electro-spinning characterised by the electro-spinning apparatus
    • D01D5/0076—Electro-spinning characterised by the electro-spinning apparatus characterised by the collecting device, e.g. drum, wheel, endless belt, plate or grid
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
    • D01D5/0007—Electro-spinning
    • D01D5/0061—Electro-spinning characterised by the electro-spinning apparatus
    • D01D5/0076—Electro-spinning characterised by the electro-spinning apparatus characterised by the collecting device, e.g. drum, wheel, endless belt, plate or grid
    • D01D5/0084—Coating by electro-spinning, i.e. the electro-spun fibres are not removed from the collecting device but remain integral with it, e.g. coating of prostheses
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F1/00—General methods for the manufacture of artificial filaments or the like
    • D01F1/02—Addition of substances to the spinning solution or to the melt
    • D01F1/10—Other agents for modifying properties
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F1/00—General methods for the manufacture of artificial filaments or the like
    • D01F1/02—Addition of substances to the spinning solution or to the melt
    • D01F1/10—Other agents for modifying properties
    • D01F1/103—Agents inhibiting growth of microorganisms
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01H—SPINNING OR TWISTING
    • D01H7/00—Spinning or twisting arrangements
    • D01H7/02—Spinning or twisting arrangements for imparting permanent twist
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04—BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04C—BRAIDING OR MANUFACTURE OF LACE, INCLUDING BOBBIN-NET OR CARBONISED LACE; BRAIDING MACHINES; BRAID; LACE
    • D04C1/00—Braid or lace, e.g. pillow-lace; Processes for the manufacture thereof
    • D04C1/06—Braid or lace serving particular purposes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2300/00—Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices
    • A61L2300/20—Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices containing or releasing organic materials
    • A61L2300/216—Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices containing or releasing organic materials with other specific functional groups, e.g. aldehydes, ketones, phenols, quaternary phosphonium groups
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2300/00—Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices
    • A61L2300/40—Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices characterised by a specific therapeutic activity or mode of action
    • A61L2300/402—Anaestetics, analgesics, e.g. lidocaine
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2300/00—Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices
    • A61L2300/40—Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices characterised by a specific therapeutic activity or mode of action
    • A61L2300/41—Anti-inflammatory agents, e.g. NSAIDs
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2300/00—Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices
    • A61L2300/40—Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices characterised by a specific therapeutic activity or mode of action
    • A61L2300/416—Anti-neoplastic or anti-proliferative or anti-restenosis or anti-angiogenic agents, e.g. paclitaxel, sirolimus
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2400/00—Materials characterised by their function or physical properties
    • A61L2400/12—Nanosized materials, e.g. nanofibres, nanoparticles, nanowires, nanotubes; Nanostructured surfaces
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B2331/00—Fibres made from polymers obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polycondensation products
    • D10B2331/04—Fibres made from polymers obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polycondensation products polyesters, e.g. polyethylene terephthalate [PET]
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B2331/00—Fibres made from polymers obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polycondensation products
    • D10B2331/04—Fibres made from polymers obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polycondensation products polyesters, e.g. polyethylene terephthalate [PET]
    • D10B2331/041—Fibres made from polymers obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polycondensation products polyesters, e.g. polyethylene terephthalate [PET] derived from hydroxy-carboxylic acids, e.g. lactones
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B2401/00—Physical properties
    • D10B2401/12—Physical properties biodegradable
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B2509/00—Medical; Hygiene
    • D10B2509/04—Sutures
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B2509/00—Medical; Hygiene
    • D10B2509/06—Vascular grafts; stents

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to strong, small-diameter sutures for controlled drug delivery, and more particularly, to fibers that can twist into high-strength sutures or coat sutures.
  • Sutures are already used to close wounds or hold tissue together. Delivering active agents at the same time would promote healing and prevent complications (Casalini, T., et al., International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 429, 148-157 (2012)).
  • the problem with many sutures for drug delivery is that incorporation of agent directly into the suture decreases strength or increases diameter if the agent is incorporated into a coating. (Weldon, C. B., et al., J Control Release, 161, 903-909 (2012)).
  • Ophthalmic sutures are commonly used during ophthalmic surgical procedures, including trabeculectomy as well as pterygium removal, cataract surgery, strabismus correction surgery, penetrating keratoplasty, sclerectomy, and conjunctival closure.
  • the choice of suture material can strongly impact the occurrence of complications related to infection and inflammation post ophthalmic surgery, either causing irritation and local inflammation or providing a substrate for microorganism growth.
  • the suture materials typically employed include non-biodegradable ophthalmic suture materials such as ETHILON® nylon suture, MERSILENE® polyester fiber suture, PERMA-HAND® silk suture, PROLENE® polypropylene suture, each commercially available from Ethicon, Somerville, N.J.; and VASCUFIL® coated monofilament suture composed of a copolymer of butylene terephthalate and polyteramethylene ether glycol, MONOSOF ⁇ DERMALON® monofilament nylon sutures composed of long-chain aliphatic polymers Nylon 6 and Nylon 6.6, NOVAFIL® monofilament sutures composed of a copolymer of butylene terephthalate and polyteramethylene ether glycol, SOFSILK® braided sutures composed of fibroin, TI-CRON-SURGIDAC® braided polyester sutures composed of polyester terephthalate, SURGILON® braided nylon sutures composed of the
  • ophthalmic suture materials are biodegradable and biodegradable over the useful suture lifetime, retaining the requisite tensile strength and capable of delivering therapeutic or prophylactic agents to increase patient success.
  • sutures could be used to close the wound and release antibiotic and anti-inflammatory drugs.
  • sutures could be placed on sclera flaps providing local chemotherapeutic agents, decreasing production of scar tissue, and on conjunctival closure with antibiotic release.
  • the sutures hold the graft, as well as release antibiotic and immunosuppressant or anti-inflammatory agents.
  • the suture needs to (i) be of suitable size, (ii) be of high-strength to resist breakage and bacterial colonization, and (iii) supply an effective amount of antibiotic.
  • nylon sutures are used in more than 12 million procedures per year globally to close ocular wounds and incisions, no drug-eluting sutures have been approved for ophthalmic use (Kronenthal R, P., et al., Sutures Materials in Cataract Surgery , (1984); Grinstaff, M. W., Biomaterials, 28, 5205-5214 (2007)).
  • Ethicon received approval to market a series of antibiotic-coated sutures. However, they are only available in sizes #1-0-#6-0, according to the United States Pharmacopeia (U.S.P.), and none were indicated for ophthalmic use.
  • Ophthalmic sutures require sizes #8-0-#10-0 or thinner, and to date, no market offering is available for antibiotic-eluting sutures for ocular surgery (Marco F, et al., Surg Infect ( Larchmt ), 8(3), 359-365 (2007); Ming, X., et al., Surg Infect ( Larchmt ), 8, 209-214 (2007); Ming, X., et al., Surg Infect ( Larchmt ), 8, 201-208 (2007); Ming X, et al., Surg Infect ( Larchmt ), 9, 451-458 (2008)).
  • ultra-thin small diameter
  • high strength multifilament composite fibers that are capable of eluting drugs in a controlled manner, without decreasing the tensile strength.
  • Suture materials or suture coating materials made from twisted, biocompatible polymeric fibers with high tensile strength for use in surgical repair and drug delivery have been developed.
  • a plurality of fibers e.g., electrospun fibers
  • the twisting increases the tensile strength of the overall multifilament composite, even in the presence of one or more active agents entrapped in the fibers.
  • a mono-filament fiber of a certain diameter loses its tensile strength significantly with the inclusion of therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic agents (e.g., 8 wt % levofloxacin)
  • twisting of multiple (e.g., hundreds) fibers containing the drug into a multifilament composite of a similar diameter precludes the loss in tensile strength normally associated with drug loading. Additional twisting of these fibers serves to further increase the strength of the multifilament composite.
  • the fibers can be micro-fibers or nano-fibers.
  • the twisted multifilament composite can have a diameter of less than 50 ⁇ m, less than 40 ⁇ m, and preferably less than 30 ⁇ m.
  • the tensile strength of the composite should be greater than 0.24 N while satisfying the size and strength requirements for a #10-0 suture according to United States Pharmacopeia.
  • the tensile strength of the composite should be greater than 0.49 N and the composite satisfies the size and strength requirements for a #9-0 suture according to United States Phaimacopeia.
  • the tensile strength of the composite should be greater than 0.69 N and the composite satisfies the size and strength requirements for a #8-0 suture according to United States Pharmacopeia.
  • the multifilament sutures generally maintain at least about 95%, 90%, 85%, or 80% of their mechanical properties (e.g., breaking strength) even after immersion in an aqueous environment for about 1 week, 2 weeks, 30 days, 45 days, or greater.
  • One or more therapeutic, prophylactic and/or diagnostic agents can be included, up to about 24 wt % or greater in the multifilament composite as a drug-releasing suture without compromising the tensile strength as required by United States Pharmacopeia.
  • the multifilament composites generally have a diameter suitable for ophthalmic suturing procedures.
  • the multifilament composites can also be twisted around a thread to provide drug-elution functionality, where the overall size of the coated suture still satisfies the needs for ophthalmic suturing procedures.
  • Exemplary suture formulation includes multi-nanofiber filaments made from polymers such as polyhydroxy acids such as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), polylactide, and polyglycolide, polydioxanone, polycaprolactone, or a copolymer, blend, or mixture thereof.
  • a preferred suture formulation is made from degradable, drug-loaded polymeric multifilament twisted fibers, surpassing U.S.P. specifications for suture strengths.
  • the suture may be of variable sizes from 2-0 to 10-0 U.S.P. specifications, based on the parameters in operating fabrication techniques (e.g., electrospinning) and the twisting and/or braiding parameters of filaments.
  • the suture may be formulated to degrade in vivo over a time period from a few days to a few years.
  • Suitable solvents for the polymers include chloroform, methanol, acetone, hexafluoroisopropanol, or other solvent depending on the solubility of specific polymers.
  • the suture materials and the coating materials for sutures are made from a polyhydroxy acid such as polylactide, polyglycolid, or a copolymer thereof or polycaprolactone, and optionally a polyalkylene oxide such as poly(ethylene glycol) or a polyalkylene oxide block copolymer.
  • the sutures entrap (e.g., encapsulate) one or more therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic agents and provide prolonged release over a period of at least a week, preferably a month.
  • s semi-crystalline, hydrophobic, degradable polymer polycaprolactone (PCL) is used. Its fiber crystallinity, and therefore suture tensile strength, is maximized through the nanofiber fabrication process of low molecular weight PCL and subsequent twisting to form single sutures with additional compaction and structural reinforcement. Electro spinning may alter the molecular orientation of PCL to improve crystallinity. The molecular confinement may contribute to the increase in tensile strength of PCL nanofibers even with reduced diameter.
  • the degradable, multifilament sutures meet U.S.P. specifications for size and strength suitable for ophthalmic use, and surpass breaking strength specifications when loaded with a wide range of antibiotics of different physicochemical properties.
  • electrospun PCL monofilament sutures which lose more than 50% of their strength with inclusion of antibiotics such as levofloxacin
  • the twisted bundle of a plurality of nanofibers, forming micron-wide sutures generally do not lose strength with inclusion of an equivalent amount of levofloxacin.
  • the multifilament sutures exhibit biocompatibility comparable to conventional nylon sutures, and are able to deliver active agent (e.g., levofloxacin) at detectable levels in eyes for at least 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 30 days, or longer.
  • active agent e.g., levofloxacin
  • the antibiotic-eluting, multifilament sutures are generally able to prevent ocular infection and decrease bacterial load against one or multiple bacterial challenges for a period of about 1 week, 2 weeks, or longer in vivo, significantly more effective than a single post-operative antibiotic drop.
  • Exemplary therapeutic or prophylactic agents include, but are not limited to, anti-inflammatory agents such as dexamethasone, prednisolone, triamcinolone, and flurbiprofen, released in an effective amount to prevent post-operative inflammation resulting from the ophthalmic procedure or from the presence of the suture.
  • Other therapeutic agents include rapamycin, neomycin, polymyxin B, bacitracin, gramicidin, gentamicin, oyxtetracycline, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, miconazole, itraconazole, trifluridine, and vidarabine to prevent or inhibit a disease or disorder.
  • Sutures release anti-infective agents such as levofloxacin for a period of at least seven days, more preferably 30 days, in an effective amount to prevent or treat infection.
  • the released drug from the multifilament suture itself may treat an infection that a common suture procedure is at high risk of developing or further developing.
  • the drug-loaded, multifilament nanofibers may weave around and serve as a drug-eluting thin coating on existing or other commercially available sutures.
  • the coating thickness is tunable, and the overall size of the multi-nanofiber-coated suture still meets U.S.P. size requirements.
  • the multifilament suture can be further coated with one or more materials for lubrication, glideability, permeation or impermeation, wettability, and/or non-fouling purposes.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic of the electrospinning configuration to make and twist electrospun fibers.
  • FIG. 2 is a bar graph showing the breaking strengths (N) of twisted multifilaments (all with 1,575 twists, and 28 ⁇ m in diameter) formed with electrospun fibers of different polymers. (* p ⁇ 0.05; conditions with different numbers of asterisks are statistically different with p ⁇ 0.05. Conditions with an equivalent number of asterisks are not statistically different.)
  • the dash line indicates the standards for sutures of USP size 10-0.
  • Polymers used include polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactic acid (PLA), poly (lactide-co-glycolide) 75:25 (PLGA 75:25), polyglycolide (PGA), and polydioxanone (PDO).
  • FIGS. 3A-3E show the preparation and characterizations of monofilament fibers.
  • FIG. 3A is a schematic of electrospinning configuration to make monofilament fibers.
  • FIG. 3B is a bar graph showing the diameter (m) of monofilament electrospun fibers forming from poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) solution containing levofloxacin and different amounts of polyethylene glycol (PEG) at 1%, 2%, or 4%, or 2% F127.
  • FIG. 3C is a bar graph showing the breaking strength (N) of the monofilament fibers of FIG. 3B .
  • FIG. 3D is a line graph showing the in vitro release of levofloxacin from the monofilament fibers of FIG. 3B .
  • FIG. 3E is a scatter plot showing the area size of the inhibition zone (cm 2 ) against S. Epidermidis by the monofilament made containing 4% PEG over time (days) in vitro.
  • FIG. 4 is a bar graph showing the breaking strengths (N) of twisted multifilaments formed with polycaprolactone (PCL) of different molecular weights, or with PCL and 8 (w/w) % levofloxacin (PCL/Levo). (Conditions with different numbers of asterisks are statistically different with p ⁇ 0.05. ## indicates statistical significance at p ⁇ 0.01.)
  • FIG. 5 is a bar graph showing the breaking strengths (N) of twisted multifilaments formed with different amounts of polycaprolactone (PCL) containing 8 wt % levofloxacin (PCL/Levo).
  • FIGS. 6A, 6B, and 6C are bar graphs showing the breaking strengths (N) of twisted multifilaments having different diameters, 21 ⁇ m, 28 ⁇ m ( FIG. 6A ), 38 ⁇ m ( FIG. 6B ), and 48 ⁇ m ( FIG. 6C ).
  • the fibers were formed with PCL and optionally containing 8 (w/w) % levofloxacin.
  • FIG. 7 is bar graph showing the breaking strengths (N) of PCL multifilaments of various twists, and the filaments optionally contain 8 (w/w) % levofloxacin. (Conditions with different numbers of asterisks are statistically different to each other with p ⁇ 0.05. Conditions with an equivalent number of asterisks are not statistically different.)
  • FIG. 8 is a bar graph showing the breaking strengths (N) of multifilaments, all 28 ⁇ m in diameter, containing different amounts (wt %) of levofloxacin.
  • FIG. 9 is bar graph showing the breaking strengths (N) of multifilaments, all 28 ⁇ m in diameter and having 1,575 twists, containing different drugs at 8 (w/w) %.
  • FIG. 10 is a line graph showing the cumulative release of levofloxacin ( ⁇ g) over time (hr) in 37° C. phosphate buffered saline from a 15-mm long, PCL/Levo twisted multifilament of 28 ⁇ m in diameter.
  • FIG. 11 is a schematic of the electrospinning configuration to coat a suture with electrospun fibers. “d” refers to the distance between the drill chuck 370 and the standalone, grounded collector 302 .
  • FIG. 12 is a bar graph showing the amounts of bacteria (colony forming units, CFU), at 48 hours after suture implantation and bacterial administration (except untreated rat cornea) in Sprague-Dawley rat cornea, of different types of sutures.
  • bacteria colony forming units, CFU
  • the rats' corneas were either healthy, untreated (no suture implantation nor bacterial administration) or implanted with the following sutures and treatments: (i) VICRYL® suture, no antibiotic; (ii) nylon suture, no antibiotic; (iii) nylon suture and a single drop of 0.5% levofloxacin immediately following implantation of the suture; (iv) nylon suture and a prescribed, daily, 3-drop of 0.5% levofloxacin; (v) nylon suture that was coated with PCL multifilament fibers containing 8% levofloxacin (PCL/Levo/Nylon), and (vi) sutures made from multifilament fibers electrospun from PCL solution containing 8% levofloxacin (PCL/Levo). Conditions with different numbers of asterisks are statistically different from each other with p ⁇ 0.05. Conditions with an equivalent number of asterisks are not statistically different.
  • FIGS. 13A and 13B are graphs showing the amounts of bacteria (colony forming units, CFU) at day 7 ( FIG. 13A ) and the percent of rat corneas without infection over 7 days ( FIG. 13B ), in Sprague-Dawley rat cornea implanted with (1) Nylon sutures on day 0 and administered with S. aureus on day 5 only, (2) 10-0 grade multifilament sutures made from polycaprolactone (PCL) containing 8% levofloxacin (PCL/8%) and administered with S.
  • PCL polycaprolactone
  • FIG. 14 is a bar graph showing the thickness of neointimal hyperplasia ( ⁇ m) at the anastomosis site of rat's abdominal aorta, at two weeks, after the vessels were tied together using, (i) 8-0 nylon suture, (ii) nylon suture coated with PLLA/PEG containing 20% rapamycin (8-0), or (iii) nylon suture coated with PLLA/PEG containing 40% rapamycin (8-0). Data are calculated as means ⁇ SEM. ** denotes p ⁇ 0.01.
  • FIG. 15 is a line graph showing the cumulative release of rapamycin ( ⁇ g) over time (days) in vitro from rapamycin-loaded (at 20%, 40%, or 80%) nanofibers coated around an existing suture.
  • FIG. 16 is a bar graph showing the breaking strengths (N) of various Nylon sutures coated with rapamycin-loaded (at 20%, 40%, or 80%) PLLA/PEG nanofibers.
  • nanofiber refers to a fiber of material with a thickness or diameter in the range of 1 nm to 1000 nm, while the length may be in the nanometer, micron, or millimeter range or greater.
  • filament herein refers to a slender threadlike object, or in relevant sections refers to the disclosed nanofiber; whereas “multi-filament” refers to a plurality of filaments or the disclosed nanofibers, in a bundle.
  • suture herein refers to a thread or wire used to join together a wound or surgical incision.
  • the disclosed multi-filament suture generally refers to a bundle of twisted nanofibers serving as the thread that may be attached or otherwise secured to a needle and be used by physicians or other medical professionals to join together wounds or incisions in surgery.
  • electrospinning refers to a technique that employs electric forces to elongate and decrease the diameter of a viscoelastic polymer stream, allowing for the formation of solid fibers ranging from nanometers to microns in diameter.
  • ground generally refers to the status of connection to a ground.
  • ground or earth is the reference point in an electrical circuit from which voltages are measured, a common return path for electric current, or a direct physical connection to the Earth. Therefore “grounded” as used herein in relation to electrospinning refers a collector acting as an electrode that is connected to ground or earth, as compared to a positive electrode (e.g., a charged needle tip or nozzle).
  • collector refers to a device where electrically charged solution, jet, melt, or gel is deposited onto in an electric field. Generally the collector is grounded, so as to provide a grounded electrode (that is apart from a positive electrode (e.g., electrically charged needle tip or nozzle)).
  • the “collector” may also refer elements that attach or connect to the device where electrically charged solution, jet, melt, or gel is deposited onto, where the whole is electrically connected and grounded.
  • chuck refers to a type of clamp used to hold an object with radial symmetry (e.g., a cylinder), and herein may be mechanically and electrically connected via an adaptor to a rotator, in forming a part of a grounded collector.
  • a chuck holds the rotating tool or workpiece.
  • alkyl refers to the radical of saturated aliphatic groups, including straight-chain alkyl groups, branched-chain alkyl groups, cycloalkyl (alicyclic) groups, alkyl-substituted cycloalkyl groups, and cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl groups.
  • a straight chain or branched chain alkyl has 30 or fewer carbon atoms in its backbone (e.g., C1-C30 for straight chains, C3-C30 for branched chains), preferably 20 or fewer, more preferably 15 or fewer, most preferably 10 or fewer.
  • preferred cycloalkyls have from 3-10 carbon atoms in their ring structure, and more preferably have 5, 6 or 7 carbons in the ring structure.
  • alkyl (or “lower alkyl”) as used throughout the specification, examples, and claims is intended to include both “unsubstituted alkyls” and “substituted alkyls”, the latter of which refers to alkyl moieties having one or more substituents replacing a hydrogen on one or more carbons of the hydrocarbon backbone.
  • substituents include, but are not limited to, halogen, hydroxyl, carbonyl (such as a carboxyl, alkoxycarbonyl, formyl, or an acyl), thiocarbonyl (such as a thioester, a thioacetate, or a thioformate), alkoxyl, phosphoryl, phosphate, phosphonate, a hosphinate, amino, amido, amidine, imine, cyano, nitro, azido, sulfhydryl, alkylthio, sulfate, sulfonate, sulfamoyl, sulfonamido, sulfonyl, heterocyclyl, aralkyl, or an aromatic or heteroaromatic moiety.
  • carbonyl such as a carboxyl, alkoxycarbonyl, formyl, or an acyl
  • thiocarbonyl such as a thioester, a
  • lower alkyl as used herein means an alkyl group, as defined above, but having from one to ten carbons, more preferably from one to six carbon atoms in its backbone structure. Likewise, “lower alkenyl” and “lower alkynyl” have similar chain lengths. Throughout the application, preferred alkyl groups are lower alkyls. In preferred embodiments, a substituent designated herein as alkyl is a lower alkyl.
  • the moieties substituted on the hydrocarbon chain can themselves be substituted, if appropriate.
  • the substituents of a substituted alkyl may include halogen, hydroxy, nitro, thiols, amino, azido, imino, amido, phosphoryl (including phosphonate and phosphinate), sulfonyl (including sulfate, sulfonamido, sulfamoyl and sulfonate), and silyl groups, as well as ethers, alkylthios, carbonyls (including ketones, aldehydes, carboxylates, and esters), —CF3, and —CN. Cycloalkyls can be substituted in the same manner.
  • the modulus of elasticity measures an object or substance's resistance to being deformed elastically (i.e., non-permanently) when a force is applied to it.
  • the elastic modulus of an object is defined as the slope of its stress-strain curve in the elastic deformation region.
  • E Stress/Strain, where Stress is the force causing the deformation divided by the area to which the force is applied and Strain is the ratio of the change in some length parameter caused by the deformation to the original value of the length parameter.
  • the modulus of elasticity is presented in Pascals (Pa), or megapascals (MPa).
  • the term “attached”, as used herein, refers to the connection of elements in a system, generally via a mechanical means including, but not limited to, a clamp, a claw, a clip, an interlock, a screw, a magnetic attraction, an adhesive, or a vacuum suction. In some embodiments, “attached” can refer to elements that are already an integral piece of a whole device. It is interchangeable with “connected” as used herein.
  • inhibitor refers to a decrease in activity, response, condition, disease, or other biological parameter. This can include but is not limited to the complete ablation of the activity, response, condition, or disease. This may also include, for example, a 10% reduction in the activity, response, condition, or disease as compared to the native or control level. Thus, the reduction can be a 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100%, or any amount of reduction in between as compared to native or control levels.
  • prodrug refers to compounds which, under physiological conditions, are converted into the therapeutically active agents of the present invention.
  • a common method for making a prodrug is to include selected moieties which are hydrolyzed under physiological conditions to reveal the desired molecule.
  • the prodrug is converted by an enzymatic activity of the host animal.
  • prevent does not require absolute forestalling of the condition or disease but can also include a reduction in the onset or severity of the disease or condition or inhibition of one or more symptoms of the disease or disorder.
  • treat refers to the medical management of a subject with the intent to cure, ameliorate, stabilize, or prevent a disease, pathological condition, or disorder.
  • This term includes active treatment, that is, treatment directed specifically toward the improvement of a disease, pathological condition, or disorder, and also includes causal treatment, that is, treatment directed toward removal of the cause of the associated disease, pathological condition, or disorder.
  • this term includes palliative treatment, that is, treatment designed for the relief of symptoms rather than the curing of the disease, pathological condition, or disorder; preventative treatment, that is, treatment directed to minimizing or partially or completely inhibiting the development of the associated disease, pathological condition, or disorder; and supportive treatment, that is, treatment employed to supplement another specific therapy directed toward the improvement of the associated disease, pathological condition, or disorder.
  • therapeutic agent refers to an agent that can be administered to prevent or treat one or more symptoms of a disease or disorder. These may be a nucleic acid, a nucleic acid analog, a small molecule, a peptidomimetic, a protein, peptide, carbohydrate or sugar, lipid, or surfactant, or a combination thereof.
  • diagnosis agent generally refers to an agent that can be administered to reveal, pinpoint, and define the localization of a pathological process.
  • prophylactic agent generally refers to an agent that can be administered to prevent disease or to prevent certain conditions like pregnancy.
  • phrases “pharmaceutically acceptable” refers to compositions, polymers and other materials and/or dosage forms which are, within the scope of sound medical judgment, suitable for use in contact with the tissues of human beings and animals without excessive toxicity, irritation, allergic response, or other problem or complication, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio.
  • pharmaceutically acceptable carrier refers to pharmaceutically acceptable materials, compositions or vehicles, such as a liquid or solid filler, diluent, solvent or encapsulating material involved in carrying or transporting any subject composition, from one organ, or portion of the body, to another organ, or portion of the body. Each carrier must be “acceptable” in the sense of being compatible with the other ingredients of a subject composition and not injurious to the patient.
  • biodegradable generally refers to a material that will degrade or erode under physiologic conditions to smaller units or chemical species that are capable of being metabolized, eliminated, or excreted by the subject.
  • the degradation time is a function of composition and morphology. Degradation times can be from hours to years.
  • biocompatible generally refers to materials that are, along with any metabolites or degradation products thereof, generally non-toxic to the recipient, and do not cause any significant adverse effects to the recipient.
  • biocompatible materials are materials which do not elicit a significant inflammatory or immune response when administered to a patient.
  • the term “degrade”, as used herein, refers to a reduction in one or more properties of the polymer over time.
  • the one or more properties include the molecular weight, total mass, mechanical strength, elasticity, or the density or porosity of the fibers formed from polymers.
  • a degradable polymer is capable of being absorbed by living mammalian tissue. This can occur over a period of days, weeks, months, or years.
  • the prevailing mechanism of degradation of hydrolytically biodegradable polymers is chemical hydrolysis of the hydrolytically unstable backbone. In a bulk eroding polymer, the polymer network is fully hydrated and chemically degraded throughout the entire polymer volume. As the polymer degrades, the molecular weight decreases.
  • Non-degradable polymer is suitably resistant to the action of living mammalian tissue.
  • U.S.P. United States Pharmacopeia
  • Electrospinning is a versatile technique first introduced in the early 1900's, which employs electric forces to elongate and reduce the diameter of a viscoelastic polymer jet, allowing for the formation of solid fibers ranging from nanometers to microns in diameter (Bhardwaj, N., et al., Biotechnol Adv, 28, 325-347 (2010); Li, D. & Xia, Y., Advanced Materials, 16, 1151-1170 (2004)).
  • An electrostatic charge is applied on the needle to overcome the surface tension of the solution.
  • the concentration of the polymer solution in electrospinning is greater than a minimum concentration for any given polymer, termed the critical entanglement concentration, below which a stable jet cannot be achieved and no nanofibers will form, although nanoparticles may be achieved (electrospray) (Leach M K, et al., J Vis Exp ., (47): 2494 (2011)).
  • the multifilament composite fibers built upon electrospinning are twisted or braided to form ultra-thin, high strength, drug-loaded sutures or to coat a commercially available suture or thread to provide additional therapeutic functionality.
  • some embodiments provide that the charged polymer jet deposits in the air gap between a chuck 270 (grounded) and another parallel, grounded collector 202 . Even when the chuck is attached to needles or substrates that protrude into the air gap between the chuck and the parallel collector, charged polymer jets can deposit in between, where fibers are formed with one end attached to the chuck and the other end attached to the standalone parallel collector. In a general configuration, collectors capable of rotation are used for polymer jets to deposit and form fibers.
  • a suture, thread or equivalent that is conductive or non-conductive, which can be any commercially available suture is placed between a drill chuck 370 and a parallel stand 302 , where the thread end of the suture is fixed at the drill chuck 370 and the needle end is placed through the stand 302 but kept free to rotate, as shown in FIG. 11 .
  • This configuration allows for the deposition of hundreds of fibers around the suture between the chuck 370 and the parallel stand 302 . Due to the electric charge, the fibers are held tightly by the chuck and the parallel stand. Rotating the drill chuck twists the fibers, with the suture “buried” among the fibers, to form nanofiber coating on the suture.
  • the individual fibers can be so thin that they are able to align the internal polymer chains without the use of heat treatment or extrusion to provide increased strength.
  • the chuck when the parallel collector is also connected to a motor or is a second drill chuck that is connected to a motor, the chuck can rotate in one direction, e.g., clockwise, to twist these fibers, while the other end is held stationary on the parallel collector. In other embodiments, both ends of the fiber(s) (e.g., in opposite directions, or at different speed) are rotated to twist the fibers.
  • the twisted fibers can optionally be further twisted in the opposite direction, e.g., counterclockwise, to ensure that the twisted fibers do not coil or snap.
  • twists of increasing numbers can be done to the fibers, e.g., 500 twists, 1,000 twists, 1,500 twists, 2,000 twists, 2,500 twists, 3,000 twists, 3,500 twists, and 4,000 twists, respectively, or even greater.
  • the diameter of the overall fiber bundle generally decreases, and the strength generally increases.
  • twisting the fibers reduces the loss of tensile strength or even increases the strength for the multifilament composite.
  • the number of twists needed to meet certain strength parameters will vary depending on the composition of the polymer/drug, and the size of individual fibers. For instance, with fibers made from a high molecular weight (e.g., 220 kDa) poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA), twists ranging from 2,000 to 4,000 are generally needed to generated twisted fibers that meet the strength requirement for sutures according to United States Pharmacopeia (USP).
  • USP United States Pharmacopeia
  • PCL polycaprolactone
  • certain types of polycaprolactone (PCL) can be twisted at a lower number, e.g., much below 1,575 twists, and still surpass strength requirements.
  • including therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic agents up to about 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30% by weight or even greater, can still meet USP requirements for strength.
  • a braid is an organization of three or more fibers or fiber bundles intertwined in such a way that no two fibers (or fiber bundles) are twisted around one another.
  • fibers are removed from the collector(s) and placed into braiding machines known in the art to form braids of fibers.
  • the electrospinning system twists rather than braids.
  • Several composite fibers can be collected and attached to the drill chuck and/or to a standstill or rotating parallel stand and the drill chuck rotated to twist the composite fibers together in the same way that individual nanofibers are twisted together to manufacture the composite fiber.
  • a component of a system for removing a fiber from a collection surface needs not be in the illustrated form. Any suitable component can be included to remove the fibers such as, without limitation, a blade, a wedge, a plate, or any other shaped device that can shear or cut the fiber from the collection surface.
  • multiple 10-0 and/or 11-0 nanofiber sutures may be braided to make drug-loaded sutures that meet U.S.P. specifications for 2-0-7-0 sutures.
  • the parallel collectors are in a lined up in a position that is perpendicular to the needle or nozzle.
  • the needle or nozzle can be 90°, 85°, 80°, 75°, 70°, 65°, 60°, 55°, 50°, 45°, 40°, 35°, 30°, or at another non-parallel angle with respect to the collectors.
  • the distance between the end of a needle or the tip of a nozzle and the collectors can be between about 4 cm and about 100 cm, or even greater. In some embodiments, this distance is between about 6 cm and about 25 cm.
  • the distance between the motor and the parallel stand (d) can be between about 2 mm up to about 200 cm, or even greater, e.g. distances between 270 and 202 in FIG. 1 , or between 370 and 302 in FIG. 11 . Maximum possible distance is generally understood to be related to fiber diameter, as well as other formation parameters. In some embodiments, the distance between the collectors is between about 15 cm and about 35 cm.
  • the heights of the collectors are about the same, i.e., parallel collectors. In other instances, the heights of the opposing collectors can be of different heights, by difference of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% or greater, of the taller collector.
  • a polymer solution, sol-gel, suspension or melt may be loaded into the electrospinning ejection device (e.g., needled syringe, nozzle).
  • the needle can have be a standard needle having a diameter between 34 gauge and 7 gauge, where diameter decreases with gauge size.
  • multiple needles are used to generate multiple streams of polymer jets towards the collectors.
  • the height of the needle or nozzle where the polymer jet starts from can be the same or different from the height(s) of the collector(s). In preferred embodiments, the height of the needle is greater than that of the parallel collectors.
  • the needle is pointed in a horizontal orientation, and in another embodiment, the needle is pointed in a vertical orientation.
  • the angle that the needle is at relative to the horizontal level can be 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, 70°, 80°, or 90°, preferably from a height no shorter than the height of the collectors.
  • the needles or syringes where the needles are attached can be mounted onto a motorized platform, e.g., a stage, a dispenser, to allow for alterations in the configuration of the system or movement of the needles.
  • the polymer solution can be held in a syringe that is controlled by a programmable syringe pump known in the art.
  • the gauge of the needle, the speed that the polymer solution is pushed out from the needle, and the volume of polymer to be electrospun can be tuned, according to the composition and the viscosity of the solution, the configuration of the collectors, and the desired properties of formed fibers.
  • multiple needles are used to generate multiple streams of polymer jets on the collectors.
  • the syringe pump can be mounted onto a base atop a motorized stage known in the art. This controls the motion of the needle in the x direction and the y direction. Moving along an x-direction may position the needle closer or farther away from the collectors, while moving along a y-direction may position the needle at a constant distance from the center-line of the parallel collectors.
  • the critical field strength required to overcome the forces due to surface tension of the solution and fotin a jet will depend on many variables of the system. These variables include not only the type of polymer and solvent, but also the solution concentration and viscosity, as well as the temperature of the system. In general, characterization of the jet formed, and hence characterization of the fibers formed, depends primarily upon solution viscosity, net charge density carried by the electrospinning jet and surface tension of the solution. The ability to form small diameter fibers depends upon the combination of all of the various parameters involved. For example, electrospinning of lower viscosity solutions will tend to form beaded fibers, rather than smooth fibers.
  • the electrospun fibers are made under sterile conditions to avoid the need for subsequent sterilization, although most sutures can be sterilized by means such as ethylene oxide.
  • Additional elements can be included in the electrospinning system, such as means for temperature control, for example, a strip heater, fan, or a temperature controller.
  • One or two motors can be connected to one or both opposing collectors.
  • a motor has a shaft to allow for connection with specific collectors via the adaptor.
  • the motor is capable of providing clock-wise or counter clock-wise rotation up to a speed of 1,000 revolutions per minute (rpm), 2,000 rpm, 3,000 rpm, 4,000 rpm, 5,000 rpm, 6,000 rpm, 7,000 rpm, 8,000 rpm, 9,000 rpm, 10,000 rpm, or greater.
  • ultra-thin, twisted multi-nanofiber sutures with sufficient strength and drug loading capacity.
  • thin nanofibers are fabricated and twisted in a bundle to compact and strengthen the mechanical properties.
  • Single needle single jet, single needle multi-jets, multi-needle multi-jets, or even needleless configurations for electrospinning may be used to fabricate polymeric nanofibers, which later are twisted by rotating two ends of the bundle of nanofibers in different angular speed and/or in different angular directions.
  • Techniques other than electrospinning may also be used to fabricate polymeric nanofibers, such as meltblowing, bicomponent spinning, forcespinning, and flash-spinning.
  • a molten polymer is extruded through the orifice of a die.
  • the fibers are formed by the elongation of the polymer streams coming out of the orifice by air-drag and are collected on the surface of a suitable collector in the form of a web.
  • the average fiber diameter mainly depends on the throughput rate, melt viscosity, melt temperature, air temperature and air velocity.
  • Nanofibers can be fabricated by special die designs with a small orifice, reducing the viscosity of the polymeric melt and suitable modification of the meltblowing setup.
  • hot air flow may be provided in the same direction of the polymer around the die. The hot air stream flowing along the filaments helps in attenuating them to smaller diameter.
  • the viscosity of polymeric melt can be lowered by increasing the temperature.
  • molten polymer is forced through the pores of a template (e.g., an anodic aluminum oxide membrane (AAOM)) and then subsequently cooled down to room temperature.
  • a template e.g., an anodic aluminum oxide membrane (AAOM)
  • a special stainless steel appliance may be designed to support the template, to bear the pressure and to restrict the molten polymer movement along the direction of the pores.
  • the appliance containing the polymer was placed on the hot plate of a compressor (with temperature controlled functions) followed by the forcing of the polymeric melt.
  • Isolated nanofibers may be obtained by the removal of the template (e.g., dissolution with appropriate solvent(s)).
  • a solution of fiber forming polymer in a liquid spin agent is spun into a zone of lower temperature and substantially lower pressure to generate plexi-filamentary film-fibril strands.
  • a spin agent is required for flash-spinning which: 1) should be a non-solvent to the polymer below its normal boiling point, 2) can form a solution with the polymer at high pressure, 3) can form a desired two-phase dispersion with the polymer when the solution pressure is reduced slightly, and 4) should vaporize when the flash is released into a substantially low pressure zone. Flash-spinning is more suitable for difficult to dissolve polymers such as polyolefins and high molecular weight polymers.
  • the spinning temperature should be higher than the melting point of polymer and the boiling point of solvent in order to effect solvent evaporation prior to the collection of the polymer.
  • Bicomponent spinning is a two-step process that involves spinning two polymers through the spinning die (which forms the bicomponent fiber with island-in-sea (IIS), side-by-side, sheath-core, citrus or segmented-pie structure) and the removal of one polymer.
  • IIS island-in-sea
  • sheath-core citrus or segmented-pie structure
  • the disclosed stent devices may be prepared via other methods than electrospinning, such as 3-D printing and dipping in polymer solutions and drying of a cylindrical/wire-shaped template, followed by removal of the template after the polymeric wall of the stent is formed, resulting in a stent device with a wall surrounding a lumen.
  • Suture diameters are defined by the United States Pharmacopeia (U.S.P.). Modern sutures range from #2 (heavy braided suture) to #11-0 (fine monofilament suture for ophthalmics). Suitable diameters for ophthalmic use are USP size 6.0-11.0, preferably 7.0-11.0, more preferably 8.0-11.0, most preferably 9.0-11.0.
  • class I suture is composed of silk or synthetic fibers of monofilament, twisted, or braided construction where the coating, if any, does not significantly affect thickness (e.g., braided silk, polyester, or nylon; monofilament nylon or polypropylene); class II suture is composed of cotton or linen fibers or coated natural or synthetic fibers where the coating significantly affects thickness but does not contribute significantly to strength (e.g., virgin silk sutures); and class III suture is composed of monofilament or multifilament metal wire.
  • Non-absorbable sutures as formed satisfy the strength requirement for non-absorbable sutures set forth in the United States Pharmacopeia (Table 2).
  • the sutures as formed typically have a diameter between 10 ⁇ m and about 400 ⁇ m, preferably between 10 and about 50 microns, more preferably between about 20 and about 50 microns.
  • the sutures typically have a Young's modulus of at least about 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700, or 1800 MPa.
  • the overall diameter of the multifilament “bundle” generally decreases, e.g., 500 ⁇ m, 400 ⁇ m, 300 ⁇ m, 200 ⁇ m, 150 ⁇ m, 100 ⁇ m, 50 ⁇ m, 40 ⁇ m, 30 ⁇ m, 20 ⁇ m, or 10 ⁇ m, while the “bundle” is of sufficient tensile strength according to USP standards.
  • the sutures have the above diameter and a tensile modulus (e.g., Young's modulus) of at least about 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, or 1000 MPa.
  • the sutures have a tensile modulus (e.g., Young's modulus) from about 1000 to about 2500 MPa, preferably from about 1200 to about 2500 MPa, more preferably from about 1300 to about 2300 MPa.
  • the sutures should retain the tensile strength for the requisite period of time.
  • the sutures have a breaking strength as specified by the USP in Tables 1 and 2 for different diameters.
  • the multifilament fibers are made with absorbable materials which are broken down in tissue after a given period of time, which depending on the material can be from ten days to one year. They can be used in many of the internal tissues of the body. In cases where three weeks is sufficient for the wound to close thinly, the suture is not needed any more, and absorbable multifilament fibers leave no foreign material inside the body and no need for the patient to have the sutures removed. Examples of absorbable polymers are listed as biodegradable polymers below.
  • the multifilament fibers are made with non-absorbable materials which are not metabolized by the body. They can be used either on skin wound closure, where the sutures can be removed after a few weeks, or in some inner tissues in which absorbable sutures are not adequate.
  • any polymer can be used in electrospinning to prepare multifilament fibers.
  • the rhythmic movement in the heart and in blood vessels may require a suture material which stays longer than three weeks, to give the wound enough time to close.
  • Other organs, like the bladder, contain fluids may make absorbable sutures disappear too soon for the wound to heal.
  • a non-absorbable or a mixture of absorbable and non-absorbable materials is used to prepare electrospun fibers and to twist into sutures or coatings for sutures. Examples of non-absorbable polymers are listed as nondegradable polymers below.
  • the fibers can be made with degradable or non-degradable polymer.
  • the multifilament fibers can be used to coat existing sutures to provide desired surface properties.
  • the coating fibers include one or more therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic agents that are encapsulated in the nanofibers, which upon twisting onto non-agent-eluting suture allows for sustained release of the agent.
  • the coating improves glide and reduces irritation and capillarity while still maintaining good knot security.
  • the coating fibers are still thin enough, do not compromise the strength of the sutures, and do not get easily rubbed off during manipulation. The lower the coefficient of friction, the less the thread gets stuck and injures the tissues.
  • the glyconate i.e., a copolymer made of glycolide (e.g., 72%), trimethylene carbonate (e.g., 14%), and caprolactone (e.g., 14%), can be used to prepare the electrospun fibers or coated onto the composite suture, combining good glideability and/or knot security.
  • polymers that have been found suitable for use in biological applications can be utilized.
  • polymers that are degradable can be utilized.
  • Non-degradable polymers can be utilized alone, in combination, or in sequence with degradable polymers.
  • a polymeric solution that is loaded into an electrospinning nozzle or syringe can include any suitable solvent. Selection of solvent can be important in determining the characteristics of the solution, and hence of the characteristic properties of the nanofibers formed during the process. Examples include hexafluoroisopropanol, methanol, chloroform, dichloromethane, dimethylformamide, acetone, acetic acid, acetonitrile, m-cresole, tetrahydrofuran (THF), toluene, as well as mixtures of solvents.
  • solvent include hexafluoroisopropanol, methanol, chloroform, dichloromethane, dimethylformamide, acetone, acetic acid, acetonitrile, m-cresole, tetrahydrofuran (THF), toluene, as well as mixtures of solvents.
  • Preferred polymers including polyhydroxy acids such as poly(lactic acid), poly(glycolic acid) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), polycaprolactone, polydioxanone, as well as combinations of polymers (i.e., poly-1-lactic acid/polyethylene glycol) having a molecular weight between 5 kDa and 500 kDa.
  • suitable biodegradable, biocompatible polymers include polyhydroxyalkanoates such as poly-3-hydroxybutyrate or poly-4-hydroxybutyrate; poly(orthoesters); polyanhydrides; poly(phosphazenes); poly(lactide-co-caprolactones); polycarbonates such as tyrosine polycarbonates; polyamides (including synthetic and natural polyamides); polyesteramides; other polyesters; poly(dioxanones); polyurethanes; polyetheresters; polymethylmethacrylates; polysiloxanes; poly(oxyethylene)/poly(oxypropylene) copolymers; polyketals; polyphosphates; polyhydroxyvalerates; as well as copolymers thereof.
  • the biodegradable polymer is polycaprolactone or polyglycolide or a poly-(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) such as poly-(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) containing about 55 to about 80 mole % lactide monomer and about 45 to about 20 mole % glycolide and poly-(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) containing about 65 to about 75 mole % lactide monomer and about 35 to about 25 mole % glycolide.
  • the poly-(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) can contain terminal acid groups.
  • the biodegradable, biocompatible polymer can be a polylactic acid polymer or copolymer containing lactide units substituted with alkyl moieties. Examples include, but are not limited to, poly(hexyl-substituted lactide) or poly(dihexyl-substituted lactide).
  • the molecular weight of the polymer can be varied to optimize the desired properties, such as drug release rate, tensile strength and tensile modulus, and degradation for specific applications.
  • the one or more biodegradable, biocompatible polymers can have a molecular weight of between about 1 kDa and 500 kDa. In certain embodiments, the biodegradable, biocompatible polymers have a molecular weight of between about 15 kDa and about 300 kDa, more preferably between about 50 kDa and about 2000 kDa.
  • Non-degradable polymers include polyurethanes, silicones or silicon elastomers, polyesters, acrylic polymers and copolymers, vinyl halide polymers and copolymers, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl ethers, ethylene-methyl methacrylate copolymers, s, ABC resins and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, polyamides such as nylon 66 and polycaprolactam, polyimides; polyethers, and a biocompatible polymer according to claim 1 selected from the group consisting of a combination thereof.
  • the fibers may include one or more therapeutic, prophylactic, or diagnostic agents that are blended, encapsulated, conjugated to the polymer in a solution before electro spinning, or encapsulated in/conjugated to sustained release nanoparticle/microparticle formulations that are entrapped in between or conjugated with the formed fibers.
  • These may be proteins, peptides, nucleic acid, carbohydrate, lipid, or combinations thereof, or small molecules.
  • Suitable small molecule active agents include organic and organometallic compounds. In some instances, the small molecule active agent has a molecular weight of less than about 2000 g/mol, preferably less than about 1500 g/mol, more preferably less than about 1200 g/mol, most preferably less than about 1000 g/mol.
  • the small molecule active agent has a molecular weight less than about 500 g/mol.
  • the small molecule active agent can be a hydrophilic, hydrophobic, or amphiphilic compound.
  • Biomolecules typically have a molecular weight of greater than about 2000 g/mol and may be composed of repeat units such as amino acids (peptide, proteins, enzymes, etc.) or nitrogenous base units (nucleic acids).
  • the active agent is an ophthalmic therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic agent.
  • Representative therapeutic agents include, but are not limited to, analgesic agents, anti-fibrotic/anti-scarring agents, anti-inflammatory drugs, including immunosuppressant agents and anti-allergenic agents, anti-infectious, and anesthetic agents.
  • exemplary analgesic agents include simple analgesics (e.g., paracetamol, aspirin), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g., ibuprofen, diclofenac sodium, naproxen sodium), weaker opioids (e.g., combinations including codeine phosphate, tramadol hydrochloride, dextropropoxyphe hydrochloride and paracetamol), and stronger opioids (e.g., morphine sulphate, oxycodone, pethidine hydrochloride).
  • simple analgesics e.g., paracetamol, aspirin
  • non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs e.g., ibuprofen, diclofenac sodium,
  • anti-inflammatory drugs include triamcinolone acetonide, fluocinolone acetonide, prednisolone, dexamethasone, loteprendol, fluorometholone.
  • Immune modulating drugs such as: cyclosporine, tacrolimus and rapamycin.
  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs include ketorolac, nepafenac, and diclofenac.
  • Antiinfectious agents include antiviral agents, antibacterial agents, antiparasitic agents, and anti-fungal agents.
  • antibiotics include moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, cefazolin, vancomycin, tigecycline, gentamycin, tobramycin, ceftazidime, ofloxacin, gatifloxacin, rapamycin; antifungals: amphotericin, voriconazole, natamycin.
  • steroids suitable to include in the disclosed suture include, but are not limited to, testosterone, cholic acid, dexamethasone, lanosterol, progesterone, medrogestone, and ⁇ -sitosterol.
  • levofloxacin moxifloxacin
  • bacitracin sirolimus
  • sunitinib triamcinolone acetonide
  • cyclosporine and dexamethasone are included individually or in combination in the formulations.
  • active agents can include anti-glaucoma agents that lower intraocular pressure (IOP), anti-angiogenesis agents, growth factors, and combinations thereof for treatment of vascular disorders or diseases.
  • anti-glaucoma agents include mitomycin C, prostaglandin analogs such as travoprost and latanoprost, prostamides such as bimatoprost; beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists such as timolol, betaxolol, levobetaxolol, and carteolol, alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists such as brimonidine and apraclonidine, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors such as brinzolamide, acetazolamine, and dorzolamide, miotics (i.e., parasympathomimetics) such as pilocarpine and ecothiopate), seretonergics, muscarinics, and dopaminergic agonists.
  • mitomycin C prostaglandin
  • anti-angiogenesis agents include, but are not limited to, antibodies to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) such as bevacizumab (AVASTIN®) and rhuFAb V2 (ranibizumab, LUCENTIS®), and other anti-VEGF compounds including aflibercept (EYLEA®); MACUGEN® (pegaptanim sodium, anti-VEGF aptamer or EYE001) (Eyetech Pharmaceuticals); pigment epithelium derived factor(s) (PEDF); COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib (CELEBREX®) and rofecoxib (VIOXX®); interferon alpha; interleukin-12 (IL-12); thalidomide (THALOMID®) and derivatives thereof such as lenalidomide (REVLIMID®); squalamine; endostatin; angiostatin; ribozyme inhibitors such as ANGIOZYME® (Sirna Therapeutics); multifunctional anti
  • the agent is a diagnostic agent imaging or otherwise assessing the tissue of interest.
  • diagnostic agents include paramagnetic molecules, fluorescent compounds, magnetic molecules, and radionuclides, x-ray imaging agents, and contrast media.
  • the active agents may be present in their neutral form, or in the form of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt. In some cases, it may be desirable to prepare a formulation containing a salt of an active agent due to one or more of the salt's advantageous physical properties, such as enhanced stability or a desirable solubility or dissolution profile.
  • pharmaceutically acceptable salts can be prepared by reaction of the free acid or base forms of an active agent with a stoichiometric amount of the appropriate base or acid in water or in an organic solvent, or in a mixture of the two; generally, non-aqueous media like ether, ethyl acetate, ethanol, isopropanol, or acetonitrile are preferred.
  • Pharmaceutically acceptable salts include salts of an active agent derived from inorganic acids, organic acids, alkali metal salts, and alkaline earth metal salts as well as salts formed by reaction of the drug with a suitable organic ligand (e.g., quaternary ammonium salts).
  • ophthalmic drugs sometimes administered in the form of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt include timolol maleate, brimonidine tartrate, and sodium diclofenac.
  • the agent or agents can be directly dispersed or incorporated into the fibers as particles using common solvent with the polymer, for examples microparticles and/or nanoparticles of drug alone, or microparticles and/or nanoparticles containing a matrix, such as a polymer matrix, in which the agent or agents are encapsulated or otherwise associated with the particles.
  • the concentration of the drug in the finished fibers or foamed structures of fibers can vary.
  • the amount of drug is between about 0.1% and about 50% by weight, preferably between about 1% and about 20% by weight, more preferably between about 3% and about 20% by weight, most preferably between about 5% and about 20% by weight of the finished stents.
  • the agent is released at an effective amount to inhibit, prevent, or treat disorders or diseases in ophthalmology, cardiology, or neurology among others for at least 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, or 20 weeks.
  • the sutures can be modified by inclusion of a hydrophilic polymer such as PEG or a POLOXAMER® to provide a burst release of an active agent, such as an antimicrobial agent, followed by sustained release over an extended period of time, such as one week, two weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 14 weeks, 16 weeks, 18 weeks, or 20 weeks.
  • a hydrophilic polymer such as PEG or a POLOXAMER®
  • an active agent such as an antimicrobial agent
  • the amount of polymer or polymers in the finished fibers can vary. In some embodiments, the concentration of the polymer or polymers is from about 75% to about 85% by weight of the finished fibers. In some embodiments, the concentration of the polymer or polymers is from about 85% to about 100% by weight of the finished fibers.
  • excipients include pH modifying agents, preservatives, antioxidants, suspending agents, wetting agents, viscosity modifiers, tonicity agents, stabilizing agents, and combinations thereof. There may be residual levels of solvent.
  • Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable excipients are preferably selected from materials which are generally recognized as safe (GRAS), and may be administered to an individual without causing undesirable biological side effects or unwanted interactions.
  • the suture is sterilized and packaged dry or in fluid, in containers (e.g., packets) so designed that sterility is maintained until the container is opened.
  • the suture is secured to a needle, which is sterilized and packaged.
  • the multi-filament polymeric sutures can be used simultaneously as drug delivery vehicles and sutures to close wounds in surgery including, but not limited to, ophthalmology (e.g., antibacterial operations; corneal transplant; trauma; acanthamoeba keratitis ; specialty surgeries), cardiology, vascular surgery (e.g., anastomosis, or grafts), plastic surgery (e.g., keloids/hypertrophic scar removal; steroid-loaded to prevent scarring after surgery), regenerative medicine (e.g., peripheral nerve regeneration), and pediatric surgery.
  • applications include ones created in ophthalmologic surgery or due to injury or trauma to the eye. They can also be used to promote vascular or graft anastomosis.
  • the fibers can also be used as sutures for skin wound or internal tissue, e.g., nerve, heart, bladder etc.
  • the sutures can be used in a variety of ophthalmic procedures known in the art. Examples include, but are not limited to, trabeculectomy as well as pterygium removal, cataract surgery, strabismus correction surgery, penetrating keratoplasty, sclerectomy, and conjunctival closure.
  • Trabeculectomy is an ophthalmic surgical procedure used in the treatment of glaucoma. Removing part of the eye's trabecular meshwork and adjacent structures allows drainage of aqueous humor from within the eye to underneath the conjunctiva to relieve intraocular pressure.
  • the scleral flap is typically sutured loosely back in place with several sutures.
  • Common complications include blebitis (an isolated bleb infection typically caused by microorganisms such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, Propriobacterium acnes , or Staphylococcus aureus ), inflammation, and bleb-associated endophthalmitis.
  • Endophthalmitis is an inflammation of the ocular cavities and their adjacent structures. It is a possible complication of all intraocular surgeries, particularly cataract surgery, which can result in loss of vision or the eye itself. Endophthalmitis is usually accompanied by severe pain, loss of vision, and redness of the conjunctiva and the underlying episclera. Infectious etiology is the most common and various bacteria and fungi have been isolated as the cause of the endophthalmitis. The patient needs urgent examination by an ophthalmologist and/or vitreo-retina specialist who will usually decide for urgent intervention to provide intravitreal injection of potent antibiotics and also prepare for an urgent pars plana vitrectomy as needed. Enucleation may be required to remove a blind and painful eye.
  • ophthalmic suture materials are biodegradable or absorbable and biodegradable over the useful suture lifetime, retaining the requisite tensile strength, mechanical modulus, and capable of delivering therapeutic or prophylactic agents to increase patient success.
  • suture can be biodegradable.
  • sutures can be used to close the wound and release antibiotic and anti-inflammatory drugs.
  • sutures can be placed on sclera flaps providing local chemotherapeutic agents, decreasing production of scar tissue, and on conjunctival closure with antibiotic release.
  • the sutures hold the graft, as well as release antibiotic and immunosuppressant agents.
  • the twisted multifilament fibers can weave around and coat existing sutures or other devices, to provide additional functionality and/or surface properties.
  • the coating fibers include one or more therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic agents that are encapsulated in the nanofibers. Two or more populations of fibers including different active agents can be twisted and form the coating on a suture, and depending on the sequence of coating and tightness of twisting, the release profiles for the different active agents are controlled and finely tuned.
  • the coating improves glide and reduces irritation and capillarity while still maintaining good knot security.
  • the coating fibers are still thin enough, do not compromise the strength of the sutures, and do not get easily rubbed off during manipulation. Specifically, the lower the coefficient of friction, the less the thread gets stuck and injures the tissues.
  • a glyconate i.e., a copolymer made of glycolide (e.g., 72%), trimethylene carbonate (e.g., 14%), and caprolactone (e.g., 14%), can be used to prepare the electrospun fibers, combining good glideability and knot security.
  • Mixtures of materials can be electrospun to form composite fibers.
  • a solution including one or more polymers in combination with a non-polymeric additive can be electrospun to form composite fibers.
  • Additives are generally selected based upon the desired application of the formed fiber structures.
  • one or more polymers can be electrospun with a biologically active additive that can be polymeric or non-polymeric, as desired.
  • a 3D structure of fibers can include an electrospun polymer in conjunction with one or more therapeutic, prophylactic, and/or diagnostic agent.
  • the secondary material can be incorporated in the fibers during formation as is known in the art, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,821,479 to Smith, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,753,454 to Smith, et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,273 to Chung, et al.
  • the ultra-thin, high strength multifilament fibers can be braided into membranes with defined interstices for industrial applications, e.g., water purification.
  • Suture breaking strength, Levo concentration, and bacterial load are presented as mean ⁇ standard error below. Statistical significance for breaking strength and bacterial load data has been determined via one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test. Statistical significance for the Kaplan-Meier curve of long-term infection prevention was determined via the Mantel-Cox test.
  • PCL Polycaprolactone
  • PLLA polylactic acid
  • PLGA poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)
  • PGA polyglycolide
  • PDO polydioxanone
  • a grounded, drill chuck 270 connected to a motor 250 via an adaptor 260 was a collector 204 for electrospun fibers to deposit on one end; and a standalone, parallel, grounded stand 202 was used as another collector for the other end of the electrospun fibers to deposit onto.
  • the two grounded collectors, 202 and 204 were situated perpendicularly to the syringe pump. Rotation of one collector resulted in the twisting of deposited parallel fibers into a single, multifilament suture. The amount of fiber deposition, and consequently, suture diameter could be reproducibly tuned by adjusting spray time.
  • a 120 W regulated high voltage DC power source 200 applied a voltage to a blunt tip needle 210 on the end of a syringe 220 .
  • the drill chuck 270 was connected to a mounted 120V, 1 ⁇ 3 hp, 300-3,450 rpm speed-control motor 250 (capable of clockwise or counter-clockwise rotation) via an adaptor 260 .
  • Solutions were electrospun via pumping at 450 ⁇ L/h through a 20 G blunt-tip needle with an applied voltage of 17 kV, at a distance of 13 cm from a set of parallel grounded collectors to form parallel nanofibers.
  • One collector was then rotated clockwise for a specified number of rotations (twists) prior to removal of the suture from the collectors and storage at ⁇ 20° C.
  • the drill chuck 270 was rotated about an axis defined by collectors 204 , 202 , to twist the parallel fibers into 28 ⁇ m-thick in diameter and having 1,575 twists.
  • Suture diameter was determined via light microscopy using the 20 ⁇ objective of an Eclipse TS100 (Nikon Instruments, Melville, N.Y.) and calibrated Spot 5.2 Basic imaging software (Spot Imaging, Sterling Heights, Mich.). Each suture was measured at three different locations at least 2 cm apart, and used in additional experimentation only if the average diameter was within ⁇ 0.5 ⁇ m of the specified diameter.
  • Suture morphology was observed via SEM at 1 kV using a LEO Field Emission SEM (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Prior to imaging, samples were desiccated and then sputter coated with 10 nm of Au/Pd (Desk II, Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, N.J.).
  • the multifilament sutures (having an overall thickness of 28 ⁇ m after twisting of hundreds of nano-fibers) made from PCL provided the greatest strength, and surpassed the knot-pull tensile strength requirement according to USP specifications for 10-0 sutures.
  • This study was performed comparing the listed polymers all of a molecular weight of about 75 kDa. It is believed if other molecular weights of polymers are used, a different polymer composition may possess the greatest strength after twisting.
  • Multifilament, drug-loaded sutures were cylindrical and met U.S.P. specifications for 10-0 suture diameter (20-29 ⁇ m), making them suitable in size for ocular surgery. SEM images showed they were also comparable in both size and shape to commercially available 10-0 Ethilon® (nylon) sutures.
  • Poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) solutions containing levofloxacin and different amounts of polyethylene glycol (PEG) at 1%, 2%, or 4%, or 2% by weight PLURONIC® F127 were electrospun. Briefly, PLLA (221 kDa; Corbion, Amsterdam, Netherlands) at 86-89% (w/w) was mixed with levofloxacin (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) at 10 wt % and either PEG (35 kDa, Sigma Aldrich) or PLURONIC® F127 (BASF, Florham Park, 73 NJ) between 1-4 wt % and dissolved in chloroform (Sigma Aldrich) at room temperature for 24 h.
  • PEG polyethylene glycol
  • Levofloxacin concentration was held constant and PLLA concentration in chloroform was maintained at 15 wt % in all formulations.
  • Sutures were produced by wet electrospinning the polymer/drug solution in a setup consisting of a high voltage power supply (Gamma High Voltage Research, Ormond Beach, Fla.), syringe pump (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass.), and rotating metal collector with hexane (Sigma Aldrich) as the lending solvent.
  • the polymer solution was ejected through a blunted 18G needle (Fisher Scientific) at 13 mL/h with 4.7 kV of applied voltage 5 cm away from the collector rotating at 40 rpm. Fibers were then collected and desiccated for two days prior to storage at ⁇ 20° C.
  • SEM scanning electron microscopy
  • suture 10 mg was placed into 10 mL of 1 ⁇ Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS, ATCC, Manassas, Va.) rotating at 37° C. At each time point, 2 mL aliquots were withdrawn and replaced with fresh PBS. Aliquots were frozen, lyophilized, and resuspended in ultrapure water prior to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Waters Corporation, Milford, Mass.) analysis.
  • PBS Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline
  • HPLC high performance liquid chromatography
  • S. epidermidis ATCC was cultured overnight at 37° C. on agar plates produced using nutrient agar (BD, Franklin Lakes, N.J.).
  • sutures were retrieved and placed on plated cultures in order to investigate bacterial inhibition. Bacterial inhibition zones around the sutures were measured and imaged 24 h after suture placement.
  • rats Prior to implantation, rats were intraperitoneally anesthetized with a solution of Ketamine:Xylazine (75:5 mg/kg, Sigma Aldrich) and a drop of 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution (Bausch & Lomb Inc., Tampa, Fla.) was applied to the cornea. Following implantation, the rats were evaluated for signs of infection every day for seven days. The rats were then euthanized and eyes enucleated, fixed in formalin (Sigma Aldrich) for 24 h, embedded in paraffin, cross sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological evaluation.
  • Electro spinning of a 10 wt % polymer solution with application of 4.7 kV into a collector containing hexane and rotating at 40 rpm allowed for manufacture of a single, uniform, defect-free, cylindrical filament without beading, necking, or pores.
  • Microfibers manufactured with a collector speed of 40 rpm were thinner than those manufactured at lower speeds, and were more uniform in diameter than those manufactured at higher speeds where there was also significant fiber loss at the edge of the collector. Under these conditions, it was possible to produce meters of suture material at a time.
  • PLLA and levofloxacin served as the core suture components in this Example.
  • the electrospun monofiber containing 2% F127 had a diameter that could be categorized as a 9-0 suture according to USP specification, but its strength was about six-fold lower than the clinical strength requirement for a 9-0 suture.
  • the electrospun monofiber containing 1% PEG or 4% PEG had averaged diameters that could be categorized as a 8-0 suture (i.e., 4% PEG along with the use of blunted 18G needles and a flow rate of 13 mL/h provided for sutures 45.1 ⁇ 7.7 ⁇ m in diameter), but their strengths were about one seventh of the clinical strength requirement for a 8-0 suture.
  • the electrospun monofiber containing 2% PEG had a diameter that could be categorized as a 7-0 suture according to USP specification, but its strength was more than ten-fold lower than the clinical strength requirement for a 7-0 suture.
  • Tensile strength evaluation determined that the 4% PEG/PLLA/levofloxacin formulation also provided the highest breaking strength, 0.099 ⁇ 0.007 N, of all formulations tested, although it was not statistically significant.
  • levofloxacin and PLLA are both hydrophobic, increasing the concentration of hydrophilic PEG did not significantly modify suture tensile strength.
  • the monofilament suture was unlike multifilament sutures in Examples 1, 3, and 4, the latter ones of which satisfied the clinical strength requirement.
  • the inclusion of PEG, especially at 4%, in the PLLA polymer electrospun fibers enhanced the release rate of levofloxacin from the fibers, which sustained antibiotic release to inhibit S. Epidermidis for at least 7 days in vitro.
  • FIG. 3E shows that after 7 days in release media, drug-loaded sutures still provided bacterial inhibition, confirming that biologically active antibiotic was being released from the suture in an amount sufficient to eliminate surrounding bacteria.
  • the multifilament sutures were prepared using the setup as shown in FIG. 1 and followed the procedures as detailed in Example 1. Variations in either the composition or the amount of twisting of electrospun fibers were detailed in the description of the Results.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the difference in PCL suture strength with 8% Levo in either a monofilament or twisted multifilament conformation of identical diameter (28 ⁇ m).
  • multifilament sutures having 28 ⁇ m in diameter formed from 80 kDa PCL at the optimized 10 wt % and levofloxacin at 8 wt %, but twisted for different intensities: doubling of twists doubled the suture strength and prevented a strength loss due to the inclusion of drug.
  • the strength of multifilaments of 1,575 twists including 8% Levo and 28 urn in diameter exceeded that of the monofilament and surpassed the minimum U.S.P. breaking strength specification for 10-0-sized sutures of 0.24 N.
  • Increased twisting also resulted in a more compact nanofiber bundle, illustrated by the increased spray time necessary to manufacture sutures of an equivalent diameter at a higher number of twists.
  • the multifilaments showed that decreasing the individual fiber diameter (e.g., from micro-fiber to nano-fiber) and twisting to create a multifilament composite prevented the loss of strength associated with drug loading.
  • a monofilament PCL suture lost close to 50% of its strength when loaded with drug, but none of the twisted sutures significantly lost strength with the addition of drugs.
  • PCL/8% Levo and PCL/16% Levo sutures maintained their strengths and demonstrated minimal degradation in vitro over a period of 31 days in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), as shown in Table 3.
  • PBS phosphate buffered saline
  • Levofloxacin was considered as a representative hydrophobic drug
  • moxifloxacin was considered as a representative hydrophobic drug and is a fourth generation fluoroquinolone that has shown superior potency to Levo
  • bacitracin was considered as a representative hydrophilic drug from the polypeptide antibiotic class
  • tobramycin was considered as a representative amphiphilic drug, from the aminoglycoside antibiotic classes.
  • these antibiotics have different physicochemical properties owing to their varying molecular structures, there was no significant difference in breaking strength of multifilament PCL sutures loaded with any of these molecules ( FIG. 9 ). Importantly, all drug-loaded sutures met both size and strength specifications for a 10-0 suture for ocular surgery.
  • PCL nanofibers manufactured through this process likely partitions the drug and polymer. This may explain the equivalent strength of multifilament PCL sutures without drug and with inclusion of 8% Levo or other antibiotics with disparate molecular structures.
  • Example 4 Coating a Device (Suture) with Drug-Eluting Nanofibers Results in a Coated Suture that Meets USP Size Requirements and Allows Tunable Release without Affecting Strength
  • a grounded, drill chuck 370 connected to a motor 350 via an adaptor 360 was used as a collector 304 , and a standalone, parallel, grounded stand was used as another collector 302 .
  • the distance between collectors 304 and 302 was denoted as “d”.
  • a 120 W regulated high voltage DC power source 300 was applied to a blunt tip needle 310 on the end of a syringe 320 . This allowed for the ejection of electrified PLLA-PEG solution containing a 20, 40, or 80 wt % rapamycin 330 held in the syringe 320 .
  • the flow rate of this solution was controlled by a NE-1000 Programmable Single Syringe Pump 340 mounted onto a PLEXIGLASS® base atop a motorized stage capable of controlled x- and y-direction motion.
  • a 10-0, 9-0, or 8-0 nylon suture 390 was fixed on its thread end to the drill chuck 370 .
  • the needle end of the suture was held by the parallel stand 302 where the suture was placed through the stand 302 but this end of the suture was kept free to rotate.
  • an uncoated 10-0 nylon suture had a smooth surface and a diameter of approximately 25 ⁇ m.
  • the coated 10-0 nylon suture had hundreds or thousands of nanofibers covering the surface of the suture in a compacted, spiral manner.
  • the coating only added about 2 ⁇ m to about 5 ⁇ m to the overall thickness, continuing to meet the 10-0 suture size and strength requirement.
  • FIG. 15 shows the in vitro release of rapamycin from the PLLA/PEG polymeric nanofibers around a 10-0 Nylon suture was tuned based on the amount of loaded rapamycin in the PLLA/PEG nanofibers around the Nylon suture.
  • FIG. 16 shows the strengths of Nylon sutures coated with PLLA/PEG nanofibers containing different amounts of rapamycin were not affected and still able to meet the U.S.P. requirements.
  • nanofiber-coated sutures allow for tunable drug release and loading without affecting suture breaking strength.
  • Coating of 10-0 nylon sutures were demonstrated to add a specific amount of fiber coating thickness to the sutures: adding between 3 and 5 ⁇ m of fiber coating kept the USP size at 10-0; adding between about 10 and 15 ⁇ m of fiber coating increased the size to USP 9-0; and adding between about 20 and 20 ⁇ m of fiber coating increased the size to USP 8-0.
  • Example 5 Biocompatibility Study, and Immediate and Long-Term Inhibition Studies of Bacteria in Rat Cornea by Drug-Loaded Multifilament as Sutures or by Sutures Coated with Drug-Loaded Nanofibers
  • biocompatibility of antibiotic sutures was evaluated by implanting 2 mm long sutures in 6-8 week old, male Sprague-Dawley rat cornea on day 0 and enucleation and fixing on day 2 for histological analysis. No bacterial inoculation was administered in this biocompatibility study.
  • the implanted sutures and treatment included 10-0 (i) VICRYL® suture; (ii) nylon suture; (iii) nylon suture that was coated with PCL multifilament fibers containing 8% levofloxacin (PCL/8% Levo/Nylon), (iv) multifilament composite as a suture, made from electrospun from PCL solution; (v) multifilament composite as a suture, made from electrospun from PCL solution containing 8% levofloxacin (PCL/8% Levo); and (vi) multifilament composite as a suture, made from electrospun from PCL solution containing 16% levofloxacin (PCL/16% Levo).
  • rats Prior to implantation, rats were intraperitoneally anesthetized with a solution of ketamine:xylazine (75:5 mg/kg, Sigma Aldrich) and a drop of 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution (Bausch & Lomb Inc., Tampa, Fla.) was applied to the cornea. Following implantation, the rats were evaluated daily for signs of infection, inflammation, or irritation. Two days after implantation, the rats were euthanized and eyes enucleated, fixed in formalin (Sigma Aldrich) for 24 h, embedded in paraffin, cross sectioned, and stained with H&E for histological evaluation.
  • formalin Sigma Aldrich
  • the implanted sutures and treatment included (i) 2 mm VICRYL® suture, no antibiotic; (ii) 2 mm 10-0 nylon suture, no antibiotic; (iii) 2 mm 10-0 nylon suture and a single drop of levofloxacin (10 ⁇ L of 5 mg/mL, i.e., 0.5%, levofloxacin solution), immediately following implantation of the suture; (iv) 2 mm 10-0 nylon suture and a daily levofloxacin (three 10 ⁇ L drops of 5 mg/mL, i.e., 0.5%, levofloxacin solution each day); (v) 2 mm 10-0 nylon suture that was coated with PCL multifilament fibers containing 8% levofloxacin (PCL/8% Levo/Nylon), and (vi) multifilament composite as a suture, made from electrospun from PCL solution containing 8% levofloxacin (PCL/8% Levo).
  • H&E staining revealed substantial inflammation and cellular infiltration within the corneas of rats receiving implantation of VICRYLVicryl® or nylon sutures without post-operative administration of Levo.
  • the concentration of cells was greatest within the immediate vicinity of implanted sutures lacking the antibiotic loading, which was indicative that the suture itself may be the nidus of infection and location of bacterial adherence.
  • Cells were also concentrated around nylon sutures implanted in rat eyes receiving a single post-operative dose of Levo. However, there was no sign of infection or inflammation in the corneal tissue surrounding PCL/8% Levo sutures or nylon sutures in rats receiving three daily doses of Levo, and the tissue resembled that of a healthy control. Culture of bacterial swabs on agar plates similarly confirmed the presence of infection in rats with implantation of VICRYLVicryl® or nylon sutures, or nylon sutures followed by a single dose of Levo administered topically.
  • FIGS. 13A and 13B show eyes containing PCL/Levo sutures at either 8% or 16% of Levo did not become infected after the initial (day-0) S. aureus inoculation, which was in agreement with the results in the 2-day study above.
  • the PCL/Levo multifilament composites with 8% levofloxacin were able to prevent a second (day-5) infection in 6 out of 8 animals when assessed on day 7 after implantation (25% of eyes implanted with PCL/8% Levo sutures displayed a minor infection confirmed by bacterial swab and homogenization).
  • aqueous humor was collected from each eye, followed by removal of implanted sutures and harvesting of the cornea.
  • Tissue and aqueous humor samples were weighed immediately after harvesting.
  • Corneal tissue samples were homogenized in 100 ⁇ L to 150 ⁇ L of PBS prior to extraction.
  • the standard curve and quality control samples were prepared in PBS as a surrogate matrix for both aqueous humor and homogenized tissue.
  • Levofloxacin was extracted from 15 ⁇ L of aqueous humor or tissue homogenate with 50 ⁇ L of acetonitrile containing 1 ⁇ g/mL of the internal standard, moxifloxacin-d4 (Toronto Research Chemicals, Canada). After centrifugation, the supernatant was then transferred into autosampler vials for LCMS/MS analysis. Separation was achieved with an AGILENT ZORBAX® Agilent Zorbax XDB-C18 (4.6 ⁇ 50 mm, 5 ⁇ m) column with water/acetonitrile mobile phase (40:60, v:v) containing 0.1% formic acid using isocratic flow at 0.3 mL/min for 3 minutes.
  • AGILENT ZORBAX® Agilent Zorbax XDB-C18 4.6 ⁇ 50 mm, 5 ⁇ m
  • water/acetonitrile mobile phase 40:60, v:v
  • the column effluent was monitored using an AB SCIEX® Sciextriple QuadrupoleTM 5500 mass-spectrometric detector (Sciex, Foster City, Calif.) using electrospray ionization operating in positive mode.
  • the spectrometer was programmed to monitor the following MRM transitions: 362.0 ⁇ 318.0 for levofloxacin and 406.1 ⁇ 108.0 for the internal standard, moxifloxacin-d4.
  • Calibration curves for levofloxacin were computed using the area ratio peak of the analysis to the internal standard by using a quadratic equation with a 1/ ⁇ 2 weighting function using two different calibration ranges of 0.25 to 500 ng/mL with dilutions up to 1:10 399 (v:v) and 5-5,000 ng/mL.
  • a burst release of antibiotics may be important for prevention of immediate post-operative infection when wounds or surgical incisions are most vulnerable to bacterial infiltration.
  • local antibiotic delivery from drug-loaded sutures may preclude issues of patient compliance with topical eye drops, prevent suture-related infections that lead to treatment failure and re-intervention, reduce the need for oral antibiotic use, decrease the risk of infection associated with implantable ocular devices, and serve as an alternative to the more than 12 million nylon sutures used in ocular procedures each year.
  • Example 7 Inhibition of Neointimal Hyperplasia in Rat Vascular Anastomosis Procedure by Sutures Coated with Drug-Loaded Nanofibers
  • the abdominal aorta of a rat was sectioned and interrupted suturing was performed to tie the vessels back together.
  • the sutures used in this procedure included (i) 8-0 nylon suture, (ii) nylon suture coated with PLLA/PEG containing 20% rapamycin (8-0), or (iii) nylon suture coated with PLLA/PEG containing 40% rapamycin (8-0).
  • the size of the sutures (ii) and (iii) was within the 8-0 size range.
  • Overall suture diameter was increased for about 20 ⁇ m with the addition of fiber coating, i.e., suture diameter increased from 10-0 to 8-0 classification.
  • the aorta was harvested, sectioned and stained for histological analysis, where the neointimal hyperplasia formation was quantified.
  • Polymer solutions were made via dissolution of PLLA (221 kDa; Corbion, Amsterdam, Netherlands), PEG (35 kDa; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.), and rapamycin (LC Laboratories, Woburn, Mass.) in hexafluoroisopropanol (Sigma-Aldrich) by shaking overnight at room temperature.
  • Polymer to solvent concentration was maintained at 10.8% and PEG to PLLA concentration was maintained at 3.9% for all formulations.
  • Rapamycin concentration was 20%, 40%, or 80% in regard to PLLA for the 20% Rap/PLLA/PEG, 40% Rap/PLLA/PEG, and 80% Rap/PLLA/PEG formulations, respectively.
  • the non-needled end of a 10-0 nylon suture Prior to electrospinning, the non-needled end of a 10-0 nylon suture (Ethicon, Somerville, N.J. or AROSurgical Instruments, Newport, Calif.) was placed into the rotational collector. The needled end was driven through the hole in the opposing collector and allowed to hang loosely. Rap/PLLA/PEG solutions were then pumped through a 20 G blunt-tip needle at 1 mL/h with an applied voltage of 15 kV at a distance of 17 cm from the parallel, grounded collectors. The collector containing the non-needled end of the suture was then rotated clockwise for five minutes at 150 rpm and counter-clockwise for 30 s at an identical speed. The suture was then removed from the collectors and stored at ⁇ 20° C.
  • a 10-0 nylon suture Ethicon, Somerville, N.J. or AROSurgical Instruments, Newport, Calif.
  • Suture diameter was determined via light microscopy (Eclipse TS100, Nikon Instruments, Melville, N.Y.) and calibrated imaging software (Spot 5.2 Basic, Spot Imaging, Sterling Heights, Mich.). Each suture was measured at four different locations at least 2 cm apart, and used in further experimentation only if the average diameter was between 46 and 49 ⁇ m, qualifying as an 8-0 suture.
  • FIG. 14 shows all drug-coated sutures significantly decreased neointimal hypoerplasia. Histology analysis of abdominal aorta at the anastomosis on day 14 showed sutures loaded with 40% rapamycin decreased neointimal hyperplasia by 25% compared to 8-0 Nylon sutures alone.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Vascular Medicine (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
  • Spinning Methods And Devices For Manufacturing Artificial Fibers (AREA)
  • Nonwoven Fabrics (AREA)
US16/083,787 2016-03-11 2017-03-13 Ultra-thin, high strength, drug-loaded sutures and coatings thereof Pending US20190142993A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/083,787 US20190142993A1 (en) 2016-03-11 2017-03-13 Ultra-thin, high strength, drug-loaded sutures and coatings thereof

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201662307230P 2016-03-11 2016-03-11
US201662307096P 2016-03-11 2016-03-11
US16/083,787 US20190142993A1 (en) 2016-03-11 2017-03-13 Ultra-thin, high strength, drug-loaded sutures and coatings thereof
PCT/US2017/022093 WO2017156531A1 (fr) 2016-03-11 2017-03-13 Sutures ultraminces, à haute résistance, chargées de médicament et revêtements de celles-ci

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20190142993A1 true US20190142993A1 (en) 2019-05-16

Family

ID=58387983

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/083,787 Pending US20190142993A1 (en) 2016-03-11 2017-03-13 Ultra-thin, high strength, drug-loaded sutures and coatings thereof
US16/083,774 Active 2037-10-05 US11007297B2 (en) 2016-03-11 2017-03-13 Process for making aligned or twisted electrospun fibers

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/083,774 Active 2037-10-05 US11007297B2 (en) 2016-03-11 2017-03-13 Process for making aligned or twisted electrospun fibers

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US20190142993A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP3426311A1 (fr)
JP (2) JP2019507662A (fr)
WO (2) WO2017156521A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110354298A (zh) * 2019-07-26 2019-10-22 南京聚屹新材料有限公司 一种原位交联银纳米线/聚己内酯手术缝合线的制备方法
US11535729B2 (en) 2021-02-08 2022-12-27 Enviro Cast, LLC Degradable fishing lines and nets
US11730156B2 (en) * 2018-04-06 2023-08-22 Loren James Wilcox Renewable natural fiber fishing line

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10640888B1 (en) 2019-07-02 2020-05-05 University of Central Oklahoma Method and apparatus for accumulating cross-aligned fiber in an electrospinning device
FI3901281T3 (fi) 2015-04-10 2023-01-31 Biologisten näytteiden spatiaalisesti eroteltu moninkertainen nukleiinihappoanalyysi
EP3740255A4 (fr) * 2018-01-15 2021-10-06 Technion Research & Development Foundation Limited Dispositifs médicaux à revêtement électrofilé
CN112336911A (zh) * 2018-09-23 2021-02-09 湖南博隽生物医药有限公司 一种医用手术缝合线的制备方法
TWI668341B (zh) * 2018-11-30 2019-08-11 萬核應用材料有限公司 Adhesive wire drawing process
JP2020188906A (ja) * 2019-05-21 2020-11-26 グンゼ株式会社 生体吸収性縫合糸
CN112705171A (zh) * 2019-10-25 2021-04-27 中国石油化工股份有限公司 纳米纤维吸附材料及其制备方法和应用
US11311922B2 (en) * 2020-02-18 2022-04-26 Winn Applied Material Inc. Wire drawing process of light storage wire
CN111529752B (zh) * 2020-04-15 2021-07-16 东华大学 一种促肌腱愈合的变截面多孔带状缝合线及其制备方法
CN112126990A (zh) * 2020-08-06 2020-12-25 广东荣翘泰新材料科技有限公司 草本纳米抗菌面料及其制作工艺
US20230313279A1 (en) 2020-09-16 2023-10-05 10X Genomics, Inc. Methods of determining the location of an analyte in a biological sample using a plurality of wells
JP2022178046A (ja) * 2021-05-19 2022-12-02 パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社 繊維集合体の製造装置及び製造方法
CN113969446A (zh) * 2021-10-27 2022-01-25 嘉兴学院 一种功能型纱线的制备方法
CN114921882B (zh) * 2022-05-19 2023-04-28 武汉纺织大学 弹性电磁屏蔽纤维及其制备方法与应用

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140336125A1 (en) * 2011-12-19 2014-11-13 Joseph Khoury Methods for improving the bioactivity characteristics of a surface and objects with surfaces improved thereby

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6753454B1 (en) 1999-10-08 2004-06-22 The University Of Akron Electrospun fibers and an apparatus therefor
US6743273B2 (en) 2000-09-05 2004-06-01 Donaldson Company, Inc. Polymer, polymer microfiber, polymer nanofiber and applications including filter structures
US6821479B1 (en) 2001-06-12 2004-11-23 The University Of Akron Preservation of biological materials using fiber-forming techniques
US7329271B2 (en) * 2003-12-18 2008-02-12 Ethicon, Inc. High strength suture with absorbable core
US10328032B2 (en) 2005-03-04 2019-06-25 Biosurfaces, Inc. Nanofibrous materials as drug, protein, or genetic release vehicles
EP1974015A4 (fr) 2006-01-27 2012-07-04 Univ California Squelettes biomimétiques
US20110180951A1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2011-07-28 Wee Eong Teo Fiber structures and process for their preparation
JP2008138316A (ja) 2006-12-01 2008-06-19 Teijin Ltd 撚糸および撚糸の製造方法
WO2009101472A2 (fr) 2007-11-02 2009-08-20 National University Of Singapore Endoprothèse revêtue de nanofibres alignées par électrofilature
JP5456892B2 (ja) * 2009-08-07 2014-04-02 ゼウス インダストリアル プロダクツ インコーポレイテッド 多層複合体
US20130071463A1 (en) * 2009-11-17 2013-03-21 Maria Palasis Implants for postoperative pain
US20130115456A1 (en) * 2010-07-12 2013-05-09 Daniel H. Wagner Electrospun doped nanofibers and process of preparation thereof
WO2012078472A2 (fr) * 2010-12-05 2012-06-14 Nanonerve, Inc. Supports polymères fibreux comprenant des fibres polymères structurées de manière diamétrale
KR101248368B1 (ko) * 2011-05-24 2013-04-01 서울대학교산학협력단 약물이 탑재된 고분자 필름을 포함하는 봉합사 및 이의 제조방법
US9533068B2 (en) * 2012-05-04 2017-01-03 The Johns Hopkins University Drug loaded microfiber sutures for ophthalmic application
CZ306428B6 (cs) 2015-06-05 2017-01-18 Technická univerzita v Liberci Lineární vlákenný útvar s pláštěm z polymerních nanovláken obalujícím nosný lineární útvar tvořící jádro, způsob a zařízení k jeho výrobě

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140336125A1 (en) * 2011-12-19 2014-11-13 Joseph Khoury Methods for improving the bioactivity characteristics of a surface and objects with surfaces improved thereby

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11730156B2 (en) * 2018-04-06 2023-08-22 Loren James Wilcox Renewable natural fiber fishing line
CN110354298A (zh) * 2019-07-26 2019-10-22 南京聚屹新材料有限公司 一种原位交联银纳米线/聚己内酯手术缝合线的制备方法
US11535729B2 (en) 2021-02-08 2022-12-27 Enviro Cast, LLC Degradable fishing lines and nets

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2017156531A1 (fr) 2017-09-14
EP3426311A1 (fr) 2019-01-16
JP2019507662A (ja) 2019-03-22
WO2017156521A1 (fr) 2017-09-14
JP2022059088A (ja) 2022-04-12
US20190071796A1 (en) 2019-03-07
US11007297B2 (en) 2021-05-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20190142993A1 (en) Ultra-thin, high strength, drug-loaded sutures and coatings thereof
US8974814B2 (en) Layered drug delivery polymer monofilament fibers
US10471172B2 (en) Methods of making drug loaded microfiber sutures for ophthalmic application
US8128954B2 (en) Biodegradable drug-polymer delivery system
AU2019250153B2 (en) Methods and biocompatible compositions to achieve sustained drug release in the eye
Kim et al. Incorporation and controlled release of a hydrophilic antibiotic using poly (lactide-co-glycolide)-based electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds
JP6925640B2 (ja) 眼内圧の制御した低減のための部分分解性ステント
US20060024350A1 (en) Biodegradable ocular devices, methods and systems
EP2813212A1 (fr) Formulation médicinale, employant l'API en nanofibres
Kashiwabuchi et al. Development of absorbable, antibiotic-eluting sutures for ophthalmic surgery
US10894113B1 (en) Prosthetic implantable antibacterial surgical mesh
Parikh et al. Ultra‐thin, high strength, antibiotic‐eluting sutures for prevention of ophthalmic infection
Ha Electrospun medical devices for ophthalmic surgery
JP2015074641A (ja) 眼内薬物送達デバイスおよび付随する方法
Mack Biodegradable Filaments for Controlled Ophthalmic Drug Delivery
Tawfik Dual Drug-Loaded Electrospun Nanofibres for the Treatment of Corneal Diseases

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, MARYLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PARIKH, KUNAL S.;HANES, JUSTIN;ENSIGN, LAURA;SIGNING DATES FROM 20181111 TO 20181212;REEL/FRAME:047938/0222

AS Assignment

Owner name: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, VIRGINIA

Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY;REEL/FRAME:048758/0515

Effective date: 20190318

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: APPEAL BRIEF (OR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF) ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: EXAMINER'S ANSWER TO APPEAL BRIEF MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: TC RETURN OF APPEAL