US20180002788A1 - Process for obtaining a low silicon aluminium alloy part - Google Patents
Process for obtaining a low silicon aluminium alloy part Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180002788A1 US20180002788A1 US15/544,213 US201615544213A US2018002788A1 US 20180002788 A1 US20180002788 A1 US 20180002788A1 US 201615544213 A US201615544213 A US 201615544213A US 2018002788 A1 US2018002788 A1 US 2018002788A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- range
- content
- alloy
- preform
- casting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21J—FORGING; HAMMERING; PRESSING METAL; RIVETING; FORGE FURNACES
- B21J5/00—Methods for forging, hammering, or pressing; Special equipment or accessories therefor
- B21J5/002—Hybrid process, e.g. forging following casting
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21J—FORGING; HAMMERING; PRESSING METAL; RIVETING; FORGE FURNACES
- B21J5/00—Methods for forging, hammering, or pressing; Special equipment or accessories therefor
- B21J5/02—Die forging; Trimming by making use of special dies ; Punching during forging
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
- B22D—CASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
- B22D27/00—Treating the metal in the mould while it is molten or ductile ; Pressure or vacuum casting
- B22D27/09—Treating the metal in the mould while it is molten or ductile ; Pressure or vacuum casting by using pressure
- B22D27/11—Treating the metal in the mould while it is molten or ductile ; Pressure or vacuum casting by using pressure making use of mechanical pressing devices
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C21/00—Alloys based on aluminium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C21/00—Alloys based on aluminium
- C22C21/02—Alloys based on aluminium with silicon as the next major constituent
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C21/00—Alloys based on aluminium
- C22C21/02—Alloys based on aluminium with silicon as the next major constituent
- C22C21/04—Modified aluminium-silicon alloys
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C21/00—Alloys based on aluminium
- C22C21/06—Alloys based on aluminium with magnesium as the next major constituent
- C22C21/08—Alloys based on aluminium with magnesium as the next major constituent with silicon
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22F—CHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
- C22F1/00—Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
- C22F1/04—Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22F—CHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
- C22F1/00—Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
- C22F1/04—Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon
- C22F1/05—Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon of alloys of the Al-Si-Mg type, i.e. containing silicon and magnesium in approximately equal proportions
Definitions
- the invention relates to the technical field of foundry work or casting, for manufacturing aluminum parts, in particular in the automobile and aviation sectors, and more generally in all types of industry.
- alloys exist that are said to be “low-silicon” alloys. Such alloys have high mechanical characteristics after T6 heat treatment (Rp 0.2 of 300 MPa; A % of 8%). They are grouped together in the 6000 (Al—Mg—Si) series in the classification of aluminum alloys. The most well known are the 6082, 6061, and 6151. Numerous compositions also exist with contents similar to the standardized alloys, among which mention can be made, for example, of Document EP 0 987 344.
- the above-mentioned alloys have been developed for obtaining semi-finished products (billets or ingots for forging or rolling) designed to be transformed during hot or cold operations with high deformation rates (>50%).
- the geometrical shapes of such semi-finished products are simple (bar, rod, or ingot), thereby making it possible to solidify such alloys with defects being minimized, by using methods having high solidification speeds.
- Such geometrical shapes and such methods result, using techniques that are currently mastered, to semi-finished products that are exempt from defects, such defects being, for example: shrink holes, cracks, macro-segregations, and macro-precipitations (formation of precipitates that are too coarse, >100 ⁇ m).
- the problem posed that the invention proposes to solve is to make it possible to obtain parts that satisfy high safety and quality standards, and that can be of complex shapes.
- the invention provides a method of manufacturing a part made of low-silicon aluminum alloy of the 6000 type.
- the invention provides a method of obtaining a part made of low-silicon aluminum alloy, containing silicon at a content lying in the range 0.5% to 3%, magnesium at a content lying in the range 0.65% to 1%, copper at a content lying in the range 0.20% to 0.40%, manganese at a content lying in the range 0.15% to 0.25%, titanium at a content lying in the range 0.10% to 0.20%, and strontium at a content lying in the range 0 ppm to 120 ppm, said method including:
- the present invention also provides:
- the preform after the preform has been cooled, it is reheated by being placed in a tunnel furnace.
- the casting operation followed by the forging of the preform in one step do not have the same parameters as regards temperatures, solidification speed, rate of deformation, and forge temperature as the methods in the state of the prior art.
- the silicon content lies in the range 0.5% to 3%.
- a silicon content less than 1% results in the highest yield strengths and elongations.
- it is the content for which the alloy is the most sensitive to cracking and has the lowest castability or fluidity. It is therefore necessary to be able to adapt the silicon content as a function of the geometrical shape of the part. Complex geometrical shapes require a higher content so as to reduce this sensitivity to cracking.
- the maximum content of 3% corresponds to the content beyond which the elongation and the yield strength become too low for it to remain advantageous to produce parts using an alloy of this type.
- the magnesium content lies in the range 0.65% to 1%. This content makes it possible to optimize the density of Mg 2 Si precipitates in the aluminum matrix. It compensates for the reduction in the silicon content while also minimizing the macroscopic Mg 2 Si precipitates that are damaging and must be dissolved or transformed during the heat treatment. If there are too many precipitates or if they are too big, the heat treatment has only a small effect on their dissolution, since the critical dissolution size is exceeded.
- the copper content lies in the range 0.20% to 0.40%. This content makes it possible for Al 2 Cu precipitates to be formed in the matrix and for there to be a total absence of macroscopic Al 2 Cu precipitates. The absence of any such macroscopic precipitates makes it possible to maintain high forging temperatures and thereby to minimize the forging forces (forging being performed in a single step).
- the main precipitates formed in the presence of copper are Al 2 Cu and AlMgSiCu that melt respectively at 490° C. and at 525° C., and their presence would prevent forging at higher temperatures without running the risk of the alloy being burnt, which would make the parts unusable. Such degradation can be likened to the alloy being destroyed.
- a higher copper content also increases the sensitivity of the alloy to cracking, because there remains a eutectic to be solidified at low temperatures (490° C. or 525° C.) for which the mechanical stresses (related to shrinkage on solidification) exerted on the part are large.
- the manganese content lies in the range 0.15% to 0.25%. This content avoids AlFeSi precipitates forming in ⁇ form (highly damaging platelet form) and makes it possible rather for AlFeMnSi precipitates to form in a form (less damaging Chinese-script form). This makes it possible to maximize the elongation on the finished part resulting from the Cobapress method. This effect is most often used with larger quantities of manganese and of iron, since these two elements lead to high hardening of the alloy but also to larger precipitates during solidification. Such large precipitates are detrimental to proper elongation.
- the alloy of the invention is, as indicated, designed for the Cobapress method, in which forging is performed in a single step, and does not involve the large deformations usually encountered in forging, rolling or extrusion. Such large deformations make it possible to fragment the large precipitates and to make them must less damaging, while also maintaining their hardening effect.
- the impact of the iron-based precipitates on the mechanical characteristics should be minimized as of the casting stage. This is because their morphology is then no longer modified, since single-step forging does not deform the part sufficiently to change their morphology.
- this manganese content is adapted to the cooling speeds obtained when casting in a permanent mold, and, with regard to such speeds, it facilitates the formation of AlFeMnSi precipitates in a form.
- the titanium content lies in the range 0.10% to 0.20%. That content is necessary for effective germination of the grains and for a fine grain size that has a large effect on the mechanical characteristics of these alloys.
- the strontium content lies in the range 0 ppm to 120 ppm. This content is necessary for having a fibrous solidification of the small quantities of eutectic that are formed. This takes place mainly for silicon contents greater than 1 5%.
- composition of this alloy is adapted to lead to a solidification that makes it possible to maximize the mechanical characteristics in spite of the low levels of deformation encountered during the Cobapress method.
- solidification defects persist, such as inter-grain shrink-hole solidification defects at the grain joins, with a ramified and diffuse morphology that weakens the casting, i.e. the part resulting from being cast.
- the Cobapress forging operation makes it possible to re-close and re-bond such defects with the deformation rate being controlled at the design stage.
- the temperature/deformation pair makes it possible to solve the defects.
- the table below gives the mechanical characteristics on a casting and on parts, using the Cobapress method, after T6 heat treatment of the low-silicon alloy. It is possible to note the improvement in the ultimate tensile strength Rm and the ultimate elongation:
- this composition makes it possible to reduce the complexity of the usual heat treatment for alloys of the Al—Mg—Si—Cu type.
- the silicon content, the solidification speeds and the grain refinement lead to macroscopic Mg 2 Si precipitates that are of size and of morphology that facilitate dissolution during the heat treatment.
- FIG. 1 shows a casting microstructure, without any manganese, and “needle” precipitates of the ⁇ type
- FIG. 2 shows the monostructure with manganese, and “Chinese script” precipitates of the a type.
- FIGS. 3, 4, and 5 show the elimination of the Al 2 Cu copper precipitates.
- FIGS. 3 and 4 the copper content is greater than 0 40%, which leads to the presence of Al 2 Cu precipitates.
- FIG. 4 shows an example in which it is possible to observe the AlFeMnSi and Mg 2 Si precipitations surrounded by Al 2 Cu precipitates.
- FIG. 5 shows a copper content lying in the range 0.20% to 0.40%, in accordance with the invention, showing absence of Al 2 Cu precipitates.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Forging (AREA)
- Molds, Cores, And Manufacturing Methods Thereof (AREA)
- Manufacture Of Alloys Or Alloy Compounds (AREA)
- Conductive Materials (AREA)
Abstract
-
- casting said alloy in a mold so as to obtain the part;
- after the casting, demolding the part constituting a preform that is still hot;
- cooling said preform and then subjecting it to an operation suitable for reheating it to a temperature lying in the range 470° C. to 550° C.;
- positioning said part between two shells of a die that defines a cavity of dimensions substantially equal to but less than the dimensions of the cavity of the mold; and
- strongly pressing the two shells together to exert on the part disposed between said shells a combined pressing and surface kneading effect.
Description
- The invention relates to the technical field of foundry work or casting, for manufacturing aluminum parts, in particular in the automobile and aviation sectors, and more generally in all types of industry.
- Many alloys exists that are said to be “low-silicon” alloys. Such alloys have high mechanical characteristics after T6 heat treatment (Rp0.2 of 300 MPa; A % of 8%). They are grouped together in the 6000 (Al—Mg—Si) series in the classification of aluminum alloys. The most well known are the 6082, 6061, and 6151. Numerous compositions also exist with contents similar to the standardized alloys, among which mention can be made, for example, of Document EP 0 987 344.
- The above-mentioned alloys have been developed for obtaining semi-finished products (billets or ingots for forging or rolling) designed to be transformed during hot or cold operations with high deformation rates (>50%).
- In addition, the geometrical shapes of such semi-finished products are simple (bar, rod, or ingot), thereby making it possible to solidify such alloys with defects being minimized, by using methods having high solidification speeds. Such geometrical shapes and such methods result, using techniques that are currently mastered, to semi-finished products that are exempt from defects, such defects being, for example: shrink holes, cracks, macro-segregations, and macro-precipitations (formation of precipitates that are too coarse, >100 μm).
- Based on that state of the art, the problem posed that the invention proposes to solve is to make it possible to obtain parts that satisfy high safety and quality standards, and that can be of complex shapes.
- To solve this problem, the invention provides a method of manufacturing a part made of low-silicon aluminum alloy of the 6000 type.
- More particularly, the invention provides a method of obtaining a part made of low-silicon aluminum alloy, containing silicon at a content lying in the range 0.5% to 3%, magnesium at a content lying in the range 0.65% to 1%, copper at a content lying in the range 0.20% to 0.40%, manganese at a content lying in the range 0.15% to 0.25%, titanium at a content lying in the range 0.10% to 0.20%, and strontium at a content lying in the range 0 ppm to 120 ppm, said method including:
-
- casting said alloy in a mold so as to obtain the part;
- after the casting, demolding the part constituting a preform that is still hot;
- cooling said preform and then subjecting it to an operation suitable for reheating it to a temperature lying in the range 470° C. to 550° C.;
- positioning said part between two shells of a die that defines a cavity of dimensions substantially equal to but less than the dimensions of the cavity of the mold; and
- strongly pressing the two shells together to exert on the part disposed between said shells a combined effect of pressing and surface kneading.
- The present invention also provides:
-
- implementing the above method in the automobile sector or in the aviation sector;
- use of a part obtained by the above-mentioned method in the automobile sector; and
- use of the alloy in the above-mentioned method in the aviation sector.
- In an implementation of the method, after the preform has been cooled, it is reheated by being placed in a tunnel furnace.
- As a result of these characteristics, the casting operation followed by the forging of the preform in one step do not have the same parameters as regards temperatures, solidification speed, rate of deformation, and forge temperature as the methods in the state of the prior art.
- The alloy claimed satisfies these constraints and makes it possible to obtain parts of satisfactory quality, in particular if the parts have to satisfy safety obligations (suspension system parts=safety parts).
- Among such constraints, the following may be mentioned by way of example:
-
- the geometrical shape of the preform, unlike bars or ingots, includes, as of being designed, the rough outlines of the functional zones of the part, and can therefore have a complex geometrical shape including ribs or variations in section leading to isolated masses of liquid metal. Such isolated masses can be “tolerated” by increasing the silicon content (grade AS7G03, standard casting alloy). A reduction in that content makes the alloy more sensitive during solidification and leads to shrink-hole (porosity) defects that are greater in number and in volume.
- the solidification range, which is the range defined from the liquidus temperature to the eutectic temperature of the alloy in question. For a strontium-modified AS7G03 type alloy, this range is about 50° C. (from 611° C. to 562° C.). For a low-silicon 6000 type alloy, it is about 90° C. (from 655° C. to 562° C.) with the precipitation of the macroscopic Mg2Si (or silicon) as a pseudo eutectic line. A wide solidification range leads to a semi-solid zone that extends further through the part, so that it becomes more difficult to direct the solidification edge to reduce defects as is done conventionally and almost naturally with an AS7G03 alloy.
- AS7G03 has almost zero sensitivity to cracking due to the large quantity of eutectic that is able to fill in cracks that appear during shrinking while solidification is taking place. This does not apply for a low-silicon alloy, which has very little eutectic, thereby resulting in high sensitivity to cracking and requiring the composition to be adapted and the solidification temperature gradients to be controlled.
- It is also necessary to adjust the chemical composition so as to obtain a better compromise or trade-off between the parameters for casting, forging, and heat treatment and the desired mechanical characteristics for the finished parts. To this end, each of the elements of the alloy, its content, and the effects resulting in that value having been chosen are given in detail below:
- The silicon content lies in the range 0.5% to 3%. A silicon content less than 1% results in the highest yield strengths and elongations. However, it is the content for which the alloy is the most sensitive to cracking and has the lowest castability or fluidity. It is therefore necessary to be able to adapt the silicon content as a function of the geometrical shape of the part. Complex geometrical shapes require a higher content so as to reduce this sensitivity to cracking. The maximum content of 3% corresponds to the content beyond which the elongation and the yield strength become too low for it to remain advantageous to produce parts using an alloy of this type.
- The magnesium content lies in the range 0.65% to 1%. This content makes it possible to optimize the density of Mg2Si precipitates in the aluminum matrix. It compensates for the reduction in the silicon content while also minimizing the macroscopic Mg2Si precipitates that are damaging and must be dissolved or transformed during the heat treatment. If there are too many precipitates or if they are too big, the heat treatment has only a small effect on their dissolution, since the critical dissolution size is exceeded.
- The copper content lies in the range 0.20% to 0.40%. This content makes it possible for Al2Cu precipitates to be formed in the matrix and for there to be a total absence of macroscopic Al2Cu precipitates. The absence of any such macroscopic precipitates makes it possible to maintain high forging temperatures and thereby to minimize the forging forces (forging being performed in a single step). The main precipitates formed in the presence of copper are Al2Cu and AlMgSiCu that melt respectively at 490° C. and at 525° C., and their presence would prevent forging at higher temperatures without running the risk of the alloy being burnt, which would make the parts unusable. Such degradation can be likened to the alloy being destroyed. A higher copper content also increases the sensitivity of the alloy to cracking, because there remains a eutectic to be solidified at low temperatures (490° C. or 525° C.) for which the mechanical stresses (related to shrinkage on solidification) exerted on the part are large.
- The manganese content lies in the range 0.15% to 0.25%. This content avoids AlFeSi precipitates forming in β form (highly damaging platelet form) and makes it possible rather for AlFeMnSi precipitates to form in a form (less damaging Chinese-script form). This makes it possible to maximize the elongation on the finished part resulting from the Cobapress method. This effect is most often used with larger quantities of manganese and of iron, since these two elements lead to high hardening of the alloy but also to larger precipitates during solidification. Such large precipitates are detrimental to proper elongation. However, the alloy of the invention is, as indicated, designed for the Cobapress method, in which forging is performed in a single step, and does not involve the large deformations usually encountered in forging, rolling or extrusion. Such large deformations make it possible to fragment the large precipitates and to make them must less damaging, while also maintaining their hardening effect. With the alloy of the invention, the impact of the iron-based precipitates on the mechanical characteristics should be minimized as of the casting stage. This is because their morphology is then no longer modified, since single-step forging does not deform the part sufficiently to change their morphology. Finally, this manganese content is adapted to the cooling speeds obtained when casting in a permanent mold, and, with regard to such speeds, it facilitates the formation of AlFeMnSi precipitates in a form.
- The titanium content lies in the range 0.10% to 0.20%. That content is necessary for effective germination of the grains and for a fine grain size that has a large effect on the mechanical characteristics of these alloys.
- The strontium content lies in the range 0 ppm to 120 ppm. This content is necessary for having a fibrous solidification of the small quantities of eutectic that are formed. This takes place mainly for silicon contents greater than 1 5%.
- It has been seen that the composition of this alloy is adapted to lead to a solidification that makes it possible to maximize the mechanical characteristics in spite of the low levels of deformation encountered during the Cobapress method.
- However, solidification defects persist, such as inter-grain shrink-hole solidification defects at the grain joins, with a ramified and diffuse morphology that weakens the casting, i.e. the part resulting from being cast.
- The Cobapress forging operation makes it possible to re-close and re-bond such defects with the deformation rate being controlled at the design stage. The temperature/deformation pair makes it possible to solve the defects. The table below gives the mechanical characteristics on a casting and on parts, using the Cobapress method, after T6 heat treatment of the low-silicon alloy. It is possible to note the improvement in the ultimate tensile strength Rm and the ultimate elongation:
-
STATES Rp0.2 [MPa] Rm [MPa] A % [%] Casting AlMgSiCu + T6 300 315 1.3 Cobapress ™ AlMgSiCu + T6 300 340 8 Rp = Yield strength Rm = Ultimate tensile strength A % = Elongation - Finally, this composition makes it possible to reduce the complexity of the usual heat treatment for alloys of the Al—Mg—Si—Cu type. The silicon content, the solidification speeds and the grain refinement lead to macroscopic Mg2Si precipitates that are of size and of morphology that facilitate dissolution during the heat treatment.
- Reference is made to the figures of the accompanying drawings that show the metallographs of a part in order to show the importance of the manganese content and of the copper content.
FIG. 1 shows a casting microstructure, without any manganese, and “needle” precipitates of the β type, whileFIG. 2 shows the monostructure with manganese, and “Chinese script” precipitates of the a type. -
FIGS. 3, 4, and 5 show the elimination of the Al2Cu copper precipitates. - In
FIGS. 3 and 4 , the copper content is greater than 0 40%, which leads to the presence of Al2Cu precipitates.FIG. 4 shows an example in which it is possible to observe the AlFeMnSi and Mg2Si precipitations surrounded by Al2Cu precipitates. -
FIG. 5 shows a copper content lying in the range 0.20% to 0.40%, in accordance with the invention, showing absence of Al2Cu precipitates.
Claims (3)
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR1550700 | 2015-01-29 | ||
FR1550700A FR3032204B1 (en) | 2015-01-29 | 2015-01-29 | ALUMINUM LOW SILICON ALLOY PIECE |
PCT/FR2016/050069 WO2016120541A1 (en) | 2015-01-29 | 2016-01-14 | Process for obtaining a low silicon aluminium alloy part |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20180002788A1 true US20180002788A1 (en) | 2018-01-04 |
Family
ID=52779906
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/544,213 Abandoned US20180002788A1 (en) | 2015-01-29 | 2016-01-14 | Process for obtaining a low silicon aluminium alloy part |
Country Status (21)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20180002788A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3250722B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6768677B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR20170107458A (en) |
CN (1) | CN107208197B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2016211088B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR112017016024B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2973937A1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK3250722T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2689908T3 (en) |
FR (1) | FR3032204B1 (en) |
HR (1) | HRP20181682T1 (en) |
HU (1) | HUE039737T2 (en) |
MA (1) | MA41422A (en) |
MX (1) | MX2017009828A (en) |
PL (1) | PL3250722T3 (en) |
PT (1) | PT3250722T (en) |
RS (1) | RS57888B1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2700218C2 (en) |
TR (1) | TR201815694T4 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016120541A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11708628B2 (en) | 2021-03-16 | 2023-07-25 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Aluminum alloy processing method and aluminum alloy workpiece |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2022142163A (en) * | 2021-03-16 | 2022-09-30 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Processing method of aluminum alloy, and processed article of aluminum alloy |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0119365A1 (en) * | 1983-03-14 | 1984-09-26 | Thomas Di Serio | Method of producing pieces of aluminium or aluminium alloy |
US5571347A (en) * | 1994-04-07 | 1996-11-05 | Northwest Aluminum Company | High strength MG-SI type aluminum alloy |
US20020170635A1 (en) * | 1998-05-04 | 2002-11-21 | Diserio Emile-Thomas | Process for manufacturing aluminum alloys and aluminium castings |
US20030010412A1 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2003-01-16 | Asahi Tec Corporation | Aluminum alloy for casting-forge, and aluminum casting forged product and manufacturing method therefor |
US20040151615A1 (en) * | 2002-10-01 | 2004-08-05 | Asahi Tec Corporation | Cast aluminum alloy for forging, and aluminum cast-forged product and method of manufacturing the same |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH09272941A (en) * | 1996-04-04 | 1997-10-21 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Aluminum base alloy fed to product forging through casting into product preliminary shape and casting and forging method |
JP3346186B2 (en) * | 1996-10-08 | 2002-11-18 | 日本軽金属株式会社 | Aluminum alloy material for casting and forging with excellent wear resistance, castability and forgeability, and its manufacturing method |
US6630037B1 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2003-10-07 | Kobe Steel, Ltd. | High strength aluminum alloy forgings |
RU2163939C1 (en) * | 1999-08-09 | 2001-03-10 | Государственное предприятие "Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт авиационных материалов" | Aluminum-base alloy, method of production of semifinished products and article from this alloy |
FR2827306B1 (en) * | 2001-07-10 | 2004-10-22 | Pechiney Aluminium | HIGH DUCTILITY ALUMINUM ALLOY FOR PRESSURE CASTING |
DE102004022817A1 (en) * | 2004-05-08 | 2005-12-01 | Erbslöh Ag | Decorative anodizable, easily deformable, mechanically highly loadable aluminum alloy, process for its production and aluminum product made from this alloy |
US20080060723A1 (en) * | 2006-09-11 | 2008-03-13 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Aluminum alloy for engine components |
CN101855375A (en) * | 2007-11-08 | 2010-10-06 | Ksm铸造有限公司 | Cast aluminium alloy |
CN101643869B (en) * | 2009-09-04 | 2011-04-06 | 河池学院 | High strength automobile aluminium alloy wheel rim |
-
2015
- 2015-01-29 FR FR1550700A patent/FR3032204B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2016
- 2016-01-14 CA CA2973937A patent/CA2973937A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2016-01-14 RU RU2017126680A patent/RU2700218C2/en active
- 2016-01-14 ES ES16703341.4T patent/ES2689908T3/en active Active
- 2016-01-14 US US15/544,213 patent/US20180002788A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2016-01-14 MX MX2017009828A patent/MX2017009828A/en unknown
- 2016-01-14 WO PCT/FR2016/050069 patent/WO2016120541A1/en active Application Filing
- 2016-01-14 MA MA041422A patent/MA41422A/en unknown
- 2016-01-14 PL PL16703341T patent/PL3250722T3/en unknown
- 2016-01-14 AU AU2016211088A patent/AU2016211088B2/en active Active
- 2016-01-14 EP EP16703341.4A patent/EP3250722B1/en active Active
- 2016-01-14 BR BR112017016024-2A patent/BR112017016024B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2016-01-14 TR TR2018/15694T patent/TR201815694T4/en unknown
- 2016-01-14 PT PT16703341T patent/PT3250722T/en unknown
- 2016-01-14 HU HUE16703341A patent/HUE039737T2/en unknown
- 2016-01-14 KR KR1020177020845A patent/KR20170107458A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2016-01-14 DK DK16703341.4T patent/DK3250722T3/en active
- 2016-01-14 JP JP2017540119A patent/JP6768677B2/en active Active
- 2016-01-14 CN CN201680007900.6A patent/CN107208197B/en active Active
- 2016-01-14 RS RS20181215A patent/RS57888B1/en unknown
-
2018
- 2018-10-16 HR HRP20181682TT patent/HRP20181682T1/en unknown
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0119365A1 (en) * | 1983-03-14 | 1984-09-26 | Thomas Di Serio | Method of producing pieces of aluminium or aluminium alloy |
US5571347A (en) * | 1994-04-07 | 1996-11-05 | Northwest Aluminum Company | High strength MG-SI type aluminum alloy |
US20020170635A1 (en) * | 1998-05-04 | 2002-11-21 | Diserio Emile-Thomas | Process for manufacturing aluminum alloys and aluminium castings |
US20040035546A1 (en) * | 1998-05-04 | 2004-02-26 | Diserio Emile-Thomas | Process for manufacturing aluminum alloys and aluminium castings |
US20030010412A1 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2003-01-16 | Asahi Tec Corporation | Aluminum alloy for casting-forge, and aluminum casting forged product and manufacturing method therefor |
US20040151615A1 (en) * | 2002-10-01 | 2004-08-05 | Asahi Tec Corporation | Cast aluminum alloy for forging, and aluminum cast-forged product and method of manufacturing the same |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11708628B2 (en) | 2021-03-16 | 2023-07-25 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Aluminum alloy processing method and aluminum alloy workpiece |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
BR112017016024B1 (en) | 2021-10-19 |
ES2689908T3 (en) | 2018-11-16 |
HUE039737T2 (en) | 2019-01-28 |
MA41422A (en) | 2017-12-06 |
CN107208197B (en) | 2019-11-05 |
BR112017016024A2 (en) | 2018-03-20 |
PT3250722T (en) | 2018-10-25 |
AU2016211088A1 (en) | 2017-08-17 |
RS57888B1 (en) | 2019-01-31 |
FR3032204B1 (en) | 2019-08-09 |
DK3250722T3 (en) | 2018-11-05 |
EP3250722B1 (en) | 2018-09-12 |
AU2016211088B2 (en) | 2020-05-21 |
RU2017126680A (en) | 2019-01-28 |
RU2700218C2 (en) | 2019-09-13 |
CA2973937A1 (en) | 2016-08-04 |
MX2017009828A (en) | 2018-02-09 |
CN107208197A (en) | 2017-09-26 |
RU2017126680A3 (en) | 2019-05-24 |
KR20170107458A (en) | 2017-09-25 |
WO2016120541A1 (en) | 2016-08-04 |
HRP20181682T1 (en) | 2018-12-14 |
EP3250722A1 (en) | 2017-12-06 |
FR3032204A1 (en) | 2016-08-05 |
PL3250722T3 (en) | 2019-03-29 |
JP2018507324A (en) | 2018-03-15 |
TR201815694T4 (en) | 2018-11-21 |
JP6768677B2 (en) | 2020-10-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11555229B2 (en) | High-strength aluminum alloy laminated molding and production method therefor | |
US11359264B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy and die casting method | |
CA2574962C (en) | An al-si-mg-zn-cu alloy for aerospace and automotive castings | |
KR20080064984A (en) | A high crashworthiness al-si-mg alloy and methods for producing automotive casting | |
US11401586B2 (en) | High-strength A356 alloy and preparation method thereof | |
US20050191204A1 (en) | Aluminum alloy for producing high performance shaped castings | |
CN104073689A (en) | Aluminum alloy forged material for automobile and method for manufacturing the same | |
CN108251710B (en) | High-strength and high-toughness high-silicon aluminum alloy suitable for extrusion casting and preparation process thereof | |
CN113423853B (en) | Aluminum alloy for structural high pressure vacuum die casting applications | |
JPH0967635A (en) | Aluminum alloy casting excellent in strength and toughness, by high pressure casting, and its production | |
AU2016211088B2 (en) | Process for obtaining a low silicon aluminium alloy part | |
KR102423774B1 (en) | MANUFACTURING METHOD OF EXTRUDED Mg-Bi BASED MAGNESIUM ALLOY HAVING IMPROVED MECHANICAL PROPERTY VIA WARM HOMOGENIZATION HEAT TREATMENT | |
US1711000A (en) | Method of making wrought-metal articles | |
JP2018202479A (en) | Diploid cast forging method for solid-liquid transition-controlled aluminum alloy | |
JP2001316787A (en) | METHOD FOR PRODUCING HALF-MELTED BILLET OF Al ALLOY FOR TRANSPORTING MACHINE | |
US20210025034A1 (en) | Aluminum Alloy For Die Casting, And A Method For Producing A Cast Product Using The Aluminum Alloy | |
JP2003170263A (en) | Method for casting vehicle wheel under low pressure | |
JP6741208B2 (en) | Hypereutectic Al-Si based aluminum alloy, cast member made of the same, and method for producing the aluminum alloy | |
US20020170697A1 (en) | Method of manufacturing lightweight high-strength member | |
JP7459496B2 (en) | Manufacturing method for aluminum alloy forgings | |
JP3676723B2 (en) | Method for producing semi-melt molded billet of aluminum alloy for transportation equipment | |
CN116761904A (en) | Method for producing aluminum alloy extruded material | |
US20210332462A1 (en) | Aluminum alloy and manufacturing method thereof | |
JP6975421B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy manufacturing method | |
Mudassar et al. | Eutectic Si Accumulation in Liquid Forged A356 Alloy Wheel and its Adverse Effect on Tensile Fracture Behavior |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SAINT JEAN INDUSTRIES, FRANCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:EPALE, ROMAIN;DI SERIO, EMILE THOMAS;REEL/FRAME:043025/0177 Effective date: 20170630 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |