US20130333879A1 - Method for Closed Loop Fracture Detection and Fracturing using Expansion and Sensing Apparatus - Google Patents
Method for Closed Loop Fracture Detection and Fracturing using Expansion and Sensing Apparatus Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20130333879A1 US20130333879A1 US13/919,428 US201313919428A US2013333879A1 US 20130333879 A1 US20130333879 A1 US 20130333879A1 US 201313919428 A US201313919428 A US 201313919428A US 2013333879 A1 US2013333879 A1 US 2013333879A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- fracture
- formation
- wellbore
- data
- sensor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title description 24
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 91
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 90
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005481 NMR spectroscopy Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920001971 elastomer Polymers 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000806 elastomer Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 claims 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 abstract description 38
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 abstract description 13
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 22
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 22
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 19
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 19
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 19
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 15
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 8
- XQCFHQBGMWUEMY-ZPUQHVIOSA-N Nitrovin Chemical compound C=1C=C([N+]([O-])=O)OC=1\C=C\C(=NNC(=N)N)\C=C\C1=CC=C([N+]([O-])=O)O1 XQCFHQBGMWUEMY-ZPUQHVIOSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 6
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 5
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011253 protective coating Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000005299 abrasion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003079 shale oil Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000013024 troubleshooting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910021532 Calcite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000035508 accumulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- QDWJUBJKEHXSMT-UHFFFAOYSA-N boranylidynenickel Chemical compound [Ni]#B QDWJUBJKEHXSMT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013481 data capture Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005251 gamma ray Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004519 grease Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000007749 high velocity oxygen fuel spraying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000246 remedial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013049 sediment Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004062 sedimentation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009494 specialized coating Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- UONOETXJSWQNOL-UHFFFAOYSA-N tungsten carbide Chemical compound [W+]#[C-] UONOETXJSWQNOL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004593 Epoxy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000282327 Felis silvestris Species 0.000 description 1
- 229920000271 Kevlar® Polymers 0.000 description 1
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000005534 acoustic noise Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009849 deactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013100 final test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004761 kevlar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B10/00—Drill bits
- E21B10/26—Drill bits with leading portion, i.e. drill bits with a pilot cutter; Drill bits for enlarging the borehole, e.g. reamers
- E21B10/32—Drill bits with leading portion, i.e. drill bits with a pilot cutter; Drill bits for enlarging the borehole, e.g. reamers with expansible cutting tools
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N43/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds
- A01N43/34—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds having rings with one nitrogen atom as the only ring hetero atom
- A01N43/40—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds having rings with one nitrogen atom as the only ring hetero atom six-membered rings
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26B—HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B26B21/00—Razors of the open or knife type; Safety razors or other shaving implements of the planing type; Hair-trimming devices involving a razor-blade; Equipment therefor
- B26B21/54—Razor-blades
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B10/00—Drill bits
- E21B10/36—Percussion drill bits
- E21B10/40—Percussion drill bits with leading portion
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B44/00—Automatic control systems specially adapted for drilling operations, i.e. self-operating systems which function to carry out or modify a drilling operation without intervention of a human operator, e.g. computer-controlled drilling systems; Systems specially adapted for monitoring a plurality of drilling variables or conditions
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/01—Devices for supporting measuring instruments on drill bits, pipes, rods or wirelines; Protecting measuring instruments in boreholes against heat, shock, pressure or the like
- E21B47/013—Devices specially adapted for supporting measuring instruments on drill bits
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/08—Measuring diameters or related dimensions at the borehole
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/08—Measuring diameters or related dimensions at the borehole
- E21B47/085—Measuring diameters or related dimensions at the borehole using radiant means, e.g. acoustic, radioactive or electromagnetic
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/09—Locating or determining the position of objects in boreholes or wells, e.g. the position of an extending arm; Identifying the free or blocked portions of pipes
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/09—Locating or determining the position of objects in boreholes or wells, e.g. the position of an extending arm; Identifying the free or blocked portions of pipes
- E21B47/095—Locating or determining the position of objects in boreholes or wells, e.g. the position of an extending arm; Identifying the free or blocked portions of pipes by detecting an acoustic anomalies, e.g. using mud-pressure pulses
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/12—Means for transmitting measuring-signals or control signals from the well to the surface, or from the surface to the well, e.g. for logging while drilling
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B49/00—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B7/00—Special methods or apparatus for drilling
- E21B7/28—Enlarging drilled holes, e.g. by counterboring
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/12—Packers; Plugs
- E21B33/124—Units with longitudinally-spaced plugs for isolating the intermediate space
Definitions
- This invention relates to an apparatus and method capable of detecting fractures and expanding a tubular or wellbore isolation device in oil and gas wells.
- the expandable elements can be configured to expand to the actual wellbore diameter while sensors such as acoustic sensors or mechanical probes can detect wellbore fractures. Further measurements can be obtained after expansion and used in conjunction with fluid properties, vibration, flow, hydraulic force, pressure, temperature.
- expansion refers to the capacity of the expandable element to expand outwardly and against the interior wall of a passage, such as a borehole, especially a wellbore, or a tubular used as a casing, and then to maintain pressure or isolate pressure from the formation. It is not always essential that the expandable element such as a bridge plug or packer be expanded, since the sensing elements can be used to detect fractures without necessarily expanding the packer.
- the invention relates to an Expansion and Sensing apparatus and method for identifying natural fractures and optimising the process of man-made or hydraulic fractures in oil and gas wells.
- the technology is especially useful in unconventional reservoirs that hold tight gas, shale gas, coal bed methane, shale oil, etc. If critical knowledge of the fracture i.e. reservoir interconnectivty, fractures, pathways or dips can be gained both pre and post fracking this would lead to greater recovery rates due to more effective wellbore fracking by increasing the actual fracked footage in the payzone.
- the invention is suitable for open and cased/liner hole and hydraulic fracturing with or without perforating tubing.
- the apparatus and method is capable of evaluating natural fractures to determine optimal depths and locations to set an expandable element such as packers or other wellbore isolation devices so as to optimise the fracture pathways that are naturally present once the wellbore is isolated and the man-made or hydraulic fractures can be propagated.
- the apparatus and method finds particular use in characterising fractures and their geo-physical and petro-physical features principally using sensors or wellbore imaging based on electrical, ultrasonic, electromagnetic or nuclear measurements to characterise the fracture and wellbore isolation devices using expandable packers, swellable packers, intelligent control valves, intelligent control devices.
- Alternative means can be used to identify the fracture and isolate the wellbore. Any type of fracturing method itself can be employed in the invention and this is not limited to hydraulic fracturing, as different types of reservoirs may require the use of differing methodologies or new fracturing techniques.
- a microprocessor may be incorporated to process data which identifies natural fractures and optimise the coordinates for setting an isolation device, hydraulically fracturing the formation, identifying the effectiveness of the hydraulic fracture and if required repeat the hydraulic fracture at the same co-ordinates or select further co-ordinates in order to propagate an optimised fracture pathway and maximise production.
- fracture refers to the capacity of the invention to evaluate an aperture in the formation which may vary in size from millimetres to metres, have a determined angular orientation and may connect to other fractures in the same plane or another plane within a formation that extends from the tool at a determined angle and reaches a given angular depth and a true vertical depth.
- prior art logging tools are differentiated as part of a separate function i.e. are tripped out of the hole and a fracking assembly entered into the hole.
- a sensor nor an imaging tool capable of detecting fractures is in communication with the fracking operator due to the complex downhole configuration of fracking and the location of the fracking stages.
- the technology overcomes these issues by providing pre and post fracking data and can also be configured with wellbore isolation devices and may be configured so as to be retrievable through a packer to determine the effectiveness of a frack job or a frac stage.
- An expandable element and fracture sensor to determine natural fractures before formations are hydraulically fractured and thereby increase hydrocarbon recovery factors by optimally setting the wellbore and the wellbore isolation device such as a packer; a method of closed loop fracture identification, fracking and identifying frack effectiveness.
- the present apparatus and method itself overcomes these issues by providing pre and post fracking data and can also be configured with wellbore isolation devices and may be configured so as to be retrievable through a packer to determine the effectiveness of a frack job or a frac stage.
- the invention is configured with a rotary steerable to detect fractures but it is not necessary for fracking to occur using wellbore isolation devices conveyed on drill pipe.
- aspects of the invention include a method of operating an expandable element and fracture sensor to determine natural fractures before formations are hydraulically fractured and thereby increase hydrocarbon recovery factors by optimally setting the wellbore and the wellbore isolation device such as a packer; a method of closed loop fracture identification, fracking and identifying frack effectiveness, identifying fractures, angularly, axially and vertically ahead of hydraulic fractures; a method of pre and post frac analysis using a closed loop system, creating a an optimised sensing zone.
- the invention relates to an apparatus for controlling logging and wellbore placement in real-time.
- the invention may also be combined with micro-seismic, tiltmeters, frac tracers, proppant, or sensing of a frack parameters such as flow, pressure, temperature, depth, azimuth, inclination to provide insight into the fracking process.
- Geo-physical data such as formation porosity, permeability, oil, water, gas contact zones, formation beds and dips are required to be known to steer the well to its optimal location.
- a variety of logging-while-drilling technology such as neutron density, gamma ray, resistivity and acoustic investigation tools are commonly used to identify formations and evaluate their features. ( FIG. 1 ).
- the present invention provides insight into natural fractures and their interplay with hydraulic fractures.
- Many considerations affect the fracture matrix such as organic content, porosity, permeability, brittleness, orientation, pressure but as a general rule, because hydraulic fractures propagate along the path of natural fractures, detecting natural fractures is most useful in enlarging and stabilizing the natural fracture matrix.
- markers i.e. differing properties from the surrounding rock such as pressure, impedance, calcite lining, etc provide clues to their detection. Consequently, the invention would enable oil companies to maximise production by pin pointing natural fractures while drilling, feed these into the fracture matrix and complement micro seismic, tiltmeter, frac tracers, proppant effectiveness etc.
- the invention embodies a truly optimised closed loop method for open hole/cased hole completions using packers or sleeves. Further embodiments may determine fracture detection on the open hole completion or stimulation string where a perforating string is involved suitable reconfiguration of the technology.
- the present invention details an embodiment of a sensor to detect a fracture.
- fractures may be derived from a variety of formation evaluation data which comprise acoustics, electro-magnetics, resistivity or conductance measurements, neutron density, alpha particle measurements, photoelectric measurements, gamma ray.
- formation evaluation data comprise acoustics, electro-magnetics, resistivity or conductance measurements, neutron density, alpha particle measurements, photoelectric measurements, gamma ray.
- any type of sensor that can detect a fracture is useful in the invention.
- Alternatively or additionally a wellbore image may be provided.
- Seismic tools provide wide-scale geological data, however these have poor resolution of formation detail and drilling itself is the true test of geophysical formation characteristics. Therefore, there is a need for and reliance on real-time acoustic while drilling tools. These tools use transducers or sources to create high frequency sound waves which are propagated as shear or pressure waves in solids and fluids respectively. Sound waves are further classified as those travelling within the wellbore (Stoneley waves), the near formation as (Flexural waves) and far formation as (Body waves). Through an evaluation of the echo pulse, its maxima and minima, which are received back by the sensor/receiver, and derivations thereof, calculations, can be made as to the time interval between signal transmission and recording the echo to determine the distance to an object or formation feature. Further, using algorithms various characteristics such as formation density, void spaces, fluid saturations, fluid trapping and formation direction changes such as beds or dips all have definite signature velocities that correspond to their reflective ability.
- the effectiveness of the frack job is not determined as the prior art may not be deployed below the packer or may not be retrievable through the packer to determine the orientation and propagation of the hydraulic fractures ( 90 ). This severely limits the ability to repeat the frack job to allow for perforation, fracture propagation and proppant to be pumped through ( FIG. 2 ). In this way, the prior art can only provide for formation evaluation subsequent to drilling. This is unsatisfactory as it prevents the optimal placement of the packer and the wellbore due to the non-existent or tardy arrival of formation data after wellbore placement has already occurred.
- Measurement may involve the acquisition and communication to surface of various types of wellbore data such as resistivity, porosity, permeability, azimuth, inclination and borehole diameter or rugosity, formation dips or bedding angles. Such measurements are known in the art and in the interest of brevity therefore are shown conceptually only.
- the present invention may be suitably combined with microseismic, tiltmeters etc to provide inferred or indirect or direct measurements where the invention provides the detail for the fracture pathways that are necessary for production.
- Such cycles of delayed post fracture data arrival and subsequent corrections can be eliminated with the present invention.
- each layer has a given temperature profile according to the True Vertical Depth (TVD) at which it is located.
- TVD True Vertical Depth
- the sedimentary process explains why oil and gas are contained in minute rock spaces or pores (porosity) and not in caverns. This can be imagined as a dry sponge placed over water. The water is drawn in and contained within the voids of the sponge.
- porosity is defined as the percentage of ‘voids’ in a volume of rock.
- sedimentation shows the ability of a fluid to ‘seep’ or ‘flow’ through a given formation (permeability). Minute channels are created in the formations and, due to the pressurised nature of oil and gas and their relative lightness, there is always a tendency for the oil and gas to rise. This is illustrated by the migration of oil and gas from a source rock to a porous reservoir rock.
- Geological mapping and geophysical surveys allow oil companies to characterise their acquired acreage and the age and sedimentation patterns of the rock formation contained therein. This process of characterisation can be reconstructed as a visual earth model that delineates the position and shape of the structure including anticlines, faults-stratigraphy, structure which helps increase production from subsequent wells and from the field as a whole.
- the earth model and the well plan have inherent uncertainties.
- Geological uncertainties and challenges are related to the location of the hydrocarbons, water contacts, traps, formation stresses, movements and reservoir porosity and permeability.
- a highly detailed well plan is developed which contains the well objective, coordinates, legal, geological, technical and well engineering data and calculations. To resolve the uncertainties, however, drilling is the final test.
- the data is used to plot a well profile using precise bearings which is designed in consecutive telescopic sections—surface, intermediate and reservoir.
- a given wellbore trajectory with multiple sections and diameters is drilled from surface.
- a simple vertical well design could include a surface or top-hole diameter of 171 ⁇ 2′′ (445 mm), intermediate sections of 135 ⁇ 8′′ (360 mm) and 95 ⁇ 8′′ (245 mm) narrowing down to the bottom-hole diameter of 81 ⁇ 2′′ (216 mm) in the reservoir section.
- Each consecutive section is ‘cased’ with the specified diameter and a number of metal tubes placed into the wellbore according to the length of the section. Each must be connected to each other after which they are cemented into the appropriately sized hole with a given tolerance.
- a well is constructed in staged sections, each section dependent on the completion of the previous section until the well is isolated from the formation along the entire distance from surface to the reservoir.
- Each section will also have a logging plan with minimum formation evaluation requirements.
- the reservoir section is left open hole or bare or completed using production casing, sandscreens, gravel packs etc. Production casing fully isolates the wellbore from the reservoir formations and therefore requires communication which is provided via perforations created in the casing allowing fluid commingling. Perforations are of further importance in unconventional basins as they provide the coordinates for the hydraulically induced fractures.
- the well plans that are used to drill these wells may include modeling or fractures using micro seismic, tiltmeters, acoustic, resistivity or other logging devices to characterize natural fractures.
- modeling is an integral part of fracture construction and there is now an increased dependence on modeling for wellbore fracture placement.
- the fracture detection has been restricted to natural or pre frack measurements which are often modeled only.
- the natural frack data means that modeled fracture data would be provided before a fracking operation and may or may not have microseismic applied. Consequently, the fracking operation may have exited a payzone and the fracking would be of limited effectiveness. A new well may have to be drilled to reach back to the optimal location or the fracking operation repeated. If critical knowledge of the fracture i.e. reservoir interconnectivity, fractures, pathways or dips can be gained both pre and post fracking this would lead to greater recovery rates due to more effective wellbore fracking by increasing the actual fracked footage in the payzone.
- the tolerances between the planned parameters and actual downhole parameters can be very close and variations of 0.2 ppg can lead to the failure or loss of the well.
- remedial drilling action can be taken in advance saving time, money and providing a significant safety margin.
- the prior art contributes to an average and unsatisfactory recovery rate of 35% of hydrocarbons as reserves are not detected or produced in an optimal manner.
- the present invention has for a principal object to provide an improvement on the prior art wherein the pre and post fractures are characterized so that fracture pathways and production rates can be maximised.
- the invention seeks to provide critical knowledge of the fracture i.e. reservoir interconnectivty, fractures, pathways or dips can be gained both pre and post fracking this would lead to greater recovery rates due to more effective wellbore fracking by increasing the actual fracked footage in the payzone.
- the invention seeks to meet the need for a closed-loop real-time fracture detection to provide real time formation data of formation data and natural fractures (pre frack) while the wellbore is being fracked or before the packer is set at a give coordinate (depth, azimuth, inclination etc). This has not been forthcoming in the prior art due to missing steps inherent in the pre and post frack placement, orientation and assembly.
- the present invention seeks to directly investigate pre and post fracking and offers optimal wellbore and packer placement using a novel sensor configuration which also allows for optimized fracture propagation and measurement of post frack effectiveness.
- the present invention eliminates the uncertainty of trial and error by providing real-time data which allows the wellbore isolation device to be set at optimized coordinates, the frack job to conducted thereafter and the its effectiveness measured thereby providing real time data as to the effectiveness of the fracking operation and where necessary to repeat the frack job until the required recovery will be achieved.
- fracture detection is a principal route to characterizing the effectiveness of fracking
- the invention is not limited to fracture detection and envisages alternative investigation means similarly integrated with fracture detection capability of the tool.
- alternative means can include nuclear, electro-magnetic, optical, temperature or other such sensor as deemed required for optimal fracking or wellbore placement.
- the invention can be used to perform hydraulic fracking with open hole or cased/liner hole applications with or without perforating assemblies.
- the downhole and surface configurations would be arranged to meet the needs of the operation and the apparatus may be connected directly or indirectly in any manner or order so that the frack operation may be optimized.
- Fracture sensing means may be located above, below, on the wellbore isolation means and suitably configured to enable downhole fracking operations. For example, this may involve the unrestricted ID (internal diameter) or passage for full flow or pressure or to drop ball etc to as is know in the art to create the necessary pressure for fracking. Other configurations may require additionally or alternatively the ability to retrieve the sensors or to deploy the sensors above or below the packer. Deployment may be performed via means such as collapsible supports for the sensors, fibre optics, miniaturized sensing means, fixed supports, independently rotatable, extendable supports, arms, blocks, blades, etc. Power would be provided accordingly and can be contained within the apparatus or provided from outside the apparatus. Communications would be provided using wires, wirelessly or a combination. The invention is not limited in the placement or configuration of the apparatus.
- the processor will automatically detect whether corrective steps are required to maintain/move the wellbore fracking in the optimal zone. Data can be collected on each stage as it is fracked and this is compared with pre frack data and differing stage data. If the tool finds a significant divergence, a signal may be sent to the rig-surface or to the location of the operating engineer so that further remedial action can be taken, such as coordinate revisions.
- a memory mode may store sensor information that can be downloaded at surface when the tool is retrieved, or sent to the surface by telemetry or by wireless means.
- One or more sensors may be optimally spaced in the fracking apparatus in order to investigate the formation, detect fracking and provide pre and post frack data.
- the resolution of fracture detection may be user defined and can be pre-programmed at surface to the processor or via instruction from a surface location to the downhole location of the apparatus and processor.
- the method according to the invention similarly provides for pre programming or programming on the fly and communication both using wires or wirelessly.
- a keyway may provide a channel for wiring from the sensors to the processor and to a transponder.
- the wiring can be used to transmit sensor data retrieved by the sensors, as well as positional and structural data of formation characteristics such as fractures and their relative depths, pathways, corridors, inter-connectivity etc.
- the keyway may be sealed and filled with a means to absorb vibration such as silicon gel or grease and to maintain wires in position.
- the keyways may be left redundant and as a back-up to a wireless mode of operation.
- the transponder converts formation and fracture data so that it can be transmitted and may be linked a the mud-pulser which transmits the data to surface using a series of binary codes at a given frequency using drilling fluid as means of mud pulsing.
- Other means of data transfer may be used such as wireless transmission short hop using radio frequency or electro-magnetic pulses or wired drill-pipe. This allows up and downlink of the tool in order to receive and transmit data and commands so as to optimize fracking.
- a transducer may be incorporated within a decoder housing which decodes the binary code and may link to the frac operations or driller's terminal or may be yet further transmitted by satellite or other means to a remote operations centre.
- the closed loop fracture apparatus ( 50 ) comprises a tool body with means for attaching the tool body ( 63 ) directly or indirectly to a support or reamer, reaming shoe, drill-bit whereby it can be rotated and moved axially along a passage ( 20 ), and is characterized by, at least one sensor ( 58 ) which can detect natural or man made fractures ( FIG.
- the support may typically be a perforating or production string ( 30 ) or a workstring or drillstring or extended length of coiled tubing as used in downhole operations in oil and gas fields.
- the investigation operation is based on sensor elements comprising a set of at least one sensor, receiver combination optimally configured and oriented to investigate beyond the wellbore and detect fractures.
- the sensor housing may comprise protective covering, which may be of similar construction to the sensors, but having outer surfaces where sensors are protected by a hardened material. Such protection may simply bear under temperature, pressure or flow acting against it from the inside of a wellbore.
- the zone surrounding the housing may be treated to actively receive data or configured with a variety of receivers rendering it a sensing zone.
- the sensors may be provided with a lens surface that may be convex ( 52 a ), concave ( 52 b ), or planar ( 52 c ) according to requirement.
- the sensors and receivers may be optimally tuned and gated in terms of frequency so that emitted frequencies do not cancel out upon contact with return waves and so that reference measurements are taken to establish background noise which would be suitably excluded from operational measurement calculations.
- the same sensors may be received within an additional section of apparatus or a separate steel body or behind or ahead such section suitably prepared to provide a means of stabilization or centralization and protection for downhole applications.
- Further sensors may be provided with a means to reduce ‘ringing’ or ‘dampening’ of the sensors so as to always ensure the measurements are fit-for-purpose.
- sensors or receivers and tool design is applicable generally, irrespective of function, except to the extent that certain sensors may be provided specifically for formation evaluation purposes and replaced by other sensors such as nuclear or resistivity or acoustic or nuclear magnetic resonance sensors as required by the drilling operation.
- the apparatus comprises a tool body or a plurality of tool bodies which are typically cylindrical high grade steel housings adapted to form part of a fracking assembly. It is not always necessary that the assembly be used for fracking as the sensors may be used to determine natural fractures while drilling.
- the means for attaching the tool body to the support may comprise a screw thread provided on the tool body which is engageable with a drill collar or a connection to a production string for fracking.
- the attachment need not be direct, but may be indirect, as there will typically be many different functional elements to be included in the long and narrow assembly, and the arrangement of the successive elements will vary based on production, completion or drilling applications.
- the lower end of the assembly may be the drill bit (or a packer or casing shoe or reamer shoe) which may be directly connected to the tool and in between there may or may not be other components dependent on the operational requirement.
- such components could be a means for directional control such as a rotary steerable system or directional motor.
- the tool body may be provided with a through passage for the flow of drilling fluid from the drill string.
- perforating such components could be a means for wellbore isolation such as a bridge plug or packer.
- the tool body may be provided with a through passage for the flow of completion fluid from the string. In open hole completions perforating may not be required prior to hydraulic fracturing.
- the invention is not limited to a single configuration of the apparatus since it is always envisaged that the necessary components are available to perform the frack job.
- Such a through passage allows for full flow, pressure, drop ball or other actions above or below the tool i.e. activation, deactivation, or retrieval of equipment.
- the tool itself may also be provided to be retrievable so that it may be placed below a packer or take measurements below a packer or above a packer.
- any completion or wellbore isolation device such as intelligent control valve, swellable packer or inflow control device can be used to isolate the wellbore and create the necessary pressure to fracture the formation.
- the sensors may be protected and housed in a plurality of positions directed outwardly of a body.
- the sensor may be received within the profile of the tool body in a sensor recess suitably protected from abrasion, wear and damage by means of at least one protective coating or covering.
- the protective coating may be steel with HVOF, tungsten carbide, boron nickel or other protection according to requirements.
- the sensor may be provided with a dampening material or mechanism such as silicon gel or a spring.
- the sensor and receiver may then be provided with means for driving the sensors and receiving the data from the far formation, near formation or wellbore so as to characterize the fractures located therein.
- the microprocessor control means may be suitably adapted to receive formation data from the sensors and to control the frequency in response thereto.
- a gating procedure may be suitably incorporated to discard a range of background noise frequencies or by means of establishing a maxima reference measurement and engaging with such a maxima or by means of establishing a measurement and engaging with such a measurement.
- the microprocessor also may receive information from micro-seismic, tiltmeters, frack parameters so as to optimize the frack operation and this may be done in a closed loop operation with or without user intervention. In this way, a number of differing frac jobs may be performed at a number of sites and data viewed at a central location.
- Pressure compensation may be provided to handle variations in downhole pressure compared to surface atmospheric conditions for example in fracking where hydraulic flow and pressure may require pressure compensation (not shown).
- the system may comprise a microprocessor means for monitoring fracture evaluation data and relative positions of frack stages
- the microprocessor means may include a means of automatically anticipating any fracture or detecting a feature of a formation or detecting a change in the feature of a formation, thereby guiding the control system to ensure the optimal placement and functioning of the frack operation.
- the tool normally comprises a plurality of sensor and receivers arranged symmetrically around the tool and disposed outwardly.
- the sensor receiver may be configured as an integral transducer or separated as a sensor to receiver array known as a ‘sensing zone’ (not shown). Two transducers would be on opposite sides of the tool, three blocks would be separated by 120 degrees, four by 90 degrees, and six by 60 degrees. Additionally or alternatively, sensor receiver arrays could be configured in a plurality of combinations including longitudinal or wellbore spacings or axial or spiral, with the object of ensuring the zone of investigation covers the pre and post fractures.
- the sensor receiver array is provided with an internal keyway for directing power from a source within the tool and providing communications to and from the sensor receiver.
- the source of power may be a battery within the tool or within another support for the tool suitably adapted for such purpose.
- the communications may be a processor within the tool, or at surface or other support for the tool suitably adapted for such purpose.
- the sensor/receiver or tool body may be provided with a wireless means of communication to an internal or external processor. In each case, the two-way communications provide data transmission, operational refinement and data capture.
- the sensor housing may be provided with a specialized coating to minimize the residence or remove such material altogether from the sensing zone.
- the present invention incorporates a wellbore isolation device so as to permit a frack job and sensors to permit the detection of fractures before and after a frack job.
- housing for other types of sensors is provided.
- the tool may further comprise telemetry means for communicating downhole data and control signals between the tool and a surface interface, which may, among other functions, control the drill string or work string during the drilling or frack operation.
- the invention provides a method of operating an apparatus to investigate natural and induced fractures and to optimally guide and place a wellbore which comprises locating a wellbore fracking device according to the invention in a borehole on a support, activating the sensors/receivers to detect natural fractures and establish a set of coordinates for locating a wellbore fracking device, fracking a wellbore, and detecting the effectiveness of the fracking operation and if unsatisfactory repeating the fracking operation at the same coordinates or further coordinates until an optimal fracking operation is completed and hydrocarbon production is maximized.
- the data gathered by the sensors relates to the natural and induced fractures and can be all relevant characteristics concerning the fracture matrix, such as their depth, relative distance, azimuthul orientation, pathways, interconnectivity and corridors. natural fractures and their interplay with hydraulic fractures. Many considerations affect this fracture matrix such as organic content, porosity, permeability, brittleness, orientation, pressure but as a general rule, because hydraulic fractures propagate along the path of natural fractures, detecting natural fractures is clearly most useful in enlarging and stabilizing the natural fracture matrix. Although, fractures may appear closed in cores, markers i.e. differing properties from the surrounding rock such as impedance, calcite lining, etc provide clues to their detection.
- the tool may be provided with microprocessor means responsive to formation data received from the sensor/receivers.
- the sensor/receiver may investigate the fracture, or investigate a feature of a fracture, set a wellbore fracking device, frack a formation and may further investigate the fracture to provide data to a surface monitor to signal an opportunity for operator intervention to correct wellbore fracking if it were not able to do so automatically.
- pre and post frack detection system data from the formation are detected by sensors. These fracture data may be transmitted from the sensor to a processor which correlates the fracture data and uses this to establish the optimal location for setting a wellbore fracking device taking into consideration formation characteristics such as dips, faults, and allowing for variations in the formation.
- the processor uses this data to correlate whether the pre-programmed frack program will be achieved and the resulting hydraulic pressure and frack fluids that would be required to frack to an optimal level.
- the processor detects that a fracture or feature of a formation may affect the frack parameters such as hydraulic pressure, fluid types, proppants etc it can automatically recalculate an optimal value for the hydraulics as well as the physical location for the frack to occur. Or it may simply signal an opportunity for an operator to intervene.
- the operator may frack using a drilling or completion or production assembly or a frack assembly.
- the present invention can be employed to detect pre and post fractures and thereby a novel way of maximizing the placement and effectiveness of any fracking operation.
- the principal objective is knowledge of the fracture i.e. reservoir interconnectivty, fractures, pathways or dips gained both in pre and post fracking which leads to greater recovery rates due to more effective wellbore fracking by increasing the actual fracked footage in the payzone.
- the processor may be programmed with a logic circuit which can be configured in any number of ways so as to optimize performance.
- An exemplary configuration may involve the circuit to first cross check the natural fracture data and then set a wellbore fracking device. The fracking operation is performed and the induced fracture data and if required corresponding flow of hydrocarbons is obtained by the sensors and transmitted to the processor. In this way, the processor can measure the effectiveness of the induced fracking directly and if it were insufficient provide for a further cycle of fracking. This distinguishes the present invention from the prior art which has neither the ability to compare natural and induced fractures nor optimize the location of fracking devices.
- the fracking operation can be repeated at the same coordinates with a change in fracking parameters. If the post frack data still shows insufficient gain in production of hydrocarbons, the apparatus can provide for example, a change in the depth, orientation or angle at which the fracking device is either isolated from the wellbore or the coordinates at which it fractures the formation.
- the apparatus may further be optimized for shale oil, shale gas or tight gas zone or coal bed methane so that apparatus can alert the user by means of telemetry to check the wellbore frack device location, azimuthal, inclination, or frack parameters as necessary or prompt this through a closed loop system.
- the skilled person will readily appreciate that other procedures may be implemented by the logic circuit within the processor, which can be programmed to cover other scenarios.
- the invention provides a fracture detection method comprising locating a tool body with sensors and receivers, optionally but not limited to a housing carrying a plurality of sensors and receivers directed outwardly of the tool body, wherein the sensor or receiver is received within the tool body in a purpose built housing having an open mouth, and means for allowing sensor emissions to propagate to and from the housing and to and from the wellbore, near and far formation to detect natural and man-made fractures.
- the invention provides a wellbore fracking device used in conjunction with the fracture detection capability outlined above comprising a wellbore isolation device such as a expandable packer, intelligent flow control device, intelligent control valve, confirmable sponge, swellable packer carrying at least one expandable element to conform to the wellbore and isolate a specific area in the wellbore. Additionally or alternatively further areas in the wellbore may be left open to allow free flow of hydrocarbons. In this way a plurality of wellbore flow areas may be created allowing for fluids to frack the wellbore as well as allowing the flow of hydrocarbons into the wellbore.
- a wellbore isolation device such as a expandable packer, intelligent flow control device, intelligent control valve, confirmable sponge, swellable packer carrying at least one expandable element to conform to the wellbore and isolate a specific area in the wellbore. Additionally or alternatively further areas in the wellbore may be left open to allow free flow of hydrocarbons. In this way a plurality of wellbore flow
- sensor and receiver arrays may be configured optimally by providing longitudinal spacings between the sensors and receivers.
- the apparatus may be provided with compensation and/or calibration means for enhancing fracture detection.
- compensation and/or calibration occurs using look up tables for parameters affecting sensor measurements or measurements made at surface or downhole.
- the invention envisages all types of such calibration since they can improve the accuracy of measurements and fracture detection.
- FIG. 1 is a general diagrammatic view of an oil or gas well showing rig surface structures ( 10 ) and the underground well ( 20 ), with a tool ( 50 ) in accordance with the invention as part of a bottomhole assembly ( 40 ) drilling a well ( 30 ) and indicating formations and formation features ( 70 ) located ahead of the drill-bit ( 60 ) and a wellbore ( 80 );
- FIGS. 2 , 2 a , 2 b are downhole side views illustrating a a plurality of sensor distributed along the apparatus in a helical, longitudinal, spiral arrangement respectively. It is not essential the sensors are distributed on a tubular body as the may be located within collapsible arms, extendable arms, fibre optic cables, distributed within casing or liners or retrievable from below a packer. Sensors may be non rotating, rotatable, independently rotatable, toward the wellbore or internally or may be fixed in position. The invention is not limited in sensor placement or fixing.
- FIG. 3 a show a and 3 b show a radial corresponding to radial sensor distribution corresponding to FIG. 2
- FIG. 4 is a 3-D Earth cube from a surface ( 260 ) and downhole side ( 150 ) view, part cut away to show the fracking operation ( 160 ) according to a multi stage fracking operation ( 280 );
- FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic cross section through the apparatus in accordance with the invention similar having a wellbore isolation device ( 62 ) or other zonal isolation member ( 63 ) at the downhole end;
- FIG. 6 is a diagrammatic cross section through the apparatus in accordance with the invention similar to that shown in FIG. 5 , but having an additional wellbore isolation device ( 61 ) or other zonal isolation member at the trailing uphole end
- FIG. 7 is an exemplary embodiment with sensing element between zonal isolation devices as would be the case with multiple stages or packers according to frack operations.
- FIG. 8 is an exemplary diagnosis and troubleshooting procedure according to the invention showing fracture detection and integration with other data such as micro-seismic, tiltmeters, fracking parameters and the like.
- an exemplary exploration or production rig comprises a surface structure ( 10 ) at the wellhead, a wellbore ( 20 ), and a string ( 30 ) in the wellbore with a downhole assembly ( 40 ) at its lower end.
- the downhole assembly includes an apparatus ( 50 ) in accordance with one aspect of the invention, a sensing means and a wellbore isolation device ( 60 ) and formations fractured and detected as the object of the invention.
- the apparatus ( 50 ) is illustrated by way of exemplary embodiments in FIGS. 5 , 6 , and 7 comprises a tubular steel body ( 62 ) provided with a connection at either end to enable its direct or indirect connection to the wellbore isolation device ( 60 ) and connect it to other elements of the downhole assembly ( 40 ) and a link to a means of communication to the surface ( 64 ).
- Wellbore isolation device ( 60 ) may be replaceable by a drill bit where the invention is used in while drilling capacity to detect natural fractures.
- the apparatus comprises a tool body ( 58 ) that carries at least one housing for at least one sensor ( 58 ) and a wellbore isolation device ( 60 ) capable of detecting natural and induced fractures.
- the sensor element ( 51 ) comprises a number of sensing elements ( 52 ) disposed radially around the profile of the tool body FIG. 3 a .
- the sensors detect fractures that extend beyond the wellbore ( 60 ) and into formations surrounding ( 70 ) and at multiple stages or locations in the wellbore ( 110 , 120 , and 130 ).
- FIG. 5 An exemplary configuration of the invention in accordance with its specified object is shown in FIG. 5 .
- FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic cross section through a lookahead tool in accordance with the invention similar to that shown in FIG. 5 , but having a wellbore isolation device ( 62 ) or other wall contact member ( 69 ) at the trailing uphole end.
- a wellbore isolation device ( 62 ) or other wall contact member ( 69 ) at the trailing uphole end.
- such downhole wall contact may be an expandable device, pressure containment device;
- FIG. 7 illustrates diagrammatically the aforementioned sensing elements within the tool ( 50 ), together with a wellbore isolation device ( 61 ) in a cross section view in accordance with the invention similar to that shown in FIG. 5 , but having an additional wellbore isolation device ( 61 ) at the leading downhole end; wherein a plurality of such devices may be employed as is the case where multiple frack stages are required to stimulate the reservoir.
- Fracking performance is verified using a micro-processor, shown in location ( 55 ), that compares data from the sensor ( 51 ) with a pre-programmed wellbore frack plan, thus detecting natural and induced fracking.
- the micro processor may be located at the surface especially when a micro seismic or tiltmeter or surface frack parameters are measured.
- the apparatus is programmed and automated to conduct diagnostics according to a logic circuit or diagnostic program stored in processor ( 55 ) in order to ensure the fracking is optimally performed.
- an alert signal is sent via the mud-pulser ( 64 ) to the rig-surface 10 or to a remote operator so that control action of the assembly ( 40 ) can be taken.
- a memory module (not shown) associated with processor ( 55 ) may store sensor information that can be downloaded at surface when the tool is retrieved, or sent to the surface by telemetry through a transponder to a mud-pulser ( 64 ) or by other communication means.
- a means of powering the sensors and receivers is shown by ( 54 ).
- the tool is provided with a built-in link to a communication system which may be a wired or wireless telemetry system ( 64 ) which also serves to monitor real-time formation data and features.
- a communication system which may be a wired or wireless telemetry system ( 64 ) which also serves to monitor real-time formation data and features.
- One or more sensor receivers ( 51 ) are spaced within the tool body in order to detect fractures in a single part of the wellbore ( 40 ) or a multiple number ( 110 , 120 , 130 ).
- the microprocessor ( 55 ) establishes formations ( 110 , 120 , 130 ) and formation features ( 160 ) and fracture data through a series of calculations derived from acoustic velocity or resistivity or neutron density imaging.
- the invention is not limited to sensing or imaging means and compares this with preprogrammed targets. If the two measurements match given user defined tolerances the tool continues to total depth of the wellbore section. Where the formation data do not match the logic circuit dictates
- a keyway provides a channel for wiring ( 56 ) from the sensor ( 51 ) to the processor ( 55 ), and also to a comms device ( 64 ).
- the wiring is used to transmit formation evaluation data retrieved by the acoustic reflection sensors ( 51 ) as well formation features ( 110 , 120 , 130 , 160 ) from the receivers ( 52 ) to the processor ( 55 ) and transponder ( 64 ).
- the keyway may be sealed and filled with a means to absorb vibration and maintain wires in position such as silicon gel or grease (not shown).
- the comms device ( 64 ) converts data from the microprocessor ( 55 ) so that it can be transmitted to surface ( 10 ) and may also receive data from the surface. Means of data transfer may be used such as wired, wireless, short hop using radio frequency or electro-magnetic pulses, mud-pulse etc.
- FIG. 6 shows an alternative configuration with a wellbore isolation device ( 61 ) and shows a central axial through passage ( 59 ) for the free flow of fracturing fluid or drop ball through a central axial passage.
- housing ( 51 ) may also be suitably adapted and treated for use of other types of sensor, analogue or digital, resistivity, electro-magnetic, nuclear magnetic resonance, acoustic, pressure, flow to detect a fracture.
- the tool body ( 50 ) is a cylindrical high grade tube adapted to form part of a downhole fracking assembly 40 .
- Suitable materials for the tool body are metallic, ceramic, or any other high strength material.
- FIGS. 5 , 6 show a diagrammatic side view of the apparatus ( 50 ). At the leading downhole end there is pin connection ( 63 ) to a drill-bit, in the centre is a profiled section ( 58 ) housing sensing ( 51 , 52 ) and control functions ( 55 ).
- FIG. 6 shows a further section at the uphole end, ( 69 ), is connected to a fracking assembly ( 40 ).
- a wellbore isolation device may be placed to create zonal isolation for fracking.
- Sensors can detect fractures pre and post fracking either downhole or at surface as per FIG. 2 above.
- Sensors may be constructed and housed integrally and generally designated as ( 51 ), except that a plurality of sensors may be placed to form a sensing zone as per FIGS. 2 a , 2 b , 2 c , 3 a and 3 b .
- the tool is configured, in addition to sensing capacity, with the wellbore isolation device incorporating expandable device to isolate the wellbore and allow pressure to frack the formation.
- the wellbore isolation device may be directly or indirectly above or below the central sensing section and may be hard-wired or wireless accordingly so as to ensure the comms device ( 64 ) may transmit data to surface ( 10 ).
- the comms may be provided as wireless or wired the configuration of the apparatus may be changed to suit such an application.
- the illustrated example of a pre and post frack apparatus in accordance with the invention is a sensor which uses a microprocessor ( 55 ) and wellbore isolation device to determine and perform an optimal wellbore frack operation.
- Sensor/receiver means ( 51 , 52 ) determine single or multiple frack characteristics ( 110 , 120 , 130 , 160 ) and send corresponding signals back to the processor ( 55 ).
- the sensors ( 51 ) may be protected and housed ( 53 ) in a plurality of positions and/or orientations directed outwardly of a tool body ( 58 ) and at all times to detect fractures ( 60 ) and configured optimally based on formation and downhole component considerations.
- the sensors may be received within the tool body in a sensor housing recess ( 53 ) that is also suitably protected from abrasion, wear and damage by means of at least one protective coating or covering.
- the protective coating may be steel with a HVOF coating, tungsten carbide, boron nickel, titanium, epoxy, kevlar or other protection suited to requirements.
- the sensor may also be provided with a dampening material or mechanism such as silicon gel or a spring (not shown).
- the sensor means may then be provided with drive means ( 54 ) for driving the sensors and receiving data from the multiple stages ( 110 , 120 , 130 , 160 ), fracture or wellbore ( 80 ).
- the microprocessor control means ( 55 ) may be suitably adapted to receive formation data from the sensors ( 51 , 52 ) and to control the frequency in response thereto.
- a gating procedure may be suitably incorporated to discard a range of background noise frequencies or by means of establishing a maxima reference measurement and engaging with such a maxima. Noise in this context does not refer to solely to acoustic noise, but any electrical, sensor or other signal or circuitry interference.
- Pressure compensation may be provided to handle variations in downhole pressure compared to surface atmospheric conditions where activation is opposed by a source of external pressure. This may comprise a port from a source of downhole fluid into a chamber suitably connected to the area within the area requiring pressure compensation (not shown).
- the system may comprise a microprocessor means for monitoring formation evaluation data and relative positions of formation structures
- the microprocessor means may include a means of automatically anticipating a fracture or detecting a fracture or detecting a change in a fracture or detecting a fracking effectiveness, thereby guiding the fracking operation to ensure the optimal wellbore production.
- the apparatus normally comprises a plurality of sensing means arranged around the toolbody and disposed outwardly.
- the sensing means may itself may be configured as an integral transducer or separated as a plurality of sensors to receivers (array) known as a ‘sensing zone’.
- Sensors or transducers may be on opposite sides of the tool radially, longitudinally, axially or helically.
- Sensor receiver arrays could be configured in a plurality of combinations with the object of ensuring the zone of fracture detection and the zone of wellbore isolation is optimized within the sensing zone.
- the transducer or sensor receiver array is provided with an internal keyway for directing power from a source within the tool and providing communications to and from the sensor receiver.
- the source of power may be a battery within the tool or within other support for the tool suitably adapted for such purpose.
- the communications may be a processor within the tool, or at surface or other support for the tool suitably adapted for such purpose.
- the sensor/receiver or tool body may be provided with a wireless means of communication to an internal or external processor. In each case, the two-way communications provide data transmission, operational refinement and data capture.
- the sensor housing may be provided with a specialized coating to minimize the residence or remove such material altogether from the sensing zone.
- the present invention incorporates an optimal means of fracture detection which is practically applicable to natural and induced fractures and is combined with wellbore placement means such as rotary steerables.
- the fracture detection means are provided with a plurality of wellbore isolation devices.
- the apparatus may further comprise telemetry means for communicating downhole data and control signals between the tool and a surface interface, which may, among other functions, control the apparatus during the formation evaluation operation.
- the invention provides a method of operating a logging tool to investigate a formation or a fracture or the like to optimally guide and place a wellbore isolation device which comprises locating a device according to the invention in a borehole on a support, activating the sensors/receivers to detect fractures from the formation and establish data on fractures and features thereof, their relative distance, size from the tool in a preferred embodiment of apparatus, fracturing a formation, investigating the formation recently fractured by the sensors, and continuing the operation until an optimal wellbore production is achieved.
- the wellhead surface structure ( 10 ) includes a control and communications system having an interface for communication telemetry with downhole instrumentation including a transponder and a decoder which decodes data and may be linked directly to the user's terminal.
- the decoded data may be yet further transmitted by satellite or other means to a remote user or a remote operations centre by means of a telecommunication link.
- This surface control system allows full communication to and from the downlink and uplink to the invention.
- the invention may also provide a method of automatically operating a directional tool according to a processor to optimally place a wellbore, tubular or completion.
- FIG. 8 is an exemplary diagnosis and troubleshooting procedure according to the invention showing fracture detection and integration with other data such as micro-seismic, tiltmeters, fracking parameters and the like.
Abstract
An expansion and sensing apparatus used to detect natural and hydraulic fractures. In a closed loop aspect of the invention a microprocessor may be incorporated to process data which identifies natural fractures and optimises the coordinates for setting an isolation device, hydraulically fracturing the formation, identifying the effectiveness of the hydraulic fracture and if required repeat the hydraulic fracture at the same co-ordinates or select further co-ordinates in order to propagate an optimised fracture pathway and maximise production. The apparatus may be used with microseismic, tiltmeters, etc.
Description
- This invention relates to an apparatus and method capable of detecting fractures and expanding a tubular or wellbore isolation device in oil and gas wells. The expandable elements can be configured to expand to the actual wellbore diameter while sensors such as acoustic sensors or mechanical probes can detect wellbore fractures. Further measurements can be obtained after expansion and used in conjunction with fluid properties, vibration, flow, hydraulic force, pressure, temperature.
- It is to be understood that the term ‘expansion’ as used herein refers to the capacity of the expandable element to expand outwardly and against the interior wall of a passage, such as a borehole, especially a wellbore, or a tubular used as a casing, and then to maintain pressure or isolate pressure from the formation. It is not always essential that the expandable element such as a bridge plug or packer be expanded, since the sensing elements can be used to detect fractures without necessarily expanding the packer.
- The invention relates to an Expansion and Sensing apparatus and method for identifying natural fractures and optimising the process of man-made or hydraulic fractures in oil and gas wells. The technology is especially useful in unconventional reservoirs that hold tight gas, shale gas, coal bed methane, shale oil, etc. If critical knowledge of the fracture i.e. reservoir interconnectivty, fractures, pathways or dips can be gained both pre and post fracking this would lead to greater recovery rates due to more effective wellbore fracking by increasing the actual fracked footage in the payzone. The invention is suitable for open and cased/liner hole and hydraulic fracturing with or without perforating tubing.
- The apparatus and method is capable of evaluating natural fractures to determine optimal depths and locations to set an expandable element such as packers or other wellbore isolation devices so as to optimise the fracture pathways that are naturally present once the wellbore is isolated and the man-made or hydraulic fractures can be propagated. The apparatus and method finds particular use in characterising fractures and their geo-physical and petro-physical features principally using sensors or wellbore imaging based on electrical, ultrasonic, electromagnetic or nuclear measurements to characterise the fracture and wellbore isolation devices using expandable packers, swellable packers, intelligent control valves, intelligent control devices. Alternative means can be used to identify the fracture and isolate the wellbore. Any type of fracturing method itself can be employed in the invention and this is not limited to hydraulic fracturing, as different types of reservoirs may require the use of differing methodologies or new fracturing techniques.
- In a closed loop aspect of the invention a microprocessor may be incorporated to process data which identifies natural fractures and optimise the coordinates for setting an isolation device, hydraulically fracturing the formation, identifying the effectiveness of the hydraulic fracture and if required repeat the hydraulic fracture at the same co-ordinates or select further co-ordinates in order to propagate an optimised fracture pathway and maximise production.
- On average, 65% of hydrocarbons are left underground this equates to a recovery rate of 35%. Unconventional reservoirs often have as many as 10 stages requiring fracturing. An optimized fracture method and apparatus would potentially help increase recovery rates. It is to be understood that the term ‘fracture’ as used herein refers to the capacity of the invention to evaluate an aperture in the formation which may vary in size from millimetres to metres, have a determined angular orientation and may connect to other fractures in the same plane or another plane within a formation that extends from the tool at a determined angle and reaches a given angular depth and a true vertical depth.
- In contrast, prior art logging tools are differentiated as part of a separate function i.e. are tripped out of the hole and a fracking assembly entered into the hole. In the prior art, once a fracking assembly is located, neither a sensor nor an imaging tool capable of detecting fractures is in communication with the fracking operator due to the complex downhole configuration of fracking and the location of the fracking stages. The technology overcomes these issues by providing pre and post fracking data and can also be configured with wellbore isolation devices and may be configured so as to be retrievable through a packer to determine the effectiveness of a frack job or a frac stage. It can be run with a rotary steerable to detect fractures but it is not necessary for fracking to occur using wellbore isolation devices conveyed on drill pipe. An expandable element and fracture sensor to determine natural fractures before formations are hydraulically fractured and thereby increase hydrocarbon recovery factors by optimally setting the wellbore and the wellbore isolation device such as a packer; a method of closed loop fracture identification, fracking and identifying frack effectiveness.
- In one embodiment the present apparatus and method itself overcomes these issues by providing pre and post fracking data and can also be configured with wellbore isolation devices and may be configured so as to be retrievable through a packer to determine the effectiveness of a frack job or a frac stage. In another embodiment the invention is configured with a rotary steerable to detect fractures but it is not necessary for fracking to occur using wellbore isolation devices conveyed on drill pipe.
- Other aspects of the invention include a method of operating an expandable element and fracture sensor to determine natural fractures before formations are hydraulically fractured and thereby increase hydrocarbon recovery factors by optimally setting the wellbore and the wellbore isolation device such as a packer; a method of closed loop fracture identification, fracking and identifying frack effectiveness, identifying fractures, angularly, axially and vertically ahead of hydraulic fractures; a method of pre and post frac analysis using a closed loop system, creating a an optimised sensing zone. In a further aspect, the invention relates to an apparatus for controlling logging and wellbore placement in real-time. The invention may also be combined with micro-seismic, tiltmeters, frac tracers, proppant, or sensing of a frack parameters such as flow, pressure, temperature, depth, azimuth, inclination to provide insight into the fracking process.
- When deciding the optimal trajectory and placement of an exploration or production well and its completion, numerous downhole activities are conducted to ensure the highest recovery of hydrocarbons and minimise the production of water over the well's life-span. Geo-physical data such as formation porosity, permeability, oil, water, gas contact zones, formation beds and dips are required to be known to steer the well to its optimal location. A variety of logging-while-drilling technology such as neutron density, gamma ray, resistivity and acoustic investigation tools are commonly used to identify formations and evaluate their features. (
FIG. 1 ). - For unconventional wells, the present invention provides insight into natural fractures and their interplay with hydraulic fractures. Many considerations affect the fracture matrix such as organic content, porosity, permeability, brittleness, orientation, pressure but as a general rule, because hydraulic fractures propagate along the path of natural fractures, detecting natural fractures is most useful in enlarging and stabilizing the natural fracture matrix. Although, many fractures appear closed in cores, markers i.e. differing properties from the surrounding rock such as pressure, impedance, calcite lining, etc provide clues to their detection. Consequently, the invention would enable oil companies to maximise production by pin pointing natural fractures while drilling, feed these into the fracture matrix and complement micro seismic, tiltmeter, frac tracers, proppant effectiveness etc. Thus the invention embodies a truly optimised closed loop method for open hole/cased hole completions using packers or sleeves. Further embodiments may determine fracture detection on the open hole completion or stimulation string where a perforating string is involved suitable reconfiguration of the technology.
- The present invention details an embodiment of a sensor to detect a fracture. As is known in the art, fractures may be derived from a variety of formation evaluation data which comprise acoustics, electro-magnetics, resistivity or conductance measurements, neutron density, alpha particle measurements, photoelectric measurements, gamma ray. In fact any type of sensor that can detect a fracture is useful in the invention. Alternatively or additionally a wellbore image may be provided.
- Several types of sound based investigation sensors exist such as passive seismic that record natural seismic events, active seismic that generate and register sound waves from man-made sources and those known as acoustics (below 20,000 Hz) and those known as ultrasonic (above 20,000 Hz). It is understood that the term ‘acoustic’ covers ultrasonic, sonic and other frequencies.
- Seismic tools provide wide-scale geological data, however these have poor resolution of formation detail and drilling itself is the true test of geophysical formation characteristics. Therefore, there is a need for and reliance on real-time acoustic while drilling tools. These tools use transducers or sources to create high frequency sound waves which are propagated as shear or pressure waves in solids and fluids respectively. Sound waves are further classified as those travelling within the wellbore (Stoneley waves), the near formation as (Flexural waves) and far formation as (Body waves). Through an evaluation of the echo pulse, its maxima and minima, which are received back by the sensor/receiver, and derivations thereof, calculations, can be made as to the time interval between signal transmission and recording the echo to determine the distance to an object or formation feature. Further, using algorithms various characteristics such as formation density, void spaces, fluid saturations, fluid trapping and formation direction changes such as beds or dips all have definite signature velocities that correspond to their reflective ability.
- In all of these applications, the prior art suffers from two major limitations namely a lack of pre and post frack data (
FIG. 2 , 90, 100) and the integration thereof. Firstly, sensor and natural fracture data is not always available to set the packer in a timely manner based on fracture evaluation (100). The discontinuity (100 feet or more) between sensors and the packer leads to a trial and error approach. - Second, the effectiveness of the frack job is not determined as the prior art may not be deployed below the packer or may not be retrievable through the packer to determine the orientation and propagation of the hydraulic fractures (90). This severely limits the ability to repeat the frack job to allow for perforation, fracture propagation and proppant to be pumped through (
FIG. 2 ). In this way, the prior art can only provide for formation evaluation subsequent to drilling. This is unsatisfactory as it prevents the optimal placement of the packer and the wellbore due to the non-existent or tardy arrival of formation data after wellbore placement has already occurred. - Measurement may involve the acquisition and communication to surface of various types of wellbore data such as resistivity, porosity, permeability, azimuth, inclination and borehole diameter or rugosity, formation dips or bedding angles. Such measurements are known in the art and in the interest of brevity therefore are shown conceptually only.
- In the event of a productive hydrocarbon bearing zone having been unsuccessfully fractured (bypassed or exited or simply not fractured), there is a missing step between the data showing where the hydrocarbons are located and the subsequent production. Often, the missing step leads to uncertainty, additional cost and can be accompanied by a loss of production as hydrocarbons are bypassed or the optimal fracking stage configuration within a low permeability zone is lost. In the case of productive zones, characterization using wireline or micro-seismic occurs after fracking, once the assembly has been tripped out of the hole and the area has been traversed.
- The present invention may be suitably combined with microseismic, tiltmeters etc to provide inferred or indirect or direct measurements where the invention provides the detail for the fracture pathways that are necessary for production. In the prior art this means that the payzone of the reservoir may be exited and further corrective fracking or drilling must occur to place the wellbore in the desired productive state. Such cycles of delayed post fracture data arrival and subsequent corrections can be eliminated with the present invention.
- To those versed in the art, it is known that over geological time, ancient river systems carried and deposited millions of tonnes of sediment and organic matter as they ran their courses to river outlets, deltas or gulfs. Over time, continuing deposits eventually formed numerous layers of sedimentary rock. These were pushed deeper and deeper under the seabed. Each successive layer (younger deposits) increased the pressure on earlier layers (older deposits) and tectonic plate movement deformed the layers creating folds, hills (anticlines) valleys (synclines), unconformities (eroded areas), faults and traps. Time, pressure and heat converted the decomposed marine life into elemental hydrocarbons. Within a given rock structure, the younger deposits or later layers form ‘overburden’ pressure conditions. Additionally, each layer has a given temperature profile according to the True Vertical Depth (TVD) at which it is located. These factors combine to form oil and gas deposits in certain rocks known in the art as ‘source-rock’, which can often be seen in certain oil and gas provinces in outcrops. From their origins deep within the source beds, hydrocarbon molecules are squeezed by immense pressures caused by the overlying sediments similar to water from a sponge. They migrate to water-saturated porous and permeable beds where, being lighter than water, they start to rise. As they rise, they contact other hydrocarbon molecules and coalesce into droplets that keep rising until they encounter an impermeable layer known in the art as ‘a cap rock’. There, they accumulate, forming a reservoir.
- To those skilled in the art, the three rock classes—source, reservoir and cap—explain two concepts. Firstly, the sedimentary process explains why oil and gas are contained in minute rock spaces or pores (porosity) and not in caverns. This can be imagined as a dry sponge placed over water. The water is drawn in and contained within the voids of the sponge. To those skilled in the art, porosity is defined as the percentage of ‘voids’ in a volume of rock. Secondly, sedimentation shows the ability of a fluid to ‘seep’ or ‘flow’ through a given formation (permeability). Minute channels are created in the formations and, due to the pressurised nature of oil and gas and their relative lightness, there is always a tendency for the oil and gas to rise. This is illustrated by the migration of oil and gas from a source rock to a porous reservoir rock.
- Such oil and gas accumulations are therefore contained in highly complex structures which are found at varying depths in different geological basins worldwide. Exploration and production of such accumulations relies on the construction of a well according to a well plan which is itself based on calculations and assumptions derived from scarce data and similar offset wells.
- Various well types exist and are defined according to usage such as wildcats or those used in exploration; delineation; and production and injection. Variations in well profile exist also according to vertical, slant, directional and horizontal trajectories. Each differs according to the oil company's objectives and the challenges that a given basin presents from the surface of the earth or the ocean to the hydrocarbon reservoir at a given underground depth.
- Geological mapping and geophysical surveys allow oil companies to characterise their acquired acreage and the age and sedimentation patterns of the rock formation contained therein. This process of characterisation can be reconstructed as a visual earth model that delineates the position and shape of the structure including anticlines, faults-stratigraphy, structure which helps increase production from subsequent wells and from the field as a whole. However, the earth model and the well plan have inherent uncertainties.
- Geological uncertainties and challenges are related to the location of the hydrocarbons, water contacts, traps, formation stresses, movements and reservoir porosity and permeability. To overcome these challenges, a highly detailed well plan is developed which contains the well objective, coordinates, legal, geological, technical and well engineering data and calculations. To resolve the uncertainties, however, drilling is the final test.
- The data is used to plot a well profile using precise bearings which is designed in consecutive telescopic sections—surface, intermediate and reservoir. To deliver the well objective and maintain the integrity of well over its lifecycle, a given wellbore trajectory with multiple sections and diameters is drilled from surface. Although there are many variants, a simple vertical well design could include a surface or top-hole diameter of 17½″ (445 mm), intermediate sections of 13⅝″ (360 mm) and 9⅝″ (245 mm) narrowing down to the bottom-hole diameter of 8½″ (216 mm) in the reservoir section.
- Each consecutive section is ‘cased’ with the specified diameter and a number of metal tubes placed into the wellbore according to the length of the section. Each must be connected to each other after which they are cemented into the appropriately sized hole with a given tolerance. In this way, a well is constructed in staged sections, each section dependent on the completion of the previous section until the well is isolated from the formation along the entire distance from surface to the reservoir. Each section will also have a logging plan with minimum formation evaluation requirements. In a similar way, the reservoir section is left open hole or bare or completed using production casing, sandscreens, gravel packs etc. Production casing fully isolates the wellbore from the reservoir formations and therefore requires communication which is provided via perforations created in the casing allowing fluid commingling. Perforations are of further importance in unconventional basins as they provide the coordinates for the hydraulically induced fractures.
- Scarcity of oil and gas is driving oil and gas companies to explore and develop reserves in unconventional basins such as those known as tight gas, shale gas, shale oil and coal bed methane. Unconventional reservoirs are those whose permeability is far lower than conventional oil and gas reservoirs as the oil and gas is essentially trapped due to a lack of permeability. The completion method known as fracking, fractures the reservoir liberating the hydrocarbons from their tight earthen structure. These wells are highly dependent on fracture pathways to ensure that permeability is achieved to allow hydrocarbons to flow from the reservoir.
- Therefore, the well plans that are used to drill these wells may include modeling or fractures using micro seismic, tiltmeters, acoustic, resistivity or other logging devices to characterize natural fractures. In this way, modeling is an integral part of fracture construction and there is now an increased dependence on modeling for wellbore fracture placement.
- Previously, the fracture detection has been restricted to natural or pre frack measurements which are often modeled only. Typically, the natural frack data means that modeled fracture data would be provided before a fracking operation and may or may not have microseismic applied. Consequently, the fracking operation may have exited a payzone and the fracking would be of limited effectiveness. A new well may have to be drilled to reach back to the optimal location or the fracking operation repeated. If critical knowledge of the fracture i.e. reservoir interconnectivity, fractures, pathways or dips can be gained both pre and post fracking this would lead to greater recovery rates due to more effective wellbore fracking by increasing the actual fracked footage in the payzone.
- In other applications such as gas zone, kick detection, pore pressure analysis or fracture identification, the tolerances between the planned parameters and actual downhole parameters can be very close and variations of 0.2 ppg can lead to the failure or loss of the well. By being able to detect a kick, or establish a fracture before it is actually drilled through, remedial drilling action can be taken in advance saving time, money and providing a significant safety margin.
- To those skilled in the art, it is known that the industry relies on modeled data which may not incorporate direct downhole fracture detection whether pre or post fracking.
- Therefore, the prior art does not lend itself to a reliable or certain means of investigating formations before, during or immediately after drilling or fracking.
- Further the prior art generates time-consuming correction cycles of changes in fracking, azimuth and inclination in an attempt to retrospectively maintain an optimal frack trajectory.
- Further, the prior art contributes to an average and unsatisfactory recovery rate of 35% of hydrocarbons as reserves are not detected or produced in an optimal manner.
- Further the prior art does not detect variations in fractures prior to fracking in real-time.
- Further the prior art does not detect variations in fracture characteristics such as porosity or fluid content in real-time.
- Further the prior art does not detect gas zones, fractures or water flows ahead of the bit or wellbore in real-time.
- Further the prior art does not detect pressure or temperature variations ahead of the bit or wellbore in real-time.
- Further the prior art does not automatically allow for a closed-link or automatic troubleshooting of well trajectory or fracking placement.
- The present invention has for a principal object to provide an improvement on the prior art wherein the pre and post fractures are characterized so that fracture pathways and production rates can be maximised. The invention seeks to provide critical knowledge of the fracture i.e. reservoir interconnectivty, fractures, pathways or dips can be gained both pre and post fracking this would lead to greater recovery rates due to more effective wellbore fracking by increasing the actual fracked footage in the payzone.
- The invention seeks to meet the need for a closed-loop real-time fracture detection to provide real time formation data of formation data and natural fractures (pre frack) while the wellbore is being fracked or before the packer is set at a give coordinate (depth, azimuth, inclination etc). This has not been forthcoming in the prior art due to missing steps inherent in the pre and post frack placement, orientation and assembly.
- The present invention seeks to directly investigate pre and post fracking and offers optimal wellbore and packer placement using a novel sensor configuration which also allows for optimized fracture propagation and measurement of post frack effectiveness.
- The present invention eliminates the uncertainty of trial and error by providing real-time data which allows the wellbore isolation device to be set at optimized coordinates, the frack job to conducted thereafter and the its effectiveness measured thereby providing real time data as to the effectiveness of the fracking operation and where necessary to repeat the frack job until the required recovery will be achieved.
- It is thus an object of the present invention to provide closed loop fracturing means, enabling the device to give immediate evaluation of a formation to be fractured, or the characteristics of a formation once fractured and, if the apparatus detects a parameter of interest or a change in a parameter of interest such as a fracture pathway, propagation, production flow, to automatically calculate and correct for an optimal fracking, and to repeat evaluation until such an optimal well path result is achieved in real-time.
- Although fracture detection is a principal route to characterizing the effectiveness of fracking, the invention is not limited to fracture detection and envisages alternative investigation means similarly integrated with fracture detection capability of the tool. These alternative means can include nuclear, electro-magnetic, optical, temperature or other such sensor as deemed required for optimal fracking or wellbore placement.
- Further the invention can be used to perform hydraulic fracking with open hole or cased/liner hole applications with or without perforating assemblies. In such cases, the downhole and surface configurations would be arranged to meet the needs of the operation and the apparatus may be connected directly or indirectly in any manner or order so that the frack operation may be optimized.
- Fracture sensing means may be located above, below, on the wellbore isolation means and suitably configured to enable downhole fracking operations. For example, this may involve the unrestricted ID (internal diameter) or passage for full flow or pressure or to drop ball etc to as is know in the art to create the necessary pressure for fracking. Other configurations may require additionally or alternatively the ability to retrieve the sensors or to deploy the sensors above or below the packer. Deployment may be performed via means such as collapsible supports for the sensors, fibre optics, miniaturized sensing means, fixed supports, independently rotatable, extendable supports, arms, blocks, blades, etc. Power would be provided accordingly and can be contained within the apparatus or provided from outside the apparatus. Communications would be provided using wires, wirelessly or a combination. The invention is not limited in the placement or configuration of the apparatus.
- It is a further object of the present invention to provide an apparatus capable of verifying pre and post frack data through a processor arrangement that uses sensor data to detect fracking results and conducts diagnostics according to a logic circuit in order to ensure the wellbore frack plan is optimized in view of real time fracking data. The processor will automatically detect whether corrective steps are required to maintain/move the wellbore fracking in the optimal zone. Data can be collected on each stage as it is fracked and this is compared with pre frack data and differing stage data. If the tool finds a significant divergence, a signal may be sent to the rig-surface or to the location of the operating engineer so that further remedial action can be taken, such as coordinate revisions. A memory mode may store sensor information that can be downloaded at surface when the tool is retrieved, or sent to the surface by telemetry or by wireless means.
- One or more sensors may be optimally spaced in the fracking apparatus in order to investigate the formation, detect fracking and provide pre and post frack data. The resolution of fracture detection may be user defined and can be pre-programmed at surface to the processor or via instruction from a surface location to the downhole location of the apparatus and processor. The method according to the invention similarly provides for pre programming or programming on the fly and communication both using wires or wirelessly.
- A keyway may provide a channel for wiring from the sensors to the processor and to a transponder. The wiring can be used to transmit sensor data retrieved by the sensors, as well as positional and structural data of formation characteristics such as fractures and their relative depths, pathways, corridors, inter-connectivity etc. The keyway may be sealed and filled with a means to absorb vibration such as silicon gel or grease and to maintain wires in position. Similarly, the keyways may be left redundant and as a back-up to a wireless mode of operation.
- The transponder converts formation and fracture data so that it can be transmitted and may be linked a the mud-pulser which transmits the data to surface using a series of binary codes at a given frequency using drilling fluid as means of mud pulsing. Other means of data transfer may be used such as wireless transmission short hop using radio frequency or electro-magnetic pulses or wired drill-pipe. This allows up and downlink of the tool in order to receive and transmit data and commands so as to optimize fracking.
- At surface a transducer may be incorporated within a decoder housing which decodes the binary code and may link to the frac operations or driller's terminal or may be yet further transmitted by satellite or other means to a remote operations centre.
- These and other objects will emerge from the following description and the appended claims.
- In one aspect, the closed loop fracture apparatus (50) comprises a tool body with means for attaching the tool body (63) directly or indirectly to a support or reamer, reaming shoe, drill-bit whereby it can be rotated and moved axially along a passage (20), and is characterized by, at least one sensor (58) which can detect natural or man made fractures (
FIG. 5 ) relative to the horizontal axis of the tool, and (57) is adapted to investigate and recognize sensor data from a fracked stage (70) or from a plurality of stages (110,120,130,140) and thereby increase hydrocarbon recovery rates by optimizing wellbore trajectory and hydraulic frack location based on formation data acquired by the sensor before, during or after a frack operation occurs with or without a drill-bit (70). - The support may typically be a perforating or production string (30) or a workstring or drillstring or extended length of coiled tubing as used in downhole operations in oil and gas fields.
- In preferred embodiments of the invention, the investigation operation is based on sensor elements comprising a set of at least one sensor, receiver combination optimally configured and oriented to investigate beyond the wellbore and detect fractures. The sensor housing may comprise protective covering, which may be of similar construction to the sensors, but having outer surfaces where sensors are protected by a hardened material. Such protection may simply bear under temperature, pressure or flow acting against it from the inside of a wellbore. In an alternate embodiment, the zone surrounding the housing may be treated to actively receive data or configured with a variety of receivers rendering it a sensing zone. The sensors may be provided with a lens surface that may be convex (52 a), concave (52 b), or planar (52 c) according to requirement. The sensors and receivers may be optimally tuned and gated in terms of frequency so that emitted frequencies do not cancel out upon contact with return waves and so that reference measurements are taken to establish background noise which would be suitably excluded from operational measurement calculations. Alternatively, the same sensors may be received within an additional section of apparatus or a separate steel body or behind or ahead such section suitably prepared to provide a means of stabilization or centralization and protection for downhole applications. Further sensors may be provided with a means to reduce ‘ringing’ or ‘dampening’ of the sensors so as to always ensure the measurements are fit-for-purpose.
- It is to be noted that the description herein of the structure and operation of sensors or receivers and tool design is applicable generally, irrespective of function, except to the extent that certain sensors may be provided specifically for formation evaluation purposes and replaced by other sensors such as nuclear or resistivity or acoustic or nuclear magnetic resonance sensors as required by the drilling operation.
- The apparatus comprises a tool body or a plurality of tool bodies which are typically cylindrical high grade steel housings adapted to form part of a fracking assembly. It is not always necessary that the assembly be used for fracking as the sensors may be used to determine natural fractures while drilling. Thus the means for attaching the tool body to the support, whether it is a drill string or work string or coiled tubing, may comprise a screw thread provided on the tool body which is engageable with a drill collar or a connection to a production string for fracking. The attachment need not be direct, but may be indirect, as there will typically be many different functional elements to be included in the long and narrow assembly, and the arrangement of the successive elements will vary based on production, completion or drilling applications. The lower end of the assembly may be the drill bit (or a packer or casing shoe or reamer shoe) which may be directly connected to the tool and in between there may or may not be other components dependent on the operational requirement. For example, in drilling such components could be a means for directional control such as a rotary steerable system or directional motor. The tool body may be provided with a through passage for the flow of drilling fluid from the drill string. For example, in completion operations using perforating such components could be a means for wellbore isolation such as a bridge plug or packer. The tool body may be provided with a through passage for the flow of completion fluid from the string. In open hole completions perforating may not be required prior to hydraulic fracturing. Thus the invention is not limited to a single configuration of the apparatus since it is always envisaged that the necessary components are available to perform the frack job.
- Such a through passage allows for full flow, pressure, drop ball or other actions above or below the tool i.e. activation, deactivation, or retrieval of equipment. The tool itself may also be provided to be retrievable so that it may be placed below a packer or take measurements below a packer or above a packer. Similarly, any completion or wellbore isolation device such as intelligent control valve, swellable packer or inflow control device can be used to isolate the wellbore and create the necessary pressure to fracture the formation.
- The sensors may be protected and housed in a plurality of positions directed outwardly of a body. The sensor may be received within the profile of the tool body in a sensor recess suitably protected from abrasion, wear and damage by means of at least one protective coating or covering. The protective coating may be steel with HVOF, tungsten carbide, boron nickel or other protection according to requirements. The sensor may be provided with a dampening material or mechanism such as silicon gel or a spring.
- The sensor and receiver may then be provided with means for driving the sensors and receiving the data from the far formation, near formation or wellbore so as to characterize the fractures located therein. The microprocessor control means may be suitably adapted to receive formation data from the sensors and to control the frequency in response thereto. A gating procedure may be suitably incorporated to discard a range of background noise frequencies or by means of establishing a maxima reference measurement and engaging with such a maxima or by means of establishing a measurement and engaging with such a measurement. The microprocessor also may receive information from micro-seismic, tiltmeters, frack parameters so as to optimize the frack operation and this may be done in a closed loop operation with or without user intervention. In this way, a number of differing frac jobs may be performed at a number of sites and data viewed at a central location.
- Pressure compensation may be provided to handle variations in downhole pressure compared to surface atmospheric conditions for example in fracking where hydraulic flow and pressure may require pressure compensation (not shown).
- The system may comprise a microprocessor means for monitoring fracture evaluation data and relative positions of frack stages where the microprocessor means may include a means of automatically anticipating any fracture or detecting a feature of a formation or detecting a change in the feature of a formation, thereby guiding the control system to ensure the optimal placement and functioning of the frack operation.
- The tool normally comprises a plurality of sensor and receivers arranged symmetrically around the tool and disposed outwardly. The sensor receiver may be configured as an integral transducer or separated as a sensor to receiver array known as a ‘sensing zone’ (not shown). Two transducers would be on opposite sides of the tool, three blocks would be separated by 120 degrees, four by 90 degrees, and six by 60 degrees. Additionally or alternatively, sensor receiver arrays could be configured in a plurality of combinations including longitudinal or wellbore spacings or axial or spiral, with the object of ensuring the zone of investigation covers the pre and post fractures.
- In accordance with a particularly preferred aspect of the invention, the sensor receiver array is provided with an internal keyway for directing power from a source within the tool and providing communications to and from the sensor receiver. The source of power may be a battery within the tool or within another support for the tool suitably adapted for such purpose. The communications may be a processor within the tool, or at surface or other support for the tool suitably adapted for such purpose. Alternatively or additionally, the sensor/receiver or tool body may be provided with a wireless means of communication to an internal or external processor. In each case, the two-way communications provide data transmission, operational refinement and data capture.
- In order to keep the sensor/receiver clean and prevent the build-up of clogging debris from the fracking operation, the sensor housing may be provided with a specialized coating to minimize the residence or remove such material altogether from the sensing zone.
- In one preferred aspect the present invention incorporates a wellbore isolation device so as to permit a frack job and sensors to permit the detection of fractures before and after a frack job.
- In another aspect of the present invention housing for other types of sensors is provided. The tool may further comprise telemetry means for communicating downhole data and control signals between the tool and a surface interface, which may, among other functions, control the drill string or work string during the drilling or frack operation.
- In a further aspect, the invention provides a method of operating an apparatus to investigate natural and induced fractures and to optimally guide and place a wellbore which comprises locating a wellbore fracking device according to the invention in a borehole on a support, activating the sensors/receivers to detect natural fractures and establish a set of coordinates for locating a wellbore fracking device, fracking a wellbore, and detecting the effectiveness of the fracking operation and if unsatisfactory repeating the fracking operation at the same coordinates or further coordinates until an optimal fracking operation is completed and hydrocarbon production is maximized.
- The data gathered by the sensors relates to the natural and induced fractures and can be all relevant characteristics concerning the fracture matrix, such as their depth, relative distance, azimuthul orientation, pathways, interconnectivity and corridors. natural fractures and their interplay with hydraulic fractures. Many considerations affect this fracture matrix such as organic content, porosity, permeability, brittleness, orientation, pressure but as a general rule, because hydraulic fractures propagate along the path of natural fractures, detecting natural fractures is clearly most useful in enlarging and stabilizing the natural fracture matrix. Although, fractures may appear closed in cores, markers i.e. differing properties from the surrounding rock such as impedance, calcite lining, etc provide clues to their detection.
- In accordance with the method of the invention, the tool may be provided with microprocessor means responsive to formation data received from the sensor/receivers. In this way, a closed loop tool which is capable of detecting fracture changes and controlling wellbore fracking may be realised. The sensor/receiver may investigate the fracture, or investigate a feature of a fracture, set a wellbore fracking device, frack a formation and may further investigate the fracture to provide data to a surface monitor to signal an opportunity for operator intervention to correct wellbore fracking if it were not able to do so automatically.
- Thus, in the case of the pre and post frack detection system data from the formation are detected by sensors. These fracture data may be transmitted from the sensor to a processor which correlates the fracture data and uses this to establish the optimal location for setting a wellbore fracking device taking into consideration formation characteristics such as dips, faults, and allowing for variations in the formation. The processor uses this data to correlate whether the pre-programmed frack program will be achieved and the resulting hydraulic pressure and frack fluids that would be required to frack to an optimal level. Where the processor detects that a fracture or feature of a formation may affect the frack parameters such as hydraulic pressure, fluid types, proppants etc it can automatically recalculate an optimal value for the hydraulics as well as the physical location for the frack to occur. Or it may simply signal an opportunity for an operator to intervene.
- In the case of fracking, the operator may frack using a drilling or completion or production assembly or a frack assembly. In both cases the present invention can be employed to detect pre and post fractures and thereby a novel way of maximizing the placement and effectiveness of any fracking operation. The principal objective is knowledge of the fracture i.e. reservoir interconnectivty, fractures, pathways or dips gained both in pre and post fracking which leads to greater recovery rates due to more effective wellbore fracking by increasing the actual fracked footage in the payzone.
- For example, the processor may be programmed with a logic circuit which can be configured in any number of ways so as to optimize performance. An exemplary configuration may involve the circuit to first cross check the natural fracture data and then set a wellbore fracking device. The fracking operation is performed and the induced fracture data and if required corresponding flow of hydrocarbons is obtained by the sensors and transmitted to the processor. In this way, the processor can measure the effectiveness of the induced fracking directly and if it were insufficient provide for a further cycle of fracking. This distinguishes the present invention from the prior art which has neither the ability to compare natural and induced fractures nor optimize the location of fracking devices.
- If it is seen that the induced fracture is insufficient in terms of production of hydrocarbons, the fracking operation can be repeated at the same coordinates with a change in fracking parameters. If the post frack data still shows insufficient gain in production of hydrocarbons, the apparatus can provide for example, a change in the depth, orientation or angle at which the fracking device is either isolated from the wellbore or the coordinates at which it fractures the formation. The apparatus may further be optimized for shale oil, shale gas or tight gas zone or coal bed methane so that apparatus can alert the user by means of telemetry to check the wellbore frack device location, azimuthal, inclination, or frack parameters as necessary or prompt this through a closed loop system. The skilled person will readily appreciate that other procedures may be implemented by the logic circuit within the processor, which can be programmed to cover other scenarios.
- In another aspect, the invention provides a fracture detection method comprising locating a tool body with sensors and receivers, optionally but not limited to a housing carrying a plurality of sensors and receivers directed outwardly of the tool body, wherein the sensor or receiver is received within the tool body in a purpose built housing having an open mouth, and means for allowing sensor emissions to propagate to and from the housing and to and from the wellbore, near and far formation to detect natural and man-made fractures.
- In a still further aspect, the invention provides a wellbore fracking device used in conjunction with the fracture detection capability outlined above comprising a wellbore isolation device such as a expandable packer, intelligent flow control device, intelligent control valve, confirmable sponge, swellable packer carrying at least one expandable element to conform to the wellbore and isolate a specific area in the wellbore. Additionally or alternatively further areas in the wellbore may be left open to allow free flow of hydrocarbons. In this way a plurality of wellbore flow areas may be created allowing for fluids to frack the wellbore as well as allowing the flow of hydrocarbons into the wellbore.
- Additionally, sensor and receiver arrays may be configured optimally by providing longitudinal spacings between the sensors and receivers.
- Additionally, the apparatus may be provided with compensation and/or calibration means for enhancing fracture detection. Typically, compensation and/or calibration occurs using look up tables for parameters affecting sensor measurements or measurements made at surface or downhole. The invention envisages all types of such calibration since they can improve the accuracy of measurements and fracture detection.
- Other aspects of the invention are disclosed in the following specific description of exemplary embodiments of the invention.
- Embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of non-limiting examples in the accompanying drawings, in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a general diagrammatic view of an oil or gas well showing rig surface structures (10) and the underground well (20), with a tool (50) in accordance with the invention as part of a bottomhole assembly (40) drilling a well (30) and indicating formations and formation features (70) located ahead of the drill-bit (60) and a wellbore (80); - FIGS. 2,2 a,2 b, are downhole side views illustrating a a plurality of sensor distributed along the apparatus in a helical, longitudinal, spiral arrangement respectively. It is not essential the sensors are distributed on a tubular body as the may be located within collapsible arms, extendable arms, fibre optic cables, distributed within casing or liners or retrievable from below a packer. Sensors may be non rotating, rotatable, independently rotatable, toward the wellbore or internally or may be fixed in position. The invention is not limited in sensor placement or fixing.
-
FIG. 3 a show a and 3 b show a radial corresponding to radial sensor distribution corresponding toFIG. 2 -
FIG. 4 is a 3-D Earth cube from a surface (260) and downhole side (150) view, part cut away to show the fracking operation (160) according to a multi stage fracking operation (280); -
FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic cross section through the apparatus in accordance with the invention similar having a wellbore isolation device (62) or other zonal isolation member (63) at the downhole end; -
FIG. 6 is a diagrammatic cross section through the apparatus in accordance with the invention similar to that shown inFIG. 5 , but having an additional wellbore isolation device (61) or other zonal isolation member at the trailing uphole end -
FIG. 7 is an exemplary embodiment with sensing element between zonal isolation devices as would be the case with multiple stages or packers according to frack operations. -
FIG. 8 is an exemplary diagnosis and troubleshooting procedure according to the invention showing fracture detection and integration with other data such as micro-seismic, tiltmeters, fracking parameters and the like. - As shown in
FIG. 1 , an exemplary exploration or production rig comprises a surface structure (10) at the wellhead, a wellbore (20), and a string (30) in the wellbore with a downhole assembly (40) at its lower end. The downhole assembly includes an apparatus (50) in accordance with one aspect of the invention, a sensing means and a wellbore isolation device (60) and formations fractured and detected as the object of the invention. - The apparatus (50) is illustrated by way of exemplary embodiments in
FIGS. 5 , 6, and 7 comprises a tubular steel body (62) provided with a connection at either end to enable its direct or indirect connection to the wellbore isolation device (60) and connect it to other elements of the downhole assembly (40) and a link to a means of communication to the surface (64). Wellbore isolation device (60) may be replaceable by a drill bit where the invention is used in while drilling capacity to detect natural fractures. - The apparatus comprises a tool body (58) that carries at least one housing for at least one sensor (58) and a wellbore isolation device (60) capable of detecting natural and induced fractures. The sensor element (51) comprises a number of sensing elements (52) disposed radially around the profile of the tool body
FIG. 3 a. The sensors detect fractures that extend beyond the wellbore (60) and into formations surrounding (70) and at multiple stages or locations in the wellbore (110, 120, and 130). - An exemplary configuration of the invention in accordance with its specified object is shown in
FIG. 5 . -
FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic cross section through a lookahead tool in accordance with the invention similar to that shown inFIG. 5 , but having a wellbore isolation device (62) or other wall contact member (69) at the trailing uphole end. Equally, such downhole wall contact may be an expandable device, pressure containment device; -
FIG. 7 illustrates diagrammatically the aforementioned sensing elements within the tool (50), together with a wellbore isolation device (61) in a cross section view in accordance with the invention similar to that shown inFIG. 5 , but having an additional wellbore isolation device (61) at the leading downhole end; wherein a plurality of such devices may be employed as is the case where multiple frack stages are required to stimulate the reservoir. - Fracking performance is verified using a micro-processor, shown in location (55), that compares data from the sensor (51) with a pre-programmed wellbore frack plan, thus detecting natural and induced fracking. Additionally or alternatively, the micro processor may be located at the surface especially when a micro seismic or tiltmeter or surface frack parameters are measured. The apparatus is programmed and automated to conduct diagnostics according to a logic circuit or diagnostic program stored in processor (55) in order to ensure the fracking is optimally performed. Once corrective steps have been taken, and if the apparatus indicates that the planned fracking (trajectory, productivity, location etc) is not optimal in light of formation data, an alert signal is sent via the mud-pulser (64) to the rig-
surface 10 or to a remote operator so that control action of the assembly (40) can be taken. A memory module (not shown) associated with processor (55) may store sensor information that can be downloaded at surface when the tool is retrieved, or sent to the surface by telemetry through a transponder to a mud-pulser (64) or by other communication means. A means of powering the sensors and receivers is shown by (54). - The tool is provided with a built-in link to a communication system which may be a wired or wireless telemetry system (64) which also serves to monitor real-time formation data and features. One or more sensor receivers (51) are spaced within the tool body in order to detect fractures in a single part of the wellbore (40) or a multiple number (110,120,130). The microprocessor (55) establishes formations (110, 120, 130) and formation features (160) and fracture data through a series of calculations derived from acoustic velocity or resistivity or neutron density imaging. The invention is not limited to sensing or imaging means and compares this with preprogrammed targets. If the two measurements match given user defined tolerances the tool continues to total depth of the wellbore section. Where the formation data do not match the logic circuit dictates a series of diagnostic steps, which are further discussed in relation to
FIG. 8 below. - As further shown in
FIG. 5 , a keyway provides a channel for wiring (56) from the sensor (51) to the processor (55), and also to a comms device (64). The wiring is used to transmit formation evaluation data retrieved by the acoustic reflection sensors (51) as well formation features (110, 120, 130, 160) from the receivers (52) to the processor (55) and transponder (64). The keyway may be sealed and filled with a means to absorb vibration and maintain wires in position such as silicon gel or grease (not shown). - The comms device (64) converts data from the microprocessor (55) so that it can be transmitted to surface (10) and may also receive data from the surface. Means of data transfer may be used such as wired, wireless, short hop using radio frequency or electro-magnetic pulses, mud-pulse etc.
-
FIG. 6 shows an alternative configuration with a wellbore isolation device (61) and shows a central axial through passage (59) for the free flow of fracturing fluid or drop ball through a central axial passage. - Additionally or alternatively, housing (51) may also be suitably adapted and treated for use of other types of sensor, analogue or digital, resistivity, electro-magnetic, nuclear magnetic resonance, acoustic, pressure, flow to detect a fracture.
- The tool body (50) is a cylindrical high grade tube adapted to form part of a
downhole fracking assembly 40. Suitable materials for the tool body are metallic, ceramic, or any other high strength material.FIGS. 5 , 6 show a diagrammatic side view of the apparatus (50). At the leading downhole end there is pin connection (63) to a drill-bit, in the centre is a profiled section (58) housing sensing (51, 52) and control functions (55). -
FIG. 6 shows a further section at the uphole end, (69), is connected to a fracking assembly (40). At either end a wellbore isolation device may be placed to create zonal isolation for fracking. Sensors can detect fractures pre and post fracking either downhole or at surface as perFIG. 2 above. Sensors may be constructed and housed integrally and generally designated as (51), except that a plurality of sensors may be placed to form a sensing zone as perFIGS. 2 a,2 b,2 c, 3 a and 3 b. In all embodiments there is at least one surface which is hard faced or coated with a hard abrasion-resistant material. Any suitable means for attaching the tool body to a fracking assembly is envisaged. - In this alternative configuration the tool is configured, in addition to sensing capacity, with the wellbore isolation device incorporating expandable device to isolate the wellbore and allow pressure to frack the formation. The wellbore isolation device may be directly or indirectly above or below the central sensing section and may be hard-wired or wireless accordingly so as to ensure the comms device (64) may transmit data to surface (10). The comms may be provided as wireless or wired the configuration of the apparatus may be changed to suit such an application.
- As shown in
FIGS. 5 , 6, and 7, the illustrated example of a pre and post frack apparatus in accordance with the invention is a sensor which uses a microprocessor (55) and wellbore isolation device to determine and perform an optimal wellbore frack operation. Sensor/receiver means (51, 52) determine single or multiple frack characteristics (110, 120, 130, 160) and send corresponding signals back to the processor (55). - As required, the sensors (51) may be protected and housed (53) in a plurality of positions and/or orientations directed outwardly of a tool body (58) and at all times to detect fractures (60) and configured optimally based on formation and downhole component considerations. The sensors may be received within the tool body in a sensor housing recess (53) that is also suitably protected from abrasion, wear and damage by means of at least one protective coating or covering. The protective coating may be steel with a HVOF coating, tungsten carbide, boron nickel, titanium, epoxy, kevlar or other protection suited to requirements. The sensor may also be provided with a dampening material or mechanism such as silicon gel or a spring (not shown).
- The sensor means may then be provided with drive means (54) for driving the sensors and receiving data from the multiple stages (110,120,130,160), fracture or wellbore (80). The microprocessor control means (55) may be suitably adapted to receive formation data from the sensors (51, 52) and to control the frequency in response thereto. A gating procedure may be suitably incorporated to discard a range of background noise frequencies or by means of establishing a maxima reference measurement and engaging with such a maxima. Noise in this context does not refer to solely to acoustic noise, but any electrical, sensor or other signal or circuitry interference.
- Pressure compensation may be provided to handle variations in downhole pressure compared to surface atmospheric conditions where activation is opposed by a source of external pressure. This may comprise a port from a source of downhole fluid into a chamber suitably connected to the area within the area requiring pressure compensation (not shown).
- The system may comprise a microprocessor means for monitoring formation evaluation data and relative positions of formation structures where the microprocessor means may include a means of automatically anticipating a fracture or detecting a fracture or detecting a change in a fracture or detecting a fracking effectiveness, thereby guiding the fracking operation to ensure the optimal wellbore production.
- The apparatus normally comprises a plurality of sensing means arranged around the toolbody and disposed outwardly. The sensing means may itself may be configured as an integral transducer or separated as a plurality of sensors to receivers (array) known as a ‘sensing zone’. Sensors or transducers may be on opposite sides of the tool radially, longitudinally, axially or helically. Sensor receiver arrays could be configured in a plurality of combinations with the object of ensuring the zone of fracture detection and the zone of wellbore isolation is optimized within the sensing zone.
- In accordance with a particularly preferred aspect of the invention, the transducer or sensor receiver array is provided with an internal keyway for directing power from a source within the tool and providing communications to and from the sensor receiver. The source of power may be a battery within the tool or within other support for the tool suitably adapted for such purpose. The communications may be a processor within the tool, or at surface or other support for the tool suitably adapted for such purpose. Alternatively or additionally, the sensor/receiver or tool body may be provided with a wireless means of communication to an internal or external processor. In each case, the two-way communications provide data transmission, operational refinement and data capture.
- In order to keep the sensors and/or receivers clean and prevent the build-up of clogging debris from the downhole operation, the sensor housing may be provided with a specialized coating to minimize the residence or remove such material altogether from the sensing zone.
- In one preferred aspect the present invention incorporates an optimal means of fracture detection which is practically applicable to natural and induced fractures and is combined with wellbore placement means such as rotary steerables.
- In another aspect of the present invention the fracture detection means are provided with a plurality of wellbore isolation devices.
- The apparatus may further comprise telemetry means for communicating downhole data and control signals between the tool and a surface interface, which may, among other functions, control the apparatus during the formation evaluation operation.
- In a further aspect, the invention provides a method of operating a logging tool to investigate a formation or a fracture or the like to optimally guide and place a wellbore isolation device which comprises locating a device according to the invention in a borehole on a support, activating the sensors/receivers to detect fractures from the formation and establish data on fractures and features thereof, their relative distance, size from the tool in a preferred embodiment of apparatus, fracturing a formation, investigating the formation recently fractured by the sensors, and continuing the operation until an optimal wellbore production is achieved.
- To those skilled in the art, it is known that the wellhead surface structure (10) includes a control and communications system having an interface for communication telemetry with downhole instrumentation including a transponder and a decoder which decodes data and may be linked directly to the user's terminal. The decoded data may be yet further transmitted by satellite or other means to a remote user or a remote operations centre by means of a telecommunication link. This surface control system allows full communication to and from the downlink and uplink to the invention.
- The invention may also provide a method of automatically operating a directional tool according to a processor to optimally place a wellbore, tubular or completion.
-
FIG. 8 is an exemplary diagnosis and troubleshooting procedure according to the invention showing fracture detection and integration with other data such as micro-seismic, tiltmeters, fracking parameters and the like. - It is recognized that the apparatus could be programmed by the skilled person to cover many other scenarios.
- Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the examples of the invention given by the specific illustrated and described embodiments show a novel fracture detection apparatus and method for formation evaluation, with numerous variations being possible. These embodiments are not intended to be limiting with respect to the scope of the invention. Substitutions, alterations and modifications not limited to the variations suggested herein may be made to the disclosed embodiments while remaining within the ambit of the invention.
Claims (22)
1. An apparatus (50) for fracturing an oil or gas well comprising a sensing element, means for attaching the sensing element to a support whereby it can be moved in a borehole (20), characterized by, at least one sensor (58), to detect a fracture or a feature of the formation related to a fracture, at least one expandable element (52)
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said sensing element detects a fracture or a feature of a formation related to a fracture in order to generate an optimal location to set the expandable element in real-time
3. The apparatus of claim 3 further comprising expanding the expandable element in response to sensor data acquired by the sensing element.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein downhole sensors are used to sense said fractures or fracture features
5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein surface sensors are used to sense said fractures or fracture features
6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said sensors are one of the group selected from: resistivity, neutron density, nuclear magnetic resonance, acoustic, wellbore imaging, seismic, micro-seismic, tilt-meters, pressure, flow, temperature, stress, strain
7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said expandable element is selected from one or more of the group of: plugs, packers, elastomers, sponges, metals, porous material, non porous material and effectively isolates or communicates with at least one zone of the formation
8. Apparatus of claim 1 wherein the expandable element expands under mechanical force, temperature, pressure, flow or other force acting against it from the inside of a wellbore or from the inside of the support.
9. Apparatus of claim 3 wherein the expandable element is expanded on command in response to sensor data.
10. Apparatus of claim 4 wherein the expandable element is expanded on command in response to sensor data.
11. Apparatus of claim 1 wherein the sensor is locatable above or below the expandable element
12. Apparatus of claim 8 wherein the sensor is retrievable and has an unrestricted internal diameter communicable to the expandable element
13. Method of claim 20 wherein a fracture is detected by sensor, the expandable element is expanded on command in response to sensor data and a fracture is induced
14. Method of claim 15 wherein the induced fracture is detected by sensor
15. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1 with sensors and expandable elements configured with a wall contact member FIG. 5 (62) wall contact member (63) at the trailing uphole or leading downhole end
16. Apparatus of claim 17 wherein such downhole wall contact member may form part of a rotary steerable, stabilizer, roller reamer, a reamer, a pressure containment device, a measurement device, a bridge plug, a packer and inflow control device.
17. Apparatus as claimed in claim 19 which is elongate and comprises at least two of said expandable elements at longitudinally separated positions along the support, (FIG. 7 , 61)
18. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1 comprising microprocessor control means (55) adapted to receive data on the formation or formation features based on acoustic signature velocities recognized by receivers (52), detect a formation or formation feature and signal a tool in response to acquired data in order to set the expandable element to maximize production.
19. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein a plurality of sensing elements are directed outwardly of the tool to form a sensing zone wherein said plurality is placed helically, longitudinally, spirally, axially, radially and communicate with a user interface in real-time so as to optimize performance.
20. An automated method of operating a fracturing apparatus to optimally place a wellbore or tubular or packer or sand screen or like completion or production system or device based on acquired formation data, which comprises locating a tool as claimed in claim one in a borehole, activating the sensing element to send and receive formation data, rotating the tool and moving it axially along the borehole on the drill-bit or support, receiving data by receiver means, and continuing the formation evaluation until an optimal fracking operation is achieved using logic programming to diagnose and correct common errors or failures.
21. A method of fracturing using apparatus as claimed in claim 1 provided with a closed-loop micro-processor means for detecting a wellbore feature or detecting a natural fracture or an induced fracture, comparing this with a desired fracture and automatically alerting an operator or changing the condition of an expandable element in response thereto (62) and wherein the tool is supported on a downhole string (40) and a surface interface controls and exchanges data with the downhole string and any of its components during the formation evaluation operation according to a program to deliver a desired wellbore placement.
22. A method of completing an oil or gas well as claimed in claim 1 where the apparatus gives immediate evaluation of a formation, or the characteristics of a formation yet to be drilled and, if the tool detects a feature of a formation or a change in a feature of interest, to automatically calculate and correct for an optimal well path, and to repeat evaluation until such an optimal well path result is achieved in real-time where formations are detected as rock types, earthen formations or lithologies with a feature of interest meant to include but not limited to detecting porosity or a change in porosity, detecting permeability or a change in permeability, an oil zone, a gas zone, a water zone, a fracture, a fault, a dip, a bed, a vugular formation, an anticline, a syncline and a trap.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/919,428 US20130333879A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-06-17 | Method for Closed Loop Fracture Detection and Fracturing using Expansion and Sensing Apparatus |
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GBGB0811815.0 | 2008-06-27 | ||
GB0811815A GB2460096B (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2008-06-27 | Expansion and calliper tool |
PCT/ES2009/070261 WO2009156552A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2009-06-27 | Drilling tool and method for widening and simultaneously monitoring the diameter of wells and the properties of the fluid |
ESPCT/ES2009/070261 | 2009-06-27 | ||
US12/966,195 US8511404B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2010-12-13 | Drilling tool, apparatus and method for underreaming and simultaneously monitoring and controlling wellbore diameter |
US13/919,428 US20130333879A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-06-17 | Method for Closed Loop Fracture Detection and Fracturing using Expansion and Sensing Apparatus |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/966,195 Continuation-In-Part US8511404B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2010-12-13 | Drilling tool, apparatus and method for underreaming and simultaneously monitoring and controlling wellbore diameter |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20130333879A1 true US20130333879A1 (en) | 2013-12-19 |
Family
ID=39683278
Family Applications (10)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/966,195 Expired - Fee Related US8511404B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2010-12-13 | Drilling tool, apparatus and method for underreaming and simultaneously monitoring and controlling wellbore diameter |
US13/161,723 Active US8528668B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2011-06-16 | Electronically activated underreamer and calliper tool |
US13/161,806 Active US8235144B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2011-06-16 | Expansion and sensing tool |
US13/909,413 Expired - Fee Related US9447676B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-06-04 | Electronically activated underreamer and calliper tool |
US13/919,428 Abandoned US20130333879A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-06-17 | Method for Closed Loop Fracture Detection and Fracturing using Expansion and Sensing Apparatus |
US13/945,719 Expired - Fee Related US9677342B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-07-18 | Drilling tool, apparatus and method for underreaming and simultaneously monitoring and controlling wellbore diameter |
US13/949,286 Abandoned US20130306375A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-07-24 | Drilling tool, apparatus and method for underreaming and simultaneously monitoring and controlling wellbore diameter |
US13/969,576 Abandoned US20140060933A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-08-18 | Drilling tool, apparatus and method for underreaming and simultaneously monitoring and controlling wellbore diameter |
US14/295,766 Abandoned US20140299385A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2014-06-04 | Cutters forming a helix oriented in the direction of reaming |
US14/295,717 Expired - Fee Related US9593538B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2014-06-04 | Circumferential and longitudinal cutter coverage in continuation of a first bit diameter to a second expandable reamer diameter |
Family Applications Before (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/966,195 Expired - Fee Related US8511404B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2010-12-13 | Drilling tool, apparatus and method for underreaming and simultaneously monitoring and controlling wellbore diameter |
US13/161,723 Active US8528668B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2011-06-16 | Electronically activated underreamer and calliper tool |
US13/161,806 Active US8235144B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2011-06-16 | Expansion and sensing tool |
US13/909,413 Expired - Fee Related US9447676B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-06-04 | Electronically activated underreamer and calliper tool |
Family Applications After (5)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/945,719 Expired - Fee Related US9677342B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-07-18 | Drilling tool, apparatus and method for underreaming and simultaneously monitoring and controlling wellbore diameter |
US13/949,286 Abandoned US20130306375A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-07-24 | Drilling tool, apparatus and method for underreaming and simultaneously monitoring and controlling wellbore diameter |
US13/969,576 Abandoned US20140060933A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-08-18 | Drilling tool, apparatus and method for underreaming and simultaneously monitoring and controlling wellbore diameter |
US14/295,766 Abandoned US20140299385A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2014-06-04 | Cutters forming a helix oriented in the direction of reaming |
US14/295,717 Expired - Fee Related US9593538B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2014-06-04 | Circumferential and longitudinal cutter coverage in continuation of a first bit diameter to a second expandable reamer diameter |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (10) | US8511404B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP2327857B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102137981B (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0915074B1 (en) |
GB (4) | GB2465504C (en) |
MX (1) | MX2010014189A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009156552A1 (en) |
Cited By (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140290936A1 (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2014-10-02 | Peter Berkeley WILLS | Hydraulic fracture monitoring using active seismic sources with receivers in the treatment well |
US20150267525A1 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2015-09-24 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Self-Guided Geosteering Assembly and Method for Optimizing Well Placement and Quality |
US20150338543A1 (en) * | 2014-05-23 | 2015-11-26 | Reeves Wireline Technologies Limited | Relating to geological logging |
WO2015159058A3 (en) * | 2014-04-16 | 2015-12-17 | Omega Well Monitoring Limited | A downhole device for reliable data recovery after data acquisition during downhole operation and method thereof |
WO2016028513A1 (en) * | 2014-08-22 | 2016-02-25 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | Hydraulic fracturing while drilling and/or tripping |
US20160209545A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2016-07-21 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | A geostatistical procedure for simulation of the 3d geometry of a natural fracture network conditioned by well bore observations |
US9482054B2 (en) | 2006-03-02 | 2016-11-01 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Hole enlargement drilling device and methods for using same |
US9493991B2 (en) | 2012-04-02 | 2016-11-15 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Cutting structures, tools for use in subterranean boreholes including cutting structures and related methods |
WO2016187237A1 (en) * | 2015-05-20 | 2016-11-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Inversion for tectonic stress |
US9611697B2 (en) | 2002-07-30 | 2017-04-04 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. | Expandable apparatus and related methods |
US9677355B2 (en) | 2011-05-26 | 2017-06-13 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Corrodible triggering elements for use with subterranean borehole tools having expandable members and related methods |
US9719304B2 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2017-08-01 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Remotely controlled apparatus for downhole applications and methods of operation |
US9719305B2 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2017-08-01 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Expandable reamers and methods of using expandable reamers |
US9725958B2 (en) | 2010-10-04 | 2017-08-08 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Earth-boring tools including expandable members and status indicators and methods of making and using such earth-boring tools |
US9759013B2 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2017-09-12 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Selectively actuating expandable reamers and related methods |
US9931736B2 (en) | 2010-06-24 | 2018-04-03 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Cutting elements for earth-boring tools, earth-boring tools including such cutting elements, and methods of forming cutting elements for earth-boring tools |
US20180266243A1 (en) * | 2015-10-09 | 2018-09-20 | Darkvision Technologies Inc. | Devices and methods for imaging wells using phased array ultrasound |
US20180328169A1 (en) * | 2015-08-18 | 2018-11-15 | Tech Flo Consulting, Llc | Method and Apparatus for Evaluating the Potential Effectiveness of Refracing a Well |
US10488546B2 (en) * | 2010-12-14 | 2019-11-26 | Conocophillips Company | Autonomous electrical methods node |
CN111101931A (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2020-05-05 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Clustering perforation pipe string passing capacity calculation method of cylindrical well track model |
US10941647B2 (en) * | 2014-07-07 | 2021-03-09 | Conocophillips Company | Matrix temperature production logging tool and use |
WO2021062365A1 (en) * | 2019-09-27 | 2021-04-01 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Real time monitoring of fracture driven interference |
CN113153280A (en) * | 2020-10-22 | 2021-07-23 | 煤炭科学研究总院 | Underground coal seam hydraulic fracturing drilling pressure relief and permeability increase effect detection system and method |
US11299980B2 (en) * | 2016-08-18 | 2022-04-12 | Seismos Inc. | Method for fracture activity monitoring and pressure wave resonance analyses for estimating geophysical parameters of hydraulic fractures using fracture waves |
US11608739B2 (en) * | 2019-07-09 | 2023-03-21 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Electrical impulse earth-boring tools and related systems and methods |
US11725506B2 (en) | 2021-01-14 | 2023-08-15 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Automatic well control based on detection of fracture driven interference |
Families Citing this family (148)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8540035B2 (en) | 2008-05-05 | 2013-09-24 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Extendable cutting tools for use in a wellbore |
GB2465504C (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2019-12-25 | Rasheed Wajid | Expansion and sensing tool |
NO338750B1 (en) * | 2009-03-02 | 2016-10-17 | Drilltronics Rig Systems As | Method and system for automated drilling process control |
US9022117B2 (en) | 2010-03-15 | 2015-05-05 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Section mill and method for abandoning a wellbore |
US9062531B2 (en) * | 2010-03-16 | 2015-06-23 | Tool Joint Products, Llc | System and method for measuring borehole conditions, in particular, verification of a final borehole diameter |
WO2011119897A2 (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2011-09-29 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Phase shift keyed optical communications |
CN102486083B (en) * | 2010-12-06 | 2014-10-22 | 淮南矿业(集团)有限责任公司 | Well drilling corrector |
US9074468B1 (en) * | 2011-01-27 | 2015-07-07 | Selman and Associates, Ltd. | Method for real-time streaming of well logging data with self-aligning satellites |
US8973679B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2015-03-10 | Smith International, Inc. | Integrated reaming and measurement system and related methods of use |
US9963964B2 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2018-05-08 | Tool Joint Products Llc | Downhole sensor tool for measuring borehole conditions with fit-for-purpose sensor housings |
USD750509S1 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2016-03-01 | Tool Joint Products Llc | Downhole sensor tool |
US20120273187A1 (en) * | 2011-04-27 | 2012-11-01 | Hall David R | Detecting a Reamer Position through a Magnet Field Sensor |
WO2012170030A1 (en) * | 2011-06-09 | 2012-12-13 | Bonett Ordaz William Antonio | Method and apparatus for shaping a well hole |
US9133665B2 (en) * | 2011-06-11 | 2015-09-15 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Detecting and mitigating borehole diameter enlargement |
US9222350B2 (en) | 2011-06-21 | 2015-12-29 | Diamond Innovations, Inc. | Cutter tool insert having sensing device |
US9068407B2 (en) | 2012-05-03 | 2015-06-30 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drilling assemblies including expandable reamers and expandable stabilizers, and related methods |
GB201217229D0 (en) * | 2012-09-26 | 2012-11-07 | Petrowell Ltd | Well isolation |
CN102900422B (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2015-07-08 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Underground flow tester and underground flow testing method |
US9328563B2 (en) | 2012-11-13 | 2016-05-03 | Smith International, Inc. | Adjustable diameter underreamer and methods of use |
US10232332B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2019-03-19 | U.S. Well Services, Inc. | Independent control of auger and hopper assembly in electric blender system |
US10119381B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2018-11-06 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | System for reducing vibrations in a pressure pumping fleet |
US9650879B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2017-05-16 | Us Well Services Llc | Torsional coupling for electric hydraulic fracturing fluid pumps |
US11476781B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2022-10-18 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Wireline power supply during electric powered fracturing operations |
US10526882B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2020-01-07 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Modular remote power generation and transmission for hydraulic fracturing system |
US11449018B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2022-09-20 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | System and method for parallel power and blackout protection for electric powered hydraulic fracturing |
US9745840B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2017-08-29 | Us Well Services Llc | Electric powered pump down |
US10254732B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2019-04-09 | U.S. Well Services, Inc. | Monitoring and control of proppant storage from a datavan |
US10036238B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2018-07-31 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Cable management of electric powered hydraulic fracturing pump unit |
US9995218B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2018-06-12 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Turbine chilling for oil field power generation |
US9893500B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2018-02-13 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Switchgear load sharing for oil field equipment |
US10407990B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2019-09-10 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Slide out pump stand for hydraulic fracturing equipment |
US10020711B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2018-07-10 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | System for fueling electric powered hydraulic fracturing equipment with multiple fuel sources |
US9410410B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2016-08-09 | Us Well Services Llc | System for pumping hydraulic fracturing fluid using electric pumps |
US9970278B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2018-05-15 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | System for centralized monitoring and control of electric powered hydraulic fracturing fleet |
US20140172306A1 (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2014-06-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Integrated oilfield decision making system and method |
US9353613B2 (en) * | 2013-02-13 | 2016-05-31 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Distributing a wellbore fluid through a wellbore |
US9528324B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-12-27 | Smith International, Inc. | Underreamer for increasing a wellbore diameter |
US10240988B2 (en) * | 2013-05-30 | 2019-03-26 | Siemens Energy, Inc. | Fully automated calibration for acoustic pyrometry |
US10156097B2 (en) * | 2013-06-09 | 2018-12-18 | Smith International, Inc. | Downhole tool for increasing a wellbore diameter |
US10036622B2 (en) | 2013-06-28 | 2018-07-31 | Buhler Inc. | Barrel measuring device |
US9464879B2 (en) | 2013-06-28 | 2016-10-11 | Buhler, Inc. | Barrel measuring device |
MX2016001280A (en) * | 2013-08-22 | 2016-07-26 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc | Drilling methods and systems with automated waypoint or borehole path updates based on survey data corrections. |
US9085958B2 (en) | 2013-09-19 | 2015-07-21 | Sas Institute Inc. | Control variable determination to maximize a drilling rate of penetration |
US9404358B2 (en) * | 2013-09-26 | 2016-08-02 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Wiper plug for determining the orientation of a casing string in a wellbore |
US9938781B2 (en) | 2013-10-11 | 2018-04-10 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Milling system for abandoning a wellbore |
US9879518B2 (en) | 2013-10-12 | 2018-01-30 | Mark May | Intelligent reamer for rotary/sliding drilling system and method |
GB2519376B (en) * | 2013-10-21 | 2018-11-14 | Schlumberger Holdings | Observation of vibration of rotary apparatus |
US9163497B2 (en) | 2013-10-22 | 2015-10-20 | Sas Institute Inc. | Fluid flow back prediction |
CN104636712B (en) * | 2013-11-13 | 2019-07-02 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Drilling slip status image automatic recognition system |
GB2520998B (en) * | 2013-12-06 | 2016-06-29 | Schlumberger Holdings | Expandable Reamer |
CN104747086A (en) * | 2013-12-31 | 2015-07-01 | 中国石油化工集团公司 | Double-step self-locked while-drilling reamer blade |
GB2522630B (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2017-04-12 | Schlumberger Holdings | Sensing annular flow in a wellbore |
DK178108B1 (en) | 2014-03-14 | 2015-05-26 | Yellow Shark Holding Aps | Activation mechanism for a downhole tool and a method thereof |
US9617815B2 (en) * | 2014-03-24 | 2017-04-11 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole tools with independently-operated cutters and methods of milling long sections of a casing therewith |
US10214980B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2019-02-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Measuring fluid properties in a downhole tool |
US10519722B2 (en) | 2014-07-21 | 2019-12-31 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Reamer |
GB2528458A (en) | 2014-07-21 | 2016-01-27 | Schlumberger Holdings | Reamer |
GB2528456A (en) | 2014-07-21 | 2016-01-27 | Schlumberger Holdings | Reamer |
GB2528457B (en) | 2014-07-21 | 2018-10-10 | Schlumberger Holdings | Reamer |
GB2528459B (en) | 2014-07-21 | 2018-10-31 | Schlumberger Holdings | Reamer |
GB2528454A (en) | 2014-07-21 | 2016-01-27 | Schlumberger Holdings | Reamer |
US10689973B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2020-06-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Dimensional characteristic determinations of a wellbore |
US9441962B2 (en) * | 2014-09-08 | 2016-09-13 | Steve Wilhelm Fung | Shaft sounding device for measuring thickness of sediments at base of drilled shafts |
US10352139B2 (en) * | 2014-12-11 | 2019-07-16 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Coiled tubing through production tubing zone isolation and production method |
US20160237809A1 (en) * | 2015-02-17 | 2016-08-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole Tool Non Contact Position Measurement System |
US11815352B2 (en) | 2015-02-17 | 2023-11-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for determining borehole size with a borehole imaging tool |
US10037836B2 (en) | 2015-04-03 | 2018-07-31 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Slickline manufacturing techniques |
MX2017013507A (en) * | 2015-04-20 | 2019-10-30 | Nat Oilwell Dht Lp | Wellsite sensor assembly and method of using same. |
USD786642S1 (en) | 2015-04-30 | 2017-05-16 | Tool Joint Products Llc | Fit-for-purpose sensor housing for a downhole tool |
USD883761S1 (en) | 2015-04-30 | 2020-05-12 | Tool Joint Products Llc | Facing and insert portions of a fit-for-purpose sensor housing for a downhole tool |
AU2016263168B2 (en) * | 2015-05-21 | 2020-11-05 | Saipem S.P.A. | System and method for real time remote measurement of geometric parameters of a pipeline in the launch step, through sound waves |
CA2985835C (en) | 2015-05-28 | 2022-08-16 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Cutter assembly for cutting a tubular, bottom hole assembly comprising such a cutter assembly and method of cutting a tubular |
WO2016200374A1 (en) * | 2015-06-09 | 2016-12-15 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Watermelon mill |
WO2016204756A1 (en) | 2015-06-17 | 2016-12-22 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Drive shaft actuation using radio frequency identification |
WO2017003488A1 (en) * | 2015-07-02 | 2017-01-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Drilling system drag member for simultaneous drilling and reaming |
CN105003249B (en) * | 2015-08-06 | 2020-09-25 | 北京航空航天大学 | Horizontal well flow pattern identification method based on total flow and conductance probe array signals |
US10210360B2 (en) | 2015-09-02 | 2019-02-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Adjustable bent housing actuation using radio frequency identification |
WO2017132052A1 (en) * | 2016-01-28 | 2017-08-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Underreamer cutter block |
CN108603396B (en) | 2016-01-28 | 2020-07-07 | 斯伦贝谢技术有限公司 | Step type under-reaming device blade |
AU2017200699B2 (en) * | 2016-02-15 | 2021-07-01 | Joy Global Surface Mining Inc | Adaptive leveling control system |
US20180051548A1 (en) * | 2016-08-19 | 2018-02-22 | Shell Oil Company | A method of performing a reaming operation at a wellsite using reamer performance metrics |
US11181107B2 (en) | 2016-12-02 | 2021-11-23 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Constant voltage power distribution system for use with an electric hydraulic fracturing system |
US10794178B2 (en) * | 2016-12-02 | 2020-10-06 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Assemblies for communicating a status of a portion of a downhole assembly and related systems and methods |
US10458233B2 (en) | 2016-12-29 | 2019-10-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Sensors for in-situ formation fluid analysis |
US10316619B2 (en) | 2017-03-16 | 2019-06-11 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Systems and methods for stage cementing |
US11215011B2 (en) * | 2017-03-20 | 2022-01-04 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Notching a wellbore while drilling |
US11169032B2 (en) * | 2017-04-07 | 2021-11-09 | Sercel | Gauge with adaptive calibration and method |
US10544648B2 (en) | 2017-04-12 | 2020-01-28 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Systems and methods for sealing a wellbore |
US10557330B2 (en) | 2017-04-24 | 2020-02-11 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Interchangeable wellbore cleaning modules |
US10267725B2 (en) | 2017-06-02 | 2019-04-23 | Evolution Engineering Inc. | Surface profile measurement system |
US10280724B2 (en) | 2017-07-07 | 2019-05-07 | U.S. Well Services, Inc. | Hydraulic fracturing equipment with non-hydraulic power |
US10378298B2 (en) | 2017-08-02 | 2019-08-13 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Vibration-induced installation of wellbore casing |
US10487604B2 (en) | 2017-08-02 | 2019-11-26 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Vibration-induced installation of wellbore casing |
CN107366536B (en) * | 2017-09-13 | 2020-05-08 | 昆山哈伯希尔能源科技有限公司 | Method for measuring borehole diameter while drilling based on rotary steering |
US10954772B2 (en) * | 2017-09-14 | 2021-03-23 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Automated optimization of downhole tools during underreaming while drilling operations |
US10597962B2 (en) | 2017-09-28 | 2020-03-24 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Drilling with a whipstock system |
CA3078509A1 (en) | 2017-10-05 | 2019-04-11 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Instrumented fracturing slurry flow system and method |
CA3078879A1 (en) | 2017-10-13 | 2019-04-18 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Automated fracturing system and method |
CA3080317A1 (en) | 2017-10-25 | 2019-05-02 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Smart fracturing system and method |
US10378339B2 (en) | 2017-11-08 | 2019-08-13 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Method and apparatus for controlling wellbore operations |
WO2019113147A1 (en) | 2017-12-05 | 2019-06-13 | U.S. Well Services, Inc. | Multi-plunger pumps and associated drive systems |
US10648311B2 (en) | 2017-12-05 | 2020-05-12 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | High horsepower pumping configuration for an electric hydraulic fracturing system |
CN108386185B (en) * | 2018-01-17 | 2022-05-06 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining sand body connectivity |
AR114091A1 (en) | 2018-02-05 | 2020-07-22 | Us Well Services Inc | ELECTRICAL CHARGE MANAGEMENT IN MICROGRID |
US10689913B2 (en) | 2018-03-21 | 2020-06-23 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Supporting a string within a wellbore with a smart stabilizer |
US10689914B2 (en) | 2018-03-21 | 2020-06-23 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Opening a wellbore with a smart hole-opener |
US11035207B2 (en) | 2018-04-16 | 2021-06-15 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Hybrid hydraulic fracturing fleet |
US10794170B2 (en) | 2018-04-24 | 2020-10-06 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Smart system for selection of wellbore drilling fluid loss circulation material |
US10612362B2 (en) | 2018-05-18 | 2020-04-07 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Coiled tubing multifunctional quad-axial visual monitoring and recording |
US11078786B2 (en) * | 2018-05-31 | 2021-08-03 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Salt mobility assessment and review technique (smart) for exploratory wells |
WO2019241783A1 (en) | 2018-06-15 | 2019-12-19 | U.S. Well Services, Inc. | Integrated mobile power unit for hydraulic fracturing |
WO2020056258A1 (en) | 2018-09-14 | 2020-03-19 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Riser assist for wellsites |
WO2020076902A1 (en) | 2018-10-09 | 2020-04-16 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Modular switchgear system and power distribution for electric oilfield equipment |
US10920586B2 (en) | 2018-12-28 | 2021-02-16 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Systems and methods for logging while treating |
US11578577B2 (en) | 2019-03-20 | 2023-02-14 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Oversized switchgear trailer for electric hydraulic fracturing |
CA3139970A1 (en) | 2019-05-13 | 2020-11-19 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | Encoderless vector control for vfd in hydraulic fracturing applications |
US11542786B2 (en) | 2019-08-01 | 2023-01-03 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | High capacity power storage system for electric hydraulic fracturing |
CN110905403B (en) * | 2019-12-09 | 2021-07-09 | 中冶集团武汉勘察研究院有限公司 | Construction method of large-diameter groundwater environment monitoring well |
US11726223B2 (en) | 2019-12-10 | 2023-08-15 | Origin Rose Llc | Spectral analysis and machine learning to detect offset well communication using high frequency acoustic or vibration sensing |
US11009162B1 (en) | 2019-12-27 | 2021-05-18 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | System and method for integrated flow supply line |
US11125075B1 (en) | 2020-03-25 | 2021-09-21 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Wellbore fluid level monitoring system |
US11414963B2 (en) | 2020-03-25 | 2022-08-16 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Wellbore fluid level monitoring system |
US11280178B2 (en) | 2020-03-25 | 2022-03-22 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Wellbore fluid level monitoring system |
US11299968B2 (en) | 2020-04-06 | 2022-04-12 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Reducing wellbore annular pressure with a release system |
US11414984B2 (en) | 2020-05-28 | 2022-08-16 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Measuring wellbore cross-sections using downhole caliper tools |
US11414985B2 (en) | 2020-05-28 | 2022-08-16 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Measuring wellbore cross-sections using downhole caliper tools |
US11631884B2 (en) | 2020-06-02 | 2023-04-18 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Electrolyte structure for a high-temperature, high-pressure lithium battery |
US11149510B1 (en) | 2020-06-03 | 2021-10-19 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Freeing a stuck pipe from a wellbore |
US11391104B2 (en) | 2020-06-03 | 2022-07-19 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Freeing a stuck pipe from a wellbore |
US11719089B2 (en) | 2020-07-15 | 2023-08-08 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Analysis of drilling slurry solids by image processing |
US11255130B2 (en) | 2020-07-22 | 2022-02-22 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Sensing drill bit wear under downhole conditions |
US11506044B2 (en) | 2020-07-23 | 2022-11-22 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Automatic analysis of drill string dynamics |
CN111765863B (en) * | 2020-07-24 | 2022-02-18 | 莱州汇金矿业投资有限公司 | Measuring device for mine tunnel control point |
US11396789B2 (en) | 2020-07-28 | 2022-07-26 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Isolating a wellbore with a wellbore isolation system |
US20220106875A1 (en) * | 2020-10-06 | 2022-04-07 | Gordon Technologies Llc | Acoustic datalink useful in downhole applications |
US11414942B2 (en) | 2020-10-14 | 2022-08-16 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Packer installation systems and related methods |
US11867008B2 (en) | 2020-11-05 | 2024-01-09 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | System and methods for the measurement of drilling mud flow in real-time |
US11434714B2 (en) | 2021-01-04 | 2022-09-06 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Adjustable seal for sealing a fluid flow at a wellhead |
US11697991B2 (en) | 2021-01-13 | 2023-07-11 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Rig sensor testing and calibration |
CN112431598B (en) * | 2021-01-28 | 2021-04-09 | 中交四公局第一工程有限公司 | Automatic cutting device and method for inside of surrounding rock excavated by expanding small section of built tunnel |
CN112902802B (en) * | 2021-02-01 | 2022-09-16 | 杭州交投数智工程检测有限公司 | Pile hole aperture detection device capable of recovering |
US11572752B2 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2023-02-07 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Downhole cable deployment |
US11727555B2 (en) | 2021-02-25 | 2023-08-15 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Rig power system efficiency optimization through image processing |
US11846151B2 (en) | 2021-03-09 | 2023-12-19 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Repairing a cased wellbore |
CN114111679B (en) * | 2021-11-08 | 2024-01-05 | 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 | Monitoring system |
US11624265B1 (en) | 2021-11-12 | 2023-04-11 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Cutting pipes in wellbores using downhole autonomous jet cutting tools |
US11867012B2 (en) | 2021-12-06 | 2024-01-09 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Gauge cutter and sampler apparatus |
US11840898B2 (en) | 2021-12-21 | 2023-12-12 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Intelligent section mill, method, and system |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110153296A1 (en) * | 2009-12-21 | 2011-06-23 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | System and methods for real-time wellbore stability service |
US20120111559A1 (en) * | 2010-11-05 | 2012-05-10 | Aps Technology, Inc. | Method for fracturing and analyzing an earthen formation surrounding a well bore |
US20130128694A1 (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2013-05-23 | Global Microseismic Services, Inc. | Tomographic Imaging of Fracture-Fault Permeability Zones During Drilling Operations |
Family Cites Families (184)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US904344A (en) | 1908-01-28 | 1908-11-17 | Clarence T Mapes | Underreamer. |
US1302058A (en) | 1913-12-01 | 1919-04-29 | Mahlon E Layne | Drilling apparatus. |
US1667190A (en) | 1926-02-01 | 1928-04-24 | Grant John | Rotary underreamer |
US1810201A (en) | 1928-12-05 | 1931-06-16 | Grant John | Renewable reamer |
US1989476A (en) | 1931-09-26 | 1935-01-29 | Evans Flexible Reamer Corp | Expansion reamer |
US1902174A (en) | 1932-01-13 | 1933-03-21 | Miles J Lewis | Well bore straightening tool |
US2028910A (en) | 1934-02-03 | 1936-01-28 | John W Macclatchie | Reamer |
US2026323A (en) | 1935-03-18 | 1935-12-31 | Clarence E Reed | Reamer cutter assembly for earth boring drills |
US2084737A (en) | 1935-07-05 | 1937-06-22 | William J Neumann | Reamer |
US2122863A (en) | 1936-04-13 | 1938-07-05 | Globe Oil Tools Co | Reamer |
US2488003A (en) | 1945-03-21 | 1949-11-15 | Martha H Wright | Well-drilling tool |
US2712434A (en) | 1953-11-23 | 1955-07-05 | Melvin L Giles | Directional drilling tool |
US2859943A (en) | 1957-01-07 | 1958-11-11 | Chadderdon Jack | Expansible mill for well casings |
US3068946A (en) | 1958-12-15 | 1962-12-18 | Eastman Oil Well Survey Co | Knuckle joint |
NL122796C (en) * | 1960-02-15 | |||
US3023507A (en) * | 1960-03-23 | 1962-03-06 | Well Surveys Inc | Apparatus for measuring the displacement of a well tool from an adjacent surface |
US3237705A (en) | 1963-11-13 | 1966-03-01 | Williams Joseph W | Reamer for enlarging and straightening bore holes |
US3376942A (en) | 1965-07-13 | 1968-04-09 | Baker Oil Tools Inc | Large hole vertical drilling apparatus |
US3431989A (en) | 1967-07-31 | 1969-03-11 | Willis D Waterman | Planetary excavator |
US3561549A (en) | 1968-06-07 | 1971-02-09 | Smith Ind International Inc | Slant drilling tools for oil wells |
SE346354B (en) | 1970-11-27 | 1972-07-03 | Atlas Copco Ab | |
US3885638A (en) * | 1973-10-10 | 1975-05-27 | Sam C Skidmore | Combination rotary and percussion drill bit |
US4031974A (en) | 1975-05-27 | 1977-06-28 | Rapidex, Inc. | Boring apparatus capable of boring straight holes |
US4011918A (en) * | 1976-01-21 | 1977-03-15 | Christensen, Inc. | Stabilizer for drill strings |
US4241796A (en) * | 1979-11-15 | 1980-12-30 | Terra Tek, Inc. | Active drill stabilizer assembly |
US4989680A (en) | 1980-03-24 | 1991-02-05 | Camco International Inc. | Drill bit having improved hydraulic action for directing drilling fluid |
GB2128657A (en) * | 1982-10-22 | 1984-05-02 | Coal Ind | Drilling methods and equipment |
US4665511A (en) | 1984-03-30 | 1987-05-12 | Nl Industries, Inc. | System for acoustic caliper measurements |
US4552232A (en) | 1984-06-29 | 1985-11-12 | Spiral Drilling Systems, Inc. | Drill-bit with full offset cutter bodies |
GB8529651D0 (en) | 1985-12-02 | 1986-01-08 | Drilex Ltd | Directional drilling |
US5373900A (en) * | 1988-04-15 | 1994-12-20 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole milling tool |
US4964085A (en) | 1986-02-25 | 1990-10-16 | Baroid Technology, Inc. | Non-contact borehole caliber measurement |
US4791797A (en) | 1986-03-24 | 1988-12-20 | Nl Industries, Inc. | Density neutron self-consistent caliper |
US4848490A (en) | 1986-07-03 | 1989-07-18 | Anderson Charles A | Downhole stabilizers |
US4802145A (en) | 1986-08-01 | 1989-01-31 | Amoco Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining cement conditions |
US4800537A (en) | 1986-08-01 | 1989-01-24 | Amoco Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining cement conditions |
US4867264A (en) | 1986-09-17 | 1989-09-19 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Apparatus and method for investigating wellbores and the like |
US4757873A (en) | 1986-11-25 | 1988-07-19 | Nl Industries, Inc. | Articulated transducer pad assembly for acoustic logging tool |
NO164118C (en) | 1987-07-30 | 1990-08-29 | Norsk Hydro As | HYDRAULIC OPERATED ROEMMER. |
US4916400A (en) | 1989-03-03 | 1990-04-10 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for determining characteristics of the interior geometry of a wellbore |
US4992994A (en) | 1989-03-29 | 1991-02-12 | Shell Oil Company | Borehole televiewer for fracture detection and cement evaluation |
GB8915302D0 (en) | 1989-07-04 | 1989-08-23 | Andergauge Ltd | Drill string stabiliser |
US4982802A (en) | 1989-11-22 | 1991-01-08 | Amoco Corporation | Method for stabilizing a rotary drill string and drill bit |
BE1003903A3 (en) * | 1989-12-19 | 1992-07-14 | Diamant Boart Stratabit Sa | Tool for drilling extend well. |
US5130950A (en) | 1990-05-16 | 1992-07-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Ultrasonic measurement apparatus |
US5214251A (en) | 1990-05-16 | 1993-05-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Ultrasonic measurement apparatus and method |
US5027914A (en) * | 1990-06-04 | 1991-07-02 | Wilson Steve B | Pilot casing mill |
CN2103118U (en) * | 1990-11-28 | 1992-04-29 | 陈满成 | Verify apparatus under-reaming bottom pile |
CN1032120C (en) * | 1991-08-14 | 1996-06-26 | 成都华西化工研究所 | Variable pressure adsorption program controlling and operating device |
US5175429A (en) | 1991-08-30 | 1992-12-29 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Stand-off compensation for nuclear MWD measurement |
US5265684A (en) * | 1991-11-27 | 1993-11-30 | Baroid Technology, Inc. | Downhole adjustable stabilizer and method |
US5314033A (en) | 1992-02-18 | 1994-05-24 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drill bit having combined positive and negative or neutral rake cutters |
GB9208524D0 (en) | 1992-04-21 | 1992-06-03 | Scherbatskoy Serge Alexander | Measurement while drilling |
NO178938C (en) * | 1992-04-30 | 1996-07-03 | Geir Tandberg | Borehole expansion device |
US5253714A (en) * | 1992-08-17 | 1993-10-19 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Well service tool |
US5332048A (en) * | 1992-10-23 | 1994-07-26 | Halliburton Company | Method and apparatus for automatic closed loop drilling system |
GB9314954D0 (en) | 1993-07-16 | 1993-09-01 | Camco Drilling Group Ltd | Improvements in or relating to torary drill bits |
US5341345A (en) | 1993-08-09 | 1994-08-23 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Ultrasonic stand-off gauge |
JPH0762967A (en) * | 1993-08-30 | 1995-03-07 | Taisei Corp | Reaming excavator |
CA2133286C (en) * | 1993-09-30 | 2005-08-09 | Gordon Moake | Apparatus and method for measuring a borehole |
US5423389A (en) | 1994-03-25 | 1995-06-13 | Amoco Corporation | Curved drilling apparatus |
US5515336A (en) | 1994-08-17 | 1996-05-07 | Halliburton Company | MWD surface signal detector having bypass loop acoustic detection means |
US5459697A (en) | 1994-08-17 | 1995-10-17 | Halliburton Company | MWD surface signal detector having enhanced acoustic detection means |
US6088294A (en) | 1995-01-12 | 2000-07-11 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drilling system with an acoustic measurement-while-driving system for determining parameters of interest and controlling the drilling direction |
GB9507008D0 (en) | 1995-04-05 | 1995-05-31 | Mcloughlin Stephen J | A downhole adjustable device for trajectory control in the drilling of deviated wells |
US5495899A (en) | 1995-04-28 | 1996-03-05 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Reamer wing with balanced cutting loads |
GB9508803D0 (en) | 1995-05-01 | 1995-06-21 | Pbl Drilling Systems Limited | Tubular actuator component for use in a drill-string |
US5753812A (en) | 1995-12-07 | 1998-05-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Transducer for sonic logging-while-drilling |
US5655609A (en) * | 1996-01-16 | 1997-08-12 | Baroid Technology, Inc. | Extension and retraction mechanism for subsurface drilling equipment |
EP0901562B1 (en) | 1996-05-18 | 2004-10-13 | Andergauge Limited | Downhole apparatus |
BE1010801A3 (en) | 1996-12-16 | 1999-02-02 | Dresser Ind | Drilling tool and / or core. |
US6123160A (en) | 1997-04-02 | 2000-09-26 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drill bit with gage definition region |
GB9708294D0 (en) | 1997-04-24 | 1997-06-18 | Anderson Charles A | Downhole apparatus |
US6002639A (en) | 1997-05-14 | 1999-12-14 | Gas Research Institute | Sensor configuration for nulling reverberations to image behind reflective layers |
US5995447A (en) | 1997-05-14 | 1999-11-30 | Gas Research Institute | System and method for processing acoustic signals to image behind reflective layers |
US6021093A (en) | 1997-05-14 | 2000-02-01 | Gas Research Institute | Transducer configuration having a multiple viewing position feature |
US6125079A (en) | 1997-05-14 | 2000-09-26 | Gas Research Institute | System and method for providing dual distance transducers to image behind an acoustically reflective layer |
GB9712342D0 (en) | 1997-06-14 | 1997-08-13 | Camco Int Uk Ltd | Improvements in or relating to rotary drill bits |
US5987385A (en) | 1997-08-29 | 1999-11-16 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Method and apparatus for creating an image of an earth borehole or a well casing |
US6325162B1 (en) | 1997-12-04 | 2001-12-04 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Bit connector |
US6038513A (en) | 1998-06-26 | 2000-03-14 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Method and apparatus for quick determination of the ellipticity of an earth borehole |
US6366531B1 (en) | 1998-09-22 | 2002-04-02 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Method and apparatus for acoustic logging |
US6564899B1 (en) | 1998-09-24 | 2003-05-20 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Method and apparatus for absorbing acoustic energy |
US6213250B1 (en) | 1998-09-25 | 2001-04-10 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Transducer for acoustic logging |
US6378632B1 (en) | 1998-10-30 | 2002-04-30 | Smith International, Inc. | Remotely operable hydraulic underreamer |
US6429784B1 (en) | 1999-02-19 | 2002-08-06 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Casing mounted sensors, actuators and generators |
US7004266B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2006-02-28 | Mark Alexander Russell | Adjustable downhole tool |
GB2347443B (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2003-03-26 | Cutting & Wear Resistant Dev | Adjustable down-hole tool |
US6695080B2 (en) | 1999-09-09 | 2004-02-24 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Reaming apparatus and method with enhanced structural protection |
US6668949B1 (en) | 1999-10-21 | 2003-12-30 | Allen Kent Rives | Underreamer and method of use |
US7251590B2 (en) * | 2000-03-13 | 2007-07-31 | Smith International, Inc. | Dynamic vibrational control |
US6672163B2 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2004-01-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Acoustic sensor for fluid characterization |
US6564884B2 (en) * | 2000-07-25 | 2003-05-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Wear protection on a rock bit |
AU2001249000A1 (en) * | 2000-10-27 | 2002-05-06 | Vermeer Manufacturing Company | Solid-state inertial navigation control system for a horizontal drilling machine |
US6668946B2 (en) * | 2001-01-22 | 2003-12-30 | Vermeer Manufacturing Company | Backreamer |
BE1014047A3 (en) * | 2001-03-12 | 2003-03-04 | Halliburton Energy Serv Inc | BOREHOLE WIDER. |
GB0108144D0 (en) * | 2001-03-31 | 2001-05-23 | Rotech Holdings Ltd | Downhoole tool |
US7451836B2 (en) | 2001-08-08 | 2008-11-18 | Smith International, Inc. | Advanced expandable reaming tool |
US6619395B2 (en) | 2001-10-02 | 2003-09-16 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods for determining characteristics of earth formations |
US7513318B2 (en) | 2002-02-19 | 2009-04-07 | Smith International, Inc. | Steerable underreamer/stabilizer assembly and method |
US6732817B2 (en) | 2002-02-19 | 2004-05-11 | Smith International, Inc. | Expandable underreamer/stabilizer |
US6739416B2 (en) | 2002-03-13 | 2004-05-25 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Enhanced offset stabilization for eccentric reamers |
US6891777B2 (en) | 2002-06-19 | 2005-05-10 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Subsurface borehole evaluation and downhole tool position determination methods |
US7036611B2 (en) | 2002-07-30 | 2006-05-02 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Expandable reamer apparatus for enlarging boreholes while drilling and methods of use |
ATE319914T1 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2006-03-15 | Schlumberger Services Petrol | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MEASURING ULTRASONIC VELOCITY IN DRILLING FLUID |
WO2004074630A1 (en) * | 2003-02-14 | 2004-09-02 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole measurements during non-drilling operations |
WO2004074623A2 (en) * | 2003-02-15 | 2004-09-02 | Varco I/P, Inc. | Automated control system for back-reaming |
US6973978B2 (en) * | 2003-04-23 | 2005-12-13 | Varel International, Ltd. | Drilling tool having an expandable bladder and method for using same |
GB0309906D0 (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2003-06-04 | Andergauge Ltd | Downhole tool |
US7493971B2 (en) * | 2003-05-08 | 2009-02-24 | Smith International, Inc. | Concentric expandable reamer and method |
US7252152B2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2007-08-07 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for actuating a downhole tool |
US7036363B2 (en) | 2003-07-03 | 2006-05-02 | Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. | Acoustic sensor for downhole measurement tool |
US7075215B2 (en) | 2003-07-03 | 2006-07-11 | Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. | Matching layer assembly for a downhole acoustic sensor |
US6995500B2 (en) | 2003-07-03 | 2006-02-07 | Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. | Composite backing layer for a downhole acoustic sensor |
US7513147B2 (en) | 2003-07-03 | 2009-04-07 | Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. | Piezocomposite transducer for a downhole measurement tool |
US7757784B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2010-07-20 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drilling methods utilizing independently deployable multiple tubular strings |
US7422076B2 (en) * | 2003-12-23 | 2008-09-09 | Varco I/P, Inc. | Autoreaming systems and methods |
US7367392B2 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2008-05-06 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Wellbore apparatus with sliding shields |
US7364007B2 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2008-04-29 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Integrated acoustic transducer assembly |
US7460435B2 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2008-12-02 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Acoustic transducers for tubulars |
US7999695B2 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2011-08-16 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Surface real-time processing of downhole data |
GB2412388B (en) * | 2004-03-27 | 2006-09-27 | Schlumberger Holdings | Bottom hole assembly |
US7658241B2 (en) | 2004-04-21 | 2010-02-09 | Security Dbs Nv/Sa | Underreaming and stabilizing tool and method for its use |
DE602005003135T8 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2009-01-08 | Halliburton Energy Services N.V. | MAGNIFICATION AND STABILIZATION TOOL FOR A HOLE |
US7339494B2 (en) * | 2004-07-01 | 2008-03-04 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Acoustic telemetry transceiver |
US7669668B2 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2010-03-02 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System, apparatus, and method of conducting measurements of a borehole |
GB2421744A (en) | 2005-01-04 | 2006-07-05 | Cutting & Wear Resistant Dev | Under-reamer or stabiliser with hollow, extendable arms and inclined ribs |
US7775966B2 (en) | 2005-02-24 | 2010-08-17 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Non-invasive pressure measurement in a fluid adjustable restrictive device |
CA2596345A1 (en) * | 2005-01-31 | 2006-08-10 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and method for mechanical caliper measurements during drilling and logging-while-drilling operations |
US7775215B2 (en) | 2005-02-24 | 2010-08-17 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | System and method for determining implanted device positioning and obtaining pressure data |
US7927270B2 (en) | 2005-02-24 | 2011-04-19 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | External mechanical pressure sensor for gastric band pressure measurements |
US8016744B2 (en) | 2005-02-24 | 2011-09-13 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | External pressure-based gastric band adjustment system and method |
US8066629B2 (en) | 2005-02-24 | 2011-11-29 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Apparatus for adjustment and sensing of gastric band pressure |
US7658196B2 (en) | 2005-02-24 | 2010-02-09 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | System and method for determining implanted device orientation |
US7954559B2 (en) * | 2005-04-06 | 2011-06-07 | Smith International, Inc. | Method for optimizing the location of a secondary cutting structure component in a drill string |
GB0516214D0 (en) | 2005-08-06 | 2005-09-14 | Andergauge Ltd | Downhole tool |
EP1934426B1 (en) | 2005-10-11 | 2009-03-04 | Halliburton Energy Services N.V. | Under-reaming and stabilizing tool for use in a borehole and method for using same |
KR101070603B1 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2011-10-14 | 로드테스트, 인크. | Apparatus and method for investigating a formation |
US7757787B2 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2010-07-20 | Smith International, Inc. | Drilling and hole enlargement device |
GB2449594B (en) | 2006-03-02 | 2010-11-17 | Baker Hughes Inc | Automated steerable hole enlargement drilling device and methods |
US8875810B2 (en) | 2006-03-02 | 2014-11-04 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Hole enlargement drilling device and methods for using same |
US8276689B2 (en) * | 2006-05-22 | 2012-10-02 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for drilling with casing |
US8162076B2 (en) | 2006-06-02 | 2012-04-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and method for reducing the borehole gap for downhole formation testing sensors |
GB0613662D0 (en) * | 2006-07-10 | 2006-08-16 | Rotork Controls | Improvements to valve actuators |
US8220540B2 (en) * | 2006-08-11 | 2012-07-17 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and methods for estimating loads and movements of members downhole |
CA2659453C (en) * | 2006-09-27 | 2021-03-16 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Monitor and control of directional drilling operations and simulations |
US7967081B2 (en) * | 2006-11-09 | 2011-06-28 | Smith International, Inc. | Closed-loop physical caliper measurements and directional drilling method |
US7900717B2 (en) * | 2006-12-04 | 2011-03-08 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Expandable reamers for earth boring applications |
US8028767B2 (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2011-10-04 | Baker Hughes, Incorporated | Expandable stabilizer with roller reamer elements |
WO2008070038A1 (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2008-06-12 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Expandable reamers for earth-boring applications and methods of using the same |
US7484438B2 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2009-02-03 | Robert Murphy | Right angle driving tool |
EP2118430A2 (en) | 2007-01-25 | 2009-11-18 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Rotary drag bit |
US7587936B2 (en) * | 2007-02-01 | 2009-09-15 | Smith International Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining drilling fluid acoustic properties |
US7377333B1 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2008-05-27 | Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. | Linear position sensor for downhole tools and method of use |
AU2007354709B2 (en) | 2007-06-05 | 2014-04-17 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | A wired smart reamer |
US7814782B2 (en) | 2007-08-13 | 2010-10-19 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole gas detection in drilling muds |
US20090114448A1 (en) * | 2007-11-01 | 2009-05-07 | Smith International, Inc. | Expandable roller reamer |
US7844342B2 (en) | 2008-02-07 | 2010-11-30 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Powering implantable restriction systems using light |
US8057492B2 (en) | 2008-02-12 | 2011-11-15 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Automatically adjusting band system with MEMS pump |
EP2297424B1 (en) * | 2008-04-23 | 2014-12-24 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Methods, systems, and bottom hole assemblies including reamer with varying effective back rake |
US8540035B2 (en) | 2008-05-05 | 2013-09-24 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Extendable cutting tools for use in a wellbore |
AU2009244318B2 (en) | 2008-05-05 | 2012-10-04 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Signal operated tools for milling, drilling, and/or fishing operations |
US7770664B2 (en) | 2008-05-29 | 2010-08-10 | Smith International, Inc. | Wear indicators for expandable earth boring apparatus |
GB2465504C (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2019-12-25 | Rasheed Wajid | Expansion and sensing tool |
US8327954B2 (en) * | 2008-07-09 | 2012-12-11 | Smith International, Inc. | Optimized reaming system based upon weight on tool |
US7699120B2 (en) * | 2008-07-09 | 2010-04-20 | Smith International, Inc. | On demand actuation system |
US7954564B2 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2011-06-07 | Smith International, Inc. | Placement of cutting elements on secondary cutting structures of drilling tool assemblies |
US7992658B2 (en) | 2008-11-11 | 2011-08-09 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Pilot reamer with composite framework |
US20100224414A1 (en) * | 2009-03-03 | 2010-09-09 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Chip deflector on a blade of a downhole reamer and methods therefore |
US7950451B2 (en) | 2009-04-10 | 2011-05-31 | Bp Corporation North America Inc. | Annulus mud flow rate measurement while drilling and use thereof to detect well dysfunction |
US8776912B2 (en) * | 2009-05-01 | 2014-07-15 | Smith International, Inc. | Secondary cutting structure |
US9062531B2 (en) | 2010-03-16 | 2015-06-23 | Tool Joint Products, Llc | System and method for measuring borehole conditions, in particular, verification of a final borehole diameter |
US8281880B2 (en) | 2010-07-14 | 2012-10-09 | Hall David R | Expandable tool for an earth boring system |
US8172009B2 (en) | 2010-07-14 | 2012-05-08 | Hall David R | Expandable tool with at least one blade that locks in place through a wedging effect |
US8550188B2 (en) | 2010-09-29 | 2013-10-08 | Smith International, Inc. | Downhole reamer asymmetric cutting structures |
US8365821B2 (en) | 2010-10-29 | 2013-02-05 | Hall David R | System for a downhole string with a downhole valve |
US20120193147A1 (en) | 2011-01-28 | 2012-08-02 | Hall David R | Fluid Path between the Outer Surface of a Tool and an Expandable Blade |
US8973679B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2015-03-10 | Smith International, Inc. | Integrated reaming and measurement system and related methods of use |
US20120273187A1 (en) | 2011-04-27 | 2012-11-01 | Hall David R | Detecting a Reamer Position through a Magnet Field Sensor |
US8978783B2 (en) | 2011-05-26 | 2015-03-17 | Smith International, Inc. | Jet arrangement on an expandable downhole tool |
US20130206401A1 (en) | 2012-02-13 | 2013-08-15 | Smith International, Inc. | Actuation system and method for a downhole tool |
US9428962B2 (en) | 2012-10-12 | 2016-08-30 | Smith International, Inc. | Selective deployment of underreamers and stabilizers |
US9328563B2 (en) | 2012-11-13 | 2016-05-03 | Smith International, Inc. | Adjustable diameter underreamer and methods of use |
US9528324B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-12-27 | Smith International, Inc. | Underreamer for increasing a wellbore diameter |
-
2008
- 2008-06-27 GB GB1002533.6A patent/GB2465504C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-06-27 GB GB1002534.4A patent/GB2465505C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-06-27 GB GB0811815A patent/GB2460096B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2009
- 2009-06-27 CN CN200980132478.7A patent/CN102137981B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2009-06-27 EP EP09769398.0A patent/EP2327857B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2009-06-27 EP EP14160393.6A patent/EP2746527B1/en active Active
- 2009-06-27 BR BRPI0915074-9A patent/BRPI0915074B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-06-27 WO PCT/ES2009/070261 patent/WO2009156552A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-06-27 MX MX2010014189A patent/MX2010014189A/en active IP Right Grant
-
2010
- 2010-09-21 GB GBGB1015759.2A patent/GB201015759D0/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-12-13 US US12/966,195 patent/US8511404B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2011
- 2011-06-16 US US13/161,723 patent/US8528668B2/en active Active
- 2011-06-16 US US13/161,806 patent/US8235144B2/en active Active
-
2013
- 2013-06-04 US US13/909,413 patent/US9447676B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2013-06-17 US US13/919,428 patent/US20130333879A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2013-07-18 US US13/945,719 patent/US9677342B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2013-07-24 US US13/949,286 patent/US20130306375A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2013-08-18 US US13/969,576 patent/US20140060933A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2014
- 2014-06-04 US US14/295,766 patent/US20140299385A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2014-06-04 US US14/295,717 patent/US9593538B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110153296A1 (en) * | 2009-12-21 | 2011-06-23 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | System and methods for real-time wellbore stability service |
US20120111559A1 (en) * | 2010-11-05 | 2012-05-10 | Aps Technology, Inc. | Method for fracturing and analyzing an earthen formation surrounding a well bore |
US20130128694A1 (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2013-05-23 | Global Microseismic Services, Inc. | Tomographic Imaging of Fracture-Fault Permeability Zones During Drilling Operations |
Cited By (43)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10087683B2 (en) | 2002-07-30 | 2018-10-02 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Expandable apparatus and related methods |
US9611697B2 (en) | 2002-07-30 | 2017-04-04 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. | Expandable apparatus and related methods |
US9482054B2 (en) | 2006-03-02 | 2016-11-01 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Hole enlargement drilling device and methods for using same |
US9719304B2 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2017-08-01 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Remotely controlled apparatus for downhole applications and methods of operation |
US10472908B2 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2019-11-12 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Remotely controlled apparatus for downhole applications and methods of operation |
US9931736B2 (en) | 2010-06-24 | 2018-04-03 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Cutting elements for earth-boring tools, earth-boring tools including such cutting elements, and methods of forming cutting elements for earth-boring tools |
US9725958B2 (en) | 2010-10-04 | 2017-08-08 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Earth-boring tools including expandable members and status indicators and methods of making and using such earth-boring tools |
US10488546B2 (en) * | 2010-12-14 | 2019-11-26 | Conocophillips Company | Autonomous electrical methods node |
US9677355B2 (en) | 2011-05-26 | 2017-06-13 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Corrodible triggering elements for use with subterranean borehole tools having expandable members and related methods |
US10576544B2 (en) | 2011-05-26 | 2020-03-03 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Methods of forming triggering elements for expandable apparatus for use in subterranean boreholes |
US9347313B2 (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2016-05-24 | Shell Oil Company | Hydraulic fracture monitoring using active seismic sources with receivers in the treatment well |
US20140290936A1 (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2014-10-02 | Peter Berkeley WILLS | Hydraulic fracture monitoring using active seismic sources with receivers in the treatment well |
US9759013B2 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2017-09-12 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Selectively actuating expandable reamers and related methods |
US9719305B2 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2017-08-01 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Expandable reamers and methods of using expandable reamers |
US9885213B2 (en) | 2012-04-02 | 2018-02-06 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Cutting structures, tools for use in subterranean boreholes including cutting structures and related methods |
US9493991B2 (en) | 2012-04-02 | 2016-11-15 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Cutting structures, tools for use in subterranean boreholes including cutting structures and related methods |
US20150267525A1 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2015-09-24 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Self-Guided Geosteering Assembly and Method for Optimizing Well Placement and Quality |
US10267137B2 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2019-04-23 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Self-guided geosteering assembly and method for optimizing well placement and quality |
US9645281B2 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2017-05-09 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Geostatistical procedure for simulation of the 3D geometry of a natural fracture network conditioned by well bore observations |
US20160209545A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2016-07-21 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | A geostatistical procedure for simulation of the 3d geometry of a natural fracture network conditioned by well bore observations |
WO2015159058A3 (en) * | 2014-04-16 | 2015-12-17 | Omega Well Monitoring Limited | A downhole device for reliable data recovery after data acquisition during downhole operation and method thereof |
US20150338543A1 (en) * | 2014-05-23 | 2015-11-26 | Reeves Wireline Technologies Limited | Relating to geological logging |
US10941647B2 (en) * | 2014-07-07 | 2021-03-09 | Conocophillips Company | Matrix temperature production logging tool and use |
WO2016028513A1 (en) * | 2014-08-22 | 2016-02-25 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | Hydraulic fracturing while drilling and/or tripping |
US10921470B2 (en) | 2015-05-20 | 2021-02-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Inversion for tectonic stress |
WO2016187237A1 (en) * | 2015-05-20 | 2016-11-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Inversion for tectonic stress |
US20180328169A1 (en) * | 2015-08-18 | 2018-11-15 | Tech Flo Consulting, Llc | Method and Apparatus for Evaluating the Potential Effectiveness of Refracing a Well |
US20190211668A1 (en) * | 2015-08-18 | 2019-07-11 | Tech Flo Consulting, Llc | Method and Apparatus for Evaluating the Potential Effectiveness of Refracing a Well |
US11613987B2 (en) | 2015-08-18 | 2023-03-28 | Tech Flo Consulting, Llc | Method and apparatus for zone testing a well |
US11078778B2 (en) * | 2015-08-18 | 2021-08-03 | Tech-Flo Consulting, LLC | Method and apparatus for zone testing a well |
US20180266243A1 (en) * | 2015-10-09 | 2018-09-20 | Darkvision Technologies Inc. | Devices and methods for imaging wells using phased array ultrasound |
US10781690B2 (en) * | 2015-10-09 | 2020-09-22 | Darkvision Technologies Inc. | Devices and methods for imaging wells using phased array ultrasound |
US11326445B2 (en) | 2015-10-09 | 2022-05-10 | Darkvision Technologies Inc. | Devices and methods for imaging wells using phased array ultrasound |
US20220282611A1 (en) * | 2016-08-18 | 2022-09-08 | Seismos, Inc. | Method for fracturing activity and intensity monitoring and pressure wave resonance analysis |
US11299980B2 (en) * | 2016-08-18 | 2022-04-12 | Seismos Inc. | Method for fracture activity monitoring and pressure wave resonance analyses for estimating geophysical parameters of hydraulic fractures using fracture waves |
US11608739B2 (en) * | 2019-07-09 | 2023-03-21 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Electrical impulse earth-boring tools and related systems and methods |
WO2021062365A1 (en) * | 2019-09-27 | 2021-04-01 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Real time monitoring of fracture driven interference |
GB2604261A (en) * | 2019-09-27 | 2022-08-31 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Real time monitoring of fracture driven interference |
GB2604261B (en) * | 2019-09-27 | 2023-07-05 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Real time monitoring of fracture driven interference |
US11802475B2 (en) | 2019-09-27 | 2023-10-31 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Real time monitoring of fracture driven interference |
CN111101931A (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2020-05-05 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Clustering perforation pipe string passing capacity calculation method of cylindrical well track model |
CN113153280A (en) * | 2020-10-22 | 2021-07-23 | 煤炭科学研究总院 | Underground coal seam hydraulic fracturing drilling pressure relief and permeability increase effect detection system and method |
US11725506B2 (en) | 2021-01-14 | 2023-08-15 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Automatic well control based on detection of fracture driven interference |
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20130333879A1 (en) | Method for Closed Loop Fracture Detection and Fracturing using Expansion and Sensing Apparatus | |
US9097820B2 (en) | Look ahead advance formation evaluation tool | |
US8215384B2 (en) | Bit based formation evaluation and drill bit and drill string analysis using an acoustic sensor | |
EP1153196B1 (en) | Casing mounted sensors | |
CN103857872B (en) | A kind of method for the hydraulically created fracture geometry for determining reservoir or target area | |
US20150083410A1 (en) | Wiper Plug for Determining the Orientation of a Casing String in a Wellbore | |
CN104903541A (en) | Systems and methods for optimized well creation in a shale formation | |
US20210388691A1 (en) | Fluid communication method for hydraulic fracturing | |
US8756018B2 (en) | Method for time lapsed reservoir monitoring using azimuthally sensitive resistivity measurements while drilling | |
US8978461B2 (en) | Apparatus and measuring stress in a subterranean formation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SMART REAMER DRILLING SYSTEMS LTD, UNITED KINGDOM Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RASHEED, WAJID;REEL/FRAME:044475/0126 Effective date: 20171222 |