US20120073980A1 - Iridium plating solution and method of plating using the same - Google Patents

Iridium plating solution and method of plating using the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120073980A1
US20120073980A1 US12/893,454 US89345410A US2012073980A1 US 20120073980 A1 US20120073980 A1 US 20120073980A1 US 89345410 A US89345410 A US 89345410A US 2012073980 A1 US2012073980 A1 US 2012073980A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
iridium
plating
plating solution
saturated
cracks
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/893,454
Inventor
Masahiro Ito
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EEJA Ltd
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US12/893,454 priority Critical patent/US20120073980A1/en
Assigned to ELECTROPLATING ENGINEERS OF JAPAN LIMITED reassignment ELECTROPLATING ENGINEERS OF JAPAN LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ITO, MASAHIRO
Publication of US20120073980A1 publication Critical patent/US20120073980A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D3/00—Electroplating: Baths therefor
    • C25D3/02—Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions
    • C25D3/50—Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of platinum group metals
    • C25D3/52—Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of platinum group metals characterised by the organic bath constituents used
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D3/00—Electroplating: Baths therefor
    • C25D3/02—Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions
    • C25D3/56—Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of alloys
    • C25D3/567—Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of alloys containing more than 50% by weight of platinum group metals

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an iridium plating solution and a method of plating using the same.
  • Iridium is a metal having high hardness and additionally exhibiting excellent corrosion resistance to high-concentration acids, aqua regia and halogens. Accordingly, the application fields of iridium include hardening agents for specific metals and catalysts as well as ornaments, and further iridium is industrially widely used as anticorrosives and materials such as electric contact materials.
  • an iridium plating solution in such applications of iridium known is an iridium plating solution using an iridium compound obtained by adding, to an iridium (III) complex salt containing a halogen as an anionic component, one or more compounds selected from the following group and by stirring the resulting mixture, the group consisting of a saturated monocarboxylic acid, a saturated monocarboxylic acid salt, a saturated dicarboxylic acid, a saturated dicarboxylic acid salt, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid salt, an amide and urea (see Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 6-316786).
  • the above-described iridium plating solution is effectively used as a practical iridium plating solution being stable and hardly decomposable and having a high current efficiency and a high plating rate.
  • iridium plating coats are applied to rhodium substrates; however, as the price of rare metals such as rhodium is escalated, a countermeasure is investigated in which the amount of rhodium used in the substrate is reduced and plating processing is performed so as for the iridium plating coat to be thick.
  • thick iridium plating coats are formed, conventional iridium plating solutions lead to particularly remarkable occurrence of cracks and electric properties are not sufficiently satisfied as the case may be.
  • the present invention has been achieved under the above-described circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to propose an iridium plating solution capable of easily forming an iridium plating coat in which the occurrence of cracks is suppressed as much as possible and an iridium plating method.
  • the iridium plating solution uses an iridium compound obtained by adding, to an iridium (III) complex salt containing a halogen as an anionic component, one or more compounds selected from the following group and by stirring the resulting mixture, the group consisting of a saturated monocarboxylic acid, a saturated monocarboxylic acid salt, a saturated dicarboxylic acid, a saturated dicarboxylic acid salt, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid salt, an amide and urea, wherein the iridium plating solution includes at least one or more of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu. The presence of at least any metal of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu in the plating solution effectively suppresses the occurrence of cracks in the iridium plating coat.
  • the content of at least one or more of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu is preferably 0.01 g/L to 10 g/L.
  • the concerned content is less than 0.01 g/L, cracks tend to occur, and when the concerned content exceeds 10 g/L, crystal growth is unstable.
  • Any metal of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu is preferably contained as a soluble metal salt in the plating solution.
  • iridium is preferably contained in a content of 1 to 200 g/L, and more preferably in a content of 10 to 20 g/L in terms of the metal iridium concentration.
  • the iridium concentration is less than 1 g/L, the upper limit of the current density is small to make the iridium plating solution hardly practically usable, and when the iridium concentration is larger than 200 g/L, the iridium plating solution is saturated to make iridium insoluble and at the same time, the cost is expensive to be practically inappropriate.
  • Examples of the adoptable iridium (III) complex salt include hexachloroiridic (III) acid salt, a hexabromoiridic (III) acid salt and a hexafluoroiridic (III) acid salt, and preferably sodium hexabromoiridate (III) and sodium hexachloroiridate (III).
  • one or more compounds selected from the following group are added preferably in a content of 0.001 to 1.0 mol/L and more preferably in a content of 0.01 to 0.2 mol/L, the group consisting of a saturated monocarboxylic acid, a saturated monocarboxylic acid salt, a saturated dicarboxylic acid, a saturated dicarboxylic acid salt, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid salt, an amide and urea.
  • the compounds adoptable as such compounds include acetic acid, disodium malonate and oxalic acid, and preferably disodium malonate.
  • the reasons for setting the addition amount of such a compound or such compounds at 0.001 to 1.0 mol/L are such that when the addition amount is less than 0.001 mol/L, the effect due to the addition is hardly exhibited, and when the addition amount exceeds 1.0 mol/L, the deposition is disturbed.
  • the iridium plating solution according to the present invention may contain, where necessary, a buffering agent for regulating the pH, such as boric acid and sulfamic acid.
  • a buffering agent for regulating the pH such as boric acid and sulfamic acid.
  • the iridium plating method according to the present invention is applied under the operation conditions that the pH is set at 1 to 8, the temperature is set at 50 to 98° C. and the current density is set at 0.01 to 3.0 A/dm 2 , and preferably under the conditions that the pH is set at 4 to 6, the temperature is set at 80 to 90° C. and the current density is set at 0.1 to 0.8 A/dm 2 .
  • the pH is set at 1 to 8 because when the pH is lower than 1, the upper limit of the current density is small to make the plating method impractical, and when the pH is higher than 8, a hydroxide is produced to cause precipitation.
  • FIG. 1 is an observation photograph of a plated surface in Example 1;
  • FIG. 2 is an observation photograph of a plated surface involving no metal addition
  • FIG. 3 is an observation photograph of a plated surface in Example 2.
  • FIG. 4 is an observation photograph of a plated surface for a Co content of 20.0 g/L in Example 2;
  • FIG. 5 is an observation photograph of a plated surface in Example 3.
  • FIG. 6 is an observation photograph of a plated surface for a Ni content of 15.0 g/L in Example 3;
  • FIG. 7 is an observation photograph of a plated surface in Example 4.
  • FIG. 8 is an observation photograph of a plated surface in Example 5.
  • Example 1 a case where Fe was added to the iridium plating solution is described.
  • the solution composition of Example 1 was as follows.
  • Disodium malonate 0.02 mol/L
  • Iron sulfate heptahydrate 0.01 g/L (in terms of iron metal)
  • Example 1 the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), disodium malonate as a dicarboxylic acid salt and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Iron sulfate heptahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Fe in a content of 0.01 g/L.
  • a 2 cm ⁇ 2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0- ⁇ m thick gold plating coat, and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0- ⁇ m thick iridium plating coat.
  • the plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 3.5 to 4.0, the solution temperature was set at 80 to 85° C. and the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm 2 .
  • the plating properties and conditions of the coated iridium plating coat were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400 ⁇ ). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 1 .
  • a sample was prepared in which an iridium plating coat was formed by using a iridium plating solution prepared without adding any one of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu.
  • the plating conditions were set as the same as the plating conditions in the case where Fe was contained. The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the Fe content was varied to be 0.005 g/L, 0.01 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 5.0 g/L and 10 g/L, and thus the crack occurrence conditions were examined; consequently, the occurrence of cracks was observed for 0.005 g/L, but no occurrence of cracks was observed for the Fe contents of 0.01 g/L or more.
  • Example 2 a case where Co was added to the iridium plating solution is described.
  • the solution composition of Example 2 was as follows.
  • Disodium citrate 0.05 mol/L
  • Cobalt sulfate heptahydrate 0.5 g/L (in terms of cobalt metal)
  • Example 2 the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), disodium citrate as a hydroxycarboxylic acid salt and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Cobalt sulfate heptahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Co in a content of 0.5 g/L.
  • iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), disodium citrate as a hydroxycarboxylic acid salt and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath.
  • Cobalt sulfate heptahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to
  • a 2 cm ⁇ 2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0- ⁇ m thick gold plating coat, and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0- ⁇ m thick iridium plating coat.
  • the plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 3.5 to 4.0, the solution temperature was set at 80 to 85° C. and the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm 2 .
  • the plating properties and conditions of the coated iridium plating coat were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400 ⁇ ). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the Co content was varied to be 0.005 g/L, 0.01 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 5.0 g/L and 10 g/L, and thus the crack occurrence conditions were examined; consequently, the occurrence of cracks was observed for 0.005 g/L, but no occurrence of cracks was observed for the Co contents of 0.01 g/L or more.
  • the Co content was set at 20.0 g/L, and the plating properties and conditions were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400 ⁇ ).
  • Example 3 a case where Ni was added to the iridium plating solution is described.
  • the solution composition of Example 3 was as follows.
  • Oxalic acid 0.05 mol/L
  • Nickel sulfate hexahydrate 0.5 g/L (in terms of nickel metal)
  • Example 3 the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), oxalic acid as a dicarboxylic acid and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Nickel sulfate hexahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Ni in a content of 0.5 g/L.
  • a 2 cm ⁇ 2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0- ⁇ m thick gold plating coat, and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0- ⁇ m thick iridium plating coat.
  • the plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 3.5 to 4.0, the solution temperature was set at 80 to 85° C. and the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm 2 .
  • the plating properties and conditions of the coated iridium plating coat were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400 ⁇ ). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 5 .
  • the Ni content was varied to be 0.005 g/L, 0.01 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 5.0 g/L and 10 g/L, and thus the crack occurrence conditions were examined; consequently, the occurrence of cracks was observed for 0.005 g/L, but no occurrence of cracks was observed for the Ni contents of 0.01 g/L or more.
  • the Ni content was set at 15.0 g/L, and the plating properties and conditions were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400 ⁇ ). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 6 . With the Ni content of 15.0 g/L, no normal deposition was attained.
  • Example 4 a case where Cu was added to the iridium plating solution is described.
  • the solution composition of Example 4 was as follows.
  • Copper sulfate pentahydrate 0.01 g/L (in terms of copper metal)
  • Example 4 the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), acetic acid as a monocarboxylic acid and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Copper sulfate pentahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Cu in a content of 0.01 g/L.
  • iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), acetic acid as a monocarboxylic acid and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Copper sulfate pentahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Cu in a content of 0.
  • a 2 cm ⁇ 2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0- ⁇ m thick gold plating coat, and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0- ⁇ m thick iridium plating coat.
  • the plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 3.5 to 4.0, the solution temperature was set at 80 to 85° C. and the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm 2 .
  • the plating properties and conditions of the coated iridium plating coat were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400 ⁇ ). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 7 .
  • the Cu content was varied to be 0.005 g/L, 0.01 g/L, 0.5 g/L and 1.0 g/L, and thus the crack occurrence conditions were examined;
  • Example 5 a case where Co was added to the iridium plating solution is described.
  • the solution composition of Example 5 was as follows.
  • Disodium malonate 0.10 mol/L
  • Cobalt sulfate heptahydrate 0.5 g/L (in terms of cobalt metal)
  • Example 5 the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexachloroiridate (III), disodium malonate as a dicarboxylic acid salt and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Cobalt sulfate heptahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Co in a content of 0.5 g/L.
  • a 2 cm ⁇ 2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0- ⁇ m thick gold plating coat, and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0- ⁇ m thick iridium plating coat.
  • the plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 3.5 to 4.0, the solution temperature was set at 80 to 85° C. and the current density was set at 0.2 A/dm 2 .
  • the plating properties and conditions of the coated iridium plating coat were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400 ⁇ ). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 8 .
  • Example 6 a case where Ni was added to the iridium plating solution and the plating conditions were varied is described.
  • the solution composition of Example 6 was as follows.
  • Oxalic acid 0.05 mol/L
  • Nickel sulfate hexahydrate 0.5 g/L (in terms of nickel metal)
  • Example 6 the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), oxalic acid as a dicarboxylic acid and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Nickel sulfate hexahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Ni in a content of 0.5 g/L.
  • a 2 cm ⁇ 2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0- ⁇ m thick gold plating coat and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0- ⁇ m thick iridium plating coat, and thus the deposition efficiency was measured.
  • the plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 2.0 to 8.5, the solution temperature was set at 40 to 95° C. and the current density was set at 0.01 to 2.0 A/dm 2 .
  • the deposition efficiency was measured when the solution temperature was set at 85° C., the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm 2 and the pH was varied.
  • the deposition efficiency was found to be 0% and no deposition occurred.
  • the pH was 3.0, the deposition efficiency was found to be 85% and no cracks were identified.
  • the pH was 4.0 to 7.0, the deposition efficiency was 95% to 100% and no cracks were identified. Further, when the pH was 8.5, the hydroxide precipitate occurred.
  • the deposition efficiency was measured when the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm 2 , the pH was set at 3.5 and the bath temperature was varied.
  • the deposition efficiency was found to be 0% and no deposition occurred.
  • the bath temperature was 50° C.
  • the deposition efficiency was found to be 35% and cracks were identified.
  • the bath temperature was 60° C. to 70° C.
  • the deposition efficiency was found to be 40% to 60% and no cracks were identified.
  • the bath temperature was 80° C. to 95° C.
  • the deposition efficiency was found to be 90% to 100% and no cracks were identified.
  • the bath temperature was increased to 99° C., the evaporation of water from the plating bath was vigorous and it was difficult to perform stable plating treatment.
  • the deposition efficiency was measured when the bath temperature was set at 85° C., the pH was set at 3.5 and the current density was varied.
  • the deposition efficiency was found to be 50% and no cracks were identified.
  • the deposition efficiency was found to be 90% to 100% and no cracks were identified.
  • the current density was 1.5 A/dm 2 , the deposition efficiency was found to be 60% and no cracks were identified.
  • the deposition efficiency was found to be 20% and cracks were identified.
  • the current density was increased to 3.5 A/dm 2 , hydrogen was evolved and no normal deposition was attained.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electroplating And Plating Baths Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

Proposed are an iridium plating solution capable of easily forming an iridium plating coat in which the occurrence of cracks is suppressed as much as possible and an iridium plating method. In the present invention, the iridium plating solution uses an iridium compound obtained by adding, to an iridium (III) complex salt containing a halogen as an anionic component, one or more compounds selected from the following group and by stirring the resulting mixture, the group consisting of a saturated monocarboxylic acid, a saturated monocarboxylic acid salt, a saturated dicarboxylic acid, a saturated dicarboxylic acid salt, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid salt, an amide and urea, wherein the iridium plating solution includes at least one or more of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to an iridium plating solution and a method of plating using the same.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • Iridium is a metal having high hardness and additionally exhibiting excellent corrosion resistance to high-concentration acids, aqua regia and halogens. Accordingly, the application fields of iridium include hardening agents for specific metals and catalysts as well as ornaments, and further iridium is industrially widely used as anticorrosives and materials such as electric contact materials.
  • As an iridium plating solution in such applications of iridium, known is an iridium plating solution using an iridium compound obtained by adding, to an iridium (III) complex salt containing a halogen as an anionic component, one or more compounds selected from the following group and by stirring the resulting mixture, the group consisting of a saturated monocarboxylic acid, a saturated monocarboxylic acid salt, a saturated dicarboxylic acid, a saturated dicarboxylic acid salt, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid salt, an amide and urea (see Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 6-316786).
  • The above-described iridium plating solution is effectively used as a practical iridium plating solution being stable and hardly decomposable and having a high current efficiency and a high plating rate.
  • Even such an excellent iridium plating solution, however, is pointed out as follows with respect to the plating properties and conditions thereof. For example, when the iridium plating solution is used for electronic parts for use in electric connection such as lead pins (see Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. Hei 7-21867), cracks occur in the iridium plating coat to cause a phenomenon in which electric properties are not sufficiently satisfied as the case may be. In the electronic parts such as the lead pins, usually iridium plating coats are applied to rhodium substrates; however, as the price of rare metals such as rhodium is escalated, a countermeasure is investigated in which the amount of rhodium used in the substrate is reduced and plating processing is performed so as for the iridium plating coat to be thick. When such thick iridium plating coats are formed, conventional iridium plating solutions lead to particularly remarkable occurrence of cracks and electric properties are not sufficiently satisfied as the case may be.
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention has been achieved under the above-described circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to propose an iridium plating solution capable of easily forming an iridium plating coat in which the occurrence of cracks is suppressed as much as possible and an iridium plating method.
  • In the present invention, the iridium plating solution uses an iridium compound obtained by adding, to an iridium (III) complex salt containing a halogen as an anionic component, one or more compounds selected from the following group and by stirring the resulting mixture, the group consisting of a saturated monocarboxylic acid, a saturated monocarboxylic acid salt, a saturated dicarboxylic acid, a saturated dicarboxylic acid salt, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid salt, an amide and urea, wherein the iridium plating solution includes at least one or more of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu. The presence of at least any metal of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu in the plating solution effectively suppresses the occurrence of cracks in the iridium plating coat.
  • In the iridium plating solution of the present invention, the content of at least one or more of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu is preferably 0.01 g/L to 10 g/L. When the concerned content is less than 0.01 g/L, cracks tend to occur, and when the concerned content exceeds 10 g/L, crystal growth is unstable.
  • Any metal of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu is preferably contained as a soluble metal salt in the plating solution.
  • In the iridium plating solution in the present invention, iridium is preferably contained in a content of 1 to 200 g/L, and more preferably in a content of 10 to 20 g/L in terms of the metal iridium concentration. When the iridium concentration is less than 1 g/L, the upper limit of the current density is small to make the iridium plating solution hardly practically usable, and when the iridium concentration is larger than 200 g/L, the iridium plating solution is saturated to make iridium insoluble and at the same time, the cost is expensive to be practically inappropriate. Examples of the adoptable iridium (III) complex salt include hexachloroiridic (III) acid salt, a hexabromoiridic (III) acid salt and a hexafluoroiridic (III) acid salt, and preferably sodium hexabromoiridate (III) and sodium hexachloroiridate (III).
  • Further, one or more compounds selected from the following group are added preferably in a content of 0.001 to 1.0 mol/L and more preferably in a content of 0.01 to 0.2 mol/L, the group consisting of a saturated monocarboxylic acid, a saturated monocarboxylic acid salt, a saturated dicarboxylic acid, a saturated dicarboxylic acid salt, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid salt, an amide and urea. Examples of the compounds adoptable as such compounds include acetic acid, disodium malonate and oxalic acid, and preferably disodium malonate. The reasons for setting the addition amount of such a compound or such compounds at 0.001 to 1.0 mol/L are such that when the addition amount is less than 0.001 mol/L, the effect due to the addition is hardly exhibited, and when the addition amount exceeds 1.0 mol/L, the deposition is disturbed.
  • The iridium plating solution according to the present invention may contain, where necessary, a buffering agent for regulating the pH, such as boric acid and sulfamic acid.
  • The iridium plating method according to the present invention is applied under the operation conditions that the pH is set at 1 to 8, the temperature is set at 50 to 98° C. and the current density is set at 0.01 to 3.0 A/dm2, and preferably under the conditions that the pH is set at 4 to 6, the temperature is set at 80 to 90° C. and the current density is set at 0.1 to 0.8 A/dm2. The pH is set at 1 to 8 because when the pH is lower than 1, the upper limit of the current density is small to make the plating method impractical, and when the pH is higher than 8, a hydroxide is produced to cause precipitation. When the temperature is lower than 50° C., deposition is made to extremely hardly occur, and when the temperature is higher than 98° C., practically unpreferably evaporation of water is vigorous. When the current density is lower than 0.01 A/dm2, the deposition rate is extremely small, and when the current density is higher than 3.0 A/dm2, the generation of hydrogen occurs to prevent the deposit from being deposited.
  • According to the present invention, it is possible to form an iridium plating coat in which the occurrence of cracks is suppressed as much as possible.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is an observation photograph of a plated surface in Example 1;
  • FIG. 2 is an observation photograph of a plated surface involving no metal addition;
  • FIG. 3 is an observation photograph of a plated surface in Example 2;
  • FIG. 4 is an observation photograph of a plated surface for a Co content of 20.0 g/L in Example 2;
  • FIG. 5 is an observation photograph of a plated surface in Example 3;
  • FIG. 6 is an observation photograph of a plated surface for a Ni content of 15.0 g/L in Example 3;
  • FIG. 7 is an observation photograph of a plated surface in Example 4; and
  • FIG. 8 is an observation photograph of a plated surface in Example 5.
    •  DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Hereinafter, the embodiments of the present invention are described in detail with reference to Examples.
    • Example 1
  • In Example 1, a case where Fe was added to the iridium plating solution is described. The solution composition of Example 1 was as follows.
  • Sodium hexabromoiridate (III): 15 g/L (in terms of iridium metal)
  • Boric acid: 40 g/L
  • Disodium malonate: 0.02 mol/L
  • Iron sulfate heptahydrate: 0.01 g/L (in terms of iron metal)
  • In Example 1, the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), disodium malonate as a dicarboxylic acid salt and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Iron sulfate heptahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Fe in a content of 0.01 g/L.
  • Then, a 2 cm×2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0-μm thick gold plating coat, and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0-μm thick iridium plating coat. The plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 3.5 to 4.0, the solution temperature was set at 80 to 85° C. and the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm2.
  • The plating properties and conditions of the coated iridium plating coat were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400×). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 1.
  • Additionally, for comparison, a sample was prepared in which an iridium plating coat was formed by using a iridium plating solution prepared without adding any one of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu. The plating conditions were set as the same as the plating conditions in the case where Fe was contained. The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 2.
  • As shown in FIG. 2, it was verified that the sample coated with the iridium plating solution not containing Fe underwent the occurrence of a large number of cracks on the surface thereof. On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 1, in the case of the iridium plating solution which was allowed to contain Fe, almost no cracks were identified.
  • Additionally, the Fe content was varied to be 0.005 g/L, 0.01 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 5.0 g/L and 10 g/L, and thus the crack occurrence conditions were examined; consequently, the occurrence of cracks was observed for 0.005 g/L, but no occurrence of cracks was observed for the Fe contents of 0.01 g/L or more.
    • Example 2
  • In Example 2, a case where Co was added to the iridium plating solution is described. The solution composition of Example 2 was as follows.
  • Sodium hexabromoiridate (III): 15 g/L (in terms of iridium metal)
  • Boric acid: 40 g/L
  • Disodium citrate: 0.05 mol/L
  • Cobalt sulfate heptahydrate: 0.5 g/L (in terms of cobalt metal)
  • In Example 2, the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), disodium citrate as a hydroxycarboxylic acid salt and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Cobalt sulfate heptahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Co in a content of 0.5 g/L.
  • Then, a 2 cm×2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0-μm thick gold plating coat, and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0-μm thick iridium plating coat. The plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 3.5 to 4.0, the solution temperature was set at 80 to 85° C. and the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm2.
  • The plating properties and conditions of the coated iridium plating coat were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400×). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 3.
  • As shown in FIG. 3, in the case of the iridium plating solution which was made to contain Co, almost no cracks were identified.
  • Additionally, the Co content was varied to be 0.005 g/L, 0.01 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 5.0 g/L and 10 g/L, and thus the crack occurrence conditions were examined; consequently, the occurrence of cracks was observed for 0.005 g/L, but no occurrence of cracks was observed for the Co contents of 0.01 g/L or more.
  • Further, the Co content was set at 20.0 g/L, and the plating properties and conditions were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400×).
  • The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 4. With the Co content of 20.0 g/L, no normal deposition was attained.
    • Example 3
  • In Example 3, a case where Ni was added to the iridium plating solution is described. The solution composition of Example 3 was as follows.
  • Sodium hexabromoiridate (III): 15 g/L (in terms of iridium metal)
  • Boric acid: 40 g/L
  • Oxalic acid: 0.05 mol/L
  • Nickel sulfate hexahydrate: 0.5 g/L (in terms of nickel metal)
  • In Example 3, the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), oxalic acid as a dicarboxylic acid and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Nickel sulfate hexahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Ni in a content of 0.5 g/L.
  • Then, a 2 cm×2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0-μm thick gold plating coat, and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0-μm thick iridium plating coat. The plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 3.5 to 4.0, the solution temperature was set at 80 to 85° C. and the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm2.
  • The plating properties and conditions of the coated iridium plating coat were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400×). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 5.
  • As shown in FIG. 5, in the case of the iridium plating solution which was made to contain Ni, almost no cracks were identified.
  • Additionally, the Ni content was varied to be 0.005 g/L, 0.01 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 5.0 g/L and 10 g/L, and thus the crack occurrence conditions were examined; consequently, the occurrence of cracks was observed for 0.005 g/L, but no occurrence of cracks was observed for the Ni contents of 0.01 g/L or more.
  • Further, the Ni content was set at 15.0 g/L, and the plating properties and conditions were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400×). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 6. With the Ni content of 15.0 g/L, no normal deposition was attained.
    • Example 4
  • In Example 4, a case where Cu was added to the iridium plating solution is described. The solution composition of Example 4 was as follows.
  • Sodium hexabromoiridate (III): 15 g/L (in terms of iridium metal)
  • Boric acid: 40 g/L
  • Acetic acid: 0.02 mol/L
  • Copper sulfate pentahydrate: 0.01 g/L (in terms of copper metal)
  • In Example 4, the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), acetic acid as a monocarboxylic acid and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Copper sulfate pentahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Cu in a content of 0.01 g/L.
  • Then, a 2 cm×2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0-μm thick gold plating coat, and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0-μm thick iridium plating coat. The plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 3.5 to 4.0, the solution temperature was set at 80 to 85° C. and the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm2.
  • The plating properties and conditions of the coated iridium plating coat were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400×). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 7.
  • As shown in FIG. 7, in the case of the iridium plating solution which was made to contain Cu, almost no cracks were identified.
  • Additionally, the Cu content was varied to be 0.005 g/L, 0.01 g/L, 0.5 g/L and 1.0 g/L, and thus the crack occurrence conditions were examined;
  • consequently, the occurrence of cracks was observed for 0.005 g/L, but no occurrence of cracks was observed for the Cu contents of 0.01 g/L or more.
    • Example 5
  • In Example 5, a case where Co was added to the iridium plating solution is described. The solution composition of Example 5 was as follows.
  • Sodium hexachloroiridate (III): 5 g/L (in terms of iridium metal)
  • Boric acid: 20 g/L
  • Disodium malonate: 0.10 mol/L
  • Cobalt sulfate heptahydrate: 0.5 g/L (in terms of cobalt metal)
  • In Example 5, the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexachloroiridate (III), disodium malonate as a dicarboxylic acid salt and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Cobalt sulfate heptahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Co in a content of 0.5 g/L.
  • Then, a 2 cm×2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0-μm thick gold plating coat, and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0-μm thick iridium plating coat. The plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 3.5 to 4.0, the solution temperature was set at 80 to 85° C. and the current density was set at 0.2 A/dm2.
  • The plating properties and conditions of the coated iridium plating coat were observed by using a metallograph (magnification: 400×). The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 8.
  • As shown in FIG. 8, in the case of the iridium plating solution which was made to contain Co, almost no cracks were identified.
    • Example 6
  • In Example 6, a case where Ni was added to the iridium plating solution and the plating conditions were varied is described. The solution composition of Example 6 was as follows.
  • Sodium hexabromoiridate (III): 10 g/L (in terms of iridium metal)
  • Boric acid: 30 g/L
  • Oxalic acid: 0.05 mol/L
  • Nickel sulfate hexahydrate: 0.5 g/L (in terms of nickel metal)
  • In Example 6, the iridium plating solution used an iridium compound obtained by adding, to the above-described sodium hexabromoiridate (III), oxalic acid as a dicarboxylic acid and by stirring the resulting mixture with a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour while the temperature of the mixture was being maintained at 85° C. by using a laboratory water bath. Nickel sulfate hexahydrate was added to the resulting iridium plating solution to allow the plating solution to contain Ni in a content of 0.5 g/L.
  • Then, a 2 cm×2 cm brass test piece was subjected to a gold strike plating treatment to form a 1.0-μm thick gold plating coat and then subjected to a formation of a 3.0-μm thick iridium plating coat, and thus the deposition efficiency was measured. The plating conditions were such that the pH was set at 2.0 to 8.5, the solution temperature was set at 40 to 95° C. and the current density was set at 0.01 to 2.0 A/dm2.
  • The deposition efficiency was measured when the solution temperature was set at 85° C., the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm2 and the pH was varied.
  • When the pH was 0.5, the deposition efficiency was found to be 0% and no deposition occurred. When the pH was 3.0, the deposition efficiency was found to be 85% and no cracks were identified. When the pH was 4.0 to 7.0, the deposition efficiency was 95% to 100% and no cracks were identified. Further, when the pH was 8.5, the hydroxide precipitate occurred.
  • Next, the deposition efficiency was measured when the current density was set at 0.5 A/dm2, the pH was set at 3.5 and the bath temperature was varied.
  • When the bath temperature was 40° C., the deposition efficiency was found to be 0% and no deposition occurred. When the bath temperature was 50° C., the deposition efficiency was found to be 35% and cracks were identified. When the bath temperature was 60° C. to 70° C., the deposition efficiency was found to be 40% to 60% and no cracks were identified. When the bath temperature was 80° C. to 95° C., the deposition efficiency was found to be 90% to 100% and no cracks were identified. When the bath temperature was increased to 99° C., the evaporation of water from the plating bath was vigorous and it was difficult to perform stable plating treatment.
  • Next, the deposition efficiency was measured when the bath temperature was set at 85° C., the pH was set at 3.5 and the current density was varied.
  • When the current density was 0.01 A/dm2, the deposition efficiency was found to be 50% and no cracks were identified. When the current density was 0.02 A/dm2 to 1.0 A/dm2, the deposition efficiency was found to be 90% to 100% and no cracks were identified. When the current density was 1.5 A/dm2, the deposition efficiency was found to be 60% and no cracks were identified. When the current density was 3.0 A/dm2, the deposition efficiency was found to be 20% and cracks were identified. When the current density was increased to 3.5 A/dm2, hydrogen was evolved and no normal deposition was attained.
  • It is possible to easily form an iridium plating coat in which the occurrence of cracks is suppressed as much as possible.

Claims (4)

1. An iridium plating solution using an iridium compound obtained by adding, to an iridium (III) complex salt containing a halogen as an anionic component, one or more compounds selected from a following group and by stirring a resulting mixture, the group consisting of a saturated monocarboxylic acid, a saturated monocarboxylic acid salt, a saturated dicarboxylic acid, a saturated dicarboxylic acid salt, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid, a saturated hydroxycarboxylic acid salt, an amide and urea, wherein the iridium plating solution comprises at least one or more of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu.
2. The iridium plating solution according to claim 1, wherein the content of at least one or more of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu is 0.01 g/L to 10 g/L.
3. An iridium plating method wherein the plating solution according to claim 1 is used, and plating is performed under the conditions that the pH is 1 to 8, the temperature is 50 to 98° C. and the current density is 0.01 to 3.0 A/dm2.
4. An iridium plating method wherein the plating solution according to claim 2 is used, and plating is performed under the conditions that the pH is 1 to 8, the temperature is 50 to 98° C. and the current density is 0.01 to 3.0 A/dm2.
US12/893,454 2010-09-29 2010-09-29 Iridium plating solution and method of plating using the same Abandoned US20120073980A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/893,454 US20120073980A1 (en) 2010-09-29 2010-09-29 Iridium plating solution and method of plating using the same

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/893,454 US20120073980A1 (en) 2010-09-29 2010-09-29 Iridium plating solution and method of plating using the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120073980A1 true US20120073980A1 (en) 2012-03-29

Family

ID=45869526

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/893,454 Abandoned US20120073980A1 (en) 2010-09-29 2010-09-29 Iridium plating solution and method of plating using the same

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20120073980A1 (en)

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050173255A1 (en) * 2004-02-05 2005-08-11 George Bokisa Electroplated quaternary alloys

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050173255A1 (en) * 2004-02-05 2005-08-11 George Bokisa Electroplated quaternary alloys

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102892924A (en) Beta-amino acid comprising electrolyte and method for the deposition of a metal layer
CN101899688B (en) Cyanide-free gold plating solution for plating gold
Armyanov et al. Electroless deposition of Ni‐Cu‐P alloys in acidic solutions
KR102575117B1 (en) Platinum electrolytic plating bath and platinum plated product
WO2017055553A1 (en) Electroplating bath for electrochemical deposition of a cu-sn-zn-pd alloy, method for electrochemical deposition of said alloy, substrate comprising said alloy and uses of the substrate
TWI391533B (en) High speed method for plating palladium and palladium alloys
CN100424232C (en) Nickel electric plating liquid
TWI445839B (en) Electroless pure palladium plating solution
TW201239139A (en) Zinc-iron alloy layer material
EP3156517B1 (en) Use of water soluble and air stable phosphaadamantanes as stabilizer in electrolytes for electroless metal deposition
CN1139676C (en) Tin-bismuth alloy electroplating bath, and electroplating method therewith
JP2009185346A (en) Highly corrosion resistant plated steel
US20120073980A1 (en) Iridium plating solution and method of plating using the same
US6852211B2 (en) Nickel electroplating solution
EP3686319A1 (en) Indium electroplating compositions and methods for electroplating indium on nickel
JP6218473B2 (en) Electroless Ni-P-Sn plating solution
KR101392627B1 (en) Electrolytic hard gold plating solution, plating method, and method for manufacturing gold-iron alloy coating
JP4855494B2 (en) Iridium plating solution and plating method thereof
TWI495767B (en) Iridium plating solution and method of plating using the same
Xia et al. Corrosion Resistance of Electrodeposited Nanocrystalline Ni from Citrate Baths
Gamburg et al. Technologies for the electrodeposition of metals and alloys: electrolytes and processes
JP2004076026A (en) Electrolytic hard gold-plating liquid and plating method using it
KR20120029634A (en) Iridium plating solution and method of plating using the same
JP2005082856A (en) Nickel-molybdenum alloy plating liquid, plating film thereof, and plated article
JP2013144835A (en) ELECTROLESS Ni-P-Sn PLATING SOLUTION

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ELECTROPLATING ENGINEERS OF JAPAN LIMITED, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ITO, MASAHIRO;REEL/FRAME:025062/0077

Effective date: 20100923

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION