US20040244368A1 - Low emission vehicle - Google Patents

Low emission vehicle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040244368A1
US20040244368A1 US10/485,751 US48575104A US2004244368A1 US 20040244368 A1 US20040244368 A1 US 20040244368A1 US 48575104 A US48575104 A US 48575104A US 2004244368 A1 US2004244368 A1 US 2004244368A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
engine
vehicle
euro
lean
less
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/485,751
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Koon Yang
Geoffrey Cathcart
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Orbital Engine Co Australia Pty Ltd
Original Assignee
Orbital Engine Co Australia Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Orbital Engine Co Australia Pty Ltd filed Critical Orbital Engine Co Australia Pty Ltd
Publication of US20040244368A1 publication Critical patent/US20040244368A1/en
Assigned to ORBITAL ENGINE COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED reassignment ORBITAL ENGINE COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CATHCART, GEOFFREY PAUL, YANG, KOON CHUL
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
    • F02D41/021—Introducing corrections for particular conditions exterior to the engine
    • F02D41/0235—Introducing corrections for particular conditions exterior to the engine in relation with the state of the exhaust gas treating apparatus
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/30—Controlling fuel injection
    • F02D41/3011—Controlling fuel injection according to or using specific or several modes of combustion
    • F02D41/3017—Controlling fuel injection according to or using specific or several modes of combustion characterised by the mode(s) being used
    • F02D41/3023—Controlling fuel injection according to or using specific or several modes of combustion characterised by the mode(s) being used a mode being the stratified charge spark-ignited mode
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00—Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/10—Internal combustion engine [ICE] based vehicles
    • Y02T10/12—Improving ICE efficiencies

Definitions

  • This invention relates to internal combustion engines and emissions standards for internal combustion engines, and more particularly, to the calibration, control and operation of direct injection engines and lean burn stratified charge engines so as to comply with certain emissions standards.
  • Direct injection (DI) engines can promise fuel economy advantages through their ability to operate as lean burn and stratified charge engines.
  • TWC's three-way catalytic converters
  • One present way of addressing this is by incorporating a further Lean NOx Trap (LNT) catalyst which acts to adsorb NOx gases emitted from the engine until the engine is operated with a rich air fuel ratio that is sufficient to reduce the NOx adsorbed by the LNT catalyst.
  • LNT Lean NOx Trap
  • a passenger vehicle having an engine equipped with a direct injection fuel system and an exhaust system comprising a catalyst with low NOx conversion efficiency under lean air fuel ratio operating conditions, the catalyst receiving engine out exhaust emissions and outputting treated exhaust emissions, the engine further comprising an electronic control unit for controlling operation of said engine and said electronic control unit adapted to operate said engine with lean air fuel ratios over more than 50% of the MVEG-B drive cycle and satisfying Euro IV emission requirements over said drive.
  • the catalyst has near zero percent NOx conversion efficiency under lean air fuel ratio operating conditions.
  • the catalyst is a three way catalyst (TWC).
  • the vehicle has a fuel consumption in the order of 8 litres per 100 kilometres or less over the drive cycle and more preferably the fuel consumption is in the order of 7.8 Litres per 100 kilometres or less.
  • the direct injection fuel system is a central injection fuel system.
  • the direct injection fuel system is a spray guided direct injection fuel system.
  • the direct injection fuel system is an air assisted fuel system.
  • the air assisted fuel system is a spray guided fuel system.
  • the air assisted fuel system is a central injection spray guided fuel system.
  • the catalyst has a volume of 110% of engine swept volume or less.
  • the catalyst has a volume in the order of 85% of engine swept volume.
  • the vehicle is adapted to operate with a lean air fuel ratio under steady state cruise conditions in the order of 50 km/h or less.
  • the vehicle operates with lean air fuel ratios of less than 25.0:1 and preferably said vehicle operates with a lean air fuel ratio in the range of 18.0:1 to 20.0:1 for vehicles speeds in the order of 50 km/h.
  • the electronic control unit is adapted to operate said engine with lean air fuel ratios over approximately 70% of the MVEG-B drive cycle.
  • the engine is adapted to operate with stoichiometric or rich air fuel ratios when the vehicle speed is greater than 50 km/hr or during transient operating conditions.
  • engine out NOx mass for lean air fuel ratios over the Euro IV drive cycle is 80% or less of the Euro IV standard.
  • the electronic control unit is programmed to operate the engine with a lean air fuel ratio for loads having a NOx mass flow rate less than the Euro IV requirement.
  • a vehicle having an internal combustion engine with a direct injection fuel system and an electronic control unit and an exhaust system with a three way catalyst wherein the electronic control unit is programmed to operate the engine with at least lean and stoichiometric air fuel ratios and wherein engine out NOx mass for lean air fuel ratios over the Euro IV drive cycle is 80% or less of the Euro IV standard whereby said vehicle has tail pipe emissions over the Euro IV drive cycle that satisfy the Euro IV requirement.
  • said catalyst has a volume of 85% or less engine swept volume (ESV).
  • ESV engine swept volume
  • said vehicle is operated with a stoichiometric air fuel ratio for engine loads equivalent to 50 km/h cruise on the vehicle's road load curve.
  • a vehicle having a lean bum internal combustion engine, an electronic control unit and an exhaust system with a three way catalyst wherein the electronic control unit is programmed to operate the engine over a Euro IV drive cycle such that 80% or less of any tail pipe NOx mass emitted by the vehicle is generated during lean operation of the engine whereby said engine satisfies the Euro IV emissions requirements.
  • any tail pipe NOx mass emitted by the vehicle is generated during stoichiometric operation of the vehicle.
  • a vehicle having an internal combustion engine with a direct injection fuel system and an electronic control unit and an exhaust system with a three way catalyst wherein the electronic control unit is programmed to operate the engine with a lean air fuel ratio for loads having a NOx mass flow rate less than the Euro IV requirement.
  • said NOx mass flow rate is 80% or less than the Euro IV requirement.
  • said vehicle has tail pipe emissions equal to or less than the Euro IV requirement.
  • FIG. 1 a is a schematic representation of an internal combustion engine capable of operating as a lean burn engine or a stratified charge engine;
  • FIG. 1 b is a pictorial representation of an exhaust system and a three way catalyst
  • FIG. 2 a is an air fuel ratio scan for an operating point with fix speed and fuelling level
  • FIG. 2 b details an alternate air fuel ratio scan for an operating point with fixed speed and fuelling level
  • FIG. 3 is a graph depicting the road load curve for the vehicle with which Euro IV emissions were satisfied using the engine of FIG. 1 a and the exhaust system of FIG. 1 b;
  • FIG. 4 a is a graph depicting the air fuel ratio of the engine of FIG. 1 when operated in a vehicle over a Euro IV drive cycle
  • FIG. 4 b depicts a portion of the graph of FIG. 4 a in greater detail.
  • the present embodiments provide direct injection lean burn and direct injection stratified charge internal combustion engines that operate with lean air fuel ratios across at least part of the MVEG-B drive cycle and that comply with Euro IV emissions requirements without the need for an exhaust system with NOx storage capability.
  • One preferred embodiment utilises a spray guided direct injection fuel system.
  • the Euro III and Euro IV emissions targets for passenger vehicles powered only by gasoline in respect of HC, CO and NOx emissions are: EC 2000 EC 2005 TEST EMISSIONS UNIT (EURO III) (EURO IV) Rev. HC g/km 0.2 0.1 ECE + NOx 0.15 0.08 EUDC CO 2.3 1.0
  • a vehicle is typically operated on a dynamometer.
  • the dynamometer is caused to operate with a specific drive cycle that simulates certain real world driving conditions.
  • Euro III and Euro IV have specific drive cycles over which the emissions referred to above are measured, these drive cycles being referred to as the ECE and the EUDC drive cycles.
  • the ECE drive cycle is repeated four times and the EUDC drive cycle is operated only once. In total, this series of drive cycles is referred to as the MVEG-B drive cycle.
  • the emissions requirements referred to above are measured over the MVEG-B drive cycle, which is approximately 11 kilometres in length.
  • tail pipe emissions The emissions that are measured are referred to as tail pipe emissions as they are emitted to atmosphere from the exhaust pipe (often referred to as the “tail pipe”) of the vehicle.
  • emissions from the engine (often referred to as “engine out” emissions) are treated by an exhaust treatment system that typically utilises a catalytic converter which promotes further reduction and oxidation of engine out emissions so that the tail pipe emissions contain a greater proportion of N 2 , O 2 , CO 2 , and H 2 O than the engine out emissions.
  • the Euro III and Euro IV emissions specify maximum levels of tail pipe emissions of hydrocarbons, carbon-monoxide and oxides of Nitrogen for various classes of vehicles.
  • the Applicant has developed certain engines which utilise a two fluid direct fuel injection system. Simple application of such fuel injection systems to four stroke engines is not, in itself, sufficient to meet these emissions targets and further refinement is required before the above emissions targets can be met. In particular, it is necessary to calibrate an engine at various speed and load operating points in order for it to meet these emissions targets. Calibration however is a multi-variable, typically non-linear problem. In a direct injection engine particularly, it involves consideration of variables such as fuel per cycle, air fuel ratio, and exhaust gas re-circulation levels.
  • FIGS. 1 a and 1 b are schematic representations of an engine 100 incorporating a dual fluid fuel injection system of the type described in the Applicant's U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,693,224, RE 36768 and PCT Patent Application No. WO 99/28621, the contents of which are included herein by reference.
  • Such an air-assist or dual fluid fuel system is particularly conducive to engine operation with a stratified fuel charge at certain engine operating points. Additional information on control strategies for use in controlling operation of such engines may also be found in the Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 4,800,862, U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,205 and are incorporated by reference.
  • the engine 100 utilises a fuel delivery injector 102 that delivers fuel directly to a combustion chamber of the engine 120 .
  • the fuel delivery injector utilises compressed air, supplied by a compressor 140 , as a propellant for injecting fuel held in a holding chamber of the delivery injector 102 into the combustion chamber.
  • the delivery injector 102 is in fluid communication with a constant supply of compressed air and fuel is metered into a holding chamber within the delivery injector 102 .
  • a fuel injector of the type commonly used on MPI/PFI vehicles may be used as a metering device for metering quantities of fuel determined by an electronic control unit 114 to the holding chamber of the delivery injector 102 .
  • the delivery injector is supplied with fuel and compressed air by either a combined fuel and air supply rail 120 or by a separate fuel supply rail and a separate air supply rail.
  • the fuel and air supply rail 120 is in communication with a fuel supply circuit that includes a fuel tank 124 , a fuel pump 128 , a fuel pressure relief valve 126 , a fuel filter 130 and a differential pressure regulator 132 .
  • the fuel and air supply rail 120 is also in communication with an air supply circuit that includes an air compressor 140 that has an air intake line 146 in communication with a silencer volume 147 and an inlet manifold 109 downstream from an air filter box 108 .
  • the compressed air supply circuit also includes an air pressure relief valve 148 and also communicates with the differential pressure regulator 132 .
  • the differential pressure regulator 132 regulates the pressure of air and fuel supplied to the air and fuel rail 120 so that the pressure of the fuel is at a predetermined level above the pressure of the compressed air so that the fuel can be metered against the pressure of the compressed air.
  • the inlet manifold 109 contains an electronic throttle 106 that is actuated by the ECU 114 in response to a driver demand signal provided by an accelerator pedal sensor 112 .
  • a charge of fuel delivered to the combustion chamber by compressed air from the delivery injector 102 is ignited at appropriate timings by a spark plug 118 .
  • the spark plug is activated upon receiving electrical energy generated by an ignition coil 116 .
  • the ignition coil is controlled by the ECU 114 .
  • the compressed air that delivers the fuel into the combustion chamber assists with atomising the fuel.
  • Typical the fuel spray has a Sauter mean diameter (SMD) of less than 18 microns and may be as low as 7 micros depending on fuelling levels.
  • SMD Sauter mean diameter
  • Raw engine exhaust gasses from combustion chambers of the engine 100 are delivered to a three way catalyst (TWC) 110 .
  • TWC 110 promotes further oxidation of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide in the exhaust gases so as to lower the level of emissions present in the engine out exhaust gasses before they pass to atmosphere.
  • the TWC also reduces NOx (oxides of Nitrogen) to N 2 when the engine is operated with a stoichiometric or rich air fuel ratio.
  • a system allowing for the purging of fuel vapour from a carbon canister 134 associated with the fuel tank 124 is also provided.
  • a carbon canister purge valve 136 communicates the carbon canister with the compressor 140 via conduit 138 .
  • the Applicant has developed such a system which is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,245,974, the contents of which are included herein by way of reference. Further detail may also be found in Brogan et al referred to above and also incorporated by way of reference.
  • vapour purge system When compared to existing MPI/PFI engines, the application of such a vapour purge system on a DI engine operated according to the preferred embodiment would enable vapour to be purged at all speeds and loads, the vapour canister capacity to be advantageously modified, and reduced purge fuelling to be effected at light loads giving improved engine control.
  • TWCs have a preferred temperature window within which they promote conversion of emissions most efficiently. This window is typically elevated relative to ambient temperatures. Accordingly, to address the issue of a cold catalyst at start-up, an alternative mode of operation is suggested such that the catalyst may very quickly attain its light-off temperature and can hence commence high efficiency conversion of the engine emissions. In this regard, and either as an alternative to operating the engine in a lean mode at idle or together therewith, it is preferable that the engine undergo a “fast light-off” mode of operation to ensure that the catalytic converter is heated to its light-off temperature as soon as possible. Such a mode of operation is described in the Applicant's U.S. Pat. No.
  • the preferred embodiment may also provide an ability to perform post-oxidation or secondary air injection upstream of the TWC 110 in the exhaust system without the need for an auxiliary air pump or injector in the exhaust system.
  • post-oxidation may be used to improve the catalyst efficiency and hence lead to a reduced level of tail-pipe emissions.
  • injection of secondary air may be effected by way of a dual injection strategy as discussed in the Applicant's PCT Patent Application No. WO 99/28621. Additional information on post oxidation during light-off operation may also be found in Brogan et al, which again is incorporated by reference.
  • the engine 100 also utilises Exhaust Gas Re-circulation (EGR) by feeding exhaust gasses from an outlet manifold 154 to the inlet manifold 109 via an EGR conduit 150 and an EGR control valve 152 .
  • EGR Exhaust Gas Re-circulation
  • Use of EGR may provide certain emissions benefits at some load points, in particular it can assist with suppression NOx emissions.
  • Engines such as the Ford ZETEC four cylinder four stoke two litre engine are suitable for modification so as to incorporate a direct injection fuel system of the type detailed above.
  • Present embodiments utilised a 2.0 Litre Ford Zetec DOHC engine installed in a Ford Mondeo GLX vehicle with an inertia weight of 1360 kg.
  • the engine had a compression ratio of 10.8.
  • the exhaust valve cam provided retarded timings.
  • Maximum exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) of 35% was provided.
  • the preferred embodiment allows engines having direct fuel injection to be sold in markets where low sulphur fuel is not readily available. Furthermore, and as alluded to hereinbefore, the cost of an LNT converter which is significantly higher than a conventional TWC, can be avoided where the DI engine is operated according to the present embodiments. Markets expected to have high sulphur fuels include the USA and Canada.
  • FIG. 1 b there is shown a pictorial representation of an exhaust system having a TWC without an LNT as utilised in achieving compliance with Euro IV.
  • the TWC is located in a close coupled position at a length of 0.35 m from the exhaust manifold, although other distances could also be utilised depending on the precise characteristics of the catalyst selected.
  • the exhaust manifold utilised a single tubular low thermal inertia construction.
  • the TWC had a volume of 85% (engine swept volume) ESV with a cell density of 400 CPI. Its cross sectional area is 118.63 mm 2 . Its minor axis is 80.8 mm, its major axis is 169.7 mm and its length is 83 mm.
  • TWC having a volume in the range of 85% to 110% of ESV would also be effective.
  • the TWC may be generally classified as being of a type currently used on MPI/PFI vehicles to achieve Euro IV emissions standards.
  • the TWC on which Euro IV was achieved had been hydrothermally aged at 1050° C., 2% O 2 , 10% H 2 O for four hours. This ageing is believed to be equivalent to a catalyst that has operated for 100,000 km. Improved emissions compliance is available with a fresh TWC that has not been aged.
  • Three way catalysts are available from Johnson Matthey of Trafalgar Square, London, United Kingdom.
  • the TWC has low NOx conversion efficiency when treating exhaust emissions derived from operation of the engine under lean air fuel ratio conditions. Typically it is said to have 0% NOx conversion efficiency -under lean operating conditions.
  • FIG. 2 a there is shown a representative air fuel ratio scan for a vehicle having a four stroke engine with an air assisted direct injection spray guided fuel system.
  • the air fuel ratio scan details engine out emissions of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, NOx and road force for different air fuel ratios when the engine is operated with the same engine speed and fuelling level per engine cycle.
  • the engine can be calibrated to produce engine out emissions over a wide range and also to transmit road force within a particular range.
  • the vehicle is operated on a dynamometer. Throttle position is varied to change the air fuel ratio. Ignition timing, fuel injection timing, exhaust gas recirculation levels are varied so as to achieve the same engine speed.
  • FIG. 2 b there are shown the NOx and road force curves of FIG. 2 a , though it should be noted that the axis for road force has been contracted to the range of 0-200 Newton and so the relative positions of the road force and NOx curves have changed.
  • Point A may be referred to as a best fuel consumption point and Point B may be referred to as a best NOx emissions point.
  • road force is approximately 110N and NOx is approximately 12 ppm.
  • road force is approximately 95N and NOx is approximately 8 ppm.
  • an operating point near Point A would be best selected and to operate with minimum NOx for optimum fuel consumption an operating point near Point B would be best selected.
  • the vehicle of Brogan et al was calibrated for best fuel consumption and optimum NOx, whereas present embodiments are calibrated for best NOx with optimum fuel consumption.
  • This selection of a best NOx calibration produced a greater fuel economy benefit than is believed available from the Brogan et al calibration
  • This increase in fuel economy benefit was available as the reduction in NOx emissions enabled the vehicle to operate with lean air fuel ratios over a greater proportion of the MVEG-B drive cycle.
  • present embodiments operated with a stoichiometric air fuel ratio over 23% of the MVEG-B cycle.
  • the embodiments also operated with an air fuel ratio between 14.6 and 20 over 33% of the MVEG-B cycle and operated with an air fuel ratio in excess of 20 over 43% of the MVEG-B cycle.
  • Fuel consumption in the order of 8.0 Litres per 100 Kilometres or less over the MVEG-B drive cycle was achieved. In particular fuel consumption in the range of 8.0 to 7.5 Litres per 100 kilometres over the MVEG-B drive cycle is believed to be provided.
  • Fuel consumption of 7.5 Litres per 100 Kilometres over the MVEG-B drive cycle represents a fuel economy benefit of approximately 13% over a base line MPI vehicle.
  • Variations in the order of 4% between vehicles could be expected for a vehicle fleet operated in accordance with the present embodiments.
  • some vehicles may show a fuel consumption benefit in the order of 9% over a base line MPI vehicle. This corresponds with a fuel consumption of 7.8 Litres per 100 Kilometres over the MVEG-B drive cycle.
  • FIG. 3 there is shown a road load curve for an embodiment being a Ford Mondeo vehicle in which was installed a direct injection engine and exhaust system of the type detailed in FIGS. 1 and 2 and on which the emissions levels detailed herein were achieved.
  • the road load curve indicates the resistance experienced by the vehicle under steady state cruise conditions at various road speeds.
  • the road load curve has superimposed thereon a second graph indicating engine out NOx flow in g/km at different road load speeds. To achieve these NOx flow rates the engine was provided with a best NOx calibration so as to minimise the engine out NOx flow rate at least over the lean operating load range.
  • the NOx flow rate is non-linear and it can be seen that at approximately the 70 km/h load point the engine out NOx flow rate has exceeded the Euro IV flow rate requirement in grams per kilometre. Accordingly the 70 km/h cruise was selected as the engine load at which stoichiometric operation should commence during the MVEG-B drive cycle. It can however be noted that the NOx flow rate at 60 km/h was less than the Euro IV requirement of 0.08 grams per kilometre, hence operation of an embodiment under lean steady state cruise conditions of 60 km/h appears to be possible.
  • the calibration that satisfied the Euro IV emissions standards with the catalyst detailed in FIG. 2 had target vehicle operation so that 80% or less of the tail pipe NOx emissions were generated under lean operating conditions and 20% or more of the tail pipe out NOx emissions were generated under stoichiometric operating conditions. This was achieved by operating the vehicle with lean air fuel ratio at cruise points on the road load curve where engine out NOx emissions were estimated to be less than the Euro IV requirement. This resulted in the engine being operated with a stoichiometric air fuel ratio at cruise points of 70 km/h or greater during the MVEG-B cycle. During the 50 km/h cruise, 35 km/h cruise, 32 km/h cruise and the 15 km/h cruise the vehicle was generally operated with a lean air fuel ratio.
  • the engine operated with a NOx flow rate of 0.00081 grams per second which corresponds with a NOx flow rate of 0.0583 g/km.
  • the engine operated with a NOx flow rate of 0.00026 g/s.
  • present embodiments operated with NOx flow rates in the range between 0.00081 g/s and 0.00026 g/s.
  • the road force at the NOx flow rate of 0.00081 g/s was in the order of 250N and at idle the road force was zero Newtons (ON).
  • An alternate embodiment may aim to operate the engine under lean operating conditions so that a NOx flow rate is 80% or less of the Euro IV requirement.
  • FIG. 4 a there is shown a graphical representation of the air fuel ratios utilised over the MVEG-B drive cycle 400 .
  • the air fuel ratios are indicated on the left hand index and correspond to the top one of the two graphs.
  • the vehicle speed over the MVEG-B drive cycle is indicated by the right hand index, which corresponds with the lower of the two graphs.
  • a horizontal broken 440 line indicates the stoichiometric air fuel ratio level.
  • a succession of near vertical lines 442 indicate where the vehicle is operated in over-run cut. Over-run cut occurs where the operator has removed their foot from the accelerator pedal and the vehicle is decelerating. Typically, the throttle is closed during over-run cut and also fuelling to the engine is cut or substantially reduced, which provides for the large air fuel ratio excursions 442 identified in the graph.
  • the MVEG-B drive cycle 400 is divided into the ECE 405 and the EUDC 410 drive cycles.
  • the ECE drive cycle 405 is in turn divided into four identical cycles, each of which is referred to as an Elementary Urban Cycle 415 .
  • the Elementary Urban Cycle 415 consists of a first 420 , a second 422 and a third 424 , and a fourth 426 steady state cruise points.
  • the first steady state cruise point 420 is 15 km/h in first gear.
  • the second steady state cruise point 422 is 32 km/h in second gear, the third steady state cruise point 424 is 50 km/h in third gear and the fourth steady state cruise 426 is 35 km/h in third gear.
  • this cycle is repeated four times in order to make up the ECE drive cycle 405 .
  • the EUDC drive cycle consists of a fifth steady state cruise point 428 which is 70 km/h in fifth gear, a sixth steady state cruise point 430 which is 50 km/h in fourth gear, a sixth steady state cruise point 432 which is again 70 km/h in fifth gear, a seventh steady state cruise point 434 which is 100 km/h in fifth gear and an eighth steady state cruise point 438 which is 120 km/h in fifth gear.
  • This Elementary Urban Cycle is linked to the air fuel ratio plot by a number of vertical lines. This is to indicate how the air fuel ratio plot (and hence engine operation) corresponds with the Elementary Urban Cycle 415 .
  • the vehicle is operated lean primarily over the ECE 405 drive cycle and hence the description of the air fuel ratio over the Elementary Urban Drive cycle 415 is instructive of the engine calibration and operating points.
  • the engine is at idle and the air fuel ratio is lean in the order of 25.0:1.
  • the vehicle is undergoing a first gear acceleration at approximately 1.04m/s 2 .and the engine is operating lean with an air fuel ratio in the order of 19.0:1.
  • the vehicle is undergoing a 15 km/h steady state cruise in first gear with an air fuel ratio in the order of 25.0:1. The vehicle then decelerates back to idle.
  • the vehicle After resting at idle for, the vehicle, at point 450 , accelerates in first gear at a rate of 0.83 m/s 2 up to a speed of 15 km/h.
  • the air fuel ratio is lean during this period in the order of 19.0:1.
  • the vehicle then changes into second gear and accelerates at a rate of 0.94 m/s 2 .
  • the engine operates with a stoichiometric air fuel ratio during this acceleration.
  • the vehicle operates with a second gear steady state cruise at 32 km/h.
  • the air fuel ratio returns to lean in the order of 20.0:1.
  • the vehicle decelerates back to being stationary and the engine enters over-run cut.
  • the air fuel ratio returns to approximately 25.0:1.
  • the vehicle at point 456 , accelerates in first gear up to a speed of 15 km/h with an air fuel ratio in the order of 19.0:1.
  • the vehicle changes into second gear and accelerates with a stoichiometric air fuel ratio at a rate of 0.62 km/h up to a speed of 35 km/h, whereupon the vehicle experiences another gear change into third gear and a stoichiometric acceleration at a rate of 0.52 km/h.
  • the vehicle reaches a speed of 50 km/h and whilst remaining in third gear, enters a steady state cruise period, whereupon the vehicle switches back to lean operation with an air fuel ratio in the order of 19.0:1.
  • the vehicle completes this steady state cruise and decelerates down to 35 km/h under over-run cut conditions.
  • the vehicle operates under steady cruise conditions at 35 km/h with a lean air fuel ratio in the order of 20.0:1. The vehicle then decelerates back to a stationary position under over-run cut conditions and completes the third Elementary Urban Cycle 415 .
  • the above calibration operates the engine with lean air fuel ratios over steady state cruise conditions up to 50 km/h.
  • the engine is operated with stoichiometric air fuel ratios during acceleration periods, particularly in second, third and fourth gears.
  • At steady state cruise speeds of 70 km/h the vehicle is operated with stoichiometric air fuel ratios.
  • the vehicle operates with a lean air fuel ratio during first gear acceleration upon commencing the cycle 410 and during the 50 km/h cruise 430 , which is performed in fourth gear.
  • the remainder of the EUDC drive cycle is performed under stoichiometric air fuel ratio operating conditions, apart from over-run cut conditions and possibly transient air fuel ratio behaviour during gear changes.
  • the graph indicates that for approximately 70 to 75% of the MVEG-B drive cycle 400 the engine operated with lean air fuel ratios and for approximately 25 to 30% of the MVEG-B drive cycle 400 the engine operated with stoichiometric air fuel ratios.
  • the lean operation includes lean steady state operating conditions and transient air fuel ratio operating conditions from lean to stoichiometric.
  • the graph also indicates that during over-run cut conditions the engine operated with air fuel ratios exceeding 25:1.
  • the transient air fuel ratio conditions were approximately 20% of the lean operating conditions, the lean steady state operating conditions were approximately 40% of the operating conditions and the over-run cut conditions were approximately 15% of the lean operating conditions.
  • Fuel consumption in the range of 8.0 to 7.5 Litres per 100 kilometres over the MVEG-B drive cycle was provided.
  • the fuel consumption over the ECE drive cycle is in the order of 10.4 Litres per 100 kilometres of the ECE drive cycle and over the EUDC drive cycle, fuel consumption in the order of 5.8 Litres per 100 kilometres of the EUDC drive cycle.
  • the calibration achieved cycle average tail pipe NOx emissions of less than the Euro IV requirement over the MVEG-B drive cycle.
  • an average engine out NOx of 0.061 g/km was produced during lean operating conditions. This represents engine out NOx during lean operation of approximately 76% of the Euro IV standard.
  • the TWC is assumed to have minimal NOx conversion efficiency under lean operating conditions and so the engine out NOx emissions under lean conditions also correspond with the tail pipe NOx emissions under lean operating conditions.
  • An average tail pipe NOx of 0.007 g/km at stoichiometric operation was produced. This represents a total engine out NOx of 190% of the Euro IV standard during ⁇ 1 (stoichiometric) operation.
  • a total average tail pipe NOx for both lean operating conditions and ⁇ 1 (stoichiometric) conditions of 0.0.068 g/km over the MVEG-B drive cycle was produced. This represents approximately 85% of the Euro IV standard. Over the ECE drive cycle total tail pipe NOx emissions of 0.136 g/km were produced and over the EUDC drive cycle tail pipe NOx of 0.027 g/km were produced.
  • Levels of exhaust gas recirculation of up to 35% are believed to be suitable when minimising NOx emissions from a direct injection engine and particularly an air assisted or dual fluid direct injection engine.
  • Alternate embodiments may calibrate stoichiometric operation of the engine so as to minimise fuel consumption without exceeding the Euro IV requirement. This providing a stratified charge or lean burn engine calibrated for minimum NOx during lean operation and minimum fuel consumption during stoichiometric operation whereby a TWC can be utilised in satisfying Euro IV emissions standards.
  • the embodiments detailed above provide low emissions vehicles capable of operating with lean air fuel ratios and of satisfying Euro IV emissions requirements without the need for NOx storage capabilities in the exhaust after treatment system.
  • Euro IV emissions requirements are satisfied by the present embodiments when operated with a three way catalyst and without NOx storage capability.
  • the embodiments provide fuel consumption in the order of 8 Litres per 100 kilometres or less.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Electrical Control Of Air Or Fuel Supplied To Internal-Combustion Engine (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas After Treatment (AREA)
  • Combustion Methods Of Internal-Combustion Engines (AREA)
  • Fuel-Injection Apparatus (AREA)
US10/485,751 2001-10-08 2002-10-08 Low emission vehicle Abandoned US20040244368A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPR8124 2001-10-08
AUPR8124A AUPR812401A0 (en) 2001-10-08 2001-10-08 An internal combustion engine
PCT/AU2002/001369 WO2003031786A1 (en) 2001-10-08 2002-10-08 A low emission vehicle

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040244368A1 true US20040244368A1 (en) 2004-12-09

Family

ID=3831952

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/485,751 Abandoned US20040244368A1 (en) 2001-10-08 2002-10-08 Low emission vehicle

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20040244368A1 (ja)
EP (1) EP1434933A1 (ja)
JP (1) JP2005504911A (ja)
AU (1) AUPR812401A0 (ja)
WO (1) WO2003031786A1 (ja)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100012103A1 (en) * 2008-07-18 2010-01-21 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for storing crankcase gases to improve engine air-fuel control
US7743752B2 (en) 2008-07-18 2010-06-29 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for improving fuel vapor purging for an engine having a compressor
US20110126520A1 (en) * 2009-12-02 2011-06-02 Hyundai Motor Company Regeneration Method for Diesel Particulate Filter
US20170021831A1 (en) * 2015-07-23 2017-01-26 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Lnt control with adaptive cruise control
US9657659B2 (en) 2015-02-20 2017-05-23 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method for reducing air flow in an engine at idle
US20180058286A1 (en) * 2016-08-31 2018-03-01 GM Global Technology Operations LLC METHOD AND APPARATUS TO MINIMIZE DEACTIVATION OF A LOW TEMPERATURE NOx ADSORBER IN AN EXHAUST AFTERTREATMENT SYSTEM
US10024251B2 (en) 2015-06-18 2018-07-17 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method for crankcase ventilation in a boosted engine
US10233871B2 (en) 2012-12-17 2019-03-19 Westport Power Inc. Air-enriched gaseous fuel direct injection for an internal combustion engine

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6058699A (en) * 1996-11-19 2000-05-09 Institut Francais Du Petrole Exhaust gas depollution system and process
US6125629A (en) * 1998-11-13 2000-10-03 Engelhard Corporation Staged reductant injection for improved NOx reduction
US6220022B1 (en) * 1997-03-06 2001-04-24 Degussa Ag Catalyst system for the treatment of exhaust gases from diesel engines
US6826906B2 (en) * 2000-08-15 2004-12-07 Engelhard Corporation Exhaust system for enhanced reduction of nitrogen oxides and particulates from diesel engines
US6857265B2 (en) * 2000-06-06 2005-02-22 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Diesel exhaust system including NOx-trap
US6877313B1 (en) * 1998-12-05 2005-04-12 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Particulate control

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AUPQ272299A0 (en) * 1999-09-08 1999-09-30 Orbital Engine Company (Australia) Proprietary Limited Exhaust gas treatment method and device
DE19955649C2 (de) * 1999-11-19 2002-01-10 Bosch Gmbh Robert Elektronische Motorsteuerung einer Brennkraftmaschine

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6058699A (en) * 1996-11-19 2000-05-09 Institut Francais Du Petrole Exhaust gas depollution system and process
US6220022B1 (en) * 1997-03-06 2001-04-24 Degussa Ag Catalyst system for the treatment of exhaust gases from diesel engines
US6125629A (en) * 1998-11-13 2000-10-03 Engelhard Corporation Staged reductant injection for improved NOx reduction
US6877313B1 (en) * 1998-12-05 2005-04-12 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Particulate control
US6857265B2 (en) * 2000-06-06 2005-02-22 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Diesel exhaust system including NOx-trap
US6826906B2 (en) * 2000-08-15 2004-12-07 Engelhard Corporation Exhaust system for enhanced reduction of nitrogen oxides and particulates from diesel engines

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8726892B2 (en) 2008-07-18 2014-05-20 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for storing crankcase gases to improve engine air-fuel control
US20100012103A1 (en) * 2008-07-18 2010-01-21 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for storing crankcase gases to improve engine air-fuel control
US20100263636A1 (en) * 2008-07-18 2010-10-21 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for improving fuel vapor purging for an engine having a compressor
US7918214B2 (en) 2008-07-18 2011-04-05 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for improving fuel vapor purging for an engine having a compressor
US9260991B2 (en) 2008-07-18 2016-02-16 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for storing crankcase gases to improve engine air-fuel control
US8353276B2 (en) 2008-07-18 2013-01-15 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for storing crankcase gases to improve engine air-fuel control
US7743752B2 (en) 2008-07-18 2010-06-29 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for improving fuel vapor purging for an engine having a compressor
US20110126520A1 (en) * 2009-12-02 2011-06-02 Hyundai Motor Company Regeneration Method for Diesel Particulate Filter
US10233871B2 (en) 2012-12-17 2019-03-19 Westport Power Inc. Air-enriched gaseous fuel direct injection for an internal combustion engine
US9657659B2 (en) 2015-02-20 2017-05-23 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method for reducing air flow in an engine at idle
US10024251B2 (en) 2015-06-18 2018-07-17 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method for crankcase ventilation in a boosted engine
US20170021831A1 (en) * 2015-07-23 2017-01-26 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Lnt control with adaptive cruise control
US10040454B2 (en) * 2015-07-23 2018-08-07 Ford Global Technologies, Llc LNT control with adaptive cruise control
US20180058286A1 (en) * 2016-08-31 2018-03-01 GM Global Technology Operations LLC METHOD AND APPARATUS TO MINIMIZE DEACTIVATION OF A LOW TEMPERATURE NOx ADSORBER IN AN EXHAUST AFTERTREATMENT SYSTEM

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2005504911A (ja) 2005-02-17
WO2003031786A1 (en) 2003-04-17
EP1434933A1 (en) 2004-07-07
AUPR812401A0 (en) 2001-11-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7111452B2 (en) Control device of hydrogen engine
US6857264B2 (en) Exhaust emission aftertreatment
US6779337B2 (en) Hydrogen fueled spark ignition engine
CN101900041B (zh) 车辆运转方法
US6588205B1 (en) Exhaust gas purifying apparatus
EP0911499B1 (en) Exhaust gas purifying device for engine
CN101042085A (zh) 增压直接喷射式发动机系统和方法
US20180355774A1 (en) Method for regenerating a particle filter in the exhaust system of an internal combustion engine, and internal combustion engine
US7278407B2 (en) Boost control for internal combustion engine using substantially carbon-free fuel
CN101749086A (zh) 用于控制火花点火直喷式发动机的排气排放的方法和设备
CN104334845A (zh) 内燃机的排气净化装置
JP3324039B2 (ja) 希薄な燃料−空気混合気で運転されるガソリン機関の有害な排気ガス放出物の減少方法
EP2591222B1 (en) Fuel injection control of an internal combustion engine
JP3334396B2 (ja) 内燃機関の排気浄化装置
US20040244368A1 (en) Low emission vehicle
US6173704B1 (en) Exhaust gas purification system of internal combustion engine
US10378427B2 (en) Nitrogen enriched air supply for gasoline compression ignition combustion
CN101463747B (zh) 发动机系统和在这种系统中用于排气处理装置再生的方法
US6913003B2 (en) Direct injected engine control strategy
CN113958389A (zh) 用于分流λ催化剂加热的系统和方法
AU2002333055A1 (en) Low emission vehicle
EP3246548A1 (en) Exhaust emission control method for an internal combustion engine
Kim et al. The emission development for lean NOx trap system to meet Tier2Bin5
Brogan et al. A new approach to meeting future European emissions standards with the orbital direct injection gasoline engine
Mundorff et al. Direct injection internal combustion engines-The Automotive industry's contribution to reduced CO2 emissions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ORBITAL ENGINE COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED, AU

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YANG, KOON CHUL;CATHCART, GEOFFREY PAUL;REEL/FRAME:016494/0051;SIGNING DATES FROM 20041208 TO 20050117

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION