US11723754B2 - System and method for monitoring optimal dental implants coupleable with an optimized implant site - Google Patents

System and method for monitoring optimal dental implants coupleable with an optimized implant site Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US11723754B2
US11723754B2 US16/486,524 US201816486524A US11723754B2 US 11723754 B2 US11723754 B2 US 11723754B2 US 201816486524 A US201816486524 A US 201816486524A US 11723754 B2 US11723754 B2 US 11723754B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
implant
parameters
dental
optimized
implant site
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US16/486,524
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20200000561A1 (en
Inventor
Silvio Franco Emanuelli
Federico Manes
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from IT102017000017978A external-priority patent/IT201700017978A1/it
Priority claimed from IT102017000017965A external-priority patent/IT201700017965A1/it
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of US20200000561A1 publication Critical patent/US20200000561A1/en
Assigned to EMANUELLI, SILVIO FRANCO reassignment EMANUELLI, SILVIO FRANCO ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MANES, Federico
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US11723754B2 publication Critical patent/US11723754B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/50—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for simulation or modelling of medical disorders
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
    • A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
    • A61B2034/101—Computer-aided simulation of surgical operations
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
    • A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
    • A61B2034/101—Computer-aided simulation of surgical operations
    • A61B2034/102—Modelling of surgical devices, implants or prosthesis
    • A61B2034/104—Modelling the effect of the tool, e.g. the effect of an implanted prosthesis or for predicting the effect of ablation or burring
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
    • A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
    • A61B2034/101—Computer-aided simulation of surgical operations
    • A61B2034/105—Modelling of the patient, e.g. for ligaments or bones
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
    • A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
    • A61B2034/108—Computer aided selection or customisation of medical implants or cutting guides
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C7/00—Orthodontics, i.e. obtaining or maintaining the desired position of teeth, e.g. by straightening, evening, regulating, separating, or by correcting malocclusions
    • A61C7/002—Orthodontic computer assisted systems
    • A61C2007/004—Automatic construction of a set of axes for a tooth or a plurality of teeth

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a computer-implemented method for monitoring dental implants.
  • the present invention further relates to a system for monitoring dental implants.
  • the present invention relates to a method/system for monitoring dental implants coupleable to an optimized implant site.
  • dental implants are designed and prepared according to the dentist's directions mainly on the basis of the experience gained.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide an easy-to-use monitoring method/system for dental implants.
  • a further object of the present invention is to provide a stable and efficient dental implant.
  • the invention confers the main technical effect of identifying a real optimal dental implant in terms of structure, for example tooth identification code, sizing, for example diameter and length, and position, e.g. angle.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the system/method according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 2 ( 2 a , 2 b , 2 c ) is a detail of a portion of the block diagram of FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 A is a schematic view of a dental implant, according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 B shows a reference system used in FIG. 3 A .
  • FIG. 3 C schematically shows a dental implant in a maxillary arch according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 4 - 6 show functions of the system/method, according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 shows a schematic view of a mandibular bone and of a simulated dental prosthesis.
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic view of greater detail of FIG. 7 .
  • FIG. 9 is a schematic view of representative measurements of the mandibular bone with respect to an ideal surgical axis.
  • FIG. 9 A shows a reference system for the measurements of FIG. 9 .
  • FIG. 10 is a schematic representation of reciprocal positions of ideal surgical axes and a prosthetic axis.
  • dental implant screw entering the mandibular/maxillary bone
  • implant site cavity in the mandible/maxilla which receives the dental implant
  • stump pin that mates with the free end of the dental implant
  • crown tooth-shaped cover that mates with the free end of the stump
  • dental prosthesis set of stump and crown
  • edentulous site volumetric space intended to receive the dental prosthesis, in particular the space between two existing teeth;
  • vestibule space between the cheeks and the gums
  • mandible bone that forms the lower scaffolding of the mouth; it houses the lower teeth in the maxillary arch and is the only moving part of the face.
  • jaw bone that forms the upper scaffolding of the mouth and houses the upper dental arch.
  • the jaw is a fixed bone, such that it doesn't move with the opening and closing of the mouth.
  • maxillary bones are also referred to as maxillary bones and in the present description, the term maxillary bone OM will be used in this sense, i.e. without excluding that the example referred to a dental prosthesis applied to the inferior arch, excludes application to the upper arch.
  • the invention describes a method of monitoring dental implants and a corresponding system of monitoring dental implants.
  • the method comprises a step f 1 of graphically simulating an anatomy of an envisaged dental prosthesis PD coupleable to a dental implant ID which can be inserted into a maxillary bone OM.
  • the simulation also shows an edentulous site LR ( FIG. 3 C ) wherein the dental prosthesis PD corresponding to an identified tooth Tn is provided.
  • the invention applies both in case the tooth Tn is missing in the edentulous site, as well as if the tooth Tn is present in the edentulous site and must be rehabilitated.
  • the dental implant ID is installed in a maxillary bone OM at the base of the edentulous site LR ( FIG. 3 C ), in a position occupied by the identified tooth Tn, in which Tn is the tooth identified in integrity conditions of the patient's mouth.
  • the graphical simulation step f 1 is performed by means of a CT scan of the oral cavity which provides data to perform a 3D reconstruction of the maxillary bones.
  • the graphic simulation is performed by means of a traditional dental prosthesis model or which may also be obtained by intra or extra-oral scanning or be virtually modeled.
  • An integrated graphic simulation is obtained by combining the intra or extra-oral or virtually-derived scanning with the 3D reconstruction obtained via CT scans.
  • the graphic simulation step f 1 is performed via computer-implemented graphic simulation means, particularly by way of a computer-implemented graphic simulation apparatus.
  • the first simulation step f 1 defines a computer-implemented mathematical graphic model wherefrom it is possible to perform innovative elaborations of the invention in order to obtain a precise and optimized simulation in terms of implementation of an implant site; the implant site thus obtained will be configured for being coupled with a corresponding dental implant.
  • the system of the invention comprises a first simulation station 1 designed to graphically simulate an anatomy of an envisaged dental prosthesis PD and a respective edentulous site LR corresponding to an identified tooth Tn, wherein the intended dental prosthesis PD is coupleable to a dental implant ID insertable into the maxillary bone OM.
  • the invention further provides a step f 2 of simulating an optimized implant site SI for the dental implant ID as a function of implant parameters PIMP of the dental implant ID and of first representative parameters PSI of the optimized implant site.
  • the simulation performed by the invention achieves technical functions typical of modern engineering work. It provides for realistic prediction of the performance of a dental implant in respect to the designed implant site which shall accommodate the former, and thereby ideally allows the dental implant to be developed so accurately such that a prototype's chances of success can be assessed before it is built.
  • the invention provides a simulation of an optimized implant site SI performing a simulation of a patient's damaged oral cavity and defines an implant site suitable for receiving a dental implant necessary to repair the highlighted damage.
  • the system of the invention comprises a second simulation station 10 designed to simulate, according to a computer-implemented graphic mode, the optimized implant site SI for the dental implant ID as a function of implant parameters PIMP of the dental implant ID and of the first parameters PSI of the optimized implant site.
  • FIG. 4 A some simulated parameters of the optimized implant site are shown in tabular form.
  • the optimized implant site SI has an at least partially cylindrical volumetric shape VSI inscribed within an envisaged circumscribing volume V.
  • the method of the invention provides for calculating an ideal prosthetic axis PI for the envisaged dental prosthesis PD as a function of the graphic simulation performed by the first simulation station 1 .
  • ideal prosthetic axis it is meant an axis crossing an ideal point of the envisaged dental prosthesis PD as a function of the type of tooth considered.
  • the ideal prosthetic axis PI for the envisaged dental prosthesis PD is obtained as the axis passing through the center pt 1 of the envisaged dental prosthesis PD.
  • the ideal prosthetic axis PI for the envisaged dental prosthesis PD is obtained as the axis passing through the palatal vertex pt 2 of a triangle that schematizes the occlusal surface of the envisaged dental prosthesis PD.
  • the ideal point pt 1 in a first case of molar and premolar teeth, the ideal point pt 1 will be at the center of the dental prosthesis PD and the crown CO, whereas, in a second case of anterior (incisor, lateral and canine) teeth, the ideal point pt 2 will be at the apex of the palatal angle.
  • the method involves obtaining two pairs of measurements of the simulated dental prosthesis PD, in particular a first pair of cervical measures and a second pair of apical measurements that are defined in terms of statistical data dependent on the position of the tooth and the anatomy of the arch opposed to that in which the dental prosthesis PD is being inserted.
  • the pair of measurements is calculated in the vestibulo-language and antero-posterior direction.
  • the first pair of measurements is performed at the crown of the dental prosthesis PD and in the vestibular-tongue and anterior-posterior direction.
  • the second pair of measurements is performed at the collar of the dental prosthesis PD and in the vestibular-tongue and anterior-posterior direction. Alternatively or additionally, the pair of measurements is calculated in a mesiodistal direction.
  • the first pair of measurements is performed at the crown of the dental prosthesis PD, whereas the second pair of measurements is performed at the collar of the dental prosthesis PD.
  • the method involves calculating the prosthetic axis PI as a straight line passing through the intersection points of the segments of each pair of measurements.
  • the ideal prosthetic axis also passes through a second point at the cervical level that corresponds to the center of the tooth for premolars and molars and at the apex of the triangle for the anterior teeth.
  • ideal axis it is meant an axis configured to perform an ideal halving of the bone quantity of the maxillary bone OM at an edentulous site LR.
  • the method further provides for calculating a first cervical distance CT and a first apical distance ET of the maxillary bone OM at the edentulous site LR as a function of the graphic simulation in which the distances are calculated in a first direction relative to the maxillary bone OM;
  • the method further provides for calculating a second cervical distance CW and a second apical distance EW of the maxillary bone OM at the edentulous site LR as a function of the graphical simulation, in which the distances are calculated in a second direction to the maxillary bone OM.
  • the first cervical distance CT is detected at a first cervical height q 1 with respect to a reference height, e.g. relative to the upper bone margin, visible in FIG. 6 .
  • the first apical distance ET is detected at a first apical height q 2 with respect to a reference height, in particular with respect to the inferior maxillary nerve NAI in the posterior mandible, or to another anatomic structure to be taken into account.
  • the method further provides to calculate an ideal surgical axis CI ( FIG. 8 ) on the maxillary bone OM as a function of the cervical distances CT, CW and the apical distances CW, EW.
  • the steps described so far for the simulation of the implant site SI are performed taking into account that the ideal prosthetic axis PI and the ideal surgical axis CI determine a reference system REF_ID ( FIG. 10 ) for the dental implant ID and that the ideal axis prosthetic PI and the ideal surgical axis CI are offset by an offset angle ⁇ .
  • REF_ID FIG. 10
  • the method further provides for calculating a bone height HR of the maxillary bone OM as a function of the calculated first cervical distance CT and first apical distance ET, wherein the bone height HR is representative of a bone availability of the maxillary bone OM at the edentulous site LR.
  • the simulation is performed at least according to the implant parameters PIMP.
  • the implant parameters PIMP comprise at least:
  • the first cervical distance CTi and the first apical distance ETi of the maxillary bone OM are simulated at the edentulous site LR, corresponding to the envisaged dental prosthesis PD, in a first direction with respect to the maxillary bone OM.
  • the second cervical distance CW and the second apical distance EW of the maxillary bone OM are simulated at the edentulous site LR, corresponding to the envisaged dental prosthesis PD, in a second direction with respect to the maxillary bone OM.
  • the first bone height HRi is representative of a bone availability of the maxillary bone OM at the edentulous site LR.
  • variable deviation angle ⁇ i is included between the ideal surgical axis CI of the maxillary bone OM and the ideal prosthetic axis PI passing through the dental prosthesis PD.
  • the simulation is also carried out as a function of the first representative parameters PSI of the optimized implant site SI.
  • the first representative parameters PSI of the optimized implant site SI include at least:
  • the first representative parameters PSI exhibits variable values as a function of the variable deviation angle ⁇ i and of a global rating R.
  • the first representative parameters PSI include one or more rating values (R ⁇ i, RDT, RLI, RRLRC, RPO, RDO) of the optimized implant site SI defined as a function of a comparison between the first representative parameters PSI and reference threshold values.
  • the optimized implant site SI is identified with a global rating R defined as a combined function of one or more of the rating values (R ⁇ i, RDT, RLI, RRLRC, RPO, RDO).
  • the simulation of the optimized implant site SI is implemented according to the global rating R of the optimized implant site SI defined as a function of one or more of:
  • the global rating R of the optimized implant site SI is indicative of the compliance of the optimized implant site SI with predefined reference thresholds of the first representative parameters PSI.
  • the invention provides a step f 3 of calculating a plurality of dental implants MIi as a function of comparing at least the first parameters PSI of the optimized implant site SI and representative parameters PIE of existing dental implants.
  • the parameters PIE are stored in a database IE.
  • the calculation is performed by a first processing station 40 configured to calculate a plurality of dental implants MIi as a function of comparing at least the first parameters PSI of the optimized implant site SI with representative parameters PIE of existing dental implants.
  • the invention provides a subsequent step f 4 of calculating a plurality of optimal dental implants BMIii as a function of comparing between the first representative parameters PSI and the second representative parameters PIE when the global rating R of the optimized implant site SI is minimized.
  • the invention provides identifying a dental implant ID for the optimized implant site SI which performs a simulation of a patient's damaged oral cavity, and defining a plurality of optimal dental implants BMIi applicable to such optimized implant site SI.
  • the system of the invention comprises a first processing station ( 40 ) capable of calculating parameters of a plurality of optimal dental implants BMIi as a function of comparing between at least the parameters of the optimized implant site PSI and the representative parameters PIE of existing dental implants based on a minimized rating R of the optimized implant site PSI, wherein the rating R is indicative of the optimized implant site PSI being in compliance with predefined reference thresholds of the representative parameters PSI.
  • FIG. 4 B shows some calculated optimal dental implants BMIi in table form, in particular a first optimal implant BMI 0 , a second optimal implant BMI 1 and a third optimal implant BMI 2 , based on respective calculated parameters.
  • the optimal dental implants BMIi are characterized by PBMI parameters.
  • the parameters PBMI comprise:
  • the invention advantageously provides a step f 5 of selecting a usable implant UI from the plurality of optimal dental implants BMIi.
  • the system of the invention comprises a second processing station 30 comprising in turn a first calculation unit 301 adapted to select the usable implant UI from the plurality of optimal dental implants BMIi.
  • selection is made based on a clinician's clinic expertise.
  • the usable implant UI will be characterized by first parameters PUI.
  • the first parameters PUI comprise:
  • the first parameters PUI further comprise
  • FIG. 5 depicts the first parameters PUI in tabular form as well as the simulated parameters of the optimized implant site.
  • the invention further provides a step f 6 of calculating first deviations ⁇ UIi between the parameters of the optimized implant site PSI and the first parameters PUI of the usable implant UI.
  • the technical effect achieved is an estimate of the conformity between the parameters automatically calculated for the optimized implant site SI and the parameters of the usable implant obtained also as a function of the clinician's clinic expertise; this allows having a first matching between the simulated implant and the implant actually used.
  • the second processing station 30 comprises a second calculation unit 302 ( FIG. 1 ) capable of calculating first deviations ⁇ UI between the parameters of the optimized implant site PSI and the first parameters PUI of the usable implant UI.
  • FIG. 6 shows an example of first deviations ⁇ UI in table form between the parameters of the usable implant UI and the simulated parameters of the optimized implant site SI.
  • the invention provides a further step f 7 of calculating second deviations ⁇ BMij between
  • the calculation of the second parameters is performed on at least one first plurality P 1 of optimal dental implants BMij.
  • the first plurality P 1 of optimal dental implants BMij comprises a first plurality n of implants with rating RBMij next to the rating RPSI of the optimized implant site PSI.
  • the implants with the best rating are the ones taken into account, i.e. the ones being most proximate to the ideal case of the optimized implant site, regardless of respective rating values.
  • This solution may be defined as a proximity solution.
  • the calculation of the second parameters is performed on at least one second plurality P 2 of optimal dental implants BMij.
  • the second plurality P 2 of optimal dental implants BMij comprises a second plurality m of optimal dental implants with rating RBMij being lower than a predefined R_pred rating value.
  • This solution can be defined as a statistical solution.
  • the calculation of the second parameters is performed by the second processing station 30 , in particular by a third processing unit 303 suitable for calculating second deviations ⁇ BMij between:
  • FIG. 6 shows examples of second deviations ⁇ BMij in table form between the parameters of optimal dental implants BMI and the simulated parameters of the optimized implant site SI.
  • the invention provides, at this point, a step f 8 of calculating optimized real parameters PSIR of the optimized implant site SI in a combined function of the first deviations ⁇ UI and second deviations ⁇ BMij.
  • a processing unit 304 is adapted to calculate the optimized real parameters PSIR of the optimized implant site SI.
  • the technical effect achieved is concerned with the determination of real and consolidated values based on which the sector guidelines are to be adapted.
  • the method comprises a further step f 9 of overlapping the optimized implant site SI, defined in step f 8 as a function of the calculated real optimized parameters PSIR, on the optimized implant site SI simulated in step f 2 as a function of the implant parameters PIMP and the first parameters PSI of the optimized implant site SI.
  • the technical effect achieved is a verification of the stability of the biological result obtained (bone volumes) in the application of the method/monitoring system of the invention.
  • the second processing station 30 comprises, for this purpose, an overlapping module 305 ( FIG. 1 ) configured to overlap the optimized implant site SI, defined in step f 8 , on the optimized implant site SI simulated in step f 2 , in order to obtain the effects described herein.
  • the overlapping module 305 is configured to execute step f 9 of overlapping:
  • the step of calculating the optimized real parameters PSIR of the optimized implant site SI provides various implementation solutions.
  • calculating actual optimized parameters PSIR comprises a step f 71 of comparing the first deviations ⁇ UI and the average M of the second deviations ⁇ BMij.
  • a first calculation module 304 A in the processing unit 304 is configured to perform the step f 71 .
  • the step f 71 of comparing the first deviations ⁇ UI and the average M of the second deviations ⁇ BMij includes the sub-steps of:
  • the step f 71 if the value of the calculated average M is lower than the first deviations ⁇ UI, i.e. if the module of the average M is smaller than the first deviations ⁇ UI, the step f 71 provides a further sub-step of calculating the optimized real parameters PSIR by modifying the parameters of the optimized implant site PSI with the value of the average M of the second deviations ⁇ BMij being summed or subtracted.
  • PSIR PSI+
  • the step f 7 of calculating second deviations ⁇ BMij comprises:
  • the third processing unit 303 is able to calculate second positive deviations ⁇ BMij+ between:
  • the calculation is made when the diameter value of the optimal implant is greater than the value of the diameter of the optimized implant site PSI.
  • the invention provides, based on aforementioned step f 8 , calculating optimized real oversized parameters PSIR+ of the optimized implant site SI as a combined function of the first deviations ⁇ UI and second positive deviations ⁇ BMij+.
  • the processing unit 304 is able to calculate the optimized real oversized parameters PSIR+ of the optimized implant site SI.
  • the third processing unit 303 is suitable for calculating second negative deviations ⁇ BMij ⁇ between:
  • the calculation is made when the value of the optimal implant diameter is less than the value of the optimized implant site diameter PSI.
  • the invention provides, based on aforementioned step f 8 , calculating optimized real oversized parameters PSIR ⁇ of the optimized implant site SI as a combined function of the first deviations ⁇ UI and second negative deviations ⁇ BMij ⁇ .
  • the processing unit 304 is adapted to calculate the optimized real oversized parameters PSIR ⁇ of the optimized implant site SI.
  • the calculation of the optimized real undersized parameters PSIR ⁇ takes into account only the negative values of the second deviations ⁇ BMij for calculating the average M with respect to the parameters value of the optimized implant site.
  • calculating optimized real parameters PSIR comprises a step f 72 of comparing the first deviations ⁇ UI and the median MD of the second deviations ⁇ BMij.
  • a second calculation module 304 B in the processing unit 304 is configured to perform step f 72 .
  • the median is the value that occupies the central position in an ordered set of data.
  • the median is a measure which is little affected by the presence of abnormal data and due to this it is used when one wishes to mitigate the effect of extreme values.
  • the step f 72 of comparing the first deviations ⁇ UI and the median (MD) of the second deviations ⁇ BMij comprises the steps of:
  • the step f 72 provides an additional sub-step of calculating the optimized real parameters PSIR by modifying the parameters of the optimized implant site PSI with the value of the median MD being added or subtracted.
  • PSIR PSI+
  • calculating real optimized parameters comprises a step f 73 of comparing the first deviations ⁇ UI and the mode MO of the second deviations ⁇ BMij.
  • a third calculation module 304 C within the processing unit 304 , is configured to execute step f 73 .
  • the mode is the most recurring value in a data set.
  • the step f 73 of comparing the first deviations ⁇ UI and the mode MO of the second deviations ⁇ BMij comprises the steps of:
  • the step f 72 provides a further sub-step of calculating the optimized real parameters PSIR by modifying the parameters of the optimized implant site PSI by summing or subtracting the mode MO value.
  • the PSIR values obtained in one or more of the described modalities guarantee the technical effect of an objective identification in respect to an actual optimal dental implant thereby making it possible to adapt the guidelines on which dental implant construction is based, to optimal real and objective values.
  • the described monitoring method is adapted to be computer-implemented.
  • the invention further provides a computer program which, when in use on a processing means, performs one or more of the steps of the computer-implemented method.
  • the optimal real dental implant ID is adapted to be realized as a function of the optimized real parameters PSIR according to one of the solutions shown.
  • first processing station 40 the second processing station 30 and the processing unit 304 are described as divided into separate functional modules (memory modules or operating modules) at the only purpose of describing the functions in a clear and complete manner.
  • processing stations/units may consist of a single electronic device, suitably programmed to perform the described functions, and the different modules may correspond to hardware entities and/or software routines being part of the programmed device.
  • such functionalities may be performed by a plurality of electronic devices whereon said functional modules can be distributed.
  • the processing stations/units may also use one or more processors to execute the instructions contained in the memory modules.
  • the aforementioned functional modules may also be distributed on different computers locally or remotely depending on the architecture of the network they reside in.
  • the systems further comprise all memory and/or operating modules and/or means required to implement the functions as described in the methods thereof.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Dental Prosthetics (AREA)
US16/486,524 2017-02-17 2018-02-19 System and method for monitoring optimal dental implants coupleable with an optimized implant site Active 2040-05-18 US11723754B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IT102017000017978A IT201700017978A1 (it) 2017-02-17 2017-02-17 Metodo e sistema di identificazione di impianto dentale per un sito implantare ottimizzato
IT102017000017965 2017-02-17
IT102017000017978 2017-02-17
IT102017000017965A IT201700017965A1 (it) 2017-02-17 2017-02-17 Metodo e sistema di simulazione di sito implantare ottimizzato
IT102017000069221 2017-06-21
IT201700069221 2017-06-21
PCT/IB2018/050993 WO2018150384A1 (fr) 2017-02-17 2018-02-19 Système et procédé de surveillance d'implants dentaires optimaux pouvant être accouplés à un site d'implantation optimisé

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2018/050993 A-371-Of-International WO2018150384A1 (fr) 2017-02-17 2018-02-19 Système et procédé de surveillance d'implants dentaires optimaux pouvant être accouplés à un site d'implantation optimisé

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US18/220,786 Continuation US12070370B2 (en) 2017-02-17 2023-07-11 System and method for monitoring optimal dental implants coupleable with an optimized implant site

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20200000561A1 US20200000561A1 (en) 2020-01-02
US11723754B2 true US11723754B2 (en) 2023-08-15

Family

ID=61628376

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/486,524 Active 2040-05-18 US11723754B2 (en) 2017-02-17 2018-02-19 System and method for monitoring optimal dental implants coupleable with an optimized implant site
US18/220,786 Active US12070370B2 (en) 2017-02-17 2023-07-11 System and method for monitoring optimal dental implants coupleable with an optimized implant site

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US18/220,786 Active US12070370B2 (en) 2017-02-17 2023-07-11 System and method for monitoring optimal dental implants coupleable with an optimized implant site

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US11723754B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3582717B1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2964033T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2018150384A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020000346A1 (fr) 2018-06-29 2020-01-02 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Procédé et appareil de détection d'intrus
US11495028B2 (en) * 2018-09-28 2022-11-08 Intel Corporation Obstacle analyzer, vehicle control system, and methods thereof

Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999026540A1 (fr) 1997-11-24 1999-06-03 Michael Klein Ensemble gabarit chirurgical et procede de forage et d'installation d'implants dentaires
EP1449489A1 (fr) 2001-10-31 2004-08-25 Imagnosis Inc. Appareil de simulation medical et procede de commande d'afficheur d'image en trois dimensions inclus dans cet appareil de simulation medical
JP2005168518A (ja) 2003-12-05 2005-06-30 Osaka Industrial Promotion Organization 人工歯根埋入位置特定装置、人工歯根埋入位置特定方法、ガイド部材製造装置、検知装置、ドリル、義歯製造装置、コンピュータプログラム及び記録媒体
WO2007009719A1 (fr) 2005-07-15 2007-01-25 Materialise Dental N.V. Methode (semi)-automatique de preparation en vue de la pose d'implants dentaires
US20070099147A1 (en) 2001-04-13 2007-05-03 Orametrix, Inc. Method and system for comprehensive evaluation of orthodontic treatment using unified workstation
US20090111071A1 (en) 2007-10-25 2009-04-30 Pou Yu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Method for designing a digital abutment for dental implant
US20090325127A1 (en) 2006-03-24 2009-12-31 Sicat Gmbh & Co. Kg Method and device for producing tooth prosthesis parts
TW201108995A (en) 2009-09-10 2011-03-16 nai-chang Yu Positioning auxiliary apparatus for dental implantation
EP2322114A1 (fr) 2009-11-16 2011-05-18 Nobel Biocare Services AG Système et procédé de planification d'une première et deuxième restauration dentaire
US20110136080A1 (en) 2008-01-25 2011-06-09 Stephan Holzner Method for modeling an individual dental prosthesis
WO2012004937A1 (fr) 2010-07-07 2012-01-12 有限会社シエスタ Procédé de conception d'implant, dispositif de conception d'implant et programme de conception d'implant
US20120203366A1 (en) 2003-01-02 2012-08-09 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Method for automatically fabricating a dental superstructure for attachment to an implant
US8562338B2 (en) 2007-06-08 2013-10-22 Align Technology, Inc. Treatment progress tracking and recalibration
US20140234803A1 (en) 2011-09-26 2014-08-21 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Method for validating a drilling template for producing an implant-borne tooth replacement
US20140329194A1 (en) 2013-05-05 2014-11-06 Rohit Sachdeva Orthodontic treatment planning using biological constraints
US20140342302A1 (en) * 2004-11-26 2014-11-20 Cadent Ltd. Method and system for providing feedback data useful in prothodontic procedures associated with the intra oral cavity
US9111372B2 (en) 2006-08-11 2015-08-18 Visionary Technologies, Inc. System and method for object identification and anomaly detection
DE102014215103A1 (de) 2014-07-31 2016-02-04 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Verfahren zur virtuellen Nachbearbeitung eines Gingivamodells
US9411910B2 (en) 2010-07-12 2016-08-09 Centre De Recherche Medico Dentaire Am Inc. Dental analysis method and system
US11045293B2 (en) 2013-10-28 2021-06-29 3Shape A/S Method for applying design guides

Patent Citations (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999026540A1 (fr) 1997-11-24 1999-06-03 Michael Klein Ensemble gabarit chirurgical et procede de forage et d'installation d'implants dentaires
US20070099147A1 (en) 2001-04-13 2007-05-03 Orametrix, Inc. Method and system for comprehensive evaluation of orthodontic treatment using unified workstation
EP1449489A1 (fr) 2001-10-31 2004-08-25 Imagnosis Inc. Appareil de simulation medical et procede de commande d'afficheur d'image en trois dimensions inclus dans cet appareil de simulation medical
US20120203366A1 (en) 2003-01-02 2012-08-09 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Method for automatically fabricating a dental superstructure for attachment to an implant
JP2005168518A (ja) 2003-12-05 2005-06-30 Osaka Industrial Promotion Organization 人工歯根埋入位置特定装置、人工歯根埋入位置特定方法、ガイド部材製造装置、検知装置、ドリル、義歯製造装置、コンピュータプログラム及び記録媒体
US20140342302A1 (en) * 2004-11-26 2014-11-20 Cadent Ltd. Method and system for providing feedback data useful in prothodontic procedures associated with the intra oral cavity
US20120239364A1 (en) * 2005-07-15 2012-09-20 Fadi Glor Method for (semi-) automatic dental implant planning
KR20140005337A (ko) 2005-07-15 2014-01-14 머티어리얼리스 덴탈 엔.브이. 자동화 또는 반자동화 치과용 임플란트 계획을 위한 방법
WO2007009719A1 (fr) 2005-07-15 2007-01-25 Materialise Dental N.V. Methode (semi)-automatique de preparation en vue de la pose d'implants dentaires
US20090325127A1 (en) 2006-03-24 2009-12-31 Sicat Gmbh & Co. Kg Method and device for producing tooth prosthesis parts
US9111372B2 (en) 2006-08-11 2015-08-18 Visionary Technologies, Inc. System and method for object identification and anomaly detection
US8562338B2 (en) 2007-06-08 2013-10-22 Align Technology, Inc. Treatment progress tracking and recalibration
US20090111071A1 (en) 2007-10-25 2009-04-30 Pou Yu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Method for designing a digital abutment for dental implant
US20110136080A1 (en) 2008-01-25 2011-06-09 Stephan Holzner Method for modeling an individual dental prosthesis
TW201108995A (en) 2009-09-10 2011-03-16 nai-chang Yu Positioning auxiliary apparatus for dental implantation
US20120282567A1 (en) 2009-11-16 2012-11-08 Nobel Biocare Services Ag System and method for planning a first and second dental restoration
EP2322114A1 (fr) 2009-11-16 2011-05-18 Nobel Biocare Services AG Système et procédé de planification d'une première et deuxième restauration dentaire
WO2012004937A1 (fr) 2010-07-07 2012-01-12 有限会社シエスタ Procédé de conception d'implant, dispositif de conception d'implant et programme de conception d'implant
US9411910B2 (en) 2010-07-12 2016-08-09 Centre De Recherche Medico Dentaire Am Inc. Dental analysis method and system
US20140234803A1 (en) 2011-09-26 2014-08-21 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Method for validating a drilling template for producing an implant-borne tooth replacement
US9566137B2 (en) 2011-09-26 2017-02-14 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Method for validating a drilling template for producing an implant-borne tooth replacement
US20140329194A1 (en) 2013-05-05 2014-11-06 Rohit Sachdeva Orthodontic treatment planning using biological constraints
US11045293B2 (en) 2013-10-28 2021-06-29 3Shape A/S Method for applying design guides
DE102014215103A1 (de) 2014-07-31 2016-02-04 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Verfahren zur virtuellen Nachbearbeitung eines Gingivamodells
US20180206949A1 (en) 2014-07-31 2018-07-26 Dentsply Sirona Inc. Method for the virtual secondary machining of a gingiva model

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Avrampou, et al., "Virtual Implant Planning in the Edentulous Maxilla: Criteria for Decision Making of Prosthesis Design", Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 24, 2013, pp. 152-159.
Block, Micael S., "Dental Implants: The Last 100 Years", CrossMark, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 76, No. 1, 2018, pp. 11-26.
Buser, et al., "Optimizing Esthetics for Implant Restorations in the Anterior Maxilla: Anatomic and Surgical Considerations", The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2004, pp. 43-61.
Moon, et al., "Clinical Problems of Computer-Guided Implant Surgery", Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 38, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1-6.
Rajput, et al., "A Brief Chronological Review of Dental Implant History", International Dental Journal of Students Research, vol. 4, No. 3, Oct. 2016, pp. 105-107.
Rojas-Vizcaya, Fernando, "Biological Aspects as a Rule for Single Implant Placement. The 3A-2B Rule: A Clinical Report", Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 22, No. 7, 2013, pp. 575-580.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3582717B1 (fr) 2023-08-09
WO2018150384A1 (fr) 2018-08-23
EP3582717A1 (fr) 2019-12-25
US20240115356A1 (en) 2024-04-11
ES2964033T3 (es) 2024-04-03
US12070370B2 (en) 2024-08-27
EP3582717C0 (fr) 2023-08-09
US20200000561A1 (en) 2020-01-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US12070370B2 (en) System and method for monitoring optimal dental implants coupleable with an optimized implant site
RU2416364C2 (ru) Способ автоматического планирования внутричелюстного зубного имплантата
Gómez-Polo et al. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study
US20190362033A1 (en) Method and Apparatus for Dental Articulation
US8706672B2 (en) Computer-assisted creation of a custom tooth set-up using facial analysis
US11576758B2 (en) Simulation method and system for an optimized implant site
EP3998985B1 (fr) Articulation virtuelle en planification de traitement orthodontique et dentaire
KR20210048756A (ko) 교정 디자인 방법 및 그 장치
Liu et al. Virtual occlusal definition for orthognathic surgery
JP7170933B2 (ja) 歯科治療のための仮想咬合モデル
EP3582715B1 (fr) Procédé et système d'identification d'un implant dentaire pour un site d'implant optimisé
RU2760086C1 (ru) Способ диагностики аномалии высоты прикуса для выбора тактики ортопедического лечения
Schmalzl et al. Evaluating the influence of palate scanning on the accuracy of complete-arch digital impressions–An in vitro study
Elkorashie et al. Comparison Between Dental and Basal Arch Forms in Subjects with Different Vertical Skeletal Patterns Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study
Omar Farouq Three dimensional biometric guide in determining maxillary tooth position and arch form/Omar Farouq Tawfiq
Tawfiq Three Dimensional Biometric Guide in Determining Maxillary Tooth Position and Arch Form
Parker et al. Teamwork in Implant Dentistry: The Provision of a Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
BR102015005724A2 (pt) índice de funcionalidade do dente
TH98925B (th) ระบบสำหรับการจำลองและวางแผนการจัดฟัน พร้อมจำลองตำแหน่งรากฟันเทียม ด้วยโมเดลฟันปูนปาสเตอร์

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SMAL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: APPLICATION DISPATCHED FROM PREEXAM, NOT YET DOCKETED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

AS Assignment

Owner name: EMANUELLI, SILVIO FRANCO, ITALY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MANES, FEDERICO;REEL/FRAME:063795/0677

Effective date: 20230526

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE