TW202100037A - Smoking product filter to which technology for reducing smell on hands and bad breath is applied and smoking product including the same - Google Patents

Abstract

A filter for smoking articles to which hand odor and bad breath reduction technology is applied of the present invention comprises: a first filter having an upstream end coupled to a smoking material portion of a smoking article; a first wrapper surrounding the first filter; a second filter coupled to a downstream end of the first filter; a second wrapper surrounding the second filter; and a coupling wrapper wrapping the first and second filters so as to couple the first and second filters. The first filter comprises a first capsule comprising a first perfume and the second filter comprises a second capsule comprising a second perfume.

Description

Filter for smoking article suitable for hand odor and bad breath reduction technology and smoking article containing the same

The present invention relates to a filter for smoking articles and a smoking article containing the same, and more specifically, to a filter for smoking articles containing two capsules and a structure based on them in order to reduce hand odor and bad breath. Smoking articles containing it.

The smoke generated during smoking is contaminated with the fingers of the smoker holding the cigarette filter, and it can also cause bad breath after smoking.

Therefore, there is a need to develop a filter and smoking article that can minimize the smell of smoke on the hand during smoking and can also reduce bad breath after smoking.

technical problem

The present invention was developed to solve the above-mentioned problems. The object of the present invention is to provide a filter containing two capsules and a smoking article containing the same.

The purpose of the present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned technical problems. Through the following description, those with ordinary knowledge in the field can clearly understand the unmentioned or other purposes.

Solution to the problem

In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the embodiment of the present invention provides a filter for smoking articles applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, including: a first filter, the upstream end of the first filter is combined with the smoking material part of the smoking article ; A first wrapping paper to surround the first filter; a second filter to be combined with the downstream end of the first filter; a second wrapping paper to surround the second filter; and a combined wrapping paper to combine the first filter and The second filter surrounds the first filter and the second filter, wherein the first filter contains a first capsule containing the first fragrance, and the second filter contains a second capsule containing the second fragrance.

The first fragrance and the second fragrance may be different materials from each other. The second flavor may be one selected from the group consisting of apple mint flavor, orange flavor, strawberry flavor, wine flavor and mango flavor. As an example, the first flavor may be mango flavor, and the second flavor may be one selected from apple mint flavor, wine flavor, and mango flavor.

The first wrapping paper and the combined wrapping paper may be roll paper that has not undergone oil-resistant treatment, and the second wrapping paper may be oil-resistant roll paper that has undergone oil-resistant treatment.

At least one of the first wrapping paper and the bonding wrapping paper may be a porous roll paper having a porosity equal to or greater than 6500 CU.

At least one of the first wrapping paper and the bonding wrapping paper may be a porous roll paper having a porosity equal to or greater than 24000 CU.

The first capsule and the second capsule may be formed at positions separated from each other by 10 mm to 14 mm, respectively.

The second filter may be a filter that is perfumed with a third perfume that is the same as or different from the first perfume or the second perfume. As an example, the first flavor may be mango flavor, the second flavor may be one selected from apple mint flavor, wine flavor and mango flavor, and the third flavor may be green apple vanilla flavor.

In addition, another embodiment of the present invention provides a smoking article suitable for hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, which is characterized by comprising: a smoking material part surrounded by a smoking material wrapping paper; a first filter, the first filter The upstream end is combined with the smoking material part and is surrounded by the first wrapping paper; the second filter is combined with the downstream end of the first filter and is surrounded by the second wrapping paper; the wrapping paper is combined to combine the first filter and the second The filter surrounds the first filter and the second filter; and the tipping wrapper surrounds at least a part of the smoking material part, the first filter and the second filter by combining at least a part of the smoking material part, the first filter and the second filter. A filter and a second filter, wherein the first filter contains a first capsule containing a first fragrance, and the second filter contains a second capsule containing a second fragrance.

The tipping wrapper may include a first perforated area and a second perforated area, the first perforated area being located in an area overlapping the first filter, and the second perforating area being located in an overlapping area with the second filter.

At least a part of the first perforated area may overlap the first capsule, and the second perforated area may be located upstream of the second capsule.

The first perforated area may include a plurality of first holes (holes) and a plurality of second holes, the first holes are formed along the outer peripheral surface of the tipping wrapper, and the second holes are along the tipping wrapper downstream of the first hole. The second perforated area may include a plurality of third holes and a plurality of fourth holes. The third hole is formed along the outer peripheral surface of the tipping packaging paper, and the fourth hole is formed along the tipping device downstream of the third hole. The outer peripheral surface of the wrapping paper is formed, the first hole and the second hole may be formed in the tipping wrapping paper, and the third hole and the fourth hole may be formed by penetrating the tipping wrapping paper, combining the wrapping paper and the second wrapping paper.

The tipping wrapper may have a porosity of 190 CU to 210 CU in the first perforated area where the first hole and the second hole are formed.

The second hole may be located at a position separated from the first hole in the downstream direction by 1.5 mm to 2.5 mm, and the fourth hole may be located at a position separated from the third hole in the downstream direction by 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm.

The third hole may be located at a position separated from the second hole in the downstream direction by 9 mm to 11 mm. The first hole may be located at a position separated from the upstream end of the tipping wrapper by 10 mm to 13 mm in the downstream direction, and the second hole may be located at a position separated from the downstream end of the second filter in the upstream direction by 20 mm to 23 mm.

In some embodiments, the circumference of the smoking article may be 14mm to 19mm.

Alternatively, the circumference of the smoking article may be 22.5mm to 26.5mm.

In some embodiments, when smoking the smoking article in a state where the first capsule and the second capsule are broken, the sidestream smoke components collected in the area overlapping the first filter on the outer surface of the tipping wrapper may contain optional components. From D-Limonene (D-Limonene), 1-Hexanol (1-Hexanol), 3-hexen-1-ol (Z)-(3-Hexen-1-ol (Z)-), Decanoic acid (Decanoic acid), methyl ester (methyl ester), geraniol (Geranyl Alcohol), 1,6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl (1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3, At least one of 7-dimethyl-) and 2(3H)-furanone, 5-hexyldihydro-(2(3H)-Furanone, 5-hexyldi hydro-). Among the components of sidestream smoke, the detection amount of 2(3H)-furanone, 5-hexyldihydro-(2(3H)-Furanone, 5-hexyldihydro-) can be greater than 1,6-octadien-3-ol ,3,7-Dimethyl (1,6-0ctadien-3-ol,3,7-dimethyl-) detection amount. In sidestream smoke components, the detection amount of 1-Hexanol can be greater than the detection amount of decanoic acid and methyl ester (Decanoic acid, methyl ester).

Effect of invention

According to the embodiment of the present invention, by adopting the structure of the smoking article including the first filter including the first capsule and the second filter including the second capsule, the hand odor and bad breath produced by the smoker after smoking can be reduced.

Furthermore, by using roll paper with different characteristics as the wrapping paper surrounding the first filter and the second filter, and appropriately setting the positional relationship between the first perforated area and the second perforated area, the first capsule The effect of reducing hand odor caused by the rupture of the second capsule is maximized, and the liquid in the second capsule can be prevented from being directly delivered to the smoker’s mouth due to the rupture of the second capsule, causing the smoker to feel uncomfortable or due to the leakage of mainstream smoke. Satisfaction of smokers decreases.

In addition, the content and type of fragrance contained in the first capsule are appropriately set, so that the speed at which the fragrance is transferred to the finger through the wrapper surrounding the first filter after the first capsule is broken.

Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. The advantages and features of the present invention and the methods for realizing them can be clarified through the drawings and the embodiments described in detail below. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described below, and can be implemented in various forms that are different from each other. This embodiment is only used to enable the present invention to be fully disclosed for those with ordinary knowledge in the technical field of the present invention. Can fully understand the scope of the invention, the scope of the invention is determined through the scope of patent application of the invention. Throughout the specification, the same reference numerals refer to the same constituent elements.

If no special definition is made, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used in this specification can be used as meanings that can be commonly understood by those with ordinary knowledge in the technical field of the present invention. In addition, the commonly used terms that are defined in the dictionary will not be abnormal or excessively interpreted without a clear special definition.

And, as used herein, the singular form is intended to also include the plural form, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that when used in this specification, the terms "comprising" and/or "including" designate the existence of the stated features, wholes, steps, operations, elements and/or parts, but do not exclude one or more other The existence or addition of features, wholes, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.

It should be understood that although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe each unit, these units should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one unit from another.

Throughout the specification, "smoking product" may refer to products capable of generating aerosol, such as cigarettes (cigarettes), cigars, and the like. The smoking article may contain an aerosol-generating substance or aerosol-forming substrate. In addition, smoking articles may include solid materials based on tobacco raw materials, such as tobacco leaf tobacco, pipe tobacco, reconstituted tobacco, and the like. Smoking materials may contain volatile compounds.

In addition, throughout the specification, "upstream" or "upstream direction" refers to the direction away from the mouth of the user who smokes the smoking article 100, and "downstream" or "downstream direction" refers to the direction close to the smoking article 100. The direction of the user’s mouth. For example, in the smoking article 100 shown in FIG. 2, the smoking material portion 120 is located upstream of the filters 112, 114 or in the upstream direction.

In addition, in this specification, a case where the smoking product 100 is a burning cigarette is described as an example, but the present invention is not limited to this. Of course, the smoking product 100 may be an aerosol generating device such as an electronic cigarette (not shown in the figure). Out) heated cigarettes used together.

Figure 1 is a diagram showing a schematic structure of a filter for smoking articles according to some embodiments of the present invention.

1, the filter 110 for smoking articles may include a first filter 112, a second filter 114, a first wrapping paper 112a, a second wrapping paper 114a, a first capsule 112c, a second capsule 114c, and a combination Wrapping paper 116.

The filter 110 for the smoking article may be an area that is arranged downstream of the smoking material part and passes through before the user sucks the aerosol material generated in the smoking material part.

The first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be formed of various materials, for example, the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be cellulose acetate filters. The first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may have the same specifications and composition, but the present invention is not limited thereto. For example, the first filter 112 is a cellulose acetate filter that does not use fragrance materials for fragrance treatment, and the second filter 114 is a filter that uses fragrance materials for fragrance treatment, for example, a transfer jet nozzle system (transfer jet nozzle system, TJNS) filter.

In some embodiments, the respective lengths of the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be appropriately adopted in the range of 4 mm to 30 mm, and the respective diameters of the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be 5 mm. The range of to 8 mm is appropriately adopted, but the present invention is not limited to this. Preferably, each length of the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be about 15 mm, and each diameter of the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be about 5.4 mm.

In some embodiments, the first filter 112 and/or the second filter 114 may be a tubular structure containing a cavity inside. In this case, the diameter of the cavity included in the first filter 112 and/or the second filter 114 may be an appropriate diameter in the range of 2 mm to 4.5 mm, but the present invention is not limited thereto. In addition, the first filter 112 and/or the second filter 114 may be made by inserting a structure such as a film or a tube having the same or different materials in the interior (for example, a cavity).

The hardness of the first filter 112 and/or the second filter 114 can be adjusted by adjusting the content of the plasticizer when the first filter 112 and/or the second filter 114 are manufactured.

Triacetin (triacetin) can be used as a plasticizer, and the content of triacetin relative to the total weight of the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 can be 5 to 15 weight percent, but the type of plasticizer and The content is not limited to this, but can be appropriately adjusted as needed.

The first filter 112 includes a first capsule 112c, and the second filter 114 includes a second capsule 114c. The first capsule 112c and/or the second capsule 114c may have a structure in which the content solution containing the fragrance is surrounded by a film. For example, the first capsule 112c and/or the second capsule 114c may have a spherical shape or a cylindrical shape.

The material forming the film of the first capsule 112c and/or the second capsule 114c may be starch and/or a gelling agent. For example, gellan gum or gelatin can be used as a gelling agent. In addition, the gelling aid may be further used as a material for forming the film of the first capsule 112c and/or the second capsule 114c. Here, for example, calcium chloride can be used as a gelling aid. In addition, a plasticizer may be further used as a material for forming the film of the first capsule 112c and/or the second capsule 114c. Here, glycerin and/or sorbitol can be used as a plasticizer. In addition, the colorant may be further used as a material for forming the film of the first capsule 112c and/or the second capsule 114c.

The content solution in the first capsule 112c and/or the second capsule 114c may contain flavors such as menthol and plant essential oils.

In some embodiments, the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c may respectively contain selected from mango flavor, wine flavor, mojito lime flavor, apple mint flavor, orange flavor, strawberry flavor, green apple vanilla flavor, apple mango flavor. A spice in the flavor and sweet mango flavor. Here, the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c may contain different kinds of flavors, but the present invention is not limited thereto. For example, the first capsule 112c may contain a mango flavored flavor, and the second capsule 114c may contain an apple mint flavored flavor.

On the other hand, in order to maximize the speed at which the fragrance contained in the first capsule 112c passes through the wrapping paper 112a, 116, and 130 to the finger after the first capsule 112c is ruptured, the fragrance contained in the first capsule 112c is The content may be about 20% to 50% by weight relative to the total weight of the capsule, and the flavor may be a volatile fruit-based flavor that can be easily released to the outside of the wrapping paper.

In some embodiments, as a solvent for the fragrance of the content solution contained in the first capsule 112c and/or the second capsule 114c, for example, medium chain fatty acid triglyceride (MCTG) may be used . In addition, the content solution may contain other additives such as pigments, emulsifiers, and thickeners.

The first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be wrapped by wrapping paper 112a, 114a, 116. More specifically, the first filter 112 may be wrapped by a first wrapping paper 112a, the second filter 114 may be wrapped by a second wrapping paper 114a, and the first filter 112 and the second filter may be wrapped by a bonding wrapping paper 116. . In other words, the first filter 112 wrapped by the first wrapping paper 112a and the second filter 114 wrapped by the second wrapping paper 114a are further wrapped by the bonding wrapping paper 116 and physically combined.

The first wrapping paper 112a and the bonding wrapping paper 116 may be made of ordinary roll paper that has not undergone oil-resistant treatment. For example, the first wrapping paper 112a and the bonding wrapping paper 116 may be porous or non-porous rolled paper. For example, the first wrapping paper 112a and the combined wrapping paper 116 may be non-porous roll paper with a porosity of about 10 CU to 20 CU per unit of the Cooperation Center for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA), or It is a porous web with a porosity equal to or greater than about 6500 CU (for example, 24000 CU).

The first wrapping paper 112a and the combined wrapping paper 116 can be applied to the same roll paper, but the present invention is not limited to this, and may be applied to roll paper having different characteristics. For example, one of the first wrapping paper 112a and the combined wrapping paper 116 may be a porous roll paper, and the other wrapping paper may be a non-porous roll paper.

The first wrapping paper 112a and the bonding wrapping paper 116 may be made of roll paper that has not undergone oil-resistant treatment. That is, the first wrapping paper 112a and the bonding wrapping paper 116 may be made of roll paper that has not undergone oil-resistant treatment, so that the first capsule 112c is ruptured by a smoker to be released to the outside of the first capsule 112c through the first capsule 112c. The wrapping paper 112a is transferred to the smoker's hand.

The second wrapping paper 114a may be made of roll paper having oil resistance. That is, the second wrapping paper 114a may be made of oil-resistant roll paper to prevent the capsule content solution that is ruptured by a smoker to be released to the outside of the second capsule 114c from passing through the second wrapping paper 114a. In some embodiments, the inner side of the second wrapping paper 114a may further include aluminum foil.

As shown in Figure 2, the above-mentioned filter 110 for smoking articles is arranged downstream of the smoking material part 120 to serve as a filter that passes through before the user sucks the aerosol material generated in the smoking material part 120 effect. Hereinafter, the smoking article 100 including the filter 110 for the smoking article will be described in detail.

Figure 2 is a diagram showing a schematic structure of a smoking article using filters for smoking articles according to some embodiments of the present invention, and Figure 3 is a central axis direction portion of the smoking article according to some embodiments of the present invention Sectional view.

In FIGS. 2 and 3, the same reference numerals as those in FIG. 1 denote the same members, and for convenience of description, repeated description will be omitted here.

2 and 3, the smoking article 100 may include a smoking material portion 120, a smoking material wrapper 120a, a filter 110 for the smoking article, and a tipping wrapper 130. The filter 110 for smoking articles may include a first filter 112, a second filter 114, a first wrapper 112a, a second wrapper 114a, a first capsule 112c, a second capsule 114c, and a combined wrapper 116.

The smoking material part 120 may contain an aerosol generating substance. For example, the smoking material part 120 may contain shredded tobacco.

In some embodiments, the aerosol generating substance may include at least one of glycerin, propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol, and oleyl alcohol.

The smoking material portion 120 may have a long extending rod shape, and its length and diameter may be varied. For example, the length of the smoking material portion 120 may be about 15 mm to 70 mm, and the diameter may be about 5 mm to 9 mm.

In some embodiments, the smoking material portion 120 may include other additive materials such as flavoring agents, wetting agents, and/or acetate compounds. For example, the flavoring agent may include licorice, sucrose, fructose syrup, isosweet, cocoa, lavender, cinnamon, cardamom, celery, fenugreek, cascaria, sandalwood, bergamot, geranium, honey flavor, Rose oil, vanilla, lemon oil, orange oil, peppermint oil, cinnamon, coriander, cognac, jasmine, chamomile, menthol, cinnamon, ylang ylang, salvia, spearmint, ginger, coriander or coffee. In addition, the wetting agent may also include glycerin or propylene glycol.

In some embodiments, the smoking material portion 120 may include mixing the tobacco raw material with a solvent and various additives to form a slurry shape after grinding, and then drying to form a sheet, and processing the sheet to form a block such as a stick. Shaped recombinant tobacco material. For example, the smoking material portion 120 includes a plurality of tobacco material threads, one of which has a length of about 10 mm to 14 mm (for example, 12 mm), a width of about 0.8 mm to 1.2 mm (for example, 1 mm), and a thickness of about 0.08 mm to 0.12 mm. (For example, 0.1 mm), but the present invention is not limited to this.

The density of the tobacco material filled in the smoking material part 120 can be increased by making the smoking material part 120 contain a plurality of strand materials for processing the shape of a wide tobacco sheet, thereby increasing the amount of aerosol generation, and smoking of the smoking material part 120 The characteristics can be improved.

The smoking material part 120 may be wrapped by a smoking material wrapping paper 120a. The smoking material wrapping paper 120a may be made of the same roll paper as the first wrapping paper 112a or the combined wrapping paper 116 described with reference to Fig. 1, but the present invention is not limited to this.

The smoking material portion 120 wrapped by the smoking material wrapping paper 120 a and the filters 112 and 114 wrapped by the bonding wrapping paper 116 may be combined and wrapped by the tipping wrapping paper 130. That is, the tipping wrapper 130 may surround at least a part (for example, the downstream partial area) of the smoking material wrapper 120a and the periphery of the bonding wrapper 116. In other words, at least a part of the smoking material portion 120 and the filters 112 and 114 may be further packaged by the tipping wrapper 130 and physically combined.

In some embodiments, the length 130L1 of the tipping wrapper 130 may be about 33 mm to 37 mm. On the premise that the length of the filter 110 for the smoking article is 30 mm, the length 130L2 of the tipping wrapper 130 overlapping the smoking material portion 120 may be about 3 mm to 7 mm.

The tipping wrapper 130 may be made of ordinary roll paper. For example, the tipping wrapper 130 may be a porous roll paper or a non-porous roll paper. For example, the tipping wrapper 130 may be a non-porous roll paper having a porosity of about 10 CU to 20 CU, or a porous roll paper having a porosity equal to or greater than about 6500 CU (for example, 24000 CU).

The tipping wrapper 130 may be made of the same roll paper as the first wrapper 112a or the combined wrapper 116, but the present invention is not limited thereto. For example, the tipping wrapping paper 130 may be a non-porous roll paper, and the first wrapping paper 112a and/or the bonding wrapping paper 116 may be a porous roll paper.

The tipping wrapper 130 may be made of roll paper that has not undergone oil-resistant treatment. That is, the tipping wrapper 130 may be made of roll paper that has not undergone oil-resistant treatment, so that the first capsule 112c is ruptured by a smoker to be released to the outside of the first capsule 112c through the first wrapper 112a and combined The wrapping paper 116 and the tipping wrapping paper 130 are transferred to the smoker's hand. In addition, the tipping wrapper 130 may be coated with sweeteners such as sucralose, citric acid and the like.

In some embodiments, the tipping wrapper 130 may be added with predetermined materials. An example of the predetermined material may be silicon, but the present invention is not limited thereto. For example, silicon has characteristics such as heat resistance with little temperature change, non-oxidation resistance, resistance to various chemicals, water repellency to water, or electrical insulation. However, even if it is not silicon, any material having the above-mentioned characteristics can be coated or coated on the tipping wrapper 130 without limitation.

The tipping wrapper 130 can prevent the burning phenomenon of the filter 110 for smoking articles. For example, when the smoking material portion 120 is burned to a portion adjacent to the filter 110 for smoking articles, even the filter 110 for smoking articles may be burned. Even in this case, since the tipping wrapper 130 contains a non-combustible material, it is possible to prevent the burning phenomenon of the filter 110 for smoking articles.

The smoking article 100 may have a long extending rod shape, and its length and diameter may be changed.

In some embodiments, the length of the smoking article 100 may be about 45 mm to 100 mm, the diameter may be about 4 mm to 6 mm (for example, about 5.4 mm), and the circumference may be about 14 mm to 19 mm (for example, about 17 mm). The length of the smoking material portion 120 may be about 70 mm, the length 112L of the first filter 112 may be about 15 mm, and the length 114L of the second filter 114 may be about 15 mm, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

In some other embodiments, the diameter of the smoking article 100 may be about 7 mm to 9 mm (for example, about 7.8 mm), and its circumference may be about 22.5 mm to 26.5 mm (for example, about 24.5 mm).

The first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c may have a spherical shape, and the diameter 112c_D of the first capsule 112c and the diameter 114c_D of the second capsule 114c may be about 2.6 mm to 3.0 mm. In some embodiments, the diameter 112c_D of the first capsule 112c and the diameter 114c_D of the second capsule 114c may be the same, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

The first capsule 112c may be arranged at a position where an ordinary smoker grasps the smoking article 100 when smoking. Preferably, the first capsule 112c may be located at the downstream end of the second filter 114, that is, a position spaced from the downstream end of the smoking article 100 in the upstream direction by approximately 18 mm to 27 mm. As a more specific example, the center point of the first capsule 112c may be located at an interval of about 21 mm to 24 mm in the upstream direction from the downstream end of the smoking article 100, and the upstream end of the first capsule 112c may be located downstream from the smoking article 100 The ends are spaced about 22.5 mm to 25.5 mm in the upstream direction, and the downstream end of the first capsule 112c may be positioned about 19.5 mm to 22.5 mm in the upstream direction from the downstream end of the smoking article 100.

The first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c may have a separation distance Cap_D of about 10 mm to 14 mm. In other words, the first capsule 112c may be located at a position spaced from the second capsule 114c by about 10 mm to 14 mm in the upstream direction.

The second perforated area 114P may be formed on the wrapping paper 114a, 116, 130 located at the portion covering the second filter 114. As shown in Figure 3, the second perforated area 114P may have double perforations, that is, it may have a plurality of first holes 114P1 formed along the outer peripheral surface of the tipping wrapper 130 and along the joints downstream of the first hole 114P1. A plurality of second holes 114P2 are formed on the outer peripheral surface of the packaging paper 130, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, different from that shown in Figure 3, only one of the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 may be provided in the second perforated area 114P (single perforation), or may be in addition to the plurality of first holes 114P1 and 114P2. Additional holes other than the one hole 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 may be further provided in the second perforated area 114P.

For example, the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 may respectively include four to ten holes (holes), and these holes may be formed at certain intervals along the outer peripheral surface of the tipping wrapper 130, but this The invention is not limited to this. The diameter of each hole may be about 0.02 mm to 0.08 mm (for example, 0.05 mm), but the present invention is not limited thereto.

The holes can be formed by an on-line perforation method, that is, by using non-porous tipping wrappers to manufacture cigarettes and then perforating the filter part. A laser can be used to perform on-line perforation, but the present invention is not limited to this. As mentioned above, when the line is perforated, as shown in Figure 3, the hole can not only be formed in the tipping wrapper 130, but can also extend to the combined wrapper 116, the second wrapper 114a, and then extend to the second filter 114 A part of the area outside of the second filter 114 so that the outside air can flow from the outside to the inside of the second filter 114 through the second perforated area 114P. The external air introduced through the second perforation 114P can be mixed with mainstream smoke and delivered to the smoker.

In some embodiments, the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 may have a separation distance 114Pw of about 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm. In other words, the plurality of first holes 114P1 may be spaced from the plurality of second holes 114P2 by about 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm in the upstream direction.

In some embodiments, the plurality of first holes 114P1 may be separated from the upstream end of the tipping wrapper 130 by about 22mm to 25mm (114P_TEd), and the plurality of second holes 114P2 may be separated from the downstream end of the second filter 114 by about 9mm. To 12mm (114P_MEd).

As shown in Figure 3, the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 may be located in an area that does not overlap with the second capsule 114c, that is, upstream of the second capsule 114c.

Figure 4 is a partial cross-sectional view of a smoking article in the direction of the central axis according to some embodiments of the present invention.

In Fig. 4, the same reference numerals as those in Figs. 1 to 3 denote the same members, and for convenience of description, repeated description will be omitted here.

4, the smoking article 200 may include a smoking material portion 120, a smoking material wrapper 120a, a filter 110 for the smoking article, and a tipping wrapper 230, and the filter 110 for the smoking article may include a first filter The filter 112, the second filter 114, the first wrapping paper 112a, the second wrapping paper 114a, the first capsule 112c, the second capsule 114c, and the combined wrapping paper 116.

The first perforated area 212P may be formed in the tipping wrapper 230 of the smoking article 200. As shown in Figure 4, the first perforated area 212P may have double perforations, that is, it may have a plurality of first holes 212P1 formed along the outer peripheral surface of the tipping wrapper 230 and along the joints downstream of the first hole 114P1. A plurality of second holes 212P2 are formed on the outer peripheral surface of the packaging paper 130, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, different from the one shown in Figure 4, only one of the plurality of first holes 212P1 and the plurality of second holes 212P2 may be provided in the first perforated area 212P (single perforation), or in addition to the plurality of second holes Additional holes other than one hole 212P1 and the plurality of second holes 212P2 may be further provided in the first perforated area 212P.

The plurality of first holes 212P1 and the plurality of second holes 212P2 may be formed at intervals along the outer peripheral surface of the tipping wrapper 130, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

The holes may be formed by an off-line perforation method, that is, by using pre-perforated tipping wrappers 230 to manufacture cigarettes. A laser can be used to perform out-of-line perforation, but the present invention is not limited to this.

By forming a plurality of first holes 212P1 and/or a plurality of second holes 212P2, the porosity of the tipping wrapper 230 in the first perforated area 212P can be about 190 CU to 210 CU. In other words, the plurality of first holes 212P1 and/or the plurality of second holes 212P2 may be perforated so that the porosity of the tipping wrapper 230 is approximately 190 CU to 210 CU. This is because when the porosity of the tipping wrapper 230 is less than about 190 CU, the actual benefit is less in terms of the effect of increasing the transfer rate of the capsule content solution. When the porosity of the tipping wrapper 230 is about 210 CU or When larger, mainstream smoke may leak through the first perforated area 212P.

As described above, when perforating outside the line, the porosity of the tipping wrapper 230 in the first perforation area 212P becomes approximately 190 CU to 210 CU, so that, as shown in Figure 4, the hole is only formed in the tipping wrapper. 230, without extending to combine the wrapping paper 116 and the first wrapping paper 112a. As a result, the smoker ruptures the first capsule 112c to be released to the outside of the first capsule 112c, the capsule content solution can be better delivered to the smoker's hand, and the hole does not extend to combine the wrapping paper 116 and the first wrapping paper 112a Therefore, it is possible to prevent mainstream smoke from leaking to the outside of the smoking article 200.

In some embodiments, the plurality of first holes 212P1 and the plurality of second holes 212P2 may have a separation distance 212Pw of about 1 mm to 3 mm. In other words, the plurality of first holes 212P1 may be spaced from the plurality of second holes 212P2 in the upstream direction by about 1 mm to 3 mm.

In some embodiments, the spacing distance 212Pw between the plurality of first holes 212P1 and the plurality of second holes 212P2 of the first perforated area 212P may be the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 of the second perforated area 114P The separation distance 114Pw is about 1.5 to 3 times (for example, 2 times). For example, the separation distance 212Pw may be about 2 mm, and the separation distance 114Pw may be about 1 mm, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

In some embodiments, the plurality of first holes 212P1 may be about 10mm to 13mm (212P_Ted) away from the upstream end of the tipping wrapper 230, and the plurality of second holes 212P2 may be away from the downstream end of the second filter 114 20mm to 23mm (212P_MEd).

In some embodiments, the distance Per_D between the plurality of second holes 212P2 of the first perforated area 212P and the plurality of first holes 114P1 of the second perforated area 114P may be about 9 mm to 10 mm.

On the other hand, as shown in Figure 4, unlike the plural first holes 114P1 and the plural second holes 114P2 of the second perforated area 114P, the plural first holes 212P1 and the plural second holes of the first perforated area 212P The two holes 212P2 are located in an area overlapping the first capsule 112c, so that the capsule content solution that the smoker ruptures to be released to the outside of the first capsule 112c can be better delivered to the smoker's hand.

Hereinafter, the structure of the present invention and the effects therefrom will be described in more detail through examples and comparative examples. However, these examples are only used to describe the present invention more specifically, and the scope of the present invention is not limited by these examples.

Example 1

For the sake of example, the filter part of the cigarette prepared in the experiment was cut and separated. The first filter and the second filter are combined to the smoking material part using tipping paper. The first filter contains a first capsule containing mango flavor and is surrounded by roll paper that has not undergone oil resistance treatment and is made of cellulose acetate. The above-mentioned second filter contains a second capsule containing apple mint flavor and is surrounded by oil-resistant roll paper with oil-resistant treatment and made of cellulose acetate material.

At this time, the tipping paper used includes out-of-line perforations in the area overlapping with the first capsule. After being combined with the tipping paper, double perforations are formed at a position spaced about 2mm in the upstream direction of the second capsule through the threaded perforations. Preparation of smoking articles.

Example 2

The smoking article was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the tipping paper that did not form out-of-line perforations in the area overlapping the first capsule was used.

Comparative example 1

The smoking article was prepared in the same manner as in Example 2, except that oil-resistant rolled paper with oil resistant treatment was used as the rolled paper of the first filter.

Experimental example 1: Analysis of sidestream smoke components before and after the first capsule is broken

In order to measure the hand odor reduction effect when the filter of the embodiment of the present invention is applied, the sidestream smoke composition change in the first filter region that occurs before and after the first capsule is broken is analyzed.

Table 1 is used to measure the change in the composition of smoke (sidestream smoke) that occurs in the first filter region where the first filter 112 is located before and after the first capsule 112c is ruptured, according to the smoking of Examples 1, 2 and Comparative Example 1. Specifications of the product. Table 2 uses the smoking products according to Examples 1, 2 and Comparative Example 1 to measure the change in smoke composition in the tipping wrapper area where the first filter 112 is located before and after the first capsule 112c is broken. result. Generally, a smoker holds the tipping wrapper area where the first filter 112 is located when smoking, specifically, an area of about 15mm to 30mm is separated from the downstream end of the smoking article 100 in the upstream direction, more specifically Since the downstream end of the smoking article 100 is separated from the downstream end of the smoking article 100 in the upstream direction by an area of about 18 mm to 27 mm, the results of Table 2 can confirm the smoke components transmitted to the smoker's hand in the grip area.

Table 1 classification Capsule Spice/First Wrapping Paper Capsule Spice/Second Wrapping Paper Combine wrapping paper Perforation First filter Second filter Example 1 Mango/Ordinary Roll Paper Apple mint/oil resistant roll paper Ordinary roll paper Off-line (200CU) on-line Example 2 Mango/Ordinary Roll Paper Apple mint/oil resistant roll paper Ordinary roll paper No perforation on-line Comparative example 1 Mango/oil resistant roll paper Apple mint/oil resistant roll paper Ordinary roll paper No perforation on-line

Example 1, Example 2 and Comparative Example 1 are all smoking products with a length of about 100mm in the upstream and downstream directions, a circumference of about 17mm, and a tar content of about 2.0mg. Specifications not shown in Table 1 The experiment was performed under the same conditions, and the smoking articles were all smoked in an unroughened state. As the smoking conditions, the puffing volume was set to 55 ml, the puffing time was set to 2 seconds, the puffing cycle was set to 20 seconds, and the number of puffs was set to 12 times. In order to determine the composition of the flue gas, the collected flue gas is analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) after surrounding the tipping wrappers 130 and 230 where the first filter 112 is located with a Cambridge filter pad (CFP) . Measure Nicotine, 3-Ethyl pyridine, 3-Ethenyl pyridine, Pyridine and Menthol by GC analysis, but 3-ethyl The values of pyridine and 3-vinylpyridine are the limit of quantitation (LOQ) and are therefore excluded from Table 2.

Table 2 classification Whether the first capsule is broken nicotine Pyridine Menthol ug/cig Reduction rate (%) ug/cig Reduction rate (%) ug/cig Example 1 Before rupture 2.54 19.3 0.039 -5.1 0 After the rupture 2.05 0.041 2.53 Example 2 Before rupture 2.20 -3.2 0.044 18.2 0 After the rupture 2.27 0.036 1.54 Comparative example 1 Before rupture 2.10 10.0 0.038 5.3 0 After the rupture 1.89 0.036 1.34

As shown in Table 2, according to the results of measuring the smoke components of the tipping wrappers 130 and 230 where the first filter 112 is located using the smoking articles according to Example 1, Example 2 and Comparative Example 1, Example 1, The menthol content of Example 2 and Comparative Example 1 both increased after the first capsule 112c was ruptured. The nicotine in the sidestream smoke of the smoking products according to Example 1, Example 2 and Comparative Example 1 decreased. The smoking articles of 2 and Comparative Example 1 had reduced pyridine in sidestream smoke. Based on the results in Table 2, but considering the proportion of nicotine that is the cause of smoke and the importance of menthol delivery as a masking effect, it is predicted that the use of ordinary roll paper (ie, rolls that have not been oil-resistant Paper) as the first wrapping paper 112a and the tipping wrapping paper 230 in the area where the first wrapping paper 112a is located is double perforated through out-of-line perforations in such a way that the porosity is about 200CU. The odor reduction effect is the best. In addition, it can be confirmed that in the case of Example 2 in which normal roll paper without oil resistance treatment is used as the first wrapping paper 112a, compared with Comparative Example 1 in which oil resistance treatment is used as the first wrapping paper 112a, the mint Since the delivery amount of alcohol is increased, it can be expected that the hand odor reduction effect due to smoking is excellent.

Experimental example 2: Sensory evaluation based on the hand odor reduction effect of the first capsule

In order to determine the hand odor reduction effect of the smoking product of Example 1 before and after breaking the capsule, sensory evaluation was performed on the perception of hand odor after smoking and the degree of aroma other than smoke.

Using the smoking article of Example 1, sensory characteristics were evaluated on 10 panelists, and scores were based on a full score of 9 points.

Figure 5 is the sensory evaluation results of the smoking article according to Example 1 of the present invention according to whether the first capsule is broken.

As shown in Figure 5, the sensory characteristics expressed after smoking of the smoking article of Example 1 in which the first capsule was ruptured and the smoking article of Example 1 in which the first capsule was not ruptured were analyzed, and the results showed that The smoking product of Example 1 showed a reduction of about 59% in the smoke smell of the fingers after smoking compared with the case of the unruptured first capsule. The smoking product of Example 1 which broke the first capsule had the smoke smell of the fingers after smoking. The degree of aroma other than smoke smell increased by approximately 208% compared with the case of the unruptured first capsule.

This means that the first filter contains the first capsule for reducing hand odor, the case of smoking after the first capsule is ruptured and the case of smoking after the first capsule is not ruptured (ie, the case where the first capsule is not included) Compared with smoking, the effect of reducing hand odor is better.

Experimental example 3: Sensory evaluation of hand odor reduction effect applied through perforation of the first filter

In order to confirm the hand odor reduction effect of the smoking product based on whether the first filter is perforated or not, sensory evaluation was performed on the degree to which the smoking product according to Examples 1 and 2 felt the odor of the hand after smoking and other odors other than smoke .

Using the smoking products of Examples 1 and 2, the sensory characteristics of 10 evaluation panel members were evaluated, and scores were based on a full score of 9 points.

Figure 6 shows the sensory evaluation results based on whether the tipping wrapper where the first filter is located is suitable for double perforation.

The sensory characteristics of the smoking article of Example 1 to which the double-perforation structure is applied and the smoking article of Example 2 that does not apply the double-perforation structure after smoking were analyzed. As shown in Figure 6, There was no significant difference in the degree of smoke smell. On the contrary, it can be seen that the smoking article of Example 1 to which the double perforation structure is applied has a 27% increase in the degree of aroma other than the smell of the finger after smoking compared to the smoking article of Example 2 to which the double perforation structure is not applied.

It can be seen that although it is difficult to consider the use of the perforated structure 212P described with reference to Fig. 4 to remove or reduce the smoke smell itself, the fragrance material contained in the first capsule through the perforated structure is better transmitted to the smoker’s fingers, so The smoke cover effect of the fragrant fingers is improved.

Experimental example 4: Component analysis of mainstream smoke before and after breaking the capsule

In order to measure the halitosis reduction effect when the filter of the embodiment of the present invention is applied, the composition change of mainstream smoke before and after the capsule is broken was analyzed.

Table 3 is an analysis result of changes in mainstream smoke components before and after rupture of the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c included in the smoking article of Example 1 according to Table 1. From the results in Table 3, it is possible to confirm the smoke components in the mainstream smoke generated when the smoker smokes, and from this, it is possible to infer the degree of reduction of the smoke smell in the smoker's mouth.

table 3 classification TPM (mg/cig.) Tar (mg/cig.) Nic (mg/cig.) Moisture (mg/cig.) Menthol (mg/cig.) TPM-moisture (mg/cig.) Nic/ (TPM-moisture) *100 (%) Menthol/ (TPM-moisture) *100 (%) Before rupture 1.00 0.89 0.07 0.05 Not detected 0.96 7.2 - After the rupture 1.75 1.58 0.09 0.07 0.29 1.68 5.4 17.3

According to the results of the smoke composition analysis of mainstream smoke, after the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c are broken, the ratio of nicotine is compared with the value of total particle materials (TPM) except moisture After rupturing the capsule, it decreased from 7.2% to 5.4%, and the ratio of menthol increased from 0% before the capsule was ruptured to 17.3% compared to the TPM value other than moisture. On the other hand, compared with before the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c were ruptured, the TPM value after the rupture of the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c increased by about 75%, and the tar value was similar to the rupture of the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c. The capsule 114c has an increase of about 77% compared to the previous one, which is equivalent to an increase in menthol and other flavors contained in the content solutions of the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c. That is, after the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c are ruptured, as the ratio of nicotine to TPM decreases and the ratio of menthol increases, the smell of smoke in the mouth of the smoker decreases, and the aroma other than the smell of smoke increases, thereby It can be seen that it has the masking effect of smoke smell.

Hereinafter, the structure of the present invention and the effects thereof will be described in more detail through examples and comparative examples based on the combination of the fragrance of the first capsule and the fragrance of the second capsule and whether it is broken or not. However, the examples are intended to explain the present invention in more detail, and the scope of the present invention is not limited to these examples.

Example 3

Cut off the filter part of Esse Himalaya (KT&G). The first filter and the second filter are combined to the cut smoking material part using tipping paper. The first filter contains a first capsule containing mango flavor and is surrounded by a roll paper that has not undergone oil-resistant treatment. Made of cellulose acetate material, the above-mentioned second filter contains a second capsule containing apple mint flavor and is surrounded by oil-resistant roll paper that has been treated with oil resistance and is made of cellulose acetate material.

Here, the experiment was conducted in a state where both the first capsule and the second capsule were broken.

Example 4

The first capsule contained mango flavor and the second capsule contained orange flavor. The experiment was conducted in a state where both the first capsule and the second capsule were broken. The smoking article with the same other conditions as in Example 3 was used.

Example 5

The first capsule contained mango flavor and the second capsule contained strawberry flavor. The experiment was conducted in a state where both the first capsule and the second capsule were broken. Other smoking products with the same conditions as in Examples 3 and 4 were used.

Example 6

The first capsule contained mango flavor flavor, and the second capsule contained wine flavor flavor. The experiment was conducted in a state where both the first capsule and the second capsule were broken. The other conditions are the same as the smoking articles of Example 3 to Example 5.

Example 7

The first capsule and the second capsule contained mango flavor flavor respectively, and the experiment was conducted in a state where both the first capsule and the second capsule were broken. The rest of the conditions are the same as the smoking articles of Example 3 to Example 6.

Comparative example 3

The experiment was conducted in a state where the same smoking article as in Example 3 was used and the first capsule and the second capsule were not broken. Since the first capsule and the second capsule each have a structure in which the content solution containing the fragrance is surrounded by a film, an experiment related to fragrances in a state where neither the first capsule nor the second capsule is broken can mean that Experiments related to fragrances of smoking products that do not contain the first capsule and the second capsule.

Comparative example 4

Using the same smoking article as in Example 3, the first capsule was only ruptured, while the second capsule was not ruptured. For the same reason as in Comparative Example 3, an experiment related to fragrances in a state where the first capsule is only broken and the second capsule is not broken can mean smoking that only contains the first capsule and does not contain the second capsule Experiments on products related to fragrances.

Comparative example 5

Using the same smoking article as in Example 3, the second capsule was only ruptured, while the first capsule was not ruptured. For the same reason as in Comparative Example 3, an experiment related to fragrances in a state where the second capsule is only broken and the first capsule is not broken can mean smoking that contains only the second capsule and does not contain the first capsule Experiments on products related to fragrances.

On the other hand, in Experimental Example 5 to Experimental Example 7 described later, a cellulose acetate filter without added fragrance substance was used as the second filter of the smoking article, but when the second filter was used as the second filter, a fragrance substance-containing filter was used. In the case of a TJNS filter, for example, the effect of reducing bad breath and hand odor (to be described later) is expected to be even better. For example, the TJNS filter can be added with a spice selected from the group consisting of mango flavor, wine flavored mojito lime flavor, apple mint flavor, orange flavor, strawberry flavor, green apple vanilla flavor, apple mango flavor, and sweet mango flavor. Incense filter.

In some embodiments, the second filter of the smoking article may be a TJNS filter flavored with green apple vanilla flavor. Preferably, the second filter may be a TJNS filter in which each filter (ie, each cigarette) is flavored with about 2 mg to 8 mg of green apple vanilla flavor. More preferably, the second filter may be a TJNS filter in which each filter is flavored with about 2.5 mg to 3.5 mg of green apple vanilla flavor.

Experimental example 5: According to whether the capsule is broken or not and the composition of the sidestream smoke in the capsule is analyzed

In order to measure the hand odor reduction effect when the filter according to the embodiment of the present invention is applied, the smoke generated in the first filter area before and after the first and second capsules are broken for each fragrance ( Sidestream smoke) components are analyzed.

Table 4 shows the types of flavors in the capsules of smoking articles according to Examples 3 to 7 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5 and whether they are broken or not. Table 5 is the measurement results of the menthol content in the sidestream smoke components in the tipping wrapper area where the first filter of the smoking articles of Examples 3 to 7 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5 is located. Table 6 Up to Table 11 shows the name and detection amount of the name and detection amount of the fragrance expression components other than menthol in the sidestream smoke components of the smoking products according to Comparative Example 3 and Examples 3 to 7.

Generally, a smoker holds the tipping wrapper area where the first filter is located when smoking, specifically, an area separated from the downstream end of the smoking article in the upstream direction by about 15mm to 30mm, more specifically, from the smoking article The downstream end of the ”is separated by an area of about 18 mm to 27 mm in the upstream direction. Therefore, the smoke composition delivered to the smoker’s hand in the grip area can be determined through the results of Table 5 and Tables 6 to 11.

Table 4 classification First capsule Second capsule spices Whether broken spices Whether broken Example 3 Mango rupture Apple mint rupture Example 4 Oranges Example 5 Strawberry Example 6 wine Example 7 Mango Comparative example 3 X Apple mint X Comparative example 4 rupture X Comparative example 5 X rupture

Example 3 to Example 7 and Comparative Example 3 to Comparative Example 5 are all smoking products with a length of about 100mm in the upstream and downstream directions, a circumference of about 17mm, and a tar content of about 2.0mg, including the first capsule The first filter is surrounded by roll paper that has not undergone oil resistance treatment, and the above-mentioned second filter including the second capsule is surrounded by oil resistance roll paper that has undergone oil resistance treatment. The tipping paper used includes out-of-line perforations in the area overlapping with the first capsule. After being combined with the tipping paper, double perforations are formed at positions spaced about 2mm in the upstream direction of the second capsule through the threaded perforations to prepare smoking articles . Except for this, the experiment was carried out under the same conditions that all specifications not shown in Table 4 were the same. As the smoking conditions, the puffing volume was set to 55 ml, the puffing time was set to 2 seconds, the puffing cycle was set to 20 seconds, and the number of puffs was set to 12 times. In order to determine the smoke composition, smoke a cigarette with CFP surrounding the tipping wrapper where the first filter is located. In this way, each sample is repeatedly smoked 5 times, and then the CFP is placed in a glass bottle. It was extracted with methanol (MeOH) and analyzed by GC. Except for Nicotine, 3-Ethyl pyridine and 3-Ethenyl pyridine, which are the main components that cause hand odor, it is also related to the reduction of hand odor by GC analysis. The components of Menthol and Furaneol are menthol and furaneol, but furanone cannot be detected (no data), so furanone is excluded in Table 5 below.

table 5 classification First capsule Second capsule Menthol content (ug/cig) spices Whether broken spices Whether broken Example 3 Mango rupture Apple mint rupture 33.1 Example 4 Oranges 31.5 Example 5 Strawberry 29.5 Example 6 wine 28.7 Example 7 Mango 26.2 Comparative example 3 X Apple mint X 1.9 Comparative example 4 rupture X 19.3 Comparative example 5 X rupture 8.8

As shown in Table 5, the menthol content of approximately 26ug/cig to 33ug/cig was detected in Examples 3 to 7, that is, compared with Comparative Example 3 (that is, the first capsule and the first capsule were not broken). Two capsules) compared to about 13 times to 17 times the menthol content. Considering the importance of the amount of menthol delivered to mask the smell of cigarettes, referring to the results in Figure 5, it is predicted that the first capsule and the second capsule are both ruptured in Examples 3 to 7, which are all similar to the first capsule and the second capsule. The case where none was broken (Comparative Example 3) and the case where only one of them was broken (Comparative Examples 4 and 5) had an increased hand odor masking effect due to smoking. In particular, it is predicted that the flavor of the first capsule is mango flavor and the flavor of the second capsule is apple mint flavor. The above-mentioned hand odor masking effect of Example 1 is the best. In the following Table 6 to Table 11 for analyzing the fragrance expression components other than menthol in the sidestream smoke components, it can be confirmed that the components that were not detected from Comparative Example 3 where the first capsule and the second capsule were not broken ( D-limonene, 1-hexanol, 3-hexen-1-ol (Z)-, capric acid, methyl ester, geraniol, 1,6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl Base and 2(3H)-furanone, 5-hexyldihydro-) are transferred to the outside of the tipping wrapper through the rupture of the first capsule and the second capsule, and also to the smoker’s hand to reveal the odor of smoke. effect.

In addition, although the results of the sensory evaluation may vary due to various factors, only considering the analysis results of the fragrance expression components in Tables 6 to 11 and referring to the sensory evaluation results of Experimental Example 7, it is possible to predict 2 in the sidestream smoke. (3H)-Furanone, 5-hexyldihydro-component content greater than 1,6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl content, or 1-hexanol in sidestream smoke When the component content is greater than the content of capric acid and methyl ester, the cooling sensation during smoking, the refreshing aftertaste during smoking, the overall satisfaction after smoking, and the smoke taste of fingers after smoking are all good.

Table 6 Comparative Example 3 (First capsule: Mango (unruptured), Second capsule: Apple mint (unruptured)) Detection of fragrances Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 3198326 Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-(Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-) 1071618 unknown 810038 unknown 733862 1-Nonanamine, N, N-dimethyl-(1-Nonanamine, N, N-dimethyl-) 370655 1-Butanol (1-Butanol) 249872 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 219430 Glycidol 187483 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol (2-Ethyl-1-hexanol) 133482 Methyl caprylate 73918 D-Limonene 0 1-Hexanol (1-Hexanol) 0 3-Hexen-1-ol (Z)-(3-Hexen-1-ol (Z)-) 0 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 0 Geranyl Alcohol 0 1,6-octadien-3-ol,3,7-dimethyl-(1,6-0ctadien-3-ol,3,7-dimethyl-) 0 2(3H)-Furanone, 5-hexyldihydro-(2(3H)-Furanone, 5-hexyldi hydro-) 0

Table 7 Example 3 (First capsule: Mango (ruptured), Second capsule: Apple mint (ruptured)) Detection of fragrances Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 2129103 Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 968058 Geraniol 862485 unknown 658554 unknown 509717 2(3H)-Furanone, 5-hexyldihydro-(2(3H)-Furanone, 5-hexyldihydro-) 403378 D-limonene 394622 1,6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl 374608 1-Nylamine, N,N-dimethyl- 363750 3-hexen-1-ol (Z)- 353251 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 244790 Glycidol 224853 Methyl caprylate 215431 1-butanol 206537 1-hexanol 151770 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 141131 2-ethyl-1-hexanol 118359

Table 8 Example 4 (First capsule: Mango (ruptured), Second capsule: Orange (ruptured)) Detection of fragrances Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 3067165 Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 1318457 Geraniol 763669 unknown 651770 unknown 597494 1-Nylamine, N,N-dimethyl- 395603 D-limonene 355193 1,6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl 352962 2(3H)-furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- 349476 Glycidol 310001 Methyl caprylate 278510 3-hexen-1-ol (Z)- 276941 1-butanol 226554 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 212773 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 141895 1-hexanol 118093 2-ethyl-1-hexanol 100664

Table 9 Example 5 (First capsule: Mango (ruptured), Second capsule: Strawberry (ruptured)) Detection of fragrances Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 1825988 Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 826495 unknown 810356 Geraniol 696762 unknown 526448 1-Nylamine, N,N-dimethyl- 465709 1,6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl 380492 Methyl caprylate 348278 2(3H)-furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- 307410 D-limonene 287538 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 267854 3-hexen-1-ol (Z)- 258167 Glycidol 156890 1-butanol 133957 2-ethyl-1-hexanol 126925 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 125317 1-hexanol 122216

Table 10 Example 6 (First capsule: Mango (ruptured), Second capsule: Wine (ruptured)) Detection of fragrances Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 1550479 Methyl caprylate 1045830 1-Nylamine, N,N-dimethyl- 768348 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 757531 Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 753810 Geraniol 687759 unknown 660038 unknown 406702 1,6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl 289642 3-hexen-1-ol (Z)- 207842 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 172487 D-limonene 169538 Glycidol 148085 1-hexanol 135717 2-ethyl-1-hexanol 132150 1-butanol 115709 2(3H)-furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- 0

Table 11 Example 7 (First capsule: Mango (ruptured), Second capsule: Mango (ruptured)) Detection of fragrances Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 1800990 Methyl caprylate 1415909 Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 1102874 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 1049434 Geraniol 663105 1-Nylamine, N,N-dimethyl- 658344 unknown 479359 D-limonene 320644 1,6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl 288102 3-hexen-1-ol (Z)- 275433 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 172933 1-hexanol 157789 2-ethyl-1-hexanol 150781 Glycidol 149172 1-butanol 118312 unknown 116090 2(3H)-furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- 0

Experimental Example 6: According to whether the capsule is broken or not and the bad breath of the flavor in the capsule is captured, collected and analyzed

In order to measure the halitosis reduction effect when the filter according to the embodiment of the present invention is applied, the halitosis before and after the first capsule and the second capsule are ruptured according to the fragrance is captured, collected and analyzed. Table 12 is based on Examples 3 to Example 7 and the analysis results according to Comparative Example 3 to Comparative Example 5.

Table 12 classification First capsule Second capsule MM's TI (accompany) spices Whether broken spices Whether broken Example 3 Mango rupture Apple mint rupture 1.3 Example 4 Oranges 1.9 Example 5 Strawberry 2.3 Example 6 wine 1.4 Example 7 Mango 1.4 Comparative example 3 X Apple mint X 2.0 Comparative example 4 rupture X 2.1 Comparative example 5 X rupture 1.7

In each example, a total of five smoker subjects were subjected to five halitosis capture collections, with an interval of 30 minutes each time. After each smoker finishes smoking a cigarette, he closes his mouth for 2 minutes and then captures and collects bad breath. The captured smoke is sampled in a 3L bag and subjected to a thermal desorber (TD)/gas chromatography ( Gas chromatography, GC)-pulsed flame photometric detector (pulsed flame photometric detector, PFPD) analysis. For hydrogen sulfide (Hydrogen Sulfide, H2S), methyl mercaptan (MM), dimethyl sulfide (Di-Methyl Sulfide, DMS) and dimethyl disulfide (Di -Methyl Di-Sulfide, DMDS) for analysis, but the detection concentrations of H2S, DMS, and DMDS are concentrations equal to or less than the threshold level, that is, it is difficult to obtain meaningful results, so they are excluded from Table 12. Table 12 shows the threshold index (Threshold Index, TI) of MM (referring to methyl mercaptan also known as methanethiol, for convenience of description, hereinafter referred to as methyl mercaptan) of each example. The measurement result was calculated by dividing the median value of the five measurements of each example by the threshold value (0.07 ppb).

As shown in Table 12, in the examples in which both the first capsule and the second capsule were ruptured, the TI values of methyl mercaptan detected in Example 3, Example 4, Example 6 and Example 7 were lower than The TI value of methyl mercaptan in Comparative Example 3 in which neither the first capsule nor the second capsule was broken. Therefore, the case where both the first capsule and the second capsule are ruptured tends to substantially exhibit the methyl mercaptan reduction effect compared to the case where neither the first capsule nor the second capsule is ruptured or only one of them is ruptured.

On the other hand, it can be confirmed that the reducing effect of these methyl mercaptans is not simply expressed through the rupture of the capsule using fruit flavors, but is expressed and maximized through the interaction of the appropriate combination of the first capsule and the second capsule of. This is because even if both the first capsule and the second capsule are ruptured, in the case of Examples 4 and 5, there is no significant methyl mercaptan reduction effect value, or the TI value of the methyl mercaptan increases instead.

Example 3 (first capsule = mango, second capsule = apple mint), example 6 (first capsule = mango, second capsule = wine), and example 7 (first capsule and second capsule = mango) Compared with Comparative Example 3 (the first capsule and the second capsule were not broken), it showed an effect of reducing the amount of methyl mercaptan produced by about 30% or more, and with a slight difference, the methyl mercaptan of Example 3 The reduction in production has the best effect. Methyl mercaptan is an organic sulfur compound that emits the odor such as rotten cabbage, which is mainly found in peanuts, cheese, or radishes. In Example 3 (first capsule = mango, second capsule = apple mint), In the case of the smoking products of Example 6 (first capsule = mango, second capsule = wine) and Example 7 (first capsule and second capsule = mango), it is predicted that the halitosis reduction effect due to smoking is good, and With a slight difference, Example 3 has the best halitosis reduction effect.

Experimental Example 7: Sensory evaluation during and after smoking according to Example 3 to Example 7 and Comparative Example 3 to Comparative Example 5

For the smoking products of each example, the aroma intensity, cooling sensation, aroma satisfaction and aftertaste refreshing, overall satisfaction after smoking, the degree of smoke staining on the fingers, and the removal of the smoke staining on the fingers Sensory evaluation was performed on the degree of aroma other than smoke.

Using the smoking products of Example 3 to Example 7 and Comparative Example 3 to Comparative Example 5, 60 panel members were evaluated for sensory characteristics, and scores were based on a full score of 7 points.

Table 13 shows the sensory characteristics evaluation results of smoking products of Example 3 to Example 7 and Comparative Example 3 to Comparative Example 5 of the present invention. Figures 7 to 13 are Examples 3 to 7 and The sensory characteristics evaluation results of the smoking articles of Comparative Example 3 to Comparative Example 5.

Table 13 classification Smoking After smoking Aroma intensity Cool feeling Aroma satisfaction Refreshing aftertaste Overall satisfaction Smoke smell of fingers The degree of aroma of fingers other than smoke Example 3 (Mango + Apple Mint) 5.0 5.7 5.0 5.6 5.4 2.7 4.1 Example 4 (Mango + Orange) 4.9 5.1 4.8 5.0 5.1 3.6 4.4 Example 5 (mango + strawberry) 4.7 4.3 4.9 4.7 4.9 2.8 4.4 Example 6 (mango + wine) 5.3 5.7 5.1 5.4 5.3 2.8 4.6 Example 7 (Mango + Mango) 5.0 5.2 5.0 4.9 5.0 2.9 4.2 Comparative Example 3 (mango + apple mint) (none of them are broken) 3.1 2.6 3.6 4.4 3.7 5.4 1.8 Comparative example 4 (mango + apple mint) (mango cracked) 3.3 2.8 4.0 4.2 3.5 3.4 4.2 Comparative Example 5 (Mango + Apple Mint) (Apple Mint Cracked) 4.7 4.7 3.9 5.1 4.2 5.5 4.3

As shown in Table 13 and Figure 7, regardless of the type of flavor, it can be found that the smoking products of Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first capsule and the second capsule are broken have the same intensity in smoking as the first capsule and Compared with Comparative Example 3 to Comparative Example 5 in which none of the second capsules were broken or only one of them was broken, the number was increased. In the case of Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first capsule and the second capsule were ruptured, the increase was about 50% or more compared with the comparative example in which neither the first capsule nor the second capsule was ruptured, which was compared with the first Compared with Comparative Example 4 in which only one capsule was ruptured, the increase was about 40% or more, and had a value equal to or more than that in Comparative Example 5 in which only the second capsule was ruptured. It can be confirmed that the impact of the first capsule rupture (Comparative Example 4) on the flavor intensity during smoking is small, and the impact of the second capsule is greater than that of the first capsule. When comparing the results of the flavors of Examples 3 to 7, it is found that the second capsule has the best flavor intensity in smoking when the second capsule is wine flavored, and the second capsule is smoking in the case of apple mint flavor or mango flavor. The intensity of the fragrance is sub-optimal.

As shown in Table 13 and Figure 8, it can be confirmed that the refreshing sensation in smoking tends to be substantially similar to the intensity of flavor in smoking. That is to say, regardless of the type of fragrance, it can be found that the smoking products of Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first capsule and the second capsule are broken have the same cooling sensation during smoking as the first capsule and the second capsule. Compared with Comparative Example 3 to Comparative Example 5 in which cracks or only one of them was cracked, the total increase. In the same way, it can be confirmed that the impact of the first capsule rupture (Comparative Example 4) on the cooling sensation during smoking is small, and the impact of the second capsule is greater than that of the first capsule.

When comparing the results of the flavors of Examples 3 to 7, it was found that in terms of the refreshing sensation in smoking, the second capsule had a wine flavor or an apple mint flavor the best.

As shown in Table 13 and Figure 9, there is no heavy dependence on any one of the first capsule and the second capsule in terms of flavor satisfaction during smoking.

It was confirmed that Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first capsule and the second capsule were ruptured were compared with Comparative Examples 3 to 5 in which neither the first capsule nor the second capsule was ruptured or only one of them was ruptured. Higher score.

Regarding the scent satisfaction in smoking, the numerical difference of each fragrance is very slightly different.

As shown in Table 13 and Figure 10, regardless of the type of flavor, it can be found that the smoking products of Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first capsule and the second capsule are broken have a refreshing aftertaste during smoking and the first capsule and Compared with Comparative Examples 3 to 4 in which none of the second capsules were broken or only one of them was broken, the increase. As for the refreshing aftertaste in smoking, it can be confirmed that the influence of the second capsule is significantly greater than that of the first capsule.

When comparing the results according to the flavor of Example 3 to Example 7, it can be found that when the second capsule is apple mint flavor, the aftertaste is the best in smoking, and when the second capsule is wine flavor, the aftertaste is the best in smoking. The refreshing is sub-optimal.

On the other hand, as for the refreshing aftertaste during smoking, it can be confirmed that the case of Comparative Example 4 in which only the first capsule is broken is slightly lower than the case of Comparative Example 3 in which neither the first capsule nor the second capsule is broken. Even if both the first capsule and the second capsule are broken, depending on the type of fragrance, it has a lower value than when the second capsule is only broken (Examples 4, 5, 7) . Therefore, it is predicted that the influence of the interaction of the fragrance combination of the first capsule and the second capsule on the refreshing aftertaste in smoking is greater than the influence on whether the refreshing aftertaste of the smoking first capsule and the second capsule are broken.

It can be confirmed that the first capsule and the second capsule are respectively mango flavor and apple mint flavor in Example 3, and the first and second capsules are respectively mango flavor and wine flavor in Example 6. The spice combination in Example 6 has a refreshing aftertaste. Rising effect.

As shown in Table 13 and Figure 11, it can be confirmed that the overall satisfaction after smoking has a tendency similar to the refreshing aftertaste during smoking. Regardless of the type of flavor, it can be found that the smoking products of Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first capsule and the second capsule are broken have the refreshing aftertaste during smoking and that neither the first capsule nor the second capsule is broken or there is only A broken comparative example 3 to comparative example 5 increased.

When comparing the results of examples 3 to 7 by fragrance, it can be found that similar to the refreshing aftertaste in smoking, the overall satisfaction after smoking is the best when the second capsule is apple mint flavor, and the second capsule In the case of wine taste, the overall satisfaction after smoking is sub-optimal.

As shown in Table 13 and Figure 12, regardless of the type of flavor, it can be found that the smoking products of Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first capsule and the second capsule are broken have the same level of finger smoke after smoking as the first capsule Compared with Comparative Example 3 in which none of the second capsules were broken or only one of them was broken, it was significantly increased. As for the degree of finger smoke after smoking, it can be confirmed that the influence of the first capsule is significantly greater than that of the second capsule. Thus, it was confirmed that only breaking the second capsule without breaking the first capsule basically did not show the masking effect of finger smoke.

When comparing the results according to the flavor of Example 3 to Example 7, in terms of the degree of smoke taste of the fingers after smoking, the second capsule is apple mint, strawberry, wine or mango flavor and the second capsule is The orange flavor is relatively good.

As shown in Table 13 and Figure 13, regardless of the type of flavor, it was found that the smoking products of Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first capsule and the second capsule were ruptured had the fragrance of fingers other than the smell of smoke after smoking The degree is increased compared to Comparative Examples 3 and 5 in which neither the first capsule nor the second capsule was broken or only one of them was broken. On the other hand, there is no significant difference between Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first capsule and the second capsule were ruptured and Comparative Examples 4 and 5 in which only one of the first capsule and the second capsule was ruptured.

Considering that the comparative example 5 in which only the second capsule is broken as shown in Fig. 12 actually has no finger smoke reduction effect, it can be predicted that only the finger smell may not show the smoke masking effect.

When comparing the results by fragrance of Example 3 to Example 7, the second capsule has the best aroma degree after smoking, except for the smell of smoke, when the second capsule is wine-flavored. Considering the results in Figure 12 at the same time, it can be seen that when the second capsule is apple mint flavor, compared with the case of other flavors, the aroma of the fingers other than smoke after smoking is slightly smaller, but after smoking the fingers The smoke smell reduction effect is the best.

As described above, the filter for smoking articles and the smoking articles containing the same according to the embodiments of the present invention have the effect of being able to simultaneously reduce the hand odor and bad breath produced by the smoker after smoking.

Those skilled in the art will understand that various changes in form and details can be made to the above-mentioned embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the inventive concept defined by the scope of the patent application. The exemplary embodiments should be considered for illustrative purposes only, and not for limiting purposes. Therefore, the scope of the inventive concept is not defined by the detailed description of the exemplary embodiments, but by the scope of the appended patent application, and all differences within the scope will be construed as being included in the inventive concept.

100,200: Smoking products 110, 112, 114: filter 112a: The first wrapping paper 112c: the first capsule 112c_D, 114c_D: diameter 112L, 114L, 130L1, 130L2: length 114a: second wrapping paper 114c: second capsule 114P: second perforated area 114Pw, 212Pw, Per_D, Cap_D: separation distance 114P1,212P1: first hole 114P2, 212P2: second hole 114P_Ted, 212P_Ted, 212P_Med: distance 116: combined with wrapping paper 120: Smoking Materials Department 120a: Smoking material wrapping paper 130,230: Tipping wrapper 212P: first perforated area

Figure 1 is a diagram showing a schematic structure of a filter for smoking articles according to some embodiments of the present invention.

Fig. 2 is a diagram showing a schematic structure of a smoking article using filters for smoking articles according to some embodiments of the present invention.

Figure 3 is a partial cross-sectional view of smoking articles in the direction of the central axis according to some embodiments of the present invention.

Figure 4 is a partial cross-sectional view of a smoking article in the direction of the central axis according to some embodiments of the present invention.

Figure 5 is the sensory evaluation results of smoking articles according to some embodiments of the present invention according to whether the first capsule is broken.

Figure 6 shows the sensory evaluation results based on whether the tipping wrapper where the first filter is located is suitable for double perforation.

Figures 7 to 13 are the results of the sensory properties of the first capsule and the second capsule of the smoking article according to some embodiments of the present invention.

110, 112, 114: filter

112a: The first wrapping paper

112c: the first capsule

114a: second wrapping paper

114c: second capsule

Claims (23)

A filter for smoking products suitable for hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, including: A first filter, the upstream end of the first filter is combined with a smoking material portion of the smoking article; A first wrapping paper surrounding the first filter; A second filter combined with the downstream end of the first filter; A second wrapping paper surrounding the second filter; and A combined wrapping paper to surround the first filter and the second filter in a manner of combining the first filter and the second filter, The first filter includes a first capsule containing a first fragrance, and the second filter includes a second capsule containing a second fragrance. As described in the first item of the scope of patent application, the filter for smoking articles applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the first fragrance and the second fragrance are different materials from each other. As described in the first item of the scope of patent application, the filter for smoking articles using hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the second flavor is selected from apple mint flavor, orange flavor, strawberry flavor, wine flavor and mango flavor Kind of. As described in item 3 of the scope of patent application, the filter for smoking articles with hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the first flavor is mango flavor, and the second flavor is selected from apple mint flavor, wine flavor and mango flavor One of the flavors. As described in item 1 of the scope of patent application, the filter for smoking articles that is applicable to hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the first packaging paper and the combined packaging paper are roll papers that have not undergone oil-resistant treatment, and the second packaging The paper is an oil-resistant roll paper that has undergone an oil-resistant treatment. The filter for smoking articles applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology as described in item 5 of the scope of patent application, wherein at least one of the first wrapping paper and the combined wrapping paper is porous with a porosity equal to or greater than 6500CU Roll paper. The filter for smoking articles applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology as described in item 6 of the scope of patent application, wherein at least one of the first wrapping paper and the combined wrapping paper is porous with a porosity equal to or greater than 24000 CU Roll paper. As described in the first item of the scope of the patent application, the filter for smoking articles applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the first capsule and the second capsule are respectively formed at positions separated from each other by 10 mm to 14 mm. As described in the first item of the scope of patent application, the filter for smoking articles applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the second filter uses a third fragrance that is the same as or different from the first fragrance or the second fragrance Perfuming filter for perfume. As described in item 9 of the scope of patent application, the filter for smoking articles with hand odor and halitosis reduction technology, wherein the first flavor is mango flavor, and the second flavor is selected from apple mint flavor, wine flavor and mango flavor One of the flavors, the third spice is green apple vanilla flavor. A smoking product suitable for hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, including: A smoking material section surrounded by a smoking material wrapper; A first filter, the upstream end of the first filter is combined with the smoking material part and surrounded by a first wrapping paper; A second filter, combined with the downstream end of the first filter, surrounded by a second wrapping paper; A combined wrapping paper to surround the first filter and the second filter in a manner of combining the first filter and the second filter; and A tipping wrapper that surrounds at least a part of the smoking material part, the first filter and the second filter in a manner of combining at least a part of the smoking material part, the first filter and the second filter, The first filter includes a first capsule containing a first fragrance, and the second filter includes a second capsule containing a second fragrance. As described in item 11 of the scope of patent application, the smoking article with hand odor and halitosis reduction technology, wherein the tipping wrapper includes a first perforated area and a second perforated area, the first perforated area is located at and the first perforated area In the area where the filter overlaps, the second perforated area is located in the area where the second filter overlaps. As described in item 12 of the scope of patent application, the smoking article applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein at least a part of the first perforated area overlaps the first capsule, and the second perforated area is located upstream of the second capsule. As described in item 12 of the scope of patent application, the smoking article applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the first perforated area includes a plurality of first holes and a plurality of second holes, and the plurality of first holes are along the joint The outer peripheral surface of the packaging paper is formed, and the plurality of second holes are formed along the outer peripheral surface of the tipping packaging paper downstream of the plurality of first holes, The second perforated area includes a plurality of third holes and a plurality of fourth holes, the plurality of third holes are formed along the outer peripheral surface of the tipping wrapper, and the plurality of fourth holes are located on the downstream edge of the third hole Formed on the outer peripheral surface of the tipping wrapper, The plurality of first holes and the plurality of second holes are formed in the tipping wrapper, The plurality of third holes and the plurality of fourth holes are formed by penetrating the tipping packaging paper, the combined packaging paper and the second packaging paper. As described in item 14 of the scope of patent application, the smoking article applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the tipping wrapper has the first perforated area where the plurality of first holes and the plurality of second holes are formed Porosity of 190CU to 210CU. The smoking article applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology as described in item 15 of the scope of patent application, wherein the plurality of second holes are located at a position separated from the plurality of first holes in the downstream direction by 1.5mm to 2.5mm, and the plurality of The fourth holes are located at positions spaced 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm in the downstream direction from the plurality of third holes. The smoking article applying the hand odor and bad breath reduction technology as described in item 16 of the scope of patent application, wherein the plurality of third holes are located at positions separated from the plurality of second holes by 9 mm to 11 mm in the downstream direction. As described in item 16 of the scope of patent application, a smoking article with hand odor and halitosis reduction technology, wherein the plurality of first holes are located at positions separated by 10 mm to 13 mm in the downstream direction from the upstream end of the tipping wrapper, the plural The two second holes are located at a distance of 20 mm to 23 mm in the upstream direction from the downstream end of the second filter. As described in item 11 of the scope of patent application, the smoking article with hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the circumference of the smoking article is 14mm to 19mm. As described in item 11 of the scope of patent application, the smoking article applying hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the circumference of the smoking article is 22.5mm to 26.5mm. As described in item 11 of the scope of patent application, the smoking product with hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein when the smoking product is sucked in the state of breaking the first capsule and the second capsule, the tipping wrapper The sidestream smoke components collected in the area overlapping with the first filter on the outer surface contain selected from D-limonene, 1-hexanol, 3-hexen-1-ol (Z)-, capric acid, methyl ester, fragrance At least one of leaf alcohol, 1,6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl and 2(3H)-furanone, 5-hexyldihydro-. As described in item 21 of the scope of patent application, the smoking product with hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein in the sidestream smoke component, the detection amount of 2(3H)-furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- is greater than 1, 6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl detection amount. As described in item 21 of the scope of patent application, the smoking product with hand odor and bad breath reduction technology, wherein the detection amount of 1-hexanol in the sidestream smoke components is greater than the detection amount of capric acid and methyl ester.

Images